Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820236_routine_20230523(Type of Visit: (-Y(:ompliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U I ectxnical Assistance I Reason for Visit: 04outine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit:= — Arrival Time: v O L7 1 Departure Time: ► v County: Farm Name: �„ b*, Owner Email: Owner Name: % — r^ "'^_. Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: n &_jdc(J..%`i I/L Title: Onsite Representative: �jarz. c Certified Operator:�J�c.IGt�?�J Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Region: e__ Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: 100 6LZO Certification Number: Longitude: .777 Desigu Current Design Current,,Design Current Svviiie Capacity Pop Wet Poultry Capacity. s I'op Cattle Capacity fop Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars x6)YhPr Layer Non -Layer Desigii Current Dry Poultry, ' . Capacity Po Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes ,—� LJ o ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes D 1Q�o ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E]-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑"No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): &/`!' S6::& & 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [5] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes []`No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑r "No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes []-No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Eallo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E3"NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - 6 jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ET -No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2 No the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [�No 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ®'No Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [D'l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ED No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ®fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ®`No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE C6-M'ments`('tef6i'to°questi6n'°#) Uxpia n•any S answers and/or. any.add tionaLrecommetidattons,,or a �y:other comments Use drawings of f,acitity to better explain 'situations (use additional pages As, necessapy). ' Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: Date: 511212020