20150577 Ver 1_401 Application_20150615

Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc
Engineers, Surveyors, Planners, Scientists
Letter of Transmittal
To: Jennifer Robertson, President
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, NC 28211
We are sending you herewith via: f Courier
The following items: F copies
Copies Date Number of Description
sheets
From:
Jeremy Icard
Date:
June 3, 2015
Job no.:
2015 -0195
Subject:
Independence Acura
F U.S. Mail l70' Fed. Ex.
I✓' originals F [other]
1 6 -3 -15 - Check # 30268 for $570 for the permit application fee
These are transmitted as checked below:
F for approval r for your file
r for execution / signatures
Remarks:
1- as requested r for review & comment
(— [other]
For EMH &T: - -Q
Jeremy Icard
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
A legacy of experience A reputation for excellence
301 McCullough Drive, Suite 109, Charlotte, NC 28262 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
Columbus - Atlanta • Charlotte - Cincinnati - Indianapolis
ennht Conn

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info: 2 1 5 0 5 7 7
1. Project Name HBM Hendrick BMW
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: HAG RE CDT, LLC, 600o Monroe Road, Charlotte, NC 28212
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Jennifer Robertson, Atlas Environmental, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4 Related/Previous Action ID number(s): none known DWR° #,none known
5. Site Address: 7o16 East Independence Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28227
6. Subdivision Name: not a subdivision, commercial development
7. City: Charlotte
8. County: Mecklenburg
_
9. Lat: 35•i65579 Long: -80.742329 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Mint Hill
11. Waterway: Unnamed Tributary McAlpine Crk ( "C" waters)
12. Watershed: Catawba
13. Requested Action:
6Z, @ g Iln
X Nationwide Permit # 3 39 V
— JUN r D
_ General Pennit # 1 2015
_ Jurisdictional Determination Request D° N8 Bu FERER�oyuRCEs
_ Pre - Application Request n�NG
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
commercial development
Site/Waters Name: Unnamed Tributary McAlpine Cr
Keywords:

June 8, 2015
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources,
Attn: Mr. William Elliott 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
151 Patton Ave, Room 208 Attn: Mrs. Jennifer Burdette /Mr. Alan Johnson
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -2694 1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
Re: HBM Hendrick BMW — 6.653 Acres
Parcel ID's: 19106116, 19106115, and 19106101
7016 East Independence Blvd, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC, 28227
Nationwide Permit 3/39 Request
William /Jennifer:
Hendrick Auto Group RE CDT, LLC is requesting approval of the enclosed Nationwide
Permit 3/39 application. There are approximately 510 linear feet of piped stream on
parcel 19106116, 175 linear feet of open stream on parcel 19106115, and
approximately 175 linear feet of piped stream on parcel 19106101. The application
package request is for 230 -510 linear feet of culvert replacement on parcel 19106116,
175 linear feet of new culvert on parcel 19106115, and 110 -175 linear feet of culvert
replacement on parcel 19106101.
The new stream impact is necessary in order to construct a new building and parking
lot. Re- developing these three parcels is the best plan forward given the fact that all
three parcels are currently developed, there are additional existing Hendrick Automotive
facilities present at this location on additional parcels, and the stream being impacted is
assessed as a lower quality stream. There will be a functional uplift in stream and
water quality at the mitigation site.
No mitigation is proposed for the impacts requested under Nationwide permit 3 as
these impacts are replacements of existing culverts. The open stream is surrounded by
existing urban development and lacks a quality buffer. There is evidence within the
stream and on the stream banks that it receives a significant amount of stormwater
flow (trash, pieces of concrete, rip -rap, etc.). There is a chain link and an electric fence
on the west side of stream within 5 linear feet of the top of bank. A 1:1 mitigation ratio
will replace the loss of existing stream function of the unnamed tributary to McAlpine
Creek. A mitigation application request has been made to the NC Division of Mitigation
Services for 175 warm stream credits.
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704 - 512 -1206 (m) / 828 - 712 -9205 (m) / 980 - 819 -7780 (o) / 980 - 819 -7876 (1]
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville, Charlotte, and Raleigh

ENVIRONMENTAL
The existing culverts have been in place since sometime between 1978 and 1993 based
on historic aerial photographs. The project engineer estimates that sections of the
existing culverts have been in place 30 -40 years. The existing culvert on parcel
19106116 extends at least another 1,500 linear feet upstream of this project. The
existing culvert on parcel 19106101 extends at least another 260 linear feet
downstream of this project.
The stream on site is an unnamed tributary to McAlpine Creek which is classified as "'C"
waters by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. This stream is assessed to
be perennial relatively permanent water (p -RPW). Atlas staff is not aware of any other
404 permits previously issued for the property. An email from Mr. Brendan Smith is
enclosed regarding the local stormwater plan approval requirements. The City of
Charlotte Engineering and Property Management department will be reviewing all city
ordinance required stormwater detention for compliance with applicable City ordinances
and regulations and will be providing design approval for the project.
Enclosed are the necessary permit application documents and additional project
information for the requested permit approvals. Thank you for your attention to the
enclosed permit application approval request. Please contact me if you need any
additional information or have any questions.
Best regards,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
3 Robertson (cbatlasenvi.com
Hard Copy Furnished To: Mr. Alan Johnson, NC DWR, Mooresville Office
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704 - 512 -1206 (m) / 828 - 712 -9205 (m) / 980 - 819 -7780 (o) / 980 - 819 -7876 (t)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville, Charlotte, and Raleigh

ONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 -1890
-and -
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, or right to purchase holder of the
property identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation
approval and /or permit processing at the request of the Corps or WQP.
Project Name:
Property Owner of Record:
Contact Name:
Address:
HBM Hendrick BMW
HAG RE CDT, LLC
Gene Cocchi
6000 Monroe Rd., Ste. 100
Address: Charlotte, NC 28212
Phone /Fax Number: 704.566.3208/704.566.3306
Email Address: gene.cocchi @hendrickovto.com
Project Address: 7016 E. Indepe e e Blvd.
Project Address: Charlotte, /
Tax PIN: 19 510611 /,1910 01 Or
Signature:
Date: S j6141f 5
r
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704 -512 -1206 (m) / 828 -712 -9205 (m) / 980 -819 -7780 (o) J 980 -819 -7876 (t)
[e-mail]
www.atLisenvi�m

OF W ATF9
? � � p Office Use Only:
�� r Corps action ID no
1. l s o ®' DWQ protect no.
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a Type(s) of approval sought from the
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
Corps
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3/39 or General Permit (GP) number -
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No
1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
For the record only for Corps Permit
because written approval is not required? Certification
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
® Yes ❑ No
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1h
❑ Yes ® No
below
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project: HBM Hendrick BMW
2b.
County Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name not a subdivision, commercial development
40)A\
2e
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state not a DOT project
no
/O\
project
3.
Owner Information
/ / ✓UN
3a.
3b
Name(s) on Recorded Deed. HAG RE CDT, LLC
Deed Book and Page No 07706 / 755, 26468 / 60, and 04781 / 282
e01$ /
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if Gene CocchiG3
applicable)
3d
Street address 6000 Monroe Road, Suite 100
3e
City, state, zip Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
3f
Telephone no. 704 - 566 -3208
3g.
Fax no.- 704 - 566 -3306
3h.
Email address gene.cochi @hendrickauto.com
Page l of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b
Name
same as above
4c.
Business name
same as above
(if applicable).
4d.
Street address:
same as above
4e
City, state, zip
same as above
4f
Telephone no.
same as above
4g.
Fax no.:
same as above
4h
Email address
same as above
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name
Jennifer L Robertson
5b
Business name
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
(if applicable)
5c
Street address.
712 English Tudor Lane
5d
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28211
5e
Telephone no -
704 - 512 -1206
5f.
Fax no.
980 - 819 -7876
5g.
Email address
JRobertson @atlasenvi com
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) I Latitude 35.165579
1c Property size
`- Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
2c. River basin
3. Project Description
16106116,19106115,19106101
Longitude: - 80.742329
6.653 acres
McAlpine Creek
C
Catawba
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application all three parcels are developed; this project will included redevelopment of the properties; the general land
use is existing commerical development, mulifamily development, a school, and forested areas
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property- 175 linear feet open,
685 linear feet culverted
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed protect to re- develop a commercial project to meet the needs of automobile
customers (both new vehicles, used vehicles, and body shop customers)
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used Re- development of three parcels for
Hendrick BMW, heavy earth moving equipment will be used to grade and develop the site, 175 linear feet of perennial
stream impacts are necessary
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments JD has been submitted to Corps
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Final
Preliminary ®
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Name (if known) Jennifer L Robertson / Joel McSwain Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD has been submitted to Corps
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes
Page 3 of 10
® No ❑ Unknown
/1 .
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
1
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
1
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a. 2b. 2c.
2d 2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number Type of impact Type of wetland
Forested Corps (404, 10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or (if known)
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 - Choose one Choose one
Yes /No -
0
W2 - Choose one Choose one
Yes /No -
0
W3 - Choose one Choose one
Yes /No -
0
W4 - Choose one Choose one
Yes /No -
0
W5 - Choose one Choose one
Yes /No -
0
W6 - Choose one Choose one
Yes /No -
0
2g. Total wetland impacts:
0
2h. Comments no wetlands are present on the parcels
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a 3b. 3c. 3d.
3e 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial
Type of jurisdiction Average
Impact
number - (PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10 stream
length
Permanent (P) or intermittent
DWQ — non -404, width
(linear
Temporary (T) (INT)?
other) (feet)
feet)
S1 P Culvert UT to McAlpine PER
Corps culvert
510
Creek
S2 P Culvert UT to McAlpine PER
Corps 4
175
Creek
S3 P Culvert UT to McAlpine PER
Corps culvert
175
Creek
S4 - Choose one -
-
S5 - Choose one -
-
S6 - Choose one -
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
175 / 340-
685
3i Comments 175 linear feet of new culvert, 340 -685 linear feet of culvert replacement
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
5b.
5c.
none
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries,
tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any
other open water of
the U S. then individually list all open water impacts
below.
(acres)
4a. 4b.
Upland
4c. 4d
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
(acres)
number of pond
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Flooded Filled
Temporary (T)
Flooded Filled
Excavated
101 -
none
Choose one Choose
I 0
102 -
none
Choose one Choose
I 0
103 -
none
Choose one Choose
I 0
04 -
none
Choose one Choose
I 0
0 0 0
0
4f. Total open water impacts:
0
4g Comments there is no open water on site
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or ake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a.
5b.
5c.
none
5d
5e.
B4 -
none
Wetland Impacts
(acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
no impacts to protected buffers are proposed
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled
Excavated
Flooded Filled
Excavated
P1 Choose one
none none
none
none none none
none
P2 Choose one
none none
none
none none none
I none
5f. Total:
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
5g
Comments no pond construction is proposed
5h
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
If yes, permit ID no
51
Expected pond surface area (acres)
none proposed
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres)
none proposed
5k.
Method of construction
none proposed
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, t ien you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ® Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other -
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation impact impact
Temporary (T) required? (square (square
B1 -
none
B2 -
none
63 -
none
B4 -
none
B5 -
none
B6 -
none
61 Comments
no impacts to protected buffers are proposed
Page 5 of 10
feet) feet)
Yes /No 0 0
Yes /No 0 0
Yes /No 0 0
Yes /No 0 0
Yes /No 0 0
Yes /No 0 0
6h. Total buffer impacts: 0 0
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The 175 linear feet of open stream is included in this request to be culverted. This stream is surrounded by existing
commercial development and sources for stormwater run -off. Stream impacts will be minimized by the proposed mitigation
175 linear feet of stream will be restored and will be a higher quality stream system with a quality buffer
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The stream requires to be impacted in order to re- develop the property constructing a new budding and parking lot.
Construction techniques will include stormwater treatment which is currently not present on site This stormwater treatment
will improve downstream water quality
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank none
/�NER
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type Choose one
Quantity none
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Choose one
Quantity none
Type Choose one
Quantity none
3c Comments none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested
175 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Warm
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
none square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested.
none acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
none acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested-
none acres
4h Comments NC DMS application is enclosed, the approval letter will be forwarded once received
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c. 6d. 6e
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 none none 3 (2 for Catawba) none
Zone 2 none none 1.5 none
6f Total buffer mitigation required: none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
not applicable
6h. Comments no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the protect include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24% %
2b Does this protect require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
The stormwater management plan will be approved locally by City of Charlotte.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? City of Charlotte
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this protect? City of Charlotte
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply) ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ ORW
(check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
■ //m
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
I
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This commercial development will access the existing municipal sewer system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDENR Natural Heritage Program Map Viewer and GIS Layer; see enclosed desktop review for Federal T &E
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCHPO GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps GIS layer
Jennifer L Robertson
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
6/8/2015
Date
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

i
i
i
I
y • • �; "t
� 1
-- --� _- _
ar
CID
-- --I --
910605 / I
t
- X91 ;�
46 IS
•_. � L J o
Itom. gi 9106 �
ik
- -- _ } � ; 111 5 � /r 1�.. -- t( ;/ • -- J I, � � L/jiJ V
--- - -- -- - --
IMPgCT
V t Bf I 1;) i _ �-_ � I,r,,,., ■
REP /,a CE ERET
X NT 5 10 0. NOZ • r:,, . , � � ,! ,..,.:n. ! I I
D
Ce
VE 0 1 �5 m
175 RT 010.0.0. �.f. - a o
-FT 0.0166 ac. E Q
�s � � � � r� � � -♦.�►- -ors.. -��rrr4:, _- — '+� -.�' .'g g' iu IS
Pere
b6stin p
u
CU /Vg�7(S)
T otal Acreage to a�
of Site :
t Existing RPW(s) ; 1 6 653 Acres __ U
c
i' Pr °Posed imPact(s) ; (0.15 nAcr e Peet
5 s) ro
l5 . g6 r� �•
0
(0.047 _ g 0,g r s1 t c ro
ti�

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name HBM Hendrick BMW
2. Naive of Property Owner /Applicant: HAG RE CDT, LLC, 6000 Monroe Road, Charlotte, NC 28212
3. Name of Consultant /Agent: Jennifer Robertson, Atlas Environmental, Inc.
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): none known
5. Site Address: 7016 East Independence Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28227
6. Subdivision Name: not a subdivision, commercial development
7. City: Charlotte
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: 35•i65579 Long: -80.742329
10. Quadrangle Name: Mint Hill
11. Waterway: Unnamed Tributary McAlpine Crk ( "C" waters)
12. Watershed: Catawba
13. Requested Action:
Nationwide Permit #
_ General Permit #
X Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre- Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM
DWR # none known
(Decimal Degrees Please)
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
commercial development
Site/Waters Name: Unnamed Tributary McAlpine Ct
Keywords:
Begin Date

K``'I`1CIVIRONMENTAL
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. William Elliott
151 Patton Ave, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
May 13, 2015
Re: HBM Hendrick BMW — 6.653 Acres
Parcel ID's: 191061161 19106115, and 19106101
7016 East Independence Blvd, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC, 28227
Jurisdictional Determination Request
William:
Hendrick Auto Group RE CDT, LLC is requesting approval of the enclosed Waters of the
US delineation. There are 175 linear feet of open stream, approximately 685 linear feet
of piped stream, and no wetlands on the subject properties. The existing culverts have
been in place since sometime between 1978 and 1993 based on historic aerial
photographs. The project engineer estimates that sections of the existing culverts have
been in place 30 -40 years. The existing culvert on parcel 19106116 extends at least
another 1,500 linear feet upstream on this project. The existing culvert on parcel
19106101 extends at least another 260 linear feet downstream of this project.
The stream on site is an unnamed tributary to McAlpine Creek which is classified as "C"
waters by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. The stream on site is
assessed to be a perennial relatively permanent water (p -RPW). Atlas staff is not aware
of any other 404 permits previously issued for the property.
Enclosed are the necessary jurisdictional determination documents and additional
project information. Thank you for your attention to the enclosed delineation approval
request. Please contact me if you need any additional information.
Best regards,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
]Robertson @atlasenvi.com
ArL4SEnvironmental, Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704 - 512 -1206 (m) / 828 - 712 -9205 (m) / 980 - 819 -7780 (o) / 980 - 819 -7876 (1)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville, Charlotte, and Raleigh

C +_
.IRONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 -1890
-and -
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, or right to purchase holder of the
property identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation
approval and /or permit processing at the request of the Corps or WQP.
Project Name:
Property Owner of Record:
Contact Name:
Address:
Address:
Phone /Fax Number:
Email Address:
Project Address:
Project Address:
Tax PIN:
HBM Hendrick BMW
HAG RE CDT, LLC
Gene Cocchi
6000 Monroe Rd., Ste. 100
Charlotte, NC 28212
704-566.3208/704.566.3306
[e-mail]
7016 E. indepee Blvd.
Charlotte,
19 5 910611 /,1910 O1
Signature: Xv J -71�
Date:
A TLASEnvironmental Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704- 512 -1206 (m) / 828 - 712 -9205 (m) / 980- 819 -7780 (o) / 980 -819 -7876 (0
[e-mail]
www.atlasemd,com

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 7o16 East Independence Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28227
City, State: Charlotte, North Carolina
County: Mecklenburg
Directions: From Charlotte: Take 1 -77 S to Brookshire (277/16), take E
Independence (27/74), site on right near WT Harris Blvd
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 191o6116 191o6115 191o61o1
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jennifer L Robertson, Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Mailing Address: 712 English Tudor Lane, Charlotte, NC 28211
Telephone Number: (704) 512 -12o6
Electronic Mail Address': JRobertson @atlasenvi.com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: HAG RE CDT, LLC (Gene Cocchi)
Mailing Address: 6000 Monroe Road, Suite loo
Charlotte, NC 28212
Telephone Number: 704- 566 -3208 (office) / 704-566 -33o6 (fax)
Electronic Mail Address': [e-mail]
✓❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel /Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property /properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
*see agent authorization form May 6, 2015
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary_ JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a oreliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.*
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property /project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property /project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property /project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT /USACE protocols, skip to Part E
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
ZSize of Property or Project Area 6.653 acres
❑ I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form .
❑ Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 1 1 x l 7) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets F-1 Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Landscape Photos, if taken
17 Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
F✓ Project Coordinates: 35.165579 Latitude 80.742329 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
aOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
7 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
htto / /www.usace armv mil / Missions/ CivilWorks /RegulatorvProgramand Permits /reg surm.asnx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
httia-Hportal.ncdenr org /c /document library /set file ?uuid= 76f3c58b -dab8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &groupld =38364 and,
htto: / /www saw usace armv mil/ Portals /59 /docs /regulatory /publicnotices /2013 /NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318 Pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
7 USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets ❑✓ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑v Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage /linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
For] Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s) ")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one oriLnnal Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11 "x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x17 ", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e -mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings /metes
and bounds /GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
F] Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
F] When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project /property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and /or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands ", "non -
jurisdictional waters "). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
F1When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Waters of the US and Isolated
Wetlands Delineation
Report of Findings
April 14, 2015
Parcel
ID
19106116 —
4.033 Acres
Parcel
ID
19106115
— 1.37 Acres
Parcel
ID
19106101
— 1.25 Acres
Hendrick Auto Group, Independence Acura
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Prepared For:
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton, & Tilton, Inc.
301 McCullough Drive, Suite 109
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Prepared By:
EMU, Inc, Parcel ID's 19106116, 19106115, and 19106101 - Page 1

Summary of Findings
Stream and Wetland Delineation
Introduction
At your request, during April 2015, staff from Atlas Environmental, Inc. (Atlas) performed a
pedestrian survey of Parcel ID's 19106116, 19106115, and 19106101 to identify the presence of
surface waters and wetlands that are subject to Federal and State regulations. Surface waters
such as perennial (p- RPW's) and intermittent (s- RPW's) streams and their impoundments are
subject to Section 401 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. An area is determined to be a
jurisdictional wetland if it exhibits wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil
characteristics. These characteristics are required to be in accordance with the definitions in the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Wetland Delineation Manual from 1987. Isolated wetlands
are subject to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR),
Division of Water Resources (DWR) Isolated Wetlands Rules.
Surface Waters
Located on the Mint Hill topo -quad the site is within drainage areas of McAlpine Creek within the
Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050103). The DWR Water Quality Program (DWR, WQP) classifies
McAlpine Creek as "Class C" waters. The field delineation of assessed jurisdictional stream features
was conducted utilizing current methodologies which are consistent with those outlined in the 1987
US Armv Corps Wetland Delineation Manual, the Reaional Supplement of the Corps of Enaineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version2.0). April 2012,
post Rapanos Supreme Court decision guidance (2007), other Regulatory Guidance Letters provided
by the Corps, and the latest DWR, WQP, Surface Water, Wetlands Branch, 401 and Buffer
Permitting Unit Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their
Origins (V.4.11, 2010) — effective September 1, 2010. Evaluations and assessments regarding
jurisdictional limits and permitting requirements made by consultants are subject to verification by
the Corps, the DWR, WQP, and other appropriate state and local regulatory authorities.
The limits of any jurisdictional streams are depicted on Figurel Aquatic Resources Sketch Map.
This determination is subject to verification by the US Army Corps of Engineers and, in some cases,
the State agencies charged with the protection of surface water resources. The map on Figure 1
as well as the remaining resource maps was obtained from Mecklenburg County GIS. Upon review
of the existing site conditions, it is our assessment that one jurisdictional stream is present on the
project area. This perennial stream is an unnamed tributary to McAlpine Creek. Approximately
510 linear feet of this stream is piped through parcel 19106116, 175 linear feet is open stream
through parcel 19106115, and approximately 175 linear feet of this stream is piped through parcel
19106101. Other drainage features were determined to be non - jurisdictional non - relatively
permanent waters. It should be noted that this time of year is typically when high flows would be
observed. We recommend that formal written concurrence of our assessments regarding the
jurisdictional status of all drainage features on site be obtained from the Corps. The formal final
jurisdictional determination will be valid for five years.
Wetlands and Isolated Wetlands
Potential wetland areas on the site were evaluated for the presence of hydric soils, evidence of
wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. In these areas, hydrologic proof would be the
existence of hydric soils with oxidized root channels in the upper soil horizons that have low
chroma matrix colors. Indicators of hydrology may include water borne deposits, drift lines, scour
marks, the presence of crayfish borrows, redoximorphic concretions, or regional indicators of soil
saturation. Hydrophytic vegetation can range from facultative to obligate wetland plant species.
EMH &T, Inc, Parcel ID's 19106116, 19106115, and 19106101 - Page 2

Based on site observations, it was assessed that no jurisdictional wetlands or isolated wetlands
exist on the subject property.
Public Sourced Natural Resource Maivinq
County GIS Tax Parcel (Figure 2)
Relevant water resource layers and hydrologic layers have been activated for this figure. Water
resources depicted on this figure are not typically field verified but rather they are generated at
the county's direction and are most likely based on other public sourced maps or by GIS staff
photo- interpretation.
County GIS Aerial (Figure 3)
Aerial maps help with site access and orientation in the field. These maps are also useful for
determining likely stream corridors and floodplain areas.
County GIS Topographical Map (Figure 4)
Generally, a feature that is depicted in blue or magenta is a water resource. However, some of
these features may not be jurisdictional resources due to complex nuances within the regulations.
Additional jurisdictional water resources may be present though they are not depicted on this
mapping resource. Wetland and stream jurisdictional determinations are based on field
evaluations not merely the presence or absence of blue or magenta features depicted on this
map.
Delineation Findinas Summary
In summary Atlas assessed that there is one Corps jurisdictional stream or no Corps jurisdictional
wetlands on the subject parcel. Atlas assessed that there are no DWR isolated wetlands on the
property. Atlas can obtain written concurrence of the findings from the Corps and DWR.
Permittinq
In general (with some exceptions) the permitting process is regulatory and not prohibitory. A Corps
404 permit verification and /or a 401 water quality certification from DWR is not required for work
on the subject property that is restricted to high ground areas /activities. Construction activities
within jurisdictional streams and wetlands (collectively referred to as Waters of the US) require
written authorization by the Corps and /or State (DWR -WQP) water resources agencies prior to
impacts. For most development projects a stormwater management plan will be required if
impervious surfaces exceed 24% over the entire project and /or high density areas and /or if
stormwater is not treated with predominantly vegetated conveyances for low density projects.
The project may be required to meet local NPDES Phase 2 or Water Supply Stormwater
Management requirements.
Impacts of 150 linear feet and less to the identified streams and fills of less than 1/10tl' acre of
jurisdictional waters and wetlands are typically standard to permit under the Nationwide Permit
program, and may not require compensatory mitigation for impacts. Impacts to 150 linear feet of
stream up to 300 linear feet of stream and from 1/10 to' /2 acre of wetland impacts may be
authorized under the Nationwide Permit program as well, but a more thorough review for
avoidance and minimization of impacts will be conducted by both the Corps and the DWR -WQP.
Compensatory mitigation will be required for stream and wetland losses under this permitting
scenario. Unavoidable impacts that exceed these thresholds may likely only be authorized under
an Individual Permit and Water Quality Certification, and these permits involve a public notice and
comment periods and may involve a public hearing.
EMH &T, Inc, Parcel ID's 19106116, 19106115, and 19106101 - Page 3

Once an acceptable site plan is produced, Atlas can assist with the preparation and submittal of a
Pre - Construction Notification (permit application) to the Corps and NC DWR -WQP if it is
determined that impacts are unavoidable. The likely Nationwide Permit that is applicable for
commercial development is Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39. The Corps will review the application for
eligibility under NWP 39 which includes a review for impacts to cultural and historic resources,
natural heritage resources, impacts within FEMA regulated floodplains, and threatened and
endangered species. Upon their determination that the proposed development is not likely to
adversely impact those resources, they will issue their permit verification. NC DWR -WQP will
review the application for impacts to water quality and aquatic life. Storm water control and
treatment design will be reviewed by the local delegated authority, if applicable, otherwise the
North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources will review storm water plans or in
certain instances NC DWR -WQP may review the storm water plans.
The following links to the full text of the Corps Nationwide Permit 39 and NC DWR Water Quality
Certification (for commercial developments) are provided for your review:
httD: / /www.saw.usace.armv. mil / Portals /59/ docs / reaulatory /readocs /NWP2012 /NWP39 3- 23.Ddf
httD: / /Dortal.ncdenr.orq/c /document library /aet file ?uuid= 9e7c74e6- 1036- 44dd -b70f-
8e93e7ef6fbe &a rou DId = 38364
Permitting Summary
If impacts to Waters of the US and /or isolated wetlands are necessary for site development a
Corps permit and /or DWR water quality certification may be required. Nationwide permits are
usually limited to 1/2 acre of stream /wetland /open water impacts as well as 300 linear feet of
stream impacts. Individual permits require an elevated review process.
Recommendations
The following is a very general summary of the recommended next steps.
1. Conduct site visit(s) with the Corps and DWR
2. Obtain Corps verification of the Atlas delineation
3. Submit a permit application to the Corps and DWR for stream impacts.
Conclusion
This concludes our project review and report of findings for the stream and wetland delineation.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services. Please feel free to call with questions or
to discuss this report.
Best regards,
Jennifer L Robertson
President
EMH &T, Inc, Parcel ID's 19106116, 19106115, and 19106101 - Page 4

Jurisdictional Waters of the US and Isolated Wetlands
Figures
EMH &T, Inc., Parcel ID's 19106116, 19106115, and 19106101 - Page 5

Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Figure 1. Aquatic Resources Sketch Map
err s �s /�'" —�✓"�
19106117 hh
165'15113
t 4 lye X012 I
Stream Flow Direction
Existing Culvert
i
11 �L vS.rr _
I9 1 1g11,t „I �
t..
Tvlf
Existing Culvert
,r — tut1. >>.5
1 N
0 0.004¢009 0.018 Miles WE
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps, surveys,
planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources
should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburq County and its mappinq contractors assume no leqal responsibility for the information contained herein.
f \II I.1 -- Pl - _ - - I I- 4 111/1 n14n 4^4-4r -- 4 -- ^4 M- -- ^

Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Figure 2. Tax Parcel Map
+ _r
°b ��oiCiS�i �.0A
R,.a�,,�
1 ,
ti. f t'�T�
! 0 0.0125,.025 � �' 0.05 Miles "� ' . tr�� e
$
This map or report is prepared forthe inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps, surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data.
Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal
responsibility for the information contained herein.
r�111nT 1 11..._11111 - ♦/�J I�nI�� •������� _.I •��n���� 11__._�

Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Figure 3. Aerial Map

Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Figure 4. Topo Map
,
Ztl
` 1 - 0
X"
° 1 1 a"srs`
'"��'' ` f
0 0.0125 %025 0.05 Miles
This map or, report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps, surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data.
Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal
responsibility for the information contained herein.

VEcOnEty Map
Notes
. mapquest
This map doesn't contain any items.
ray View Dr
o
o a+7c� Pam 0�,a
a
A,
con G
'WalLac, YyaNwO, SL
t W
NjC%- augNln [)t
4111
Mason Wafface
Park
orb
tN
O
1
�n1O1�
Chq�e.4.
�o
74
,gam lake 01
0-1
V
a
m
0
HBM Hendrick BMW
Samon Of
C�
t
Ma��a
[1t�pqueSt' 1500M
©2015 MapQuest - Portions ©2015 TomTom I Terms I Privacy
02015 MapQuest, Inc. Use of directions and maps is subject to the MapQuest Terms of Use. We males no g uarantee of the accuracy of their content, road conditions or route usability. You
assume all risk of use. View Terms of Use

Dr'v'ng Vrec 'o is
Notes
mapq uest
Trip to:
7016 E Independence Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28227 -9419
13.39 miles / 18 minutes
[4534 -4998] N Interstate 77, Charlotte, NC 28269 Download
Free App
1. Start out going south on Juniper Dr toward Sunset Blvd. 0.7 Mi
0.7 Mi Total
2. Turn right onto Cindy Ln. 0.6 Mi
1.3 Mi Total
3. Take the 1 st left onto Beatties Ford Rd. 0.9 Mi
2.2 Mi Total
1 4. Merge onto 1-85 N toward Concord. 0.3 Mi
2.5 Mi Total
t 5. Merge onto 1 -77 S / US -21 S via EXIT 38 toward Columbia. 1.7 Mi
in j 4.3 Mi Total
6. Take the NC -16 /1-277 / Brookshire Frwy eat, EXIT 11.
®
Fs&TT--Hi 7. Merge onto NC -16 S / Brookshire Fwy Evia EXIT 11A on the left toward
® 16 Downtown.
l easy 18. Merge onto US -74 E/ E Independence Blvd via EXIT 2B on the left toward NC -27
'7- 4 E.
0 9. 7016 E INDEPENDENCE BLVD is on the right.
7016 E Independence Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28227 -9419
a
Total Travel Estimate: 13.39 miles - about 18 minutes
0.3 Mi
4.5 Mi Total
2.1 Mi
6.6 Mi Total
6.8 Mi
13.4 Mi Total
©2015 MapQuest, Inc. Use of directions and maps is subject to the MapQuest Terms of Use. We make no guarantee of the accuracy of
their content, road conditions or route usability. You assume all risk of use. View Terms of Use

Proof o-: O ersh 0 P
Special District
Account Type PARTNERSHIP
1 Municipality CHARLOTTE
Property Use COMMERCIAL
1 Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710457100K
FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
Zone TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
1 6950 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
16950 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
Ownership
Owner Name Mailing Address
% J R HENDRICK III 6000 MONROE RD STE 100
CHARLOTTE NC 28212 -6178
HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE 6000 MONROE RD STE 100
GROUP CHARLOTTE NC 28212 -6178
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price 1
07706 -755 03/17/1994 1$0.00
1
1 Site Location
ETJ Area Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No
Census Tract # 19.03
1 Post Construction District 1
Jurisdiction I Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I McALPINE
12/11/2014 from Mecklenburq County
09/22/2000 from Mecklenburq County
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
19106116
19106116
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L1 M22 -123
Land Area
4.033 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type PARTNERSHIP
1 Municipality CHARLOTTE
Property Use COMMERCIAL
1 Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710457100K
FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
Zone TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
1 6950 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
16950 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
Ownership
Owner Name Mailing Address
% J R HENDRICK III 6000 MONROE RD STE 100
CHARLOTTE NC 28212 -6178
HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE 6000 MONROE RD STE 100
GROUP CHARLOTTE NC 28212 -6178
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price 1
07706 -755 03/17/1994 1$0.00
1
1 Site Location
ETJ Area Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No
Census Tract # 19.03
1 Post Construction District 1
Jurisdiction I Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I McALPINE
12/11/2014 from Mecklenburq County
09/22/2000 from Mecklenburq County
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

09/22/2000 from Mecklenburg Countv
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby noted that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer 1 Yes
FEM
FEMA Panel#
FEMA Panel Date
FEMA Flood Zone
Community Flood
Zone
A and Community Floodplain
3710457100K
03/02/2009
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
7016 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
1
Owner Name
C/O HENDRICK
AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
RENC HB LLC
Ownership
Mailing Address
6000 MONROE RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28212
6000 MONROE RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28212
1 Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price 1
1 Deed Sale Date Sale Price 1
126468 -60 06/26/2013 $1,350,000.00 1
110444 -741 05/03/1999 $0.00 1
Site Location 1
1 ETJ Area Charlotte
1 Charlotte Historic District No 1
1 Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No 1
1 Census Tract # 19.03
1 Post Construction District
1 Jurisdiction Charlotte
1 District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name 1 McALPINE
s
12/11/2014 from Mecklenburq County
09/22/2000 from Mecklenburq County
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Identity
1 Parcel
ID
GIS ID
119106115
19106115
1
Property Characteristics
1 Legal desc
NA
1 Land Area
1.37 AC
1 Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
1 Special District
1 Account Type
NON -NC CORP
1 Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
COMMERCIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer 1 Yes
FEM
FEMA Panel#
FEMA Panel Date
FEMA Flood Zone
Community Flood
Zone
A and Community Floodplain
3710457100K
03/02/2009
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
7016 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
1
Owner Name
C/O HENDRICK
AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
RENC HB LLC
Ownership
Mailing Address
6000 MONROE RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28212
6000 MONROE RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28212
1 Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price 1
1 Deed Sale Date Sale Price 1
126468 -60 06/26/2013 $1,350,000.00 1
110444 -741 05/03/1999 $0.00 1
Site Location 1
1 ETJ Area Charlotte
1 Charlotte Historic District No 1
1 Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No 1
1 Census Tract # 19.03
1 Post Construction District
1 Jurisdiction Charlotte
1 District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name 1 McALPINE
s
12/11/2014 from Mecklenburq County
09/22/2000 from Mecklenburq County
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710457100K
FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
Zone TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
7030 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
Ownership
Owner Name Mailing Address
% HILLBILLY PROD MARKET 7024 E INDEPENDENCE
BLVD
CHARLOTTE NC 28227 -9419
MARSHALL SURFACE 7024 E INDEPENDENCE
BLVD
CHARLOTTE NC 28227 -9419
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
104781 -282 01/09/1984 1$90,000.00
11 Site Location
ETJ Area Charlotte
1 Charlotte Historic District No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No
Census Tract # 19.03
1 Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I McALPINE
12/11/2014 from Mecklenbura County
09/22/2000 from Mecklenburq County
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Identity
Parcel
ID GIS ID
19106101
19106101
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
E INDEP BLVD
Land Area
1.25 AC
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Special District
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Property Use
COMMERCIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710457100K
FEMA Panel Date 03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
Zone TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
7030 E INDEPENDENCE BV CHARLOTTE
Ownership
Owner Name Mailing Address
% HILLBILLY PROD MARKET 7024 E INDEPENDENCE
BLVD
CHARLOTTE NC 28227 -9419
MARSHALL SURFACE 7024 E INDEPENDENCE
BLVD
CHARLOTTE NC 28227 -9419
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
104781 -282 01/09/1984 1$90,000.00
11 Site Location
ETJ Area Charlotte
1 Charlotte Historic District No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area No
Census Tract # 19.03
1 Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Central Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I McALPINE
12/11/2014 from Mecklenbura County
09/22/2000 from Mecklenburq County
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

35° 10' 1" N
35° 4 51"N
;Web Soil Survey Map
523300 523340 523380 523420 523460 523500
3
Map Scale: 1:1,600 if printed on A portrait (8.5' x 11 ") sheet.
S Meters
N 0 20 40 80 120
r. #
0 50 100 200 300
A
Map proJecbon: Web Mercator Comer aoordirla6es: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Q5 35° ld 1" N
ryS
E
0
N
f�
M
V
N
M
O
M
35° 9 SI" N
523540
3
Page 1 of 3

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOQ
Spoil Area
Area of Interest (AOI)
Solis
®
Very Stony Spot
Soil Map Unit Polygons
.�,.
Soil Map Unit Lines
Other
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
Transportation
Borrow Pit
X
Clay Spot
-
Closed Depression
US Routes
Gravel Pit
Major Roads
Gravelly Spot
Local Roads
Landfill
A.
Lava Flow
Aerial Photography
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
0
Miscellaneous Water
O
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
,ry
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oe
Sodic Spot
Soil Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
g
Spoil Area
a
Stony Spot
®
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
'
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
ti
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
.
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: hftp : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal -area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 10, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011 —Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
4.9
75.4%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15
0.9
13.4%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Ur
Urban land
0.7
11.2%
Totals for Area of Interest
6.5
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

NWI Map
t�
il!NIAN11 Iw ilt
MF N1'X 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Invents
This map Is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service Is not
responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All
wetlands related data should be used In accordance with the layer metadata found on
the Wetlands Mapper web site.
User Remarks:
Wetlands
- freshwater C„egeit
I resnwater rxettew5nrun
- Estianne and Marine Ceepwater
E suanne and marine
- Frcahwatcr Pand
- Lase
- Rimine
- Dther

Polaris 3G Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
FEMA Ma
p
ice,`
k
0-
I
0
,reekwood. -
bu o1ru m
X FN
11111111 Shit
TT
7
A4,
W,
0 0.0375'.075 6\-15 mil
. nss
S
L-L
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within ecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps, surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data.
Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal
responsibility for the information contained herein.

stream ciass---ca, -on
NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY 2B .0300
.0308 CATAWBA RIVER BASIN
Class
Name of Stream
Description
Class
Date
Index No.
Little Sugar Creek
From source to
North
C
09/01/74
11 -137 -8
Carolina -South
Carolina
State Line
Dairy Branch
From source to
Little Sugar
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -8 -1
Creek
Brier Creek
From source to
Little Sugar
C
08/01/85
11- 137 -8 -2
Creek
Edwards Branch
From source to
Brier Creek
C
03/01/77
11- 137 -8 -2 -1
Little Hope Creek
From source to
Little Sugar
C
08/01/85
11- 137 -8 -3
r-1,
McAlpine Creek (Waverly
From source to
North
C
09/01/74
11 -137 -9
Lake)
Carolina -South
Carolina
State Line
Campbell Creek
From source to
McAlpine
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -9 -1
Creek
Irvins Creek (McEwen Lake)
From source to
McAlpine
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -9 -2
Creek
Lake Windermere and Chillis
Entire lakes and connecting
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -9 -3
Lake
streams to McAlpine Creek
Fourmile Creek
From source to
McAlpine
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -9 -4
Creek
Rocky Branch
From source to
Fourmile
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -9 -4 -1
Creek
Lake Providence
Entire lake and connecting
C
09/01/74
11- 137- 9 -4 -1 -1
stream to Rocky Branch
McMullen Creek
From source to
McAlpine
C
08/01/85
11- 137 -9 -5
Creek
Steele Creek
From source to
North
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -10
Carolina -South
Carolina
State Line
Walker Branch
From source to
Steele Creek
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -10 -1
Polk Ditch
From source to
Walker Branch
C
09/01/74
11- 137- 10 -1 -1
Blankmanship Branch
From source to
North
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -10 -2
Carolina -South
Carolina
State Line
Clems Branch
From source to
North
C
09/01/74
11- 137 -11
Carolina -South
Carolina
State Line
Twelvemile Creek
From source to
North
C
03/01/62
11 -138
Carolina -South
Carolina
State Line
West Fork Twelvemile Creek
From source to
Twelvemile
C
09/01/74
11 -138 -1
Creeek
Culvert Branch
From source to
West Fork
C
09/01/74
11- 138 -1 -1
Twelvemile Creek
Mundys Run
From source to
West Fork
C
09/01/74
11- 138 -1 -2
Twelvemile Creek
Page 38 of 40
2013 -12 -09 10:46:19

The National Map
NOTES: Data available from U.S. Geological Survey, National Geospatial Program.
Hydrography Flow Map
Il
Open in The National Map Viewer
p4A
NI
s at -, rdi% 's
�fFak s
is 0: lj4'q 'I ;fit l4
Aardis
Patio
12-
`j�iliu�ol 11 +1111 -t
O%ndr(�k
ka-%- e-ik :')
k 14,
rte `'lcn od
7. . 1 IYO\ R till
toll ella ell
04,
ry %I
fff
...... ...
'11-0
4il
till,, 1�-
all (loll
1 1 1
Cr Celli
41 1 1 $4,
1111
f 0 14 11,4 it 11 11111-
1'1'1,111:
Sta k I
soll
t"ood%
rVIA i-A We 4) 16 1411 114'!a,�
Il
Open in The National Map Viewer
p4A
NI
s at -, rdi% 's
�fFak s
is 0: lj4'q 'I ;fit l4
Aardis
Patio
12-
`j�iliu�ol 11 +1111 -t
O%ndr(�k
ka-%- e-ik :')
k 14,
rte `'lcn od

i - - -- - -- _ _ -- RPVtr U-r 10 IMILAj�in meek
USACE AID# DWQ # Site (mdicate on attac e�i d map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _
�-
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: HBM Hendrick BMW
3. Date of evaluation: 4 -30 -2015
5. Name of stream: UT to McAlpine Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: +/- 30 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 175 Total Length +/- 86o'
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35.165579
2. Evaluator's name: .1 Robertson
4. Time of evaluation: 3:30 pm
6. River basin: Catawba River Basin
8. Stream order: ist order
10. County: Mecklenburg
12. Subdivision name (if any): commercial development
Longitude (ex. - 77.556611): - 80-742329
Method location determined (circle): GPS Tcpo Sh.;et Ottho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other G .S Other Google Earth
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
only jurisdictional drainage feature on the property, in between a paved parking lot and a pad building pad
14. Proposed channel work (if any): culvert
15. Recent weather conditions: Spring rains.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Clear, sunny. 75 degrees F during site evaluation.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 111K If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? )VS NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? VS NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 35 % Residential 60 % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
5 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( TOTAL 100
22. Bankfull width: 6' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) ✓ Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: V Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 33 Comments: perennial (p -RPW)
Evaluator's Signature i "Ziw'' Date May 5, 2015
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0- 5
0-5
0
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
2
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
.4
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
d
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 -4
0 -4
0 - -2
O
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
0.
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0- 4
0--2
0
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
0
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0--4
2
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
1 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
2
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0 -- 5
0
>I
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
'F-"
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0- 5
3
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
dRoot
14
depth and density on banks
0 -3
0 -4
0- 5
3
F,
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
0
0
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
-5
-4
-5
2
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0 -3
0 -5
0 -6
3
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points
F
17
Habitat complexity
0 -6
0 -6
0 - -6
1
F
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 -5
-
0 5
0 -5
2
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
2
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
2
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
C
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0- 4
0 4
0- 4
p
FZ
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0- 5
1
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
33
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 4 -30 -2015
Project/Site:HBM Hendrick BMW
Latitude: 35•i65579
Evaluator:J Robertson
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:- 80.742329
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent 30
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Mint Hill
at
if 2 19 or perennial if L> 30`
Ephemeral Intermittent PeWAnial
7
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
0
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
O
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7 _ 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
O
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
O
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1 .5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
O
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
I
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: HBM Hendrick BMW City /County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 4-30-2015
ApplicanttOwner: HAG RE CDT, LLC / Gene Cocchi State: NC Sampling Point: Upland
Investigator(s): J Robertson J MCSwain Section, Township, Range: Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope ( %): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35•i65579 Long: -80.742329 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil. or Hydrology significantly disturbed? no Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation Soil. or Hydrology. . naturally problematic? no (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks: Upland
WL Type p
Yes
No
✓
Yes
No
✓
Yes
No_
WL Series
24 HR Weather Clear, sunny. 75 degrees F during site visit.
Recent Weather Recent rain. Normal rainfall.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
Surface Water (At)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (131)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Iron Deposits (135)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
- Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Field Observations:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Yes
Appx. Acreage
No ✓
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
These parcels are existing car dealerships and a farmer's market.
No V
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

EMH &T -tool
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
HBM Hendrick BMW
VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Total % Cover of: MultiDIv by:
Sampling Point: Upland
30
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liriodendron tulipfera
20
Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
2. Quercus rubra
20
Y
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3. Prunus serotina
20
Y
FACU
Total Number Dominant 6
Species Across s All Strata: (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.67
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7 (A/B)
6.
of total cover:
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
20
50% of total cover:
SaDlina Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Cornus florida
3. Liquidambar stvraciflua
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: WI boundary t
1. Elaeaanus anaustifolia
2. Rosa multiflora
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. no herbs
2.
3.
4.
5.
6,
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. no woody vines
2.
3.
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
50 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: MultiDIv by:
_ 20%
of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
20
Y
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2= 0
20
Y
FACU
FAC species 1 x 3= 3
5
N
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4= 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 6 (A) 23 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.67
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 20%
of total cover:
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
20
Y
FACU
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2
N
FACU
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
0 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
50 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

EMH &T -tool
SOIL
HBM Hendrick BMW
Sampling Point: Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type,
Loc` Texture Remarks
0 -6
10 YR 5 /6 90
10 YR 5 /6 10 C
M loam
6 -18
10 YR 7 /4 85
10 YR 4 /4 15 RM
M loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Sol[ Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
- Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section W of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: HBM Hendrick BMW, E Independence Blvd, UT to McAlpine
Creek
State:NC County /parish/borough: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.165579° N, Long. - 80.742329° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: WGS 84
Name of nearest waterbody: McAlpine Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Catawba River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050103 -0107
® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 4/30/2015
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waterS2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 8601inear feet: 6 width (fl) and/or 0.12 acres.
Wetlands: none acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):unknown.
2. Non- regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 500 acres
Drainage area: 30 acres
Average annual rainfall: 42 inches
Average annual snowfall: 4 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 3 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 25 -30 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 15 -20 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: the project is not located along the North Carolina state border.
Identify flow route to TNW5: UT to McAlpine Creek to Sugar Creek to Catawba River.
Tributary stream order, if known: first.
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that analv):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
® Manipulated (man- altered). Explain: straightened.
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 6 feet
Average depth: 3 feet
Average side slopes: Vertical (1:1 or less).
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ® Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
® Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type /% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: urban stream.
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain: weak.
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 -4 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: heavier during and after storm events, perennial.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
®
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑
the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
®
scour
❑ sediment deposition
®
multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
®
abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
El Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain: .
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water is clear.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: none known.
'A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): early successional.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or, indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationshin with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationshin) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:Significant nexus
is present in the form of the unnamed tributary to McAlpine Creek.
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 111.13:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: stream characteristics, multiple observations.
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 860 linear feet6width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section ❑I.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATES WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):lo
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Fallowing Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:Mint Hill.
® USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:Mint Hill.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Web Soil Survey.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:NWI wetlands mapper.
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:FEMA NFHL GIS overlay.
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date):Site visit photos (4/30/2015).
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

HBM Hendrick BMW - Site Photographs
Photo is Looking downstream near culvert Photo 2: Looking upstream mid reach
Photo 3: Looking downstream at downstream existing culvert

Photo 4: Looking upstream mid reach
Photo 5: Upper reach

Photo 6: Upper reach looking upstream
Photo 7: Upper existing culvert looking upstream

Jennifer Robertson
From: Smith, Brendan <bmsmith @ci.charlotte.nc.us>
Sent Friday, May 29, 2015 4:21 PM
To: Icard, Jeremy
Subject RE: HBM Hendrick BMW Expansion: Stormwater Design / USACE
Jeremy,
City of Charlotte Engineering will review all City- ordinance required stormwater detention for compliance with applicable City
ordinances and regulations, and provide design approval for the project.
Thanks
Brendan
Brendan M. Smith
City of Charlotte I Engineering & Property Management I Land Development Division
600 E. 4m St I Charlotte, NC 28277 1 704 - 336 -4556 1 htto: / /development.charmeck.orq.

Hendrick Automotive Group, EMH &T
East Independence Boulevard, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Desktop Review Summary (Federal Listed Species)
Summary of Database Searches and Desktop Review for Federal T &E Species
-the project is located on the Mint Hill topoquadrangle
-a two mile radius from the approximate center of the project overlaps onto the Charlotte East
topoquadrangle to the west
- Carolina heelsplitter (Losmigona decorata), an endangered species; Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata),
an endangered species; Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), an endangered species; and Michaux's
sumac (Rhus michauxii), an endangered species all occur within Mecklenburg County
-there are two known mapped element occurrence within a two mile radius of the approximate center
of the project according to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) GIS files as of February
2, 2015; there are historic populations of Tall Larkspur (Delphinium exaltatum), a historic federal
species of concern (last observed more than 50 years ago) and Eastern Creekshell (Villosa vaughaniona),
a current federal species of concern
- Eastern Creekshell occurs in Irvins Creek which is a tributary to McAlpine Creek, the subject property
contains a drainage that is an unnamed tributary to McAlpine Creek upstream of the confluence of
Irvins Creek with McAlpine Creek, no Eastern Creekshells have been documented from McAlpine Creek
in the vicinity of the project area
-the project area is mostly already developed as existing vehicle dealership lots
Recommendation
-the completed database searches and summary above should be sufficient for any Waters of the US
permitting needs related to Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 39

Map 1. Hendrick Auto Group, NC NHP Element Occurrences, Two Mile Radius
Two Mile Radius z
r r,.
r Tall Larkspur
Federal Species of Concern
K Historic Element Occurrence;z
• Project Location
c:.
Charlotte East I
Mint Hill
Eastern Creekshell
Federal Species of Concern
Current Element Occurrence

Table 1. Hendrick Auto Group, Element Occurrences within Two Mile Radius
EO ID # E
EO Status E
EO Svmboloey E
EO Identification from NHP F

Table 2. Mecklenburg County, Fish and Wildlife Service Database Search Results, January 26, 2015
Group IName IPopulation Istatus
Clams Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) Entire Endangered
Flowering Plants Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) Endangered
Flowering Plants Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) Endangered
Flowering Plants Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) Endangered
Lead Office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Recovery Plan Name
Carolina Heelsplitter
Smooth Coneflower
Schweinitz's Sunflower
Michaux's Sumac
Recovery Plan Stage
Final
Final
Final
Final

Table 3. Charlotte East Topoquadrangle NC NHP Database Search Results, February 3, 2015
STATE
IFEDERAL
STATE
GLOBAL
TOPO MAP
TAXONOMIC GROUP
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
STATUS
ISTATUS
RANK
RANK
IHABITATCOMMENT
TOPO MAP
STATUS
Vascular Plant
Cirsium carolinianum
Carolina Thistle
E
S2
G5
forests and disturbed areas, mostly on basic soils
Charlotte East
Historical
Animal Assemblage
Colonial Wading Bird Colony
S3
G5
Charlotte East
Current
Vascular Plant
Delphinium exaltatum
Tall Larkspur
E
FSC
S2
G3
grassy balds, glades, woodlands, mostly over mafic rock
Charlotte East
Historical
Moss
Dichelyma capillaceum
Hair Claw Moss
SR -P
Si?
G5
lbases of trees, stumps, or on rocks in places submerged at high water
Charlotte East
Historical
Vascular Plant
Echinacea pallida
Pale Coneflower
SR -D
51
G4
mafic glades and barrens
Charlotte East
Historical
cliffs (for nesting); coastal ponds and mudflats (for foraging in winter) [nesting
Bird
Falco peregrinus
Peregrine Falcon
E
S1B,S2N
G4
evidence; regular wintering sites)
Charlotte East
Current
roosts in Spanish moss and other thick vegetation near water, often in longleaf pine
Mammal
Lasiurus intermedius
Northern Yellow Bat
SC
51
G4G5
habitats
Charlotte East
Current
Catawba and Pee Dee drainages (endemic to this area in North Carolina and
Freshwater Bivalve
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina Heelsplitter
E
E
51
G1
adjacent South Carolina)
Charlotte East
Historical
Bird
Nyctanassa violacea
Yellow- crowned Night -Heron
SR
52B
G5
inland swamps; woods or thickets on maritime islands [breeding sites only]
Charlotte East
Current

Table 4. Mint HIII Topogtwdrangle NC NHP Database Search Results, February 3, 2%,,5
ST'A'TE FEDERAL STATE GLUBAL
M9 19 IC GROUP SS��T��fISJIIj ME _ . _ COMMON f'IAJV(E STATUS STATUS RANK (RANK HABITAT 4 ME�j ITp� MAP ITOPQ �prp STATUS
Oj 45lnt9F4n he er ��lj'�1 /apt- trefoil MZ_ -V P S _ 0 IG3 p� n woo s over c av soils. roadsides Mint Hill �stor¢al
j -'- �j( °y' F�
.!a ;cu(ar (�nJ D�P;Jum SnA�jpfurn __ _ _ _ _ _ - fall Larkspur E — C � grassy bolds, glades, woodlands, mostly over mafi� r9Zk �Jnj IjJJJ I$jPJjcal
�I go� 91113 ftk yatuss nlOP .. _. lP 1 j �yIY�r (v(i /nt HIII �Ccturrent urrent
�rA/RrUll' %ty Dry OA-Hickory (Pied t Subtype) 4 q
dragonfly or Damselfly atus spine- crowned Clubtail 53 G4 r _ N�int HIII
£ Crested Coralroot 5R -P ( �,�5 Yl# or mesic woods on ba;;ojls Mint Hill �rfvlesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) g I( 3 'y,`,��� "j ryj� rfr,�t
ity Piedmont Alluvial Forest 4 � � _ Mint Hill ;)6scure
mafic cliffs, dry coniferous woodlands, and associated nutrient -rich
Jascular Plant .Primula meadi� _ _ _ _ _opP�pg -star T - _ir53�5 #�J�yial forests Mint M `isjp�iS��
reshwater Bivalve Villosa delumbis astern Creekshell sR 3 4 Cape Fear, Lumber, Yadkin - -Pee Dee, and Catawba drainages Oint Hill _urrent
Cape Fear, Yadkin -Pee Dee, and Catawba drainages (endemic to
! Freshwater Bivalve Villosa vaughaniana Carolina Creekshell E FSC S2 G2 North Carolina and adjacent South Carolina) Mint Hill Current

DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143- 214.11 & 143 - 214.20
(link to G.S. 143 - 214.11)
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), all applicants must demonstrate compliance
with G.S. § 143 - 214.11 and 143 - 214.20. All requests MUST include this form signed and dated by the
permit applicant or an authorized agent. Please refer to DENR's Implementation Policy for more details.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143 - 214.11 and 214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143 - 214.11 and is not required to
purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
® There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWR list)
Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
p The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
0 This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review. Bank
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
banks regarding credit availability.
JLR
I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attachedl
Initial here
Signature of Applicant or Agent
June 8, 2015
Date
HBM Hendrick BMW
Project Name
Jennifer L Robertson
Printed Name
Charlotte, North Carolina
Location

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (DMS)
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised 4/23/2015
Complete requested information, sign and date, email to kellv.williams(cDncdenr.gov . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map, address or lat long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may be
requested by third_parties_ Review meetings are held on Tuesday afternoons.
- -- - - - - -- --------------- r------------------------------------- - - - - --
CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT'S AGENT APPLICANT
----------------------- - - - - -- - - -------- i-------------------------------------------- i--------------------------------- --- -- -----
i
1. Business /Company Name Atlas Environmental, Inc. HAG RE CDT, LLC
2. Contact Person Jennifer L Robertson Gene Cocchi
F-------------------------------------- - - - - -i -------------------------------------- - - - - -i -------------------------------------- - - - - -i
3. Street Address or P O Box 712 English Tudor Lane 6000 Monroe Road, Suite 100
-------------------------------------- - - - - -i -------------------------------------- - - - - -i -------------------------------------- - - - - -i
4. City, State, Zip Charlotte, NC 28211 Charlotte, NC 28212
E-------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- - - - - -
i
5. Telephone Number 980 - 819 -7780 704 - 566 -3208
E------------------------------------------- i------------------------------------- - - - - -- -------------------------------------- - - - - -i
6. E -Mail Address [e-mail] gene.cocchi @hendrickauto.com
------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------- - - - - -r ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -�
7. Project Name :HBM Hendrick BMW
8. Project Location (nearest town, city) ;Charlotte, North Carolina
r________________________________________________________ r----------------'----'--"-- __- -____-_-___-_-____________-_ ,
9. Lat -Long Coordinates or attach a map :35.165579 / - 80.742329
10. County ;Mecklenburg
11. River Basin & Cataloging Unit (8- digit) :Catawba / 03050103
(See Note 1) ;
12. Project Type " *indicate owner type and ; Owner Type: Q Government Private
write in project type (e.g. school, church, retail,
residential, apartments, road, utilities, military, Project Type: automobile dealership
etc.)**
r 13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13) r 0 acre
14. Non - Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) 0 acre
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.) 0 acre
Warm Cool Cold
i 16. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234) ------------------------ ------------------- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -i
175 0 0
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.)
Include subwatershed if Jordan or Falls Lake: Zone 1: ;Zone 2:
0 0
r________________________________________________________ r_____________________________________________ ______________________________,
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
NCDW R:
USACE: William Elliott ; Other: Alan Johnson
F- - -- - - -- - i - a
Check (�I) below if this request is for a: By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
revision to a current acceptance ; read and understand the DMS refund policy posted at
nceep.net and attached to this form.
renewal of an expired acceptance Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:
extension of unexpired acceptance June 8, 2015
Date:
= -----------------------------------------------------'------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- '
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, visit:www.nceep.net or contact DMS
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919 - 707 -8915 or kellv.williams cDncdenr.aov or to the front desk at 919 - 707 -8976

Refund Policy for Fees Paid to DMS In -Lieu Fee Programs (9/21/2009)
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests made on or after the publication date of
this policy.
Policy Statement: The policy of DMS is to allow for refunds under certain conditions.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
keliv.williamsencdenr.gov.
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W -9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

y��i �#ONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 -1890
-and -
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, or right to purchase holder of the
property identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation
approval and /or permit processing at the request of the Corps or WQP.
Project Name:
Property Owner of Record:
Contact Name:
Address:
Address:
HBM Hendrick BMW
HAG RE CDT, LLC
Gene Cocchi
6000 Monroe Rd., Ste. 100
Charlotte, NC 28212
Phone /Fax Number:
704.566.3208/704.566.3306
Email Address:
gene.cocchi @hendrickauto.com
Project Address:
7016 E. Indepe4e Blvd.
Project Address:
Charlotte, /
19 5 91061 1 1910/1
Tax PIN:
,
Signature:
�i
X
Date:
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
712 English Tudor Lane
Charlotte, Norm Carolina 28211
704- 512 -1206 (m) / 828 - 712 -9205 (m) / 980 - 819 -7780 (o) / 980 -819 -7876 (0
[e-mail]
www.atlasenvi.com

VEcEnEty Map
Notes
mapquest
This map doesn't contain any items.
�o
+o' city View Or
CL �� V A.
'Nalt� YVa'ha� � S�
U.,
%ilr, -augNln `c
-o
Fa
a
w
O
Q S �Qi
N
id Rd
Lake Ot
"i-
a
HBM Hendrick BMW
'Samon a
Mason Wallace
s
Park
\1b
rStty
��
a
Ma�A
-o
Fa
a
w
O
Q S �Qi
N
id Rd
Lake Ot
"i-
a
HBM Hendrick BMW
'Samon a
01 12000ft I
,_ "'aP Ot'1 500m
,"0 ©2015 MapQuost - Portions ©2015 TomTom I Terms I Privacy
©2015 MapQuest, Inc. Use of directions and maps is subject to the M apQuest Terms of Use. We males no guarantee of the accuracyof their content, road conditions or route usability You
assume all riskof use. View Terms of Use
�
s
\1b
��
a
Ma�A
01 12000ft I
,_ "'aP Ot'1 500m
,"0 ©2015 MapQuost - Portions ©2015 TomTom I Terms I Privacy
©2015 MapQuest, Inc. Use of directions and maps is subject to the M apQuest Terms of Use. We males no guarantee of the accuracyof their content, road conditions or route usability You
assume all riskof use. View Terms of Use

35° 10' 1" N
35° 9' S1" N
,Web Soil Survey Map
M
O
O
O
n
a
r9i
v
rn
M
rn
NS
0
M
523300 523340 523380 523420 523460 523500 523540
3 3
Map Sole: 1:1,600 if prinked on A porh-at (8.5'x 11 ") sheet
N 0 20 40 80 1 Meters
A rut
0 50 100 200 300
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGSM
USDA' Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
35° 10A N
35° 9'51"N

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOQ
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
U
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
A-
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
0
Miscellaneous Water
O
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
,pry.
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
0o
Sodic Spot
Soil Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
F-*+ Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
. Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal -area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 10, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011 —Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map — Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
4.9
75.4%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15
0.9
13.4%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Ur
Urban land
0.7
11.2%
Totals for Area of Interest
6.5
100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
�� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3