20230812 Ver 1_401 Application_20230610

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID#* Version* 1
20230812
Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes
No
Reviewer List: * Holley Snider: [e-mail]
Select Reviewing Office: * Wilmington Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type: * 401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
2/13/2023
Project Contact Information
Name: Heather LaGamba
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Lake Michael Trail
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (ies)
Orange
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
7127.2_Lebanon Rd_PCN_6.5.23.pdf 11.93MB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
PCN for 401 WQC
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:

• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
��nrii�t ,✓�..���iairrAii
Submittal Date: 6/5/2023
Is filled in automatically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2023 Begin Date (Date Received): 06.05.23
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Lebanon Rd
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description/Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Greenway/Sidewalk Connector
4. Property Owner/Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: City of Mebane
5. Agent/Consultant [PNC Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Bradley Luckey, Pilot Environmental, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location—Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
36.10904,-79.25156
8. Project Location—Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a]: 9825862705
9. Project Location—County [PCN Form A2b]: Orange
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Mebane
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Mill Creek
12. Watershed/ 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Cape Fear 03030003
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑ Section 10 and 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit ❑Pre-Application Request
0 Nationwide Permit# ❑Unauthorized Activity
Rurisdictional
Regional General Permit# ❑Compliance
Determination Request ❑No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

OF W A TF9
moo`' pG Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
o < DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s)of approval sought from the
Corps: ® Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP) number: NWP 14 or General Permit(GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No
1d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ❑ Yes ® No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ® No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Lebanon Rd
2b. County: Orange
2c. Nearest municipality/town: Mebane
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: City of Mebane
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 00068/00089
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if Mr. Chris Rollins
applicable):
3d. Street address: 7300 Lebanon Rd
3e. City, state, zip: Mebane, NC 27302
3f. Telephone no.: 919-563-5901
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Bradley Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address: PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip: Kernersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.: 336.708.4997
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9825862705
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.10904 Longitude: --79.52156
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 1.58 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water(stream, river, etc.)to Mill Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-III, HQW, NSW
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land and mowed grass right of way. Structures are not located on the site. The
site is located within a mixed use area of Mebane, Orange County, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.188 Ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial)on the property:
Stream=35LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a greenway/sidewalk connector between the Lake Michael Trail.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project is to construct a greenway/sidewalk connector between the Lake Michael Trail. The
greenway/sidewalk extension will require widening the existing Lebanon Road right of way. In order to construct the
sidewalk, it is necessary to have four wetland crossings and one stream buffer crossing. For development of the site,
clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during
grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/ ElYes ® No ElUnknown
project(including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: S
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? El Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Catherine Carston/Mihcael Brame Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project(including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to"help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed
project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams-tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps-404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent(P) (if known) DWQ—non-404, other) (acres)
or Temporary
T
W1 ® P ® T Fill/Construction Access ® Yes ® Corps 0.001/0.001
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W2 ® P ® T Fill/Construction Access ® Yes ® Corps 0.038/0.004
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ® P ® T Fill/Construction Access ® Yes ® Corps 0.010/0.010
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T Construction Access ® Yes ® Corps 0.001
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g.Total wetland impacts 0.050/0.016
2h. Comments: Wetland Impact 1 will permanently impact 0.001 acres (22 square feet)of wetlands associated with greenway
fill and temporarily impact 0.001 acres of wetlands (32 square feet)of wetlands associated with temporary construction
access.
Wetland Impact 3 will permanently impact 0.038 acres (1,675 square feet)of wetlands associated with greenway fill and
temporarily impact 0.004 acres of wetlands (202 square feet)of wetlands associated with temporary construction access.
Wetland Impact 3 will permanently impact 0.010 acres (490 square feet)of wetlands associated with greenway fill and
temporarily impact 0.010 acres of wetlands (415 square feet)of wetlands associated with temporary construction access.
Wetland Impact 4 will temporarily impact 0.001 acres of wetlands (35 square feet)of wetlands associated with temporary
construction access.
Areas of temporary wetland impacts will be restored to similar pre-construction grade and stabilized with native herbaceous
seed mix and biodegradable matting. Mitigation is not proposed for the net loss impact to wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER)or (Corps-404, 10 stream length
Permanent(P) intermittent DWQ—non-404, width (linear
or Temporary (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
(T)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Stream impacts are not proposed.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact(acres)
number—
Permanent
(P)or
Temporary
T
01 ❑ P ❑
T
02 ❑ P ❑
T
03 ❑ P ❑
T
04 ❑ P ❑
T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com fete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of pond (acres)
number Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer
impact Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
number— Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Permanent required?
(P)or
Temporary
T
131 ® P ® Greenway/Sidewalk ® Nos 238 914
B2 ❑ P ❑ ❑ Yes
T ❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ ❑ Yes
T ❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts 238 914
6i. Comments: Buffer Impact 1 will permanently impact 238 square foot of zone 1 and 914 square foot of zone 2 buffer
associated with construction of the sidewalk/greenway. Temporary impacts are not proposed. Mitigation is not proposed for
buffer impacts.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the project to replace an existing headwall to allow for construction of the greenway/sidewalk
without net loss impact to streams. The applicant is using 3:1 or steeper sideslopes adjacent to the greenway/sidewalk.
The 35 linear feet of Mill Creek and remaining 0.138 acres of wetlands are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and surveyed in the field. Sediment and erosion control devices and other best management
practices will be utilized during site development activities to prevent down-gradient sedimentation into waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts ❑ Yes ® No
to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes,mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? Low density%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Mebane
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ® NSW
❑apply (check all that apply): USMP® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ® No
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes"to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Impacts from wastewater generation are not proposed.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The attached IPaC report does not identify federally protected species that could be affected by the proposed project.
Therefore, we have made the determination the proposed project will have no effect to federally protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down-gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)to identify cultural resources of the site. The map does not
identify listed or eligible for listing properties on or nearby the site.A copy of the map is included as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NHFL(Drawing 4, attached)
Digitally signed by Bradley Luckey
Bradley
DN:cn=Bradley Luckey,o=Pilot
Enviromental,Inc.,ou,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS Luckey c U5l=[e-mail], 6.5.23
Date:2023.06.05 15:03:02-04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form—Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Proposal for Environmental services
Pilot Proposal 7127,2
February 14,2023
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
i
Property Address: 7300 LEVWVAl ;OD.
&AfA 4 A14 '273OZ
.Pine 482Seb Z7o5
Applicant Information
1
Name: !19644E
1
Address: /Ob 0, Gtl44#1A4,7 !LV -
a
r
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: fC e 0 dot"
Signature: Date:
i
I
4

THIS PUN DOES NOT PURPORT IS SHOW ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES,LINES,APPURTENANCES, \
ETC.,AND THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES,PIPES.VALVES,ETC.FI
SHOWN ARE IN LT APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN SHALL
DE DE TERMINE VERIFIED BY / ' \ �1 &24"RCP
(BY DROP INLET
THE OWNER OR THE ENGINE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT
AGREES ToOF ALL EXISTING SINEB,ONES,PIPES,ETC.BEFORE COMMENCING WORK,AND EX CI &24"RCP BY OTHERS)
AGREES TO S FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH L UNDERGROUND
RESULT FROM THE / \ �.• III III II TOP 612.16 / /
CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO ENA THE LOCALE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND O'WIDE HI-VISIBILIT)' PROP.10'WIDE / /
UTILITIES.PIPES AND VALVES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENCINEER/ARCHITECT OF INV-609.36 CROSSWALK CONCRETE
ANY CONFLICTS WITH EXIS17NG AND PROPOSED FACILITIES TO DETERMINE IF AN ITEM WILL 500-YR FLOOD \ III i� III PROP.3'DOUBLE /
NEED TO BE RELOCATED. < I1 (NCDOTSTD.1205.07) SIDEWALK
100-YR FL000 y, P - YELLOW LINES
THE EN MATERIALS ARE
HAS MADE ON EXAMINATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY HAZARDOUS 73 / \\ \ O I- O TOXIC MATERIALS ARE PRESENT OR CONTAINED IN,UNDER,OR NT THE ED THIS
T PROPERTY OR ITS }\--�\�
WATERS,OR O ANY WATERS IN OR TONIC MATERIALS HAVE CONTAMINATED THIS IA OTHER EX. Cl \ 24"Q4IC /
PROPERTIES OR ITS WATERS I ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. NO SUB-SURFACE EXAMINATION OF ANY TYPE \
HAS BEEN MADE BY THE ENGINEER/ARCHITEC7,AND ACCORDINGLY,NO OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR TOP-612.42 SIGN CURB'�P#
INFERRED ON ALL SUCH MATTERS.RE FURTHER,NO OPINION IS RENDERED L A ANY VIOLATION OF / NV.-608.92 �IYPE-1 MOD. ,' W w %
ANY ENVRONMENTAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS,EITHER FEDERAL,STATE,OR LOCAL RELATED 70 THE SIG IT CURB RAMP#
INFORMA770M SHOWN ON THIS PUN AND THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT IS IN NO WAY LIABLE FOR ANY \
VIOLATION OF SUCH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS SHOULD SUCH EXIST. BEGIN GAIT TRAIL, k• E 1 MOD. �3atH P�WV
PROP.DI NO.1 7L\
STA.0+00 TOP-606.00 \ _
EX.INV IN-603.80 /INV-604.51 Pq IDE DETECTABLE ® - 0 / EX. 12"
PROP.INV.OUT-603.30 1 WATER
WAROSI�DOMES,TYPE \ 0
PROP.30'CURB
GATE \- - - - - - - f LAKEMICHAEL WAY) ALTERNATE \l &GUTTER j{gMP#3 „.' /
IX CURB \ LIMITS OF w
INLET s09 \ CONSTRUCTION ` DISTURBANCE TYPE 1 MOD. 0 PROP CB N .2
TOP 609.5T /
KEY PAD � m ROCKINLET ENTRANCE sy CRAPE _ _ -� - g�0 !
L=50'W=6 '0 - �P r IN.OUT B03.00
O IX 612.16 _STAND PROP.8'WIDE II" SEDIMENT - \ MYRTLE _ LA SIGN T \
elaae IX.e,zte d/� � GRIT TRAIL � TRAP TYPE'C _ ` - - CRAPE y H 4 HD / PP
EX.611.04 e1213 -.-t d __ d01 y� RE 0
IX� EX CAB TO . B L PP 3H -- / / PP,.24%
e11.76 BE REMOVED �,�j --- �- ^IGNJ/ AoAY/ $R
efi.ef a CURBRAMP#t EXISTING _
(TYPE 1 MODIFIED) I BUILDING �GRA �-� D� \
d LE GQO
Bn.B1 L - - J ORNE /9 1- i '•^DMA / //
M.611.49 TEMP Y
m.m CONSTRUCiON SF-SF
\L-50',WENTRANC 8 2' PROP.�F�S \ __ 6 WIDE
f2ae +r p
LIMITS OF PROP.SILT
IX /
611.Ye DISTURBANCE 332122"RCP `'n " / FENCE,TYP �\ .60, --4p /EX /
_ \ INV-602.90 \ WETLANDS -FREE MAo ED SCOUR 1 3'-24"RCP
u HOLE WITH 20 LF / p 0.5�
SILT FENCE OUTLET
D PROP 'CURB
SILT BASIN TYPE'B'
CLASS t RIP-RAP PAD L=17, SI W?H PREFORMED SCOUR
W/TYPE4 FABRIC SILT FENCE OUTLET HOLE WITH 32 LF ADJUST FILL SLOPE TO 2.5:1 AT-
_ L=12' SILTFENCEOUTLET SIGN X STA.2+60 TO INSTALL SCOUR HOLE
T=78"
EX 610.84 Ex.efifo �.
610.37
GUARDRAIL NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
3 609.BB TRAIL STA.3+64=LEBANON ROAD STA.1+11 INSTALL GUARDR BETW L-2 UNITS N r� NOTE:C/L STATIO S ALONG L BANON ROAD ARE I I r TRAIL STA.7+99=LE ON ROA IL ST +52
B10.OB / II
FOR CROSS SECTIONS ONLY(SEE SHEET 5) I TOE 100-YR FLOOD
INV.-5\99.15 301 ---��
.eW 500-YR IFL000
PRO BN0.9B--
-�- -- ROCK �^ / --1OCKINLET-
�T -�� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ -PROP.HANDRAIL WITH DISTURBANCE OP TOP C
-�SEDIMENL� LIMITS OF -� -_ _ -"'�-
CURB RAMP#1 SEDIMEI4F-TRAPA'�' NPE'C PROP.30"CURB �_�
SCALE:1"=1d ' _� - TURNDOWN SIDEWALK 4+00 &GUTTER iR - -
�L �XC LSE IOR MATTING PRO 3A 3+00 OVER EXISTING CULVERT 3d-1 - _ _ - �- pROP.6'WIDE �.T.00 L 13 _ TOP
JN96TTOMOTSWALE _ 6 O _ ❑2 TELE -610- I __CO - - - NON ROAD ,6 T•1 GUARDRAIL END UNIT�
TOP-B08.4
_"Ll END NITS ry T-802.00 SIGN PEE SIDWALK - BANON RD STA,5+80± _
TRAIL ST +401- 2+00 >
�y _ CHAMFEREDC RB
i 93'-24'RCP 37-15 RCP Q SGN O _ - '- - -- _ SD
®0 B EX. P"WATER
CURB RAMP#2 ' PROP.CS NO.2 @0 S. ❑2
(1YPE TOP-609.57
eto.aD erase 1+00 INV.0OT�0� EX. 12'WATER
,
8f0.30 B10.fe 010.84 ' +, TOP
P(tl/N A ON
° � -��. � TAPER LENGTH E
a PED❑T - T "ALUMINUM PROP.&WIDE ,� m
a 30 !2
ALL
ti V \ � HALL w OE SF �
P- a eto. ti w y,-599.61 w -�' \ EX. 12"I SF S� SF_SF SF
1 .14 eoe ,u INV4f02.5SF .. \ WATER
etD.fe .elo.e7 - INV
- �� SF F
EO I
EX a�o.os ° 5F
EX 810.23 / :601.50 PREFORMED S4`
LL EX.Blase 0 / i 6 , \INV. ' SCOUR HOLE FENCE,TYP. ^ WETLANDS
�o PROP.RETAINING LIMITS OF
of PREFORMED WALL(SEE SHEET SILT BASIN TYPE'B' DISTURBANCE
SCOUR HOLE 6 FOR DETAIL) L-17,W=8',WITH SILT BASINTYPE'& I
s \\ T SILT FENCE B 6'SILT FENCE
PROP.20 LF-24"RCP Le12',W= WITH OUTLET,TYP.
cR" ,� B7 S E r7a EXTENSION INV:RIP-RAP
OUTLET,TYP. O SILT FENCE
Re 70 �,, OUTLET,TYP.
CLlP#3 C \ \ \ �l2"/ MER IN SCOUR HOLE CLASS 1 RA R IC PAD 1
'l1j\ W/TVPE 4 FABRIC
EX all \� \ &DISCHARG TO THE LOWEST T FLOODWAY \
IX BOD.61 L Ib \ 4CENT G�TO DRAIN
OP we.e7 eoe.eeM2 Bro \�\\ 9y \WETLANDS
800.85
eoeso INITIALLY INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG TOP OF SEE SHEET 2 FOR STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION
+ BANK EACH SIDE OF PROP.24"RCP EXTENSION SIGN&UTILITY NOTES: PR 0R.
301 I &INSTALL PER DRAWING AFTER PIPE EXTENSION Q, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY TO ADJUST CITY OF MEBANE
SEE SHEET 6 FOR PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE DETAIL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TO GRADE INSTALL 24"RCP EXTENSION WHEN NO WATER IS 1{EV(zUN S\C NS 1�X7� LEBANON ROAD CONNECTOR SIDEWALK&TRAIL
REMOV IPE / ❑2 RELOCATE EXISTING CHEVRON SIGN TO AS MEBANE, NORTH CAROLINA
} INSTA ED BY FLOWING IN DRY WEATHER DITCH,OR PROVIDE DIRECTED BY NCDOT
Oi ERS& s SEE SHEET 2 FOR TYPICAL SECTION DETAILS TEMPORARY CREEK CROSSING PUMP AROUND pE,O ,N�N� CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NC
IN ALL CB# / PER DETAIL,SHEET 8 ❑3 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE TO PROPOSED
SIDEWALK GRADE OR FILL SLOPE alley,williams, carmen&king,inc.
s A
" R • �Iu ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS&SURVEYORS
.W+ NOTE: ❑4 RELOCATE EXISTING STOP SIGN TO SHOULDER
740 chapel hill road o.
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE / ., nn pe p. box 1179
' WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF SCALE: 1" = 20' '126344 'Ji �I � ( burlington,n.c.27215 336/226-5534
MEBANE&NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �_�_J u U
AND DETAIL DRAWINGS. �.,.TAnnaEE":'GS,,F Firm's Engineering License No.F-0203
�,. DATE: JOB NO. 22011
REV.4113123-ADDED CB 3B&PIPE 7,SIDEWALK 4/1BY, PLAN SHEET DWON &-22011.DWG
CURB RAMPS#2&#3 TOTAL DISTURBED AREA-1.3 ACRES± DRAWN�' SHEET NO.
SCALE:1"-id ALIGNMENT TO PROVIDE 1.5-FT GRASS STRIP FOR TJN NO. 1
GUARDRAIL.ADDED GUARDRAIL. Q
01 20' 40' 60, 80' 100' REV.4121123-ROW LINE LABELED,PAVEMENT TAPER CHECKED BY' STA.O+OO TO STA.8+50 3
LABELED,2'CHAMFERED CURB ADDED. MDR OF 10

THIS PUN DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES,LINES,APPURTENANCES,
ETC.,AND THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES,PIPES,VALVES,ETC.AS
SHOWN ARE IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY -
THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEEV CHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT \ \ \ I T \� / ��
LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTT(ILITIES,UNES,PIPES,ETC.BEFORE COMMENCING WORK,AND11-146
AGREES TO'S FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE \ I �_ ` \ SADDLEEJ ROAD\
CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE 70 EXACTLYTHE LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND \\ \ �'^ \ \ \ \
UTILITIES,PIPES AND VALVES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINES ARCHITECT OF I V
ANY CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACILTRES TO DETERMINE IF ANITEM WILL \ �� EX. INV,-610.31
NEED 70 BE RELOCATED.
THE ENGINEETj/ARCHITECT HAS MADE NO EXAM/N4710N 70 DETERMINE WHETHER ANY HAZARDOUS OR �D�' -TOE �_
TOXIC MATERMLS ARE PRESENT OR CONTAINED IN,UNDER,OR ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR ITS \ \ \ I I � /
WATERS,OR IF ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC MATERIALS HAVE CONTAMINATED THIS OR OTHER TO I
PROPERTIES OR ITS WATERS IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. NO SUB-SURFACE ENAMINATION OF ANY TYPE \ Tp
HAS BEEN MADE BY THE ENGINEER/ARCHI7ECi AND ACCORDINGLY,NO OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR 11 1 �— I
INFERRED
ON ALL SUCH MATTERS. FURTHER,NO OPINION IS RENDERED AS TO ANY VIOLATION OF \ - �
ANY ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS,ERHER FEDERAL,STATE,OR LOCAL RELATED TO THE
INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT IS IN NO WAY L14BLE FOR ANY TOP —� TJ' \—
OOURON OF SUCH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS SHOULD SUCH EXIST. ��— ROCKINLETSEDIMENT SR 1306 o
/ TOP PROP. o.4 \TYPE'C WISILTBASINTYPE' LEBANON ROAD Ex. tz'waTER
M 'T'" Y�12',Web' J
_ 67S EX INV IN- — — ---�W w i WV
\ \ PROR IN-B08.7 n — — TOP
LIMITS OF PROP.INV.OUT- f0 _ _ 7 \ f„ /
SILT BASIN \ ROCK PIPE INLET \ PED — \ — — —T^P 615 W��--CW� E�W ��W TOE FH /
TYPE'B'
SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE TELE DISTURBANCE '—� T I 1`
EX, 12"WATER T p — — TOP —_W--w—w w SIGN \ /
W—w w w \ \
_ TOP \ \ /
Of TOE TOE )
�T w'�w TOE
w TO 0/
28'-16"RCP 613--
Q 1.07% JB 25
10
SF��SF zD
MV 08.60/ .ROP�. SF__SF
01.68% SSA, F/•
�� \ \P.TRAIDE\615\ SF�/5� 5��, .SF �F �,F
FENCE, 610 GRIT TRAIL
--- S .••""' �� ��O �_ --_SILT. W TYPE'B' Y
LSEE SHEET 2 FOR STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION \ " � % B SILTFENCE \MITS \ \ \ E\T/NG CHAIN /
CLASS}.RIP-RAP PAD�� OUTL 1,.TIP. DISTURBANCE\ 1 NK FEt E
\ 6 SILT FENCE WITYPE 4 FABRIC \ \ \
SEE SHEET 6 FOR PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE DETAIL - INV.-W7.3o 6�0� H/ \ L=16 I
IJNfrD(TCH WIT OUTLET,TYP. T-18..
\
CEL�S1Gf�MATT�/L
)00-YR FL,\00D
1 1/2"SKIMMER IN SCOUR HOLE 500-YR F,L00D
&DISCHARGED TO THE LOWEST P OVIDE 40 LF OF
ADJACENT GRADE TO DRAIN \ —6p5\ ILT F CE� /
1346
MDDL auB ROAD
T\ SR 13 w �' Ex.a
TOP-634.0215" INV
LE�iQNON ROA� \ \ \ \ .-631.41
INV
I \ \ FES —
EX-12'WATER — — \— of row_ of OP 15 / / / / \X\p
ry w r -6'S,0 / / .e,FH
I �\
I \ / Top
D ,
D
1 \ / 637
l / ao I I I gI I Q
—7 EXISTING WATER I I C
QUALITY DEVICE18*- I I I I 7J
INV.F63707 1 I PP
I
-644.60 /
LIMITS '� LIMITS OF / TW- / /
y. DISTUAB4N E PROP.SILT DISTUR CE •�A \ —/ /W 643.0 TOE / /gD TO 6
F - §��r11WNN 6' \ ✓ CRC TOP-644.54
SF SF F SF ` / / / FENCE,TYP. / / / PROPOSED 8 / 4t CON / ,O INV.-638.89
r • ���J', CONCRETE ��/ TELE
RETAINING WALL td• / �WV PED
\ HIV BW-640.30 /BW-644.88
TW-B41.7 tpP WM
1 EX IS (I / I ^TW-644.BB
TING CHAIN
I UN FEM;E h / 85
1-1 END GRIT TRAIL,
109 6p0 -1/EXISTING STA.1B+61x
HOUSE
SILT BASIN TYPE' - RO
• S BW840.17 APPXIMATELY 88 LF OF
J L=12,Walf,WITH . TW 642.17 EXISTING 8'WIDE
SILT FENCE / LINE ITCH WITH SF SF • I CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO
/I I OUTLET,TYP. / IXC LSIOR MATiIIJ� "�"�'� �F� BE REMOVED&REPLACED
J I I I
REV 4113123-NO REV.TO SHEET.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FOR:
CITY OF MEBANE
LEBANON ROAD CONNECTOR SIDEWALK& TRAIL
MEBANE, NORTH CAROLINA
6g Tenn CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NC
alley,williams,carmen&king,inc.
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BEINACCORDANCE ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS&SURVEYORS
€ WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF
MEBANE&NCD07 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SCALE: 1" = 20' 740 chapel•'' hlll load p.D.box 1179
m AND DETAIL DRAWINGS. I"O�' I ( burlington,n.c.27215 336/226-5534
ATt� ���____ __JJJUU Firm's Engineering License No.F-0203
YYY^^^ 1' C' DATE: JOB N0.
u 12834 ;:�L' 4112123 22011
•. bMEEP.'.t.P
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA-1.3 ACRES± yq °,.•' DRAWN BY, PLAN SHEET DNG NAME:22011.DWG
,•'aK�.,Di,..��'' WDF NO.2 SHEET NO.
o' 20' 40' 60, 80' too' CHECKED Br STA.8+50 TO STA. 16+61± 4MDR of 10

o —
SR 1306
LEBANON ROAD—
PERMANENT PERMANENT� i m PERMANENT TEMPORARY
WETLAND
IMPACT#2 WETLAND WETLAND
IMPACT#3 IMPACT#3
TEMPORARY
I.
�i tie WETLAND TEMPORARY
IMPACT#2 WETLAND
IMPACT#4
\ \ TEMPORARY
WETLAND \
IMPACT#1
\ \M PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
WETLAND PERMANENT AREA #1 22 SF
IMPACT#1 \ PERMANENT AREA #2 1675 SF
TEMPORARY AREA #1 32 SF
TEMPORARY AREA #2 202 SF
TEMPORARY AREA #3 415 SF
TEMPORARY AREA #4 35 SF
TOTAL PERM.AREA -2187 SF OR 0.050 AC.
TOTAL TEMP.AREA - 684 SF OR 0.016 AC.
TOTAL PERM. & TEMP.AREAS-2871 SF OR 0.066 AC.
alley, Williams, carmen 8v king, inc. _
CITY OF MEBANE SHEET NO.
m1m
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS LEBANON ROAD CONNECTOR SIDEWALK & TRAIL
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS 1
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 ALAMANCE COUNTY
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS MEBANE, N.C.
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: 219122 DWG.BY WDF PROJECT NO.: 22011 OF 1

' —
-30l- _
\ G WALL LEBSIR 1306
ANON ROAD — —
/ ETAININ BOX —
R� MENTAL ALLjMIN�M —
SED SE ISTING ea+ TOE
/ PROPO ENT TO EGUL/E j W ��- —
ADJA
SF/ SF
SF
j0? 1 \ F— SF FJ /
S J
1oE /
• a
W
TOP OF
/ \ BANK EXISTING
WATER
MAIN
a W FtOW -
SF �
N ZONE 1 NOT
ZONE 1 IMPACTED
a SF STREAM IMPACT ZONE 2
STREAM
S EXISTING ALUMINUM IMPACT
m BOX CULVERT
o �
N V/
ZONE 2
STREAM
Y ys IMPACT
FLOODWAY
N` \
y
U
\ STREAM IMPACTS
S ZONE 1 238 SF OR 0.005 AC
ZONE 2 914 SF OR 0.021 AC
J` TOTAL ZONE 1 &ZONE 2 1152 SF OR 0.026 AC.
alley, Williams, carmen 8v king, inc.
CITY OF MEBANE SHEET NO.
AA- ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS&SURVEYORS ZONE 1 STREAM IMPACTS LEBANON ROAD CONNECTOR SIDEWALK & TRAIL
STREAM IMPACT AREAS 1
F 740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 ALAMANCE COUNTY
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ZONE 2 STREAM IMPACTS MEBANE,N.C.
Firm's Engine-aring License No. F-0203 SCALE: I/" = 20' DATE: 612123 Dwc.By TJN PROJECT NO.: 22011 of 1

1�_ � �� `� \ , • alp~n -� � f :b
s� e
Ila
WI
Rpm
i. e• , S
op
slot— '•` .l sc
ff
! LEGEND
Site Boundary a'
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map ,'. Lebanon Road
Mebane, Efland, Cedar Grove, and
�l Approximate 1.58-Acre Tract
Burlington NE, NC Quadrangles fly �a ` Mebane, Orange County, NC
Scale: 1" = 2,000' P�L' T V L 1 A L. C Pilot Project 7127.1

lip
1.
All
q� •,� 1.:
• 1t�
All
t-x uh .1 .,
1 lit Nag ft
f r �"
R f ,
Age 9
r
L

J
R'
1
.00
4r
GqC
. .
•�� Gr 6 F
F
TOD AV
'I r Fb
sae p .
t
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2A Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey ,,.f,. -.�;,' .; Lebanon Road
of Orange County, NC ' " ``�` ti <r1 Approximate 1.58-Acre Tract
Published 1977, Sheet 13 ''. , Mebane, Orange County, NC
Not To Scale :' Plum Pilot Project 7127.1
hilVl E*v Y.V'/f�EN IAI. hC

•J 1
b
n
l
iw
1
r�f
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
+ Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
_ Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
i Riverine
Other
Drawing 3 NWI Map
USFWS NWI r��: •l low
\ Lebanon Road
r ►yr =-�' � �` Approximate 1.58-Acre Tract
Wetlands Mappera.., Mebane, Orange County, NC
Scale: 1" = 300' '"' g y
��L� Pilot Project 7127.1
. PILO l E*v t O N M i N T A l.I N C

° ' N
Oh
Nt
601.8
k
Zone AE
Zone AE
,on AE
Zone AE
44
•S ��a
PANEL
� 3�710982500L
'' eff. 11/17/2017
� � Zone AE
3�710 L 1
� eff. 11/17 0
1 �
LEGEND
} Site Boundary
1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
MR egulatory Floodway
~ Special Aoodway
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
�Areawith Reduced Risk Due to Levee
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
Lebanon Road
National Flood Hazard Layer
y ,j►ar =-�' , ' r Approximate1.58-Acre Tract
From FEMA Web Map Servicea �
Scale: 1" = 200' ,,, Mebane, Orange County, NC
17��.� Pilot Project 7127.1
. PILO l E*v t O N M i N T A l.I N C

5A WB 1-8 ~ �_
(35Lf) (0.108Ac)
. . J. • N` -
DP-1 • t
l
•
ti
i
L WA 1-9
(0.08 ac)
w-
lop
LEGEND
-• � - !�' �i-;FLAG NUMBERS/INFO Now Site Boundary.
Perennial Stream
WETLAND FLAGS=
STREAM FLAGS= Wetland
Stream Flags=2 wa 1-s Flag Number
Wetland Flags= 17
Total Flags= 19 DP 1 O Data Point
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR THE
NCDEQ-DWR.THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF JURISIDICTIONAL FEATURES.
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI ; �•. rft_ „; r Lebanon Road
and Pilot GPS Data r
Approximate 1.58-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 150' Mebane, Orange County, NC
Date: 03.10.22 PILOT Pilot Project 7127.1
h Il01 1*v tO NN f N T A 1.INC

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lake Michael Trail City/County: Mebane/Orange Sampling Date: 3/8/22
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range:
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): sideslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 0-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.10909 Long:-79.25067 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Georgeville silt loam(GeC) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
APT indicates conditions are normal(-10)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
—Sediment Deposits(132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 30 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 9 (A)
3. Salix nigra 15 Yes OBL Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5• Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
65 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 33 20%of total cover: 13 OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species 30 x 2= 60
1. Salix nigra 10 Yes OBL FAC species 80 x 3= 240
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 135 (A) 325 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.41
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. X 3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
20 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Carex intumescens 20 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Juncus effusus 10 Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/1 100 7.5YR 4/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Lake Michaels Trail City/County: Mebane/Orange Sampling Date: 03/08/22
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range:
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): sideslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 0-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.10912 Long:-79.25059 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Georgeville silt loam(GeC) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
APT indicates conditions are normal(-10)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
—Surface Water(Al) —True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
—Saturation(A3) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
—Sediment Deposits(132) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 30 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Ligustrum sinense 40 Yes FACU FAC species 60 x 3= 180
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC FACU species 115 x 4= 460
3. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 175 (A) 640 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.66
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
50 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Polystichum acrostichoides 15 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Lonicera japonica 10 Yes FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
35 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 18 20%of total cover: 7 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 10 Yes FACU
2. Lonicera japonica 10 Yes FACU
3. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
4.
5' Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147, 148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

taEH�CF Ty 17
Q PP F.yT riwAV4M ru'i r•
a United States Department of the Interior 4' ',
!, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
=RCH 3 �s Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: June 02, 2023
Project Code: 2023-0088817
Project Name: Lake Michael Trail
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species'presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

06/02/2023 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts)that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act(ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act(BGEPA)to
protect native birds from project-related impacts.Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.govibirds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

06/02/2023 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

06/02/2023 1
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/02/2023 2
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0088817
Project Name: Lake Michael Trail
Project Type: Commercial Development
Project Description: Sidewalk/Greenway Trail
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/(a)36.10900395,-79.2517613610861,14z
lr.TWcnR�
'i
e
Counties: Orange County, North Carolina

06/02/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 2 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile:httpss://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S)MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

06/02/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act!and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location.To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)in this area,but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.

06/02/2023 2
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(SCRs)in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern(BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.)A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

06/02/2023 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort —no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR }APPR} MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC s+++ 0+++ +++J f11� gil
++++Iiii jig j& iiii Iiii jil
Vulnerable am= =M
Chimney Swift ++++ ++++ 17 +� i I I I I I, i�111111 iii1111111++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON) l
Prairie Warbler ++1 BCC Rangewide ■■
++++ ++++ ++++ *A + +++} ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON) ____ _J miss.
Prothon
Warblerotary ++++ ++++ ++++ 1111
iiii
Ell 1111
++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON) +■ ■ y y
Red-headed I # I
Woodpecker I I I I y I I I + I ' ++ +T11 11;1 PIT ++++ AU ++++ VA 0+++
BCC Rangewide
(CON) + yy
Rusty Blackbird +++* +++ T+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++, 0+++
BCC-BCR

06/02/2023 4
Wood Thrush BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ +il' 0*0' till +," ,+++ ++1+ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
■ Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librar3r�/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator(RAIL)Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

06/02/2023 5
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC -Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

06/02/2023 6
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

06/02/2023 7
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Pilot Enviromental, Inc
Name: Bradley Luckey
Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
City: Kernersville
State: NC
Zip: 27285
Email [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

• F INC K INCS 11AI rik.. 11 © s JOSIMS10s JOKIS -JNcc ® SI !;JAI ® s INSIOs MEI II © SIjoF Ncc ® FINCPj * r H x +
E- G A nc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=79ea67lebdcc45639fO860257d5f5ed7 * 0 O
• NC RUCs © Soil Surveys by Stat...
_.
ce
��f • Q OR0882 Ri kiousE 1 f
.ram a•� . . ._ 1' e C
w f r A ''-
4bor
i„
• •� �� • OR 3 Rice House u. in
or r * s 1 .• ;
• r
IL
Ilk
low
♦ �► a i F
a �
Z.
#� lip .,.
r
•—
r NC CGIA, Maxar
IPaC.pdf Species List_Ralei....pdf IPaC.pdf Show all X
CC Q Search �i+ �76° UT 4)) �l 5 O
Mai6/5/2023 23

Brad Luckey
From: Heather LaGamba
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 4:29 PM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: Pre-File Notice - Lake Michael Trail (7127.1)
We would like to submit a Pre-filing Notice for the following project:
Project Name: Lake Michael Trail (7127.1)
Project Owner: City of Mebane
Project Owner's Address:
Project County:Alamance
Type of project/Approval Sought: 401 WQC, Pre-Application Request Meeting Declined
Thank you and have a wonderful day!
Sincerely,
Heather LaGamba
336.345.9536(c)
336.310.4527(o)
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
1

® ngiP Earth Pr
File Edit View Tools Add Help
Search ® l y o+ a i e ti 7 1 1 0 ® ® L
R�
bass rd rockingham county Search r
X btu
Get Directions History t MEBANE CITY OF
4 Bass Rd � � � MEBANE CITY OF '
-D
Parcel Number 982586270t
.Alternate Parcel Number
Owner Name MEBANE CITY OF (�
Improved Value 0
Land'Value 1896700 1
Parcel Value 1896700
* Mailing Address 106 INASHINGTON ST,
Mailing Address Unit Number -
Mailing Address City MEBANE
Mailing Address State NC 4
Mailing.AddressZip 27302
_ Full Site.Address y,
Id X Site Address Unit Number
Places Site Address City r _
GIS Acres 0
► hydro24k. ' Structure Indicator N
Multiple Structures N
Untitled Placemark ttW Last Sale Date 7/24/2020
► 6791_350 South_Wet Ver Ma 10.11.21 '
p_ - Last Sale Date Text 7f24±2020 12:00:00 AIv1 !
o•a 6tr aa9
7181_Spring�;rood Church Rd—Wet Ver Map_02.1... S!0 SR 1306 8 B PH 1 RETREAT.AT LAKE MICHAEL P122142- -
Full Legal Description
► ^�- 7181_Springvvood Church Rd_bVet Ver Map_02.1... 44
► Springwood Church IP_Off-site Alternatives_vv/Im... Tax Parcel Use Code
© 4J Temporary Places Tax Parcel Use Code Description - *C l U Pa
rcel Use -
7832_Nlontgomery Farms—Wet Delin Map_06.03.2... Second
Legend: VJtld Text Second Tax Parcel Use
j Description
<j Legend: PILOT Logo Type of'Value Reported Assessed
► 13 Intermittent_Stream Owner Type
► LD Perennial—Stream Record Area Number 260.540009
► LD Wetland Record Area Text
► L7 Pilot_Enviro_Boundary Revised Date <Null> ,
► d Culvert—Pt Source Document Reference Deed BookJPage 6670177
► L Stream_Pt Source Document Date 4jull>
► (13 Wetland_Pt . s Source Document Date Text
(� Subdivision Name
q All * + CI► . National Parcel Number 37135_9825862705
v Lavers County Name orange
County FIPS Code 135
!' ?' Primary Database State FIPS Code 37
C 0 Announcements State-County FIPS Code 37135
/ C Borders and Labels GPlIS Identifier 1008576
C O Places Information Source Orange County Assessor
► r - Photos Transform Date 502023
Roads Mailing Address Prefix
► ° 3D Buildings Mailing Address Numoer
► weather
THE l0[ATIONS OF FEATURES! Mailing Street Full Name
THE NCDEQ-DWR.THIS EXHIBIT l la,rinn Arirlrocc Rtr..t Kama
► �-: Gallery
► • ❑ MoreSAW
... �. r r t �: . r •
0, Search Q? �)) � 2:45 PM 0
6/5/2023