SW8080301_HISTORICAL FILE_20080429

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW8 0 00?JO \
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
© HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
2UOFS oy2C)
YYYYMMDD

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleco 11. Sullins Director
Division of Watcr Quality
April 29, 2008
Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
USMCB Camp Lejeune
Bldg 1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521
Subject: NPDES Phase II Stormwater Permit No. SW8 080301
Special Operations Training Ground (S.O.T.G.)
High Density Commercial infiltration Basin Project
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete NPDES Phase II Stormwater
Management Permit Application for Special Operations Training Ground (S.O.T.G) on April
24, 2008. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project, as
proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Session Law 2006-246 and
Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000. We are forwarding Permit No. SW8 080301 dated April 29, 2008,
for the construction of the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 29, 2018, and shall be
subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay special attention to
the Operation and Maintenance requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate
system for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system will result in
future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within sixty (60) days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands
are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this
contact C ristine Nelson, or me at [phone].
Sine ely, n
Edward Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
ENB/can: S:\WQS\STORMWATER\PERMIT\080301.apr08
cc: Bryan Dick, Earth Tech
Onslow County Building Inspections
Christine Nelson
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
matter, please
NorthCarolma
JVaturallil
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone]
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: w%vN% ncwaterg qualitN or Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080301
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NPDES PHASE II STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Carl Baker & USMCB Camp Lejeune
Special Operations Training Ground (S.0.T.G.)
Dr. G. W. Garner St., Camp Lejeune, Onslow County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of seven infiltration basin(s) in compliance
with the provisions of Session Law 2006-246 and 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter
referred to as the "stormwater rules') and the approved stormwater management plans
and specifications and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved
by the Division of Water Quality and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 29, 2018, and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater
runoff as described in Section 1.8 on page 3 of this permit. The seven stormwater
controls have been designed to handle the runoff from a total of 82,871 square
feet of impervious area. Infiltration basins 1A, 1 B, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 have been
designed to handle 12,447, 1,670, 4,220, 12,933, 20,552, 18,855, and 12,194
square feet of impervious area, respectively
3. These basins must be operated with a 50' vegetated filter.
4. The tract will be limited to the amount of built -upon area indicated in Section 1.8
on page 3 of this permit, and as shown on the approved plans.
5. All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either
dedicated common areas or recorded easements. The final plats for the project
will be recorded showing all such required easements, in accordance with the
approved plans.
Page 2 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems '
Permit No. SW8 080301
6. The runoff from all built -upon area within the permitted drainage area of this
project must be directed into the permitted stormwater control system.
7. The built -upon areas associated with this project shall be located at least 30 feet
landward of all perennial and intermittent surface waters.
The following design criteria have been permitted for the infiltration basins and
must be provided and maintained at design condition:
Infiltration
Infiltration
Infiltration
Infiltration
Infiltration
Infiltration
Infiltration
Design Criteria
Basin #1A
Basin #113
Basin #2
Basin #3
Basin #4
Basin #5
Basin #6
a. Drainage Area: acres
0.42
0.10
0.10
0.66
0.47
0.63
0.36
-Onsite, ft2:
18,455
4,470
4,220
28,740
20,552
27,327
15,472
-Offsite,ft2:
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
b.Total Impervious Surfaces, ft2:
12,447
1.670
4,220
12,933
20,552
18,855
12,194
-Buildings, ft2:
1,311
870
4,220
3,450
0
18,855
0
-Parking/Streets, ft2:
11,136
800
0
0
20,552
0
12,194
-Sidewalks/Concrete, ft2:
0
0
0
9,483
0
0
0
c. Design Storm, in.
3.68
3.68
3.68
3.68
3.68
3.68
3.68
d. Difference in the pre- and post -
development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff, ft':
3,454
463
1,171
3,613
5,703
5,233
3,383
-Pre-developmentt-yr,24-hr
285
69
65
443
317
421
239
runoff, ft3:
-Post-development 1-yr, 24-hr
3,739
532
1,236
4,056
6,020
5,654
3,622
runoff, ft3:
e. Basin Depth, ft:
1.20
0.90
1.10
1.42
1.42
1.50
1.6
f. Bottom Elev., FMSL:
28.10
28.10
26.10
26.58
26.58
25.00
20.90
Bottom Surface Area, ft :
4,556
664
1,102
3,173
5,150
3,503
2,435
h. Bypass Weir Elevation, FMSL:
28.80
28.80
27.00
27.58
27.58
26.30
22.10
i. Permitted Storage Volume, ft :
3,458
465
1,177
3,624
5,714
5,252
3,400
j. Pre -development 1-yr 24-hr
discharge, ft3/s:
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.01
k. Type of Soil:
Ba meade
Marvyn
Mervyn
Ba meade
Ba meade
Ba meade
Ba meade
I. Expected Infiltration Rate, in/hr:
3.94
5.91
7.09
5.91
5.91
6.69
2.61
m.Seasonal High Water Table,
26.08
26.10
24.08
24.10
24.10
23.00
18.80
FMSL:
n. Draw Down Time, hrs:
2.3
1.7
1.8
2.3
2.3
2.7
6.4
o. Receiving Stream / River Basin:
New River / White Oak
p. Stream Index Number:
19-(27)
19-31
q. Water Body Classification:
„SA„
"SC" - within Y2 mi of and draining to SR / SA
waters
II: SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety,
vegetated and operational for its intended use prior to the construction of any
built -upon surface.
During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the system will be repaired immediately.
Page 3 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080301
The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to assure the permitted stormwater system functions at optimum
efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan must be followed in .
its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals including, but
not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing and revegetation of slopes and the vegetated filter.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of all slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of bypass structure, infiltration media, flow
spreader, catch basins, piping and vegetated filter.
g. A clear access path to the bypass structure must be available at all times.
4. Records of maintenance activities must be kept for each permitted BMP. The
reports will indicate the date, activity, name of person performing the work and
what actions were taken.
5. The permittee shall submit to the Division of Water Quality an annual summary
report of the maintenance and inspection records for each BMP. The report
shall summarize the inspection dates, results of the inspections, and the
maintenance work performed at each inspection.
6. The facilities shall be constructed as shown on the approved plans. This permit
shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting data.
If the stormwater system was used as an Erosion Control device, it must be
restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater treatment device,
and prior to occupancy of the facility.
Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification ustbe received
from an appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the
approved plans and specifications must be noted on the Certification. A
modification maybe required for those deviations.
9. Access to the stormwater facilities shall be maintained via appropriate
easements at all times.
Page 4 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080301-
10. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed
below:
a. Any revision to any item shown on the approved plans, including the
stormwater management measures, built -upon area, details, etc.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the
drainage area.
e. Further subdivision, acquisition, lease or sale of all or part of the project
area. The project area is defined as all property owned by the permittee,
for which Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval or a CAMA
Major permit was sought.
f. Filling in, altering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
11. The permittee shall submit final site layout and grading plans for any permitted
future areas shown on the approved plans, prior to construction.
12. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Permittee for a minimum of ten years from the date of the completion of
construction.
13. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one
or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame
specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the
Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee
shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director
that the changes have been made.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. In the event of a change of ownership, or a name
change, the permittee must submit a completed Name/Ownership Change form
to the Division of Water Quality, signed by both parties, and accompanied by the
appropriate documentation as listed on page 2 of the form. The approval of this
request will be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
The permittee is responsible for compliance with all permit conditions until such
time as the Division approves the transfer request.
3. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality, in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
4. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation
of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action,
including those as may be required by this,Division, such as the construction of
additional or replacement stormwater management systems.
6. The permittee grants DENR Staff permission to enter the property during normal
business hours for the purpose of inspecting all components of the permitted
stormwater management facility.
Page 5 of 8

State Storrnwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080301
The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until revoked or terminated.
The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the stormwater
controls must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
10. The issuance of this permit does not prohibit the Director from reopening and
modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or terminating the permit
as allowed by the laws, rules and regulations contained in Session Law 2006-
246, Title 15A NCAC 21-1.1000, and NCGS 143-215.1 et. al.
11. The permittee shall notify the Division in writing of any name, ownership or
mailing address changes at least 30 days prior to making such changes.
Permit issued this the 29`h day of April 2008.
LINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Jor uoieen ri. ounms, uirecior
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 6 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080301
Camp Lejeune - Special Operations Training Ground (S.O.T.G.)
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 080301
Onslow County
Designer's Certification
1, , as a duly registered in the
State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/ weekly/ full
time) the construction of the project,
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is included in the Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specification:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
SEAL
Page 7 of 8

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 080301
Certification Requirements:
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted
acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted
amount of built -upon area.
3. All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the
runoff drains to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The bypass structure weir elevation is per the approved plan.
6. The bypass structure is located per the approved plans.
7. A Trash Rack is provided on the bypass structure.
8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-
circuiting of the system.
11. The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been
provided.
12. All required design depths are provided.
13. All required parts of the system are provided.
14. The required system dimensions are provided per the approved plans.
cc: NCDENR-DWQ Regional Office
Onslow County Building Inspections

DWQ USE ONLY
Date Received
Fee Paid
Permit Number
J
3—/1?-4 r
1000. 3s2Fr
S OdD o /
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
2. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
Bldg 1005 Michael Rd.
City: MCB Camp Lejeune State:NC Zip:28547-2521
Phone: (910 ) 451-2213 Fax:
Email: carl.h.bakerOusmc.mil
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name -should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
USMCB Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G.
5. Location of Project (street address):
Camp Lejeune, Stone Bay, Dr. G. W. Garner St.
City:Camp Lejeune County:Onslow
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
From Jacksonville, take US 17-S, turn left onto NC 210, turn left on to rifle range road, turn right onto
Booker T. Washington Rd. Site is to the east of the parking area.
7. Latitude: 34-35-19 N Longitude: 77-26-35 W of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name:Brvan Dick Telephone Number: (919-854-6252 )
Email:brvan.dick@e-,irthtech.com
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one)
❑Renewal ❑Modification
Form SWU-101 Version 8.07 Page 1 of 4

2. If this application is being submitted as the result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit numberNA and its issue date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
❑Low Density ®High Density ❑Redevelop ❑General Permit ❑Universal SMP ❑Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
❑CAMA Major ❑Sedimentation/Erosion Control ❑404/401 Permit ❑NPDES Stormwater
Information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
Ill. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) describing stormwater management for the project.
Stormwater will be routed via grassed swales from imperivous areas to 7 separate basins. Each infiltration basin
meets DWO requirments for drawdown time and is sized for the required treatment volume This project is
withing 1 /2 mile of SA (SC) waters
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the White Oak River basin.
3. Total Site Area: 18.1 acres 4. Total Wetlands A
5. 100' Wide Strip of Wetland Area: NA acres (not applicable if no wetlands exist on site)
6. Total Project Area**:4.39 acres 7. Project Built Upon Area:.77.7 '%,
8. How many drainage areas does the project have? 7
9. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information
Drainage Area 1 A
Drainage AreaX 113
Receiving Stream Name
New River
New River
Stream Class & Index No.
SA �G -
SA
Drainage Area (sf)
18455
4470
Existing Impervious* Area (sf)
1,311
870
Proposed Impervious*Area (sf)
11,136
800
% Impervious* Area (total)
67%
37OX,
Impervious* Surface Area
Drainage Area 1
Drainage Area 2
On -site Buildings (sf)
1,311
870
On -site Streets (sf)
0
0
On -site Parking (sf)
11,136
800
On -site Sidewalks (sf)
0
0
Other on -site (sf)
0
0
Off -site (sf)
0
0
Total (sf):
12,447
1670
Form SWU-101 Version 8.07 Page 2 of 4

Basin Information
Drainage Area 2
Drainage Area 3
Drainage Area 4
Drainage Area 5
Drainage Area 6
Receiving Stream Name
New River
New River
New River
New River
New River
Stream Class
SA lq- �,
SA Iq.31
SA t9.31
SA 19-31
SA
Drainage Area (sf)
4, 220
28,740
20,552
27,327
15,472
Existing Imp. Area (sf)
0
2,950
0
7,700
0
Proposed Imp Area (sf)
4,220
9,983
20,552
11,155
12,194
Imp Total
100°
45 %
100%
69 %
79
Imp Surface Area
On -Site Buildings (sf)/4,220
,220
3,450
0
18,855
0
On -site Streets (sf)
K
0
0
0
0
On -Site Parking (sf)
0
0
20,552
0
12,194
On -Site Sidewalks (sf)0
0
0
0
0
Other On -site (sf)
0
9,483 (concrete pads)
0
0
0
Off -site (sf)
0
0
0
0
0
Total
1
12,933 1
20,552 1
18,855 1
12,194

Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
**Total project area shall be calculated based on the current policy regarding inclusion of wetlands in the built upon area
percentage calculation.
10. How was the off -site impervious area listed above
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
One of the following deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all subdivisions,
outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a table listing each lot
number, size and the allowable built -upon area for each lot must be provided as an attachment.
Form DRPC-1
High Density Commercial Subdivisions
Form DRPC-2
High Density Developments with Outparcels
Form DRPC-3
High Density Residential Subdivisions
Form DRPC-4
Low Density Commercial Subdivisions
Form DRPC-5
Low Density Residential Subdivisions
Form DRPC-6
Low Density Residential Subdivisions- with Curb Outlets
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this
project shall include all the applicable items required in the above form, that the covenants will be binding on
all parties and persons claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants
cannot be changed or deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each
BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at (919) 7335083 for the status
and availability of these forms.
Form SW401-Low Density
Form SW401-Curb Outlet Svstem
Form SW401-Off-Site System
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin
Form SW401-Infiltration Trench
Form SW401-Bioretention Cell
Form SW401-Level Spreader
Form SW401-Wetland
Form SW401-Grassed Swale
Form SW401-Sand Filter
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off -Site System Supplement
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Bioretention Cell Supplement
Level Spreader/Filter Strip/Restored Riparian Buffer Supplement
Constructed Wetland Supplement
Grassed Swale Supplement
Sand Filter Supplement
Form SWU-101 Version 8.07 Page 3 of 4

VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (Appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map at htto://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/sa/msi maps.htm)
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form
• Original and one copy of the Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants Form
• Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) and O&M agreement(s) for each BMP
• Permit application processing fee of $505 (54,000 for Express) payable to NCDENR
• Calculations & detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Copy of any applicable soil report
• Three copies of plans and specifications (sealed, signed & dated), including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm
- Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
Initials
13m.0
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section.
Designated agent (individual or firm): Bryan Dick, PH, Earth Tech
Mailing Address: 701 Corporate Ctr. Dr., Suite 475
City:Raleigh State:NC Zip:27607
Phone: (919 ) 854-6252
Email:[e-mail]
VIII. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
Fax: [phone]
I, (print or type name ofperson listed in General Information, item 2) � aI- I CL _
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project wi e constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective ven nts will b r corde , and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2H .10
Signature: Date:
Form SWU-101 Version 8.07
Page 4 of 4
ors' iwcA S�rsnhJ'

VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (Appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map at http://h2o.enr.state.nC.us/su/InSi maps.htin
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
• Original and one copy of the Storrawater Management Permit Application Form
• Original and one copy of the Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants Form
• Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) and O&M agreement(s) for each BMP
• Permit application processing fee of $505 ($4,000 for Express) payable to NCDENR
• Calculations & detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management
• Copy of any applicable soil report
• Three copies of plans and specifications (sealed, signed & dated), including:
- Development/Project name 2
- Engineer and firm
-Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section.
Designated agent (individual or firm): Bryan Dick, PH Earth Tech
Mailing Address: 701 Corporate Ctr. Dr., Suite 475
Phone: (9919 ) 854-6252
Email:bryan.d ick©earthtech.com
State:NC Zip:27607
Fax: (919 ) 854-6259
VIII. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2) �Lf ate j
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project wi e constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective 96venpnts will b r corde , and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2H .10
Signature: Date:
Form SWU-101 Version 8.07 Page 4 of 4
5e ion V1- j ,,\*;atQ

Permit No. �,\,J` MQJI
(to be provided by DWO)
ode w A rpgoG
724 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
NCDENR 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
INFILTRATION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be filled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part III) must be printed, filled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name USMC6 Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G.
Contact Person Bryan M. Dick, PH
Phone Number 919-854-6252
Date 4/18/2008
Drainage Area Number 6
II. DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area
15,477J00 ftz
Impervious area
12,194(00 fe
Percent impervious
0.79
Design rainfall depth
3.7 in
Peak Flow Calculations
Is pre/post control of the 1-yr 24-hr peak flow required?
Y
(Y or N)
1-yr, 24-hr runoff depth
3.7
in
1-yr,24-hr intensity
0.9
in/hr
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
0.01
ft3/sec
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff volume
0.09
ft3/sec
Pre/Post 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow control
0.1
ft3/sec
Storage Volume: Non -SR Waters
Minimum design volume required
ft3
Design volume provided
ft3
Storage Volume: SR Waters
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
3.7 in
Pre -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
239 ft3
Post -development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
3622 ft3
Minimum volume required
3383 ft3
Volume provided
3,400 ft3
Soils Report Summary
Soil type
Baymeade
Infiltration rate
2.61
in/hr
SHWT elevation
18.80
fmsl
Basin Design Parameters
Drawdown time
0.27
days OK
Basin side slopes
4
:1 OK
Basin bottom elevation
20.90
fmsl OK
Storage elevation
22A0
fmsl
Top elevation
22.50
fmsl
Basin Bottom Dimensions
Basin length
67
it
Basin width
36
ft
Bottom SA
2,435
fe
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts I. & I. Design Summary, Page 1 of 2

Permit No. MM �3�)
(to be provided by DWO)
16
Additional Information
1DA
Total runoff volume captured by basin
0.93
ac-in
OK
Length of vegetative filter for overflow
50
ft
OK
Distance to structure
122
ft
OK
Distance from surface waters
80
ft
OK
Distance from water supply well(s)
NA
It
OK
Separation from impervious soil layer
NA
ft
OK
Naturally occuring soil above shwt
1.7
ft
OK
Bottom covered with 4-in of clean sand?
N
(Y or N)
OK
Recorded drainage easement provided?
NA
(Y or N)
OK
Capures all runoff at ultimate build -out?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Bypass provided for larger storms?
Y
(Y or N)
OK
Pretreatment device provided
Y
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Parts I. & II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 2

Permit No. cJ W7-o6 V Jot
(to be provided by DWQ)
Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will
result in a request for additional information. This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to
indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a
requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Page/ Plan
iit' Is Sheet No.
nN/ 1- G 21G
TM
1. Plans (1" - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing:
- Design at ultimate build -out,
- Off -site drainage (if applicable),
- Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin),
Basin dimensions,
Pretreatment system,
High flow bypass system,
Maintenance access,
Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW),
Overflow device, and
Boundaries of drainage easement.
C 3 2. Partial plan (1" = 30' or larger) and details for the infiltration basin showing:
Bypass structure,
Maintenance access,
Basin bottom dimensions,
Basin cross-section with benchmark for sediment cleanout,
Flow distribution detail for inflow,
Vegetated filter, and
Pretreatment device.
e q 3. Section view of the infiltration basin (1" = 20' or larger) showing:
Pretreatment and treatment areas, and
Inlet and outlet structures.
C!_ 4. A table of elevations, areas, incremental volumes & accumulated volumes to verify the volume provided.
5. A soils report that is based upon an actual field investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The
results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWQ, by completing & submitting the soils
investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information.
AA/tBM1115 6. An assurance that the installed system will meet design specifications upon initial operation once the
project is complete and the entire drainage area is stabilized.
C_ c 7. A construction sequence that shows how the infitlration basin will be protected from sediment until the
entire drainage area is stabilized.
IitlE, 8. The supporting calculations.
MA F 9. A copy of the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (AM) agreement.
IAA' 10. A copy of the deed restriction.
Form SW401-Infiltration Basin-Rev.1 Page 1 of 1 Part III. Required Items Checklist, Page 1 of 1

EarthTech
A Tyco Intemalional Ud, Company
.GL 127 U$
Earth Tech of North Carolina
Bryan M. Dick, EIT, PH
701 Corporate Center Dr.
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-854-6252
NC DWO - Express Stormwater Permitting
Attn: Christine Nelson
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
701 Corporate Center Drive P 919.854.6252
Suite 475 F 919.854.6259
Raleigh, NC 27607 earthtech.com
AAIV '-To Checl<
APR 2,4 2008
Re: USMC — SOTG Express Stormwater Permit Application SW8 080301 — Response to RFI dated
4/11 /08.
Mrs. Nelson,
Please find enclosed the check that was left out of the submittal packet.
Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Sincerely,
Bryan M. Dick. EIT, PH
Project Manager
CC: Mr. David Towler, EIT
USMCB Lejeune Public Works

� EarthTeeh 70ate Center Drive 919.854.625
Suiteite475 475 F 919.854.6259
Raleigh, NC 27607 earthtech.com
A Tyco International Ltd. Company
April 18, 2008
Earth Tech of North Carolina
Bryan M. Dick, EIT, PH
701 Corporate Center Dr.
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-854-6252
NC DWO - Express Stormwater Permitting
Attn: Christine Nelson
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
APR � 1 2008
Re: USMC — SOTG Express Stormwater Permit Application SW8 080301 — Response to RFI dated
4/11 /08.
Mrs. Nelson,
Please find enclosed the changes to the application per the comments in your RFI referenced above. Our
response to the itemized comments are as follows:
1) Basin #6 has been amended to coincide with the appropriate K value for ET 7 in the amended soils
report. We did not label any of the basins on the design drawing "Basin 7" but I assumed that you
mean the basin that would correspond with Basin 7 as titled on the infiltration request form. I
believe that this is a correct assumption due to the fact that the K value in the supplement form of
Basin 6 deviated from the corresponding value from the soils report (ET 7). 1 used the more
conservative of the 2 values reported by Catena in the report, using 2.61 in/hr aerial infiltration
rate rather than the geometric mean value.
2) The following chart is updated to reflect that one of the soil boring locations, ET5, was not used.
When Mr. Lewis performed the site visit, he suggested that the proposed Basin at ET5, Design
Basin # 4, be moved to sit beside Design Basin #3 in order to utilize the more suitable location for
both basins. This was discussed in the initial review meeting. The chart has been corrected to
indicate that Design Basin #4 correlates to ET3 and Soil Investigation Request Label 4. Both of
these basins are at the same approximate ground elevation and approximate SHWT due to the
homogeneity of the locale and the observations made by Mr. Lewis while on the site. Mr. Lewis
indicated that another boring would not be necessary. The design takes advantage of higher
infiltration rates while using a more conservative SHWT due to the shallower SHWT at ET3 vs.
ET5. This was viewed as a conservative approach rather than removing the hardpan at ET5 and
placing Desi n Basin #4 in a location of a hardpan.
Cross Reference Table for Basin # to Soil Test Location #
Design
Basin #
Catena Soil
Bore
Soil Investigation Request
Label
1A
ET4
1
1B
ET2
2
2
ET1
3
3
ET3
4
Not Used
ET5
5

EarthTech
A Tyco International Ltd. Company
4
ET3
4
5
ET6
6
6
ET7
7
'Note: Soil Bore locations are shown on plan sheets.
3) The volume reported on the Supplement form for Basin I A is a typo and has been corrected to
match the calculations, which were deemed to be correct.
4) Comment has been addressed.
5) Print settings were cutting off the calculations. It has been adjusted and another copy of the
calculations is included.
6) A 1000.00 check is enclosed.
I hope that this clears up everything for you, especially with the confusion of the two basins at the one soil
boring location. I am sure that Mr. Lewis can verify that it was his suggestion that we are following and
that they are located to provide a more environmentally sensitive design.
I look forward to hearing from you with regard to the application.
Sincerely,
Bryan M. Dick, EIT, PH
Project Manager
CC: Mr. David Towler, EIT
USMCB Lejeune Public Works

Michael P. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
April 11, 2008
Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
USMCB Camp Lejeune
Bldg 1005 Michael Rd.
MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 080301
USMCB Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G.
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
The Wilmington Regional Office received an NPDES Phase II Post Construction Permit
Application for USMCB Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G. on March 12, 2008. A preliminary review of
that information has determined that the following information is needed to continue the
stormwater review:
1. The infiltration rate presented in the supplement for infiltration basin 7 does not
correspond with the infiltration rate identified in the soil report. Please report the
infiltration rates consistently or explain the reason for the difference.
2. The provided cross reference table for the various basin and boring numbers shows
that infiltration basins 3 and 4 were designed based on the infiltration rate of soil
boring ET3. However, infiltration basins 3 and 4 are associated with 2 different
samples (numbers 4 and 5) from the samples taken by Vincent Lewis. Why are
these two infiltration basins not based on the same soil test as shown with the
Catena Soil Bore (ET3)? It appears that the SHWT presented on the supplements
for these two infiltration basins assume the same boring and SHWT.
Also, the cross reference table indicates that infiltration basin 3 is associated with
boring 4 from Vincent Lewis's field visit. However, the supplement for infiltration
basin 3 appears to use a different SHWT than boring 4. Please verify the
information is presented consistently.
3. On the supplement for infiltration basin 1 A, the provided storage volume is reported
to be 5,458 cubic feet; however, the calculations report the storage volume at the
design elevation as 3,458 cubic feet. Is this a typo?
4. The drawdown time identified on the infiltration basin supplements should be
consistent with the actual drawdown of the infiltration basins as shown in the
calculations. For example, the supplement for Infiltration basin 1A reports the
drawdown rate to be 2 days, however the calculations report the drawdown rate to
be 0.1 day.
The drawdown calculation associated with infiltration basin 2 was not included with
the calculations. Please provide the drawdown calculations for this infiltration
system.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive 13xtenston Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone]
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: www.newatergualitv.ore Fax [phone]
0,,,
NorthCarolina
A4turally
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110 % Post Consumer Paper

Carl Baker
April 11, 2008
Stormwater Application No. SW8 080301
Please submit a $1,000 fee for the additional review required for this
application.
Please keep in mind that changing one number may change other numbers and require
the calculations, supplements, plans, and other supporting documentation to be
updated. Verify all numbers are correct.to ensure consistency in the application
documents.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary
review. The requested information should be received in this Office prior to April 21,
2008, or the application will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will
necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under
an approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and
is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. If you have
any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone] or
email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Christine Nelson
Environmental Engineer
ENB/can: S:\WQS\STORMWATERWDDINFO\2008\080301.apr08
cc: Bryan Dick, Earth Tech
Christine Nelson
Wilmington Regional Office
Page 2 of 2

2nd request for additional information: Stormwater Project No. SW8...
Subject: 2nd request for additional information: Stormwater Project No. SW8 080301 - SOTG
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:31:53 -0400
To: carl.h.baker@usmc,mil, [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]
CC: Janet Russell <[e-mail]>
Gentlemen,
I have attached a pdf version of my second request for additional information for
Stormwater Project SW8 080301 - Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G. I will also send copies via
mail.
Also, when resubmitting the additional information, you don't have to resubmit the
entire package. If it helps, you can just send the pages that have changed.
Thank you!
Christine
Express Stormwater Permitting
NC-DENR
Content -Type: application/pdf
SW8080301 - Camp Lejeune SOTG 042008.p7
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 1 4/11/2008 10:32 AM

EarthTech
A Iyno International Ltd, Company
April 4, 2008
Earth Tech of North Carolina
Bryan M. Dick, EIT, PH
701 Corporate Center Dr.
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-854-6252
INC DWQ - Express Stormwater Permitting
Attn: Christine Nelson
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
701 Corporate Center Drive P 919.854.6252
Suite 475 F 919.854.6259
Raleigh, INC 27607 earthtech.com
Re: IJSMC — SOTG Express Stormwater Permit Application SW8 080301
Mrs. Nelson,
Please find enclosed the check list for the Supplement forms that are a part of the Submitted stormwater
management plan for SW8 080301. The completed check list were not included in the submittal. I
included a complete copy with these additional forms in the document and a loose original of each for
addition the original of the management plan document. My apologies for any inconvenience that this
may cause you....
I look forward to hearing from you with regard to the application.
Sincerely,
Bryan M. Dick, EIT, PH
Project Manager
nE C E I V ED
���u�,�{pp► APR 0 7 2008
DWQ
PROJ #

EarthTech
A Lyn International Ltd. Company
April 3, 2008
Earth Tech of North Carolina
Bryan M. Dick, EIT, PH
701 Corporate Center Dr.
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-854-6252
701 Corporate Center Drive P 919.854.6252
Suite 475 F 919.854.6259
Raleigh, NC 27607 earthtech.com
APR 0 4 2008
NC DWQ - Express Stormwater Permitting
Attn: Christine Nelson
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: USMC — SOTG Express Stormwater Permit Application SW8 080301
Mrs. Nelson.
Per your request for information. please find enclosed an updated design that reflects changes to basin
dimensions and the accompanyin, updated application and Supplement forms. Specifically, your
comments were addressed in the following matter. The outline helow correlates to the outline of your
letter (fated March IS, 2008.
I.) Checklist is included for each basin supplement, and the level spreader/filter strip supplement.
it. it: The soils report amendment indicates the SHWT.
b. Basin #6 has it separate amendment that is included as added to the soils report.
c. See the cross reference chart for Basin and soil boring cross reference. This should clarify
each basins relationship to the soils report.
d. Updated design calculations use the appropriate boring location
e. Desi.-n calculations are based on Vincent Lewis' determination of SHWT and included in
the this document
2.) Soils reports have heen amended
a. a: The soils report amendment indicates the SI-IWT.
b. Basin #6 has it Separate amendment that iS included as added to the soils report.
c. See the cross reference chart for Basin and soil horing cross reference. This should clarify
each basins relationship to the soils report.
J. Updated design calculations use the appropriate boring location
e. Design calculations are based on Vincent Lewis' determination of SHWT and included in
the this document
3.) Calculation spreadsheet has been corrected
4.) Pre -development nmoff calculations were found to be incorrect due to a spreadsheet data envy error,
each calculation has heen corrected and verified.
5.) The spreadsheet calculation has heen amended to rellect drawdown time for the design volume
based on exfiltration into the soil at rates that correspond to the infiltration rate (actually Ksat) for
each site, from the soils investigation. Additionally, the. TR-55 based Hydrocad model results that
were used to insure that the Phase 11 requirements were met have marked with a call -out that
indicates the actual drawdown time with routing and soil conditions considered for the 1 yr storm.

EarthTech
A Tyco Intemm,onal Ltd. Company
6.) Minimum sw face area calculations now reflect each K value for the corresponding soil test location.
7.) A table in the calculations has been added to indicate the SA at the bouom and at the storage
elevations. Hydrocad tables are included to demonstrate the stage -storage capacities for each basin.
Bottom elevations in the Hydrocad model arc now identical to the supplement form and calculations.
as pore space is not considered for storage, as it was previously.
8-) Filter strip supplements are provided
9.) Comment is addressed
I0.)Filter snip area are defined
I I .)The filter strip has been modified and relocated
12.)Spot elevation have been added
13.)Conunent is addressed
14.)Though many of these values have changed for the re -design, in all cases, the bypass outlet being
below the storage elevation does not affect basin storage due the being hydraulically controlled by
the weir. However, if the bypass outlet were above the weir, it would "control` and not the weir.
The current plans call for weir elevations that are equal to the storage elevation fit sets the storage
clevation) for each basin. The detail that was previously used was unclear and the associated table
was also unclear. Changes have heen made to the detail and the table of elevations I'm the flow
splitter that should help to clarify each clevation.
15.)Commax is addressed
I6.)A 1000.00 check is enclosed
17.)I-evel spreaders were added to each basin and included on the supplement form for each hasin.
Basin IA and 113 utilize the same level spreader clue to the down -slope position of Basin IA to the
outfall of Basin IB. Total area for the conirihuting DA for level spreader IA/IB accounts for the
total drainage area, including offsite area not associated with either basin's capacity.
Please give me it call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
z
Bryan M. Dick, FIT, 131-1
Project Manager

Re: USMC SOTG Express Permit SWO80301
Subject: Re: USMC SOTG Express Permit SWO80301
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:34:15 -0400
To: "Dick, Bryan' <[e-mail]>
CC: Janet Russell <Janet.Russel [e-mail]>
Bryan,
A new date of April 4 for returning the requested additional information is fine with me.
Christine
Dick, Bryan wrote:
I received the soils report a few hours ago and we are still compiling everything. Since the program allows
it, I believe that having this document to you at some date later than tomorrow would be beneficial by
providing ample time for an adequate CC. In the end, this should save us all time.... I was going to have
to drive to the Base to get additional signed documents (one DA has now been divided, so it adds another
M&O agreement that must be signed.) David can mail it to me tomorrow and I can fedex the entire
application as soon as it arrives on Wed or Thursday. So, it looks like Friday, April 4 would allow us
enough time for the mail transactions. The application itself will be ready tomorrow and that will allow time
for CC. So, if that is agreeable, I would like to extend the deadline until COB on April 4.
Please let me know if this is OK.
Thanks again
Bryan
Bryan M. Dick, PH
Project Manager
EARTH TECH, INC.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax: [phone]
From: Christine Nelson[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 4:31 PM
To: Dick, Bryan
Cc: Janet Russell
Subject: Re: USMC SOTG Express Permit SWO80301
Bryan,
Within the express program you are allowed up to 2 5-day extensions.
Christine
Dick, Bryan wrote:
Ok. Well, I will design for the peak flow for the 10 yr storm. Bypassing the bypass flow seems to be
getting redundant. That would mean 2 bypasses for each infiltration basin..... I will just design for the 10
yr, but it looks like the spreadsheet it still requiring it. Maybe it will not have tell me to bypass with the new
spreadsheet that you just sent. Thanks for sending that so quickly.
Since I still have received my soils update, I may miss the deadline and have to start this permit application
all over. Just a heads up that we may end up starting all over....
I of 3 4/2/2008 2:49 PM

Re:,USMC SOTG Express Permit SWO80301
Thanks in advance. I hope to be able to hand deliver the document tomorrow..
bryan
Bryan M. Dick, PH
Project Manager
EARTH TECH, INC.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax [phone]
From: Christine Nelson[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 11:17 AM
To: Dick, Bryan
Subject: Re: USMC SOTG Express Permit SW080301
Bryan,
I checked out the level spreader supplement on the website (since the attachment was left oft).
And I came up the same problem. I have e-mailed the people in Raleigh who are responsible for
those forms so hopefully they will fix it in the near future. But for now, I would prefer if you
could fill out the supplement electronically as much as possible and just write in the fields that
can't be filled out.
As for your second question, I can't look at the numbers so I'm not sure how you are tilling out the
supplement fonn. What kind of flows are going to your level spreader? What storm event are
you using to design your level spreaders? If you are designing based on the peak flow from the
10-yr storm, then a bypass is not required (Section 8.3.1)
Christine
Dick, Bryan wrote:
Hi Christine. I am trying to wrap up this application for re -submittal and have run into a problem with a
DWQ supplement form. I have attached the supplement form, as downloaded yesterday from the DWQ
website. I noticed this last week and called over to the main division, they said they were having server
issues and that it may be related. On the level spreader supplement form, the Rainfall Intensity cell (1332)
is locked. This is colored as a user input cell, yet, I am unable to put in any values to let the spreadsheet
calculate the peak flow from the 10 yr storm (1333). So far I have just printed off the sheet and manually
written the values and made the calculation manually. Wil this be ok? I have attached one of the sheets
for you to try it..
Second question about the Level Spreader supplement: The spreadsheet is indicating that I need a
bypass device for the level spreader that I am using to treat the flow from our bypass devices. This is
confusing and does not seem to be correct. (cell 860) We have added a level spreader for each filter
strip, but the spreadsheet is directing me to add a bypass for our bypass flow?? Please let me know your
take on this. You can see what I am talking about in the attached spread sheet. It may just be something I
am missing....
Thanks in advance
Bryan
Bryan M. Dick, PH
Project Manager
2 of 3 4/2/2008 2:49 PM

Re: JJSMC SOTG Express Perniit SW080301
EARTH TECH, INC.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax :[phone]
3 of 3 4/2/2008 2:49 PM

W ATER
March 18, 2008
Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
USMCB Camp Lejeune
Bldg 1005 Michael Rd.
MCB Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 080301
USMCB Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G.
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
The Wilmington Regional Office received an NPDES Phase II Post Construction Permit
Application for USMCB Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G. on March 12, 2008. A preliminary review of
that information has determined that the application is not complete. The following information
is needed to continue the stormwater review:
Provide page 3, Section III - Required Items Checklist, of the infiltration basin
supplement for each infiltration basin.
2. Questions regarding the soils report:
a. The soils report included in the application does not present the seasonal high
water table (SHWT) at the locations of the borings or infiltration basins. Provide
a soils report that includes the estimated SHWT at each proposed infiltration
basin location.
b. The soils report does not include the information for the proposed location of
infiltration basin #6. Provide a soils report documenting the SHWT, soil type, and
infiltration rate for infiltration basin #6.
c. Does boring number 7 (as identified on the infiltration system site visit request
form) correspond with the location of infiltration basin #6? Where is boring - ---
number 7 located?
d. The infiltration rates for the individual basins presented in the supplements are
inconsistent with the information in the soils report. The infiltration rates
presented in the supplements appear to directly correlated with the boring
number and infiltration basin number. However, according to the soil boring map
and the plans, the infiltration basin number and boring number are not associated
with each other. For instance, infiltration basin #1 appears to correspond with
boring ET4 not ET1, as inferred from the supplement.
e. It appears that the SHWT is reported inconsistently between the information
presented on the infiltration system site visit request form, Vincent Lewis's
findings, and the supplements. The elevation of the SHWT used for the design
of the infiltration system should be based on Vincent Lewis' SHWT
determination. No"thcarohna
Aiturn//y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Wilmington Regional Office Internet: www ncwaterquality.orFax [phone] 1-877-623-6748
An Equal OpportunitylAtfrmative Action Employer— 50%Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Carl Baker
March 18, 2008
Stormwater Application No. SW8 080301
3. The calculations for Infiltration Basin #1 indicate that there is 0% impervious
proposed on the site, when the supplement and application indicates that 56%
impervious is proposed. This appears to be causing the runoff volume
calculations to be off. The calculations show that infiltration basin #1 has a
lower post -development volume (417 ft) than the pre -development volume
(730 ft). The supplement presents the post -development volume as 4,594 ft3.
4. Verify the calculations used to determine the minimum required storage volume
for each infiltration basin. The pre -development runoff volume from each
drainage area is greater than anticipated, resulting in undersized infiltration
basins. The general equations for determining the runoff volume to be treated
by the infiltration basins presented in Step 1 of the calculations appear to be
correct. Please provide more detailed calculations for how the pre -
development and post -development runoff volume and minimum required
storage volume were determined.
5. Provide calculations for the drawdown time of each infiltration basin.
The calculations to determine the minimum surface area for each infiltration
basin refer to the calculated average infiltration rate for the entire site. Use the
infiltration rate specific to each infiltration basin for determining the drawdown
rate and other related calculations.
Provide a table in the calculations with the elevations, surface areas, and
incremental and accumulated volumes at the bottom elevation,
storage/overflow elevation, and top elevation for each infiltration basin to
demonstrate that the minimum required volume has been provided.
In addition, the HydroCAD analysis appears to report the bottom elevations of
the infiltration basins inconsistently with the supplement. Report all data
accurately and consistently.
8. Provide a filter strip supplement and associated calculations for each proposed
filter strip. Please ensure that Section III — Required Items Checklist is included
with the supplement.
9. The plans indicate that the vegetated filter strips are 50 ft wide, however, the
infiltration supplements indicate that they are 30 ft wide. Please report
accurately and consistently.
10. befine the filter strip area (length and width) and include the filter strips within
the project area. Also, please re-evaluate the placement of the filter strip for
infiltration basin #5. The length of the filter strip should be level and at virtually
a zero percent grade ensuring uniform, dispersed flow (i.e. parallel with the
contours).
11. According to the plans, a portion of the 50' vegetated filter strip for infiltration
basin #2 includes an existing gravel road. Provide a filter strip with 50' of
vegetation and no impervious area.
12. Provide additional spot elevations within drainage area 5 to show that the
stormwater runoff will enter the proposed infiltration system.
Page 2 of 3

Carl Baker
March 18, 2008
Stormwater Application No. SW8 080301
13. The infiltration basin table on page C-4 of the plans report the bottom length
and width of infiltration basin #6 as 70 ft by 30 ft, while the supplement and
calculation report the infiltration basin to be 64 ft by 30 ft. Report all data
accurately and consistently.
14. Demonstrate how the minimum required storage volume will be stored in
infiltration basins #1, 2, 5, and 6 if the bypass outlets to the basin and the
bypass weirs are set below the storage elevations. Provide elevations for the
bypass bottom, overflow outlet, and top.
15. Provide calculations that are sealed, signed, and dated.
16. Please submit a $1,000 fee for the additional review required for this
application.
The following comment was not considered in the assignment of the Additional
Information Fee as they are a clarification to a discussion held in the submittal/scoping
meeting.
17. Contrary to the discussion in the submittal/scoping meeting, a distribution
device of some kind is required to provide even distribution of runoff across the
vegetated filter strip (Filter Strip Major Design Element #3, page 13-1, 2007
BMP Manual) unless permanent, sustained sheet flow can otherwise be
demonstrated. Please refer to Chapter 13 — Filter Strip and Chapter 8 — Level
Spreader for the design requirements of these BMP elements.
Please keep in mind that changing one number may change other numbers and require
the calculations, supplements, plans, and other supporting documentation to be
updated. Verify all numbers are correct to ensure consistency in the application
documents.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary
review. The requested information should be received in this Office prior to March 27,
2008, or the application will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will
necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under
an approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and
is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. If you have
any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone] or
email me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Christine Nelson
Environmental Engineer
ENB/can: S:\WQS\STORMWATER\ADDINFO\2008\080301.mar08
cc: Bryan Dick, Earth Tech
Christine Nelson
Wilmington Regional Office
Page 3 of 3

request for additional information: Stormwater Project No. SW8 08...
Subject: request for additional information: Stormwater Project No. SW8 080301 - SOTG
From: Christine Nelson <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:41:39 -0400
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]
Gentlemen,
I have attached a pdf version of my request for additional information for
Stormwater Project SW8 080301 - Camp Lejeune - S.O.T.G. I will also send copies via
mail.
Thank you,
Christine
Express Stormwater Permitting
NC-DENR
W8080301 - Camp Lejeune SOTG.pdf;i Content -Type: application/pdf
Content -Encoding: base64
I of 1 3/18/2008 12:42 PM

'4
r TopoZone - USGS Sneads Ferry (NC) Topo Map
Page 1 of l
Iopoionei
an Irawataeatrc�`Cro
-'��t� l �i
i, ,;
�t
StuacaIS
it
.10
! �'� \ �
(c�� au M• n� t e . �
r� ._� ` oDalGnln
� C
l
a t r� �. �
1` a !��
¢ .�
<. l
: u
��
m
ivy �
I JC0,
01
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
UTM 18 275864E 3830776N (NAD83/WGS84)
USGS Sneads Ferry (NC) Quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 18 NAD83 Datum
M*
M=-9.333
G=-1.388
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?lat=34.59436&Ion=-77.44397&size=l&u=4&layer=D... 3/ 14/2008

I
NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
. 0312 WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN
Class
Name of Stream Description Class Date Index No.
NEW RIVER
Goose Creek
Two Pole Branch
Stones Bay
Mill Creek
Muddy Creek
Stones Creek
Millstone Creek
New River Restricted Area #
1
Everett Creek
Ellis Cove
Sneads Creek
Fannie Creek
Wheeler Creek
Courthouse Bay
New River Restricted Area #
2
Unnamed Tributary to New
River (Rufus Creek)
Traps Bay
Traps Creek
From a line extending across
New River from Grey Point to
a point of land
approximately 2200 yards
downstream from mouth of
Duck Creek to Atlantic
Ocean; including all unnamed
bays, creeks, and other
waters except restricted
areas # 1 and # 2 described
below.
From source to New River
From source to New River
Entire Bay
From source to Stones Bay
From source to Stones Bay
From source to Stones Bay
From source to Stones Creek
All waters within 1,000
yards of earthen dock at the
United States Marine Corps
Rifle Range
From source to New River
Entire Cove
From source to Ellis Cove
Bay
From source to New River
From source to New River
Entire Bay
All waters within a line
beginning at the Government
Dock in front of U.S. Coast
Guard Detachment Barracks at
Marines and running a
southwest course 1,000 yards
to Channel Marker #13,
thence a southeasterly
course 1,000 yards to Flash
Beacon # 11, thence a
northeasterly course 500
yards to al point on the
mainland at Wilkins' Bluff,
thence following the
shoreline to the Government
Dock
From source to New River
Restricted Area # 2
Entire Bay
From source to Traps Bay
3
SA; HQW
SC; HQW
SC; HQW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
SC
SA; HQW
SA; NOW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
SC
SC; HQW
SA; HQW
SA; HQW
06/01/60 19-(27)
08/01/90 19-28
08/01/90 19-29
06/01/56 19-30
06/01/56 19-30-1
06/01/56 19-30-2
06/01/56 19-30-3
06/01/56 19-30-3-1
06/01/56 19-31
06/01/56 19-32
06/01/56 19-33
06/01/56 19-33-1
06/01/56 19-34
06/01/56 19-35
06/01/56 19-36
06/01/56 19-37
08/01/90 19-37-1
06/01/56 19-38
06/01/56 19-38-1
23 .0300

State Stormwater Permit Application Trackink Cover Sheet
Wilmington Regional Office
Project Name: SPECIAL OPERATIONS TRANINING (SOTG) IMPROVEMENTS-MCB
Project Category: NEW
Project Type: INFILTRATION SYSTEM
App Accept Date: 3/12/2008
Application Fee Amt. $ 7t
Fee Check Number:
Reviewer Name: NELSON, CHRISTINE
Record the following information from BIMS after project has been entered!
Permit Number (BIMS): ,5 GJ f108D30 /
Please update the SW Access System by entering the Permit Number for the project!
Date Entered in Access:-3Zi3�D
Entered in Access By:
Date Printed: 311312008 9:58:26 AM

EarthTeeh Suite
IF
Center Drive P 919854625
Suite 475 919,854,6259
A ryco International Ltd. Company Raleigh, NC 27607 earthtech.com
March 11, 2008
Earth Tech of North Carolina
Bryan M. Dick, PH, EIT
701 Corporate Center Dr.
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-854-6252
NC DWQ
Christine Nelson
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: USMC — SOTG Express Stormwater
Mrs. Nelson,
7MAR
EIVED
] 2 2008
I have enclosed the permit application and supporting documents for the SOTC site at Camp Lejeune, NC.
A check is also included to cover the applicable express stormwater fee. Please let me know if you need
anything else.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
4e4� // '0�
Bryan M. Dick, PH

RE: 1-MC SOTG
Subject: RE: USMC SOTG
From: "Dick, Bryan" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:15:11 -0500
To: "Janet Russell" <[e-mail]>
We are confirmed. Thank you for the help.
Bryan
Bryan M. Dick, PH
Project Manager
EARTH TECH, INC.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell[mailto:Janet. [e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:38 PM
To: Dick, Bryan; Funk, John; Baker CIV Carl H; Towler GS05 David W
Subject: Re: USMC SOTG
*SOTG At Camp Lejeune*
February 20, 2008
Gentlemen:
The Express Stormwater Submittal Meeting has been rescheduled for *March
4, 2008 at 10:30 AM with Christine Nelson* here in the Wilmington
Regional Office. Mr. Carl Baker or his assistant is required to attend
the meeting.
I'm not sure that we provided you a copy of the Session Law that deals
with the federal Phase II stormwater rules. A copy is attached in case
we didn't. Please review pages 13, 14, 15 in particular for design
requirements of measures within the Phase II counties.
Please respond within 2 business days to confirm and reserve the
submittal meeting date.
Thanks,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
Dick, Bryan wrote:
Hi Janet,
Can you let me know of dates and times that we can re -schedule the
express stormwater review for the SOTO site. You may recall, but we
cancelled our Tuesday appointment due to a realization that we did not
have flow splitters on the plans. David Towler, Mr. Baker's
representative is unavailable Feb. 26-28, so if we van avoid those
days that would be great. I can make a point to be available as
1 of 2 2/20/2008 5:26 PM

RE: USMC SOTG
needed.
Have a good day!
Bryan
**/Bryan M. Dick, PHI**
/*/Project Manager/*//*/
**EARTH TECH, INC.**
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax: [phone]
2 of 2 2/20/2008 5:26 PM

RE: S&C Improvements
Subject: RE: SOTC Improvements
From: 'Dick, Bryan" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:52:54 -0500
To: "Janet Russell" <[e-mail]>
Thanks Janet. We are confirmed.
I checked on the date of the wetland survey and it was approved in 2006,
surveyed in 2005. As far as the demolition of the structures go, the
only reason I presented them was to illustrate the improvements to the
project site will have an improvement to the adjacent wetlands. The
removal of the structures, though not a part of this project or this
permit, will be performed in a area that is currently mowed and driven
on by heavy equipment. I am told that officials at the base expressed
concerns about the continued use of the training facilities near the
wetlands due to the activity that it creates within 50' of the wetlands.
This project does not cause any action to or near the wetland that is
not already occurring. After completion, the base intends to not have
equipment and training in the area near the wetland, thus the removal of
an existing impact is the only probable outcome. In example, an
equipment roadway that is currently in use, will no longer be used after
the installation of these structures.
Bryan M. Dick, PH
Project Manager
EARTH TECH, INC.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell [ mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 12:55 PM
To: Dick, Bryan; Baker CIV Carl H; Funk, John; Christine Nelson
Subject: SOTC Improvements
SOTC Improvements
February 8, 2008
Gentlemen:
The Express Stormwater stubmittal meeting has been scheduled with
*Christine Nelson on February 19, 2008 at 10:00 AM * here in the
Wilmington Regional Office. * Mr. Carl Baker or his assistant is
required to attend the meeting.
have
reviewing the Express Request Ms. Nelson noted that you may not
have designed the project in compliance with the requirements under the
Session Law. All projects within 1/2 mile and draining to SR waters
must control and treat the difference in runoff from the pre and post
conditions. See the Session Law (attachment) page 15, which is
applicable in Onslow County. Please email Christine if you have a
specific question about your design.
Also, note that the project narrative says "Associated wetlands that are
adjacent to the UT to the North of the site will benefit from the
removal of structures within 20 feet of the tributary and the reduced
activity around the UT due to the elimination of those structures."
Wetlands generally occur adjacent to a tributary. Therefore we are
would be remiss not to ask if there is a wetland delineation signed by
1 of 2 2/8/2008 2:08 PNI

RE: SOT ; Improvements
the Corps of Engineers (within the last 5 years since they expire after
5 years); are the existing structures to be removed in or adjacent to
wetlands?; will there be wetland impacts as a result of mobilization of
equipment or trucks associated with removal of the structures?
*Please respond within 2 business days to confirm and reserve the
submittal meeting date and time*. Also, review the attachment,
"submittal requirements".
Thank you,
Janet Russell
Express Permitting
2 of 2 2/8/2008 2:08 PM

MA
NCDENR:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 26405 [phone] FAX [phone]
Request for Express Permit Review
FILL-IN all information below. FAX to Express Coordinator along with a completed ques
a detailed narrative and vicinity map of the project location.
Reviewer -C! 0
N
Submit 2. — l 1
t�+
Time t0'.0i
0
3S
Confirm
onnake,
APPLICANT: Name dA&L A. 'BAkE2 Title 1)ep'Jv A.U'r Woo<- O ,r
Company Name NtCT6 cA,NMP I E-lEu N E
Address r31dq�• loos MtC*AEL- za City r14413 CAW 1.15srwv9 Zip z05Lilzszf
Phone 410- `I51 2213 Fax Email cnar-, N, BAeERa wsmc,mrc
PROJECT: Name County vrv5i_
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT INFORMATION: 5b q 150 G- Wo'N
br:pm r7ic_ic-
Name 'Sohn ur k Company IFAiLT14 TECH
Addressyout ra2Po2RrE Lrx. DR surm vas City gAg ErGN State__NC Zip 177607
phnna G16_ gets- ,_n20 P.v O14 _ OCN_ Z-,,6 GMnil _-6.._ (?. _'L rl i\_ _r_ - _
❑ SCOPING MEETING ONLY DWQ DLR DCM Other
❑STREAM ORIGIN DETERMINATION _ # of Stream calls Stream
�,S,T-ORMWA,TERJ ❑ Low Density ❑ High Density -Detention Pond ❑High Density -Other
(check all that apply) ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter High Density -Infiltration ❑ Off -site
Wetlands MUST be addressed below NPDES Phase 11 Plan Revision
----------------------- ................. -....... -..... -... ------------- •------------ --------- ---------------------------------------------- -------------- --
❑� COASTAL MGT. gExcavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information ❑ Upland Dev
1 ❑ LAND QUALITY ® Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with acres to be disturbed
0 WETLANDS (401) Wetlands on Property ? ❑ Yes oNo Isolated Wetlands on Property? ElYes X No
El all that apply) Wetlands will be impacted? Yes No Wetland impacts: IyA acre(s)
Wetlands delineation has been completed? NJYes ❑ No ❑ Buffers impacted: Acre(s)
USACOE Approval of Delineation completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
404 Application in Process w/USACOE? ❑ Yes M No / Permit recv'd from USACOE❑Yes ❑ No
401 Application Required? ❑ Yes o No It Yes, ❑ Regular ❑ Express
Additional fees, not to exceed 50% of the original Express Review permit application fee may be charged for
subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit application.
Total Fee:$
iccl �-o C. b
Stormwater
$
CAMA
5_
LOS
S
401
Revised 10/9/2007
tlz v iv SPA
uY\O F'�F
Date Received
1E C E I V E D
;pf FEB 0 7 2008
PROJ #
Fr- Or.x
PS IS 1

Project Name uSMGt3
Stormwater Express Questionnaire (10/9/2007)
1. . What is the applicant's full legal name? _ M.4 4NF 6oRPS 6,4SE DAMP Lxm�ayc_
Is the applicant associated with Sole proprietor. Corporation ❑ LLC
e Partnership e Municipality — U • S. GovT,
If it's an LLC, is it ❑ Manager -managed or ❑ Member -managed?
OWhat is the applicant's title within the Corp., LLC or Partnership?
Will an agent (someone other than the applicant) be signing the application? Ll Yes No
If Yes, what is the agent's name and title?
OP/ease note the application signature requirements are listed in NCAC 2H.1003 (e), to
summary, only the sole proprietor of a sole proprietorship, the designated manager, member -
manager, president or vice president of a corporation or LLC, the general partner of a
partnership, or a ranking official of a municipality may sign permit applications and supplements.
The signature of the engineer or other agent can be accepted only if accompanied by a signed
letter of authorization from one of the aforementioned individuals. Corporations, LLC's and
Partnerships must be registered with the NC Secretary of State's Office, and be active. Please
note that spelling, capitalization, and punctuation are extremely important. Please provide the
entity name exactly as on file with the NC Secretary of State.
2 Project Location: County [orv.5/ n v./ Nearest Town/City �EtClcsory V tr t I- tJC
(Attach a detailed vicinity map with both local street names and SR, NC, US orinterstate
highway numbers, plus other relevant information such as town or city names, directions to, etc.
Show the nearest intersection of two major roads on the vicinity map. A major road is any 1, 2 or
3 digit NC, US or interstate highway.)
If the project is located in Brunswick, Onslow, or New Hanover Counties, or a small
portion of northern Pender County, NPDES Phase II Post -Construction rules will apply,
unless a vested development right, as described in the Session Law, can be
demonstrated, which is dated prior to July 1, 2007,
3. Receiving stream name NEW 2 iyEFt River Basin NEW /Zl vEK
What is the classification of the receiving stream? 5A wh7FR
For SA or SR waters, a separate scaled topographic map will be required. The project must be
accurately located on the map and the !,� mile radius from the property corner closest to the SA
or SR receiving stream must be drawn on the map. If you claim that the project is not within Y2
mile of SA or SR waters, you must conduct a series of chlorides tests to demonstrate that the
chlorides level at a point in the receiving stream that is at least % mile from the project is less
than 500 ppm. Samples must be sent to a State certified lab for testing.
4. If the project is high density, what type of stormwater management BMP's are being proposed?
(check all that apply)
Wet Detention Infiltration Trench Infiltration Basin Sand Filter
Bio-retention Wetlands Alternative 8 Offsite
Dry Detention NPDES Phase It Other
How many separate BMP's are being proposed? 1 2 3 4 5 608 9 10 11 12 Other_
5. Is there offsite runoff from the adjacent properties or public right -of -wax that will drain into N/A
of
the proposed BMP's on the project and is not being diverted? 0 Yes No
6- Is a road across other properly required to access the project? ❑ Yes N No ❑ N/A
7. Is there any existing development or pre-1988 existing BUA located on the pro eriy?
(Please docurnent. delineate and identify on the phns.) � Yes r] No ❑ N/A
J. Will the high density project collect all of the proposed BUA? X Yes L] No f- N/A
E C
(it not, attach a separate explanation sheet) E Y E D
Page 1 of 2 R
Revised 10/9/2007 FEB 0 7 2008
DWO
PROJ #

9.
Project Name (t5 Wa - 50TG
Will the project involve the subdivision and sale of property? []Yes, kNo ❑ WA
Is the subdivision ❑ residential or ❑ commercial?
How many lots are proposed?
(Deed restrictions are required for all residential, commercial, tow density or high density sub-
divisions. Specific language for the various types of subdivisions is available from DENR.)
10. Will the plans show all delineated wetlands? Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
(All projects require either a signed wetlands delineation map or a wetlands report to be
submitted with the application. Only a trained professional may provide information regarding
the presence or absence of wetlands.)
11. Are wet detention ponds or other engineered controls proposed to be located adjacent wetlands? ❑ Yes plc No El N/A
(If, yes, a physical means to prevent the dewatering of the wetland must be provided, or the
SHWT must be provided to demonstrate that the permanent pool of the BMP is above the
SHWT and will not dewater the wetlands over time. Where possible, all BMP's and swales
should outlet into back the wetland (with level spreaders).
12. For infiltration projects, a site visit must be completed with the DENR soils scientist to verity the
soil type, water table and infiltration rate provided in the soils report.
What is/was the scheduled site visit date? l)Oy, lar a00
(Include a copy of the consultant's soil report with the application.)
13. Level Spreaders are required at the outlet of all engineered controls and swales prior to entering
surface waters or wetlands. Will the plans reflect level spreaders? U Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
(The purpose of the level spreader is to reduce the energy of the incoming runoff and to
promote diffuse sheet flow to prevent erosion and scour into the receiving waters or wetlands.)
14. Is this project 8 A modification to an existing permit
A lot that will be treated in an existing, previously permitted BMP?
What is the name of the existing permitted facility? AIA
What is the permit number of the existing permitted facility? SW8
A/ A
Is the permitted facility in compliance with its permit?
Yes
No
[[[���N/A
Have the deed restrictions been recorded?
Yes
No
Vl N/A
Have the deed restrictions been submitted?
Yes
No
H
(j�� N/A
Has the Designer's Certification been submitted?H
Yes
No
N/A
15. Do the plans reflect all information in 15A NCAC 2H.1003 (g)? [0 Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
16. Will all of the design requirements for each proposed BMP be met? M Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
(It not, attach a separate explanation sheet. Please note that the Express program is not set up
to handle any type of deviation from the standard design.)
17. For each BMP in all high density projects, and low density curb outlet swale projects, the
individual drainage area for each proposed BMP must be clearly delineated.
18. Any revisions made to the application as a result of this review may cause changes to the other
documentation. Plans, calculations, application, and supplements should be reviewed for any
necessary changes. For example, changing the orifice size will require a modification to the
calculations, the pond details on the plans, and page t of the supplement.
19. IS THE PROJECT PESIGNED AND THE APPLICATION READY TO suBMff? Rr Yos 1-1 A'o
Cowpleic nppiical10n5 may i.o arcepie''d cal li'm !1 Ih('I'e IS a Ci1nCdl6!i0n In CIVI SUbII1i;1al
schedule.
Revised 10/9/2007 Page 2 of 2 R
E C E I V E D
FEB 0 7 2008
DWO
PROJ#

Application for Stormwater Permit
Project:
USMC Base Camp Lejeune— Special Operations Training Group
Facilities Improvements
Date: Dec. 5, 2007
The project consists of improvements to the existing SOTG facilities at Stone Bay, near Jacksonville, NC.
The completed project will; add 4 gravel parking areas or pads, 7 concrete pads of 700 square feet, I
concrete pad of 5,500 square feet, 2 crib walls approximate 100 feet long by 4' wide, addition of
approximately 3 shipping containers as structures, and the construction of 3 open air — low rise structures of
approximately 1000 square feet each. Several of the structures that are to be constructed are actually being
moved away from a riparian area some 300 feet to the north of the project site in an effort to move all
structures out of that area.
The project site is a part of the New River basin and is approximately 1700 feet at its closest point to the
river. The New River in this area is a SA class waters. The nearest body of water is a UT to the New River
that runs east to West at approximately 500' to the north of the project site. To the south, another UT to the
New River is approximately 1300 feet away from the site. There are no wetlands in the near vicinity of the
project site. Associated wetlands that are adjacent to the UT to the North of the site will benefit from the
removal of structures within 20 feet of the tributary and the reduced activity around the UT due to the
elimination of those structures.
The improvements to the existing facility will primarily add gravel parking areas and a few pavilions or
shelters at several different locations within the approximately 17 acre facility. Proposed stonnwater
treatments are infiltration basin located at 7 locations on the site, so that a minimal routing distance is
obtained before stormwater is treated. Five of these sites have a channel distance of less than 30 feet with
the remaining 2 having a channel distance of approximately 200 feet to collect runoff from multiple small
impervious areas. A soils investigation was performed on the site on November 12, 2007 and the soils
(Group A) are well suited for the application with an average infiltration rate of approximately 4.5 in/hr to a
depth of4-5 feet.
A vicinity map is included in the narrative that indicates proximity to the receiving waters and NRCS Soil
types.
j1E C E I V ED
8�,8( FEB 0 7 2008
DWO
PROJ #

col
k

Legend
— Road Centerline
EarthTech
Vicinity Map
i Roads
---
Special Operations Training Ground
—
[_] Driveway
A tgC0 ftnUonel❑l.fnmpanr
Marine Corps Base
Stormwater Plan
Parking Area
Onslow County, North Carolina
F—] Existing Structures
NTS
Onslow County Soils

u
The
Catena
Group
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
SOIL & SITE EVALUATION FOR
STORM WATER BASINS
Special Operations
Training Ground
Camp Lejeune, NC
Prepared For:
EarthTech
701 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Prepared By:
The Catena Group
Hillsborough, North Carolina
November 26, 2007
/G ary S.
EDFEB 0 1 2008
PROJ
DWO
ft __

INTRODUCTION
An expansion of The Special Operations Training Ground at the Marine Corps Base at
Camp Lejeune is planned. As part of the planned expansion several storm water
infiltration basins are proposed. As part of the application process, a soils report detailing
soil type and infiltration rate is required. The Catena Group, Inc (TCG) performed a
soil investigation in the general vicinity of the proposed basins to provide the required
soil information.
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY
Prior to the field investigation, the Onslow County Soil Survey was referenced to get an
overview of the possible soil series located at the site. In the area of the Training
Ground, two soil series; Baymeade and Marvyn were mapped. Figure I presents the
mapped soil series, the general location of the proposed infiltration basins and where the
borings and infiltration tests were performed. Table 1 presents the soil series, mapping
unit -and taxonomic class.
Table 1. Soil Series, mapping unit, taxonomic class for soils in the area of proposed
expansion.
Soil Series
Mapping Unit
Taxonomic Class
Baymeade
BaB,BmB
Loamy, siliceous,
semiactive, thermic
Arenic Hapludults
Marvyn
MaC
Fine -loamy, kaolinitic,
thermic, Typic
Kanhapludults
The field investigation was performed on November 12, 2007. Twelve (12) Soil borings
were made with a hand -turned auger in the general vicinity of the proposed infiltration
basins. Observations of the landscape (slope, drainage patterns, past use, etc.) as well as
soil properties (depth, texture, structure, seasonal wetness, restrictive horizons, etc.) to a
depth > 48 inches, when possible, were recorded. Soil color was determined with a
Mansell Soil Color Chart.
One soil infiltration test (double ring infiltrometer) was performed at each of the six
proposed infiltration basins. A total of six (6) infiltration tests were performed.

FINDINGS
Soil Type
Based on the borings in the general vicinity of the proposed basins, it was determined that
the majority of the soil in the Training Ground was the Baymeade soil series. There was
one section of the Training Ground (ET 1) that the soil borings indicated that the Marvyn
soil series was present.
Table 2 presents each boring with a soil series determination. Determination of soil
series was made through a comparison of soil boring descriptions to the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Official Series Description (OSD) for both the
Baymeade and Marvyn series.
Table 2. Soil Borings and Soil Series Determination.
Boring #
Soil Series Determination
ETl -1
Marvyn
ET 1-2
Marvyn
ET2-1
Baymeade
ET2-2
Baymeade
ET3-1
Baymeade
ET3-2
Baymeade
ET4-1
Baymeade
ET4-2
Baymeade
ET5-1
Baymeade
ET5-2
Baymeade
ET6-1
Baymeade
ET6-2
Baymeade
Infiltration Rate
The infiltration rate was tested at the six proposed infiltration areas. The results for each
test are shown below in Table 3. Data and calculations for each test are also attached.
The highest result was excluded from calculating the average cumulative infiltration rate.
The average infiltration result for the remaining five tests is 4.59 in/hr. Of note, the result
from ET5 was very low (0.49 in/hr). During the field investigation, it was noted that
there was a clayey fill material present at the surface (approximately 5 inches thick) and
that the soil was very compacted. If any infiltration basin is located in this area, then this
compacted fill material should be removed.

Table 3. Infiltration Test Results
Test Location
Infiltration
(in/hr
ETl
7.09*
ET2
5.91
ET3
5.91
ET4
3.94
ET5
0.49
ET6
6.69
Average
4.59
*result not averaged
CONCLUSIONS
The findings presented herein represent TCG's professional opinion based on our site and
soils evaluation. This report is provided to assist in the application for the infiltration
basins by providing the soil information. North Carolina DWQ must issue the final
permit. Airy concurrence with the findings in this report would be made at that time.

Bab ....._.. _. _..
ew ..
... _
'ET3
' t' MaC
•
'
ET 4
y..
r
�
�ET5-
1
*-.
}4
i
n :Ph
eYYfnf ...
MaC
Legend
Approximate Test Locations
Soil Mapping Unit
BaB
BmB
Mac `
Mk ,5
Tr,e
Catena
u�
'A a iwri'
Vz
OF
t
Special Operations
Training Ground
Camp Lejeune, NC
Date: November2007 Figure
Scale 1"=20U
Job No.: 7333

ETI
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
cndminutc
P/C
0
11 5
0
2
10.3
2
1
1.2
0.6
4
9.4
2
3
0.9
0.45
6
8.6
2
5
0.8
0.4
8
7.9
2
7
0.7
0.35
10
7.2
2
9
0.7
0.35
12
6.6
2
11
0.6
0.3
14
6
2
13
0.6
0.3
16
5.4
2
t5
0.6
0.3
Avg last 3
0.30
cm/minute
18
cm/hr
7.09
in/hr
ET2
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
.cm
minute
minute
cm
cm/minute
E/C
0
9.3
0
2
8.2
2
1
1.1
0.55
4
7.6
2
3
0.6
0.3
6
7
2
5
0.6
0.3
8
6.5
2
7
0.5
0.25
10
6.2
2
9
0.3
0.15
12
6.1
2
11
0.1
0.05
14
5.4
2
13
0.7
0J5
16
5
2
15
0.4
0.2
18
4.6
2
17
0.4
0.2
Av last 3
0.25
crn/minute
15
cm/hr
5.91
in/hr

ET-3
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
cm/minute
:/C
0
12
0
2
10.7
2
1
1.3
0.65
4
9.9
2
3
0.8
0.4
6
9.4
2
5
0.5
0.25
8
8.9
2
7
0.5
0.25
10
8.4
2
9
0.5
0.25
12
7.9
2
11
0.5
0.25
Avg last 3
0.25
cm/minute
15
cm/hr
5.91
in/hr
ET4
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
cm/minute
IJC
0
9
0
2
8.6
2
1
0.4
0.2
4
7.9
2
3
0.7
0.35
6
7.3
2
5
0.6
0.3
8
6.9
2
7
0.4
0.2
10
6.6
2
9
0.3
0.15
12
6.2
2
11
0.4
0.2
14
5.9
2
13
0.3
0.15
16
5.5
2
15
0.4
0.2
18
5.2
2
17
0.3
0.15
Avg last 3
0.17
cm/minute
10
cm/hr
3.94
in/hr

ET5
A
D
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
cm/minute
F/C
0
9.5
0
2
9.1
2
1
0.4
0.2
4
8.9
2
3
0.2
0.1
6
8.9
2
5
0
0
8
8.8
2
7
0.1
0.05
10
8.7
2
9
0.1
0.05
12
8.7
2
11
0
0
14
8.7
2
13
0
0
16
8.7
2
15
0
0
20
8.6
4
17
0.1
0.025
20
Avg
0.02
ctr✓minute
1.25
cm/hr
0.49
in/hr
ET6
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
cm/minute
F/C
0
8.5
0
2
6.8
2
1
1.7
0.85
4
5.8
2
3
1
0.5
6
4.9
2
5
0.9
0.45
8
4.5
2
7
0.4
0.2
10
4
2
9
0.5
0.25
12
3.4
2
11
0.6
0.3
14
2.8
2
13
0.6
0.3
Avg last 3
0.28
cndminute
17
cm/hr
6.69
in/hr

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
INFILTRATION SYSTEM INVESTIGATION
Complete and email this form to Vincent. Lewis@ncmail. net, If there are more than 7 area's to be tested
attach a second sheet. 1
fJ-Y uf,�
Scheduled Site Visit Date: l 1-3 - Time: 600
Project Name: USMC-S.O.T.G County: Onslow \ G
Street Address: Dr. G.W. Garner Street \�^/
Directions from the nearest intersection of two major roads: From Jacksonville,
take US 17- S, turn left onto NC 210, turn left onto Rifle Range Rd, turn rt. Onto
Booker T. Washington Rd, site is to the East of the parking area
>1 acre being disturbed? ®YES ❑NO CAMA Major required? ❑YES ENO/ 1
Consultant Name: Bryan Dick Phone: [phone] "4' Sd 10^ 1pJ
Consultant Firm Name:
Bore Number
1
12
3
4
5
6
7
a ExistingGround Elevation
29
28.80
27.0
27.5
28
26
20
b Proposed Bottom Elevation
27.60
27.80
25.56
26.23
26.32
23.82
18.44
c Difference a minus b
1.4
1.0
1.44
1.27
1.68
2.18
1.56
d Add 2 ft. Min. Bore Depth)
3.4
3.0
3.44
3.27
3.68
4.18
3.56
e Hardpan Depth?
NA
NA
NA
NA
.5'
NA
NA
f Infiltration Rate OK?
y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Approx. Elev. Of SHWT
23.6
23.8
22.0
22.5
23.0
21.0
15.0
h Max. lowest bottom elev.
25.6
25.8
24.0
24.5
25.0
23.0
17.0
Sufi : 5`na 54 ,7 3 a 9a .32-* d.,., D 3va3
Required Attachments:
1. Legible vicinity map.
2. Complete Soils Report.
3. PDF formatted site plan with the boring locations to be tested. Site plans should
be emailed or hand -delivered only. Illegible faxed maps will not be accepted.
All proposed infiltration areas and existing, active utility lines located within the proposed
basin/trench must be marked and flagged. If these areas are not flagged, the Soils Scientist
reserves the right to decline to do the investigation. If the proposed infiltration system will be
located in an area of existing pavement and there is no open area nearby, equipment capable
of breaking through the impervious layer must be provided. The soils investigation does not take
the place of a soils report prepared by an appropriate professional. The Soils Scientist will only
verify the soil conditions that are reported in the Soils Report, and make a determination as to
the suitability of the site to meet the infiltration design requirements under NCAC 2H.1000, and
assumes no liability should the system fail.
S:\WOS\STORMWATER\FORMS\infiltration site visit.for n Re&eft8107V ED
Ipppn��uf FEB 0 6 200B D
PROJ k Dwo

FW: FW: Express Permit Review
Subject: FW: FW: Express Permit Review
From: "Dick, Bryan" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:36:59 -0500
To: "Janet Russell" <[e-mail]>
Here is the request and supporting documents. (repeated from earlier.
You mentioned that you were scheduling for the week of the 18th. I am
available during the following days:
Feb. 18, 19, 22, 25-28
Please let me know if you need anything else.
Bryan
Bryan M. Dick, PH
Project Manager
EARTH TECH, INC.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Dick, Bryan
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 1:23 PM
To: '[e-mail]'; Jewell, Ian
Cc: Funk, John
Subject: RE: FW: Express Permit Review
Ms. Russel,
I wanted to touch base with you on the USMC- SOTG express permit
request. I have attached the email that you sent to John Funk and
responses are below. My apologies for any inconvenience that was caused
by the missing responses in the application regarding wetlands and I
appreciate you taking the time to try to make sure we have our permit
application in order when we meet. I am quickly learning all of the
specifics of this process and I appreciate your patience.
1- I have attached the soils report from The Catena Group. Per the
comments in the DWQ manual, we contracted TCG to perform the soils
investigation at each location that we intended to put an infiltration
basin. Should we have requested that your soil scientist perform this
review instead?
2- I have added the answers to the wetland questions on the Express
Review App and have attached a pdf of the updated application. I have
also attached a GIS image of the wetlands in the project vicinity. This
image and the metadata of the Delineation dates, approval, etc will
accompany the full permit application. My apologies, I overlooked those
questions in the first submittal.
3- The project is designed to meet the phase II reqs for pre and post
and a 1.5 inch storm due to CAMA regulations. The pre and post flows
are analyzed in Hydrocad to show compliance and we have designed
infiltration basins per the DWQ manual guidance for surface area,
storage volume for the 1.51, event, pre-treatment, etc. I believe this
addresses your comment in item 3, unless something has jumped out at you
that indicates we are not meeting one of the requirements. There may be
something that I have overlooked and that you have already specifically
noticed in the application.
4- I have used the July 2007 DWQ manual as the basis for guidance on the
design and all forms will be included with the full application.
1 of 3 2/7/2008 9:54 AM

FW: FW: Express Permit Review
Untill, your comment, I had not realized that I needed the maintenance
forms, so thank you for pointing out that we would need those as well as
the supplement form.
Please let me know if this does not address your concerns and when we
can schedule the permit review meeting. I will be out until Dec. 26th
after today. Ian Jewell has been copied on this email and may be able to
answer in questions that you have in the meantime. Specifically, he
should be able to get you any additional images that you need.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Bryan
Bryan M. Dick, PH
Project Manager
EARTH TECH, INC.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607-5074
Phone: [phone]
864-506-1465 (cell)
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Janet Russell [mail to: Janet. Bus [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:15 PM
To: Funk, John
Subject: Re: FW: Express Permit Review
John:
I have some questions / comments for your review.
1. Has Vincent Lewis, our State soil scientist, been on site to perform
a review of the soils for the proposed infiltration? we did not receive
an Infiltration Request nor a soils report as part of this Express
Request.
2. The questions related to wetlands on the Express Cover sheet have
been left blank. A Corps approved wetland delineation should be part of
the stormwater submittal package. Of course the signed delineation must
be less than 5 years old.
3. The project must be designed to meet the federal Phase II stormwater
rules as outlined in the Session Law (attached). Please review closely,
especially pages 13, 14, 15, etc.
4. The project must be designed in accordance with the new BMP Manual.
New application, supplement forms, maintenance forms must be used. The
link to the BMP Manual is in the Submittal Requirements attachment.
Please address these items so that we may proceed with the scheduling.
Thanks,
Janet
Funk, John wrote:
Have you had a chance to look at this, please let me know - thanks.
John Funk, PE
Phone Office:919-854-6239, Cell: 919-632-6830
Fax [phone]
2 of 3 2/7/2008 9:54 AM

c
FW: FW: Express Permit Review
*From:* Funk, John
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:48 PM
*To:* '[e-mail]'
*Cc:* Icarl.h. bake [e-mail]; 'Marshburn GS13 Brian R'
*Subject:* Express Permit Review
Attached is our request for express stormwater permit review for Camp
Lejeune, Special Operations Training Group (SOTG). If you have any
questions, please let me know.
John Funk, PE
Phone Office:919-854-6239, Cell: 919-632-6830
Fax [phone]
Camp Lejeune Report
Content -Description: from the Catena
Camp Lejeune Report from the Catena Group.pdf Group.pdf
Content -Type: application/octet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Description: Express ApplicationCompleted 12-5-07.pdf
Express Application Completed 12-5-07.pdf Content -Type: application/octet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Description: Wetlands_Map.pdf
Wetlands_Map.pdf Content -Type: application/octet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
3 of 3 2/7/2008 9:54 AM

The
Catena
Group
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
SOIL & SITE EVALUATION FOR
STORM WATER BASINS
Special Operations
Training Ground
Camp Lejeune, NC
Prepared For:
BarthTech
701 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Prepared By:
The Catena Group
Hillsborough, North Carolina
November 26, 2007
I _
/ Gary S. Kreiser

INTRODUCTION
An expansion of The Special Operations Training Ground at the Marine Corps Base at
Camp Lejeune is planned. As part of the planned expansion several storm water
infiltration basins are proposed. As part of the application process, a soils report detailing
soil type and infiltration rate is required. The Catena Group, Inc (TCG) performed a
soil investigation in the general vicinity of the proposed basins to provide the required
soil information.
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY
Prior to the field investigation, the Onslow County Soil Survey was referenced to get an
overview of the possible soil series located at the site. In the area of the Training
Ground, two soil series; Baymeade and Marvyn were mapped. Figure 1 presents the
mapped soil series, the general location of the proposed infiltration basins and where the
borings and infiltration tests were performed. Table 1 presents the soil series, mapping
unit and taxonomic class.
Table 1. Soil Series, mapping unit, taxonomic class for soils in the area of proposed
expansion.
Soil Series
Mapping Unit
Taxonomic Class
Baymeade
BaB,BmB
Loamy, siliceous,
semiactive, thermic
Arenic Hapludults
Marvyn
MaC
Finc-loamy, kaolinitic,
thermic, Typic
Kanhapludults
The field investigation was performed on November 12, 2007. Twelve (12) Soil borings
were made with a hand -turned auger in the general vicinity of the proposed infiltration
basins. Observations of the landscape (slope, drainage patterns, past use, etc.) as well as
soil properties (depth, texture, structure, seasonal wetness, restrictive horizons, etc.) to a
depth > 48 inches, when possible, were recorded. Soil color was determined with a
Munsell Soil Color Chart.
One soil infiltration test (double ring infiltrometer) was performed at each of the six
proposed infiltration basins. A total of six (6) infiltration tests were performed.

FINDINGS
Soil Type
Based on the borings in the general vicinity of the proposed basins, it was determined that
the majority of the soil in the Training Ground was the Baymeade soil series. There was
one section of the Training Ground (ET 1) that the soil borings indicated that the Marvyn
soil series was present.
Table 2 presents each boring with a soil series determination. Determination of soil
series was made through a comparison of soil boring descriptions to the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Official Series Description (OSD) for both the
Baymeade and Marvyn series.
Table 2. Soil Borings and Soil Series Determination.
Boring 4
Soil Series Determination
ET1-I
Marvyn
ET I -2
Marvyn
ET2-1
Baymeade
ET2-2
Baymeade
ET3-1
Baymeade
ET3-2
Baymeade
ET4-1
Baymeade
ET4-2
Baymeade
ET5-1
Baymeade
ET5-2
Baymeade
ET6-1
Baymeade
ET6-2
Baymeade
Infiltration Rate
The infiltration rate was tested at the six proposed infiltration areas. The results for each
test are shown below in Table 3. Data and calculations for each test are also attached.
The highest result was excluded from calculating the average cumulative infiltration rate.
The average infiltration result for the remaining five tests is 4.59 in/hr. Of note, the result
from ET5 was very low (0.49 in/hr). During the field investigation, it was noted that
there was a clayey fill material present at the surface (approximately 5 inches thick) and
that the soil was very compacted. If any infiltration basin is located in this area, then this
compacted fill material should be removed.

Table 3. Infiltration Test Results
Test Location
Infiltration
(in/hr)
ETI
7.09*
ET2
5.91
ET3
5.91
ET4
3.94
ET5
0.49
ET6
6.69
Average
4.59
*result not averaged
CONCLUSIONS
The findings presented herein represent TCG's professional opinion based on our site and
soils evaluation. This report is provided to assist in the application for the infiltration
basins by providing the soil information. North Carolina DWQ must issue the final
permit. Any concurrence with the findings in this report would be made at that time.

r7r
�2,
^ET4
a
_
r�
4•
ame r
r
.
�
r �
me'
ET
Legend
Approximate Test Locations P
Soil Mapping Unit
- BaB
- BmB
- Mac
_ Mk
The
Catena
6%4 Group
Special Operations
Training Ground
Camp Lejeune, NC
)ate: November 2007 Figure
Scale 1"=200'
Job No.: 7333

ETI
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
cm/minute
(E/C
0
11.5
0
2
10.3
2
1
1.2
0.6
4
9.4
2
3
0.9
0.45
6
8.6
2
5
0.8
OA
8
7.9
2
7
0.7
0.35
10
7.2
2
9
0.7
0.35
12
6.6
2
11
0.6
0.3
14
6
2
13
O.6
0.3
16
5.4
2
15
0.6
0.3
Avg last 3
0.30
cut minute
18
cm/hr
7.09
in/hr
ET2
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cut
minute
minute
cut
cm/minute
(E/C)
0
9.3
0
2
8.2
2
1
1.1
0.55
4
7.6
2
3
0.6
03
6
7
2
5
0.6
0.3
8
6.5
2
7
0.5
0.25
10
6.2
2
9
03
0.15
12
6.1
2
11
0.1
0.05
14
5.4
2
13
0.7
0.35
16
5
2
15
0.4
0.2
18
4.6
2
17
0.4
0.2
Avg last 3
0.25
Can minute
15
cm/hr
5.91
inQlr

ET3
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
Cut
cm/minute
(E/C
0
12
0
2
1M
2
1
1.3
0.65
4
9.9
2
3
0.8
0.4
6
9.4
2
5
0.5
025
8
8.9
2
7
0.5
0.25
10
8.4
2
9
0.5
0.25
12
7.9
2
11
0.5
0.25
Avg last 3
0.25
cm/minute
S
cm/hr
5.91
in/hr
ET4
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
Cm
minute
minute
Cm
enl/minute
(E/C
0
9
0
2
8.6
2
1
0.4
0.2
4
7.9
2
3
0.7
0.35
6
7.3
2
5
0.6
0.3
8
6.9
2
7
0.4
0.2
10
6.6
2
9
0.3
0.15
12
6.2
2
11
0.4
0.2
14
5.9
2
13
0.3
0.15
16
5.5
2
15
0.4
0.2
18
5.2
2
17
0.3
0.15
Ave last 3
0.17
cn✓minute
10
cm/hr
3.94
in/hr

ET5
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Imen,al
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
cm/minute
(E/C
0
9.5
0
2
9.1
2
1
0.4
0.2
4
8.9
2
3
0.2
0.1
6
8.9
2
5
0
0
8
8.8
2
7
0.1
0.05
10
9.7
2
9
0.1
0.05
12
8.7
2
11
0
0
14
8.7
2
13
0
0
16
9.7
2
15
0
0
20
9.6
4
17
0.1
0.025
20
Avg
0.02
cm/minutc
125
cm/hr
0.49
in/hr
ET6
A
B
C
D
E
F
Time
Reading
Interval
Midpoint
Water Change
Flow Rate
minute
cm
minute
minute
cm
CII]/mlmne
(E/C)
0
9.5
0
2
6.8
2
1
1.7
0.85
4
5.8
2
3
1
M
6
4.9
2
5
0.9
0.45
8
4.5
2
7
0.4
0.2
10
4
2
9
0.5
0.25
12
3.4
2
11
0.6
0.3
14
1 2.8
1 2
13
R6
0.3
Avg last 3
0.29
cm/minulc
17
cm/hr
6.69
in/Iv

The
Catena
Group
410-6 Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
SUPPLEMENT SOILS REPORT FOR
STORM WATER BASINS
Special Operations
Training Ground
Camp Lcjcune, NC
Prepared For:
EarthTcch
701 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Prepared By:
The Catena Group
1-lillsborough, North Carolina
March 31. 2008
/ Gary S. Kreiser

INTRODUCTION
This Soils Report is a supplement for the November 2007 Soils Report for The Special
Operations Training Ground (SOTG) proposed infiltration basins at the Marine Corps
Base at Camp Lejeune. The original Soils Report included the soil type and infiltration
rate for six (6) proposed basins. Based on comments received from the NC Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) the depth to seasonal high water table (SHWT) is being requested.
DEPTH TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE
Since the soil is typically sandy, the depth to S14WT was determined through the
presence of either redoximorphic features or the occurrence of saturated soil. Borings
were performed in the area of the proposed basins and Table I presents the basin location
and the determination of the SHWT.
Table I. Seasonal Fli_h Water Table Determination
Test Location
SHWT
(inches below
ground surface)
ETI /
36
ET2
36
ET3
33
ET4
34
ETS
55
ET6
34
CONCLUSIONS
The findings presented herein represent TCG's professional opinion based on our site and
soils evaluation. This supplement report is provided to assist in the application for the
infiltration basins by providing the requested seasonal high water table information.
NCDWQ must issue the final permit. Any concurrence with the findings in this report
would be made at that time.

The
Catena
Group
410-B Millstone Drive
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
ADDENDUM TO SOILS REPORT FOR
STORM WATER BASINS
Special Operations
Training Ground
Camp Lejeune, NC
Prepared For:
EarthTech
701 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Prepared By:
The Catena Group
Hillsborough, North Carolina
April 2, 2008
/ o Solt S�\
tP ate_=e`ia
/ Gary S. Kreiser

INTRODUCTION
This Soils Report is an addendum to the November 2007 Soils Report for The Special Operations
Training Ground (SOTG) proposed infiltration basins at the Marine Corps Base at Camp Lejeune.
The original Soils Report included the soil type and infiltration rate for six (6) proposed basins.
At the request of Earth Tech an additional infiltration basin was evaluated (ET 7).
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY
The field investigation was performed on March 27, 2008. Soil borings were made with a hand -
turned auger in the vicinity of the proposed infiltration basins. Observations of the landscape
(slope, drainage patterns, past use, etc.) as well as soil properties (depth, texture, structure,
seasonal wetness, restrictive horizons, etc.) to a depth ? 48 inches, when possible, were recorded.
Soil color was determined with a Munsell Soil Color Chart.
The rate of water entry into a soil is referred to as the infiltration rate. The infiltration rate into a
soil decreases with time mainly due to an increase in the soil water content and a decrease in the
hydraulic gradient. As infiltration continues, the rate of water entry into the soil reaches a
constant value (steady state condition) which is considered to be the same as the saturated
hydraulic conductivity (KSAT) of the soil. The Ks, is a soil property that can be easily measured
in the field and was used to characterize the infiltration rate for each proposed infiltration basin.
Saturated Hydraulic conductivity (K,AT) measurements were performed at the proposed
infiltration basin using a constant -head permeameter (Amoozemeter). Before any readings were
recorded, the Amoozemeter was allowed time to equilibrate, typically 25 minutes.
Based on conservations with the designer of the proposed infiltration basin (Bryan Dick of Earth
Tech), construction of these basins would remove approximately 6 to 12 inches of topsoil. As
such, the Ks, , measurements were performed around a depth of 12 inches in order to estimate the
infiltration rate at the new, soil surface.
FINDINGS
Soil Type
Determination of the soil series was made through a comparison of soil boring descriptions to the
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Official Series Description (OSD) for the soil
series that were mapped by the NRCS for this site. Based on this comparison it appears that the
soil in the vicinity of ET 7 is most likely to be the Marvyn soil series.
Depth to Seasonal High Water Table
During the field investigation, the depth to the seasonal high water table (SHWT) was
determined. Since the soil was typically sandy, the determination of the SHWT was made
through field indicators of redoximorphic features or the presence of saturated soil. Table I
presents the determination of the SHWT.
Table I Depth to SHWT
Location
SHWT Determination (inches
below Surface)
ET 7
22

Infiltration Rate
Multiple saturated hydraulic conductivity tests were performed at each proposed infiltration
basin. The results for each test are shown below in Table 2. Data sheets for each hydraulic
conductivity tests are also attached. At each basin location the geometric mean was taken and is
presented in Table 2. The geometric mean was calculated instead of the arithmetic mean, as it
tends to dampen the effect of very high or low values, which might bias the arithmetic mean if a
straight average was calculated.
Table 2 Results of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Tests and Geometric Mean
Test Location
Test Number
Test Depth
(inches)
Measured KSAT
(in/hr)
Geometric
Mean (in/hr)
ET 7
1
12.6
4.63
5.23
2
13.0
6.19
3
12.6
0.34
Since soil is inherently non -homogeneous, field tests can often misrepresent the areal hydraulic
conductivity of a soil. Typically, field tests underestimate the saturated hydraulic conductivity of
clayey soil and overestimate it in sandy soils. As a result of this misrepresentation a "moderation
factor" is suggested to convert point saturated hydraulic conductivity to areal saturated hydraulic
conductivity for each proposed infiltration basin. Since the soil is typically fine sand or loamy
sand, a moderation factor of 0.5 was used to correct for the potential of overestimating the
infiltration rate. Table 3 presents the saturated hydraulic conductivity geometric mean for each
infiltration basin as well as a moderation factor to get an area infiltration rate for each proposed
infiltration basin.
Table 3 Geometric Mean, Moderation Factor and Areal Infiltration Rate for ET 7
Test Location
Geometric Mean
Moderation Factor
Areal Infiltration Rate
(inches/hour)
ET 7
5.23
0.5
2.61
CONCLUSIONS
The findings presented herein represent TCG's professional opinion based on our site and soils
evaluation. This report is provided to assist in the application for the infiltration basins by
providing the soil information. North Carolina D WQ must issue the final permit. Any
concurrence with the findings in this report would be made at that time.

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY
STOG
Data: Lz]arofi
w®Irs fa,noon: sunw
Lors— Basin?
Isme lve(H 60
NumEac I
.e,i
O
Deno mes): 12.6
fIP
Tisi Water Lev.: 150 59
cre
Rry—rg Water Level 140 55
Hde Oegn (oral:
320 (1$6
EMN: ng Write, Lev130 5.1
Reference(cm)
130 5.1
Hemet imi
150 59
CHT Ti see,
= 30.0
Htle remain, 1—) 5�
Hde mealua (1. 2 t5
Vnlva 5emn9:
r
casim ons A: 000I 436
1-0N 3-0N
NOTE: Flooli ler. an land, Water Level
Cwersian FeGM (C F.):
1010
tioi charge In
Chamber de" Ell Tom. G K K K
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY
OG
O.
13sin7
Numnr.
Horlmor
O
oevin mclres):
uo
F
Tarael water Level: 150 59
B 5i=n Welw Level: 130 59
HdeDeter
.130
Ela4rg Water Level: t]0 51
Deter—(con1:
110
43
He.159
-
15.0
LHT iu6sm e(sJ utllny
CIAT
=290
Hde tlinmeler (cmj 60
Hae aelua Oh z 5
Valve Setlup:1
mel5Gen1 P: (I
-0N
-0N
NOTE: Rentlings 6xxtl on EnJiml Water Laval
Cwaro on Fecl« C
i.I
105.0
W.I.,
riemo
ClamCer
d-i,
Elogno Time D K K
K
ReeJire
vtoerlevel
CE.
tome (min)
lmm)
(hr) (cmLnrl (cramp (iNnr)
9ounu2
343
00
1050
15
I
I
I
]f.699
389
$1.5
Ia
1050
65
IN0.011
AAA 126E0$ i9T
HY-1.1-1C CONDUCTIVITY STUDY
STOG
Orate: 3l2JY2W8
ratim Lo: Basin?
Numper 3
e
O
Da9m(mcnuesea): 126
Tar9.W.er Lev.: 110 S9
rags
Be Lava6. 110 a.3
Dapple).
3?0
i126
Eresn9Wafer
ENirp Water Leah: 110 43
Ree
Reler(.)lcml:
150
,59
-15-0
59
CHIHasTrove
CHI Tu6u(a)sltmg:
=]90
Hdetllame� 5.0
Ha25
i(r
VNue $etivg:
1 a
1
a —nos
¢eHiG�anl A: 0031621
-0N -0N
NOTE: Reatllrgs In. on EnOng W aler Level
Coamsicn Fri C I 1
1050
We. ctannion
C1mml tl k
Elato Time 0 K K
K
11.493
831d
9
9
8�
100
6
1Mw
0011
SEND
161163
931