The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150542 Ver 2_Application_20150611��jo .. �y �yA � ��} � � �� 'i `@��µ��.s'"a STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT L. MCCRORY GOVERNOR Jtme 12, 2015 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 ATTN: Mr. David Bailey NCDOT Division 7 Project Coordinator ANTHONY 1. TATA SECRETARY Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for replacement of Bridge No. 110 over Wolf Island Creek on SR 1767 (Mayfield Road), Rockingham County, North Carolina, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP- 1767(5), TIP No. B-5341. Debit $240.00 from WBS Element No. 46055.1.1 Please find enclosed the Pre-Constcuction Notification (PCN) fonn, stormwater management plan, permit drawings, and roadway design plans for the above ►•eferenced project. � The proposed let date for the project is Janiiary 19, 2016 with a review date of December 1, 2015. However, the let date may advance as additional funds become available. A copy of this pe►•mit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT website at https://connect.ncdot.�ov/resources/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx . A copy of the PCE (Programmatic Categorical Exclusion) is also available at the above website address. Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Deanna Riffey at either driffey_(a),ncdot..o�v or (919) 707-6151 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ' � 1.� '� � ,� Richard W. Hancock, P.E. Manager -� .� Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit Cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �7AILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OPTkANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION 1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER R.ai,E�cii NC 27699-1598 TELEPHOhE: 919-707-6100 FAX: 919-212-5785 IVER.S/TE: IVli'IY. NCDO'f. ORC PHYSICAL ADDRESS: Cenhuy Center - Building B 1020 Birch Ridge Dr Raleigh, NC 27610-4328 ��oF w a r�9Q� � � 5 � P Y Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 110 over Wolf Island Creek on SR 1767 2b. County: Rockingham 2c. Nearest municipality / town: RufFin 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5341 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6151 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: driffey@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.481497 Longitude: - 79.558195 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.89 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to �/�/olf Island Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Roanoke 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Land use within the vicinity is predominately residential and agriculture with forestland along stream corridors. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 70 linear feet 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The bridge is considered to be structurally deficient due to superstructure condition and functionally obsolete due to stru ctu re. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing the 175 foot long bridge with a 190 foot long bridge which includes two 11 foot lanes and two 4 foot 3 inch offsets. Approaches will be widened to include two 11 foot lanes with 6 foot shoulders. The proposed project is approximately 0.123 miles long. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Tem orar T Site 1❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts � 0 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average �mpact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ— non-404, other) Site 1❑ P� T Dewatering Wolf Island Creek � PER � Corps 30 34 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1� P � T Bank �/olf Island Creek � PER � Corps 30 42 Stabilization ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 42 ft Perm 34 ft Temp 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tem orar T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent X Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flo Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded d P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporar T re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Buffer impacts for this project are less than 40 linear feet for the road crossings and are exempt. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The bridge is being built at the same location and will be a longer bridge that provides more hydraulic opening. An offsite detour will be used for traffic. One stormwater outfall is proposed in conjunction with a riprap pad to dissipate the energy. Other than no build the minimal effects on this project is unavoidable. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities and Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be employed. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain: 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from the replacement of this bridge, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program data and USFWS website. No Effect/ No habitat present calls were made for James spinymussel and Roanoke logperch after NCDOT biologist conducted aquatic surveys. No EffecU Habitat present call was made for smooth coneflower. Last field survey done for smooth coneflower was in May 2015. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps � Richard W. Hancock, P.E. �� -�- , , ----- -=--y _ l2.ZO/S Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name � � Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization leiter from the applicant is rovided.) 11 Hi�;hway North Carolina Department of Transportation � Stormw�ter M ,,,,,.,,�,,, Highway Stormwater Program �_� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 46055.1.1 TIP No.: B-5341 County(ies): Rockingham Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 46055.1.1 TIP Number: B-5341 Project Type: Brid e Replacement Date: 3/25/2015 NCDOT Contact: Bill Zerman Contractor / Designer: Frank Fleming, PE - Ecological Engineering Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway Raleigh, NC 27610 Suite 101 Car , NC 27518 Phone: 919-707-6755 Phone: 919-557-0929 Email: bzerman@ncdot, ov Email: fflemin @ecolo icalen .com Cit /Town: Ruffin Count (ies): Rockin ham River Basin(s): Roanoke CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet): 0.12 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Rural area with forest and agricultural landuses Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.4 ac. 0.3 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 11 ft lane, 4.3 ft shoulders, with total bridge width of 33.0 ft and total bridge length of 2@ 11 ft lane with total bridge witdh of 22 ft and total bridge length of 175 ft. 190 ft. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 800 Year: 2040 Existin : 720 Year: 2016 General Project Narrative: State Project 46055.1.1 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #110 on SR 1767 over Wolf Island Creek. Bridge #1110 consists of 5@ 35'-0" concrete deck (Description of Minimization of Water on timber piles with concrete caps. The proposed bridge at #110 will be 1@90', 1@100' 39" Box Beam with 4' caps and sloping abutments. The proposed bridge is located in Quality Impacts) zone AE of FIRM map number 3710892800J and was studied by "Limited Detailed" methods. The proposed bridge will provide more hydraulic opening than the existing bridge. Deck drains are proposed on both sides of the bridge to meet spread design criteria. One stormwater outfall is proposed along with a Rip Rap pad to dissipate the energy. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): Wolf Island Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 22-48 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Sup iemental Classification: Other Stream Ciassification: None Impairments: None Threatened/Endangered Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Wolf Island Creek Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Brid e S anning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � � � � � � � � `�� z �" �° �� w �,. �� v� � �� v J I � ., � V W � � � � � � � � V � � O V See Sheet fA Fo� Index of Sheets See Sheet 1 B For Conventional Plan Si�eet Symbols See S/aeet iC-1 For Survey Control Sheet �� i� �� \' � .C.� R tROL]FLL 055.1.1 THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. GRAPHIC SCALES 50 25 0 50 100 PLANS 50 25 0 50 100 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) ILE DESIGN DATA ADT 2016 = 720 ADT 2040 = 800 K = �2 % D = 60 % T = b % * V = 55 MPH * TTST = 3% DUAL = 3% FUNC CLASS = MINOR COLLECTOR "SUB-REGIONAL TIER" PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5341 = 0.087 MI. LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5341 = 0.036 MI. TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5341 = 0.123 MI. Prapared /n ihe Offloe dr DIVISI011I OF HIGHWAYS 1000 Birch Ridge Or., Raleigh NC, 27610 2012 ST9NDARD SPECIFICATIONS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: I JAMES A. SPEER, PE JANUARY 23. 2015 �RO�scr sxcrxsse LETTING DATE: I DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR, PE JANUARY 19, ?O�6 �'ROJECT DES/GN ENG7NEER �.�..�� .�,a � B-5341 s.wwm.nn n BRSTP-17671: -L mom�oe� P.E. '--� _ NAD 83/ NSRS 2007 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 6 HYDRAULICS ENGIIYEER ROADWAY DESIGN ElYGI1VEER r.s. SR 2023 GUERRANT SPRINGS ROAD TO NC PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USF. FOR CONSTRUCTiOv e f NO d � � S . . , 4f T11AM � � � _ � W H � � � � � � � U W a� W� v, � N z g 0 � � � � �p d�� W� �~ � �� W� � �Q � + Z � W� i � � � �� Nd �� «� � � � � � � � � � �, � {- PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-539/ 4 ics ER 1S tq p, SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEETS S-? THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS 5 � x � W H � � � � � � � U W a� W� v, �2 N O o � �� h � d�� W� a ~ � � � W� ti�Q � + Z � W� �� Nd �� ,�� : � — �� -- - �� 1 ELEV SEE S �` �i {%'/ �. � �� Lr / / � /. � - / ' i /�F� �� j __ ��' � � �� . ��._... .. \ \�\` �\ � �� , , ; \ \�� V �, � \ _ �:�� , � I � i' �/// /�/ j�� ;' ' � j i/ii .; � �%%�i%. 3� '!/, //'�i;/�i� �.� _ _ __ _ _� �� , I � � � \ ✓� / �� I ��/... ..� ilODS� \ � \ � /% � `, 1 — . €, f �; �; \, I D {- Pl S�luy l�1+�8�/D/6��/� Pl Sllnp/�2/�f9y��2�2/ Pl Slln l3/�1+B�/ApO� p� ��-__� � � s N J7 {/4/ �� s G M W�V �� 0 s �� W'IW �/7/ � D� 6?1' 5�3' D� l'QB'' �53' D� T Q9' S5.8' -m- � �- m� �= ns� �-�.oe� -� , : , � ., R � �.00' � 5� �S � � � LIWS —�� , I � `'y �I I I', I ' �'1 I I lil il ��Ilil�'llll��11111` IIIII � � il ��,��I� � �,i,� � I " y I�� I'� I � I� �� I �, II ��II I I li �I 111 �� _� ��' I � �' II Ij �' '' II ��' '� \ �� I i'l,� il I�I IIII I \� I�/ //l� II� /III II �I � II IIII �\a \ `,�� '� ' ` � ` �I � ;///� v�'��/� ll l� � o ' \ \\ \�. \ s I � �. �.. \ \-"'` �� 15" w'� ELBOWS E� �F/ \—'° -- — � �'x �\ PD f �� F—� / STANDpRD V DITCH . /� W/CLASS B RIP RAP SLOF� _ +/- 6.0%�� ESF DDE = 7 C fi �� ES7 22 TONS .. - �� ES7 65 5 7EXTILE � SEE 1 �� - _ � � C�) '---� � �� , \ � '� , �.�. �,;� �� CLA55 B RIP RAP ' '� � E5T 1 TON / EST 5 SY � �`5�� GEOTEXTILE II RIP RAP PDE� � � � CLA55 II RIP RAPJ 1 �. BANK STABILIZATION EST 120 TONS E5T 160 SY GEOTEXT � SEE DETAIL 5 1 ' � i� �� t I E �� y l S�j, � �/ /� / /S� I � � �� J ��,i . �,, I �/ ', � , �� / � � �� \��\� �� SITE 1 � � � NAD 831/ SRS 2007 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 6 �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-539/ 4 WJJ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDR4ULIC5 ENGINEER ENGINEER PRELIMIN Y PLANS DO NOT USE PO CON9TRUCTION I Nm,o s�oie� �- _ . . 5.0'min. � 1.0'mi 2.0' NWS �\\\� - - GEOTE%TILE .�� \ 1\\\ �� \� \ � �,i \ � � � � , � �,� � s� �, � � '� STANDARD 3.0' BASE DITCH � W/CLA55 II RIP RAP \ SLOPE _ +/- 12A% � �5T 80 SY� GEOTEXTILE � � � SFE�„DETAIL 3 � .�� \ 1. � � \ V � "1�_ \\\\� � �� . SPECIAL�IT DITCH . "�� SEE DETAIL�2 t� �� _ EF�,� � � E�� \ 'F\ QQ� � �w �� ' Q\ �k � � F� F— �� F�F �� ,��% S�% A --- Type MLiner= CLASS II RIP RAP FROM STA.161-38 TO STA.16+65 L CL _� \ �—_ _` �,. ` �� f� ; � � �` STANDARD V W/PRSM EST 9 SY SEE DETAIL 4 \s �. � j ��_ _%/� �� / �/� � �,�= r / J / � , 'C� i � ' \ � � i�. , / � '�� / � ��1� � �� SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEETS S-? THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS 'T� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 0 � ✓��/�a 8-534/ 4 � W V RM/ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYORAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER � PERMIT DRAWING � SHEET 4 OF b � PRELIMIN RY PLANS � � � DENOTES IMPACTS IN uo Nor use Fo co�sTaocTioN � SURFACE WATER � � DENOTES TEMPORARY �i � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER I � 1 / JS v, ,_ � � \'� � , m � , � , ,,iJ, C PDE E � E PDE ,�, E , , , �_ — - �-�-- �---��_ a ,'; �� . i I ''�_ � � � --� � � � � � m �� , ,�". o ��` ` " ' Y� �� ,� � � i, f-1 �� i �� I � i� _ ( la'XX � � ��_ ; �� r��-� - I � , � _ �_ , - � � � � ��r ,�u�� a i i 1 y� � a� �� + � f�1 ��, I,` � �;�i s'I 1 l l ,Y L � a �l _ � � �' � .� �, - , , � -� , , _ �, �� =� �� _ �— � � ;� '� --, – ': � � � _ , � � � � � / � –, _ �� I � - - �� — -- --------- _� � PDE E � �,� F F F F F � � � PDE E - , , -� � � �� , , a � � � y � � �, , I , � � Q WOODS / __ J / _ _ c.� , � � / , , ' �' � � I � � . / O � � � � � , �1�� _. � . � � � � � � � �. S ITE 1 � � � � � , z ,� �o �� ; �� w� �� V14ALL . ' F— ` L� e �� r �� y �� <� � � �� I� �� -- �- -- -� -- �oY -- -� -- --��-��--�m---�-- SHEET NO. WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 16+65 -L- BANK STABILIZATION < 0.01 42 1 16+93 -L- " COFFER DAM < 0.01 34 TOTALS`: < 0.01 < 0.01 42 34 0 'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: " Temporary impacts are for a coffer dam needed to remove existing piers. � �� . � � m� �� o� �� o�w �� ,,a � oz N �� o `� a o� �� , OQ'W V ' • I � � � � V W O QC � � � � • � V � � O V See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets See Sheet iB For Conventional Plan Sheet Symbols See Sheet 1C- 1 For Survey Control Sheet ��.�-��, �� f��,�� . Tfn Tf Ti 9 lf ,!� Tf /ItiC A Y //R. Tr� Tf lS lT' TV 1T lT l8l[9 A 4 Y� THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. �AD NC 700 I PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE FOA CONSTRUCTION Prepo�ed ln the Offlce of: H1'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11l DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2016 = 720 DIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS 5L0 �2I$ � $0 100 ADT 2040 = 800 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 ��p kORipc+ ■ I■�� 0 2012 STANDARD SPECIF7CATIONS a�' 'a� PLANS K— 12 �° LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5341 = 0.087 ML ° � D = 60 °/a r.E. q , S/GNATURE: s 5o z5 o so �oo T— 6��a * LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5341 = 0.036 MI. RIGx7' oF WAY nATE: 1,e,MES A. SPEER, PE 9w a V= 55 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5341 = 0.123 MI. JANUARY 23, 2015 rxo�ECZ ExcrNEEn ROADWAY DESIGN �°F�.r ea�,4r PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) *�ST =3% DUAL =3% ENGINEER oF Twwy�e 70 5 0 70 2p FUNC CLASS = LETTING DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR, PE MINOR COLLECTOR JANUARY 19, 2016 PRO�FCZ nFSrcN FNC�xFFn PROFILE (VERTICAL) "SUB—REGIONAL TIER" PE SlGNATURE: � � N Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin Property Corner Property Monument Parcel/Sequence Number Existing Fence Line Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence Existing Wetland Boundary Proposed Wetland Boundary Existing Endangered Animal Boundary Existing Endangered Plant Boundary 0 EiP � 0 i23 —x x x- e e � — — — — w L B — — — — wLB EeB Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite � Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site — � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• � ,�r .�. Gas Pump Vent or U�G Tank Cap O Sign � WB�� w Small Mine 'SZ� Foundation � Area Outline 0 Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Jurisdictional Stream Buffer Zone 1 BufFer Zone 2 Flow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring Wetland Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump �----J �s — BZ 1 BZ 2 5�'�°]�]C �iF�° 1�C��°]�i�[ �C��$�]Ie�1�� 1[�� ]F �[��iE�I�� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF Wf1Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite WW Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C1A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement � CSX TRANSPoRTATION MILEPo T 35 �0 a� ia v✓ ia L�✓ ��a ��./ /A\ �� J �� _.. TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Curb ----- Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed $lope Stakes Fill - - - F - - - Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail T T T r Existing Cable Guiderail n n � P d C bl G'd 'I n n n n ropose a e ui erai E Equality $ymbol � Pavement Removal °� �" ^ i�EGET�ITION.• � Single Tree �� Single Shrub � Hedge '�" �� # Woods Line �""'-' Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole $torm $ewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer WG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded WG Power Line Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: WATER: Water Manhole OO Water Meter o Water Valve � �? Q f? Q Water Hydrant � vtnerora Recorded l!/G Water Line • Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - - Above Ground Water Line A�c wa,a� CONC - J CONC WW I � CONC HW >---------� �CB OO s • • O /1 r �� Existing Telephone Pole � Proposed Telephone Pole � Telephone Manhole OO Telephone Booth ❑' Telephone Pedestal ❑T Telephone Cell Tower � U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G Telephone Cable � Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - - -'- - - - Recorded WG Telephone Conduit '� Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T�� Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T °°- - - rv: N Satellite Dish CC TV Pedestal ❑O TV Tower � WG N Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G N Cable �° Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable �° F� Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*� ----T� F�- -- GAS: Gas Valve � Gas Meter � Recorded U/G Gas Line � Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -°- - - - Above Ground Gas Line A�c co� SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+ U/G Sanitary Sewer Line s� Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa�,+o�Y Sewer Recorded SS Forced Main Line Fss Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -F�s- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic $ignal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. — A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U�G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records End of Information • O O ❑s ��.� � 0 � AATUR E.O.I. �� r J � B-5341 S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET z n 0 a wz � �� z UA I UM ��SCI-� 1 N I 1 UN THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPGD FOR TH[S PROJGCT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHE� BY NCGS FOR MONUMENT "B5341-2"' W1TH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTIi1NG: 995.598.128(ft) EASTWG: 1�835�998.698(ffl ELEVAT�OM 546.46'Iftl 5HE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR 11SE� ON THIS PROJ-Ci (GROUND T�J GR[DI [S: 0.9999169995 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED FIORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE �ROM "B5341-2" TO -L- STATION 13+50 1S S 4°38'06" W L 29A.79' ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL D[STANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 NOTES 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTZNG PROJECI' CON'l'ROL llA7'A AT: HTTPSI/CONNECTNL'DOT.GOU/RE90URL'ES/LOCATION/PAGES/DEFAULT.ASPX THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B6341_LS_CONTROL.TXT S%1'I' CAL[BSATION !N/�'OHMATION HAS NOT BGEN PHOVIDGU FOR THIS Y[20JEC7'. !R FURTH/s'R INFORMATION IS NEEDED.PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. �INDZCATES CEODETIC CON'/'HO/. MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR FZORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS (7NZT. PROJLCT CONTftOL ESTABLZSHED USING CLOBAL YOSITIONlNG SYSTEM. NETWORK ESTAI3LISFIED FROM NGS ONL/NF. POSITIONING SERVlCE (OPU3) BASELINE DATA BL. PDINT DCSC. NO�Th�i GAST LEVATION L STATION OFFSGT ------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- 3 BL-3 9939m7.4272 1835936.2704 537.36 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS 4 BL-4 994499.2354 18359ID2.8417 516.65 15�41.36 14.81 RT _ 8L-5 995152.5895 1835886.4974 540.13 21�92 J2 26.36 LT B5341�2 995598.128� 18359q8.6988 546.46 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS I B5341-I q9g871.155� t835932.131P� 532.37 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMiTS BENCHMARK DATA ........................................ 13M1 ELEVATION - 534.84 N 993919 E 18359ID8 BL STATION 5�13.m1� 28 LEFT RR SPIKE IN 2B" POPLAR ........................................ ........................................ BM2 ELEVATION = 512.64 N 994636 E 1835786 DL STATiON 12^35e�B 193 LEFT RR SPII<E SN 74" PnPL9R ................<.,.....>............,.. _L ALIGN L L L L L L L -L- ALIGN L L L L PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5341 1C-1 Location and Survevs SR 2023 GUERRANT SPRINGS ROAD II II II I � I ---_- � -- �� QI NCDOT BASELINE ��I STATION "85341-I" � `�I N = 996071.1550 / I E = 1835932.1310 / � -___ -----�/ �� TO NC 700 �-- NCDOT BASELINE � �' STATION °B5341-2" � � N = 995598.1280 � / E = 1835998.6980 � � 1 I� I �I 1 1 l� TYPE STATION POT I��BIDeBB PC 10�34.74 PCC 12��5.96 PT 13�82e45 PC 18�B4e91 PT 21•55e99 FOT 23��1.96 L NORTH ERST 9939E1e2�78 1835936e3654 993994.8435 1835927.6936 994163.7049 18359pG7.9288 99434BeBB74 1835893e�924 994762e313� 1835881e7843 995111e98?9 18359�6e3763 995255.9215 183593�.66`�4 PRELIMINRRY NEW PERMRNENT DRRINRGE STRTION OFFSET NORTH 2ID�35.B� -3IDeBB 994995.1823 2ID-5�.�� -64.BB 995813.9542 2m�75.�� 3�.4m 995m35.5124 2ID-8�.8� -54eBID 995B43e5537 2ID-2�a�� 3�a�� 994974e4�81 2ID�16.�� 41.�� 994969e5�36 28�42.�� 3�.00 994995.9392 2��35.�0 48.�0 994987e2879 PRELIMIN�IRY NEW PERMANENT UTILITY STATION OFFSET NORTH 13�84.�0 3�.m0 994344.7551 13-84.BB -55eBe 99434Be�859 14-ID4.�� -55vIDID 99436IDe�787 14^84.�� -3IDeIDB 99436Be7479 ERSEMENTS ERST 1835H6Be3931 1835828.1841 1835864.9137 1835841e7294 1835918e6742 1835929e2725 183592�.7°42 1835938.��C�7 ERSEMENTS EAST 18358630�616 1835838e�7ID6 1835837e5352 1835H62e52E3 NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE J Wm ¢ J 2 � � Q ti � _ � � W � � W � O2 ¢ U J J � � � � _ � � Z U r J W m O� � Wp �a � a � Z 23 � O J � ti W RJ � � Y � � � � Q � J dv �� i a �o Q O Oa ti W � ti J � W� �� _ � ~ O OyN, ti O N 2� �� Wp i �� OQ� �p� i * �N Nd _� o �n � � W J � ` � �� Q � � � m � e o_ -o —L — S nu.,_.. �i ca� iiin/fLi GI f�.. 17iaA77 OI ff.. iOJ.OIM PROIECT REFERENCE NO. � SHEET NO. � . � o� �NFFr ti� EXACAVATE EXISTING ROAD FILL I�) NOTE: SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER TO NATURAL GROUND = 180 CY -L- STA. 15+10.00 TO BEGIN APPROACH SLAB LT. & RT. (STRUCTURE PAY ITEM) DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 DETAIL 3 STANDARD 'V' DITCH SPECIAL CUT DITCH STANDARD BASE DITCH (Nof�o Scole) INO��o Smla� INO��o Scale) NaNrol NoNrol Nofural � Dfch G�ound 1� Ground Gro�n 3 � Groun � p� � Slopv �� D �', d p 3� �d ? o ��e� d Min. D=1.0 Ft. Geo�e.11e B Min. D= 2.0 Ft. Geoee.�Ae Max. d= 2A Ft. Min. D=1.0 Ft. WWnen B I: < 6.0' B= 3.0 Ft. Type of Liner=CLASS B RIP RAP Mox. d=1.0 Ft. FROM STA. 19+00 L TO STA. 20+00 L LT FROM STA. 73+50 L TO STA. 13+93 L RT T pe of Liner= CL455 II RIP RP.P STA. 20+53 L lT 1 � \ \ � DETAIL 4 DETAIL 5 STANDARD 'V' DITCH BANK STABILIZATION �Na�o s<aiel 1� �ro s�oie� 5.0'm'in. NoNrol No�u�ol Gra�nd 2.� ♦ Gro�nd 1.0'min. ��' p ti NWS d � Min. D= 1.0 Ft. GEOTEXTILE Type ofLi�er== PSRM Mox.d= 1.0 Ft. Type olLiner= CLA55 II RIP RAP FROM STA. 20+55 TO STA. 20+66 L LT FROM STA.16+38 TO STA. 76+65 L CL J$ is� - iR /76J � i / i SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEETS S-? THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS