20230803 Ver 1_Three Oaks_Bennett Farms_PJD Package_10072021_20230605

5`p XERI*e f
o
0
Three Oaks Engineering, Inc.
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham,NC 27701
[phone]
October 7, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
ATTN: David Bailey, PWS
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
SUBJECT: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Package for Parcel PIN No.'s
792201050275, 792201255899, 792202767238, and 792204840294 located in the
Huntsville and New Bethel Townships of Rockingham County, North Carolina (Bennett
Farms)
Mr. Bailey:
Three Oaks Engineering, Inc. (Three Oaks) recently completed potential jurisdictional waters delineations
for Parcel PIN No.'s 792201050275, 792201255899, 792202767238, and 792204840294, which are
centered between Stokesdale, Ellisboro, and Witty's Crossroads in the Huntsville and New Bethel
Townships of Rockingham County, North Carolina (Figure 1). Three Oaks is a sub-consultant to Summit
Design and Engineering Services (Summit),who is under contract with LGI Homes, Inc. The study area is
approximately 525 acres in size and consists of agricultural fields,recent clear-cut forestland,planted pines,
and mature mixed pine/hardwood stands. Below and attached are a brief description of the project, figures
depicting all features, and appropriate forms.
Field assessments of the project site were completed by Three Oaks staff on the following dates: August 2,
4-6, 9, 11-13, 19, and 31, 2021. During these site visits, led by environmental scientists' Nathan Howell,
PWS,Byron Levan, and Trevor Hall, 70 potential jurisdictional features (41 streams and 29 wetlands)were
identified within the study area(Tables 1-2, Figures 2-5). All features are located within the Roanoke River
Basin (United States Geological Survey [USGS] Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 03010103).
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Stream Identification Forms were completed for
potential streams where jurisdictionality was in question. United States Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)
Wetland Determination Forms (wetland and upland) are included for each potential wetland. North
Carolina Stream Assessment Method(NCSAM) and Wetland Assessment Method(NCWAM) forms were
completed for potential streams and wetlands possessing characteristics conducive to them receiving lower
functional rating and mitigation values (Appendix B). Also included are a USACE ORM Data Entry Form;
Three Oaks Engineering tnreeMsenp-neermo cam

USACE Jurisdictional Request Form;USACE PJD Form;Agent Authorization Form; Real Estate Purchase
Contract; and a USACE Waters Upload worksheet(Appendix Q. Please see the following PJD Package:
Table 1. Potential jurisdictional streams in the study area
Stream Map NCDWR Best Usage NCSAM On Topo
Name ID Index Classification Classification Rating or Soil
Length
Number Survey
Jacobs Jacobs 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X1 Both 4,394
Creek Creek
Unnamed
Tributary
(UT)to S1 22-31 C Perennial X Both 1,002
Hogans
Creek
UT to
Hogans S2 22-31 C Perennial X No 3
Creek
UT to
Hogans S3 22-31 C Perennial X Both 1,761
Creek
UT to
Hogans S4 22-31 C Perennial X No 76
Creek
UT to
Hogans S5 22-31 C Perennial X No 154
Creek
UT to
Hogans S6 22-31 C Intermittent X Topo 293
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S7 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 15
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S8 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X Both 3,200
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S9 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 16
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S10 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 1,011
Creek
UT to Intermittent X No 426
Jacobs S11 22-32-(0.5) C
Creek Perennial X No 151
TbM 02b Ee*WWbR MreeMsenpmewnw om

0
Table 1. Potential jurisdictional streams in the study area (continued)
Stream Map NCDWR Best Usage NCSAM On Topo
Name ID Index Classification Classification Rating or Soil Length
Number Survey
UT to
Jacobs S 12 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 110
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S 13 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 64
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S 14 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X Both 226
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S15 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X Both 2,333
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S17 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 169
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S18 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 91
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S 19 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 83
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S20 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 132
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S21 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 158
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S23 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 556
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S24 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 192
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S25 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 82
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S26 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 240
Creek
Thm Otb MOOMM`1 ttireemsenpmewnw om

0
Table 1. Potential jurisdictional streams in the study area (continued)
Stream Map NCDWR Best Usage NCSAM On Topo
Name ID Index Classification Classification Rating or Soil Length
Number Survey
UT to
Jacobs S27 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X Both 1,647
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S28 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 73
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S29 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 1,058
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S30 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 88
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S31 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 52
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S32 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 919
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S33 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 1,461
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S34 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 40
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S35 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 68
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S36 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X Both 344
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S37 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X No 12
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S38 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 194
Creek
UT to
Jacobs S39 22-32-(0.5) C Intermittent X No 16
Creek
Thm Otb Mnoww`1 ttireemsenpmewnw om

0
Table 1. Potential jurisdictional streams in the study area (continued)
Stream Map NCDWR Best Usage NCSAM On Topo
Name ID Index Classification Classification Rating or Soil Length
Number Survey
UT to
Jacobs S40 22-32-(0.5) C Perennial X Both 7
Creek
Total 22,917
Note: Streams S16 and S22 do not exist.
1 —Streams possessing characteristics conducive to them receiving high mitigation and functional rating values are represented
by an"X".
Table 2. Potential jurisdictional wetlands in the study area
Map NCWAM NCWAM Rating Hydrologic Area
ID Classification Classification
W 1 Headwater Forest V Riparian 0.17
W2 Basin Wetland X Non-riparian 0.01
W3 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.17
Forest
W4 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.03
W5 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.15
W6 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.03
W7 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.04
Wg Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.12
Forest
W9 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.01
Forest
W10 Bottomland Hardwood Medium Riparian 0.02
Forest
W11 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.06
Forest
Thm 08b WNW* ttireemsengmewnwom

Table 2. Potential jurisdictional wetlands in the study area(continued)
Map NCWAM NCWAM Rating Hydrologic Area
ID Classification Classification
W 12 Bottomland Hardwood Medium Riparian 0.71
Forest
W 13 Bottomland Hardwood Medium Riparian 3.59
Forest
W 14 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.08
Forest
W 15 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 1.31
Forest
W16 Bottomland Hardwood Medium Riparian 1.27
Forest
W17 Bottomland Hardwood Medium Riparian 0.12
Forest
W 18 Headwater Forest Medium Riparian 0.42
W 19 Headwater Forest X Riparian < 0.01
W20 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.24
W21 Bottomland Hardwood Medium Riparian 0.26
Forest
W22 Riverine Swamp Forest X Riparian 10.48
W23 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.74
Forest
W24 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.06
W25 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.08
Forest
W26 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.01
W27 Headwater Forest X Riparian < 0.01
Tkm OYs EeOWSYp MreeMsenpmewnpcom

Table 2. Potential jurisdictional wetlands in the study area (continued)
Map NCWAM NCWAM Rating Hydrologic Area
ID Classification Classification
W28 Headwater Forest X Riparian 0.23
W29 Bottomland Hardwood X Riparian 0.73
Forest
Total 21.14
2 — Wetlands exhibiting characteristics conducive to them receiving high functional rating and mitigation values are
represented by an"X'.
If you have any questions, require additional information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please
contact me at [phone] or by email at fames.mason(ca threeoaksengineering com. Three Oaks is the
authorized agent for this project and is submitting this request on behalf of LGI Homes, Inc. This is a
request for concurrence with our assessment. We appreciate your assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
James Digitally signed by James
Mason
Mason Date:2021.10.07
18:24:48-04'00'
James Mason, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Three Oaks Engineering, Inc.
Cc: NCDWR Winston-Salem Regional Office
TOM Of OIOMM1N ttireeoilsenpmeennpcom

Appendix A
Figures
TbM 0mb EDVIOW I- ttireemsengmewnpcom

�_ h �,\NEEfte
Legend �' N Q - 2
aAw
Project Study Area Streets 5ft Contours 1
© Uwdnsvllle
D We 1 '�_. t CgRLT <,Q �'� ' Prepared For:
�OwRlDak
xKNIG� a
J l 4 .
1ftV
saon•Ysb SmOnglon W y - :� a Bar ..• ti - ''11 . �'�'�' ►- �.�
f ti w^fie'
;V J Q
Hlph oln 'i -w1NP _
Proposed
IL
_,"� + ► . °�'` ail Bennett Farms
Residential
DALE DR
Development
Project
2�4,te so,� :� ` V i c i my M a p
-52
W i
Rockingham County
m ..�
�� " r oe`� � -• North Carolina
RIDGE CT
V3
W y,. s. ✓ Date:
� �� �r%°�" � ,"� � ''tip. �'-''� r�--= � � � September 2021
l
O Q p j "~ , { Scale:
�i �y 0 500 1,000 Ft
ED<
� . �„ �� I, �• Job No.:
77
E HOME DR Ia ROCKWOOp ` 1"' 21-633
r" aWELCOM
1 1+
J R � *�� ' c `� �,.• 1' Drawn By: Checked By:
fir, Q t t' :1 NDH JSM
LIJ
CO
i i' r.. Y?
s" y
, '` Figure
PiC RIVER OAK ,,.
�00 OFtTNGRES�D .+• � J' , ;tia

N EERjy�r
:- Legend z
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS (Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation
T 11
-; - High : 943 iw4 9N��/�3N\�
Ma Grid Culvert Disturbed �.
Streets Intermittent ; Undisturbed - Low : 688
Prepared For:
AWA
' 5ft Contours Perennial y
,'/'` ': b
�� ' -{{{"����rs'-" yll`�f h� •,as � -.�. - '}✓�I'F r'^ i�, �-r0 • ��q�� � - •
- Proposed
I =------------- --- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - --� - Bennett Farms
-------------------�-------------------------------- -------�------------------------!
'_i.yA
I �:', ! ! ! ! ! Residential
Shee
She t 7 Development
!" f et 5 I I I I I p
� Sheet 1 I, Sheet 2
Sheet 6 I I Sheet 8 I Sheet 9
- - - - - - -------------
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - � Sheet
----------------- - -- ---------------- --r-------
Index M a p
Sheet 3 Sheet 4
fSheet 10
_ ! Sheet 11 Rockingham County
r------------------- - - - ---=--- —` - - -—-I I I I North Carolina
-------------------------- --------- ----------� '
I I
Date:
September 2021
Sheet 12 �
Scale:
0 500 1,000 Ft
Job No.:
i --------------------------I 21-633
' `,r�'• � � �t'� rr Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
1
Figure

5�*%NAEER1*6,
Legend � N
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS W Fn
--- Streets Culvert jj Disturbed 1 O
MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed •�
Perennial -------•---------------------------------1 ----------- ------------------- -------------,---------- - --------------I! f`�N�U33N�`���'S
1 i �
Prepared For:
I ` I
job
,
I I
I I
1
1
Proposed
Bennett Farms
1 • 1 e Residential
oP��o Development
.I }
silkJurisdictional
1` Y Features
— i o Map
m
s �
— i Rockingham County
f - North Carolina
W3
Date:
September 2021
Scale:
I I 0 100 200 Ft
i i I i I
I I
Job No.:
I - • i 21-633
i --J i Drawn By: Checked By:
1 � r i
' I W 1 NDH JSM
.r
` � l
I
--_-----------:- ------------------------ ------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------_--------- Figure
I �► ! S33
1 1
I I
Sheet 1 of 12

Legend - :; < N �6�NEER�,y�y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland W OUS
I •• 11,919
Lai
Streets Culvert Disturbed
�q�7I
2ft Contours Intermittent Cll� Undisturbed
MapGrid Perennial r "1�
-------------------,---------- - - -_-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ ------------
- •,,
W14
;.�� Prepared For:
"`s+5$�t�
r
2 gel An I
N
Proposed
I - I
Mee
I
:+
i �'•-, �';��� � - Bennett Farms
I I Residential
"e-
I I o
Development
I I �yo
! I r• i-1 •! le V ! }I ���w Jurisdictional
J
� w�•� � .� `� „� Y� �,' � Features
r ' I 0 Map
�:@�• r I "�� `� F� .�. .ate+._ s ;;�, `'� v . i Y
Rockingham County
a '' ! North Carolina
W3 ! �
( I
r#, /k� Date:
September 2021
l
Scale:
+ 0 100 200 Ft
I I I
.A
Job No.:
I I 21-633
Z
1 r-. _ i Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
law -
- _
- - - - - - - - - Figure
Awl
- ,411 4
Sheet 1 of 12

�6\NEERGC
_y
Legend , ' ' a< � `� ` t , `� .�#4t zy N y
'Je
., O
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOOS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation t`;, t7 e W n�
I----I High:943 '� ', (�`��r iir;�r �' � 1LAJ
Streets Culvert I�l7J I Disturbed = j t, + ( x N -. ;��' d a
L---I MapGrid Intermittent Undisturbed t a + '`
Perennial Low:688 --- ------ ------- �N�R�3N\`���'
WWW
Prepared For:
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
Proposed
Bennett Farms
o�- Residential
Development
I I �
o
I I , Jurisdictional
Features
°o Map
I I m
Rockingham County
North Carolina
W3 �
I I
j Date:
September 2021
I Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
1 1 1
Job No.:
_ 21-633
? _. Drawn y
_ D By: Checked B
w
_ _ „w ;� NDH JSM
L T ` .y '
-----t N ---- Figure
I S3 .
I I
Sheet 1 of 12

EERl*e
Legend j g�R NCR N c
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS C Lai rV9
Streets Culvert Disturbed
L---I MapGrid Intermittent VIA Undisturbed
Perennial
low
l Prepared For:
Joe
Ilip
Q
I I �
w
I z
( I m
COFFSIDE up,
v I Proposed
o ! Bennett Farms
i R = # J j Residential
aUP o ! Development
rn
CD
i J N N
of N N Jurisdictional
Q (PNP ! W W
! I w Features
I 0 c�
i Map
2 «
co ,
Rockingham County
North Carolina
W3 ,, Q
�
S6
Date:
! ,� September 2021
I
I
Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
TUR4VO I i
��C/R
I I Job No.:
21-633
BERT DR
I
i S5 '� r (_—_—_ —_—_—_---_ Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
• �►
--- ------------- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------- Figure
3 S3 rr
I Sheet 2 of 12

Legend ,� `4 cR ; j', -- - - - - N �6\NEER�,yer
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS 1 - - + - ! r i Lai �^
Streets Culvert �,I Disturbed
,p o
2ft Contours Intermittent 7d Undisturbed
MapGrid Perennial _I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - ------------------------------------------------
� ! I s I Prepared For:
ex-,I
LL-
Z
I
.� W
f u
I '�' P�-�DFL ►Y � �'- �p 1 ` f�L1�tD �. i .�
lT: � yam-
�P� Proposed
COIF SID M
i V.
^ ,y � o Bennett Farms
AV, ►_ . /y'°z. - Residential
.L ��PCR �, a.- -- Development
I r COP " �,r I p
J�� C. 9� , : m ;� �� ►, P�ER�N ; N N Jurisdictional
�� ,� ! Features
1
Y W, r rar vJn I •W
i! M a p
`
I A. aJco !,oJi AIM
f,
O
Rockingham County
I ! '
=� Vie• ��' North Carolina
; ' Date:
September 2021
r w
k`( A Scale:
T 0 100 200 Ft
URFwo
R Job No.:
{' 21-633
41`. 5 i ` - BERT DR I -
Li.f
S5 L- - - - - - - Drawn By: Checked By:
AL l� �
NDH ism
��py r'
' -------------- ' ------------------------- --- ------ ------------------- --------------- ----------------------- - - - - -------- Figure
Rr
I S3
Sheet 2 of 12

Legend
N �6�N EE RjNCr
g RDN Yam_ ► � +i � - o �� w+
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation i Lai �
--- ----I High:943 _ Lai O
Streets Culvert Icl�I Disturbed I a
Ma Grid Intermittent Undisturbed
- Perennial Low:688 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Avast sax'°- - - - - - - - - - - - ----------I
i
I
Prepared For:
I f t !
L
w
z
LU
D PLE I A
- �,;� C�IFFSIDE DR v I Proposed
Bennett Farms
' t R _ z ; Residential
P\SING ,, '�` z J . I Development
Lu NPC71 �N ; N CD Jurisdictional
> _ Features
�', I W Map
2
Rockingham County
I _
.. >tir ! North Carolina
3
.! -• ,� ,% � �C4 _' � '•f ��'► I Date:
I'
September 2021
y F
!/ ! Scale: 0 100 200 Ft
Job No.:
21-633
13ERT DR
/ S5 �_—_—_ _ _ _ - _ _ Drawn By: Checked By:
I ism
F;
NDH
WRIT
r r - sk
V V- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- �J 2!---r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - it - - - -1 - - --I
' I Figure
IN 1
Sheet 2 of 12

EERl*e
Legend ' N Q
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS I Lai �
Streets Culvert I____I Disturbed 44 a
MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _I Undisturbed j u 7`,
Nt
Perennial ------� ------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------I----------------- r5
' I
i I t i Prepared For:
S3
i
J
i U) • i
I f I
Proposed
Bennett Farms
1 Residential
Development
46 i s1 Jurisdictional
Features
z ; ; Map
- i r� q4 i Rockingham County
eFRTRD North Carolina
: _
I I Date:
September 2021
t Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
i
Job No.:
21-633
Drawn By: Checked By:
I { NDH JSM
- I I
MIDD ;
--------- ----------'-------LErDN
RD-------------------------------------------------- - -------------� ---------------k' -------+—- Figure
40
li�iUoZ3
LL<•
Sheet 3 of 12

� EERjy�r
N
Legend ,' �' y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS � �' ` ,� � . . � � r+m
Streets Culvert Disturbed
--- MA
2ft Contours Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed
MapGrid Perennial
{I �: (, �' 1 t ( _• _..« =w.__ Prepared For:
S3
;i
I z
w ,
a
Proposed
Bennett Farms
,r ; I Residential
,
y,
'r J v
Development
. �'I �� � � � — yam'%^�• I
S� Jurisdictional
Features
'.:• � i n ►'�' � tr {fir � ,�:
a' ! Map
q4eFRT �, +I / Rockingham County
topi Ro �' i North Carolina
Date:
September 2021
Y I 4 + I Scale:
s A i 0 100 200 Ft
IRW
No.:Job R' i. ,• .,i
21-633
' �/ ' �r;�,M 'f �-' � Drawn By: Checked By:
,�', f �• "� ;r,, '� NDH JSM
MIDCLETp !/RDDM
&'44gV
r,M, ' + 11 's
-------------------------------=- - - - - - - - - - - -- I L- - - - - ----- - - - - -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Figure
or r N'
�r, �' �^�' �,•,'�' �� roar J7J ,J
n,. , y •� 1 f d'''
W
z ` . 'f 1h o
"�' 7. Sheet 3 of 12

� EERl*e
Legend N Q 9,
0
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation : Lai �
Streets Culvert jLl�j Disturbed High:943 d a
MapGrid Intermittent Undisturbed
Perennial Low:688 ------- '- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - �N�R�3N\`��'�
r i
Prepared For:
S3
I I
i J I' •
Proposed
Bennett Farms
. a i Residential
Development
i
- s1 Jurisdictional
Features
I ,!I•` I
Map
Rockingham County
�4eFRTR� North Carolina
s 1! Date:
I I September 2021
Scale:
100 200 Ft
0 i I
r Job No.:
21-633
i Ah ' i , i Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
NRD - =='�---------------------------------------------------------1----------------- Figure
of
LU
Sheet 3 of 12

BERT DR j L N N\'GXNEEfte
Legend -- � ----- ��IA� �a
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS tI I W Fn
--- Streets Culvert jj Disturbed • A
L---I MapGrid Intermittent — — — Undisturbed
Perennial --------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ---------------------------- I `�N�U33N\`��'�
I
I I
• i Prepared For:
I
S3
I
I
W1
s
I I
S4
W1
! i I
I '
Proposed
I
Bennett Farms
�� ♦ ! Residential
i Development
I � I
I I
I
I y
Q I
s1 — 2��� tiFsA _ dew �Q Jurisdictional
I
U) Features
• _ ' a Map
I I
S2
I , !
!
Rockingham County
North Carolina
I I
won
I
!
I Date:
September 2021
-vow i
I
I i Scale: 0 100 200 Ft
a
Job No.:
21-633
I
i Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
I 1
I
! !
------------------I--- -----------------------'------------------------ ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------—---- Figure
STONEY RIDGE CT .
A I 1 3
Sheet 4 of 12

Legend ,ftr M' i't*� a " BERT DR 7j'I- - - N S l
•-:a '""-+I►,;s�`"�4_ �t„» _� �`` �' � x A + ��7I� �
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS 1 ", ` � ; �,• 7-
Lai
W �^
Streets Culvert j____j Disturbed r tir r w
--- 2ftContours Intermittent — — — Undisturbed _ ,� ,:
L---I MapGridroy
Perennial 1\ �� �� �.'t'; r_I =-- ;�y� ���
------ _ ---- ---- z -— -� - - -
Prepared For:
I }sn ,11f � `•�� :�. .Y �, '.► :��; 1r fr . 1� � 'i rs-*� Lea �^ •. � �x ,, � t rl._ 1,;
ZIA
kVA
l Ad
W 1
jfs J� " (" Proposed
will
Bennett Farms
I ► f �,��,j*; �, Residential
I r�'
r i Development
Jurisdictional
°�ti Features
N17 Map
�� ,'' , . ''� � 11/� � �` � '�'�- i i Rockingham County
i �1�r�,,,�. �� ;� A��� :•°�'.' � ,,.,'� � �� i North Carolina
i �:�'. ,ice• �� ''��. ,� 4�, r�' r '`,,.,,;` . � :,� . '� "� I
II 1J� r'� �• r�i i1�' '� � t �e{,l�rf/i.`I1� � � ^ll � ,+ 11 � i
Date:
' R September 2021
�+,
j �+. / Scale:
� �. `�.- j ..+L ' •` � Y,�• x 11l71. � 0 100 200 Ft
��' y .� * 1;` ' . :art': �'Z'i•' 4� +� M� [J:l.• �' t' i �` Job No.:
21-633
'� �i� ' '� r�{�t i ,�j� • , ,��` •. . .'�� �,1-�:,�/ � �, •, ''� � i i Drawn By: Checked By:
ND H JSM
=-- ------ - - - - r► - `- - - - - - - -- --+M'-' - - - - ' _ - - �- - - - - � - ----- - - - --------------- - � r: - �►_ - . -�� Figure
7 r��, R STONEY RIDGE CT • - IJ
`3 r `� _,g• t"
a �"f
r T 1
,
Sheet 4 of 12

ER EEfte
Legend r - R
y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation Lai
�lJ I : i ✓y w"� aG a
--- Streets Culvert Disturbed High 943 •. J � � �� �'4 .� � � I
q7i
L-—-I MapGrid Intermittent Undisturbed
---- -- -- --- ' r/ ,� C•�
Low:688 ---- -=------------- ------- _ ---- - - --- - --- --- - -
Perennial � r
. •.,r
tit ?+� r I
I ,,1 ,
_ � -- .I • ,, �' ,. .. • � �• ��' 1r r I Prepared For:
I �' !�.vs,I ..et � .fir. •.� >7 •A
Ar
,( �1
4 Proposed
Bennett Farms
� I
Residential
Development
CO
III S 1 - !._ - - i, - - �!(i� - , ' N (n
s I Jurisdictional
UJ Z) Features
a' a Map
s2
I
I I
I � ,
I I
Rockingham County
I North Carolina
I � I
I I
I
j ', -�+ p !"�P'• y �— Date:
September 2021
1 I
r r f \ �' I Scale: 0 100 200 Ft
1+ .�, r� � I Igoe i
Job No.:
I -a. J... r 7•,M ,r +. �t• a� 21-633
s+d Yx
''"� ^ "b• '` a/;1�, v �i� tj I Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
- ---------- -------- - - -- - - - - - - - -'�L- - ` �+i� -�w. y ____Li w : - �- ----------- - - - -------------- Figure
--------------- — STONE �, ,f5 ,
q Y RIDGE CT ,� r. °
"'�� Sheet 4 of 12

.. ��6\VEERl*e
Legend �•� N Q
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS W
Streets Culvert j Disturbed r� O
MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed
_ a
Perennial
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------;
_ I
I
Prepared For:
I ;
I
1
! I I
I
S 10 W6
! !
I I Proposed
s10 Bennett Farms
- i Residential
S8.
- Development
W5
o
pp
CD N Q s1o �, W7%i Jurisdictional
I D D LL /,�`;` i� Features
Nt4N " w I Map
z �-
QG92 LU
m S8 i S8 W8
W4 S8
�s
Rockingham County
Y
North Carolina
I I Date:
September 2021
Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
• j _ ;. lob No.: 21-633
11
tI Drawn By: Checked By:
•
NDH JSM
BERT DR
- - - - ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!-----------------.i Figure
• I —
'r� Sheet 5 of 12

�X EERI*e
Legend .c s Nlo
Q y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS �^ �� '�
/ A / W
Streets Culvert Disturbed •1 ,_ O
--- 2ft Contours Intermittent Cll� Undisturbed/ �!
I MapGrid Perennial r_ ► r i
Zp*.a - - Y.- �r� — - -7- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ is`?Y--------------i ]]f1
Prepared For:
---------------— i III ;1 R
-----------
2� W6 I
9 , S10 OWN
I � i
i I
Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
Development
•� ii ���., - illif S8 ����r.
I o
Jurisdictional
I Features
CPNP� R I W LU
I U pGy Ii a z
rc Map
m L Q. W8 �..,r.-.
,p •, S9 I
Rockingham Count
I g Y
I r`
North Carolina
- I
_ � I
I
I
� R
J.
J7 I
I
1
t ~
Date: September 2021
err Scale: 0 100 200 Ft
'W.
I
= I
�.^ Job No.:
�.
21 633
B �Checkecl
Drawn Y BY:
NDH JSM
I
I
BERT DR -- I
I
- - - - - - - - - - '--------------------__-----__ - - - - - - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------.; Figure
411WAnaiiiiii AL
Sheet 5 of 12

- �X EERI*e
Legend ,r - ' N y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation Lai
----I High:943 yi
— — Streets Culvert Icl�I Disturbed ••. , a
MapGrid Intermittent Undisturbed r S
— Perennial Low:688
;;- - - - -------------- ---- -- ---� _- -------------------�
I
Prepared For:
I
I � I
I
A. y'nil
�F i W6 I
a.
s10 Proposed
FA �
Bennett Farms Residential
WEA
' S8 Development
s10 Jurisdictional
U) !� Features
'CPNPG�R i U � � w I . � IIIIIIV IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Ma
P
S8 ---� i W8
S8 �,_ "r W4 S8
F
S9 i Rockingham County
I f I
i �► 1 i North Carolina
Date: September 2021
el Scale: 0 100 200 Ft
I
I �
Job No.:
21-633
GEL MMA
Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
L ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_.' Figure
I
I
a � I
Sheet 5 of 12

6X EERI*e
Legend
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS • Lai
Streets Culvert jj Disturbed `t rA
a
O At MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed A \
_
Perennial ow
--------------------------- ------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------- ----------------- r���v�]�,�r�S
! _
�! Prepared For:
a _ S14,
,6 POW
W9
i S12 S8
S8
W5
W7�!
13 i Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
! W8 !
s$ s11 Development
Jurisdictional
Features
Map
AV
! !
I I
! i Rockingham County
North Carolina
I I
!
Date:
September 2021
s
------------------I ! ' Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
I I Job No.:
,i S17 i 21-633
I ` I Drawn By: Checked By:
# W14 NDH JSM
#!---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------------------!- -------------- Figure
� ✓l I ` I
i S39 S38
i i�i&Sj 8
15
Sheet 6 of 12

Legend Y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential
Streets Culvert �� .
• , ,Perennial Undisturbed
ro
2ft Contours Intermittent
tre
J�. / 1 �. i �.if ti 1 ✓ _ -" �:_._...i�Z-_ _ - --..
PLEi
HOMES
Proposed
Bennett
ZZ Residential
Development
_ _ _ • �_ Wit- _. __ �/.� i
Jurisdictional
Features
Map
o
Rockingham County
Al
North Carolina
= ,` i ♦ Y /f \ .
Date
September 2021
Owl
Job No.
21-633
Drawn By:
/j//-- 1 ( ) �/_ / •t �•;�� , \ \\. , ram\ _
s {
.
J i WW f
Figure
Sheet
6 of

W. ��*,\V EER/NC.
Legend ,.% �.� '« N y
F=Streets
y Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation r, Lai �
Culvert j�l� Disturbed High:943 /
Lai
O
L_—_I ap Intermittent Undisturbed
— Perennial Low:688 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ -
I C.
^gam
Prepared For:
I ,• I
I sr. I
r S 8 `
S12 .. I
S8
I
Proposed
Bennett Farms
- W8 Residential
rrS$ i Development
s11
I I
Jurisdictional
Features
M a p
r
I I
I � I
- ., Rockingham County
�r C North Carolina
t
Date:
September 2021
------- --------- Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
Job No.:
r ! 21-633
I I Drawn By: Checked By:
{ W14 NDH JSM
I I �
I I
I I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------=- Figure
I I
S39 S38
I I
I
I I
I
Sheet 6 of 12

5���\NEERI*e
Legend N Q�f y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS W
Streets Culvert jj Disturbed r� O
I MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed 1 F �N cy'
Perennial -------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------!------ ---------_------- `��'�
� I y
I I Prepared For:
Jacobs Creek
4600�Wol
S33 i
I I
!� W24 S31 S33 I Proposed
r Bennett Farms
Residential
lf' W25 S33 Development
i W27 i
I I
w26 i Jurisdictional
oil
Features
Map
W22 1
W23 0 i Rockingham County
�✓ ! North Carolina
l
A Date:
September 2021
S3O
I I Scale:
S29 i 0 100 200 Ft
i i I i I
141111110- S19 Job No.:
S17 I S15 21-633
r ! ! Drawn By: Checked By:
= I « I
W14 NDH JSM
I !
-------��� ---- ----------------------—- -------------- -------- --------------------------- ---------------------------------;----------------- Figure
�I
I� Sheet 7 of 12

--��. ` ate. % f 1.! � r/Od�/�f ` '`i. -•. -• •
/ —OVA
LEil
' \ fw. !► t %' �'_ i _ - y _ HOMES
10
`� 1 �� '}i \ .R�y J,,I.'/�/� '.,� _,;�'` -_.ice •r ,r ,.1, „"•• .
AV
Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
Development
Jurisdictional
4
Features
Map
Rockingham County
North Carolina
IVA-
WWI
00.1
05
A Ill
1110� I I/Y-
0 scale.
IV, ®R Ill
VAR
OrW
Job No.
Drawn By:
NDH
WA
Figure
� F 1
. Y
Sheetof

. .
j'
11 OF
TWIf If
pod W - -
\�\v w t
LEil
HOMES
Proposed
Bennett Farms
OAF
Residential
Development
Jurisdictional
Features
4r Map
VIA
v ;
Rockingham County
North Carolina
IL
� •i
i r'-
�� September 2021
i.
l �-

' III N AA
Legend Legend � � t ��IA' ;0_�a
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS io/ 1� Lai ,
Fn
Streets Culvert jj Disturbed
MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed , � t u77 p
Perennial - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------- • -------------------------------------- ----------------- ���/Q]]N\`��5
\ �
I
1111111
Prepared For:
S34 1
i W28 i
I I
! !
! i Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
I I Development
Jurisdictional
Features
Map
I o
1 �
Rockingham County
North Carolina
I I
I I
Date:
September 2021
�t Scale:
I � I
0 100 200 Ft
Job No.:
21-633
I I
I d I Drawn By: Checked By:
N
\I--
----------------- NDH JSM
� ------------------1----------------- Figure
i
i
i
I . SLO
I3MOE OR
allf
Sheet 8 of 12

l^
j y /
Kamm
_71 Prepared For:
y r jj •' t 3 i/ i ¢ .� BennettProposed
Development
Jurisdictional
Features
AWE
Map
Residential
Rockingham County
North Carolina
Date:
` September 2021
/ f��`�_ I Jam_ r k,t l /• � � 0 100 200
Ft
21-633
Drawn By
NDH
Figure
` � *+'\_ � q �. �'�. / � �' •� 1 1I III// � • ��
\�•I � �� � L / I�•' ~ I/ - � ,'.�`\ � - 1(+1111 I/( (1 (j/ 1I{. _k \ 7J/��y(•�i/. '-J:,
I •. -I / ) • 4 -� ' A '���•' `... � '�..I�, - ! - v. ,♦ r ., .} _ , -.�' 1, • f 11' IJ \ F /�•1 `r 'f 1 Sheet 8 of

EERl*e
Legend N
0
Q
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation Lai �
Streets Culvert jLl�j Disturbed High:943IM Lai
a
MapGrid Intermittent Perennial Undisturbed
Low:688 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - ----------------------------- - - -'r------------ ---------- - - - ��w�]f1\`1��
s I
Prepared For:
S34 i
I �� •� e I
I ;
-yam
Proposed
I r t
, , • '' �.,��� I ,' Bennett Farms
Residential
Development
Jurisdictional
Features
Map
S
� Y i
' 7 . i Rockingham County
North Carolina
i ??' Date:
September 2021
I I
Scale:
100 200 Ft
Job No.:
I I
21-633
I I � Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
I I
I I
I
----------- ------------------1----------------- Figure
I � NIOE
Sheet 8 of 12

-- �X EERI*e
Legend � � _ N Q�IA� �+
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS ' u.i M
Streets Culvert jj Disturbed
a
r� O
MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed 91
_ _ _ uu
Perennial ------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- i ----------------- �.
, I
Prepared For:
S36
1 i S35 --
I � f
I
i W29
Proposed
Bennett Farms
I
Jr'� — ; Residential
Development
i
� I i
Jurisdictional
Features
s low I Map
I
I � �
� i I
+ , I
Rockingham County
•.� North Carolina
, I
I
i Date:
September 2021
I � iScale: 0 100 200 Ft
i Job No.:
i 21-633
I � I
I
Drawn By: Checked By:
i ( i — _ �i. NDH JSM
Figure
•
1
SLO MOE DRE _ MW 3
Sheet 9 of 12

r
LEil
HOMES
�Z: Proposed
r, � ,�:i• ,y�_ •�. -''�/ i /!-- -_._._- � ��.--,-_tom----j i- _ Bennett .
Residential
�� _—_.__ �'`�\ `. •/�A "?•y /// /� / -- ^ice" :�=-'- - Development
urisdictional
Features
Map
[1 t iJ /� .y, J`/ -�- MIL ; 1{. ..�`T r + 'I f `�i..' .+ �`•-~"� •!..r_�•` .-'.- J� ..ys_7.t� �r
North Carolina
- � r / � I `1 •'i +, ';/'' * t' \� ',�'_""' `' _ram ~4 //yJ /- / Rockingham County
r k i � - / �� � - � fit: �• _ � f ..h !/i .i / ��V / �a
Date
September 2021
f Job No.
21-633
Drawn By:
NDH
Figure
Sheet 9 of 12
s• „a w-

EERl*e
Legend N Q
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation Lai
---� High:943 vs i O
Streets Culvert �LJJ Disturbed t• 4•,, d a
MapGrid Intermittent Undisturbed I ,1 i',"
— Perennial Low:688 - - - --
�.—;._� _TV �.r.----= .r ca+f1�:"fiPY E!-�IPP.1"!C� =aT".�rr>_r:�3i------------------------------
I
J 1 Prepared For:
I
S36
S35 y �:
I I
2 gel
W29
I
I I
I I :
Proposed
Bennett Farms
i10W \ ; Residential
Development
,' M. _ _ Jurisdictional
:>�' '�` �,�„i� 1, �►_ '<'F ,I "r Features
Map
I ICJ y►+ �,..r � '1f'� _� �,�;, � �,, ;�. I
I j �►I h i��Y Mw.l � �, '�� .,
I / All _',� ,+, ,'; - ••:. - - -_�.�: i - � Rockingham County
North Carolina
IM
� �� � In
ISO, All rx�
A M_W
1,'; tj4 �� Date:
I September 2021
jt" � � p+ �t�► � rt}'}^ �?I'A,Y�r��".;pj-` s � � .�1 p1;r#��
Scale:
in r tr{ ', Er +' 0 100 200 Ft
A14 q,��ll l l'�� L �f • �� 1 `',I�'..7 I�'^ r`;J.p�i'1'1. I.vM•f I I
�'. _ i�� � `J �\. d�-I.�1 �, b� �_.r± + .fw, t �a+j{J �� Y ` ,7 'h'- T' A w •.t 1_, ..,�
_ �• ? 1 ,,, ��zt .,� FC �r�;,' +��a �'' Job No.:
I f �,r�. d.d�\\, ,` N ,clew . r•�ret +Js� ' ,'c�.'+ s I 21-633
Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
---------- -----------------------------------------------��'-==----- t►\-----r'=-M- -=---- - "'�_ �' 1 ----------------------------- � -'`' Figure
If,
MOE DR :i :, r� ��"-,� •�� �,, ,�O�l, ,E slew
' t • M 1
Sheet 9 of 12

S 17 ! ���\VEER/NC.
Legend i N Q
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS W14
Streets Culvert j____j Disturbed �O
MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed r ems'
Perennial
1 I S39
I ! S38 I Prepared For:
I _ I`S18
I�S15 �
S15
W12 W13 ""► Proposed
w11 • Bennett Farms
_1 • w10 Residential
Development
S15 M i
Jurisdictional
- ! Features
* i i Map
lip '
• i "' Rockingham County
S15 - I 1 North Carolina
S4010 -low
♦ i • i # i
.-� . � Date:
N _ � September 2021
t I Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
Job No.:
i ��� 21-633
I I Drawn By: Checked By:
++ NDH JSM
--- -------------------------------------------------- ------ - - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------- ------------------ Figure
, I
i
J Sheet 10 of 12

LEj I
HOMES
00
- ti R
i`, _ • rya, ...•.'.. _. �. � ' , •,rF , 'rt ?1) ,a " Proposed
Bennett Farms
• • k �� a R 9i"� f� '� _ r 4 3 j�' „ti; ie .� 4 i" ' w, }1Residential
Development
Jurisdictional
Features
! -mil 9ie:' � / / 5 .'� i.'.'t w.� ►' _�.� ,
•D yet �If .� ,� J _ r } � .
_ n �.e '��, •,�
Map
.. •� �, .,� � �� +r. . _ `---- -ter r � r - {�,
lisp
Rockingham Count
North Carolina
Date
�� tr L�� -yam Yr ( j• \... �/ i},, ,
+ �^ /.• f'- 1 100 200 Ft
q
lie
Job No.
21-633
Drawn By:
NDH
Sheet 10 of 12
I i
'a- I
'• r I
1'
r

s 17 �*%\VEER/yC
Legend - N QS�'I/�'
0
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation
l� High:943
Streets Culvert Disturbed
L_—_I MapGrid Intermittent VZ2 Undisturbed `\S
Perennial Low:688
S39
i S38 Prepared For:
i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/ I �
IIIIII IIII IIIIIII IIII I IIIIII���IIII �
I I
I I
I I
S15
W12 W13 i f_ Proposed
w11 ! Bennett Farms
I I '
W10 Residential
Development
f j S15 i
' Jurisdictional
Features
I I I
Map
I I
I I
Rockingham County
S15 North Carolina
S40
I I
I I �
I I
Date:
I I September 2021
Scale:
I I 0 100 200 Ft
i i ICI
' I I
I I '
I I ,lob No.:
21-633
I I Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
I I
I I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Figure
I
I
I
Sheet 10 of 12

EERl*e
Legend ! y
� o
Q A
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS i LaiM
Streets Culvert Disturbed \? t r�
--- I--_-_-� ! y SR
MapGrid Intermittent _ _ _ Undisturbed
Perennial a ----------------- `�N�R�3N\`���'
Prepared For:
S29 W22
W21 Ir
`Tj ~ W13 ! S*
,!
W13 i� Jacobs Creek i Proposed
i S20 Bennett Farms
Residential
! ,✓ ' i Development
W20
Jurisdictional
ri I Features
i S21 ! Map
I
S28
I
Rockingham County
W18 North Carolina
UP% I
I '
i
Date:
_ W19 i September 2021
Scale: 0 100 200 Ft
i Jacobs Creek S37 _ Job No.:
21-633
i Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
W16 S25
----------------��III
------------ -----------------n---------- -----------------------�------------------ --------i! Figure
----------------------- -- — --------- Sheet 11 of 12

Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS x
- Culvert Streets //Legend
AV A
- Intermittent
2ft Contours
Undisturbed
' \ "' a,
/ +
7 ` �
LEil
HOMES
\. Y
Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
Development
Juris
ir' ` �• r may, � � ��rl� � j i ��� � ,j it �.
• •
10
1+ ,rb f ���� ���� A ( 1, _ . •
Rockingham County
North Carolina
Date
September 2021
21-633
r.�' ` [' ` + ' - r- - J -� - _ ` iceDrawn By:
-•
_ _ - +t •' Y ' .V� �I• -� �' - ' -- - -.�; �:. -y,.�. i _ ` 1 tea-
it j r 1: �" �� ,ril. � _ - -..._T-..�
Fr i..� ^ 5.
_-

�Al, EER/NC.
Legend ' N -C y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS Project Elevation p:ie u.i
Streets Culvert I I Disturbed High:943 �- '•, if. i d a
I�lJ_I
MapGrid Intermittent Cl�� Undisturbed - C.�
Perennial Low:688
1, / i / I
Prepared For:
� S18 _ t
I .W22 I •���..;.
I
S29 I
W21
I ;
I � •
I ,Y
W 13
I
I
I I
W13 i Jacobs Creek -
i S20 i Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
Development
I -
I
i W20
Jurisdictional
Features
S21 i Map
I
s2s '
Rockingham County
W18
North Carolina
! i
I - j
I
I ;
I - ,
I I �
i Date:
W19 i September 2021
I
I '
Scale:
0 100 200 Ft
S37
_ T Jacobs,Creek Job No.:
- 21-633
i - Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
' S25 I
I '
I I
------------------!------------------------ ----------------------------------------------- ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------- '' Figure
' I ,
I I
I
Sheet 11 of 12

EERl*e
Legend N Q y
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) Potential Wetland WOUS I u.i r9m
Streets Culvert ' Disturbed I r�
-- '----� W 16 S25 d a
Nt
I__-_I MapGrid Intermittent Undisturbed I
Perennial _ _ _ ----------- ---------------- ---------- --------------------- ------------------— ------`-------- I rS
I
~ ; Prepared For:
. ;
i i
AW
I I
' W17 i
,1
•
I I
S23
Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
Development
S24
S27 Jurisdictional
Jacobs Creek i Features
Map
I .
I
I
W15 +�
I I
Rockingham County
�. North Carolina
, I
yl i Date:
I � September 2021
, I
I '
./ S26 Scale: 0 100 200 Ft
Job No.:
_ N
' 21-633
I j Drawn By: Checked By:
NDH JSM
1 I I
----- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----'-'------------------------------------------J Figure
— lob.
Sheet 12 of 12

Legend
rCulvert
Project Study Area Potential Non-wetland WOUS(Stream) ��- —_
Potential WetlandStreets
Disturbed
2ft Contours Intermittent Undisturbed
MapGrid
A6
74
_ � _�'i. { / I /Jim'. / - ••,, � I l' 1 j(I I j/i / / _ �/�J —� �`\\\\` � LEi I
HOMES
I,• `�`t ',, ~~.:�lf��+.-�-� ��/ �'�; Y /PIS �� 'r s _- __ � 1 I 111 1 I 1 ��—~�•�•',` 1 - �
h,` -- ;.t _S' 1 f �+h—�- \ �Ft,\��\,,• 1 j ' �/I `"r ` 1 w /1��.' �f�' ) /-� _•/___- \\\,`_`_ Proposed
f• .N _ _ `Y •�Y�- � - -- �,+'. 4.lr i .ram ' r `\�• � " `4 / /�//
to Residential
/I X/
X Development
Bennett Farms
Jurisdictional
Map
/Y / t�'
1, �f �,� '' �•Y
4 � / , /•. � �,'�j� /r;% � � �. �•� � � `��. � �Lam- I
Rockingham County
September 2021
1 a :�% 1 '�' — `;, i • 0 1000
/ •.
sf /
✓n Y• I •
33 Drawn By:
NDH
Figure
Sheet 12 of 12
w k Y r

,v
�� /-'•`^mil
,_ 11
VIM-
000�
HOMES
j� Proposed
Bennett Farms
Residential
A/ Development
Jurisdictional
a� •• 0 i�
�-
'r' / Lip f ` / � �` �• � Scale
Features
I
Map
x Rockingham County
North Carolina
Date
September 2021
,ti f � ,,1•y� \' • r! F1 i'///!T' -'^ ///�:�. \� • / - i - - - 1 100 200 Ft
1p
Job No.
21-633
Drawn By:
..J / /�/�1JI��I �.1/�1�1'It11��1511�1��\\1 \1\\ ND
\\ /
i �\\ 111�
1 -
I ) tSheet 12 of 12

Appendix B
Stream and Wetland Data Forms
Three 04b fr4OR ►Inq MreeMsenpmeennpcom

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1 S4
Date:Aug 4, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.28864157
Evaluator:Byron Levan County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.94717629
Total Points: Stream Determination:Eiil Other: Ellisboro
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =12_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 1
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =8.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =9.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 1.5
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 3
There were dragonfly and stonefly larvae in the stream, but were Bankfull Width (feet) 3
confined to the lower reaches next to the larger system. Stream Water Depth inches 3
empties a wetland,which serves to drain fields. Channel Substrate Sand
Velocity: low
Clarit tear
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1 S5
Date:Aug 4, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.28969304
Evaluator:Byron Levan County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.94713236
Total Points: Other: Ellisboro
Ei�] Stream Determination:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =15_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 1
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 2
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =10) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 2
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =10.5) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 2
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 1.5
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 3
There were dragonfly and stonefly larvae in the stream Bankfull Width (feet) 3
Water Depth inches 3
Channel Substrate Gravel
Velocity: low
Clarit tear
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1 S6
Date:Aug 4, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.29066197
Evaluator:Byron Levan County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.94703348
Total Points: Ellisboro
25.75 Stream Determination: Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =18 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 3
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =2.75) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0.75
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 3
Bankfull Width (feet) 3
Water Depth inches N/A
Channel Substrate obble
Velocity: /A
Clarity: /A
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/ Pro ect/Site: Latitude:2 Lot � � �
Evaluator: 1, County: ) Longitude:
Total Points: Stream-Date rmination(circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent if?19 or perennial if 2 30' F 1 Pubermittent Perennial e.g.Quad Name: /
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 'f r ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
12 Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2
2.Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg 0 1 2 3
3.in-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, � 1 2 3
-ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate 1 2 3
5.Activetrelict floodpiain 1 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 1J 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 ,. 2 3
9.Grade control 0; 0.5 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1_5
11.Second or greater order channel No`0: Yes=3
artificial ditches are not rated;see di ions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal=
12.Presence of Baseflow ® 1 2 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14.Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? NQ- Yes=3
C.Biology Subtotal=
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 -11 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22.Fish of 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish EtE
0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0.5 1 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: /_ i►1 N rk -fa s� ✓5 r ' 4 h li
i U rl n Jo Jd m wa
S,t-ee-4,n 5 Bank Height:y
�f
Sketch: Bank Width:/,3
(k,�-5 - NC) Water Depth:p
Channel Substrate:41a It,Sand Grave obble,
P1R-GS- mcp Bedrock
Velocity: Naq-
Clarity: N/A

55
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 'Z Zo2 Project/Site: Latitude: 2b J
Evaluator:tA County: J , Longitude:I
Total Points: Stream Determination f circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent r
if a 19 or perennial it z 30' ( Z Ephemerel'rntermittenf'Perennial e.g. Quad Name:J- , O r6
A. Geomorphology Subtotal Absent Weak Moderate Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 1 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1' 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=b _;' Yes=3
e artificial ditches are not rated;see discu5ons in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= >
12.Presence of Baseflow '0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria �, 1 2 3
14.Leaf litter 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 A.5 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology Subtotal=
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in streambed -3- 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 1A 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks ._0 1 2 3
22.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 01 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBI=1.5 Other=0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Bank Height: 2
Sketch: Bank Width:2-3
s(r i - Water Depth: 4
Channel Substrate`.Cla,Silt,Sand,Grav`et7Cobble,
I,I�JGS, Bedrock -
Velocity: //o/7&
Clarity: /IM

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1S12
Date:Aug 5, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.29245253
Evaluator:Byron Levan, Trevor Hall County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.93011467
Total Points: Ellisboro
EE
Stream Determination: Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =14_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 3
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =325) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0.75
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 8
Very strong headcut, but evidence of water almost completely Bankfull Width (feet) 5
disappears above it. Water Depth inches N/A
Channel Substrate Cobble
Velocity: /A
Clarity: /A
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1S13
Date:Aug 5, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.29228759
Evaluator:Byron Levan, Trevor Hall County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.92966611
Total Points: Ellisboro
21.75 Stream Determination: Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =12_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =6 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =325) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0.75
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 3
Bankfull Width (feet) 5
Water Depth inches 1
Channel Substrate Gravel
Velocity: low
Clarit tear
Sketch:

F7, 5Zo1 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version4.11
Date: vl i Project/site: I Latitude:
20
Evaluator County: r� Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination circle o e Other
Stream/s aileasf Intermfrfenr Z �- Ephemeral Intermittent etertnl e.g 4uaa Name:
If a 19 or perennial if?30' !" �7 ra
A. Geomor holo Subtotal=�.� Absertt Weak Moderate Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank _ 0 _ 1 _2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thatweg J 0l�--L 2 3
3. In-channel structure ex riffle-pool,step-pool, �nc)
ripple-pool sequence 1 2 3
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict fioodplain 0 1 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches -, 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
B. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9.Grade control 0 0 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 _ 0.5 1 `1-5
11.Second or greater order channel No 0 Yes=3
'artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= T�
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1 -'2, 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0_ 1 ) 2 3
14.Leaf litter -1-5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 Q. ,-! 1 1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 CGIU> 1 1.5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology Subtotal=
K22-Fish
s roots in streambed 2 1 0
d upland plants in streambed 2 1 0 -~ -
a os(note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3
ic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
0 0.5 1 1.5
sh _ ) 0.5 1 1.5
24 Amphibians V 05 1 1 5
25 Algae - _( 05 1 1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0 75; OBL=1,5 Oth =0 _
'perennial stree-s may also be identified using other methods Seep 35 of manual
Notes < l
ke;'ciS: �fdoPSII 4f?7e-r' 1-6 IC�A.n 4 /OW ){�I1C.( aT VI fO/o9�eankHeight(ft):�-8'f
i b rovyp#,,4 4-Le- `/eot. -fBfun;j/ b<d oA 73 5 Bankfull width(ft):/-Z
(q I 46 Water depth(in) q�(
p� Channel substratesC ay.Silt,Sand7Ga-Aj Cobble.
Bedrock
Velocity• fast,moderate to
Cla,ity,..-<rea Ilghtly turbid,turbid

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1S24
Date:Aug 12, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.28317516
Evaluator:Byron Levan, Hayley Wood County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.92356354
Total Points: Ellisboro
21.25 Stream Determination: Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =9 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 1
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =6.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =5•75) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0.75
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 6
Bankfull Width (feet) 2
Water Depth inches N/A
Channel Substrate Sand
Velocity: /A
Clarity: /A
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1S25
Date:Aug 12, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.28470715
Evaluator:Byron Levan, Hayley Wood County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.92109427
Total Points: Ellisboro
Eil Stream Determination: Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =1.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 0
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 0
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 0
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =5.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =3.75) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0.75
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 1
This is a man-made channel that drains a wetland. It holds Bankfull Width (feet) 2
sediment from runoff and connects W16 to Jacob's Branch. BPJ Water Depth inches N/A
to consider it intermittent.
Channel Substrate Sand
Velocity: /A
Clarity: /A
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1S26
Date:Aug 12, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.28156242
Evaluator:Byron Levan, Hayley Wood County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.91931593
Total Points: Ellisboro
Eil Stream Determination: Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =12_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
,a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =4 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =4 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 4
Bankfull Width (feet) 1
Water Depth inches N/A
Channel Substrate obble
Velocity: /A
Clarity: /A
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1S31
Date:Aug 13, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.29182056
Evaluator:Byron Levan, Hayley Wood County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.92318236
Total Points: Stream Determination:Eiil Other: Ellisboro
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =6.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 0
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 1
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =9 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =11) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 1.5
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 3
This stream comes out from underground as a wetland but then Bankfull Width (feet) 2
channelizes before going underground again.The soil above the Water Depth inches 3
stream is not entirely closed, however, and multiple portals in the Channel Substrate Gravel
soil above show the stream still flowing below the surface.
Epheroptera, plecoptera, and tricoptera were present in moderate Velocity: low
al Clarit tear
Sketch:

Zoo
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �� ProJectlSlte: e, Latitude:
Evaluator: ( I �-,�� County: / Longitude: :�yl9
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination(circle one) Other
��
if z 19 or erennial if z 30• Ephemeral. Ifitermlttent Perennial e.g.Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal= ? - Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 ( 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3
3.In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 0 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4.Particle size of stream substrate 0 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 2 3
6.Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3
7.Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9.Grade control '"0 i 1 1.5
10.Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= , )
12.Presence of Baseflow 0 2 3
13.Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 2 3
14.Leaf litter 1: 1 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1,5
16.Organic debris lines or piles 0 -�5 1 1 5
17.Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes.=3
C. BiologySubtotal=
18.Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2, 1 0
19.Rooted upland plants in stream bed 2 1 0
20.Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22.Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23.Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1 5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1 5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Bank Height: - Zr
Bank Width: /,Z
0ek- 1'\/e s Water Depth _l r r 7oo1S ne
r
/ J�/ yes Channel SubstraterClay,Silt,Sand,Grave-1,tobble,
y Bedrock ------
Velocity:�On/
Clarity:` /OAF rIl 7cr(S

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1s35
Date:Aug 11, 2021 Project/Site: Bennett Farms Latitude:36.29323077
Evaluator:Byron Levan, Nathan Howell County: Rockingham Longitude:-79.90776576
Total Points: Other: Ellisboro
EEI
Stream Determination:
Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30 Perennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =6.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 0
3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 0
ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 2
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =9.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes=3 3
C. Biology Subtotal =11) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 1 2 3 2
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 1.5
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet) 1
Stream comes from an underground source to supply hydrology Bankfull Width (feet) 1
to the wetland but goes back underground before joining the Water Depth inches 3
larger stream, S36. BPJ,this is perennial.
Channel Substrate Sand
Velocity: Moderate
Clarit tear
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:8/31/21 Project/Site:Bennett Farms/Stream 38 Upper/Stream 39 Latitude:36.288859
Evaluator:J. Mason, Three Oaks Eng. county: Rockingham Longitude:_79.927005
Total Points: Stream Det ina io ircle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 1 9 Ephemeral Intermittent erennial e.g. Quad Name:
if> 19 or perennial if>_30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =8.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate St mpg
1a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 (2) 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 CiD 2 3
9. Grade control 0 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Qes=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch. Bank Height 2-4
Stream Width 3
Water depth 0
Channel substrate:
Gravel
Sand
Silt

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:8/31/21 Project/Site:Bennett Farms/Stream 38 Lower Latitude:36.288971
Evaluator:J. Mason, Three Oaks Eng. county: Rockingham Longitude:_79.92486
Total Points: Stream Det ina io ircle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent 23 Ephemeral Intermittent erennial e.g. Quad Name:
if> 19 or perennial if>_30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =10 ) Absent Weak Moderate St mpg
1a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure:ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 t2) 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
8. Headcuts 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 es=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch. Bank Height 3-5
Stream Width 3-5
Water depth 0.5
Channel substrate:
Gravel
Sand
Silt

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/04/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: WI-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28824515 Long: -79.94698105 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) X True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Salix nigra/Black willow 15 Yes OBL Total Number of Dominant
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
30 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 90 x 2= 180
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC FAC species 30 x 3= 90
2. Salix nigra/Black willow 10 Yes OBL FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 170 (A) 320 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.88
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
25 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 12 20%of total cover: 5 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Phalaris arundinacea/Reed canarygrass,Reed canary gran 75 Yes FACW
2. Eupatorium perfoliatum/Common boneset 15 No FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Sagittaria latifolia/Broad leaf arrowhead 15 No OBL
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Polygonum sagittatum/Arrowleaf tearthumb 10 No OBL
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
115 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 57 20%of total cover: 23 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 3/1 100 Loam
10-18 10YR 5/1 100 Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Through old ag fiels.Human modified/made but has drained surrounding floodplain and filled with wetland species.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/04/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28936189 Long: -79.94682313 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W2-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 5 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
5 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 30 x 2= 60
1. Sambucus nigra/Black elderberry 5 Yes FAC FAC species 10 x 3= 30
2 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 40 (A) 90 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.25
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
5 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
1. Leersia virginica/White grass 20 Yes FACW - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2. Boehmeria cylindrica/Smallspike false nettle 10 Yes FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
30 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 3/2 100 Loam
10-18 10YR 3/1 100 Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/02/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W3-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levant&lHayley Wood Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29092459 Long: -79.94837719 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Area logged within the last two years,compacted disturbed soils,disturbance vegetation,hydrology may be slightly altered.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) X True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Due to logging,hydrology may be slightly modified.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W3-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 5 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
5 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 10 x 2= 20
1. Liquidambar styraciflua l Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC FAC species 110 x 3= 330
2. Sambucus nigra/Black elderberry 15 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. Lindera benzoin l Northern spicebush 5 No FAC UPL species 20 x 5= 100
4 Column Totals: 140 (A) 450 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.21
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
35 Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
50%of total cover: 17 20%of total cover: 7 -
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) -
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 50 Yes FAC -
2. Athyrium filix-femina/Common ladyfern 20 Yes FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Osmunda regalis var.spectabilis/Royal fern 10 No NI
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Osmunda cinnamomea/Cinnamon fern 10 No NI
5. Onoc/ea sensibilis l Sensitive fern 10 No FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
g, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
100 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 50 20%of total cover: 20 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1• Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W3-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-9 5YR 6/4 85 5YR 6/6 15 C M Clay Loam Disturbed soils
9-18 10YR 5/1 80 5YR 6/6 10 C M Clay Loam Disturbed soils.This represents what the le
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) X Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
These soils are disturbed but are saturated,full of wetland plants,and in geomorphic position to be wet.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/05/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W4,W5,W7-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levant&lTrevor Hall Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29188335 Long: -79.93411158 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W4,W5,W7-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 60 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Quercus nigra/Water oak 10 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 40 Yes FAC FAC species 200 x 3= 600
2. Quercus nigra/Water oak 5 No FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 200 (A) 600 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.0
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
45 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 22 20%of total cover: 9 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 30 Yes FAC
2. Thelypteris noveboracensis/New york fern 25 Yes FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Athyrium filix-femina/Common ladyfern 20 Yes FAC
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
g, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
75 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 37 20%of total cover: 15 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia/Horsebrier 5 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. Toxicodendron radicans/Eastern poison ivy 5 Yes FAC size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
10 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W4,W5,W7-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 Clay Loam
4-18 10YR 6/1 95 5YR 6/4 5 C M Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Proposed Bennett Farms Residential Development City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 8/2/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: w6(w50)wec
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell Section,Township, Range: Ellisboro
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Headwater Drainage Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.293405 Long:-79.935572 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar Forest sandy clay loam,8-15%slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
X Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
X Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W6(W50)Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Ulmus americana 20 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 87.5% (A/B
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
40 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Carpinus caroliniana 10 Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Elaeagnus pungens 10 Yes UPL FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (E
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
20 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supportin
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum 30 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I
2. Juncus effusus 10 Yes FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Carex spp. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)c
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless o
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 20 Yes FAC
2. Campsis radicans 10 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: ws(w50)wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-12 10YR 4/1 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/05/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W8-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levant&lTrevor Hall Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 10
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29202874 Long: -79.93255317 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar forest sandy clay loam, 15-25 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil X or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Pond naturalized to wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
This appears to be an old mill/farmpond that has reverted to wetland
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W8-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 5 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
5 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 45 x 2= 90
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica/Green ash 15 Yes FACW FAC species 5 x 3= 15
2 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 90 (A) 145 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.61
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
15 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 7 20%of total cover: 3 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Phalaris arundinacea/Reed canarygrass,Reed canary gran 30 Yes FACW
2. Scirpus polyphyllus/Leafy bulrush 20 Yes OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Sparganium americanum/American burr-reed 20 Yes OBL
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
70 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W8-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/3 85 10YR 4/6 15 C M Sandy Loam
5-18 10YR 4/3 100 Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) X Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/05/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: W9-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levant&lTrevor Hall Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 10
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29306182 Long: -79.92826615 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar forest sandy clay loam,15-25 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(Al) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(134) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(135) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(69) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): .5
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W9-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 10 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Platanus occidentalis/American sycamore 5 Yes FACW Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
15 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 7 20%of total cover: 3 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 15 x 2= 30
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 5 Yes FAC FAC species 45 x 3= 135
2 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 60 (A) 165 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.75
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
5 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 30 Yes FAC
2. Lobelia cardinalis/Cardinalflower 5 No FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 5 No FACW
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
g, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
40 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W9-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/3 85 10YR 4/6 15 C M Sandy Loam
5-18 10YR 4/3 100 Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) X Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/02/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W10,12,13,21-Wei
Investigator(s): Hayley Woodl&lByron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.2882669 Long: -79.92685498 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Area logged within the last two years,compacted disturbed soils,disturbance vegetation,hydrology may be slightly altered.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) X True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Due to logging,hydrology may be slightly modified.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W10,12,13,21-Wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 5 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
5 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 30 x 2= 60
1. Sambucus nigra/Black elderberry 15 Yes FAC FAC species 90 x 3= 270
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. Lindera benzoin/Northern spicebush 5 No FAC UPL species 10 x 5= 50
4 Column Totals: 140 (A) 390 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.79
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
35 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 17 20%of total cover: 7 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 50 Yes FAC
2. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 20 Yes FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Eleocharis/Spikerush 10 No NI
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Scirpus cyperinus/Woolgrass 10 No FACW
5. Typha latifolia/Broadleaf cattail,Broad-leaved cattail 10 No OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
100 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 50 20%of total cover: 20 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W10,12,13,21-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-9 5YR 6/4 85 5YR 6/6 15 C M Clay Loam Disturbed soils
9-18 10YR 5/1 80 5YR 6/6 10 C M Clay Loam Disturbed soils.This represents what the le
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) X Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
These soils are disturbed but are saturated,full of wetland plants,and in geomorphic position to be wet.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/11/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W11-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levan)&)Nathan Howell Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28786559 Long: -79.92883854 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W11-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 8 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Quercus phellos/Willow oak 15 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Acer rubrum/Red maple 15 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
3. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 10 Yes FAC
4. Magnolia tripetala/Umbrella magnolia 10 Yes FACU Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 88.9 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 45 x 2= 90
1. Ulmus americana/American elm 10 Yes FACW FAC species 50 x 3= 150
2. Lindera benzoin/Northern spicebush 10 Yes FAC FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 125 (A) 300 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.4
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
20 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 20 Yes FACW
2. Boehmeria cylindrica/Smallspike false nettle 15 Yes FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Carex lupulina/Hop sedge 15 Yes OBL
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Saururus cernuus/Lizard's-tail 5 No OBL
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
55 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 27 20%of total cover: 11 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W11-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 5/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loam
5-18 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) X Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 09/19/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W14-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levan)&)Nathan Howell Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28912057 Long: -79.92534648 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W14-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 25 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 20 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
3. Pinus taeda/Loblolly pine 10 No FAC
4. Quercus phellos/Willow oak 10 No FAC Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 87.5 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
65 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 32 20%of total cover: 13 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 25 x 2= 50
1. Lindera benzoin/Northern spicebush 15 Yes FAC FAC species 95 x 3= 285
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica/Green ash 15 Yes FACW FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3 UPL species 15 x 5= 75
4 Column Totals: 135 (A) 410 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.04
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
30 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) -
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain
1. Carex/Sedge 15 Yes NI )
2. Chasmanthium laxum/Slender wood-oats 10 Yes FAC
3. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 10 Yes FACW Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
35 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 17 20%of total cover: 7 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia/Horsebrier 5 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W14-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Loam
5-18 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 4/6 15 C M Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/12/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W15-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levant&lHayley Wood Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.2828787 Long: -79.9243485 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
X Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W15-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 8 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 40 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
3. Quercus phellos/Willow oak 15 Yes FAC
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 15 x 2= 30
1. Lindera benzoin l Northern spicebush 20 Yes FAC FAC species 190 x 3= 570
2. Liquidambar styraciflua l Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. Acer rubrum/Red maple 10 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 220 (A) 615 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.8
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
45 Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
50%of total cover: 22 20%of total cover: 9 -
4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) -
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 65 Yes FAC -
2. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 15 No FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Carex lupulina l Hop sedge 15 No OBL
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5• Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
95 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 47 20%of total cover: 19 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 10 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
10 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W15-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Loam
5-18 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Parent material is red,so soil still seems to hold some color due to weathering of parent material,but not from moisture-related iron oxidation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/12/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W16,17,18,19-Wei
Investigator(s): Byron Levant&lHayley Wood Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28438347 Long: -79.92212825 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
Area logged within the last two years,compacted disturbed soils,disturbance vegetation,hydrology may be slightly altered.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) X True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Due to logging,hydrology may be slightly modified.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W16,17,18,19-Wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 5 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Magnolia tripetala/Umbrella magnolia No FACU Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
5 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 30 x 2= 60
1. Sambucus nigra/Black elderberry 15 Yes FAC FAC species 90 x 3= 270
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. Lindera benzoin/Northern spicebush 5 No FAC UPL species 10 x 5= 50
4 Column Totals: 140 (A) 390 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.79
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
35 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 17 20%of total cover: 7 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 50 Yes FAC
2. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 20 Yes FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Eleocharis/Spikerush 10 No NI
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Typha latifolia/Broadleaf cattail,Broad-leaved cattail 10 No OBL
5. Scirpus cyperinus/Woolgrass 10 No FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
100 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 50 20%of total cover: 20 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
0 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 0 20%of total cover: 0 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W16,17,18,19-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-9 5YR 6/4 85 5YR 6/6 15 C M Clay Loam Disturbed soils
9-18 10YR 5/1 80 5YR 6/6 10 C M Clay Loam Disturbed soils.This represents what the le
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) X Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
These soils are disturbed but are saturated,full of wetland plants,and in geomorphic position to be wet.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/06/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W20-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levan)&)Nathan Howell Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28703131 Long: -79.92161631 Datum: (phone
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) X True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) X Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Slope wetland that seems to be perched on top of bedrock.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W20-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 25 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Magnolia tripetala/Umbrella magnolia 15 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
3. Liriodendron tulipifera/Tuliptree 15 Yes FACU
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 71.4 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
55 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 27 20%of total cover: 11 OBL species 90 x 1 = 90
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 25 x 2= 50
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 25 Yes FAC FAC species 65 x 3= 195
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica/Green ash 10 Yes FACW FACU species 30 x 4= 120
3. Lindera benzoin/Northern spicebush 5 No FAC UPL species 40 x 5= 200
4 Column Totals: 250 (A) 655 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.62
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
40 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
1. Carex lupulina/Hop sedge 75 Yes OBL - Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
2. Osmunda cinnamomea/Cinnamon fern 25 No NI
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 15 No FACW
4. Mimulus ringens/Typical monkeyflower 15 No OBL be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. Osmunda regalis var.spectabilis/Royal fern 15 No NI Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
145 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 72 20%of total cover: 29 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia/Horsebrier 10 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
10 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W20-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C PL Loam ORC along living roots
5-18 10YR 6/1 85 10YR 7/8 15 C M Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Bedrock
Depth(inches): 0-20 Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Shallow aquitard does exist in some areas of wetland.Deeper soil above a bedrock shelf provides hydrologic origin.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Proposed Bennett Farms Residential Development City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 8/9/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: w22(w54)wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell Section,Township, Range: Ellisboro
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29108 Long:-79.921704 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Hatboro silt loam, 0-2%slopes,frequently flooded, long duration NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Riverine Swamp Forest
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Moss Trim Lines(1316)
X Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
X Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W22(W54)Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acer rubrum 40 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Ulmus americana 20 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 8 (A)
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Yes FACW Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
80 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 40 20%of total cover: 16 OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Viburnum nudum 20 Yes OBL FAC species x 3=
2. Ilex decidua 20 Yes FACW FACU species x 4=
3. Lindera benzoin 10 No FAC UPL species x 5=
4. Carpinus caroliniana 10 No FAC Column Totals: (A) (E
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
60 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supportin
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Symplocarpus foetidus 60 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I
2. Juncus effusus 20 No FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Saururus cernuus 20 No OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Lobelia cardinalis 10 No FACW Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)c
5. Carex spp. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless o
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
110 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 55 20%of total cover: 22 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
2. Mikania scandens 10 Yes FACW
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: w22(w54)wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/1 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/06/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W23-Wet
Investigator(s): Trevor Hall Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29073106 Long: -79.92321251 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: PF01a
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) X Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W23-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 6 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 15 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 10 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 85.7 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
25 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 12 20%of total cover: 5 OBL species 45 x 1 = 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 30 Yes FAC FAC species 60 x 3= 180
2 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3 UPL species 15 x 5= 75
4 Column Totals: 120 (A) 300 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.5
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
30 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Saururus cernuus/Lizard's-tail 20 Yes OBL -
2. Osmunda cinnamomea/Cinnamon fern 15 Yes NI
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Woodwardia virginica/Virginia chain fern 15 Yes OBL
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Typha latifolia/Broadleaf cattail,Broad-leaved cattail 10 No OBL
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
g, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
60 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 5 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W23-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/1 100 Muck
2-18 5YR 5/1 100 Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/06/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W24-Wet
Investigator(s): Hayley Woodl&lByron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29182245 Long: -79.92349519 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar forest sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W24-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 6 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 15 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 10 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 75.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
25 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 12 20%of total cover: 5 OBL species 45 x 1 = 45
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Sambucus nigra/Black elderberry 30 Yes FAC FAC species 60 x 3= 180
2. Rubus argutus/Saw-tooth blackberry 10 Yes FACU FACU species 10 x 4= 40
3 UPL species 15 x 5= 75
4 Column Totals: 130 (A) 340 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.62
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
40 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Saururus cernuus/Lizard's-tail 20 Yes OBL -
2. Woodwardia virginica/Virginia chain fern 15 Yes OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Osmunda cinnamomea/Cinnamon fern 15 Yes NI
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Typha latifolia/Broadleaf cattail,Broad-leaved cattail 10 No OBL
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
g, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
60 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 5 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W24-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/1 100 Muck 2/Muck
2-18 5YR 5/1 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Proposed Bennett Farms Residential Development City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 8/9/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: w25(w55)wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell Section,Township, Range: Ellisboro
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29218 Long:-79.92274 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0-2%slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Bottomaland Hardwood Forest
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(61) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
X Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
X Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W25(W55)Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 30 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 6 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 85.7% (A/B
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Lindera benzoin 20 Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Ilex decidua 10 Yes FACW FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (E
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
30 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supportin
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum 40 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I
2. Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Carex spp. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)c
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless o
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
60 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: w25(w55)Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/6 100 Sandy Sandy alluvial overburden
4-12 10YR 4/1 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Proposed Bennett Farms Residential Development City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 8/9/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: w26(w57)wec
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell Section,Township, Range: Ellisboro
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Headwater Drainage Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.291697 Long:-79.919487 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex, 15-25%slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest. Wetland W27 is located immediately adjacent to W26. It is another,small,seepage depression located at the toe-of-
slope,feeding into Stream S33(UT to Jacobs Creek). Due to their similar soils,flora,hydrology,and position in the landscape,they are each
represented by this form.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(614) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
X Water Marks(61) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
X Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W26(W57)Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A/B
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Absent FAC species x 3=
2. FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (E
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
=Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supportin
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Absent 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I
2. present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)c
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless o
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: w26(w57)wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Proposed Bennett Farms Residential Development City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 8/19/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: wza(wloo)wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell Section,Township, Range: Ellisboro
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Headwater Drainage Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.293132 Long:-79.911665 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8-15%slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Headwater Forest.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(61) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
X Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
X Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W28(W100)Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Ulmus americana 20 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 6 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
40 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Viburnum nudum 10 Yes OBL FAC species x 3=
2. FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (E
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
10 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supportin
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Saururus cernuus 10 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must k
2. Juncus effusus 10 Yes FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)c
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless o
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 20 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: w28(w100)wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-12 10YR 4/2 80 5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 1279 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/11/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: W29-Wet
Investigator(s): Byron Levan)&)Nathan Howell Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29310805 Long: -79.90774572 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
X Surface Water(At) X True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) X Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
X Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) X Microtopographic Relief(D4)
X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W29-wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 10 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 30 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Acer rubrum/Red maple 30 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
3. Quercus phellos/Willow oak 10 No FAC
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 15 x 2= 30
1. Lindera benzoin/Northern spicebush 10 Yes FAC FAC species 120 x 3= 360
2. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 10 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3. Acer rubrum/Red maple 10 Yes FAC UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 160 (A) 415 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.59
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
30 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
X 50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
-
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) - 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Juncus effusus/Common bog rush,Soft or lamp rush 15 Yes FACW
2. Saururus cernuus/Lizard's-tail 10 Yes OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Carex lupulina/Hop sedge 10 Yes OBL
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Cirsium muticum/Swamp thistle 5 No OBL
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
40 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 10 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. Smilax rotundifolia/Horsebrier 10 Yes FAC size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
20 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W29-Wet
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Loam
5-18 10YR 6/1 100 Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/04/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: W1-3-Upl
Investigator(s): Byron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 15
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28991911 Long: -79.94707149 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(Al) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(134) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(135) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(69) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1-3-Upl
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum/Red maple 20 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Liquidambar/Sweetgum 15 Yes NI Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
3. Pinus taeda/Loblolly pine 15 Yes FAC
4. Pinus virginiana/Virginia pine 10 No NI Percent of Dominant Species
5. Juniperus virginiana/Eastern red-cedar 10 No FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 70.0 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Pinus taeda/Loblolly pine 10 Yes FAC FAC species 85 x 3= 255
2. Lindera/Spicebush 10 Yes NI FACU species 25 x 4= 100
3 UPL species 35 x 5= 175
4 Column Totals: 145 (A) 530 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.66
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
20 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
) -
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 15 Yes FAC
2. Polystichum acrostichoides/Christmas fern 15 Yes FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Chasmanthium laxum/Slender wood-oats 10 Yes FAC
4. Thelypteris noveboracensis/New york fern 10 Yes FAC be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
g, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
50 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 5 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-3-Upl
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-18 5YR 5/6 100 Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Proposed Bennett Farms Residential Development City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 8/2/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: ws(w50)Upi
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell Section,Township, Range: Ellisboro
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 15
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.293352 Long:-79.935704 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Poplar Forest sandy clay loam,8-15%slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This upland plot is located on an east-facing slope above W6 at the pine/hardwood transition line. The upland plots for W4,W5,W7,W8,and
W9 possess similar edaphic,floristic and hydrologic characteristics. As a result,they are also represented by this form.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(61) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W6(W50)Upl
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Quercus alba 30 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Carya tomentosa 30 Yes UPL That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3. Pinus virginiana 15 Yes UPL Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A/B
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 38 20%of total cover: 15 OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Cornus florida 20 Yes FACU FAC species x 3=
2. Kalmia latifolia 5 Yes FACU FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (E
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
25 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supportin
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Tipularia discolor 10 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I
2. present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)c
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless o
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1. Lonicera japonica 10 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: W6(W50)Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 7.5YR 5/8 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/12/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W10-14,21-UPL
Investigator(s): Byron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 15
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28794271 Long: -79.92432604 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
Area clearcut within the last year
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W10-14,21-UPL
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Liriodendron tulipifera/Tuliptree 10 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant
2. Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
3.
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 57.1 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
10 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua/Sweetgum 15 Yes FAC FAC species 45 x 3= 135
2. Rubus/Blackberry 10 Yes NI FACU species 55 x 4= 220
3. Pinus taeda/Loblolly pine 10 Yes FAC UPL species 10 x 5= 50
4 Column Totals: 110 (A) 405 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.68
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
35 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
50%of total cover: 17 20%of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
) -
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Solidago rugosa/Wrinkle-leaf goldenrod 15 Yes FAC
2. Andropogon virginicus/Broomsedge bluestem 15 Yes FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Ambrosia artemisiifolia/Annual ragweed,Common ragweec 10 No FACU
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Eupatorium capillifolium/Dog-fennel 10 No FACU
5. Erigeron canadensis/Horseweed 10 No FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
g, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
60 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 30 20%of total cover: 12 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 5 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W10-14,21-UPL
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 5YR 5/6 100 Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/12/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: NC Sampling Point: W15-20-Upl
Investigator(s): Byron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 15
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.28393634 Long: -79.92042175 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W15-20-Upl
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Fagus grandifolia/American beech 25 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant
2. Acer rubrum/Red maple 20 Yes FAC Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
3. Liriodendron tulipifera/Tuliptree 10 No FACU
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 55.6 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
55 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 27 20%of total cover: 11 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Lindera/Spicebush 10 Yes NI FAC species 60 x 3= 180
2. Fagus grandifolia/American beech 10 Yes FACU FACU species 60 x 4= 240
3 UPL species 10 x 5= 50
4 Column Totals: 130 (A) 470 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.62
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-
20 =Total Cover X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
) -
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum/Japanese stilt grass 15 Yes FAC
2. Polystichum acrostichoides/Christmas fern 15 Yes FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Chasmanthium laxum/Slender wood-oats 10 Yes FAC
4. Thelypteris noveboracensis/New york fern 10 Yes FAC be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
50 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 5 Yes FAC Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3.
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
5 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 2 20%of total cover: 1 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W15-20-Upl
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 5YR 5/6 100 Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Proposed Bennett Farms Residential Development City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 8/9/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: w22(w54)Up1
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell Section,Township, Range: Ellisboro
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Floodplain Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.291941 Long:-79.922656 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus loam,0-2%slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This upland plot is located between wetlands W22(54)and W25(55). This area is located where the levee begins to transition into the higher
elevation bottomland hardwood floodplain hardwoods. Due to the location of this plot and the similarity in soils,flora,and hydrology,the upland plots
for W23,W24,W25,W26,and W27 are also represented by this form.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(139) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W22(W54)Upl
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 30 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 62.5% (A/B
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 38 20%of total cover: 15 OBL species x 1 =
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Carpinus caroliniana 20 Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Magnolia tripetala 20 Yes FACU FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (E
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is 153.0'
40 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supportin
50%of total cover: 20 20%of total cover: 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum 30 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I
2. Polystichum acrostichoides 20 Yes FACU present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4• Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)c
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless o
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines, less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11 of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 25 20%of total cover: 10 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 15 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

SOIL Sampling Point: w22(w54)Upi
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 7.5YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-12 7.5YR 5/8 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Bennett Farm City/County: Rockingham Sampling Date: 08/12/2021
Applicant/Owner: LGI Homes State: INC Sampling Point: W28,W29-Upl
Investigator(s): Byron Levan Section,Township,Range: Stokesdale
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 15
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-P,MLRA 136 Lat: 36.29169252 Long: -79.91189387 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview-Poplar Forest complex,8 to 15 percent slopes,moderately eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
_ Surface Water(At) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_ High Water Table(A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
_ Saturation(A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Drainage Patterns(1310)
_ Water Marks(131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_ Drift Deposits(133) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_ Iron Deposits(65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4)
FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W28,W29-Upl
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
Absolute Dominant Indicator That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) %Cover Species? Status
1. Nyssa sylvatica/Blackgum 15 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
2. Liriodendron tulipifera/Tuliptree 10 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
3. Quercus alba/White oak 10 Yes FACU
4. Pinus taeda/Loblolly pine 10 Yes FAC Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 33.3 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
45 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 22 20%of total cover: 9 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Pinus taeda/Loblolly pine 10 Yes FAC FAC species 45 x 3= 135
2. Liriodendron tulipifera/Tuliptree 10 Yes FACU FACU species 60 x 4= 240
3 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4 Column Totals: 105 (A) 375 (B)
5.
6 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.57
7.
8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
9. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
20 =Total Cover _ 2-Dominance Test is>50%
3-Prevalence Index<_3.0'
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft radius ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
1. Polystichum acrostichoides/Christmas fern 5 Yes FACU
2. Tipularia discolor Crippled-cranefly 5 Yes FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. Goodyera pubescens/Downy rattlesnake-plantain 5 Yes FACU
be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
5. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
6.
7. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
8. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
9, height.
10.
11. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
15 =Total Cover than 3 in.DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)
50%of total cover: 7 20%of total cover: 3 tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia/Virginia creeper 10 Yes FACU Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless of
2. Vitis rotundifolia/Muscadine 10 Yes FAC size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
3. Lonicera japonica/Japanese honeysuckle 5 Yes FACU
4• Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5. height.
25 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 12 20%of total cover: 5 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W28,W29-Upl
Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 5/6 100 Clay Loam
'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol(Al) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8) (MLRA 147,148) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck(A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
(LRR N,MLRA 147,148) (LRR N,MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Umbric Surface(F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present.
Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID# NCDWR#
Project Name Bennett Farms Residential Date of Evaluation 8/11/2021
Development
Applicant/Owner Name LGI Homes, Inc. Wetland Site Name W13
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Nathan Howell-Three Oaks
Engineering
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Jacobs Creek
River Basin Roanoke USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03010103
County Rockingham NCDWR Region Raleigh
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude deci-de rees 36.288707,-79.924169
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past(for instance,within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams, beaver dams,dikes, berms, ponds,etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks(USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage,disease,storm damage, salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration(examples: mowing,clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations-Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any?(check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal(if tidal,check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure(VS)in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks,excessive
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance,herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,less
diversity[if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and duration(Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially(typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water> 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure-assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions,or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon< 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon>_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland-opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub). Examples
of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen, particulate,or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use-opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10%impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >-20%coverage of pasture
®D ®D ®D >-20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer-assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_50 feet
❑B From 30 to<50 feet
®C From 15 to<30 feet
❑D From 5 to< 15 feet
❑E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered-adjacent open water with width <2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
[]Exposed-adjacent open water with width >_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area-wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT)and
the wetland complex at the assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ®A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to< 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to<80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to<50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to<40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to<30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to< 15 feet
❑H ❑H <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric (skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to<25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to< 10 acres
®G ®G ®G From 1 to<5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to< 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely)to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water> 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
®A ®A >_500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to<500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to< 100 acres
❑D ❑D From 10 to<50 acres
❑E ❑E < 10 acres
❑F ❑F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas>_40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option"C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(< 10%cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has> 10%to 50%cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
❑A >_25%coverage of vegetation
❑B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o❑A ❑A Canopy closed,or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present,but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
>,
o❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
1= ®B ®B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
mc ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH); many large trees(> 12 inches DBH)are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are> 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
®A Large logs(more than one)are visible(> 12 inches in diameter,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams,and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C,or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Wetland W13 occurs in the floodplains of both Jacobs Creek and an UT to Jacobs Creek(0.75 sq. mi.watershed size). The floodplain has been
recently clear cut. This was the first growing season post timber removal. Wetlands W10,W12,W16,W17,W 18,and W21 all occur in clearcut
floodplains along Jacobs Creek and an UT to Jacobs Creek. They all possess similar landscape positions as well as hydrologic, floristic, and
edaphic characterisitcs;therefore,they are also included on this form. Overbank flow from Jacobs VCreek and the UT to Jacobs Creek is altered
due to significant stream incision.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name W13 Date of Assessment 8/11/2021
Nathan Howell -Three
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Oaks Engineering
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-surface Storage and
Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Soluble Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

Appendix C
ORM Data Entry Form
JD Request Form
PJD Form
Agent Authorization Form
Real Estate Purchase Contract
ORM Waters Upload Sheet
Three 04b FINOR ►Inq MreeMsenpmevmW om

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW- 202 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Bennett Farms PJD
2. Work Type: Private ❑0 Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑
3. Project Description/ Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
PJD Delineations for Bennett Farms Parcels
4. Property Owner/Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: LGI Homes, Inc.
5. Agent/Consultant [PCN Form A5-or ORM Consultant ID Number]: James Mason - 3 Oaks
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location -Coordinates, Street Address,and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
36.291431, -79.925897
792204840294
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]:792201050275, 792201255899, 792202767238
9. Project Location—County [PCN Form A2b]: Rockingham
10. Project Location—Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Stokesdale
11. Project Information—Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Roanoke
12. Watershed/8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03010103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 FE-1 Section 10 &404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit ❑ Pre-Application Request
U Nationwide Permit# Unauthorized Activity
❑ Regional General Permit# ❑ Compliance
0 Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Jurisdictional Determination Request
M
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination(JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District(Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.Lkmy.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE&CHARLOTTE REGULATORY WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
FIELD OFFICES US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208 Washington,North Carolina 27889
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number:[phone]
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue
3331 Heritage Trade Drive,Suite 105 Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
Wake Forest,North Carolina 27587 General Number:910-251-4633
General Number:[phone] Fax Number:[phone]
Fax Number:[phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C,D,E,F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency,please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D—PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination,which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D -NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service,prior to starting work.
Version:May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Bert Drive I Bennett Farm Road I Griffin Road
City, state: Stokesdale, NC
County: Rockingham
Parcel Index Number(,) (PIN): 792201050275, 792201255899, 792202767238
792204840294
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: James Mason
Mailing Address: 324 Blackwell St, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
Telephone Number: 704-604-8358
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other,please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Bert Bennett
Mailing address: 313 Bennett Farm Road
Stokesdale, NC 27357
Telephone Number: 336-407-4371
Electronic Mail address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request(copy of Deed,County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version:May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps)to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
James Mason
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
October 7, 2021
Date James Digitally signed by James
Mason
Mason Date:2021.10.07
18:28:22-04'00'
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols,skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties,please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version:May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination(PJD)provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or"navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional"waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed(33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination(AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional"waters of the United States"or"navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner,permit applicant, or other"affected
parry" (33 C.F.R. 331.2)who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 525 acres.
❑ The property boundary(or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version:May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.291431
Longitude: -79.925897
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or"Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
ul Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled"Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations"to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hgp://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re2ulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
Version:May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
zCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form'and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs•please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
F4 Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
✓0 USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
DOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan,previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02 Ann A Prelim JD Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see htip://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiy-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the proj ect area subj ect to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses:This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal,state,and local
government agencies,and the public,and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination(AJD),which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure:Submission of requested information is voluntary;however,if information is not provided,the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version:May 2017 Pagc 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: .lames Mason,324 Blackwell St,Suite 1200,Durham, NC 27701
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Rockingham City: Stokesdale
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.291431 Long.: -79.925897
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Roanoke
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject(i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
See Attached List

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD)for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Vicinity Map, Topo Map, Aerial Map, LiDAR Map
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 1971 Ellisboro, NC
Q Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1992 Rockingham County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determi nation(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
James Digitally signed by James
Mason
Mason Date:2021.09.23
11:34:13-04'00'
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Three Oaks Engineering
324-51ac)-Q"-LStrW,Suite 200
DWrh m,.NC_277Q1
Office: 919-7321300
Cell: 810.876.3Q16
SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
792201050275, 792201255899
PItopwry LFGAL DESCRIPTION:
792202767238, 792204840294
LOT No. PLAN N10. PARCEL ID:
STIW AWIM: Bennett Farm Road 1 Bert Drive I Griffin Road
P'° porc Bert Bennett
Property Owr►er. - - — - - --
Property Owner:
The undersigned,roglstered property owners of the above noted property,do hereby AutI oAze
James Mason Of Three Oaks Engineering
(Contractor/Agent) (Name of consulting Arm)
to art on my beha#and take ah actions necessary for the processing, Issuance and acceptance of
this permit or ce"cation and any and an standard and special conditions attached.
Property Ovmer's Address(d diftcrent than pruperty abuve):
313 Bennett Farm Road Stokesdale, NC 27357
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby(entity the above lnformation submitted In this application is true and accurate to the

best of our bwMedgL
James Digitally signed by James
Mason
{/ Mason Date:2021.09.23
11:31:50-04'00'
Authorized Authorized Signature -- ——
Doe: Tfaf Tom( tom: 9/22/2021

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT
(Bennett Farms Property—Vacant Land—Rockingham County,NC)
THIS REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT(the"Contract') is made and entered into
as of the date last executed below(the"Effective Date")between BENNETT FARMS,LLC, a North
Carolina limited liability company, JACOBS CREEK FARMS, LLC a North Carolina limited
liability company, W. BERT BENNETT AS TRUSTEE OF W. BERT BENNET REVOCABLE
TRUST dated DECEMBER 13,2002 (together,jointly and severally as"Seller"),and LGI HOMES
- NC, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company (the "Buyer").
RECITALS
A. Seller is owner of certain real property comprised of more than 530+/-undeveloped acres
in Rockingham County, North Carolina, all of which is described more particularly on Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof as the"Overall Property."
B. Buyer desires to purchase virtually all but not quite all of the Overall Property
(approximately 529 acres out of the total acreage and described more particularly on Exhibit A), together
with all improvements, and other rights, privileges, licenses, easements, pennits, approvals, other
development rights, entitlements appurtenant thereto, and all right, title and interest in and to all oil, gas
and mineral rights, and all streets and water courses, on, adjacent to,abutting or serving the real property
appurtenant thereto(all together, the"Property") upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. For
purposes of this Contract, the Overall Property, less and except the Property, is hereinafter referred to as
the"Seller Retained Property".
C. Buyer desires to purchase the Property upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set
forth.
NOW,THEREFORE. in consideration of the agreements contained herein,the Earnest Money
(defined below), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
I. Property. Seller agrees to sell to Buyer. and Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller. the
Property.
2. Earnest Money. Not later than five (5) business days after the Effective Date, Buyer
shall deposit with McDonnell and Associates, Attn: Kim Fianna, 2442 Devine Street, Columbia, South
Carolina 29205 ("Escrow Agent")the sum of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
($200,000.00)as earnest money(together with any later deposited earnest money described herein once the
same has been deposited, ifany,the"Earnest Money"). Escrow Agent shall hold all Earnest Money in
an escrow account with a federally-insured financial institution. All Earnest Money be held and
disbursed in accordance with the terms of this Contract and in any event shall be disbursed and applied
against the Purchase Price at Closing if Closing takes place.
3. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property (the "Purchase Price") shall be as
follows (with the Site Plan A and B Property together comprising the Property): TWENTY-EIGHT
THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS(28 000 00) per gross acre of the"Site Plan A Property"(defined
on Exhibit A) and THIRTY THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($30 000 00) per gross acre of
Property forthe"Site Plan B Property"(defined on Exhibit A),with all such gross acreage being established

during the Feasibility Period by Buyer's Survey(defined below)rounded to the nearest tenth of an acre(so
for example if the surveyed acreage of the Site Plan A Property is 392.02 acres and surveyed acreage of the
Site Plan B Property is 137.95 acres, then the Purchase Price would be $15.1 16.000.00). The Purchase
Price is payable at Closing as provided herein and subject to all terms hereof.
4. Closin . If Buyer has not terminated this Contract under Section 8 below,then,subject
to all terms and provisions herein (including without limitation the Conditions Precedent), Closing on
the Property("Closing")shall occur on or before that date which is thirty(30)days after expiration
of the Feasibility Period (the"Outside Date"). Closing shall occur at/through the offices of Buyer's
attorney unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties.
5. Costs and Prorations.
a. Seller shall pay at or before Closing, all real estate taxes. and all other public
or governmental charges and public or private assessments against the Property (including
metropolitan district, sanitary commission, benefit charges, liens or encumbrances for sewer, water,
drainage or other public improvements whether completed or commenced on or prior to the date hereof
or subsequent thereto,and/or any private assessments);all or any of which are pertaining to or are past
due (as the case may be) for any and all periods prior to the year of Closing.
b. All real estate taxes, and all other public or governmental charges and public
or private assessments against the Property for the year of Closine (including metropolitan district.
sanitary commission,benefit charges, liens or encumbrances for sewer,water,drainage or other public
improvements whether completed or commenced on or prior to the date hereof or subsequent thereto,
and/or private assessments),shall be adjusted and prorated between the parties as of the day of Closing
(with Seller paying/being responsible for all of the same through and including the day of Closing)and
shall thereafter be assumed and paid by Buyer, whether or not assessments have been levied as of the
date of Closing. Any tax proration based on an estimate shall be subsequently readjusted upon receipt
of a tax bill. The obligations to adjust shall survive Closing.
C. The cost of documentary stamps and transfer taxes fees shal I be paid by Seller.
Buyer shall pay for recording fees, title insurance and costs of its financing.
d. Notwithstanding any contrary terms and provisions herein, and without
limiting any other terms and provisions herein. Seller shall pay at or before Closing, (i)all rollback or
like taxes for periods prior to and for the year of Closing, if any, and (ii) the cost of preparing release
documents, if any. and the recording thereof for any lien releases required to be obtained by Seller in
order to convey title to the Property in accordance with Section 6. If the cost of any taxes described in
this Section 5(d)are not known at the time of Closing. Seller shall escrow(with Escrow Agent out of
Seller's proceeds at Closing) the estimated amount that will be due and payable for the same if the
exact amount of the same is not capable of being known as of the date of Closing.
e. Buyer shall pay all premiums and costs associated with any title commitment
and title policy obtained by it on the Property, the cost to record the deed for the Property, the cost of
surveys, if any, obtained by Buyer, and any other expense agreed to be paid by Buyer. Except as
provided in Section 33. each party shall bear its own attorney, paralegal and consultant fees and
disbursement in connection with this Contract and Closing. Buyer and Seller shall share equally any
Escrow Agent fees(if any)that are associated with this Contract.
2

This Section 5 shall survive Closing or tennination of this Contract.
6. Title to Property.
a. Title and survey to the Property shall be good and marketable of record and in
fact, free and clear of all liens,encumbrances,encroachments and violation notices from any Authority
other than the"Permitted Exceptions", which Buyer shall determine and identify to Seller in writing
prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Period. Buyer shall obtain a commitment for an owner's policy
of title insurance ("Buyer's Title Commitment") during the Feasibility Period and shall provide a
copy of the same(and the Survey that Buyer has prepared during the Feasibility Period)to Seller along
with its written notice of Permitted Exceptions described above. In the event that Buyer's Title
Commitment or survey, as the case may be,contains/reveals matters which Buyer finds objectionable,
then at such time as Buyer provides Seller with notice of the Permitted Exceptions, Buyer shall notify
Seller of any objections to title or survey. Seller shall have the right, within ten (10) days from
receiving such notice, to elect: (i)to cure the title/survey defect at Seller's cost and expense,or(ii)not
to cure such detect. Seller's failure to notify Buyer within the stated time frame shall be deemed
Seller's election to cure. If Seller elects or is deemed to have elected to cure. Seller shall do so at or
before Closing. If Seller elects not to cure. Buyer shall have the right to either waive the defect and
close without a reduction in the Purchase Price. or to terminate the Contract prior to Closing in which
event the Earnest Money shall be immediately refunded to Buyer.
b. Buyer shall likewise obtain a survey of the Property (and deliver a copy of the
same to Seller) during the Feasibility Period, which survey shall be certified to Buyer. Seller, and the
title company and shall be subject to the approval of Seller(the"Survey"). The Survey shall set forth
the exact acreage of the Property rounded to the nearest tenth of one acre and the Survey shall show
(and shall set up to work as a conveyance plat at Seller's expense if requested by Seller as necessary
to allow Seller to retain the Seller Retained Property) the Seller Retained Property and the Property
together. In the event any encroachments or other survey objections are reflected on the Survey, then
Buyer may (during the Feasibility Period) make objections. whereupon such objections shall be
handled in accordance with Section 6(a)above.
C. If,after expiration of the Feasibility Period Buyer determines that there are new
title and/or Survey exceptions that are not Permitted Exceptions and that are first appearing after the
effective date of Buyer's Title Commitment to which Buyer objects. Buyer may notify Seller, in
writing, of such title/survey defects prior to Closing and Seller shall cure such defects at or before
Closing.
d. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Buyer shall not be required to
object to monetary liens (including but not limited to assessments,which if past due, would constitute
or allow for the enforcement by lien) or other monetary encumbrances or any form of real property
taxes, and the parties agree that such items will be released at Seller's expense as of Closing and as
provided herein,and fiends payable by Buyer at Closing may be used to pay off any existing liens, real
property taxes, encumbrances or violation penalties. including accrued interest thereon.
7. Broker and Commission. Buyer represents and warrants to Seller that Buyer has not
used the services of any real estate agent, broker or finder with respect to the transactions contemplated
hereby. Seller represents and warrants to Buyer that Seller has not used the services of any real estate
agent, broker or finder with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby. Each party agrees to
3

indemnify and hold harmless the other against and from any inaccuracy in such Party's representation
tinder this Section 7. This indemnification shall survive Closing.
8. Feasibility Period. Buyer shall have a period extending from the Effective Date
through and including the date which is ninety (90) dam after the Effective Date (the "Feasibility
Period"). within which Buyer may, in its sole discretion, terminate this Contract for any reason. If
Buyer does not terminate the Contract via written notice of such termination to Seller (the
"Termination Notice") before the expiration of the Feasibility Period, then Buyer shall no longer be
permitted to terminate this Contract, except as otherwise specifically stated herein, and this Contract
shall remain in full force and effect. If Buyer does terminate this Contract during the Feasibility Period
in accordance with the provisions set forth herein and by providing the Termination Notice required
hereunder,then this Contract shall terminate effective upon Seller's receipt of the Termination Notice,
and the Earnest Money shall be returned to Buyer. Upon such termination and Buyer's receipt of the
Earnest Money,neither party shall have any further rights nor obligations hereunder except for Buyer's
obligations to restore the Property as provided in Section 9. or as otherwise expressly set forth herein.
Upon expiration of the Feasibility Period if Buyer has not terminated the contract pursuant to
this Section 8,the Earnest Money shall be deemed to be non-refundable,except as otherwise expressly
set forth in this Contract.
Without limitation, during the Feasibility Period. Buyer and Seller shall together cooperate,
with Buyer taking primary responsibility and with Buyer bearing the full cost, to prepare, apply for
and to diligently pursue or re-establish (as the case may be) final, binding and non-appealable zoning,
utilities, site plan approvals, construction drawings, and any other approvals reasonably required (all
together the "Regulatory Approvals") from Rockingham County. State of North Carolina, and any
other applicable state, local or other regulatory authorities as applicable (all together for purposes
hereof, the "authorities"), so that Buyer can develop. market, construct and sell (as the case may be)
at least 1,650 single family lots and homes (of the type, size and style that Buyer intends to construct
and using such materials as Buyer intends to use) and related roads, drives. common areas and
amenities. on the Property all suitable in all respects to Buyer in Buyer's sole discretion.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, and without limiting Buyer's right to terminate this Contract for any
reason or for no reason during the Feasibility Period, Buyer shall in no event be required to expend
money or revise its plans to defend or to continue to pursue any Regulatory Approval under this Section
8,or defend any appeal of any Regulatory Approval it obtains, if, in Buyer's reasonable discretion,and
as the case may be, it appears as likely that suitable approval will not be granted, or that any party
seeking to overturn the approval will be strccessftrl.or that the appeal will not be resolved on or before
the expiration of the Feasibility Period,and following expiration of the Feasibility Period, if applicable,
any refusal to continue on such grounds shall be deemed a failure of Condition Precedent to Buyer's
obligation to close For purposes hereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing. Buyer shall have the unilateral right to extend the Feasibility
Period one (1)time (with each extension being up to 30 days) by written notice of extension to Seller.
if needed in Buyer's discretion to complete due diligence and approvals.
9. Access to Property. Seller covenants that Buyer and Buyer's agents, employees and
independent contractors shall have the right and privilege to enter upon the entirety of the Property at
any time following the Effective Date and prior to Closing to survey, test, investigate, review and
inspect the Property and to conduct soil borings and other geological, engineering, or environmental
tests or studies on the Property and any other tests or inspections Buyer deerns appropriate, all at
4

Buyer's sole cost and expense. Buyer shall indemnify, defend and hold Seller harmless from and
against any liens, claims, losses, damages and liabilities resulting from Buyer's exercising the right
and privilege to go upon the Property as provided herein: provided, however,that Buyer shall have no
responsibility or liability for (a) any act or omission of Seller or its employees, agents, contractors or
invitees; or(b) any adverse condition or defect on or affecting the Property not caused by Buyer or its
employees, agents, consultants, or contractors but discovered or impacted during their inspections
including. without limitation, the pre-existing presence or discovery of any matter such as, but not
limited to,any hazardous materials. If this transaction does not close. Buyer shall restore the Property
to a reasonably neat and presentable condition free from any damage to the Property caused by Buyer's
activities on the Property. Seller acknowledges that earth moving equipment will be used to provide
access to the Property for Buyer to perform the tests (including soil borings), tree removal (only as
reasonably necessary),equipment tracks and other incidental cutting of brush in connection with such
tests shall not be deemed damage for purposes of Buyer's restoration obligations under this Section 9.
10. Eminent Domain. If, at any time prior to Closing, Seller receives notice of the
commencement or threatened commencement of eminent domain or other like proceedings against the
Property or any portion thereof, Seller shall immediately give Notice thereof to Buyer. Buyer shall
elect (by the later to occur of the end of the Feasibility Period or thirty (30)days after Buyer's receipt
of Seller's Notice) either (i) to terminate this Contract, in which event the Earnest Money shall be
refunded to Buyer, or (ii) to Close on some or all of the Property, in which event the Purchase Price
shall not be reduced but Seller shall assign to Buyer Seller's rights in any condemnation award or
proceeds. If necessary to allow Buyer to exercise its rights under this Section 10,then the Outside Date
shall automatically be extended by the required number of days to allow for the exercise of such rights.
I I. Notice. Each Notice ("Notice') provided for under this Contract shall be in writing
and shall be: i) physically delivered in person; or ii)sent by depositing it with a nationally recognized
overnight courier (such as Federal Express) with adequate postage prepaid. for next day delivery
addressed to the appropriate party(and marked to a particular individual's attention if so indicated)as
hereinafter provided; or iii) by electronic transmittal to a fax (with confirmation of delivery) or email
address set forth below(provided, however, that no electronic delivery to an email or fax address shall
be good Notice hereunder unless a fax or email address, as the case may be, is expressly stated below).
Each Notice personally delivered shall be effective on delivery (email being deemed delivered on the
date sent without kick-back notice of delivery failure); each Notice sent by a nationally recognized
overnight courier shall be effective when deposited with the courier for delivery as specified herein.
The parties' addresses shall be those set forth below and a copy of any Notice shall be sent to parties
designated below,and notice provided by either party's attorney is good notice:
As to Seller: Bennett Farms LLC (For all Seller entities)
Attn: Bert Bennett
313 Bennett Farm Road
Stokesdale. NC 27357
Email: bertbennett(a)g_mail.com
Email: am).matthews(&me.com
With a copy to: Email: idunhamrltuggleduggins.com
To Buyer: LGI Homes-NC, LLC
Attn: Drew Kirchner
6500 Creedmoor Road,Suite 212
5

Raleigh,NC 27613
Email: dre%%.kirchner(ic)lgihomes.ctmt
With a copy to: Matthew G. St. Amand. Esq. (as Buyer's attorney)
St. Amand& Efird PLLC
3315 Springbank Lane,Suite 308
Charlotte,NC 28226
E-Mail: mstamand(datamand-etird.com
To Escrow Agent: McDonnell and Associates(Title Agency)
Attn: Kim Hanna
2442 Devine Street,
Columbia, South Carolina 29205
Email: Kim.Hanna(&mcdonnelI law firm.com
Any party shall have the right from time to time to change the address or individual's attention to which
Notices to it shall be sent by giving to the other party at least five(5)days' prior Notice thereof. Notice
by a herein listed attorney for a party shall suffice as notice of said party.
12. Seller's Covenants. Warranties and Representations. Seller covenants, represents and
warrants (which covenants, representations and warranties shall be true as of the Effective Date, all
during the entire term of this Contract,and at the time of Closing)as follows:
a. Seller has good, marketable, indefeasible and insurable fee simple title to the
Property, free and clear of any objections,easements, liens,encumbrances,restrictions,encroachments
or other survey exceptions of every nature, other than the Permitted Encumbrances.
b. To the best of Seller's knowledge, there is no action, suit, investigation or
proceeding by or before any Court, arbitrator, administrative agency or other authorities initiated at
any time, now pending or, to the best of Seller's knowledge, threatened which involves Seller, or the
Property, and which if adversely determined would have a material adverse effect on the Property, nor
is there, to the best of Seller's knowledge, any state of facts, or occurrence of any event which might
give rise to any of the foregoing.
C. To the best of Seller's knowledge, the execution, delivery and performance of
this Contract by Seller does not and will not result in any violation of.or be in conflict with or constitute
a default under,any provisions of any agreement,judgment.decree,order,statute.rule or governmental
regulation to which Seller is a party or which affects the Property.
d. To the best of Seller's knowledge, there are no proceedings for the taking of
any of the Property by eminent domain, or for changing the public access thereto from abutting streets
by any authorities pending or, to the best knowledge of Seller, threatened.
e. This Contract as executed by Seller is the valid and binding obligation of Seller.
The execution and delivery of this Contract by Seller and the execution and delivery of the deed and
other documents as are necessary or desirable to effectuate the transaction contemplated by this
Contract are within Seller's capacity and all requisite action has been taken to make this Contract valid
and binding on Seller in accordance with its terms,and the person executing this Contract on behalf of
6

Seller has the authority to do so. No consent or approval of, prior filing with or notice to, or other
action by, any governmental body or agency, or any other person or entity is required in connection
with the execution and delivery of this Contract by Seller or its partners, or the consummation of the
transactions provided for herein. All spouses of all parties hereto are likewise executing this Contract
and are bound by the same. If Seller is a trust or other entity rather than an individual person, then
Seller is legally established and in good standing under the laws of the State of North Carolina and is
legally authorized and in good standing to do business in the State of North Carolina Any trustee
described herein purporting to act for a trust has the unilateral legal authority to do so.
f. Seller has not entered into any other contracts, agreements or understandings,
verbal or written, for the sale or transfer of any portion of the Property. Between the date of this
Contract and Closing hereunder, Seller shall not alienate, encumber the Property, contract to sell or
assign its rights to purchase/sell the Property, or transfer the Property, other than to Buyer. From and
after the Effective Date Seller shall not, without Buyer's written consent(i)alter or permit waste upon
the Property, (ii) grant any easements or rights-of-way affecting the Property, (iii) convey any estate
or interest in the Property, (iv) further encumber the Property, (v)cut or sell any timber located on the
Property or(vi) move or demolish any existing buildings or other structures located on the Property.
g. To the best of Seller's knowledge, the Property has been operated so as to
comply with all laws. statutes. regulations, rules and other requirements of any authorities applicable
to it, and there are no outstanding notices,judgments, orders, writs or decrees of any judicial or other
authorities binding specifically against the Seller and/or otherwise pertaining to the Property.
h. Without limiting the foregoing Seller's use of the Property,and to Seller's best
knowledge, there has been no presence or disposal, except as in accordance with applicable law, on
the Property of hazardous or toxic waste or substances, which are defined as those substances,
materials, and wastes listed in the United States Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials
Table(49 CFR Part 172.101).or by the Environmental Protection Agency as hazardous substances(40
CFR Part 302.4), and amendments thereto, or such substances, materials and wastes. which are
regulated under any applicable local, state or federal law, including, without limitation, any material,
waste or substance which is:(i)petroleum,(ii)asbestos,(iii)polychlorinated biphenyls,(iv)designated
as a Hazardous Substance pursuant to §31 1 of the Clean Water Act of 1977(33 U.S.C. §1321)or listed
pursuant to §307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. §1317). (v)defined as a hazardous waste
pursuant to §1004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. §6903)or(vi)
defined as a hazardous substance pursuant to §101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response.
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980(42 U.S.C. §9601). Further,to the best of Seller's knowledge,
(i) Seller has received no notice from any authorities having jurisdiction thereof that the Property and
the use thereof are now or have previously been in violation of any Environmental Laws;and(ii)there
does not exist on the Property any hazardous substance, hazardous waste,pollutant,contaminant,toxic
substance, asbestos, oil, or other petroleum or chemical, biological or radioactive substance which is
subject to regulation under any Environmental Laws or any storage tank used for the storage thereof.
whether above-ground or underground; (iii) there has been no discharge, storage or disposal of any
hazardous substance, hazardous waste, pollutant, contaminant, toxic substance, asbestos, oil, other
petroleum or chemical, biological or radioactive substance which is subject to regulation under any of
the Environmental Laws on or from the Property;and(iv)any and all reports,analyses,studies or other
documentation owned or controlled by Seller identifying or relating to any hazardous substance.
hazardous waste,pollutant,contaminant,toxic substance.asbestos.oil.or other petroleum or chemical.
biological or radioactive substance which is subject to regulation under any Environmental Laws or
7

any storage tank used for the storage thereof. used in connection with, existing upon, stored upon or
disposed or discharged on or from the Property have been delivered to Buyer.
i. No commitments have been made by Seller to any authorities, utility company,
school board,church, religious body,or other organization,group, or individual that would impose an
obligation upon Buyer to construct any improvements.to make any contribution of money, to dedicate
any land or to maintain any land for improvements.
j. No site or area improvements have been constructed or installed by any public
authority, the cost of which may be assessed in whole or in part against any part of the Property, and
Seller has not been notified of any possible future improvements that might create an assessment
against any part of the Property.
k. Seller has no knowledge that the Property has been used as a landfill or that
any construction or other debris has been buried on any portion of the Property.
I. Seller has no knowledge that the Property contains any threatened or
endangered species or endangered or protected habitats or burial grounds or items of historical or
archaeological significance as defined by applicable state and federal laws.
M. As disclosed to the Buyer. the following utilities are accesible to the Property:
public water, public sewer. electricity, phone, cable and gas. The Property touches and fronts on and
has direct access to a dedicated public roadway.
n. Seller has no actual knowledge of any inaccuracies in any of the Documents
provided pursuant to Section 24. If Seller receives any Documents during the term of this Contract,
then Seller shall provide by Seller to Buyer are full and complete copies of the same (as received by
Seller) to Buyer within three (3)days of Seller's receipt of the same.
o. Seller has not and does not contemplated filing for or seeking relief under the
United States Bankruptcy Code or any other law.ordinance, state,code,or regulation. state or federal,
providing for debtor relief.
Seller shall not allow or cause any action to be taken that will cause any of the foregoing
representations or warranties to be materially untrue or materially incorrect at Closing, or fail to take
any action that may be required to keep such representations and warranties materially true and
materially correct at Closing. In the event any of the foregoing representations or warranties materially
change prior to or at Closing. Seller shall provide immediate notice of such change to Buyer. In the
event such change is not caused by the action of Seller or a failure of Seller to act, then Buyer shall
have the right to terminate this Contract by delivery of written notice to Seller within five (5) days of
Buyer's receipt of notice of the change and receive return of its Earnest Money.
13. Conditions Precedent to Buyer's Obligations. The obligation of Buyer to consummate
the transaction provided for herein is subject to the following conditions (none of which limit any of
the others or limit any other terms or provisions in this Contract), each of which must have been
satisfied (or waived by Buyer in its sole discretion)by the Outside Date for Closing:
8

a. Seller shall have performed all of its obligations under this Contract, has not
violated any covenants set forth in this Contract and all representations and warranties of Seller set
forth in this Contract shall be true and correct as of the Closing Date.
b. Title to the Property shall be as set forth in Section 6 and Buyer shall have
obtained title insurance insuring Buyer's title to the Property at standard rates, all in accordance with
Section 6.
C. There shall have been no material adverse change in the physical condition
(including but not limited to the environmental condition)of the Property from that as it exists on the
Effective Date of this Contract.
d. There shall exist no condition(or lack of condition as the case may be) relating
to the Property either on site or off site (including a moratorium or other requirement of any authority)
that did not exist (or that did exist in the case of a condition now lacking)at the end of the Feasibility
Period. and that is not within the sole control and responsibility of Buyer(at no expense to Buyer and
Without requiring Buyer to change its plans for the development of the Property)to cure, which would
result in any authority delaying or denying permits necessary for the development, construction, use
or occupancy of the subdivision improvements(including infrastructure and utilities)and the minimum
of 1.650 homes that Buyer intends to construct on the Property when application is made therefor.
e. The Regulatory Approvals have been obtained from all applicable authorities.
with all appeal periods for challenging the same having run without an appeal being filed.
f. All utility services (meaning without limitation, public water, public sewer,
storm sewer.electricity,street lights,telephone,gas,and cable television)reasonably necessary for the
development of the Property as a residential subdivision and for the construction of not fewer than
1,650 homes and issuance of certificates of occupancy for the same, all as contemplated herein, are
available to the Property line (either by existing lines/facilities or by existing easements running in
favor of Property and benefitting the owner of the same or the public), with public water and sanitary
sewer capacity allocated to the Property sufficient to serve the above described development.
construction and issuance of certificates of occupancy
In the event any of the foregoing Conditions Precedent have not been satisfied to
Buyer's satisfaction prior to the Outside Date for Closing. Buyer shall have the right to waive the
unsatisfied Condition Precedent and close or terminate this Contract and the Earnest Money shall be
paid to Buyer; provided, however, that Buyer shall have the one-time unilateral right (exercisable by
written notice to Seller) to extend the Outside Date for Closing, not to exceed 45 days, to allow
additional time for satisfaction of any then yet unsatisfied Conditions Precedent, If Buyer exercises
this right to extend the Outside Date then Buyer shall (concurrently with notice of extension to Seller)
deposit an additional $25,000.00 with Escrow Agent, which amount shall be additional deposit
hereunder and shall be part of and treated as Earnest Money for all purposes hereunder. If Buyer
extends the Outside Date as above and all Conditions Precedent have still not been satisfied within the
45-day extension,then Buyer shall either close on the Property(waiving any Conditions Precedent that
are still unsatisfied), or the Contract shall terminate and the Earnest Money shall be paid to Buyer.
14. Intentionally Omitted
9

15. Closing Documents. Seller shall convey title to the Property to Buyer in accordance
with the provisions hereof by execution and delivery of a general warranty deed conveying to Buyer
good. marketable and insurable fee simple title to the Property free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances except for the Permitted Exceptions (the Property to be therein conveyed either by
description in Seller's vesting deed or by description in Buyer's Survey, if applicable, in Buyer's
reasonable discretion) and by a non-warranty deed from each Seller party for the overall boundary
legal description of the all the Property per Buyer's Survey (for avoidance of doubt and coverage of
gaps). Seller shall also furnish at Closing (i) a lien and possession affidavit on the Title Company's
standard form; (ii)a non-foreign affidavit; (iii)a 1099 reporting form; iv) if Buyer determines it is
applicable during its Feasibility Period and in Buyer's discretion.a quit claim Assignment and Bill of
Sale executed by Seller in order to convey such personal property rights/interests and such intangible
appurtenant property related rights as pertain to and are part of the Property as herein described; and
(v) such other documents and instruments as Buyer may reasonably require or which may be required
to satisfy any conditions of Buyer's title insurance company. At Closing, Buyer shall deliver to Seller
the Purchase Price (taking account of all other costs and adjustments provided for herein) and such
documents and instruments as Seller shall reasonably require, in form and substance reasonably
approved by Seller.
16. Severability. Any provision of this Contract,or portion thereof, which is prohibited or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall as to such jurisdiction be ineffective to the extent of such
prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof, portions thereof,
and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render
unenforceable such provision,or portion thereof. in any other jurisdiction.
17. Default. This document shall be construed as a contract to sell real estate binding upon
the parties hereto.
a. If Seller defaults in the performance of any obligation of Seller set forth in this
Contract, then Buyer may, by written notice to Seller, elect to pursue either of Buyer's sole and
exclusive remedies hereunder, which are to: (a) terminate the Contract. in which event Buyer shall be
entitled to the return of the Earnest Money; or (b) initiate proceedings in any court of competent
jurisdiction for specific performance of the terms. conditions, and covenants of this Contract. Other
than the specific Buyer remedies expressly set forth in this Section 17(a), Buyer hereby waives any
and all right and remedy, at law or in equity, to which Buyer may otherwise have been entitled by
reason of Seller's default. including, without limitation, any right at law to seek damages from Seller.
b. If Buyer defaults in the performance of any obligation of Buyer set forth under
this Contract resulting in failure to Close in accordance with the provisions hereof. Seller may
terminate this Contract and Seller shall be entitled to be paid the Earnest Money and, it being mutually
agreed that Seller's damages in such event would be difficult or impractical to ascertain,the same shall
be deemed to be liquidated damages and shall be the sole and exclusive remedy of Seller for any breach
by Buyer. Other than the specific Seller remedy expressly set forth in this Section 17, Seller hereby
waives any and all right and remedy, at law or in equity, to which Seller may otherwise have been
entitled by reason of Buyer's default, including any right in equity to seek specific performance of this
Contract against Buyer. and any right at law to seek damages from Buyer.
C. This Section 17 shall survive termination of the Contract. Furthermore,
notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 17 above, no default by either party hereto shall result
in a termination or limitation of any rights of such party hereunder, or otherwise trigger any default
10

remedies hereunder, unless and until the other party shall have notified the defaulting party in writing
of said default, and the defaulting party shall have failed to cure said default within ten (10) business
days after the receipt of said written notice.
18. Interpretation. The Section headings are inserted for convenience only and are in no
way intended to interpret,define,or limit the scope or content of this Contract or any provision hereof.
If any party is made up of more than one person or entity, then all such persons and entities shall be
bound jointly and severally, even though the defined term for such party is used in the singular in this
contract.
19. Possession. Seller shall deliver actual and exclusive possession of the Property to
Buyer at the Closing.
20. Survival. All matters set forth in this Contract, including but not limited to the terms,
conditions, representations, guaranties and warranties made herein shall survive Closing.
21. Applicable Law. This Contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with
the laws of the State of North Carolina without regard to its principles of conflict of laws.
22. Successors and Assigns. This Contract shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of the parties and their respective legal representatives. successors and assigns. Seller shall not
assign this Contract without the consent of Buyer,and any attempt to do so without the written consent
of Buyer shall be null and void.
23. Recitals and Exhibits. The recitals and exhibits contained/referred to in/attached to this
Contract are incorporated herein in full by reference.
24. Existiniz Documents. Not later than five (5) days after the Effective Date Seller will
furnish Buyer with copies of all existing deeds, plans, CAD files, studies, construction drawings. title
commitments and/or policies, surveys, plats, site and development plans environmental reports, and
any other materials which are in the possession of the Seller or its agents (all of the foregoing being
collectively, the "Documents*'). Seller shall likewise promptly deliver to Buyer and additional
Documents obtained by Seller or its agents during the term of this Contract. Buyer acknowledges and
agrees the Documents or other items delivered by Seller to Buyer under this Section, some or all of
which may have been prepared by third-parties, shall all be delivered without any representation or
warranty of any kind or nature by Seller, including. without limitation,any representation or warranty
as to the accuracy or completeness of any such Documents, except as otherwise may be expressly
provided herein
25. Duties and Responsibilities of Escrow Agent. If any dispute or difference arises
between Buyer and Seller or if any conflicting demand shall be made upon Escrow Agent, Escrow
Agent shall not be required to determine the same or take any action, but may await settlement of the
controversy by final appropriate legal proceedings or otherwise as it may require. Buyer and Seller,
jointly and severally, agree to and hereby indemnify, defend and hold Escrow Agent harmless from
and against all costs,damages,judgments,attorneys' fees,expenses,obligations and liabilities of every
kind and nature reasonably suffered or incurred in connection with or arising out of this Contract and
the performance of its duties hereunder, including, but not limited to, all costs and expenses incurred
for the interpretation of this Contract or any other agreement related hereto, or with respect to any
II

appointment or interpleader or other proceeding, unless such liability arises as a direct result of the
gross negligence or willful misconduct of Escrow Agent.
26. Further Assurances. Each of the parties hereby agrees to execute and deliver such
further agreements and take such further actions as the other may reasonably request to effect the intent
and purpose of this Contract.
27. Entire Agreement; Time of the Essence. This Contact merges all prior negotiations
and understandings between the parties, and constitutes their entire agreement for the purchase and
sale of the Property. which is binding upon Buyer and Seller when executed by Seller, regardless of
any written or verbal representations of any agent, manager, or other employees to the contrary. This
Contract constitutes the entire agreement of the parties as to the subject matter hereof and may not be
amended except by written instrument executed by Buyer and Seller. Time is of the essence under this
Contract.
28. Cot►nte►parts; Electronically Transmitted Signatures. This Contract may be executed
in counterparts. each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. Electronically transmitted signatures shall constitute originals for
purposes hereof.
29. Time Periods. Any and all references in this Contract to time periods which are
specified by reference to a certain number of days refer to calendar days, unless "business days" is
otherwise expressly provided. Therefore, if(a) the last date by which a Closing is permitted to occur
hereunder,or(b)any date by which a party is required to provide the other party with notice hereunder,
occurs on a Saturday or a Sunday or a banking holiday in the jurisdiction where the Property is located,
then and in any of such events, such applicable dates shall be deemed to occur, for all purposes of this
Contract. on that calendar day which is the next, succeeding day, which is not a Saturday. Sunday or
banking holiday.
30. No Partnership. Nothing in this Contract shall be deemed in any way to create between
the parties any relationship of partnership,joint venture or association, and the parties disclaim the
existence thereof.
31. Waivers. No party shall be deemed to have waived the exercise of any right which it
holds hereunder unless such waiver is made expressly and in writing(and no delay or omission by any
party hereto in exercising any such right shall be deemed a waiver of its future exercise). No such
waiver made as to any instance involving the exercise of any such right shall be deemed a waiver as to
any other such instance, or any other such right.
32. Parties Represented. This Contract was prepared and negotiated between the parties,
both having had legal representation (or the opportunity to obtain the same) relative to such
preparations and negotiations.and no terms or provisions herein shall be interpreted against the drafter
thereof: the parties agreeing that they have reviewed and agreed upon all of the same with assistance
of their respective chosen counsel.
33. Prevailing Party Fees and Costs. In the event of any legal action or arbitration
proceeding between the Parties regarding this Contract or the Property (an "Action"). the prevailing
party shall be entitled to payment by the non-prevailing party of its reasonable attorneys' fees and
litigation or arbitration expenses as determined in the course of the proceeding. As used herein,
12

"prevailing party" means a party recovering all or substantially all of the relief sought by such party,
whether as plaintiff or defendant.
34. Force Maieure. Neither party to this Contract shall be held liable or responsible to the
other party nor be deemed to have defaulted under or breached this Agreement for any failure or delay
in fulfilling an obligation to perform, if and to the extent, and for so long as, such failure or delay is
caused by or results from causes beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing party, including
but not limited to fire, Floods, pandemics, disease, embargoes, war, acts of war (whether war be
declared or not),acts of terrorism, insurrections,riots,civil commotions,strikes, lockouts or other labor
disturbances, acts of God or acts, omissions or delays in acting by any governmental authority or the
other party ("force majeure"). If a party is delayed in its performance of an obligation hereunder by
force majeure, then following the same, said party shall keep the other reasonably apprised of such
delay and the reason therefor. Furthermore, in the event that any force majeure event runs for a
continuous period of at least 30 consecutive days, then the party having its performance interrupted
may notify the other party of the force majeure event in writing, and the date for
performance/expiration of Feasibility Period/Closing (as the case may be) shall be extended by the
duration of such major event; the design of this extension provision being to allow that the
contemplated performance dates herein should be extended if there is a major force majeure event
(such as a moratorium, pandemic or similarly scaled event) that prohibits the timely performance
intended by the parties.
[Remainder of Page intentionally Blank]
13

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties have executed this Contract as of the date and year
indicated next to their signatures.
BUYER:
LGI HOMES —NC, a North Carolina limited liability__
compan
By:
NarriFe:—Drew Kirchner
Title: Authorized Officer
Q �`
Date of Execution:
SELLER:
BENNETT FARMS, LLC a North Carolina limited
liability company
By: 4�V L
Name: C(/ tpr-{ 13.e n sl
Title: Authorized Manager
Date of Execution: ` ' v Z�
JACOBS CREEK FARMS, LLC a North Carolina
limited liability
company
By: w /Zt
Name: i vi
t� A�
Title: Authorized Manager
Date of Execution: �—fg/Z/
W. BERT BENNETT AS TRUSTEE OF W. BERT
BENNET REVOCABLE TRUST dated
DECEN]B� 13,2
Date of((Exxecution: � ��' Z
14

The undersigned joins in the execution of the foregoing Contract for the sole purpose of
agreeing to hold and apply the Earnest Money subject to and in accordance with the terms of the
foregoing Contract.
ESCROW AGENT: MCDONNELL AND
ASSOCIATES
By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank]
15

EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The "Overall Property" is all of that certain real property described and shown on the Prospectus and
Site Plans attached hereto as Exhibit A-I, all of which is located in Rockingham County, North
Carolina, and all of which together is approximately 530 acres in size, and being all of Rockingham
County PINS 121371, 170093. 121529 and 121531.
The "Property" is all of the Overall Property less the Seller Retained Property. The "Site Plan A
Property' is that approx.392-acre portion of the Property comprised of P1Ns 121529 and 121531. The
"Site Plan B Property" is that approx. 137-acre portion of the Property comprised on PINS 170093 and
121371 less the Seller Retained Property.
The"Seller Retained Property' is described more particularly as approximately 0.5 acres taken out of
P(N 121371 configured approximately as shown below. [add sketch here]
16

EXI-IIBIT'A-1
Prospectus and Site Plans
-1 HAVE IN EXCESS OF 500 ACRES IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NC, 9 MILES NORTH
OF THE CITY LIMITS OF GREENSBORO AT THE INTERSECTION OF 1-73, US 720
AND NC 68
-THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED 15 MINUTESS FROM THE GREENSBORO AIRPORT
AND HAS ACCESS TO WATER, SEWER AND GAS
-THE COUNTY HAS INDENTIFIED THIS PROPERTY AS BEING WELL SUITED FOR A
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT UNDER THEIR NEW COUNTY LAND USE PLAN. THE
COUNTY USED THIS PROPERTY FOR A CONCEPTAL MASTER PLAN SHOWING AN
EXAMPLE OF HOW A WIDE RANGE OF HOUSING TYPES, NEIGHBORHOOD
STYLES, COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND GREENSPACE CAN COHABITATE IN THIS
AREA OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
-WITH YOUR EXPANSION IN THE TRIAD AREA WOULD YOU OR SOMEONE IN
YOUR ORGANIZATION HAVE AN INTEREST IN LOOKING THIS PROPERTY
-1 HAVF MAPS AND INFORMATION FROM ROCKINGHAM COUNTY OFFICIALS
CONFIRMING WHAT I HAVE PRESENTED. THE COUNTY IS EAGER FOR GROWTH
AND IS CURRENTLY ACTIVELY WORKING WITH DEVELOPERS
-PARCEL ID'S FOR THESE TRACTS ARE:
-121371 BERT PIECE 2.8 ACRES
-170093 BENNETT FARMS LLC 135 ACRES
-121529 BERT JOYCE 100 ACRES
-121531 JACOBS 292
��x
Bert Bennett
7:]zelwWf,sn.0.6.1 .t� 13!aa7r a1'Z
:rracssrsM n[:7i.f •s..� b!]�a93a7]
17

FOR SALE
-IN EXCESS OF 500 ACRES OF DEVELOPABLL LAND IN FAST GRO'NING
AND PROGRESS±VE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY NC. BENNETT EAST AND
RENNETT WEST PROPERTIES
LOCATED 9 MILES NOR1 II OF GREENSBORO NC CITY LIMITES AT THE
INTERSECTION OF I-73, US 220 AND NC 68
LOCATED 1S MINUTES FROM PIEDMONT TRIAD INTER%ATIONAL
AIRPORT
1 MILE NORTH OF SOUTH ROCKINGHAM CORPORATE PARK
-AVAILABLE ACCESS TO WATER, SEWER AND NATURAL GAS
-PARCEL ID'S 121371, 170093,121529,121531
CONTACT
BERT BENNETT
( C ) 336-407-4371
bertbennett@gmaii,com
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL CONTACTS
LEIGH COCKRAM
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM
( C ) 336-791-3840
[e-mail]
CARRIE SPENCER
UIMLLIUK OF LUMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
( C) 336-552-7722
[e-mail]
18

MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT LAND AVAILABLE
39`2 ACRES AVAILABLE ALONG JS2201I.I3
�ro
{
;k.
L-_
Koekinghnm Tomorrow `rj"' __ '+ •+•- DESTIMATION
�.t•Any1r5.L ByruK�r Myrcwy ��.+�• Arai. . a n �D(S!6w
-I: t c':_ -IL F -'.cdrrnnt 'rood Inlr; ,tatt,�nn) r{, :�.rrt ulu,-w lip: it.
�_•II lk�:� ... 'T`
h-e .its-, titer pro,cpe Ty is weG sJ'-Its
��' j�l':I. •I1P `i•t:C�? .•:tiJ� 1UCft�IIP� c! aSjf'�4'ol�ll: ��1�:��1a' �' �'.�:`,if'.'ili-fi' �_ti_ li,''1 r•{•..
_u ,r� U : -'ion, ut .:•�: ,elec*e� �o� : corcept.ul mud., Jy r
r'••.v rl %Vide rpr'q! :. ho ;tng types, rk:ghFx)-r coA :,•r V' .* J
7 ree n sp % r r rnhobito
19

Waters_Name Cowardin_Code HGM_Code Meas_Type Amount Units Waters—Type NWPR_Determine_Code I. Latitude Longitude Local_Waterway
Jacobs Creek NORTH CAROLINA R2UB RIVERINE Linear 4,394 FOOT PJD404 36.290768 -79.922784 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S1 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 1,002 FOOT PJD404 36.286781 -79.947563 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S2 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 3 FOOT PJD404 36.287214 -79.945503 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S3 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 1,761 FOOT PJD404 36.288626 -79.947277 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S4 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 76 FOOT PJD404 36.288642 -79.947176 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S5 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 154 FOOT PJD404 36.289693 -79.947132 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S6 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 293 FOOT PJD404 36.290662 -79.947035 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S7 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 15 FOOT PJD404 36.291310 -79.935921 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S8 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 3,200 FOOT PJD404 36.292450 -79.929889 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S9 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 16 FOOT PJD404 36.291310 -79.935754 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S10 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 1,011 FOOT PJD404 36.292512 -79.934941 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S11 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 577 FOOT PJD404 36.292046 -79.931729 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S12 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 110 FOOT PJD404 36.292453 -79.930115 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S13 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 64 FOOT PJD404 36.292288 -79.929666 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S14 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 226 FOOT PJD404 36.293198 -79.928190 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S15 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 2,333 FOOT PJD404 36.288971 -79.924860 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S17 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 169 FOOT PJD404 36.289201 -79.924864 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S18 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 91 FOOT PJD404 36.288985 -79.924468 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S19 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 83 FOOT PJD404 36.289462 -79.922442 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S20 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 132 FOOT PJD404 36.287457 -79.921455 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S21 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 158 FOOT PJD404 36.287113 -79.921255 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S23 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 556 FOOT PJD404 36.283172 -79.924001 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S24 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 192 FOOT PJD404 36.283175 -79.923564 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S25 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 82 FOOT PJD404 36.284707 -79.921094 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S26 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 240 FOOT PJD404 36.281563 -79.919331 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S27 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 1,647 FOOT PJD404 36.282747 -79.920105 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S28 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 73 FOOT PJD404 36.286131 -79.920996 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S29 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 1,058 FOOT PJD404 36.290108 -79.922095 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S30 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 88 FOOT PJD404 36.290747 -79.922915 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S31 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 52 FOOT PJD404 36.291821 -79.923182 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S32 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 919 FOOT PJD404 36.292161 -79.922150 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S33 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 1 FOOT PJD404 36.291466 -79.920408 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S34 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 40 FOOT PJD404 36.293478 -79.911762 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S35 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 68 FOOT PJD404 36.293231 -79.907766 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S36 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 344 FOOT PJD404 36.293127 -79.907367 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S37 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 12 FOOT PJD404 36.285817 -79.921026 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S38 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 194 FOOT PJD404 36.288673 -79.926988 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S39 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 16 FOOT PJD404 36.288824 -79.927063 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
S40 NORTH CAROLINA R4SB RIVERINE Linear 7 FOOT PJD404 36.285740 -79.932008 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W1 NORTH CAROLINA PEM RIVERINE Area 0.17 ACRE PJD404 36.288154 -79.946754 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W2 NORTH CAROLINA PFO DEPRESS Area 0.01 ACRE PJD404 36.289420 -79.946834 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W3 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.17 ACRE PJD404 36.291019 -79.948368 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W4 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.03 ACRE PJD404 36.291884 -79.933933 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W5 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.15 ACRE PJD404 36.292072 -79.933635 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W6 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.03 ACRE PJD404 36.293393 -79.935566 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W7 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.04 ACRE PJD404 36.292004 -79.933173 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W8 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.12 ACRE PJD404 36.292022 -79.932521 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W9 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.01 ACRE PJD404 36.292955 -79.928386 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W10 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.02 ACRE PJD404 36.287445 -79.929368 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W11 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.06 ACRE PJD404 36.287866 -79.928839 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W12 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.71 ACRE PJD404 36.288267 -79.926855 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W13 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 3.59 ACRE PJD404 36.288707 -79.924169 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W14 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.08 ACRE PJD404 36.289121 -79.925346 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W15 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 1.31 ACRE PJD404 36.282847 -79.924373 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek

W16 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 1.27 ACRE PJD404 36.284383 -79.922128 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W17 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.12 ACRE PJD404 36.284228 -79.921219 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W18 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.42 ACRE PJD404 36.286183 -79.921283 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W19 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.001 ACRE PJD404 36.285854 -79.921076 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W20 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.24 ACRE PJD404 36.287173 -79.921661 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W21 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.26 ACRE PJD404 36.288498 -79.922174 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W22 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 10.48 ACRE PJD404 36.291103 -79.921708 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W23 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.74 ACRE PJD404 36.290731 -79.923213 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W24 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.06 ACRE PJD404 36.291822 -79.923495 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W25 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.08 ACRE PJD404 36.292180 -79.922740 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W26 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.01 ACRE PJD404 36.291697 -79.919487 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W27 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.001 ACRE PJD404 36.291764 -79.919397 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W28 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.23 ACRE PJD404 36.293132 -79.911665 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek
W29 NORTH CAROLINA PFO RIVERINE Area 0.73 ACRE PJD404 36.293050 -79.907692 Hogans Creek/Jacobs Creek