Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000601_MS4 Annual Report (2022-23 FY)_20230831 NCS000601_SAWMILLS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Reporting Line Year BMP Reporting Measurable Goal Comments No. (July 1- Ref. Metric June 30) Did Sawmills submit the Annual Self-Assessment to NCDEQ prior to August 2 2 1 31 each year? YES Did Sawmills develop and distribute new educational fliers about illicit 11 2 3.B.2. discharges? YES 12 2 3.B.2. If so, how many educational fliers about illicit discharges were distributed? 35 Did Sawmills attend the annual Fall Festival and Tractor Treat to disperse stormwater outreach materials/awareness through the use of interactive 21 2 4.B.1. educational games and activities? NO If so, how many event attendees were engaged in stormwater 22 2 4.B.1. outreach/received stormwater information? 0 Did Sawmills provide additional outreach supplement or alternative 31 2 4.B.2. outreach opportunities if the annual Fall Festival was canceled? YES Butterfly Festival-400 people event _ 32 2 4.B.2. If so, how many attendees were engaged in stormwater outreach? 100 Did Sawmills have WPCOG provide instruction and stormwater educational 42 2 5.B.1. activities to youth? 43 2 5.B.1. If so, how many WPCOG youth education activities/events were provided? 1 44 2 5.B.1. If so, how many WPCOG youth event participants were reached? 1 55 2 5.B.2. How many storm drains were stenciled? 0 Did Sawmills create a presentation covering stormwater topics to be 62 2 5.B.3. presented in digital classrooms and/or provided to teachers? NO In Progress If so, how many classroom presentations were provided by teachers or 63 2 5.B.3. staff? 0 64 2 5.B.3. If so, how many students were reached by classroom presentations? 0 Did Sawmills provide one presentation about one of the six NPDES Minimum Control Measures at each annual WPCOG Water Quality 77 2 7.B.1. Conference? YES If so, how many attendees were reached during the annual WPCOG Water 78 2 7.B.1. Quality Conference stormwater presentation? 2 Did Sawmills evaluate the target pollutants and audiences to identify 88 2 8.B.1. where outreach can be improved? YES 89 2 8.B.1. If so, were any revisions made to target pollutants? NO 90 2 8.B.2. If so, were any revisions made to target audiences? NO 104 2 10.B.2. Was the annual selfThssessment uploaded to stormwater website? YES WPCOG's website Did any links, contact information, or documents on the stormwater web 105 2 10.B.2. page need to be updated? YES 106 2 10.B.3. How many hits did the stormwater web page receive? 123 Did Sawmills provide citizen education as part of the enforcement process 118 2 11.B.3. for illicit discharges, illegal dumping and improper disposl of waste? YES If so, how many educational citizen interactions were completed as part of 119 2 11.B.3. the illicit discharge and illegal dumping enforcement process? 0 129 2 12.B.3. How many stormwater hotline calls were received? 0 There were no hotline calls Did Sawmills stormwater hotline staff receive training in general stormwater awareness, complaint call protocols, appropriate contacts for 134 2 12.B.4. referral, and typical stormwater issues? YES Did Sawmills publicize contact information on the municipal Facebook 139 2 12.B.5. page, and the stormwater program and WPCOG webpages? YES How many messages were received via the web based complaint/ 144 2 15.B.2. reporting/input form? 0 Was the web based complaint/reporting/input form maintained/ 148 2 15.B.3. updated? YES 155 2 16.B.1. Did Sawmills maintain a Facebook page for stormwater messaging? No Did Sawmills utilize the Facebook page to promote public involvement in stormwater programs, events and projects and provide outreach/general 156 2 16.B.2. stormwater awareness messages? If so, how many posts were made on the Facebook page related to the 157 2 16.B.2. stormwater program? 0 Did Sawmills participate in quarterly Water Resource Committee 170 2 17.B.1. meetings? YES If so, how many quarterly Water Resource Committee meetings did 171 2 17.B.1. Sawmills participate in? 2 Page 1of4 NCS000601_SAWMILLS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT If so, how many attendees (total of all meetings) were at quarterly Water 172 2 17.B.1. Resource Committee meetings that Sawmills participated in? 32 Did Sawmills provide a survey to engage the public and gauge public 184 2 18.B.1. interest in stormwater issues and the stormwater program? YES 185 2 18.B.1. If so, how many surveys were completed? 0 196 2 19.B.1. Did Sawmills provide and promote volunteer stream cleanup activities? YES 197 2 19.B.1. If so, how many stream cleanup events were held? 1 198 2 19.B.1. If so, how many stream cleanup participants were there? 2 199 2 19.B.1. If so, how many trash bags were filled during stream cleanup events? 8 Did Sawmills provide materials for volunteer stream cleanup activities 213 2 19.B.2. hosted by Sawmills and WPCOG? YES Did Sawmills supplement or replace stream clean-up time with outdoor educational activities if streams do not have adequate litter available for 220 2 19.B.4. cleanup? NO Stream Clean-Up on Catawba River If so, how many supplemental or replacement outdoor educational 221 2 19.B.4. activities were held? 0 If so, how many supplemental or replacement outdoor educational activity 222 2 19.B.4. participants were there? 0 Did Sawmills update the existing MS4 map to include open channels, In Progress, Caldwell County is being 234 2 20.B.1. storm drain information and flow direction? YES mapped currently through WPCOG 235 2 20.B.1. If so, was at least 20%of the MS4 area mapped? Yes Did Sawmills add newly constructed infrastructure to the existing MS4 243 2 20.B.2. map? PARTIAL 248 2 21.B.1. Did Sawmills review the IDDE ordinance and update if needed? YES 255 2 23.B.1. Did Sawmills review/update priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? YES Did Sawmills perform dry weather inspections in accordance with the SOP There are only a couple outfalls, 260 2 24.B.2. and schedule? YES estimated at about 13 total 261 2 24.B.2. If so, how many dry weather inspections were performed? 0 262 2 24.B.2. If so, how many potential illicit/dry weather discharges were identified? 0 275 2 26.B.1. Did Sawmills screen priority areas likely to have illicit discharges? YES 276 2 26.B.1. If so, how many illicit discharges were identified in priority areas? 0 Did Sawmills evaluate and assess the IDDE plan/program and revise if 284 2 26.B.3. necessary? YES 290 2 27.B.2. How many verified IDDE issues were identified? 0 297 2 27.B.3. Did Sawmills enforce illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations? PARTIAL How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement 298 2 27.B.3. actions were issued? 0 There were no Illicit Discharges How many illicit discharge and illegal dumping violations/enforcement 299 2 27.B.3. actions were resolved? 0 311 2 27.B.4. Did Sawmills establish and maintain a list of chronic violators? PARTIAL There were no chronic violators 312 2 27.B.4. If so, how many chronic violators were identified? 0 Did Sawmills evaluate and assess the IDDE Program documentation to 319 2 27.B.5. identify areas for improvement? YES 320 2 27.B.5. If so, were revisions made to the IDDE tracking sheet? NO Did Sawmills train new staff and contractors to identify and report illicit 330 2 28.B.2. discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills? YES How many new staff and contractors were trained to identify and report 331 2 28.B.2. illicit discharges, illicit connections, illegal dumping and spills? 2 Did Sawmills utilize social media and the stormwater webpage(s)to 339 2 29.B.2. publicize contact information for IDDE reporting? YES 345 2 32.B.2. Did Sawmills evaluate the IDDE complaint response time? YES 346 2 32.B.2. If so, what was the average response time for IDDE complaints/ reports? 12-24 hours Did Sawmills train new municipal staff on proper handling of construction 356 2 33.B.1. site runoff complaints? YES How many new staff were trained on proper handling of construction site 357 2 33.B.1. runoff complaints? 2 How many construction site runoff complaints were received from 358 2 33.B.2. municipal staff? 0 Did Sawmills administer a public survey to receive perspective on 370 2 34.B.1. construction site runoff? YES Did Sawmills publicize the ability to report concerns about construction runoff issues via the online form on the Sawmills and WPCOG websites 371 2 34.B.4. and social media? YES Did Sawmills maintain/update the adopted construction site waste 380 2 35.B.4. ordinance? YES Page 2 of 4 NCS000601_SAWMILLS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT Did Sawmills train municipal staff on identifying and reporting construction 386 2 35.B.3. site waste violations? YES How many staff were trained on identifying and reporting construction 387 2 35.B.3. site waste violations? 2 394 2 35.B.5. Did Sawmills enforce construction site waste violations? YES There were no violations at this time 395 2 35.B.5. How many construction site waste enforcement actions were issued? 0 396 2 35.B.5. How many construction sitewaste violations were remedied? 0 Did Sawmills track the number of low-density and high-density plan There were no low density or high 411 2 36 reviews performed? YES density plan reviews 412 2 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were performed? 0 413 2 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were performed? 0 414 2 36 If so, how many low density project reviews were approved? 0 415 2 36 If so, how many high density project reviews were approved? 0 Did Sawmills maintain a current inventory of low-density projects and constructed SCMs, including SCM type or low-density acreage, location, 432 2 36 last inspection date and type of enforcement action (if any)? NO There are no SCMs in Sawmills How many high density non-municipally owned SCM inspections were 437 2 36 performed? 0 442 2 36 How many low-density inspections were performed? 0 447 2 36 How many post-construction enforcement actions were issued? 0 Did Sawmills train field and office staff in Stormwater Ordinance 453 2 38.B.1. procedures and enforcement actions? YES How many staff were trained in Stormwater Ordinance procedures and 454 2 38.B.1. enforcement actions? 2 464 2 38.B.2. How many post-construction notices of violation were issued? 0 465 2 38.B.2. How many post-construction Civil Citations were issued? 0 466 2 38.B.2. How many post-construction violations are still in process of abatement? 0 Did Sawmills review post-construction procedures and documents and 477 2 39.B.1. update as needed? PARTIAL There are no SCMs in Sawmills 489 2 42.B.1. How many pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 0 490 2 42.B.1. How many repeat pre-CO SCM inspections were completed? 0 491 2 40.B.1. How many permitted projects with O&M Plans received their CO? 0 492 2 42.B.2. How many SCM inspections were completed by municipal staff? 0 493 2 42.B.2. How many SCM inspections performed by municipal staff were failed? 0 How many qualified licensed professional SCM inspections completed with 494 2 42.B.3. documentation received? 0 495 2 42.B.3. How many SCMs are under annual inspection enforcement? 0 Did Sawmills conduct inspections of There are now low density sites in 496 2 42.B.4. 20%of low-density projects this year? NO Sawmills Did Sawmills provide educational materials about low density developments during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed through 523 2 43.B.3. mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? NO 524 2 43.B.3. How many low density educational materials were distributed? 0 Did Sawmills provide educational materials to developers about high density development during the issuance of zoning permits, distributed 533 2 44.B.2. through mailings, posted on social media, and handed out at events? NO There are no high density sites in 534 2 44.B.2. How many high density educational materials were distributed? 0 Sawmills Did Sawmills establish/maintain links to all post-construction ordinances, manuals, policies, checklists, design standards, and/or other materials on 542 2 44.B.3. the website? YES via WPCOG's website 548 2 45.B.1. Did Sawmills maintain a Pet Waste Ordinance? YES 549 2 45.B.1. Did Sawmills implement and enforce the Pet Waste Ordinance? YES _ How many educational awareness materials on fecal coliform pollution 558 2 45.B.2. associated with maintenance of septic systems were distributed? 35 How many municipal facilities were inspected to ensure good 566 2 47.B.3. housekeeping/spill prevention and control measures are implemented? 1 How many municipal facilities implemented corrective action(s)following 571 2 47.B.4. inspection? 1 577 2 48.B.3. Did Sawmills review/maintain written spill response plans? YES In Progress 578 2 48.B.3. How many spill response procedure plans were revised? 0 How many non-reportable spills were documented according to the spill 587 2 48.B.5. response SOP? 0 How many reportable spills were documented according to the spill 588 2 48.B.5. response SOP? 0 597 2 49.B.3. Did Sawmills implement the MS4 O&M Plan? PARTIAL In Progress Page 3 of 4 NCS000601_SAWMILLS 2023 ANNUAL SELF ASSESSMENT 601 2 49.B.4. How many MS4 inspections were completed? How many comprehensive stormwater training sessions for new staff were 608 2 50.B.2. held? 1 How many new municipal and contractor staff received comprehensive 609 2 50.B.2. stormwater training ? 2 620 2 51.B.1. Did Sawmills inspect the MS4 infrastructure? YES 621 2 51.B.1. How many MS4 catch basins were inspected? 11 622 2 51.B.1. How many MS4 conveyances were inspected? 11 623 2 51.B.1. How many MS4 issues were documented? 0 637 2 52.B.2. How many MS4 cleanings/maintenance actions were performed? 15 Did Sawmills maintain an inventory of municipally-owned SCMs with information including type,year built, date of last inspection and 644 2 53.B.1. maintenance actions? YES _ 645 2 53.B.1. How many municipally-owned SCMs are in the inventory? 0 Did Sawmills develop/maintain a SCM Operation and Maintenance Plan for 646 2 53.B.2. each muncipally-owned SCM? NO There are no SCMs in Sawmills 657 2 54.B.3. How many municipally-owned SCM inspections were performed? 0 How many municipally-owned SCMs had documented 663 2 54.B.4. deficiencies/required maintenance? 0 How many municipally-owned SCM corrective actions/repairs were 664 2 54.B.4. performed? 0 Did Sawmills ensure that only certified landscapers/applicators are 673 2 56.B.1. applying pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers? YES How many certified landscapers/applicators are applying pesticides, 674 2 56.B.1. herbicides and fertilizers? 2 Did Sawmills implement standard operating procedures for vehicle and 683 2 57.B.3. equipment washing? YES 120 washings performed 692 2 59.B.1. Did Sawmills perform annual municipal street/curb and gutter sweeping? YES 693 2 59.B.1. How many lane miles were swept? 4 Did Sawmills track conveyances/infrastructure that have frequent 694 2 59.B.2. problems with pollution to prioritize their maintenance? YES 706 2 59.B.3. Did Sawmills distribute educational flyers regarding street ruoff pollution? YES How many educational flyers regarding street runoff pollution were 707 2 59.B.3. distributed? 75 716 2 60.B.1. Did Sawmills service public waste receptacles? YES 717 2 60.B.1. How many trash bags were used/collected? 140 726 2 60.B.2. Did Sawmills collect litter on an as-needed basis? YES 727 2 60.B.2. How much trash was collected (pounds)? 4,760 736 2 61.B.1. Did Sawmills perform bagged leaf collections? NO 737 2 61.B.1. How many bags of leaves were collected? 0 Did Sawmills train first responders on minimizing, collecting and disposing 746 2 62.B.1. of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? NO How many first responders were trained on minimizing, collecting and 747 2 62.B.1. disposing of fluids and other vehicular pollutants following an accident? 0 756 2 62.B.2. Did Sawmills equip and maintain spill kits in first responder vehicles? YES 757 2 62.B.2. How many first responder spill kits were maintained/ refilled? 0 How many public education materials about vehicle leaks/pollution 765 2 62.B.3. potential were distributed? 0 Did Sawmills enforce significant vehicle leaks from parked cars under the 771 2 62.B.4. IDDE ordinance? YES No significant leaks were reported How many enforcement actions were issued for significant vehicle leaks 772 2 62.B.4. from parked cars? 0 Page 4 of 4