820100_Routine Inspection_20230905

Type of Visit:.Aff Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: _,E) Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: j . a3 /JArrival Time: C Departure Time:1 17 County:`%A Region: 115�eQ
Farm Name: � ZAI� Owner Email:
Owner Name:- lja�� Phone:
,
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:/J /J /�
Facility Contact: &-ozir4/.a Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:✓mil/
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
x&BHwtlga ak#A§NT%> �qajp�r4tgR(,baY'.t�$ry ^4##} # # U#44k#4=�fi§%a# sa Jj qk4lk R#9asm#+ a».§tea R §R #A6 kfiS ANt S#bwb q#.Yy4pYa d5&@@f Yffi&'�84
�1 8 #d -066 1 ?t#5
R1
aY#&
it 54
O"kV*y£{4'NpHi
Y9 $i4#AiN?t $#t#fiRkae &flFA# #$.'E f' R
gg r�r � #� .ss R4 a rag *.A a#za��s% hw ax# a 4 a
krexbaxxz I! C {¢y �AG14# aaottao#max
P3' bAeA '. #Ne Wa#b+�sk # #U�AtiVa 0ltia# #'#3R*4'' x& 4xh&
44 .]^*AYtl.�+xk
$ xuSn It .§dd #$&W4�d §,+ B# 4,44 ##�8�ffi bea§a#k#.mk. �L %Y^#V* I*x"i#4b�
„
d I tr �§di �§A �&.&�4 �#4*4644#'OYb�a4%di!
x
toFinish
'r, Wean to Finish$ La er
3Dair Cow
f
$$$ Wean to Feeder Non -Layer
Feeder to Finish D by# *s'� AAa$'id
p Dairy Calf
{' Dairy Heifer
,3(o
Farrow to Wean a� �na
eta sa a�a� � � �e
�
D
� 1'Y Cow
9
aFarrow to Feeder �a
Non-Dairy yA
Farrow to Finish Layers
Beef Stocker
#� 0iltsa-0 Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
!#A' Boars sx Pullets
4`
M Beef Brood Cow #d.
as#xar
ABgPq.o Ot�4d"M;ii 4##s455^A&kka gX�o- dfrpp d'#fidYxEx #....
axxdAak d :tbaP ^�}Yn 4frAtP#&#44#AH%4a9 &b Turkeys
ggk4-'4hea'�k a^#bait #frnka#�.d+k 9tP xRa
=1 0' nx4+&b# #N#"tow§axi#�9&6k##�
'
$ gas.aKfftensa,sxi n°4�"ttS z n �raa>" Turkey Pon
°a' za x .s'r�# as"xiwuamc0.10, 94totmak
9y:p F #.{.. vg ID#ae YH#u'€ it A'R#`¥'StSi,& adb '6
#%
AE4 fa# Other
$ s�II�$aSS�usa�a*ara
A ar sa °a°apnA eA�+aia t
9'aaZ mo
- 4s".ab o-xa w
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes —EE'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
.E!rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - . Q " Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes /e❑rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: l
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes .E7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes -f!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes _J�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures
require ❑ Yes _E3-Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes -Ef FIo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes O­-No
❑ Yes [7FNo
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C:rNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [-]Yes allo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ['No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑-Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
_12-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,E/rNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes .d No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [D"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .f No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes eNo
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [�TNo
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [—]Yes fro
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020

FACILITY#: �`� FARM NAME: LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT pis) -
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- - EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (m»
-GOOD FOR 60DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER f
DATE 1R3 /�"3 NITROGEN LEVEL `' a5'
DATE %�ZLt s. NITROGEN LEVEL 3-0
DATE �S�G �'� NITROGEN LEVEL
1,4141
- EVERY 3 YEARS:
- P-1(NO MORETHEN400)
- PH (Wteif4.,I..)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000)
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
SOIL REPORT (#21)
DATE 6-/,31 ;Lj
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
IRR2 (# i)
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION Izzal
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CA�LI5RA ED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION dGl Y
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (az1az5)
-DU� ��ERY YEAR: DATE c c
0: '1 U P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#zz AND#21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY_
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1 �- Ends September 30�
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 313t
Corn: Opens February 15* - Ends .tune 30n
Cotton: Opens March 15t - Ends August 1�
Rye: Opens September 1n-Ends March 31A
Oats: Opens September 1Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1 st - Ends April 30'~
Soybeans: Opens April 1-t- Ends September 15t .
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t - Ends August 31 st