510035_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230801

A LJ S U Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 3 s O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 7Routine
Hance Inspection Operation Review p Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: - h x Arrival Time: p Q Departure Time: 1z pD County: aA,J S d/J Region: XKO
Farm Name: S FjC 1 / p/� KE, 'S R G/�sp� 1'A I�t Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: g/O -
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: JRg i/4 4d , QA K S
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Caoacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L'J ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes❑
NA
FZ�O
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: 5- 3.5 1 Date of inspection: d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): r,
Observed Freeboard (in): 7-5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
V
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [7'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes �
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and?or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ZI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
[] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
l2. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
[j No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
� ❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
rN❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspectio;�o
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: f 1 - Date of Inspection: - 2.3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [—]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �rNo ❑ NA [] NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes El"No
❑ Yes No
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? EYes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
[Z"No
ILJ "'Q
E No
�No
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
SC' IGS; z3) /,/6- z�
�hll 8 i/ CA) s .�zo �.) 2.3 B;G GKd -lie_jfAC0
r
/l�1JA � 515 i, g ,Sf It-f►IIdtN It 1-01. 3 (r7 r,mr, v�
Y
� ! 5
M t �"�l! Gj fq k its
-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: leltr! S / y /Z.'_- '-
de.g.;iC'�0 /
cur#is.tyree@
work cell: 919-81 a-2691
Phone: it g f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: I'/ Z_3
511212020