20150687 Ver 1_401 Application_20150715

SUI AT
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES
TO Karen Higgins
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Supervisor
NCDENR Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
ATTN
Karen
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached
® Prints ❑ Reproducible
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order
COPIES
4
4,
4
TRANSMITTED
919.732.3883 SUPJMIT- ENGINEER.COM
504 Meadowland Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 07 -08 -15 1 PROJECT: 14 -0060
RE: Star Mount Subdivision Phase 111
❑ Under Separate Cover ❑ Transmitted Via
❑ Specifications ❑ Shop Drawings
El
DESCRIPTION
PCN Notification Forms
Endangered Species, Historical Structure Data, Deeds, Soils Map, Flood Map, Culvert Calcs & other supporting
documents
Plan sheets showing buffer impacts
®For Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ For Your Use ®For Review and Comment
COMMENTS
Please find the attached PCN and supporting documents. I have also attached email correspondence
between myself and USACOE Eric Alsmeyer.
Please review these and send me any comments /feedback.
If you need additional information please don't hesitate calling or emailing me at the information below.
matt.hastings(a-)summitde.net or 434 - 579 -4604
COPY TO
SIGNATURE: _
Matt Hastings, PE

T
AO
aa� W ATF90 2 0 1 5 0 6 8 7 Office Use Only -
M i Corps action ID no.
o �. ■�' c DWQ project no.
f ��► Form Version 1 41•-anutW009�
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form , e
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: I ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑X Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
❑ Yes ❑X No
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer
1 h ❑ Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project: Starmount Subdivision Phase III
2b.
County: Granville
2c.
Nearest municipality / town: Town of Youngsville
II 11 , r7 t,
2d.
Subdivision name: Starmount Subdivision
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: I N/A
1 tf{1f
t� /a t ✓J�
3.
Owner Information
a L��5 _
,
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Sterling Creek, LLC &JAMES &NANCY
HARGT,UN
3b.
Deed Book and Page No. DB 1213, PG 9 & DB 146, PG 239
u` r�tK pERMiTTING
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if Jim Parker
applicable):
3d.
Street address: 504 Meadowland Drive
3e.
City, state, zip: Hillsborough, NC 27278
3f.
Telephone no.: 1 919 - 732 -3883
3g
Fax no.: 1 919 - 732 -6676
3h.
Email address- I lames.parker @summitde.net
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify- Engineer
4b.
Name.
Matt Hastings, PE
4c
Business name
Summit Design and Engineering Services, PLLC
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
504 Meadowland Drive
4e
City, state, zip:
Hillsborough, NC 27278
4f.
Telephone no.:
434 - 579 -4604
4g.
Fax no.:
434 - 575 -0617
4h.
Email address:
matt.hastings @summitde.net
5.
Agent/Consultant Information
(if applicable)
5a
Name:
Matt Hastings, PE
5b.
Business name
(if applicable).
Summit Design and Engineering Services, PLLC
5c.
Street address:
504 Meadowland Drive
5d.
City, state, zip:
Hillsborough, NC 27278
5e.
Telephone no.:
434 - 579 -4604
5f
Fax no.:
434- 575 -0617
5g.
Email address:
matt.hastings @summitde.net
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
I Pin# 183600153325 & 183600250262
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 36.1265
Longitude: -78.5546
1 c.
Property size
51.8 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Ford Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
C; NSW
2c.
River basin-
Tar - Pamlico
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Wooded with residential homes in all directions This is the third phase of Starmount
Subdivision
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (Intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,171
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
The development of a residential subdivision with a new proposed street to access the property which crosses a buffered stream.
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Heavy equipment will be used in the clearing and grading & construction of the new roadway that will cross buffer and stream. New roadway will consis
+❑
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑ Yes ❑X No 0 Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain In detail according to "help file" instructions.
E &S permit was obtained for phase II prior to the stream crossing Phase III of E &S review is waiting for the PCN to be completed
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? I 0 Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Phase I was completed several years ago Phase II is under construction and includes all work prior to the stream crossing. This is the final phase of
the subdivision
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
1. Impacts Summary
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
1a. Which sections were completed below
for your project (check all that
apply):
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams
— tributaries ❑X Buffers
❑ Open Waters
❑ Pond Construction
Temporary (T)
2. Wetland Impacts
feet)
S1 P
Fill Embankment
Unnamed trib. Ford Crk INT I DWQ I 5
If there are wetland impacts proposed on
the site, then complete this question for each wetland
area impacted.
2a. 2b.
2c.
2d.
2e
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
S6 Choose one
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
75
3i. Comments:
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
and has been confirmed by the USACOE. See attached email correspondence.
W1 Choose one
I Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 Choose one
I Choose one
Yes /No
W4 Choose one
I Choose one
Yes /No
W5 Choose one
I Choose one
Yes /No
W6 Choose one
I Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total
Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Fill Embankment
Unnamed trib. Ford Crk INT I DWQ I 5
75
S2
Choose one
S3 Choose one
S4 Choose one
S5 Choose one
I -
S6 Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
75
3i. Comments:
The stream impacts fall under a nationwide 14 impact
and has been confirmed by the USACOE. See attached email correspondence.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b.
4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
6g.
impact number (if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary (T)
mitigation
01
Choose one I Choose
02
Choose one I Choose
03
Choose one
I Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
B1 P Roadway Crossing
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 I Choose one
P2 I Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑X Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c.
6d. 6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1 P Roadway Crossing
Unnamed tributary flowing into Cedar Creek No
4,711
3,157
B2 I
I No
B3 I
I I No
B4
Yes /No
B5 I
I Yes /No
B6 I
I I Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
4,711
3,157
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The project consists of a new roadway crossing to access a third phase of Starmount subdivision The initial design showed the road crossing the
creek in 2 locations to maximize the number of lots After the field survey identified the onsite stream we rerouted the road around the creek and
pushed it as far south as possible to try and miss the creek entirely However, to allow access to a large portion of the property, it was necessary to
cross at the furthest upstream point that could possibly be crossed
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
A road is being built through the stream so there are no construction techniques that will avoid impact There are no areas onsite where there are
crossings without permanent impact.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank.
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type- Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested- acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments-
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Level spreaders and/or plunge pools to be used where new /existing concentrated discharges occur
❑X Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0.118%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes x❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
There is no stormwater program administered in this area.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
NA
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? I NA
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application? El Yes 0 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This protect is the final phase of the subdivision There is no room for future expansion The current design includes level spreaders and filter strips
along with plunge pools that will be used to diffuse flows and reduce sediments prior to entering the buffer /creek
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Each housing unit wil have it's own individual septic tank and drainfJeld
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or I Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act I ®Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. I Raleigh
5d. What date sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Threatened and Endangered Species list by County and Natural Heritage websites (SEE ATTACHED)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this ro ect occur in or near
p J an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem website (See Attached)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. WIII this project occur In or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources?
NC State Historic Preservation Office GIS website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
8b, If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements;
❑ Yes
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
North Carolina Floodplaln Map #3720182600J, Dated April 16, 2007 and the NC Floodplain Mapping website
Matthew Hastings
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applican gen nature
(Agent's signature Is valid only if an authorization
letter from the eDDlicant Is Drovlded.)
Page 10 of 10
ME.
07 -07 -2015
Date

Star Mount Subdivision
IPaC Trust Resource Report
Generated July 07, 2015 11.29 AM MDT

IPaC Trust Resource Report
US Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC Trust Resource Report
Project Description
NAME
Star Mount Subdivision
PROJECT CODE
TS H OO- 6S56Z -FJ DC7- 2ZVVV-U PQ6L4
LOCATION
Granville County, North Carolina
DESCRIPTION
Residential Subdivision in Granville
County, NC. Phase II under
construction. Phase III waiting on PCN
l�
TS H OO- 6S56Z -FJ DC 7- 2ZVVV -U PQ6 L4
S 3
x ..t119fllagiiJ�3§
7ta
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Contact Information
Species in this report are managed by.-
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636 -3726
(919) 856 -4520
07/07/2015 11 29 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 2
Version 2 1.0

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Endangered Species
TS H OO- 6S56Z -FJ DC7- 2ZVVV -U PQ6L4
Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species that are managed by the
Endangered Soecies Program and should be considered as part of an effect analysis
for this project.
This unofficial species list is for informational purposes only and does not fulfill the
requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which states that Federal
agencies are required to "request of the Secretary of Interior information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a
proposed action." This requirement applies to projects which are conducted, permitted
or licensed by any Federal agency.
A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can be
obtained by returning to this project on the IPaC website and requesting an Official
Species List from the regulatory documents section.
Clams
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Flowering Plants
Harperella Ptdimnium nodosum Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Critical Habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) within the project area must be analyzed along with
the endangered species themselves.
There is no critical habitat within this project area
07/07/2015 11.29 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 3
Version 2 1 0

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Migratory Birds
TSHOO- 6S56Z -FJ DC7- 2ZVVV-U PQ6L4
Birds are protected by the Miaratory Bird Treatv 8!�J and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act.
Any activity which results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless
authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1). There are no provisions for
allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured.
You are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations for the protection of
birds as part of this project. This involves analyzing potential impacts and implementing
appropriate conservation measures for all project activities.
American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus
Bird of conservation concern
Season Wintering
Bald Eagle Hahaeetus leucocephalus
Bird of conservation concern
Year -round
httos ://ecos.fws.00v /soeciesProfile/
-
Brown- headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
Bird of conservation concern
Year -round
Bird of conservation concern
Chuck - will's -widow Caprimulgus carolinensis
Bird of conservation concern
Season Breeding
Bird of conservation concern
FOX Sparrow Passerella diaca
Bird of conservation concern
Season Wintering
Kentucky Warbler Oporomis formosus
Bird of conservation concern
Season Breeding
Least Bittern Ixobrychus exdis
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus
Bird of conservation concern
Year -round
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Bird of conservation concern
Season Breeding
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Red - headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Bird of conservation concern
Year -round
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
Bird of conservation concern
Season Wintering
Short -eared Owl Asio flammeus
Bird of conservation concern
Season- Wintering
http$1/ecos fws gov /speciesRrofile /profile /soeciesProfile .action ?socode =BOHD
Swainson's Warbler Limnothlypis swainsonii Bird of conservation concern
Season- Breeding
07/07/2015 11 29 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 4
Version 2 1 0

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
Season. Breeding
Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum
Season Breeding
TSHOO- 6S56Z- FJDC7- 2ZVVV- UP06L4
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
07/07/2015 11 29 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation
Version 2 1 0
Page 5

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Refuges
TSHOO- 6S56Z- FJDC7- 2ZVVV- UPO6L4
Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuae lands must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. If your project overlaps or otherwise impacts a
Refuge, please contact that Refuge to discuss the authorization process.
There are no refuges within this project area
07/07/2015 11:29 iPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 6
Version 2.1 0

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Wetlands
TSHOO- 6S56Z- FJDC7- 2ZVVV- UPQ6L4
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats from your project may be subject to
regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State /Federal Statutes.
Project proponents should discuss the relationship of these requirements to their project
with the Regulatory Program of the appropriate U.S. Army Coms of Enaineers District.
DATA LIMITATIONS
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use
of imagery, thus, detailed on- the - ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted Metadata
should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the
actual conditions on site.
DATA EXCLUSIONS
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
DATA PRECAUTIONS
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.
There are no wetlands identified in this project area
07/07/2015 11 29 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 7
Version 2 1 0

NC HISTORIC .rte wM. an'agwnSw� °tl'� 4 nae..•wuM.w
_ � fN ITN Mw•n..
GIS MAP x i
i• � sww � a wr... war. �
eM.n,s.raW.Rw. �w.
J`' Now.. ,.' � c•'� Pte. � STAR MOUNT
t, 5 � SUBDIVISION
% s kb 4 yn oc
w•a i d a
owwwW.iw.w.nw..wi ° ! f
sVpMrlwlwwiw Iwo 6
GRANVILN
oww. i b
rr• , *vow U-00- woo —'tE �MA
•CVOMOMMMn Mww Nlr�wrr aW r... "�w • iY�w�Rrw�yrgMaw Tcn A%,.a }4``''`_
> Pa
orelq�rir°rnB..INIir. 4 *'
♦� pw" MrIpsYgIrMIMMMwM14M.1
MM#M"1w. M1 +�� a V t!
Y
y
c
aSppn:as.EVt HERE. Cblprms. tJSG S.Inlennap. ns tPCerp..NRC.N Esri Japan. METI Epri GM1lna Mmrq NOnq1 . Ell (fM1abntlI. TomTpm. Map`. y1MY. o
_ Dpe�SpeeMap wmrbNaa. anEme GAS lker Gpm un* aT �

L
r
s
a
a
m
a
u
• s
r 1
r •
o -
- r g
a
• s r
° F •
r 8`
• 8
St
° _ s
r

i
t
Sta�nnount Subdivision Phase 3�
_ -'
ti
�qA ,
SUBDIVISION
PREIIMINARV PUT

Page .fbf 4
,�' •' IIIIIINNII�NI�N�NI�lIiN111UN11�N��I�IIIIINIIIN�iNl�f�ll
�� Ooc ID: 000167720004 TVPe: CRP
' FaeoAmt�$123 002Pageal of 46'32 PM
Excise Tax: $100.00
! Granville County. NC
\ Kathryn Crews Averett Reg of Deeds
E 1213 PG9 -12
'gevenue.'$100.00 i
Prepared by and Hoid for: Nathan M. Garren
STATE OP N0R"l;'1 l CAROLINA
\\ ' ''I GENERAL WARRANTY DFED
COUNTY OI' I,ANVIi': P
THIS DE13)), rn1 de.'this 30�h dsy of..May', 2007, by and between Nancy R. Tharrington,
unmarried, and James',Wi. McCri"on,�Bbnniy McCrimmon, Jr., and Joseph McCrimmon
and wife, Elitabetli�leCrimmoii;,being tt11 bf the heirs of lames K. Tharrington, deceased and
Bettie Tharrington Mc"immgr,, deceased rhercirrtlltzr "Grantors ") and Sterling Creek, LLC
(hereinafter "Grantee ") wilh a mailing addrdss cif ,-4662 Phrn Hollow Drive, Nranklinom, NC
27525.
r5
WI TNESS Elf Mi
• I,
THAT Grantors in considdratiott of T; n Doll (s''t`0,00) dqd other valuable
consideration to them paid by Grantm ib, r rt:ceipt of w"Aich is,hcrc6y acknowledged, have and by
these presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey, urto ;,kis licirs, successors and assigns,
all of their interest in those certain tracts or parcels of land situate in Granville County,
North Carolina as described on ExhibitA attached hereto an}d incorporated herein by
reference. \ ;'
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said land, Cogether with a,U- Tvivileges and appurtenances
as thereunto belonging unto the said Grantee in f, simple. •'
.• r \
I ;
� rr
V
\
• :' i v I I
1 ' �
r r
I
Book: 1213 Page: Seq: 1

Page bit 4
I
And the Grantors covenant will) the Grantee, that the Grantors are seized of the premises
% m fie'`s>rnplc, have the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free
and rlear.of all encumbrances, and that Grantors will warrant and defend the title against the
i iawlhl claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
1
;1 itle to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
1. Ad Valorem taxes for the year 2007 and thereafter.
Restrictive covenants and casements of record.
'J r TN WETNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have hereunto set their hands and affixed their
seav5 the day aZI IyNar first above written.
f t
'T' 1�..1• "'. z,',,,,v'— `Y- ��;_� - -- (SEAT.)
Nancy ngton
(SEAL)
Jos h 4c rimn;bn.•'
_ 1� _(SEAL)
Eli . eth TvTtC i men
antes McCrimmoti
Bennie �. McCrImmnn.; Jr.
His hark Y \4'itness
Ze41e Loe�v
I ' ;witness
` I t
� 1 4
• \ II
/ 11
I�
i
I � 1
l �
r �
y I
,
Book: 1213 Page: 0/ Seq: 2

Page Slot 4
t.
r -•
i STA3`PI. F NORTH CAROLINA
COIATP '-.OF GRANVILLF
i
1, a Votary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that Nancy B. Tharrington,
Joseph 1 &i*lmmon, Elizabeth McCrimmon and James M. McCrimmon, personally
appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
ikWiess my hand and official stamp or seal, this,?,/ -day of /y,,� 2007.
.. No
_ ,x �►f— Notary Public
..WCommiySii'nExpjres: TA��
STMT, OF NORTH,CAROT.TNA �1�'Z iA•� '��
COU`'d y,617 GRA.'VVILLF 4E
1, A N'otarj Public of the �3punty an� aid, certify that Bennie McCrimmon,
Jr., who sipped >by.way of,,, k iri the presence of witnesses, personally appeared before me this
day and acknolyllcdged the: ex�;outtott of t1p. f%egoing instrument.
'Witness my'handnd:ofticial stahtp or seal, day of 2007
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
hityy +�< `•' r��'.
r.
I
' 1 I
_ r
• I
v•♦
i
r r
5 I
\% -
fr
Book: 1213 Page: � Seq: 3

Page oaf 4
'I
f Exhibit A
'+ Beginning at existing axle located in the line of Lot 5 of Starmount Forest Subdivision,
i Phase I, thence S 83° 46' 30" E a distance of 1,692.93' to an existing iron pipe, thence S
013" 19' 4$" W a distance of 1,154.7' to a new iron pipe; thence N 55" 47' 10" W a
Sistarrce of 67.95'to a new iron pipe; thence N 60" 32' 50" W a distance of 123.89'to a
new iron pipe; thence N 74" 01' 02" W a distance of 49.69'to a new iron pipe; thence N
749 01' 02" W a distance of 49.69'to a new iron pipe; thence N 59" 23' 59" W a distance
` 2 ?:113;to a new iron pipe; thence N 591 51' 01" W a distance of 190.16' to anew iron
ot�
\ Oipe; thenCs.N 59° 47' 06" W a distance of 34.90' to a new iron pipe; thence N 59" 50'
ti ter•' 40 ".W a dist*Ance of 197.93' to an existing axle; thence N 15112' 52" E a distance of
t 202.14' to aii existing iron pipe; thence N 15" 22' 29" E a distance oi' 684.74' to the point
and place of begianing and containing 15.00 acres more or less according to a survey by
Acculine,Survcyinp dated November 29, 2006 and entitled "Property Surveyed for
Pleiades, a .Point Vfnture ".
r:
I _r
I• vJ
_ r
• I
\ f
♦ r' i v
I I �
ra r
5 I
i
Book: 1213 Page: 9 Seq: 4

J6 35 ­4758 10 I SBO
9794 ,\ U.94A 453A
0.94A
U.91A ti 1618 q 6750
75ti4 0 3 1. A d
r' ].21fi B�q . a.A ; 9.'A
3577 R ,,'
15
0576 1S74 7546 24
1.00A 553: �,� ai, 45530.9 <.A
�5 A J 4 Jq U.96A
,p��'/
1.11A 3) 2.34 0,93A a` 1,D4A U.93A xt E " 7470
h �R• 1.tl8A2336 73414 0197A S,OSA 3'
x� 1258 6 0371 2381 4331 lODA 14 1y 0.9.5A
1 t
0261 i.D6A 5U' li3Ll": 1 1:f 62h'l l.D64 p' 3 yo 729I
1.21A .5 !R 1 35 a10611176A1.b(A 1.08A
9193 4 614) ti b1 ?,
1 12A 3 39 D1a0 2088 3008 7160 (R,5RA1
4063 •' R 4U 1 83A •. 44A U.G18A,0.96A 1 10A 3N 94 Q93A 4072 ].35S 3011
0906 2919 3yg6 D93A 11 b94ti
l7q q0 41 •R 102A- 6 J R - 9 JU tC� p 1R.R 19 R .0 21
Ic 1,47A4895 � 1.06A
~ \,'I .64A 470u 9631
7H1. 1.23A
W0 86u3I 12A
1,24A 8444
438Q 1.19A J 15,(RlA i i 15 D.92A 45.OaA
J .' - �� u1�S 02ti2
t r� Qh
7083 52' 17 ;4s.91
(2.36A) D91A i
2884 7 1,,3 u 475.41
1B 4773 i'� 1765 0.9
6.00A iSp 1$ 3688 �33.gy
B66G w 4i ?9l y 8501 S� 1sU 30 6529
(1) 859 15b,n 7 ?7815 6.09A 1 U4A 5
0 20 1.U7A 1SU ?q 135,50
55 6 11 9478 ;1414 7.12A 11 151 41 1 44R.i � 84455 I.UBA
1,07A 0S'S5 23 3329 1.35A 144,98 '2J5.5 1 �' o a 1430
1 5.O5A 45 -#6k • 24 3353 1.a4A 1.27A a �RU?
1,27A �; n. n. 16
7390 r pyJB 7 /]A r i glrih 617 .y�, i 5
1yJ 26 9121 122o� L�, QS13u
GRANVILLE COUNTY Parcel Number 31470
Map Number. 183600153325 Plat Reference
t� 0► Owner Name. STERLING CREEK LLC Account 31813 -302
Owner Address 1662 FERN HOLLOW DR Deed Acres: 15
Owner City: FRANKLINTON NC Calc Aces. 14.8428126572 T
Parcel Address: OLD FRANKLINTON RD OFF Value: 47895
»�� TMNbgovq. EanMmrr�pv. p. paiMkrtlromaMOryolrxlprop .M�ouMxMin Nolen. 1705 SR Sale. 50000
c..nwr cp .my.c.na..amw.en.mr.�.ra.ep.n e..a..�nm.p.aK .a,a. Deed Reference: 1213!9 Township. BRASSFIELD
am mh rns mi ne br lmornrYOn.i purpnwa only.nE slwuW red b pumMNeE
Mw...r<..w —fty. r„�,.,��,r,.rar.onw„wraa,an Deed Date 5131!2007 Onelnch =400 Feet
A
(16 a3P
80_S5

E
D
3
�j
It
Y
W • .. M u � � `� ri
SVpZJ � �i
I
i
�
11c
Hilt,
il�ii
W • .. M u � � `� ri
SVpZJ � �i
tl
t��( � ilEi� 11��3dEK EY t� tYtr rY9 � 1 #y11 ! ?tfi 11 t �� !Y 1iy
I
i
�
11c
F
tl
t��( � ilEi� 11��3dEK EY t� tYtr rY9 � 1 #y11 ! ?tfi 11 t �� !Y 1iy

FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
FUR 8121
CTtM14
['}.y�tfr � IYlft
EFFECTIVE DATE
MAP NUMBER
APRIE 16. 2W
37101826001
Sane of N. b Grul,..
FadenY Flwq e y
hill,— Ax—,,
.� era. rxor a . oueo, de. �o....r,.reee.aae m.p ■
wtocfea crap cJM a.u,w tw. m� mw nol m..d cn.n0..
e d� ca e.e Iww ams.n +nb,.ar«r n,a,e wr,a,.. cmoa xrv.,ce
eo.m .mG m.P � nK FEMA Reee M.a ��e .I «+r m.c fo-ne pe.

36° 7 47' N
36° 7 31'N
a Hydrologic Soil Group — Granville County, North Carolina 3
(Starmont Subdivision)
719870 719930 719990 720050 720110 720170 720230
719870 719930 719990 720050 720110
3
e
Map Sole: 1:2,460 if printed on A portrait (8.5' x 11 ") sheet.
Meters
N
0 35 70 140 210
A ��
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer 000rdinates: WGS84 Edge tics: LF M Zone 17N WGiS84
itSIM Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
36° 7 47' N
Q
gn
S
g�
S
36° 731"N
720170 720230
3
P
2/17/2014
Page 1 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group — Granville County, North Carolina
(Starmonl Subdivision)
MAPLEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
O A
o AID
® B
® BID
oC
Q CID
E] D
Q Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
r� A
.�� AID
y B
,y BID
.. C
hi CID
N D
. . Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
. A
AID
B
BID
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AD[ were mapped at 1 24.000.
Warring: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map. Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL. htlp //websoilsurvey.nrrs.usda.gov
Coordinate System. Web Mercator (EPSG.3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal -area conic projection, should be used it more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area. Granville County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 14, Dec 20. 2013
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed May 10, 2010 —Apr 4,
2011
The orthopholo or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
tisrm Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 211 712 01 4
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4
C
CID
D
0
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
`y
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
■
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AD[ were mapped at 1 24.000.
Warring: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map. Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL. htlp //websoilsurvey.nrrs.usda.gov
Coordinate System. Web Mercator (EPSG.3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal -area conic projection, should be used it more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area. Granville County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data Version 14, Dec 20. 2013
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed May 10, 2010 —Apr 4,
2011
The orthopholo or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
tisrm Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 211 712 01 4
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4

Hydrologic Soil Group — Granville County, North Carolina Starmont Subdivision
Hydrologic Soil Group
a,
Hydrologic;Soil' Group - .Summary by Map -Unit — Granville County, North Carolina (NC077)�'
Map,unit symbol' Map unit name I ;Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI `
I
j CaB Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6
A
13.3
percent slopes
CeC2
Cecil clay loam, 6 to 10
B
10.51
percent slopes,
I
I moderately eroded
Totals for Area of Interest
i 23.81
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long- duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A /D, B /D, or C /D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
55.9%
44.1%
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/17/2014
�d" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk0 AutoCADO Civil 3DO by Autodesk, Inc Wednesday, Apr 22 2015
Pipe 3
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 429.00
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 62.00
Qmin (cfs)
= 39.39
Slope ( %)
= 4.84
Qmax (cfs)
= 39.39
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 432.00
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc +D) /2
Rise (in)
= 36.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 36.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 39.39
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 39.39
n -Value
= 0.013
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 6.21
Culvert Entrance
= Groove end projecting (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 7.69
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0045, 2, 0.0317, 0.69, 0.2
HGL Dn (ft)
= 431.52
HGL Up (ft)
= 434.04
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 435.03
Top Elevation (ft)
= 436.50
Hw /D (ft)
= 1.01
Top Width (ft)
= 55.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 10.00
Elev (ft) Plpe 3 Hw Depth (8)
437,00 — .r-
4:s6,00 s . m �_ — �� ',,,� .� « • T 5,00
434.00 2.00
455.00 �`_ ` m`Ie �.,,...- �"'"► --�' {�� °. • _ _- 7.UU
-057,00 _ -_ ._.r• _ - _I — -: -- iko
430.00 --- - -- =s-�. .2.G0
0 6 10 16 20 Z6 30 36 40 46 .0 66 60 06 '.0 76 A b6
Cim4ef Culvert HGL Fan Dan Y, Reach (h)

7)
M 03
co
IIca
1zz
_ _ _ _� � _� _ _ _ _� _ " .� ,« ._ � •' � � .jam..,
°I
16 1 AC

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Matt: As we discussed by phone today, it looks like the proposed road crossing, which should be the
only work in waters of the US on the site, can be authorized under a nationwide general permit 14,
linear transportation crossing, with no notification required to the Corps, since it will not impact
wetlands or a stream with a riffle -pool complex. Therefore, you don not need to submit anything else to
the Corps, or to wait for anything from the Corps.
Please reply or call if you have any questions or if I may serve you in any other way.
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us
ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://regulatorv.usacesurvev.com/.
Eric Alsmeyer
Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x23
Fax: [phone]
Regulatory Homepage: http: / /www.saw.usace.armv.miI/ Missions /RegulatorvPermitProgram.aspx
(If you need information that is not yet available on our new website, please let me know)
From: Matt Hastings fmailto : matt. hastin4sCa)summitde.netl
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:08 PM
To: Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] creek /stream crossing (UNCLASSIFIED)
Eric,
I am working on a 37 lot subdivision in Granville County and will have some minor stream impacts. We
pushed our road as far east as possible to avoid a stream crossing but it looks like we will still be crossing
at the very end. Can you please give me some guidance on the permit process needed. I have attached
a copy of the survey plat.
Thanks
Matt Hastings, PE
Project Manager — Land Development
Phone: [phone]

t #40",
Ca
Lij
V)
d
Lu
Ce
f" z ®
en 00 3¢
- No
m U az ° [8 z
o >7PZ Lu W�
cvzx ° <20
H" C3 J 3 >z
W Ow -¢UwQ
z Zs 'z x� y
Hs
C7 C? to < � z to
Z 0< iH ? �x���
@
QwUQwdwa
�� WC34�4yQ f
U
m
= U
w
d
.0
a�
a)
in
CL
0
ILI
rn
CA
(N
0
m
n.
ul
C)'
0
0
es
m
ry
V)
V)
CL
0)
c
C
C
a�
v
0
rd
0
of
40 0 20 40 80 160 I JAMES M. ETHRIDGE & # MAPN# 163600246 IMPERVIOUS AREAS:
J
MAPN 163600246481 - SHEET NO.
J li milli uiuu TABITHA G. ETHRIDGE EXISTING, 0 SF (0 °! °)
i D6 678 170 JEFFREY R. BURNEY STEPHEN R. JONIE
-- / HERYL L. JONI
(IN FEET) PB 13/185 DB 678/170 DB 881 /126 PROPOSED: 0,93 AC. (1.8 %) C-2
� inch= as o
PB 13/185 PB 13/185
_
II I IIIIIII IIII IIIIIIiII Il l lr. II i I II I I II III IIII VIII lillllllllllllllll ,LL� 11W4� 1llll llll 111 llll l l lll VIII IIIIIIW r.wu.Il . IIIIUIIWIIIWIIIIi . IIIIIIIII I i I II i VIII VIII I � I�� uW� UilY4�.� .�U� YWIIIIWIIY 61llWIUJ1u,L.Ili�. �.i I . L II1i 10i ill . V. i wr wulw ,.
wruu,i uwuwwemuuwuwiom"um. I 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111 . . .
I I I ,di ilr,.,, ill 1 11 l
1 11 1 1 11 Ill 11111111 1111 11 11

Em
Em
440
am
SCALE: 1" = 40'
O
PLAN - EMERALD LANE
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20 40
80
PROFILE-EMERALD LANE
430
425
11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+5C 14+00 14+'50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50
Ili Ili 11 111111[111111 1 1 1 Ill INWHIIIII I 111U1111 I II li IIII IIIiYMlllll!i101 1111m, 11 1 All Ill I I I l�jli 1 11 I1iwIUkm­[4jjjI1I! ­ qjl J'AP&IIIINNAIIII. .11.i,01 1 11, 1 1 1
18+00 18+50 19+00 1 , 9+ ., 5 - 0 .. ...... . .. 20 +a0
11 1 1,11WI, . 1 11 1 1 1 , iWWO IMU11111111 1. 1 luquuu1111 [11111 1