20150522 Ver 1_Application_20150527

(V
e
r
s
i
o
n

1
.
2
;

R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

J
u
l
y

2
0
1
2
)
17
B
P
.
9
.
R
.
5
Co
u
n
t
y
(
i
e
s
)
:
St
o
k
e
s

Page 1of 1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

T
y
p
e
:
D
a
t
e
:
Ph
o
n
e
:
Ph
o
n
e
:
Em
a
i
l
:
Em
a
i
l
:
Co
u
n
t
y
(
i
e
s
)
:
CA
M
A

C
o
u
n
t
y
?
De
s
i
g
n
/
F
u
t
u
r
e
:
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
:
Su
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
:

Pr
i
m
a
r
y
:

Da
n

R
i
v
e
r

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y

5
0

(
R
i
c
k
e
r
s

B
r
a
n
c
h
)
Ro
a
n
o
k
e
22
-
(
2
5
.
5
)
hw
e
l
l
s
@
s
u
n
g
a
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
c
o
m
2
1
2
'

l
a
n
e
s

w
i
t
h

1
'

pa
v
e
d

s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
2

1
0
.
5
'

l
a
n
e
s
N/
A
NC
D
W
Q

S
t
r
e
a
m

I
n
d
e
x

N
o
.
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
/
T
I
P

N
o
.
:
NC
D
O
T

C
o
n
t
a
c
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.
:
17
B
P
.
9
.
R
.
5
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

/

D
e
s
i
g
n
e
r
:
gc
a
i
l
@
n
c
d
o
t
.
g
o
v
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
9
9
-
1
5
9
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
:
3/5/2014
91
5

J
o
n
e
s

F
r
a
n
k
l
i
n

R
o
a
d
15
9
0

M
a
i
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

C
e
n
t
e
r
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
0
6
No
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Hi
g
h
w
a
y

S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

FO
R

L
I
N
E
A
R

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
Ga
l
e
n

C
a
i
l
,

P
E
Br
i
d
g
e

R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
ac.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
r
r
a
t
i
v
e
:
Th
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

i
n
v
o
l
v
e
s

t
h
e

r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t

o
f

B
r
i
d
g
e

N
o
.

8
4
0
0
5
8

o
v
e
r

D
a
n

R
i
v
e
r

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y

5
0

(
R
i
c
k
e
r
s

B
r
a
n
c
h
)

o
n

U
S

3
1
1

i
n

S
t
o
k
e
s

C
o
u
n
ty, NC with a 3@11'x7' RCBC with a
be
v
e
l
e
d

h
e
a
d
w
a
l
l
.

T
h
i
s

b
r
i
d
g
e

r
e
p
l
a
c
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

t
h
e

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d

r
o
a
d
w
ay

i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s

h
a
v
e

b
e
e
n

d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d

i
n

a

m
a
n
n
e
r

t
h
a
t

m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
s

the increase in impervious surface area.
Th
e

c
u
l
v
e
r
t

w
i
l
l

b
e

b
u
r
i
e
d

1
'
.

T
h
e

t
w
o

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

b
a
r
r
e
l
s

w
i
l
l

h
a
v
e

3'

s
i
l
l
s

t
o

a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e

t
h
e

e
x
is
t
i
n
g

b
a
n
k

h
e
i
g
h
t
,

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

a

hi
g
h

f
l
o
w

c
h
a
n
n
e
l

a
n
d

f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n bench. The interior
ba
r
r
e
l

w
i
l
l

h
a
v
e

a

1
'

s
i
l
l
,

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

a

c
o
n
s
t
a
n
t

l
o
w
-
f
l
o
w

c
h
a
n
n
e
l

th
a
t

a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
s

t
h
e

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

s
t
re
a
m

c
h
a
n
n
e
l

w
i
d
t
h
.

D
u
e

t
o

c
on
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

h
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

d
e
s
i
g
n

c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
,

t
h
e

pr
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
t
r
e
a
m

c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g

w
i
l
l

b
e

r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d

a
n
d

t
h
e

s
t
r
e
a
m

c
ha
n
n
e
l

w
i
l
l

b
e

r
e
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
.

T
h
e

e
x
i
s
ti
n
g

c
h
a
n
n
e
l

w
i
l
l

b
e

f
i
l
l
e
d

a
f
t
e
r
t
h
e

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

c
h
a
n
n
e
l

i
s

c
r
e
a
t
e
d

a
n
d

f
i
l
l

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

wi
l
l

b
e

g
r
a
d
e
d

t
o

d
r
a
i
n

t
o
w
a
r
d

t
h
e

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
t
r
e
a
m
.

R
i
p

r
a
p

b
a
n
k

s
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

h
a
s

b
e
e
n

s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d

w
h
e
r
e

n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y

a
t

t
h
e

i
n
l
e
t

an
d

o
u
t
l
e
t

o
f

t
h
e

c
u
l
v
e
r
t

t
o

p
r
o
v
i
d
e

e
r
o
s
i
o
n

pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.

T
h
e

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

r
o
a
d
w
a
y

d
i
t
c
h

i
n

t
h
e

n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t

q
u
a
d
r
a
n
t
w
i
l
l

b
e

m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d

a
s

f
a
r

a
s

p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e

b
y

a
d
d
i
n
g

r
i
p

r
a
p

p
r
o
t
e
c
ti
o
n

t
o

t
h
e

t
o
e

o
f

t
h
e

f
i
ll slope, then it will be
pi
c
k
e
d

u
p

b
y

a

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
p
e
c
i
a
l

l
a
t
e
r
a
l

V

d
i
t
c
h

t
h
a
t

w
i
l
l

t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n

t
o

a

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

V

d
i
t
c
h

b
e
f
o
r
e

r
e
a
c
h
i
n
g

t
h
e

r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d

s
t
r
e
a
m
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
.
Ty
p
i
c
a
l

C
r
o
s
s

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:

Re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s

3500 (YR-2009)
0.
1
5
Av
e
r
a
g
e

D
a
i
l
y

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

(
v
e
h
/
h
r
/
d
a
y
)
:
ac
.
Ot
h
e
r

S
t
r
e
a
m

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:

Su
n
g
a
t
e

D
e
s
i
g
n

G
r
o
u
p
,

P
A
Ci
t
y
/
T
o
w
n
:
(9
1
9
)

8
5
9
-
2
2
4
3
NC
D
O
T

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s

U
n
i
t
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
:
Pi
n
e

H
a
l
l
,

N
C
(9
1
9
)

7
0
7
-
6
7
1
1
St
o
k
e
s
No
NC
D
W
Q

S
u
r
f
a
c
e

W
a
t
e
r

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

P
r
i
m
a
r
y

R
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g

W
a
t
e
r
30
3
(
d
)

I
m
p
a
i
r
m
e
n
t
s
:
Ri
v
e
r

B
a
s
i
n
(
s
)
:

Pr
i
m
a
r
y

R
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g

W
a
t
e
r
:

Wa
t
e
r

S
u
p
p
l
y

I
V

(
W
S
-
I
V
)
Bu
f
f
e
r

R
u
l
e
s

i
n

E
f
f
e
c
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
No
n
e
Su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g

L
a
n
d

U
s
e
:

Ar
g
i
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
,

R
u
r
a
l

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
0.
1
2

M
i
l
e
s
No
t

A
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
0.
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

B
u
i
l
t
-
U
p
o
n

A
r
e
a

(
a
c
.
)
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

S
i
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
l
i
n
.

M
i
l
e
s

o
r

f
e
e
t
)
:

US HWY 311
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R5
STA. 11+00.00 -L- END TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.5
STA. 13+50.00 -L-
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 1 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
DETOUR ROUTE
58
135
C53
Ore
R
d.
Preston
Rd.
H
o
w
a
r
d
B
ullins
R
d.
Jo
e
Jo
y
ce
R
d
.
Ridge
R
d.
M
ad
ison Rd.
Pine Hall
Church
Rd.
Knight Rd.S
a
m
H
ub
Ju
stice Rd
.
W
illi
a
m
s
R
d
.
Rd.
Pi
n
e
B
e
t
h
e
s
d
a
W
h
it
e

R
d
Loblolly Rd
Chow Ln
K
e
l
l
y

D
r
F
ly
n
n
F
a
r
m
R
d
Preston Rd
P
ro
v
id
en
ce Ln
1725
1689
1734
1728
1728
1729
1729
2086
1900
1741
1724
1911
1688
1908
1759
Bethesda
United Methodist
Morning Star Baptist Church
Pine Hall
Presbyterian Church
Church
.50
.3
0
.70
.13
.
431.80
.
1
0
.
28
.
3
0
.7
0
1
.
0
6
C
o
rp
.
772
772
772
311
311
311
1196
1160
1159
1190
1138
Sharps
1
.
2
8
.
1
6
.
1
0
1.
0
6
.
1
1
.
08
.67
.
4
9
.45 .46
.51
.
3
1
1
.
0
6
.51 .18 .81
.12
1.25
.01
.3
9
.6
4
.
2
4
.1
8
.0
1
.29
.08
.48.10
1.49
VICINITY MAP
LOCATON
PROJECT
TO NC MADISONTO WALNUT COVE
US HWY 311

ROY CURRIN, PE
STOKES COUNTY
REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE NO. 58
US 311

GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVEMENT, STRUCTURE
AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010
V
=
=
3500
MPH
ADT 2009

DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

17BP.9.R.27 PE, R /W, CONST.

PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES
PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
0
9
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
4
/
13
/
2
0
15
8
4
0
0
5
8
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
t
s
h
.
d
g
n
b
s
m
i
t
h
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
D
E
P
A
R
T
MEN
T
O
F TRA N SPORTA
T
IO
N
S
T
A TEOFNORT
H
CAR
O
LI
N
A
60 =
=
=
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
DIVISION BRIDGE - PROJECT MANAGER
MATTHEW JONES, PE

LETTING DATE:
NCDOT CONTACT
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
Prepared in the Office of:
RAMEY KEMP & ASSOCIATES
For NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
5808 Faringdon Place, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27609
COLLECTOR
FUNC CLASS = MAJOR
-
1
7
B
P
.
9
.
R
.
5
17BP.9.R.5

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R5
STA. 11+00.00 -L- END TIP PROJECT 17BP.9.R.5
STA. 13+50.00 -L-
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.9.R.5
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.9.R.5
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BP.9.R.5
REGION TIER
10
15
102
103
104
BRANCH
RI
C
K
E
R
S
N
S
R
S

2
0
0
7
N
A
D

8
3
/
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
4
/
13
/
2
0
15
8
4
0
0
5
8
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
4
.
d
g
n
b
s
m
i
t
h
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
0417BP.9.R.5
SHEET 2 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
23’ BST
US HWY 311 N
TO WALNUT COVE
TO MADISON
5SB
W
8"PVC
UNKNOWNEND
5SBW
(RECENTLY CUT)
WOODS
(RECENTLY CUT)
WOODS
BRANCH
RI
C
KE
R
S
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
BARNES
NATHAN PPLAZA LLC
MIXTRY
ROTHROCK
CRAIG A
CORPORATION
VIRGINIA HOLDING
RAY FULP
MICHAEL
10 15
2:12:
1
D
( Not to Scale)
d
STANDARD ’V’ DITCH
FROM STA. 12+00 TO STA. 12+45 -L- LT
Type of Liner= Class ’B’ Rip-Rap Max. d=1.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
DETAIL 2
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
D
d
2:
1
FROM 11+65 STA. TO STA. 12+00 -L- LT
DETAIL 1
Max. d=1.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class ’B’ Rip-Rap
Slope
Fill
Flatter2:1 or
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
FLATTER2:1 OR
FROM STA. 10+73 TO STA. 11+65 -L- LT
DETAIL 3
Type of Liner= Class ’B’ Rip-Rap
d=1.0 Ft.
GROUND
NATURAL SLOPE
FILL
GEOTEXTILE
RIP RAP AND PLACE NATIVE MATERIAL ON TOP TO FILL VOIDS.
RIP RAP. IF FILL IS NEEDED FOR THE BENCH, USE CLASS ’I’
MATTING AND THE PERIMETER SHALL BE LINED WITH CLASS ’I’
*THE FLOODPLAIN BENCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH COIR FIBER
FABRIC
GEOTEXTILE
NG
NG 2 :1 2 :1
2
.
0
’
1 .5 :1
2
.
0
’
VARIES

MATTING
COIR FIBER
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
CL ’I’ RIP RAP
CL ’I’ RIP RAP FABRIC
GEOTEXTILE
MATTING
COIR FIBER
CL ’I’ RIP RAP
11’-0’
VARIES
11’-0’
VARIES
ELEV.=573.5
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
1 .5 :1
NGNG2:1 2 :1
2
.
0
’
1 .5 :1 1 .5 :1
2
.
0
’
VARIES

MATTING
COIR FIBER
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
CL ’I’ RIP RAPCL ’I’ RIP RAP
FABRIC
GEOTEXTILEFABRIC
GEOTEXTILE
MATTING
COIR FIBER
CL ’I’ RIP RAP
11’-0’
VARIES
11’-0’
VARIES
ELEV.=573.1
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
EXCAVATION
CHANNEL
EXCAVATION
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
FILL EXST.
TYPICAL INLET CHANNEL (NTS)
TYPICAL OUTLET CHANNEL (NTS)
s
s
s
s
s
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
GTD
TO BE REMOVED
EXST BRIDGE
BURIED 1’
3@11’x7’ RCBC
EST 43 SY GF
EST 26 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
EST 134 SY GF
EST 79 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
EST DDE=400 CY
11’ BASE CHANNEL
EST DDE=355 CY
11’ BASE CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL 1
W/ CL ’B’ RIP RAP
SPEC LAT V DITCH
SEE DETAIL 2
W/ CL ’B’ RIP RAP
V DITCH
SEE DETAIL 3
CL ’B’ RIP RAP
TOE PROTECTION
EST 130 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
1’ SILL
3’ SILL
3’ SILL
3’ SILL
BENCH
FLOODPLAIN
EST 130 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
EST 390 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F F
F
F
F
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 3 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
ENLARGED VIEW OF IMPACT AREA
4
/
13
/
2
0
15
8
4
0
0
5
8
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
4
a
.
d
g
n
b
s
m
i
t
h
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
04A17BP.9.R.5
10 20 40200
PLANS
BURIED 1’
3@11’x7’ RCBC
EST 43 SY GF
EST 26 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
EST 134 SY GF
EST 79 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
EST 130 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
EST 390 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
s
s
s
s
s
23’ BST
US HWY 311 N
5SB
W
8"PVC
UNKNOWNEND
BRANCH
RI
C
K
E
R
S
F
F
F
F
FF
F
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
4
/
13
/
2
0
15
8
4
0
0
5
8
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
s
h
0
4
.
d
g
n
b
s
m
i
t
h
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
0417BP.9.R.5
SHEET 2 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
570
571
571
572
572
572
5
7
3
5
7
3
5735735
7
3
5
7
4
5
7
4
574
5
7
4
575
5
7
5
5
7
5
5
7
5
5
7
5
5
7
5
575
575
575
5
7
5
5 7 6
5
7
6
576
5 7 6
576
5
7
6
576
5
7
6
576
577
577
577
5
7
7
577
5
7
7
577
577
5
7
7
5
7
7
5
7
8
578
578
5
7
8
5
7
8
578
5
7
9
579
579
579
5
7
9
5
8
0
5
8
0
580580
5
8
0
580 580
5
8
0
580
580581
581
581
581
581
582
582
582
582
582583
583 583
583584
584 584
584
585
585
585
5
8
5
585
5
8
5
585 585
585585
586
586
586
586
586
587
587
588589
590
590591592593594
595596597598599
600
601602603604605
606
607
608
23’ BST
US HWY 311 N
TO WALNUT COVE
TO MADISON
5SB
W
8"PVC
UNKNOWNEND
5SBW
(RECENTLY CUT)
WOODS
(RECENTLY CUT)
WOODS
BRANCH
RI
C
KE
R
S
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
BARNES
NATHAN PPLAZA LLC
MIXTRY
ROTHROCK
CRAIG A
CORPORATION
VIRGINIA HOLDING
RAY FULP
MICHAEL
10 15
2:12:
1
D
( Not to Scale)
d
STANDARD ’V’ DITCH
FROM STA. 12+00 TO STA. 12+45 -L- LT
Type of Liner= Class ’B’ Rip-Rap Max. d=1.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
DETAIL 2
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH
D
d
2:
1
FROM 11+65 STA. TO STA. 12+00 -L- LT
DETAIL 1
Max. d=1.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class ’B’ Rip-Rap
Slope
Fill
Flatter2:1 or
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
FLATTER2:1 OR
FROM STA. 10+73 TO STA. 11+65 -L- LT
DETAIL 3
Type of Liner= Class ’B’ Rip-Rap
d=1.0 Ft.
GROUND
NATURAL SLOPE
FILL
GEOTEXTILE
RIP RAP AND PLACE NATIVE MATERIAL ON TOP TO FILL VOIDS.
RIP RAP. IF FILL IS NEEDED FOR THE BENCH, USE CLASS ’I’
MATTING AND THE PERIMETER SHALL BE LINED WITH CLASS ’I’
*THE FLOODPLAIN BENCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH COIR FIBER
FABRIC
GEOTEXTILE
NG
NG 2 :1 2 :1
2
.
0
’
1 .5 :1
2
.
0
’
VARIES

MATTING
COIR FIBER
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
CL ’I’ RIP RAP
CL ’I’ RIP RAP FABRIC
GEOTEXTILE
MATTING
COIR FIBER
CL ’I’ RIP RAP
11’-0’
VARIES
11’-0’
VARIES
ELEV.=573.5
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
1 .5 :1
NGNG2:1 2 :1
2
.
0
’
1 .5 :1 1 .5 :1
2
.
0
’
VARIES

MATTING
COIR FIBER
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
CL ’I’ RIP RAPCL ’I’ RIP RAP
FABRIC
GEOTEXTILEFABRIC
GEOTEXTILE
MATTING
COIR FIBER
CL ’I’ RIP RAP
11’-0’
VARIES
11’-0’
VARIES
ELEV.=573.1
BENCH*
FLOODPLAIN
EXCAVATION
CHANNEL
EXCAVATION
CHANNEL
CHANNEL
FILL EXST.
TYPICAL INLET CHANNEL (NTS)
TYPICAL OUTLET CHANNEL (NTS)
s
s
s
s
s
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
GTD
TO BE REMOVED
EXST BRIDGE
BURIED 1’
3@11’x7’ RCBC
EST 43 SY GF
EST 26 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
EST 134 SY GF
EST 79 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
EST DDE=400 CY
11’ BASE CHANNEL
EST DDE=355 CY
11’ BASE CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL 1
W/ CL ’B’ RIP RAP
SPEC LAT V DITCH
SEE DETAIL 2
W/ CL ’B’ RIP RAP
V DITCH
SEE DETAIL 3
CL ’B’ RIP RAP
TOE PROTECTION
EST 130 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
1’ SILL
3’ SILL
3’ SILL
3’ SILL
BENCH
FLOODPLAIN
EST 130 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
EST 390 CY
TO T.O.B.
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
F
F
F
F
F
F
F F
F
F
F
-L-
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
= 900
= 50
= 577.7
= 1000
= 100
= 577.99
= 2680
= 500+
= 586.4
SHEET 5 OF 7
PERMIT DRAWING
10+008+00 12+00 14+00 16+00
590
580
530
540
550
560
570
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
0517BP.9.R.5
4
/
10
/
2
0
15
8
4
0
0
5
8
_
H
y
d
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
_
p
f
l
.
d
g
n
b
s
m
i
t
h
(-)0.5360%(+)0.4080%
SKEW = 90
3 @ 11’ X 7’ RCBC
GRADE POINT ELEV = 586.21
CL STA 12+68 -L-
12-29-11=571.82
NWSE AND WSE ON
PROPOSED GROUND
PROP 50 YR=577.7
PROP 100 YR=577.99
E
L
=
5
7
6
.4
S
T
A

12
+
0
0

-
L
-

L
T
B
E
G

’
V
’

D
I
T
C
H
E
L
=
5
8
0
.2
S
T
A

11+
6
5

-
L
-

L
T
B
E
G

S
P
E
C

L
A
T

’V
’
D
I
T
C
H
E
L
=
5
7
6
.0
S
T
A

12
+
4
5

-
L
-

L
T
E
N
D

’V
’
D
IT
C
H
(-)
1
0.
8
6
%
(-) 0.89%
PI = 12+25.00
EL = 586.00’
VC = 150’
3’ SILL
AT INLET
EXISTING GROUND
3’ SILL
BURY 1’
1’ SILL
UPSTREAMDOWNSTREAM
PROFILE
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NCDOT
SKEW = 90
3 @ 11’ X 7’ RCBC
GRADE POINT ELEV = 586.21
CL STA 12+68 -L-
SLOPE=0.0053 FT/FT
INV ELEV=570.3
100 0 100
570
580
590
TB RT
TB LT
TB LT
TB RT
EXST STREAM BED
=571.82
WSE ON 12-29-11
2:1 NORMAL
BEVELED HEADWALL
TO BE REMOVED
EXST BRIDGE
200 200
560
STOKES COUNTY
PROJECT: 17BP.9.R.5 (SF-840058)
STOKES NO. 58 ON US 311
REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGE TO CULVERT
SHEET 6 OF 7 10/13/14
Ha
n
d
Existing Existing
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.

E
x
c
a
v
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
c
h
a
n
i
z
e
d

C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
nt

T
e
m
p
.

C
h
a
n
n
e
l
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
N
a
t
u
r
a
l

Si
t
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
F
i
l
l

I
n
F
i
l
l

I
n
i
n

C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
i
n

S
W

SW
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
S
t
r
e
a
m
No
.
(
F
r
o
m
/
T
o
)
S
i
z
e

/

T
y
p
e
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
n

We
t
l
a
n
d
s

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
D
e
s
i
g
n

(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)

-
L
-

1
1
+
9
4

T
O

1
2
+
9
0
3

@

1
1
'

x

7
'

R
C
B
C

D
A
N

R
I
V
E
R

T
R
I
B
.

5
0
C
U
L
V
E
R
T

2
1
5

B
A
N
K

S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N

5
0

T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y

D
E
W
A
T
E
R
I
N
G

5
0

-L
-

L
E
F
T

1
2
+
2
0

T
O

1
2
+
9
4
3
@

1
1
'

x

7
'

R
C
B
C

U
N
N
A
M
E
D

T
R
I
B
.
C
U
L
V
E
R
T

9
5

TE
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y

D
E
W
A
T
E
R
I
N
G

/

D
I
V
E
R
S
I
O
N

5
0

TO
T
A
L
S
*
:

3
6
0
1
0
0
0
*R
o
u
n
d
e
d

t
o
t
a
l
s

a
r
e

s
u
m

o
f

a
c
t
u
a
l

i
m
p
a
c
t
s
NO
T
E
S
:
Re
v
i
s
e
d

2
0
1
3

1
0

2
4
SH
E
E
T

0OF 0

W
E
T
L
A
N
D

P
E
R
M
I
T

I
M
P
A
C
T

S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
WE
T
L
A
N
D

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
SU
R
F
A
C
E

W
A
T
E
R

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
STOKES COUNTY
BR
I
D
G
E

5
8

O
N

U
S

3
1
1

(
1
7
B
P
.
9
.
R
.
5
)
OV
E
R

D
A
N

R
I
V
E
R

T
R
I
B
.

5
0

(
R
I
C
K
E
R
S

B
R
A
N
C
H
)
NC

D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T

O
F

T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 42139

Project Track ing No.
13-02-0012
NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION

Project No: Bridge 58 County: Stokes
WBS No : 17BP.9.R.5 Document: MCS
FA. No : nJa Funding: ~ State D Federal
Federal Permit Required? ~ Yes D No Permit Type: unspecified
Project Description: This project proposes to replace Bridge No. 58 OIl US311 over Rickers Branch in
Stokes County, North Carolina. The project length measures 275ft and the proposed right-of-way,
100ft. in wid/h. A 2.5 mile long off-site detour route will be utilized during construction activities
thereby minimizing the perspective impacts to the surrounding ground surfaces. The archaeological
Area ofPotential Effects (APE) is centered upon the Bridge 58 structure and measures 400ft in length
(200ft/rom each bridge end-point) and 100ft in width (50ft from each side ofthe US31J center-line).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefdescription ofreview activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The project area is located in the southeastern portion of the county, near the Stokes-Rockingham border,
just north of Belews Lake and the Dan River, and east of NC772. Rickers Branch, included within the
Roanoke River Drainage Basin, constitutes a second order stream flowing north to south through the
project area. It empties into the Dan River several hundred feet south/southeast of the bridge location. A
relatively flat, floodplain topography typifies the majority of the study area and surrounding land
surfaces.
A map review and site file search conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday,
February 12, 2013 determined that no previously recorded archaeological sites are located within or
directly adjacent to the defined project APE . One archaeological site (31SK5) recorded by Wake Forest
University in 1957 is situated about a mile west along the southern side of U5311. According to the NC
Archaeological Site form, lithic debitage from an unknown subperiod was collected and a midden with
faunal material was present. Yet, a cultural midden feature without corresponding aboriginal ceramics
collected from the site area, especially this close to the Dan River, is an uncommon occurence and may
signal a spurious conclusion in respect to the recordation and interpretation of this site feature . Without
additional data, little can be discerned about this prehistoric site of past activity. Because of the relative
adjacency to and environmental s imilarities between the 31SK5 and the bridge replacement location, a
moderate potential exists for the recovery of prehistoric artifacts in the vicinity of the APE based on the
cultural resource profile alone.
Historic structure locations reveal patterns of settlement and occupancy across a landscape. These
important resources and the archaeological deposits often affiliated with them aid in disclosing muted
histories and forgotten details of past lives. An inspection of National Reg ister of Historic Places (NRHP),
State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (55)
"S oARC }f AE01 .oG J'SURVEY REQUIRED "form fo r Mmor Transportotion Proj ects '" (]l1 rJ I~li e d m the ;00 7 Progr ommoucAg reenwlII.
1 of2
properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website concluded that none of the above
designated property types were located within or adjacent to the project area. In general, this work
confirmed that no existing NRHP listed properties, significant archaeological resources, or unassessed
archaeological sites will be impacted by the proposed construction project.
Further, topographic, historic, and NRCS soil survey (DaA [primarily], CfD) maps, and
historical/archaeological reference materials were reviewed to appraise ecological, cultural, and other
elements that may have resulted in past occupation of the project study area. Aerial photographs
(NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) were examined/utilized for ass es sment of hydrological, agricultural,
modem earth-moving, and other erosive disturbances that may characterize the APE and construction
design data was reviewed for determination of potential impacts to the project ground surfaces.
BriefExplanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in tile APE:
The project APE contains no NRHP listed historic properties no r any previously identified archaeological
sites or cemeteries. Aerial imagery relates a number of disturbances associated with the project APE.
These include impacts associated with th e e xisting US311 right-of-way corridor, slope and recent logging
activities (northwestern quadrant), major earth-moving activities and development (southeastern
quadrant), and agriculture/erosion (southwestern quadrant). Despite the relative proximity of the APE to
31SKS and the Dan River, archaeological site potential is considered poor for the study area. While some
minor probabilty may exist for uncovering an unprovenienced artifact in the vicinity of the project, past
and on-going surface and subsurface impacts would have eradicated any intact, significant archaeological
deposits or cultural features at this location. Since the proposed bridge replacement is diminutive in
scope and unlikely to alter any undisturbed ground areas, significant NRHP eligible archaeological
resources will not be affected by the project. No further archaeological input or work will be necessary for
this state-funded NCDOT Division 9 road improvement project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached : ~ Map(s) l25f Previous Survey Info o Photocopy of Count y Survey Notes
~ Photos o Correspondence
Other:qUl~ ,4,p./ ~i.f
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
(flO ARCHAEOL OGY S UR VE'fREO UlREp
NCDOT
"No ARfJiAEOWGr SUi W ET REQUlRED f orm for Minor Tronvportuuon Proj ects as Qualy;,'d in,lIe l OU7 Progro mmauc Aj?'e"menl .
2 on
..

4 5 6 7 6 9 10
I
I
v R G
I
I ~
N "
.'I LfCl:NO....t,..,.--.....u-.w--.;1--­~~.........'C .OflOllCl
-~­4 .....~~., .--.u........ ...........~ .....
......~I_II(d...
~lbbl_
'-­_iII.....c .............ca
( .
",,--+ --InIIIoJ f~......I""' ...-­--­--t­.........
~..-. ...C"l~
~
~lII'III'WI''Iu-I.~.....
a "'.....,.,... _..
.)
E~ " ' ~"' Q "'­IIIC,---.,....-...
l'l!
~ . c.--...u..~u~
.Iurto,.." .........
~~ ._. B
~
----.
~"'''''''''''UI'''MOo _,t)... -....~..... ~
E .......,......t'1I'~ ....... i "No cN ~....
~~ml"llUClJll"1"(11­
1IiIIlLMiIlO&'.....--­....­...­--
.-.. ..
~
==­~ olYUIllr
MI'UIIIoIII..,..1t , ~1eo~·
'1IlillJWWI'"
"'*""" ~fCUt-'
~ ' ­..... ..-...a....-­
.~ "_""" _IOI ~......... ..
~
~Dc.YOlI __..
......_.n ~ -­C'
I
-.....
........ lQ"lh...... .­-.­
'""""'"" 1"";­......IIOOC --­fIrMI"NIf9 -...... . cc.....
~laC.~1IW 1. e .~I""...­
~... r.. '*-t....,....... . i _,
HmIIft, .....,.
~QII""'''''''___.t.IMlIitlW:~'..,........... __1 «noI
"I'lI1Qf"". -.tQll;
iliD
N
W -+­. " -E
S
.. ..
?
Cl
= .
•.. ..
~.-..~sm.­.....,_.....-­~1UII"IA.l""
UW,..-"iIIIIl.t"lOllI. -.n...........1b.I
(l(lM'~0IIIl"""""'1'" .........OIrfl •-­~.Ir""" "'IQ
---I
I
-III
I
r-I
Tnl l'ryC'Oconl.ln... in lhl .. m.p i'l hom
USGS t :100,000 OlO "lei l~at have .....
ldIIt,ed uSln; Ihe USGS 1:2",000 0000• . "" .
'"':>\ ." r-=:­·~ lT j ~ \ NORTH CAROUNA
STOKES COUNTY
IEj
I
,..
:::>
u
o
<
"
" ..
-
"
u
0
'"
....­--.
T Y"\Joct(TyRof
Name : BELEWS tAKE
Dale: 08JO/iJll
Scale: 1 inch =2.000 It
L0C8~ on' 036 · 20' 57 .98"N 000' 02' 17,8ft' W
DaA-Dan River and Comus soils, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
Map Unit Setting
• Landscape: Valleys
• Elevation: 200 to 1,510 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
• Frost-free period: 160 to 200 days
Map Unit Composition
• Dan river and similar soils: 50 percent
• Comus and similar soils: 40 percent
• Minor components: 10 percent
Description of Dan River
Setting
• Landform: Flood plains
• Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
• Down-slope shape: Convex
• Across-slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 4 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class : Well drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat) : Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 ln/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 30 to 60 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Occasional
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: High (about 10.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 2w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Typical profile
• a to 8 inches: Loam
• 8 to 46 inches: Loam
• 46 to 80 inches: Loam
Description of Comus
Setting
• Landform: Flood plains
• Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
• Down-slope shape: Convex
• Across-slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Loamy and sandy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic
rock
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 4 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Well drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 30 to 60 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Occasional
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
SR163US3111 Bridge 58/ 13-02-0012/
Stokes Cou nty
m
STOKES RO CKINGHAM
St01 e5 tM. a"" ~ ex_el F ( ~ e
f
~ . :;
.3
90 U B e..~iN4 1GM S~ &s.r:l:lI"I!soac'i2 _ _ ._
'C'S¥.:l: · eJ ~~~I~ ~1!!
'R9: 1 ~.. :s~~.J~1CW"' "~" ~
~
D.'.
I
Copyright2011 Esri.All rights reserved.ManFeb11 2013 12:43:42 PM.
Project T17Jcldng .'1'0. antanal Use)
1/3'-0 ;1' -00/ :?--jREQUEST FOR Cl;LTURAL
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyner, Human Environment Unit
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 n:'B 067..0'3ATTENTiON: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor ENTEREOMary Pope Furr , Historic Architecture Supervisor
FROM: Stephen Greene, P.E. J?]MlII
¥l
nVice President
SUBJECT: Request for Cultural Resources Review FEB 0 2 2013 'I
DATE: February 2, 2013 T"............~..,..,..~~

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project No : 17BP.9.R .5 County:

WBSNo: N/A Document:

......__ ----_ .
Stokes
Programmatic CE
FA. No: N/A Funding: [g] State o Federal
USGS Quad: Belews Lake
Project Description : Replace existing Bridge #58 on US 3) lover Rickers Branch in Stokes County,
Purpose & Need: Bridge #58 currently has a sufficiency rating 0/71.4. lfthe bridge is not replaced it
will need to be closed for safety purposes.
SCHEDULING AND CONTACT INFORMATION
Date Needed: ASAP
Engineer: Stephen Greene Tel [phone]\15 Email [e-mail]
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length: 275 feet
Exist. RfI'V: 100 feet Proposed RIW: 100 feet
Exist. Speed Limit: 55 mph (statutory) Proposed Speed Limit: 55 mph
Exist. X-Section: 2 -10' lanes
Detour Route: Madison Road, NC 772
Reinf. Cone. Thru girder.
Structure Type : Reinf Cone. FuJI height Year Built: 1925
abutments