860030_Inspection_20230612

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: *— M
Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: r l(A l f f & L Owner Email:
—P
Owner Name: /►�l t 1� ��►'I nsoy) Phone:
Mailing Address: X " 161�
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 16`yj�_A Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: JU Integrator:
I 0 Certification Number: �� \ N IN
Certified Operator: ev
'e.,� �Ul'1{�S
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
^
Location of Farm: Latitude. �� 2l 4 Longitude: � l 1 I b
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer I I I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder L INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish f Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dais
Farrow to Finish I Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars jPullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other ITurkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: jDate of inspection.
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: 7
Designed Freeboard(in):
ii
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) /
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NI
waste management or closure plan? 7�
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 4
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes (} No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? /T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): > ��
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box. 77��
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑ Weather Code§� '�R
[Rainfall X ok Stocking Crop Yield KA 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Judge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/ 2/2020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with p rmjt conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes (� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. `r 1 V ,7�
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? J�
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings)of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
vzc) CN�' ICT,, 0 U
y cck 1l' 1�-'h_ �U� `��}c � . lY.6152 � (10��� " c�v� CI in
Stu d e s-I�1-vs? �}h �r ���i n s�ULg�
o ��
C GS �^- ,'���- � heccj 04-)
� �
10 q�S52cQ vA4<,Y-Na
J
(� 6-
C` k`� 2 �-�s fir, e S �l',S'� �� �-��ti eve �,n 1a+, e e M►x�>1 S a S
Q
3.u� 3 .2��' Sew � -Faf �` ✓��
Reviewer/Inspector N e: aoAcw KY I Si' 6 Phone: '��6 1j n��-
Reviewer/Inspector Signa Date:
2/2020
Page 3 of 3 511