B-4595 CAMA Application

ROY COOPER
GOVERNOR
January 25, 2023
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
Dear Sir,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
J. ERIC BOYETTE
SECRETARY
Stephen Lane — Division of Coastal Management
Michael Aman, PE — Division 2 Bridge Program Manager
Application for CAMA Major for Bridge 14 over Beard Creek in Pamlico
County, NC
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes the replacement of the
existing bridge over Beard Creek. The proposed project is located at Neuse Road (SR 1005), near
the Town of Arapahoe in Pamlico County, NC (Figure 1). The coordinates of 35.038p,-76.868'
generally correspond to the center of the site. The project is included in the current NCDOT Bridge
Program as 17BP.2.PE.94. Please debit permit fees from Bridge Project Number 17BP.2.PE.94.
Existing Conditions
The project area is predominantly rural and includes large, wooded areas interspersed with
agricultural fields and the wetlands associated with Beards' Creek and Cedar Gut Creek. A
delineation and evaluation of jurisdictional features within the study area was conducted on January
2, 2015, and reverified on June 3, 2021. The evaluation identified three (3) jurisdictional features
including two wetland areas (WA and WB) and one stream, Beard Creek. Beard Creek is a Public
Trust Water and therefore a CAMA AEC and wetland WB is a CAMA wetland.
USACE verified the wetland delineation, and a tear sheet was issued on February 4, 2016. An
updated Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package was sent to USACE on February 28,
2022. Beard Creek is a perennial stream. A NCDEQ-DCM meeting was conducted on March 18,
2022, and normal water lines and 75' AEC lines were established for the area of the project that
crosses Beard Creek.
Proposed improvements
The proposed project includes the replacement of the existing bridge. The existing structure is three
spans, 90-feet in length. It has concrete deck girders. The bridge deck is 26-feet wide and is
currently posted at 26 tons for single axle and 29 tons for semi -trailers. The bridge will be removed
under closure with and offsite detour. Utility relocation is anticipated and plans are included.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 2
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PO BOX 1587
GREENVILLE, NC 27835-1587
Telephone: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location:
1037 W.H. SMITH BLVD
GREENVILLE, NC 27834

The purpose of this letter is to request approval for a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
Major Permit. In addition to this cover letter, the following have been included to assist your
review:
• Appendix A
— Major Permit Forms (as requested by NCDEQ-DCM)
• Appendix B
— Permit Drawings and Wetland Mitigation Acceptance Letter
• Appendix C
— Roadway Plans and Stormwater Managment Plans
• Appendix D
— Utility Drawings
• Appendix E —
Approved Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Appendix F —
Archaeological and Historic Resources Review Forms
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact me via email at
mcamanAncdot.gov or phone at 252-439-2812. Please include the appropriate project number(s)
in all correspondence and comments.
Sincerely,
Michael Aman, PE
Division 2 Bridge Program Manager

DCM MP4
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
North Carolina Department Of Transportation - Division 2
17BP.2.PE.94
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Michael
Aman
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
PO Box 1587
Greenville
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
27835-1587
USA
252 - 439 -
2812 ext.
- -
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
1037 W.H. Smith Boulevard
Greenville
NC
27835-1587- 0000
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Sepi Engineering And Construction
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
Anna
MI
Last Name
Reusche
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
One Glenwood, Suite 600
PO Box
City
Raleigh
State
NC
ZIP
27603
Phone No. 1
919 - 747 -
5865 ext.
Phone No. 2
- - ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Pamlico
GPS Corddinates (35.038,-76.868)
SR 1005
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
Arapahoe
NC
-
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
See attached, I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Neuse
Beard Creek
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Beard Creek
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
4.
Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
400 LF (200 LF on each bank)
226512
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
54 AC, 52 AC, 1.3 AC, 27 AC
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
8.5 ft ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Within the project area, 2.3-acres is classificed as maintained and disturbed. Approximately, 1.9-acres is classified as
blackwater bottomland harwoods and 0.9-acres are made up of brackish marsh. The remaiing areas are esturine woody
wetlands and headwater forest. The Marsh is mainly made up of black needle rush and giant cord grass.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
SR 1005 crosses over Beard Creek. Manmade features include the roadway, bridge and two small boat ramps to the north
side of the project area.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Adjacent land is comprised of both rural residential and forested areas.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by whom? C.Damon Jones, NCDOT
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None in the area.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
County water lines run along SR 1005
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
NA
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑ Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The bridge replacement will carry traffic over Beard Creek
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Equipment typical for road construction and grading will be used to construct the proposed project such as track hoes,
bulldozers, dump trucks, etc.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Replacent of bridge and installation of road side drianage
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? both
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 1.2 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Currently all discharge drains off the road and into the existing wetlands. There is a roadside ditch on the northeast side of
SR 1005. On the east side of the bridge, roadside ditches and riprap are proposed. The west side will be stablized at toe of
slope with riprap and culverts and drop inlet put in to drain the runoff from the bridge.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. AdditionalInformation
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See Attached List Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
US Coast Guard Permit Issued 04/07/2022
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land I
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date 1/25/2023
Signature
Print Name �Anna�Reus
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.necoastalmanagernenc.nei

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
Length
Width
Avg. Existing
NA
NA
Depth
Final Project
NA
NA
Depth
1. EXCAVATION ®This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
C. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ®This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
C. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL [-]None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, where?
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised:12/26/06

Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 3)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ❑This section not applicable
(if development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: West bank 53' East bank 63'
[]Bulkhead SRiprap ❑Breakwater/Sill []Other: _ Width: Weast bank 20' East bank 28'
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 23 FT d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 27 FT
e. Type of stabilization material:
Class 2 Rip Rap - Granite Material
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill _ Riprap 2,463 SF
BreakwaterlSill _ Other _
I. Source of fill material.
TBD by NCDOT Contractor
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
Rip rap (size TBD by NCDOT corrector)
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ❑This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes El No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water 15 CY other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 9'x9' SCW 1947 SF❑SAV _ ❑SB
(iv) Purpose of fill ❑VyL _ ❑None
Stabilization for approach ditch (rip rap at embankment) (ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
Fill for roadway const. - widened lanes and paved shoulders
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Materials will be kept in uplands and surrounded by silt fences excavators, asphalt pavers, rollers, motor grader etc.
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project? d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
❑Yes SNo ❑NA site? []Yes SNo []NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented. (it) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
1/25/2023
NCDOT
Date
Applicant Name
Bndge 14 over Beard Creek
rC
eAl— e r
Project Name
Applicant Signature
"L52-Y,08 ?E•Qt� :: t-[i86-41dCC3f:51 :: va wve.nccoasfaim znaae rreut.net revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 3 of 3)
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.necoastaimanagement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP-5
BRIDGES and CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. BRIDGES ❑This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: b. Water body to be crossed by bridge:
❑Commercial ®Public/Government ❑Private/Community Beard Creek
c. Type of bridge (construction material):
Concrete - Cored Slab
e. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 90'
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 24'
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 4_9'
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) yes; turntable remnant to remain in place
g. Length of proposed bridge: 130'
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at NLW or NWL:
7.84'
f. (i) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
h. Width of proposed bridge: 36'
i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ❑Yes ®No j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
If yes, explain: increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
k• Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: yes
I. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands: +/- 5'
waters? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
2. CULVERTS ®This section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed:
b. Water body in which the culvert is to be placed:
< Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
revised: 10/26/06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
c. Type of culvert (construction material):
d. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
❑Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge:
(iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert:
e. (i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
[-]Yes [-]No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii) Width of existing culvert(s):
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
g. Width of proposed culvert:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHW or NWL. i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
j. Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ❑Yes ❑No
If yes, explain:
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
If yes, explain:
[-]Yes ❑No
3. EXCAVATION and FILL ❑This section not applicable
a. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation below the NHW or NWL? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated:
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards:
C. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high -ground excavation? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: West bank 49' east
bank 50'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: West bank 25' east
bank 23'
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: +/- 2'
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 500
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised:10/26/06

Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of 4)
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following:
(i) Location of the spoil disposal area: All spoil will be hauled offsite.
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area:
(iii) Do you claim title to the disposal area? ❑Yes ®No (If no, attach a lettergranting permission from the owner.)
(iv) Will the disposal area be available for future maintenance? ❑Yes ®No
(v) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs), other wetlands (WL), or shell
bottom (SIB)?
❑CW ❑SAV OWL ❑SB ®None
If any boxes are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ®Yes ❑No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 205'
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 35'
(iv) Purpose of fill: Roadway embankment at 1.5:1 behind
guardrail
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high -ground? ❑Yes ®No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 875 ft
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 45 ft
(iv) Purpose of fill: raise roadway grade and widen
road/shoulder
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing b
utility lines? ®Yes ❑No
If yes, explain: 6" and 8" water line, power
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
(i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
ECW 1947 SF/0.05 AC ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
increased front slope impact due to raised roadway
grade and widening for extended paved shoulder
Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary
detour structures? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
< Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised:10/26/06

Forn2 DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2.
e. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
excavators, asphalt pavers, rollers, motor grader etcent
g. Wiil the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes [:]No
If yes, complete form MP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilizah'on only.
1 /2512023
Date
Bridge 14 over Beard Creek 17BP.2.PE.94
Project Name
NCDOT
Applicant Name
COIL
Applicant Signature
d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
controlled?
site erosion control plan provides perimeter measures
f. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site?
[]Yes ®No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
252&0a-2F,6& :: S-EdE-r. FC:Oo'<�l' :: v✓ww.ncco«stzlmauacEmert.ncti revised: 'i C:1kG/U6

Lengyel Mitigation Site
ONEID 025-001
The Lengyel Site is in Craven County within the USGS hydrologic unit 03020204 of the Neuse
River. NCDOT acquired the 11.9 acre brackish marsh site to mitigate for unavoidable,
jurisdictional impacts associated with TIP B-2531. Monitoring requirements were performed from
1999 to 2003 and the site was closed out in 2004. Table I shows the final mitigation quantities
approved for the site. The site has been placed on the NCDOT On -site Debit Ledger for use within
HUC 03020204. Table 2 indicates all mitigation debits that have occurred per regulatory agency
approval.
In order to offset 0.16 acres of unavoidable brackish marsh impacts associated with Bridge 14
over Beard Creek in Pamlico County (17BP.2.PE.94)), the Lengyel Mitigation Site will be
debited 0.32 acres of brackish marsh mitigation. The following debit is highlighted below.
Table 1. Mitigation Quantities Approved
HUC I Mitigation Type 11 Starting Amount I Additional Notes
3020204 1 Brackish Marsh Restoration 1 7.2
3020204 (Brackish Marsh Preservation 1 4.7
Do not debit.
Table 2. Mitigation Debits — Brackish Marsh Restoration
Mitigation Type
Debit
tatu
ite TIP
Action ID# I
Notes
Brackish Marsh Restoration
1.56
Close Out
B-2531
199401568
0.78@2:1 ratio
Debited in
03020202
Brackish Marsh Restoration
1.08 Close Out B-2531 Mod
1994-01568
0.46 acres of these
impacts were
charged to Sawmill
Debited in
03020202
Brackish Marsh Restoration
0.18 Close Out B-4598
Impacts were 0.09
@ 2:1 ratio
Debited in
03020202
Brackish Marsh Restoration
0.11 Close Out B-4593
Debited in
J
Brackish Marsh Restoration
0.07 Close Out BP2.R020.1
03020204
3049.2 scl ft of
impacts at 1:1 ratio
0.07 acres of
mitigation
Brackish Marsh Restoration
0.32
Close Out
I Bridge 14
0.16 impacts at 2:1

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
oay ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
PRESENT FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project.
`.` It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult Qj
separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Bridge 14; B-4595 County: Pamlico
WBS No: 17BP.2.PE.94 Document: Federal CE
F.A. No: na Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USACE & USCG
Project Description:
The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 14 on SR 1005 (Meuse Road) over Beard Creek in
Pamlico County. This project is a resubmittal as the APE has expanded. The revised archaeological Area
of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined as a 1,400 foot (426.72 m) long corridor running 750
feet (228.60 m) east and 650 feet (198.12 m) west along Neuse Road from the center of Bridge No. 14. The
corridor is approximately 200 feet (60.96 m) wide extending 100 feet (30.48 m) on either side of the road
from its present center. In all, the new APE encompasses approximately 6.5 acres.
Initially, a `No National Register of Historic Places Eligible or Listed Archaeological Sites Present or
Affected " form was submitted on March 26, 2015. Since the project as expanded, this form PA form is no
longer valid.
This project is currently state funded; however, federal permits are anticipated, and federal funds may be
used during the future. Therefore, this archaeological review was conductedpursuant to Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance (36 CFR Part 800).
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Team has reviewed
the subject project and determined:
® There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area
of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed.)
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project.
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
® Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
® All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
1 of to

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
NCDOT has conducted an archaeological reconnaissance and field investigation for the proposed replacement
of Bridge No. 14 on Neuse Road over Beard Creek in Pamlico County, North Carolina. The Bridge 14
replacement project is located west of Arapahoe and is plotted in the southwest corner of the Arapahoe USGS
7.5' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1).
Background Research
A site files search was initially conducted at the Office State Archaeology (OSA) on February 19, 2015; while
an updated review was carried out using data from OSA on July 23, 2021 (HPOWEB 2021). Within a mile
of the APE, no known archaeological sites are reported. The site files suggest that the bridge might have
been previously reviewed by OSA, but no Environmental Review (ER) number associated with the project
could be found. Overall, very few archaeological investigations have been conducted in the area. More work
is needed in the region to better understand site placement in this portion of the county before prediction
models can be applied.
According to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online data base (HPOWEB 2021), there
are no known significant historic architectural resources within the APE that may yield intact archaeological
deposits.
An examination of historic maps concerning this project failed to find any significant features within APE.
Most early maps provide only general details concerning the region illustrating just major roads, settlements,
and drainages. The MacRae and Tanner's New Map of the State of North Carolina from 1833 is typical of
maps from 18th and 19th centuries (Figure 2) (Brazier et al. 1833). This particular map depicts a road in the
vicinity of Neuse Road, but the exact route is not clear. In addition, no structures are shown. By the early
20th century, maps in which the project area can be accurately determined are more common. The 1934 Soil
Survey map for the county illustrates a road with a similar layout as Neuse Road with a crossing over Beard
Creek at or near the current bridge location (Figure 3) (Hearn et al. 1934). The field investigations identified
an old road trace in the southwestern quadrant and the partial remains of wooden piers to the south of the
bridge. These features likely date to the early 20th century as seen on the map but are not considered
significant. The 1934 map also plots a structure to the northeast, which is very likely the Alex Brinson House
(PM 255). The three other structures depicted to further to the east are probably the Reel House, their Store,
and an associated building (PM 256). At least two of three Reel's structures are still standing but outside of
the APE in the forest with third collapsed. All of the following structures appear on HPOWEB's data base
as surveyed only and are well away from the project limits. They will not be impacted.
The USDA soil survey map indicates that three soil types make up the APE (Figure 4). Hobucken muck
(HN) composes the marsh. The series is nearly level, very poorly drained, and inundated with water. It is
unlikely to yield any significant cultural resources associated with early settlement activities due to being
persistently wet. The low stream terrace to the east consists of Fork loamy fine sand (Fo). This series is
nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. Generally, significant sites are not found on this series due to
wetness, but the nearby Alex Brinson House is located on this soil type. This suggests other previous
settlement activities might have taken place in the vicinity as the soil could be better drained than reported.
The western terrace and the far eastern high stream terrace are made up of Norfolk loamy fine sand (NoB).
This is a well drained series with a slope of 2 to 6 percent. This series is well suited for early occupations
and as a result was recommended for testing. It also covers a larger area that what is depicted on the soil map
to the east and far lesser area to the west according to field observations.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
2of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
Fieldwork Results
Bridge No. 14 and Neuse Road cross Beard Creek east to west. The creek drains to the south and is part of
the Neuse drainage basin. The APE consists primarily of a marsh with stream terraces at either end (see
Figure 4). To the east of Beard Creek, the low stream terrace is flat with an open lawn and cultivated field
north of Neuse Road and a forest to the south (Figures 5 and 6). Soil erosion is strong especially in the field.
One to two feet of soil has been removed as compared to the high stream terrace in the neighboring forested
property. To the west, only a small section of the stream terrace resides within the APE. It is found mostly
south of the road, while the marsh/wetland covers a greater portion of the APE especially to the north (Figures
5 and 6). Other ground disturbance comes from buried utilities (gas and phone) along the north side of Neuse
Road. The road is also elevated on an earthen embankment as it passes through the marsh.
The archaeological field reconnaissance and survey for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 14 was
initially conducted in 2015. Subsequently, a new testing was carried out on July 27, 2021, to cover the
expanded APE. The investigations included a visual inspection of the surface and the excavation of five total
shovel tests (STs) (see Figure 4). STs #1 and 2 were excavated during the first survey in 2015, while #3-5
were dug in 2021. All STs were placed on either the low or high stream terraces with none located in the
marsh/wetland, which was poorly drained or contained standing water. STs were dug 60-m (ca. 197 ft) apart
in the northeast and southeast quadrant to test both the high and low stream terraces and to avoid wet soils.
Only one ST (#5) was excavated in the southwest quadrant along the terrace, while no STs were placed in the
northwest since it was low lying and part of the wetland. A surface inspection was also carried out in the
northeast quadrant within the cultivated field. Although surface visibility was near 100 percent in this area,
no artifact scatters or remains of former structures or features were revealed.
Subsurface testing identified at least three soil layers in the lower stream terrace to the east at STs #1 and 2.
The upper layer is a very dark grayish brown (I OYR 3/2) loamy sand approximately 10 cm (ca. 4 in) thick.
This is followed by a layer of grayish brown (10YR 5/2) sand, which reaches 35 cm (ca. 14 in) below the
surface. Lastly, a stratum of pale brown (10YR 6/3) sand extends to at least 50 cm (ca. 20 in) below the
surface. These soils are very moist and increased in wetness with depth. Since the soils were poorly drained
and unlikely to yield any significant deposits, no additional STPs were determined necessary on the low
stream terrace. ST #3 on the high terrace to the east contains at least 50 cm (ca. 20in) of disturbance overlying
a yellowish brown (I OYR 5/6) clay subsoil, while ST #4 is composed of three soil layers. The surface is a
20 cm (ca. 8 in) thick brown (I OYR 4/3) sand. This is followed by a yellowish brown (I OYR 5/4) sand
extending to 60 cm (ca. 24 in) below the surface. Lastly, a grayish brown (1 OYR 5/2) sand is present, which
reaches a depth of at least 75 cm (ca. 30 in) below the surface. ST #5 on the western terrace also consists of
three layers. The upper is a dark brown (1 OYR 3/3) sandy that is 20 cm (ca. 8 in) thick. Beneath this is a thin
layer of brown (1 OYR 4/3) sand that is 10 cm (ca. 4 in) thick. Subsoil is a yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/3) sandy
clay at approximately 30 cm (ca. 12 in) below the surface. No cultural material was identified.
Recommendations
The archaeological investigations for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 14 show that no significant
archaeological sites are within the APE. Soils are mostly poorly drained or in marsh, which is not suitable
for early settlement activities. The limited dry area produced no positive results for cultural material. In
addition, all historic structures are outside of the archaeological APE, and any associated deposits should not
be encountered. As a result, no further archaeological work is required for replacement of Bridge No. 14 in
Pamlico County. However, additional work might be required should design plans change to encompass
property outside of the currently defined APE.
This project falls within a North Carolina County in which the Catawba Indian Nation have expressed an
interest. We recommend that you ensure that this documentation is forwarded to these tribes using the process
described in the current NCDOT Tribal Protocol and PA Procedures Manual.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
3of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos
Other: historic map images
Signed:
G.
C. Damon Jones
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
❑ Correspondence
8/11/21
Date
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
4of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
REFERENCES CITED
Brazier, Robert, John MacRae, E.B. Dawson, J. Knight, and Henry Tanner
1833 A New Map of the State of North Carolina. Fayetteville, North Carolina. On file at
North Carolina Collections, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Hearn, W. Edward, John Miller, and Arthur Taylor
1934 Soil Survey Map for Pamlico County, North Carolina. United States Bureau of Soils.
North Carolina Department of Agriculture. United States Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C.
2021 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office GIS Web Service.
htWs://nc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=79ea671 ebdcc45639fO860257d5f
5ed7. Accessed July 23, 2021.
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Services (USDA NRCS)
2021 Pamlico County Soil Survey. Available online at
http://webosilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/. Accessed July 23, 2021.
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
2016 Arapahoe, North Carolina 7.5 minute quadrangle map.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
5of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Arapahoe (2016) NC USGS 7.5' Topographic
Quadrangle.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
6of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
�� fit. •4. ti
Project Area
-",--.&'
NNz
Figure 2. The 1833 New Map of the State of North Carolina by MacRae and Tanner showing the
approximate location of the project area.
Sw
N4-
Project Area//
40
Ns
4
L d
00 .
S
"'a" 1�
_d
7A _ V-
Le
Figure 3. The 1934 Soil Survey map for Pamlico County showing the location of the project area.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
7of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
Figure 4. Aerial photograph of the APE showing development, landforms, soils, and STs within
and near the project area.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
8of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
Figure 5. General view of the project area showing lawn and field in the northeast quadrant looking east.
Figure 6. General view of the project area showing the forest in the southeast quadrant looking east.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
9of10

Project Tracking No.
15-02-0033 Revised
Figure 7. General view of the project area showing the marsh in the southwest quadrant looking
west.
Figure 8. General view of the project area showing the marsh in the northwest quadrant looking west.
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT" FORM
10 of 10

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
15-02-0033
Revised
G�►t+� HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
., NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
1 ,a
This form supercedes that dated 1 October 2015
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
(formerly B-4595)
County:
Pamlico
WBSNo.:
17BP.2.PE.94 (formerly
Document
Federal CE
38425.1.2)
Type:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
X State Federal
Federal
X Yes ❑ No
Permit
USACE, USCG
Permit(s):
Type(s):
Project Description: Replace Bridge Number 14 on SR 1005 (Neuse Road) over Beard
Creek (off -site detour planned, no improvements anticipated). New study area, July
2021.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
❑ There are no National Register -listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of
potential effects.
❑ There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
X There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
DESCRIPTION OF REVIEWACTIVITIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 10 March
2015 and 4 August 2021 and yielded three SS and no NR, SL, DE, or LD properties in the Area
of Potential Effects (APE). Pamlico County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax
information identified a mostly wooded APE with some cultivated fields and cleared residential
parcels (viewed 10 March 2015 and 4 August 2021). The APE equates with the 2021 study
area to encompass construction activities as currently defined (see attached).
Resources within the APE to the west of the existing bridge date from the late 1950s to the
2000s and all are unexceptional examples of their types; one received a survey site number for
the 2015 investigation of the project area. Pamlico County GIS identifies the Barrington/Brinson
Cemetery on the large parcel NW of the existing bridge; the cemetery is located well outside
the APE and beyond likely project impact. The previously surveyed Alex Brinson House
(PM0255) stands on a large parcel intersected by the APE, approximately 200 feet east of the
existing bridge and 150 north of SR 1005 (Neuse Road). To the east of the Brinson House and
also intersected by the APE is a parcel containing the Reel House and Store (PM0256), identified
by the 2015 study and eliminated from further consideration; the buildings no longer stand.
Constructed in 1964, Bridge No. 14 is not included in the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey and is
not eligible for the National Register as it is not representative of any distinctive engineering or
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 8

aesthetic type. The comprehensive architectural survey of Pamlico County (1979) and later
investigations recorded the resources already mentioned (Angela Barnett, Pamlico county imagery —An
Architectural Survey ([Bayboro]: The Pamlico County Historical Association, 1980), p.108). There are no NR-listed
properties along the proposed off -site detour route (see attached).
Given their close proximity and the possibility of historically related resources, NCDOT
addressed the Bridge No. 14 and the Bridge No. 28 project (originally B-4596, now BP2.R.002.1,
PA Tracking No. 15-02-0031) in a combined study. NCDOT identified multiple resources as
warranting additional investigation and NR-eligibility evaluation and contracted with Coastal
Carolina Research to carry out the necessary work. The resultant technical report (August 2015)
assessed the Alex Brinson House (PM0255), and near Bridge No. 28 the George R. Brinson
House (PM0258), and the Levin Paul House (PM0259) (see attached). The study concluded
that the resources are not NR-eligible as they have suffered loss of historical integrity through
structural change and attrition of outbuildings and also are surpassed in significance by more
intact examples of comparable nineteenth -and early -twentieth-century dwelling houses and
farmsteads located elsewhere in the county. The study also considered the possibility of a
Beard's Creek Landing Historic District, but found that its former cohesiveness and integrity are
greatly diminished through loss and alteration of many component resources, especially
commercial buildings. The remaining elements of the former community do not constitute a
historic district that meets National Register criteria. HPO has reviewed the study and agreed
with the conclusions (see attached correspondence). The 2015 findings remain valid.
No additional resources of concern are located in the APE, so a finding of "no historic properties
present or affected" will satisfy both Section 106 and GS 121-12(a) compliance requirements.
Should any aspect of the project design change, please notify
NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessary.
Technical report, photographs, GIS data on file
at NCDOT Historic Architecture and NCHPO; see also https://connect.ncdot.gov.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos X Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OF AFFECTED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Bridge Number 14
17BP.2.PE.94
PA Tracking No. 15-02-0033
5 August 2021
Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 8

A-- Z
00
o r-q r-4
v CDG
N n CDZ
�m
an
yd a
z CO
CD
1�t mt
cn
a Z
r� w
m
�L
Co
A
u
0
E
a
yT�
V N
C
O
C
C 0.
E
a
0- q}
/a
�y m
N
M
G
L
a
a
ba
co
W
r r
o �
� 2
z �
C
F-
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 3 of 8

Historic Arccture andLandscapesN HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AF7c D»af Minor Transportation Projects
zQualified mthe zzProgrammatic Agreement.
Page 4 of 8

" -tS- -00.3.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 5 of 8

rR
00
N
73
c
r�
L
CU
E
No
m
H
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 6 of 8

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
Siate Hismuc Presen-aticm Office
�•txzt�
G4Sie ai Amhe cL and His=
Seaearr 3Lu FaLMtz D,!7 : 5ecmb Kris C�3GaS
September 28, 2015
XfEMOR ANDUlf
TO: Vanessa Patrick-
Hurnar Environment T lflit
C Department of Transportation
FRO -XL- Renee Gledhill -Earley YI-'-r-
En�mt3„meatal Review Coordinator
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridges 14 and 28 on SR 1005 (Neuse R.oadl over Beard Creek and Cedar Gut,
B-4595 and B-4596, Pamlico County, ER 15-2012
Thank sou for your August 24, 2015 subrstission of the Hktoric Architectural Resources Evaluation Report,
prepared by Coastal Carolina Research for the above zeferenced project )N.'e have review ed the submittal and
offer the faIlowing comments.
The report includes sufficient infounafion to evaluate the historic architectural properties located within the
APE. We concur with the e4,aluation and eligibility detem-m motions outlined in the report as follous_
Tt►e Alex Brinson House (P-NED255), the George R. Brinson House (PW258), the Levin Paul House
(FM 0259) are not eligible for listing in the National Resister of Historic Places due to the loss of lntept�
and the level of significance_
Tluee additional resources were e�,,aluated as part of a potential historic district the Beard's Creak Landing
Historic Ddstrictl - the Benjamin Benson House (PM0254), the Reel House and Stare (PM0256), and
the Joe Brinson House (EM 0257)_ Six other buildings were also docurnented as part of the evaluation of
the potential historic district Saved on the information obtained during the evalmtio 4 none of these
resources are indisiduaW eEgtb&e for listing in the Nationai Register of Histoac Places and there is no
potential foi an eligible historic distract.
Toe above conixx is are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation A zt and the
A&isory Councii on Historic Pfeset7ation's Regulations far Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR part
800_
Thank you for YaLu oaoperaton and comaderatiori_ If you have am questions oo-noeuvag the above cr nment-
please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environtnetal re6--w coordinator at 919 f 807-65%9_
oc_ -Warr Pope, Furr, NCDOT, cder- y
Lo 2&m ±C9 Past; cues S- e t Ral5ZhLZ.Z-.M1 kbOlaE,3mot-;+ , s� R NC.2-W946t- Tdepbmx/Fa (919) W745+0iAT'-&-B9
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 7 of 8

STATE of FORTH CARouNA
DEPARTMENT" OF TRANSPORTATION
1501bLxILa1LVW£ _e'rrcee Rnicv:u N-C-27699-150]
PAT NIDa0KY NICHOLAS I TENN SON
G6VF.RMM SEc[ETw4V
Memorandum S
To: Renee Iedhifl-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
From: Vanessa E- Patrick
Ar0itectural Historian
NCDOT — Historic Architecture
Date: October 1, 2015
Subject: Nrstonc Architecfural Resources Eigrbiiify EvaivaOon Report,
PA Nos- 15-0 -0031 (B-4596) and 15-0 -0033 (8-4595).
Repfaoerneat of Bridge Nos. 28 and 14 on SR 1005 (fVeuse Road)
over Beard Creek and Cedar Out, Parrrffco County, EP 15- 01
Thank you for your recent comments on the above report- We are pleased you
concur vdth the National Register of Historic Places eligibility recommendations
for the resources evaluated.
No additional properties of concern are located in the project Areas of Potential
Effects, and I sham prepare the appropriate paperwork to conclude compliance
review under the provisions of the PA far Minor Transportation Projects -
As always, your Delp is greatly appreciated- Should questions arise: please
contact me at vepetridgZC nWot-gov or 919-707-6082.
Vanessa E- Patrick
FHCFM913t--?1 -2g0D FA X PM-733-915D
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects
as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 8 of 8

Highway
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
\,
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
\°=�
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021)
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.2.R.94
TIP/Prof No: SF-680014 Count ies : Pamlico Page 1
of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element:
17BP.2.R.94 ITIP Number: SF-680014 Project Type: 113ridge Replacement Date:
12/9/2021
NCDOT Contact:
Michael Aman, PE
Contractor / Desi ner:
SEPI, Inc.
Address:
1037 W.H. Smith Blvd
Address:
1 Glenwood Avenue
PO Box 1587
Suite 600
Greenville, NC 27834
Ralei h, NC 27603
Phone:
252 439 2812
Phone:
919 747 5864
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
City/Town:
Grantsboro
Count ies :
Pamlico
River Basins :
Neuse
I CAMA County?
Yes
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Yes
Project Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
0.17 F Surrounding Land Use: Rural residential
Proposed Project
Existing Site
mol—
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
0.7 1 ac.
0.5 1 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
Proposed 2-lane, 2-way section of SR-1005 (-L-) is normal crown, symmetrical widening to
Existing section is 2-lane, 2-way with 10-ft travel lanes and no shoulder
12-ft travel lanes with 4-ft paved shoulders on each side. Paved shoulders widen to 6-ft for
guardrail sections approaching the bridge
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 1600 1 Year: 2040
I Existing: 915 Year:
2022
General Project Narrative:
SF-680014 project proposes the replcement of Bridge 14 on SR-1005 (Neuse Rd.) as well as improvements to Neuse Rd. as it approaches the bridge.The bridge replacement will
(Description of Minimization of Water
require surface water impacts to Beard Creek for the proposed interior bridge bents as well as rip rap bank stabilization. Wetlands are located on both sides of the alignment
on the
Quality Impacts)
west side of Beard Creek. To reduce impacts to the wetlands, fill slopes are proposed at 2:1. Since rock plating is provided on the slopes, no additional toe protection is provided.
Both storm drain outlets are located outside of Buffer Zone 2.

I lighway North Carolina Department of Transportation
Stormwater
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ---
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.2.R.94 TIP/Prof No.: SF-680014 County(ies): Pamlico Page 2 of 2
General Project Information
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body 1 : Beard Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
27-111
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class SC
Supplemental Classification:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Swamp Waters Sw
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species?
No 7 Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
WB
Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
iYes
I Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
IN2
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) I
Surface Water Body (2): 1
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species?
Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) I
Surface Water Body 3 : 1
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species?
Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) I

0
cli
91
01
n1
3, >
no
z+
nw
H
U
O
I0 i
v
0
U
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
DETOUR ROUTE
STATE OF NORTH CAROL INA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO. COUNTY
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 9
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.14 ON SR 1005 (NEUSE ROAD) OVER BEARD CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
ONNELS101
BEACH ROAD)
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2022 = 915
ADT 2040 = 1,600
K = %
D = %
T = 6% *
V = 60 MPH
* TTST = DUAL =
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR COLLECTOR
"SUB —REGIONAL TIER"
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94 = 0.141 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94 = 0.025 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94 = 0.166 MILES
Prepared In tip Office 0f:
?= 1 Glenwood Avenue
re Raleigh, NC 27803
Tel:[phone]
FR 919.789.9591
License: C-2197
En m n aconBw�llon, ioo.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RAJIT RAMKUMAR, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
JUNE 21, 2022
DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
LETTING DATE:
MICHAEL AMAN, PE
SEPTEMBER 28, 2022
NCDOT CONTACT
STATR
BTATE PRORiCL RBPERENCE NO.
BNOET
N.C.
176P.2.R.94
TR PROl. NO.
.A.PROI.NO.
DeBCRIPI'fON
17BP.2.PE.94
WA
PE
17BP.2.PE.94
WA
WW & UTILITIES
1713P.2.11.94
WA
CONST.
TO NC 306
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R> W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

'Ti,
WOODED
E
\ � J
IS' PERETAN
—_—_vFo--
11 NN S �El4 .
*OAb '
/STAGINGS R`I
♦. ICI IF
EXISTING R1*TAJIL
T o j; DPIE
®
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
®
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
®DENOTES
IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES
TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
RIP RAP AT
NKMENT
CLA 'I' RIP
NI E TYPE
TERIAL w
SEE D AIL 5 ¢
NHW
REM EXISTIN b
y� BRIDG .
AA T� iNM SOURFR E T R TEMPORA Y PA
IN SURF CE A
CHr4NIZ TRIINNG�
9' WOODED \
(Q�Ty RAP �\\
RiiNITE TY IAy \ fir,+
PUE -
LA S 'II'RIP �9, G TE�RIDI*E H CONC SAT EC
i R,SP
vpGRANITE EEM�:T ARtA;
Y` WOODED STYITF � �
� C�OAST4 WETLAND
�G ME?A�MZEW CL&RING y�F
O BUFF INEUSE
ROZONE 1 /
NHW
DETAIL 1
ROCK PLATING
(Nof ro Smle)
5 Ft
'6'l aau ry
+ 0 FROM STA. 273 TO STA. 22+75 -L- LT /
Fp Te 7T re o0+75 -L- RT
NHW
PROJECT REFERENCE IN
SHEET NO.
PERMIT
D RAW I N G
'
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Te1919.789,9977
Fax [phone]
/7BP2 PE 94
4
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
SHEET
2 OF 9
License: F-04530453
A Division of TranSystems
50 25 0 50 100 1N�®1ED LE E LAN3
DO NOT USE POR /W ACQUISITION
DETAIL 5
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
I Norro xnle)
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
Diroh-�*�
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
01
Grade
Type of Liner= 2..s I I RIr2Rpp wGronire Type Mo 6.1 Q
Esf. 20 tons Gaotexfile= 2J SY
FROM STA. 23+85 TO STA. 24+10 -L- LT Q
Z
WOODED
x..
VV El
IIL�II O
30' NEUSE
BUFFER ZONE 1
1
•
c�
� / /
4,j
/ /
/
WOO ED
.�j
{� \y
UI� I TUE
— TUEI r— TUE
E N m
DUE —DUE DUE-
-
—11 C C
--c—
I
DETAIL 2
SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
I Nof fo Scnlel
Nprprpl from
Groun 3.) D d `orol Difrh
Slop
Geofexfile B
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
Max. d= 1.0 k.
Type of Liner= CI ss'B' Rip -Rap B- 2.0 Ft.
cants crn 7a,nn T cre -Inn, _I_ IT
OM STA. 24+15 TO STA. 25+00 —L— RT
1005
E—E— E —CWOODED
O
WOODED
DETAIL 3 DETAIL 4
SPECIAL CUT 'V' DITCH SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
I Norro -1.)1Nof to Sc.IN
N°fur°I of Fronf
Ground 3' sl
Nafuml 1°g Franf �)
Ground J;) D � O� � DioP D P°�ef Slope
Min. D=1.0 F.
B=2.0 F.
Min. D= 1.0 Fr.
FROM STA. 25+00 TO STA. 28+50 -L- LT
FROM STA. 25+00 TO STA 28+00 -L- RT
El
®RUINS
WOODED
SEE SHEET 5 FOR —L— PROFILE
SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-26 FOR STRUCTURE PLANS

E
V ry _i 1J' f\� -� y �" f J I l I r i s r PROJECT REFERENCE NO- SHEET NO.
9 �� 2�� ] �✓ 1 / 1 ( IIr�/®� // / / �! / J r I \ - 1 Glenwood Avenue
> '1 /y/� 3 7 ( �- C N\( I \ / /�3L j� C0� `� �, \ 9 DENOTES FILL IN e
a y 1` e 1, ) �/-��� ^/ �WETLAND P E I I T D I VlW I N G Raleigh, NC 27603 �7BP2.PE94 4
�`-i l� ) r�r' 0 > Jam, ��r / I 7 1' \ - ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
`8' ` (, ti 2 v7� 1 ✓ V J J c2l v -�,- D t `"! ' I Tel ENGINEER ENGINEER
a3�J� a �� a SHEET 3 OF 9 — License F-0453 f
DENOTES
NIZED
V g `A' a y p �� \ ` Ir y%J / / r S j `���\•G+ ^ ✓% 'l ` A Division of TranSystems
® DENOTES HAND 550 255 0 550 100 II l f a e a LZ �� �1` 2 �— ` J J dN�® 1EDLE E PLANS
11 I �CLEARING /�v �T" f 7 t DO NOT USE Pon /w ACQUISITION
a , DENOTES IMPACTS IN 1 V Ir C
2 T t~\\ 3 \\1 �^�� (� /� I\ll`'Lg✓ tti.� e ��y,"t'�- __ 2 1(\/ SURFACE WATER r l
�\ / �L��/ %�4��t �� �� \\�J rL J 1 \ ,.�✓ 1/(/' / / /,JL`�\d"':�J� L' t j� �D 3 �Lti� ` ( l® MPADENOTES
CTS IN
MPO "A SURFACE WATER (�S( RY
ti `f ��x RIP RAPDATTEMBANKMENT
\ ~ \O l \ / / / l 0\ V 1 i ti� �/ Z �� `'/ ' ;R J l G i S�� l/i �J 1 �.J •/_�I "`) 0 / \ \ 1 Not ro kalel ) •/ 10
��L
' a s / /v r<°y,� ) ) n DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
.� T j,\ �\ ��-�U •�' �� \� �` 'r/� �0 �J �3� y �iJ C c \ ade I.o'm�n. 1.zs• 4f UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GEOTMLE
f b •L �` J / \ J\ ��a l / T l V r/ ' �`Z� G\ 3 2 �1 l/( /a, J (� "3 C `�ro Hn `i t �' /��` \/ ////r' f'� �� t1 1> ` ..i�/ �IQ� `-�` 3 /4` ��/ \ l�
JType of Liner= Class I Rii� 7t'SY nits TY Moteriol I \ •.'� �� - `s/� �-
3 nit ,,-J) s N ism, / f Esf 20 tons Geo'5 z7 sy
/ CJ "-LL �- \ I / �-,- FR M STA. 2 S 0 L- L
a s (` J7a \ < / \ I / \Z'` -��� C/ nL1. ✓� L l �"� vrd ` ; J a 'lr� w ~ .._ ✓J �\ 1
�� l ` .! 9 \ .r= f ,� -�. �" 'J ��^._`•i� _..- �\ �' �\ .s
)(��c ��'� ���1� \ \ l Y , I 41 %' 1i1--I�-( e` .J`� %`� �r �` `-�", �1 `�¢p J���• N � �.- � `v a � e�\ � s �,s�t.- /' -'�� 6 � rc
j~��:
a ,� �.- \ I i / / L I I �- ,r �fr �.-• l N� '� a . ti \� _j ') L t'� /-•5.T
OR
q I J WO ED ;5�
-`, 15
65 �j4 Hiq 61,1���
K C
�` �}��e \ z, te✓ �9 r r� s "7
4 \fir/PJNE 1
1,3
RIP RAP AT Oiw/� '� • I •� l I r a I,
NKMENT �\ 1 `� .r I� "r�C.•� ) ! I �`
TYPE 16� w
✓ \\ \��� ��-%%% Z / L cY a — �� D Ate—_��
�HW�� ' I /
=EMPORARY I CBRIb-
TS 1 I / / / \ S
3�-- �' f SURF TER TEMPORARY PACT (f I)W00
HTR ) / \ i A \ TL�Lr1D U I 1il�J\�tFACE ATER'\I l
5 I1IOCK TRNG i' `t-I WOODED \\1\\`\ \ /\\, 1 _ \y� I J / I . S '.
\ 1 s. � GIN 0 E s .'I�' P RAP ��\ :V � 1 /-- / V� I TUE TUE WOODED / kUINS
/' _ \ \ \ I I ti�CNif€TY MnaFgI& fin IIII' m - —TUE �— /
E N . dDU��+�—DUE�DUE +—$� p
( .H - HIS I
/ a
C
T � E p rQ-
Ea— Iry F
- - - - _ -
SR 1005 (NEUSE RD) 2'-257- - TB2GL — -
T E `(� NC Riw
L % \
�G� p VTE�RID*'E H CONC SAT C / E P a \ ^
WOODED 1 > �SwvE L �= �L /r/ 1 I \ I\ ( WOOD ODFD '�W ODE RANITD
y DETA 1 I I I \ \
r SITE'
CbASST4 WET --LAND j � � / / // / �V
`EHAL�IZEd' CLARI / I ! // l
T/LLB D
J- �) .1Q_ ^-! PnG2/ ''30":I�EWSE Z ` /1 IMPACTS
BUFlFZONE 1
4(Jar7W
el
`-l\
t 6 �4j\- -u
4JH� 2 s �r &f m A� N
>h �' �^./�v'�,( rr \ �� >• L a I--��Sa fNi (���,,� , 5��� a 1 �a I /r /�y1 / to 3 P° °Jw� �--Iry ( �� �0�-l` �� �/) 15� \ / �-.
< e �.-�I\
9� 9 L
9 DETAIL 1 a 1 \r� 6 ®� y s� Q [ r to ��
ROCK PLATING r , DETAIL 4 `
` S Netro Sale) e� l aq VII, DETAIL 2 DETAIL 3 G J _
%'i / l \ SPECIAL CUT ' .DITCH I Not to 5calel /" L
/ -✓ z a /, �1 ^ SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH r/ Z y� �_
T \ Nmro kolel
Not to Smlel K \ 1
�J 3 )J (V` > L ! �ro
Neturel Front .� 91 `- W
✓ l 1J l { �—I �' Ground aerial 3 S' �f \ J f fmM� Ground F�pr SOlorh r 1 �4J� ff r
Rk Plonan(�orM \� J� Groun 3.J D F�U�sr Slorh Ground J�.1eT Ditch D OHpr
/r g Geo ile g D Slope B Min. D=1.0 m� Ir/
Ploti 1 3 �\ \ 1 �/ '�`
3 roeRe yw 1 \ a=z.o Pr.
8 Min. D = 1.0 Ft.
1, 1 Js �� \ r 2 C^ i Ma..d= 1.0 k. Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
IQ J l J ��i ST .2�1+F3 O S A.2 +75 MRT �r �� g e OM STA. + 0 28+00 L T FR ST 00 TA. +50 - LF--� \� J 11 y� 2�`✓ ,-f J��(
N A _ �c l ��R l ���J Type ofMneSTA. 24+00 TO RSTA. a +00 -L- m J ✓ \ N / _ (, i a
�/ \ i e\ �� F 1 S 1 ` �`
l \ I _/ / f / \ /(✓� ,xG� 7"' ti 3 `z' ✓\ wZ� GJ�'Y''�S 1 I\ \ ' `/ dF=ROM STA. 24+15 TO STA.2 000 -L- 0 � / ��/ ✓�(( Ll /�3 X � � ! /1 v � (_ � �/�\/r�� .✓ � / \ ( \ \\ ~ � 9 (, �
r� \ �c J������� /��� 9n`>��
J�.%-'J 1, K
®� \� 1 �/ / ��. '� � � J (, �9 '39 a <L 2 G � 3�✓ 7 L. -17 �� 3 /� _Z \ \ � / Ley )� � \\� ) /�.. v 1 � CrL /� � � � j `( l) �`i'� ` � (� � / -�a f [. Z\ � a a �! -� '�( ri ��. ^� 4 � ��
�I ✓�( 6 9� (ram% C )�Z'
� n V f J yc J y C N
f 23 �� � � � �e , � -v ti � � � � 7 � C:7 l7 L� C . ¢ � , � ,,, w, � ✓ ,�
---� sH �r �,SFer� _
r�5 -5-1 TH RU 8-
PLANS

DETAIL 1
ROCK PLATING
(N. ro Scale)
1.5 Ft.
ry cl— Iv
It. Selen
Motetlel
cr�kp n. roe
ko w
FROM STA. 20+73 TO STA. 22+75 -L- LT
FROM STA 20+73 TO STA 22+75 -L- RT
E
DETAIL 5
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
I Not to Swlel
10'min.
Ditch 1.0'min. 1.25'
Gmde
GEOTEMLE
Type of Liner- Class I Rip -Rap wUranile Type Mmerial
Est. 20 rorrs; Gea_ile= 27 a
FROM STA. 23+85 TO STA. 24+10 -L- LT
®
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
®
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
®DENOTES
IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES
TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
PERMIT
DRAWINSRaleigh,
G
1 Glenwood Avenue
NC 27603
Tel:919:789,9977
/7BP.2R94
4A
ROADWAY DESIGN
PAVEMENT
DESIGN
F-919.789.9591
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
SHEET
4 OF 9
License: C-2197
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
25 12.5 0 25 50 INCOMP LE E PLANS
DO NOT USE MR /W ACQUISITION
1
IDERED FINAL '
ES COMPLETED

DETAIL 1
ROCK PLATING
(N.ro S.l.)
1.5 Ft.
ry cl-, iv
It.
Moten.l
R.
c., P
R..k ��q
Plot
rn�.i�.n. qrw
iol
FROM STA. 20+73 TO STA. 22+75 -L- LT
FROM STA 20+73 TO STA 22+75 -L- RT
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
DETAIL 5 DENOTES FILL IN 1 Glenwood Avenue
F S I /7BP.2R.94 4A
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT WETLAND PERMIT D RAW I N G Raleigh, NC 27603
IN. Swl.) Te1:919:789,9977 ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN
DENOTES MECHANIZED SHEET 4 O F 9 F-919.789.9591 ENGINEER ENGINEER
1o'min. .�.'.'• CLEARING License: C-2197
Gmde 1.0 min. 1.25 ® Engineering & Construction. Inc.
DENOTES HAND 25 12.5 D 25 50 INCOMP E E PLANS
CLEARING DO NOT USE MR /W ACQUISITION
GEOTEXTILE
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
ryp• IRip dLin.r= i, -R.p wUr.nite Typ. Mmeri.l SURFACE WATER
Est. 20 rorrs; Gea
_roNil.= 21 :
FROM STA. 23+85 TO STA. 24+10 -L- LT ® DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
1
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
INSET 4A Z UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
JS j _ ,� �� ��� \�S �/ \ �FFENE 1 R
RIP RAP AT �1
l NKMENT
��)L� �1 ! 'TRIP—
v2 i E TYPEw
lQ- —SEED �A �r — — \� 1 . �5� Cr
rE BRI6G
� MPORARY I CTS \ Q \ T
D �� I SURFAC TER ( 7r F E A��� ( / JWOo E� /
i A LAN � I \ I �� ) \
z/ i ✓►NIZ ARING L
�D JMAT ' I' VE �/ / / 1tDic TINC7 �� ,WOODED
S)AGINC\-��// S I P RAP / /� N �^ I I) I I \ /
II II \ — rnR NTYMAT I� / N I I I I / DU
J I �I LL SSE DA 1 H ME I D E ►.�
— � T oC�l 5" REIN/ F �G—� — —44
— T o-- — -- — —
TBZC4—
o
`O i i7 SR 1005 (NEUSE RD) -2-21-6ST c —T62GI
_ xis iNc rw
Q
� LA 'II /RIP P TF�BRID*E HA COONNC S AT N i C , \ / I /A I I ( B9E ( \
/W/GRANITJ/Y E L
10AED �� \/ � DETA , V
C q�� , �
T WETALA146
- i
�l/41ECHAYZEb(- CLiARIN�G
WETLAND
z-
/17
C/ t
n \ r EE�_// PO IMPACTS
/ f / 7�l✓� 1 UCH �r �� /�� , � �BUF E ZONE 1 �� I \ =_�% ////fir) ����J ���„� C'E WA1�f�
NHW"

MENEM
.........:
E NEN.
EEEEEEENEM
......::.:
:::::: HE
::::H ON

MOON::::::
MINE::::::
MINE::::::
MINESEEM::::::MMMMO
offiffiffiffiffiffiamm
::::::::::
MENOMONEE
.■■■■■■■■■
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
7�7A7���7d�C�� t'i:l�:l■►[�a

........................................................
........................................................ ,
........................................................
......[MMMMMMMMMMMM......................... mmmm
....ENGIN ER ENGINEER
M III
INN. MEN
.....mmmm ...
::::: :::
.......................................
..................................... .
NONE oil
MEMO M,
........................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
........................................................
.......................................................DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
........................................
License: C-2197
OEM
........................................ ...
........................................................
........................................................Engineering & Construction Inc.
........................................ ....
....................................... ...
....................................... ... ...
....................................... MONENEENEE
■■r
.......................................
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.............................■......................
..........................................................................................
..................................................■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..........
.■■■■.■■■■■■■■■.■■■.....................YWYW Y..................YY■YY■Y........
ON
...........................................w...ww...............■■....w...w w........
...........................................w...ww000n n000n...w...ww000n -
........................................ w. w w. w w.................. w. w w. w w........
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.......NONE :::
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
oo.00. oo.00. oo.00■
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
................MEMEME..............................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
mom
UMBER
- ■■■■■■■■■■
---------- - AMIN
iron ....... ......Mo.
f[���IRoo■ ^rO=ZZ=�7�J L■ ■ l■Il �r■Yrrr■r ■.r■r.Y�a ■ 1.7.[7......9.....Y......n
R s

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
20+87 to 22+75 -L- LT
Roadway Fill/Rock Plating
0.02
1
20+61 to 22+75 -L- LT
Perimeter EC/Easement Clearing
0.04
0.06
1
22+75 to 23+06 -L- LT
Bridge Construction
< 0.01
0.01
2
20+76 to 22+75 -L- RT
Roadway Fill/Rock Plating
0.02
2
20+40 to 22+75 -L- RT
Perimeter EC/Easement Clearing
0.07
2
22+75 to 23+02 -L- RT
Bridge Construction
< 0.01
< 0.01
3
23+08 to 23+17 -L-
Rip Rap Bank Stabilization
< 0.01
71
3
23+17 to 23+27 -L-
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.01
3
23+77 to 23+87 -L-
Proposed Bridge Bent
0.01
3
23+87 to 23+97 -L-
Rip Rap Bank Stabilization
< 0.01
3
23+85 to 23+94 -L-
Rip Rap at Embankment
< 0.01
3
23+06 to 23+13 -L- LT
Stream Access/Turbidity Curtain
< 0.01
11
3
23+07 to 23+14 -L- RT
Stream Access/Turbidity Curtain
< 0.01
21
3
23+32 to 23+42 -L-
Removal of Existing Bent
< 0.01
33
3
23+62 to 23+72 -L-
Removal of Existing Bent
< 0.01
4
3
23+80 to 23+95 -L- LT
Stream Access for Stabilization
< 0.01
13
3
23+88 to 23+95 -L- RT
Stream Access/Turbidity Curtain
< 0.01
6
TOTALS*:
0.05
0.11
0.08
0.03
0.02
71
88
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2018 Feb

0
cli
91
01
I
c
n1
3, >
no
z+
Imo°
nw
H
U
O
I0 i
v
0
U
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
DETOUR ROUTE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PAMLICO. COUNTY
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 7
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.14 ON SR 1005 (NEUSE ROAD) OVER BEARD CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
ONNELS101
BEACH ROAD)
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2022 = 915
ADT 2040 = 1,600
K = %
D = %
T = 6% *
V = 60 MPH
* TTST = DUAL =
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR COLLECTOR
"SUB -REGIONAL TIER"
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94 = 0.141 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94 = 0.025 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94 = 0.166 MILES
Prepared In Ito Of/Ice of:
S ZM P I T 1 919 78 9 99Raleigh NC 03Faxe
License. C-2197
En in n & ConsVuclion, Inc.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
RAJIT RAMKUMAR, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
JUNE 21, 2022
DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
LETTING DATE:
MICHAEL AMAN, PE
SEPTEMBER 28, 2022
NCDOT CONTACT
STATB
STATE PROJECT RBPERENCE NO.
SNOET
17BP.2.R.94
DESCR P TON
17BP.2.PE.94
WA
PE
17BP.2.PE.94
WA
PW & UTILITIES
17BP.2.R.94
WA
CONST.
TO NC 306
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R> W ACQUISFFION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

HTR
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
1 Glenwood Avenue
/7BP2.PE94
4
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
BUFFER
DRAWING
Raleigh, NC 27603Tel:
S
977
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
SHEET
2 O F 7
Fax:[phone]
Fax919.789.
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
License: C-2197
®
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
EngineadngB Construction, Inc.
I 25 0
I I I
50 100
I I
dNTq USE MR[/WE
DO NOT USE MR
PLANS
ACQUISITION
--z O \
s
-FNs-
5, t
*ODC0 /
/ I � TUE
� II
y ICI~
EXISTING R/NR T R! Q`
� o IS$VIDPIE
�Y
WOODED
WOODED
DETAIL 1
ROCK PLATING
(Notro Smle)
1.5 F.
�y� Clau ry
M.
furol 1 N' I
Ground P Lofexlila for
k Plating
k Plofinp
E
DETAIL 5
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
( N. Scale)
10,min.
Ditch 1.0'min. 1.25'
Grade
GEOTEKDLE
Type of Liner= Closs I Rip-Rop wGmnite Type Moteriol
Esf. 20 tons Geotexfile= 2J SY
FROM STA. 23+85 TO STA. 24+10 -L- LT
WOODED xx..
V
n
RIP RAP AT
NKMENT
'I'
I
A
CLA RIP
NI E TYPE
TERIAL
SEE D AIL 5
SN
w 2-FT
IAL CUT
E DITCH
/
REM EXISTIN
BRIDG .
LASS RIP RAP
n `� EST. 9ETON5
�¢ EST. 7 SYGF
`W
/
1
/
� I
` D
WOODED
(Q�ARRO�y�CKJI PTI�
RiENITE TYPE'
_ U�
E 1---TUE
�c S�E� 1
PUE
��DDUUEE
FiJE
\� E� Nv
Iu
u
C la
TB2GI
T62GI
FEj E1
>pRIP R TE�8RIDIYE H S CONC SEAT C
LA S 'II' RIP R AP Y'
SANITE TY$EEfvT Al l
SEE
�/
E
B
^
lit, I
— PDE E
SPECIAL CUT
2-FT BASE DITCH
CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
�=
�G 4Q
/
m
DETAIL 2
EST. 50 T ONS
EST. 1142 IY GF
O
�S
4
DETAIL 2
SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
I Nof fo Scale)
Natpml � from
Groun 3.) D �`arec Difrh
d Slope
Geofexfile B
Min.D= 1.0 Ft.
P.
Type of Line— Claes'B' Rip Rap B- 2.0 FI.
cants — 7A,nn T — -Inn _I_ IT
FROM STA. 24+15 TO STA. 25+00 -L- RT
I
SPECIAL CUT -
-FF BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL 4 TUE
—DUE DUE—
P — C C
WOODED
Ln
01
Q
Z
U
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
®RUINS
SR 1005 (NEUSE RD) 22' BST
_---aoT�---- _ ---emu--
C C - EXISTING R/W
E—ESE E
WOODED WOODED
O
DETAIL 3 DETAIL A
SPECIAL CUT 'V' DITCH SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
I Not ro Scale) I Nof to Scale)
N°feral of Fronf
Ground 3' DII
Nafuml 1°g Franf)
Ground J;) D � O� t DioP D F\�a< Slope
Min. D=1.0 Ff.
8=2.0 Ft.
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 25+Cl. TO STA. 28+50 -L- LT
FROM STA. 25+00 TO STA 28+00 -L- RT
SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS

C
On
0
E
C
O
U
N
E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
1 Glen-odAvenue 17BP2.PE.94 4
1 v /S� J-" e( �, �l� �' �l �✓\ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 BUFFER DRAWING I Raleigh, NC 27603 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Tel:919.789,9977
4 ll �� ) 7�` ��-J -�V r, /'�v Ealcgig 7gg g6g1 ENGINEER ENGINEER
3,��N SHEET 3 OF 7 License C-2197
N ® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 Engineering& Construction, Inc.
--
50 25 0 50 100 INCOMPLE E PLANS
[v DO NOT USE MR /W ACQUISITION
\'\1 � \ % / i/ �,'- J L �(?��� ` z ��� � Z $ �V � L, ��\`,- � �;�, � 5 jJ � � �� {y� �3� C� �,�� �� �` z � 24
�\ -�/ s' 4� ice\\ � � \\ f AI \ \ .�✓ lJ (// C\ \C/, �^'':�J ,F-� �" �try�- I �I T' ro 3 (r N I RIP RAPDETAIL 5
EMBANKMENT
�~� JV�Z1l ��� ;R �A /l �✓ Y�3 �� Norrokale)� /
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
/ A (�\ �� l-�� .f •� z�, L \� �C a �� // ,/� `d -f^'� �e �cR ` G > �, C ;Y Dorn 1.o•m,n. 1.xs• 4/ UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
<1 \ �% ✓ C7 g �'_ e >S 2 / l ( f!2\ 1 /J C \ Grade _
/ L S (l it \ \ I \fin\ `T�g � `�\\ J,.\.y�(�� w2Z �� /Y� l ,`(,jf��) -j 32� i •%n� j l 'Z �� 'C/`� I I-) �_.� GEOTE%OLE\\�i,7-7T 7\
tiR�(�/ I J�J del /T i J✓ /�`z,-\�G\`/g12 �lL% %���/RQ�� �'/��r////r r� V r ` N� ti 3/4�����
T I Rirr Ty
pe of LinerCl—
= ROP+rcnite YPe Moreriol
I \ •.'� �� - `s� �_
f3r„7 s � / / \ I r I / �� \S �� `� n a/ _ !� / ,, ��� �� •� �C�i \ ti� \� -\\ I I-� / /! / 1.—Geotextila- 27 SY
f �-- r- PROM
STA-2y�iq'S' S 0 L- L
% � C� � `� 6 �r; \
�, B e s� t�
���Y
WO
JL, < EDLL-
15
y�S�� \ 2✓ 3���\ .-_I,N - I 5-� �'� ti�Jj �`✓ `5 J\`J\��
�l ��/� g \ z, / '�.-.-�\ e'r } .L /- 1� \ v ^-7ter- ` � � . '� J
v al
HTR 1 1 ( \\ 5\ �OD TUE /
ED
21, F
✓ G � ( � m � 1 � f� p �w � 15 r � � �pht, l" � i.
J ;✓ P
14
Ir r✓
S j
�PECIAL CUT - /
-FT' BADITCH /
SSEEE DETAITUE T/.U/E / �� WOODED1I RUINS 1
DUE�DUE —$� p .. L —J
C_ C rp
1005 (N=U. EERRD)
/0-_
E— C I ,—
CW ODED
`--I C � \ Igo—, ]� � � �; �' \ �l / Z���/�gT O�n JC M/ _� S�/�`e—� ��_-g.. ti.�1`�1 _'9\i��r�\\ �\]l� �\ I\� E C^� J/1\`�����^\� ro`! �J�IPf f C�L�("1�j�C�' ' �'�\ �� 2J v `-'(���l t�S �.�31 <\'1p E \r�\ \ ,y !�� @/��• ,�`3*1�\ � g�N\ �3 Ca8 99 Q CbL,1 �f)\. 19fbz��
r� \
C
3 -(3DETAIL 1
ROCK PLATING " , DETAIL 4
` S (N.-Smlel l� -q DETAIL 2 DETAIL 3 >. G J _
l /� f / / �1y 9 3 �j %'i / l \ SPECIAL CUT 'V' DITCH 1 Nor to 5calel /" -z L
/ / -✓ z a Jr �1 ^ SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH `" r/� y� �_
T \ I NO kalel
9 '7 S \ 1 1 1 Nor ro Smlel I Li' K 1 \ 11I ( y 7
9 / (II Nd..I Nmurol
V 1 l 1J l { �' Ground aerial 3 S' \ J f Dt,h Ground F�Pr SDIoRh r 1 �4J� ff r
S �k Plonan(�orM \� J� Groun 3.J D F�U�et Slorh Ground J;J �.1er Dirch J D Offer 10
Geo evrile g D Slope B Min.D=1.0 F.\af, Ir/
�\ "l/
3 m�R. yP• 1 \ a=z.o Fr.
Min. D = 1.0 Ft.
C^ i Ma.Ad 1.0 Ft.
' 2�+ �/ O A. +f5� f jrT \� �/ e OM STA. + 0 28+00 L T FR ST 00 TA. +50 - LF--/ / \� ) 11 7� 2�`✓ / JJ�(
O 5 A.2 +75 RT �3" 1 8= 2.0 H. _
�/ J/ �R" �\ r./� _ Type ofMneSTA. 24+00 TO Rbp
STA. +00 -L- mJ
l \ _/ / \/(✓� yG\ �7'r €7 ti 3 `z' ✓\ (w�Z�i'J�'Y''�Sr Ili \ ��'`/ 31 MSTA. 24+15 TO STA.2 00-L- t �1 g f 1)
` 0 � / ��/ �iC/( Ll /jl3 U � � ! /1 v � � � '\\` j�� ✓ � / \ / \ \� ~ � 9 (. } � 2 � r '� w- , � � J ` `4.� U� `rf `` � ..� � � � � M i� �\ \ �� ` / � b�f ��\��\ �\ _` �� � 9 J � �.I 4
�� ✓�� \�}\
'39 a <L 2 G 3�✓ 7 L. -17 �� 3 /� _Z \ \ / / Ley )� \�\ ) .. v 1 C'L /� j`( l) / -�Z f [. Z\ a i �! -� 4
�I ✓�� e 9� (rL% G� , )�� / w% l2 \5 /<� f �� �—\ �V� s �� ti� \ i �n (�h� /
��(7 n V f J yG J y -%
Icy
D l \��\ `z\ a3 ti��}�Yj�,������; ���: �� ��7� i ��I r✓���' rraE �SaIET �
2 EJ—'L/—//HRU F R E
--�7-E�_
lTODED
Y
v e 1 \� I \C�] 1
)
.� . c� �✓
RIP RAP AT
(�� "�\��✓\� NKMENT
^ I
oS�r, .v • /)
NPE_
L• ri 2'- C� _E -�3� AS=
E '7r�U
tr c
/\ �IgTD
�Rf/F
t'Y'
ON
r
WOO
� �' WOODEDI
RANRE FE'I PTIRA
rY IAL �I
11
U\
/ E TUE'
DU
pl E
LIE
Q
DUE ,.
L ,f I
'I' IP P VTE�BRID*f H S CONC SEAT ECG / I / 1 /
NIT E L �= Y' /m
� DETA 1 I I
I �' //J I I J/ I I I/
PDE', P
SPECIAL CUT
�N h\ 1 -FT BASE DITCH?
LASS 'B' RIP RAP
/
/ �) /
\
SEE�DETAIL 21 n
/149
4."
Xf
"/J�-ESTT.50
C
,- g �C-✓ �' 'I� �\ j- -`� / •�v c —ate � g �,
/�1'
I�
2 C K+ V b
�.j B
4
a ern f
Z' f mN
PLANS

DETAIL 1
ROCK PLATING
( Ne11e Swlel
y.. see, N
en
Nmural N' MnMrial
Grouik Geaexsle kr
Rork elas
RwUmnl a Tyy
ednl
FROM STA. 20+73 TO STA. 22+75 -L- IT
FROM STA. 20+73 TO STA. 22+75 -L- RT
DETAIL 2
SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
(Not. Scale)
Natewl
Gwund 3.7 3'� dal —h
D P° slope
Geoleinile B
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
Max. d= 1.0 Ft.
Type of Line— Class'B' Rip -Rap B- 2.0 R.
FROM STA. 24+00 TO STA. 25+00 -L- LT
FROM STA 2A+15 TO STA. 25+00 -L- RT
1 Glenwood Avenue
Rv/7BP.2R94 Vv
v
�n 4A1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 BUFFER
DRAWING
Raleigh, NC 27603
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER
Te1:919.789,9977
Fax [phone]
SHEET 4 OF 7 ri
License: C-2197
ay
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
®
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
FE PLANS
25 12.5 0 25 50
INCOMP LE
DO NOT USE MR
/W ACQUISITION
F�
\ RIP RAP AT
EMBANKMENT �
CL,4� 'I' RIP
wGR�N1 E TYPE
TERIAL w S E IAL CUT
SEE D TAIL 5 -A 2-FT E DITCH
w/CLASS ' ' RIP RAP
REM01/E EXISTIN o TAIL
ST. 9E TONS i
( BRIDG Q EST. 7 SYGF
-k W 0 0 E
ROCK TINGWOODED
I SI' P RAP \ �i
7GR)EN TY MAT IAA
DAL�N T E TUE, I
1 PUE m PUE W DU
\ —
—TVF VFW 0 511
— — — — TB2GI �
TB- 1- - I I ----
VY
FZJ�~
EL PDE E
LASS 'll' R PT PQTE�$RID€ HAS CONC SATN C E C BD
RANITJ TY�E WIJEROAL �k
SPECSEE DETAIY 2-FT
EUDITCH
m N w/CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
SEE m EST. DETAIL
2
50 -k Q0� N EST.142 SYGF
� � J
E
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

DETAIL 1
ROCK PLATING
( Ne11e Swlel
y.. see, N
en
Nmural N' MnMrial
Grouik Geaexsle kr
Rork elas
RwUmnl a Tyy
ednl
FROM STA. 20+73 TO STA. 22+75 -L- IT
FROM STA. 20+73 TO STA. 22+75 -L- RT
DETAIL 2
SPECIAL CUT BASE DITCH
(Not. Scale)
Natewl
Gwund 3.7 3'� dal —h
D P° slope
Geoleinile B
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
Max. d= 1.0 Ft.
Type of Line— Class'B' Rip -Rap B- 2.0 R.
FROM STA. 24+00 TO STA. 25+00 -L- LT
FROM STA 2A+15 TO STA. 25+00 -L- RT
1 Glenwood Avenue
Rv/7BP.2R94 Vv
v
�n 4A1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 BUFFER
DRAWING
Raleigh, NC 27603
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
PAVEMENT DESIGN
ENGINEER
Te1:919.789,9977
Fax [phone]
SHEET 5 OF 7 ri
License: C-2197
ay
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
®
Engineering & Construction, Inc.
FE PLANS
25 12.5 0 25 50
INCOMP LE
DO NOT USE MR
/W ACQUISITION
V0
3
�I
r ����•A\
6 _3RIP
AT
EMBAN MPENT
�j� ��—
t C
NI TYPE
TER1AL-'
�. I—i-----
I� I iR
T E Dl rid I
__ 4EI T/w
AIL
rEX[ST�YCnN \\\ T �f
BRI G \
_ L
i
\ \ Q .,
�1GF
J
�)WOO E
� \ 1
—ROCK TING �� � �/�
S 'I' P RAP /
NfiE TYMAT IAA ��/�c�
WOODED \ I I11�111
1,\\\\\\\ \\
�� Y II111\\ I\ I IIIII
JN III I I I I I
.— �\ _
\ = UTUEI
1
_ DUE DU
E� P �D
I �(\�=I 0
Ti�p
151,
---- TB26F—
---------------
--
I I
_—
— — c------�B2GI
C
LA 'I 'DRIP P rQTE WRID*E HAS CONC S AT N C // 1 I/ I I I
IAJNITTY E L
SPECIAL CUT
J1 � DETA
BASE DITCH/
'FT
LA
DETJ RIP RAP
SEE SS
EST. 50 TCNvsI
_
-EST. 142�SYGFry
^�
(
E
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
Site Station Structure ROAD PARALLEL
No. (From/To) Size / Type BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
CROSSING IMPACT (2) (2) (z) (2) (2) (z) (2) (2)
ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft
1
22+50 to 22+75 -L- LT
Roadway Fill/Rock Plating
X
598
598
1
22+70 to 23+06 -L- LT
Bridge Construction
X
809
809
1
22+46 to 22+73 -L- RT
Roadway Fill/Rock Plating
X
463
463
1
22+67 to 23+04 -L- RT
Bridge Construction
X
651
651
1
23+93 to 24+24 -L- LT
Bridge Const./Roadside Ditch
X
903
903
1
24+24 to 24+45 -L- LT
Roadside Ditch
X
607
607
1
23+94 to 24+27 -L- RT
Bridge Const./Roadside Ditch
X
787
787
1
24+24 to 24+47 -L- RT
Roadside Ditch
X
553
553
TOTALS:
3150
2221
5371
0
0
0
0
0
NOTES:
2018 Feb

WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLANDS IN
BUFFERS
STATION
ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO.
(FROM/TO)
(tt) (tt)
1
22+52/23+06
-L- LT 809 590
1
22+48/23+06
-L- RT 481 323
TOTAL:
1290 913
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
6/20/2022
Pamlico County
SF680014
1713P.2.R.94
Revised 2018 Feb
SHEET
7 OF 7
Rev.Jan 2009

L�
G0
O
V)
O
Li nl
CL
CL
L
CL
m
E
L
TT
w
o�
w
i
4-
i
0
i
w
CL
N
m
LL
O
O
N
O
O
Q
i
O
O
IO
LL
0
C�
O U)
Tw
�LL-
Q
Lz
o +�
>w
L
c�
oU� -(A
ti
H
CyAress
Scotts store (i°
euSe Ro et
dd �Ch rc
Town goad
Scott Town oad
3p6
z
C apel
d ndin9 Rod °tea � UniChu h
0
qj
0-
PROJECT 1 P.2.R 9
°
3p6 Nard n F\ \d Rd
Layton m d
boa
Cemetery h
Amity
o- hers �
dq cl"ITC
°a °a Ne e Ro
e � � � 3 6 a
S. °Se Gr e0 211 eu5e Ro der rave 1° 0on
m
e
VICINITY MAP
DETOUR ROUTE
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
UTILITIES BY OTHERS PLAINS
PAMLICO CO UNTY
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NO.
UO-1
UO-2
T.I.P. NO.
SHEET
NO.
17BP.2 . PE.94
UO-1
'NOTE:
ALL UTILITY WORK SHOWN ON THIS
SHEET IS DONE BY OTHERS.
NO PAYMENT WILL BE MADE TO
THE CONTRACTOR FOR UTILITY WORK
SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 14 ON SR 1005 (NEUSE ROAD) OVER BEARD CREEK
TYRE OF WORK: UTILITIES BY OTHERS RELOCATIONS
(KENNSMELS ��
BEACH Rpgp)
DESCRIPTION
TITLE SHEET
UBO PLAN SHEET
-L- STA. 19 + 25.00
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB ���
—L— STA. 22 + 75.00 +/— / 6
BEGIN BRIDGE
—L— STA. 22 + 87.00
UO-2)
-L- STA. 28 + 00.00 4
END TIP PROJECT 17BP.2.R.94
UTILITY OWNERS WITH CONFLICTS
(A) POWER - TIDELAND EMC
(B) TELECOM - CENT UR YLINK
-L- SR 1005 (Neuse Road)
END APPROACH SLAB
-L- STA. 24 + 29.00 +/-
—L— STA. 24 + 17.00 +/—
--------- TO NC 306
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
HINDE
ENGINEERING
License No. C-2639
401 Harrison Oaks Blvd., Suite 220 Cary, NC 27513
(919)-653-0001
Clint L. Stevens, P.E. UTILITY COORDINATION PROJECT MANAGER
Harris Winters PROJECT UTILITY COORDINATOR
Jordan K. Chapman PROJECT UTILITY DESIGNER
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION 2
2815 ROUSE ROAD EXTENSION
KINSTON NC 28504
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
Jeff Cabaniss, P.E. DIVISION ENGINEER
Cadmus Capehart, P.E. DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGR
UBO PLANS ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL PROPOSED RELOCATION INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE UBO PLANS WAS PROVIDED BY 3RD PARTIES. HINDE ENGINEERING, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR VALIDITY OF 3RD PARTY INFORMATION PROVIDED.

X /
Cj�.1=5" IJbPERETAN
—TV FO— — — — — -
- —T—
—-W
N 80'31'45" W
140.16'
1
GILBERT FRANKLIN BRINSON, II °L�' �0- ..J,
�S DB 228 PG 800 °s
TIDELAND EMC
OH POWER LINE
\ N
P IAL CUT
o w 2-FT DITC
0
o m w/CLASS RIP RA
o SE ETAIL
cc
l EMO EXISTI z Q
p BRID m WO DE
IN
i CL. 'B' RIP RA
Mj
TUE � ' " r I� EST. 5 SYG�
F_s�� �N 0 D E D ,����S PT
tB'IZAP
C �E TECTIO
I I LU rn SSE DJ L
I� (II UE PUE � PUE 1 f
III �``� -
EXISTING R/* T I It Qt F _ _ F — PRO
U/CF TEL & FO 6L€S
� _ � — � �R � $•1 T T �T T T
�,
EXISTR
GEORGE BRINSON, et ux
WOODED DB 524 PG 700
MB 3 PG 13
is
is
-JS�
CENTURYLINK
UG FO & TELE LINE
S 79° 44' 55°5" E
SR /005 (NEUSE RD) 22' BST
CODED
EMBAN ENT
D AIL 5
m
w
�\SEE
`n
PU � N
I ,1, :k-
N 00
_ Q- —
4, PS
TI3 G
R/w E F F�
E
S 'B RIP AS CONICS Am EC T-
TE RID
FOE PROTECTION E HT V
:E E BETA 1 J1 4
VOODED :kCLE'B RI RAP
/ � � EST 5 SYGF
CLASS 'II' RIP RA o
TO ELEV. 5. 4ujo °
DES
O
0>
�O
O
+ WOODED
O
O
O
J
I
GREU
O
O
O
N
E
C
x
O
/
0
SPECIAL CUT -
\` i 2-FT BASE DITCH
TUE'� SFF nFTA"FUE
PUE PUE —
PDE �E
V SPECIAL CUT
/ 2-FT BASE DITCH
w/CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
N SEE DETAIL 2
ti APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
I OLD BRIDGE TURNTABLE
3
ANN B. BATCHELOR, et al
DB 442 PG 743
TIDELAND EMC
OH POWER LINE
r+oP',0/H POW LINE;
2 L _ C --
S 79' 22' /8
IR
E
0
wl
Q
0
PUE
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
17BP.2.PE.94 I UO-2
THIS SHEET CORRESPONDS TO RDY-4
UTILITIES BY OTHERS
NOTE:
ALL UTILITY WORK SHOWN ON THIS
SHEET WILL BE DONE BY OTHERS.
NO PAYMENT WILL BE MADE TO THE
CONTRACTOR FOR UTILITY WORK
SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.
6
VERA R. GASKINS, et al
DB 159 PG 35
DRAWN BY PAMLICO COUNTY GIS
CENTURYLINK
UG FO & TELE LINE
WOODED
�1140 0) POW ES-
/G TES LJ:CABLES
C E---E
WOODED
SPECIAL CUT 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL 3
SR /005 (NEUSE RD) 22' BST
FRANCES B. HOLT o oN
_ DB 228 PG 797 N G
GEORGE BRINSON, et ux UNRECORDED MAP •J
DB5524 PG 00 �`' S A ELLEN B. JOHNSON, et al
MP
13
�+
DB 544 PG 229
TRACT THREE
/ N 79°36'16" W C"
297.89' M
(D
V)
O cb°
P� �1b°
C�
O
�O
P
OAP `LO,�
Q�
C-D
NOTE: PROPOSED SHOULDER BERM GUTTER —L— STA. 22 +44 TO STA. 22 + 75 LT. & RT.
wirH Ta T OF
PLO BEARD �RICREE RANCH
WOODED
0
LQ
Ln
EXISTING R/W
—T V FO-
-
EXISTING R/W
®O
RUINSRUINS
ELLEN B. JOHNSON, et al
DB 544 PG 229
A*HINDE
�.I ENGINEERING
License No. C-2639
401 Harrison Oaks Blvd., Suite 220 Cary, NC 27513
UBO PLANS ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL PROPOSED RELOCATION INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE UBO PLANS WAS PROVIDED BY 3RD PARTIES. HINDE ENGINEERING, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR VALIDITY OF 3RD PARTY INFORMA
TION PROVIDED.

T FRANKLIN �f
DB 228 PG 800
8 /
15" 4DPE
ORGE BRINSON, et ux
DB 524 PG 700
MB 3 PG 13
50'
40'
30'
20'
10'
11
-10'
- 20'
0+00'
3 6
VERA R. GASKINS, et al
n ANN B. BATCHELOR, et al DB PG 35
�Q ^^' o^ 7^: DRAWN BY PAMLICO COUNTY GIS
1 +00' 2+00' 3+00, 4+00' 5+00' 6+00' 7+00' 8+00' 9+00, 10+00'
1
GILBERT FRANKLIN BRINSON, III
DB 228 PG 800
l
ON, II I 1
I I
s II
C5/ II III
c�
POL 1
�� I 298' POLE 2
r �
�r K
EXISTING W F F ---- F ----- ----- ---- ---
� F F F
w
U
N
w
m
381'
3
NEW POLE AND // /� ANN B. BATCHELOR, et al
LINE LOCATION / / DB 442 PG 743
POLE 5
0
_ � I
I I
I I
ICI
G—==
— I—
CP 15" CMP -- ;1
EXISTING POLE AND
LINE TO BE MOVED
0
GEORGE BRINSON, et ux PRANCES B. HOLT
DB 524 PG 700
MB 3 PG 13 DB 228 PG 797
UNRECORDED MAP
NOTE:
NEW LINE SHOWN IS CENTERLINE OF CIRCUIT.
CROSSARM CONSTRUCTION AND WIND (61b S/ft2) WILL
CAUSE THE ROADSIDE CONDUCTOR TO BE AS MUCH
AS 4-8 FEET CLOSER TO BRIDGE STRUCTURE.
CONCEPT DRAWING ONLY.
DO NOT USE FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES NOT SHOWN
IN
PRELIMINARY
6 0'
50'
40'
30'
20'
10'
0'
-10'
- 20'
6
VERA R. GASKINS, et al
DB 159 PG 35
DRAWN BY PAMLICO COUNTY CIS
1111ullluu«r r � i � �/
364'
C— _— — — — — —
C
A Touchstone Energy Cooperative K,-t
Tideland EMC
Real People. Real Power.
5) 1
155 U.S. HWY. 70 WEST
N. C. CORP. C-1063
U71tility
kdrical
t-,onsultants
J L
POLE 4
EXISTING R/W
EXISTI
PC
GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA
PH [phone]
DRAWN BY: ABB
JOB NO.: 23-2191
VER: 1" = 10'
SCALE: HOR: 1 "= 40'
CHECKED BY: TBP
CAD FILE: PAMLICOBG14DOT
APPROVED BY: TBP
DATE: 02/28/2023
SHEET NO. 1 OF 1

P/ = 20.15.00
EL = 6.72'
VC = 180'
K = /5/
DS = 60 MPH
BORE PIT
5'X3'X3'
(-)0.7111% F
I'L STA.23+52 -L-
Cp SGP EWLEEV.p=81.@33'
LO OWC SIDE 24.C9RDDS AE1@6PJ'; 1@35'
A i ON 4'-0" END BENT CAP
EG LT-- v 3'-6" MIN
-G(TYPICAL) s
EG RT IT�'
wow/
T T
15' MIN.
THEORETICAL 100yr SCOUR DEPTH
19
20
21
EXCHANGE KEY
ENGINEERING CONTACT
NAME:
PHONE:
REMOTE SWITCH EXCHANGE KEY
COMMUNITY NAME
NAME:
CITY:
22
CONTRACT ENGINEER
NAME: KEVIN GODWIN
COMPANY: 910-366-2142
CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR
NAME:
PHONE
* DIRECTIONAL BORE 1 M30' *
(2) 2" HDPE SDR 11 CONDUITS
E/W 48 FO AND 100 PR COPPER
(MIN 15' DEPTH BELOW CREEK BED)
23 24 25
L717PUL -L-
= 11.72'
P/ =
27�10.00
EL
= 10.05'
VC
= /80'
K =
131
DS
= 55 MPH
7.73007 (RT)
—EG RT
EG LT
BMI ELEVATION = 8.17'
N 475698 E 2658852
BL STATION O�66,00 /05' LEFT
RR SPIKE EST IN 36" HARDWOOD
L U
M n® DATE
EXCEPTAS MAY BE OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY CONTRACT. THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF LUMEN BEING ISSUED IN STRICT CONFIDENCE AND SHALL
NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, OR USED FORANY PURPOSE WITHOUT SPECIFIC -WRITTEN PERMISSION.
26
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION
BORE PIT
5'X3'X3'
(RT)
27 28 29
PROJECT#: B-4595 / 17BP.2.R.94 DATE:
WFMT PROJECT:
DESC: BRIDGE 14 BORE PROFILE - PAMLICO CO
WC CLLI: TOWNSHIP:
SECTION: RANGE:
REVISION: I SCALE: SHEET: 1 OF 1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 891C64E2-A616-4EDD-9977-DE22B863CAE2
Q
v
::,
L
4
m
LL
IZ
lZ
m
i
0
L
n
i
C
L
a�
L
w
N
+'
i
1)
0
i
m
II
c�
m
CL
W
(\1
N
N
N
Q
n
HTR
GILBERT FRANKLIN BRINSON, I
DB 228 PG 800
486 LF OF 8" WATER LINE
486 LF OF DIRECTIONAL DRILL OF 8"
(HDPE DR 9)
8" X 6►►
HDPE TO PVC PIPE
TRANSITION FITTING
6" 450 BEND-
50 LF OF 6" WATER LINE
(PVC RJ, SDR 21)
�;- 6" VALVE
6" 22.5 ° BEND
6II 450 BEND
6" SLEEVE
/
I '
CONCRETE
THRUST
BLOCKING
ICI
X O / EXISTING R/* T I It
Q5" I�I75PERETAN — 5" /ROBE_
—TV F0— — — —
N 80'31'45" W
140.16'
1 4
GILBERT FRANKLIN BRINSON, III
�S DB 228 PC 800
\\\�� is
\ N
SP IAL CUT
0
w 2-FT B DITCH
o cL w/CLASS RIP RA
0 " SE ETAIL
/ 'vd
0 cc
EMO EXISTI z Q
p� BRID m WO DED
� A � CL. 'B' RIP RF
T y EST.5 SYG� CODED
rn OB' P RAP
gDEE S PROTECTIO
I +rui�i � �0� �U
t. U E 8" WL W
J _ F —
$ :� - �. Jam- 1320 <0491>
u — — — — — — —Lu
is
10
6" PLUG S 79 44 55a5 E
° SR 1005 (NEUSE RD) 22' BST
— 7UTL— — — — — — — — — — — — — — 7UTL— — — — — — — — — — — — —-- _
— 4' PS TB2G is w/1
EXISTING R/W E )= IF
IP
GEORGE BRINSON, et ux OE PROTECTIONTE�RID HAS CONICS AT mI'EC
WOODED DBMB24 PC 3 PC 300 WOODED / EE SETA 1 JCL. B' RIP RAPS
ET. 5 SYGF
CLASS 'll' RIP RA _ '
/J, TO ELEV.S.
ABANDON 575 LF OF
6" UTILITY PIPE
GEORGE BRINSON, et ux
DB 524 PG 700
MB 3 PG 13
NOTE:
THE ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF DUCTILE IRON
WATER PIPE FITTINGS ON THIS PLAN SHEET
IS 630 POUNDS. THE ACTUAL QUANTITY AND
TYPE OF FITTINGS WILL VARY BASED ON
FIELD CONDITIONS.
\ w
E PU
z SLOW WI E
TV FO--
— —
0)
0)
Q6
+ WOODED
N
O
v I
J
I
HINDE
ENGINEERING
License No. C-2639
401 Harrison Oaks Blvd., Suite 220 Cary, NC 27513
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NU.
17BP . 2 . PE . 94 „11U'C - 4
DESIGNED BY: J KC
DRAWN BY: J NA ;'���" CAR04
CHECKED � Ivor
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL APPROVED BY: CLS CtAL�"ewv
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED = 040370
REVISED : ,k6* .32D777EB420,.
n
8 ►► X 6 ►►
HDPE TO PVC PIPE
TRANSITION FITTING
6" 450 BEND 3
C
I. ° T - LOR,
83 LF OF 6" WATER LINE 743
• ( PVC RJ , SDR 21 )
6" VALVE
RELOCATE WATER METER
is 47 LF OF WATER SERVICE LINE
I
�. I SPECIAL CUT
PUE
` 12-FT BASE DITCH WOODED
R TUE'� i SFF nFrJ,"FUE - _
E
S - D JE I �I o40 PUE PUE p �
o C I a D U E------- — D U E
o� 15\ CUP' C — — - C
— — — —TV Fo —4`PS --w —
V SPECIAL CUT
/ 2-FT BASE DIT H
w/CLASS 'B' RIP R,
SEE DETAIL 2
ti APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
I OLD BRIDGE TURNTABLE
FRANCES B. HOLT
DB 228 PG 797
UNRECORDED MAP
4
N 79'36'16" W
297.89'
NORTH CAROLINA
;��i'••FNGINE�•'•��,�'
DEPARTMENT OF
Sj�J��
TRANSPORTATION
��,,,,,,,0t,
UTILITIES ENGINEERING SEC.
1/30/2023
PHONE:[phone]
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
FAX: [phone]
PLANS ONLY
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
6
VERA R. GASKINS, et al
DB 159 PG 35
DRAWN BY PAMLICO COUNTY DS
EXISTING R/W
—TV F 0— —
T— — — — — — — T—
' l8°0II — —
" E
0
_ SR 1005 (NEUSE RD) 22' BST `"°
— — — — — IQTL— — — — — — — — — — — — — IL— —
---
E E
WOODED
0
CONCRETE
THRUST
BLOCKING 'ECIAL CUT DETAIL 3 V' DITCH
-6" SLEEVE
—6 rf 450 BEND
6" 22.5° BEND
NOTE: PROPOSED SHOULDER BERM GUTTER -L- STA. 22 +44 TO STA. 22 + 75 LT. & RT.
5
ELLEN Be JOHNSON, et al
DB 544 PG 229
TRACT THREE
WITH GUT OF SPRING
To �BEARD', CREE RANCH
(V
0
,79;
WOODED
\_ EXISTING R/W
ELLEN Bo JOHNSON, et al
DB 544 PG 229