20041660 Ver 1_401 Application_20041013

T
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. Bob Zarzecki
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Request for NWP 39 and Buffer Compliance
Novo Nordisk Facilities Expansion
Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Zarzecki and Mr. Yates:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. Kevin Yates
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
0 L-q n
1J
0 C T 1 3 2004
QUALITY
WETLANDS STCR AR RANCH
On behalf of Novo Nordisk (Attn: Bill Guthrie), we request authorization from the US
Army Corps of Engineers to use Nationwide Permit 39 for proposed permanent impacts
to a perennial stream (see attached overall map). We also request written concurrence
from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality that the project complies with GC
3402. A Pre-construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an
agent authorization form.
Project Location
The site is located on the western side of Powhatan Road (S.R. 1901) approximately 2500
feet from its intersection with Highway 70 in City of Clayton, in Johnston County, NC.
See Figures 1 and 2. An existing Novo Nordisk facility is currently located on the site.
The property is approximately 46 acres in size.
Project History
S&EC delineated the wetlands and stream channels located on the property, and a site
meeting was then held on September 29, 2004 with Mr. Kevin Yates of he USACE. A
wetland survey has been submitted to the USACE for approval. It was also determined
that the existing stormwater pond on-site is not jurisdictional, and will therefore continue

6 October 13, 2004
® S&EC Project #6324.W1

October 13, 2004
S&EC Project #6324.W1
Page 2of3
to be used for stormwater. A meeting was held with Bob Zarzecki of the NC-DWQ on
June 30, 2004 to discuss the project, present its status, and solicit input and guidance
regarding storm water treatment and this request. Our client has agreed to implement all
the suggestions we mutually developed regarding the proposed facilities expansion. A
major buffer variance was requested and approved earlier today.
Impact Justification
The production of insulin is strictly regulated by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) under requirements defined as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) in 21 CFR
Parts 210 and 211. According to GMP requirements the flow of components, drug
products, and personnel through the building or buildings shall be designed to prevent
contamination.
In its current configuration the Novo Nordisk facility prevents product contamination by
establishing cascading pressure differentials from the interior of the building outward and
through strict hygiene and gowning requirements for personnel.
In order to meet increased patient demand for insulin, Novo Nordisk must expand the
existing production facility. A portion of the proposed expansion will include new
packaging and warehouse space that services our current process. To maintain the
integrity of the current contamination controls and eliminate risks associated with
personnel and product movement through contaminated areas, it is imperative that
building continuity be maintained.
Building expansion to the east and south are restricted by Powhatan Road and the
existing railroad easement respectively. Expansion to the west is restricted by existing
facility already integral to personnel flow. Due to these geographic restrictions and our
need to integrate the proposed facilities into our current process, expansion to the north is
the clear alternative.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed facilities expansion consists of approximately 117,000 square feet of
building space, which is necessary to accommodate increased global insulin production
demands. In order to construct the proposed expansion impacts to the riparian buffer and
stream channel were required. The proposed impacts due to the access road/loading dock
construction include 111 linear feet of perennial channel, and 0.3 acre (12,933 ft2) of
riparian buffer. The proposed impacts due to facilities construction include 118 linear
feet of.perennial channel, and 0.42 acre (17,259 ft2) of riparian buffer. The total impacts
resulting from the proposed facilities expansion include 229 linear feet of perennial
channel and 0.72 acre (30,191 ff) of riparian buffer. There will be no impact to
wetlands on-site.
October 13, 2004
S&EC Project #6324.W1
Page 3 of 3
Impervious Surface/Stormwater
The existing impervious surface area fro the site is 15%. Proposed impervious surface
area (i.e. existing + proposed) totals 31 %. A Stormwater plan was submitted with the
buffer variance request and can be supplied again if necessary. A copy of the
maintenance agreement for the stormwater pond is also attached. `
Mitigation
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses. During the site meeting with Mr.
Kevin Yates, it was determined that the stream with the proposed impacts is perennial
and will require mitigation at a 1:1 ratio. The NC-EEP agreed to accept payment for the
required stream and buffer mitigation. A copy of the EEP acceptance letter is attached.
Please call or email me at SClark&SandEC.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
avid Gam u l1
Environmental Technician
Sean Clark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization Form
Site Location Map-USGS (Figure 1)
Site Location Map - Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Mitigation Acceptance Letter from NC-EEP
Proposed Wetland Impact Maps
Office Use Only: nn 6 0 Form Version May 2002
()416
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Novo Nordisk
Mailing Address: Attn: Bill Guthrie
3612 Powhatan Road
Clanton, NC 27520-9217
Telephone Number: 919-550-2200 ext.2315 Fax Number: 919-550-3670
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:. [e-mail]
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project:Novo Nordisk Facilities Expansion
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Not Applicable
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1678-51-2048
4. Location
County: Johnston Nearest Town: Clayton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located on the western
side of Powhatan Road (S.R. 1901) approximately 2500 feet from its intersection with
Hi way 70 in the Town of Clayton, in Johnston County. NC. Please see Figures 1 and 2 for
the project's location on the USGS and Soil Survey Maps.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035°37'9.36"N 078°24'38082"W .
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): f 30 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Neuse River
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mVs/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently a manufacturing facility. The stream
with posed impacts flows out of an existing; stormwater pond and flows between a parking
Page 2 of 8
lot and the existing fL acility and then flows under a driveway crossing. The rest of the
.property is primarily grassed fields with wooded riparian buffers
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project is the expansion of the existing acility and will impact one perennial stream and its
Liparian buffers due to building and road construction. The construction will employ typical
grading and excavating equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed facilities expansion consists of
approximately 117,000 square feet of building space which is necessary to accommodate
increased global insulin production demands
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The site was owned by another company at the time of construction and no prior permitting
information is available at this time (see attached variance request letter). After S&EC completed
a detailed wetland delineation a site meeting was held with Mr. Kevin Yates of the USACE on
September of 2004 at. which time it was determined that the stream with proposed impacts is
perennial and would require mitigation at a 1:1 ratio. It was also determined that the existing
stormwater pond on-site is not jurisdictional and will therefore continue to be used for
stormwater. A meeting was held with Bob Zarzecki of the NC-DWQ on June 30, 2004 to
discuss the project present its status and solicit input and guidance regarding storm water
treatment and this request Our client has ag[eed to implement all the suggestions we mutually
developed regarding the proposed facilities expansion A major buffer variance was requested
and approved earlier today The wetland delineation maps have been submitted for approval.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future 401/404 permits are anticipated on this site at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
Page 3 of 8
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: 111 linear feet of perennial
stream and 0.3 acres of associated buffer will be permanently impacted in order to construct
an access road/loading dock. 118 linear feet of perennial channel and 0.41 acres of associated
buffers will be impacted to construct a production facility. The total impacts resulting from
the proposed facilities expansion include 229 linear feet of perennial channel and 0.72
acre (30,191 W of riparian buffer. No wetlands will be im acted as a result of the
aforementioned proposed impacts.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:

Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps. are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hap://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 0.72 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact lease specify)
A
(NWP 39) Culvert / Rip-
Rap
111
UT to Neuse River
+/- 4'
Perennial
B
(NWP 39) Culvert/ Rip-
Rap 118 UT to Neuse River +/- 4' Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.Mozone.com,
www.mgpguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 229 Linear Feet
Page 4 of 8
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
To maintain the integrity of the current contamination controls and eliminate risks associated
with personnel and product movement through contaminated areas, it is imperative that building-
continuity be maintained. Building expansion to the east and south are restricted by Powhatan
Road and the existing railroad easement respectively. Expansion to the west is restricted by
existing facility already integral to personnel. flow. Due to these geographic restrictions and our
need to integrate the proposed facilities into our current process, expansion to the north is the
clear alternative.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when'
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The NC-EEP has agreed to accept payment and responsibility for the required buffer
mitigation and the required 1:1 stream mitigation. Please see the attached EEP letter.
2. Mitigation may also be made, by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htip://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wW/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 229
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 72,651
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) .
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the " SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify, 19
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 18,243 3 54,729
2 11,948 1.5 17,922
Total 30,191 72,651
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
Page 7 of 8
Payment to the NCEEP is proposed to meet the buffer requirements. Please note that this site
was granted a major variance for the proposed buffer impacts
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
.downstream from the property.
As per Patrick Smith's (S&EQ office meeting with Bob Zarzecki, all proposed impervious
surface area will meet current stormwater standards. Stormwater devices will be added as much
as possible to treat run-off from the existing acility. Current site conditions include 15%
impervious surface area. Proposed site conditions including the existing acility will total 31 %
impervious surface area.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The site will tie into the existing sanitary sewer system
XIII. Violations (required byDWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is. the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In B The Current Landowner
Name: ,-Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc
Address: 3612 Powhatau Road Clanton NC 27520
Phone: [phone]
Project Name/ Description: ariance for Fle en Expansion
Date. 2 Sep 004
The Department of the Arniy
US. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: 2v? Ve e5
Field Office: *k
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, -the current ro owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The _ day of
130
g?ember. ?004
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&UC
to arrange a site :meeting prior to visiting the site.
John R. Prattt Vice President & General Manager
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Mr. John Donley
NCDENR - DW Q
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
blank agent i ath form.doc
alarlotta Office:
G Gree sbnro Office:..
Hickory.0[1tce:
236 LcPWWP Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Want-= Lune
Concord, NC 28025 Gmonsboro, NC 27455 Taylorsvillc, NC 28681
/NA AN -ran nAAe ,.. ,.... .. ?... ...... - ?.. ...wm /7e coon
cc: Mr. Walter Cole
Soil & Envirormiental Consultants, PA
l9oz
(
I
•-
a r
.?
a ,o ?
,?--?• ? ? ? ??` / I ? X11. r ,r/ ?% '? ?.
304 ll
?
?

/ OWIIS
Ch •

' •? /??

? f 3/2
•? \`?\ 00
3
1
I
o
300 ?
1901 \
-
J \ I gg/1ry:C?e,
`! /
_ U
o • titan •
0 _'
0 Ne el

300.
f O
11
\\//

?l
11

I
299

,D

'? ••?l

lI

II

11
I G:9
\ /
it
i
U

C:P

X67 -
?
??
? l
.. 1574 .? o
h
708 J
??
• A U o
Ce o
263
~ \I y • ` 6 6 \ 250 0 ~
WT
j
2000 1000 0 2000
NORTH CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10'
PROJECT NO, MAP SOURCE:
G324 D2
U5G5 7.5 MIN. QUAD.
PROJECT MGR.: POWhatan, NC
PK5
DRAWN: 5CALE:
PK5 1 2000'
Pgure No.: LOCATION:
I OF 5 JOMN5TON CTY, NC
5NEET TITLE:
FIGURE I -VICINITY MAP
PROJECT: N O V O N O RD I S K
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CLIENT:
Novo Nordl5k Pharmaceutical Indu5trle5, Inc.
u
vswumingmtel la
Ps
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27614
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
2000 1000 0 2000
NORTH
PROJECT NO.: MAP 50URCE:
6324. D2 USDA 5oile Survey of
PROJECT MGR.: John5ton County
PK5 North Carolina
DRAWN: SCALE:
PK5 I " = 2000
F!gure No.: LOCATION:
2 Of s JOHN5TON CTY, NC
5HEET TITLE:
FIGURE 2 - SOILS MAP
PROJECT: NOVO NORDISK
FACILITIES EXPANSION
CLIENT:
Novo Nordisk
Inc.
I Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Patrick K. Smith, PE
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
September 29, 2004
0 C T
1 2004
Subject: Project: Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
County: Johnston
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for stream and buffer impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by the
NCEEP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be approved by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP for impacts associated with this project is
appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. H we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to
forward copies of the 404 Permit/401 Certification to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program in order for an invoice to
be generated.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated September 9, 2004 the stream and buffer restoration that is
necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
maximum amount of mitigation that the NCEEP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Riparian Buffer
(ft2)
Impacts 271 27,077.2
Mitigation Maximum 545 64,686.6
The riparian buffer and stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or
Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the N.C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Department of Transportation
signed July 22, 2003.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,,
innAAa.
Deborah D. Anderson
In-Lieu Fee Administrator
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Kevin Yates, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Regional Office-Raleigh
File
Resto?u2?... F ... Protect oarft a&
eVA
IWENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 / 919-733-5208/ www.nceep.net
6
Inset 10.4-04
Proposed Concrete
°Ileadwall at Edge of
Proposed Road
- `
9?
`L JAI .
T
ASP
FLUME
I M FACT
AREA A
y ?5
1-ST METAL
BUILDING

Extl" "51gyti ' 4.
Vvith Cnncreie Ff,
RIB-,Ra.Apron,, L r>*
_ CH CK '•?
O _

t_ST BLOCK
BUILDING _ f
,
l ?h I if PACT
lam` j _ AREA B

Exi5ting
Production
Facility
I M PACT AREA A
5TREAM CHANNEL: I I I.OLF
(PIPE 4 APRON L - .1 02,37
BUFFER ZONE 1: 7,731.2 FT? (0.18 ACRE5t)
BUFFER ZONE 2: 5,202.0 FT.Z (0.12 ACRE5±).
IMPACT AREA B
STREAM CHANNEL: 1 18.0 LF
(PIPE L - 188.7)
BUFFER ZONE 1: 10,512.4 FT? (0.25 ACRE5±)'
BUFFER ZONE 2: G,74G.7 FT? (0.16 ACRES±)
NEUSE BUFFER -
ZONE I
NEUSE BUFFER -
ZONE 2
STREAM CHANNEL

5PIt1 .. _
D
D

f Ext5tmg
48" RCP
L = 108.5'
ra.LK
I M PACT TOTALS
STREAM CHANNEL: 229.0 LF
BUFFER ZONE 1: 0.43 ACRES±
BUFFER ZONE 2: 0.28 ACRES±
NOTE:
PROP05ED STORM
WATER WETLAND
PROPOSED FLEX PEN
PRODUCTION FACILITY
PROPOSED FUTURE
FLEX PEN EXPANSION
IMPACT AREA OUTLINE
LIGHT GRAY REPRE5ENT5
EX15TIR19ME LAYOUT
BOLD BLACK SHOWS
PROPORrEXPAN51ON PLANS

O
novo nordisk®
Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Industries, Inc.
f"
0 60 120
SCALE: P'= 60'
51TE. PLAN
A5 PROVIDED BY:
&I
6ITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA.
A5 PROVIDED 5Y:
GEORGE FINCH/
Boney and Associates, P.A.
Raleigh, North Carolina
5HEET TITLD PROJECT:.NAME: y
I /1 PACT NOVO NORDSK o = m rn w
N Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA R) • 9 d E
INSET MA P FACI LITI E5 EXPAN51 ON 11010 Ram Ridp 11ud • a&W^ N04 Cuohm 37614.. Fhm [phone] • Fa: (919) 8169467
N 5TORMWATER PLANNING """6i°?0°m ?. Q 70

X
i
Proposed
New Pipe
L = 188.77'
O
N

Proposed Storm Water
Wetland #2 for Existing
Facility Runoff Treatment.
All Construction to be
Performed Outside of Buffer
Existing Intermittent
Stream Channel
(Not Depicted on
u5G5 or Sod survey)
Exi\the Culverted
Ar?icultural
*y5tream Crb55ing
I Facilitarking .
Access d
Ex vin,3
Rla
&6tina Linear
Neuse
.._,; Buffer. bmlts
I mpact'Ar
5ee Inset

Proposed Flex Pen
Employee Parking 4
Facility Access Road
Proposed Facility w/
Future Expansion
Existing
Rip-Rap
Proposed
Employee
Parking
ti
N/1
A,
Ir>,pact Area„
5ee \I•QsCt Map
0 200 400
SCALE: I " = 200'
0
novo nordisk?
Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Industries, Inc.
NEUSE BUFFER -
ZONE I
NEUSE BUFFER -
ZONE 2
STREAM CHANNEL
LINEAR WETLANDS
PROP05ED 5TORM
WATER WETLAND
NOTE: 51TE PLAN

7
PROPOSED FLEX PEN A5 PROVIDED BY:
, PRODUCTION FACILITY LIGHT GRAY REPRESENTS
PROPOSED FUTURE EX:15TING ITE LAYOUT & {
FLEX PEN EXPANSION
.. BOLD BLACK 5HOW5
IMPACT AREA OUTLINE PKOPO-5 ? PAN510N PLANS
517E TOPOGRAPHIC # WETLAND
DATA A5 PROVIDED BY:
GEORGE FINCH/
Boney and Associates, P.A.
Raleigh, North Carolina
C SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NAME: F rn a -0 b
OVERALL NOVO NORDI5K o _ s ° w z
soil & Environmental Consultants, PA .? II cn ^' 0 °
0 FACILITIES EXPANSION 11010 Ran Rid$* Road - Me* Noetlt Cud= 27614 - P6ow [phone] - F= (919) u &w7 . cm
N 51TE PLAN 5TORMWATER PLANNINGauaa .>,
I WAGl
VVerall Iv-4-V4 U
Existing Stream
Channel
Proposed Storm Water Wetland
for Proposed * Future Faci
Expansion Runoff Treatme
All Construction to be Performe
Outside of Buff

Existing
Employee
44?? / Parking
Proposed
Employee
* Truck
Entrance
Existing Facility
f Entrance
Access Road
Existing 0
Production -- '
Facility. Existing Pond w/
Proposed Modification
for Existing Facility Runoff
?.. •? Treatment
NON-JURISDICTIONAL
* / WETLANDS
QVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA MEE=
NC Division of Water Quality
Tran # Invoice
4596 1013042 Type Date
Reference
Invoice 10/13/04 6324.691
017068
Date: 10/13/04 Check Number: 17068
Check Amt:
Balance
Discount $475.00
$475.00 Ray Amount
$0.00 $475.00
QR! c?
OCT 13 2004
D96 2 • VdATER QUALITY
V. OW 0S AND STR,i'd1ATER E PMCH