660084_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230320

'j 5 0 Division of Water Resources
Facility lumber ®- ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 rRoutine
fiance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
i
Date of Visit: 3 - ZQ - Arrival Time: p_ Lv Departure Time: County: tl&A y` 1 1`�`� egion: RAG
Farm Name: pf,4 4 i /Dili c50 e.JA Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
2,41 A 4 ��A11t/1%
�d p L-W. keA
Ma -AA
Facility Contact:
ejAP—l' t
Title:
Phone: Ile - ,39 5— l44 e
Onsite Representative:
Integrator: /1//¢1
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
i 4 S
Farrow to Wean
ODD
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
6 0
Boars
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Caoacitv Pon.
Lavers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharaes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes 0--No ❑ NA [] NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
EfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
5No ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
i
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: 46 - 4 Date of Inspection: 3 • Z. Z gr
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [—]No ❑'I 1�A ❑ NE
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
3 L-
Structure 2
r#—a—
Structure 3
4f-3
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ No 6NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
F 12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
O% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes
Y_JrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfali [] Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes 6No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 66 - $ Date of Inspection: _ z-v . y
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes F]XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[] Yes (( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes 12�No
[:]Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
1 z 3
s/� AGt SS /�✓c y CLQz2- f. 3..V_ Lz o- 3, 7 j f� L. L y
` n,
n,
3' z 2- Z a 3
Z - j- L 7- O
2-z'Z3 j 'fir N
C4r��s,fyr-ee Q ^o_d enr, ga✓
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
intpRK 'rf'l 4/9-81D- Z bit
Phone: ?/ 1- 79I - 4�-3"
Date: 3 - 7—ID Z
511212020