WWW Farms 1 (1)

\I
— Lagoon Closure
Details
*Read the entire Lagoon Closure design packet before starting any work.
*Contact the NC Division of Water Resources at least 24 hours prior to beginning
the Closure operation.
*Attend the Pre Construction meeting prior to starting work.
*Insure the prescribed amount of gray water has been removed and applied on
an approved plan site. Insure the remaining gray water is present on top of the
sludge to match the Waste Plan prescription before agitation begins.
V
tr
6ce4�1 Lagoon Closure Plan
r Ni ltl y
S S� �� ..1 •4' ft. of water to be top of sludge before agitation begins.
Leg y oo•� ,`,,,;.� vr, • d-}'•-�- , a� W A,+e L. 4o b e O ry '�'riP a� �S'�K� Lc c�' �; o -v
c,j es4s c
*After agitation has been completed obtain a sample and have it analyzed before
land application begins. Review the nutrient analysis with the Plan author to
insure it is equal to the prior sludge survey samples or more dilute.
*If the agitated sample is equal to or the prior sludge survey samples then land
apply according to the approved plan. Insure all equipment operators are
informed of the maximum application rates and application locations.
*Observe all Buffers included on the application fields.
Stay 100 feet from any wells
Stay 200 feet from any non controlled residence/dwelling
Stay 25 feet from any streams or ditches and highways.

*See the Plan for application rates/field they are not all the same in each field.
*Do not apply waste on fields that are not included in the plan and do not exceed
the application rates/acres.
*Remove all waste from the Lagoon unless it can be determined the seasonal high
water table is above the lagoon bottom.
*Install a 12" ID PVC or 12" ID smooth inner wall driveway culvert pipe through
the lagoon dike as indicated by the Northampton Soil and Water Conservation
District Staff.
*Stabilize all disturbed areas by liming, fertilizing, seeding and mulching according
to the seeding specification sheet.
*Provide written application of waster records on the required forms for each
field where waste was applied.
I have read and agree to the components of this Waster Management Plan.
Operator a le r —Date"/ 2 112 3
Prin Nar1 e �/
Contractor ka 'V
Print Name
Da " a 7 /a3

WWW Farms Inc Lagoin Closure
212712C
This plan has been prepared for:
WWW Farms Inc
William Wheeler
1014 Golf Course Road
Lasker, North Carolina 27845
[phone]
This plan has been
DS - ATAC
Tim Etheridge
1939 NC Highway 30
Gree ville, North Caro
li
[phone]
n
Dever Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Clos re Cleanout
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and a
established in this nutrient management plan which ini
the farm named above. I have read and understand the
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
by:
27834
L �nffl� rAW1
in and maintenan procedures
an animal waste tilization plan for
-ed Specification concerning animal
/ it", / j - 7 .2 'y
Date
v 1,�-I. V 13
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications V the U.S.Departm nt of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of ractices adopted y the Soil and
Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: �iU•
Technical Specialist Signature
Date

WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
2/27/2023
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Closure Cleanout Only
Narrative:
WWW Farms Inc. Closure
Producer: William A. Wheeler Cell # 252-539-2151
Address: 1014 Lasker Golf Course Rd. Lasker, NC 27845
Operation Location: Located off Lasker Golf Course Rd. 1/3 mile west of NC 305
Type Operation: Feeder to Finish (Topping)
Number of Animal Units 1100
The operation was provided a notice of contract cancellation by Smithfield.
Converted to annual average capacity of no greater than zero swine with NC Division of
Environmental Quality.
William A. Wheeler has applied for Lagoon Closure Assistance with the Swine and Dairy
Assistance Program and has been approved for assistance for closure.
The operation has two lagoons to be closed where by the contents of the Lagoon will be measured,
sampled, mixed and land applied utilizing a properly approved waste utilization plan signed off by
an individual with the appropriate waste closure job approval authority with the NC Division of Soil
& Water Conservation and conforming to the rules and guidelines within the NRCS Technical
guide standards and specifications including but not limited to the NC Realistic yield expectations.
The Lagoon will be closed and transformed into a clean water pond with the appropriate spillway
devices as computed by the NRCS Area Engineer, which could be a pipe device or earthen
spillway or both.
The appropriate buffers for streams, wells, open ditches and residential property have been
identified and reduced from the planned land application fields.
The waste utilization plan was developed using 2022 crop year soil samples, which used the
Melich III sampling method.
The Ag Producer is Mark Lassiter and plans to grow full season manure soybeans in 2023 for all
fields planned for swine waste application.
3/2/2023 1:33:51 PM 1 / 1

Waste Storage Closure Source Description
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
SOURCE: Lagoon 1 Slurry
Date Measured: 04/21/2022
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 92.4 X 170.1; BOTTOM - 40.1 X 117.8; SIDE SLOPES - 2:1
Liquid Depth: 3.00 ft.; Liquid Volume: 188,785 gallons.
Sludge Depth: 3.70 ft.; Sludge Volume: 163,080 gallons.
Liquid Depth: 2.00 ft.; Liquid Volume: 216,076 gallons.
Sludge Depth: 4.00 ft.; Sludge Volume: 350,443 gallons.
Waste Sample #: FY23-
W003403
Waste Sample #: FY23-
W003403
Waste Sample #: FY23-
W003403
Waste Sample #: FY23-
W003403
U 1010
Lagoon 1 Slurry is an animal waste storage structure that is no longer in operation and is being closed as part of a
closure plan. There are an estimated 351,865 gals in this structure prior to closure.
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Application Method
(Ibs N/1000 gals)
Source Total (Ibs)
Injected
10.90
3,831
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
10.90
3,831
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos following
application
9.08
3,193
Broadcast
9.08
3,193
Irrigated
9.08
3,193
Max. Available PAN (Ibs) `
Actual PAN Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus / Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
3,193
8,451
(5,258)
931,280
(579,415)
Note: In Source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
3/4/2023 7:26:54 PM 1 / 2

Sources in Plan
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U 1010
Lagoon 1 Slurry waste generated 351,865 gals/year by a 0 Swine Lagoon Liquid - Feeder -Finish
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 0 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
3,831
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
3,831
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
3,193
Broadcast
3,193
Irrigated
3,193
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs) '
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
3,193
8,451
(5,258)
931,280
(579,415)
3/4/2023 7:25:53 PM 1 / 2

Waste Storage Closure Source Description
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
SOURCE: Lagoon 2 Slurry
Date Measured: 04/21/2022
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 92.4 X 170.1; BOTTOM - 40.1 X 117.8; SIDE SLOPES - 2:1
Liquid Depth: 3.00 ft.; Liquid Volume: 188,785 gallons.
Sludge Depth: 3.70 ft.; Sludge Volume: 163,080 gallons.
Liquid Depth: 2.00 ft.; Liquid Volume: 216,076 gallons.
Sludge Depth: 4.00 ft.; Sludge Volume: 350,443 gallons.
Waste Sample #:
FY23-
W003403
Waste Sample #:
FY23-
W003403
Waste Sample #:
FY23-
W003403
Waste Sample #:
FY23-
W003403
U 1011
Lagoon 2 Slurry is an animal waste storage structure that is no longer in operation and is being closed as part of a
closure plan. There are an estimated 566,519 gals in this structure prior to closure.
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Application Method
(Ibs N/1000 gals)
Source Total (Ibs)
Injected
14.55
8,235
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
14.55
8,235
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos following
application
12.13
6,863
Broadcast
12.13
6,863
Irrigated
12.13
6,863
Max. Available PAN (Ibs) '
Actual PAN Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus / Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
6,863
10,782
(3,919)
890,018
(323,499)
Note: In Source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
3/4/2023 7:26:54 PM 2 / 2

Sources in Plan
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
U 1011
Lagoon 2 Slurry waste generated 566,519 gals/year by a 0 Swine Lagoon Sludge - Feeder -Finish
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 0 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
8,235
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
8,235
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
6,863
Broadcast
6,863
Irrigated
6,863
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs) '
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
6,863
10,782
(3,919)
890,018
(323,499)
3/4/2023 7:25.53 PM 2 / 2

Planned Crops Summary
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon
■ IA�MA
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal
Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field,
where available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested
plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive
no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract Field Total I Wettable SMU LI Crop Name RYE Recom- I PLAT P205 (lbs/acre)
Acres Acres mended Rating Crop
PAN Removal Applied
548 — 1 29.1 29.1 CrB 8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 39 Bushels 150 Medium 31 NA
548 —
5
6
5.7
Be
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
35 Bushels
135
Medium
28
NA
631 —
1
1 7.6
7.6
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Medium
30
NA
632 —
1
1 15.7
15.7
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Medium
30
NA
632 —
3
5.8
5.8
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Medium
32
NA
632 —
7
17.5
17.5
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Medium
32
NA
632 —
10
3.6
3.6
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Medium
30
NA
632 —
11
13.8
13.8
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Medium
30
NA
633 —
1
28.7
28.7
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Low
30
NA
633 —
4
2.4
2.4
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Medium
30
NA
633 —
8
18.9
18.9
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Low
30
NA
687 —
1 11.5
11.5
CrA
8
3/4/2023 7:27:32 PM 1 / 3

Planned Crops Summary
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season 40 Bushels 154 Low 32 NA
687 —
2
2.6
2.6
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Low
32
NA
687 _
3
11.7
11.7
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Low
32
NA
687 —
4
0.8
0.8
Le
F8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Medium
30
NA
687 —
5
30.5
29.9
Be
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
35 Bushels
135
Medium
28
NA
687 —
6
13.9
13.9
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Low
32
NA
687..
7
26.7
26.7
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Low
32
NA
687 -
8
16.5
16.5
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Low
32
NA
687 —
9
5.6
5
Le
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
146
Low
30
NA
3021 —
1
10.1
10.1
CrB
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
39 Bushels
150
Low
31
NA
3021 —
2
16.9
16.9
Cr6
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
39 Bushels
150
Low
31
NA
3021
3
3.8
3.8
CaA
8
1
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
38 Bushels
148
Low
30
NA
6389 —
1
2.4
1.9
CrA
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
40 Bushels
154
Medium
32
NA
6389 —
3
5.3
4.8
Cr6
8
Soybeans, Manured, Full Season
39 Bushels
150
Low
31
NA
Totals:
307.40
304.90
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
3/4/2023 7:27:32 PM 2 / 3

Planned Crops Summary
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon
f'lLI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient None
<2 leaching below the root zone.
JModerate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> = 2 & < = 10 leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone. practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10 Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
Starter P application only
> 100
Very High
3/4/2023 7:27:32 PM 3 / 3

Soil Metal Indices
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
Lagoon sludge often contains high concentrations of zinc and copper. High levels of these metals in soils can adversely affect plant growth. The following table
provides a conservative(maximum potential) estimate for increase in soil index values.' Due to inherit variability of waste and soil sampling, it is
recommended that conservative soil target levels be set for copper (e.g. Cu-1 < 700-1000) and zinc (e.g. Zn=1 < 300 for land where peanuts may be grown; for
other cropland Zn-1 < 700-1000). Alternative application sites should be selected if the following table indicates that concentrations of these metals may
approach excessive levels. For maximum copper and zinc soil index limits, see the NRCS Nutrient Management Standard (Code 590).
Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sample
Crop
Source
Applic
Waste
Waste
Soil Test
Soll Test
Cu-I
Zn4
Estimated New
Number Date
ID
Inches
Cu ppm
Zn ppm
Cu-I
Zn-I
Adj.
Adj.
Soil Cu-I Soil Zn-
1
548
1
T548-1
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
169
136
192
121
361.00
257.00
Season
548
5
T548-5
10/7/21
Soybeans. Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
181
116
192
121
373.00
237.00
Season
631
1
T631-1
10/7/21
Soybeans. Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
126
161
192
121
318.00
282.00
Season
632
1
T632-1
10/7/21
Soybeans Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
98
129
192
121
290.00
250.00
Season
632
3
T632-3
10/7121
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
164
145
192
121
356.00
266.00
Season
632
7
T632-7
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
111
106
192
121
303.00
227.00
Season
632
10
T632-10
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
103
170
192
121
295.00
291.00
Season
632
11
T632-11
1017/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
103
125
192
121
295.00
246.00
Season
633
1
T633-1
1017/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
51
63
192
121
243.00
i
184.00
i i
Season
I
I
NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
3/4/2023 7 29 19 PM 1 / 4

Soil Metal Indices
` NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
3/4/2023 7 29 19 PM 2 / 4

Soil Metal Indices
633
4
T633-4
1017/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
100
165
192
121
292.00
286.00
Season
633
8
T633-8
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1011
0.22
138.65
172.09
63
77
192
121
255.00
198.00
Season
687
1
T687-1
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
43
30
111
108
154.00
138.00
Season
687
2
T687-2
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79,95
153.64
115
55
111
108
226.00
163.00
Season
687
3
T687-3
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
124
63
111
108
235.00
171.00
Season
687
4
T687-4
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
245
98
111
108
356.00
206.00
Season
687
5
T687-5
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
208
122
111
108
319.00
230.00
Season
687
6
T687-6
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
61
30
111
108
172.00
138.00
Season
687
7
T687-7
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
43
25
111
108
154.00
133.00
Season
687
8
T687-8
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
69
43
111
108
180.00
151.00
Season
687
9
T687-9
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
41
35
111
108
152.00
143.00
Season
3021
1
T3021-1
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
47
28
111
108
158.00
136.00
Season
3021
2
T3021-2
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
34
23
111
108
145.00
131.00
Season
3021
3
T3021-3
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
3
16
111
108
114.00
124.00
Season
6389
1
T6389-1
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
70
33
111
108
181.00
141.00
Season
6389
3
T6389-3
10/7/21
Soybeans, Manured, Full
1010
0.22
79.95
153.64
60
58
111
108
171.00
166.00
1
Season
NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
14/2023 7 29 19 PM 3 14

Soil Metal Indices
' NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
3/4/2023 7 29 19 PM 4 / 4

Waste Utilization Table
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
Res.
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
(Ibs/A)
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Field
Source
Total
Wettable
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract ID
ID
ID
SMU
Acreage
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
548 -
1
• 1011
CrB
29.10
29.10
Soybeans Manured Full
39 Bushels
4/1-9/15
150
63
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
174.06
0
Season
548 -
5
' 1011
Be
6.00
5.70
Soybeans Manured Full
35 Bushels
4/1-9/15
135
48
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
34.09
0
Season
631 -
1
' 1011
Le
7.60
7.60
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
59
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
45.46
0
Season
632 -
1
' 1011
Le
15.70
15.70
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
59
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
93.91
0
Season
' 1011
CrA
5.80
5.80
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
411-9/15
154
67
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
34.69
0
Season
• 1011
CrA
17.50
17.50
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
411-9/15
154
67
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
104.67
0
Season
M
' 1011
Le
3.60
3.60
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
59
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
21.53
0
Season
' 1011
Le
13.80
13.80
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
59
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
82.54
0
Season
' 1011
Le
28.70
28.70
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
59
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
171.66
0
Season
3/4/2023 7 28 15 PM 1 / 3

Waste Utilization Table
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
633 -
4
' 1011
Le
2.40
2.40
Soybeans, Manured, Full
38 Bushels
411-9/15
146
59
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
14.36
0
Season
633 -
8
' 1011
Le
18.90
18.90
Soybeans, Manured, Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
59
0
Incor.
87
5.98
0
113.05
0
Season
687-
1
• 1010
CrA
11,50
11.50
Soybeans, Manured, Full
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
154
69
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
68.61
0
Season
687-
2
' 1010
CrA
2.60
2.60
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
4/1-9115
154
69
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
15.51
0
Season
687-
3
' 1010
CrA
11.70
11.70
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
154
69
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
69.80
0
Season
687-
4
' 1010
Le
0.80
0.80
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
61
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
4.77
0
Season
687-
5
' 1010
Be
30.50
29.90
Soybeans Manured Full
35 Bushels
4/1-9115
135
50
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
178.38
0
Season
687-
6
' 1010
CrA
13.90
13.90
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
154
69
20
Incor.
85
5.97
0
82.93
0
Season
687 -
7
' 1010
CrA
26.70
26.70
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
154
69
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
159.29
0
Season
687 -
8
' 1010
CrA
16.50
16.50
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
154
69
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
98.44
0
Season
687 -
9
' 1010
Le
5.60
5.00
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
146
61
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
29.83
0
Season
3021 -
1
' 1010
CrB
10.10
10.10
Soybeans Manured Full
39 Bushels
4/1-9/15
150
65
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
60.26
0
Season
3021 -
2
' 1010
CrB
16.90
16.90
Soybeans Manured Full
39 Bushels
4/1-9/15
150
65
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
100.82
0
Season
3021 -
3
' 1010
CaA
3.80
3.80
Soybeans Manured Full
38 Bushels
4/1-9/15
148
62.6
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
22.67
0
Season
6389 -
1
• 1010
CrA
2.40
1.90
Soybeans Manured Full
40 Bushels
4/1-9/15
154
69
20
Incor.
65
597
0
11.34
0
Season
6389 -
3
' 1010
CrB
5.30
4.80
Soybeans Manured Full
39 Bushels
4/1-9/15
150
65
20
Incor.
65
5.97
0
28.64
0
Season
Total Apphed 1000 gallons
1,821.30
Total Produced. 1000 gallons
918.38
Balance 1000gallons
(902.91)
Total Applied tons
0.00
Total Produced tons
0.00
3/4/2023 7:28:15 PM 213

Waste Utilization Table
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
Notes 1. In the tract column - symbol means leased otherwise owned 1 Symbol' means user entered data
Balance tons E
3/4/2023 7 28 15 PM 313

Land Application Table
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
Manure
PAN
PAN
Liquid
Req'd
Applied
Manure
Applic.
Crop
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Applied
Amount
Source
Total
Wettable
PLAT
Applic.
Applic.
1000
(Inches/
Tract
Field
ID
SMU
Acres
Acres
Rating
Crop
RYE
Period
Method
N
N
gal/Acre
Acre)
548
1
1011
CrB
29.1
29.1
Medium
Soybeans Manured.
39
4/1-
Incorporated-4
150
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
548
5
1011
Be
6
5.7
Medium
Soybeans Manured
35
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
135
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9115
wks or less
following
application
631
1
1011
Le
7.6
7.6
Medium
Soybeans Manured
38
4/1-
Incorporated-4
146
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
632
1
1011
Le
15.7
15.7
Medium
Soybeans. Manured
38
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
146
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
632
3
1011
CrA
5.8
5.8
Medium
Soybeans, Manured,
40
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
154
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
632
7
1011
CrA
17.5
17.5
Medium
Soybeans, Manured,
40
4/1-
Incorporated-4
154
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
632
10
1011
Le
3.6
3.6
Medium
Soybeans, Manured,
38
4/1-
Incorporated-4
146
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
NOTE: ' indicates user defined value
3/4/2023 7 24 41 PM 1 / 4

632
11
1011
Le
13.8
13.8
Medium
Soybeans, Manured,
38
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
146
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
633
1
1011
Le
28.7
28.7
Low
Soybeans, Manured
38
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
146
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9115
wks or less
following
application
633
4
1011
Le
2.4
2.4
Medium
Soybeans, Manured,
38
4/1-
Incorporated-4
146
87
5.98
022
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
633
8
1011
Le
18.9
18.9
Low
Soybeans, Manured
38
4/1-
Incorporated-4
146
87
5.98
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
1
1010
CrA
11.5
11.5
Low
Soybeans. Manured
40
4/1-
Incorporated-4
154
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
2
1010
CrA
2.6
2.6
Low
Soybeans. Manured
40
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
154
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
3
1010
CrA
11.7
11.7
Low
Soybeans, Manured
40
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
154
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
4
1010
Le
0.8
0.8
Medium
Soybeans, Manured
38
4/1-
Incorporated-4
146
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
5
1010
Be
30.5
29.9
Medium
Soybeans, Manured,
35
4/1-
Incorporated-4
135
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
6
1010
CrA
13.9
13.9
Low
Soybeans, Manured,
40
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
154
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
NOTE: ' indicates user defined value
3/4/2023 7 24 41 PM 2 / 4

687
7
1010
CrA
26.7
26.7
Low
Soybeans, Manured.
40
4/1-
Incorporated-4
154
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
8
1010
CrA
16.5
16.5
Low
Soybeans, Manured,
40
4/1-
Incorporated-4
154
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
687
9
1010
Le
5.6
5
Low
Soybeans, Manured.
38
4/1-
Incorporated-4
146
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
3021
1
1010
CrB
10.1
10.1
Low
Soybeans, Manured,
39
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
150
65
5.97
022
Full Season
Bushels
9115
wks or less
following
application
3021
2
1010
CrB
16.9
16.9
Low
Soybeans, Manured,
39
4/1-
Incorporated-4
150
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
3021
3
1010
CaA
3.8
3.8
Low
Soybeans, Manured,
38
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
148
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
6389
1
1010
CrA
2A
1.9
Medium
Soybeans, Manured,
40
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
154
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
6389
3
1010
CrB
5.3
4.8
Low
Soybeans, Manured,
39
4/1 -
Incorporated-4
150
65
5.97
0.22
Full Season
Bushels
9/15
wks or less
following
application
NOTE: ' indicates user defined value
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure Summary:
Source Volume Available: 918,384 gals
Source Volume Applied: 1,821,297 gals
Excess Volume Remaining: 90( 2,913) gals
3/4/2023 7 24 41 PM 3 / 4

NOTE: ' indicates user defined value
3/4/2023 7 24 41 PM 4 / 4

Required Soil Test Values
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each
crop based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes,
these recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are
maintained.
Tract ID
Field ID
Crop(s)
pH
Lime Recom.
for Crop(s)
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper
Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc
Recommendation
548
1
6.1
0,0
169
0,0
136
0.0
548
5
6
0, 0
181
0,0
116
0, 0
631
1
6.2
0, 0
126
0, 0
161
0,0
632
1
6.2
0,0
98
0,0
129
0,0
632
3
6.2
0,0
164
0,0
145
0,0
632
7
6.2
0, 0
111
0,0
106
0,0
632
10
5.8
0,0
103
0, 0
170
0, 0
632
11
6.3
0, 0
103
0, 0
125
0,0
633
1
6
0, 0
51
0,0
63
0,0
633
4
6.1
0,0
100
0,0
165
0,0
633
8
5.9
0,0
63
0,0
77
0,0
687
1
6.3
0,0
43
0, 0
30
0,0
687
2
6.5
0,0
115
0,0
55
0,0
687
3
6.3
0.0
124
0.0
63
0,0
687
4
6.6
0,0
245
0.0
98
0, 0
687
5
6.6
0.0
208
0.0
122
0, 0
687
6
6.3
0,0
61
0.0
30
0, 0
687
7
6.2
0.0
43
0.0
25
0,0
687
8
6.4
0,0
69
0,0
43
0.0
687
9
6.3
0,0
41
0.0
35
0,0
3021
1
6.1
0.0
47
0.0
28
0,0
3/4/2023 7:30:12 PM 1 / 2

Required Soil Test Values
WWW Farms Inc Lagoon Closure
3021
2
6.5
0,0
34
0,0
23
0.0
3021
3
6.2
0,0
3
0,0
16
0.0
6389
1
6.4
0.0
70
0,0
33
0.0
6389
3
6.6
0.0
60
0,0
58
0.0
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal
Soil Test Index
Recommended Action
Zn
300
Limit application on peanuts. Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
500
Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
Cu
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH — 6.0.
3/4/2023 7:30:12 PM 2 / 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
s. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

2o. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

0 MRCS
United Sutes Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
NUTRIEN MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPP EMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Prepared for:
By:
Farm: Tract(s):
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
A
f p& e
Date: P.5 OZ/L023
ao e•,l Fw x sCT's
fertilizer and m nure application methods.
When precisio ag/variable rate application
technology is u ilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet or additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site ph ograph(s)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soi s information —such as dominant
soil map unti for each planned field —needed
to apply nutri ents at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment olanning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated n Litrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessa evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, mpost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommende tions must be made using NCDA-
similar guide ines and methodologies. Note:
high levels o soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to productior crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCD crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yiel goals for the crops planned for
nutrient appli tion.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 1 1 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYES) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable fate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
• Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be
provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where
Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary
variable rate P fertilizer
source appli
d on legume crops, additional N
will likely be i
ieeded to achieve RYEs.
The plan was d
3veloped based on the current
NRCS 590 star
and and Federal, state, or
local regulation
or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may
require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet
is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Mariagement
Plan.
NC PermittedPaste
imal Operations: For NC
permitted animal
DENR-DWR orDES
operations, the
utilization portion of the
Certified Animalaste
Management Plan
(CAWMP) must
requirements specked by
the Permit. The
NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance
on the required minimum
elements of a C
WMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest
1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
hlM://www.ncag rgov/SWC/tech/q
uidancedocumen
ts. html.
Nitrogen Lea,-hing
Index Values
Index values obtained throujgh
Nitrogen Leachi
use of current Scit
Hydrologic Group SHG -based
LI index maps in
Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil
loss calculations are included
in the Nutrient IV
ana ement Plan. SHGs per soil
lable through selection of the Soil
map unit are ava
Data Explorer and
Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil
Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of
nterest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil
Survey.
If the Nitro en Leaching
Index > 10 for planned
conservation practices must be
fields, appropriat
included in a conservation
plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the
field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conse
vation crop management
techniques and r
ractices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate
losses (practices also
documented in conservation
plan):
I ✓e,Qs
u� 4Ct r/ f q�rQ/r1G
a ✓e n-o f a �4 r
d ,0,
/"✓ 4,0
.10/ta m
page 2
*ej
M1

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
http.-Anutrients.soil. ncsu. edulindex. htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
httQ://www. ncapr. gov/SWC/tlsch/1217committee. ht
ml
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned area)
In NC, a field -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
PLAT Cate oric I Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term b sis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-ba ed manure application planning
and planning for o additional manure P.
Conditions that 41 require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT cal egorical ratings that will require
enhanced P appl cation planning are:
HIGH: P-based anure application is required
(limited to P upta a in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be pecified in nutrient management
plan.
Information:
Implementation a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be consequence of PLAT results,
or may be reque ted in order to lower soil test
phosphorus level .
Should a reducti n in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the ot ily currently proven method of
substantial P 'dra wdown' is to not apply manure -
based P and to p ant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently preset in the soil surface.
Crop specific est ated annual P removal amounts
are available on he NCSU Nutrient Management
in r website:
Conservation p ices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges ar effective in preventing
phosphorus mov ment from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss isk. These practices must be
included in the c nservation plan where
determined PLA risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the cons mvation plan developed in
conjunction with I he nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
hos horus AND nitro en loss risks. Application
management tec niques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be pres ribed below:
a,, o r
no - hfr le"_J,

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
I /pd �ZCQ.ty' �o "14
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm for third part application:
9 A? Z //n-r s hi rr
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
Waste reports fro the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equiv lent, are acceptable sources of
information for clEtermining applied manure nutrient
amounts for reco dkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and man ier required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plan tissue, water, manure, and
organic -product analyses resulting in
recomm ndations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of applici ition,
• weather onclitions and soil moisture at the
time of a plication; lapsed time to manure
incorpor tion; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional re rds for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps idE ntifying the variable application
source, t ming, amount, and placement of
all plant imtrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields ca i be digitally collected.
• Docume tation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based r ommended rates
• Documeiitation that applied phosphorus
and pota sium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests
• For non- ariable rate application of P & K,
provide pplied map with field boundaries
indicatin source, timing, method, and rate
of all app lications.
• Where 'c ilorophyll reader' technology is
utilized, pplication records that nitrogen
rates ma ch RYE -based N rates as closely
as possi r
.
page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 1 1 page 5

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Field Numbers: _1CdC'+11-- SLAB 1p IL-t TrdC4-*_1Ey - W Al
Tract 5u� Feld* 3 , Trac,+ Sq0 F,cld. 4-y � rack �5yg Ft eld# r'—
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 142 lbs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. I voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that I own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon clos a plan. (*Both11anowned and farmer/operator must sign.)
Owner* C))o -I-e t- Date
Farmer/Operator*
/j'�( �• �SSI�e �/ Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007 P 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts &Field Numbers: e,( Tr V+ _* 3-2 Fie,( 1( Trdc,+-� b3 I& tt.3
Trdc,4 &3;L Fe Id #- rr7, -1raC,t * b3 A. F, e,161 %-f 1 O, Trdc, -'!-(a 3-j R-e I 11
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 142 lbs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. 1 voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified abo a that I own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon clos g plan. (*Bo�Ondowner and farmer/operator must sign.)
D to
Farmer/Operator* M*L K 4 A-SS14e r/ Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007
p. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Field Numbers: 1 ract #7, 3 � Fr e l A � 1 Tra ♦+k r 3 3 t=, el d � � Trtt ci � (p 3 �e (d.}-
Trd�+*(¢33 F�eld.+k-8�i'rdc�F�-1o33 F�e(d.�ll ��
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 1421bs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
I understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. 1 voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that I own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon closure plan. (*Both landowner and farmerloperator must sign.)
Ow er"
1 i c�e� i s' Date
Farmer/ 'erator* M*a< 4A-SSI4dd/ Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007 P. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Field Numbers: - �t t�3G3G1 F;eld-A-1 'TrdC>I-tto 4�,
F�e lc1 3 Trc)c�1 66q c Id 82) %-�, ld, U-3-1 F',r,� a-y, Ws� F�eki �k(Q� �,�►3 +► 7. Fjet&4t�� Feld + �1
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 142 lbs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
pH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. I voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that 1 own or operate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon cl plan. (*Both landowner and farmer operator must sign.)
Ow1(a.
ner* 'L 3
A�
G�S� 1 Lr u�1)dXN I-�e;��s / Date Q % 1
ic.hd V � � /�1'V Lf •
` 3-3-2-3
iarmerlOperator* M.4`K 4A}5S/4e c-^,' Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007
p. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON A SITE
FROM APPLYING LAGOON SLUDGE
As part of either a lagoon closure operation or on -going lagoon maintenance, the attached plan
has been developed to apply sludge to the following areas:
Tracts & Field Numbers: T_61�+4 -4 30&A Rod* '
Trcl c+ # 30,11 field. # 3, ---�
While using animal waste as a source of nutrients for crops in lieu of inorganic fertilizers is an
ecologically sound practice, producers should be aware that sludge that accumulates in a lagoon
may have high concentrations of nutrients and/or heavy metals. Accordingly, the quantity of
phosphorus and micronutrients in the material to be applied may exceed the fertility
requirements of planned crops.
Metals. High concentrations of metals in the soil can impact crop growth or yields. The
application of lagoon sludge has the potential to significantly increase the concentration
of metals (particularly copper and zinc) in the soil. NCSU and NCDA&CS recommend
that alternative sites for waste application be sought when soil concentrations of zinc (Zn)
exceed 142 lbs/ac (Zn-I of 2000) or copper (Cu) exceed 72 lbs/ac (Cu-I of 2000). A Cu-I
or Zn-I of 3000 is recognized as a critical toxic level for some crops. For peanuts,
alternative sites are recommended when the Zn-I is 300, and a Zn-I of 500 is recognized
as a critical toxic level. Producers should be aware of the post -application Cu and Zn
concentrations predicted on the sites planned for sludge application. Additionally, soil
PH should be maintained at 6.0 or above to minimize risk of toxicity.
Phosphorus. Phosphorus (P) concentration in lagoon sludge may be high. Because P
adsorbs onto iron, aluminum, and calcium, the soil can bind and store excess P. When P
concentrations reach higher concentrations, there is an increasing potential for P to be
transported offsite and become a pollutant of surface waters. This transport may occur
through soil erosion, or as a soluble form in surface runoff or leaching. An assessment of
the risk for P loss to surface water is required as part of a nutrient management plan for
permitted operations or those receiving federal or state cost -share assistance. If the
potential for P transport offsite is high, then future application of animal waste may not
be allowed in a nutrient management plan. Producers should be aware that applying
lagoon sludge may limit the ability to use the site for future animal waste application.
Accordingly, applying lagoon sludge to fields that are planned for future waste
application as part of a nutrient management plan is not advised.
1 understand that applying macronutrients or micronutrients at rates that significantly exceed the
expected crop removal could limit the future use of the field as a waste application site, and in
some cases, negatively impact future plant growth. 1 voluntarily agree to apply sludge to the
fields identified above that 1 own or erate according to the attached nutrient management plan
or lagoon clo a an. (*Both 1 do a farmer/operator must sign.)
3r3-4.3
ner iCildrd �Qt-I��IG�iCI 1 Date Q A/ / �n
Farmer/Operator* A?.4`K 4 A-SS!'le e/ Date
NPPH, NC Supplement 2007-01, June 2007
p. 6