20230989 Ver 1_PCN_FillableForm_v4-Truelove Apts_15510_signed_20230711

He STATE
Z«ti
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action ID no. [Click to enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
DWR project no. Dlick enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
Site Coordinates:
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.447102
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 79.127511
Form Version 4.3, April 20, 2022
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 4.2, January 31, 2022))
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk are required. The form is not considered complete until all
mandatory questions are answered.
The PCN help document may be found at this link:
https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2196924&cr=1
Please ensure you have submitted a pre -filing meeting request at least 30 days prior to submitting this
form, as DWR will not be able to accept your application without documentation of this important first step.
The Division has developed a Pre -filing Meeting Request email address 401401 PreFile(a)-ncdenr.. ov to accept
the federally required pre -filing meeting request and provide confirmation receipt of submittal . This receipt
or similar documentation will satisfy 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) which states "At least 30 days prior to
submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying
agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5), all certification requests must
include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority at least 30
days prior to submitting the certification request.
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request to this Application.
Date of Pre -filing Meeting Request (MM/DD/YYYY) : 5/16/2023
Page 1 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located: *
Lee Additional (if needed).
Is this an ARPA project? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, ARPA project number:
* The project number can be found on the "Letter of Intent to Fund"
(LOIF) or "Offer and Acceptance Letter". If you are unable to locate
Click or tap here to enter text.
your DWI ARPA Funding Project Number, please contact Corey
Basinger at core y.basinger(cDncdenr.gov for further assistance.
Is this a NCDMS project? *
(Click yes only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-
❑ Yes ❑x No
applicant)
Is this a public transportation project?
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
❑ Yes ❑x No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
Click to enter
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: *
Click to enter
❑x Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
Clean Water Act)
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
Please provide the date of the previous submission. *
Click to enter a date.
❑x Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek
❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
authorization?
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as attachments and
submitted with this form.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
NWP number(s) (list all numbers ):
29
RGP number(s) (list all numbers ):
Click to enter.
Are you a federal applicant?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please provide a statement concerning compliance with
the Coastal Zone Management Act
Click to enter text.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from DWR (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Is this a courtesy copy notification
❑ Yes ❑x No
Page 2 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? *
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: *
❑ Yes
❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit: *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1f.
Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1g.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
® Yes
❑ No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1 i.
Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)? *
❑ Yes
❑x No ❑ Unknown
1j.
Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Requlatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 3 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

B. Applicant Information
1a.
Who is the primary contact?
Deborah Shirley
1 b.
Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
1 c.
Primary Contact Phone: (###)###-####
[phone]
1 d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? (check
all that apply)
® Owner ❑ Applicant (other than owner)
1e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mission CCC Sanford, LLC
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
Book: 1713 Page: 718
2c.
Contact Person (for corporations):
C. Jason McArthur
2d.
Address
Street Address:
5800 Old Pineville Road
Address line 2:
Suite 201
City:
Charlotte
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28217
Country:
USA
2e.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
2g.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Name:
Click to enter.
3b.
Business Name (if applicable):
Click to enter.
3c.
Address:
Street Address:
Click to enter.
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Click to enter.
State/ Province/ Region:
Click to enter.
Postal/ Zip Code:
Click to enter.
Country
Click to enter.
3d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
3e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
3f.
Email Address:
Click to enter.
Page 4 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4.
Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a.
Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b.
Business Name:
Soil and Enviornmental Consultants PA
4c.
Address:
Street Address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address line 2:
Suite 104
City:
Raliegh
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
27615
Country:
USA
4d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
4e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
4f.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw. usace.army.mil/Missions/Reg ulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 5 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project: *
Truelove Apartments
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
Click to enter.
1c. Nearest municipality/town: *
Sanford
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9661-27-0694-00
2b.
Property size (in acres):
7.23 acres
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
3239 NC Highway 87
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Sanford
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
27330
Country:
USA
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point): *
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): * 35.447102
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD): *-79.127511
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Carrs Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
C
water: *
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https:Hncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6e125ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
Cape Fear
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located? *
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
030300040202
located: *
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https:Hncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Publiclnformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cd069db238ac3
Page 6 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
Existing conditions consist of one vacent parcel of land that is an open field area. The property contianes two
wetland areas (W1 and W2) on the northern property line. The property is bounded by US 421 to the north,
private businesses and Hwy 87 to the west, private businesses to the south, and a residential area to the east.
General land use in the vicinity of the project is commercial and residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
[Click to enter.]
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
jClick to enter.]
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4b2. Is any portion of the work already complete?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the completed work.
N/A
4c. List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state or local agencies for work
described in this application not related to the 404 or 401.
Developer applying for other local permits such as E&S, not aware of other approvals that maybe needed.
4d. Attach an 8'Y2 x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e. Attach an 8'Y2 x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
Approximately 0.137 acres
property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
0 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
0 acres
property:
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is construct a residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Per the project engineer: The site has 7 apartment buildings with a mix of 1, 2, and 3- bedroom units, with an
overall total of 180 units. The site also will have a pool, clubhouse, and a mail kiosk. The site will have public
water provided by the City of Sanford. The site has gravity sewer flows to an onsite pump station that pumps the
wastewater to gravity sewer manhole located on an adjacent property to the south of the development.;
Specifically, there are wetland impacts associated with lot fill. Equipment typically used for construction and
earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavets etc. will be utililzed for this project.
4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
4k. Will this activity involve dredging in wetlands or waters?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the type of dredging, the composition of the dredged material, and the locations of disposal area.
Click to enter text
Page 7 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

5.
Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.
Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on
the property or in
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
,TICK to enter text
5b.
If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed concurrence
what type of determination was made?
❑x Not Verified ❑ Unknown ❑ n/a
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
SAW-2023-00736
Name (if known): Josh Harvey
5c.
If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil and Environmental
areas?
Consultants, PA
Other: r;lick to enter
5d.
List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
S&EC submitted a PJD request on March 31, 2023.
S&EC was provided the SAW # and an email indicating that
it was assigned to Chris Hopper on April 5, 2023.
5d1.
Attach jurisdictional determinations.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, explain.
:lick to enter
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings
for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction
notification.
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown.
Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
7. Addresses of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. whose property adjoins the waterbody (if more than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list)
Please reference Lee County GIS
8. Scheduling of activity:
Construction timeline will be after permits are issued by agencies, including the local municipality and before
permits expire. The exact date is unknown at this time.
Page 8 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impacts Summary
❑x Wetlands
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑ Buffers
(check all that apply):
❑ Pond Construction
❑ Streams - tributaries
❑ Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Site #
2al.
Impact
Reason/Type
2b.
Impact
Duration
2c.
Wetland Type
2d.
Wetland Name
2e.
Forested
?
2f.
Jurisdiction
Type
2g.
Impact Area
(ac)
W1
Fill (Incl.
Riprap)
Permanent
Headwater
Forest
Wetland impact Al -
W2
No
Both
0.07
W2
Fill (Incl.
Riprap)
Permanent
Headwater
Forest
Wetland impact A2 -
W2
No
Both
0.01
W3
Fill (Incl.
Riprap)
Permanent
Headwater
Forest
Wetland Impact B1-
W1
No
Both
0.04
W4
Other
Temporary
Headwater
Forest
Wetland impact B2 -
W1
No
Both
0.001
W5
Other
Temporary
Headwater
Forest
Wetland Impact B3
- W1
No
Both
0.002
W6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W9
Choose one
-emp/ Perm
Choose onE
Click to enter
Y/I
Choose one
Click to enter
W10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W11
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W15
Choose one
-emp/ Perm
Choose onE
Click to enter
Y/N
,hoose one
Click to enter
2gl . Total temporary wetland impacts
0.003 ac
2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts
0.12 ac
2g3. Total wetland impacts
0.123 ac
2h. Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards:
N/A
Page 9 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

2i. Comments:
Click to enter text.
Page 10 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
Site #
3a
Impact
Reason*
3b.
Impact
Duration
3c.
Impact Type
3d.
Stream Name
3e.
Stream
Type
3f.
Jurisdiction
Type
3g.
Stream Width
(avg ft)
3h.
Impact length
(linear ft)
S1
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S2
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S3
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S4
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S5
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S6
slick to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
lick to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S7
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S8
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S9
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S10
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S11
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S12
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S13
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S14
lick to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
lick to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S15
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S16
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S17
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S18
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S19
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S20
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch
impact:
Click to enter. linear ft
3i2. Total permanent stream
impacts:
Click to ent, linear ft
M. Total temporary stream
impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
34. Total stream and ditch
impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
3j. Comments:
UICK to enter.
Page 11 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a.
Site #*
4a1.
Impact Reason
4b.
Impact
Duration*
4c.
Waterbody Name*
4d.
Activity Type*
4e.
Waterbody
Type*
4f.
Impact area
(ac)*
01
dick to ent(
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
:hoose one
Click to enter.
02
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
-hoose one
Click to enter.
03
dick to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
04
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
05
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table below. (*This
does NOT include
offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
P2
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
ente
P3
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
ente,
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Clicl
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
ent
5g.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 12 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)?
(Check all that apply.)
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
❑ Other: .,;K to ern_
Site #*
6b.
Impact Type*
6c.
Impact Duration*
6d.
Stream Name*
6e.
Buffer
Mitigation
Required?*
6f.
Zone 1 Impact*
(sq ft)
6g.
Zone 2 Impact*
(sq ft)
131
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B2
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
1311
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B16
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B17
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B18
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B19
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B20
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
DICK to enter.
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 13 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
S&EC completed a wetland delineation for the entire property in order to identify natural resources so that
impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Impact area Al is proposed permanent loss fill to construct the site infrastructure for traffic circulation for the
development and provide parking to meet the City of Sanford minimum parking requirements. This impact is
necessary to construct the site infrastructure such as roadway for vehicular access, required parking, sidewalk
for pedestrian access of the site and utility lines (storm drainage). Reference City of Sanford UDO section
10.2.4 pedestrian circulation & Section10.3 Multi -family residential development. Wetland mitigation is being
proposed at a 2:1 ratio to compensate for these proposed impacts.
Impact area A2 is proposed permanent loss fill within an existing conveyance wetland (W2) that currently
receives drainage from the site. The proposed impact is adding riprap to a portion of the existing wetland W2 to
increase the stability and reduce erosion. The proposed design ensures safe conveyance of site runoff to natural
drainage patterns in the area and meets the City of Sanford and NCDEQ guidance for stormwater design.
Wetland mitigation is being proposed at a 2:1 ratio to compensate for these proposed impacts.
Impact area B1 is proposed permanent loss fill due to the site infrastructure for a pumpstation for sanitary sewer
collection and required sidewalk for pedestrian access of the site facilities. A retaining wall is proposed to
minimize impacts to wetland W1. Reference NCDEQ guidelines for Design of sanitary sewer pumpstation, City
of Sanford UDO section 10.2.4 pedestrian circulation & Section10.3 Multi -family residential development.
Wetland mitigation is being proposed at a 2:1 ratio to compensate for these proposed impacts.
Impact areas B2 and B3 are temporary wetland impacts for retaining wall construction. Temporary wetland
impacts will be brought back to pre -construction contours and revegetated with adjacent wetland seed source.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Per the project engineer - Silt fence, diversion ditches, sediment skimmer basin, silt fence outlets. The grading
plan include retaining walls to limit the impacts on wetlands
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? ❑x DWR ❑x Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? (check all that apply) ❑x In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank
(Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
"'lick to enter.
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
Click to enter.
Page 14 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4. Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a. Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
https://ribits.usace.army.miI/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.25 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
Private mitigation banks were contacted, specifically Wildlands and Davey, neither has wetland credits
available within the 03020004 HUC, therefore the NCDMS was utilized.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including mitigation credits generated.
lick to enter.
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑x No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b.
If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires
mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
lick to enter.
Zone 2
Click to enter.
Click to enter
^.hnncn nna
Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
lick to enter.
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i.
Comments:
k-HUN UJ CI III --I.
Page 15 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
❑ Yes ❑x No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse/dispersed flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deg.nc.,qov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
El Yes ❑x No
2b.
Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
❑ Yes ❑x No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c.
Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
ElYes ❑x No
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -
approved local government stormwater program?
❑ n/a — project disturbs < 1 acre
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2d.
Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
❑ Local Government
(Check all that apply.)
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
❑ Phase II ❑ USMP
Local Government Stormwater Programs
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Page 16 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Click to enter.
State Stormwater Programs ❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
Per the project engineer, there are no SCM's on site and the site is not required per the City of Sanford to provide
stormwater control measures. Please see attached Storm Drainage and Erosion Control Calculations dated May
15, 2023.
Page 17 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
❑ Yes ❑x No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
❑ Yes ❑ No
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
Click to enter.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),
Federally Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands /Classified Surface Waters
❑ Yes ❑x No
(15A NCAC 2H. 1400) DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Click to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes ❑x No
downstream water quality? *
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and
Isolated Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version
2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including
projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as
agricultural and silvicultural operations. The Truelove Apartments projet is a residential development and located
within the City of Sanford jurisdiction. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is
needed.
3c. If yes, provide a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWR
policy. (Attach .pdf)
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
Page 18 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
The wastewater generated from the site will be treated at the City of Sanfords treatment plant. Per the project
engineer, the City of Sanford treatment plant has capacity for this project.
5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
❑ Yes ❑x No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.govl)
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
® Yes ❑ No
Act impacts? *
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d.
Is another federal agency involved? *
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
Click to enter.
5e.
Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
5f.
Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
5g.
Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
5g1.
If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as
staining, guano, bats, etc.? Representative photos of signs of bat use
❑ Yes ❑ No
can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7.
Representative photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES,
Appendix F, pages 3-7. Link to
NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed
NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
If you answered yes to 5g1, did you discover any signs of bat use? *
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
If yes, please show the location of the bridge on the permit drawings/ project plans
5h.
Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf)
5i.
Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
❑ Yes ❑x No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.? *
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose,
duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdf)
Page 19 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat?
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -certification letter through the
US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official
Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on July 8, 2023. The USFWS has 30
days to respond from the date of the sent request. The S&EC determinations were that the proposed project is
not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Please see
attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report.
Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat?
❑ Yes ❑x No
Is there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity?
El Yes ❑x No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation?
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
Explain: N/A
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat
Mapper website was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
http://,qis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
❑ Yes ❑x No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on June 2,
2023, no historic listings or study list entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property
boundaries. Additionally, no structures exist within the property boundaries.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.,qov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
_.IIGN UJ CI IICI _
Page 20 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
(`lick fn nntnr
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
I. Signature *
0 By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: Deborah Shirley
DigitaDeborh E.
Signature: * D&ardh E. Shirley Date: 2102 07.111signedb1 01:15a04'00' Shirley
Date: 7/11 /2023
Page 21 of 21 PCN Form Version 4.3- April 20, 2022

PCN Attachments
1. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
2. NCDWR PRE -FILING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3. USGS TOPO VICINITY MAP
4. NRCS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY VICINITY MAP
5. USACE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SUBMITTAL EMAIL
6. S&EC SKETCH MAP
7. MITIGATION NCDME ACCEPTANCE LETTER
8. S&EC THREATENED & ENDANGERD SPECIES REPORT
9. S&EC T&E SUBMITTAL EMAIL TO USFWS
10. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAPS
11.IMPACT EXHIBITS
12. STORM DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS

r-1
Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse ROaCI, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: (91)) 846-5900
sandec.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Truelove Apartments S&EC Project # 15510
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn:
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9661-27-0694-00
Site Address: 3239 NC Highway 87
City, County, State: Sanford, Lee County, NC
Name: l -)QSGv, IV/` ar7 (noe
Mailing Address: .5-Fj 0 0 dl d P1%u V 11u !�cl � 'fc VD
Telephone Number: mod: 3 071 1r17 65'
Email:
Applicant (please print) Date
Applicant
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
7-17

Deborah Shirley
From: Mason Montgomery
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 3:53 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; Deborah Shirley
Subject: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request- Truelove Apartments
Attachments: Truelove Apartments Overall Site Plan.pdf
401/Zachary:
Please see the project details below and let me know if a DWR Pre -Filing Meeting is needed.
Contact: Deborah Shirley
Contact Email address: [e-mail]
Project Applicant: Mission Properties; —Jason McArthur: [e-mail]
Project Name: Truelove Apartments
Project County: Lee County
Is this a Transportation Project: No
Types of Approvals Sought from DWR: 401 WQC-4256
Types of Approvals Sought from USACE: NWP 29
Does this project have an existing project ID#? No
Name of staff member you would like to request a meeting with, if necessary. Zachary Thomas
Brief Description of the proposed project:
The proposed Truelove Apartments project is located at 3239 NC-87 Highway, Sanford, Lee County, NC. The project is
approximately 7.23 acres. The project purpose is to construct an apartment complex residential development and its
necessary infrastructure including but not limited to; buildings, parking lots, roadway infrastructure, and utilities. There
are 2 wetland impacts for lot fill. See attached Overall Site Plan.
Thanks,
Soil And Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road. Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
mmonteomerv(@sandec.com
Visit us at sandec.com

74C
Do-B GhD
wna C
/ , r
� 0
� OO
PaF
DoB DoA
CfD
4
GhB �+ PaF
x ,! Wn { DoA
wn.CfD
x
Project Number: Map Title: N
15510.W1 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: Figure 2- Soil Survey Map I i i i I i i i I
SB 3239 NC 87 Property Feet
Scale: 1" = 500' Lee County, NC
'k I
;
Source: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 8412 Falls of N— Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: (919) W-9467
11/29/2022 Soil Survey Sheet No. 5 & 6 smdee.com

F
From:
RaleighNCREG
To:
Kevin Murohrev
Cc:
Horner. Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject:
SAW-2023-00736 (3239 NC 87 / Sanford NC / Lee County)
Date:
Wednesday, April 5, 2023 3:50:18 PM
Good afternoon,
Your JD request has been received, assigned action ID SAW-2023-00736 and forwarded to
Chris Hopper for further processing.
Please refer to the action ID in all correspondence.
Thank you,
Josephine Schaffer
From: Kevin Murphrey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 11:57 AM
To: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Steven Ball <[e-mail]>
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] S&EC_3239 INC 87 Property_JD Request
Good morning, attached is a JD Request for a site located in Sanford, INC. Please let me know once
this has been assigned.
Thanks
Kevin Murphrey, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Professional Wetland Scientist #3538
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office 984-238-2650
Mobile [phone]
kmurahrev(@sandec.com
Visit us at sandec.com

Legend
Evaluation Area
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
2' Lee County Contours
US"42
• �,R- 21 &22ttPL
01 &30ttPL t
WO
' DP1_wet
31 &50ttPL
W '
f
BL
W
/
Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US
(Q� •,t ' ^ S.itoble for Preliminary Planning O.iy
S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork,
1 and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped using
% 1 topographic maps, air photos and ground truthung. If the site is g—g
to be disturbed, S&EC's detailed delineation should be approved and
x • • /.. permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of
this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by
! ,e ,{ �y■ Y�,/ tY y. - - S&EC, they should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to
�+•�` a� i l �,,.}" �, 7.I ! ITf t_-,/» :.,... locates&EC's flagging.
�� �...
Project Number: Map Title: N
15510.W1 0 150 300
Project Manager: Wetland Sketch Map I i i i I i i i I
SB 3239 NC 87 Property Feet
Scale: 1 150' Lee County, NC
"=
Source: soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 8412 Falls of Ne.. R-d, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • F-: (9l9) 846-9467
01 /10/2023 Aerials from NC OneMap10
a�d�e<em

F]
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Jason McArthur
Mission CCC Sanford, LLC
5800 Old Pineville Road, Suite 201
Charlotte, NC 28217
Project: Truelove Apartments
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 28, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 12/28/2023
County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.25
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James B. Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Debbie E. Shirley, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
h(h�TH :.AROI iRA IV
o �nmmmenni w�a 919,707,8976

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone; [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
June 30, 2023
S&EC Project No: 15510.W6
Re: Online Project Review Request, Truelove Apartments, Sandford — Lee County, North
Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review June 30, 2023 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of. A planned residential development that is proposing impacts to
wetlands.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Truelove Apartments (35.446957,-79.127761). The site is located at 3239 NC 87, Sanford — Lee County,
North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package 6. FWS Official Species List
2. S&EC T&E Species Report 7. NIP Report
3. Vicinity Maps 8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
4. S&EC Photo Report 9. FWS Self -Certification Letter
5. Overall Site Plan

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
June 30, 2023
S&EC ProjectNo.: 15510.W6
To: Mission CCC Sanford, LLC
Attn: Jason McArthur
5800 Old Pineville Rd, Ste 201
Charlotte, NC 28217
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Truelove Apartments (+/- 7 acres)
3239 NC 87 Hwy, Sanford, Lee County, NC
Jason McArthur:
On June 16, 2023, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Truelove Apartments
shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located at 3239 NC 87
Hwy in Lee County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into Carrs Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin,
which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to Surface Waters
and Wetlands of North Carolina" as C.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Truelove Apartments- S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 4

June 30, 2023
S&EC Project #15510.W6
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Tricolored Bat, (Perimyotis subflavus), Proposed Endangered
• Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas), Endangered
• Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate
• Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly (Neonympha mitchelhi francisci), Endangered
• Harperella (Ptilimnium nodosum), Endagered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within one mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP
report identified two managed areas within one mile of the project area. These are listed out in the
attached NHP Report.
TRICOLORED BAT (Perimotis subflavus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat for Tricolored Bat's within the
project area. During our survey, we found no individual species. Relying upon the findings of the
December 2021 Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Tricolored Bat. S&EC did not
identify any culverts on -site or within adjacent ROW large enough to be considered roosting habitat.
Due to the nature of the project being residential development, which will include tree removal, we
concluded that the project is "not likely to jeopardize the existence of the species" for TCB's.
CAPE FEAR SHINER (Notropis mekistocholas)
During the preliminary survey for the Cape Fear Shiner, we looked for any suitable habitat and
evidence of the species being present. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence
within the project area or within one mile of the site. These species are found in the Upper Cape Fear
River Basin. The suitable habitat these species are found in are streams with rocky substrate with slow
flowing water. While we did not specifically sample the species, we also did not find any evidence of
the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat.
Truelove Apartments - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 4

June 30, 2023
S&EC Project #15510.W6
Our preliminary survey concluded that potentially suitable habitat does not exist on -site. Due to the
lack of streams present on -site, we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Cape
Fear Shiner.
MONARCH BUTTERFLY (Danaus plexippus):
The Monarch Butterfly is currently listed as a candidate species, and not yet listed or proposed for
listing as threatened or endangered. Due to the status of Monarch Butterfly, consultation with USFWS
under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required. FWS recommends conserving
pollinator habitat where practicable.
HARPERELLA (Ptilimnium nodosum):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project areas. It should
be noted this survey took place outside of the optimal survey window (July through early September).
We found no individual Harperella species within the project area. The NHP report did not list any
known elemental occurrence within the project area or one mile of the project area. We found no
suitable habitat within the project area since there were no streams present. Given the lack of species
and suitable habitat present we concluded that the project would have "No effect" on Harperella.
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is "Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
Truelove Apartments - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 4

June 30, 2023
S&EC Project #15510.W6
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS.
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. May 18, 2023.
7. NHP Report: May 18, 2023.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. June 30, 2023.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. June 30, 2023.
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2021. Species Assessment (SSA) Report for the Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus)
Version 1.1. Hadley, MA.
-U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. 2022 Recommended Minimum Culvert Dimensions for Bat Roost Surveys in Western
North Carolina. Ashville, NC.
Truelove Apartments - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 4

V
4
C
Project Number: 15510.W6 Map Title:
Project Manager: USGS Map
MM 3239 NC 87 Property
Scale: 1 if = 1000' Lee County, NC
Date: Source: 2019
06/28/2023 Broadway & Sanford Quads
O
Bus
421
N
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
' Soil Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 F.1h of \coat &a.d S.Rl 104. R.W& \C 27613 - Phac! (919) 846-3W- F—(919)

74C
Do-B GhD
wna C
/ , r
� 0
� OO
PaF
Do B DoA
CfD
4
GhB �+ PaF
x ,! Wn A
wn.CfD
x
Project Number: Map Title: N
15510.W6 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: SOII Survey Map I i i i I i i i I
MM 3239 NC 87 Property Feet
Scale: 1 " = 500' Lee County, NC
Date: Source:
Soil & Eiivironmeiital Consultants, PA
06/28/2023 Soil Survey Sheet No. 5 & 6 r413 Fal6d lcuu&mSSu:r IOi. A.ngR NC 17615•Phu�c (9i7)8465900•Fu:[919]8M.916

Legend
Evaluation Area CDI W
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland °
W
2' Lee County Contours
Photo 3
US 42
_ ..
Aw
Photo 4 �`
W1
-- n BLUMONT DR
Photo 1
Photo 2 U)
w . .
4 >
«S
Ui
� Y
2 / 1 ple
NC Center for Geographic Information
Project Number: Map Title: N
15510.W6 0 150 300
Project Manager: Aerial Photo Map I i i i I i i i I
MM 3239 NC 87 Property Feet
Scale: 1 150' Lee County, NC
"=
Source: soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 8412 Falls of N— Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: (919) W-9467
06/28/2023 Aerials from NC OneMap smdee.com

Job #: 15510.W6
June 28, 2023
Threatened and Endangered Species Photo Report for the Truelove Apartments
Photo 1:
Photo 2:

'I • vloi
'.
.. �..�-..>s:�,::.;:4.+_..� .i•�.1.8 ar n... - ... .. :ice y... �ffi�.A'. �_'�' ' ..�'�.. _' - ��....d.. ' . •_ _ _ _ _- _

9oaea �n1'auoue4� ZEELZ ON'PI'll'S f�H LS ON 6SZS
z z W UB d aI!S
a �
F i Goe O o
W Emma s}uG)wnoo4 uo!}ona}suoo C'7
seivadoaduoissiw sluaUJ:pedb anolanJl 01s13d 1. 3da o a o o U
U
v
00 Wo°€ \�
OE
o�
0 W i mJ
g wi
o
F
m m
IIfIIIIIII�IIJ/J/I/III///Il� � �\ \ I � i"-- eM
—____ = -i m 133F1153/10'13llyl
�ne„v
�II�IIII 11 /I�JJ` JJ -- _y —"�—
Illllll!
I�IIIII l\�l l I 1 y�
I t
II IIIIIIII 1 I, I
I II IIIII l 1, l � y `
1114�1u�1�14 11 II I i.19
v sr<
r4�(ilo��l44 v v b b
i
0" : m -
l;I%l%;ll�l'1,;j1/l,
/
l Iflll'
f /l I lfI,,
I III �III�r III I rr� � 1r�Y 5
l /f IIIII II IIII Ii�II t - gg�°� gg,,A —L----
I'I�I/II III (IIIII mew
-_,\ -
Tl v -
o I=�=a
rills lei �4f;` v/D/ r i I = III E �=aeaa I
i
rr�l�lI IIIII Jii i I L - I �='�a�
lllifliliol 4II� l i I � � ��
i� ii�lillllnl I �tl � I �� i �
�� iili�Iiliii .�� _- ■" ■ao�■ � m Ra��g
I
IIIIIII�I
/I r
�I II II�s& � Z ` - I
o ^6
III i �l � p� .......v.....»....«
I1411\ ....
I I I911 � m
1141 -
IIII\ g
III III
I f I�� ? z o od✓ 19� m P a
I )
Ir
r
m
a
7 I
I I
f . � ♦.� f �T II
\
m \ I

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0083555
Project Name: True Love
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
+cfln7i�
i�
May 18, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

05/18/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

05/18/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

05/18/2023
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

05/18/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0083555
Project Name: True Love
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: This project is located in Lee County and is approximately 7 acres.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.44719215,-79.12729628914917,14z
Counties: Lee County, North Carolina

05/18/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
FISHES
NAME
STATUS
Proposed
Endangered
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
INSECTS
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME
STATUS
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739

05/18/2023
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

05/18/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.

05/18/2023
BREEDING
NAME
SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

05/18/2023 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill ---+ ji1111ll Fr.11.dil
Vulnerable
Nuthatheaded OF Jill Jill Jill Jill ---�
BCC -BCR
Chimney Swift —+—+ + ��'� Jill
"""""' 1111
�'—� —+—+ —+++ ++—+
BCC Rangewide ++ +
(CON)
Prairie Warbler ' JillJillJill---,
BCC Rangewide —+—+ ++++ ���— + +— +-- —+�+ —+++ ++�+
(CON)
Prothonotary rt+—+ ++++ Jill Jill
Jill
Jill
---+ —+-- —+�+ —+++ ++—+
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed III
Woodpecker ' "' mill 1&
+—+ ++++ ���— +++— + +-- —+—+ —+++ ++—+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)

05/18/2023
4
Wood Thrush +—+ ++—+ '-4- ---+ -+-- -+-+ -+++ 4-4-4-
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.Ddf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, bandim
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

05/18/2023 5
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

05/18/2023 6
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

05/18/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Name: Mason Montgomery
Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2: Suite 104
City: Raleigh
State: NC
Zip: 27615
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
May 18, 2023
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Truelove Apartments; 15510
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
IR \�701.1D]WA111901:3I
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

\
\
CO
/ /
3
7a
v
\
\
CO
\ /
3 ®
3
f
/
o
<
}
\
CO ±
\
CO%
2
« m
g/
y2
\}
/
7
\
0
/
\/
\ƒ
\
/
®/
2
CO
LL
i/
»
tt
G:
>
EE
\o
c-
CO
\ 4
\ \ \
E 3
O
/
CO
/
\ \
\ \
\
§
u
e
33
>>
®%
?
}aO
u
/ \ 0
\
23
\ 9)
6 \
\
E \
( $
-
J
/
-
\
\(% %
/
G
\\
co/ § N %
/ 2 9
\
ƒ ƒ
:
No
x<z//
/
T�
e t>»
mw\e&
± m 2
m%
/
\\
/>eeZ
<aeoo
20
/
©
/
�/
// y Z
t g
e
g
e
±
\ \
.\
e
0
/
y
-
/
±
±
g
t
m
m
m
g
3
2
3
0
\
��
\
m
m
0
±
= >
z
§
\ /
}
/
/ /
\
5 ®
®
_\
`
\
\
§
\ E
z
%
O e a
zE
&
\
\/
/
/
\
ƒ\
\
0
0
\
E
`
e
/m
\
\\
H
/
\
\(
\
\
/CO
\\
\\
//
\
\/
\
\\
3
t
\
E.±
E\
\
\
\
e2{
\
//
/\
/
\
\�
�0
Z
z
o
E
s z
/»
»
2
e
«/
uc
/
g
E
e
o
( /
ze
» 2
\o
e
o
g/
\
§
CO
»
®
\
}
/
/®
\
��\-
�\
E
>>
=
s
s g =
\ / z
14
0 \
o
\
\ 2 /
\ /
2
E } /
CO E
z
=
_ > m
:
\ \
/ / \
do o /
z
2:
2:
§
/

I
Rosser Rd
4
R
d�
Z. �t
tom
R.e
La
O t
N � PcaaemV S a
m '—
G 2 '� Le MeterY Rd
s
N
N z
�� LLEF
Nyd
OE�w`-n
N�NW�
�a9a
2-17
ra
W
< d
F m L-
fu w a O C
Q d
0
� � a6
CD a'
N C CD O
N m a
iu�0
M
0
M
N
a

a>
ca
F-
N
O
Ej
a
O
U
N
N
n
N
cy')
CV
O
N
(:
cy')
Q)
c
ca
70
(1)
m
ate)
ate)
ate)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
E
O co
O o)
O cy')
O cy')
O M
U CV
U CV
U CV
U N
U CV
O
O
O
O
O
p N
p N
p N
p N
p N
C
M
M
M
E
ca c
ca c
ca c
ca c
ca c
O
O
O
O
O
O
22'
0
m
m
.0 U)
= N
C N
C N
C N
N
E U
E U
E U
E U
E U
N=
W
'- W
- W
- W
1206
- W
1206
O
NoLS
C,6
06
Z
a_ (n
0- (n
a_ (n
a_ (n
a_ (n
p
U
�
U
�
C
Q)
,
0
Q)
Q)
Q
Q)
>
70
(B m
07
0
ca
W
m
ti
0
Q
o
p
',
O U)
U
Q
C
^
a)
U
(l) a)
Y Q
a)
a)
CD
a)
Q
a)
Q)
W
>
Q)
�
W
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
C
cn
N
U)
a)
Q
Q
U
12
a]
L
Q
N
(B
a)
Q)
Q)
Q
M O
m
O
O
U
Q) W
_a w
_a
cn
U)
Y 70
U
Q)
U
U
U
Z
� M
n QZ
a)
Z31
m
�
m
o
70 -
U
LO
�
L U
p
U
p
_O
cn
—
cu
Q) o
p
a) -`_)
I L
_�
m a)
a)
�o
M-
a) ci
LJJ cB
--
O
L
(B
CO
cn��
ccuz
c
c�
a)
c�
E
O
U)
a)
U
O
N
a)
L
>
M
O
NO
Q
CV
O
O
�
M
O
�
a)
N
.N
U
a)
O
N a_
U U
U)w
0 06
O U)
E O
�+ L
L
O U) ca
Q
0
p O N
E
O E
E E
a) Ln
0 �r
m U
C
O_
a) N
Q)
E
E 'V
cm
pCT
C
N
N �
a)
0
N
O
c
U)
m
Q .E
�

United States Department of the
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date. J u ne 28, 2023
Self -Certification Letter
Pro]ectNameTruelove Apartments
Dear Applicant:
IN
n.' a wn.nut-c
B1umv IVE
Interior
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
✓❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleighgfws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

u
From: Mason Montgomery
To: "Raleigh. FW4"
Subject: Truelove Apartments T&E Submittal
Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 8:52:00 AM
Attachments: S&EC Truelove Apartments T&E Report Signed.odf
Hello,
Attached is the threatened and endangered species report for the Truelove Apartments project in
Lee County, INC. SUC is submitting for concurrence. Please let me know if any additional
information is needed when reviewing the determinations.
Thank you,
Mason L. Montgomery
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road. Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office [phone]
Direct [phone]
Mobile [phone]
mmontRomerv(@sandec.com
Visit us at sandec.com
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information.
This electronic communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations
included herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing
the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the
original communication from your system. Thank you.
APlease consider the environment before printing this email.

9o—a ,o o ZEELZ ON'POPES fmH LS ON 6SZS
z z s}oedwl puelleM
a W ay a a
s}uewnoo4 uoi}ona}suoo N
sluaw:pedb 9n01anal o�1�3d 3/da o a o o U
6d saivadoad uoissiw
z Min
mUZ
ir�Nlm�l,ll illlllili Sri/��/��-____--' w �_ I I-1___ __ �3aiseno�3nai �--•
-
�Il�tllu
IIII!!!/i%/l
If 01W,%/—
,,l ;III%I;;;, 1
IhG°ll dy',gllll� I I I I II II I I I 1 I v I r'I
II,o11111/IVmI III I I I I I /v ', v`. � ��
IIIIII/IIII l) IIIIl�II I I II I I I 1 1 I I
; ,41�II1
Il,,l,rl�l 11 11 v �r �II
lli/I�T��i
I�it �� /Dj, 11 11 I 11 II II v `III
it i1411 ui'�� ail II II li II 11 v 1 v \ —
1
IIIIIIIII„I II31I1
IIII IIY �� 1 1 I L 1 \ l I� 4maar- —
IIII, II (IIII IrI l l l m I I I I --� ^ RR I II I
u r II dp �✓� / l I A `. A "�€�sd� a
_ a� iiI ill i�ii I hii/ i i r I � I I i A V _ IIII A II III
a' a r1I no 14j1 / r l I v v v /v �I AI I
a...........n�'g
3 II II IIn �III..f.,.I
IIII,4IIn I �.. Iv � �I/ � � II. G�'�� 11
m n 1, 41n Ol I
rr �i lrilr�lj yl�lo III a I I II 11 A "a leQ� 9 m - 941iI
I III,IIIp ,l �. 1� p r r A
aromr ` /
II Ili17r,lc. iII Ii C i 1\ \ II
IIIII,II�
Il llljl \LR•� h.......��.����l•l`f i l l l I I I / I I � Il,y /� __�_ { �\
I I II \
III 1
\
III,\:
I / I
It,
/ I
- _ I
I f \\
� r 4-
0

9oaea �N'auoue4� ZEELZ ON'PI'll'S f�H LS ON 6SZS
00�«a�,a w.w a, �
z z UB d aI!S
a � W
s}uewnoo4 uo!}ona}suoo C'7
saivadoad uoissiw sluaUJ:pedb anojanj j os 3d 1. 3da o a o o U
U
v
o�
0 W i °J
g wi
o
F
m m
Ilflllllll�lll/J/I/III//�Il� � �> > � � i" eM
—____ = -i m 133F1153/,O1311F11
�ne„v
iylf,IlllllJJ _ -- —
IIIIIIII lI llllll/ l � -
I t
I,,
Il llllllll 1 I, I
I II IIIIII l 1, l � y `
'h"'6in41 � I e u
I s«
r4i(ilo��l44 v j b b
i
10
,
� Iflll'
f Il I III�Q
I III �I ll�rll rr 1 rY 5
I II III II IIII if ll sw�-
- _ - _1\
uliilill�;4l,��1 � i ,= 1
riIr,lIjI((
llIll i m
II I IlO Irr
ll lI III IIIII VII�` l I I _ � li �=p°88 I
llll ill IIIII lIfl � I ( � ��p�R�
Illl ill Ill lull 1 / i Il4 � � �Oo
Illl illllll, �1l
?Jllllilll�l Illl / I 1 �• 4
i II II IIII IUi - � Elk —No
III �ii��l iJl �� Ia i _ 11 II --
lliil
II �Illll,t 111 I '1 1'
6d�
'
w
III
L
IIIII. e e Y���
III,
�!I�
III
77
III �1 pI e
((( l ) try
--
\
I I �
\ I
11

� M
0 N
00
0 \
Z
¢ N
r o
on
w
U O
} N
S �
a E
ZZ>
00 K
00 n
z fn w
�ZZ
�s�
o>m
Q w o
l z w
o
O 5
un O
ow U_
woa
sozeZ NN'auol�eyN 3EELe ON Paol-S i^LH L8 ON 6C3E
OOl# anuany wawal� b L L l
z z y joedual- I!q!UX3 PUeIlaM
Q V, = c ziybp e g T
Sluawnoo4 uoilonilsuoo Cl)
❑ - ��6d sailiadoad uoissiw sluawliedb an01anal
O O
Ll O
co l
N U)
� M
N M
M M
II cclyyl
Q Q
W LU
Q Q
Q Q
0 0
g g
LU LU
Q m Q
EJo
Q m Q Q�
K3 K 2
U
Q� ¢
¢ a�
a�
o
z
z
� :2
:E
E
~
oH
¢ g
F
LU
n rm
rm
Ln
J
w w a
3�
w o
3c
w
V-1

sozeZ NN'auol�eyN 3EELe ON PI-I-S i^LH L8 ON 6C3E
OOl# anuany wawal� b L L l
z z 8 joedwi- I!q!ux3 pUelleM CV
a�Fc®ae® °aoe s
W dam 'esti sluawnooa uollonalsuoo Cl)
❑ - ��6d sailjadoad uoissiw sluawliedb an01anal
} U U
N O O O ! 'Al,
Z
¢� U coco
o0
<4 m m w= E U
U_ O Q Q Q r Z '3S3
N N LU LU Q 2
d 0 Q Q U z wIg p o
J> Q < Z Q
Z j U U a< Y a
r
zo0, ° a a Z w �0 �'
W 3 oQ << 3
r<w LU o o as a
m m z z LU M ' me M
�o<
w_� a
w w �
o<m
<w
ICS
owe g
10LU
a w iV a
I
-D°
\ \ M \ X
\ m m
J
\ a\ I < 1 3 a
\ \ z < U
z
\< \ m a
i
\ w \ 19, of
w w o i
< Of
Ch
O Ofan d a V A \
�.O \ 0 0
o \ \ \ ~ \

STORM DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL
CALCULATIONS
FOR
Truelove Apartments
Sanford, North Carolina
Date: February 28, 2023
Revised: May 15, 2023
U R B A N
DESIGN
PARTNERS
NCBELS Firm #: P-2671
UDP Project No: 22-RDU-032
PREPARED BY:
URBAN DESIGN PARTNERS
150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1310
Raleigh, NC 27601
CARS
SO�
SEAL
028116
""'/A A,N10,,``'
05/25/2023

Table of Contents
1. Project Narrative & Summary
2. Soils Report
3. Precipitation Data/Rainfall Data
4. FIRM Map
5. Storm Drainage Pipe Calculations
6. Riprap Calculations
7. Temp. Diversion Ditch Calculations
8. Erosion Control Calculations
9. Permanent Swale Calculations
10. Drainage Area Maps
11. Downstream Culvert Analysis

1.
Project Narrative & Summary

SITE SUMMARY AND PRE -DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
Truelove Apartments is a proposed 7.23 acre 180 unit multifamily development in the City of Sanford, in
Lee County, North Carolina. The PIN is 966-27-0694-00. The existing undeveloped parcel is 7.23 acres and
is grassy field. The site currently drains from south to north and outfalls to Carr Creek. The adjacent
properties' stormwater devices, including concrete pipes, and a swale drain to a low point on the north
side of the property.
Per the USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey, the soil type on this project site are Dothan Loamy Sand, DoB and
Pacolet Fie Sandy Loam, PaF. Please refer to the soil information included in the report for further details.
As shown in the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 3710966100J, there are no jurisdictional flood hazard
areas within the development area.
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE NETWORK
The proposed development will capture stormwater runoff through a system of swales, inlets, and pipes,
that will channel stormwater runoff to the low point on the north side of the site. The swales were sized
using Hydroflow. The stormwater inlets and pipe network has been designed and analyzed through
Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension for AutoCAD Civil3D 2023. The system was sized for the 10-year storm
event and will safely convey runoff to the proposed drainage point. Calculations are attached to this
report.
A downstream 60" culvert crosses NC87 within NCDOT right of way. The culvert was analyzed using pre
and post developed flows. The culvert was found to have adequate capacity.
Rip -rap dissipator pads have been provided at pipe outlets and sized in accordance with the NC Erosion
and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. Calculations are attached to this report.
CONCLUSION
The plans have been designed in accordance with applicable jurisdictional regulations and the proposed
permanent stormwater management system is not anticipated to have negative impacts on downstream
or adjacent properties.
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL DESIGN
A two phased sediment & erosion control plan has been designed for the proposed site development. The
specified erosion control measures provide perimeter sediment controls via diversion ditches, silt fences,
and silt fence outlets.
A temporary simmer basin is designed for sediment control purposes near the northeast corner of the
site. The proposed erosion control plan is designed per NCDEQ's Erosion Control design manual.
NPDES stabilization plan is also included to identify the areas that need to be stabilizes in 7 & 14 days.

VICINITY MAP
4 VICINITY MAP 1"=1000'

ONE
pl�!..jfjj- �1
t
mu"Pw
Mm"
� sal
�X
t
1
SY _
`•ai���f"Fi
�i�yF9Fi
f %S. } ,Yr
y �t�
��q�d1
��
�9F
� V}�� k �.1-1-
':s�C}�/-�
Z a
M&W
12
1
oL.
os
1.
�+
'
/
`e
rl✓
Nam„
a6
rQ
%
-
a7 .
o
E 07
06 }
- 06
05 -
''
05
0
«
04 ,
asprQL
Q:
a,
3�
��
61
fiR 84 fi5 fib
u xnnvm uw u�r rxmw = w�a ¢
I -I _
o ■
w — O C7 O
SANFORD, NORTH CAROLINA 5154 1 V742 EDITION 4-DMA
67 68 89 w78 1 72 J3 74 ss 7
SGIE 1:f4M0
ELEVATIONS IN METERS
CgIT011R W16NLL 10 MFRPS
26
Site
21

A 2' D Ail I I I

2.
Soil Report

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Lee County,
North Carolina
October 27, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Lee County, North Carolina.............................................................................13
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes .......................................
13
PaF—Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes .............................14
References............................................................................................................16

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Z
0££bZ6£ 00£bZ6£
M„Z£,L o6L
-'
O
Q
N
Ad
N
L
:3 Q
O CO
w
O
'O U)
VJ
0 YS
U
o_
M „bb,L o6L
OCD36£ OOEV36£ OLZb36£
z
OLZbZ6£ ObZbZ6£ OZ7Z6£ 026t7MC
ObZb36£ OZ736£
N
O
Ln N �>
Z
N
A
_
W
L>)
>
X
Q
O
p
8
O
M
ti
p
(V
ai
C
dS
�
Q
Q
Q
O O
Z iiijc
M „bb ,L o6L
086bZ6£ 096bZ6£
z
N

a).0 L
a)
m
m
Q
a)
(n(n
U
0yU)
m
N
m
U O O _0
O
O
U 0
m
N
a) 7
C
O
a)
m 0
E
a)
-a Ln E
a) 'O U) 6
��—
U)O
N
C E
U
N
O
C
Z
m
E
a)
O
O
O if
N `) N a
m
(n
E
N
N-0 O
y
O
Q� `°
`° Co)
Q=�
U
m
o
�
U)
E
U)
N
0 2
O
U)
uO)
V`
6N
-a)==
EN
O C)
CL
m
OIL
70 O
a) U)
Q
UO
O
Q U)
�,
E
O
U W
N O O O N
CL
L
Q
i
U)
mOc
y E
U)
O
a
zm
N
O NQ
N my
CL
00
Z
N
0 L
O
a) 2
L '� m m
O-0
7 C
N
Q
N m E a)
N O
a)
m
'0
—
a)
2i
00
Q
0
m
.E.- V
Q
-0
J>
N O_'— O
C
>
J
a)
O
(6
E
Q
m D a)
a)
m
Z E
Q Q U
a) Q O
a) Utl)
a)
m
a)
a)
0 N 0
U)
m
E C y
>+ )
m
a) a) jp
aci
O) (6
m
m a)
E
O O N
a)
0 -0
O y
O_ N >+
a) U N (6 7
,U) '6
N
U)
.—
T
O '6 m O_
O
U)
C m N y
a) N E o)
O a)
3
U) °?
.J 3 C m m
U .O
U)
Q m
'C
O
cu
L C to E
Q m
U)
.30
C
E a) .c
N '6 y
N E
0= m
O C
E m U
O a
O p U 0
'6
O>
aa)
m CL 0
a)
m
N
O '6
2 L,
y O
m
2) O N
Q
a) 7
rn y
m U) 'O
y U O N m
Q a)
7 >+
U) a)
E O
O
� O)
o 'Q a) C
L N
E
a)
O '(n C U
a) a)
O a) O
m O n �_ U
L 46
0 7
O N
m
m
L
O
W E— U y
a E
(n > U
Q 'O Q m
H O
(n (n
(n
N
O t
H U .'= U)
Q
y
d y
R O
Li U
R
L
L
Q
>.
0
0
L
d )
Q
0
0 J N
CL E
U)CL
a) .0. O
m o M
O
� a
0 O
U) cn
Z
>
N L_ y
O cn cn
�
O
°
a)
S Z) :E
R m
U
3 a Q
0
R
N
R
O
0
C
p
O
Z
a
WR
4
R
5 R
fVn
�
F
m
W
J
y
a
a
0CL
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
E
R
y
Q
a
o
a
O`
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
Q Q
w
3 R
3 y
O >
>
°
w o
0 W
Q
_
`o
o
o
a R
R
R R y
LL 3
3
o U)w
a
> >
= o
a R w o
E
coi
O
o
Y o
U)
a
y
Q
o
cn
0 0 o
cn cn p m
o R
m U
o
U (7 (7
R
J J
y
a
o m
m U)
R >
U) U)
a
in U)
o
U)
w
a
R ❑
R +Vy�
■
y0 ❑ a i/
®
�ap�
<> { �
yp�
"V
`}
!
}�
y
Q
cn
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
DoB
Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
7.5
99.9%
PaF
Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to
40 percent slopes
0.0
0.1 %
Totals for Area of Interest
7.6
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Lee County, North Carolina
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t5z
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loamy sand
E - 10 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv1 - 40 to 60 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv2 - 60 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 60 inches to plinthite
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
PaF—Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3t6b
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
E - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 29 inches: clay
BC - 29 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 45 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F136XY820GA - Acidic upland forest, moist
Hydric soil rating: No
15

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
17

3.
Precipitation Data/Rainfall Data

10/26/22, 10:41 AM Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: Sanford, North Carolina, USA* ""�'°
Latitude: 35.447*, Longitude:-79.1275*
Elevation: 411.28 ft**
*source: ESRI Maps 'w,�w, �d
source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1
Average recurrence interval (years)
1
2
5
10
25
50
100
200
500
1000�
0.430
0.508
0.590
0.650
0.718
0.765
0.809
0.848
0.895
0.929
5-min
(0.392-0.474)
(0.463-0.561)
(0.537-0.651)
(0.590-0.715)
(0.649-0.790)
(0.690-0.841)
(0.725-0.889)
(0.757-0.932)
(0.790-0.982)
(0.814-1.02)
0.687
0.813
0.945
1.04
1.15
1.22
1.29
1.35
1.42
1.46
10-min
(0.626-0.758)
(0.740-0.897)
(0.860-1.04)
11 (0.944-1.14) 1
1 (1.15-1.41)
(1.20-1.48) 1
l(l.28-1.61)1
0.859
1.02
1.20
1.31
1.45
1.54
1.63
1.70
1.78
1.84
15-min
(0.783-0.947)
(0.930-1.13)
(1.09-1.32)
11 (1.19-1.45) 1
1 (1.46-1.79)
(1.51-1.87) 1
l(l.61-2.02)1
1.18
1.41
1.70
1.91
2.15
2.33
2.49
2.64
2.83
2.97
30-min
(1.07-1.30)
11 (1.29-1.56)
11 (1.55-1.87)
11 (1.73-2.10)
1 (2.10-2.55) 11
(2.23-2.74) 11
(2.36-2.90) 11
(2.50-3.11)
(2.61-3.27)
1.47
1.77
2.18
2.48
2.86
3.15
3.43
3.71
4.07
4.34
60-min
(1.34-1.62)
(1.61-1.95)
(1.98-2.40)
(2.25-2.73)
(2.59-3.15) 1
1 (3.07-3.77) 1
1 (3.59-4.46)
(3.81-4.77)
1.73
7 2.09
7 2.61
7 3.00
3.51
3.91
4.30
4.70
5.22
5.63
2-hr
(1.56-1.93)
(1.90-2.33)
(2.36-2.91)
(2.70-3.34)
1 (3.49-4.34) 11
(3.81-4.78) 11
(4.13-5.21) 1
1(4.87-6.25)1
1.84
2.22
2.78
3.22
3.81
4.28
4.76
5.26
5.94
6.49
3-hr
(1.66-2.05)
11 (2.02-2.48)
11 (2.52-3.10)
11 (2.91-3.59) 11
(3.42-4.24) 11
(3.82-4.76) 11
(4.21-5.29) 11
(4.62-5.83) 11
(5.16-6.60)
(5.57-7.21)
2.19
2.65
3.33
3.86
4.59
5.17
5.77
6.40
7.27
7.97
6-hr
(2.00-2.43)
11 (2.42-2.94)
11 (3.02-3.68)
11 (3.50-4.26) 11
(4.13-5.05) 1
1 (5.62-7.02) j
1(6.82-8.75)1
2.59
3.13
3.95
4.60
5.51
6.26
7.04
7.86
9.03
9.97
12-hr
(2.36-2.87)
11 (2.86-3.47)
11 (3.59-4.37)
11 (4.16-5.09) 1
1 (5.57-6.88) 11
(6.20-7.72) 11
(6.86-8.62) 11
(7.75-9.90)
(8.44-10.9)
3.03
3.66
4.62
5.36
6.39
7.21
8.05
8.92
10.1
11.1
24-hr
(2.82-3.27)
11 (3.41-3.95)
11 (4.29-4.98)
11 (4.97-5.78) 11
(5.90-6.89) 1
1 (7.40-8.67) 11
(8.18-9.60) 11
(9.23-10.9)
(10.1-11.9)
3.53
4.25
5.32
6.16
7.31
8.22
9.16
10.1
11.5
12.5
2{iay
(3.28-3.80)
11 (3.96-4.58)
11 (4.95-5.73)
11 (5.71-6.63) 1
1 (7.58-8.84) 11
(8.42-9.85) 11
(9.28-10.9) 1
1 (11.4-13.5)
3.74
4.50
5.60
6.47
7.65
8.60
9.57
10.6
11.9
13.0
3{iay
(3.49-4.01)
11 (4.20-4.83)
11 (5.21-6.00)
11 (6.00-6.93) 11
(7.08-8.20) 11
(7.93-9.21) 11
(8.80-10.3) 11
(9.69-11.3) 11
(10.9-12.8) 11
(11.8-14.0)
5
3.9(3.69-4.23)
4.75
5.88
6.77
8.00
8.97
9.97
1.0 1
12.4
13.6
4{iay
11 (4.43-5.08)
11 (5.48-6.28)
11 (6.30-7.23) 11
(7.41-8.55) 11
(8.28-9.59) 11
(9.18-10.7) 11
(10.1-11.8) 1
1(12.3-14.5)1
4.55
5.44
6.64
7.60
8.92
9.97
11.0
12.2
13.7
14.9
7{iay
(4.26-4.87)
11 (5.08-5.82)
11 (6.20-7.11)
11 (7.08-8.13) 11
(8.28-9.53) 11
(9.24-10.7) 11
(10.2-11.8) 1
1(13.6-16.0)1
5.19
6.19
7-A6
8.44
9.78
10.8
11.9
13.0
14.4
15.6
10-day
(4.89-5.53)
11 (5.81-6.58)
11 (6.99-7.93)
11 (7.91-8.98) 11
(9.14-10.4) 11
(10.1-11.5) 11
(11.1-12.7) 11
(12.0-13.8) 1
1(14.3-16.6)1
6.99
8.26
9.78
11.0
12.6
13.8
15.1
16.4
18.1
19.5
20-day
(6.57-7.43)
11 (7.77-8.78)
11 (9.18-10.4)
(10.3-11.6)
(11.8-13.4)
(12.9-14.7)
1 (15.2-17.4) 11
(16.8-19.3)
(18.0-20.8)
8.70
10.2
11.9
13.3
15.0
16.3
17.6
18.9
20.7
22.0
30-day
(8.21-9.23)
(9.66-10.9)
(11.2-12.7)
(12.5-14.1)
(14.1-15.9)
(15.3-17.3)
1 (17.7-20.1) 11
(19.2-22.1)
(20.4-23.5)
11.0
13.0
14.8
16.3
18.2
19.6
21.0
22.4
24.1
25.5
45-day
(10.5-11.7)
(12.3-13.7)
(14.0-15.7)
(15.4-17.2)
(17.2-19.2)
(18.5-20.7)
(19.7-22.2) 1
1(23.8-27.1)1
13.2
15.5
17.5
19.1
21.2
22.7
24.2
25.6
27.5
28.9
60-day
(12.6-13.9) IL
(14.7-16.3) JL
(16.6-18.4) JL
(18.1-20.1) j
(22.8-25.5)
(24.1-27.1) j
(27.1-30.6)
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=35.4470&Ion=-79.1275&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 1 /4

10/26/22, 10:41 AM Precipitation Frequency Data Server
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: Sanford, North Carolina, USA* ""�'°
Latitude: 35.447*, Longitude:-79.1275*
Elevation: 411.28 ft**
*source: ESRI Maps 'w,�w, �d
source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hourp
Duration
Average recurrence interval (years)
1
2
5
10
25
50
1 100
100
200
500
1000
5-min
5.16
(4.70-5.69) 11
6.10
(5.56-6.73) 11
7.08
(6.44-7.81) 11
7.80
(7.08-8.58) 11
8.62
(7.79-9.48)
9.18
1 (8.28-10.1)
9.71
1 (8.70-10.7)
10.2
1 (9.08-11.2)
10.7
1 (9.48-11.8)
11.1
1 (9.77-12.2)
4.12
4.88
5.67
6.23
6.87
7.31
7.72
8.07
8.49
8.77
10-min
(3.76-4.55)
(4.44-5.38) 11
(5.16-6.25) 11
(5.66-6.86) 11
(6.20-7.55)
1 (6.59-8.03)
1 (6.92-8.48)
1 (7.20-8.87)
1 (7.50-9.32)
1 (7.69-9.64)
3.44
4.09
4.78
5.26
5.80
6.18
6.50
6.79
7.12
7.34
15-min
(3.13-3.79) 11
(3.72-4.51) 11
(4.35-5.27) 11
(4.78-5.79) 11
(5.24-6.38)
1 (5.56-6.78)
1 (5.83-7.14)
1 (6.06-7.46)
1 (6.29-7.82)
1 (6.44-8.06)
2.35
2.82
3.40
3.81
4.30
4.65
4.98
5.28
5.67
5.94
30-min
(2.15-2.60) 11
(2.57-3.11) 11
(3.09-3.75) 11
(3.46-4.19) 11
(3.88-4.73)
1 (4.19-5.11)
1 (4.46-5.47)
1 (4.71-5.81)
1 (5.01-6.22)
1 (5.21-6.53)
1.47
1.77
2.18
2.48
2.86
3.15
3.43
3.71
4.07
4.34
60-min
(1.34-1.62)
(1.61-1.95)
(1.98-2.40) 11
(2.25-2.73) 11
(2.59-3.15)
1 (2.84-3.46)
1 (3.07-3.77)
1 (3.31-4.07)
1 (3.59-4.46)
1 (3.81-4.77)
0.865
1.05
1.31
1.50
1.76
1.95
2.15
2.35
2.61
2.81
2-hr
(0.782-0.964)
(0.948-1.17) 1
1 (1.35-1.67) 11
(1.57-1.95)
1 (1.74-2.17)
1 (1.91-2.39)
1 (2.07-2.61)
1 (2.28-2.90)
1 (2.43-3.13)
0.611
0.740
0.927
1.07
117
1.43
1.59
1.75
1.98
2.16
3-hr
(0.554-0.682)
(0.671-0.826)
(0.839-1.03)
(0.969-1.19)
(1.14-1.41)
1 (1.27-1.58)
1 (1.40-1.76)
1 (1.54-1.94)
1 (1.72-2.20)
1 (1.85-2.40)
0.366
0.443
0.555
0.644
0.766
F 0.863
F 0.964
1.07
1.21
1.33
6-hr
(0.334-0.405)
(0.404-0.490)
(0.505-0.614)
(0.584-0.711)
(0.689-0.843)
(0.771-0.949)
(0.854-1.06)
(0.938-1.17)
1 (1.05-1.33)
1 (1.14-1.46)
0.215
0.260
0.328
0.382
0.458
0.519
0.584
0.652
0.749
F 0.828
12-hr
(0.196-0.238)
(0.237-0.288)
(0.298-0.363)
(0.345-0.422)
(0.410-0.504)
(0.462-0.571)
(0.515-0.641)
(0.569-0.715)
(0.643-0.821)
(0.700-0.907)
0.126
0.153
0.192
0.224
0.266
0.300
0.335
0.372
0.422
0.461
24-hr
(0.117-0.136)
(0.142-0.165)
(0.179-0.207)
(0.207-0.241)
(0.246-0.287)
(0.277-0.323)
(0.308-0.361)
(0.341-0.400)
(0.385-0.454)
(0.419-0.497)
0.074
0.089
0.111
0.128
0.152
0.171
0.191
0.211
0.239
0.261
2-day
(0.068-0.079)
(0.083-0.095)
(0.103-0.119)
(0.119-0.138)
(0.141-0.164)
(0.158-0.184)
(0.175-0.205)
(0.193-0.227)
(0.218-0.257)
(0.237-0.281)
0.052
0.063
0.078
0.090
0.106
0.119
0.133
0.147
0.166
0.181
3-day
(0.048-0.056)
(0.058-0.067)
(0.072-0.083)
(0.083-0.096)
(0.098-0.114)
(0.110-0.128)
(0.122-0.142)
(0.135-0.158)
(0.151-0.178)
(0.165-0.195)
0.041
0.049
0.061
0.071
0.083
0.093
0.104
0.115
0.129
0.141
4-day
(0.038-0.044)
(0.046-0.053)
(0.057-0.065)
(0.066-0.075)
(0.077-0.089)
(0.086-0.100)
(0.096-0.111)
(0.105-0.123)
(0.118-0.139)
(0.128-0.151)
0.027
0.032
0.040
0.045
0.053
0.059
0.066
0.072
0.081
0.089
7-day
(0.025-0.029)
(0.030-0.035)
(0.037-0.042)
(0.042-0.048)
(0.049-0.057)
(0.055-0.063)
(0.061-0.070)
(0.067-0.077)
(0.075-0.087)
(0.081-0.095)
0.022
0.026
0.031
0.035
0.041
0.045
0.050
0.054
0.060
0.065
10-day
(0.020-0.023)
(0.024-0.027)
(0.029-0.033)
(0.033-0.037)
(0.038-0.043)
(0.042-0.048)
(0.046-0.053)
(0.050-0.058)
(0.056-0.064)
(0.060-0.069)
0.015
0.017
0.020
0.023
0.026
0.029
0.031
0.034
0.038
0.041
20-day
(0.014-0.015)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.019-0.022)
(0.021-0.024)
(0.025-0.028)
(0.027-0.031)
(0.029-0.033)
(0.032-0.036)
(0.035-0.040)
(0.037-0.043)
0.012
0.014
0.017
0.018
0.021
0.023
0.024
0.026
0.029
0.031
30-day
(0.011-0.013)
(0.013-0.015)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.017-0.020)
(0.020-0.022)
(0.021-0.024)
(0.023-0.026)
(0.025-0.028)
(0.027-0.031)
(0.028-0.033)
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.015
0.017
0.018
0.019
0.021
0.022
0.024
45-day
(0.010-0.011)
(0.011-0.013)
(0.013-0.015)
(0.014-0.016)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.017-0.019)
(0.018-0.021)
(0.019-0.022)
(0.021-0.024)
(0.022-0.025)
0.009
0.011
0.012
0.013
0.015
0.016
0.017
0.018
0.019
0.020
60-day
(0.009-0.010)
(0.010-0.011)
(0.012-0.013)
(0.013-0.014)
(0.014-0.015)
(0.015-0.017)
(0.016-0.018)
(0.017-0.019)
(0.018-0.020)
(0.019-0.021)
Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?Iat=35.4470&Ion=-79.1275&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 1 /4

4.
FIRM Map

Zak€bA e _ s sd Ash as d g
w s--' _ _ w egg p
go
J g�g§_¢P 1g2g2H4E��
& ag iH H g$ 91§ "g tE aff d f g va a
I
$%
d
flip
8
g
'
i
�u pas �LL EB`�
4 `as �� p€^a�;
€4; :g ye' "sis€
.H.I. a. e, ld�Tn
e° aC �=yg.�
s
5ba9�a�
�LLaa„ ;SPE fE l��ggLL
y a5gEB, a2 rocs^R €ys yBg�
"�f$5s E �`FER:
c � F •e ��am geasg cFp��=�§�`� � 9 s`E"s ;Yp��a�
Q 'v/ � ��ep 8� ��a&fig ���g§�a�� � �e&� ,�•° QmcQa�i
,8z
o $4 s=pH� e8 g� �g seEsge � �P `8 eQs %m E
a
¢ s 5 � �8z 8„F a'SSp' �`•efi S� 5 y
Fmea s35�zLL 4`yz s§ss'Ee s„- ; $$cE -
g28 i P 8 gcB �'
t29 gg yyfi

5.
Storm Drainage Pipe Calculations

Cl)
N
O
N
r
N
0
0
0
s
7
T
CD
N
0 00
LO
c�
V
O
T
E
Q
0
U
N
O
a`

co
N
O
N
M)
N
(6
0
_ N
L
O
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
C
C
O
I-
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
O
N Q
O
LO
w
wO
a0
M
LOO
LON
uJ
C
.-.
e
(4
(4
r
r
LO
V
O
M
LO
(O
C
J�
...
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
N
V
V
CDm
O
N
C
.-.
�
Lq
W
M
W
-
O-
-
�
-
E
♦J
V
v
LO
w
w
I-
M
M
00
I�
r
r
7
W
Z
cli
M
J
COO
M
NC?
N
LO
a
w
(4
(4
r
r
M
00
O
00
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
r
cli
�
W
M
O
�
N
V
Lq
(4
V
> 0
N
N
M
V
V
I-
M
M
LO
C
.may..
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
cli
r-
M
O
M
N Q
N
m
V
O
w
N
v
N
N
M
�-
N
N
o
I-
N
�
M
V
N
00Or-
00
V
N0
(
U
N
i Q
w
O
O
W
I�
V
V
M
LO
N
O
"=
U
U
(O
M
N
LO
N
N
00
N
N
O
M
M
Q 7
LO LL
w
O
O
00
00
00
LO
M
1�
M
N
U
.V..
00
LO
LO
N
M
N
N
(D
�
�
3
N
�2
O
LO
M
V
00
00
O
04
N
_o
II
w
N
M
00
V
V
I�
N
N
00
0
LL
.V..
I-
LO
4)
IZ
O
O
M
O
M
O
i
a
(0
r
O
N
I`
U
.V..
0')
Cl)
cli
LO
M
N
N
00
C
O
V
O
O
O
O
N
f�
N
N
Cl?
�
d
L L
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
N N
00
N
(0
(0
O
V
00
00
00
O
M
C N_
J (A
C
M
M
M
N
—
—
—
N
N
C D
22,
Q
Q
N
Q
N
Q
N
N
J
Q
a
a
a)
LL
a
LL
a
I?
LL
a
a
a
a
a
CL
LO
IL
m
QI
u
�
N
M
V
LO
(O
I`
00
Q
Q
m
O
O
O
O
ID
ID
CD(p
CD
co
�
�
�
�
C
U
LL
U
W
N
M
V
LO
w
I-
m
O
O
.O
C O
O
J Z
d
Z

E
Q
I
E
O
CO
N
4-
0
L
a
L
ww3+
VO
E
L
O
''-W^
V/
0
0
co
0
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
co ao c i ao co ao
N O O M O
}np V V V V V coO
mmmmmmm
M
p :ul 1960'gt7+C IRIS
N
UI M
In Q
E •Ul o
M
N
O
In
N
Ln
N
N
O
O
N
L
U
(0
ul Lo a)
;n O 0'
Z :U1
CD
O
LS')
N
O
UI
}n p
6:U1
w
o
J
Ln
ul N
6
II ej4n
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O o 0
.. coa2 r2 0 0 ao
N O
V V V V V co
a)W
il
iiiiiiii
III�IIIII�III�IN�����III
Illlllllllllllllllli��l����

0 0
0 0 0 0
LO o
Lri o LO o
}no v v
v v
N
N
L , u,
O
O
N
LO
ul
}n p
g :ul
0
LO -
N Iz
U
(0
N
0
0
LO
ul
;nt}
cj:u-1
LO J
W
LO
N J
ul
}n p
9t7'M7'13 UN
0 0
o 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
.. Lri o
N N
Lri o_ CD
0 O
w
IIIIIIIII
IIIII`1
111�11111
nnn��
IIIIIIIIII�III�III�IIIII
II�

E
Q
I
E
L
0
CO
^L
LL
4-
0
IL
L
3
cn
E
L
O
''-W^
V/
0
0
0
0
0 0
co
N
O
Ln
I-
co
O O
V
V
V
V
V V
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
;no 90'6017 '13 'nu1
99'967'13 w1N
S :ul - tr90'99+0 e3S
o �
� U
(0
N
v
0
Ln
O
co
tr
O J
N
w
O0 J
u1 69'9017 '13 'Au1
;no 9b'tr0b '13 'nul
2TH7'13 w1N
00'00+0 ejS
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
co�_
�
_
coN
O O
N
W

E
Q
I
E
L
0
CO
^L
LL
4-
0
IL
L
3
cn
E
L
O
''-W^
V/
0
0
0
0
0
0
V
O
CO
N
00
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
O
O
O
;np 9E'LO17l3 'nu1
99' M7 '13 wl2l
6 :ul - 99E'09+0 e3S
O
°O
0
0
O
LO U
o
N
O
V
O
M
O J
N
w
� J
ul 96'9017'13 'hu1
;no 96'9017'13 'nu1
ZO'9H7'13 MN
00'00+0 ejS
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
O
0
O
._. V
N
O
N
CO
N
00
O
V
O
a)
W

E
Q
I
E
L
0
CO
^L
LL
4-
0
IL
L
3
cn
E
L
O
''-W^
V/
0
0
0
0
0
0
I-
N
r
N
r
N
V
V
V
V
V
V
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O L
LO U
(0
N
3no 6Z'6017'13 'nul
H?'967'13 MN
06 :ul - 99E'Eb+0 BIS
0
v
O
co
o
a
IlS
tG
x
O J
N
J
W
cM
co
d
� J
u1 9V9017 '13 'AU1
}no 94'17017'13 'nul
9b' M7 '13 MN
00'00+0 ejS
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
O
.. r
N
N
N
r
N
r
O
N
O
a)
W

QI
E
L
O
-W
A
co
N
O
N
M)
N
(6
0
i
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
_ N
L
a0
Cl?
Cl?
Cl?
Cl?
Cl?
Cl?
Cl?
Cl?
Cl?
O
Cl?
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
C
C
I-
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
O
r
r
r
r
r
r
N a)uJ
N
(0
O
O
I�
O
O
O
V
O
O
V
V
O
O
N
� CL
.-.
e
�
M
�
�
�
�
�
a0
�
�
(O
M
V
(O
�
�
a0
c
�
J�
...
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
N
CD
CD
CDr
O
N
J
,..,
O
c0
U)
(4
It
M
U)
c0
O
c0
M
N
O
0)
N
M
(0
O
M
O
O
t`
r
O
r
00
O
M
r
00
N
s
E
0
v
r
m
I-
(4
r
00
00
O
00
O
00
O
O
M
M
r
r
7
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Z
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
(0
N
(0
N
W
J
M
O
O
c0
N
r
N
c0
(0
O
M
Q
=
v
00
O
M
r
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
M
r
M
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
O
M
U)
M
U)
N C
Ln
c0
c0
O
M
N
0)
(0
(0
c0
V
I�
(4
N
(4
> 0
N
N
V
V
(0
I-
m
m
M
V
V
Lo
m
Lo
Ln
Lo
Lo
C
.may..
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
U)
t`
O
(0
N
O
O
O
U)
t`
t`
a) CL
00
co
00
O
M
N
O
r
M
00
It
LO
00
I-
LO
00
v
N
M
V
6
I�
00
00
O
V
V
6
O
6
6
6
6
t
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
0)
00
N
Ln
00
V
M
N
LO
1`
V
00
O
U)
L6
N
00
N
Ih
V
N
Ln
M
0)
r
LI7
O
N
M
LI7
V
O
(0
U
i Q
w
O
N
N
V
M
r
O
O
a0
a0
a0
V
V
V
r
r
'=
r
r
r
U
0
LO
LO
N
LO
V
V
O
0)
N
Cl)
N
(0
O
I—
N
M—
N
r
V
O
-
O
O
V
c0
O
M
V
O
V
r
I-
00
I-
O
M
NO
(0
W
I—
V
U LL
.V..
�
V
Ln
r
r
N
N
r
r
r
r
r
}
O
0)
(0
h
LO
O
LO
I—
O
O
N
O
00
00
00
00
N
(0
r
3 am)N
c0
N
r
I�
M
M
r
Ln
O
00
N
O
W
O
W
II
l0
w
M
O
I`
M
M
N
O
O
O
O
V
O
LO
V
V
r
O
a
LL
.V..
00
LO
N
O
r-
LO
0
r
r
r
r
N
IZ
M
O
(0
O
U)
0)
00
O
I—
O
V
00
00
(0
(0
i
O
(0
Lq
O
c0
O
(0
r
O
c0
O
N
O
O
O
W
>
U
.V..
(M
(0
N
r
r
Lo
O
O
O
M
(0
LO
V
M
r
O
M
N
N
N
V
p7 La
M
a7
(0
00
O
N
M
O
O
O
O
(0
00
(0
0)
p
L d
(j
Cl?
O
Cl?
r
N
I�
r
O
M
M
O
0)
O
O
00
o
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
o
ce)
o
O
o
0
o
p
N N
O
00
00
00
00
V
00
00
00
00
00
cm)
C N
M
M
r
r
r
r
LO
LO
00
M
r
r
r
r
r
M
J (A
C
C
C
o
rn
C
o
o
U
\'
..
..
..
of
U
C D
a)
I?
N
I?
N
I?
a)S?
N
�
N
S?
N
N
M
N
c
CL
CL
°'
CL
sz
a
a
a
a
a
sz
a
CL
CL
a)
CL
�?
o
In
CL
u
�
N
0)
Q
M
V
CD
M
r
O
r
N
M
V
00
CO
U
0
p
�•
CD
O
O
CD
CD
O
O
r
O
p�
07
0)
'N
N
N
CD
p
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
[0
CO
N
m
CO
CO
m
}
CO
CO
c0
}
}
CO
N
N
N
N
U
C.)
m
C.)
U
U
C.)
C.)
U
C.)
in
m
}
U
U
U
LL
U
W
r
N
M
V
LO
(0
I�
m
O
Or
N
M
V
(0
h
.O
C O
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
O
J Z
CL
Z

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
00
N
CO
O_
V
a0
V
V
V
V
V
co
O
;n t}
g :u
0
0
v
0
M
O
O
co
ul
}n p
s :u-1
L
N
L
U
(0
N
ul
3nC}I
o
N
tr :u1
O
LO
O
0
J
W
ul
3n C}
4 :ul
0 Lo J
u1?
Il ern
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
._. W
N
N
N
O
O_
V
O
00
m
co
W
I

co
0 0 0 0 0 0
o ui o ui o ui
M v v v v
C} N In
8 :ul
O
O
N
LO
O
ul
In p
N
U
(0
a)O
0
0
� J
W
N
In p J
u�
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O
.. o ui o ui o_ Sri
M N N
a)
O
w
1111111111111
llll�lr
� :u
IIIIIIIIIII'IIYIII�I
IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII�I III

4-
0
IL
L
3
cn
E
L
O
''-W^
V/
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
V)
N_
O
M
co
V
V
V
V
V
V
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O L
LO U
(0
N
O
v
O
co
3no 96'9017 '13 'nul
L9'067'13 w1�1
tq .ul - zOv'sZ+O ejs
O J
N
W
� J
u1 69'9017'13 'nul
;no e$'Z0b '13 'nul
9tr'06713 MN
00,00+0 ejs
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
co
O
N
W

0
co
O
0
0 0 0 0 0 O
O O O O O o
V Oi V Oi V Ln Oi
N O O O
jnogw.��%V V V V V co
O
O
06 •ul M
u Ln
}n N
g :u1
O
iiiiiiiiii
Ln
N
Ln
11111111111111111111111IN
N
O
N
a)O
LS')
L
U
(0
o
N
O
O
ul
}n p
Z ;ul Ln
J
W
Lo
J
Lo
N =
ul
}n p
CDO O O O O
co
0 0 0 0 0 0
o
N O O O
a)
w
�
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIII

co
0 0 0 0 0 0
m �_ _ co
N N O O
V V V V V V
r-
t7 N }n
j:� :U
Lo
N
Lo
N
N
O
O
ultFL'9017 N
}np
Z6 :ul
CD
(0
N
ul
In() 0
66 :ul
J
O W
Lo
� J
N
ul
}n p
— — — 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
_ _
.. m �_ _
N
a)
N O O
w
III�I
IIIIIIIIII�IIIIIil�lllllll
!!!!!!!!! I II I I I A I I�

0
0
CR
0
0
0 0
o bo O
N
r2 of
O
Sri
O O
V
V
V V
V V
O
M
In O
16 :ul
N
M
ul
In 0
96:ul
o
M
ul
In Q
N
9 4 :ul
0
N
N
N
O
O
N
.�i
L
r (�
ul
In Q
o
E :ul
N
O
O
r
J
W
O
J
Ln
ul
N
In p
0
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
0 0
O o
.. _
N
r2 of
O
Sri _
O O
N
W
Illlllllllllllllllllliiiii����llllllll
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�III'IIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIII

N
m

0)
rn
IL
co
N
O
N
N
LO
0
_ N
L
CD
CR
W
a
CR
C
C
I-
r
r
M
N Q
O
:F
I�
a0
CO
N
=
J �
CD
O
J
CR
V
�
N
-0q
p
W
v
LO
0
r-
Z
V
V
V
J O_
Lq
(3�
V
q
W
v
M
r
V
V
V
N C
I-
M
a0
> 0
v
LO
M
r
C
NQ
M
a0
M
>
�-
N
N
N
0
CO
M
U
00
N
LO
LnCL
m LL
v
W
V
00
i
U
}
_o
3 w
O
N
O
O
II
l0
LL
v
O
O
O
Q
CY
rn
D
L
LQo
U
v
o
0
0
a>
c m
o
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
0) 0)
C N_
C
o
M
J (A
N
C
N
J
d
a
a
E
N
o
L9
VIILO
u
N
O
M
O
V
O
.�
N D
M
M
M
Cn
LL
C0
C O
N
M
U
W
o
J Z
d
Z

0 0
0
0 0 0
00
LO
N
O M M
V V
V V V
V
;np
o
8 :u-I
Ln
N
N
O
O
N
ul
Ln
;np
z :uI
0
U
(0
N
O
O
VI
}np
6 :u�
��
IN
IN
IN
IN
r-
J
O (7
Ln J
N (�
ul
d
Ilegn
0
0 0
O O
0
O
0 0 0
O O o
._.
W Ln
N N
N
N
O M M
a)
W
liiiiiii►�illllllll
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��IIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�lIIIIII
,

2
J
N
E
i
N co
CO N
0 O
0
N
i
W
LU
Ir U)
U
w
o
w
0
0
0
u
z
LO
r
z
U
rn
U
0
0
a)
o
T
o
OD
OD
O
U
NO
co
N
M
O
N
0
0
0
0
m
Q
U
z
U
�
w
m
�
�
o
a)
N
U
Z
U
�
o
O
-a
0
0
0
w
r
z
u
z
U
U
o
o
a)
U)
D
o
0
�
W
M
(o
O
N
r
(C
N
7
a)
O
O
O
M
i
Q
O
T
m
U
Z
U
a)
vd
�
OLNcF
JE
U
CJ
H
U
OD
O
o)
.600
0
u
rn
u7
z
U00
z
U
a)
o
o
C
O
W
O
O
U
co
r
O
LO
N
O
O
o
O
m
Q
U
z
U
O
CO
a)
NE•O
uU )
EU
C7
UW
rl-
M
O
N
Oo
N
ao
-a
0
0
0
0
zLOr
u
z
U
00
a)
a)
v,
D
o
�
o
M
T
OD
O
r
W
U
(C
O
a)
O
O
O
i
Q
co
O
m
U
Z
U
a)
to
a)
•�
to
>)
a)
—
E
U
E
H
U
C7
Z
U
rn
o
rn
w
.600
0
0
u
zLOr
z
U
U00
a)
N
o
o
�
�
O
W
O
o
U
�
co
r
O
co
CV
a)
O
O
O
�
Q
U
z
U
O
N
a)
O
>
c
E
U
E
U
U
(�
LO
Oo
N
O
(o
Oo
(O
ao
'000
0
0
zLOr
u
z
U
U-:
o
a)
ud
D
o
�0
o)
T
r
OD
O
O
0
O
a)
0
0
0
m
Q
Cl)
O
m
U
Z
U
a)Cl
vd
H
>°)��U
C'3
H

CO
O ZO
_� g
coo
d
N N J
2)� z V
0 > Q
C Z_
-0
LL
O J
2 W
r d
2
J
con. k-d ' :
C d
N
E
i
N co
CO N
0 O
0
N
i
0
LU
U)
w
Ir
Z
U
r
ao
N
o
7
Oo
.600
0
u
zLOr
z
U
U00
a)
N
o
o
�
W
O
LO
U
r
O
lC
(00
r
CV
N
O
O
O
00
Q
U
z
U
N
N
0)
2
O
>
co
ro
E
oE6
o
o
UM
(o
LO
O
OD
(o
00
co
'000
0
0
zU)r
u
z
U
Uco
a)
N
D
o
o
M
M
(p
O
O
M
o)
U
lC
03
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
U
i
Q
M
O
Z
U
N
N
>°)��
E
oE(5t
0
U
OD
O
OD
.600
0
u
rn
Lf)
z
U00
z
U
N
o
o
o
O
O
(p
O
O
N
0
r
O
o�
Q
U
z
U
N
CO
0)
+=
>
N
E
0Ec�
°�lc,
o
(�
M
OD
N
O
LO
OD
In
00
'000
0
0
zLOr
u
z
U
00
U
a)
N
D
o
M
o
�
r
OD
O
-'r
Lo
W
U
N
w
09
O
M
N
0
0
0
i
Q
co
O
m
U
Z
U
N
N
a)
•0
to
�
N
>°'��
—
E
oE
o
U
�
o
Lo
.600
0
u
zLOr
z
U
U00
a)
N
o
o
0
Oo
O
Lq
O
N
T
O
co
O
O
O
Na)
O
O
O
�
Q
z
U
N
N
0)
�
O
>
(
co
IL-Eo
0E
-
°
z
U
v
o
v
v
'000
0
0
zLOr
u
z
U
Uco
a)
N
D
0
0
M
Lq
�
O
N
r
U
so)
03
O
T
Na)
0
0
0
v
i
Q
O
T
m
U
Z
U
N
N
a)
Cl
=-
>
cl °l��
E
0Ec5�
o
U(0Do
o
�
.600
0
u
LO
uD
z
U00
z
U
N
o
o
OD
N
O
o
U
co
co
r
7
N
w
O
O
O
m
Q
U
z
U
N
N
0)
+=
'
NO
>°'�ILI�
cl
E
oE(.D
°
o
ULqo
(o
'000
0
zLOr
u
z
U
U
00
a)
N
D
o
o
�
M
�
Lo
O
-'r
M
r--
U
N
03
O
O
O
N
0
0
0
U)a
i
O
T
m
U
Z
U
N
N
a)
Cl
�
=—
•�0
N
>°'��
-cl
E
0E(D
00
U
N
r
co
M
.600
0
0
u
zLOr
U00
z
U
a)
N
o
o
LO
LO
LO
1-
N
O
O
N
O
O
O
OV
�
a
i
O
O
0
00
Q
U
z
U
N
N
0)
O
>
a)
E
()-0°o
(�
N
7
(O
(O
rl-
O
rl-
r-
'000
0
0
zLOr
u
z
U
Uco
a)
N
D
7
0
o
CO
N
f�
O
O
O
r
U
lC
03
T
O
Na)
0
0
0
(o
i
a
O
T
m
U
Z
U
(D
N
a)
Cl
>Q.
cl
E
0Ec5
o
Z
U
OD
O
OODD
OD
.600
0
0
u
z
U00
LO
uD
z
U
N
ol
o
To
OD
O
O
U
coS
OD
N
LO
O
CO
co
N
N
O
o
O
Q
U
z
U
N
CO
0)
—
'
NO
>°'wFz
E
0
°o
()
7
Oo
N
O
(o
Oo
(o
00
'000
0
0
zLOr
u
z
U
U
00
a)
N
D
o
�0
0
r
r
W
O
(o
N
W
U
N
03
T
O
r
N
0
0
0
tia
i
O
T
m
U
Z
U
N
N
a)
Cl
=—
0
to
�
N
>°'
—cl
E
0E0
MI

CO
o f
§j ®
2j0/
&\q
K2/�
B\a/
2> /
C13 Z
2 2
0
2 ƒ
�
j
\
§
_
§RGF
.6eee
�
LO $f
z
0
000
e
j
.1\\
�j§q\
Gr000
�
<
0
§
©
�
e
e}.
k
3£$°3
§==rU)
It
0
g
R
20000
a
z§f
z
0
oco
m
j
�\]
0
Snno
gkk]
<
<
§
\
§
0
Ia)}.
a)@
#
E
£%/3
§R3/
.6eee
a
z§f
§
O00
e
f
*\0
�j§§G
&2CIJ
w
\
�
§
©
CO
e
CL e/
GO
�
0
k°@#E
3£$°3
§nC\Irn
gCC)
OR
.CC)
20000
a
z72
z
o
o00
k
n
$\m
=o
NnTr
§0050
o
_
<
2
§
0
©
to
e
e}�
0
k°@#E
3
_Ed
Ekg7
.6000
�
LO $f
z
0
000
e
j
\0
�j&qR
&rood
�
\
§
©
e
e}.0
k
a)
§
#
cl
E
3£$°3
§0
g
.0
20000
a
z§f
z
0
oco
m
j
.1\\
r
OD
e
f
0
-
ropo
§
<
0
§
§
(D
U)
a)e}
CI
k
.
k
°
@
#
E
3£%/loll

CO
0 f
E2 ®
2j0/
&\q
K2/�
B\)
2\f /
C13 Z
2 2
0
2 ƒ
�
j
■
§morn
C�
.mgm
20000
a
z72
o00
z
o
k
*00
WR
)
eo
0
m
<
R
m
0
§
©
-
e
e}
k°@#E
3£%/3
0
cl
\\§\
2000
a
z§f
z
0
oco
m
j
�
0)
10
-
e.0
ropo
n
<
R
m
0
§
©
e
Cl
F—
k
k
°
@
#
E
00
E (5
§nr==
R
.R0R
20000
a
z72
z
o
o00
k
�\0
n
ASS0
,goo
2oae
\
m
0
§
©
-
e
Cl
F-
0
cl
k°@#E
3£%/3

r�
Riprap Calculations

• ©0®
� ©0®
�00�
-_--
-_--

7.
Temp. Diversion Ditch Calculations

m 0
k \
�/§
a$\
%//
. 7
© > k
D m 7
§krr
2 2
§
m
ƒ co
RC\j
_
§
m
G
m
/
§
>
\
■
B
\
EA U
ME
3
g
g
7 7
k
2
c 0 C) \
-0
2±
z
2
D
z
7z
/
>
§
\/\ \
k�
\
§
I /
2\
/
2 /> a
/
}
CO/ \ \ i
0
a
2
\
E
i
LO J
\
\ /
E §
o=
�@

\
2
�/§
a$\
%//
. 7
© > k
D m 7
§krr
2 2
§
m
JW
2q
�1\
ƒ
2
§
11
i
(D Cl
_ a
F 0
%\$
/7/
/ \ /
j $ $ $
2 E E E
j//f
I o 0 0
gd
E431
±
\
>
§
\
}
0
\
a)}\}\}\\\
[>\>\>�\\
\\\\\\##
a
�
3
\
/
f
S
7
&
\
c
�
\
/
/
\
>
m
\
\
\
\
t
a
a
a
Cc?
>
\
\
S
w
w
\
&
\
\
=
o
a
o
0
t
/
Z
f
\
a
w
a
a
a
\
j
\
\
<
a
w
a
\
NL\
U)
\

m 0
k \
�/§
a$\
%//
. 7
© > k
D m 7
§krr
2 2
§
m
JW
2q
co
ƒ
RC\j
_
§
co
/
/
a
a
2
0
//
:
y
M
� (
/
f
�
#
�
$ \
)
$
)
/
_
$ \ \ ®
0 \
a a a \
\ %
a
§ /
E
\
ak
/
R
�
g ~
a
a
�
2
<
/
±
cz
U) E
»
2SE/
\
2
>
<D\E
e§
&zz0
7\
/ / E \
E
/
/ / ƒ Li-/
cz
±
/
\
E
0
§
�
$
)
\
\

m 0
k \
�/§
a$\
%//
. 7
© > k
D m 7
§krr
2 2
§
m
cq m cq
$/
Rcq
$
q
§
.
j
0
5
0
g
7
E
w
§
LU
©f
/
�
\
\
\
k
\
m
G
m
\
n
>
\
2
§
■
± ƒ
7
[
C)
3�«
«_..
)
.U) n%—
(D \
© `
\
d
%D\ 2
}
e
E
© 2 I /
0
\
co :$& a
/
0
I
m / \ i
\
\
/
E
}
0 )
= a
�@
n
>
J§
M > \
> 2 m
© _ & 2
2 S / /
2 / ( ]
m E m E I

\
2
�/§
a$\
%//
. 7
© > k
D m 7
§krr
2 2
§
m
Mi 2
2$
�1ƒ
ƒ �
Rcq
$
q
w
>
0
_j ..
w /
0 \
±
\
>
§
\
\
}
}
0
0
k
k
c
_0
_0
�
a)0
0
0
e e
E
a o=
o
a/$$
E>ki>
0>_0VVA
v m
m
>oaa
v
#
3
3
\
\
§
f
\
\
\
&
Q
\
2
7
/
\
\
0')\
>
m
m
2
/
/
\
t
a
a
a
=
>
2
S
E
S
w
w
a
a
§
g
\
S
=
a
a
a
\
\
\
/
I
cr
§
\
k
\
U)
\
\ CO \ / y
/ \
\ �
)
ƒ
ca .
E D
E maa
@ = 7 $
\ -ao)
[ m § / \ y
ca / ± Cl
3$\//j/

m 0
k \
�/§
a$\
%//
. 7
© > k
D m 7
§krr
2 2
§
m
C
�$
co
ƒ �
Rcq
$
q
\ co
g
a
a
2
0
/ E
:
\
/
f
/
\
�
�\
G = t
75
>
7
) 2 ƒ
i §
\ \ 3 & \
E /
o a 2 $
00 a
%
a)®
§ d
-0
\
ak
m o
\�
0�
/
2
<
± /
\ *�
m } [
v
3 R ) /
_
C\l
e §
&za§
7\
/ \
\ / ƒ i
/
\
�
$
)
\
\

E:1
Erosion Control Calculations

Truelove Apartments Urban Design Partners
JOB NO.: 22-RDU-032 BY: MLH 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1310
DATE: 2/28/23 P.M.: SSM Raleigh, NC 27601
REVISED: Skimmer Sediment Basin Design
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
DRAINAGE AREAS/REQ'D STORAGE
dME
il DESIGN CRITERIA
Total drainage area (TDA)
9.95 ac
Proposed sediment depth
2.0 ft
Disturbed area(DA)
9.95 ac
Bottom elevation of basin
403 msl
Required sediment storage (1,800 CF x DA)
17,910 cf
Side slopes (H:V)
2 :1
Required surface area (325 SF per CFS 'Qio')
10,075 sf
Depth of flow over spillway
1 ft
Freeboard Heiqht
1.0 ft
BASIN CONFIGURATION
Bottom Elevation 403.00 msl
Top of Sediment Storage Elevation 405.00 msl
Spillway Elevation 407.00 msl
Top of Berm 409.00 msl
BASIN EFFICIENCY
Sediment Storage Required:
Sediment Storage Provided:
17,910 cf
20,075 OKAY
Surface Area Required:
Surface Area Provided:
10,075 sq ft
14,802 OKAY
PLANNED BASIN SIZE
(REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN)
Elev. Area SF Cumulative Volume CF
403.00
8,390
0
404.00
10,014
9,202
405.00
11,732
20,075
406.00
13,234
32,559
407.00
1 14,802
46,577
408.00
16,434
62,194
409.00
18,130
79,477
PRIMARY SPILLWAY DESIGN 10-YEAR STORM
DESIGN FLOW (Q=CIA) PRIMARY SPILLWAY DESIGN
Bare soil coefficient 'C' = 0.40 Spillway design: (L=Q/(C*h^1.5)); C=3.01 h= 1
Area 'A' = 9.95 ac
2 yr. storm rainfall intensity, 'I' = 6.1 in/hr Required Spillway Length 11 ft
2 yr Design flow, 'Qz' = 24 cfs @ 1.00 ft flow depth
10 yr storm rainfall intensity, 'I' = 7.8 in/hr Provided Spillway Length ft
Desi n flow from site, 'Q,o' = 31 cfs
BASIN DEWATERING - FLOATING SKIMMER
Settling Volume/Storage Required:
17,910 cf
Settling Volume/Storage Provided:
20,075 cf
Skimmer Size
2.5 in
Head on Skimmer
0.21 ft
Orifice Size
2.50 in
River Basin: Cape Fear
Dewater of Actual Volume 3.05 days

a
Permanent Swale Calculations

Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Post Construction
Swale on Northwest Edge
(10-yr Design)
Trapezoidal
Highlighted
Bottom Width (ft)
= 1.50
Depth (ft)
Side Slopes (z:1)
= 3.00, 3.00
Q (cfs)
Total Depth (ft)
= 2.00
Area (sqft)
Invert Elev (ft)
= 407.17
Velocity (ft/s)
Slope (%)
= 4.22
Wetted Perim (ft)
N-Value
= 0.020
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Calculations
EGL (ft)
Compute by:
Known Q
K
sown u (cts)
Area: 8.07 ac
11oyr: 5.26 in/hr
C: 0.80
Q=C*11oyr*A=0.80*5.26*8.07=33.96 cfs
Elev (ft)
Section
Wednesday, Feb 22 2023
= 0.86
= 33.96
= 3.51
= 9.68
= 6.94
= 1.29
= 6.66
= 2.32
Depth (ft)
410.00
2.83
409.50
2.33
409.00
1.83
408.50
408.00
1.33
0.83
37
_
407.50
407.00
0.33
dnA tin
-0.17
-0 67
2 4 6 8 10
Reach (ft)
12 14 16
18

Channel Report
Elev (ft)
0
417.50
417.00
416.50
416.00
415.50
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
South Side Swale
Triangular
Side Slopes (z:1)
= 3.00, 3.00
Total Depth (ft)
= 1.00
Invert Elev (ft)
= 416.45
Slope (%)
= 1.00
N-Value
= 0.020
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q
Known Q (cfs)
= 5.05
Area: 1.20 ac
11oyr: 5.26 in/hr
C: 0.80
Q=C*11oyr*A=0.8085.26*1.20=5.05 cfs
Section
Thursday, Feb 23 2023
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
= 0.70
Q (cfs)
= 5.050
Area (sqft)
= 1.47
Velocity (ft/s)
= 3.44
Wetted Perim (ft)
= 4.43
Crit Depth, Yc (ft)
= 0.71
Top Width (ft)
= 4.20
EGL (ft)
= 0.88
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Reach (ft)
Depth (ft)
1.55
1.05
0.55
0.05
-0.45
■rd:L^

10.
Drainage Area Maps

9oea -'a ,o o ZEELZ ON 'P,o;u-S f-H LS ON 6SZS
00 �« a��a�d
w —jo a...
z z .•; '"':':'ry�r ueId eaay ebeuiea4 WJOIS
�.
U'
co ?- s}uauanoo4 uoi}ona}suoo Lo
o-N„,;,:5•.. Sjuawa iedb anojanal os3d e 3da o a o o U
saivadoad UOISSIw
I.
j5
ONE
E C
soa

9oaea �N'auouey� ZEELZ ON'P,o;u-S f-H LS ON 6SZS
oo�«a��aw wawaio ou` ULld 25LUILJ(l 2ILM5`
s}uewnoo4 uoi}ona}suooLo
.Ud i
saivadoad uoissiw sjuawa jedb anojanal o - U - �
Jw
f
6Nz
6
K1
6$aW C
6f
/ OOwE
mm�
Ljl
LLJ
J6
QZ w
U
�IIL
l
I I
�I
II
i/
I
I
i
o
Q
w
�
a
z
a
<
o
i
0
0
w

9oaea �nl'auouey� ZEELZ ON'P,o;u-S f-H LS ON 6SZS
oo�«a��aw wawalo ou` ULId 2bLUILJ(l IJ2Aln'J
a�Z6 N
s}uG)wnoo4 uoi}ona}suoo Lo
saivadoad uoissiw sjuawa jedb anojanal o o�l�3d - U - �
Jw
f
K y'.
F \_
/ OOwE
mm�
J�
aZ
VLLJ
I
I
�• �1
�,i _ 551 I
\
Q
A
`.•
a
W
z
z
�
a
p
p
p
a
p
w
O
0
J
W
W
p
(n
�
a
0
a

11.
Downstream Culvert Analysis

Truelove Aprtments Urban Design Partners
JOB NO.: 22-RDU-032 BY: MILH 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1310
DATE: 2/24/23 P.M.: SSM Raleigh, NC 27601
REVISED: PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS
INTRODUCTION:
Pre- and Post -developed drianage areas for the culvert near site that goes under US 421.
DRAINAGE AREAS:
CURVE NUMBER:
(see attached drainage area map)
Predeveloped Drainage Area 29.43 acres
Postcleveloped Drainage Area 29.43 acres
Predeveloped CN
Cover Type
Area (ac)
®/
CN
Wtd. CN
Bldgs
1.81
6%
0.95
0.06
As
8.07
27%
0.95
0.26
Grass
19.55
66%
0.15
0.10
ITotal
29.43
0.42
lComposite CN IF--
Use CN
Postdev loped CN
Cover Type
Area (ac)
%
CN
Wtd. CN
Bldgs
3.60
12%
0.95
0.12
As
10.99
0.37
0.95
0.35
Grass
14.84
0.50
0.15
0.08
ITotal
29.43
0.55
lComposite CN IF--
Use CN =
0.55

Flow for Culvert Analysis
Pre -Developed
Q=(Curve Nuber)*(Intensity)*(Area)
Q25yr = (0.42)x(8.62)x(29.43)
= 106.55 cfs
Q50yr = (0.42)x(9.18)x(29.43)
= 113.47 cfs
Q100yr = (0.42)x(9.71)x(29.43)
= 120.02 cfs
Post -Developed
Q=(Curve Nuber)*(Intensity)*(Area)
Q25yr = (0.55)x(8.62)x(29.43)
= 139.53 cfs
Q50yr = (0.55)x(9.18)x(29.43)
= 148.59 cfs
Q100yr = (0.55)x(9.71)x(29.43)
= 157.17 cfs

Culvert Report
Pre -Developed
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Monday, Mar 13 2023
Pre -Developed US Hwy
421 Culvert
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 382.95
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 452.26
Qmin (cfs)
= 106.55
Slope (%)
= 1.07
Qmax (cfs)
= 120.02
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 387.79
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 60.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 60.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 106.55
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 106.55
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 6.37
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 8.88
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 386.92
HGL Up (ft)
= 390.73
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 392.22
Top Elevation (ft)
= 404.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 0.89
Top Width (ft)
= 105.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 100.00
B-C( )
9460�
4020�
39000
3B6.00
3pL.00
3]8 D]
Pre -Developed US Hxy 421 Culvert
- Depth Ih)
�421
221
1.A
b.]9
3]9
1-1(')

Culvert Report Post -Developed
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Monday, Mar 13 2023
Post -Developed US Hwy 421 Clvert
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
= 382.95
Calculations
Pipe Length (ft)
= 452.26
Qmin (cfs)
= 139.53
Slope (%)
= 1.07
Qmax (cfs)
= 157.17
Invert Elev Up (ft)
= 387.79
Tailwater Elev (ft)
= (dc+D)/2
Rise (in)
= 60.0
Shape
= Circular
Highlighted
Span (in)
= 60.0
Qtotal (cfs)
= 139.53
No. Barrels
= 1
Qpipe (cfs)
= 139.53
n-Value
= 0.012
Qovertop (cfs)
= 0.00
Culvert Type
= Circular Concrete
Veloc Dn (ft/s)
= 7.94
Culvert Entrance
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
= 9.87
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
HGL Dn (ft)
= 387.14
HGL Up (ft)
= 391.17
Embankment
Hw Elev (ft)
= 393.16
Top Elevation (ft)
= 404.00
Hw/D (ft)
= 1.07
Top Width (ft)
= 105.00
Flow Regime
= Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft)
= 100.00
B-C( )
9460�
4020�
39000
3B6.00
3]8 D]
Post -Developed US Hwy 421 Cl-e
- Depth Ih)
�421
221
1.A
b.]9
3]9
1-1(')