510111_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230327

ff I e)
AW5 (0 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
1 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 40 Co pliance Inspection C-) Operation Review C) Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: �7Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: A -3 Owner Email:
i
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Region: kkio
Physical Address: �;?'o 4""dve-11 R1
Facility Contact: 2a
,A,4Atdl� Title: Phone: 1/40— 38 1"/'0'0t7
Onsite Representative: Integrator: y0;1A6r1"1A 64)
Certified Operator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: . Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder 10 0 152,
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I 11-ayer I
I INon-Layer 1
rou
Non -La
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
113eef Stocker
Beef Feeder
113eef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes
Ef-No
C] NA
F] NE
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure El Application Field F-1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Yes
D No
M,N A
0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
Ej Yes
0 No
�j`NA
E] NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
Yes
ON A
[] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
F] Yes
NA
[D NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
0 Yes
rNo
NA
E] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 'rl - /1( 1 FD'ateof Inspection: S - 27 - Z 3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes O-No [:] NA E] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes Ej No �NA [] NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway? -
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes JEr<o [D NA 0 NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed an&or managed through a Yes EJ'No E] NA 0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes 2j'No NA NE
Yes jrNio NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes El"No NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Awlication.
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need 0 Yes 2fNo ONA ONE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes E]-No E]NA ONE
Fj Excessive Ponding Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
F-1 PAN M PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
V 12, Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Yes
F] N [] NA
[—] NE
15. Does the receiving crop andior land application site need improvement?
Yes
r�x 0 NA
0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable
0 Yes
VN o NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes
No NA
NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
0 Yes
No
IZ1<0 NA
E] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes
Fn"*No NA
[:] NE
the appropriate box.
EJWUP OChecklists 0 Design 0 maps E] Lease Agreements 00ther:
2 1, Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E] Yes ONo NA [:] NE
Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers Weather Code
Rainfall M Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
N 0 NA C
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes _—] NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes rNo 0 NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: !�/ - /11 ff �a
I te of Inspection: 3 - 2.1 -
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? E] Yes Ej_`N� NA 0 NE
NA 0 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes 2/No
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? F-1 Yes NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes P�Zo NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [:]Yes CrNo NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [-]Yes 21/No D NA NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the D Yes ID --No [—] NA D NE
pen -nit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
E] Yes
El No 0 NA
0 NE
F� Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond r_1 Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
0 Yes
zr�lv [—] NA
0 NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
E] Yes
20 DNA
ONE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
D Yes
�rNo DNA
ONE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any addifional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
eA'g)p 5 &v 2- 0 q,,
A
ic
Ir 2-
-:r a kv �71
j9 ! 4,. 6
to '�. -I-
AWA)ISI� -
; 7�F
0 4Pi;"7'1e—f
fjzc
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: qj(?-711-�(2_3
Date: 3-z-7- z3
Page 3 of 3
511212020