20150079 Ver 1_Permit Drawings_20150511

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

__________________________________________________________________________________________
716 W. Main Street, Albemarle, NC 28001 * Telephone [phone] * Fax [phone]
North Carolina Division of Highways – 10th Division

October 20, 2014

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28403

Attention: Ms. Crystal Amschler
NCDOT Coordinator

Subject: Application for Section 404 Individual Permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification,
for the improvements to Windy Road (SR 1442), along Bridge No. 12 over Emerson Branch
between NC 3 and SR 1606 in Cabarrus County. State Project No. 17BP.10.R.53

Dear Ms. Amschler:

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 12 over Emerson
Branch and make minor improvements to Windy Road (SR 1442) in Cabarrus County. The proposed project
consists of removing the obsolete bridge and replacing it with a double 8 x 9-foot Reinforced Concrete Box
Culvert (RCBC). In addition to the bridge replacement, roadway improvements include widening the shoulders
and providing guardrail to improve safety of the facility. The project length is approximately 0.105 miles with a
typical section of 11-foot travel lanes and six-foot wide shoulders.

Included in this application package are the following: (1) this cover letter, (2) ENG Form 4345, (3) Onsite
Stream Relocation Plan (4) Stormwater Management Plan, (5) permit drawings, (6) and half-size roadway
plans.

Project Schedule

The project is anticipated for construction letting fall 2014.

Purpose and Need

NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate that Bridge No.12 has a sufficiency rating of 7 out of a
possible 100 for a new structure and is considered structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. Replacement
of this inadequate structure will result in safer and more efficient traffic operations. The roadway is also
compromised due to the nearby unnamed tributary eroding the banks and roadway fill along the facility, the
narrow roadway at the bridge, and lack of a shoulder considering the traffic volume utilizing the facility. In

Page 2

addition to the replacement of the bridge, roadway improvements including 11’ travel lanes, 6-foot wide
shoulders, and guardrail are also proposed to create a safer facility for the traveling public.

NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS

This is a State Funded Project and not subject to NEPA.

RESOURCE STATUS

Wetland delineations followed the field delineation method outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, I987) and supplemented in the Regional Supplement to the
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers [USACE], 2008 [Interim]). Stream identification and classification followed the Identification
Methods for the Origins of Intermittent and Perennial Streams (North Carolina Division of Water Quality
[NCDWQ], 2005).

Within project footprint, two streams and no wetlands were identified. Jurisdictional streams were reviewed by
USACE Regulatory Specialist Crystal Amschler and Alan Johnson of the Division of Water Resources on May
8, 2014.

IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES

The project is located in the Yadkin River Basin in Cabarrus County (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]
Hydrologic Unit [HUC] 03040105). A total of two jurisdictional streams will be impacted by this project.
These include Emerson Branch [Class WSII; HWQ, CA and NCDWQ Index No. 13-17-6-4-(2)] and an
unnamed tributary to Emerson Branch.

None of the streams located within the project study area support trout or anadromous fish and no Primary
Nursery Areas are present within the study area boundaries. Emerson Branch is not listed on the 2012 Final
303(d) List of Impaired Waters.

Surface Waters
Surface water impacts for the project include 363 linear feet of jurisdictional stream impacts related to
relocation of the UT to Emerson Branch and 97 linear feet of jurisdictional stream impacts to Emerson Branch
of which 43 is due to bank stabilization. An additional 43 linear feet of temporary stream impact is also
anticipated for Emerson Branch due to tie-in of the channel to the culvert. Jurisdictional stream impacts are
summarized below in Table 1.

Table 1. Impacts to Jurisdictional Streams
Site
Number Stream ID DWQ
Classification
DWQ
Index No.
Stream
Designation
Impact
Length (lf)
Type of
Impact
1 UT to Emerson
Branch WSII; HQW, CA 13-17-6-4-
(2) Perennial 363 Relocation
2 Emerson
Branch WSII; HQW, CA 13-17-6-4-
(2) Perennial
54 Fill
43 Bank
Stabilization
Total 460

Wetlands
There will no wetland impacts associated with this project.

Page 3

Utility Impacts
An overhead utility line will be relocated with the project; however, this will not create additional streams
impacts.

PROTECTED SPECIES

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists two federally protected species for Cabarrus County
as of December 26, 2012 (Table 8).

Table 2. Federally Protected Species in Cabarrus County
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status
Habitat
Present Impacts
Lasmigona decorata Carolina heelsplitter E No None
Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz’s sunflower E Yes None

Suitable habitat for Schweinitz’s sunflower was surveyed on October 17th, 2014. No individuals of the species
were found within the project area.

CULTURAL RESOURCES

The State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) and NCDOT concurred that the project will have no direct effect
on any known historic architectural or archaeological resources.

Archaeology

There is minimal likelihood of finding significant archaeological resources in the project area due to previous
road construction and straightening of the existing channel(s). The NCDOT Archaeologist deemed that no
archaeology survey is required. See attached documentation.

Historic Architecture

There are no structures located within the project footprint. There will be no impacts to historic architecture.
The NCDOT Architectural Historian determined that no historic architecture survey is required. See attached
documentation.

FEMA COMPLIANCE

The project is not within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), state, and local floodway
regulations area.

INDIRECT AND CULMULATIVE EFFECTS

Section 402-2 of NCDOT's Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures is labeled Removal of Existing
Structure. This section outlines restrictions and Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and
Removal (BMP-BDRs), as well as guidelines for calculating maximum potential fill in the creek resulting from
demolition.

Construction of the proposed project will impact water resources by bridge removal and box culvert
construction and may include the following impacts to surface waters:

Page 4

 Increased sedimentation and siltation from construction and/or erosion
 Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and vegetation removal
 Changes in water temperature due to vegetation removal
 Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas
 Increased concentration of toxic compounds from roadway runoff, construction, and toxic spills, and
increased vehicular use

Temporary construction impacts due to erosion and sedimentation will be minimized through implementation of
a stringent erosion control schedule and use of BMPs. The contractor will be required to follow contract
specifications pertaining to erosion control measures (as outlined in 23 CPR 650, Subpart Band Article 107-13)
entitled Control of Erosion, Siltation, and Pollution (NCDOT, Specifications for Roads and Structures).

These measures include:
 Use of dikes, berms, silt basins, and other containment measures to control runoff during construction.
Regular maintenance and inspection of these structures to insure effectiveness.
 Elimination of construction staging areas in floodplains or adjacent to streams and tributaries to help
reduce the potential for petroleum contamination or discharges of other hazardous materials into
receiving waters.
 Rapid re-seeding of disturbed sites to help alleviate sediment loadings and reduce runoff.
 Careful management and use of herbicides, pesticides, de-icing compounds, or other chemical
constituents to minimize potential negative impacts on water quality. Utilize roadside maintenance
crews well versed in the use of these chemicals.
 Avoidance of direct discharges into streams whenever feasible. Filtering runoff effluent through
roadside vegetation in order to remove contaminants and to minimize runoff velocities.

WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS

This project will not impact any designated Wild and Scenic Rivers or any rivers included in the list of study
rivers (Public Law 90-542, as amended) or North Carolina Natural and Scenic Rivers.

ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT

The project will not impact any essential fish habitat afforded protection under the Magnuson- Stevens Act of
1996 (16 U.S.C 1801 et seq.).

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Several alternatives were evaluated for this project. The first of these includes the option to not replace the
bridge; however, this is not a feasible alternative as the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 7, is functionally
obsolete, and structurally deficient. The other alternatives evaluated were all related to replacement of the
bridge and improving safety of the bridge approach.

A second alternative evaluated included relocation of the road to the east in order to avoid the UT to Emerson
Branch. This alternative was eliminated due to the need of additional right of way, it considerably increases
project length, and could increase potential impacts to other jurisdictional resources. The relocation of the
roadway would likely require extensive right of way impacts, potential taking of homes, and relocation of
driveways due to the length of roadway that would be required in order to tie back in.

Page 5

A third alternative reviewed included replacement of the bridge with no roadway improvements; however, this
option did not fully address the purpose and need of the project due to the lack of roadway shoulders and
narrow lanes of the bridge. This alternative would likely require a later fix of the roadway and impacts to the
UT to Emerson Branch which is unstable and eroding toward the road.

The fourth alternative considered was to replace the bridge and address the roadway deficiencies as well as the
instability of the UT to Emerson Branch. This alternative fully addresses the purpose and need of the project as
the bridge would be replaced and roadway shoulders plus guardrail would be provided to improve safety of the
facility to the traveling public and addresses the adjacent channel which is actively eroding toward the road.

Several options for the fourth alternative were considered to address the UT to Emerson Branch which included
piping the stream, trying to stabilize it in place, or relocating it away from the road with natural channel design
concepts, a rip rap lined channel, or trying to create a stable channel with a blended approach. Piping the
stream channel was not considered a feasible option as it would create greater maintenance concerns and
increased impacts to jurisdictional resources. Stabilization of the stream in place with retaining walls or rip rap
on the banks was considered as it helped with the channel erosion issues; however, there were concerns with the
constructability of retaining walls and anchoring the guard rail as well as not addressing the lack of shoulders or
improving safety along this stretch of roadway.

Relocation of the channel and trying to stabilize it with natural channel design was discussed in depth but there
were several problematic issues. A full stream restoration using natural channel design techniques would
require increased right of way, the existing channel slope is very steep and would require hardened structures to
assist with potential down cutting, the Division noted the stream as being very flashy, constructability of the
channel with a 2-foot meandering base would require specialized contractors, and past experience with natural
channel design in similar situations has not been successful and created long term maintenance issues for the
Department. Relocation of the channel with a rip rap lined channel was also explored as an option and
addresses the purpose and need for the project but does not replace the stream with similar existing function.
This option was dismissed for the following blended approach.

Relocation of the UT to Emerson Branch approximately 20 feet west of its current location appears to be the
least environmentally damaging alternative as it maintains a daylighted channel and provides a stable stream
cross section as well as addresses the project purpose and need to improve overall safety in the vicinity of the
bridge replacement project. This blended option to relocate the channel requires minimal right of way
compared to other alternatives, provides for a stable stream with a 2’ base, floodplain benches, and associated
vegetative planting. It also provides for the channel slope by embedding rip rap in the base of the channel at
certain intervals in order to maintain long term stability and minimize future downcutting.

MITIGATION OPTIONS

The USACE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland mitigation policy
that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore
and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of the waters of the United States. CEQ has
defined mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts to include: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts,
rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and compensating for impacts ( 40 CFR 1508.20).

The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize
jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional
impacts. Avoidance and minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design. Minimization
includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the adverse impacts.

Page 6

Avoidance and Minimization

Avoidance and minimization has been employed in the project area to the maximum extent practicable. The
following measures were implemented for the project:

 The project was designed to avoid or minimize disturbance to aquatic life movements.
 NCDOT will minimize long-term water quality impacts using the most recent Best Management Practices
for Protection of Surface Waters, as identified in the Federal Aid Highway Program (FHPM) and North
Carolina Administrative Code, Chapter 4.
 Sediment and erosion control measures will accommodate a 25-year storm event.
 Special sediment control fence is used in low areas along the standard silt fence.
 The use of 2:1 fill slopes in jurisdictional areas where practicable.
 Lowered the roadway profile to minimize impacts to jurisdictional resources which reduces the amount of
off-site borrow required for the job and reduced widening required by using guardrail.
 The construction sequence has been developed to avoid temporary impacts by providing an off site detour.

On-Site Stream Relocation

On-site stream relocation has been fully evaluated and is being pursued on this job. NCDOT intends to relocate
approximately 363 linear feet of stream as discussed with the Corps prior to submission of this permit
application. The plan is to relocate the jurisdictional stream approximately 20 feet west and create a stable
channel that does not jeopardize the existing roadway. The existing stream adjacent to the roadway is unstable
and creating bank erosion and failures. NCDOT will perform the stream relocation in right of way to be
purchased for the project and provide a 2’ base channel with floodplain benches and side slopes of 2:1 along
with vegetative planting. Bed stabilization by imbedding rock in the channel base at certain intervals is also
being employed with the project to minimize potential future downcutting. The specific stream relocation plan
sheet is included with this permit application within the roadway plan set.

Compensation

The NCDOT has avoided and minimized impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible as
described above. The impact to Emerson Branch is anticipated to be 97 total linear feet. Of the 97 linear feet of
impact, 43 linear feet is due to bank stabilization which does not require compensation. The remaining 54
linear feet is less than the threshold typical of the Nationwide Permit No. 14 which requires mitigation for a loss
of more than 150 linear feet. Currently, NCDOT does not propose compensation for these impacts to Emerson
Branch.

REGULATORY APPROVALS

Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Individual Permit as required for the
above-described activities. We are also requesting a Section 401 Individual Water Quality Certification from
NCDWQ. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC, we will provide $570.00 to act as payment
for processing the Section 401 permit through WBS Number 17BP.10.R.53 .

Page 7

Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Larry Thompson at [e-mail] or [phone].

Sincerely,

Larry Thompson, PWS, LSS
Division Environmental Officer

Cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
OMB APPROVAL NO 0710-0003
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 2013
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, inc uding the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
First - Larry Middle -B. Last - Thompson
Company - North Carolina Department of Transportation (Div. 10)
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Middle - Last -
Company -
E-mail Address -
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 716 W. Main St.
City - Albemarle State - NC Zip - 28001 Country -USA
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address -
City - State - Zip - Country -
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
704-301-4881 704-982-3146
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as
my agent in the processing of this application
and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this
permit application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Windy Road Improvements along Bridge No. 12 over Emerson Branch in Cabarrus County
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
Emerson Branch and UT to Emerson Branch
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Address
City - State Zip
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude:.N 35.479291 Longitude: oW-80.729249
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Municipality
Section - Township - Range -
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Take Exit 55 off of I-85 onto NC 73 toward Huntersville. Continue on NC 73 for approximately 4 miles and turn Right onto Odell School
Road. Continue on Odell School Road for 1.4 miles then take a slight right onto Windy Road. Continue on Windy Road for approximately
1.4 miles.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 12 over Emerson Branch and make minor improvements to Windy Road (SR 1442) in
Cabarrus County. The proposed project consists of removing the obsolete bridge and replacing it with a double 8 x 9-foot Reinforced
Concrete Box Culvert (RCBC). Roadway improvements include widening the shoulders and providing guardrail to improve safety of the
facility. The project length is approximately 0.105 miles with a typical section of 11-foot travel lanes and six-foot wide shoulders.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate that Bridge No.12 in Cabarrus County has a sufficiency rating of 7 out of a possible
100 for a new structure and is considered structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. Replacement of this inadequate structure will
result in safer and more efficient traffic operations. The roadway is also compromised due to the nearby unnamed tributary eroding the
banks along the facility, the narrow roadway at the bridge, and lack of a shoulder considering the traffic volume utilizing the facility. In
addition to the replacement of the bridge, roadway improvements including 11' travel lanes, 6-foot wide shoulders, and guardrail are also
proposed to create a safer facility for the traveling public.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Both permanent and temporary stream impacts will result from construction of the proposed project. Impacts will result from the
construction and replacement Bridge No. 12 with the RCBC and relocation of the stream along Windy Road. The relocation of the UT to
Emerson Branch will result in creating a more stable channel while providing for the necessary width for a safe roadway.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
See attached cover letter
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres See attached cover letter
or
Linear Feet
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
Please see the attached permit application cover letter and permit package.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012
Page 2 of 3

10-28-14
Pat McCrory
Governor
4arvA,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael Ellison, Director John E. Skvarla, III
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Secretary
Mr. Louis Mitchell, P.E.
NCDOT Division 10 Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
716 West Main Street
Albemarle, North Carolina 28001
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
October 28, 2014
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 10 Project, Replace a Bridge on SR 1422 (Windy Hill Road), Cabarrus County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the
compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information received from you on October 28,
2014, the impacts are located in CU 03040105 of the Yadkin River basin in the Southern Piedmont (SP) Eco-Region,
and are as follows:
Yadkin
03040105
Sp
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non-
Riparian
Coastal
Marsh
Zone 1
Zone 2
Impacts (feet/acres)
0
0
50.0
0
0
0
0
0
This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2014 impact data. EEP
will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this
project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F.3.c.iii of the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated
July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer
be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
,: „ v
James
EE°
. Stanfill
set Management Supervisor
cc: Ms. Crystal Amschler, USACE — Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Larry Thompson, PWS, LSS, NCDOT — Division 10 Environmental Officer
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA
File: SR 1422 — Bridge — Division 10
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opporunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — Made in par: by recycled paper

Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 5
14-08-0017

Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5′ Topographic
Quadrangle.

Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 5
14-08-0017

Figure 2. Aerial photograph of the APE showing development, landforms, and soils within and near the
project area.

Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 5
14-08-0017

Figure 3. The 1910 Soil Survey Map for Cabarrus County showing the location of the project area.

Figure 4. The circa 1921 U.S. Post Office map showing the location of the project area.
(V
e
r
s
i
o
n

1
.
2
;

R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
1
)
17
B
P
.
1
0
.
R
.
5
3
Co
u
n
t
y
(
i
e
s
)
:
Ca
b
a
r
r
u
s

Page 1of 2
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

T
y
p
e
:
Date:
Ph
o
n
e
:
Ph
o
n
e
:
Em
a
i
l
:
Em
a
i
l
:
Co
u
n
t
y
(
i
e
s
)
:
CA
M
A

C
o
u
n
t
y
?
De
s
i
g
n
/
F
u
t
u
r
e
:
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
:
Su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g

L
a
n
d

U
s
e
:

Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
-
R
u
r
a
l
0.
1
1

m
i
.
19
,
4
0
0

(
2
0
2
5
)
0.
3
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

B
u
i
l
t
-
U
p
o
n

A
r
e
a

(
a
c
.
)
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g

S
i
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
l
i
n
.

M
i
l
e
s

o
r

f
e
e
t
)
:

Ri
v
e
r

B
a
s
i
n
(
s
)
:

Pr
i
m
a
r
y

R
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g

W
a
t
e
r
:

W
a
t
e
r

S
u
p
p
l
y

I
I

(
W
S
-
I
I
)
Ro
a
d
w
a
y

-

(
2
)

1
1
'

t
r
a
v
e
l

l
a
n
e
s

w
i
t
h

6
'

s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
.

Cu
l
v
e
r
t
-

(
2
)

1
1
'

t
r
a
v
e
l

l
a
n
e
s

3
4
'

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

t
o

o
u
t
s
i
d
e
.
Ro
a
d
w
a
y

-

(
2
)

1
0
'

l
a
n
e
s

w
i
t
h

1
'

s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
.

Br
i
d
g
e
-

(
2
)

1
0
'

T
r
a
v
e
l

L
a
n
e
s

2
0
'

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

t
o

o
u
t
s
i
d
e
.
Bu
f
f
e
r

R
u
l
e
s

i
n

E
f
f
e
c
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
No
n
e
NC
D
W
Q

S
u
r
f
a
c
e

W
a
t
e
r

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

P
r
i
m
a
r
y

R
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g

W
a
t
e
r
30
3
(
d
)

I
m
p
a
i
r
m
e
n
t
s
:
Ot
h
e
r

S
t
r
e
a
m

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:

Cr
i
t
i
c
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
C
A
)
HD
R

E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g

Ci
t
y
/
T
o
w
n
:
(9
1
9
)

7
8
5
-
1
1
1
8
10
2
0

B
i
r
c
h

R
i
d
g
e

R
o
a
d
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
:
Ka
n
n
a
p
o
l
i
s
,

N
C
91
9
-
7
0
7
-
6
7
2
0
Ca
b
a
r
r
u
s
No
ac.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
r
r
a
t
i
v
e
:
Re
p
l
a
c
e

b
r
i
d
g
e

#
1
2

o
n

S
R

1
4
4
2

(
W
i
n
d
y

R
o
a
d
)

o
v
e
r

E
m
e
r
s
o
n

B
r
a
n
c
h

w
i
t
h

a

D
o
u
b
l
e

8
'

X

9
'

R
C
B
C

b
u
r
i
e
d

1
'

w
i
t
h

a

2
'

s
i
l
l

i
n

b
a
r
r
e
l

2
.

Ty
p
i
c
a
l

C
r
o
s
s

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
:

Re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s

9,700 (2012)
0.
4
3
Av
e
r
a
g
e

D
a
i
l
y

T
r
a
f
f
i
c

(
v
e
h
/
h
r
/
d
a
y
)
:
ac
.
No
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Hi
g
h
w
a
y

S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

FO
R

L
I
N
E
A
R

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
Pa
u
l

F
i
s
h
e
r
Br
i
d
g
e

R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Ya
d
k
i
n
-
P
e
e

D
e
e
Ad
d
r
e
s
s
:
8/19/2014
37
3
3

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

D
r
i
v
e
,

S
u
i
t
e

2
0
7
Ra
l
e
i
g
h
,

N
C

2
7
6
1
2
Jo
s
h
u
a
.
M
a
s
s
r
o
c
k
@
h
d
r
i
n
c
.
c
o
m
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
/
T
I
P

N
o
.
:
NC
D
O
T

C
o
n
t
a
c
t
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.
:
17
B
P
.
1
0
.
R
.
5
3
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r

/

D
e
s
i
g
n
e
r
:
pf
i
s
h
e
r
@
n
c
d
o
t
.
g
o
v
N/
A
NC
D
W
Q

S
t
r
e
a
m

I
n
d
e
x

N
o
.
:
Su
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
:

Hi
g
h

Q
u
a
l
i
t
y

W
a
t
e
r
s

(
H
Q
W
)
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
:

Em
e
r
s
o
n

B
r
a
n
c
h
13
-
1
7
-
6
-
4
-
(
2
)
(V
e
r
s
i
o
n

1
.
2
;

R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
1
)
17
B
P
.
1
0
.
R
.
5
3
Co
u
n
t
y
(
i
e
s
)
:
Ca
b
a
r
r
u
s

Page 2of 2
Sh
e
e
t

No
.
St
a
t
i
o
n
(F
r
o
m

/

T
o
)

Fe
a
t
u
r
e

Im
p
a
c
t
e
d
Wa
t
e
r

/

W
e
t
l
a
n
d

/

Bu
f
f
e
r

T
y
p
e
Re
c
e
i
v
i
n
g

S
u
r
f
a
c
e

Wa
t
e
r

N
a
m
e
NR
T
R

M
a
p

ID
NC
D
W
Q

S
t
r
e
a
m

In
d
e
x
NC
D
W
Q

S
u
r
f
a
c
e

Wa
t
e
r

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
30
3
(
d
)

Im
p
a
i
r
m
e
n
t
s
Ty
p
e

o
f

Im
p
a
c
t
Existing SCM
10
+
3
5
13
+
9
0
13
+
9
0
14
+
4
1

S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R

M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T

P
L
A
N

FO
R

L
I
N
E
A
R

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S

E
q
u
a
l
i
z
e
r

P
i
p
e
s

t
o

b
e

n
o
t
e
d

a
s

a

m
i
n
i
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
Re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s

Pr
o
j
e
c
t
/
T
I
P

N
o
.
:
*
L
i
s
t

a
l
l

s
t
r
e
a
m

a
n
d

s
u
r
f
a
c
e

w
a
t
e
r

i
m
p
a
c
t

l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s

r
e
g
a
r
d
l
e
s
s

o
f

j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n

o
r

s
i
z
e
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

S
u
m
m
a
r
y
St
r
e
a
m
13
-
1
7
-
6
-
4
-
(
2
)
Fill

No
r
t
h

C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Hi
g
h
w
a
y

S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Cu
l
v
e
r
t
13
-
1
7
-
6
-
4
-
(
2
)
Proposed SCM N/A N/AN/AN/A
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n

o
f

M
i
n
i
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

I
m
p
a
c
t
s

o
r

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

A
l
l

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

S
C
M
s

l
i
s
t
e
d

m
u
s
t

a
l
s
o

b
e

l
i
s
t
e
d

u
n
d
e
r

S
w
a
l
e
s
,

P
r
e
f
o
r
m
e
d

S
o
u
r

H
o
l
e
s

a
n
d

o
t
h
e
r

E
n
e
r
g
y

D
i
s
s
i
p
a
t
o
r
s
,

o
r

O
t
h
e
r

S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
r
o
l

M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
St
r
e
a
m
4
No
n
e
4
Pe
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
No
n
e
Su
r
f
a
c
e

W
a
t
e
r

I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Tr
i
b

t
o

E
m
e
r
s
o
n

Br
a
n
c
h
Em
e
r
s
o
n

B
r
a
n
c
h
Pe
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
WS
-
I
I
;

H
Q
W
,

C
A
WS
-
I
I
;

H
Q
W
,

C
A
36" HDPE
18" RCP
1' TI
MBE
R
U
N
K

S
IZ
E
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
8
'
P
O
W
E
R
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
B
1
4

P
G
1
8
11
'

G
R
16
'

G
R
10
'

G
R
22' BST
SR 1442 WINDY ROAD
DB 2171 PG 69
MAXINE CRAINSHAW
DB 398 PG 267
WENDY H PARKER
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR.
DB 10711 PG 335
WENDY H PARKER
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR.
DB 10711 PG 335
ALLEN WENDY PARKER
C
F F F F
F
F F F F
C
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 45 TONS
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
18" RCP-III
REMOVE
15+00
-L- POT Sta. 10+00.00
-L- PC Sta. 10+25.05
-L- PT Sta. 12+28.03
-L- POT Sta. 16+00.66
PI Sta 11+26.59
D
L = 202.98'
T = 101.54'
R = 2,650.00'
-L-
V = 45 MPH
e = 0.04
RE
VIS
IO
N
S

HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

8
/
7
/
2
0
1
4
.
.
.
\
1
7
B
P
.
1
0
.
R
.
5
3
_
H
Y
D
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
.
D
G
N
$
$
$
$
U
S
E
R
N
A
M
E
$
$
$
$
8
/
1
7
/
9
9

17BP.10.R.53 4
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SITE 1
SITE 2
NAD 83/ NA 2011
SHEET OF
PERMIT DRAWINGS
EM
ER SON BRA N CH
156 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 75 TONS
SEE DETAIL 'B'
W/ CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
RETAIN
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP (TYP.)
ROCK STEP DOWN
30 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 15 TONS
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
63 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 60 TONS
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
ON SHEET NO. 2
SEE DETAIL 'A'
STREAM RELOCATION
S S S S
6
8
5
685
685
68
5
685
685
6
8
5
6
8
5
685
690
690
6
9
0
690
690
690
690690
690 690
690
690
6
9
0
69
0
6
9
0
6
9
0
695
695
695
6
9
5
695
695
695
695
695
695
6
9
5
6
9
5
6
9
5
700
700
7
0
0
70
0
700 700
700
700
700
700
7
0
0
7
0
0
705
705
705
705
705
7
0
5
710
710
71
0
715
715
71
5
720
720
36" HDPE
18" RCP
1' TI
MBE
R
U
N
K

S
IZ
E
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
6
8
'
P
O
W
E
R
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
B
1
4

P
G
1
8
11
'

G
R
16
'

G
R
10
'

G
R
22' BST
SR 1442 WINDY ROAD
DB 2171 PG 69
MAXINE CRAINSHAW
DB 398 PG 267
WENDY H PARKER
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR.
DB 10711 PG 335
WENDY H PARKER
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR.
DB 10711 PG 335
ALLEN WENDY PARKER
C
F F F F
F
F F F F
C
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 45 TONS
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
18" RCP-III
REMOVE
15+00
-L- POT Sta. 10+00.00
-L- PC Sta. 10+25.05
-L- PT Sta. 12+28.03
-L- POT Sta. 16+00.66
PI Sta 11+26.59
D
L = 202.98'
T = 101.54'
R = 2,650.00'
-L-
V = 45 MPH
e = 0.04
RE
VIS
IO
N
S

HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

8
/
7
/
2
0
1
4
.
.
.
\
1
7
B
P
.
1
0
.
R
.
5
3
_
H
Y
D
_
p
r
m
_
w
e
t
.
D
G
N
$
$
$
$
U
S
E
R
N
A
M
E
$
$
$
$
8
/
1
7
/
9
9

17BP.10.R.53 4
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SITE 1
SITE 2
NAD 83/ NA 2011
SHEET OF
PERMIT DRAWINGS
EM
ER SON BRA N CH
156 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 75 TONS
SEE DETAIL 'B'
W/ CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
RETAIN
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP (TYP.)
ROCK STEP DOWN
30 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 15 TONS
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
63 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 60 TONS
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
ON SHEET NO. 2
SEE DETAIL 'A'
STREAM RELOCATION
S S S S
00
00
55
55
1010
1010
1515
1515
2020
2020
2525
2525
3030
3030
3535
3535
4040
4040
4545
4545
5050
5050
5555
5555
6060
6060
6565
6565
7070
7070
7575
7575
3
:
4
9
:
3
2

P
M
1
7
B
P
.
1
0
.
R
.
5
3
_
H
Y
D
_
p
r
m
_
P
F
L
.
D
G
N
$
$
$
$
U
S
E
R
N
A
M
E
$
$
$
$
8
/
2
3
/
9
9
PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0
X-617BP.10.R.53
-L-
2.5 5
ROADWAY
PROPOSED
L
NO
RM
AL
2:
1
NORMAL2:1
S=0.0027
WSEL=683.8'
8-12-13
C ELEV.=681.2'L
680
690
SHEET OF
PERMIT DRAWINGS
2' SILL IN BARREL 2
BURIED 1.0' WITH
DOUBLE 8' X 9' RCBC
SKEW=90
C ELEV.=694.5'
-L- 14+00.00
3 4
Ha
n
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g

Existing
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.

E
x
c
a
v
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
c
h
a
n
i
z
e
d

C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

T
e
m
p
.

C
h
a
n
n
e
l
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
N
a
t
u
r
a
l

Si
t
e
St
a
t
i
o
n
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
F
i
l
l

I
n
F
i
l
l

I
n
i
n

C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
i
n

S
W

S
W
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
S
t
r
e
a
m
No
.
(
F
r
o
m
/
T
o
)
Si
z
e

/

T
y
p
e
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
n

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
(a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
1
1
0
+
3
5

t
o

1
3
+
9
0

-
L
-

L
T
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
0.
0
3
36
3

2
1
3
+
9
0

t
o

1
4
+
4
1

-
L
-

C
u
l
v
e
r
t
0.
0
1
0.
0
1
54
4
3
Ba
n
k

S
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
0.
0
1
43
TO
T
A
L
S
:
0.
0
5
0
.
0
1
4
6
0
AT
N

R
e
v
i
s
e
d

3
/
3
1
/
0
5
SH
E
E
T

8/27/2014

W
E
T
L
A
N
D

P
E
R
M
I
T

I
M
P
A
C
T

S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
SU
R
F
A
C
E

W
A
T
E
R

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
WE
T
L
A
N
D

I
M
P
A
C
T
S
OV
E
R

E
M
E
R
S
O
N

B
R
A
N
C
H
ON

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y

S
R

1
4
4
2

(
W
I
N
D
Y

R
D
)
NO
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A

DI
V
I
S
I
O
N

O
F

H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
CA
B
A
R
R
U
S

C
O
U
N
T
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
:

1
7
B
P
.
1
0
.
R
.
5
3
H-
0
M
0
0
a_
�o0
LN
r—
SheetSTATE
See 1-A For Index of Sheets STATE OF I O' TH CAROLING
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SORT
NO
TOTAL
SETS
Earnhardt` -1�
NE.
17BP.10.R.53
it
1613 d� t• / / t, / O�
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE PRO]. NO.•
P.APROl.N0.
D66(:RIPTION
1442, 1q
17BP.10.R.53
P.E., R/W, CONSTR.
a�Cy,`0
1e7sr�� b m
•
car
R. •
co
\� �O'
CZ
S�1apJry 1949
CABARR US CO UNTY
•
,,..,�°��
�' _ ethBpe
s=h°ag°'
PISPROJECT
LOCATION )I'BethPae
FECT: 171
Barnett Rd.
1442
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.12 ON SR 1442 OVER EMERSON BRANCH
�a
V
J
rr
o
���\ J Shiloh Ch
,sos
,
\
o �- '�
,
��� cBe RBn o�
DDi 1950
13
1442
1901
a
a
0
a
BETWEEN NC 3 AND SR 1606
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND STRUCTURE
o c
Cl.
/I r
Aa I '
1602
Gdwood Churc%
c
1605
o�ercash R
1442
/Q)
Pp o.\
�P
VICINITY MAP
DETOUR ROUTE (NOT TO SCALE)
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
—L— STA. 10+35.00, 42' LT. e�'` �
END CONSTRUCTION
CI)2
i, �0 END STATE PROJECT 17BP.10.R.53
@ 8' X 9' RC BC —L— STA. 16 + 00.00
I \ �`°�
-_,
=.S I /
II -_ ------- JS��_ — JS JS -- - 75-----------JS— Is .
_L_
WINDY RD. ` �
' --
1
TO N�
C
TO SR 1606 SR 1442 U
I I I
II II
1
r3
BEGIN CULVERT END CULVERT
—L— STA. 13 + 91 +/— m —L— STA. 14 + 09 +/—
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 17BP.10.R.53 5
�
—L— STA. 10 + 55.00 (��
LOCATION SKETCH
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR The ACQUISITION
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II
FN 3733 National Drive, Suite 207 Raleigh, N.C. 27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
•
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2012 = 9,700
ADT 20 = 19,400
PROJECT LENGTH
Prepared in the Office of:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0,e®RTN
°/to
LENGTH ROADWAY STATE PROJECT 17BP.10.R.53 = 0.100 MILES
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
as �
PLANS
DHV = °
D = %
PE.
LENGTH STRUCTURES STATE PROJECT 17BP.10.R.53 = 0.003 MILES
SIGNATURE,
50 20J0 50 100
T 6 %
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
DOMINIC M. WAINWRIGHT, P.E.
�•��Op
• �y
1 ■ t'
I 1
=
V45 MPH
TOTAL LENGTH STATE PROJECT 17BP.10.R.53 = 0.103 MILES
_
PROJECT ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGNENGINEER
,,.
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
FUNC CLASS =
LETTING DATE:
JAMES R. RICE, P.E.
gR& 1
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
MINOR COLLECTOR
SEPTEMBER 17, 2014
SUBREGIONAL TIER
PE.
LOUOGEP.E.
/ PROFILE (VERTICAL)
SIGNATURE, DIVISION ENGINEER
`�
I

Note: Not to Scale
S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
STATE OF NO I' TI-1 CA O LINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
/7BP.10.R.53
/—B
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:
State Line
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Properly Corner
0
EIP
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
ECM
X X X
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
VILB
EAB
Known Soil Contamination: Boundary or Site
Potential Soil Contamination: Boundary or Site -
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
Sign
Well
Small Mine
Foundation
Area Outline
Cemetery
Building
School
Church
Dam
HYDROLOGY:
Stream or Body of Water
O
0
0
t
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
Buffer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring 0�
Wetland a
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch >> > >
False Sump
is
BZ 1
BZ 2
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
IIII
CSX TRANSPORTATION
0
MILEPOST 35
SWITCH
RIGHT OF WAY:
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Temporary Construction Easement -
Temporary Drainage Easement
Permanent Drainage Easement
Permanent Drainage /Utility Easement
Permanent Utility Easement
Temporary Utility Easement
Aerial Utility Easement
•
® A
Proposed Permanent Easement with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
Proposed Curb Ramp (00)
Curb Cut Future Ramptom)
Existing Metal Guardrail
E
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
C
F
Proposed Guardrail
Existing Cable Guiderail
Proposed Cable Guiderail
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION:
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
—T� L
a
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
End Wall -
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES:
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
O 0 0
Vineyard
CONS
CONS WE (
/ CONS HW
>—
CB
©
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
Recorded U/G Power Line
Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Booth
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole
Recorded U/G Telephone Cable
Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*)
Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit
Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*)-
Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable
Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*t
•
-0-
iC
TC
WATER:
Water Manhole
Water Meter
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
Recorded U/G Water Line
©
0
0
Designated U/G Water Line (S.U.E.*
Above Ground Water Line
TV:
TV Satellite Dish
TV Pedestal
TV Tower
U/G TV Cable Hand Hole
Recorded U/G TV Cable
Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*)
Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable
Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*)
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
Recorded U/G Gas Line
Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*)
Above Ground Gas Line
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
A/S Water
0
0
0
H1
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
Recorded SS Forced Main Line
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
A/S sane—Brr
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
•
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
AATUR
E.O.I.

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
Cl
PROP. APPROX. 3.0" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B, AT AN AVERAGE
RATE OF 168 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS.
C2
PROP. APPROX. 1.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B, AT AN AVERAGE
RATE OF 168 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD.
D1
PROP. APPROX. 3.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE 119.OB, AT
AN AVERAGE RATE OF 399 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD.
El
PROP. APPROX. 5.0" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B, AT AN AVERAGE
RATE OF 570 Lbs PER SQUARE YARD.
T
EARTH MATERIAL
V
8" INCIDENTAL STONE BASE
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
VARIABLE
SLOPE
SEE X-SECTIONS
Natural
Ground
VAR.
Natural
Ground
DETAIL A
STREAM RELOCATION
( Not to Scale)
3'
—
1'7Ft.
?'I
2'
3'
1"/Ft.
5'
1'YFt.
VAR.
FROM STA. 10 + 50 TO STA. 11 + 2 5 -L- LT
FROM STA. 11 + 40 TO STA. 12 + 15 -L- LT
FROM STA. 12 + 30 TO STA. 13 + 05 -L- LT
FROM STA. 13 + 2 0 TO STA. 14 + 00 -L- LT
ROCK STEP DOWN
( Not to Scale)
GEOTEXTILE —/
Type of Liner= CLASS II RIP —RAP (2' THICK)
FROM STA. 11 +25 TO STA. 11 +40 -L- LT
FROM STA. 12 + 15 TO STA. 12 + 30 -L- LT
FROM STA. 13 + 05 TO STA. 13 + 20 -L- LT
Roadway
Fill
Slope
Roadway
Fill
Slope
6'
SHOULDER
0.08
4'
F.D.P.S.
0.02
—z
11' I 11'
TRAVEL LANE
TRAVEL LANE
GRADE
POINT
0.02
GRADE TO THIS LINE
Cl
6'
SHOULDER
4'
F.D.P.S.
VARIES
SEE
X-SECTIONS
ORIGINAL GROUND
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
/7BP.10.R.53
2
!LW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
INCOMP]L]ET]E PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
P ELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207 Raleigh, N.C. 27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
ORIGINAL GROUND
LINE FROM STATION TO STATION
-L- 10+55.00 16+00.00
NOTE: PAVE DRIVEWAYS AT -L- STA. 12+95 RT AND 15+18 RT WITH (V BASE AND C2) SURFACE COURSE.
(-) 1.34%
4'
LONGITUDINAL SECTION A -A
( Not to Scale)
3'
A
EST. 21 SY GEOTEXTILE
PER EACH ROCK STEP DOWN
3'
(-) 1.34%
2' MIN. THICK
CLASS II RIP RAP
EST. 20 TONS PER EACH
ROCK STEP DOWN
4'

REVISIONS
COMPUTED BY: T.N. BEDENBAUGH DATE: DECEMBER 2013
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
CHECKED BY: D.M. WAINWRIGHT DATE: JULY 2014
/7BP.I0.R.53
3
STATE OF NO !) TH CA OLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS �Y
1L 1LIG Jl W�yA 1L S
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
SUMMARY OF EARTHWORK
IN CUBIC YARDS
RIGHT OF WAY AREA DATA SUMMARY OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL
LOCATION
UNCLASSIFIED
EXCAVATION
UNDERCUT
EMBT+20%
BORROW
WASTE
-L- STA. 10+55.00 TO 16+00.00
472
1704
1332
PARCEL
TOTAL
AREA
AREA
AREA
PERM.
TEMP.
PERM.
PERM.
IN SQUARE YARDS
PROPERTY OWNERS NAMES
REMAINING
CONST.
DRAIN.
DRAIN.
UTILITY
DRAINAGE /
UTILITY
ASPHALT
ASHPALT
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
PROJECT TOTALS
472
1704
1232
NO.
ACREAGE
TAKEN
RT.
REMAINING
LT.
EASE.
EASE.
EASE.
EASE.
EASE.REMOVAL
LOCATION
BREAK UP
REMOVAL
BREAK UP
SAY
480
STA. 10+55.00 TO EXIST. BRIDGE
815
-L-
1
MAXINE CRAINSHAW
11.31
11.31
0.019
-
-
-
0.550
2
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR. & WENDY H. PARKER
5.53
5.53
0.113
-
-
-
0.010
EXIST. BRIDGE TO -L- STA. 16 +00.00
431
3
ALLEN WENDY PARKER
2.00
2.00
0.042
-
-
-
0.061
DRAINAGE DITCH EXCAVATION
PROJECT TOTALS
1246
-L- STA. 10 +50.00 TO 14+00.00
907
PROJECT TOTALS
907
SAY
910
"NOTE: ALL AREAS ARE IN ACRES
Note: Approximate quantities only. Unclassified Excavation, Borrow Excavation, Drainage Ditch Excavation,
Shoulder Borrow, Fine Grading Clearing and Grubbing, Breaking of Existing Pavement, and Removal of
Existing Pavement will be paid for at the contract lump sum price for "Grading."
LIST OF PIPES, ENDWALLS, ETC. (FOR PIPES 48" & UNDER)
STATION
LOCATION (LT,RT, OR CL)
STRUCTURE NO.
TOP ELEVATION
INVERT ELEVATION
INVERT ELEVATION
SLOPE CRITICAL
CLASS IV R.C. PIPE
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
C.S. PIPE
(UNLESS NOTED OTHRWISE)
CLASS III R.C. PIPE
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)STD.838.11
15" SIDE DRAIN PIPE
18" SIDE DRAIN PIPE
24" SIDE DRAIN PIPE
ENDWALLS
QUANTITIES
FOR DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES
' TOTAL L.F. FOR PAY
QUANTITY SHALL BE COL. I
'A' + (1.3 X COL 'B')
C.B. STD. 840.01 OR STD. 840.02
FRAME, GRATES
AND HOOD
STANDARD 840.03
D.I. STD. 840.14 OR STD. 840.15
D.I. FRAME & GRATE STD. 840.16
G.D.I. TYPE "A" STD. 840.17 OR 840.26
G.D.I. TYPE "B" STD. 840.18 OR 840.27
G.D.I. TYPE "D" STD. 840.19 OR 840.28
G.D.I. FRAME WITH GRATE STD. 840.22
G.D.I. FRAME WITH TWO GRATES STD. 840.22
G.D.I. (N.S.) FRAME WITH GRATE STD. 840.24
G.D.I. (N.S.) FRAME WITH TWO GRATES STD. 840.24
J.B. STD. 840.31 OR 840.32
G.D.I. (N.S.) FRAME WITH TWO GRATES STD. 840.29
nE
O
inTHICKNESS
d
CORR. STEEL ELBOWS NO. & SIZE
CONC. COLLARS CL. "B" C.Y. STD 840.72
FCONC. & BRICK PIPE PLUG, C.Y. STD. 840.71
PIPE REMOVAL LIN.FT.
ABBREVIATIONS
STD. 838.01,
OR
STD. 8
(UNLESS
NOTED
OTHERWISE)
C.B. CATCHBA
N.D.I. NARROW DROP INLET
D.I. DROP INLET
G.D.I. GRATED DROP INLET
G.D.I. (N.S.( GRATED DROP INLET
(NARROW SLOT)
J.B. JUNCTION BOX
M.H. MANHOLE
T.B.D.I. TRAFFIC BEARING DROP INLET
T.BJ.B. TRAFFIC BEARING JUNCTION BOX
PER EACH (0' THRU 5.0')
LIN.
'FT.
SIZE
CU. YDS.
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
43"
12"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
A
B
e!
O
r
O
10.0' AND ABOVE
OR GAUGE
a
'5
a
v
R.C.P.
N
u
O
LL
O
TYPE OF GRATE
REMARKS
E
F
G
12+97
RT
0401
691.19
689.84
36
25
NOTE: Invert Elevations are for Bid Purposes only and shall not be used for project construction stakeout.
See "Standard Specifications For Roads and Structures, Section 300-5".
"N" = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF LANE TO FACE OF GUARDRAIL.
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO SHOULDER BREAK POINT.
FLARE LENGTH = DISTANCE FROM LAST SECTION OF PARALLEL GUARDRAIL TO END OF GUARDRAIL.
W = TOTAL WIDTH OF FLARE FROM BEGINNING OF TAPER TO END OF GUARDRAIL. GUARDRAIL SUMMARY
G = GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
NG = NON -GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
SURVEY
LINE
BEG. STA.
END STA.
LOCATION
LENGTH
WARRANT POINT
"N"
FROM
E.O.L.
TOTAL
SHOUL.
WIDTH
FLARE LENGTH
W
ANCHORS
IMPACT
ATTENUATOR
TYPE 350
SINGLE
FACED
GUARDRAIL
REMOVE
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
REMOVE
AND
STOCKPILE
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
REMARKS
STRAIGHT
SHOP
CURVED
DOUBLE
FACED
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
XI
MOD
XI
GRAD
350
M-350
XIII
CAT-7
VI
MOD
TYPE
III
AT 1
EA
G
NG
-L-
10+56
15+55
LT
500
14+16
10+75
6
9
50
50
1.0
1.0
2
2
-L-
13+22
14+91
RT
168.75
13+81
14+16
6
9
50
50
1.0
1.0
SUBTOTAL
668.78
GRAU 350 @ 50'X4
-200
TOTAL
468.75
4

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "BL-1"
WITH NAD 83 (2011) STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 633585.2107 (ft) EASTING: 1484974.8330 (ft)
ELEVATION: 700.22 (ft)
THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT
(GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.99985182
THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND
LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM
"BL-1" TO -L- STATION 10+55.00 IS
S 74°12'07.82" E 21.17'
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES
VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88
+00.00
60.00' LT
+00.00
29.50' LT
(EX. RNd)
EIPc=
-L- POT Sta. 10+00.00
-L-
Pl Sta 11+26.59
= 4' 23' 18.8' (RT)
D = 2' 09' 43.6'
L = 202.98'
T = 101.54'
R = 2.650.00'
V = 45 MPH
e = 0.04
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
STA10+35.00. 42' LT.
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS
30 SY GEOTEXTILE
+ 01.00 +06.00
80.00' LT
+ 06.00
74.00' LT
80.00' LT
+01.00
74.00' LT
DUE
GRAU 350 TL-3, +56
STREAM RELOCATION
SEE DETAIL 'A'
ON SHEET NO. 2
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST 60 TONS
63 5Y GEOTEXTILE
jW G B/HOPL\`�c`��
Ex TINW
\ELI to.
N 35' 20' 05.5' E
DUE
F T T T T T T T
+55.00
40.00' RT &
30.89' RT
(EX. RAN)
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR. I
WENDY H PARKER
DB 107I1 PG 335
+ 75.00
87.00' LT
+75.00
81.00' LT
C
TYP. E JDUE
BEGIN PROJECT I7BPJO.R.53
-L- STA.I0+55.00
-L- PT Sta. 12+28.03
-L- PC Sta.10+25A5
50.00
45.00' RT &
31.25' RT
(EX. RAW)
+ 75.00
66.00' RT
& 45.00' RT
MAXINE CRAINSHAW
DB 398 PG 267
+80.00 +02.00
87.00' LT 88,00' LT
+80.00 +02.00
81.00' LT 81.00' LT
ROCKDSTEP DOWN
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP (TYP,
U 350 TL-3,+2
+57.00
66.00' RT
& 45.00' RT
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W/CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 'B'
EST. 75 TONS
156 SY GEOTEXTILE
+80.00
66.00' RT
& 45.00' RT
-L- POT Sta.16+00.66
+07.00
88.00' LT
+07.00
81.00' LT;,
N 39'43'24.3'EI
55.00' RT &
30.37' RT
(EX. RAN)
+ 75.00
55.00' RT
& 45.00' RT
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 45 TONS -
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
ALLEN WENDY PARKER
DB 2171 PG 69
EXISTING
STRUCTURE "12
TO BE REMOVED
+75.00
43.00' RT
+43.00
43.00' RT
+ 43.00
66.00' RT
+32.00
55.00' LT &
30.17' LT
(EX. RAV)
+45.00
+00.00 55.00' RT
55.00' RT
END CONSTRUCTION
END PROJECT 17BP.JO.R.53
-L- STA/6+00.00
+00.00
30.51' LT
(EX. RAN)
•
s6
+00.00
29.49' RT
(EX. RV)
NOTE:
INCIDENTAL MILL APPROXIMATELY 25' AT EACH TIE IN AT
BEGIN AND END PROJECT LIMITS TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH
TRANSITION TO THE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT.
LIP
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR.
WENDY H PARKER
DB IOTBPG 335
BL
POINT
r
DESC.
NORTH EAST
I7BP.JO.R.53
4
RAN SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
INCOMPLETE
PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR
I/ W ACQUISITION
1P0 E]LIMINA
RY PLANS
DO NOT USE FO,
CONSTRUCTION
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Dive, Suite 207 Raleigh, N.C. 27612
N.C.B.E.L.S License Number: F-0116
DETAIL B
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
( Not w ScoW
GeeteMile
Type of L ner= Class 'B' Rip-Rop
Mn D= 1 Ft.
Max d= 1 Ft.
Front
Ditch
Slope
FROM STA. 10+75 TO STA. 13+87 -L- RT
ELEVATION
EL STATION
OFFSET
2
3
BL-1
EL -2
BL-3
633585.2107
633851.9560
634085.2166
1484974.8330
1485233.6500
1425383.0460
700.222
692.944
600.634
10.47.41
14.16.70
16.92.32
20.77 LT
14.48 RT
17.61 LT
710
700
690
680
670
660
BEGIN GRADE
-L- STA10+55.00
EL699.88
STA. 10+75.00 RT
ELEV.=697.30'
PI = 12+20.00
EL = 695.79'
K = //5
VC = 200'
V = 55 MPH
STA. 12 + 25.00 RT
ELEV. =693.30' PROPOSED
o___ GRADE
SPECIAL Cl1T DITCMJ2473O% �'-
CLASS'B'RIP RAP wi'-----_E.J, �_)0.7386%---
(-) 7.3400% A/, )00 (-) 13400% / - CLgSSA B�UT_DITCN Wi
RIP RAP @ 3'89 0 - - -
- - • (-) 1.3400% // 7 -
I: I
-L-
STA. 13+87.00 RT
ELEV. =687.00'
II
w
STREAM
RELOCATION
PROFILE
10+00
11 + 00
12+00
A
PI = 15+50.00
EL = 693.36'
K = 176
VC = 100'
V = 65 MPH
END CONSTRUCTION
END GRADE
-L- STAI6+00.00
EL69327
f-10.7386% f-IOJ705%
EXISTING GROUND
EXISTING BRIDGE "12
TO BE REMOVED
PROPOSED
DOUBLE 8'X9' RCBC
90' SKEW
BL -2
- EL- STA. 14+16.70 (14.48' RIGHT)
- L- STA. 14+17.11 (14.89' RIGHT)
ELEVATION = 692.944
13+00
14+00 15+00
16+00
710
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE DISCHARGE
= 600
= 25
= 688.8
= 850
BASE FREQUENCY = 100
BASE HW ELEVATION = 689.83
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 1140
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= < 500
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 693.3
DATE OF SURVEY = 08-12-20/3
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
= 683.8 FT
E0EN
700
690
680
670
660

PROJECT:I7BP.l0.R.53
FY2
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207 Raleigh, N.C. 27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY
WITH THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE
NCG-010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011
ISSUED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY.
THIS PROJECT HAS
BEEN DESIGNED TO
SENSITIVE WATERSHED
STANDARDS.
HIGH QUALITY WATER(S) EXIST
ON THIS PROJECT
High Quality Water Zone(s) Exist
From Sta. 13+90 -L-
to Sta. 14+10 -L-
Refer To E. C. Special Provisions
for Special Considerations.
JOSHUA MASSROCK
LEVEL IIIA NAME
650
LEVEL IIIA CERTIFICATION NO.
STATE OF NO
DIVISION 0
I
TH CA I' OLINA
�HIGHWAYS
PLAN FOR PROPOSED
HIGHWAY EROSION CON
CABARRUS COUNTY
ROL
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.12 ON SR 1442 OVER EMERSON BRANCH
BETWEEN NC 3 AND SR 1606
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND STRUCTURE
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- STA. 10 + 35.00, 42' LT.
- --- - ----
JS ----
2 @ 8' X 9' RCBC
JS- - -- JS ---IS IS
END CONSTRUCTION
e% END STATE PROJECT 17BP.10.R.53
-L- STA. 16 + 00.00
-L -
TO SR
WINDY RD.
SR /442
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 17BP.10.R.53
-L- STA. 10 + 55.00
to
TO NC 3
LOCATION SKETCH
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II
/ 1
ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY
WITH THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE
NCG-010000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 3, 2011
ISSUED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY.
Prepared in the Office of:
ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
1 South Wilmington St.
Raleigh, NC 27611
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
HEHTS
N.C.
17BP.10.R.53
EC-1
STATE PROM. NO.
F. A. PROI. NO.
DESCRIPTION
17BP.10.R.53
P.E., R/W, CONSTR
EROS ON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
1630.03 Temporary Silt Ditch
1630.05 Temporary Diversion
1605.01 Temporary Silt Fence
1606.01 Special Sediment Control Fence
1622.01 Temporary I.erms and Slope Drains
1630.02 Silt Basin Type B
Symbol
TSO
TD
1633.01 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type -A •OIo
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type -A with
Matting and Polyacrylamide (PAM)
1633.02 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type-B D
Wattle/ Coir Fiber Wattle
Wattle/ Coir Filter Wattle
with Polyacrylamide (PAM)
1634.01 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type -A
1634.02 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type-B -�
1635.01 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type -A
1635.02 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type-B
1630.04 Stilling Basin
1630.06 Special Stilling basin
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap:
Type A
1632.01
1632.02
1632.03
Type B
Type C
Skimmer basinTiered Skimmer
Infiltration Basin
U
C
AD
BD
CD
ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE AREA(S) EXIST
ON THIS PROJECT
Refer To E. C. Special Provisions
for Special Considerations.
THIS PROJECT CONTAINS
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR CLEARING AND
GRUBBING PHASE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
NOTES: ANY DEVIATION FROM OPTIONS GIVEN WILL
REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER.
ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY
NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
Roadway Standard Drawings
The following roadway english standards as appear in "Roadway Standard Drawings"- Roadway Design
Unit - N. C. Department of Transportation - Raleigh, N. C., dated January 2012 and the latest
revison thereto are applicable to this project and by reference hereby are considered a part of
these plans.
1604.01
1605.01
1606.01
1607.01
1622.01
1630.01
1630.02
1630.03
1630.04
1630.05
1630.06
1631.01
Railroad Erosion Control Detail
Temporary Silt Fence
Special Sediment Control Fence
Gravel Construction Entrance
Temporary Berms and Slope Drains
Riser Basin
Silt Basin Type B
Temporary Silt Ditch
Stilling Basin
Temporary Diversion
Special Stilling Basin
blasting Installation
1632.01 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type A
1632.02 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type B
1632.03 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type C
1633.01 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type A
1633.02 Temporary Rock Silt Check Type B
1634.01 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type .
1634.02 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type B
1635.01 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type A
1635.02 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type B
1640.01 Coir Fiber Baffle
1645.01 Temporary Stream Crossing

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
6i.10.R.53
EC-2
HDR
ring, Inc. of the Carolinas
I I N.C.B3733 tEoalSreLiCeive, nse Number: 207 Raleigh,
12
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECK TYPE A WITH
EXCELSIOR MATTING AND POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) DETAIL
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE
STRUCTURAL STONE
1' MIN
f
A
EXCELSIOR
MATTING
FLOW
B—
D
O O
O p 7y p ( CC R�I p9)
p CJ D p� O O
OC,"OC,612
PLAN
2/3 CHANNEL.,
WIDTH
SECTION A -A
EXCELSIOR
MATTING
See Inset A
NOTES
USE EXCELSIOR FOR MATTING MATERIAL AND ANCHOR
MATTING SECTION AT TOP AND BOTTOM WITH CLASS B STONE.
PRIOR TO POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) APPLICATION, OBTAIN
A SOIL SAMPLE FROM PROJECT LOCATION, AND FROM OFFSITE
MATERIAL, AND ANALYZE FOR APPROPRIATE PAM FLOCCULANT
TO BE APPLIED TO EACH ROCK SILT CHECK.
INITIALLY APPLY 4 OUNCES OF POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM)
TO TOP OF MATTING SECTION AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL
EVENT THAT EQUALS OR EXCEEDS 0.50 INCHES.
INSET A
CLASS B STONE
1' MIN t 1
H = 2' MIN
p
pD p c D cO D p
D p Cf D p O D CO D p6 D
O p.
O'7O O'O O''O O'7O O
—111-111-111—I 11-111—I -1 iI - ] In I1 fI r
111=111=111=III-11 I-111—III-11 I-111=11 I-11 I-111=111=111-111=111=11 I -
SECTION B-B
12"
EXCELSIOR
MATTING
I
CLASS B STONE
NOT TO SCALE

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
I7BP.I0.R.53 EC-3
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOIL S TABILIZA TION SUMMARY SHEET
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207 Raleigh, N.C. 27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL MATTING FOR 2:1 CUT AND FILL SLOPES
CONST
SHEET NO.
LINE
FROM
STATION
TO
STATION
SIDE
ESTIMATE (SY)
4
-I,-
10+35
14+00
KT
345
4
-I.-
10+55
12+25
KT
230
SUBTOTAL,
575
CONST
SHEET NO.
LINE
FROM
STATION
TO
STATION
SIDE
ESTIMATE (SY)
4
-I.-
10+75
13+75
I,T
440
4
-I.-
10+75
1 1 +50
KT
96
4
-I.-
13+25
13+75
KT
76
4
-I.-
14+25
15+50
I.T
155
4
-1,-
14+25
14+75
KT
75
SUS1OfAl.
644
TOTAL.
1419
SAY
1420

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
/7BP.10.R.53
EC-3A
EN N.C.B.E.L.S. al Drie, uite a 7Rallebef o-1116
SOIL STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES
SITE DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION TIME
TIMFFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HOW) ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3el
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2e1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
SLOPES 3alOR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50'IN
LENGTH.
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4e1
14 DAYS
NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HOW ZONES.

-L___P
IN3 =F93.J5'
---05-
700
-SZL - -
710
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA
SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
INSTALL TEMPORARY 36" PIPE
TO USE AS TEMPORARY STREAM
CROSSING. NCDOT STD. 1645.01
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS
30 SY GEOTEXTILE
700
STREAM RELOCATION-
---SEE DETAIL 'A' __----'00
ON SHEET NO. 2--
'CLASS 'II' RIP RAP,
EST 60 TONS
63 SY GEOTEXTILE--
\
,
I
/
/
/
Excavate Proposed Ditch
according to Detail A from
Sta. 10 + 50 to Sta. 14 + 00
MAXINE CRAINSHAWM N
CAB 398 .PG 267
I /
I 1
I/ 1
I/
6
:logo" ;*7-00,0y, . 410iAllA14.40:0#...reitie;'%"AdWAr
i viriir
z-AffAIW.4,W,.-ArAP,..*.,,.t*,.,1:.1;A.Pi$4 F„d"ri
695
., F..��:io44.uDorarr��®� v,•Ipw 7
A,T.�rmc oise:�a�_��bip„_.s.�ia.�._i'r����mfr%��I����irs�������i,�6��i���_,,_�. �_ ��
rIoFAr.R.,-r-W,
.o�oii•��.�fiii�•
PC Sta. /0 +25.05
'8
JERR� 1�Y1�1� RA-RKER;'Ro \
•
-- - DB--0•7JLPC--335\ \\
- 00L-
s 7 \ \
\
N
\\\
-L- PT Sta. 12 +28.93,,,
I
\
/
/ ;
i
/
I ,
/ I
I I
/
' / '
/
/
•
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W/CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 'B'
\ EST. 75 TONS
v1 156 SY GEOTEXTILE = ,
I y
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 45 TONS
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
INSTALL DRIVEWAY PIPE DURING
CLEARING & GRUBBING PHASE
1 /11///l/I I I'
1 ,
/ / /U//A.LLEN WENDY PARKER
1 1 1 1 II II j''�,I y7 ;
1, ,III // 1 /'�J,%2,111 I I P G 6 9
1 1
I 1
I 1 I 1
1 I I 1
\ / I' / 1 1 1 I, I 11I
1/ %/i I i !/ l/ I
i
5 \
\ \ \ \
I •
\ \
`\I\'I I111`\Ilii I i /7
1
i , f , ,1 1II\\ t / /
m , 11 I , I \ \ \ \ /
I /
1 �
PROJECT
17BPJO.R.53
EC-4/CONST.4
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suit 207 Raleigh, N.C.27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. Licen e Number: F-0116
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
EROSION CONTROL FOR
CONSTRUCTION SHEET 4
S85
—L — POT Sta. /6 +OOe66
CV
•
I -w-
90
P
JERKY',,WAYI
WEND/
DB 10-

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
/7BP./O.R.53 EC-5/CONST.4
DOUBLE 8' X 9' RCBC CULVERT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
PHASE I
1. RELOCATE THE EXISTING TRIBUTARY ACCORDING TO DETAIL 'A' AND STABILIZE WITH RIP RAP.
2. INSTALL IMPERVIOUS DIKES UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROPOSED CULVERT.
3. INSTALL 54" CSP TO CARRY CLEAN WATER THROUGH THE WORK AREA AND ALLOW
THE LOW FLOW BARREL (BARREL 1) TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
4. PROVIDE PUMP AND STILLING BASIN FOR DEWATERING THE WORK ZONE.
5. CONSTRUCT BARREL 1 INCLUDING WINGWALLS ATTACHED TO BARREL 1. PLACE INLET AND
OUTLET STABILIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH BARREL 1.
STREAM RELOCATION
SEE DETAIL 'A'
ROADWAY PLANSHEET 2
/
MQXINE CRAINSHRW'
DB -8 hG'67
I 1 / , l
I
1 /
I I I / /-
-I / / /
—..-- J
1
DUE '`,11
ArdirealF!)- inirmaawarifirm„;
1 KV Wit I tat:: '14 11111111MIT
CAP I__:
O\
C.,-T-
DUE'
NN. `
\\•
`
I
DE —WATERING STATION
CV
O O
TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
PO
F
TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
TEMPORARY
CULVERT
54" CSP
PHASE II
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207 Raleigh, N.C. 27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
1. REMOVE TEMP. 54" CSP AND INSTALL TEMPORARY IMPERVIOUS DIKES AS SHOWN
TO DIVERT STREAM INTO THE CONSTRUCTED LOW FLOW BARREL.
2. PROVIDE PUMP AND STILLING BASIN FOR DEWATERING THE WORK ZONE
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BARREL 2.
3. CONSTRUCT BARREL 2 INCLUDING WINGWALLS ATTACHED TO BARREL 2 AND OUTLET
STABILIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH BARREL 2.
4. CONSTRUCT FLOODPLAIN BENCH WITH NATIVE BED MATERIAL AND STABILIZE
BENCH FACE WITH CLASS 'II' RIP RAP.
5. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND DEWATERING STATION.
6. REMOVE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND BEGIN ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS.
I
MQXINE CfAAINSHAW \
DB 398 hG �67
' I
I I I
I / 1
I - J
CAPE•-
N
T
4•_ CV
O co
\1
\
\ ,W
\ \\ ,/ ',\ ' `\ I' \
\ ` \ 111 4 `..../
\
\\\
\ `. `\\\\\\ \\
`\ \� `♦ \\\ \\\\/ 1..-
, -
I\ \\ \\\ --\\ \\\ \\ \\ \' 11\\,\\I\\II\ \`I
\ ` \\ \ \ ''''I'
\ 11111
\ �\ \� \\ \\\ `\ `\ \ \I 11 11 11 ,,‘,I, ++)��I11
\ / \\ \\\ \\ \\1 \\I II; i i I \\ / ,
\ N. \ \\ \\ f ,) I ;hi/ I II / Ili
\ \ I I I •• l 1/ I 1
\ � 1 I I
TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
t /
/
TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
+oo
F
F
ct�-'C9
—
\F

EIP
s
POT Sta. /0 +00.00
73.
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS
30 SY GEOTEXTILE
STREAM RELOCATION
SEE DETAIL 'A'
ON SHEET NO. 2
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST 60 TONS
63 SY GEOTEXTILE
MAXINE CRAINSHAW
DB 398 PG 267
DUE ROCIDUE DOWNDWN
GRAU 350 TL-3, +56 CLASS 'II' RIP RAP (TYI?
RENN
DUEF r"6116,- KO ra IA FA I I PI W. TA 11141 PrA rAl r.A rAi VA VA I PA PrAi TAP VA VA PrA PrA § VA r
a��rr��r ���r
36" HDPE 1-011. 11 .W111111711Mai 'MLI.:11.11,1711.9�� i7Ji���►A�s�� t►���4���
EXI�TINGI R/W _ ������T� �_���w���
N." 1 1 1 11111
N
N 0
IN
TING R/IN W
E
DUE
I J,
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR. I
WENDY H PARKER
DB 10711 PG 335
PT Sta. /2 +28e03
PC Sta. /0 +25.05
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W/CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
-SEE DETAIL 'B'
EST. 75 TONS
156 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 45 TONS
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
ALLEN WENDY PARKER
DB 2171 PG 69
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
SHEET NO.
I7BP.I0.R.53
EC-6/CONST.4
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207 Raleigh, N.C. 27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
POT Sta. /6 +00e66
O
O
N
EXISTING R/V
EXISTING
JERRY WAYI
WENDY
DB 107

PROJECT REFERENCE NO
SHEET NO
17BPJO.R.53
RF-1
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas 1
3733 National Drive, Suit 207 Raleigh, N.C.27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. Licen e Number: F-0116
0.19 ACRE STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
INV=693,15'
EIP
POT Sta. /0 +00.00
N
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS
30 SY GEOTEXTILE
INV=692.85'
N
TING R/W W C
E
STREAM RELOCATION
SEE DETAIL 'A'
ON SHEET NO. 2
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST 60 TONS
63 SY GEOTEXTILE
1--- DUE
GRAU 350 TL-3, +56
C
JERRY WAYNE PARKER JR.
WENDY H PARKER
DB 10711 PG 335
DUE
LLI
-L- PT Sta. /2 +28.03
SEE RF-2, RF-3 AND PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
DUE
ROCK STEP DOWN
CLASS 'II' RIP RAP (TY
N
O
INV=692,49'
AT=691.96'
DU E
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
W/CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 'B'
EST. 75 TONS
156 SY GEOTEXTILE
o
co
co 0-7
o
\-o
777
SO
ntP
-L - POT Sta. /6 +00.66
692.11' GRAU 350
_ - -TL3, +91
LCLASS 'II' RIP RAP
EST. 45 TONS
45 SY GEOTEXTILE
FF
—
//C
EXISTING R/'r
026
JERRY WAY
WENDY
DB 10

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
17BPJO.R.53 RF-2
PLANTING DETAILS
LIVE STAKES PLANTING DETAIL
LIVE STAKE
SQUARE CUT
BUDS (FACING UPWARD)
LIVE CUTTING
(1/2"-2" DIAMETER)
2 - 3 Fee+
ANGLE CUT 30°-45°
COIR FIBER MAT
LIVE STAKES
EXISTING/PROPOSED
GROUND
EXISTING/PROPOSED
STREAMBED
BANK STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES
NOTE:
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED APPROXIMATELY 4 FEET
ON CENTER
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN UNTIL APPROXIMATELY 3/4
OF LIVE STAKE IS WITHIN GROUND
BAREROOT PLANTING DETAIL
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR
1. Insert planting bar
as shown and pull handle
toward planter.
4. Pull handle of bar
toward planter, firming
soil at bottom.
11 1 Ia1E1I�-
1E111 1E11 1
11=1IH1 IE 111E111E 111E1111=
1E111 —1E11E11
11I 111E11 11E111 E1111-
11I HIL= Ill E 1
2. Remove planting bar
and place seedling at
correct depth.
5. Push handle forward
firming soil at top.
PLANTING NOTES:
PLANTING BAG
During planting, seedlings
shall be kept in a moist
canvas bag or similar
container to prevent the
root systems from drying.
KBC PLANTING BAR
Planting bar shall have a
blade with a triangular
cross section, and shall
be 12 inches long,
4 inches wide and
1 inch thick at center.
ROOT PRUNING
All seedlings shall be root
pruned, if necessary, so that
no roots extend more than
10 inches below the
root collar.
ILA ITEll _,
IIIE
I_II�I 11TE1 ITEH I
11 E11 IE 1 IE 1= EH
3. Insert planting bar
2 inches toward planter
from seedling.
6. Leave compaction
hole open. Water
thoroughly.
❑ TYPE 1 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED 3 FT. TO 5 FT.
ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 4 FT. ON CENTER,
APPROXIMATELY 2724 PLANTS PER ACRE.
❑ TYPE 2 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED 6 FT. TO 10 FT.
ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8 FT. ON CENTER,
APPROXIMATELY 680 PLANTS PER ACRE.
❑ NOTE: TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE
PAID FOR AS "STREAMBANK REFORESTATION"
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suit 207 Raleigh, N.C.27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. Licen e Number: F-0116
STREAMBAI\
TYPE II
Natural
Ground
K REFORESTATION TYPICAL
STREAM
TYPE II
Slope
( Not to Scale)
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
MIXTURE, TYPE, SIZE, AND FURNISH SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING:
TYPE 1
50% SALIX NIGRA
50% CORNUS AMOMUM
TYPE 2
25% LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA
25% PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
25% FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
25% BETULA NIGRA
BLACK WILLOW 2 ft - 3 ft LIVE STAKES
SILKY DOGWOOD 2 ft - 3 ft LIVE STAKES
TULIP POPLAR
SYCAMORE
GREEN ASH
RIVER BIRCH
12 in - 18 in BR
12 in - 18 in BR
12 in - 18 in BR
12 in - 18 in BR
❑ SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR AREAS TO BE PLANTED
7-
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
DETAIL SHEET 1 OF 2
N.C.D.O.T.- ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
I

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
I7BPJO.R.53 RF-3
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
MATTING
IN TRENCH
ANCHOR TRENCH
ON 1' CENTERS
ANCHOR OVERLAP
ON 1' CENTERS
0\4 **S.* •
o " 4>••• .o. At 4;,. 41.1,
ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS
COIR FIBER
MATTING
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
EXTEND MATTING
TO NWSEL
STREAM BED
6" OVERLAY(MIN)
PLAN VIEW
NN
18"
(TYP)
BACKFILL-
ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS
IN TRENCH
MATTING SHALL BE
PLACED IN TRENCH
AND BACKFILLED
ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS
FLOODPLAIN/
EXISTING
GROUND
6" MIN
COIR FIBER h7ATTING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
2" x 2" (nominal)
WOODEN STAKE
1-2"
1-2'
12-24"
#10 STEEL
REINFORCEMENT BAR
4"
4"
IAMETER BEND
24"
1" (nominal)
STAPLE
1"
12"
ANCHOR OPTIONS
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suit 207 Raleigh, N.C.27612
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number: F-0116
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 2
N.C.D.O.T. - ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
I

75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 2.5 5
PROJ.REFERENCE NO.
17BP.10.R.53
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
SHEET NO.
X-1
75
705
700
695
705
700
695-------
705
2.7
691.51
2.1 \ y1
691.58
700----------------------------------------
705
700
695
i
�-
i
-
0.020
co
co
rn
0.043
------------
699.88
10 + 55.00
----------------------
700.00
10+50.00
----------------------
700.72
10+25.00
— 701.42 --
10+00.00
6:1
698.16
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R! W ACQUISITION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
705
700
695
705
700
695
705
700
705
700
695
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75

75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 2.5 5
PROEFERENCE NO.
17I.RBP.10.R.53
SHEET NO.
X-2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
75
705
700
695
690
705
700
695
690
705
700
695
690
------ ?, 1 S.S. 692.74
L' r`
690.91 S.S.692.20��,___
691.25
i
r S.S. 694.21
0.040
698.15
0.040
11+25.00
0.040
0.040
698.76
11 + 00.00
CO
T
0.030
0.040
699.38
10 + 75.00
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 -L-
10 5 0
5
10
15
S.D. 695.97
S.D. 696.63
S.D. 697.30
20
25
S.S. 700.23
S.S. 700.83
S.S. 701.62
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
705
700
695
690
705
700
695
690
705
700
695
690

75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 2.5 5
PRO!. REFERENCE NO.
17BP.10.R.53
SHEET NO.
X-3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
75
700
695
690
705
700
695
690
705
700
695
688.27
0.040
0.040
i
i
S.S. 691.75
696.51
12 + 00.00
0.040
S.S. 692.07 \ //
//
688.61
690 \ ,�
75
70
65
60
55
50
688.94
45
40
35
\S.S. 692.56 7/
\------�
30
25
20
15
697.02
0.040
11 +75.00
N.
0.040
0.040
10
5
697.53
11 +50.00
5
10
15
3.7
S.S. 694.91
S.D. 693.97
3; 7 g.1
S.D. 694.63
S.D. 695.30
20
25
S.S. 698.02
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
700
695
690
705
700
695
690
705
700
695
690

75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 2.5 5
PRO!. REFERENCE NO.
17BP.10.R.53
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
SHEET NO.
X-4
75
695
690
685
700
695
690
685
700
695
690
700
695
690
685.63
685.97
686.30
0.008
N
N
0'
o 0.020
/
_ S.S. 689.76 \ /
-3
694.86
13 + 00.00
op
f;
0.004 0.020
5'
_ 2
8.0 % DRIVEWAY
---
-------------------
/
S.S.690.33\\
/
695.19
12 + 75.00
o
0.016 '0 0.020
----------------------
L1 S.S. 690.79 \\
\ /
z•� S.S. 691.34\
687.07
695.53
12 + 50.00
0.028 '0
0.
28
696.02
12+25.00
S.S. 694.11
S.D. 691.36
S.S.693.83---
S.D. 692.33
S.S.693.96
S.D. 693.30
695
690
685
700
695
690
685
700
695
690
700
695
690
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
-L-
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75

0 2.5 5
PRO!. REFERENCE NO.
17BP.10.R.53
SHEET NO.
X-5
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
75
695
690
685
695
690
685
695
690
685
683.33
S.S. 687.66\
\ /
/
3
3
-43
0.020 ° 0.020
694.13
13 + 75.00
M
co
0.020
----------------------
---------N /
?: I
z
683.67
-------------------
?'I
?v
684.00
/
S.S. 688.12 \\
/
S.S. 688.97 \\
\ //
/
\_/
_--
/
694.38
13 + 50.00
0.020 -4D 0.020
694.62
13+25.00
S.S. 688.72
S.D. 687.47
695
690
685
695
3:1 S.S.689.45 --- —_—_-- 690
S.D. 688.44
S.S. 690.23---------
S.D. 689.41
685
695
690
685
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 —L-
5 0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

0 2.5 5 PRO!. REFERENCE NO.
17BP.10.R.53
SHEET NO.
X-6
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
75
N9a dx as 9- Z a 19i920SOR .d
695
690
695
690
--------------- S.S.688.06
-3
c
ri
0.020 'O 0.020
-----------------
-3
----------------------------
V
S.S. 688.16
695
690
685
695
690
685
680
V
/__
S.S. 688.58
V
V
V
V
3
693.72
14 + 75.00
0
4
0.020 �° 0.020
693.83
14 + 50.00
14 + 25.00
END CULVERT STA. 14 + 09 +/-
0.020
0'
0.020
682.84
14 + 00.00
BEGIN CULVERT STA. 13 + 91 +/-
S.S. 687.92 _ - -
------------------------
S.S. 687.38
S.S. 688.45 ------------------
695
690
695
690
695
690
685
695
690
- 685
680
N
oa0-
—,N
ti0L0
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

0 2.5 5 PRO!. REFERENCE NO.
17BP.10.R.53
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
SHEET NO.
X-7
75
ng\tpaA50568615\17BP-1 0R53_RDY_XPL.DGN
695
690
_______
----_________ --___________ —
S.S. 688.50
L_
0.017
0.020
693.36
15 + 50.00
4:1
S.S. 688.07 ------------
695
690
695
690
695
690
------ ------------------
S.S. 688.35
-----------
---------------------
S.S. 688.68
---------------------
S.S. 688.71
0.020
0.020
5'
2.0 %
5'
12.0 %
693.48
15 + 25.00
0.020
0.020
5'
5'
1_ o°/o 120
J
693.52
15+17.00
0.020
0.020
695
690
695
---- 13 % DRIVEWA y GRADE 690
693.61
15 + 00.00
4:
----------------------------
S.S. 687.05
695
690
695
690
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

0 2.5 5
PRO! REFERENCE NO.
17BP.10.R.53
SHEET NO.
X-8
75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
75
N90dx as 9- Z a 9i920SOR gd
695
690
695
690
(N
rn
/<7.j 0.007 ° 0.026
693.27
----------------------------
16 + 00.00
0.005
---------------------------- S.S. 688.32
75 70 65 60 55 50 45
M
o0
693.31
0.020
15+75.00
-L-
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5
4:7
--------------
S.S. 688.85-----------------------------
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
695
690
695
690

Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 5
14-08-0017

NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project No: Str.# 120012 County: Cabarrus
WBS No: 17BP.10.R.53 Document: PCE
F.A. No: NA Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: NWP 3

Project Description:
The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 12 on SR 1442 (Windy Road) over Emerson Branch in
Cabarrus County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined as a
520-foot (158.50 m) long corridor running 260 feet (79.25 m) northeast and 260 feet southwest along
Windy Road from the ends of Bridge No. 12. The corridor is approximately 90 feet (27.43 m) wide
extending 45 feet (13.72 m) on either side of the road from its present center.

SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW

Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:

Bridge No. 12 is located west of Kannapolis and east of Cornelius in the northwest corner of Cabarrus
County, North Carolina. The project area is plotted in the northwest section of the Kannapolis USGS 7.5'
topographic quadrangle (Figure 1).

A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on August 29,
2014. No previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within the APE, but two sites
(31CA108 and 31CA109) have been recorded within a mile of bridge. According to the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office online data base (HPOWEB 2014), there are no known historic
architectural resources within the APE that may yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps,
USDA soil survey maps, aerial photographs (NC One Map), historic maps (North Carolina maps
website), and Google Street View application were examined for information on environmental and
cultural variables that may have contributed to prehistoric or historic settlement within the project limits
and to assess the level of ground disturbance.

Bridge No. 12 and Windy Road cross Emerson Branch northeast to southwest. Emerson Branch drains
southeast into the Coddle Creek Reservoir. These waterways are part of the Yadkin-Pee Dee drainage
basin. The APE resides in a floodplain to the north of the bridge, a drainageway to the southwest, and
side slope to the southeast (Figure 2). The floodplain is forested, while the side slope is part of a
residential property. The drainageway is covered in secondary growth and contains a utility corridor.
Ground disturbance is likely minimal, except along the drainageway which appears to have been
channelized to run alongside the road as a ditch and to allow space for utilities.

The USDA soil survey map suggests that the APE encompasses two soil types (see Figure 2). The
floodplain and drainageway are composed of Chewacla sandy loam (Ch). This somewhat poorly drained
soil is nearly level and subject to frequent floods. Due to persistent wetness, this series is unsuit ed for
Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 5
14-08-0017
early settlement activities and unlikely to contain significant deposits. The side slope to the southeast is
made up of Pacolet sandy loam. Although this series is well drained, slope is at 15 to 35 percent and
erosion can be severe if the surface has been exposed. It too is unlikely to yield significant deposits due
to steep slope.

A review of the site files shows that only a few archaeological investigations have been carried out in the
area, but a large scale survey was conducted for the Coddle Creek Reservoir in 1986 by Archaeological
Research Consultants. They identified several sites within the reservoir basin with two (31CA108 and
31CA109) falling within a mile of the bridge. Both sites are situated along the Coddle Creek floodplain
and consist of a low concentration of prehistoric lithic material. They were determined ineligible for the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Overall, archaeological site density is fairly moderate in
the region, but eligible sites on poorly drained soils or strongly sloping soils do not occur. As a result, it
is unlikely for a significant site to be within the currently defined APE.

Lastly, a historic map review was conducted. Early and accurate historic maps of the project vicinity are
rare. The 1910 soil map of Cabarrus County is the earliest map to depict the project area with any
accuracy (Figure 3). This map shows a road similar to Windy Road with a crossing at or near the current
bridge, but no historic structures are present near the APE. Likewise, the circa 1921 U.S. Postal map
illustrates no additional features (Figure 4). As a result, it seems that no historic archaeological deposits
should be affected by the proposed bridge replacement.

Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:

The defined archaeological APE for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 12 over Emerson Branch
consists of floodplain and side slope. It is unlikely intact and significant archaeological deposits will be
encountered within the APE due to persistent wetness within the floodplain and steep slope on the
hillside. Also, the floodplain to the southwest is likely disturbed from modification to the drainage.
Lastly, the historic maps suggest that no former historic structures and/or features are in the area. As long
as impacts to the subsurface occur within the defined APE, no further archaeological work is
recommended for the replacement of Bridge No. 12 in Cabarrus County. If construction should affect
subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological consultation might be necessary.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other: Images from historic maps

FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED

9/02/14
C. Damon Jones Date
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II
Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 5
14-08-0017

Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Kannapolis (1993), NC, USGS 7.5′ Topographic
Quadrangle.

Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 5
14-08-0017

Figure 2. Aerial photograph of the APE showing development, landforms, and soils within and near the
project area.

Project Tracking No.:

“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 5
14-08-0017

Figure 3. The 1910 Soil Survey Map for Cabarrus County showing the location of the project area.

Figure 4. The circa 1921 U.S. Post Office map showing the location of the project area.
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
C , HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
rr
-4 .r-
. r'< This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Cabarrus
WBS No.:
17BP.10.R.53
Document
Type:
PCE
Fed. Aid No:
N/A
Funding:
4 State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
a Yes ❑ No
Permit
Type(s):
NWP3
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 12 on
SR 1442 (Windy Road) over Emerson Branch.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on August 25, 2014. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS
properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 300' from each end of the bridge and 75' from the
centerline each way. Cabarrus County GIS/Tax information shows that none of the properties within the
APE are under fifty years of age. In addition, Bridge No. 12 is not eligible for National Register listing. If
design plans change, additional review will be required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentified siinircant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project
area:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Cabarrus
County survey, Cabarrus County GIS/Tax Information, and Google Maps are considered valid for the
purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no National Register
listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
t4Map(s) ['Previous Survey Info. ['Photos nCorrespondence (Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
His tpric,Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
g IZ�zol�l
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 2

Rege0 Or
rooCesvi\le Rd
garnet Pd
Cj
V�aar&endr—
lli
Eme ake
441dixOok Fd..
CD
Moog
PS����P9a
Ill
Ara
(3)
444.
cs�
Bosses Farm & Stables ( )
Mooresville Rd l=
t)aVl 'Messmer Stables (_)
$ou hland
Pave rr� tCleaning�"�
eSv \\e Rd ♦
Project Location.
HPO GIS.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 2

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.

SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):

B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:

C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cabarrus City: Kannapolis
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.479° Pick List, Long. -80.729° Pick List.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Emerson Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Coddle Creek Reservoir
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040105, Rocky, North Carolina
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc…) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.

D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 12/12/2013
Field Determination. Date(s): 12/12/2013

SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.

There Appear to be no “navigable waters of the U.S.” within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: .

B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.

There Are “waters of the U.S.” within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]

1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): 1
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands

b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: approximately 400 linear feet: variable 3 to 10 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0 acres.

c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): .

2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: .

1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least “seasonally”
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS

A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.

1. TNW
Identify TNW: .

Summarize rationale supporting determination: .

2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is “adjacent”: .

B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):

This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.

The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are “relatively permanent
waters” (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.

A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.

If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.

1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches

(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
Tributary flows directly into TNW.
Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.

Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .

Identify flow route to TNW5: .
Tributary stream order, if known: .

4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the arid
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: Natural
Artificial (man-made). Explain: .
Manipulated (man-altered). Explain: .

Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.

Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
Silts Sands Concrete
Cobbles Gravel Muck
Bedrock Vegetation. Type/% cover:
Other. Explain: .

Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: .
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: .
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %

(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime: .
Other information on duration and volume: .

Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics: .

Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .

Tributary has (check all that apply):
Bed and banks
OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
clear, natural line impressed on the bank the presence of litter and debris
changes in the character of soil destruction of terrestrial vegetation
shelving the presence of wrack line
vegetation matted down, bent, or absent sediment sorting
leaf litter disturbed or washed away scour
sediment deposition multiple observed or predicted flow events
water staining abrupt change in plant community
other (list):
Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain: .

If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
oil or scum line along shore objects survey to available datum;
fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) physical markings;
physical markings/characteristics vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
tidal gauges
other (list):

(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .

6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody’s flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
7Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): .
Wetland fringe. Characteristics: .
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .

2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW

(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain: .
Wetland quality. Explain: .
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: .

(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain: .

Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics: .

Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings: .
Dye (or other) test performed: .

(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
Directly abutting
Not directly abutting
Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: .
Ecological connection. Explain: .
Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: .

(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.

(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain: .
Identify specific pollutants, if known: .

(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width): .
Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: .
Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings: .
Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: .
Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: .
Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: .

3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:

Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)

Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: .

C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION

A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.

Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
 Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
 Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
 Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
 Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?

Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:

1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D: .

2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D: .

3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: .

D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):

1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.

2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: NCDWR's Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Stream and Their Origins
(Version 4.11) was used to assess Emerson Branch and its unnamed tributary. An evaluation of the existing geomorphology,
hydrology, and biological characteristics determined both of these streams to exhibit perennial flow. .
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow “seasonally” (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .

3. Non-RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .

4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: .

Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow “seasonally.” Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: .

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.

7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from “waters of the U.S.,” or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).

E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain: .
Other factors. Explain: .

8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
Wetlands: acres.

F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in “SWANCC,” the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
“Migratory Bird Rule” (MBR).
Waters do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: .
Other: (explain, if not covered above): .

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: acres.

Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the “Significant Nexus” standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: .
Wetlands: acres.

SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.

A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: .
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: .
Corps navigable waters’ study: .
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: .
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Kannapolis 24K Quadrangle.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: .
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: .
State/Local wetland inventory map(s): .
FEMA/FIRM maps: .
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date):Bing Aerials.
or Other (Name & Date): Field Photographs 12/12/2013 and 10/17/2014.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
Applicable/supporting case law: .
Applicable/supporting scientific literature: .
Other information (please specify): .

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: .