20150769 Ver 1_Application_20150731

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the follo���ing info:
1. Project Name: Replace Bridge No. 372 ou SR 1346 (Wl�ite Oak Roacl) over Stevens Creek
2. Name of Property Owner/ApplicauL•_Nortli Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
3. Namc of Consullaut/Agent: N/A _
'Agent aWhorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Pi•evious Action ID nuntber(s):
Site Address:
5. Subdivision Name:
6. City:
7. County:
8. Lat: 35.66151 1 N Long: _-83.026156 W (Decimal Degrecs Plense)
9. Quadrangle N�me: _Cove Creek Gat> (35083-F1-"fF-024)
10. R�ater��vTy: _Stevens Creek (DWR Class: C)
I 1. W�tershed: French Bro1d Rivei• (HCU: 060 1 0 1 061
12. Requested Action:
X Natioinvide Permit # 14
Gencral Permit #
Jurisdiction�l Determinatiai Request
Pre-Application Request
The (ollowing information ���ill be compleled b�� Corps office:
AID:
Prepare Tile Polder Assign nuniber in OItM Begiu Date
Aiithorization: Section 10 Sectio�i 404
Project Deseription/ Nature of Activity/ Projecl Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Key���ords:

PA�r MCCizoitY
GUVEIi.\U2
�: n��W
�''�a �_i.,..� a��
� f:.� _-��
�° 1��
STATE OF NORTFI CAROLINA
DEPARI`MENT OF TRANSPORTATION
July 31, 2015
Ms. Lori Beckwith, NCDO'1' Regulatory Project Mauager
U. S. Army Corps of Engi��eei's
151 Yatton Avenue, Room 203
Asheville, NC 28A01-2714
Snbject: Natiom��ide 14 Permit Application
N�c��oi„as 1. Tt;nm�vso��
SECaEr,�av
Replaee Biidge No. 372 on SR 1346 (White Oak Road) over Stevens Creek
Ha}�a�ood County
St:ite Project No. 17BP.14.R.128 (DWQ Mium• Periuit Pee �240.00)
Dear Ms. Beck�a�itl�:
Tl�e Nortli Caroliva Department of Trausporlation (NCDOT) is proposing to replace the sl�bject
brid�e. The e�isting timber bridge needs to be replaced due to detcrioration and iusufficient
widtl�. The proposed replacement structure will be a 16'2" W � 5' I' H x 60'3" L alumu�um bos
culvert ��vitli ��otclied sills aud bafiles added to promote bedload relention and tish passage. The
culeert ��vill be stage constrncted �vitti the do���nstreTm section of cuh�ert built tirst to serve as the
on-site detour �vhile the old bridge is removed and the upstream culvert sectiou is coinpleted.
Enclosed are a PCN application, Rapauos Jutisdietional Form, Divisio�� of Mitigation Seivices
Acceptance Letter, plan sheets sho�ving the proposed work, a USGS quad map, photograpl�s, and
otlier pertinent project information.
'I'he Nortl� Caroliva Natural Heritage Program database was checked for records of tlueatened
and endangered species. There are 51 species listed for H1y���ood County that liave federal
st�tus. The bog turtle (Gl��lenrys muhlenbergir) is listed as threateued dae to suuilariry of
appearance to tl�e Iisted �iortl�ern bog turtle. Bald eagle (Haliaeel�is leucocephalus) is listed
uuder ihe Bald and Golden Gagle P�rotection Act (I IGPA). Nine species, Carolina nort�ern flying
squirrel (Glnuconrys snbrinus color�dus), gray b�t (1t�Iyoli,s grisescens), indiana bat (NI7�olis
sodnli�), Appalachian elktoe (Alns�nidnnia r�ri�eitelim�n), spruce-fir moss spider (�ldrerohextn•n
inoi�/ii�agn), small �vl�orled pogonia (Isoh•ia nredeo7oirles), spreading avens (Get�nt radinitm�),
rock gnome lichen ((%��ntrtodermr� linem•e), and nortl�ern loug-eared bat (il�L��olis seylenii•ionnlis,
NLEB) are luio�vn fi•om cuireiit records and are listed as either threatened or endaugered.
According to the USFWS, IIa}�wood Con��ty is-i�ow coi�sidered occupied sumuier ratige for
IndiT��a bats aud NLEB.
P'oudeeuth Division 011ice
"1'elephone: (R28) SN6-214I 253 \Vebster RouJ. Sylva. North Cuolinu 23779 Pas: (323) 53G-4043

Y�gc 2
Appalachian elktoe �re Pouud iu some �vell-oxygenated streams witli moderate to f�st flo��viug
�vater and stable, iuiaed snbsh��tes of silt, sa�ici, gravel, and/or cobble. Streams that support this
nwssel are typically much larger than Stevens Creek. The onl}� records in HTyG��ood County are
from the Pigeon River, aiid the east a�id �vest forks, tliere are tio records iiom any lribataries to
tliese riveis. Aiid, the ne�iest iecords to the bridge site are over 21 miles upsh�eaui of the
confluence of Stevens Creel: ��vith Wateiville Lake (Pigeon River).
Witl� rare e�ception, gray bats roost in caves year-round. This project ouly iuvolves a small
bridge replacemeut, so consiruelion worl< will not extend far from the e�istiug riglit-of-wa�� into
areas �vl�ere caves could occur. Tliere Tre no e�ves or mines visible near tlie biidge and,
accordiiig to USGS d�t�, the neaiest undergronnd mine is over LS miles a��vay. Therefore, gea��
bats �vill not be affected b3� the project.
Iudiau� bats aud NLEB ���inter in caves or mines �aith stable, but not freezing cold lemperatures.
Iu summer, tliey geneially ioost onder the loose barl: of trees, eitlier dead witli pecling bTrk oi
cavities, or live trees with shaggy bark sueh as �vhite oak, maples, sycamore and hickories. Tl�ere
is a blacl< ��valnut and a fe��� other saplings tliat ����ill need to be cut for the projeet, but tliey lack
peeliiig or shaggy b�ck. Regaiclless, these trees ��vill be removed fi�om October 15 to April 15
(winter cleacing) �vhen bats should not be roosting in �irea trees. Also, we conducted a sarvey of
the bridge on June 1, 2015 and did not see roosting bats or any evidencc of bat usage (i.e.
staining or guano).
Small whorled pagonia generally occurs in open, dry, deciduous �voods with acid soil, tltough
l�abitats c�u iuclucte slopes along streams and mesic forest with white pine and rhododendron.
Laud ase adjaceut to tl�e bridge consists of maintained road slioulders, a utility rigltt-ol=��vay,
driveways, a garden and fields and, to the southeast, a �vooded road shoulder slope. Vegetation
oii tlie cut-slope appears too dense for this plant, and regardless, this area should not be distncbed
for consh'tiction. Overall, habitat for small wl�orled pagonia appears lacking in the aYfected
project area. And, tlie uearest record ior this plant is over 10 miles from the project.
The Carolina northern flying squirrel, rock gnome lichen, spruce-fir moss spider and spreadiug
avens are fouud in spruce-tir Yorests and other isolated high elevation locations in ��vestern North
Carolina. Ho�vever, rock guome liel�en is au exceptiai because it eau occasionally be found at
lower elevations in deep river gorges witl� high humidity or on some vertical rock faees tl�at are
periodically ���et. The bridge site has au elevatiou of 2,520 feet aud lacks vertical rock faces and
other habitat condilions required by these species.
Tl�e project is limited in scope. Erosion �ud sedimci�tatiai control measures will be
implemented to minimize ach�erse ei�fects of the ���ork on aqiiatic l��bitats. Il�bitTts for listed
specics appear lacking �t thc project site aud noue of tliese species ���ere observed during field
visits. For these reasons aud those discussed above, �ve recommenc( that a determination of "uo
esfect" on listed species apply to this project.
This project was reviewed by NCDOT's Human Environment Unit in 2013 aud it was
deteriuined tliTt iio historic structures or archeological resources wotild be affected by the bridge
project (see attaclied fonns).

Page 3
NCDOT best mauagement practices �vill be used to minimize �ud control sedimentation �ud
erosion on this projecL The consu�uctiou foreman will review all erosion conUol measures dail}�
to ensure sedimentation and erosion coutrols are being effectivel}� coutrolled. If the devices are
not functioniug as iutended, they will be replaced iuunediately ���ith better c(evices.
Lnpacts to Wate�s of tlic United States
Stevens Creel< (DWQ Class: C) is sho�a�u on the USGS topographic inap as a perennial stre�m.
The channel is well deliuecl willi a substrate oC sand, gravel, and rock and is appro�imately 8 feet
in ���idHi. 'fhc stream has sufticient flow to support fish aud otl�cr Tquatic life. Stcvens Creek
flows to the Pigeon River. The Pigeon River nieets the detinition of a Traditional Navigable
W�ter (TNW). For these reasons, we believe Stevens Creek is a Relatively Permanent Water
(RPW) aud is auder tl�e jnrisdiction of the U.S. Arm}� Corps of Engineers. Iu order to coi�struet
the project, it ��vill be necessary to iiupact ��vaters of the Uuited Slales in lhe Prench Broad River
BTSin (CU 06010106). Specitically, NCDOT is requesting to replace Bridge No. 372 witl� an
alt�minum box culvert. T isted below is a summary of the proposed impacts.
Net
Site No. T�isting Conclition Proposed Condition I�upacts
fcet
16'2"Ws5'I"H�61'L
1 Timber Bridge Aluinivam Bo� Culvert �vitli 61
Heacl�val Is
lA Frec Flo��ving Stream ��»l�ervioas Dike and Flow 150
Diversion
Frec Flo���iug Stream Ch�unel Relocation
� 40 Liue�r Feet (Culvei't Outlet) 52
52 Linear Peet
3 Pree Flowing Streaui Rip Rap Bank Stabilization aud s�
Ploodplain Benches
Tot�l Permanent Stre�m and Tribut��y Lupacts for Cuh�e�•t 61'
Total Tempoi•a�y Sh�eaui I�upncts for Impei��ious Dilce aud F'lo�v Diversion 150'
Tot�l Permanent Strenm �nd Tributnry Impact fm� Cl��unel Reloc�tion 52'
Tot�l Pcrmaucnt I�npact fm• Banlc StabilizTtimi nud F'loodplain 13cucl�cs 87'
Permits Reqnested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorizatio�i under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed
���itl� tlie construction project outlined above. By capy of tl�is letter, I am �sking Ms. Marla
Chambers, Western NCDOT Review Coordinator, of the Norlh Carolina Wildlile Resources

Page 4
Commission (NCWRC) to coiumei�t directly to }�ou concerning lhe 404 N�tiott��vide Pertuit
requcst.
I am also requestiug aulhorizalion uu<ler Section 401 of the Clean ti�ater Act from the North
Carolina Deparhnent of En��ironment and Natural Resources (DENIZ), Divisiou of Watei•
Resonrces (DVdR). In addition, I am asking Ms. Cl�aiubers and Mr. Ben DeVJit, TI, Roadside
Tnviroivnental Field Operations Eugineer (NCDOT), to commcnt directl}� to me coi�cerning this
periuit request.
If you have an}� qnestions or need additioual information, please contact Mr. ,Tosh Deyton at
[phone] or me �t (823) SS6-214L Yonr earl}� review and consideration will be greatly
appreci�ted.
Sincerel��,
�.���-'�
Mark S. Davis
��r-��, :�a . ,
Division 14 �iiviromnental Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Ainy Chapman, Division of Water Resources — DENR, Raleigh
Ms. Kristi Carpenter, Divisioii of Watei' Resources—DI:NR, Raleigl�
Mr. Kevin Barnett, Division of Water Resources — llENR, Asl�eville
Mr. Jason n9ays, Biologist, US Fish &Wildlife Se�l�ice, Asheaille
Ms. Marla Chambers, Western NCDOT Review Coordinator, NCWRC, Albemarle
Mr. Josh De}�ton, PE, Division 14 Bridge Mauagement Engineer, NCDOT, Br}�son City
Mr. Ben DeWit, �I, Roadside Enviroiw�eutal Field Operations �ngineer, NCDOT

I I
i���i
�
o��F V 1 ATE9QG
� T
o�<
Office Use Only:
Corps aclion ID no.
DWQ project no.
Forrn Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processin�
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought irom the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Seclion 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: N/A or General Permit (GP) number: 31
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Qualily Certificalion — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdicfional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Qualily Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For lhe record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigalion � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee prograrn. (NC Division of Mitigation Services)
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenly coastal counlies. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is lhe project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmenlal Concem (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Narne of project: Replace Bridge No. 372 on SR 1346 (White Oak Road) over Stevens Creek
2b. County: Haywood
2c. Nearest municipality / town: White Oak Communily near Maggie Valley
2d. Subdivision narne: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or State 17BP.14.R.128 (Design Build Contract)
Project No:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Mark S. Davis, Division 14 Environrnental Supervisor
applicable):
3d. Street address: 253 Webster Rd.
3e. City, state, zip: Sylva, NC 28779
3f. Telephone no.: 828-586-2141
3g. Fax no.: 828-586-4043
3h. Email address: markdavis,�a ncdot.qov
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: N/A
4c. Business name N/A
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: N/A
4e. City, state, zip: N/A
�if. Telephone no.: N/A
4g. Fax no.: N/A
4h. Email address: N/A
5. AyenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name N/A
(if applicable):
5a SUeet address: N/A
5d. City, state, zip: N/A
5e. Telephone no.: N/A
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: N/A
Page 2 of 11

�. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Properiy identificalion no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latilude: 35.661511 Longilude: -83.02616
1 c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Stevens Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C
2c. River basin: French [3road River Basin (HUC 06010106)
3. Project Descrip4ion
3a. Describe lhe existing conditions on lhe site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Landscape is primarily agricultural and rural residenlial with some foresled areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all exisling wetlands on lhe property:
N/A
3a List the total estimated linear feet of all existing slreams (intermiltent and perennial) on the properiy:
N/A
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace the existing substandard timber bridge with a 16' 2" W x 5' 1" H x 60' 3" L single barrel aluminum box culvert
with headwalls on existing location.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including lhe type of eyuipment to be used:
The culvert will be phased consUucted to lhe downsfream side of the old bridge in order to maintain traffic on this dead
end road during construction. Erosion and sedimentalion measures will be installed. Flalf of lhe new culvert will be
phased constructed downstream of the existing bridge location. Once complete, traffic will be placed on part of the new
culvert and the old bridge will be removed. The new box culvert will lhen be completed. Track hoes, dump Vucks,
bulldozers, paving equipment, water puinps, sandbags, diversion pipe and various hand tools will be used to accomplish
the work.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional weUand or stream determinations by lhe
Corps or State been requested or obtained for lhis property /
project (including all prior phases) in lhe past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
Comments: N/A
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional detennination, what rype
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated lhe jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: N/A
Name (if known): N/A Olher: N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisQictional determinations or State determinations and atlach documentation.
N/A
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been reyuested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
ihis project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help fle" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is lhis a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Imnacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all lhat apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wellanci iinpacls proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
l'em orar T
W1 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A ❑ Yes ❑ Corps N/A
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetlancl impacts N/A
2h. Comments: N/A
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermiltent stream impacts (including temporary iinpacts) proposed on the site, then cornplete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3 a. 3 b. 3 c. 3d. 3 e. 3f. 3g.
Slream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intennitfent DWQ — non-404, �.`�idth (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 � P❑ T CulveR Installation Stevens Creek � PER � Corps 5 61
❑ INT � DWQ
S1A ❑ P� T Flow Diversion Stevens Creek � PER � Corps 5 150
❑ INT � DWQ
S2 ❑ P� T Channel Relocation Stevens Creek � PER � Corps 5 52
(Culvert Outlet) ❑ INT � DWQ
S3 � P❑ T Bank Stabilization Stevens Creek � PER � Corps 5 $�
❑ INT � DWQ
S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Tot:il Permanent Sh�e�m and Tributar}' Impacts Pm• Culvert 61'
Totnl Permanent Sh•e�m and Tributnr�- Impacfs fm• Channel Relocation 52'
Total Perm�nent Shram nnd Tributnry Impncts fm• Rip Rap f3;inl< Stabilizatia� and Tloodplaiu 6cnches 87'
Totnl Temporary Strenm Impacts for Impervious Dil<es nnd P'low Dicersions 150'
3i. Comments:
rage o or i i
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, soimds, ihe Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
lhe U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Walerbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T
01 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A N/A N/A
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts N/A
4g. Comments: N/A
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construclion ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond Floode
d Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavaled Flooded
P1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
P2
Sf. Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
5g. Cornments: N/A
5h. Is a darn high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no: N/A
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): N/A
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): N/A
5k. Method of construction: N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacls require mitigation, lhen ou MUST fill out Section D of this fonn.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ 7ar-Pamlico ❑ Olher:
Project is in which protected basin? N/A ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Bufferimpact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem ora (T im act re uired?
B1 ❑ P❑ T N/A N/A ❑ Nos N/A N/A
82 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts N/A N/A
6i. Comments: N/A
Page 6 of 11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minirnize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The alurninum box culvert was designed lo meet the hydraulic needs of the site. The culvert will be on a 5.75% grade
and will be buried 1-foot into the strearn substrate. Five (5) notched sills and baffles will be placed in the structure to
reduce velocity and mainlain ayuatic life passage during periods of low flow (see plan sheets).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All instream work will be perforined in a dry work area using an impervious <iike and cliversion to divert the water arounci
lhe project site. Appropriate E3MPs according to the approved erosion and sedimentation conUol plan will be installed on
the project prior to culvert inslallation.
2. Compensatory Mitiyation for Impacts to Wa[ers of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for �Yes ❑ No
impacts lo Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the Slale?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ �Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigalion option will be used for this
project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program (NCDMS)
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (altach receipl and letter) Type N/A Quanlity N/A
3c. Coinmenls:
4. Complete if Makin� a Payment to In-lieu Fee Proc�ram
4a. Approval lelter from in-lieu fee program is aitached. � Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 61 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool � cold
4d. Buffer mitigalion requested (DWQ only): N/A syuare feel
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation reyuested: N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland miligation requested: N/A acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Usin� a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a descriplion of the proposed mitigalion plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitiyation (State Reyulated Riparian Buffer Rides) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project residt in an impact within a nrotec[ed riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, lhen idenlify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires miligation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 N/A N/A 3(2 for Catawba) N/A
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: N/A
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 8 of 11

E. Storrnwater Manayement and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan inGuded? If no, explain why.
Comments: N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is lhe overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does lhis project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If lhis project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES reyuire a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narralive description of ihe plan:
Project is covered by NCDOT Individual NPDES Permil No. NCS000250.
❑ Certified Local Governrnent
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of ihe Stormwater Managemenl Plan? ❑ DWQ Stonnwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemmenCs jurisdiction is lhis projecl? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implementeQ stonnwater manageinent programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all lhat apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Olher:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-irnplemented stormwater inanagement programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Managemenl Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does lhe Stormwater Management Plan meet lhe appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submitlal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to lhe above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to lhe requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmenlal Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by ihe
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA fnal approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Commenls: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ WeUand Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2FI .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. CumiUative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on pasl and reasonably anticipaled future impacts) result in � yes � No
additional development, which could impacl nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance wilh the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a rural secondary road The bridge is being upgraded to standard load limits and widlh to improve safety for the
traveling publia The bridge (culvert) upgrade is not anticipated to have any significant impact on future development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Reyuirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ullimate Uealment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewaler generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
5. Endanyered Species and Desic�nated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this projecl occur in or near an area with federally protected species or yes
habitat? � ❑ No
5b. Have you checked wilh the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to Qetermine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina NaWral Herilage Database and site specific siweys conducted during the bridge scoping process.
Page 10 of 11

6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your sile would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
N/A—There are no marine or estuarine communilies within lhe Blue Ridge Physiographic Province.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Reyuirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
govermnents have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.y., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources Qid you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The bridge projecl was reviewed by NCDOT's Human Environment Unit in 2013 and there will be "no effecC' on historic
architechue or archaeological resources. These findings have been approved by the State Hislorical Preservation Office
(ShIPO) through MOA with NCDOT (see attached forms).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA reyuirements: FEMA requirements were taken into consideration by lhe NCDOT
Hydraulics Unit during lhe design of the bridge (see attached Hydraulic Report in lhe plan sheets)
8a What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain delermination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Mark S. Davis �
Division 14 Cnvironmental Supervisor � ��,� �� � �-,3 /� L j
ApplicanUAgenYs Signature Date
AppliCarlVAgenPs Pfinted N8m@ (AgenCs signalure is valid only if an authorization le�ler from lhe
applicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 11

,,
` ' : U o _— I I 'I
, � �; � � � �
�, � \ ` � � a � „
\ •�. a ..i-
� o �\ �`,V `t� q i �.. . . . - -
�
� -W . ��r��, �\.\ '�.'f �`:.� � J � P!1
, �� ,� \ ` � J �
.\ S '` ' W O - .. _ _ ,. � ,
\� �.� `! _ \\ \\ . i � u r;, z Q � � � \� -
�� ,.- , a \,
\ , �. � v -
, \ ^ =* ` = O _
I " J
� ,'� ,: � . �"� ��� ' � � �'.� N w .
� : .. � � � \ �yI"V •i, � � ..
V � `� � \ �d�� \! . ��� � 'i,�l '� "�
"t' o � \� \ • �„, � � 'I(���� I� .� � !v � \}
, A �/ !�'� ��i � �� ��'� o � � � �
o i ��V •-� /� i. ? � f� � �
/ v �� � � ' / f` �' � �� �i� � � � � I
\\� , � \�'�` �� \; � %,, �I�!/ �' (� � i
'�� � � . , , . , v �
�� \ \�\�� l,� l �i� ' i`%� 1 �,. � '_ 0 � �
,��5 " � ' �� �� I � / '� '�� " '
� ' � �
�'�� \ � �� � ' '
)� � �` ' \�� �� ;�� ,��,�� ,- : �
�/ ' A � m V�'i� � ;� � , ,• ; �- �7
� , \ � ..,: ; !
�� � � � � � � �
� �/ �� ,. ` , �,' �'/� ;
� � �� A �� �A�, �
az ✓ \, � ��
� ��`' r ���� -
� � "� ' `.\�" �\ ;� ' \ �;� �
W v� �•� ��,
F— ' �`=C'. � '
w �•�, � ✓ �' , � / . `��
'� . ��� �,
a > ' ,
� o ��.� `� �`\ � \ �� - �'��
> {� � �� � �� � 1�,� � � i =� t
., o _ � K � �� � W ���� � �
-.w d \ '` � � `� ��';% �
_� J \,',. = I �; -- — - -
_ � -. � -
V � i ...
,. � •:\
�
" �� 0�� � i \,!� ��ti:�� � � `� - .. ��
S
� i,
,:, ,- 6���� `� I ' =�� ��� ���= � \ � � � � �
� ?� �
'_ _ � �� 1. \� /d�, �e,� \� : )� � ��' W ?'°
_ , ; - I �\ \� J i
�'
�,
�,
� \ ' ' �v �), •_ �� ``> \• � /
�
� � � M1 ti�
� �\ , �p� . ._
� _ '�\t� \�
��) �_ � � u, ti - ��u-
II 1 \ \\ —�l — \ t \\ �`. / .
, N
� o � � ` ������; ��" v \� '�� ;-�"�� o
;
�
w �^ \ �i ,, l . ° , � is- �° ) a
• 1- � t, � ,� ` � i
a > � �,, '�r �'- ,� �� r g
„ ,
v`ii � \ � 1 , o 0
�
i
� �� � ��� ��\� ���� °_�:. � � � N
�
� �
, ��d \\% \'�,,�\ i�� ':`,'� ,� l _ __ � ' o v>
•015 ; ` \\,, li _ � �C c�
�,�d 21 � - � �� - I �, -� ' � �
��' ` �
. L6 ,� ' = _ „ �: � �
, � � ;��1 � I W ;,
. � I �, � m i

r` i:r:
� �
Y '� ' �
, , .
4F°
�l / i.
���,.�
� �
< � � -,
�
P-. w- ,�1
r
s 'f'_;i
'��' >.�; � . Y",� ,..
, _
, 'y ��
q t ; ,.- . � -�.
, ,�. � � , �
� '' � _;� � '� s �'i
� �� y �
_ ''�'��yt �' `�. > �`� � , ? a ' ;;� 4 � '= ' r
y� . r`�i,: y� �.�.� 1 �".�t '� s '' �
3x � ." • � � ��1 : - -L� � � '�� i� Y� .
�i �'• . � s„ � '�+ �: � � ;.� .Y .1 ,y �'�� .
�' a� ��' � 7`�� •. '•�•
� ,', :�'� w �-�'��. _ � �,� ,��� .
,� � d �� � �„ , � �7� �' �� � 4� ,�.�'�
.�
�'. � .�� �'�'� � — � / .h 4x�'r
` ;;?4'` -
X �_Bridge Niunber 372 � `� . �-
{� � � . 3�, '� �. . °
� �� , �� �
G
�
�� a.' .
V
�j � �
,
� r �,� ij,
,. � . , ' �
` � �� � � °
... C� ,�• `„ . �
-r � ,t r.�� ,. f _ I'
,.._. t,.
.;� �-�, - . ,
� n; . �� �. ., ,.
_ , .. . ,,a.,;f.'��_.
:
n
w�E
s
_i �'.. ,��
t, . J
/'� N•./%}Y� � fi �
r , `: ;',�j ~" �
� ' � i' � ��i
� ; � ���
�,., �i .
_ `- � ��; , .
� �` � ' %
� � ��
. `Y.
Z ` �s�`_'3�,',. � y. . qj,f ,.
� ��:%J��.,.:1.?'/'-./� �;�+�'
r
Bridge Number 372 over
Stevens Creek on SR 1346
Haywood County, NC
o eo ioo zoo
Feet
'�� ..
f
.%E
`�
�'
^��i� ����i������1
!�aS:{►�i�� :�'s�
� �i.1►:����'+�■ i��
r+

Haywood County Bricige �i372 on SR 1346 over Stevens Creek
June 1, 2015 Photographs
. ,- • .}".
�.
X `:o
Looking southwest towards bridge.
. ��. '2.
� '�
.t
�.> �
�.,�,-r ::..
4
.._n. _. . x `,- .
�.�rz
c.:;
s ' ��,
�� .
`�;i
T
� i,',
�� ,.
� ���
- .. _ . .. `� -�
l
, . . - . . . . . ... �
. . .._ �� ; . . 6��
Looking northeast towards bridge.

Haywood Coun[y Bridge #372 on SR 1346 over Stevens Creek
�,�� ` .
i
a •
n` i y'� � � �� •
a[' !'.�, a .(fY � y.'\r� ,
, + r �.+5 r f 4 _ �, { `
' - , f r �r� . N f �!_ :t �
� a -
s �§.
� " �
.� . ,
I. � ' /-'�'. .
� J•. •..
��.����4,rr`r r �
.'^#' " I • � �
��� � . , �� �
, � ���
:'
Looking downstream from bridge.
June 1, 2015 Photographs
r 4 ��
� � '� � �
/
i r , i
`a � +
:i:-': �..��
�Y r
v
.. �i:�
y� h(i ir
NlF�.i -O �-,
a' ,�..'��"�
.F.. �.,:.t.'�l.a .,t}�•
� ', Y ''.�T3�.�r�
:,;,y -�'.� ��
� i d
i �
_ ; �• '�, " ! ���•� �
_ . � .1''H �_!; �
sa�� �, '' '�Y.:v�f
.. � .f :?-uIti`5', i
T'R�� -d,�
, � ' ' •,•� ,
' � ?^a.; ,-�:'i
� �.A�,: ' ..._ .
• „"'I
�. -i
. � � rt �� . •� w,• � �
* � ' � � 1 � � g - � r ?. � , -'I
�- ''£ � �a: i
"a� �6 : � "' .:3. � '
;.;�t.�-+`i y�� � �i- � t_ �� r�,
�`" �5 � ,� ' � ,h ` �' �
� �
� , >
a ,, � � �;;,�
�� :.. �.,; ��,'" ,,
r;;„ , � � � * � � i
, ,, � ,
*' N > ' `° t
`. � �.� � ! � � '�•� r � F "� � %i
���� �R�� � � �� � "n' � ` 'j ' � '�'��� �
�'�'L�, . �'' .a - `�s�i�� ` e';, ;� ��
�> -��� r �t { � ' `
,� a � ! '" r S E��a �
n � `i
� �p ",1��\ � . .,.�,c _ .� _ . >, _ �1 yJ..�
�; ' Y � � .. � ' �B, � �
y� ��•� r . � 1.`.�r • �',f \A/�� t � �� I'�X� .
, ` ' r � � , ��e , a..
ti" .; '�i4?' ��'� � "�e.�� �� �,.� �
,.
,
'r' ?a`rt ; a � � �: .� � J . �i.'.
. f - •
����� ,,6 ..;� �.." -. x /. �:. '�4�'" .� t � v
����� !.1 _ �p �r� ���
�:v+e( �Gy i s �" �� f R� � '� �� �d Ve� t��Q�•�-� �
^�'�i.> i� Vat�\� j� . � x �T r+ . '
+ �� �.'` � ���� i _�I t �s ��' 1..•`' •. -ie;'� P
4�3�Rpg� �a.. il it iti.�': i . r��}i:�tw/� / wi
1' �:4� 'rY�� �t :.. .� yri .!i Af'���R � 1 + � � ���`���%
���T�SD�`i1..:' � '���1.�i �m.�,�1��� {�q� ��1�� `L�
� , aj a �� '.�� ������.
r r r r��; :.
� ,
`'tlr� ' �r��'; i 'i s , � 1fi :� � � -�?�L�
Looking upstream froin bridge.

Haywood County Bridge N372 on SR 1346 over Stevens Creek lune 1, 2015 Photographs
�
\�. ��/ _ El�. ��� � � ��PY
', �' �._ _
� �.r.�:_ r ' � , �
' .'� :'- /
;.. .
. ��%, - > � ,i
-r,•�.,�; � ��,�►� ��
i� t `'�� ' ��'�j �
> �
�
� 1li-� '�%/' ��qe�+r �'4, �
�f '' r ��� ..�►�
flc 4�,. f E, r� �r ./
��P/ f.� �ra�f'�, //�dF
F �r 1�.�,. q �, i
�t��..s�R'! �i� .p� �A �� � �
I'��/r�p �'J`C r���
. �'. !K�r
�i �n� � ��u �:
� �
r
� � �,� r`� ` � ; �,p.':a,l' � ,
,�,�- r �
fyic�'�*��`lj 4,� l'-�*`;�r
i��9 =
t : f � �
n
L � .
t ' - - .-
`..�-t�.a:�� .1 •�1 :�.a���e. ./ � -P t,
`11�f' \�� { $AZ � ( � r,
����:.F � f._ I i _,' � ��E
� �,>. ;� .. F ,„r.� !i
i W:.� . i � , . 1. �c '.- , �{rr, .� �d�1
���, ' �
�
� .
,�
.��
�: •
Looking downstream under bridge.
� ,
..,r � ..
�

��`:..
a
� Z
0
a E a
c � 1-
q rn z
F � W F
a � �
o � w w
r �
C q Q �
e E ao
N p � O
y N W �
� T F K
� n Q o
c 3 3
o rn �
U �
t N
Y
2
L;
�s ,
`�J
4
K
�
G
N
0
a'
L'
�
U
0
vd
.L �
N
o E
� v
U
m N
E 3
� O
L �
r d
N "
E o
E o
O �
U
T O
�- N
m �
N C
n �
N �
K U
N O
N � '
N a �
3 w �
m m
w E �
� � m
� n'�
� Q '-
D � N
y�j N N
n d �
o � -
p � OI
s � _
� w
U p
y� v O
o '�
E a m
= v o
v ti �
0 3
$�v
� O� N
� Qy
d N O
� �
� U v
� � �
TE
1O w n
3 m a
o �
o d �
m
m v n
S U D
y �
v g m
- n
m w m
N O N
o -- rn
E � o
T � ry
� � �
y C �
o� m 3
C
N U =
X �
v � rn
� ;D
c j
'a U
U Q
c _
d � L
� U
3 � C = N
^ � � Q W
� v O
jA C N v
�o E �. ° n
w'° o � 3
� N � C V
E C a i6 T—'
x m m � o� c
aU � 3 � m
N � � oJ O U
`-' w 'a �" 3
� O C v Q O
C � � C � �
N O E N y O
U D S U� L
� d
0 3 �a "
� `n O � L O
3
3 E
o �
J
rny
c
�
N �
d
'o
a
m
W
.�
�
n
E
R
N
e
�
V
d
t
'o
N �
N �
0
7 L
D T
c �
m �
N N �
C � N
- 5 i
rn �n c m n
"+ '� v �
m
� U O
,� m '
U d �
N y N
d N N
N �L C
n �
- n t
3 io >
� � U
N V ��
U �
� N W
O D � Q
a o m a
N
� v N O �
N U C N 7
c y � � �
" ° r in
�! v � a� m
v `m o � c
p� v, '� n C
H � � � 1
n 9 o M U
o v v e m
V1 '] C W L
C o � � �
w m o � s
] � V m
- `1 � N p
u (° n�
d =' o o �
o y � D ..
4 N �- N
n O p� v N
v v w v �
t � L � Q
- � C O W
u
F
m
N
N
U
m
N
N
3
LL
0
J
�
N
H
a
N
a
r C
`o >
C �
D U
� �
o c
N �
a
m m
c v
N �
C
c 3
o� o
�a
� C
� �
K m
� v
N �
rt O
N p
E .a
N �
� N
T N
a `�
N U
o c
� 3
v D
E N
c �
a�
� N
E v
d �
Y
'" c
D �p
ym
Q �
O C
n�
W
>
D
O
a
Q
N
n
m
0
O
n
m
� IJ I�
Q
."- D
v °—' m
� o a
n L v
N �
N
i C �
O "
n
m v �
N N
N L
°' E
t O
N W
C a �
� @ N
>
N � d 9
? U o v
N v `� X
U � C v
L O � � d
`1 N
C W p� V� O
5 o m 3 d
3 9 � o �
� D �
c N W N >
c x $ E �
N N ry C �p U
U � N O� N
a�Srw S
0 5 v j m o
� ry L J '- N
3a g o in a
a � K �
v v v
v a� �' v E
'- T O
O � � � � �
� O `yl
� p � y c �
d E- ��e 3
L � Ql � N D
j N� N a O
p t C N C
a o� c - �
<° '� 1O 'N' o E
v Ec w Z. m
a � a� o @ �
> rn 7 u '^ %n
° m u 2 m °
n o u
N N ✓i p C �
`m v o � N "
3 � �° a+ o a
o a+ a m a m
� G �n � i� m
N
n
N N
j } -
N
N
U
�$ t � ` p
O N '� � y �-
y � C v « �
C 4! j � 3 10
N `� t C N
EQ�'U " � c u
C - N
��° a m � E v
O c 2
d U N N. C� N- c
Y .�. N 0 q
= R C� U 6 �j � Y E
c $�' nm p `1 Ya
u u a E N o'�' N�°i
� u �
i. C 4 LL N 9
a� 1° E° 3^ai u"
Ec� rno°' °amn E
q d N LL N 11 •_ 6'�
�« N D O 3 O n �+ �
�
n`oa m a � °m'�m
C T
C
> N
c �
N
o y
J "'
o .�
3
�- I/i
C Q
L U
C W
v
> O
o °
V O
� N
@
P �
O
@ N
N 9
a a
m
T C�
O Q
N v
E m
N N
L 4
H m
u �
� C
A `
O C
�- N
v E
n �
O .@
E �
m m
o w
m
3 ..
°m Z
o .
�O
c n
- T
� v
� m
� E
� p
3 n
o n
m �
0 0
d o
7 @
� U
u a
v v
`o �
v w
D �
N `A
E `0
� N
d �
N � .
0 C � C
o c
D y� N
� � U
L
rn m
o. c
�' N 'L
v N
j O X
« � v
✓+ c N
p ~ .L
V '
� J
m o rn
�p � C
� � 4
� L
� � O
� � �
� o c
C v
U @ O
� a
a « v
m 3 .L.
> � N
N
3 o t
a a m
m c
� N C
� O N
u 4

.. v�
.L- N
E v
;�� � N 3 �, m - -
�°v'° T3 a
o rv m _
�n a c°� -,� a-3 Q Q y
� � ��� z z.,
> ° E ° °c
c v � o e�'i 2 ..
3 � � U � �
� � � " � � v
p o m �� d V'L' >
u � 'm c m `°
� m v o y A Z�
c « Z
6 � � T O E 1� (�. .O V
F U
« �n � 3 � a � a 'Q
" in N m rn9 i- �-6
C� ' 0 o O a1 �'
E`v °o c n 3 '" a' $� �`v v
� E
a .`. rn ` a
= m 3' w v u=" `c r .. a m c9
2' J � " �� N F v p 2 U O C
� N � V
,� � "' a a T a,r"A w°�
V O d n o� � N � Y O c C D u
m` � Q o'o K U �- m m
LL v o Z a@ _ E > o a a a
0
a�°a t m o tt v � a.m � o"
5i n ��u 'd m in a° �`" G;' i.
o °o � - e� o � e� `v E � � . ? N `
I- tt ��n �°' t o o `o � 'o c �c o m O
'O u N C fp f�J Z uU�i N � E L« U
p p'C 2 'G m- O.
a a a w m n .% �° ��3 � U ..
a � y w o >
¢ - $ � m `_ z '�
.. �� mx?�mc x a`
C C W o� U. v'� V Z r�
0 o rv u r a 9 U Z
� c
o g p �' �� u�`o N E a z o
n E 2 � c y ti v (u U d`
n m Z a 4 � ° o �o " a�i E � in m
U M
~ °w° � € c =i `s �E„v� -:3 a�`�
r°, u '
�E~ Z a � U U U � rv�� E a N € Z � t
C �
E a o � m � v o'o v o 5 m' `
n 9rcu" �o �« o '^ �' m oEov °o � > `o_
N w d o� v o 0 3
� rQ p� A 'o o v a B n u" a .. u c�::.
� t3�` ° e� a` � � o m do=° m `o_ "- �
' U c A c o '^ ' t�
5 m� � � � � �F.oUO 3 � n �v
U=� c o m✓°', o� i v � � U O o
C N `u °c d � � v° 9°-' n� � n
Z a o o � n o � U � ' -
E � _ n m E � T
z' v � o c m ovn� " ❑,�
a - ho 3 vnr=n E u"
�' v a v .v-�'"�m a` m' o
° _`m �' o v v E �
n 3 � o a o o � ..
" �> '-" Et � E
q °° � r L�' o
m
a w > 'oo o ¢ 3 rn u£ U o¢�
m a o o . m o � „ N r�� z z
o s � � t -
ry j v rv N c � ° ° �« o o� z
`v " ° b
2 K � U � LL h LL �1 3 cU y .Q N
. N` b Z n m � c Q E 9 a N U O Q
� � ' � a
Fa-- a � m E° n° E o m n`o a F `n � m �' m
m u N o v m r o p� o b n r « a c
��°¢ tt°i E a` F° a v o in 3 z m t`� v
m � e- � w � ac�
� i � E T V O 3 m�
L
N D a W .. a N '� �, (� �
e� a nin' � n = o N u .c 3�
` y �
° a � o � y >. o � 0 4 �>:
>� 1 tp � V> N U '� 9 N Q j
U � C � L� N U N G 4
�; °� 'o E Q o : E � q !E i,� a. a
C C � A C 9 �
� � u � '- O G T Z� O 3 q q m U Q
�� a` E c 5 x i t � N 0 v`o .�i m u u � 9 a o"
� C . e� m o c'; � �� o m� o n '�' � � � a �-' � i
^=. S w W o o m � � N o q�'g E m rc � u� -'� c
:I. � N O N E« N
-� C?i m� t> u o o n c c y�'� ,t � r'n y� � o
->` 3z iirc3 a` a`r a`t�°a' `'n z ri E�za`o

��
�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environmenl and Natural I�esources
Pat McCrory Division o( Mitlgafi�n Services
Govemcr
July 29, 2015
Mr. Mark S. Davis
NCDOT Division 14 Eovironmental Supervisor
North Carolu�a Department of Transportalion
2531Vebster Road
Sylva, North Carolina 28779
Dear Mr. DTVis:
Subjece Miligatio�� Acceptance Letter.
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
RECEIVE�
JUL 3 0 2015
�DIVISION 14
Division I4 Yroject, Replace Bridge 372 at SR 1346 (White Oak Road) over Stevens Creek,
Haywood County; NBS Elentenl 17BP.l4.R.128 / DB14A-430372
Tlie purpose of this Ietter is to uotify you thal the Division of Mitigation Services (DT9S) will provide the
compeus�tory stream mitigation Cor the subject projecL Based ou the infomiation received on July 28, 2015, tlie
impnets are located in CU 06010106 of the Frencl� IIroad River basin in tlie Southeru Mow�tains (SM) Eco-Region,
and are as follows:
Frcuch Broad
06010106
SRi Cold
61.0
Stream
Cool
Weflands
�Vami Ripanan Non- Coas�al
Bufter
Zone 1
q. Ft.)
Zone 2
This impact and associated mitig�tion need were under projec[ed by tlie NCDOT in the 2015 unpact dala.
DMS will commit to implemeut sufticie�t compeusatory stream mitig�tion credits to offset U�e impacis associated
wilh tlils project as delem�ined by ihe regulatory ege��cies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F3.c.iii of the
In-Lieu Fee Instmment dated July 28, 2010. if the above referenced irvp�ct amomNs are revised, then tl�is
mitigatiou acceptance le[�er will no longer be valid and T new mitigation acceptance letter will be required &om
DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional informelion, please contact Ms. Belh Harnion at 919-707-
8420.
Sincerely,
�' ��V ``
Jam �B). Sta�Fll
Asset Management Supervisor
ec: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACC — Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mc Josl� Dey[on, P.E., NCDOT— Division 14 Bridge Mainteuance Engi��eer
Ms. Linda Fitzpa(rick, NCDOT — PDEA
File: SR 1346 — Bridge 372 — Division 14
to52 ka'�1 Se�ryice Center, Ra'.eigh, Hcr�n C2ro:in2 2709&7652
Pno�e. 919-707�97611nfemel http�,//por�al.ncdenr.org/n�eb,�eep
An Equ� OpportunFy 1 P.�irmYYe Ptfon Emp!oyer-l.�ak in � b/ recycled �r

APPROVCD JURISDICTIONAL Df,TERDIINATION POR�i
U.S. Army Corps o( Engineers
This torm should be completed by follo�rine thc instnictions pro�•ided in Section IV of thc JD Porm Instruc�ion�il Guidcbook.
SECTION L• 6ACI<GROUND INtORDIATION
A. IiEPOR'f COAIPLI:TION DATE FOR APPROVEU JUIi1SUICTIONAL DETG[2DIINA'I'10\ (JD):
B. DISTRICT ORFICC, fILC NA�IE, AND NUDIDER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND 6ACI<GROUND INFORDIATION: Bridge No. 372 on S2 13d6 over S�e��ens Creck
Stnte: �C County/parish/borough: I lay�cood City: AA'hite Oak Communit�° ncar �4negie Valley
Ccntcr coordinntes o� site (IaUlong in degree decimnl format): Lnt. 35.6615I I N, Long. -83.02GU6 R'.
Universol Trnnsaerse b[ereatoe
Name of neares� �ca�erbody: Steaens Creek (Class C)
Name of nearest'fraAitional Na��igable \Vater (TIVIV) lnto �rhich the nqiurtie resource Oo�rs: Pieeon Riecr (Prench Broad River Basin)
Neme of �vatershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 0601010b0303
� Check if mnp/diagrom ol revie�v area and/or potential jurisdictionnl nreas is/are aeuilable upon request.
❑ Check if o�her sites (e.g.. oflsite mitiga(ion si�es. disposal sites, elc... ) are associnted ���ith �his action nnd nre. recorded on a
ditl�crau JD (orm.
D. R6A'IC\5' P�RFORVIED f'OR SITC EVAL.UATION (CHCCK ALL THA'T APPLI'):
� Oflice (Desk) Detcrminntion. Date: 7-23-IS
� Cicld Deteimination. Uate(s): 9-10-13
SCCTION 11: SUDIDIARI' OR FINDINGS
A. RIIA SCCTION f0 DETEI2DIWA"PION OP JURISDICTIO�.
There ,Are nu "um�ignble irn�ers oJ t/re CLS." �vithin Rivers and Harbors Act (RIiA) jurisdic�ion (as defined by 33 CCR part 329) in the
rcvicw arca [Rer�nire�IJ
❑ 1Va�crs subjeet to the ebh and Flow of the tide.
❑\Yaters nre przsently used, or have been used in the pas-t, or may bz susecptible for use to Vanspoh interstate� or toreign commerce.
Gsplain:
B. CR'A SECTION 404 DCTER�IINATION O� JU2ISDICTIOY.
There Are "irn�ers o) the US." �viihin Cleun 1Vn�u Act (C\VA) jurisdic[ion (as defined 6r 33 CFR pnrt 328) in the revie�c arex. �2equiredJ
I. �Vnters of the U.S.
n. Indicnfe presence of waters of U.S. in revie�r area (check nll thnt npply): �
❑ 1NVVs. includine territorial seas
❑ Wetlantls aci,lncent to TNVVs
� Rela�ivelr pennanent «�ntcrs (RPAVs) thnt flo�c direelly or indirectly into "CN\Vs
❑ Non-RPA1's Iha� flow directly or indireclly into'INVVs
❑ A1'e�lnnds Aireetly abutting 2PlVs �hat llo�v directly or indirecdy into TNWs
❑ VVetlands a�jacent to but not directly abutting RPAVs �hnt (lo�v directly or indirectly into TNVVs
❑ AVetlands a�jacent to non-RPVVs Ihnt Flo�v direetlp or indirectly into �INVVs
❑ Impoundments ofjurisdictional o�aters
❑ Isolated (interstatc or imr�s�ate) �vaters, includine isolated we�lnnds
b. Idenfify (estimate) size of �vsters of tlie U.S. in tl�e revicw nren:
non-���etlnnd ��°aters: 200 linear Ceee >' width (R) ancVor neres.
lVetlands: ncres.
c. Limifs (bom�dnries) ofjurisdiction based on: Estnblished by 011�1'Dl.
Eleantion of cstnblished OHVVM (if knu�vn): .
2. Non-regidntedo�ntershvetlands(checl<iSopplicnble):'
❑ Potentiallp jurisdic�ional aaters end/or �vetlands were nssessed ���ithin �hz revie�v nren nnd de[enuined �o Lie not I���isdic�ionnl.
Gsplain:
' 6o�es checked belo�c s6all be suppohed by comple[ing the nppropri�tesections in Seclinn III belo�s.
' for pu�yose� of �his Pomi, an RPR' is de�ned �s � Iributaq� tha� is not a"fN1V nnd Ihot Iypic,iliy flo«� penrmund or has continuous Flo�c a� letis[ "sensonnlly"
(e.g, tppicnlly 3 mon�hs).
' Supporiine documanlalion is presented in Sec�ion III.P.

SLC"I'ION III: CR'A ANALYSIS
A. TY�Vs AND R'CTLANDS AUJACENT TO TN�Vs
The ngencies will nssert jurisdiction over TN�Vs nud �retlmids ndjncent to TN��'s. If the nquatic resource is n 7'MV, complete
Section III.A.I oud Section III.D.1. mily; if lhe nquntic resource is n wetlmid adjacent to a TN\4, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
nnd Secfion III.U.I.; other�vise, see Secliou III.B below.
I. "1'N�V
Iden(ily TN\1':
Suminarize rationnle supporting determinntion:
2. �Vetland adjacent to TNR'
Summnrize ra�ionale suppoding conclusion that u�eUnnd is °ncijacenf':
B. CHARACTf RISTICS OI� '1'R113UTARY (THAT IS NOT A TN�V) AND ITS ADJACENT �VETLANDS (If ANl'):
This section summarizes inPormntiou regnrding chnr�cteristics of the h�ibutary and its adjacent wetlniuls, if any, ond it helps
defermine whetlier m� not the sinndnrds forjm�isdiction established under Rnpnnashnve been met.
Thc ngencies will nssert jurisdiction over non-nm�ignble h'ibufnrics of TNNs where tl�e tribufaries nre "relatively permanent
wnters" Q2P�Ys), i.e. tributnries ihnl t}�picnllp Oo�v year-iround or h:rve mntinuous ilo�v nt lenst sensonally (e.g., typicnlly 3
months). A we�lm�d thnt directly abuts an RP\V is also jw�isdictiounl. If the nquntic resom�ce is imt n TN�1', but hns yem�-round
(perenninl) Ilow, sl<ip to Section III.U1. If the nquntic resow�ce is n�retlnnd direc�ly nbu�fing n �ributnry with perenninl ilo�r,
sl<ip to Section III.UA.
A wetlnnd tlint is ndjncent to but that does uo[ directly nbul nn RP��' requires n significnnt necus evnluntion. Corps districts and
EPA regions n�ill inelude in ihe record miy nvnilnble information Ihat documents the e�istence of a signifeant ne�us behreen n
rcl�ticely permanent tributory thnt is not perennial (and its adjacent �retlands if any) nnd n trnditionnl nnvignble water, eren
ihough n signilicnut nexus finding is not required as m m�tfer of law.
If the wsiterbody' is not nn RP�V, or n wetinnd directly nbutting nn RPR', n JD will require ndditionnl dntn to determinc if thc
�rnterbody hns n significmrt nesus with a"I'N�V. If the U�ibidn�}� h�s ndjncent wcllnnds, ihe significmif nezus evnluntion must
consider the �ributary in combination �ritl� nll oPits ndjacent ���etlnnds. This significont nezus evaluation that combines, Cor
nnalyticol pw�poses, ihe �ributmy nnd nli o( ifs adjocent �vetlmids is used �vheWer the review m�en ideutilied in ihc JD rcqucst is
ihe tributnry, m� i�s ndjncent weH:inds, m� both. IPihe JD covers n tributm�c with ndjncent we�lnnds, complefe Sectian 111.B.1 fm�
the tributary, Seetion III.B.2 fm� nny onsitc wetlnnds, and Section ]II.I3.3 fm� all wetlnnds �idjacent to tlint tributm�y, bofh onsite
and offsite. The deferminntion whetl�er a significnnt nesus esists is determined in Section IILC below.
L Chnrncterisfics oPnon-TNR's tlint Oow direcfir or inclirec�ly into "PN\V
(i) Gcnernl Arca Conditions:
\1'ntershed size: Pick List
Drninage aren: Piek List
Acem;e annual rainfnll: inches
A��crngc nnnual sno�rfall: inches
(ii) Physical Chm�nclerisfics:
(a) Relationshiu �rith 7T1V:
❑ Tribu�an� Flo�cs directly into TI�N.
❑"Prihulaq� flo�vs �hrou�h Pick List tribu�nries before entering TNVV.
Project watcrs nrc Picle List river miles li�om TNVV.
Projcet �vnters are Picl< List river miles from RPAV.
Prolect �caters are Piel< List aerinl (str�ight) miles from'INVV.
Prolect o'alers are Picic List acrinl (straight) miles from RPAV.
Project �saters cross or serve ns state boundaries. Esplain: .
Identify (lo��� rowe to TNVA'`: .
'Pributaq� stream order, if laio�vn:
' No�z �hnt �he Ins�niclional GuiJebaaA conlnins additiannl intommtion rcgnrding s�cales, ditches, wnshes, nnd erosinnal fcatures �enzmlly and in Ihz nrid
VVesl.
' flo�c wute cnn be descri6ed by idenliCyiue, ee.. IeibWnq� a, ivhich ilo�cs �hroug6 (he meie�c arcq to ilo�c into Icibutaq� b, �chich then tlo�cs into "I N14.

(b) Genera�l'fribulan� Characteristics (chcek �II �hnt �ooh�l:
'Pributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (mnn-mnde). E�plain: .
❑ A�(anipulntcd (mun-altered). E�plain:
Tribufnry propcities �vilh respec� to top of bank (cstiinatc):
Arcraec a-idth: feet
Arernge depth: feet
Averege side slopes: Pick Lisl.
Primar}� Iributary substraie eomposi�ion (check all Ihut �ipply):
❑ Silts ❑ Snnds ❑ Concrctc
❑ Cobblcs ❑ Gravel ❑ bluck
❑ I3edrock ❑ Veeeia�ion. Typc/%cover:
❑ Othcr. Gspinin: .
"I'ributary condi�ion/stability �c.@., highlp eroding. sloughine banks]. Explain:
Presence of rw✓ritile/pool compleses'. Esplain: .
Tributnq� geometry: Picl< List
Tributmy grnAient (npproxiinate averaee slope): %
(c) Flo�v:
'1'ributaq� provides loc Pick List
Gstima�c nva�ngc numher of Flo�v events in revic��� nre;✓yenr: Piek Lisl
Describe ilo��� reeime: .
Otlier infommlion ou durntion nnd volume: .
Surfncc ilo�v is: Pick List Charactcris�ics:
Subsurfacc flo���: Pick Lisf. E�plain lindings:
❑ Dyc (or o�her) test performed: .
Tributarp hns (chcck nll dmt apply):
❑ 13ed and banks
❑ OHIVNIb (chcck nll indicnrors that apply):
❑ cicar, na�urnl line imprzssed on �he bank
❑ changes in tlie character of soil
❑ shelving
❑ vcgetntion matted do�rn, 6en1, or absent
❑ lenf litter dislurbed or �vashcd n«�ny
❑ sediment deposition
❑ �vntcr stnining
❑ othtr(IisQ:
❑ Discontinuous OI11VibL' Esplain: .
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
thc prescncc of li��cr nnd dcbris
destruction of �errestrial vegelation
the presencc oC�vrnck linc
sedimen� sorting
scour
nwliiple obsen�ed or predimed tlo�v crarts
nbrup[ chnnge in pinnt conununiq,
It fac�ors other tlian the OHVA'M ���cre used lo determine I�teral es�ent of CAYA jurisdiclion (check all th�t npply):
❑ 1-ligh Tide Line indicntcd by: ❑ �1ean High AVa�er blark indicaled by:
❑ oil or scum line nlong shore objects ❑ survcy to nrnilnblc dnhnn;
❑ fine shell or de6ris deposits (forzshore) ❑ physicnl merkines;
❑ physical markines/chnracteristics ❑ reeetalion lines%changes in vegetation q�pes.
❑ lidal gauges
❑ ofhcrQist):
(iii) Cliemical Char:�eteristics:
Chnrae�erizz tributary (e.g., a�ater color is eleac discolorecl, oily film; �vater qualiqe general �vatershed chaeacteris[ies, etc.).
Esplain: . ,
Iden�ify spccitic pollutnnts. if kno�cn: .
`A naiural o� man-inada disconlinui[y in Ihe OI1lV\9 does nnt neeess�eily secee jurisdic�ion (e.g.. �chera tl�e slreom temporarily Flo�cs underground, o� �chere
�he OHR'M has been remoceA bp derelopmenl nr a^_eicuhuml prnc�ices). \Vhere �here is a break in Ihe OH\VW Ihal is unrelated to the �cnte�bodp's Oo�c
rc_inre (c.e.. Flo�c orzr a rock oulc�op or Ihrough a culvert). �he agencies �cill Wok li�� indicalor ol Ilo�e nbore and 6elow lhe brenA.
9bid.

(iv) i3iologicnl Chm�ncfcris�ics. Chnnuel supports (checl< nll flinl npply):
❑ Ripm�inn corridoc Characteris�ics (�rpe. aver�ee �vid�h): .
❑ \VeUend fringz. Charnctcristics: .
❑ I Inbil�t tbr.
❑ Federally I,isted spccics. P,�plain tindings: .
❑ Fisli/sp.ncn fireas. h;spinin tindines: .
❑ Olher environmentally-sensitivc spccies. 8xplain Ilndings: .
❑ Aquatich��il�life dicersiq'. B�pinin findings: .
2. Charncteristics of wetlnnds ndjncent to non-TNR'that ilo�r directly or indirectl}� into TNVA'
(i) Pl�ysicol Char;icferisfics:
(a) Genenil AVetlnnA Charnctcristics:
Properties:
VA'ctlmid size: acres
VA'etland tgpe. F,spinin: .
1Vctland qualiq�. E�plain: .
Prqlect �ceUnnds cross or ser��e as state boundaries. F;�plain:
(b) General Flo�v Rela�ionship ���ith Non-TN1V:
�lo�r is: Pick List Expinin: .
SurFice flo�v is: Picl<List
Ch�rncteris�ics: .
Subsurfncc Oo�v: Pick Lisk Expluin tindings:
❑ Dye (or othcr) tcst perfonned: .
(c) Nctland Adiacenc�� Detennination �vith Non-TNN:
❑ Directiy abuttine
❑ Not directlp abuttine
❑ Discrete �ceUand hydrologic mnnec�ion. Explain:
❑ Gcologicalconnec�ion. Esplein: .
❑ Separn�ed by bcrn�/bnrria�. Csplain: .
(d) Prosimit�� (Relntionshi ro TNlA'
Prqject �ve�lnnds nre Pick List rirer miles (rom TN1V.
Pr�jecl wa�ers are Pick List aerinl (strai=ht) miles fiom T'NIV.
Plon� is tiom: Picl< List.
8stinmte appro�im�te locntion of �eetland ns ���i�hin the Pick List Floodpinin.
(ii) Chemical Charnctcristics:
Char.icterize �cetlnnd system (e.g.. wa�cr color is elemt bro�vn. oil film ou sudace: ���a�er qunlity: general ���atershed
chnmcteristics; etc.). Esplain: .
Idcntifj� spccillc pollutants, if kno�vn: .
(iii) Biologicnl Chnrneteristies. AVetlnnd supports (check nll thnt npply):
❑ Ripnrinn bWlic Chai�icteris�ics (h�pe, evemge �cidth): .
❑ Vegcmtion type/percent corer. F.spinin: .
❑ I lnbitnt for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Espinin tindings: .
❑ Pisl�spa�rn areas. Esplain tindings: .
❑ Othcr environmentally-s'ensitive species. Explain findinos: .
❑ Aquntic/�vildlifc di��ersity. E�plain findings: .
3. Charncferistics of nll �retinnds �idjncent to the tributary (if nny)
All ���c�land(s) being considered in the cumulntive nnnlpsis: Picl< List
Appro�imntcly ( ) acres in toml are being considered in �hc cumulatiae annlysis.

Por cach ���c�lmid, spccifi� �hc follo�cing:
Directiv nhu�s? (1'M) Size (in acres) Directlr abuts? (YN) Size (in acres)
Swnmarize overnll biologicnl, chemical imd physicnl fune�ions being perComied: .
C. SIGNICICAVT N�VUS DET�R�IINATION
A significnnf nexus annlysis ���ill nssess tlie ilow ch:u�octeristics nnd funetions of the tributary itself anA the funetions performed
by nny wetlands adjncent to the tributary to defermine if they significmdly nffect the chemicnl, physicnl, nnd biological integrity
of n T\R'. P'm� ench o(the following sifuations, a significnnt nexus esisls if the iributary, iu combimition �eilh nll of its ndjacent
wetlands, hns more than a speculatire or insubstnntinl e(fect mi the chemicnl, physicnl nnd/m� biologicnl iutegrity of n TNR'.
Considerations �vhen evnlunting significnnt nexus include, but are not limifed to the volume, duration, nnd fi�equency of tlie �ow
of �vnter in fhe tributnry nnd its proxiinih� to a"CNR', and the Punetions performed by Uie h�ibutary and all its adjacent
weUnnds. It is not npproprinle to determine significant ne�us based solely on any specific threshold oPdistance (e.g. behveen a
tributm�y nnd its ndj�cen� �retland m� bet�veen a U�ibulnry nud ihe TNR'). Similarly, the fnct mi ndjacenl weUand lies �vithin or
outside of a f7oodploin is imt solely determinntive of significnnt nexus.
Drnw connecfious behreeu the Pentures documented and the effecfs on the TN�S', ns identitied in the Napnuns Guidance nnd
discussed in tlie Instructional Guideboole. �nctors to consider include, fm� exnmplc
• Does ihe tribu�aq�, in combina�ion �cith its ncl.jncenl �ceUnnds (if nny), heve lhe c�pacitp lo carq� pollu�ants or flood waters to
TNV�'s, or to reduce the amounl ot pollutnnts or �ood «�a�ers renching a'IT\V?
• Does the tribwap�, in combinalion with its adaceu� �cetlnnds (if nnr), proriAe hnbitnt and lifeerele support hinetious for tish nnd
o�her species, such as feeding. nesiine, spm��ning. or renrine young for spccics �hnt nrc present in Ihc 9'N\V?
• Does �he tribulaiy, in combina�ion n�itl� its adjacen� ���ctlands (il nny). have the capacity �o hmnsCcr nutrients and oreanic carbon that
support do�cnstream food�vebs?
• Docs the tribWnry. in combinn�ion �ritli i�s adjacenl ��atlands (il any), have other relationships to �he physical, chemicnl, or
biological integriq� of theTNN?
\otr. the nbore lisf of considerations is not inclusire nnd ather functions obserred a� I<no��•n to occw� shoulcl be documented
belo�r:
I. Significnnt nezus findings (or non-RP�V tlint hns im ndjncent wetlands nnd Oo�rs directly m� indirectly iuto TNNs. E�plain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus bclow. bascd on thc tribulary itself. �hcn go to Scction IILD: .
2. Significant nezus findings fm� non-RP�V and its ndjncent wetlnnds, where the non-RP\V Oows directly or indirectly into
'PN�A's. Esplain findines of presence or absenee of signific�nt nesus belo�c, bnsed on �he tribulnq� in eombinntion �vith nll of i�s
adl�cent �retlands, ihen go to Section III.D: .
3. Significnnt nezus findings for �vetlands adjncent to nn RP\\' but ihnt do uot direclly nbut �he RPR'. Gxplain tindings ul
presence or a6s-ence of sieni�icant nesas belo�r. bnsed on Uie tributnry in coinbin�tion ���ith all of its nci,l��ent �cetlnnds, then go �o
Section III.D: .
D. DETCRAIINATIONS OT JURISDICTIONAL RINDINGS. THE SUUJEC"C �YATERSAVE"1'LANDS A[LE (CHECI( ALL
THAT APPLI'):
I. TN\5's nnd Adjncent \Vetlands. Check all thn� appir nnd proride size es�inm�es in reaic�c area:
❑ TNVVs: linear 1'eet �vid�h (d), Or, neres. .
❑ VVetlands adjacen� to TNVVs: acres.
2. ItP\\'s Hiot Oo�r directiv or indirectiv into TN1Vs.
�"fributaries of TT Ws �vhue iributarics q�picnlly Flo�v ycnrvrounA nrz I��risdic�ionnl. Proridc dntn nnd rntionale indicntine that
Iributaq� is perennial: There is n�vcll-defineA eh�nnel nnd �he strenm is sho�cn ns n perenninl slrenm on �he USGS topograhie
map.
❑'I�ributnries of'ITI\V �chero �ribuwries have continuo�u Ilo�v "seasonally" (e.g., �ypically three months each year) are
juris-diclional. Da�a supponing tliis conclusion is provided nt Section III.d. ProriAe rntionnie indienting thnt tributnq� flo�es
seasonall��: .

Provide es�ima�es for jurisdictional ���aters in �hc recic�v aren (chcck nll thn� npplr):
� "fributaq� �caters: 200 liuear Ceet 5' �vid�h (it).
❑ Olher non-�retland o�aters: acrzs.
Iden�ily type(s) of�caters: .
3. Non-RP�Ys" ihnf Ilo�s direcfly or indirectlr into TNR's.
❑ Nmerbody �hat is not n"INVV or nn RNVV, bW flo�cs directly or indirectly into a TNVA', mid it has a significmit nesus o�ith a
T1JN isjurisdictionnl. Dnt� supporting this conclusion is prorided al Section IILC.
Provide esiim�tes fnr jurisdiclional �vaters �cithin tlie re��ie�v arca (eheck all thnt npply):
❑ 'I'ributarr �r�uer;: linear lect �rid�h (ft).
❑ Oiher nou-�retland �caters: neres.
Iden�ify tppe(s) of�ratcrs: .
J. �Vetl�ndsdireetl�� abu[ting nn RPAA' Ihnt Oow directly or indirecfly into TNVA's.
❑VVcUnnds directly abul RPAV and thus arejurisdietional as adjnecnt ���etlnnds.
❑ lVetlunds directly abw�ine mi RPW ���here tributarics t}°picnllr Flo�v yenr-round. Provide dntn nnd rntionnle
indicating Iha( tribut�ry is pereiuiinl in Section IIID2. ahove. Prm�ide auionale indicating that �celland is
direc�ly nbutting �n RPVA': .
❑AA'etlends directly abutting an 2PN �ehere tributarics typicnlly Flo�v "sensonnlly." Proeidc da�n indicn�ing �hnt tribatnry is
seaso�ml in Section III.B and mtionnle in Sec�ion III.D2, ubove. Proride rationale indicating thnt �cetlund is diroc�ly
abutting nn RP1V: .
ProviAe ncreage estimates Corjurisdictional �retlands in the rerie�c nren: ncres.
5, \Vetlnnds adjncent to but not direclly nbulting nn RP��' thnt Ilow direcfl�� or indirectly into T\\1's.
❑AVetlands �hat do no� direcfly abW nn RPAA', bul �chen considtred in combin�ition �vith �he tribu�nry to o•hich Ihe}' are u�jacent
and �vi�h similnrly situnted n�lxcent �cetlands, have a signi(icant nesus ���ith a 7TVV are I�irisidictional. Data supporting Ihis
conclus-ion is provided al Section IILC.
Pro��ide aerene.e estimnles for jurisdiclionnl �cetlands in tl�e revie��� aren: acres.
G. �Vetlnnds ndjncent to non-RI'\Vs that flow directly m� indirectly into TNR's.
❑�Vetlnnds ncl,l��ent tu such �caters, and have �vhcn considcrcd in coinbinntion ���ith thc tribwnq� �o �ehich thcy nrc ndjncent nnd
�citli similarly situated adjnecn� �rcUnnds, have a significfmt nesus �vith a'fNV1' are I������dictional. Data supporting this
eonclusion is provided nt Section IILC.
Provide estinr.ites f'orjurisdic�io�ml �ve�lm�ds in [he rzrie��� nren: ncres.
7. Impoundments ofjurisdictionnl wntcrs.'
As- u geneial rule, Ihe impoundmcnt of n I��risdictionnl tributun� rtmtiins lurisdictional.
❑ Demons�rate tha� impoundment �cns cmn�ed from "weter, oC�he U.S.;' or
❑ Demons�imte thnt �c�ter meets the criteria for one ofthe wtegories presented abore ( I-6), or
❑ Demonstrate tha� �cu�er is isoluted �rilh a ne�us to commeree (see F, belo�r).
E. ISOI,ATED �IN"P�RS'I'A'PE OIt INTRA-STATE� �VAT6RS, I\CI.UDINC ISOI,ATCD \VETI,ANDS, TIIG USG,
DEGILADATION OR DESTRUCTION OC A�'IIICH COULD AI'P EC'1' IN'fERS'I'A'PE CO�AliA1ERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH \VATERS (CIII:CI< ALL THA"P APPLI'):1°
❑�chich ure or could be used by interstate or foreign trnvelers for recrentional a other purposes.
❑ Gom ���hich �ish or shclltish nre or could be teken and sold in imers�ate or lorei�n commerce.
❑���hieh nre or could be used for industrial purposes by indus[rics in interstnte eommeree.
❑ Interstate isolated �vaters. �splain: .
❑ O�her Cuttors. E�plain: .
"See Poo�noie N 3.
' To complztz �he onnlysis refer ta Ihe key in Seclion III.Db ol Ihc Inslruc�ionnl Guidzbook.
°' Priur lu nsserling ar dcclining C\PA jnrisdietiun based solely on Ihis cnfegm���, Corps Uish�icls �sill elernle Ihe ncliun fo Cm�ps nnd GY,111Q for
recie�c consistent �cilh Ihe prncess descrihed in Il�e Corpsll:PA�1/emnrrmduni Hegnrding CII'A.le! Jiuisdiclinrt FoNou•ing Rnpnnns.

Identify watcr body nud summm�izc rn�ionale suppm4ing detrrminntion:
Provide estimntcs 1'or jurisdic�ionnl �raters in �he revie��� nrca (clieck;ill (hnt apply):
❑ Tributaq� �vntcrs: linet�r fee� �cidth (li).
❑ Olhcr non-�vetlnnd ���a�crs: iicrzs.
Identilp lype(s) ot �va�ers: .
❑ \Vctlands acres.
R. NON-JUIiISDICTIONALVA'ATERS,IYCLUDINGAVF.TLANDS(CII�CI<ALL7'HATAPPLI'):
❑ If po�en�ial �vetlands were nssessed within (he revic�r ama. Ihese nre�s did no� meel the critcrin iu �hc 1987 Corps of En�inacrs
VVe�land Dclincalion �dnnunl nnd/or appropri.ile Regionnl Supplemen�s.
❑ Rcrie�v aret� incluAcd isolaled wNen �vi�h no subsmntial nexus to inters�ale (or forcigu) coininerce.
❑ Prior �o Ihc Jan 2001 Supreme Cowt decision in ",SII',I�VCC.° tlre revie��� nrca a�ould have 6een regulated based solelr on ihe
.bligratoq� 13ird Rule' (��IBR).
❑\Vn�ers do not mee� �he °SigniOcnnt Ne�us" s�nndard. �vhere such n tindine is required forjurisdiction. E�plain: .
❑ Olher: (cxplain, if not covered abo�•e): .
Provide acreage es�imntes for non-I����isdictional wtrters in thc rerie�c aren. �vhere (ho sole potential bnsis ofjurisdiciion is the V46R
tnctors (i.e.. presenec of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of wn�cr for irrigated agriciJturc), using best professionnl
judgmcnt (check all �hnt npply):
❑ Non-���e�land �vn�crs (i.c., rivers. s�renms): lincar feet �vidlh (li).
❑ L�kcs/ponds: ticres.
❑ Other non-�vetland �vaters: acres. List type of nqun�ic resource: .
❑ Netlands: acres.
Providc acreage estimn�cs lor non-jurisdictionnl wa�crs in �he revie�v nren �ha� do nn� mcct �hc "Significnnt News" s�andard, �shere such
a Gnding is i�:quired for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Nou-���e�land �vnters (i.e.. rivers. strenms): linear feec �vidth (Il).
❑ Lnkcs/ponds: �cres.
❑ O�her non-���e�land �vnters: acres. List type of nqualic resom�ce: .
❑ \Ve�limds: acres.
SCCTION 1\': DATA SOURCES.
SUPPOI27'INU DATA. Uatn reviewed for JD (check nll tl�nt npply - ci�ecked i�cros slmll be includcA in case tile and, �vherc checked
xnd requcsted, approprintely reference sources bclo���):
�A4nps, plans, plots or pint submilled by or on behalf oCtlie npplicanUconsultanC 7J-I5.
❑ D��hi shec�s prepared/submitted by or on behnlf ofthe npplicanUconsultnn�.
❑ 011ice coneurs ���iih diria shecls/dclinea�ion repur�.
❑ 011ice does not concw� o�ith dnta shee�s/dclinca�ion repuit.
❑ Dnta sheets prepnre<I by �he Corps: .
❑ Corps nnvieable �vn�ers' s�udy: .
❑ U.S. Geological Surrey I lydrologic Atlas: .
❑ USGS NI ID da�n.
❑ USGS R nnd 12 digit HUC mnps.
� U.S. Gcological Swvep map(s). Cite scnle �C. qund name: L2d,000; Cove Geek Gnp .
❑ USUA Nntucal Resources Consereation Serrice Soil Sun�ev. Ci�n�ion: .
❑ Ntllion�l �rctlmids inventory nmp(s). Cite n;�me: .
❑ Sln�e/Local n�etland inven�o�y map(s): .
❑ PEMA/PlfU�l nwps: .
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevnlion is: (National Geodeclic Vcrtical Dalum of 1929)
� Photograplis: ❑ Aerial (Name F Date): .
or � Othcr (Name & Da�c): Projcet Site 6-I J 5.
❑ Proeious dctermination(s). C'ilc no. and dele of responsc letter: .
❑ Appliceble/supporlingca�seln�v: .
❑ Applicable/suppo�ting scientific liternture: .
❑ Other informn�ion (please specif}•): .
I3. ADDI'1'IONALCODiD9CNTSTOSUPPORTJD:

:-°°,.� a�=-=�
� G�`��t�r'i',1��,Sj
��,� -. .,
�•),:�,� ;�
� �-� . ; �
,� u
Projtd %7'arkiiig n'n.(/ul.rna( lJ�e)
13-08-0041
HISTORIC ARCHITCCTURC AND LANDSCAPCS
NO HISTORIC PROP�RTI�S PR�S�NT OR ATr�CTCD TORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project It
is not valid for Archaeological Resotuces. You must wnsult sepaiately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJCCT INPORMATION
Pi•ojec/ No: Corruly: Haywood
{VBSNo.: 17I3.14.R.95 Docru�ieut PCE or MCC
Ty��e:
Te�(. Aid No: NlA T��nding: � State ❑ Pederal
Ferlerrd ❑ Yes ❑ No Perv�it NWP3, NWPl4, &'CVA
Permit(s : Ty/�e(s):
Proiect Descrrn(ion:
Re �lace Bridge No. 372 over Steven's Creek ai SR 134( (White O�k Rd.).
SUMMAI2Y OF HISTORIC ARCH[T�CTUR� ANll LANDSCAP�S RTVI�W
� There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of
potential effects.
� There are no properties less than fifty years old �vhich are considered to �neet Giteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties �vithin the project's area of potential effects.
� There are properties over fifty years old within the area oFpo[ential effecfs, but they do not
meet the criteria For listing on the National Register.
� There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
Date of field visit: Octobcr 29, 2013
Descriuliou of �'evieiv nctivities, resrdls, rrsd coudr�sioiis:
Review oF HPO qund mnps, HPO GIS informntiou, historic designalions rosler, and indeses was undertaken on
August 19, 2013. Bnsed on [his review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DG, or SS properties in �he Aren of
Po[enli�l Eftects, which is 75' fi�ont the cenlerlit�e each tvay :tnd 300' fi�om each end of the bridge. There is a 1940s
house �nd oulbuilding complex directly west of the bridge and n swvey was required to nssess �he slructure.
There are lwo properties in Ihe APE over fifly yenrs of age. 304 Sleven's Creek, buih c. 1948 northwest of ihe
bridge, is � one-story gable-eud frame colt�ge �vith composite siding and a s��nding seam metal rooE 'fhe house is
unremnrknble and h�s undergone many mnterial ch�nges, including repl�cement of ihe siding, roof, windows, and
enhy doors, and is no[ eligible for National Register listiug.
A log �nd frame b�rn loc�ted soulh of Bridge No. 372 mny be associaled wilh �he house �l 304 Steven's Creek
Road. The centrnl core of the bain is log construction, while �he shed-roofeA outer addilions are frame consh uclion.
The barn has lost origival materi�ls Ihrough delerior�tion and Ihe shed-roof porlions appear [o be additions to �he
slructure. The barn is unremark�ble nnd has lost in�egrity of design and mnterinls; it is not eligible for Nnlionnl
Regisler listing.
Bridge No. 372, built 1962, is not eligible 1'or Nalionnl Regis[er lisliug. There are no Na�ional Register listed or
elieible orooerties within Ihe APE. If desien ulans cl�nnae, addilion�l review �vill be required.
iu,m�r�
PNgrnlllbinllf ASIi0tl12111.
P�ge 1 of 4

SUPPORT DOCUMCNTATION
�Map(s) ❑Previous Su�vey Info. �Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
PINDING BY NCDOT ARCH[TECTUI2AL HISTORiAN
HIS(Ot'1C At'CI11fCCfU1"C iittC� L�II(�SC1�)CS — NO IIIS7'ORIC PROPCR7'IGS PRESE�T OR AFRI;C"I'b;U
i � �
,.��r��` �_ I����;��,�1� �G��-���,s
,
NCDOT Arehitectural Historiau Date
�
)
,�;u.
���:,,;�: . . t7
i�„ i�: �t. � .
i.
i'h'k
f.en'.tl?�y
���
�1.\
1
Project Localim�.
u.a �m�
crrraiay
,IJ r.
111
(i
�/
��
�:rn 8 �
Nl�rwlo Ardillrilurs nuA/ me6en�xs NO H1.S1(l2IC PFOYl7t]/ES P/UiSI:A'/'O/7 AF/4iCT/iDfn�ni fiirdliear ihmqroilnNou Yrul�'�R ns Q�mll� �/ in lAr IU09
I'rogrmnrnnrirARrremrui.
Page 2 of 4

1 ,y'�� �
r ''
� � J ��.,
J i t�¢
j T�A I �
� lll;:�'. . i ��� ..': 1-
/ fj y.. �
r�, �+ e F
I � `� � •�� � l ��
f I��I c ��'e>��
�f ' .
�7:,, ..,.;,. ;:
J
. , • i�yy~ j,�',� . p4 � �
.��'� ��� ?y � �'•• � � 4' :
' � diQ:�' i . y.'..,}V�:
. ,� 1 L.'��(+� gx` ���� �� <7:�,
a � i � � A,' `� '- .
�g 3'
�� �� � ,.��t {e �.�'YDr• .�� ; ,
r ; d' Y�, t .�'.
,; t_, � Kk ;� :
� �?i ' , ' i� �' : 'i'
.' f � t � :� �t'
. ,� � �'� � � 1 ,&
, 3 ;, � �
� F+� ,
;,� � �.
s � - `icpg
,. �i I��j��
; �.
....�`�. . .. .. .._
.. '.4_-.:;...._,_,_ . . '
�arm complcx mul bridgc loca(ion, luol<iug wcet.
304 Steven's Ceeelc Ro�d, no[ NR cligible.
�ra���r��.i,d�r�������.<<,�,�rz�„�✓r���,�,�. xo Htsinmr raorr>'�tn�s� re��:er„vr ua n�a�itor;ul�����lo,�er��o. rm,�,���,����o,� r.��.�n, o� u,���f��d ��, �n�� ion�
Yrogromnmiie .IGn en�au.
P1ge 3 of 4

i r �
�' I1� I!
���i� � f � ��H
��� ( ' i� I .��
i '
� _+ . � ' � .rr
�� �r
� � .
�
, � �_ � i i _ i ' i
�- ��,+� � i , , � �, 1 ;� :
'ssy c . ��. -a
��#' t� ` Y' s
r;h r ;�r f �--_
� :t. �
a '..
t
�+� �?r ��`��.4` �
� 'e" °
�_,. , ,� .� a
4.�
h
. . . �lr� .l.�i`^.]SJ �Aji��.�. .". Y ��Y
. � , . � �'/�• �AI
1 ��
�'I�
' �.'
� S �}J � � � � ; :, � ,
�. � � C . , � �.1�: � � _. r r r4�� �< �.�,�.-v�
�+� *u" •� j ; �: �.� + ' � � � t, �r , Y, �
.y l
� z !�'� �r'�i�: i�7,�" �r � � 4 �' -5 �� d�.:".-� �`� �
^�7�y �t�' .;�r! i��' �� � �
•� _�� � � f � .
� � I �� �r� 5�h��� - W � ��� ��
., � ri- � y '"Y A„(�t �,s�i� ���zi i � ' ai, �.
j ( � ' 4 al 1 n.+ �'� � , �' + �S � . �` � ' 6
�.F. fe` =':�:'!j� < i �.., '_��*�r7�A� <�l`9�. )srt. . . � . .
I3�rn south of Slevcu's Crcel< Rond, not NR cligiblc.
i�•�.�+"�� .
� �.
{ �i•.
,� + !
t , c 'j`r�
i lr�i}t, ��i�.
.... . ,<��a
13arn smith of Steven's Creelc Ro�J, nol NR eligible.
fli�Iwlc.IrrLlrecnu-r nnALmulrrnpes A'O f//STONICYROP/ilt%///J PRES6N]'OR.IFFfC//iD fmrn/orA/iuw Tronxporinllan Prol�•�la ar [hml!/led L� Ihr 200]
Piugrv�mnnlie Agrrrniee�.
Page 4 of 4

Projee( 7}ncking A'o.:
13-08-0041
NO NATIONAL RCGIST�R Or HISTORIC PLACF,S
°�✓;y�, CLIGIBLG OR LISTED ARCHA�OLOGICAL SPCLS �nti'U\
�UL °'°�i PI2�S�N'1' OR AI'['�CTCD I+ORM „ l� �I �'�
i-.� v�f �'?'j� This form only perlains �o ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES (or Ihis projecl 1� is nol ��. ri��L� ,;, '
���,'«�� v�lid lor Hisloric Archileclure nnd Lnndscapes. You must consull sepnrately with ihe ��?.� a:'/
f-lis�oric Amhitecturo and Landsenpes Group.
PROJGCT INTORMA'fION
Project No STRN43D372 -BRIDGE 372 �bun(y: Haywood
NlJSNo: 176P.14.R95 DocmnenC MCS
/'✓1. No: u/a b'midr�tg: � S�ate ❑ �ederal
I%edernlPernirl2equired"l � Yes ❑ No PeruiilType: Nafiou�vide3Sc14,TVA
Projec( Descri��lrnn: 'Phis projcet is �n intensive archaeologicTl survey and evnluntion for ihe
repl�ceiuent of[3ridge No. 372 on SK134G (While Oak/Stevens Creek Ro�cl) over Stevens Creek (\NE3S
No. 17BP.I4.R95; PA No. 13-08-0041) in Haywood County, North Cnrolina. As spcciticd by �hc
NCDOT, the survey corridor (Arc� of Poten�ial Effects [APE]) for archaeology is extends 300 feet (91 �14
m) noriheast and 300 feet (91.44 m) southwest along SR1346 fiom either end of [3ridge No. 372. Thc
corridor is appinximately I50 feet (45.73 ro) wide extending 75 feet (22.8G m) on ei�her sidc of SR 134G
from its present center.
SUMNIARY Or ARCHACOLOGICAL I'INDINGS
The Norlh Cnro/inu Depnrliuenl oJ'Trnnspo�7�dio�r (NCDO'f) �l rchrreo/o�p Gror��� revieived
!he suGjecl pi•ojec! nnd r!eler»�ine�l:
� There are no National Register listed ARCHAIiOLOGICAL SITES within the project's
area of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface nrchaeologicnl investigations �re required For this project.
❑ Subsucfnce inves[ig�tions did not revcll the presence of any �rchneologicnl resowces.
� Substu face investigntions dicl not reveal lhe presence of any �rchaeological resources
considered eligible for lhe N�tion�l Rcgister,
❑ All identified arch�eological sites locntecl within the APC hnve been considered �nd nll
compli�nce for �rchneologic�l resomces with Section 106 of the National Historic
Prese�v�tion Act �nd GS 121-12(�) has been completed for this project.
� There are no Nntion�l Register Eligible or Listed ARCIiAEOLOGICAL SI'I'GS present
or affected by this projecL (Altnch �ury notes or docu�ue��ls tcs �ieeded)
..xn wmo,vai. rutct.ciaa rruciaur on cisnm.�nninirocucirai..+��iesrrsEe�ir,vroa,��aarcrr:n
/�„nlo.nm,��, r,�„�,��„n��r,��, v. /.n. �,. oa.�rf.n r�, �i,z moi r.��.�,A,,,����r�,�x,,,,,��„i.
Iof15

Prajecl"frnckiug Na.:
13-08-0041
1lrief r/escriplroii nf revieiv nclivilies, resrdls af renreir, mrd conclrr,sioi�s:
An archaeological survey and evaluation for repince�nent of Bridge No. 372 on SR 1346 over Sleveus
Creek in Haywood County wns conducted on October 3 end 16-17, 2013, by Michael Nelson, Belinda
Cox, and'C�sha Benyshek of TRC Environmental Corporatiou (TRC). During the course of the survey,
one previously unidentified archaeological sitc (31 H W573) w�s loc�ted within the project APB.'Phe
archacological resource is recommended uot eligible for fhe NRHP, aud no fm�thec zrchaeological
investigations are needed for this project.
SUPPORT DOCUM�NTATION
See attachcd: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
Signed
Other: Culhu•.il Review
ARCHA�OLOGIST
� Yhotos QCorrespondeuce
////.5���'a/ 3
D1te
..A'O h'AIlONAL RGGISTIiR lillGlALL' Ok LISTliO AHC//AIiOLOGIGIL S/TCSVRGSfiNI'OR AI�b7iCT/'U
fnnnJorhLnorTinm��aiotlnnPr JecrsnrQunlfcdlniha7009ProSrnrnv:oilc.ignen�rm.
2of15

Projecl Trncki�ig A'o.:
13-08-0041
SUMMARY OT CULT012AL RESOORCPS R�VI�W
I3�iefde,scri�Niox oJrenieu� aclinilieat resulls ofrevrew, ru�d coucl��srons:
TRC has conducted �n intensive archaeologicnl smvey Tnd evaluation for the replaceroent of Bridge No.
372 on SR1346 (White Oak/Stevens Creek Rond) over Stcvcus Creck in Haywood County, Norlh C�rolina
(Pigures I and 2). As specified by Ihe NCDOT, fhe survey con'idor (Area of Po�enti�l CfY'ects [APE]) for
�rchaeology exlends 300 feel (91.44 m) noriheest nnd 300 Feel (91.44 m) soulhwes( along SR 1346 Gom Ihe
ends oF Driclge No. 372. The corridor is �pproyimately I50 feel (45.73 m) wide, extending 75 fee� (22.86
m) on ei(her side of SR 1346 from ils presenl center.
A map review �nd sile files senrch was conducled by Belinda Cox of "fRC at �he Office of Slate
Archneology (OSA) Western E3r�nch on September 26, 2013, suppleinenling n previous NCDOT review.
This review identifiecl no archaeological sites within or ndjacent to the APE, allhough three previously
recorded archneologienl sites (31 H\V385, 31 H\N38G, ancl 31 H\V387) nre locatecl within a mile of ihe
project �rea (Nocl and Snedeker 1993). All three si�es are in upl�nd seltiugs norlh of �he project area, along
ihe Pigeon River. Two of ihe sites (31 FIW385 and 311IW386) are non-dingnoslic prehistoric lithic sc�tters,
while 31I-I1V387 is the above giauud rem�ins of � 19°i to 20'�' centwy liome site. Si�e 31 H W385 yielded 30
lithic arliFacls from rclntively deep subsin face deposits nnd was recommended for prescivTtion by
avoidance, while 31I I1V386 �nd 31I IW387 were recommended for no furlher nrchaeologicnl �vork (Noel
mid Snedcker 1993).
'Popog�<�phic maps, United StTtes Department of Agricultm�e (USDA) soil survey maps, �nd olher historic
maps were exnmined for informn�ion on natural or cidhual variables ihat might have aFfecled site locations.
'Che project area is at the very western edgc of thc Price and Strother mnp (1808), which shows the "[3ig
Pidgon° River in Hie nren nnd some lributaries, but no other detail in tl�e viciniry. The MacRae map ( I R33)
contains a li�tle more det�il, nnd includes �he Pigeon Rive r along with some of its h'ibut�i'ies; none �ppear
to represent Stevens Crech. (An unnamed tributary is located on the west side of ihc river between Jon�lhnn
Creek �nd "Chatnluchee" Creek, but likely represenls nnother tribulary to ihe soulh of Stevens Creek.) An
Old Chataluchee Rond is also depic�ed on �hat map running nor�h-souih, but no other detail in the nren. "I'he
Kerr map (I882) depicis the Pigeon liiverjust north of N�e project �rea nud nlso depicts "Cntnluche" Rond,
but no other detail in Ihe project vicinity. The 1893 USGS Mt. Guyot quTdrangle depicls a siream in the
vicinity of S�evens Creek, and the conununi�y of Teague �o lhe enst of tlte project are�, but no o�her det�il in
Ihe vicinity (USGS 1893). The 1912 ML Guyot USGS quadrangle shows 7'e�gue, Stevens Creek, and a
road in Ihe approximate location of SR1346, but no slruclwes nre shown in the arel(USGS 1912). "fhe
1936 Cove Creck Gnp USGS pinnimcu ic quadrnngle shows more delnil in the nre�; n rond is shown in ihe
SR 13d6 localion with Ihe creek crossing in �pproximntely �he same arca ns �he present d1y bridge. A
sh ucliue is depicfed that likely represents the house in Ihe norUiweslern portion of the APE (USGS 1936).
The 1925 soil mnp of I Inywood County depicts Stevens Creek, as well as the road in ihe current SR 1346
locetion with eight structures along thnt rond, �Ithough the exact location of ihe current project are� is
difticult to disccrn (USDA 1925).
On-line soils date indicate thatjust one soil type, Whiteonk cobbly loam, is present in �he APG Whi�eoak
cobbly lonm, 8—I S% slopes, is foimd on coves, drainnges, or fans �long moun�nin slopes. '1'he soils nre
described as rocky and well drained (NRCS 2013).
The �rchaeologic�l field investigation included a system�tic walkover of Ihe APE to search for above-
ginund fealures nnd Ihe excavation of 17 shovel tests in nreas I�cking stnnding �vater, we�land soils, m signs
of severe distiubance. The survcy identified one uewly discovered nrchaeologicnl site, 7111 W573 (Tnble I).
The shovel tests measured 30 cm in diameter and �vere excavated to subsoil or at least 75 cm belo�v surface
(cmbs); all soils that were not obvious fill �vere dry-screened th�nugh'/a-inch mesh. In addition, a small
..xo,va nav.�t ar:cisnre cr n;iui.e oa i isrcu nace.�ua.ocic.v, snasrxi:a'u,vrw� a��ia:c u;��
/u.,n/o.,vnw. T uu,�on�ma� N.o�«�a u. o„o�lr,�;n ide moJ P.ng.a„n:nucdR•••+,�,:,u.
3of15

Piajen Trnrkiiig Na.:
13-08-0041
plo�ved garden are� w�s swface inspected; no artif�cts were obscrved in Ihis �rea. A single lxl m test unit
('fUl) was �Iso excnvaled to g�llier further inTonn�lion on soils and components.
I3oth flie noi1heastern and soWhwestern portions of Ihe project APG contained sleep slopes and were not
suitnble for shovel tesling (Pigures 3 and 4). The na lhwestern part of ihe APG includes some slope and
also cont�ins the crcek. 7�h�t men contains �n exlnnt residential slructure, and there has been some
associated ground modification (�igure 5). 'ftvo shovcl tesis tvere escnvated in Ihis �rea adjacenl to Ihe
creek near the Gont �mcl back yards of the residence; no ar(iCacts �vere recovered from thuse lesls.
"I'he southeaslern portion of the survey zrea contained site 31 HW573, within a genlly sloping, open field
nlong ihe south side of Stevens Creek (f igure 6). 'fhe creck parallels 521346 in the site area, so shovel tests
were Iocated in the southernmost portion of ihe APE. Nine of I S shovel tes�s contained historic and
prehistoric materinl; the context of some of this material was difficult to interpret, �nd ihe tesl uuit
excnv�tion demonstrn�ed lhat parls of Nie �re� has been severely disturbed (despite tlie facl thnt no
disturbance is visible from ihe swface).
Soils encounlered within shovel tes�s a� �he site generally consisted ofa thin (10 cm), compnct, rocky, dark
bro�vn ( I OYR 3/3-3/4) �o d�rk yellowish brown ( IOYR 4/4) sill loam A horizon. A well-developed A
horizon is not present iu mosl nrcas. Bene��h Ihis w�s a 25-35 cm �hick dark yellowish bro�vn (I OYR 4/3,
I OYR 416, or I OYR 5/6) loam Ih�l conlained nwnerous grnvels �nd rock. In some shovel tests, there w�s n
clear distinction betwcen a plowzone �nd ihe underlyiug soils, �vhile in othcrs �here was no clear
differentialion ancl no plowzone appeared to be present; artifacfs �vere collected from both Ihe A horizons
�nd underlying soils. It is unclenr, bul these soils �II in�y represent historic colluvimn. At 35-50 cmbs,
shovel tests encountered very rocky (including boulders) d�rk yellowish brown ( I OYR 3/4-4/4) Tlluvi�l
lo�my snnd and/or sand; this alluvium was devoid of �rtifacts.
TUI was placed directly adjacent to ST3, which yielded a sherd fiom what �ppeared to be sub-plowzone
contexls (see �igure 2). The soils encountered in TU I were completely disturbed (figures 7-9). Historic
�rtif�cts were recovered froro the cleepest levels in very low densities, , including in whTt appenred to be
displaced colluvium or B horizon soils. Tow�rd the bnse of �he test unit, a soil anomaly containing charcoal
�vas encountered that consisted of d�rk yellowish brown ( I OYR 3/4) loam mo�lled with n dnrk brown
( I OYR 3/3) loniny snnd; it was first encountered along the south wall at depths of 43-<46 cmbs. An attempt
was m�de to escavate ihe nnom�ly sepa�<�tely Gom the surroundiug soil m�triY but the st�in quickly
e�panded to encompnss most of ihe test unit and contained � number of large boulders. The stain wns nol
encountered along the north �v�ll unlil 56�i0 cmbs. The anoivaly, excavaled as p�rl of Level 5 nnd Level 6,
coninined 23 artifacts includiug a piece oFglass nnd consisted of a sloped deposit that represents historic
deposilion. It is uncle��r how much area along Ihe creek has been disturbed. The causes of Ih�t dislurbance
are unclear, bul it may result from at(empts at creek bank sl�bilize�ion.
The shovel tesls �nd tes[ unit yielded I56 lithic �rlifnc�s, Iwo sherds, and five historic items (T�bles 2 and
3). The nine positive shovel tests yielded 70 artifac�s, �nd an addition�l 93 artif�cts were recovered from the
test unit. Densily wilhin the shovel tesls ranged from 2 to 13 artifacts per shovel �est; most (ii=6) cont�ined
more than five artitacts each. Of Ihe 93 artif'acts recovered from "fU I, 23 �vere found within the .ippnrent
plowzone, while 47 were derived from the underlying dispinced soils, and 23 from ihc historic
dislurbance/displaced soils (ihese deposits were partinlly screened rogether due to mixing after large
boidders were removed).
The 156 lithic �rtif:�cts recovered from Ihe site include 152 chipped stone artifacis (including six tools and
146 pieces of debitage) �nd f'our pieces of fire-crTCked rock (FCR). The stone tools inchide T small,
uutyped, quartzite, contrlcting stemmecl projectile point/knife (pp/k), a crude chert trinngular bifnce, a
quartz endscraper, hvo quartz bif�ce preform fragments, and a quariz/quartzite core. Chipped stone raw
materials were domivaled by quariz (n=126), followed by quartzile (n=12), chert (n=8), quarl�Jquarizite
"RO Nd9/O,VdI. RfiU/STG¢ 6'L/G[OL6 0!t /.ISTI:U AftCO.IIiOLIX.ICAL S?FSPRl�J'L'1!l'Ok A�FFC7/:n
�,,,�/ . nr,,;��. �a����p�.��,�m„ r, ��«<<�� g„„���d i„ e,r zou� r,�,A,.,�.�,,:�e�ds,.r��.�„r.
4af15

Projecl7l�ncking No.:
13-08-0041
(n=5), �nd chalcedony (n=1).
'fhe two prehistoric sherds include one wiidentified stamped sherd that was recovered from ST3 fYom 30-40
cmbs. The stamping is eroded and it is diffictdt �o deterntine �vhether it is check stamped or rectilinear
complicated stamped (although checks appe�r to be pait of the pattern if ihe design is in f�ct rectilinear
complica�ed stnmped). 'Che other sherd came from TUI, Level 4 nnd appenrs to be check slamped.
The five historic niiifacts recovered include hvo possible uail fragmenls, one piece of whiteware, one piece
of light green glass, and one piece of clear glass. These artifacts tvere recovered from the Ap and
imderlying horizons, �s well ns from thc historic deposit in TU I from depihs rnnging Gom I Ofi5 cmbs.
The si�e likely conlinues ou�side �hc currenl projecl boundaries to the soulh, and intacl cultural deposi�s
mny be present on the higher pnrt of the I�ndform outside of ihe project area. However, ns defined within
the APL', site 31 FI W573 does iiot nppear to retnin integrity; artiflcfs werc recovered f'rom questionnble
contexis .md Gom clearly disturbed are�is. Despite the variety of �rlifacts recovered nnd ihe rel�tively liigh
�r�ifact density, fhe site is recommended ineligible for ihe NRHP �vithin Ihe APE.
Rnsed on the results of �he background research and field survey, �here is no evidence �hat NRI-IP-eligible
archneological resources are situated wilhin ihe l3ridge 372 APF.. Consequently, no addilional
nrchaeological investigntions are recommended for this project es cmrently defined.
� ` q
�,f l<�� �l�.�r�i,��
"Pasha 6enyshek
Senior ArchaeologisUFlssislanl Program Mnnager, Asheville
TRC Environmentnl Corporntion
ItP�I;RRNC�S CITLD
Kerr, W.C.
1882 h/np ojA'o���h Cnro(i��n. On file, Norlh Cnroliun S�nle Archives, Raleigh.
MacRne, John
1833 A New b(ap of tl�e Sinte of Norlh Cnrolinn. lohn bincRne, 1'ayetteville, mid f-I.S. Tnnner,
PhilnAelphin.
Nntional Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
201I Nnmral Resources Conservntion Service, Uniled Slates Deparlmenl of Agriculture 1Veb Soil Survey.
Availnble online at hup://�vebsoilsmvey.nres.usdn.gov/ accessed December 5, 2012.
Noel, IZ. O. nnA R. J. Sncdckcr
I 993 fleriingc Reswirces 57rrvey fa� IGe A�oposed l i'i(kins Creek ll TiwGe�� SrJe, Com��u�m�enl 6J, l�rencli
6i�onrl Rmiger Dis/��icl, Pisgnh iVnlionnl Fa�es(, Ha�nro�d Comi(��, �\'or(h Cnrolinn.
Price, Jon �md John S�rother
I 808 The Tirsl Aclunl Survcy of Ihe Sfnle of NorU� Carolina. Pla�e IX in Nor(h Cm�olinn in iLlnps,
ediled by \V. P. Cummiug, l9GG. Slnte DepnrhneN of Archives and History, R�Icigh.
U.S. Department of Agricidhire (USDA)
1925 Soilhlnp, A�or!liCnrolinn, Hn}�roodConnl��. On file, Nortli Carolinn Stnte Archives, Rnleigh.
Available ouline at htip://dalib.wic.edidedm/ref/collecliui�/ncmnps/id/I143.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
1893 ML Guyot,'I'N, �opogrnphic nmp (1:125,000).
1912 Mt. Giryot, 7'N, topographic map (1:125,000).
1936 Cove Creek Gnp, NC, lopogrnphic mnp (124000)
..xo N,marv u, iu;crsn;n nvmutc ors usn:v.ierud�:ruocic¢ since ran�se,vroa,a�i�r:cn:n
funn f rAlnrer YYemyo.miim� Prujrr�s us gnal frJ in iGr IW�Vinpinuu:nNc d.K�eem�nr-
Sof15

Projecl'Il'arking No.:
13-08-0041
Table 1. ArcLneologicnl Sites Identified iu the Bridge 20 Survey.
Shovel7'esls Arlifacls (including O�om TU)
Si�eH CamponcN(s) ToLd" Preh. Hist. Li�hic Ceramic Hisloric 7'olal liccommendnlion
71111V573 Unknown Prehisloric 17 9 7 66 2 5 156 Not 8ligiblc
Iilhic/cernmic (Pmb
\4uodland); His�oric;
" Includes all shuvel Iesis wilhin 30 m of pusilive tests
Table 2. Site 31H�V573 Arfifncl
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
a
5
STI
STI
STI
S72
ST2
S7'2
ST'1.
ST3
ST3
I
I
I/11
I/11
IAI
IAI
1
I I
10.20 (Ap)
2�30 (Ap)
20.30 (Ap)
10-GO (Ap/coarse sand)
IO�iO (Ap/coacsc sand)
10-60 (Aplcoarse sand)
10�0 (Ap/cunrsc sand)
0.10 (diahvbed)
10-20 (dis�urbed)
8
3
I
8
I
1
I
2
I
cic�ilage
dcbifagc
bifnce/prcfonn ftag
debilage
de6il�ge
biface
mclnl
dcbilage
�vhitewnrc
Chcrt flnkc
Qunr�z
Qunriz
Qu, rtz
Quntlz
Quarizile
Chcd; crude �riangulnr
Possiblc nnil fmgment
Qunrtz
G S'17 Il 20-30 (disturbed) 5 debifage Quanz
7 S"13 II 30-00 (dislurbed) I sherd U]D stainped, c. send �empec, no
inlerior surfacc (realmcnl
8 ST4 II 20-40 (6?) 2 de6i�age Quartz (one inny be tml Gag)
9 S'f5 II IS-65(B7) 3 debitnge Quada
10 ST10 II 10-20(B?) 3 debitage Quadz
II STlO If 40-50(D?) 3 dcbi�ngc QuMz
II STIO II 40-50(B?) I debitage Quadzi�e
12 S7'12 II 30-58(D'?) 8 debi�age Qunriz
12 S'I'12 IL 30-58(D?) I debi�agc Quarizile
13 STI3 1 0-10 (Ap?) I debitage Cherl Oake
13 STI3 1 0-10(Ap?) 2 Aebi�ngc Quar�z
U 5"fl3 I 0-10(Ap?) I �CR Quartz.
14 S"1�13 I 10-20(Ap?) 4 debi�ngc QuaAz
IS ST17 I 2�30(Ap?) 5 debi�agu Quorl�
16 S'P1A 1 40-53 (Ap?) 2 Acbi�agc Quanz
16 STI4 I 9�53(A�i?) I 6ottleglrivs Lightgrcen
Table 3. 31HW573 Test Unil 1 Artifact
Depih
Lcv (cmbs) StrnL }Im'izon Ccramics Lilhics Historic DiaRnoslicArlifnc�s
I 0-9 I Ap 10
2 9-QI f Ap 13
3 21-3I II displaced I3 22 I
4 31110 ❑ dispinceA I3 I IS Possibly Pigeon
5 40-03 lll}list dispinced E3/Hisl 23
6 43-RO Hist Hisloric deuosit 7 I
"KO NA7/ONAL R!!GISiG2 ELlG19l (i OR LI,STSD ARCHA/i0lAGIGII. S/!/'S P2L�S2NTOR AFFFCTG�
/.,,� f, er�o> �r.����r,om�ro�� r,�i�n. �� Q���il�nn� n,� loa� v.aG.�,��,,:�r;�nx�����t��r.
fiol IS

' ��
� ,�
��
�
�•yz: �i � i ' i
� �w'' ii r% / / J'
� � /
��; � � � ' ��� I�i I' /
,
\� �N � �I
�`�; ` \ I��1 /lil �I II // %�/ �
` \ I /
/ / I� �i + I
J� i �1 \ �� +,- . II J
\ \\`\`I�\ 'Ii I ( � �..1�i /� / � j�� � /' i
� �� m � � r
�
������������ fC ���� i �� l ;
�1 ; J �
,�\\,,\����\�� ' `j , i I, (�,j
� A � 1� / ' �o:i
�\�\�\ � i� � N
�
\ � �,��' � . ,�ra /��` , ' /
� �ai Q�S � r �' /
� I�
���i� `1 � J � G� � �
\� �� oo� 1iti �`7� ��� �� �
\�u\\� `,\��\ :�� \4�/� F.����/ i�e i -i
w
�
L b
> ; 5
0
F� � � ° ¢
Z a V
i i ,
a° O C �� l
�
� �":ss:�'- -:-'_`���9
r u � � o.
If �I�, � �� �� �`� 4 . �
{, �� �11 \,�,� x�°, �� �
i � F�� �����i' .M4 �� I� b
p'��sti'� � � \� ' n' �. \
�
��41;r� ��.�� � � �� �;����� I
�\� � � �\\ � X � �
, � � ,�t ;� )
� "� '�. � 'w. �� ,
�`\ `
�� ��� `� �����' `� �
� �
� f� ,//
�����` \����\\1 \�\` i�l '
,,, ,,, � ��' � /
��y
` ����1\l�' � ;';� In ��'"pt\� I'//�
`11 �� � �� � k•n
�d\�.A14�� ��.� � �� ��� � � �
' V/
�\ �� �
� � / � � i:.
, �
` �( i � i i
�\ \` I { �� ///
�V� \�\� `�� � ��,�' � �.� � ii %
�
! �
\��.��y��all;,; �';'���� i� � , ����!�/r�%��;:.
` �n�°
�
i�
� ";
�i 4 , I'
` ,11 `
1
=�
� �
./�1�� /// -S 5 �
�";��/�/�%; i
�ili,i�� (��(� I�i� ��
�' �� �,�l�..l� \\�����-��_�_ ,
1 �� \
����� \ �A1A��'��� `.,,_�
,���� ���, V� � i
�
\� ���� � � ; �\` E? i
��� � `� � oi
'� �
� � ��
��C, ` �o„
\�: o � ` � .o
�, �
� � � �A � � �•�� �
' � , l� !}
)� � ' ro
, ''� ��, �'' ��
; �
i�� �� f ,I w
I c
v
� ;`� i% i b
%�' �5; F: c°'i
; � < � ,�� o
!��/ /� �
;,, ,
��� �� �'�
�i/�i 15n
�;�� � i c '1 �
%/ � // . � ;�,c
� �j ' � � C U
�;,���%� � � �
°� �
,,,/ �
f���i/l , , ao
,,��/;i� „ ��
� o�
91, ° i
III o •

Projec� Trnrking i\'o.:
13-08-0041
a ,
�� � � � ,� .
I , �;s
� �:
t , ,�!?;
�, .
.�i:�� � :,i.
i i
, . ��:. '�ii
A ��� •
4`"fiy}; � ;vfyu
Pigure 3. Sloped Uank in norlhe�stern portion of the Bridgc No. 372 APE along Stevens Creek Rd, view to
northeast.
�.n�o,v,ina,v.�i. iurw.ruu� utiant�t oa usn;� daruarninurer. sin�.crar:e�r.r,rore,u�i�rcn:o
��,,,,/ .nro��,, z,.,,,�„�,mrm�, r, ;.�n. ��� P„�����r,,, e,� zoo� r,oR,�,,,,�,n�-n.e,..�,,,F„�_
9of�5

Projen TrneFing No.:
13-08-0041
I�igmt d. Vie�v of sloped �ank along Stevens Creek Rd in ihe southwestern portion of ihe [3ridge No. 372
AP�, view to enst-sou�hensf.
•,,\'O A'A7/0,1'dL 2l:(!/S!d'!f /:Y/G/N/.f:OR //5%l:Dd2f/IAk060G/C.IL ti/T/:SPftlSENTORA(�TF('//'D
/ormJiA/�narTnwrpwl�ninuPi j.rlsmQnnlfnliutl�r]OOJPingreamm�i..7g�rernnn.
10ofIS

Pr ojecl 77��rking �\'o.:
13-08-0041
I� igure 5. I louse aud outbuildings in noithwestern portion of the Bridge No. 372 APE Tlong Stevens Creek,
view lo nor�hwest.
Pigure G. View �long Stevens Creek in southeastern portion of the Bridge No. 372 APE, site 31 HW573
IocTted in fnr end of field, view e�st.
..so,v,�no,��i, erccisn;a ev.�mutr: au�sn;n dacu,u;ntor,u•nc siresrretia�r:Nroa.u�i�ecurn
/»,�,/ .na„�„ n�,�,�k�,�„rc���, r, �.� n��, Q���hJi.�d �„ mz zaii v.��A,��,����,n��nx,..,��.���.
I l u l l s

Proje<!71'noAing�\'o.:
13-08-0041
I�igure 7. 31H1U573, "I'es� Unil I, South Profile.
•N'O A'd!/O,VAL IflfOlS/E1i f:%/G/9/Jf O/t LLCI7ID.IFCl/d/fOIOG/GIL 5'/TFS 19ULl7fAY0lf A4%'FC77i0
JonnJorA/bmr lmmyormrlau /'rolenr nv [hral f:d b� iGr dWJl9ugianio�mic.lRru n�zni.
12afIS

Projecf7Frsching A'o.:
13-OS-0041
j ` " tj 7 iii�� 1 �. i-: i ,, --
� � ` ����{ ! ` �1' \ � ` _
C a: � �-� �ii �' � .. i i e� � �� � ��� �� � �� -�-�
l �. . _-� . . `
� i� r. � � � ����� i �:t:�s � a .
, � � �, � C� a i � �t � � i .. �d! If � �
�� � �Fi� - �� 1����\ �, . � 1��� ���� S,',
I.4 e/i /F � 2. il % �� I'. i f 5' � 4,� �
�.�li� �,ii i � I J-` 6F5�1 � � 1�i.. i��,/_
11 � �'t .. ..c.`t
',� ��� ' !� C I..� .;, a e'.�e � p a �� � lY
r /��\ � ` > ��. � ,f ��s ���k`k � �'�V *�` li � � :' ..
' � `a � � `�=�' � � � ? '!� rt c �.a • 1\ s ..
:� yl ; > 1 -� aif � - `l� � � '
�� 1 '� � � :� i�f.,r�fa.' ^���Jrl :'�� \ '.
� � i r g � � � _�
a ���1 k��."l �..� ������• r����q� s7 •1�f:� i� ��>s'
1� I��i � � � i i� :..�y4A':ti Ys�=->bb� l� '- I
, � 7 � � i% � I. i i—. X.` �� l' 'S'�'" � �' �`• O
r u
.i � ��z� � ` �. �I • :� {w 1� � '�
�. ��t�l , . �� i ��.�F i � �n� .:��
� l�l �{\\ -! >� f i ��n i
)�� 1� . � r , � e .4� ! � \ V 1� � ��
�%4� 1\i � �/! �.�y` � c " v., `t � �� �
Y � r . �'
� 1� /� Y�'/1 y ti� .�� 1 ry �' i
V l� 1 i . ' . / � : ��.
Sr � �,�, � _ ; ;'�;i
� �i� y \� _ Vlii , �I- ' V� �V � � � �` J
�r� �"� y ` . V�y� � i �� �. b 1 llc'�
.. . � � / � �� ���� � :. �1 i . �.
� -i i! t�� F '1 � � I
li� re ., �C� Fr � r ��r /l�'; � i� jl1 ��1� �\ �I:LI ( a�� �P��'���%
�. �� � i�,hti y, s,� ��.il rs� . i�'. �� �� � v ti� L. N �>1(��,�,l.l
I���f � ' �d � J E� :ib �u . �:'C�. _ d ��,IIOi A�fu,<;', 1, t.''���f `?�
Pigure 8. 31H\V573, Tesl Unil I, E:isl Profile.
°xo N.�7ron�,�i_ nrr.isnra vi �r,m�.i: na i.isrirn,in�ruroi.or,ic,�t, siv:s rra:a'�,vroe eri�'r;crrn
Junn J r A/iu�r Im�uponatlun Pny��nr nrQun/�rd m iGe 1001 /bogm nnmtiv.lynan.�n.
U o(IS

s
0
0
�
�
� S
:�
€ o
A �
3�
3
�
a
0
€ °
s �
3 �
i
�
0
� �
�
`
V
�
<�
�'s
Y �
F.3
5
� �
3 �
_ u
�
0
� �
O [[
.-i
��
De�
3s
i, r� +'
�q3S
a � �
=��a
1 6E0
G
a
.] S
� �'7(�
u 5S
V
Q
�
�
4
G
VS-
�
V
c
t
a