20150647 Ver 1_401 Application_20150715

June 29, 2015
Mr. Craig Brown
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh District Regulatory Branch
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
and
Ms. Cherri Smith
NC DWQ, 401 /Wetlands Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699 -1650
Re: Pre - Construction Notification Application
Sun Devil Solar Project
Highway 158
Littleton, Warren County, North Carolina
Approximate Center: 36.434407 °N, 77.970651 °W
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Smith,
r
Energy Renewal
PARTNERS,LLC
On behalf of FLS Energy, Inc., we are submitting this Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) application for
temporary and permanent impacts to waters of the U.S. including wetlands from three culvert
installations at the proposed Sun Devil Solar Project for a site access roadway. The project will result in
the loss of 117 linear feet of stream and less than 0.04 acre of permanent impacts to waters of the U.S.
including wetland and stream habitat. Per the requirements of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE)
and the Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 and the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Certification 3886,
this PCN is being submitted to the NCDWQ and USACE for approval.
Proiect Information
The project site is approximately 29 acres located approximately 2.75 miles west of Littleton, NC on the
north of Highway 158 and west of Bobbitt Road (Warren County PINS 3907 -28 -7373, 3908 -30 -0526,
3908 -30 -6572, and 3908 -31- 2785). The site consists of approximately 23 acres of dense woodland with
an approximately 5,400 -foot planned road easement with variable land cover, including approximately
2,000 feet of cleared land along the northernmost extent, approximately 1,600 feet of an overgrown
previously cleared corridor along an old berm, a small stretch of approximately 150 feet of woodlands,
and a second previously cleared easement with pockets of shrub /scrub vegetation along the southern
approximately 1,600 feet nearest the project area. The project access easement was designed from the
north after the original planned access from the south, across the Seaboard Coast Railroad easement
101 W Worthington Avenue, Suite 120, Charlotte, NC 28203 • (980) 949 -8523
305 Camp Craft Rd, Suite 575, Austin, TX 78746 • (512) 222 -1125

Energy Renev
PARTNERS. LLC
Pre - Construction Notification
Sun Devil Solar Project
was denied by the railroad. The proposed project consists of a 5 megawatt (MW) solar energy facility
which will deliver renewable energy to the local utility grid.
Jurisdictional Waters
The planned roadway access easement of the project includes three jurisdictional crossings (Figure 1),
where the planned route intersects two jurisdictional stream crossings (S1 and S2), one of which
coincides with a wetland (WA /S2), and a wetland only crossing (WB). Crossing 1 corresponds to stream
S1, Crossing 2 corresponds to wetland WB, and Crossing 3 corresponds to both stream S2 and wetland
WA (Figure 1). The two jurisdictional streams are unnamed tributaries to Big Stone House Creek and run
from east to west through the planned access easement of the project (Figure 2). The streams cross
oriented roughly perpendicular the easement, approximately 137 linear feet, and averages 5.25 feet
wide. Stream S1 is a perennial stream with a defined bed and bank with clear evidence of an ordinary
high water mark. The stream has been channelized and is nearly straight through the property. Stream
S2 is an intermittent stream with defined bed and bank and evidence of an ordinary high water mark.
Additionally, two swale wetlands (WA and WB) are located along the planned project easement. No
other jurisdictional waters of the US, including wetlands, were noted on the site.
Summary of Proposed Impacts
In order to access the site, a road will be installed with a 66" diameter culvert in S1 and 24" diameter
culverts in S2 and WB. Rip rap will be keyed in on either side of the culverts for stabilization. Coffer
dams will be temporarily installed on either side of the culverts in S1 and S2 to allow for work in the dry.
The following tables summarizes the proposed impacts to streams and wetlands:
Average
Stream
Stream
Types of Impacts
Stream Type
Permanent
Temporary
Identification
Width
Impact (LF)
Impact (LF)
(LF)
Stream S1
Culvert, coffer
(UT to Big Stone
7
dams and energy
Perennial
77
10
House Creek)
dissipater
Stream S2
Culvert and coffer
(UT to Big Stone
3.5
dams
Intermittent
40
10
House Creek)
Impact
Totals (LF)
117
20

F
Energy Ren&-
PARTNERS. LLC
Pre - Construction Notification
Sun Devil Solar Project
Wetland Type of
Permanent
Temporary
Wetland Type
Forested?
Impact
Identification Impact
Impact (ac)
(ac)
Roadbed
Headwater
WA Fill
Wetland
No
0.023
0
Culvert,
Roadbed
Headwater
WB Fill
Wetland
No
0.015
0
Impact Totals (ac)
0.038
0
The number and width of the crossings have been limited to the bare minimum to safely construct and
operate the solar farm. Road crossings were designed perpendicular to the stream to minimize impacts.
The project construction, including the installation of the culverts, will be completed in accordance with
state and federal regulations, including the NCDWQ Stormwater rules and Nationwide and Regional
Conditions (Nationwide and Regional).
Closing
We appreciate your prompt review of this PCN. If we can facilitate your review in any way, please do
not hesitate to contact James McRacken at imcrackenC @eneravrenewalpartners.com or (980) 949 -8523,
Ext 203
Sincerely, f�
! 4�
James MCRacken, Jr.
Senior Scientist
p� J'��
Lauren Sicarelli
Project Manager
Attachments:
Pre - Construction Notification Form
Figure 1— Site Location and Jurisdictional Features
Figure 2 — USGS Topographic Map
Attachment A — Kleinfelder Engineering Sheets
Attachment B — Endangered Species Report and USFWS Concurrence
Letter Attachment C — Agent Authorization Letters
Attachment D — PJD Submittal (USACE only)

AAW �, Pre- Construction Notification
Energy Renewal Sun Devil Solar Project
PARTNERS, LLC
PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FORM

li, vw n r� Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no
�' DWQ project no.
a _ • _ Form Version 1.4 January 2009
1
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express
❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Sun Devil Solar Project
2b. County Warren
2c. Nearest municipality /town Littleton
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: (See attached for complete owner information)
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.
3g. Fax no
3h. Email address
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X❑ No
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes X❑ No
❑ Yes ❑X No
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Site developer with lease on property
4b. Name:
Greg S.K. Ness
4c. Business name
FLS Energy, Inc.
(if applicable):
4d. Street address
130 Roberts Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
4f. Telephone no.:
(828) 350 -3993
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address
gness @fisenergy.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information
(if applicable)
5a. Name:
James McRacken Jr
5b. Business name
Energy Renewal Partners, LLC
(if applicable):
5c. Street address
101 W. Worthington Avenue, Suite 120
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
5e. Telephone no.:
(980) 949 -8523 l
5f. Fax no.:
(980) 949 -8530 1
5g. Email address
jmcracken @energyrenewalpartners.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 36.432392
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
3908300526, 3908306572 ,3908312785,3907287373
Longitude: - 77.970196
29 acres
Big Stone House Creek
C
Roanoke
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site consists of approximately 23 acres of dense woodland within the panel area. Approximately 6 acres of proposed access road will be
constructed generally along existing logging roads and maintained property access easements. The subject property is bound to the south by the
Seaboard Coast railroad and Highway 158. The property is surrounded by cultivated cropland, standing forests, and rural residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.038
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 137
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project consists of a 5MW AC solar energy facility which will deliver renewable energy to the local utility grid.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached sheet
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / Comments: Requested 6/26/15. Updated 7/1/15 PJD attached
project (including all prior phases) in the past? q
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary E] Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Energy Renewal Partners, LLC
Name (if known): Jesse Degnan Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Requested 6/26/2015, updated request sent 7/1/2015.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X❑ No
6b. If yes, explain
Page 3of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands
❑X Streams —tributaries
❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland
area impacted
2a. 2b.
2c.
Temporary (T)
2d
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
S3
Choose one
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
Choose one
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
S6
Choose one
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total
Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
SEE ATTACHED VVETLAND IMPACTS TABLE
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
SEE ATTACHED STREAM IMPACTS TABLE
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary (T)
01 N/A Choose one Choose
02 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
04 Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: r""'
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed. ther complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments: N/A
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
P 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
If 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then
individually list all buffer
impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d
6e. 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
131
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6i. Comments: N/A
Page 5 of 10
Yes /No
Yes /No
Yes /No
Yes /No
Yes /No
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The road crossings are necessary to access and maintain the site. The number and width of the crossings have been limited to the bare minimum to
safely construct and operate the solar farm The original access route crossed two wetlands and one stream that now are being avoided by the longer
proposed route along an upland ridge. Road crossings were designed perpendicular to streams to minimize impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan developed for the Site will include the implementation of silt fencing, temporary coffer dams and energy
dissipators. These measures will be utilized to perform work in dry conditions. Instream work will be minimized and work will be conducted in uplands
as practicably practical. Pre - fabricated culverts will be placed into streams complete to minimize impacts Coffer dams will be removed after
construction is complete.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity.
3c. Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h.
Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
N/A
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 1.3%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Manaqement Plan? X❑ Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
See attached Stormwater Management Plan Description.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's Jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
NCDEMLR
Warren County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other: Raleigh Office
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other: NSA
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, El Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? El Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s).
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in E] Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? II
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No sewage will be generated at the site. Portable toilets will be utilized during construction and waste will be trucked off -site.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes m No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ZYes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Pilot Environmental, Inc. completed a Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the site, which included a review of the USFWS Endangered
Species Database. USFWS reviewed and responded to the project on February 20, 2015. See Attachment B for Pilot's report and USFWS response.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
www.habitat.noaa.gov, NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes m No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Historical Preservation Office GIS Service - www.gis.ncdre.gov
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Ba. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes
Bb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
fema.maps.arcgis.com, FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) Community Panel Numbers 3720390BDOJ and 3720390600J
.TAn+, R. fy.,cRace k Cf\ '"St .
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
G
, &I-E
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
m No
7/1/2015
Date

A3. Owner Information
Name(s) on Recorded
3a. Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.:
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone No.:
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email address:
Name(s) on Recorded
3a. Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.:
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone No.:
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email address:
Name(s) on Recorded
3a. Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.:
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone No.:
3g. Fax No.:
3h. Email address:
Pontiac Plywood, Inc.
563/620 and 713/160
Hunter Stone
3204 Nash St. N., Suite C
Wilson, NC 27896
252 - 230 -9068
Ernest C. and Dorothy S. Bobbitt
367/249
623 Wilson St.
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
252 - 537 -5818
Norman Perry Bobbitt
367/249 and 210/452
PO Box 1173
Littleton, NC 27850
252 - 586 -4286

133e. Project Description
Approximatley 75 rows of solar panels will be installed east -west. Panels
will be mounted above ground and an underground collection system of
electric cables will connect the panels to three transformer /inverter pads
and connect to the existing power line along US Highway 158. Standard
construction equipment, including earthmoving equipment, will be used
during construction. See attached Site Plan.
C2. Wetland Impacts Table
Wetland
Permanent
Temporary Type of
Stream
Permanent
Wetland Type
Identification
Impact (ac)
Impact (ac) Impact
Impact (If)
Impact (If)
Type
Headwater
WA
0.023
0 Roadbed Fill
Wetland
Stream S1
Culvert,
Headwater
WB
0.015
0 Roadbed Fill
Wetland
Impact Totals
Perennial
House Creek)
(ac):
0.038
0
Stream S2
C3. Stream Impacts Table
Forested? Type of
Jurisdiction
No Corps
No Corps
Type of
Jurisdiction
Corps
Corps
Average
Stream
Permanent
Temporary
Stream Width
Types of Impacts
Stream
Identification
Impact (If)
Impact (If)
Type
(if)
Stream S1
Culvert, coffer
(UT to Big Stone
77
10 7
dams and energy
Perennial
House Creek)
dissipater
Stream S2
Culvert and coffer
(UT to Big Stone
40
10 3.5
Intermittent
dams
House Creek)
Impact Totals
(If):
117
20
Type of
Jurisdiction
Corps
Corps

E2d. Stormwater Management Plan Description
The amount of disturbed acreage permitted is for the entire site, 41.5 acres. The actual disturbed
area will be much less and limited to the areas required to install the solar panel posts in the
ground by mechanical methods, installation of the panels on the posts, and trenching to install
electrical conduit. Access to the internal portions of the site will be around the perimeter of the
site. If any rutting or land disturbance occurs on these access drives, it will be stabilized and timber
logging mats placed in these locations. No drainage patterns are being changed with this project.
Stormwater will primarily be treated through overland sheet flow across herbaceous ground cover.
The total new impervious area of 103,068 square feet (1.30% of the site) will be spread out across
the entire project area with no more than 41,247 square feet in any drainage area. Therefore, the
site is a low density development. As such, the development will have minimal impact on the
downstream properties.

Energy Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
Pre - Construction Notification
Sun Devil Solar Project
FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2

Legend
® Project Area
Stream /Drainage
O Culvert and Rip -rap
Approximate Center of Site:
36.434407, - 77.970651
F
• 's7r V- --
v
E
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575 r'
West Lake Hills, Texas 78746
512- 222 -1125
www.energyrenewalpartners.com AM AL
Energy Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
� u
N
N. :
ti
_ y 1W.,
3�
FLS Energy
Sun Devil Solar Project
Warren County, NC
Site Location and Jurisdictional Features
Q '
Q
O
CO
t
4
158
N
A 0 200 400
Feet �
IN
FIGURE
1
BFR 7/1/2015

Legend
® Project Area
Stream /Drainage
O Culvert and Rip -rap
r
a
1 � y
. .,.%-
AV
�n s�
s
•
I u
.�
O
I �
• 1 � y
dh
7
158
s -
f
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575 F L S Energy
West Lake Hills, Texas 78746
512- 222 -1125 1
www.energyrenewalpartners.com Sun Devil Solar Project
s Warren County, NC
Energy Renewal Littleton USGS Topographic Quadrangle
PARTNERS, LLC
J
3 <S
FIGURE
2
BFR 7/1/2013

Ak
F
Energy Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
Pre - Construction Notification
Sun Devil Solar Project
ATTACHMENT A
Kleinfelder Engineering Sheets

ACCESS ROAD CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. BEFORE ANY CULVERT INSTALLATION PROCEDURES BEGIN, INSTALL PERIMETER
EROSION CONTROL AS SHOWN.
PIPE AREA (AC) tc TIME OF
CONC. (min)
2. REMOVE ALL SURFACE VEGETATION AND DEBRIS AT CROSSING LOCATION
PIPE 1 6.29 5.0
3. PREPARE EXISTING SUBGRADE FOR INSTALLATION BY REMOVING UNACCEPTABLE SOILS , PIPE 2 4.06 5.0
AND DEBRIS PIPE 3 215.65 28.1
ALL CULVERTS MUST HAVE 6" MINIMUM COVER
4 TEMPORARILY DIKE STREAM AND DIVERT STREAM FLOW AROUND CONSTRUCTION AREA
KL E //VFEL DER
Bright People. Right Solutions.
3500 GATEWAY CENTRE BLVD., SUITE 200
MORRISVILLE NC 27560
� 755 -5011
USING PUMP AROUND DETAIL PROVIDED. PUMP WATER FROM WORK AREA TO - - -- ! / /� TAX PARCEL ID: 3907287373 PHONE: 919
WWW.KLEINFELDER.COM
ESTABLISH DRY WORKING CONDITIONS WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - -- �� / ' ! ( 4. PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE IN A F.E.M.A. SPECIAL
NE /-- j i --T-7 7 - - , \ FLOOD HAZARD AREA REF. PANEL 3720390600J,
p,CK UN
5. INSTALL ACCESS ROAD GRAVEL, CULVERT, FLARED END SECTIONS AND RIP RAP ENERGY - - - - - 30• SIpE SETS / / - _ r�T DATED JULY 03, 2007.
w PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY PV / _ _ _ c PROPOSED
DISSIPATER MODULES ON GROUND MOUNTED i = _ _ PERMANENT FENCE 5. CULVERTS SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 6
RACKING SYSTEM (TYP.) �� = LINE MIN. 20' OF ITS DIAMETER TO FACILITATE THE
6. RETURN STREAM FLOW BY REMOVING PUMP AROUND PUMPS AND DIKES _ \ - (SETBACK FROM MOVEMENT OF AQUATIC LIFE
- - APPROXIMATE / _ _ \C� I \ ARRAYS (TYP.)
CENTERLINE LOCATION OF i / / / _ 6. DISTURBANCE AT THE TRIBUTARY CROSSING
PROPOSED LIMITS UNNAMED TRIBUTARY / _ _ _ \_ SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE MAXIMUM
\ OF DISTURBANCE / / / / _ �� / / / / _ _ _ _ m EXTENET PRACTICABLE FOR INSTALLATION
ti
- FS FS
S\
FS FS ° \ I I
SF
770 ZZ2
SF\ SF FS /�� \ i �_ _ = = = - _ - _ 1 I N
/ / I
LL
LL zz
\ - - - - - - INSET A l I I
SEE THIS SHEET _
PROPOSED POINT OF -
- INTERCONNECTION (EXACT = - _ /
\ _ LOCATION TO BE STAKED IN - - - _ _ = _ = = _ = = _ i# _ _ - -
- - - - - - _ - - - -- _ -- - - - - -
FIELD BY DUKE ENERGY) - _ _
I _ = PROPOSED PERMANENT = = rn
_ 24' GATE (TYP.) _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - -
_- - - - -__ = =_ -_ -_ _ __ =_= _ -_ ___ = = =_ _� - _ -_ -_�_ I _ -
_ 1 T
IL/ -� -4 SF
/ PROPOSED 14 WIDE ACCESS PROPOSED PROPOSED SF _ ® /
ROAD WITH 6" GRAVEL BASE. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC INVERTER (TYP.) SF SSF
SEE SHEET C -6 DETAIL 5 (TYP.) I I �-
/ / I -SF PROPOSED TREE
o
I _ LINE (TYP.) i I
E
r
m
a
v
N
V
In
0
N
I-
0
w
r \
0
J
a
t
z
a
a
0
z
O
U
z
0
W
O
Of
w
v
D
O
a
J
,_
21
w
LL
C
0
U_
w
LL
0
a
U
s � 1
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
COFFER DAM
(TEMPORARY IMPACT)
NCDOT CLASS B RIPRAP -
12'L X 35W X 22" THICK
(PERMANENT IMPACT)
i
S2 -2 PERMANENT IMPACTS:
LENGTH: 40 LF
F9 f S FS �- FS FJ FS
EXISTING UTILITY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LAYDOWN AREA. - �
1.0 ACRE. 400'x 110' - _ \ POLE (TYP.) j
I I BACKU� - - EXISTING TREE
30' SIDE - _ LINE (TYP.) LEGEND
250 EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR (10')
WETLAND A
(38 LF WIDTH)
E
E E E
E E E E
WIDTH: 3.5 LF E E <-
AREA: 81 SF E F _ F 5' F
PROPOSED PIPE 1 E E E E E
24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP �S E E E
MIN.COVER 6" F E F F TEMPORARY
(PERMANENT IMPACT) IMPACT
:is
F F F F AREA -
E
WA -1 PERMANENT PERMANENT
IMPACTS: 5' _ _ IMPACT
LENGTH: 40 LF AREA
WIDTH: 39 LF E E
AREA: 1004 SF E E E
F E <
F F E F TEMPORARY
<- F E E E IMPACT
PROPOSED LIMITS OF E E E E F AREA
DISTURBANCE E E E
E E L PROPOSED TEMPORARY
COFFER DAM
(TEMPORARY IMPACT)
STREAM 2
WIDTH: 3.5'
l
- l
INSET A
20 10 0 20
SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
320.00
310.00
300.00
290.00
:1 11
270.00
PROPOSED
COFFER DAM
EXISTING STREAM
BED
PROPOSED RIPRAF
DISSIPATER
P PE 1
320.00
310.00
300.00
=ES -1 INV
'N: 287.61'
-� - - - -_ 290.00
PROPOSED 24" RCP PROPOSED
CULVERT COFFER DAM 280.00
-50.00 -40.00 -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00
10 05 0 10
SCALE: 1 INCH = 10 FEET
20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00
270.00
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR (2')
LEASE BOUNDARY
PROPERTY SETBACK
EXISTING PARENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
R/W EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
EXISTING TREE LINE
EXISTING STREAM
STREAM BUFFER
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
PROPOSED FENCE LINE
PROPOSED TREE LINE
o- -- PROPOSED CULVERT WITH FLARED END SECTIOf
® PROPOSED RIPRAP ENERGY DISSIPATER
TEMPORARY
IMPACT AREA
DESCRIPTION
IMPACT (LINEAR
FEET)
AREA OF IMPACT
24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
130 ROBERTS STREET
WA -1
NOTES
SUN
DEVIL SOLAR
SITE
DRIVEWAY CULVERT STORM
DRAINAGE CALCULATION
24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
40 LF
S2 -2
14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD, AND
10 LF
I
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
PROJECT NO.
20153383
24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
.002 AC
WB -3
AND 14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD
0 LF
66" RCP, 45' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
41 LF
S1 -4
-1. SURVEY PROVIDED BY SACK SURVEYING &
INTENSITY
Cc (INLET)
Q FLOW (cfs)
Q TOTAL
SLOPE (ft /ft)
Dtheo
SIZE
Vfull (ft /sec)
LENGTH (ft)
UPPER
LOWER
TOP EL (ft)
PIPE
MAPPING, DATED 02 -10 -2015.
(in /hr)
(AREA)
FLOW (cfs)
(in)
(in)
INVERT (ft)
INVERT (ft)
MATERIAL
2. CONTOURS PROVIDED BY CONNECT NCDOT:
7.03
0.30
13.3
13.3
0.0050
22.4
24
5.5
24.00
287.61
287.49
290.36
CLASS IV RCP
CONNECT.NCDOT.GOV
7.03
0.30
8.6
8.6
0.0050
19.0
24
5.5
25.00
289.75
289.62
292.13
CLASS IV RCP
3. PARENT PARCEL INFORMATION:
7.03
0.30
321.0
321.0
0.0189
57.5
66
21.0
24.00
267.91
267.46
275.28
CLASS IV RCP
PROPERTY OWNER: PONTIAC PLYWOOD INC.
DEED BOOK: 563 PAGE: 620
KL E //VFEL DER
Bright People. Right Solutions.
3500 GATEWAY CENTRE BLVD., SUITE 200
MORRISVILLE NC 27560
� 755 -5011
USING PUMP AROUND DETAIL PROVIDED. PUMP WATER FROM WORK AREA TO - - -- ! / /� TAX PARCEL ID: 3907287373 PHONE: 919
WWW.KLEINFELDER.COM
ESTABLISH DRY WORKING CONDITIONS WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - -- �� / ' ! ( 4. PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE IN A F.E.M.A. SPECIAL
NE /-- j i --T-7 7 - - , \ FLOOD HAZARD AREA REF. PANEL 3720390600J,
p,CK UN
5. INSTALL ACCESS ROAD GRAVEL, CULVERT, FLARED END SECTIONS AND RIP RAP ENERGY - - - - - 30• SIpE SETS / / - _ r�T DATED JULY 03, 2007.
w PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY PV / _ _ _ c PROPOSED
DISSIPATER MODULES ON GROUND MOUNTED i = _ _ PERMANENT FENCE 5. CULVERTS SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 6
RACKING SYSTEM (TYP.) �� = LINE MIN. 20' OF ITS DIAMETER TO FACILITATE THE
6. RETURN STREAM FLOW BY REMOVING PUMP AROUND PUMPS AND DIKES _ \ - (SETBACK FROM MOVEMENT OF AQUATIC LIFE
- - APPROXIMATE / _ _ \C� I \ ARRAYS (TYP.)
CENTERLINE LOCATION OF i / / / _ 6. DISTURBANCE AT THE TRIBUTARY CROSSING
PROPOSED LIMITS UNNAMED TRIBUTARY / _ _ _ \_ SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE MAXIMUM
\ OF DISTURBANCE / / / / _ �� / / / / _ _ _ _ m EXTENET PRACTICABLE FOR INSTALLATION
ti
- FS FS
S\
FS FS ° \ I I
SF
770 ZZ2
SF\ SF FS /�� \ i �_ _ = = = - _ - _ 1 I N
/ / I
LL
LL zz
\ - - - - - - INSET A l I I
SEE THIS SHEET _
PROPOSED POINT OF -
- INTERCONNECTION (EXACT = - _ /
\ _ LOCATION TO BE STAKED IN - - - _ _ = _ = = _ = = _ i# _ _ - -
- - - - - - _ - - - -- _ -- - - - - -
FIELD BY DUKE ENERGY) - _ _
I _ = PROPOSED PERMANENT = = rn
_ 24' GATE (TYP.) _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - -
_- - - - -__ = =_ -_ -_ _ __ =_= _ -_ ___ = = =_ _� - _ -_ -_�_ I _ -
_ 1 T
IL/ -� -4 SF
/ PROPOSED 14 WIDE ACCESS PROPOSED PROPOSED SF _ ® /
ROAD WITH 6" GRAVEL BASE. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC INVERTER (TYP.) SF SSF
SEE SHEET C -6 DETAIL 5 (TYP.) I I �-
/ / I -SF PROPOSED TREE
o
I _ LINE (TYP.) i I
E
r
m
a
v
N
V
In
0
N
I-
0
w
r \
0
J
a
t
z
a
a
0
z
O
U
z
0
W
O
Of
w
v
D
O
a
J
,_
21
w
LL
C
0
U_
w
LL
0
a
U
s � 1
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
COFFER DAM
(TEMPORARY IMPACT)
NCDOT CLASS B RIPRAP -
12'L X 35W X 22" THICK
(PERMANENT IMPACT)
i
S2 -2 PERMANENT IMPACTS:
LENGTH: 40 LF
F9 f S FS �- FS FJ FS
EXISTING UTILITY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LAYDOWN AREA. - �
1.0 ACRE. 400'x 110' - _ \ POLE (TYP.) j
I I BACKU� - - EXISTING TREE
30' SIDE - _ LINE (TYP.) LEGEND
250 EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR (10')
WETLAND A
(38 LF WIDTH)
E
E E E
E E E E
WIDTH: 3.5 LF E E <-
AREA: 81 SF E F _ F 5' F
PROPOSED PIPE 1 E E E E E
24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP �S E E E
MIN.COVER 6" F E F F TEMPORARY
(PERMANENT IMPACT) IMPACT
:is
F F F F AREA -
E
WA -1 PERMANENT PERMANENT
IMPACTS: 5' _ _ IMPACT
LENGTH: 40 LF AREA
WIDTH: 39 LF E E
AREA: 1004 SF E E E
F E <
F F E F TEMPORARY
<- F E E E IMPACT
PROPOSED LIMITS OF E E E E F AREA
DISTURBANCE E E E
E E L PROPOSED TEMPORARY
COFFER DAM
(TEMPORARY IMPACT)
STREAM 2
WIDTH: 3.5'
l
- l
INSET A
20 10 0 20
SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
320.00
310.00
300.00
290.00
:1 11
270.00
PROPOSED
COFFER DAM
EXISTING STREAM
BED
PROPOSED RIPRAF
DISSIPATER
P PE 1
320.00
310.00
300.00
=ES -1 INV
'N: 287.61'
-� - - - -_ 290.00
PROPOSED 24" RCP PROPOSED
CULVERT COFFER DAM 280.00
-50.00 -40.00 -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00
10 05 0 10
SCALE: 1 INCH = 10 FEET
20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00
270.00
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR (2')
LEASE BOUNDARY
PROPERTY SETBACK
EXISTING PARENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
R/W EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
EXISTING TREE LINE
EXISTING STREAM
STREAM BUFFER
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
PROPOSED FENCE LINE
PROPOSED TREE LINE
o- -- PROPOSED CULVERT WITH FLARED END SECTIOf
® PROPOSED RIPRAP ENERGY DISSIPATER
PROPOSED PERMANENT IMPACT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY IMPACT
REVISIONS
REV DESCRIPTION DSN CHK DATE
DWN APP
-2-, _ z
SCALE VERIFICATION
THIS BAR IS 1 INCH IN LENGTH
ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
0 1"
I I
IF IT'S NOT 1 INCH ON THIS
SHEET ADJUST YOUR
SCALES ACCORDINGLY
100 50 0 100
SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEET
ORIGINAL DRAWING SIZE IS 24 x 36
STREAM CROSSINGS EXHIBIT
SUN DEVIL SOLAR FARM
3401 US HWY 158 E.
LITTLETON, NC 27850
FLS�,ry
MAKING SOLAR MAINSTREAM
TEMPORARY
IMPACT AREA
DESCRIPTION
IMPACT (LINEAR
FEET)
AREA OF IMPACT
24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
130 ROBERTS STREET
WA -1
14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD, AND
10 LF
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
(ACRES)
24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
40 LF
S2 -2
14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD, AND
10 LF
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
PROJECT NO.
20153383
24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
.002 AC
WB -3
AND 14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD
0 LF
66" RCP, 45' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
41 LF
S1 -4
14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD, AND
10 LF
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
DRAWN BY
PROPOSED PERMANENT IMPACT
PROPOSED TEMPORARY IMPACT
REVISIONS
REV DESCRIPTION DSN CHK DATE
DWN APP
-2-, _ z
SCALE VERIFICATION
THIS BAR IS 1 INCH IN LENGTH
ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
0 1"
I I
IF IT'S NOT 1 INCH ON THIS
SHEET ADJUST YOUR
SCALES ACCORDINGLY
100 50 0 100
SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEET
ORIGINAL DRAWING SIZE IS 24 x 36
STREAM CROSSINGS EXHIBIT
SUN DEVIL SOLAR FARM
3401 US HWY 158 E.
LITTLETON, NC 27850
FLS�,ry
MAKING SOLAR MAINSTREAM
FLS ENERGY
PERMANENT
AREA OF IMPACT
130 ROBERTS STREET
IMPACT (LINEAR
FEET)
(ACRES)
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
40 LF
.023 AC
EXHIBIT
PROJECT NO.
20153383
40 LF
.002 AC
ISSUE DATE
07 -01 -2015
CURRENT REVISION
41 LF
.015 AC
DESIGNED BY
MDI E-1
DRAWN BY
MEW
77 LF
.012 AC
CHECKED BY
CAL
APPROVED BY
JAC SHEET 1 of 3

T
N
3
}
m
LO
N
0
N
0
w
0
a
z
a
a
0
z
0
U
z
O
U
O
Of
w
D
0
a
J
21
w
LL
J
C
0
U_
w
LL
0
a
0
NOTES
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
1. SURVEY PROVIDED BY SACK SURVEYING & COFFER DAM PROPOSED -
\ \ ✓ �� / / / / / \ \\ MAPPING, DATED 02 -10 -2015. (TEMPORARY IMPACT) , PIPE 3 COFFER DAM KLE //VFEL DER
2. CONTOURS PROVIDED BY CONNECT NCDOT: 300.00 300.00 Bright People. Right Solutions.
PROPOSED LIMITS OF I FES -3 INV - g P 9
\\ CONNECT.NCDOT.GOV PROPOSED 14' WIDE
�� DISTURBANCE 5 ACESS ROAD
IN: 267.91'
l /\ \ / 3. PARENT PARCEL INFORMATION: 290.00 TOP ELEV.: 275.28' 290.00
PROPOSED LIMITS PROPERTY OWNER: PONTIAC PLYWOOD INC. NCDOT CLASS II RIPRAP /
45'L X 7LA X 27" THICK I 1 1 3500 GATEWAY CENTRE BLVD., SUITE 200
DEED BOOK: 563 PAGE: 620 2:1 SIDE SLOPE MORRISVILLE,
19- 55 2711
INSET B \ OF DISTURBANCE � (PERMANENT IMPACTS) TEMPORARY 280.00 ' ' � 280.00 PHONE: [phone]
/ / SEE THIS SHEET / j / \ TAX PARCEL ID: 3907287373 \ FES -3 INV WWW.KLEINFELDER.COM
/ IMPACT OUT: 267.46'
/ I �2 ~ 4. PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE IN A F.E.M.A. SPECIAL �\ AREA �_ 1
270.00 r 270.00
/x� � � \ 1 � - I I I / � \ FLOOD HAZARD AREA REF. PANEL 37203906001, \\ _ - -
r DATED JULY 03, 2007. \ \�.
/ \ / I 5. CULVERTS SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 6" S1 -4 PERMANENT \ 260.00 PROPOSED 66 RCP
- 260.00
/ - OF ITS DIAMETER TO FACILITATE THE IMPACTS: SILT FENCE TYP. CULVERT
w / I / \ MOVEMENT OF AQUATIC LIFE LENGTH: 77 LF ( )
LLI WIDTH: 7 LF �/ 250.00 250.00
�� PROPOSED RIPRAP
PROPOSED
6. DISTURBANCE AT THE TRIBUTARY CROSSING AREA: 539 SF COFFER DAM DISSIPATER
SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE MAXIMUM '
/ c I I I
240.00
240.00
EXTENET PRACTCABLE FOR INSTALLATION PROPOSED PIPE 3 EXISTING STREAM W
24 LF OF 66" CLASS IV RCP ' y� BED REVISIONS
MIN.COVER 6 PERMANENT
IMPACT \ zJIS 230.00 230.00 DSN CHK
(PERMANENT IMPACT) REV DESCRIPTION DATE
TEMPORARY;- 5, AREA �S , -120.00-110.00-100.00 -90.00 -80.00 -70.00 -60.00 -50.00 -40.00 -30.00 -20.00 DWN APP
IMPACT
AREA - PROPOSED TEMPORARY
COFFER DAM
(TEMPORARY IMPACT)
STREAM 1
TOP OF BANK WIDTH: 13.5'
BOTTOM WIDTH: 7'
�/\ \ 20 10 0 20
INSET --l--
/ 20 10 0 20 SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
INSET C
-- / SEE THIS SHEET V� _ ��
1
IMP
PROPOSED TREE {1/
ACCESS ROAD CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. BEFORE ANY CULVERT INSTALLATION PROCEDURES BEGIN,
INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL FILTER SOCK AND BROAD
BASED DIPS AS SHOWN.
2. REMOVE ALL SURFACE VEGETATION AND DEBRIS AT CROSSING -
LOCATION
3. PREPARE EXISTING SUBGRADE FOR INSTALLATION BY REMOVING
UNACCEPTABLE SOILS AND DEBRIS SUN DEVIL SOLAR SITE DRIVEWAY CULVERT STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATION \ /'
4. TEMPORARILY DIKE STREAM AND DIVERT STREAM FLOW AROUND tc TIME OF Cc (INLET) Q TOTAL Dtheo SIZE UPPER LOWER PIPE
PIPE AREA AC INTENSITY Q FLOW cfs SLOPE ft /ft Vfull ft /sec LENGTH ft TOP EL ft \ \ \ \ �
CONSTRUCTION AREA USING PUMP AROUND DETAIL PROVIDED. AREA( AC) CONC. (min) (AREA) ( ) FLOW (cfs) ( ) (in) (in) ( ) O INVERT (ft) INVERT (ft) O MATERIAL
PUMP WATER FROM WORK AREA TO ESTABLISH DRY WORKING (in /hr) \ \
CONDITIONS WITHIN TEMPORARY LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PIPE 1 6.29 5.0 7.03 0.30 13.3 13.3 0.0050 22.4 24 5.5 24.00 287.61 287.49 290.36 CLASS IV RCP
PIPE 2 4.06 5.0 7.03 0.30 8.6 8.6 0.0050 19.0 24 5.5 25.00 289.75 289.62 292.13 CLASS IV RCP
5. INSTALL ACCESS ROAD GRAVEL, CULVERT, FLARED END SECTIONS PIPE 21 2 .1 7.0 21.0 21.0 .018 57.5 66 21.0 24.00 267.91 267.46 275.28 LA IV RCP
3 5 65 8 3 0 30 3 3 0 9 CLASS C
AND RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPATER ALL CULVERTS MUST HAVE 6" MINIMUM COVER
i
6. RETURN STREAM FLOW BY REMOVING PUMP AROUND PUMPS AND
DIKES j
MATCHLINE SHEET 3 SCALE VERIFICATION
LEGEND
250 EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR (10') THIS BAR IS 1 INCH IN LENGTH
ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
WETLAND B PPE 2 EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR (2') r z
0 1"
LEASE BOUNDARY I
NCDOT CLASS B RIPRAP 320.00 320.00 PROPERTY SETBACK
IF IT'S NOT 1 INCH ON THIS
121 X 6'W X 22" THICK EXISTING PARENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHEET ADJUST YOUR
(PERMANENT IMPACT) SCALES ACCORDINGLY
EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
_ II EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
- SILT FENCE (TYP.) _� ' �S f 310.00 310.00 R/W EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 100 50 0 100
Q 4\ o F PROPOSED 14' WIDE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEET
WB -3 PERMANENT � �� o E
IMPACTS: ACESS ROAD EXISTING UTILITY POLE
LENGTH: 41 LF o TOP ELEV.: 292.13' ORIGINAL DRAWING SIZE IS 24 x 36
EXISTING TREE LINE
WIDTH: 28 LF � 300.00 I 300.00 EXISTING STREAM STREAM CROSSINGS EXHIBIT
AREA: 649 SF, � ' I 2:1 SIDE SLOPE
FES -2 INV STREAM BUFFER
/ FES -2 INV IN: 289.75' LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SUN DEVIL SOLAR FARM
PROPOSED PIPE 2 ' OUT: 287.62' � 3401 US HWY 158 E. rsl� 24 LF OF 24" CLASS IV RCP 29000 - - - - - - - 29000 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE LITTLETON, NC 27850
. .
MIN.COVER 6" ' PROPOSED FENCE LINE
(PERMANENT IMPACT) _/ PERMANENT
IMPACT PROPOSED TREE LINE
F AREA :PROPOSED 24" RCP
' CULVERT PROPOSED CULVERT WITH FLARED END SECTION
280.00 PROPOSED RIPRAP I C7 280.00 ® PROPOSED RIPRAP ENERGY DISSIPATER
DISSIPATER PROPOSED PERMANENT IMPACT
i MAKING SOLAR MAINSTREAM
PROPOSED TEMPORARY IMPACT
I' EXISTING WETLAND
TEMPORARY PERMANENT FLS ENERGY AREA OF IMPACT 130 ROBERTS STREET
270.00 270.00 IMPACT AREA DESCRIPTION IMPACT (LINEAR IMPACT (LINEAR
PROPOSED LIMITS OF FEET) FEET) (ACRES) ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
� DISTURBANCE
-50.00 -40.00 -30.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00 24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON,
WA -1 14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD, AND 10 LF 40 LF .023 AC EXHIBIT
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
24" RCP, 12' LONG RIPRAP APRON, PROJECT NO. 20153383
S2 -2 14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD, AND 10 LF 40 LF .002 AC ISSUE DATE 07 -01 -2015
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
CURRENT REVISION
INSET B WB -3 24" AND P142WIDE ACCESS ROAD APRON, 0 LF 41 LF .015 AC DESIGNED BY MDI
10- -0� - 0 10 10- -05 - 0 10 66" RCP, 45' LONG RIPRAP APRON, DRAWN BY MEW
SCALE: 1 INCH = 10 FEET SCALE: 1 INCH = 10 FEET S1 -4 14' WIDE ACCESS ROAD, AND 10 LF 77 LF .012 AC CHECKED BY CAL
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
APPROVED BY JAC SHEET 2 of 3

0
3
E
}
co
a
LO
N
V
LO
O
0
W
F-
0
a
V
z
J
a
0
z
0
U
z
O
0
Of
w
v
0
a
J
21
w
LL
J
c
0
U_
J
LL
0
a
U
KL AEI DER
IN Bright People. Right Solutions.
3500 GATEWAY CENTRE BLVD., SUITE 200
MORRISVILLE, NC 27560
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KLEINFELDER.COM
MATCHLINE SHEET 2
xx
REVISIONS
DSN CHK
// / \ / REV DESCRIPTION DATE
I I
NOTES DWN APP � � � � \ � � I / F \ I \ � � � � I / \ \
1. SURVEY PROVIDED BY SACK SURVEYING &
MAPPING, DATED 02-10-2015.
2. CONTOURS PROVIDED BY CONNECT NCDOT: -
CONNECT.NCDOT.GOV
3. PARENT PARCEL INFORMATION: \ \\V� \ \ I / \ \ /
PROPERTY OWNER: PONTIAC PLYWOOD INC. / ( / \
DEED BOOK: 563 PAGE: 620 \ / / i / / / /
TAX PARCEL ID: 3907287373
4. PROPERTY DOES NOT LIE IN A F.E.M.A. SPECIAL
FLOOD HAZARD AREA REF. PANEL 3720390600J,
DATED JULY 03, 2007.
/ \� \\ I ) l PROPOSED TREE
5. CULVERTS SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 6" 1 I \ \ I I LINE (TYP.)
OF ITS DIAMETER TO FACILITATE THE
MOVEMENT OF AQUATIC LIFE / \ \ I / PROPOSED SILT \ I \ \ \
FENCE TYP. \
6. DISTURBANCE AT THE TRIBUTARY CROSSING / / I
MINIMIZED SHALL BE D THE MAXIMUM
EXTENET PRACTICABLE FOR INSTALLATION
ACCESS ROAD CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. BEFORE ANY CULVERT INSTALLATION PROCEDURES BEGIN, INSTALL PERIMETER
EROSION CONTROL FILTER SOCK AND BROAD BASED DIPS AS SHOWN. I I \
2. REMOVE ALL SURFACE VEGETATION AND DEBRIS AT CROSSING LOCATION
3. PREPARE EXISTING SUBGRADE FOR INSTALLATION BY REMOVING UNACCEPTABLE SOILS
AND DEBRIS \ /
4. TEMPORARILY DIKE STREAM AND DIVERT STREAM FLOW AROUND CONSTRUCTION AREA
USING PUMP AROUND DETAIL PROVIDED. PUMP WATER FROM WORK AREA TO
ESTABLISH DRY WORKING CONDITIONS WITHIN TEMPORARY LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE J \
5. INSTALL ACCESS ROAD GRAVEL, CULVERT, FLARED END SECTIONS AND RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATER
J
6. RETURN STREAM FLOW BY REMOVING PUMP AROUND PUMPS AND DIKES
SCALE VERIFICATION
LEGEND THIS BAR IS 1 INCH IN LENGTH
ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
\ \\ \ r t
250 EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR (10') I / / / / / / \ \ \
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR (2') I / _ _ / / / / \ / / \
LEASE BOUNDARY / \ / / / / / / / j / / \\ \ \ \ IF IT'S NOT 1 INCH ON THIS
\ \
PROPERTY SETBACK SHEET ADJUST YOUR � \ \ / � � / / � / / / � / / � / / / � � � ��� —\
\ SCALES ACCORDINGLY
EXISTING PARENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY \ / ✓ / / / // \ L/ = ������
EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT \ / / / // / \ \ __�_��� �� _ _ 100 _50 _ 0 100
R/W EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
SCALE: 1INCH = 100 FEET
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
ORIGINAL DRAWING SIZE IS 24 x 36
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
EXISTING TREE LINE STREAM CROSSINGS EXHIBIT
��� _ \ /j � � � � � � �_ , , � ��
EXISTING STREAM
STREAM BUFFER _ \� \ \ / �� L �` �� - - SUN DEVIL SOLAR FARM
3401 US HWY 158 E.
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LITTLETON, NC 27850
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
PROPOSED FENCE LINE
PROPOSED TREE LINE I
BOBBIT ROAD
— — — — — — — — PROPOSED CULVERT WITH FLARED END SECTION
® PROPOSED RIPRAP ENERGY DISSIPATER —
- - - FLS
MAKING SOLAR MAINSTREAM
I
FLS ENERGY
130 ROBERTS STREET
ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
EXHIBIT
PROJECT NO. 20153383
ISSUE DATE 07 -01 -2015
CURRENT REVISION E-3
DESIGNED BY MDI
DRAWN BY MEW
CHECKED BY CAL
APPROVED BY JAC SHEET 3 of 3

0
0
L6
Lu
O
CO
U-1
Z)
0
LU
LL
r)
U)
Lu iii
(D LL
< LU
X
00
aQ
--1
ch qF i hosesp. L4-AII
I� 14*6 I.
how]
F 11
-i-Aevimteflng pbmp
INTAKE STRUCTURE
SHALL NOT PULL UP
SEDIMENT. HOSE IN
BUCKET TO BE USED
flow,
intbke
fowl
1-io - -j
A
❑
clean -W;"
9-W
LT
'a(
K
-1 Jill
Fv
III be
oator lm@od
--1
-1 -j
Ll A
-j
-base VoW, + I iDOt t I
N --I -F -1
-T Ll
- F]
section of sandbag dike
PUMP AROUND DETAIL
-- j--- r F---F-- - -J-.- -ter -- - - - I- - i- F r-
NOT, E�w-� I I Ff f f- r-
F- r
!�:r',,PUMR AROUND DIKES sHAL'iI BE SET dUTSIDE OF,-THE DISTURE13ED/IMPACT
A F- F--
`LIMITS i'SHOWN,ON THE PLANS.
F
F F
PTAA, � ISONAND DEWATER THEiCONSTRUCTION ZONE
--j iI Pomp-Af,?DLIND DIVER
THROU G14 THE DIEWATERING DEVICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAGE THE LIMITS OF
EDU
M AROUN6 FLOW DIVERSION TO DIEWATER ONLY THAT SECTION SCHEDULED
HE I - P-,
1F,OR THAT 'DAY'S WORK. AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE
STABILIZED, ,:THE PlUlhillIf' AROUND LIND PRACTICE REMOVED, AND THE FLOW RESTORED TO
-WO
THE CHA.NN811- k-,$HA N
_,L1 BE COMPL5T"ED,,, LY.PYRING. FORECAST PERIODS OF
—,
------
DRY WE�A-�H F—
EAR%, —I �
PROJECT NO. 20153383 QUINCY SOLAR FARM
DATE: 07-01-2015 STREAM CROSSING
DETAIL
PUMP AROUND DETAIL
KLC1N#=CLA0AE#c? DRAWN BY: xxx
Right Soludorm CHECKED BY: CAL FLS ENERGY
�B/ightPeople.
FILE NAME: 130 ROBERTS STREET
www.kleinfelder.com Pump Around Detail.dwg ASHEVILLE, NC 28801

A t Pre - Construction Notification
Energy Renewal Sun Devil Solar Project
PARTNERS, LLC
ATTACHMENT B
Endangered Species Report and USFWS Concurrence Letter

:E7
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
March 6, 2015
Mr. Greg Ness
FLS Energy
130 Roberts Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Reference: Limited NEPA Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Farm
US Highway 158
Littleton, Warren County, NC
PEI Project No. 1358
Dear Mr. Ness:
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (PEI) is pleased to submit this report of the Limited NEPA Assessment
for the approximate 25 acre tract located north of US Highway 158 in Littleton, Warren County,
North Carolina. A U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map (Drawing 1) and a 2012 aerial
photograph (Drawing 2) of the site are included as attachments.
Background
Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1973. The purpose of the ESA is to protect
and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. It is administered
by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Commerce Department's National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS). The USFWS has primary responsibility for terrestrial and freshwater
organisms, while the responsibilities of the Commerce Departments NMFS are mainly marine
wildlife. Under the ESA, federally protected species may be listed as either endangered or
threatened. "Endangered" means a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range. "Threatened" means a species is likely to become endangered
within the foreseeable future. All species of plants and animals, except pest insects, are eligible
for listing as endangered or threatened. For the purposes of the ESA, Congress defined species
to include subspecies, varieties, and, for vertebrates, distinct population segments.
Scope of Services
PEI was contracted to perform a Limited NEPA Assessment for the site located north of US
Highway 158 in Littleton, Warren County, North Carolina. The site is an approximate 25 acre
parcel identified by the Warren County Geographical Information Systems (GIS) website as Parcel
Identification Number (PIN) 3907 -28 -7373. The site is being evaluated for proposed development
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www. Xom

Limited NEPA Assessment
PEI Project No. 1358
March 6, 2015
with a solar farm. The purpose of the Limited NEPA Assessment is to identify the potential for
impact to federally listed threatened and endangered species. The scope of services included a
field reconnaissance, a review of available literature and a submittal of relevant site information
to solicit comments from the USFWS. The site boundaries were not surveyed at the time of our
field evaluation.
Site Reconnaissance
PEI conducted a site visit on December 19, 2014. The site contains wooded land and remnants
of a single family residence on the central portion of the site. A former logging road crosses the
central portion of the site and an overhead power line easement bounds the site to the north.
The wooded land consists of primarily planted loblolly pine that ranges from 8 to 16 inches
diameter at beast height (DBH). Few scattered hardwood species including sweet gum, red
maple and various oak species are located in the wooded areas. Fire cut lines containing dense
sapling /herbaceous vegetation crosses wooded areas of the site. Moderate to mostly open mid
and under story canopy cover is present in the majority of the wooded areas located on the site.
PEI has conducted a stream /wetland delineation on the site. Based on the stream /wetland
delineation, jurisdictional features are not located on the site. The site has not been verified by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species
Literature Review
We reviewed the USFWS Endangered Species Database to identify federally protected
threatened and endangered species in Warren County, North Carolina. The following federally
protected Threatened and endangered species are identified in Warren County, North Carolina:
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle
Invertebrate:
Dwarf wedgemussel
Scientific name
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
�Alasmidonta heterodon
Federal Record Status
Status
' IBGPA IlCurrent
ICE IlCurrent
'Tar River spinymussel I Elliptio steinstansana IIE
E — Endangered BGPA — Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
N
Current

Limited NEPA Assessment
PEI Project No. 1358
March 6, 2015
Species /Habitat Description
Bald Eaele (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Description: The Bald Eagle is a regulated species underthe Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(BGPA). Bald Eagles were removed from the federal list of threatened and endangered species
on August 9, 2007, and are no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act. However,
Bald Eagles remain protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act. The Bald and Golden Eagle Act prohibits anyone from taking, possessing, or
transporting a Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) or Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysoetos), or the
parts, nests, or eggs.of such birds without prior authorization. This includes inactive nests as well
as active nests. Take means to pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect,
destroy, molest, or disturb. Activities that directly or indirectly lead to take are prohibited without
a permit.
A large raptor (bird of prey), the bald eagle has a wingspread of 5% to 8 feet. Adults have a dark
brown body and wings, white head and tail, and a yellow beak. In flight, the bald eagle often
soars or glides with the wings held at a right angle to the body. Juvenile bald eagles have mottled
brown and white plumage, gradually acquiring their dark brown body and distinctive white head
and tail as they mature. Bald eagles generally attain adult plumage by 5 years of age. Adults weigh
8 to 14 pounds, occasionally reaching 16 pounds in Alaska. Those in the northern range grow
larger than those in the south, and females are somewhat larger than males.
Habitat: Bald eagles generally nest near coastlines, rivers, large lakes or streams that support an
adequate food supply. They often nest in mature or old- growth trees; snags (dead trees); cliffs;
rock promontories; rarely on the ground; and with increasing frequency on human -made
structures such as power poles and communication towers. In forested areas, bald eagles often
select the tallest trees with limbs strong enough to support a nest that can weigh more than
1,000 pounds. Nest sites typically include at least one perch with a clear view of the water where
the eagles usually forage. Shoreline trees or snags located near reservoirs provide the visibility
and accessibility needed to locate aquatic prey. Eagle nests are constructed with large sticks, and
may be lined with moss, grass, plant stalks, lichens, seaweed, or sod. Nests are usually about 4 -6
feet in diameter and 3 feet deep, although larger nests exist.
Conclusion: Based on the lack water bodies located on the site, it is the opinion of PEI that the
proposed project will not likely adversely impact the bald eagle.
3

Limited NEPA Assessment
PEI Project No. 1358
March 6, 2015
Dwarf wedgemussel (Alosmidonta heterodon)
Description: The dwarf wedgemussel is a small bivalve, rarely exceeding 45 mm in length. Clean
young shells are usually greenish -brown with green rays. As the animal ages, the shell color
becomes obscured by diatoms or mineral deposits and appears black or brown. The shell is thin
but does thicken somewhat with age, especially toward the anterior end. The anterior end is
rounded while the posterior end is angular forming a point near the posterio - ventral margin. The
ventral margin is only slightly curved. The nacre is bluish- white, appearing whiter in the thicker
anterior end. The most distinctive shell character of the dwarf wedgemussel is the arrangement
of the lateral teeth. There are two lateral teeth in the right valve and one in the left valve. The
typical arrangement for most freshwater mussel species consists of two lateral teeth in the left
valve and one in the right valve. The incurrent and excurrent apertures and their associated
papillae are usually white. The foot and other organs are also white. Maximum age for the dwarf
wedgemussel is around twelve years. The species is a bradytictic breeder, meaning that females
become gravid in the early fall and glochidia are released by mid - spring. The tessellated darter
(Etheostoma olmstedi), johnny darter (Etheostoma nigrum), and mottled sulpin (Cottus bairdi)
have been identified as hosts for the dwarf wedgemussel. An anadromous fish may also serve as
a host species but this has not been documented for the dwarf wedgemussel in the southern
portion of its range.
Habitat: The dwarf wedgemussel appears to be a generalist in terms of its preference for stream
size, substrate and flow conditions — it inhabits small streams less than five meters wide to large
rivers more than 100 meters wide; it is found in a variety of substrate types including clay, sand,
gravel and pebble, and sometimes in silt depositional areas near banks; and it usually inhabits
hydrologically stable areas, including very shallow water along stream banks and under root
mats, but it has also been found at depths of 25 feet in the Connecticut River. Dwarf
wedgemussels are often patchily distributed in rivers.
Conclusion: Suitable habitat is not present on the site.
Tar River spinymussel (Picoides borealis)
Description: The Tar River spinymussel is one of only three freshwater mussels with spines in the
world. The brownish shell is rhomboid - shaped, up to 2.4 inches long, with 0 -6 spines on each
valve. The shell is rather smooth and shiny, with concentric rings, and ends in a blunt point.
Younger individuals are orange -brown with greenish rays streaking outward from the hinge area.
Adults are darker with less distinct rays. One to three small thin ridges run on the interior surface
of the shell from the beak cavity to the lower ventral area of the shell. The anterior half of the
shell's inner surface is salmon - colored, the posterior half is iridescent blue. Juveniles may have
up to 12 spines, however, adults tend to lose their spines as they mature. Their method of
reproduction is similar among freshwater mussel species. Males release sperm into the water
column, and the sperm are taken in by the females through their siphons as they respire. The
rd

Limited NEPA Assessment
PEI Project No. 1358
March 6, 2015
eggs are fertilized and develop within the females' gills into larvae (glochidia). The females
release the glochidia that must then attach to the gills or fins of specific fish species. The glochida
transform into juvenile mussels and drop off the fish onto the stream bottom.
Habitat: The Tar River spinymussel lives in relatively silt -free uncompacted gravel and /or coarse
sand in fast - flowing, well oxygenated stream reaches. It is found in association with other
mussels, but it is never very numerous. It feeds by syphoning and filtering small food particles
that are suspended in the water.
Conclusion: Suitable habitat is not present at the site.
USFWS Correspondence
PEI submitted a letter to the USFWS to solicit comments pertaining to the proposed project. The
USFWS responded to our request in a letter dated February 20, 2015. The letter response
indicates that the USFWS concurs with our opinion that the proposed action of developing the
site with a solar farm is not likely to adversely affect federally listed endangered or threatened
species, their formally designated habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act
at the site. According to the letter, the USFWS believes that the requirements of Section 7(a)(2)
of the Act have been satisfied for the proposed project. A copy of the letter is included as an
attachment.
Conclusions and Opinions
This Limited NEPA Assessment has revealed that it is not likely for the proposed development of
the site with a solar farm to impact federally listed threatened /endangered species. If additional
information concerning federally listed threatened /endangered species becomes available that
makes a material difference in our findings and conclusions, PEI reserves the right to review
applicable information that could alter the conclusions and opinions found within this report.
Additional assessment is not recommended at this time.
5

Limited NEPA Assessment
PEI Project No. 1358
March 6, 2015
Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (336) 310-
2527 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
- 7 �-�
B. J. Lineback, CIEC, LEED AP
Project Manager
Bradley S. Luckey
Project Manager
Attachments: Drawing 1— USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 2 — 2012 Aerial Photograph
USFWS Response Letter, February 20, 2015
11

iJ�, rill � � � '`•` y I ` � � \" � _ •� ��'
Pea .1 Harbc
333 I�r
Ohnz Y�s
JoM
fr
Athletic
Fred - \
lr -.
/may
}tom ! ,' f ba. • r, • t l
,f
337 / � I t� �; C �• { i1. ,\ Ja <:• Q
i- -•r'�1 376 r (
Q
(a0; a,,. ,� .. ;,,•�- a i SCI 3
�`�`� • r� ;,' �_�, n �� �
r {
Vii—. ttipp; r%] a3 ,
S Higvwa°:
l f (\ ! c
3�
b-- �' - - -� x 336
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map Sun Devil Farm
Littleton, NC Quadrangle Approximate 25 Acre Tract
Littleton, North Carolina
,o; - SCALE: 1" = 2,000' PEI No. 1358

t
to** f
orp
.AAb—Qm_
V -
A6.
.rF%Aw

�"£ "` °` United States Department of the Interior
f:
M Tti FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
�t Raleigh CS Field Office
P(),l Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
February 20, 2015
Bradley Luckey
Pilot Environmental Inc.
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
Re: Sun Devil Solar Farm- Warren County, NC
Dear Mr. Luckey:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally - protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally - protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally - listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- protected species list. information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally- listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies. and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down- gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
In general, the Service recommends that solar facilities be sited in areas that are previously
disturbed, or sites that do not impact mature forest, wetlands, or streams. The North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a copy can be found
on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate secondary and
cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality. We
2

recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and infonnative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Kathy Matthews of this
office at (919) 856 -4520 ext. 27.
Sincerely,
W
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
3
�01

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Perquimans
Beaufort
Person
Bertie
Pitt
Bladen
Randolph
Brunswick
Richmond
Camden
Robeson
Carteret
Rockingham
Caswell
Sampson
Chatham
Scotland
Chowan
Tyrrell
Columbus
Vance
Craven
Wake
Cumberland
Warren
Currituck
Washington
Dare
Wayne
Duplin
Wilson
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
4

AAIk
F
Energy Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
Pre - Construction Notification
Sun Devil Solar Project
ATTACHMENT C
Agent Authorization Letters

June 16, 2015
Mr. Craig Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105
Ware Forest, NC 27587
Re: Agent Authorization for
Property Location
Warren County PINS:
Dear Mr. Brown:
Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permitting
Sun Devil Solar Project
West of Bobbitt Road
Warren County, North Carolina
3908 -30 -0526, 3907 -28 -7373
This letter is to inform you that I, Hunter Stone, owner of the above referenced real property, hereby
grants permission to FLS Energy, Inc. and its consultant, Energy Renewal Partners, LLC to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary to request a jurisdictional determination (preliminary or final) and
for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this Clean Water Act Section 404/401 authorization and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at the phone number below.
With est regards,
0: 7
Hunter Stone
Pontiac Plywood, Inc.
3204 Nash St. N., Ste. C
Wilson, NC
(252) 230 -9068

AAIk
F
Energy Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
Pre - Construction Notification
Sun Devil Solar Project
ATTACHMENT D
PJD Submittal

Energy Renewal
PARTNERS. LLC
June 26, 2015
Mr. Craig Brown
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh District Regulatory Branch
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Sun Devil Solar Project, Warren County, North Carolina
Approximate Center of Site: 36.434407 °N, 77.970651 °W
Dear Mr. Brown,
On behalf of FLS Energy, Energy Renewal Partners, LLC (Energy Renewal) is providing the information
attached in support of a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination request for the Sun Devil Solar Project.
The Sun Devil Solar Project (the "Site ") consists of approximately 29 acres located north of Highway 158
and west of Bobbitt Road, approximately 2.75 miles west of the town of Littleton in Warren County, North
Carolina. FLS Energy is proposing to construct a solar farm which will include the construction of access
roads, installation of solar arrays, and burial of electrical conduits. This assessment consisted of a desktop
review and an onsite investigation for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
The Jurisdictional Waters of the US Assessment consisted of desktop evaluations and an onsite
investigation for the presence of jurisdictional waters and wetlands habitat where proposed solar farm
infrastructure has a potential for jurisdictional impacts. The enclosed information summarizes the results
of Energy Renewal Partner's Jurisdictional Waters of the US Assessment completed on June 26, 2015.
Contact Information of the Project Owner is provided below:
Applicant:
Bru Weber, Project Manager
FLS Energy
130 Roberts Street
Asheville, NC 28801
(828) 233 -8150
bweber @flsenergy.com
Agent:
Lauren Sicarelli, Project Manager
Energy Renewal Partners
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575
West Lake Hills, TX 78746
(512) 222 -1125 ext. 104
Isicarelli @energyrenewalpartners.com
Please contact me if you have any questions or if we can provide additional information to assist with
approval of our Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request. Thank you for your time and
consideration, and I look forward to receiving your response.
Sincerely,
Lauren Sicarelli
Project Manager
305 Camp Craft Rd, Suite 575, Austin, TX 78746 • (512) 222 -1125
101 W Worthington Ave, Suite 120, Charlotte, NC 28203 • (980) 949 -8523

Energy Renewal
PARTNERS. LLC
Attachments:
JD Request Form
PJD Request Form
Agent Authorization Form
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment Report
305 Camp Craft Rd, Suite 575, Austin, TX 78746 • (512) 222 -1125
101 W Worthington Ave, Suite 120, Charlotte, NC 28203 • (980) 949 -8523

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wimirgbn Disidel
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on -line at: htti): / /www.saw.usace.ai-mv.iniI/ Missions /Rev-uIa_toi-yPermitPi-oPram.asr)x , by
telephoning: 910- 251 -4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
General Number: (828) 271 -7980
Fax Number: (828) 281 -8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: (919) 554 -4884
Fax Number: (919) 562 -0421
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251 -4610
Fax Number: (252) 975 -1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910 -251 -4633
Fax Number: (910) 251 -4025
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWN FR Ai_1`I'HORILATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization /notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT /USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
US Highway 158
City, State:
Littleton, NC
County:
Warren
Directions:
Site is located approximately 0.4 miles west of, and accessed via, Bobbitt Road
Littleton. NC.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Warren County PINs: 3907 -28 -7373, 3908 -30 -0526,
3908 -30 -6572, and 3908 -31 -2785
Name: Lauren Sicarelli
Mailing Address: 305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575, West Lake Hills, TX 78746
Telephone Number: 512- 222 -1125 ext. 104
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address 3:
Hunter Stone /Pontiac Plywood, Inc.
3204 Nash St. N., Suite C
Wilson, NC 27896
252 - 230 -9068
Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS /Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Hunter Stone (see attached for signature)
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a Dreliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an aDDroved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an aDDroved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT re.quests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
❑7 Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area 29 acres
III verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
W1 Completed and signed Preliminary, Jurisdictional Determination Form 6.
970651 434407
,i% Project Coordinates: 36. Latitude - 77. Longitude
Maps (no larger than 1 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
W1Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
7 Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Q Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets8
nutariCs:
USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets ✓❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
✓❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 1 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
hTtu l /www.tu5ace.armv, mil / Missions/ Civ ilWorks /ReRulatotOrokramandPerm its /rcR surmasox
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
htt : /cortal.ncdenr.orp/c /document library /yet file ?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- b.343- 45b7faf06f4c &izroudld =38364 and,
htlu. / /www, saw. usace -armv,niil/ Portals/ 591docs /reeulator- v /dublicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318 -odf
B Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form (s) ")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

I.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than l 1 "x17 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
u Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
FMust clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
OMust clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
71 When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
71 all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project /property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non -
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
lJ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundarv:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title
Date
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
11 be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Lauren Sicarelli, Project Manager, Energy Renewal Partners
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575, West Lake Hills, Texas 78704
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Raleigh
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
US Highway 158, approximately 0.4 miles west of, and accessed via, Bobbitt Road, Littleton, NC.
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Warren City: Littleton
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 36.434407 °N; Long. - 77.970651 OW,
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Stone House Creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
linear feet: width (ft) and /or 0.014 acres
Cowardin Class: R3UB2 and R3UB3
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: Total =0.038 acres.
Cowardln Class: PEM /PSS and PEM
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal-
Non-Tidal.

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date.
❑ Field Determination. Date(s).
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
✓❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑✓ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
appiicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas.
USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name.
F7USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
0 National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name.
State /Local wetland inventory map(s).
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
0 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or
Other (Name & Date) see Attached
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
3

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessariiv been verified by the Coros and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
0---- 7////T---
.Zignature a to of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Feature
Latitude
Longitude
Wetland WA
36.437709 °N
- 77.970094 °W
Wetland WB
36.436379 °N
- 77.969805 °W
Stream S1
36.442402 °N
- 77.968147 °W
Stream S2
36.436355 °N
- 77.969758 °W
Cowardin Estimated Amount
Class of Aquatic Resources
PEM /PSS
0.023 ac
PEM
0.015 ac
R3UB2
522.72 sqft
R3UB3
87.12 sqft
Class of Aquatic Resource
Non - section 10 -- wetland
Non - section 10 -- wetland
Non - section 10 -- non - wetland
Non - section 10 -- non - wetland

June 16, 2015
Mr. Craig Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105
Ware Forest, NC 27587
Re: Agent Authorization for
Property Location
Warren County PINS:
Dear Mr. Brown:
Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permitting
Sun Devil Solar Project
West of Bobbitt Road
Warren County, North Carolina
3908 -30 -0526, 3907 -28 -7373
This letter is to inform you that I, Hunter Stone, owner of the above referenced real property, hereby
grants permission to FLS Energy, Inc. and its consultant, Energy Renewal Partners, LLC to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary to request a jurisdictional determination (preliminary or final) and
for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this Clean Water Act Section 404/401 authorization and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at the phone number below.
With est regards,
0: 7
Hunter Stone
Pontiac Plywood, Inc.
3204 Nash St. N., Ste. C
Wilson, NC
(252) 230 -9068

Energy Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Warren County, North Carolina
June 2015

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Prepared for:
Mr. Craig Brown
FLS Energy, Inc.
130 Roberts St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Prepared by:
Energy Renewal Partners, LLC
101 W Worthington Avenue, Suite 120
Charlotte, NC 28203
Date:
June 2015
Jesse Degnan
Environmental Scientist
Lauren Sicarelli
Project Manager

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Table of Contents
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
5.0
6.0
Figures
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Summary......................................................................................................... ..............................1
Project Description and Background .............................................................. ..............................1
Methodology................................................................................................... ..............................1
Results............................................................................................................ ............................... 2
DesktopReview .......................................................................................... ............................... 2
FieldVisit ..................................................................................................... ..............................3
Conclusion...................................................................................................... ............................... 4
References..................................................................................................... ............................... 5
Figure 1 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2 Hydrography and Delineated Wetland Map
Figure 3 Hydric Rating by Soil Map Unit
Appendices
Appendix A Wetland Determination Data Forms - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Appendix B North Carolina Division of Water Quality- Stream Identification Form
Appendix C Site Photographs

Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Energy Renewal
PAI,RTNERS, 6LC Sun Devil Solar Project
1.0 Summary
This report presents the results of an onsite assessment for jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including
wetlands, on the approximately 29 -acre proposed Sun Devil Solar Project ( "subject property' or "the Site ")
located in Warren County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The subject site consists of an approximate 23 -acre
portion planned for the installation of solar panels, while the remaining approximately six acres comprise
the Site's planned access easement from the north. Energy Renewal Partners, LLC (Energy Renewal)
scientists conducted a field delineation of potential jurisdictional waters within the subject property. This
preliminary delineation identified no wetlands or jurisdictional waters within the 23 -acre panel area;
however, Energy Renewal identified two potentially jurisdictional wetlands and two streams along the
proposed access road easement (Figure 2).
2.0 Project Description and Background
The Site is situated in northeastern Warren County, approximately 2.75 miles west of the Town of
Littleton. The subject property is bound to the south by the Seaboard Coast railroad followed by Highway
158, and Bobbitt Road is located approximately 0.4 miles east of the Site. The northern portion of Bobbitt
Road will provide access to the Site. The Site consists of approximately 23 acres of dense woodland within
the panel area, identified by Warren County PIN number 3907 -28 -7373, with an approximately 5,400 -foot
planned road easement to the north, within parcels identified by Warren County PIN numbers 3908 -30-
0526, 3908 -30 -6572, and 3908 -31 -2785. This road easement is located directly adjacent to the west of a
former dammed pond that appears to have been drained in the early 2000s based on aerial imagery.
Unnamed tributaries to Big Stone House Creek are located to the north, east, and west of the Site. The
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) database depicts the subject
property as being void of wetlands, however, a freshwater pond (PUBHh) is depicted at the location of
the former pond directly east of the planned road easement (Figure 2).
3.0 Methodology
The assessment of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. consisted of desktop research and field investigations.
Energy Renewal scientists first reviewed relevant supporting information from sources including U.S.
Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles (Figure 1), National Wetlands Inventory
(Figure 2), National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) (Figure 2), Warren County Geographic Information
Systems (GIS) data, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation
Service (NRCS) Warren County Soil Survey (Figure 3), the USDA publication Hydric Soils of the U.S., and
representative aerial imagery. Energy Renewal consulted these sources to assist in the characterization
of current site conditions and for comparative analyses of findings present at the time of field review.
Subsequent to the desktop review, possible jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands, were
assessed in the field. During the onsite assessment, Energy Renewal scientists evaluated the Site for
drainage areas and potentially jurisdictional waters of the U.S. located within the proposed project
boundaries. For identification of wetlands, Energy Renewal followed guidance set forth in the 1987 USACE
Wetlands Delineation Manual as amended by the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement
1

Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
,ARTNI L L r Sun Devil Solar Project
Guide (2012). Field conditions were documented using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data
Forms (Appendix A) and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Identification Forms
(Appendix B), as appropriate.
This technique uses a three parameter approach, which requires positive evidence of:
• Hydrophytic vegetation
• Hydric soils
• Wetland hydrology
Areas exhibiting the above three wetland characteristics, as well as surface waters, are considered
jurisdictional. Detailed information, required to determine wetland conditions, was collected during the
field reconnaissance and documented on the attached USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms.
Drainage features were also evaluated for the presence of continuous bed and bank and evidence of an
ordinary high water mark (OHWM), in accordance with USACE Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 05 -05,
Ordinary High Water Mark Identification, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Draft Guidance
on Identifying Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act (2011). Drainages /canals with continuous
evidence of bed and bank and an OHWM, are typically considered jurisdictional.
4.0 Results
4.1 Desktop Review
Review of the NWI and aerial imagery depict no wetlands within the subject property, but show a
freshwater pond (PUBHh) directly east of the planned road easement. This freshwater pond is evident in
Google Earth aerial imagery prior to 2005, at which point the pond is no longer visible and appears to have
been drained. During the site visit, Energy Renewal confirmed this pond is no longer present; however,
two Swale wetlands, were identified along the planned project road easement. Additionally, two stream
crossings were identified along the planned road easement, one of which corresponds to an apparent
break in the levee which previously contained water in the dammed pond (Figure 2).
The USDA Web Soil Survey (Figure 3) depicts approximately 60% of the project area as underlain by
Appling sandy loam and approximately 33% underlain by Wedowee sandy loam. All field- identified
wetlands and streams are located within areas underlain by Wedowee sandy loam, which is characterized
as well drained and non - hydric. Cecil sandy loam makes up the remainder of soils within the subject
property, and is depicted only along the northernmost extent of the planned access easement near
Bobbitt Road.
The 1973 Littleton [NC] 1:24,000 USGSTopographic Quadrangle and the online USGS National Map Viewer
depict unnamed intermittent tributaries to Big Stone House Creek to the north, east, and west of the Site,
all flowing to the north toward Big Stone House Creek. The maps show a dammed pond along the eastern
tributary, which is depicted as crossing the northern portion of the planned access easement just before
converging with the western tributary to continue on to convey flow into Big Stone House Creek, located
approximately 0.75 miles to the north of the subject property (Figure 2). The former pond is located
directly east of the Project's planned easement and the convergence of the eastern and western
tributaries is portrayed on the maps as occurring to the west of the Project's planned road easement.
2

Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
,ARTNI L L r Sun Devil Solar Project
NCDWQ Stream Forms and Wetland Determination Data Forms were completed, as appropriate.
Photographs demonstrating site conditions at the time of review are presented in Appendix C.
4.2 Field Visit
Following review of this information, Energy Renewal scientists, Jesse Degnan and Julianne Wooten,
visited the subject property on June 18 and 23, 2015, to evaluate the site for features exhibiting
characteristics that are consistent with jurisdictional waters of the U.S., following guidance set forth in the
1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Regional Supplement to the Wetland Delineation
Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (April 2012).
Mr. Degnan and Ms. Wooten identified two swale wetlands and two streams along the Project's planned
access road easement. Energy Renewal delineated wetland boundaries with sequentially- numbered
flagging. The approximate extent and location of jurisdictional features delineated onsite are depicted on
the attached Approximate Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Map (Figure 2).
Weather conditions at the time of the site visit consisted of temperatures from 85 -95 °F and 99% humidity.
Documented land cover types include contiguous woodlands within the subject property. Land cover
along the planned road easement is variable and consists of approximately 2,000 feet of cleared land
along the northernmost extent , approximately 1,600 feet of an overgrown previously cleared corridor
along an old berm, a small stretch of approximately 150 feet of woodlands, and a second previously
cleared easement with pockets of shrub /scrub vegetation along the southern approximately 1,600 feet
nearest the project area.
During the site assessment, two swale -like wetlands and two streams were delineated along the route of
the proposed Project access road. Data point locations, depicted in Figure 2, represent the locations
where data required to complete Wetland Determination Data Forms was recorded. Data forms for
potential wetlands can be found in Appendix A. Stream identification forms, located in Appendix B, were
used to help distinguish flow regime within identified surface water features. Energy Renewal completed
two forms, identifying one perennial stream (Stream 1) and one intermittent stream (Stream 2) along the
planned access easement (Figure 2). Both streams had continuous bed and bank and an ordinary high
water mark. Photographs of each area described are provided in Appendix C.
Stream 1 originates southeast of the project area, generally flowing north and east across the proposed
access road easement (36.442363 °N, - 77.968688 °W) to its confluence with an unnamed tributary of Big
Stone House Creek.
Wetland WA and Stream 2 coincide with one another and are located nearest the project area within the
proposed access easement. Stream 2 generally flows west, across the existing maintained easement being
proposed for site access purposes, to an unnamed tributary of Big Stone House Creek. Wetland hydrology
indicators observed within wetland WA at data point WA -Wet included surface water (A1), high water
table (A2), soil saturation (A3), oxidized rhizospheres along living root channels (0), and the FAC- neutral
test (D5). Vegetation at WA -Wet consisted of herbaceous species dominated by fringed sedge (Carex
crinita) and common rush (Juncus effusus), with common boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum), joe pye weed
(Eutrochium dubium), and cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea) also present. Soils documented at WA-
3

AAIW Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Ene o,V Renevvaa
PARTNERS, LLG Sun Devil Solar Project
Wet were consistent with the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement's technical
description of hydric soil indicators sandy gleyed matrix (S4) and sandy redox (S5). Data point WA -Up
represents the upland abutting the boundary of wetland WA. Vegetation observed in this area included
tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), white oak (Quercus alba), Scribner's rosette grass (Dichanthelium
oligosanthes), and common mullein (Verbascum thapsus). Energy Renewal did not observe signs of
hydrology or hydric soils at the WA -Up data point location.
Wetland hydrology indicators observed within wetland WB at data point WB -Wet included A3, water -
stained leaves (139), hydrogen sulfide odor (Cl), C3, D5. Similar to Wetland WA, herbaceous vegetation
observed within Wetland WB included common rush, cinnamon fern, common boneset, jewelweed
(Impatiens capensis), and water hemlock (Cicuta maculata), but also included a sapling /shrub stratum
consisting of hazel alder (Alnus serrulata) and sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua). Hydric soil indicators
S4 and S5 were also observed within Wetland WB. The upland area abutting wetland WB (represented by
data point WB -Up) did not contain evidence of hydrology or hydric soils. Vegetation noted at WB -Up
included loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), sweetgum, common persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), and roundleaf
thoroughwort (Eupatorium rotundifolium).
Energy Renewal observed an upland drainage along the western edge of the existing easement,
approximately 100 feet north of Wetland WB, which is represented in Figure 2 as data point DP -1.
Hydrophytic vegetation, including sweetgum, sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), deertongue
(Dichanthelium clandestinum) and common rush, was observed; however, wetland hydrology and hydric
soil indicator criterion were not met (see Wetland Determination Form DP -1 for additional details).
Energy Renewal did not observe evidence of wetlands within the planned panel area of the Site. Data
point DP -2 was taken as a representation of lowland areas onsite (Figure 2). Facultative plant species and
indications of wetland hydrology were present; however, no hydric soil indicators were identified (see
Wetland Determination Form DP -2 for additional details).
5.0 Conclusion
During the stream and wetland assessment, Energy Renewal evaluated potential jurisdictional waters of
the U.S. based on information from both the desktop review and from the observed conditions during the
site visit. This assessment did not identify potentially jurisdictional waters within the 23 -acre portion of
the Site where solar panels are proposed. This assessment identified four potentially jurisdictional
features within the Project's access road easement. These features included:
• two swale wetlands (WA and WB); and
• two streams (Stream 1 and Stream 2).
All jurisdictional determinations are preliminary prior to regulatory verification by the USACE. Any
proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters will possibly require a permit from the USACE, with the
possibility of compensatory mitigation being required.
4

Energy I
PA R T h E R .. L L r
6.0 References
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Ewing, Justin M., and Michael J. Vepraskas. "Estimating Primary and Secondary Subsidence in an Organic
Soil 15, 20, and 30 Years after Drainage." Wetlands 26.1 (2006): 119 -30. Springer Link. Springer
Netherlands. Web. 1 June 2015..
FAO. 1988. Nature and Management of Tropical Peat Soils. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 59. Rome, FAO.
Web. 9 June 2015.
L.M., V. Carter V., F.C. Golet, E.T. La Roe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the
United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report No. FWS /OBS /- 79 /31.Washington, D.C.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web
Soil Survey. Available online at http: / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov /. Accessed June 25, 2015.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory, Wetlands Delineation Manual, Y -87 -1, 1987.
US Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 05 -05, Ordinary High Water Mark
Identification, 7 December 2005.
US Environmental Protection Agency. Draft Guidance on Identifying Waters Protected by the Clean
Water Act. April 2011.
USFWS NWI Map. http: / /www.fws.gov /wetlands /Wetlands - Mapper.html, Accessed June 19, 2015.
5

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
FIGURES

Legend
Project Area
(approx. 29 acres)
m
a
w
W
rn�
tidf� �a
CO
m
moo
131a
S�a�e �a\
Old Macon Hwy
ea
5r
�-a
Y
J
Jm
01 �m
0
Q) o
h Cf
�a
tie �
07
Virginia
North Carolina
Project
Location
Durham
Raleigh
Cary
Overview Map 0 20 40 Miles
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575Ar,
West Lake Hills, Texas 78746 �•
512 - 222 -1125
www.energyrenewalpartners.com
Energy Renewal
PA1RTNERS, LLC
State Ra t63o
h
a
C: C' a
CO m
Q �
s
oy�l90 �6 1353 Forest Hill Dr
LAKE CAwTON
J
7
J \ \l
�a
Rache�
5
^3 m
Qa Jo
w°
,gym
6A356 Of
m
Fpw v, p
orth R �
a E
u_
grate Rd 1352
shc�
co
State Rd 1358
N(b
�a
0
J
N
O
Stat�S�S
FLS Energy
Sun Devil Solar Project
Regional Topography
South Hill SE, Gasburg, Macon, Littleton, Inez, and Hollister USGS Topographic Quadrangles
�L
N
4
S�
d�
o�
a7
6�6
N
A 0 2,000 4,000
Feet
FIGURE
1
BFR 7/1/201.r
7`''67
�
W
v
_
v
s
0
N
y
-
a
-
a
�
a
a
Q-
Littic
�a
c
Y
C
N(b
�a
0
J
N
O
Stat�S�S
FLS Energy
Sun Devil Solar Project
Regional Topography
South Hill SE, Gasburg, Macon, Littleton, Inez, and Hollister USGS Topographic Quadrangles
�L
N
4
S�
d�
o�
a7
6�6
N
A 0 2,000 4,000
Feet
FIGURE
1
BFR 7/1/201.r

Legend
® Project Area
Field- delineated Wetland
Field- delineated Stream
Stream /Drainage
O Data Point Location
Wetland Area B
Wetland Area A
0
CO
r
-y "
Liz., ��
► ,,yy
'' J
FLS Energy
FIGURE
Sun Devil Solar Project
Warren County, NC 2
Hydrography and Delineated Wetland Map
.r . -CO
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575
West Lake Hills, Texas 78746
512- 222 -1125
N
www.en ergyren ewa Ipartners.com
Energy
o
200
400
A
Feet
► ,,yy
'' J
FLS Energy
FIGURE
Sun Devil Solar Project
Warren County, NC 2
Hydrography and Delineated Wetland Map
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575
West Lake Hills, Texas 78746
512- 222 -1125
www.en ergyren ewa Ipartners.com
Energy
Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
► ,,yy
'' J
FLS Energy
FIGURE
Sun Devil Solar Project
Warren County, NC 2
Hydrography and Delineated Wetland Map

Legend
® Project Area
Soil Map Unit
0
t
I WMe
WWC
r
WWC
-�
305 Camp Craft Road, Suite 575 I
West Lake Hills, Texas 78746 ■
512- 222 -1125 I
www.energyrenewa Ipa rtne rs.com
Energy Renewal
PARTNERS, LLC
i
WWC
� w
a P
c9
r
4
f
%k
s
,P
�i.
Soil Map Unit
ApB - Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
CeB - Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
W - Water
WwC - Wedowee sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
FLS Energy
Sun Devil Solar Project
Warren County, NC
Hydric Rating by Soil Map Unit
2 N
A o 200
T
Acres in Percentage of
Project Area Project Area
17.2 58.9
2.3 7.8
0.1 0.2
9.7 33.1
400
Feet
Hydric
Rating
0
0
0
0
FIGURE
3

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Appendix A
Wetland Determination Data Forms — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: Sun Devil Solar City/County: Littleton/ Warren Sampling Date: 18- 3un -15
Applicant/ Owner: FLS Energy State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1
Investigator(s): Jesse Degnan and Julianne Wooten Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 5.0% / 2.9
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.438002 °N Long.: - 77,970203 °W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Appling sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO C
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O NO * Is the Sampled Area 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No
within a Wetland? Yes NO C
C
Remarks:
Information presented herein is representative of upland data recorded within an upland drainage.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
d❑ FAC- neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes U No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 NO 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No 0
(includes capillary frinqe) Yes ❑ NO Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is absent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6._
35 = Total Cover
_ 0
❑
Dominant
0
Sampling Point: DP -1
0.0%
0
Species?
0.0% i
0
❑
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2
0
❑
0.0%
❑
°
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
0.0 /o
_
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4. -
o
❑
o.o%
5
0
❑
0.o%
Percent of dominant Species
❑
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ 100.0% (A /B)
6.
0
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g
0
❑
0.0%
_
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
Sapling - Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
1. Liguidambar styraciflua
5
W
100.0%
FAC
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 15 x 3 = 45
2
3
0
❑
0.0%
_
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4.
0
❑
0.0%
_
OPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 40 . (A) 95 (B)
6
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.375
7
0
❑
0.0%
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$
0
0.0%
U Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g
0
❑
0.0 %
d❑ Dominance Test is SO%
10.
0
❑
0.0 %
>
Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
5
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1.
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3.
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6•
0
❑
0.0%
_
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
0
= Total Cover
of height.
Sapling /shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1 , OnOClea sensibilis
20❑
57.1%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
2• Dichanthellum clandestlnurn
10
28.6%
FAC
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
3. ]uncus effusus
5
❑
14.3%
FACW
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
❑
_
in height.
5.
0
0.0%
6
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7.
0
❑
0.0 °r°
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
$
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
g.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
i
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
10.
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than
11.
0
❑
0.0%
_
3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0%
i
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6._
35 = Total Cover
_ 0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0% i
0
❑
0.0%
o
❑
o.o °r°
0
❑
0.0%
0 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers
vines, approximately 3 to 20 it k to 6 m) in height.
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m)
in height.
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation , -
Present? Yes � NO
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) "/o Tvoe 1 Loc? _ Texture Remarks
0 -20 5Y 8/3 100% Very Fine Sand
1Type: C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation: PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
[71 coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3 Indicators of vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
wetland hydrology must be present,
hydrology must
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ''D No
Remarks:
Hydric soil is absent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: Sun Devil Solar City/County: Littleton/ Warren Sampling Date: 18- 3un -15
Applicant/ Owner: FLS Energy State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2
Investigator(s): Jesse Degnan and Julianne Wooten Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Lowland Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 1.0% / 0.6 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.43005 °N Long.: - 77.97087OW Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Appling sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO 0
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 NO * Is the Sampled Area 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes * No
within a Wetland? Yes NO C
Remarks:
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
d❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
d❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
W1 Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 NO 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary frinqe) Yes 0 NO Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology criterion not met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Facultative species present.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Dominant
Sampling Point: DP -2
Species?
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 • Liguidambar styraciflua
70
❑d
82.4%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2. Pinus taeda
10
❑
11.8%
FAC
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3. Quercus phellos
5
5.9%
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
o
❑
o.o%
5
o
❑
0.o%
Percent of dominant Species
❑
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ 100.0% (A /B)
6.
0
0.0%
i
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g
0
❑
0.0%
_
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
85
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling - Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 -
1. Acer rubrum
15
W
100.0%
FAC
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
2
3
0
❑
0.0%
_
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4.
0
❑
0.0%
_
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 105 (A) 315 (B)
6
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000
7.
o
❑
0.0 °ro
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$
0
0.0%
U Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g
o
❑
0.0 %
d❑ Dominance Test is 500/b
10.
o
❑
0.0 %
>
Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot . size: 15' )
15
= Total Cover
L] Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1.
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3.
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
0.0%
_
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
0
= Total Cover
of height.
❑
Sapling /shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1
0
0.0%
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
2.
0
❑
0.0%
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
3.
0
❑
0.0%
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
❑
i
in height.
5.
0
0.0%
6
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0 °r°
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
$
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
g.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
i
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
1
0
0.0%
_
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than
11.
0
❑
0.0%
_
3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
0
= Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5❑
100.0%
FAC
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
•
-
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m)
2•`
0
❑
0.0%
in height.
3.
_ 0
❑
0.0%
i
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
4.
0
❑
0.0%
height.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
6.
Vegetation ,-
_
5'
=Total Cover
Present? Yes NO
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Facultative species present.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil Sampling Point: -DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0 -18 10YR 5/8 100% Clay Loam
1Type: C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation: PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
[71 coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3 Indicators of vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
wetland hydrology must be present,
hydrology must
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ''D No
Remarks:
Hydric soil is absent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: Sun Devil Solar City/County: Littleton/ Warren Sampling Date: 18- 3un -15
Applicant/ Owner: FLS Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WA -Up
Investigator(s): Jesse Degnan and Julianne Wooten Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Mound Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 3.0% / 1.7 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.437756 °N Long.: - 77,970089 °W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes O NO C
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O NO * Is the Sampled Area 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No
within a Wetland? Yes NO C
C
Remarks:
Information presented herein is representative of upland data recorded outside of Wetland WA.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that ap)ly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes U No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 NO 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No 0
(includes capillary frinqe) Yes ❑ NO Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is absent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
WA -Up
0 (A)
3 (B)
0.0% (A /B)
g
0
Dominant
0.0% _
Sampling Point:
0.0%
30
Species?
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling - Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
1.
o i
Number of Dominant Species
1 • Liriodendron tulipifera
20
❑d 66.7%
FACU
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2. Ouercus alba
10
❑d 33.3%
FACU
3
0
❑
❑ °
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Species Across All Strata:
4. _
o
❑ o.o%
Column Totals: 70 (A) 280 (B)
6
5
0
❑ 0.o%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000
Percent of dominant Species
0
❑
❑
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
0
0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$
0
0
❑ 0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Prevalence Index worksheet:
WA -Up
0 (A)
3 (B)
0.0% (A /B)
g
0
❑
0.0% _
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0.0%
30
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling - Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
0.0%
o
-
o.o °ro
o
El
°%
0.0%
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
o i
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 0 x 3= 0
2.
3
0
❑
0.0% _
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
4.
0
❑
0.0% _
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 70 (A) 280 (B)
6
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.000
7
0
❑
0.0%
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$
0
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g
0
❑
0.0 %
❑ Dominance Test is > SO%
10.
0
❑
0.0 %
❑ Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
0
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1.
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3.
o
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
0.0% _
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6•
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
0
= Total Cover
of height.
0
Sapling /shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1 , DlChanthelium oligosanthes
35
87.5% FACU
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
2. Verbascum thapsus
5
❑
12.5% FACU
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
3.
0
❑
0.0%
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
❑
_
in height.
5.
0
0.0%
6
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7.
0
❑
0.0 °r°
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
$
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
g.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
i
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
1
0
0.0% _
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than
11.
0
❑
0.0% _
3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0% i
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6._
40 = Total Cover
_ 0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0% i
0
❑
0.0%
o
❑
o.o °ro
0
❑
0.0%
0 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is absent.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers
vines, approximately 3 to 20 it k to 6 m) in height.
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m)
in height.
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes O No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: WA -Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvoe 1 Loc?
_ Texture Remarks
0 -18 10YR 5/4 900/0
Sandy Loam
10YR 5/8 100/0
Sandy Loam mixed matrix
1Type: C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation:
PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
[71 coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3 Indicators of vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
wetland hydrology must be present,
hydrology must
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ''D No
Remarks:
Hydric soil is absent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: Sun Devil Solar City/County: Littleton/ Warren Sampling Date: 18- 3un -15
Applicant/ Owner: FLS Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WA -Wet
Investigator(s): Jesse Degnan and Julianne Wooten Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.437709 °N Long.: - 77.970094 °W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO C
Hydric Soil Present? Yes NO O Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes 0- NO C
Remarks:
Information presented herein is representative of wetland data recorded at Wetland WA.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
LI/I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
d❑ FAC- neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes CO) No O Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes NO O Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary frinqe) Yes 0 NO O Depth (inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6._
65 = Total Cover
_ 0
❑
Dominant
0
Sampling Point: WA -Wet
0.0%
0
Species?
0.0% i
0
❑
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2
0
❑
0.0%
❑
°
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
0.0 /o
_
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4. _
o
❑
o.o%
5
0
❑
0.o%
Percent of dominant Species
❑
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ 100.0% (A /B)
6.
0
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g
0
❑
0.0%
_
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
0
= Total Cover
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
Sapling - Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
o
El
o.o °%
FACW species 45 x 2 = 90
1.
o
i
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 0 x 3= 0
2.
3.
0
❑
0.0%
_
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
4.
0
❑
0.0%
OPL species 0 x 5= 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 65 (A) 110 (B)
6
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1,692
7.
0
❑
0.0%
❑
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$
0
0.0%
U Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g
0
❑
0.0 %
d❑ Dominance Test is SO%
10.
0
❑
0.0 %
>
Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
0
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1.
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3.
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6•
0
❑
0.0%
_
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
0
= Total Cover
of height.
Sapling /shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1 , CareX Crinita
20❑
30.8%
OBL
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
2• ]uncus effusus
20
❑d
30.8%
FACW
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
3. Eupatorium pertoliatum
10
❑
15.4%
FACW
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4• Eutrochium dubium
10
❑
15.4%
FACW
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
❑
in height.
5. Osmunda cinnamomea
5
7.7%
FACW
6
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7.
0
❑
0.0%
❑
-
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
$
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
g.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
i
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
1
0
0.0%
_
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than
11.
0
❑
0.0%
_
3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0%
i
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6._
65 = Total Cover
_ 0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0% i
0
❑
0.0%
o
❑
o.o °ro
0
❑
0.0%
0 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers
vines, approximately 3 to 20 it k to 6 m) in height.
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m)
in height.
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation , -
Present? Yes � NO
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: WA -Wet
Profile Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox
Features
(inches)
Color (moist) _ %
Color (moist)
% Tvue, 1 Locz
_ Texture Remarks
0 -12
l0Y 6/1 900/0
10YR 6/6
10% C M
Very Fine Loamy Sand
12 -20
5Y 4/1 80%
10YR 6/6
20% C PL
Very Fine Loamy Sand
1Type: C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric soil is present.
zLocation: PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: Sun Devil Solar City/County: Littleton/ Warren Sampling Date: 18- 3un -15
Applicant/ Owner: FLS Energy State: NC Sampling Point: W113-Up
Investigator(s): Jesse Degnan and Julianne Wooten Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Mound Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 0.0% / 0.0 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.436328 °N Long.: - 77,969807 °W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO C
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O NO * Is the Sampled Area 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No
within a Wetland? Yes NO C
C
Remarks:
Information presented herein is representative of upland data recorded outside of Wetland WB.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that ap)ly)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC- neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes U No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 NO 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No 0
(includes capillary frinqe) Yes ❑ NO Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is absent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Dominant
Sampling Point: WB -Uo
Species?
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2
0
❑
0.0 °ro
❑
°
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
o.o%
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
o
❑
o.o%
5
o
❑
o.o%
Percent of dominant Species
❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ 100.0% (A /B)
6.
0
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g
o
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
Sapling - Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 15'
)
0
100.0%
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Pinus taeda
5
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2
3
0
❑
0.0 %
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 100 (A) 300 (B)
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.000
7.
0
❑
0.0 °r°
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g
o
❑
0.0%
❑d Dominance Test is
10.
0
❑
0.0%
> 50%
0 Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
5
= Total Cover
❑ Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1. Llguidambar stvraciflua
15
d❑
60.0%
FAC
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
10
d❑
40.0%
FAC
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2. Diospvros viroiniana
3.
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
25
= Total Cover
of height.
❑
Sapling /shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1 , EuDatOrium rotundlfolium
70
100.0%
FAC
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (11 m) tall.
2.
0
❑
0.0%
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
3.
0
-
❑
0.0%
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4'
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
❑
in height.
5.
0
0.0 %°
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7.
0
❑
0.0 °r°
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
8
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
9.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
1 l).
0
0.0%
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than
11.
0
❑
0.0%
3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (t to 6 m) in height.
Woody Vine Stratum ( Plot size: 30' )
70
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous non -wood plants,
( Y) P
1
0
❑
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (11 m)
2•
0
❑
0.0%
in height.
3.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
4.
0
❑
0.0%
height.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
6.
Vegetation
Yes * No O
0
= Total Cover!
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
Sampling Point: WB -Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvoe 1 Loc?
_ Texture Remarks
0 -3 10YR 8/4 100%
Coarse Loamy Sand
3 -18 5Y 6/3 100%
Fine Loamy Sand
1Type: C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation:
PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
[71 coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
3 Indicators of vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
wetland hydrology must be present,
hydrology must
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ''D No
Remarks:
Hydric soil is absent.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: Sun Devil Solar City/County: Littleton/ Warren Sampling Date: 18- 3un -15
Applicant/ Owner: FLS Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WB -Wet
Investigator(s): Jesse Degnan and Julianne Wooten Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 5.0% / 2.9
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 in LRR P Lat.: 36.436379 °N Long.: - 77.969805 °W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Wedowee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * NO O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * NO O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 NO C
Hydric Soil Present? Yes NO O Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes 0- NO C
Remarks:
Information presented herein is representative of wetland data recorded at Wetland WB.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
LI/I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift deposits (B3)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
d❑ FAC- neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes U No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 NO 0 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary frinqe) Yes 0 NO O Depth (inches): 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WB.Wet
Species?
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
0
❑
0.0%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2
0
❑
0.0%
❑
°
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
o.o%
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
o
❑
o.o%
5
o
❑
o.o%
Percent of dominant Species
❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ 100.0% (A /B)
6.
0
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g
o
❑
0.0%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
OBL species 75 x 1 = 75
Sapling - Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
70
0
93.3%
OBL
FACW species 100 x 2 = 200_
1. Alnus serrulata
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
2. Uguidambar styraciflua
5
❑
6.7%
FAC
3
0
❑
0.0 %
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 180 , (A) 290 (B)
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.611
7.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
$
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g
o
❑
0.0%
❑d Dominance Test is
10.
0
❑
0.0%
> 50%
0 Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot. size: 15' )
75
= Total Cover
❑Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting
1.
0
❑
0.0%
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
3.
0
❑
0.0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4.
0
❑
0.0%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Four Vegetation Strata:
7
0
❑
0.0%
Tree stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
0
= Total Cover
of height.
❑
Sapling /shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding
1 , Juncus effusus
80
76.2%
FACW
vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (11 m) tall.
2. Osmunda cinnamomea
10
❑
9.5%
FACW
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
3. Eupatorium perfoliatum
5
❑
4.8%
FACW
regardless of size, and all other plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4. Impatiens capensis
5
❑
4.8%
FACW
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
-
❑
in height.
5. Cicuta maculata
5
4.8%
OBL
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Five Vegetation Strata:
7.
0
❑
0.0%
❑
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
8
0
0.0%
ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in
9.
0
❑
0.0%
diameter at breast height (DBH).
❑
°r°
Sapling stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
1 l).
0
0.0
vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than
11.
0
❑
0.0%
3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
12.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub stratum - Consists of woody plants, excluding woody
vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (t to 6 m) in height.
Woody Vine Stratum ( Plot size: 30' )
105
=Total Cover
Herb stratum - Consists of all herbaceous non -wood plants,
( Y) P
1
0
❑
0.0%
including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
species, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (11 m)
2.
0
❑
0.0%
in height.
3.
0
❑
0.0%
Woody vines - Consists of all woody vines, regardless of
4.
0
❑
0.0%
height.
5.
0
❑
0.0%
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
6.
Vegetation
Yes * No O
0
= Total Cover!
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned
because Regional
status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Soil
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Sampling Point:
Profile Description:
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox
Features
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist)
% Tvue, 1 Locz _ Texture
0 -4
10Y 6/1 90%
10YR 6/6
10% C M Sandy Clay
4 -16
5Y 5/1 80%
10YR 6/6
200/b C PL Very Fine Loamy Sand
1Type: C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
zLocation: PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F33) (MLRA 136, 122)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric soil is present.
WB -Wet
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Energy PARTNERS, LLC Sun Devil Solar Project
Appendix B
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Stream Identification Forms

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/23/2015 Project /Site: Sun Devil
Evaluator: Jesse Degnan
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 30.5
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15 )
1 a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active /relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5
County: Warren
Latitude: 36.442363 ° N
Longitude: - 77,96$6$$ °W
Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Stream S1
00
00
00
00
00
00
Weak
10
1
1
1 0
1 •
1
1 •
1
0. •
0.5®
No =00
0® 1®
0 1�1. :• 1
0 • 0.50
0 0.50
No =O0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3n
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 •
22. Fish
0 ,
23. Crayfish
0 •
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
00
26. Wetland plants in streambed
= 1.500ther = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41
Moderate
20
20
20
20
2®
2
2
20
1
1
2(j)
2®
0.5®
1
10
Strong
3Q
30
30
30
30
3
3
3
1.50
1.50
Yes =30
Yes =3 e
2'
in
2
1
1 •
2
1 ;,
2
0.5 !
1
0.5
1
0.5 •
1 ,
0.50
10
FACW = 0.75QOBL
= 1.500ther = 0
30
30
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/18/2015 Project /Site: Sun Devil
Evaluator: Jesse Degnan
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 23.25
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9 )
1 a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active /relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.75
County: Warren
Latitude: 36.436354 ° N
Longitude: _77.969748 °W
Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Intermittent e.g. Quad Name: Stream S2
Absent
0®
0 n
0®
0®
0(F)
0 E)
0 •
0
0
0
Weak
10
in
1
1®
1
1
1
1 •
0. •
0.50
No =00
0® 1®
0 1�1. :• 1
0 • 0.50
0 +• 0.50
No =O0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3n
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 •
22. Fish
0 ,
23. Crayfish
0 •
24. Amphibians
0 •
25. Algae
00
26. Wetland plants in streambed
= 1.500ther = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41
Moderate
2 Q
2
20
2 E)
2®
2
2
20
1
1
2(j)
2®
0.5®
1
10
Strong
30
3 n
30
30
30
3
3
3
1.50
1.50
Yes =30
Yes =3 e
20*
in
2
1
1 •
2
1 ,_,
2
0.5 !
1
0.5
1
§
0.5
1
0.50
10
FACW = 0.7500BL
= 1.500ther = 0
30
30
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Appendix C
Site Photographs

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Photograph 1— View facing north of wetland WA.
Photograph 2 — Eastern extent of wetland WA and stream S2 within woodlands. * "WC.01" shown on
flagging represents former name of wetland.

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Photograph 3 —View of wetland WA and stream S2 facing west toward previously cleared easement.
Photograph 4 — Representative view of vegetation at wetland WB.

Energy i
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Photograph 5 — View from DP -1 facing south, showing representative vegetation at DP -1 and general
view of wetland WB within previously cleared easement in the background.
Photograph 6 — View facing west from southeastern bank of stream S1.

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Photograph 7 — View of stream S1 from top of bank facing south.
Photograph 8 — Representative view of corridor planned for northern portion of access easement.

Energy
PARTNERS, LLC
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Assessment
Sun Devil Solar Project
Photograph 9 — Representative view of land cover within project area.