20150435 Ver 1_401 Application_20150515

Providing Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
ph /fax [phone]
adam @bfec.org
tills,
April 23, 2015
Ms Karen Higgins
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
RE: Vannoy Stream Restoration Project - NWP 27 /GC 3885 Application
Ashe County, NC
Ms Higgins,
IR
rMAY Q 4
2015 i I
Enclosed find 4 copies of the referenced project permit /PCN application Also enclosed
please find a $570 00 check specific to the mayor water quality certification permit
application fee
If you have any questions give me a call at 423 727 4476
Sincerely,
Adam Williams, PWS

O�UF�W A r,ER
20150435
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no 6% vp Q j
Form Version 1 3 D10 2008
Page I of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 27 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
if
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1 g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Vannoy Stream Restoration Project
2b
County
Ashe ®r:_1
2c
Nearest municipality / town
West Jefferson, NC
q'
2d
Subdivision name
N/A u U
` 1/11T
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
N/A ^i 4 2015 d J l/
i
3.
Owner Information IFFE
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Russell Vannoy (Parcels 13192-016, 13192 -111, 13192-018) n'
3b
Deed Book and Page No
187/2421, 192/1047, 123/1348
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
3d
Street address
SR1246 (Off Clarence Lyall Rd)
3e
City, state, zip
West Jefferson, NC 28692
3f
Telephone no
336- 877 -6767
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
rvannoy farms @gmail com
Page I of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.-
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ® Other, specify See Memorandum of Understanding, Agent
Authorization
4b
Name
Resource Institute
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
2714 Henning Drive
4e
City, state, zip
Winston Salem, NC 27106
4f
Telephone no
366- 750 -0522
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Adam Williams, PWS
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc
5c
Street address
5902 Highway 421 South
5d
City, state, zip
Mountain City, TN 37683
5e
Telephone no
423 - 727 -4476
5f
Fax no
5g
Email address
adam@bfec org
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
is
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Parcels 13192 -016, 13192-111, 1 31 92 -01 8
Latitude 36 3531225 N Longitude -
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
81 5273597 W
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
36 052 cumulative (3 parcels) acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Old Fields Creek
proposed project
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C, Tr, +
2c
River basin
New River
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
Old Fields Creek flows through the three parcels owned by R Vannoy from approximately north to south The site is
currently used for cattle pasture /grazing Highway US -221 borders the properties to the west The municipality of West
Jefferson, NC is located northeast of the project site The streambanks of Old Fields Creek are eroding due to
disconnectivity from the floodplain, upstream stormwater flows from commercial /residential development around West
Jefferson, and streambank and riparian vegetation disturbance by cattle which access the stream as a watering source
Two un -named tributaries (UT) to Old Fields Creek, referred to as UT1 -OFC and UT2 -OFC enter Old Fields Creek at the
project site They are similarly impacted by erosion and cattle access
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
Approximately 690 linear feet of Old Fields Creek, approximately 230 linear feet of UT1 -OFC, approximately 1700 linear
feet of UT2 -OFC
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
Elements included in the project current deflection including i- hooks, toe -wood, and cross -vanes throughout the reaches
Natural channel structures will enhance riffle /pool structures and in- stream habitat Streambank and floodplain sloping
and benching will re- establish connectivity between the stream and floodplain There will also be a riparian buffer installed
along the project reach to help stabilize streambanks and improve water quality The goal is to install natural channel
design structures, floodplain benching and sloping, and a forested riparian buffer to restore the stream to reference
conditions Cattle will be permanently excluded from the stream via fencing Two (2) stream crossings will be improved
and fenced from Old Fields Creek to allow for controlled animal movement between grazing areas
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The proposed stream restoration will occur along approximately 690 linear feet of Brushy Fork Creek (see Site Plan) Toe
wood and ) -hook structures are proposed to be installed along outer river bends Sloping, benching, and pool
establishment will occur throughout the reach This restoration also proposes approximately 35 linear feet of restoration
along each UT, from each's confluence to 35 ft upstream Following construction, the disturbed areas will be seeded,
matted (coconut), and planted with native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous species in all direct riparian areas (see re-
vegetation detail) Proposed excavation equipment includes hydraulic thumb trac - hoe(s), and tandem axle road dump
truck(s) All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during project construction except where absolutely
necessary to install boulder structures
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company BFEC, Inc
Name (if known) Carrie Boyd, PhD
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Jurisdictional field determination performed by Carrie Boyd, of
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ PMT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0 impacts
2h Comments
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Stream
Restoration
Old Fields Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
-25 ft
-690 In ft
S2 ® P ❑ T
Stream
Restoration
UT1 -OFC
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
-6 ft
-35 In ft
S3 ®P ❑ T
Stream
Restoration
UT2 -OFC
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
-5 ft
-35 In ft
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
-760
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
linear feet
of
impacts
31 Comments
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.- Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
01 []P [IT
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
0 impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
I
I
I
I
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total 0 impacts
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
Project is in which protected basin?
6b 6c 6d
Buffer impact
number — Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
B1 ❑P ❑T
B3 ❑P ❑T
61 Comments
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6e I 6f I 6g
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
0 impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The proposed work and associated impacts are intended to restore Old Fields Creek, UT1 -OFC, and UT2 -OFC at the project
site while minimizing impacts to aquatic resources Design measures which minimize impacts include j -hook, toe wood, and
cross vanes intended to decrease site erosion /sedimentation and enhance stream morphology and water quality All
streambanks will then be planted with appropriate native species (see re -veg detail)
All disturbed buffer areas will be immediately seeded upon completion (temporary - annual ryegrass), matted (coconut/coir
matting), and stabilized at the close of each construction day Following construction, the banks of the restored channel will be
seeded with a native floodplain mix (permanent seed) Live stakes and matting staples will be used to secure the coconut
matting in these high- stress areas Bare -root hardwood riparian tree species will be planted as a forested buffer for all three
stream reaches
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during project construction except where absolutely necessary to
install in- stream structures Any entering of the channel or immediate riparian area will be done with new equipment, no
hydraulic leaks tolerated Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the minimum
necessary to allow for bank stablization sufficient to restore the hydraulic capacity of the stream channel Streamflow will be
diverted around the work area when channel base flow is less than 5 cfs Flow diversion will not be performed for work that is
done from the top of bank, or minor placement of structures
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
E:1 Payment to in -lieu fee program
projects
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank N/A
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
N/A
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation9
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
0 impacts
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Comments The proposed project is not adjacent to a protected riparian buffer as
❑ Yes ® No
identified within the NC Riparian Buffer Protections Rules The proposed project
occurs within the New River Basin, which is not listed in the NCDENR Riparian
Buffer Rules Therefore, a diffuse flow plan is not included in this application
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why This
project does not require a
Stormwater Management Plan because the imperviousness is not increased by this project
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plans
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
New County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached'?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The project proposes stream restoration on an active agricultural property and is unlikely to result in additional
development which could impact nearby downstream water quality
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑ No
habitat9
5b
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
® Asheville
5d
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat'2
BFEC, Inc has contacted Bryan Tompkins with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and we are awaiting his response
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat2
NOAA -- Office of Habitat Protection Division
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑ No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)2
7b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources
NC Historic Preservation Office - Renee Gledhill Earley has received the site information and we are awaiting his
response
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain9
❑ Yes ® No
8b
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Watauga County GIS Data
Adam Williams, PWS
Brushy Fork Environmental
Brushy
r
e/6—
Consulting, Inc
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page I I of 11
PCN Form – Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR WNCI STREAM PROJECTS
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. N/A PARCEL ID: 13192 -123, 13192 -017, '
13192-016,13192-111,13192-018
STREET ADDRESS: SR 1246 (Off Clarence Wall Rd) West Jefferson, NC 28604
Property Owner:
Russell Vannoy
Property Owners Street Address (if different than above: 125 Maplewood Dr West Jefferson,
NC 28604
The property owners above have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Resource
Institute, Inc. that authorizes the activities proposed on the subject property (see attached). As
an authorized representative of Resource Institute, I do hereby authorize
Adam Williams of Brushy Fork Environmental, Inc.
(Contractor /Agent) (Consulting Firm)
to act on my behalf of Resource Institute and take all actions necessary for the processing,
ti issuance and acceptance of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special
conditions attached
Resource Institute Address:
2714 Henning Drive, Winston Salem, NC 27106 Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Authorized Sienature:
Date: ` 4 — — I

Mutual Agreement
for
Stream Restoration Project
Resource Institute (RI) is a non-profit organization that assists organizations and individuals in
carrying out projects to protect natural and human resources white promoting economic development.
RI can assist with projects in a variety of ways, including, but not Iirnited to, fund - raising, administering
project fiends, and contracting for services needed to complete a project. RI has recently adopted a project
refereed to as the Western North Carolina Stream Initiative to help fainters and landowners address
eroding stream banks that are negatively affecting them through loss of property, hazards for livestock,
sediment transport into a stream and degraded aquatic habitat. The farmer /landowner has either initiated
an application for assistance through USDA/NRCS's EQIP program or has already signed an
agreement /contract for assistance with USDA/NRCS's EQIP program. RI's role is to help attain the
Rinding, for the design, construction oversight and unmet construction needs of the work for sites with
current EQIP program agreements /contracts through USDA/NRCS.
RI will assist the farmer /landowner by helping to address issues related to managing and
contracting for the required design, planning, permitting and construction work for stream. enhancement
practices on the site, as well as necessary structure work, and bank stabilization. RI's objective is to help
address current water quality degradation issues; however, work cannot be guaranteed for acts of nature
related to flood events. RI is working with NRCS, Conservation Districts and the farmer /landowner to
help reduce those impacts as much as possible
In providing services to the farnter /landowner on this tract of land for stream
restoration/stabilization activities to be performed we thereby .mutually agree to the following items:
1. The farmer /landowner will allow ingress and egress for all activities related to the stream
restoration/stabilization such as: surveys, engineering, construction, monitoring, etc. for RI and
its agents.
2. Farmer /landowner will follow the contractual guidance in the EQIP program with USD.A.,
NRCS,
3. Farther /landowner will allow NRCS to provide RI with a copy of the associated NRCS EQIP,
application, contract and /or contract modifications, and appendix for the purpose of allowing RI
to share with R ' er funders in an effort to help obtain matching dollars.
(Initial/date)
4. RI will serve the financial manager for all finds related to the stream restoration /stabilization
activities received for the project.
5. RI will provide project management services such as, obtaining the technical resources, bidding
and contracting of project elements, and project construction oversight.
6. RI will work with fanners /landowners to resolve differences between construction costs and
payment schedule rates

Signature Sheet:
Stream Restoration Project Agreement Letter
ht 6 1 d T--41"r-( C �?J0 4+
County Stream Length Stream Name
VAMOV
Farmer /landowner Print Name and Title
Z
F rnxer /landotivner Signature 'lYtl
2- 261-5
Date
r V6
tmjv
Email Address
Phone Number
Resource Institute Incorporated
Chairman, Resource Institute RC &D, Inc.
Date
M1

D81.5500000° W 081.5400000° W 081.5300000° W 081.5200000° W 081.5100000° W
m
l
\ I.J
194
- J4
b I' Cou C
JtW
�--..
.
¢II PP
`Ba d it
Cr \
y Jj 99
\ 1 11
`l I Neak Ch.
•_.
\)
FAQ+ ..
i
Z
j �>
c 4.
�, ',-I :J 1fA0 i, /-1✓ ."
Z
o
v •: c1
i l
lot
Oo
M
r \ b
��••
\`rf
Cl?
C')
J
i �
2/9 ✓ , i )
O
Ci
ce)
\' R -Booth Beaver Cr
m
r
_
-
31E
, , R _
V NOY T SITE \
✓
O
j�J
M
Baldwin
C
0
IS
1
c / 4
"/'(/�
i i
•
f/' J�
°00
�t K -y--"
191 �
) I l: `
CD
M
to
r`°i
Decl* lion wj
N \
I
SCALE 1:24000
Z
��
•
_
0 1 MILE
00
"
3Q70
0 1000 YARDS
0
M
MN 7.00° W
0 1 KILOMETER
M
081.5500000'W 081.5400000° W 081.5300000° W 081.5200000° W 081.5100000° W
Name: TODD Location: 036.3531225° N 081.5273597° W
Date: 04/21/15
Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft.
' ht C 2008. MyTopo
Datum: NAD83

Vannoy Stream Restoration
Site Photosheets
Photogr,apoed by BFEC 03/09/2015

Photosheet 1
Old Fields Creek is experiencing significant erosion along its river left and river
right streambanks as well as lacking riparian vegetation. Stream restoration
coupled with cattle exclusion and riparian buffer planting is proposed. Restoration
is also proposed along reaches of UT -1 and UT -2 upstream of their confluence
with Old Fields Creek.

Photosheet 2
Middle section of Old Fields Creek project reach.

Photosheet 3
Project End: 36.35188N,
Lower section of Old Fields Creek project reach.

14-
T,
1 1 O,eCt Start . �•
14q _..— __. —c {� �`r.+�4 y, j' -i 'rl �s.. 'F►r `? A�ti� t
• J
Photosheet 4
OOD0920 %
Eroded river right at upstream extent of Old Field Creek project site. Grazed
riparian corridors at river right /river left.

Vil
• r
W.~
UT -1 Confluence @F -
STA 1+01 "Old Fields
Creek
4- Old Fields Cree
X :
Restoration at UT -1 is proposed for 35 ft
upstream of the confluence with Old Fields
Creek. An additional 750 ft of UT -1
(upstream) will be planted with forested
buffer species and cattle will be excluded.
Photosheet 5
UT -1 Looking
Upstream fro ;a � .
confluence.`F'-
s� �;7

Photosheet 6
till
flub-
K
on
'
■l k
Creek
-oft
Old Fields Creek
Al 7
UT -2 Looking
o"
along ,
Upstream from _
..
confluence.
Restoration at UT -2 is proposed for 35 ft
upstream of the confluence with Old Fields
Creek.
_4�

14r '
J.'r
.,Old - Fields Creek -
MMUROM
-Old Fields Creek-
Photosheet 7
`%..
Old Fields Creek — river left, downstream of UT -2 confluence. The existing fence will be
removed. Natural channel design structures (j -hook, toe wood) will be implemented to
deflect erosive stream flows. Floodplain benching and sloping will restore natural flow and
flooding pattern — decreasing erosion and stream incision.

k
Old Fields Creek
Re- EstabT
Photosheet 8
Bench and sloping Flatten Sloop
_.
�i
Low Bench allows
floodwaters to spread out.
y
Old-Fields Creek
Floodplain Benching and Sloping along Old Fields Creek. Forested riparian buffer will be re-
established along the entire riparian corridor (cattle excluded).

J
�A
4
r � a
oil
i3
�? �, � � .� • �... " : i�. � tea. � � _ � � C �w'" -
-- . — - l -.,- • :w.+ yam. .. -
- Id Fields Creek
r
Trampling dp$ -too GvaxtLse -.
At
safe:
• "'fin . ,r r i ''�
w
Photosheet 9
A stream crossing is present at the end of the Old Fields Creek project reach.
This crossing will be rebuilt via sloping and rock surface. Cattle will be excluded
from adjacent areas.

WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA STREAM INITIATIVE
SHEET INDEX
COVER
SITE PLAN
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE AND TYPICAL SECTION
CROSS SECTIONS 1 -3
CROSS SECTIONS 4 -6
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:
BRUSHY FORK CREEK
RUSSELL VANNOY STREAM STABILIZATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1) ONCE SITE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN AN AREA HAS CEASED ALL
DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE IMMEDIATELY SEEDED (TEMPORARY &
PERMANENT SEED), MATTED (COCONUT MATTING: NAG C- 12513N),
AND STABILIZED. SEE SHEET 6.
2) LIVE STAKES AND BIODEGRADABLE MATTING STAKES WILL BE USED
TO SECURE THE COCONUT MATTING.
3) BROADCAST SEEDING RATES WILL BE AS SPECIFIED ON SHEET 6.
4) NATIVE SHRUB AND TREE SPECIES WILL BE PLANTED THROUGHOUT
THE PROJECT AREA AT A RATE OF 300+ STEMS /ACRE, SECURING
NEAR BANK AREAS AND PROVIDING FUTURE SHADING OF CHANNEL
(SEE CHANNEL REVEGETATION DETAIL SHEET 6).
5) PRECAUTIONS WILL BE TAKEN TO KEEP HEAVY EQUIPMENT OUT OF
THE STREAM CHANNEL EXCEPT WHERE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY TO
INSTALL BANK STABILIZATION /ENHANCEMENT MEASURES.
a
LOCATION MAP
NTS
OVERALL SITE MAP
1" =200'
�qY o
APPROXIMATE QUANTITZ5
Item
Quantity
Live Stake
4,152
SF
Bare Roots /Container
39,407
SF
J -Hook (Arm Length 23' -25')
4
EA
J -Hook (Arm Length 25' -27')
7
EA
Cross Vane (Arm Length 12')
2
EA
Bank Sloping & Stabilization
728
LF
Toe Wood
243
LF
Stream Crossing
2,700
SF
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
AGE, JUDGMENT, ni y_
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE O n I RC ( UUw
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE I \vl \J R7- SOL'lll'I.
REGULATIONS. INSI I I L' Il:
Z�
co
o C'jti
c=t
N Z3 4
ul
O u
w
t;
a
r
y
w
'\I
>m3
¢
YU
zz
O
J N Q
co 0
2 as
Lll Q w o
0 Z
0
Q W ?
Z
Q co °�
Z '- �
O o �)
Z cc
0
LLI U �
Q wr
J C/) w Q
Sheet
118

GENERAL NOTES:
1. STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA (LONGITUDINAL PROFILE, CROSS- SECTIONS,
ETC.) PRESENTED HEREIN COLLECTED BY BFEC.
2. CONTOUR DATA PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS TAKEN FROM NCDOT
LIDAR DATA (2' and SO' CONTOURS).
3. RELATIVE NORTH, US HWY 221, AND PROPERTY LINES PRESENTED IN THE
SITE PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE AND BASED UPON GIS DATA.
JH -1 .�
Y7
1
REVEGETATE TRIBUTARY
FROM CV -1 TO UPSTR�AM
PROPERTY LINE. SEE/
CHANNEL RE- VEGETATION
DETAIL, SHEET 6
1
SC -1 _
os
= a
pa
` r
WE Y
I
THIS PLAN DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. LINES, APPURTEWINCES,
VANE
PLANTING AREA
ETC., AND THE LOCATIONS OF EXJSTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPES, VALVES, ETC. AS
LOG WITH ROOTWAD
SHOWN ARE IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY
C
y n
THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE ENACT LOCATION OF
O
+
o n v
y
. GA G ALL EXISTING UlIU77ES, LINES. PIPES, ETC. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE
c)
FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND All Q4M4GES WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE
w
CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND
STREAMBANK
N
UTILITIES, PIPES AND VALVES OR THE CONTRACT SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY
�
t U'
CONFLICTS W17H EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACILITIES TO DETERMINE IF AN IT WILL NEED 70
EM
BE RELOCATED .
m
=
THE ENGINEER HAS MADE NO EXAMINATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC
t
a
At4MMLS ARE PRESENT OR CONTAINED IN, UNDER, OR ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR ITS
g o
WATI3M OR /F ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC A64TDZWS HAVE CONTAMINATED THIS OR OTHER
C
PROPERTIES OR 17S WATERS IN ANY WAY WI447SOEVER. NO SUB - SURFACE EYAMIN477ON OF ANY
O
TYPE HAS BEEN MADE BY THE ENGINEER, AND ACCORDINGLY, NO OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR
/ INFERRED ON ALL SUCH At4TTERS. FURTHER, NO OPINION IS RENDERED AS TO ANY VIOLA71ON
OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS, EITHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL RELATED TO
O
U,1
THE INFORA64WN SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND THE ENGINEER 5 IN NO WAY LIABLE FOR ANY
a
VIOLATION OF SUCH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS SHOULD SUCH EXIST.
_
ZI
GRAVEL DR%VE
0
i 0
d`
I
LEGEND
I ]-HOOK / EXISTING FENCE / PROPERTY LINE
RCROSS
VANE
PLANTING AREA
10' Contour
LOG WITH ROOTWAD
/
/ 2' Contour
FOR TOEWOOD
/ OVERHEAD POWER
STREAM CROSSING
STREAM THALWAG
STREAMBANK
SLOPING
EX. BARN
EA TO B D (TYP). SE
CHANN E- VEGETAT
DETAIL, SH
N
. .�L. S 1
�.y 9�
a t
M
V `
to
1
\ GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 50'
50 0 50 100
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
PROGRESS DRAWING AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
9
alW
>3
N mm m0 Q
z
O
Q ~�
N Q
co
I- o
� ZU
w o
w
cl) c�
Z cc
o=
z
J ZU
co c Q
co 3 LU
Sheet
2/8
NRCS 11'I'INI l' II

3120 -
Jk
3115 -
fD
v
3110 -
3105
0 +00 0 +50 1 +00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50 3 +00 3 +50 4 +00 4 +50 5 +00 5 +50 6 +00 6 +50
Station
3120
M
cD
3115
O
3110
M
L
e-F
O
0 +00 0 +50 0 +96
Station
3120 LONGITUDINAL PROFILES
v 3115
UT2 - OLD FIELDS CREEK
Average Slope: 3.3%
3110
0 +00 0 +50
Station
1 " =50' HORT
1 " =5' VERT
C�M0a
co Z N
cz
rn�
_�-
N � Q
0
w
a
coo
,c
ai
w
Z
3
o
t v
m
V
�8
LEGEND
Stream Crossing @ STA 1 +79
TO TIE
o
ti3
ZU
Cc
w
O
INTO
EX. GRADE AT
OT EXCEEDI
A SLOPE
G 3H:1V
ti
JH_
�Q
U
uj
co
Z
O
U
- WATER SURFACE
��� '
CL
Q
m
o
?U
w o
-Z
FPW
01 oft --
XR
- - - - -- THALWAG
JH - J -HOOK
XSE 1 ` JH-
]H
�„—
-4
5-1 MIN B
NCH P
..
` — _
``—
=���
XSEC2
��
CONFLUENCE WITH
XSEC
JH -6
r
3
_
JH -�'
J�
UT1 -OFC
`
`
_ _ _ —
Str am Crossing STA 6 +80
— _ —
♦ ] -1Q —-
CONFLUENCE
WITH
JH­-'97
AVE =
RAGE SLOPE 1.2%
UT2 - OFC
XSEC H-11 — — — —
5 �
STREAM TYPE = C4
�
XSEC
M
L
e-F
O
0 +00 0 +50 0 +96
Station
3120 LONGITUDINAL PROFILES
v 3115
UT2 - OLD FIELDS CREEK
Average Slope: 3.3%
3110
0 +00 0 +50
Station
1 " =50' HORT
1 " =5' VERT
C�M0a
co Z N
cz
rn�
_�-
N � Q
0
w
a
coo
,c
ai
w
O O O o O
Station
Z
3
o
t v
m
V
�8
PROPOSED
Z
TO TIE
o
ti3
ZU
Cc
w
O
INTO
EX. GRADE AT
OT EXCEEDI
A SLOPE
G 3H:1V
ti
co
�Q
U
uj
co
Z
O
U
N
a .�
CL
Q
m
o
?U
w o
-Z
O O O o O
Station
Z
EX. STREAM BANK
w
o
?:
PROPOSED
GRADE
TO TIE
o
ti3
ZU
Cc
w
INTO
EX. GRADE AT
OT EXCEEDI
A SLOPE
G 3H:1V
co
�Q
i
i
FPW
Wbkf
XR
OPOSED SLOPE
2H: 1V MAX
5-1 MIN B
NCH P
O O O o O
Station
NOTE: ti
THE PROPOSED SECTIONS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 2 cr-
EACH CROSS SECTION LOCATION DIFFER SLIGHTLY p
FROM THE TYPICAL SECTION. THE TABLE ABOVE PROGRESS DRAWING
0 0 0 o PRESENTS THE RANGE OF PARAMETERS FROM EACH FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY Sheet
+ + + + CROSS SECTION. SEE SHEETS 5 AND 6.
FNRCS HE BEST H SE KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT, 318
O O O O
BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
TYPICAL SECTION STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE �� ULATIONS.
Z
Q
w
o
?:
cc
Q
E-
J
o
ti3
ZU
Cc
w
w
co
�Q
NOTE: ti
THE PROPOSED SECTIONS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 2 cr-
EACH CROSS SECTION LOCATION DIFFER SLIGHTLY p
FROM THE TYPICAL SECTION. THE TABLE ABOVE PROGRESS DRAWING
0 0 0 o PRESENTS THE RANGE OF PARAMETERS FROM EACH FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY Sheet
+ + + + CROSS SECTION. SEE SHEETS 5 AND 6.
FNRCS HE BEST H SE KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT, 318
O O O O
BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
TYPICAL SECTION STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE �� ULATIONS.

3125
M
M 3120
D
O 3115
z
3110
3125
M
M 3120
D
O 3115
z
3110
3125
M
M 3120
D
O 3115
z
3110
CROSS SECTION 1 - STA 0 +45
EXISTING I BANKFULL - - I
3 1 I
I I PROPOSED I TOE 'WOOD
0 0 0 0 0
CROSS SECTION 2 - STA 1+27
EXISTING -
il BANKFULL
2 -
PROPOSED
I.- N W -N Ln
0 0 0 0 0
CROSS SECTION 3 - STA 2 +95
EXISTING
I
TOE WOOD v
N W
0 0
0
I
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PARAMETER
MIN
MEDIAN
MAX
FPW (ft):
30.4
54.7
77.0
Wbkf (ft):
19.1
22.6
31.4
Entrenchment ratio, ER:
1.3
2.3
3.1
Abkf (sq ft):
19.4
29.7
36.9
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
0.8
1.4
1.6
W /D:
12.6
17.1
32.5
Dmax (ft):
1.5
2.5
2.9
N W
0 0
0
I
I
VALUE
I
24.3
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
--I{
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
PARAMETER
VALUE
WbIA (ft):
25.5
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
1.9
Abkf (sq ft):
41.3
2.3
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
1.6
Dmax (ft):
1.7
0 0
i
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
PARAMETER
VALUE
Wbkf (ft):
24.3
AbM (sq ft):
41.3
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
1.7
Dmax (ft):
2.9
V
O
I I I I
PROPOSED
0 0 0 0
A Ln V
C3 o O C7
STATION
1 " =10' HORT
1 " =10' VERT
0 0
00 %O
O O
0
0
O
0
r
O
(D
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
0
2�a
C/)
Ei
c =
w n
0
O
.s;
Lb
0
Q $
c
ai 2
c
T£�
3
2
O
Q ti�
N g
- o
wo
O C_
Ui co C
Cn U m
(n O ~3
z
0
c z
w ti
C/ w Q
j Zt
Cr
Sheet
4/8
N RCS:N*S1'11-U11,
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
PARAMETER
VALUE
WbW (ft):
23
Abkf (sq ft):
43.3
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
1.9
Dmax (ft):
2.3
0 0
00 %O
O O
0
0
O
0
r
O
(D
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
0
2�a
C/)
Ei
c =
w n
0
O
.s;
Lb
0
Q $
c
ai 2
c
T£�
3
2
O
Q ti�
N g
- o
wo
O C_
Ui co C
Cn U m
(n O ~3
z
0
c z
w ti
C/ w Q
j Zt
Cr
Sheet
4/8
N RCS:N*S1'11-U11,

1 " =10' HORT
1 " =10' VERT
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
$c'
m Noa
W
rz
O
c $
w
W
>3
ti mmm o¢
N 3V cU
z
O
o
y ~ w o
C
I W zN
U )
° �
W c�
a �Z;
CC z a
OZ °
U
w L
Z 3
Sheet
N
< 5/8
RC S <,
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PARAMETER
MIN
CROSS SECTION 4 -
STA 4+28
FPW (ft):
30.4
54.7
77.0
Wbkf (ft):
19.1
22.6
31.4
Entrenchment ratio, ER:
1.3
2.3
3.1
Abkf (sq ft):
19.4
29.7
3120
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
0.8
1.4
1.6
W /D:
12.6
17.1
32.5
Dmax (ft):
M
M
3115
2.9
EXISTING BANKFULL
i
I
<y�.
_l 1
3_
I
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
I
O3110
PARAMETER
Wbld (ft):
VALUE
26.4
I
{
z
PROPOSED TOE WOOD
Abkf (sq ft):
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
35.5
1.3
Dmax (ft):
2.3
3105
O
O
O 10 10
T T
L
T
1O `O
T T
10 1
T
~
O
O
O O O
O
Ln
O O
O
CROSS SECTION 5 -
STA 5 +81
3120
I
M
I
I
I
I
r
<
3115
I
EXISTING
BANKFULL
I
I
D
J 1
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
O
3110
y _ __ -__ 3
PARAMETER
Wbld (ft):
VALUE
28
I
PROPOSED
�
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
1.1
I
Dmax (ft):
1.7
3105
O
O
O O O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
CROSS SECTION 6 -
STA 6+39
3120
I
I
M
I
I
I
I
rl
3115
—
——{—
—�
<
D
I
EXISTING BANKFULL
i
I
I
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
3110
— — —
— — — - —
1
3
PARAMETER
Wbkf
VALUE
26
O
(ft):
z
I
I
I Abkf (sq ft):
38
I
I
I
I
I
I PROPOSED
1
1
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
I Dnw
1.5
(ft):
2.7
3105
O
r
N W
Ln
0% V
00
O
O
O O O
O
O O
O
STATION
1 " =10' HORT
1 " =10' VERT
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
$c'
m Noa
W
rz
O
c $
w
W
>3
ti mmm o¢
N 3V cU
z
O
o
y ~ w o
C
I W zN
U )
° �
W c�
a �Z;
CC z a
OZ °
U
w L
Z 3
Sheet
N
< 5/8
RC S <,
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PARAMETER
MIN
MEDIAN
MAX
FPW (ft):
30.4
54.7
77.0
Wbkf (ft):
19.1
22.6
31.4
Entrenchment ratio, ER:
1.3
2.3
3.1
Abkf (sq ft):
19.4
29.7
36.9
Mean depth, Dbkf (ft):
0.8
1.4
1.6
W /D:
12.6
17.1
32.5
Dmax (ft):
1.5
2.5
2.9
1 " =10' HORT
1 " =10' VERT
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
$c'
m Noa
W
rz
O
c $
w
W
>3
ti mmm o¢
N 3V cU
z
O
o
y ~ w o
C
I W zN
U )
° �
W c�
a �Z;
CC z a
OZ °
U
w L
Z 3
Sheet
N
< 5/8
RC S <,

COMPLIANCE AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. v
SYMBOL
DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL
DESCRIPTION
NATIVE SOD MATTING AND /OR EROSION CONTROL FABRIC ARE
structures (J- Hooks, Cross vanes, etc.) and planting of the stream
NATIVE TREE AND SHRUB
I. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE IMMEDIATELY SOWED WITH Al
TO BE PLACED ON NEAR BANK AND DISTURBED AREAS WHEN
(BAREROOT OR 1 -3 GALLON
shift, wash away, settle, or otherwise physically cannot function as
AVAILABLE.
TEMPORARY GRASS MIXTURE.
CONTAINERS) SPECIES TO BE
1. SEED IMMEDIATELY WITH TEMPORARY RYEGRASS.
j�j
PLANTED AT A DENSITY
-
2. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, AREA TO BE SEEDED WITH A
�
SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE 300
PERMANENT GRASS /HERB MIXTURE. MATTING AND FABRIC
MIXTURE WILL BE APPLIED WHEN AVAILABLE.
TREES /ACRE AT MATURITY
�
ARE TO BE STAKED DOWN WITH LARGE STAPLES AND /OR
NATIVE /WOODY STAKES.
APPLY AT 15 LBS PER ACRE OF DISTURBANCE (per specifications of
- FLOODPLAIN SPECIES INCLUDE
BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
seed supplier):
�
Acer Amelanch/er
.c
3. LIVESTAKE SPECIES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
ERNST CONSERVATION SEED MIX ERNMX -178 (FLOOQPLAIN MIX)
arborea, Betula nigra, Ilex
arbo ea, Bet,
Corpus amomum, Physocarpus opulifolius, Salix sereda,
unert
spp., Juglands nigra,
Sambucus canadensis.
Linodendron tulipifera, Malus
coronaria, Physocarpus
opulifolius, Quercus rubra, etc.
TYPICAL CHANNEL RE- VEGETATION PLAN VIEW DETAIL
—2 " -5"
(5 CM -12.5 CM)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SLOPE INSTALLATION
C -125BN
NOTE:
This consists primarily of two components, stream stabilization
�
structures (J- Hooks, Cross vanes, etc.) and planting of the stream
I. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE IMMEDIATELY SOWED WITH Al
banks and riparian areas. In the event that the stream structures
e
shift, wash away, settle, or otherwise physically cannot function as
c
TEMPORARY GRASS MIXTURE.
designed, contact the area NRCS Agent. If the new plantings
experience a mortality rate of greater than 25 %, the dead /dying
2. FOLLOWING SITE CONSTRUCTION A NA17VE /PERMANENT GRASS
plants will need to be replaced.
�
W
MIXTURE WILL BE APPLIED WHEN AVAILABLE.
PERMANENT SEED MIX:
�
APPLY AT 15 LBS PER ACRE OF DISTURBANCE (per specifications of
o
seed supplier):
�
.c
ERNST CONSERVATION SEED MIX ERNMX -178 (FLOOQPLAIN MIX)
ttan ar
unert
��
�L FOR
+
�unmc
�a
mro
0
v
w
Station
TYPICAL CHANNEL RE- VEGETATION CROSS - SECTION DETAIL
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SLOPE INSTALLATION
C -125BN
(15 CM)
SLOPE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS:
1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. NOTE: WHEN USING CELL -O -SEED DO NOT
SEED PREPARED AREA. CELL-0-SEED MUST BE INSTALLED WITH PAPER SIDE DOWN.
2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE 8Y ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" (IS CM) DEEP X 6" (15 CM) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) OF BLANKET
EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART IN THE
BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12"(30 CM) PORTION OF
BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12"(30
CM)
APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET.
3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL
BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES /STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE.
WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM ,STAPLES /STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE
PATTERN.
4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2" - 5" (5 CM - 12.5 CM) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. 5. CONSECUTIVE
BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5 CM) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH
OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH.
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE:
This consists primarily of two components, stream stabilization
�
structures (J- Hooks, Cross vanes, etc.) and planting of the stream
banks and riparian areas. In the event that the stream structures
e
shift, wash away, settle, or otherwise physically cannot function as
c
designed, contact the area NRCS Agent. If the new plantings
experience a mortality rate of greater than 25 %, the dead /dying
plants will need to be replaced.
�
W
PERMANENT SEED MIX:
�
APPLY AT 15 LBS PER ACRE OF DISTURBANCE (per specifications of
o
seed supplier):
�
.c
ERNST CONSERVATION SEED MIX ERNMX -178 (FLOOQPLAIN MIX)
WHICH INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING SPECIES:
+
�unmc
�a
mro
ws�
(15 CM)
SLOPE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS:
1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. NOTE: WHEN USING CELL -O -SEED DO NOT
SEED PREPARED AREA. CELL-0-SEED MUST BE INSTALLED WITH PAPER SIDE DOWN.
2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE 8Y ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" (IS CM) DEEP X 6" (15 CM) WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) OF BLANKET
EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART IN THE
BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12"(30 CM) PORTION OF
BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES /STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12"(30
CM)
APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET.
3. ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL
BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES /STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE.
WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM ,STAPLES /STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE
PATTERN.
4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2" - 5" (5 CM - 12.5 CM) OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. 5. CONSECUTIVE
BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3" (7.5 CM) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH
OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH.
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE:
This consists primarily of two components, stream stabilization
�
structures (J- Hooks, Cross vanes, etc.) and planting of the stream
banks and riparian areas. In the event that the stream structures
e
shift, wash away, settle, or otherwise physically cannot function as
c
designed, contact the area NRCS Agent. If the new plantings
experience a mortality rate of greater than 25 %, the dead /dying
plants will need to be replaced.
�
W
PERMANENT SEED MIX:
�
APPLY AT 15 LBS PER ACRE OF DISTURBANCE (per specifications of
o
seed supplier):
�
.c
ERNST CONSERVATION SEED MIX ERNMX -178 (FLOOQPLAIN MIX)
WHICH INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING SPECIES:
Fox Sedge, Partridge Pea, Dear Tongue, Little Bluestem, Virginia Wild
Rye, Riverbank Wild Rye, Swamp Sunflower, Ox Eye Sunflower, Arrow
Wood, Big Bluestem, Silky Dogwood, Switchgrass, Indiangrass,
Staghorn Sumac, Showy Tick Trefoil, Purple Bergamot, Black Eyed
Susan, Joe Pye Weed ,Soft Rush, Giant Ironweed, Tall White Beard
Tongue, Spotted Joe Pye Weed, Bone Set, and Blue False Indigo.
TEMPORARY SEED MIX AND SPECIFICATIONS:
Common Name Scientific Name Rate per Acre Optimal Planting Dates
Rye grain Secale cereale 30 Ibs Aug 15 -May 15
Browntop millet Urochloa ramosa 10 Ibs May 15 -Aug 15
Seedbed Preparation:
Disturbed soils within riparian areas will be amended to provide an optimum
environment for seed germination and seedling growth. Surface soils will be loose
enough for water infiltration and root penetration. Lime will be added to the soil to
ensure a pH level between 5.5 - 7. Fertilizer (18 -46 -0) will be added to nutrient
deficient areas. All riparian areas will be raked to loosen compacted soil prior to
seeding.
\ RUN 1 POOL co
I` c�toF/
011-1 IO�OE \
RUN POOL
r
PLAN VIEW
WATER SURFACE
STREAM BED "Z
Ow_�
PROFILE VIEW
TYPICAL BEDFORM GRADING DETAIL
PROGRESS DRAWING AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
Z
C)
Q Q �
N ti o
m
1 �1
Q m U
W
�L
cc
,L,�tL,
z°
O
w z�
� o U�
Z � O
ZU
O
Sheet
NO 6/8
N RCS N(J

■ SURFACE ROCK
MATERIAL NOTES:
1. ROCK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 1'-2' THICK, 2'-3' WIDE, AND 3'-5'
LONG.
2. ROCK SHALL BE NATIVE STONE HARVESTED LOCALLY OR FROM
EXISTING STREAM.
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR NEARLY SO AT THE
ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT. THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT
SHOULD BE SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE
THICKER END SHOULD BE PLACED DOWNSTREAM.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG IN A MANNER THAT THE FOOTER
ROCKS, CROSS HEADER ROCKS AND A MIN OF 113 OF THE WING
HEADER ROCKS ARE BURIED BENEATH THE BED SURFACE
ELEVATION.
2. ROCKS ARE PRECISELY PLACED WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB.
3. FOOTER ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED FIRST WITH HEADER ROCKS
PLACED ON TOP PRIOR TO BACKFILLING THE TRENCH.
4. IN THE CENTER (CROSS) PORTION THE HEADER ROCKS SHALL BE
PLACED SO THAT THE TOP OF THE HEAD ROCK IS AT AN
ELEVATION EQUAL TO THE PROPOSED BED ELEVATION.
S. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN THE TRENCH WITH
APPROX. 2 FT OF OVERLAP.
6. ROCK FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE BACK FILLED AROUND THE FABRIC.
7. THE HEADER ROCKS ON THE WING PORTION SHALL BE PLACED SO
THAT THEY SLOPE UP FROM THE BED ELEVATION AT THE CROSS
PORTION, TO A BANKRB.L ELEVATION AND MEET THE BANK AT A
I5° -22° ANGLE.
B. SURFACE AND FOOTER ROCKS AT BOTH ENDS SHALL BE TIED IN
SECURELY TO THE BANK TO ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF
WATER DIVERSION.
FLOW
LT'S' I I5° -22° I5° -22°
0
TER ROCK (TYP)
CROSS VANE WI FOOL SURFACE ROCK (TYP)
STEP
NON -WO VE
. _ RAMP (TYP)
Cl)i11E
GEOTEXTILE
LE
A �* A
CUT-OFF SILL
SET HEADROCK TO MATCH
THAL WAG ELEVATION
LOG ENDS BURIED 2'-3' BELOW
CHANNEL GRADE
I
7 /
J
0
-A
LOG ENDS BURIED 2' -3' BELOW
CHANNEL GRA
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE-
FABRIC
�- NATIVE STONE AND GOBBLE
ANON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
b
NATIVE STOW Al
qWB 1
(LEFT BI
PLAN
FILLER LOGS, TL
� \1 BRUSH, AGGRE
NOTE . •.r
CROSS-SECTION POOL STEP OMrT TED FOR CLAR�FFY
2 % -4%
.. L_ -
-i1 m •IR
B -B
PROFILE
ROCK CROSS -VANE STRUCTURE
ROCK (TYP)
MAl0.0LY, AIJ
LOG CROSS -VANE STRUCTURE
r�GRADE—
POOL
GALVANIZED WIRE ROPE
RATED AT 9,800 LBS MIN.
ALUMINUM OR GALVANIZED
\Q\ \OOH
DUCTILE IRON DUCKBILL ANCHOR
RA1 FOR 5,000 LBS IN NORM4L
PROFILE SOIL
i /. FILLER
LOGS, TOPS,
\i
ON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ON-WO .� \ / \ \ /�\! //
FABRIC
SECnON
.,
MMU
C -C
ARM CROSS - SECTION
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
C m ca o,
0
y M ^ m
O 'Q
' N
t
NO O Q
C t�
0
C
W
a
3
co
.0
L W
2
C 7
@1
3
N m m c Q
N �U cXJU
Z
Q j
cl) Q p N
Q ,C
J O
Zm
Q m U
W wa
� Z
ti
W Z0
`�
Go z
cr
m
O m
U
O 3
Zz�
U � �,z
Sheet
K14 7/8
MRCS �

MATERIAL NOTES:
1. ROCK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 1' -2' THICK, Y -3'
WIDE, AND 3' -5' LONG.
2. ROCK SHALL BE NATIVE STONE HARVESTED LOCALLY OR FROM
EXISTING STREAM.
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR NEARLY SO AT THE
ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT. THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT
SHOULD BE SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE
THICKER END SHOULD BE PLACED DOWNSTREAM.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. THE LOWER ROCK (HEAD ROCK) FOOTER WILL FIRST BE PLACED
FOLLOWED BY THE HEAD ROCK TO SET THE INITIAL STRUCTURE
ELEVATION.
2. THE SUBSEQUENT ROCK (MOVING DOWNSTREAM) AND ASSOCIATED
FOOTERS WILL THEN BE SET SIGHTING THE PROPOSED 15 -22° BANK
DEFLECTION LINE.
5. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG UPSTREAM ON THE BANKSIDE OF THE
WING WHERE NON -WOVEN GEOTEX77LE FABRIC WILL BE PLACED
WITH APPROX. 2' OF OVERLAP
6. ROCK PLACEMENT FOLLOWS MOVING UPSTREAM AT A 2-4% SLOPE
UNTIL A BANKFULL ELEVATION IS REACHED AT THE END OF THE
STRUCTURE WING.
7. A ROCK SILL WILL THEN BE CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE
STRUCTURE ANGLE TO PREVENT THE FORMATION OF A CUTOFF
CHANNEL.
8. 84CKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE MATERIALS AND RE- VEGETATE.
ICUT -OFF SILL (TYP)
MATERIAL NOTES:
1. ROCK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE I' -2' THICK, 2' -3' WIDE, AND 3' -5'
LONG.
2. ROCK SHALL BE NATIVE STONE HARVESTED LOCALLY OR FROM
EXISTING STREAM.
3. THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR NEARLY 50 AT THE
ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT. THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT
SHOULD BE SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE
THICKER END SHOULD BE PLACED DOWNSTREAM.
4. LOGS SHALL BE 10" MINIMUM DIAMETER.
S. LOGS SHALL BE 10' MINIMUM LENGTH.
6. ROOT WADS SHALL BE 3' -5' MINIMUM DIAMETER.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES.,
1. THE LOWER FOOTER ROCK WILL FIRST BE PLACED FOLLOWED BY
THE VANE LOG TO SET THE INITIAL STRUCTURE ELEVATION.
2. SET THE SUPPORT LOG AND VANE LOG UPSTREAM AT A 2 -7%
SLOPE UNTIL A BANKFULL ELEVATION IS REACHED AT THE END
OF THE VANE LOG.
3. ENSURE THE ROOT WADS OF VANE AND SUPPORT LOGS ARE IN
GOOD CONTACT WITH EACH OTHER AND THE ROOTS AS
INTERLOCKED AS POSSIBLE.
4. SECURE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO VANE LOG WITH ROOFING NAILS.
5. CONSTRUCT THE ROCK HOOK BEGINNING FROM THE TOP OF THE
VANE LOG.
6. A ROCK CUT OFF SILL WILL THEN BE CONSTRUCTED
PERPENDICULAR TO THE ROCK HOOK TO PREVENT THE
FORMATION OF A CUTOFF CHANNEL.
7. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG UPSTREAM ON THE BANKSIDE OF THE
WING WHERE NON -WOVEN GEOTE)MLE FABRIC WILL BE PLACED
WITH APPROX. 2' OF OVERLAP. ATTACH FABIRC TO VANE LOG
WITH ROOFING NAILS.
8. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE MATERIALS AND RE- VEGETATE.
,LOW B } S 1/4 TO 1/3 R B WyH
1 DIAMETER IN HOOK I rwoax�e� nwK �r«r
1 3 ROOT WA
--"�
NO FABRIC AT GAPS RUN GLIDE 112 F
j
TER LOG
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
FOOTER ROCK (TYP)
�t
-OFF SILL
PLAN
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
E AND COBBLE
ROCK
CROSS - SECTION
B -B
PROFILE
ROCK ]-HOOK VANE STRUCTURE
A -A
CROSS- SECTION
FOOTER LOG (T'P)— ­9
FLOW- �� ._ -�•
ROOT WAD
NOTES:
I. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG ALONG THE TOE OF THE BANK
TO A DEPTH OF THE DIAMETER OF THE FOOTER LOG.
2. A PRUNED FOOTER LOG SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE
OF THE CHANNEL AND THE ROOT WAD SHALL BE
PLACED DIRECTLY ABOVE IT.
3. THE VELOCITY VECTORS OF THE STREAM IN THE
CHANNEL ARE ALIGNED WITH THE TRUNKS
LONGITUDINAL AXIS AND WILL INTERSECT THE ROOT
MASS AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE.
4. A BOULDER MAY BE PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE,
ON TOP OF, AND ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE BETWEEN
THE ROOTMASS AND THE BANK TO PROVIDE EROSION
CONTROL.
S. ROOTWAD LOGS SHALL BE AT LEAST IV IN LENGTH AND
HAVE A MINIMUM DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH)
OF 10 ".
6. SiLLLLOW- ROOTED RATHER THAN DEEP-ROOTED TREE SPECIES
WITH RATIOS OF ROOT FAN DIAMETERS TO BOLE DIAMETERS
OF 4.0 OR GREATER ARE PREFERRED; AVOID NARROW BASED,
FAN DIAMETER RATIOS LESS THAN 3.0.
FILLER LOGS, TOPS, LIMBS,
BRUSH, AGGREGATE, SOIL
a
,1
I
I
i
TOE WOOD BANK STABILIZATION
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC LAID OVER WOODY
DEBRIS ON INSIDE OF LOG.
-NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
BUTTRESS ROCK BURIED
FLUSH WITH BANK ON U
LATERAL ROOT
4 f -•,. .
a a
i
FLOW
•rrF
ROCK/LOG ]-HOOK VANE STRUCTURE
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
DT,�
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
0
n
I \vI
I j1�( �f�LVRLT
K J w; \L �L•RL�I.
REGULATIONS.
V
IKSfIIV LL:
L
rr •rr
B -B
PROFILE
ROCK ]-HOOK VANE STRUCTURE
A -A
CROSS- SECTION
FOOTER LOG (T'P)— ­9
FLOW- �� ._ -�•
ROOT WAD
NOTES:
I. A TRENCH SHALL BE DUG ALONG THE TOE OF THE BANK
TO A DEPTH OF THE DIAMETER OF THE FOOTER LOG.
2. A PRUNED FOOTER LOG SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE
OF THE CHANNEL AND THE ROOT WAD SHALL BE
PLACED DIRECTLY ABOVE IT.
3. THE VELOCITY VECTORS OF THE STREAM IN THE
CHANNEL ARE ALIGNED WITH THE TRUNKS
LONGITUDINAL AXIS AND WILL INTERSECT THE ROOT
MASS AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE.
4. A BOULDER MAY BE PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE,
ON TOP OF, AND ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE BETWEEN
THE ROOTMASS AND THE BANK TO PROVIDE EROSION
CONTROL.
S. ROOTWAD LOGS SHALL BE AT LEAST IV IN LENGTH AND
HAVE A MINIMUM DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH)
OF 10 ".
6. SiLLLLOW- ROOTED RATHER THAN DEEP-ROOTED TREE SPECIES
WITH RATIOS OF ROOT FAN DIAMETERS TO BOLE DIAMETERS
OF 4.0 OR GREATER ARE PREFERRED; AVOID NARROW BASED,
FAN DIAMETER RATIOS LESS THAN 3.0.
FILLER LOGS, TOPS, LIMBS,
BRUSH, AGGREGATE, SOIL
a
,1
I
I
i
TOE WOOD BANK STABILIZATION
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC LAID OVER WOODY
DEBRIS ON INSIDE OF LOG.
-NON -WOVEN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
BUTTRESS ROCK BURIED
FLUSH WITH BANK ON U
LATERAL ROOT
4 f -•,. .
a a
i
FLOW
•rrF
ROCK/LOG ]-HOOK VANE STRUCTURE
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, JUDGMENT,
DT,�
AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS MEET APPLICABLE
NRCS STANDARDS, AND LOCAL AND STATE
0
n
I \vI
I j1�( �f�LVRLT
K J w; \L �L•RL�I.
REGULATIONS.
V
IKSfIIV LL:
� © a
qo v Ali
a --
li Zt
Za
o �

6io-oelq•MMM
6901 -d # 3SN3oll
MV'OoIN
eupoieC) UvoN 'uoS-IaJJar JsaM 'Alunoo aflsV
9Lb6'LZL'EZ6:xellUd
'14!0
A809)03H0
3AIlVI11Nl
WV3H1S VNI-IOHVO H1HON NH31S3M
C99LE Ni urelunory
eao
NOIIVZ /7IGV1S Wd3&lS AONNVA 773SSnKi
UJnoS lZt, AGmg6iH ?089 J�' �
AE? MAU
y
�
suol ;nlos laluawuoj/nu3
punos
uuaaur u3 ;�j
S�oz /ezho
S7Ib'130
NOIlO%)N1SN00
31V0
11�
v
o�
Z J
f m H
U Q
n 00. 0
Q Z
ui
L yrj J
W Lu
30 OJ
Z
Z 5 0
Y , Z
f N U)
LL W
0E-¢Ui
W W Z 0
CO J Q
W LU
F-0Ug
oQZQ�
u
c
C
�
fYl
■
C
f0
fL O
C
fo
��' C
c u L 01
N
E o 0
E
L
C
a – c
f0 c
•c
fU >
U >
fv �' c
fy fL >
��
m
E C L
fo m OfJ _ �
a--
i O Oa L
CL
Y
v N V
fn L C�
C
_O U1 C
C
O x t
X a+
j
N m C>
L f0 C
L
Q
u
u
C
> fy w
O
++ cn ° 'tn w x >
4- x >
C N 'O fn O fL U
m
_
0 u0
C C
E fT fL :2
c 0) f0
E L
0
O f0 f0 y
C
}
3
a c O O.-r- C u N a
u
c
'n
Q) 'D fv
+ a rL
+,L.Eowfn
�_ fn 0
c fn XE
fa a fv 0
O
Z
O
fv rn ,
UJ L •
w
a
o
■
C7
tiA �P
o
o o tth
o L E c O=
c >
Z_ N
a
t
ro v - o
` fU t-r
a v L ro
��
W
s
"
�`�° u
��fOEoo v � v,v
fu
�0
C o"
i3 2
.�
t fJ) U
E
C f0 -D :
u N w � = C C U
C
w X
in
Yo
fa>3:w
Na
cu C:
3Eao� Dm
yC0W= 4-1
f0`omu
�%
uj
7 01
o,�from -0E
W L C •—
LramxE
-o fco 0
w w fu 3
/^
v'
/ P1 W
o -0 V)W
c c a
C fn L
vfoc �a
E fL L fL
OV>
W
E� o
N > 3
fU f0� cu �'o 0 `
a oC
_ (o 3 � y
�'y =_.0 c �'� v o
1O to
HI
cC
O
fo .c C CD 0
Ln fp C ++ N
f0 m 3 Q) C - `t a N-Q
L i+ O •t--+ M 7 0 L N
E fo
LL
u (A o �v�;
L
fn x+� ro t 3
C C `� O�
■�--�
f0 'O C
w a=-+ a C
m f0 E ol L
p fll
C CO O C
V
L
O
c
°�- c�c+�L�
5�o'rvy %-0CD E3
yJ
O
x O O C .0 of
y U) C a+ Iy0
.0 fL L O f0 fU
O
�
c O i L
fL �
N fu C ` f6 a.+ > fL � Qj
Co `t O `t
U
01,
jj� O p� .0 u fo
d fU C= c> C
0
a+ C 3 y
N C u f' to
C 7 fli X fp `J
�a °
Y C
Mn CA VI >ww.,
v
�Q cCo Q) U
�v Zri VIN �M N�•'�
fay
Uu1 N�D�
V n Q. CO 001
L C
/rte
L
U
t'Jn
u
C
m
V
Q
`L
�
Q
Q)0
L
0 fli
fy
■r-�
01 0
U L
_a
O
Vl
rn-
m `"
a
v
V 1
(A
U
fn
L
O
7 L
U
ri
N
r o�
U
y��
6Ui�Uaj 1�o;SaAil
ti
aF
h
C�
y
�+
V
-
O
�
v
>
•�
a
y
J
,.y 2
N
-
L
h T
y
a
u
C
2
X
O
N
fu
L
0
V
'^-
.�
6U17Ua; )pOjSaAi-j
E
L
o
m
fs
-f0
f l