The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150808 Ver 1_Application_20150810�p ,srm*mwH .. i3',G { °ra,: � w:•�� (� � �i .�.�. ��.a- % m�W STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPART`1V1ENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVERNOR :1U�*ll5i %� 2�1$ Wilmington Regula[ory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darling[on Avenue Wilmin�ton, NC 28403 ATTN: Dear Madam: Subject: Liz Hair NCDOT Coordinator NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON SCCRETA&Y Pre-Construction Notification For proposed replacement of Bridge Nos. 230212 and 230213 over Bogue Swamp on SR 1736 in Columbus County The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace two bridges. The existing bridge 230212, a five-span (] @ 18'-2", 3@ 18'-3", 1@ 18'-P') reinforced concrete deck on I-beams with concreCe caps and timber piles structure, will be replaced with a two-span (2 @ 55') cored slab (2 ]") bridge with sloping abutments. The exisCing bridge 230213, a three-span ( I@ 18'-1 ", 1@ 18'-3", I@ 18'-1") reinforced concrete deck on I-beams with concrete caps and timber piles structure, will be replaced with a two-span (2 @ 40') cored slab (2]") bridge with sloping abutments. Traffic will follow an offsite deCOUr during construction. Temporary and permanent impacts to jurisdictional resources cover approximately 0.06 acres resulting from placement of the two bridges. Please see enclosed copies of the LIBR Spreadsheet, Preliminary Jurisdictiona] Determina[ion Form, permit drawings, stormwater management plan and design plans for the above-referenced project. The Low Impact Bridge Spreadsheet serves as the Environmental DocumenC (MCC) and the Pre-Construction Notification. This project was let on 2/19/2013 and construction is due to begin 09/07/2015. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit All aspects of this project aze being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a"State Minimum Criteria Check]isP' in accordance with 23 CFR 771.1 15(b). The NCDOT requests tha[ these activities be authorized under a NaCionwide 3 permiY. Section 401 Permit: The NCDOT requests that these activi[ies be authorized under Water Quality Certi£�cation Number 3883. V✓e anticipaCe that written approval from the NC Department of V✓ater Resources will be required. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (910) 437-0207. �ncerely, �� 1 � . �`+^-' ��v!:-�� Pw_i � James�J. Rerko Division Environmental Officer — Division 6 P.O. Box ll 50 —Fayetteville, N.C. 28302 — Phone: (910) 486-1493 —Fax: (910) 486-1959 Stream Existing SimcWre Proposetl ShucWre Stream Wetiands T8E Moramrium Trout Waters C Essentiai r.w Low/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet Calumbus 230212 ai warmllnlantl water canal present along sou�M1 sitle ot roatl; approximalely 30' wide bp 8'4". 3 Q 1 B'-3". 1@ 18'-0") reinfo¢etl wncrefe tleck on I-beams witM1 IB'-1", 1@ 1B'-3", 1� 18'd') reinforce0 concre�e aeck on I-Oeams wiN Bntlge ft 230212 is 25.3' aut to out Briage tt 230213 is 25.3' out to out Britlge p 230212 sufficiency raling = 38 Bridge fl 230213 suRiciency �aling = 42 12 will be a two span (2 � 55') coretl slab (21") bntlge will� sloping abut 13 will be a hvo soan (2 (� 409 cored slah 121'9 hrinna wm �b.��,. �e�n 230212 will be 3fi' out ta aut 230213 will be 36' out lo out ee impacl summary sM1ee[) None present impacC 0.01 acre o0en water '^V^°4' In�l None presenl mpac[s�SF� None equiretl �>60 k) �VIN� No Permi[ Requlretl (YIN) No _ American alligator- Habllet present __ __ Cooley'smeadowme-NOhabita[ � _ _ _ Rough-leave� loosestrrfe- No habllat - Habita[�yln) _ Red-mckadetlwootlpeckerNOM1abi�al - . Sbortnose sWrgeon - No M1abl�at Waccamawsilversitle-NOM1abitat � - - - - W ootl 51oM - Hebitat presen[ . _ _ Ameriwnalllga�or-NOneoGServetl COOIQy5111EdllOWN2- NO Ildblt3l _ RougRleavetlloasesinfe-NOhabita� - Specles Present Retl-mckatletl wootlpecke�- No M1abi[at _ _ _ _ _ SM1OMOSe sWrBeon- No habllat � � - Waccamawsilversitle-NO�abiul - -- — - Wootl slork - Nane observetl - _ __ _ , _ Amencanalligalor-Notappliwble Cooley'S meatlowme - No ERec! __ RbugM1-leavetl ioosesttife- No Effect - Bio Conclusion _ Retl-wckatle0 wooEpecker No Effect ShortnoseSNrgeon-NOEHec[ - � Waccamawsilve5ltle- No ERect Wootl stork- MaV ARecl Not Likelv �o Ativersxla Affan No No No No No USTSIHazMaLS I NO �Relocatees rya I�AT 34 315392 ILONG � -�8589600 GrojeciCOmmen[s I L t f 0 tlg k2302 2 / � \ Comp�ereEby:�_ _ EcoloaicalEnqineerinq LLP � Bl112o15 II i. Engineer . _ . . . . . 'Dale � ) Y _ _ — — _ _ . _ ___ . — ' ' . _. .__ ... _ . ._ — _— . . . e F . . _ . Jim Rerko u rU.. /� i -!. -i �. . l( � /� 8H 0/20'I S d 11 TIP 17BP.6.R.34 /35 (Bridges 230212 & 213) Columbus County PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: James J. Rerko, PWS NCDOT Box 1105 Fayetteville, NC 28302 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:0.6 miles east of the intersection of SR 1001 and SR 1736 (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State:NC County/parish/boroughColumbus City: Hallsboro Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.3154° Pick List, Long. -78.5896° Pick List. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Bogue Swamp Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: 60 linear feet: ft.width (ft) and/or Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial Wetlands: 0.02 acres. Cowardin Class: forested Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non-Tidal: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to 1 request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicabie. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): 2 � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: . � Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: . ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: � U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. � U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Lake Waccamaw West, NC. ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): . ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: . ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): . or ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): . I� later iurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) 3 �� , %„�,� 7 �---� t w S Signature and date of � person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) A l io %d� 17BP.6.R.34 & 35 (Bridges 212 & 213) Columbus County Estimated Site Cowardin amount of Class of number Latitude Longitude Class aquatic aquatic resource in resource review area 1 34.1215 -78.7712 Riverine 0.02 acre Non-section 10 -wetland 2 34.1215 -78.7712 Riverine 60LF Non-section 10 non— wetland 2 34.1215 -78.7712 Riverine 0.03 acre Non-section 10 -wetland +s�i:�.■■��■4it.11 �►�+.�T3iRr��tii.� r��t�Y./►i�*�Y? Il�r��J�� J� � Figure 1 Project Vicinity Bridge No. 212 over Bogue Swamp on SR 1736 (Giles Byrd Road) WBS No. 176P.6.R.34 .� � Columbus County, North Carolina �` t � .,_ an:.a '` ., _ . - � :.�. �;rn r.. � � �� r.rd� �� w � �� il l�.r��. iT � * � � a t „� ��,t� :-.�{ �� North Carolina � i�o � � ;� ,'A'�i .�ill ig�e 4�{ � �s� �,� , i �°�= Department of Transportation -;r �.,. :,Qdw �'�,o„e„oa :1`B'�i5N (n ` . •.. , ''' y 1Jq Project ViciniTy 1 1 f 1 .,fll1 5'� Ak p � � L V 0T1 L] lVj _ ,� : OnrF f• � ��i�i.lir- � � I. , _„. � � � � .211 . ...' •!»f r. � � Nn.11yht� � 1Y�. � /1r ` �'. @ . t� ( - — �— � - — — -- � - �� 1 `�� - ArtesiaAd; : - - -.- .. ,,, � . � r - - _ - _ — � ° an � . . J �1 i � - . , 7 0 _ ' . � � � ' ; LL . t� 1 � yche R��. • % ��-� / . , �`-._ . � c- .-,� .. . . l�_' ' _ I� : i � � i yA,� ,�y�, Ha�st�oro Sa � PAtt�:41wY . ` ' Artesia . - ,._ I .i.: � _ ., .. .... . _. ._! - . •: Buss 5d �� ' ( ' st�a8a ` i ' � \ . . • � a r. � �H+ �- . �. � � ,I-- - �: sr z° .t�' S-`�' _ I� `� ¢ � '.. • � . -� � -' __ � . ' - —_-� . I -.;_ —. - _ •I' _ _ _ I _ _ ' � � � �P � I I —� V I � Mi71 ' V �� ' �•• �� l i ! ..a . -. ' �. \ , Q�aner 9c( � ¢ . ! ! y3 ' ? - �.. �a' ` � . ��- I _�� I _ ' fi ' 55 ' JaC�r.Rd.�P'.�Meae«r MtNCbvon � s� '�' l�_ 'u �/PS .. � -'Ne.morial P�rk ' � . ,\` • � : � �° � , �� a9a„� - Legend ' � � � L � a!n,s� ,�J - •- � Boone Ln�O � : - _ � Bridge N0. 212 p�e`c ' `lr..� \. y i`� i m . r__'-_1 : •�y� �� -- r � : � ____f Couniy Boundary P�'9a � � - - � � \ � �, — NCDOT Roads . "'�`� ,:� � \-s� � -�;�� - �� ^� Railroads c� f.-' .�i � , _�, , _ , � , - 1 ' � � \ 5'- — Streams/Waterbodies � - .. ,t I . ,. �� /� - � / � // � � � - '� � . Source: NCOOT, NCO�Map a� USGS ssf - .-_ _ '. \✓ \ , _ ' 1` �}�� :_i::� Fi9ure0a(e:M102012 �e_•.. �' ____ ` � � �[ __ / . � �=w— f `� ' o i.000 z.000 . _ � t . \'� . . . � Feel WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atiantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ProjecUSite: Bridge 212 City/County: ��umbus Sampling Date: 3�2��2 Applica�VOwner. NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: UpWA208 Investigator(s): Ma�ic Mickley, MulkEy, Inc. Section, Township, Range: Halisbo�o Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, �one): n011e Slope (%): 2% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T �t_ 34.3�542 Long: -78'589�� Datum: W65 84 SoilMapUnitName:Meggettfinesandyloam,frequentlyflooded NWlclassification: Upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yea�? Yes � No _(If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation � Soil _� or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydmlogy naturelly pmblematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point bcations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Presen[? Yes _ No � ,�,�i� a WeUand? Ves No � Wetland Hydrology PresenC? Yes No � — Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetiand Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators fminimum of hvo reauiretll Primarv Intlicators (minimum of one is reouired' check all that aooM _ SuKace Soil Cracks (B6) _ Surtace Water (At ) _ Aquatic Fauna (B73) _ Sparsely Vegetafed Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Drainage Pattems (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ Hydmgen Sulfide Odw (C1) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ DrySeason Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposils (82) _ Presence of Redoced Iron (C4) _ Cra�sh Burrows (CB) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visihle on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposifs (BS) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (W) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ WaterStained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No � Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes _ No � Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No � Depth (inches): WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes No � includes ca illa fin e — — Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if availa6le: Remarks: No hydrologic indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Streta) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stmtum (Pbt size: 3D ft. � / Cover Scecies? Status i. LiquidambarstyraciFlua FAC 5 \ FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. fi. 7. 8. 5 = Total Cover 50% oftotalcover. 3 20°/ of[otalcover: � Sa�linq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: � 5 ft � t. Ligustrum sinense FAG 50 \ FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 6. 50 - Total Cover 50 % of total cover: ZS 20% of total cover: 10 Herb SVatum (Plot size: 5 ft � 1. Festuca soo. 2. Trifolium spp. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 30 \ 30 � 60 = Tofal Cover 50 % of total cover: 3� 20 % of total cover: � 2 Woodv Vine Stratum (Pbt size: 30 ft. ) 1. Lonicere iaoonica FAC 15 \ FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 15 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover. 3 Sampling Point: UpWA208 Dominance Test worksheet Number of Dominant Species 3 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant 5 Species Acrass All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 6D% That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (AIB) Prevalence Intlex worksheM: Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv� OBL species x 1= � PACW species x 2= � FAC species x 3= � FACU species x 4= � UPL species x 5= � Column Totals: (A) � (g) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophy[ic Vegetation Indicators; 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation � 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegelation' (F�plain) 'Indicaiors of hydric soil and wetland hytlrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Tree - Woody planls, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH artd greater lhan 328 ft(1 m) tall. Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft tall. Woody vine -All woody vines greater lhan 328 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegefation Present? Yes \ No _ US Army Corps of Engineers Atlanfic and Gulf Coasial Piain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: UpWA208 Profile Description: (Describe to the tlepth needed to documerrt the indicator or confirm the absence of intlicators.) Depth Matrix Retlox Fea[ures (inchesl Color(moistl % Color(moisfl % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10 YR 3/2 100 scl Fill 4-12 10YR4/4 �00 scl Fill 'T e: C=COncentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. �Location: PL=POre Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise nated.j Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Ft) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F�8) (outside MLRA 150A,B) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) _ Stratified Layers (AS) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (FS) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Mad (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 751) _ Thick Dark SurFace (Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surtace (F73) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 751) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F1 B) (MLRA 150q 150B) Sandy Redox (SS) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Stripped Matriz (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surtace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No � Remarks: No hydric soil indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Aflanttc and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ProjectlSite: Bridge 212 Ciry/COUnty: Columbus ApplicanUOwner. NCDOT State: NC Investigator(s): Mark Mickley, Mu�key, Inc. Section, Township, Range: Hallsboro Sampling Date: 3�2��1Z Sampling Point: W�OS Landfortn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): �One Slope (%): 0% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: ��31541 Long: 78�58901 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Meggettfinesandy loam, frequentlyflooded NWI classitication: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site Typical for this time of yean Yes � No _ Q( no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hytlrology _ significantly disturhed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No Are Vegetafion , Soil , or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? WeUand Hydrology Present? HYDROLOGY Yes � No Is the Sampled Area Yes � No M,�thin a WMland? Yes � No Yes � No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of hvo reauired) Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all tha[ a�olv) _ Surtace Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (At ) _ Aqualic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Conrave Surface (BS) � High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) � Drainage Pattems (B10) � Saturation (A3) _ Hydmgen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Moss Trim lines (B76) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Ozidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ OriR Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) _ Geomorphic PosRion (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Ezplain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) \ FAGNeutral Test (D5) � Water-Stained Leaves (89) _ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No � Depth (inches): WaterTablePresent? Yes � No_ Depth(inches): 4�� Satura6on Present? Yes � No_ Depth (inches): 0�� Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes � No_ includes ca illa 6in e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec[ions), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atla�tic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Streta) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree SUatum (Plot size: 30 ft. � %VCover 3pecies? Status 1. Nvssa 6iFlora OBL 60 \ OBL 2. Acer rubrum FAC 15 FACW 3. Ulmusamericana FACW 20 � FACW 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 95 = Tofal Cover 5� % of total cover: 4$ 20 % of total cover: � 9 Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft � 1. Quercus michauxii FACW 15 2. Jgusfiim s'nense FAC 25 3. Ulmus amencana FACW 10 4. Ilexooaca FAC 5 5. Sabal minor FACW 5 6. Arundinariaqiqantea FACW 5 7. 8. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. \ FACW � FAC FACW FAC FACW FACW 65 = Total Cover 50 % of total cover: 33 20 % of total cover: � 3 Sft � = Total Cover 50 % of total wver: � 20% of total cover: 0 Woodv Vine SVatum (Plot size: 30 ft. � 1. Smilax laurifolia FACW 5 \ FACW 2. 3. 4. Sampling Poini: WA208 Number of Dominanl Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 �A� 5 �e� ��% (A/B) Prevalence Intlex worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv� OBL species x 1= 0 FACW species z 2= � FAC species x 3= � FACU species z 4= � UPL species x 5= � Column Totals: (A) � (g) Prevalencelndex = B/A = 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation � 2 - Dominance Test is >50°/ _ 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ ProblemaGc Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydrtc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless dislurbed or pm6lematic. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diame[er at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sap�ing/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 328 ft(1 m) tall. Hefi-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 5� Hydrophytic 5 = Total Cover Vegefation Present? Yes \ No 50 % of tofal cover: 3 20 % of total cover 1 - US Army Corps of Engineers qtlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA208 Profile Description: (Descnbe to the depth needetl to tlocumeM the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moisfl % Color (moist) % Twe Loc Tezture Remarks 0-3 10 YR 3/2 � 00 sl 3-8 10 YR 4/1 9� 10 YR 4!6 � � C M scl 8-12 10 YR 5/2 9� 10 YR 4/6 10 C M scl 'T : C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grai�s. �LOCation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matnx. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicahle to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (At ) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin �ark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ Black Hiffiic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F1 S) (outside MLRA 150A,B) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Flootlplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) _ Stratified Layers (AS) \ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redoz Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 153B) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Mad (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (Fi 1) (MLRA 151) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Coast Prairie Redox (A�6) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, UJ wetland hydrology must 6e present, _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed MaMz (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150q 150B) Sandy Redox (SS) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Stripped Matrix (Sfi) _ Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surtace (S7) (LRR P, S, r, u� Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and GWf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 I�t�� ilia�j��1►� ��:�1►�� r=�br'�'/►. �wl L►�J�� rs�� '�•,I � Figure 1 Project Vicinity Bridge No. 213 over Bogue Swamp on SR 1736 (Giles Byrd Road) WBS No. 17BP.6.R.35 Columbus County, North Carolina � �L � r �' , � ,,,,, �,_, �.�,� � � , North Carolina ,.�,� �,,;� �e�ll a< , ��- Departm n l, i,�.> �' • a e t of Transportation �.�.. y�'�^rorw�w*'d' +Y . -�, \ >>�� Project Vicinity i � L Lf M 8 � ,.Y . . . � , f , ... ,- ,�' •„ �. . � � ,i� , �,�- _ , , - _ ,:'� _ .. . _ � � Artesia R� . . t . c �_ x . t lY � ' y�Gl',E iid_ , . f .� l _i . . i . , . ., "' Natlsboro � ` . . ��_ ..n:� �r . �vti�fl.�.s H6VY � • .. .. . _— ." _.... - '_ ` __'_ — _ —: .c=_ ' - '- _ , :�3us5 RJ�� , . . ,. -'- -:. . � �. r _ {., . ..b , f%F,N�. . � . „ . � •� . • � f . � U " . Y • AAii; Q�yrier Fi� � F � , � �. �,� . . ... P o . . ' , � � iy� o. , _, _ � y�- " pa a , , ; � � . � , . _. �°I' r = ` ( � �. . ne` pd•.� v t,.�.�.. .: • �+��n v� � : : . �s i � � LM \•,.,*tw�al Ppk . • � Q • ` . � _ " . -.. . . ' . 7� � "'._ e, . . . .. °' ,' �. �- � Legend „� .J:::;. � . . . $aonc Ln . Y , .� 4 . . . . . ... - .. • .. . , ,5 � . * A . O Bridge No. 213 Re�bug� �' . :.- �q� r�----� � �P�,qc � - z% � � � ` _ j County Boundary � •� � � Pre� R . ' ' � `� `. ' — NCDOT Roads �^ `- I �� Railroads : �y ' - ��. — Streams/Waterbodies _' � � � - . . �'� . . S i ' �Y e � . . .... a : _' ' . . _ : �:, � Soume: NCDOT, NC OneMaP antl USGS qjP FigureDate:410.2012 �� `qd ; a i,000 z,000 . . .. . ,' . ... � Feel WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atiantic and Gulf Coastai Plain Region ProjecVSite: Bridge 213 City/County: CO�umbus Sampling Date: 3�2��2 Applicant/Ovmer: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: �PWA24 Investigator(s): Mark Mickley, Mulkey, Inc. Section, Township, Range: Hallsbo�o Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hlllslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): nOne Slope (%): 2% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: ��31542 Long: -78.589041 Datum: WG$ 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Meggettfine sandy loam, frequenUyflooded NWI classification: Upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditio�s on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation � Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturhed? Are °Normal Circumsfances" present? Yes � No _ Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydmlogy Present? Remarks: HYDROLOGY Yes � No Is the Sampled Area Yes No � � within a Wetlantl7 Yes No � Yes No — Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indirators (minimum of hvo reauired) Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aoolvl _ Surtace Soil Cracks (66) _ Surtace Wa[er (A7 ) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (BS) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Mad Deposits (815) (LRR �) _ Drainage Pattems (B10) Saturafion (A3) _ Hydmgen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Moss Tnm Lines (B1fi) Water Marks (B1) . _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (CA) _ Cre�sh Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) imn Deposits (BS) _ Other (Ezplain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ FAC-Neutrel Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, Uj Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No � Depth (inches): WaterTablePresen[? Ves_ No � Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No � Depth (inches): Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No � inGudes ca illa frin e �escribe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial pholos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No hydrologic indicators US Artny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stralum (Plot size: 30 ft. � �, Liquidambar styraciFlua FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Sampling Point: UpWA24 % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 5 \ FAC Tha[ Ne OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Num6er of Domircant 5 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 60% That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (NB) 5 = Total Cover 50 % of total cover: 3 20% of total cover. � SaplinalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft � 1. LiquSWm sinense FAC 50 \ FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. — 8. — 50 -TOfalCover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 1 D Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 re ) 1. Festuca soo 30 � _ Z, Trifalium spp 30 � _ 3. — 4. — 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 60 = Total Cover 50 % of total cover: 3� 20% of [otal cover: � 2 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft. ) t Lon cera iaoonica FAC 15 \ FAC 3. 4. 5. 15 =TotalCover 50 % of total cover: $ 20 % of total cover: 3 Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv: OBL species x 1= � FACW species x 2= � FAC species x 3 = � FACU species x 4 = � UPL species x 5 = � Column Totals: (A) � (B) Prevalence Intlex = BIA = _ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophy[ic Vegefation � 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetafion' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of heighl. SaplinglShrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and grealer than 328 R(1 m) tall. Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 328 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes \ No_ US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 $��L Sampling Point:UpWA24 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moistl % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 0-4 10 YR 3/2 � �0 scl Fill 4-12 1 � YR 4/4 100 scl Fill 'T e: C=Concentretion, D=De lelion, RM=Reduced Matriz, MS=Masked Sand Graina �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Mahix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, ll) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6) _ Hydrogen SulTide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyetl Malrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) _ Stratifed Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Brigh[ Loamy Soils (F20) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U} _ Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 1538) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Mad (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLR4151) _ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 6, P, T) 'Indica[ors of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLR.4'150A, 1506) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Stripped Matrix (56) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surface (57) (LRR P, S, 7, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Ves No %< Remarks: No hydric soil indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Atlan[ic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ProjecUSite: B�dge 213 City/County: Columhus Sampling Date: 3/27/12 ApplicanVOwnec NCDOT State: NC Sampling PoinC WA24 Investigator(s): Matk Mickley, MWkey, In0. Seclion, Township, Range: Hallsboro Landform (hillslope, [errece, etc.): swamp Local relief (concave, comex, none): nO�e Slope (%): �% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.31541 �0�9: 78.58901 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Meggetl fine sandy loam frequently flooded N W I classiication: PFO Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _(If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil , or Hydrology significan[ly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes %< No Are Vegetation , Soil _, or Hydrology naturally problematic? Qf needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes %� No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No �s the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetiand7 Yes %� No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauired) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired� check all that aoplv) _ Surtace Soil Crecks (B6) Surface Water (A1) _ Aquatic Fauna (B73) Sparsely Vegetated Concave SuKace (B8) x High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) %< Drainage Pattems (B70) %� Saturafion (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Moss Trim Lines (616) _ Wa[er Marks (Bt) _ Oxidized Rhimspheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Cra�sh Burrows (CS) _ Dnit Deposi[s (83) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Satura[ion Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (BS) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inuntlation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) X WatervStained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): WaterTablePresent? Yes %� No_ Depth(inches): 4�� Saturation Present? Yes x No _ Depth (inches): �� Wetiand Hydrology PresentT Yes X No includes ca illa frin e — — Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 20 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WAZ4 30 ft. AbsoW[e Dominant Indicalor pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Pbt size: ) % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Nyssa brflore OBL 60 X OBL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2. Acermbrum FAC 15 FACW Total Number ot �ominant 3. Ulmus americana FACW 20 X FACW Species Across AII Strata: 4. Percenl of Dominant Species 5� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6. 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 5 �A) 5 (B� 100% (�B) 8. Total % Coverof: MW[iolvbv: 95 =TotalCover 50 % of [otal cover. 4$ 20 % of total cover � 9 Saolinq/Shmb Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft � 1. Quercus michauxii FACW 15 2 Li9ushum sinense FAC 25 g Ulmusamencana FACW �p 4. Ilex ooaca FAC 5 5. Sabal minor PACW 5 6. Arundinaria qiqantea FACW 5 7. 8. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 6. 9. 10. 11. 12. X FACW X FAC FACW FAC FACW FACW 65 - Total Cover 50 % of total wver: 33 20 % of total cover 13 5 ft � = Total Cover 50 % of total cover: � 20 % of total cover � Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft. � 1. Smilax laurifolia FACW 5 X FACW 2. 3. 4. 5. 5 =TotalCover 50 % of total cover 3 20 % of total cover: � hological adaptations below). 08L species x 1= � FACW species x 2= � FAC species x 3= � FACU species x 4= � UPL species x 5= � Column Totals: (A) � (g) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ 1- Rapid Test for Hytlmphytic Vegetation %< 2-DominanceTeslis>50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Pour Veoetation Strafa� Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7B cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less lhan 3 in. DBH and grea[er [han 328 ft(1 m) tall. Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft[all. Waody �ine - qll woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present7 Yes X No_ US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling PointWA24 Profile Description: (Oescrihe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a6sence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Fea[ures (inches) Color Imoist) % Color (moist) % ,�� Loc Texture Remarks 0-3 10 YR 3/2 100 5� 3-8 10 YR 4/1 g� 10 YR 416 � � C M scl 8-12 10 YR 5/2 90 10 YR 4/6 10 C M scl 'T e: C=Concenhalion, D=De Ietion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (AppliCable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Probiematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (A1) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _ His[ic Epipedon (A2) _ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (LRR 5, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR 5) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) _ Stratified Layers (AS) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, 7, U) _ Redox Oark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 1538) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Sur(ace (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ Redox Depressions (FB) _ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Marl (F70) (LRR U) _ Other (Ezplain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A71) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Coas[ Prairie Redox (Ai 6) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problemalic. _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLR4150A, 1506) _ Sandy Redox (55) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surtace (57) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depih (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes %� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Allantic and GWf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 HighwaV North Carolina Department of Transportation � Sto rri�wa ter _ M ,,,�,,.,�,,, Highway Stormwater Program � �=�� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN _. (Version 12; Released September 2011) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Project/TIP No.: 17BP.6.R.40 County(ies): Columbus Page 1 of 1 General Project Information Project No.: 17BP.6.R.40 Pro�ect T e: Brid e Re lacement Date: 11/5/2014 NCDOT Contact: Rachel Evans Contractor / Designer: Brandon Barham, PE - Ecolo ical En ineerin Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway Room #16 Suite 101 Ralei h, NC 27610 Car , NC 27518 Phone:919-707-6609 Phone:919-557-0929 Email: revans@ncdot. ov Email: bbarham@ecolo icalen .com City/Town: Whiteville Count (ies): Columbus River Basin(s): Lumber CAMA Count ? No Primary Receiving Water: Bo ue Swam NCDWQ Stream Index No.: 15-3 NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water Primar : Class C Supplemental: Swam Waters (Sw) Other Stream Classification: None 303(d) Impairments: None Buffer Rules in Effect N/A Project Description Project Length (lin. Miles or feet): 0.161 Miles Surrounding Land Use: Rural area with forest and agricultural landuses Proposed Project Existing Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area (ac.) 0.64 ac. 0.43 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 11.0 ft lane width with 5.9 ft shoulders and 1.1 ft guardrail with total bridge width of 2@ 11.0 ft lane width with 1 ft shoulders and total bridge width of 24 ft for bridge 36 ft for bridge #230212 and #230213 #230212 and #230213 Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: Not Available Existin : 1100 General Project Narrative: State Project 176P.6.R.40 (SF-230212 and 230213) involves the replacement of the existing North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Bridge #230212 and #230213 on SR 1736 over Bogue Swamp. Bridge #230212 consists of 1@ 18'-2",3 @ 18'-3", 1@18'-1" reinforced concrete deck on I-beams on reinforced concrete caps and timber piles. Bridge #230213 consists of 1@ 18'-1 ", 1@ 18'-3", 1@ 18'-1" reinforced concrete deck on I-beams on reinforced concrete caps and timber piles. The existing Bridge #230212 will be removed and replaced with a 2@ 55', 21" Concrete Cored Slab Bridge and the existing Bridge #230213 will be removed and replaced with a 2@ 40', 21" Concrete Cored Slab Bridge. The proposed bridges are located in zone AE of the FIRM Map number 3720122000J and were studied by "Detailed" methods. The proposed bridges will provide more hydraulic opening than the existing bridges. One stormwater outfall is proposed on the begin of bridge side of bridge #230212 and one on the end of bridge side of #230213. Outfalls will be placed at a distance to minimize disturbance to adjacent wetlands. Rip Rap pads will also be utilized to help with energy dissipation. References WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (tt) 1 12+66 - 13+20 -L- LT 2@ 55', 21" CORED < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 SLAB 2 17+17 - 17+25 -L- LT 2@ 40', 21" CORED < 0.01 SLAB 3 18+05 - 20+00 -L- LT 2@ 40', 21" CORED � 0.01 < 0.01 0.02 SLAB 4 18+38 - 18+89 -L- RT 2@ 40', 21" CORED SLAB < 0.01 < 0.01 TOTALS: < 0.01 < 0.01 0.03 < 0.01 < 0.01 Temporary Fill Temporary Fill In Wetlands Hand Clearing In Wetlands Surface Water Surface Water (Sq. Ft) In Wetlands Due to EC Impact Impact (Sq. Ft) Devices (Sq. Ft) �Sq. Ft) �1Tip8CtS: (Sq. Ft) Site 1 263 462 40 0 0 Site 2 0 81 0 0 0 Site 3 3 893 346 0 0 Site 4 0 0 0 49 77 Total 266 1436 386 49 77 Revlsetl 3/31/OS � ff? � � � � � � � � � z �o �'�� w �� Q ��z >�� w �� 64 f� fR 0 � . � • �o � � � ., � V W � � � � N 0 V � � � V � � 0 V �� See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 1-B For Conventlonol Plan Sheet Symbols See Sheet i-C For Survey Control Sheet NOTE: THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. •DETOUR ROUTE Ta /SCyOO� R 968 Oq�/ » ,� � � � � \�� S ITE 1 ��1�� ll' �� .��y�� °� ��.� ��'y�°��v� COL UMB US CO U1�lTY GIN BRIDGwE � � =S�A.1�09.Q0 � � Le- \ LOCATI011L• BRIDGES 230212 A1VD 230213 0111 SR 1736 (GILES BYRD ROAD) OVER BOGUE SWAMP. TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAl11lAGE, PAVING AND STRUCTURES. WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT / I � � gOGUE ��P � y � � � i� E � / / �� I 1., �- �_ _ __--__----� � �S / } } � } i i i �µµ1P / /� � � � � � � � ��E � \�S �. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. � � � � SITE 2 � � � � � � � �/I � � � °BRI Gft�----- �� BE�IN�-BR1dGE � 1 ITA. 1 ��0 ` - - STA. V +1\ .00� \ �� \ �---� ___ � � � � —w�e� /� ��E 5YlPMP \ / �� , N g3 RN� 2011 N pD SITE 3 �UE ��P / � END BRIDGE / -L-�STA. �17 + 91�.00 � � � I� �� '------.�a------ ---------� v�e� _ — _ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � / / , � � J /� �/ � � � � SITE 4 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET OF � TO SR 1956 (PIERCE ROAD) � INCOMPLETE PII.ANS DO NOT L'SE FOR Rf W ACQ[11SITION I'RELIMINARY IDLANS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepared ln ti� Offlce of: FIyDRAULICS ENGLNEER ADT 2013 = 1100 50 25 0 50 100 ¢��p T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT = 0.125 MILES �� '� �,� PLANS V= 45 MPH (212) LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.036 MILES zoiz srAxnnnn srsciFrcATroxs �� o V = 55 MPH (213) ''� � � TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 0.161 MILES sichArunE: � 50 25 0 50 100 * nST=3% DUAL=3°/a RIGHT OF WAY DATE: TRACY N. PARROTT, PE � � MARCH 26, 2013 PRO�scr sxcr�ssn ROADWAY DESIGN PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = ENGINEER �� 10 5 0 l0 2p RURAL LOCAL �� v�a�� NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY LETTING DATE: BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE NCDOT TPMU MARCH Zb, ZO�3 �'XOJEC7' DESlGN ENG7NEEK PROFILE (VERTICAL) pE S7GNATURE: zl 0 w � 6 � F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES HAND i, CLEARING � � DENOTES IMPACTS IN i � ' SURFACE WATER I ' i i � DENOTES TEMPORARY i IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � ' BEGIA � ' � DENOTES TEMPORARY -L- : i FILL IN WETLAND � � i 7� ' 60 50 40 30 � � � 2� � � � � � � � �� 56' 0' 100' � � �_ � GRAPHIC SCAL= � SITE 1 -L- STAl3-I'09.00 -�- ��,`+.�tr�y.w / END APP. SLAB I -L- STA/4t3/AO 31 ��P ; � � � � � � � PC S7a. /6+32. � ., � � � �UE� I � SITE 2 � � � � I �� - �- � � �/I � � � � � � � �s , - � �-� , i i_ � � �-, � � � � � �� w�a� � � -w�a_ ` � � � � � \---� F �"' � _' � \--- �-- � E E FEj 0 F, -' — — �t — — — — —n-PHaN F� �... \ � ��E-� ��Y �e �"'�"'� �"— _ — _ — _ .e� i 4/ � � 'z �� a� 4 � / � � � � � � � 30 -L- _- _ _- _ -- - - �-i �-��r=�I— � BM #2: R�R SPIKE SET IN 24" PINE �=� .--' - . . � -L- STA. 12+82.29 83.36' LT �. T -BL- STA. 30+57.98 87.94' LT �.� EL 46.38 _ -SL i ii BEGIN GRADE BEGIN BRIDGE � -L- STA 11 + 50.00 -L- STA 13 + 09.00 EL=49.34 EL=50.16 � i � Pl = 12+00.� -- - EL = 4972' �-'r VC = l00' K = 278 _ - �: - DS= 60mph � , � +10.7600% � BRIOGE HYDRAUUC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE _ /� CFS DESIGN FREIX/ENGY = �5 YR DESIGN HW ELEVATION = Q� fT BASE DISCHARGE = 2330 CFS BASE FRE4Y/ENCY = � YR BASE FM' ELEVATION = $� fT OVERTOPP/NC DISCHARGE � �_ CFS OVERTOPPING FREWENCV= � YR OVERrOPPING ELEVATION = 4788 fT DATE OF SUftVEY = ro/ll/l3 WS.ELEVATION AT DATE Of SURVEY � 1/SL � 10 11 �'y� � — — � _— — �E E �E-- — !y, � � - UE SWPMP . — — —w�e— — � UE 8�' � \— � � � � � / B0� � � � � � � ��s� , BEGIN APP. SLAB -L- STAl6+gg,0p BEGIN BRIDGE -i - cre n-�iinn PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. l7BP.7.R.63 4 PERMIT DRAWING � SHEETNO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYOR.4ULIC5 SH E ET _ O F — ENGINEER ENGINEER INC�MI�L1E 'E PLANS (� DO NOT U9F. FOR C W pCQU19ITION N GR�� RE]LIMIN RY I'LANS �� C��A ZpAI uo Nor use r•o co�sTaocTioN SITE 3 Prepared 'in the c FiAM icErvs P off,�e e, �� suMM,T �so�so�o��w,a�ds�o� m...��d..� �y9g3'z Ez-38a3p: P Prepared in IFe 6 BOGUE �� orr��o oc ��uss.� oa r>sao «.� � Pr sro. ia+z5zi ��N�d��c�� =;5�a / END PROJECT _i _ crn �n�.nnnn � /�ra�-.a_ �� t � t �� / �%� 32 � K - 250 DS= 60mph t1o.4000/ ----------- � � � � r > t � � � � _F �� I _wie ��\\V-- // --- � � ..� � 4 /�� . � � � � � \ SITE 4 BM #7: fLR SPIKE SET IN 26" OAK _ -L- STA. 78+31.17 53.64' LT - -Bl- STA. 36+11.08 70J4' LT - EL 46.45 r END BRIDGE -L- STA 17 + 91.00 � EL=50.52 - Pl = 1Bt50A0 Pl = 19-f60A0 EL = 5028' EL = 48.49' vc = ioa vc = 8a K=8/ K=128 DS= 50mph DS= 55mph 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 � _i . .�. . .., . ..I _ � . ; _ . _. . .. . . . . _ :_ _ END GRADE -L- STA 20+00.00 E L = 48.09 - - - ,., ---- . BRIDGE HYDRAUUC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE _ ( f¢� CFS DESIGN FREWENGY = � YR D£SIGN MV ELEVATION = ¢j� fT BASE DISCHARGE = 2330 CFS BASE FREQUENCY = � YR BASE NW ELEVATION = 9j� fT OVERTOPPING D/SCHAFt�f = � CFS OVERrOPPING FREQUENGY= (¢2 YR OVERrOPPING ELEVATION = $� fT DATE OF SURVEY = 'N6 WS. El.EVATION �. AT DATE OF SUHVEY a lQ/ll/20 20 7� 60 50 40 30 20 �0 zl 0 w � 6 � F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES HAND i, CLEARING � � DENOTES IMPACTS IN � � ' SURFACE WATER I ' I i � DENOTES TEMPORARY i IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � ' BEGIA � ' � DENOTES TEMPORARY -L- : i FILL IN WETLAND i � i � I � i i \ I 1 � �� i I i � � � i 7� ' 60 50 40 30 � � � 2� � � � � � � � �� 56' 0' 100' J � � �_ � \ GRAPHIC SCAL � BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIOGE -L- STA13+09.00 -L- STA/4+/9A0 ++ eREw`R SITE 1 � END APP. SLAB � -L- STA/4t3/AO 31 ��P ; � � � � � � � PC Sto. /6+32 � � � ; �UE � _ -,, � � � SITE 2 �� /I � � � � � �s � � � �-� -- , i i_ � � � - , � � � � `\ , � �� w�a� � � -w�a_ � \r � � � F \ _'_ � � �---� �. � \ �- (/l E E FEj .�! � \\ F� c_i — — �r— — — —TY-PPii1 F� �i \... \ � �_ � E�� r —_ � �_�— �,----- a— .a_ � �� —,a� � � / � � � � � � � 30 -L- �� °�- ------ �— � E.._ E . �E-_ — �S � � — UE SWPMP — — —w�e— — � UE 8�' \ \— � � 'x � � / BOG : � � � � � � �.�d\ , , , � i � BEGIN APP. SLAB -L- STAl6+gg,0p BEGIN BRIDGE -i - cre n-�iinn PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. l7BP.7.R.63 4 PERMIT DRAWING � �� ROADWAY DESIGN HYOR.4ULIC5 SH E ET _ O F — ENGINEER ENGINEER INC�MI�L1E 'E PLANS // --. (� DO NOT U9F. FOR C W pCQU19ITION N GR�� RE]LIMIN RY I'LANS %� � NC �NA ZpAI uo Nor use r•o co�sTaocTioN NA� g3 �� SITE 3 �-- - Prepared 'n the rvc F AM off�e e, �r suMMIT =04 M� o � � soo ❑�.��.� gg� P Prepared 'n IFe p BOGUE �� orrao oc �� s s.� o° r .` � PT Sta. 18+252/ ��N�(�oc�C�� N� z,s�a / END PROJECT _i _ crn �n�.nnnn i ,�,a_=�— � � � � � � � � � � �% 32 _- _ _- _ -- - - �-i -� �-��r=��— � BM #2: R�R SPIKE SET IN 24" PINE �=� --' - � ' -� � -L- STA. 12+82.29 83.36' LT � -+i - -BL- STA. 30+57.98 87.94' LT ��. T -- EL 46.38 �-�f _ -SL i ii BEGIN GRADE BEGIN BRIDGE � -L- STA 11 + 50.00 -L- STA 13 + 09.00 EL=49.34 EL=50.16 � i � Pl = 12+00.� -- - EL = 4972' �-'r VC = l00' K = 278 _ - �: - DS= 60mph � , � +10.7600% � BRIOGE HYDRAUUC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE _ /� CFS DESIGN FREIX/ENGY = �5 YR DESIGN HW ELEVATION = Q� fT BASE DISCHARGE = 2330 CFS BASE FRE4Y/ENCY = � YR BASE FM' ELEVATION = $� fT OVERTOPP/NC DISCHARGE � �_ CFS OVERTOPPING FREWENCV= � YR OVERrOPPING ELEVATION = 4788 fT DATE OF SUftVEY = ro/ll/l3 WS.ELEVATION AT DATE Of SURVEY � 1/SL � 10 11 � K - 250 DS= 60mph t1o.4000/ ----------- ; i � � � � r > � � � � � ' _F �--_ _� -� i - / -- � —w�e- „ , — � � � � � �i � � � � � \ SITE 4 „ BM #7: fLR SPIKE SET IN 26 OAK -L- STA. 78+31.17 53.64' LT -Bl- STA. 36+11.08 70J4' LT EL 46.45 END BRIDGE -L- STA 17 + 91.00 E L = 50.52 Pl = 1Bt50A0 Pl = 19-f60A0 EL = 5028' EL = 48.49' vc = ioa vc = 8a K=8/ K=128 DS= 50mph DS= 55mph 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 N�()�� J' / I �.i ... .. ...I_ �l f -. . .... . �-. . -� END GRADE -L- STA 20+00.00 E L = 48.09 - - - ,., ---- . BRIDGE HYDRAUUC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE _ ( f¢� CFS DESIGN FREWENGY = � YR D£SIGN MV ELEVATION = ¢j� fT BASE DISCHARGE = 2330 CFS BASE FREQUENCY = � YR BASE NW ELEVATION = 9j� fT OVERTOPPING D/SCHAFt�f = � CFS OVERrOPPING FREQUENGY= (¢2 YR OVERrOPPING ELEVATION = $� fT DATE OF SURVEY = 'N6 WS. El.EVATION �. AT DATE OF SUHVEY a lQ/ll/20 20 7� 60 50 40 30 20 �0 � z 0 > I � � 0 � � � � � � � � � � m � , SITE 1 , � ,� F -�� SITE 2 � � � � � �� T � SITE 3 SITE 4 � -- � �� ' - ��- PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEFT NO. 178P.7.R.63 5 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYORAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INC�MI�L1E 'E PLANS DO NOT U9F. FOR C W pCQU19ITION GR�� RE]LIMIN RY I'LANS �� C��A ZpAI uo Nor use r•o co�sTaocTioN Prepared 'in the c Fi P off,�e e, �r suMMIT �=oaAM� �s o. ❑�.��.� Prepared in IFe �4M ur�N Officv o!_ � �Cii5i5� CarySPCrx.� PERMIT DRAWING SHEET OF zoo o q�o �NSET �R�F�� S��E F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES HAND CLEARING DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND � I Z 0 > � � � 0 � � � � � � � � � �' m, SITE 1 , � ,� F � -��- �� ,- ,—.-_ T � �� SITE 3 � � '� � �� - - -- � � ; � ; � � , u � \ �� SITE 4 SITE 2 � i � �� ;'�� ;� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEFT NO. 178P.7.R.63 5 RhV SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYORAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INC�MI�L1E 'E PLANS DO NOT U9F. FOR C W pCQU19ITION GR�� RE]LIMIN RY I'LANS �� C��A ZpAI uo Nor use r•o co�sTaocTioN Prepared 'in the c Fi P off,�e e, �r suMMIT �=oaAM� �s o. ❑�.��.� Prepared in IFe �4M ur�N op Offi<c ol� F I� rvcii5i�5E �a rrSPO k.F �@N�P1V�G�C�� zrs��e PERMIT DRAWING SHEET OF zoo o q�o �NSET �R�F�� S��E F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES HAND CLEARING DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND