20150465 Ver 1_Stormwater Info_20150707

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: Don Curry <don @curryeng.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 3:26 PM
To: Burdette, Jennifer a
Subject: Novo Bridge - Stormwater Calculations
Attachments: 2015 -07 -02 JOCO Submittal.pdf
Jennifer,
Attached are our calculations for the stormwater wetland associated with the Novo Bridge project, for which we have a
NRB impact hearing tomorrow.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
DON CURRY, PE
pir sld nt
CrryENGINEERING
205 S. Fuquay Ave.
Fuquay - Varina, NC 27526
wk [phone]
fax [phone]
cell [phone]
don(Wcurrvena.com
www.currvena.com

Curr
IY
ENGINEERING 'lllllllllllllllfuuLE"LuV"
REMARKS:
Enclosed is the stormwater- and erosion control. submittal package for the Novo Nordisk Bridge II
Project.
IL MaL

CturyENGINEERING
TRANSMITTAL FORM
TO: Mr. Carlos Bagley
Stormwater Administrator
Johnston County Department of Utilities
309 E. Market Street
Smithfield, NC 27577
SUBJECT: Novo Nordisk Bridge II DATE: July 2, 2015
Clayton, NC SENT BY: Ed Loeffler
CURRY PROJECT NO: 2015 -016
We are sending you the following items:
COPIES ITEM I DESCRIPTION
2 Prints /Plans I Site Plans fated Ju[y 1, 2015
1 Calculations I Sturmwater Calculation Notabook Dated .duly 1, 21115
These are transmitted as checked below:
For Information _ Approved as Noted - Revise and Resubmit
As Requested _ Not Approved - Revise and Resubmit
For Review and Comments _ For Record and File
For-Revision _ Submittal
x For Approval _ For Recording
Approved _ For Signature, then return
REMARKS:
Enclosed is the stormwater and erosion control submittal package for the Novo Nordisk Bridge II
Project.
T 19 191 552-10549 2015 C Fuqudy Avenue
F (919) 552 -2043 Fuquay- Varina, NC 27526
4 1 EIV
Fp
Esr. Q u►
a 10
CA R 0�•���

PREPARED FOR
Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Industries, Inc.
Stormwater Management
&Erosion Control
Submittal Package
Novo Nordisk- Bridge Crossinq
3612 Powhatan Rd.
Clayton, NC 27520
1st CD Submittal — 07/01/2015
(Reference: Central Parking Expansion Project)
Curr
ENGINEERING
Prepared by:
Don Curry, President
The Curry Engineering Group, PLLC
PO Box 2018
205 S. Fuquay Ave.
Fuquay - Varina, NC 27526
(9191552 -0849
026970
1p
..,� �.

Curr -
ENGINEERING MMMW—
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB I: PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND REQUIRED FORMS
TAB II: WETLAND CALCULATIONS
TAB III: SOILS REPORT
TAB IV: DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS
TAB V: SOILS. TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS. & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
T (919) 552 -0849 205 S. Fuquay Avenue
F (919) 552 -2043 Fuquay- Varina, NC 27526
4
ci
1 ElVo,
Fp
Es r. Q u+
0 1Q
\�r
y FARO% -\ �P

Tab I — Permit Applications
Required Forms

JOHNSTON COUNTY EROSION and SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN PRELIMINARY REVIEW CHECKLIST
The following items shall be incorporated with respect to specific site conditions, in an erosion & sedimentation control plan:
NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCG010000
X Designation on the plans where the 7 or 14 day ground stabilization requirements apply per Section 11.8.2 of the permit.
�— Design of basins with one acre or more of drainage area for surface withdrawal as per Section II.B.4 of the permit.
LOCATION INFORMATION X Name and classification of receiving water course or name of
municipal operator (only where stormwater discharges are to
X Project location & labeled vicinity map (roads, streets, landmarks) occur)
_X North arrow and scale
X Provide a copy of site located on applicable USGS quadrangle and STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
NRCS Soils maps
GENERAL SITE FEATURES (Plan elements)
X Property lines & ownership ID for adjoining properties
X Existing contours (topographic lines)
X Proposed contours
X Limits of disturbed area (provide acreage total, delineate limits,
and label). Be sure to include all access to measures, lots that will
be disturbed, and utilities that may extend offsite.
X Planned and existing building locations and elevations
—� Planned & existing road locations & elevations, including
temporary access roads
X Lot and /or building numbers
X Hydrogeologic features: rock outcrops, seeps, springs, wetland
and their limits, streams, lakes, ponds, dams, etc. (include all
required local or state buffer zones and any Riparian Buffer
X determinations)
__ Easements and drainageways, particularly required for offsite
affected areas. Include copies of any recorded easements and/or
agreements with adjoining property owners.
X Profiles of streets, utilities, ditch lines, etc.
X Stockpiled topsoil or subsoil locations
X If the same person conducts the land- disturbing activity & any
related borrow or waste activity, the related borrow or waste
activity shall constitute part of the land- disturbing activity unless
the borrow or waste activity is regulated under the Mining Act of
1971, or is a landfill regulated by the Division of Waste
Management. If the land- disturbing activity and any related
borrow or waste activity are not conducted by the same person,
they shall be considered separate land- disturbing activities and
must be permitted either through the Sedimentation Pollution
Control Act as a one -use borrow site or through the Mining Act.
Location and details associated with any onsite stone crushing or
other processing of material excavated. If the affected area
associated with excavation, processing, stockpiles and transport
of such materials will comprise 1 or more acres, and materials will
be leaving the development tract, a mining permit will be required.
X Required Army Corps 404 permit and Water Quality 401
certification (e.g. stream disturbances over 150 linear feet)
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (on plan)
X Legend (provide appropriate symbols for all measures and
reference them to the construction details)
Location of temporary measures
Location of permanent measures
Construction drawings and details for
temporary and permanent measures. Show measures to scale on
plan and include proposed contours where necessary. Ensure
design storage requirements are maintained through all phases of
construction.
X Maintenance requirements for measures
X Contact person responsible for maintenance
Pre - construction runoff calculations for each outlet from the site (at
peak discharge points). Be sure to provide all supporting data for
the computation methods used (rainfall data for required storm
events, time of concentration /storm duration, and runoff
coefficients).
X Design calculations for peak discharges of runoff (including the
construction phase & the final runoff coefficients for the site)
X Design talcs for culverts and storm sewers (include HW, TW and
outlet velocities)
X Discharge and velocity calculations for open channel and ditch
flows (easement & rights -of -way)
_ X Design talcs for cross sections and method of stabilization for
existing and planned channels (include temporary linings). Include
appropriate permissible velocity and /or shear stress data.
X Design talcs and construction details for energy dissipaters below
culvert and storm sewer outlets (include stone /material specs &
apron dimensions). Avoid discharges on fill slopes.
X Design talcs and dimension of sediment basins (note current
surface area and dewatering standards as well as diversion of
runoff to the basins). Be sure that all surface drains, including
ditches and berms, will have positive drainage to the basins.
VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION
X Area & acreage to be stabilized with vegetation
X Method of soil preparation
X Seed type & rates (temporary & permanent)
X Fertilizer type and rates
X Mulch type and rates (include mulch anchoring methods to be
used)
NOTE: Plan should include provisions for groundcover in accordance with
NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCGO10000
and permanent groundcover for all disturbed areas within 15
working days or 90 calendar days (whichever is shorter) following
completion of construction or development.
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY /OWNERSHIP FORM
X Completed, signed & notarized FR/O Form
X Accurate application fee payable to Johnston County Public
Utilities
X Certificate of assumed name, if the owner is a partnership
X Name of Registered Agent (if applicable)
X Copy of the most current Deed for the site. Please make sure the
deed(s) and ownership information are consistent between the
plan sheets, local records and this form.
X Provide latitude & longitude (in decimal degrees) at the project
entrance.
NARRATIVE AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
X
SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES
X
X Existing and planned drainage patterns (include off -site areas that
drain through project and address temporary and permanent
conveyance of stormwater over graded slopes)
X Method used to determine acreage of land being disturbed and
drainage areas to all proposed measures (e.g. delineation map)
X Size, pipe material and location of culverts and sewers X
�— Soil information: type, special characteristics
X Soil information below culvert storm outlets
Narrative describing the nature & purpose of the construction
activity
Construction sequence related to erosion and sediment control
(including installation of critical measures prior to the initiation of
the land- disturbing activity & removal of measures after areas they
serve are permanently stabilized). Address all phases of
construction and necessary practices associated with temporary
stream bypasses and /or crossings.
Bid specifications related only to erosion control
JCPU ESC August 2013

Stormwater Permit Application
Development/Site Name: NOVO NORDISK - BRIDGE CROSSING
Owner /Developer Name: NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC
Address: 3612 POWHATAN ROAD, CLAYTON, NC 27512
Phone: 919 - 550 -2200 Contact Person: JODY BURGART
Fax:
No. of acres in development: 5 ac
Type of Fee Fee
Development
Residential 0 -10 acres* $700.00 10+ acres* $700.00 + $50.00 per acre*
(single family)
Other 0 -5 acres* $700.00 5+ acres* $700.00 + $100.00 per
Development acre*
*The review fee is based on total site acreage, rounded up to the nearest acre. All
checks should be made payable to Johnston County.
I hereby certify that all information contained within this Stormwater Management
application is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and conforms to
Johnston County's Stormwater Management Ordinance and stormwater design criteria.
Johnston County has the right to inspec all stormwater facilities on this tract of land.
I I 11„
Typed or Printed Name Signature of Owner /Developer Date
I assume responsibility for inspections, installation, maintenance and operation of all
stormwater facilities and Best Management Practices in accordance with the Stormwater
Management Plan enclosed and the Inspection and Maintenance Agreement, as
applicable. * *Droiect utilizes existina BMP and SWMP on record **
N/A
Typed or Printed Name Signature
Acting as an agent for: N/A
Date
*Note: Responsibility for the continued operation and maintenance of the proposed
stormwater management facilities can be transferred from the developer to an individual
landowner or Home Owner's Association. A copy of a recorded document, indicating
who will be responsible for maintenance of all stormwater management facilities, must
be provided as a condition of the approved Stormwater Management Plan.
Send the completed application package to:
Stormwater Administrator, Johnston County Department of Utilities
P.O. Box 2263
Smithfield, North Carolina 27577
If you have any questions or need more information, contact the Stormwater Administrator
at 209 -8333.
52 Revised 1/08

JOHNSTON COUNTY FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY /OWNERSHIP FORM
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
No person may initiate any land- disturbing activity on one or more acres as covered by the Act before this
form and an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the
Johnston County Department of Public Utilities. (Please type or print and, if the question is not applicable or
the e-mail and /or fax information unavailable, place N/A in the blank.)
Part A.
1. Project Name Novo Nordisk Bridge Crossinq
2. Location of land- disturbing activity: City or Township: Clavton
Highway /Street: Powhatan Rd. Latitude: 35dea37'08" Longitude78dea24'32"
3. Approximate date land- disturbing activity will commence: Jan 2015
4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Commercial
5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): 5.00 ac
6. Amount of fee enclosed: $1250. The application fee of $250.00 per acre (rounded up to the next acre)
is assessed for the first 8 acres and an additional $65 per acre for each additional acre (rounded up to
the next acre).
7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes_ No Enclosed X
8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land- disturbing activity:
Name Jodv Buraart E -mail Address: iobub- novonordisk.com
Telephone [phone] Cell # Fax #
9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list additional owners):
Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Indust. Inc. 919 - 550 -2200
Name Telephone Fax Number
3612 Powhatan Rd.
Current Mailing Address
Same
Current Street Address
Clavton NC 27527 Same
City State Zip City State Zip
10. Deed Book No.3834 Page No.0908
Part B.
1. Person(s) or firm(s) who are financially responsible for the land- disturbing activity (Provide a
comprehensive list of all responsible parties on an attached sheet):
Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Ind. Inc. jobunnovonordisk.com
Name E -mail Address
3612 Powhatan Rd.
Current Mailing Address
Clavton NC 27527
City State Zip
Telephone 919 - 550 -2200
Same
Current Street Address
City
Fax Number
State
WE

2. (a) if the Financially Responsible Party is not a resident of North Carolina, give name and street address
of the designated North Carolina Agent:
N/A
Name
Current Mailing Address
City State Zip
Telephone
E -mail Address
Current Street Address
City
Fax Number
State Zip
(b) If the Financially Responsible Party is a Partnership or other person engaging in business under an
assumed name, attach a copy of the Certificate of Assumed Name. If the Financially Responsible
Party is a Corporation, give name and street address of the Registered Agent:
N/A
Name of Registered Agent
Current Mailing Address
City State Zip
Telephone
E -mail Address
Current Street Address
City
Fax Number
State Zip
The above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and was provided
by me under oath (This form must be signed by the Financially Responsible Person if an individual
or his attorney -in -fact, or if not an individual, by an officer, director, partner, or registered agent with
the authority to execute instruments for the Financially Responsible Person). I agree to provide
corrected information should there be any change in the information provided herein.
?0L tt42- TVI0 f-ge-n
Typ r print name
&&(J"AC41
S�e Ge—nCcir-A l Aaneynr
Title or Authority
.::24 3L) IS—
Signature Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
I, _nY1 S�,, i3�.+a.rc� , a Notary Public of the County of
State of North Carolina, hereby certify that 1� � -r-K61%. appeared
personally before me this day and being duly sworn acknowledged that the above form was
executed by him.
Witness my .a; yang notarial seal, this
BREQ,00
Ski`
ez
•. oyN.. ..••� Jam..
•00000, STON .G_.0
a day of '�uNE , 20 I S
y'1'Za�.e• ��
Notary
My commission expires 03-is-2-015

7/1/2015
Corporations Division
North Carolina
Elaine F Marshall DEPARTMENT OF THE
Secretary SECRETARY OF STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, NC 27626-0622 (919)807 -2000
Click Here To:
View Document Filings File an Annual Report Print a Pre - Populated Annual Report form
Amend a Previous Annual Report
Corporate Names
Legal: Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
Bi
Sosld:
Status:
Annual Report Status:
Citizenship:
Date Formed:
Fiscal Month:
State of Incorporation:
Registered Agent:
Corporate Addresses
0283913
Current Active
Current
Foreign
3/4/1991
December
DE
CT Corporation System
Reg Office:
225 Hillsborough Stmt
Raleigh, NC 27603 -1767
Reg Mailing:
225 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603 -1767
Mailing:
3612 Powhatan Road
Clayton, NC 27527 -9217
Principal Office:
3612 Powhatan Road
Clayton, NC 27527 -9217
Officers
President: Palle Thorsen
3612 Powhatan Road
Clayton NC 27527 -9217
Secretary: Curtis G. Oltmans
3612 Powhatan Road
Clayton NC 27527 -9217
Treasurer: Lars Nielsen
Hallas AII6
Kalundborg, 4400 XX 00000
Stock
Class: 99 SEE CERT
Shares: 0
Par Value: 0
Ar_rm int
Login
Register
Mp:/&vww.secretary.state.nc.us/SearcWofcorp/458M 1/1

.,.. .
BOOK 120 0 PAGE 54
Prepared by and return to:
A,-A,4 t; . FeTrtaf -►
Poyner & Spruill
Post Office Box 10096
Raleigh, NC 27605
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL, WARRANTY DEED �
THIS DEED is made this 25th day of February, 1991, by and between LOCH
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., an Ohio corporation (the "Grantor "), and NOVO NORDISK
PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Grantee "), with
a mailing address of 405 Lexington Avenue, Suite 6200, New York, New York 10017.
i
WITNESSETH: N.G. Real Estate Excise Stamp Tax 8 .3.
For and in consideration of $1.00 cash in hand paid and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor has and
by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Grantee in fee simple, all that i
certain lot or parcel of land situated in Johnston County, North Carolina, more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a railroad spike located at the intersection of the centerline of SR
1901 and the Northeastern edge of the right -of -way of Southern Railroads Two -
Hundred (200) foot right -of -way, said railroad spike being the southernmost corner
of that certain 46.349 acre tract of land shown on survey recorded in Plat Book 31,
Page 21 Johnston County Registry, and running thence with said right -of -way of
Southern Railroad, North 49 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 1793.72 feet to an
iron pipe; thence leaving said right -of -way of Southern Railroad, North 03 degrees
29 minutes 05 seconds East 86.41 feet to a concrete monument; thence South 86
degrees 28 minutes 59 seconds East 658.51 feet to a concrete monument; thence
along a line of marked trees North 05 degrees 51 minutes 43 seconds East 968.01 '
feet to an iron pipe located in the centerline of Steep Hill Branch; thence with the `
centerline of Steep Hill Branch, along a traverse line, eight (8) calls as follows: (1)
South 61 degrees 53 minutes 02 seconds East 131.48 feet to an iron pipe; (2) South
67 degrees 58 minutes 47 seconds East 241.93 feet to an iron pipe; (3) South 75
degrees 27 minutes 46 seconds East 169.44 feet to an iron pipe; (4) South 87 degrees
18 minutes 57 seconds East 198.06 feet to an iron pipe; (5) South 74 degrees 33
minutes 54 seconds East 165.02 feet to an iron pipe; (6) South 41 degrees 09 minutes
55 seconds East 119.12 feet to an iron pipe; (7) South 07 degrees 27 minutes 01
second East 145.95 feet to an iron pipe; and (8) South 04 degrees 20 minutes 14
seconds East 309.82 feet to an iron pipe located in the centerline of Steep Hill
Branch; thence leaving Steep Hill Branch, South 29 degrees 25 minutes 49 seconds
West 267.72 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 47 degrees 14 minutes 17 seconds '
East 180.00 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 32 degrees 17 minutes 23 seconds East
217.42 feet to a railroad spike located in the centerline of SR 1901; thence with
centerline of SR 1901 three (3) calls as follows: (1) South 34 degrees 57 minutes 48
CONVEVANCE OF THIS PROPERTY
HAS BEEN DULY NOTED ON THE
TAX RECORDS. je
TAX SUPERVISOR
•

0 sou 12 0 0 PAGE 55
seconds West 5031 feet to a point; (2) South 31 degrees 03 minutes 30 seconds West
100.14 feet to a point; and (3) South 30 degrees 08 minutes 39 seconds West 828.00
feet to the point and place of BEGINNING, containing 46.247 acres according to
plat entitled "SURVEY FOR NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL PLANT,
INC. CLAYTON TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA"
dated December 18, 1990, revised January 4, 1991 prepared by Kenneth Close, Inc.
i
Land Surveying.
TOGETHER WITH all right, title and interest of Grantor in and to the area lying
within the right of way of the Southern Railroad.
The aforesaid lot or parcel of land was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded
in Book 1097, Page 364, Johnston County Registry.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
Grantor covenants with Grantee that Grantor is seized of said land in fee simple, that
Grantor has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and
i clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the
lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except for the following:
i
The lien of ad valorem taxes for 1991.
Easements, rights of ways and restrictions of record affecting said land including,
specifically, the following:
Easements to Carolina Power 8t light Company recorded in Book 382, Page
61 and Book 1130, Page 387, Johnston County Registry.
Easements to Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company recorded in
Book 196, Page 491 and Book 435, Page 98, Johnston County Registry.
The warranties of Grantor provided herein do not extend to any property lying within
the right of way of the Southern Railroad.
The designation "Grantor ", and "Grantee" as used herein shall include said named
parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include the singular,
plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
�_J

nox 12 U 0 Phu 56
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed by the duly authorized 'r'
officers of the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.
ATTEST: LOCH PHARMACELITICAL $ r INC., 4
an Ohio corporation
TE SEAL]
OF Ohid
B� ��y:
Print Name: E-OwARo c, sm , TH
Title: ggES ror"T
COUNTY OF C(Aye koaa
`1
THIS ,day of February, 1991, personally came before me, a Notary Public in
and for the said County and State, ,&Wt,,rd C 5m;" , who, being by me duly sworn,
says that he is the President of Loch Pharmaceutical; Inc., an Ohio corporation and
that the seat affixed to the foregoing instrument in writing is the official corporate seal of
said corporation, and that the said writing was signed and sealed by him in behalf of said
corporation by its authority duly given, and the said President acknowledged the said
writing to be the act and deed of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this AS. day of February, 1991.
'r�tal�ub�dzc�,
rY
Expires: -,
• K
State of kcrth Carolina-Johnston County / J. .
The foregoing certificates} of LIt
Notary(Nobrio Public is(are► carbfied to be correct.
This inftmeit was presented for re@stration and recorded
in Bock Pad 1 401 a n' 30 rA
Rooster of Deeds Deputy R -#Mer of Deeds
Q�
s p $R:F
m3�°
11
!I
e
•

JOHNSTOH couitTY
663
e7 -bB -9f
$250.00
STATE RTH
0.0ouNA
Real Estate
Excise Tax
Excise Tax $250.00
State of Nodh Carolina, johrd&m �o
Fled for Regist Gon alt, V
S! e i4 1 the
Records of Deeds
Recorded in Book 2iple
Phyllis N. Wan
Repsler Deeds
8y
Recording Time, Book and Page
Tax Lot No. .95E, M, . K ............................... ............................... Parcel Identifier No............................................ ...............................
Verifiedby ........................................ ............................... County on the ................ day of .......................... ..........1.1...............L.' 19............
by..................................................................................................... ............................... .......................................................... ...............................
Mail after recording to pOYNER 6 SPRUILL, L.L.P., PO BOX 10096, RALEIGH, NC 27605
.................................................................................................................................. ...............................
ATTN:'ALAN H. PETERSON
This instrument was prepared by ... P.A.TUR-4 ... PRRV1; 1Te..., L.. L., P. ......................................................................... ...............................
Brief description for the Index l i
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made this „17th,,,, day of ............................ June......................., 1994 ...... , by and between
GRANTOR
ARCHIBALD 0. MCFADYEN and wife,
DEBORAH R. MCFADYEN and JOHN PAGE
MCFADYEN and Wife, MAXINE MCFADYEN
CONVEYANCE OF THIS PROPERTY
HAS BEEN DULY NOTED ON THE
TAX RECORDS. ,!,M llklyk
TAX SUPERVISOR
GRANTEE
Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Industries, Inc.
3612 Powhatan Road
Clayton, NC 27520
Enter In appropriate block for each party: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, c4 corporation or partner9hip.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and
shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that
certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of ....: ... Clayton,.,,,,,. Township,
Johnston County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
•
0.

The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in ............................... ...............................
101.r...Pa9e„79Af..Johnston CountX,.Rec�istry ........................ ...............................
A map showing the above described property Is recorded in Plat Book ..... ............................... page...............,.,.,..,..
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid tot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to
the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey
the same In fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend the title against the lawful claims of all persona whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
See Exhibit B attached hereto and by this'reference made a part hereof,
LM WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor hat hereunto set his hand and seal, or It corporate, has caused this Instrument to be signed In its
torporate name by Its duty oathorixed officers and Its lied to be hereunto affixed y authority of Its Board of Directors, the day and year first
above written.
() . ...................MALI
corporate Name Archibald O. Mc d n
t
871 ------­-------- ............................... ..........
-- L�e.7y�/. (SEAL)
....-- •------------- ------ President eborah 11t� McFadyen
ATTEST:
.... _
.........--- . ..............I.._...__........ ._............. tq hn Pa cFadyen
........................ ....SFsaitiey�Corporate.tibaR :.
SEAL.STAMP Nlt>}l�n• CxR' 6N`l4X, ....11::l� K� ................... County.
Je 1, •'Notary Publle of thq County and State aforesaid, certify that , 15$X?,?)_ l?i1G;XCi1 .................
BRENDAB. G(*JERT :. .................................................---.....---.. ..__....------ ........... - - - - -• Granter.
NOTARY PUtf C • e'
! •w �u�tt .yFeso Ily appeared before me this day and acknowledged tae execution of the ferelloins Instrument. Witness my
4
MgcmaiSto �A� ,�IM d official stamp or seat. this �1,,.T,tth.. day of ............ Surie....................... 10.94..
My commission expires... Q a`� "7.. -- .._�_.OtiL!ISi _.....- Notary Public
$CAL.STA.MP NORTH CAROLINA, .......... . .......................County.
I, a Notary Public of the County and $late aforesaid, certify that ........... ...............................
at personally -came before me this day and acknowledged that .... he is ------ ------ -- - -- =t.:.::. Secretary of
r.
X ....................................................... a North Carolina corporation, and that by authority duly
given and as the act of the Corporation, the foregoing Instrument was signed In Its name by-its ............
President, staled with Its corporate seal and attested by ........... as its ............... ...: ....... Secretary.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this ....... day of ............................ t0 .....
.. -.
mycommission expires : .............................. ..._....__..--- ..._............ Notary Public
The foregoing certiticatets) of ................................. ............ I ..................................................................
,
is /are Certified to be correct. Tbls instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on Olt Itrst page hot tot.
.................................. ............................... ......REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR .... ............ . ................... COUNTY
BY----------------------------- ------------ ------ ------ --------------Deputy /Assistant. Register at Deeds
N.C. Liar Assm Form No 3 6 1976, R41vlS41d 1977 Printed W Agreement with the N.C. G& Assn 1`00141 PdMng CC. We. PA. Boa $6487, Raleigh, N.C. 27656

BQox 1389 PACE 116
STATE OF WORT CAROLINA
COUNTY OF - jWf/
THIS i day of July, 1994, personally came before me, a
Notary Publ c in and for the said County and State, Archibald O.
.wife, Deborah R. McFadyen, who, being by me duly
ledged the execution of this instrument as his act and
my hand and notarial seal, this day of July,
AA 1V A
A++v
Notary
My Commission Expires: / ( 9
STATE OF NORTH C ROLINA
COUNTY OF 1AJn 12►.
THIS 4� day of July, 1994, personally came before me, a
Notary Public in and for the said County and State, John Page
McFadyea, who, being by me duly sworn, acknowledged the execution
rument as his act and deed.
my hand and notarial seal, this day of July,
Notary
n Expires: And�
" I
Sim or ft(th CerON-Johosten Cft
the IWOPRI cc/r�ufKStels)
ti0tarylNolatKS) P�ht �i = bffr�■.��
Thn mwuminl *is presented tv
in 8aoe I TO Pike _ _Ll�
� w
This �[fcS� 'lam: . i•
F pis N.
r �
DO
Pro. 2
Reg. 144 r
Stamp "Mro c►
4
•
•

BOOK 13 8 9 PAGE 117
EXHIBIT A
BEGINNING at an RRSS in the Southern right of way line of Southern
Railroad, said RRSS being in the center line of SR 1901; runs
thence along the centet line of SR 1901 South 30 degrees 29 minutes
36. seconds West 265.77 feet to an RRSS; runs thence North 46
degrees 42 minutes 16 seconds West 1557 feet to a concrete
monument, runs thence North 03 degrees 29 minutes 05 seconds East
231.11 feet to an iron pipe set in the Southern right of way line
of Southern Railroad; runs thence along the Southern right of way
line of southern Railroad South 49 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds
East 1648.36 feet to a point in the Northwestern right of way line
of SR 1901, and South 49 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East 30.46
feet to an RRSS in the center of SR 1901, the point and place of
BEGINNING and containing 8.279 acres, including right of way of SR
1901, according to survey and plat prepared by Kenneth D. Close,
Registered Land Surveyor, dated June 21, 1988.
TOGETHER WITH, all right, title and interest of GRANTOR in and to
the following described tract or parcel of land:
BEGINNING at an RRSS in the center line of the right of way of
Southern Railroad, said RRSS being in the center line of SR 1901;
runs thence along the center line of SR 1901 South 30 degrees 29
minute 36 seconds West 101.55 feet to an RRSS in the Southern right
of way line of Southern Railroad; runs thence along the Southern
right of way line of Southern Railroad North 49 degrees 29 minutes
30 seconds West 30.46 feet to a point, and North 49 degrees 29
minutes 30 seconds West 1648.36 feet to an iron pipe set; runs
thence North 03 degrees 29 minutes 05 seconds East 125.25 feet to
an RRSS in the center line of the right of way of Southern
Railroad; runs thence along the center line of Southern Railroad
South 49 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East 1736.58 feet to an
RRSS, the point and place of BEGINNING according to survey and plat
prepared by Kenneth D. Close, Registered Land Surveyor, dated June
21, 1988.
Ra12\009104 -013 \0091632\ 07.05-%
D

Bou 13 8 9 PAGE $
EXHIBIT B
PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS
I. The lien of all taxes for the year 1994 and thereafter.
2. Permits to Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company
recorded in Book 196, Page 491 and Book 435, Page 98, Johnston
County Registry. ,
3. Easement to Carolina Power and Light Company recorded in book
382, Page 61, Johnston County Registry.
4. Reservation of sewer easement in deed recorded in Book 1101,
Page 705, Johnston County Registry.
S. Right -of -way of N.C.S.R. 1901.
6. Right -of -way of Southern Railroad.
Ra12 \009101411 \0086712\ 07-0694
13
•
•
i

V/ClN1rYA9AP 40 ..'itL
NENNETR NVCLtBC ...... ..
w. M62
.AbA'iii "Fa9p
eesT4y9,\
sEaL = A ___ a
1362 =
F1
°!u
xrwalow'
4KNIIET. 0004FI�D Ir. ,w vnr _ _
•':...... :. .a..e ».• _-4UOWTTy�un: •00n,.��
•. ._...... ...... X6Y 26 . - 93
.. r•s a af, 19
a�ESv G»OOq'w''a
4y PUBLIC
. A
,�bLG..trpr,.w r T'?h COO. hN�,..
�.- .N.��:,.as/ Ayr•. •.j�.�t %��� __
200• rov o awl__. To fao•
SCALE
/fr., ra.." r:i 8 d A9:y:S' py
NOTE.•
6Pl)6 P FVI010
Tip R r SET
1m r) WwwrE ,NMN6CNT Fwc
ARWRAZr SAW SET
recur•
SOUTHERN RAILROAD
. (200• R/W )
06 6; ,, r]f
08 HO1G. U
REV ISIONS
106 LS PO l /�`A\
1 \
1 \
SNORT LEG TABLE
+ s9nsls� s6c
P er6'OiBTW 926T
S1YWsw IOOH•
0 mra3 x 3050'
6 mwsy GF A}if0•
e Nu•4ssrE Km'
�M1i, irr�ll.r Md.: - Y ..n 'y wl r u!•1 .1 rM1•
a.i •�e rM1• INFe• •1•rh• R., 's i0 .�• • M(•Kde.!
N•rrl. C•.•I � M i•le. / el • . ,•
•nude. .'F�d'CI�IR.1�. 'w •Mn. r.l A,� •r.�
r Y. .. ._ �•i;l Iet 1�1 w: 111'W ,:: r 1`W ;�•�ri
I�q: ''C �;•':. n}.. .,.. IRr.•I.r.•. 1010.:
� r .� r .. a :.:�.. e••tanal. -.• rs.
OrM1 uw Pef• W. L.+u.wl.l el Fw,••y CI_wAri
-f
OI 1
r� Ru,.! MYFe dr rdF
y �
my s• • . FFFO PAIYfER
£ O
.r• r , • ..• ru• • Fw• y /•M .•a ,I/mAM
••
.... , . Auewr'y ., ee
f•wrI /•
F f' NOTAgy
I.T PUBLIC tv
Rio
PROPERTY OF
LOCH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
KENNETH CLOSE, INC.
1•- d• +- �«9
7aMa.1 HAI'k:l. }111.1. Nl1AU. NM.611:H, N(' TNAT
TOWNSHIP.' CLAYTON I col/wry: ✓owsToN
SURVEY SURVEYED BY: 0s B TE
PATE,
STATE: NORTH CAROLINA
SCAL£
I ORAWN BY: mw
ZONE: TAX MAP: PARCEL
-
CH£CKEO f CLOSURE BY Mr
_ iiiSrl�f -A

M.
CREZn
I.At
-15� 57 ACRES
f.4—)
45689 ACRES
45.57 ACRES (wwr)
0.677 ACRES avRlw)
46.247 ACRES fromi
0.677 Ac.
SOUTHERN RAILROAD
(WO'RIW)
NOTE Im MAP KM PREVIOUSLY RECORDED
;'!:y li- f, A It, it
11 oll-, 1-I...
NV PLAT BOOK k PAGE 7( THE PROPERTY
LRM ON TIC NORTH CAST SIDE MM RFVMM
0.* t
AND A Lillff MREEMENY "S ADDED ON 12-4-90.
NorE..
OF)ROW PIE mm
]EE ~ 01 IbNIVfICK fAGNEeM
flnED 'ATxNYMMEE ML M r
IFW AOW PPE aEy
SEPTaq" Is. I9
(OW) W1/CRCTE AKW*tIW iGNSYN
A �7
REVISIONS
4 OF CFfEK Is
PROPERTY I WE
-15� 57 ACRES
f.4—)
45689 ACRES
45.57 ACRES (wwr)
0.677 ACRES avRlw)
46.247 ACRES fromi
0.677 Ac.
SOUTHERN RAILROAD
(WO'RIW)
"ROPERTY OF
LOCH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
-1 1 -
TOWNSHIP ClArim
S M TE NORM CAROLINA
p, SCALE ZONE TAX MAP:
Cov#rr k)tgurojy
PARCEL
SHORT LE6 TABLE
I s3 -57'�w 5air
a s sjrw01 'Dw.,
MWRVWV 3050'
Njew7clE 104W
W4 r4" =W
-W.,
... . ...... .
....... ........
..... ....
11
a.OHS10V II
PusLift. cj
KENNETH ct.osF.• WC.
Lm s—va.j
N-1 411.\P1.1 RIA., ROM, kM.M,;Ik 1-1 il.,
SURVEY
PATE, SURVEYED BY 06 S T6
SCAL • ZMAWN BY mw
CHECKED $ CLOSURE BY: m•
9070—A
NOTE Im MAP KM PREVIOUSLY RECORDED
it
NV PLAT BOOK k PAGE 7( THE PROPERTY
LRM ON TIC NORTH CAST SIDE MM RFVMM
0.* t
AND A Lillff MREEMENY "S ADDED ON 12-4-90.
NorE..
OF)ROW PIE mm
]EE ~ 01 IbNIVfICK fAGNEeM
flnED 'ATxNYMMEE ML M r
IFW AOW PPE aEy
SEPTaq" Is. I9
(OW) W1/CRCTE AKW*tIW iGNSYN
A �7
REVISIONS
"ROPERTY OF
LOCH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
-1 1 -
TOWNSHIP ClArim
S M TE NORM CAROLINA
p, SCALE ZONE TAX MAP:
Cov#rr k)tgurojy
PARCEL
SHORT LE6 TABLE
I s3 -57'�w 5air
a s sjrw01 'Dw.,
MWRVWV 3050'
Njew7clE 104W
W4 r4" =W
-W.,
... . ...... .
....... ........
..... ....
11
a.OHS10V II
PusLift. cj
KENNETH ct.osF.• WC.
Lm s—va.j
N-1 411.\P1.1 RIA., ROM, kM.M,;Ik 1-1 il.,
SURVEY
PATE, SURVEYED BY 06 S T6
SCAL • ZMAWN BY mw
CHECKED $ CLOSURE BY: m•
9070—A

al a
fit
Ys OR
46 i
till] 11 11'ri
ii dai S 111112
d d w d -t y
i a
till QTµ s''� ����aos
NfrE OpCH A t0 j fy f
[ � MpSt 0710 � d � NQ�,�jI •4 * itY
fig! \ M
O
sy= _
Ix
511
0
r•„ •n foil � .11 Net M .OG36Ap S � ya
kip
v Al
� lhY a.l a:Yryy •rr� i
•••
k�91
N W as a
~ t ""Kf►�t� O !p D i
•.riuou roww rerrosotwwao7ruaowt ►scaoeoteaurtarrtalow^ +•6P"'m -baw a r

gig
15 Ei iJ j •
fit-It e e w $
i pu IM - i I
r•ii A �yl
non. x r,` ff
• RARiR^ -MRh 77 8:� n wor/cr do - am ON s
Up
OUT N
���ShEmu, 6 oy51�er J yr \ Kf� —D' �j� �, Od1'�fiy
r��N�6'1• p6 y76 eft _ !,,fps
En
lateW
jan� /
W
x �
o �nin! an.u,uor a,wv
/ � � I IIIIIIII'I
;alt lilt/
r § a L, �r /
qF
wln•or iiwr rs+o6ae aav mK/' AS ww+ �roi � OWE 0 �r , i•NNe •w

m
SURVEY NOTES.,
Lu
co
ca -;t
A It
J=
W—M
R,
Surveying:
Taylor Land Consultants
5M Apr —Y,S.W.
APx, NC—
.xo.nmwlm)
.—:M.MT
ii
if
9
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

''G tt, -xk
UTE"Y
IUDG CRaS-SNG
Novo o 5 RD crowo�orlpo �
p

PREPARED FOR
U� e
(Id11%1(1 is
Novo Nordisk Phormdmti -I
Industries, Inc.
`STORMWATER
WETLAND ¥2
/ M wuww � ra1BII�W 1W Q�IINM�B'M� M M � ��
I/{ W MON IOFC
MMlXmwl aaK NX
�f .MY MM
aK I � � daa•l
WWaa,1
tt I
1
It� t
N-4-'
>rr Wa 7
IV W Y WWII
!e tOIC l
1�`iia'wa ro �
�lSTORMWATER
WETLAND #i
nirKi m""' !aD01o« ' lianuan MKiI Mwl.
. Sim c mgnnu ml mrs+.. arm r.on m M
a �WlmmK rites. sweonwxr �KaK,w. �
wn awa K
KKiarn�m�.sMWa a�maaaa W°mriraala
WMKm K .iw.. me avu M aaram .lrK l6
" i.lo°�'wc u�°"°a vHiMwec'mwK�i v u �mweo
r arwn.
— � e
- -
swax
o. aKlvaK aw�,raro'wm°OANe cs.'mn�1mrrnrKm
'n"0m�"0io� w 0000a wnmars
•plwi OYllt aML K IYWI! W R /. KK IOICMIM
a� IA 1aalY NIN M MoMI.ICCdiKn
-
�11K�MUM! M. �6m f.l
MCI W mrCIYCBGtr&lwit IrM A[ AM K MNPM a KpKID
� '
A,w
ortF. (� Ilv�_K[MNp
fL1l bA t aliS.l
la
ar.MlK Wa
� arW.alaM,ma
O
flC
V
-
o
m�a
O
Z
Ea
Y �I
1 kw
WAZ
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION " 110" C•05 F

Tab 11 — Wetland Calculations

Calculate Wetland Size Using Original Design Guidelines
Post - Development BMP # 1
Proposed Site: Area
Impervious Area = 423,510 sf
Contributing Drainage Area:
Off Site = - sf
On Site = 605,921 sf
% Impervious (Calculated) = 70%
% Impervious (Design) = 70%
SA/DA Ratio = 2.93
Minimum Surface Area = 17,753 sf
Proposed Wetland Surface Area 24,500 sf
*From NCDENR BMP Manual Table 10 -1
*Measured from Permanent Pool Elevation

Project Data Revisions
Project # 2015 -016 No Date Description
Pro)Ject Name Novo - Nordisk Bridge
Dafe 7/1/2015
SOIL WEIGHTED CN VALUES _ 4
Post-Mveloped i-
Residential
Curve Numbers for Hydrologic Soil Group
Faceville
A
B
C
D
Open Space (Lawns, Parks)
77
i.
85 J
J
Poor Condition
68
79
86
89 J
Fair Condition
49
69
79
84
(Good Condition
39
61 J
74
80 J
Impervious Areas I
68
84
12 acre
1
Parking Lots, Roofs
1
65 1
82 1
Paved; Curbs
98
98 1
98 1
98 1
Paved; Open Ditches
83
89 J
98
98 J
Gravel
76
85 J
89 J
91 J
Aplrt I
72. �
82 1
85 1
88
-- - -
Woods I
I
I
-- --
Poor Condition 1
45
66 J
77 J
83
Fair Condition
36
60
73 J
79
Good Condition ;
30 1
55 1
70 J
77 J
Residential
; I
Faceville
B J
1
1
1/8 acre or less
65 I
77
i.
85 J
92 1
1/4 acre
38
61
1
75 J
87
_11/3 acre
1/2 acre
_ 30
25
57
54
72
70
86
85
1 acre
20
51
,
68
84
12 acre
1 12
46
1
65 1
82 1
Types of Soils with in Drainage Area
Soil Name
I Hydrologic Group
Faceville
B J
Gilead
C J
Varina
C
Impervious Surface =
i.
I
I
i
I
i Soil Area in C
[Drainage Area =
ITotal Area in "A" Soils =
ITotal Area in "B" Soils
ITotal Area in "C" Soils
Total Area in "D" Soils =
irainage Area_____ _
13.91 'ac
0.00 ac
1.25 ac
12.66 ac
0.00 ac
Use the following CN Values for each Land Use
J
Poor
r Fair
Good J
Open Space =
85
78
73 1
Impervious Surface =
98
98 i
98 j
Wooded Area =
76
72
69 1
Residential Area =
92 90
i
54 1
Land Uses in Sub -Basin
Open Space
4.19
ac
Impervious
9.72
ac
Wooded
0.00
Jac
Residential (1/2 ac)
0.00
Jac
Poor
Fair Good
Weighted CN Value
94
92 90

Hydraflow Tabies ofrGvants Novo Nordisk Bridge II1DesignlHydraFlowlNovo Nordisk 2015 -07 -01 - DA1.gpw
Hydraflow Hydrographs F)dension for AutoCAD® Civil 3138 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.4
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
Watershed Model Schematic ...................................................... ............................... 1
Hydrograph Return Period Recap .............................................. ............................... 2
- Year
SummaryReport .......................................................................................... ............................... 3
HydrographReports .................................................................................... ............................... 4
Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre - Development ................................... ............................... 4
Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Post - Development ................................. ............................... 5
Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Exist. Wetland Outlet ................................. ............................... 6
Pond Report - Existing Wetland ............................................................ ............................... 7
Hydrograph No. 4, Reservoir, Prop. Wetland Outlet ................................. ............................... 8
Pond Report - Proposed Wetland ......................................................... ............................... 9
10 - Year
SummaryReport ........................................................................................ ............................... 10
HydrographReports .................................................................................. ............................... 11
Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre - Development ................................. ............................... 11
Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Post - Development ............................... ............................... 12
Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Exist. Wetland Outlet ............................... ............................... 13
Hydrograph No. 4, Reservoir, Prop. Wetland Outlet ............................... ............................... 14
25 - Year
SummaryReport ........................................................................................ ............................... 15
HydrographReports .................................................................................. ............................... 16
Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre - Development ................................. ............................... 16
Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Post - Development ............................... ............................... 17
Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Exist. Wetland Outlet ............................... ............................... 18
Hydrograph No. 4, Reservoir, Prop. Wetland Outlet ............................... ............................... 19
100 - Year
SummaryReport ........................................................................................ ............................... 20
HydrographReports .................................................................................. ............................... 21
Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, Pre - Development ................................. ............................... 21
Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, Post - Development ............................... ............................... 22
Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Exist. Wetland Outlet ............................... ............................... 23
Hydrograph No. 4, Reservoir, Prop. Wetland Outlet ............................... ............................... 24
OFReport ................................................................................... ............................... 25

Watershed Model Schematic Hydreflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3138 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Legend
i" Ortialn
1 SCS Runoff
2 SCS Runoff
3 Reservoir
4 Reservoir
1 2
w w
Pre - Development
Post - Development
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Project: ZAProjects Folder- Zebulon12015\2015 -016 Novo Nordisk - Bridge II1Design\Hyd[aFirdad Nes"p@Mdkl 67 -01 - DA I .gpm

2
Hydrograph
Return Period
ReFPr.P. Hydrographs
Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3130 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. A0.4
Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow
Peak Outflow (cfs)
Hydrograph
No. type hyd(s)
Description
(origin)
1 -yr 2 -yr 3 -yr
5 -yr 10 -yr
25 -yr 50 -yr
100 -yr
1 SCS Runoff - --
32.14 - -- - --
- - - - -- 72.68
86.78 - - - - - --
113.29
Pre - Development
2 SCS Runoff - - - - -- 48.99 - -- - --
- - - -- 100.41
118.02 - --
151.05
Post - Development
3 Reservoir 1
3.797 - - -- - - - --
- - - - -- 36.54
40.60 - - - --
44.97
EAst. Wetland Outlet
4 Reservoir 2
3.520 — - — -- -
- -- 6.626
14.51 --
46.58
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Proj. file: Z:1Projects Folder- Zebulon1201 51201 5 -01 6 Novo Nordisk - Bridge ll\+3llgeddyddd5j Md\ddN disk 2015 -07 -01 - WI.gpr

3
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc.
v10.4
Hyd. Hydrograph
Peak
Time
Time to
Hyd. Inflow
Maximum
Total
Hydrograph
No. type
flow
interval
Peak
volume hyd(s)
elevation
strge used
Description
(origin)
(cfs)
(min)
(min)
(cult)
(ft)
(cuft)
1 SCS Runoff
32.14
1
718
68,303 - --
- - --
Pre - Development
2 SCS Runoff
48.99
1
718
106,762 - - --
- - --
Post - Development
3 Reservoir
3.797
1
741
55,393 1
278.19
34,562
Exist. Wetland Outlet
4 Reservoir
3.520
1
755
91,711 2
278.97
60,561
Prop. Wetland Outlet
ZAProjects Folder- Zebulon1201512015 -016 hoPafdaFd ?*ioBrit*lttDesignlHy(Ir&V pMitW2O15 -07 -01 - DA1.gpw

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs 6dension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 1
Pre - Development
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Basin Slope
Tc method
Total precip.
Storm duration
SCS Runoff
1 yrs
1 min
10.980 ac
0.0%
User
3.20 in
24 h rs
* Composite (Area/CN) = [(5.050 x 98) + (5.930 x 74)1/ 10.980
4
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
Peak discharge
= 32.14 cfs
Time to peak
= 718 min
Hyd. volume
= 68,303 cuft
Curve number
= 85*
Hydraulic length
= 0 ft
Time of conc. (Tc)
= 8.00 min
Distribution
= Type II
Shape factor
= 484
Pre - Development
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 - -1 Year Q (cfs)
35.00 35.00
30.00 30.00
25.00 25.00
'
20.00
I
20.00
15.00
15.00
10.00
10.00
5.00 5.00
0.00 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
- Hyd No. 1 Time(min)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 2
Post - Development
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Storm frequency
= 1 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 13.910 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Tc method
= User
Total precip.
= 3.20 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
" Composite (Area/CN) = [(9.900 x98) + (4.370 x74)]113.910
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Curve number
Hydraulic length
Time of conc. (Tc)
Distribution
Shape factor
Post - Development
Hyd. No. 2 - -1 Year
N
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
= 48.99 cfs
= 718 min
= 106,762 tuft
= 90*
= Oft
= 8.00 min
= Type II
= 484
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00 - — 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320
Hyd No. 2 Time (min)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 3
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 1 yrs
Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Pre - Development
Reservoir name = Existing Wetland
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0 300
Hyd No. 3
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Hyd. No. 3 - -1 Year
600 900 1200
Hyd No. 1
6
Wednesday, 07 11 1 2015
= 3.797 cfs
= 741 min
= 55,393 cuft
= 278.19 ft
= 34,562 cult
Q (cfs)
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000
® Total storage used = 34,562 cuft Time (min)

Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
Pond No. 2 - Existing Wetland
Pond Data
Contours - User - defined contour areas. Average end area method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 277.00 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (cuft)
0.00 277.00
24,482
0
0
1.00 278.00
31,738
28,110
28,110
2.00 279.00
35,393
33,566
61,676
3.00 280.00
38,520
36,957
98,632
4.00 281.00
41,554
40,037
138,669
5.00 282.00
44,632
43,093
181,762
6.00 283.00
47,722
46,177
227,939
7.00 284.00
51,083
49,403
277,342
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
IB]
[C]
[PrfRsrl
[A] [B]
[C] [D]
Rise (in) = 30.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 12.56 20.00
0.00 0.00
Span (in) = 30.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 278.00 279.00
0.00 0.00
No. Barrels = 1
1
1
0
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33 2.60
3.33 3.33
Invert El. (ft) = 275.00
277.00 0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= 1 Broad
Length (ft) = 100.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
Multi -Stage
= Yes Yes
No No
Slope ( %) = 3.00
0.10
0.10
n/a
N -Value = .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff. = 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(In/hr)
= 0.000 (by Contour)
Multi -Stage = n/a
Yes
Yes
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Note' Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (Ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (a).
Stage (ft)
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
Stage/ Discharge
Elev (ft)
285.00
283.00
281.00
279.00
0.00 277.00
0.00 6.00 12.00 18.00 24.00 30.00 36.00 42.00 48.00 54.00 60.00 66.00
Total Q Discharge (cis)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADC Civil 3136 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. A 0.4
Hyd. No. 4
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 1 yrs
Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post - Development
Reservoir name = Proposed Wetland
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Hyd. No. 4 - -1 Year
8
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
= 3.520 cfs
= 755 min
= 91,711 cuft
= 278.97 ft
= 60,561 cuft
Q (cfs)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00- ---_ _......_.... -- 0.00
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000
Time (min)
Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Total storage used = 60,561 cult

Pond Report 9
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4 Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
Pond No.1 - Proposed Wetland
Pond Data
Contours - User - defined contour areas. Average end area method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 277.00 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Contour area (sqft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (cuft)
0.00
277.00
24,482
0
0
1.00
278.00
31,738
28,110
28,110
2.00
279.00
35,393
33,566
61,676
3.00
280.00
38,520
36,957
98,632
4.00
281.00
41,554
40,037
138,669
5.00
282.00
44,632
43,093
181,762
6.00
283.00
47,722
46,177
227,939
7.00
284.00
51,083
49,403
277,342
Culvert/ Orifice Structures Weir Structures
Stage (ft)
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s)
Stage / Discharge Elev (ft)
285.00
283.00
281.00
279.00
0.00 ' 277.00
0.00 7.00 14.00 21.00 28.00 35.00 42.00 49.00 56.00 63.00 70.00
Total Q Discharge (cfs)
[A]
IBl
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A]
[B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 30.00
3.00
6.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 12.56
20.00
0.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 30.00
3.00
6.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 281.00
282.00
0.00
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
4
0
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33
2.60
3.33
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 275.00
277.00
278.00
0.00
Weir Type
= 1
Broad
-
Length (ft)
= 100.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
Multi -Stage
= Yes
Yes
No
No
Slope (W
= 3.00
0.10
0.10
n/a
N -Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(in /hr)
= 0.000 (by
Contour)
Multi -Stage
= n/a
Yes
Yes
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s)
Stage / Discharge Elev (ft)
285.00
283.00
281.00
279.00
0.00 ' 277.00
0.00 7.00 14.00 21.00 28.00 35.00 42.00 49.00 56.00 63.00 70.00
Total Q Discharge (cfs)

10
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. A0.4
Hyd.
Hydrograph
Peak
Time Time to
Hyd. Inflow
Maximum
Total
Hydrograph
No.
type
flow
Interval Peak
volume hyd(s)
elevation
strge used
Description
(origin)
(cfs)
(min) (min)
(cult)
(ft)
(cuft)
1
SCS Runoff
72.68
1 718
159,881 - --
- - - - --
—
Pre - Development
2
SCS Runoff
100.41
1 718
228,985 - --
- - --
Post- Development
3
Reservoir
36.54
1 724
146,732 1
279.06
63,858
Exist. Wetland Outlet
4
Reservoir
6.626
1 757
212,918 2
280.91
135,053
Prop. Wetland Outlet
ZAProjects Folder- Zebulon1201512015 -016 hoRmNcmd?*io0ritlgiYlilDesign\Hydr&V fflRdiAW2M5 -07 -01 - DA1.gpw

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 1
Pre - Development
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Basin Slope
Tc method
Total precip.
Storm duration
SCS Runoff
10 yrs
1 min
10.980 ac
0.0%
User
5.80 in
24 h rs
Composite (Area/CN) = ((5.050 x 98) + (5.930 x 74)] / 10.980
Q (cfs)
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00 -
0
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Curve number
Hydraulic length
Time of conc. (Tc)
Distribution
Shape factor
Pre - Development
Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year
A
11
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
72.68 cfs
718 min
159,881 tuft
85*
Oft
8.00 min
Type II
484
Q (cfs)
80.00
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320
Hyd No. 1 Time (min)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. A0.4
Hyd. No. 2
Post - Development
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Basin Slope
Tc method
Total precip.
Storm duration
SCS Runoff
10 yrs
1 min
13.910 ac
0.0%
User
5.80 in
24 h rs
* Composite (Area/CN) = [(9.900 x 98) + (4.370 x 74)] / 13.910
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Curve number
Hydraulic length
Time of conc. (Tc)
Distribution
Shape factor
12
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
100.41 cfs
718 min
228,985 tuft
90*
Oft
8.00 min
Type II
484
Post - Development
Q WS) Hyd. No. 2 - -10 Year Q (cfs)
120.00 120.00
100.00 100.00
80.00 80.00
60.00 = '60.00
40.00 1 40.00
20.00 = 20.00
0.00 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320
Hyd No. 2 Time(min)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 3
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Inflow hyd. No.
= 1 - Pre - Development
Reservoir name
= Existing Wetland
Storage Indication method used
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year
80.00
70.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
we
13
Wednesday, 07 /1/ 2015
= 36.54 cfs
= 724 min
= 146,732 tuft
= 279.06 ft
= 63,858 cuft
Q (cfs)
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
I — — - - -- — - — 0.00
120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 ® Total storage used 63,858 cult

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 31® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 4
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Storm frequency
= 10 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Inflow hyd. No.
= 2 - Post - Development
Reservoir name
= Proposed Wetland
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0 300 600
Hyd No.
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Hyd. No. 4 -- 10 Year
14
Wednesday, 07 / 1 1 2015
= 6.626 cfs
= 757 min
= 212,918 cuft
= 280.91 ft
= 135,053 tuft
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
- -- 0.00
900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000
Hyd No. 2 ® Total storage used = 135,053 cuft Time (min)

iE
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. Hydrograph
Peak
Time
Time to
Hyd. Inflow
Maximum
Total
Hydrograph
No. type
flow
interval
Peak
volume hyd(s)
elevation
strge used
Description
(origin)
(cfs)
(min)
(min)
(cult)
(ft)
(cult)
1 SCS Runoff
86.78
1
718
192,994 - - --
- --
Pre- Development
2 SCS Runoff
118.02
1
718
272,215 -- -
- - —
- - - - --
Post - Development
3 Reservoir
40.60
1
724
179,791 1
279.35
74,570
Exist. Wetland Outlet
4 Reservoir
14.51
1
735
255,895 2
281.31
152,215
Prop. Wetland Outlet
ZAProjects Folder- Zebulon1201512015 -016 hoRmiMcrd ?*ioBrM@4YI10esign\Hy(IrW tUdi3W2O15 -07 -01 - DA1.gpw

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow HydrDgraphs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 1
Pre - Development
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 10.980 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Tc method
= User
Total precip.
= 6.70 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
* Composite (Area/CN) = [(5.050 x 98) + (5.930 x 74)] 110.980
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Curve number
Hydraulic length
Time of conc. (Tc)
Distribution
Shape factor
Pre - Development
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 — 25 Year
J
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
0
16
Wednesday, 07 11 / 2015
86.78 cfs
718 min
192,994 cuff
85*
0 ft
8.00 min
Type II
484
Q (cfs)
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
\ 10.00
0.00
120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320
Hyd No. 1 Time (min)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3136 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. A 0.4
Hyd. No. 2
Post - Development
Hydrograph type
= SCS Runoff
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Drainage area
= 13.910 ac
Basin Slope
= 0.0%
Tc method
= User
Total precip.
= 6.70 in
Storm duration
= 24 hrs
Composite (Area/CN) = [(9.900 x 98) + (4.370 x 74)] 113.910
Q (cfs)
100.00
80.00
40.00
20.00
0.00 -
0
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Curve number
Hydraulic length
Time of conc. (Tc)
Distribution
Shape factor
Post - Development
Hyd. No. 2 -- 25 Year
120 240 360 480
Hyd No. 2
17
Wednesday, 07 / 112015
118.02 cfs
718 min
272,215 cuft
90*
Oft
8.00 min
Type II
484
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320
Time (min)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.4
Hyd. No. 3
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 25 yrs
Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Pre - Development
Reservoir name = Existing Wetland
Storage Indication method used.
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Exist. Wetland Outlet
18
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
= 40.60 cfs
= 724 min
= 179,791 cult
= 279.35 ft
= 74,570 cult
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 -- 25 Year Q (cfs)
90.00 I 90.00
80.00 80.00
70.00 70.00
60.00 60.00
50.00 50.00
40.00 40.00
30.00 30.00
20.00 20.00
10.00 10.00
0.00 — � - - 0.00
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 ® Total storage used = 74,570 cult

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 31382015 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.4
Hyd. No. 4
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Storm frequency
= 25 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Inflow hyd. No.
= 2 - Post - Development
Reservoir name
= Proposed Wetland
Storage Indication method'used.
Q (cfs)
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0 300 600
Hyd No. 4
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Hyd. No. 4 — 25 Year
19
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
= 14.51 cfs
= 735 min
= 255,895 cuft
= 281.31 ft
= 152,215 cuft
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
-1 1I
40.00
20.00
— 0.00
900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000
Time (min)
Hyd No. 2 ® Total storage used = 152,215 cuft

20
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. A 0.4
Hyd.
Hydrograph
Peak Time
Time to
Hyd. Inflow
Maximum
Total
Hydrograph
No.
type
flow Interval
Peak
volume hyd(s)
elevation
strge used
Description
(origin)
(cfs) (min)
(min)
(cuft)
(ft)
(cuft)
1
SCS Runoff
113.29 1
718
256,473 --
Pre- Development
2
SCS Runoff
151.05 1
718
354,442 - - - - --
- - - --
......
Post - Development
3
Reservoir
44.97 1
725
243,185 1
279.91
95,386
Exist. Wetland Outlet
4
Reservoir
46.58 1
726
337,756 2
281.99
181,266
Prop. Wetland Outlet
ZAProjects Folder- Zebulon1201512015 -016 P, oFalWc xd?* io0ritpVlglesign lHy(IrcWkk*bmkgNMi9W2M5 -07 -01 - DA1.gpw

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 1
Pre - Development
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Basin Slope
Tc method
Total precip.
Storm duration
SCS Runoff
100 yrs
1 min
10.980 ac
0.0%
User
8.40 in
24 h rs
* Composite (Area/CN) = [(5.050 x 98) + (5.930 x 74)] / 10.980
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
*1 1I
40.00
20.00
M
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Curve number
Hydraulic length
Time of conc. (Tc)
Distribution
Shape factor
Pre - Development
Hyd. No. 1 - -100 Year
J
U
21
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
113.29 cfs
718 min
256,473 cult
85*
Oft
8.00 min
Type II
484
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320
Hyd No. 1 Time (min)

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4
Hyd. No. 2
Post - Development
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Basin Slope
Tc method
Total precip.
Storm duration
SCS Runoff
100 yrs
1 min
13.910 ac
0.0%
User
8.40 in
24 h rs
Composite (Area/CN) = [(9.900 x 98) + (4.370 x 74)] / 13.910
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Curve number
Hydraulic length
Time of conc. (Tc)
Distribution
Shape factor
22
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
151.05 cfs
718 min
354,442 cult
90*
Oft
8.00 min
Type II
484
Post - Development
Q WS)
Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year
Q (S)
160.00
160.00
140.00
140.00
120.00
120.00
100.00
100.00
80.00
80.00
60.00
60.00
40.00
40.00
20.00
20.00
0.00
I
0.00
0 120 240
360 480 600 720 840
960 1080 1200
Time (min)
Hyd No. 2

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. A 0.4
Hyd. No. 3
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 100 yrs
Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 - Pre - Development
Reservoir name = Existing Wetland
Storage Indication method used.
Q (cfs)
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Exist. Wetland Outlet
Hyd. No. 3 - -100 Year
23
Wednesday, 07 / 1 / 2015
= 44.97 cfs
= 725 min
=
243,185-cuft
= 279.91 ft
= 95,386 cuft
Q (cfs)
120.00
100.00
80.00
1 40.00
20.00
memimi - - - -- - - - - - -0.00
120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560
Time (min)
Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 I Total storage used = 95,386 cuft

Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. 00.4
Hyd. No. 4
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Hydrograph type
= Reservoir
Storm frequency
= 100 yrs
Time interval
= 1 min
Inflow hyd. No.
= 2 - Post - Development
Reservoir name
= Proposed Wetland
Storage Indication method used.
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Max. Elevation
Max. Storage
Prop. Wetland Outlet
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 - -100 Year
1
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
40.00
20.00
0.00 -
0
180
Hyd No. 4
24
Wednesday, 07 /1 / 2015
= 46.58 cfs
= 726 min
= 337,756 cuft
= 281.99 ft
= 181,266 cuft
Q (cfs)
160.00
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
-0 1I
40.00
i
20.00
- 0.00
360 540 720 900 1080 1260 1440 1620 1800
Time (min)
Hyd No. 2 ® Total storage used = 181,266 cult

Hydraflow Rainfall Report 25
Hydraflow Hydrographs E=xtension for AutoCAD® Civil 3138 2015 by Autodesk, Inc. v10.4 Wednesday, 07 /1 / 2015
Return
Intensity - Duration- Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA)
Period
Intensity Values (En /hr)
(Yrs)
B
D
E (N /A)
1
63.0344
12.7000
0.8866 -- - - - - --
2
76.7932
13.3000
0.8914 - - --
3
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 -- --
5
77.7657
13.3000
0.8501 - - - - - --
10
72.9776
12.4000
0.8023 - - --
25
65.4451
11.2000
0.7457 - - - --
50
59.4988
10.2000
0.6996 - - --
100
53.8843
9.2000
0.6563 - ---- --
File name: Clayton. OF
2.26
2.05
Intensity = B / (Tc + D) ^E
Return
Intensity Values (En /hr)
Period
(Yrs)
5 min
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
1
4.93
3.96
3.32
2.86
2.52
2.26
2.05
1.88
1.73
1.61
1.50
1.41
2
5.75
4.64
3.90
3.37
2.98
2.67
2.42
2.22
2.05
1.90
1.78
1.67
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
6.57
5.35
4.54
3.95
3.51
3.16
2.88
2.65
2.45
2.29
2.15
2.02
10
7.38
6.02
5.12
4.48
3.99
3.61
3.30
3.05
2.83
2.65
2.49
2.35
25
8.20
6.71
5.73
5.03
4.50
4.09
3.76
3.48
3.24
3.04
2.87
2.72
50
8.87
7.27
6.22
5.48
4.93
4.49
4.14
3.84
3.60
3.39
3.20
3.04
100
9.44
7.75
6.66
5.88
5.30
4.85
4.48
4.18
3.92
3.70
3.51
3.34
Tc = time in minutes.
Values may exceed 60.
PreciD.
file name: SamDle.DCD
Rainfall Precipitation Table
(in)
Storm
Distribution
1 -yr
2-yr
3 -yr
5 -yr
10 -yr
25-yr
50-yr
100 -yr
SCS 24 -hour
3.20
3.70
1.00
4.90
5.80
6.70
7.50
8.40
SCS 6 -Hr
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.38
4.92
4.00
Huff -1st
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.00
Huff -2nd
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Huff -3rd
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Huff -4th
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Huff -Indy
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.00
Custom
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.10

PREPARED FOR
noNrdie
Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical
Industrim, Inc.
9 PROPOSED POND PLAN — FOREDAY & POND
f/ scar
A
7
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-09
7%mmm w MAU HUG&&
t
MUM
awn •pr
=A—_ rm W
=IMED POND PROFILE - FORERAY & POND
7
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-09
7%mmm w MAU HUG&&
t
1. l61RRRRDIRD 1.116MUM,
awn •pr
=A—_ rm W
7
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-09

m
0
, lair >m
m
0 _n
j7
12,
X
X� 4
12 opll
Ti
z lCurry Q kft. I NOVO NORDISK BRIDGE CROSSING
�' ENQINEERINQ� PRE-DEVELOPMENT DROUNAGEAREAS

m
ar0
m
-n
0
41
&
P5.
H A00"L ip;
P, gp�
XlCurryQ NOVO NORDISK BRIDGE CROSSING
POST-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGEAREAS
ENGINEERING I I

r
4
AL
-----------
0
. .. ...........
6
611
I it
--------------
�y
Ic
r Si
W cc urr =.z.n. NOVO NORDISK BRIDGE CROSSING
yQI ENGINEERING INLET DRAINAGEAREAS

Tab III -- soils Report

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
o NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Sol! Survey,
a Joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Johnston County,
North Carolina
Novo Nordisk 3692 Powhatan Rd.,
Clayton, NC
July 8, 2013

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning In survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide infomnation about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including fanners, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists In recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil propertles
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users Identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onske investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http: / /soils.usda.gov /sqi/) and certain
conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact
your local USDA Service Center (http : // offices .sc.egov.usda.govAocator /app?
agency =nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (htip: /Isoils.usda.goy /contect/
state_offices/).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils Is updated periodically. Updated Information is available
through the NRCS Soil Data Mart Web site or the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The Soil
Data Mart is the data storage site for the official soil survey Information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income Is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means

for communication of program Information (Braille, large print, audlotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720 -2600 (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rfghts, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250 -9410 or call (800) 795 -3272
(voice) or (202) 720 -6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.

Contents
Preface...................................................................................... ..............................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made .................................................... .............................
.. 5
SoilMap .................................................................................... ..............................7
SoilMap .................................................................................. ..............................8
Legend................................................................................... ..............................9
MapUnit Legend ................................................................... .............................10
Map Unit Descriptions ........................................................... .............................10
Johnston County, North Carolina ....................................... .............................12
CoB— Cowerts loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes ......... .............................12
FaB— Facevilie sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent sl opes ........ .............................12
GeB-- Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes ........... .............................13
GoP�-- Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ..... .............................14
PaE— Pacolet loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes ................. .............................15
UcB —Uchee loamy coarse sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes .............................16
Ud— Udorthents, loamy .......................... .................... .............................17
VrA —Varina loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............. .............................18
References............................................................................... .............................20
4

How Sall Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas
In a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and
their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations
affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of
the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and
the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is
the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, In a soil. The profile extends from the
surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the
surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other
living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas
(MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share
common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources,
soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Sal survey areas typically
consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is
related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of
landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous
areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the
landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus,
during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable
degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the
landscape.
Commonly, Individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by
an understanding of the soil - vegetation- landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify
predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to
identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of
soli properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have
similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique
combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of
the map unfit The presence of minor components In a map unit in no way diminishes
the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and
landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of
resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is
needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and
experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -
landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific
locations. Once the soil - landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of
measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These
measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to
bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of
sand, slit, clay, salt, and other components. properties of each soil typically vary from
one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret
the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field - observed characteristics
and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different
uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils
In different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are
modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet
local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information,
production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop
yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from
field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such
variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long
periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil
scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will be"
a high water table within certain depths In most years, but they cannot predict that a
high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and Identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields,
roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
6

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
7

as ar 2r
as ar sr
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
N!p 8a x:1:1,790 tT prbled on AWw (8S x 11')shnL
N Metes
/� 0 45 90 180 270
F1 I
/!'\\ D 150 300 500 900
9s 9r 2r
asst 5s

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOq
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soli Map units
Spacial
Point Features
V!¢
Blowout
®
Borrow Ph
i(E
cky spot
4
Closed Depression
X
Grove; Pit
A.
Gravely Spot
0
Landfill
1L
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
+�
Nine or Owarry
@
Miscegen®aus Warm
0
Perennial Water
IV
Rock Outorop
+
Saline Spat
..
Sandy spot
-w
Son aey Eroded Spot
d
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
0
Sodic slot
M
Spoll Ares
Stony Spot
Custom SoU Resource Report
( Very Stunt Spot
Wet spat
m Oar
ape" une Feotuna
. Gully
Short Steep slope
"A I Other
Political Features,
0 Cities
Water Feebwas
Streams and Canals
Transportation
ar+ Rolfe
Interstate Highways
us Routes
Major Roads
.ry. local Roads
MAP INr NATION
Map Scale: 1:4,730 d printed on A size (6.7 x 11 ") sham.
The soil surreys that comprise your AOI Were mapped at 1:24,000
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of napping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soti line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map street for accurate map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL• http :/Mrebsoilsurvsy.nresusda,gov
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD63
This product Is generated from the USDA NRCS certified date as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Johnston County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sap 11, 2012
Date(s) aerial Images were photographed: 6117!2006
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil fines were
compiled and digitized probably dtftm from the badcground
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shitting
of map unit boundaries may be evident

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map 'Unlit Legend
Johnston County, North CwWkm (NC191)
Map Unit "bad
Map Unit Name
Aeran do A0l
Po »t of fiS3i
Cos
Cowart$ foamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
7.1 I
........._ ......_ ....._.......__—
12.895 1
__._......_._ ,
FaB
Facevllle sandy loam. 2 to 6 percent slopes
5.3
9.4% .
008
..._......_ - -•—
— ..........__ Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
_......... _.
9.0 `
16,0%1;
GoA
.... _ _..._._ ......... .........._................_. -_
Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
2.7 i
4,8%
__.�...—.�
PaE
.............. _ ._..._._............__...... ._..... _.... _. - - -._.
Pecolet loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
. _......_— I
I
22.2%
t._.._. . _ ... —_..
UcB
.._....._......._...1........_. _._.. ........._._._..._..._._— __.... - —
' Uchee loamy coarse sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
_.12.5
1
_ 3.91 _-
�^ _.... -_ _ ._. ,6.9% 1
lid
Udorthents, loamy
1,7 r
3.1%
VrA
( ..._...
.......___..___..._. __........ —___.
1 Varine loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes I
a.
_— .......... _...._._....
14.11
25.1%1
. -.,. _.._�.....,......._.... ....... ... __.... ., ____ -.. ...__•_•__.. .. ................. ___.
Totals for Area of interest
.. _- _ ........ ... ............
._ -. _, ...., .�......._.___.�..__..._..__.
M21
-. ... .......
Map Unit- Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
nonoontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If Included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that It was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
The presence of minor components In a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
Intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsitae investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
Indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be,made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas In a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Johnston County, North Carolina
CoB--- Cowarts loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F•
Frost-free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Cowarts and similar soils, 80 percent
Description of Cowarts
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two - dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material.* Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding., None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity. • Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification. Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonlrnrgated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group. C
Typical profile
0 to 8 Inches. Loamy sand
6 to 34 Inches. Sandy clay loam
34 to 80 inches. Sandy clay loam
FaB— Faceville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Eevation. 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation. 38 to 55 inches
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period. 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Facevllle and similar sons. 85 percent
Description of Faceville
Setting
Landibrm. Ridges on marine terraces
LandYbrm position (two- dimensionag: Shoulder, summit
Landlbrm position (three - dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape. Convex
Parent material. Clayey marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to reshtfive feature. More than 80 inches
Drainage class. Well drained
Capacity of the mostllmiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Ail areas are prime farmland
Land capability (noninigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Fine sandy loam
8 to 13 inches: Fine sandy loam
13 to 80 inches: Clay
GeB— Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period, 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landfonn: Ridges on marine terraces
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landfarm position (two - dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landfom7 position (three - dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape, Convex
Parent material. • Clayey marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class. Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most /lmiting layer to transmit water (Kset): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 In/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7.5 Inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification. All areas are prime farmland
Land capab/W (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Sall Group: C
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches. Sandy loam
5 to 15 inches: Sandy clay loam
15 to 29 inches. Clay
29 to 38 inches: Clay loam
38 to 80 inches. Sandy day loam
GoA--- Goldsboro sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slope&
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation. 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frod -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Goldsboro and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components. 2 percent
Description of Goldsboro
Setting
Lendform: Flats on marine terraces, broad Interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two - dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material., Loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 Inches
Drainage class. Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 In/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency ofponding: None
Available water capaW- Moderate (about 8.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B _
Typical profile
0 to 8 Inches: Sandy loam
8 to 15 inches. Sandy loam
15 to 45 Inches. Sandy day loam
45 to 80 Inches. Sandy clay loam
Minor Components
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform. Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two - dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
PaE-- Pacolet loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Uplands
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature. 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Pacoiet and similar soils. 85 percent
Minor components: 13 percent
Description of Pacoiet
Setting
Landthnn: Hiilslopes on ridges
Landform position (two- dimenslonao: Backslope
Landform position (three - dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Acrow,slope shape: Convex
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material. Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Properties and qualities
Slope. 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Keel): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to watertable. More than 80 Inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity., Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland class cation: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group. B
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches. Sandy loam
5 to 8 inches: Sandy loam
8 to 29 inches. Clay
29 to 38 inches. Sandy clay loam
38 to 80 inches. Sandy loam
Minor Components
Spartanburg
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two - dimensional): Backslope
Landfonn position (three- dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Bethlehem
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two - dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three - dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
UcB —Uchee loamy coarse sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period, 210 to 265 days
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Composition
Uchee and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Uchee
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two - dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landforrn positron (three - dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to
0.57 in /hr)
Depth to water table: About 42 to 60 Inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirnfgated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Loamy coarse sand
6 to 26 Inches. Loamy coarse sand
2616 47 inches: Sandy clay loam
47 to 80 inches: Sandy clay loam
Ud— Udorthents, loamy
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation. 20 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents and similar soils: 100 percent
Description of Udorthents
Setting
Down -slope shape. Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
17

Custom Sal Resource Report
Parent material. Loamy mine spoil or earthy fill
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches
Drainage class• Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00 to
1.98 in/hr)
Depth to wafer table: More than 80 Inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Typical profile
0 to 80 inches: Sandy clay loam
VrA Varina loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation: 80 to $30 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 Inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period.• 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Varina and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Varina
Setting
Landform: Broad Interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down-slope shape. Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material. Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope. 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature. 40 to 60 inches to plinthite
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most Iimiling layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table. About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 6.1 inches)
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Farmland dassification: All areas are prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Loamy sand
7 to 14 inches: Loamy sand
14 to 38 inches: Sandy clay
38 to 57 inches: Sandy clay
57 to 100 fiches: Sandy clay loam
100 to 118 inches: Sandy clay loam
19

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487 -00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OBS- 79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasllas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
In the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 16. http: / /solls.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and Interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http : / /soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:/ /solls.usda.gov/
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y -87 -1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http: / /solls.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http:tlwww.gifi.nrcs.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http: / /Soils.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http: / /solls.usda.gov/
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210.
21

Tab IV — Drainage & Erosion Control
Calculations

91p REM 9IM5 R mi A
a o gP E ER E EM
q�j j' G 8 vg
-8, -. -'—s R ee
vz
yO
844
8v
mm�n
mm m
mm
8 V1 T,
0 PAO
1 6A,
88
N N
POn
R R
g fs
I
a° 9
SF
o

7/1/2015
HGL
Novo Nordisk Bridge Crossing
10 YEAR STORM
HEAD LOSSES
INLET OR
OUTLET
OUTLET
owner
Vfull
ll
V11111
Hf
He
He
Chanve in
Hb
Ht
INLET
JUNCT. #
ELEVATION
+ 0.8D
W.S
D (in)
Q (cfs)
L (ft)
K
Sf
OUTLET
INLET
(Fdctlon
(Contraction
(Expansion
direction
K for Hb
(Bend
(Total
W.S
RIM
DIFF
ELEV
(fps)
(fps
Loss)
Loss)
Loss)
DfO.q
Loss)
Loss)
ELEV
ELEV
EX -1
278.44
280.44
280.44
30
27.93
23
722.6
0.001
10.71
4.08
0.03
0.44
0.09
4$
0.38
0.10
0.67
281.11
266.95
5.84
E2
278.78
279.98
281.11
is
8.47
300
245.1
0.001
4.08
4.08
0.36
0.06
0.09
15
0.10
0.03
0.54
281.65
282.50
0.85
E1
279.98
281.18
281.65
18
4.77
61
245.1
0.000
4.08
0.00
0.02
0.06
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.09
281.74
283.22
1.48
W5
268.38
269.58
269.58
18
17.04
11
245.1
0.005
12.59
12.25
0.05
0.62
0.82
2
0.00
0.00
1.48
271.07
282.62
11.55
W4
268.80
270.00
271.07
18
13.94
42
245.1
0.003
13.73
5.00
0.14
0.73
0.14
5
0.00
0.00
1.00
272.07
283.13
11.06
W3
276.40
277.60
277.60
18
7.45
20
245.1
0.001
18.26
3.00
0.02
1.29
0.05
3
0.00
0.00
1.36
278.96
283.00
4.04
W2
270.70
271.90
272.07
1s
6.50
50
245.1
0.001
12.25
11.44
0.04
0.58
0.71
1
0.00
0.00
1.33
273.40
283.61
10.21
W7
272.50
273.70
273.70
1e
BA9
100
245.1
0.001
11.44
0.00
0.07
0.51
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.58
274.28
264.61
10.33
7/1/2015

STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN
CALCULATIONS
(FOR JOHNSTON COUNTY
STORMWATER PERMIT)
FOR
FACILITIES EXPANSION
NOVO NORDISK
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
2950 -A
DECEMBER 2004
FINAL CALCULATIONS
FOR REVIEW ONLY
�,ar�s►r :aeaerr,
r�
k�
w �1�
w
w
w
25 t
t
THE WOOTEN COMPANY
FNGINF.FNING P LANNINUTARCHITECTURE
001ki l WurrAmov hittgh 102101114421
91.9,?7000 1XV.904,3M

�- ydraflow Plea View
.f
i
Ex•
ar
Project file: Novo- rev.stm No. Lines: 4 ( 12-17-2004
iipe J' e,►-, //?? ///51dj //
`loge — 7-bes, 7 10 -a 0 B n a7� ac c� n �' fit" v tlp Ts-erc- -e o- %i e-Cl 3 7�tr,•� t �`?G �a a2Czl

tome Sevier Prof'
Elev. (ft)
306.00
298.Oo
290.00
282.00
274-00
266.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Reach (ft)
Proj- file: t i-rev.stm
350 400 450 500
/0 cf'r "P/vr-m
Hydraflow Storm Sewers 2003

Storm Sewer Inventory Report
Line
Physical Data
Alignment
Flow Date
Invert
No.
Invert
Line
Line
N
J-ioss
V _
Inlet!
Dnstr
Line Defl
Junc
Known
Dmg Runoff
Inlet
coeff
line
length angle
type
0
area coeff
time
No.
(ft) {deg}
(ft)
(cis )
(ac) (C)
n
(min)
1
End
55.8 15.0
MH
0.00
0.00 0.00
OA
2
1
47.2 24.0
MH
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.0
3
2
264.6 -21.0
MH
9.00
0.00 0.00
0.0
4
3
114.0 -21.0
MH
81.00
0.00 0.00
0.0
Page 1
Project File: Novo-rev.stm Number of lines: 4 'Date: 12 -17 -2004
_ I
Physical Data
Line ID
Invert
Line
Invert
Line
Line
N
J-ioss
V _
Inlet!
EI Dn
slope
El Up
size
We
value
coeff
Rlm El
(ft)
0/6)
- (ft)
(in)
(n)
(K)
(ft)
J
271.30
1.06
271.89
54
Cir
0.013
0.45
288.40
1 I
271.89
1.99
272.83
54
Cir
0.013
0.45
289.00
2
272.83
2.64
278.81
54
Cir
0.013
0.45
289.84
3
280.31
0.95
281.38
48
Cir
0.013
1.00
287.86
4•Ex.
Project File: Novo-rev.stm Number of lines: 4 'Date: 12 -17 -2004
_ I

Storm Sewer Summary Repoft
Page ,
Line Line ID Flow Line Line Invert
Invert
Line
HOL
HGL
Minor
Dns
No. rate size length EL Dn
EL Up
slope
down
up
loss
line
(cfs) (in) (ft) (ft)
(ft)
(°/.)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
No.
1 1 90.00 54 c 55.8 1 271.30
271.89
1.057
274.91
274.51
0.56
End
2 2 90.00 54 c 47.2 271.89
272.83
1.992
275,17
275.55
0.56
1
3 3 90.00 54 c 264.6 272.83
279.81
2.638
276.11
282.53
0.56
2
4 4-Ex. 81.00 48 0 114.0 280.31
281.39
0.948
263.09
284.05
1.29
3
Project File: Novo- rev.stm Number of lines: 4 Run Date: 12- 17.2004
NOTES: c - circular; e = elliptical; b = box; Return period = 10 Yrs.; " indicates surcharge condition.
`'W
Nrslr -ft w Rfw Rnwwk 9MR

Storm Selvier Tabulation
Page 1
Station
Len
Drag Area
Rnoff
Area x C
Tc
Rain
Total
Cap
Vet
Pipe
Invert Elev
NGL Elev
Gmd f Rim Bev
Line I©
coeff
--
(1)
flow
full
Line To
Incr Total
Incr Total
inlet
Syst
Size
Slope
Up
On
Up
On
Up
On -�
lane
(ft)
(ac) (ac)
(C)
(min)
(min)
(inthr)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ftls)
(in)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
VQ
(ft)
1 End
55.8
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.0
0.9
0.0
90.00
202.2
7.76
54
1.06
271.89
271.30
274.61
274.91
288.40
290.00
1
2 1
47.2
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.0
0.8
0.0
90.00
277.6
8.10
54
1.99
272.83
271.89
275.55
275.17
289.00
288.40
2
3 2
264.6
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.0
0.2
0.0
90.00
319.4
8.10
54
2.64
279.81
272.83
282.53
275.11
289.84
289.00
3
4 3
114.0
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
81.00
139.8
8.90
48
0.95
281.39
280.31
284.05
283.09
287.86
289.84
4.Ex
Project File: Novo- revstm
NOTES: Intensity = 99.441(infet time + 16.30) " 0.86; Return period = 10 Yrs.
Number of lines; 4 Run Date: 12 -17 -2004
ttydrafbw Storm Sewers X03

Hydrae is
Grade Une
Go p tationw
Page 1
Line Size Q
Downstream
- -
Len
ttpstrearn
Check
JL
Minor
(in) Mr.)
invert
elev
(6)
HGL Depth
elev
(ft) (ft}
Area Vei
(sgfQ (ftfs)
Vet
head
(it)
EGL
elev
(ft) _
Sf
N
(ft)
Invert
eiev
(ft}
HGL
elev
(ft)
Depth Area Vei
(ft) (sgft) (ft)
Vei
head
(ft)
EGL
elev
(ft}
- Sf
tom}
Ave
Sf
{ %}
Emgy
foss
{tt}
coeff
(K)
Ins
{tt}
1 54 90.00
2 54 90,00
3 54 90.00
271.30
271.89
272.83
274.91 3.61
275.17 3.28
276.11 3.28
13.68 6.58
12.43 7.24
12.43 7.24
0.67
0.82
0.82
275.58
275.99
276.93
0.218
0.269
0.269
55.8
47,2
265
271.89
272.83
279.81
274.61
275.55
282.53
2.72- 10.06 8.95
2.72° 10.06 8.95
2.72" 10.06 8.95
1.24
1.24
1.24
275.86
276.80
283.78
0.453
0.453
0.453
0.335
0.361
0.361
n/a
rda
n/a
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.56
0.56
0.56
4 48 81.00
280,31
283.09 2.78
9.33 8.68
1,17
284.26
0.462
114
281.39
284.05
2.66" 8.88 9.12
1.29
285.35
0.520
0.491
n/a
1.00
1.29
Project File: Novo-rev.stm
_
_
Number of lines: 4
1I Ftun Date: 12 -17 2004
111
NOTES: ` Normal depth assurrred., "' Critical depth assumed.
1
Hydrs%w
&arm Sewers 2x03

Sediment Basin Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Novo Nordisk - Central Parkin Lot Exnansion
Sediment Basin # 1
Area Disturbed = 56625 sf
1.30 acres
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = 36992 sf
0.85 acres
Q10 =CxIxA
C=
0.30
Ito =
7.1 in/hr
A =
0.85 acres
Q10 =
1.81 cfs
Minimum Surface Area Calculation:
Surface Area (SF) = Q10 x 0.01 x 32500 sf/ac
= 1.81 cfs x 0.01 x 32500 sf/ac
Surface Area Req = 588 sf
Basin Volume Calculation:
Volume of Sediment
= (Disturbed Ac.) x (1800 cf sed. /year) x (1 year)
0.125 Head on Skimmer (feet)
= 1.3 ac x 1800 x I yr
1 Orifice Size (1/4 inch increments)
Min Vol =
2340
cf
Assumed basin depth =
3.5
ft
min D = T for "Skimmer Basin"
Resultant Basin Area Req =
669
sf
Check Surface Area Criteria
8
Surface Area Requirement =
588
sf
Basin Volume Calc Area =
669
sf
Therefore: Basin Volume Area Requirement
Governs
Min Volume Req =
2340
cf
Min Area Req =
669
sf
Assume L = 2xW, calculate basin dimensions
Actual W =
19
ft
Min W = 18 ft
L=
38
ft
D =
3.5
ft
Actual Vol =
2527
cf
Vol Check: OK
Actual Area =
722
sf
Area Check: OK
Actual Basin Dimensions =
19 ft W x 38 ft L x 3.5 ft D
Weir Design and Velocity Check:
Calculate Flow Depth
H = [Q /CL]211
Q19 =
1.81
cfs
C =
2.68
constant
L=
8
ft
min L =4'
H=
0.19
ft
max H =0.5'
Calculate Velocity Over Weir
V = Q/A
V=
1.81 cfs/8 ftx 0.19 ft
V=
1.18
ft(sec
OK
Skimmer Sizing:
1.5 Skimmer Size (inches)
Skimmer Size
0.125 Head on Skimmer (feet)
(Inches)
1 Orifice Size (1/4 inch increments)
1.5
3.09 Dewatering Time (days)
2
2.5
3
4
5
6
8

Sediment Basin Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Novo Nordisk - Central Parking Lot Expansion
Sediment Basin # 2
Area Disturbed = 27300 sf
0.63 acres
Peak Discharge Calculation:
Drainage Area = 27300 sf
0.63 acres
QIo =CxIxA
C = 0.30
lia = 7.1 in/hr
A = 0.63 acres
Qla = 1.33 cfs
Minimum Surface Area Calculation:
Surface Area (SF) = Q10 x 0.01 x 32500 sf/ac
= 1.33 cis x 0.01 x 32500 sf/ac
Surface Area Req = 434 sf
Basin Volume Calculation:
Volume of Sediment = (Disturbed Ac.) x (1800 cf sed./year) x (1 year)
= 0.63 ac x 1800 x 1 yr
Min Vol = 1128 cf
Assumed basin depth = 3.5 ft
min D = T for "Skimmer Basin"
Resultant Basin Area Req = 322 sf
Check Surface Area Criteria
Surface Area Requirement = 434 sf
Basin Volume Calc Area = 322 sf
Therefore: Surface Area Governs
Min Volume Req = 1128 cf
Min Area Req = 434 sf
Assume L = 2xW, calculate basin dimensions
Actual W = 10 ft
Min W = 13 ft
L = 44 ft
D = 3.5 ft
Actual Vol = 1540 cf
Vol Check: OK
Actual Area = 440 sf
Area Check: OK
Actual Basin Dimensions = 10 ft W x 44 ft L x 3.5 ft D
Weir Design and Velocity Check:
Calculate Flow Depth H = [Q /CL]21'
Q10 = 1.33 cis
C = 2.68 constant
L= 4 ft
min L =4'
H= 0.25 ft
max H =0.5'
Calculate Velocity Over Weir V = Q/A
V= 1.33 cfs / 4 ft x 0.25 ft
V = 1.34 ft/sec
OK
Skimmer Sizing:
1.5 Skimmer Size (inches)
Skimmer Size
0.125 Head on Skimmer (feet)
(inches)
1 Orifice Size (1/4 inch increments) 1.5
1.89 Dewatering Time (days)
2
2.5
3
4
5
6
8

Tab V -- Soils, Topographic Maps, &
Supporting Documents

} - i GRID NORTH
. • +; _ : -;! _} , .. .3 SCALE 10 = 500' (1 6,000)
500 low
FEET
PANEL 1676J _
F1 RM
�, J •. , . n• } k :I FLOOD INN NCE DATE 11AP
'' ;,�. ' • -1`� w ; .. NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL IM
} -T ' :.^�i' ,. - - S : -t:- :. - AIE'L YO Iit CYtC-MM OR MAP IMDIM FOR FIRM
.L.•- -'r A'9 '�. �.y. •+ ..`'' �.' `F 1� .:r'i CdAINKlldly W PANE. 9M
' �. , l :]1•�!E s'/ELs. _'Sf ► Z 1` aAWMTOWn C- mea we r
�l\ r; A�R.S i(, r. " • t i. ,• .`•Y'� � _ - f JCFMTW CVJkw 77Af! MNt
• � ••��., . +- S;,S�T"Y iyC'�YC� .1 � '�1 ,{ �N FF � t' F=`
i. may- r��e•' i'•,} ♦ „y, ''aE > j `. i': bV .TWW 1--War ahW i, use
-..• ' Y V - ] PWAa PaP oMas: Eu CrtYYib uniww 14.6"
ty} l 1 +ti t I -h ► f S? I +brae baud M rw6 m iWwa rppbrbn Wvw W140d
. ��:� : ���.�1rr `.% • '+'L, t �'�« r r'J : 4r, � < E .:� mernsiq.
�;1,. • :r, �' 7 t 44 it EFFECiIYE DATE MV NWBEN
Al DEMBER 2.2005 3i2U1878001
�z,. y,.f er• 3q 'rte ' . � "` h.f. c .� dew �":• � I ' . s •
• t '! -r I i
r�r rK �' �� � r-. r'}�. a t.'� a.. !r 2 �I• .,.°i
� , '„ �:T iJ � r� a � � , s�.'2 � `"' � ;, ». �," x:950 '' �1j�`•`` r "� �' �` : I Scau of North Grniiaia
r
It 00m9 T"` M fiederal Emergency Management Agency f
i' 00 "' aoc JOINS PANEL 1677 78' 24' 30" -This Is an a icid copy of a portion of the above referenced Rood map. It
wee extracted Ln)r i F-MIT On -Une. This map does not Edleq chen4es
or amendments which may hale been mach ecbsaqueM to the date on the
Ydte Hack. For dw latest prlduot iETihrrnaticn atxwt Natlond Flood IEteorence
PEogmm Rood maps check the FEMA Float Map Store at ww ,, msc.fama.gtw

uw..wgivwuel�
gin
all Immulm 117tl�T�1.0911y.ygpw. A�qq� +• +•+ +•w�
iMi •itl/YJYI Yf •rN!'w9••��_• �Awlri
NII IOMLLW'i101m{.pMlPtllgl .u.el�y� w9 �i�r.11W�V�T.. .�
WR .wfiFl �A lib.l l.®K1rGllm MP.wf tw ��...`•,r „.��_�...��i�
_ � fYtOYYCYIwwRO. .VV�1 tl1 9�•�- .••�••••___•�•••�•••..�._. ly
W>e]011w� <Y ®W i1RY11• YNI '•••"••�••••••••••�•••••_•••�— jy
4w.19iO w.i111� ggqu�l�
Oi. 1 .... .• �...� . -.. ..
ieu 0 w�ew4r.vgNwia�nvarwww
am
Ie.l � � 1 �IiL .. .. i ,•_n _._ 1 R�ql •�.h�•uim�`wrrlr�.mrea`�e,w,`
eouv+uss<u..ui 000 YC1 zwm IOnY na ro. a�rw.x
AMA*,* .86 wigs WYM1.41�q rwlgey
�F•
���� � ..s� t .. efp c• 41.x! ��4 � �V�:/ tl ��fj 'r � .p ',�'�� ' � •.4.� .` • b ti -
_5��� }���1� ��•Yy. i _ 4� } � Y JI ���y. ,�w ��`.`�/'y ',. •�a'`: .�"�:. � ��.5` -'7S �r
s.
v. � t�• 6� - ni. ! •• r •14 j� '� �tl � .irlMpi . p t M ...
P. iR0$i+'Ia' T • i r t + w
/�.. �P�°s x �^ �j • i.x}� � c r� �`�('" 1 � �. Ord.
�\ �..a8 n.wn�xa ee � �•� .�ay.wAndiM�i�" i*-�• +- ��� /i`SL/yfe�.: �.�•�`.�., �ti li_ c.i � re ^4 -.r>
"�;-: _ { e.. "t . • > ,f w..• i /�7a•� bra.. eft
1 ..,,." ' ors °'vk, • -tip i ! } - 3
pi
X15 r•.

l�/ .... I 17 �y, ; ititti6J!c°l ::R�:
JW
to I
Nv
je
j1
Ae _ r.w ._.. °Sin � !F . . �'`' -� 'Wy � xr„�cW •y�'
� V 1 rt� `� ' l '' `' t � •,� � J 11 •� � \�(,�
Odo1Sno
wm)xvnaVIIajcwxvnMed dop-rs-ft
oBRp1c /
S�1�111
aaetmszvomoozoa®•e •n
ante: ��ao.r�a�azxv.�a •ea

Neuse River Basin
Name Index Number Classification
Class Date
Aescription Special Designation
Neal Creek 27- 150.3 -1 SQSW NSW
05/01/88
From source to South Prong Bay River
Neal Creek 27- 135 -S SA;HQW,NSW
05/01/88
From source to South River
Nelson Swamp 27- 86- 9-0.5 -1 C;Sw,NSW
05/01/88
From source to Robin Swamp
NEUSE RIVER 27 -(22) WS- IV;NSWaCA
07/01/04
From a point 0.5 mile upstream of Town of Wake Forest proposed water supply intake to Town of Wake
Forest proposed water supply Intake
NEUSE RIVER 27- (38.5) WS -IV;NSW
04 /01/97
From a point 0.2 mile downstream of Johnston County SR 1700 to a point 1A mile downstream of Johnston
County SR 1908
NEUSE RIVER 27 -(104) SB ;SW'NSW
05/01/88
From a line across Neuse River from Johnson Point to McCotter Point to a line across Neuse River from
Wilkinson Point to Cherry Point
NEUSE RIVER 27 -(36) WS -V;NSW
08 /03/92
From mouth of Beddingfiekl Creek to a point 0.2 mile downstream of Johnston County SR 1700
NEUSE RIVER 27 {118) SA;HQW,NSW
05/01/88
From a line across Neuse River from Wilkinson Point to Cherry Point to its mouth in Pamlico Sound (mouth
of Neuse River described as a line running from Maw point to Point of Marsh)
NEUSE RIVER 27- (41.7) WS -V;NSW
OB/03/92
From City of Smithfield water supply intake to a point 1.7 miles upstream of Rowdy Creek
NEUSE RIVER 27- (41.3) W54V;NSW,CA
08 /03/92
From a point 0.1 mile downstream of mouth of Poplar Creek to City of Smithfield water supply intake
NEUSE RIVER 27- (20.7) WS-IV NSW
07/01/04
From dam at Falls Lake to a point 0.5 mile upstream of Town of Wake Forest proposed water supply intake
(Former water supply intake for Burlington Mills Wake Finishing Plant)
NEUSE RIVER 27 -(56) QNSW
08 /01/02
From City of Goldsboro water supply intake to a point 0.7 mile downstream of the mouth of Coxes Creek.
NEUSE RIVER 27- (49.5) WS- IV;NSW
08/03/92
From a point 1.7 miles upstream of Bawdy Creek to a point 0.8 mile upstream of Little River
NEUSE RIVER 27- (39.7) WS4V;NSW
08/03/92
From Johnston County proposed water supply intake to a point 0.1 mile downstream of mouth of Poplar
Creek
Thursday, Febnrary 09, 2012 Based on Classifications as of 20120208 Page 46 of 72

Total Nitrogen Loading Calculation Worksheet
Project Name: Novo Nordisk Bridge Crossing
Date: 71112015
By: D. Curry Checked By: E. Loeffler
Total Site Acreage:
Proposed BMP:
Total acreage of catchment 1 =
First BMP's TN removal rate =
2,312,174 sf
53.08 ac
BMP Measure:
13.91 ac
40 % Wetland #I
*Pre- development Catchment (Wetland #1):
(1) (2)
Type of Land Cover Catchment
Acreage (ac)
Impervious Surfaces 9A
(3) (4) (5)
TN Export TN Export from use TN Export
Coeff.icient (Ibs /yr) (Ibs /ac/yr)
(Ibs/eclyr)
21.20 209.98
Managed Open Space 4«37 1.20 5.25
Permanently Protected Undisturbed 0.00 0.60 0.00
Open Space (Wetlands)
Total Area of Development = 14.28 215.23 15.07
Post - development: Catchment I (Wetland #1)
(1) (2)
Type of Land Cover Catchment
Acreage
Impervious Surfaces 9.72
(3) (4)
TN Export TN Export from use
Coeff.icient (lbs/yr)
(Ibs /ac/yr)
21.20 206.06
Managed Open Space (Includes Open 4,19 1.20 5.03
Space Areas w /in Drainage Area)
Permanently Protected Undisturbed
Open Space 0.00 0.60 0.00
Subtotal Catchment 1= 13.91 211.09 15.18
TN Reduction with BMP (See "Proposed 126.66 9.11
BMP" Section Above)
Total Nitrogen Export Post development is less than 10.0. Remaining Nitrogen Export Reduction
will be achieved by offset payment to Wetland Restoration Fund.
Buydown Calculation:
FP Exnansion Post -BMP TN Export (lb /ac /vr)* 9.04 lb /ac/yr
Central Parkin Exnansion Post -BMP TN Exoort (lb /ac /vr) 9.11 ib /ac /yr
Net TN Increase (lb /ac/vr) 0.07 lb /ac%j'r
IBuv -Down For Net TN Increase 0.07 Ib /ac/yr
Offset Pavment Rate ** $ 8.90 $/lb
Offset Pavment Amount = (TN) Ib /ac /vr x 14.27ac x 30 yr x $8.90 /lb $ 242.65
*Predevelopment calculations are based on calculations submitted by Curry Engineering dated July 1, 2015 and
have been included behind these calculations for reference
* *Nitrogen buy down rate is for estimating purposes only. Actual rates are market driven.