20150362 Ver 1_USACE/DWR Public Notice_20150505

M I
US Army Corps PUBLIC NOTICE
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: May 1, 2015
Comment Deadline: June 1, 2015
Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2008-03229
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps)received an application from North
Carolina Department of Transportation, Attn: Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager, Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,North
Carolina 27699-1548 seeking Department of the Army authorization for the permanent impact to
4,273 linear feet(If) of stream channel(of which 956 if of impact is for stream stabilization) , the
temporary impact to 631 if of stream channel and the impact to 0.41 acres of wetlands (0.3 acres
of permanent fill, 0.04 acres of excavation, and 0.07 acres of hand clearing), associated with
proposed Interstate 85 (I-85) Widening and Interchange Improvements Project(TIP Project No.
I-3802A). The proposed project is located along an approximately 7.6 mile corridor along
existing I-85 from north of NC 73 (Davidson Highway/Exit 55) to north of SR 2180 (Lane
Street/Exit 63), in Cabarrus and Rowan Counties, County,North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans.
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoUPermitProgram.aspx
Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
Attn: Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1598
Authority
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory Authorities:
❑ Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 U.S.C. 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
U.S.C. 1413)

Location
Directions to Site: The proposed project is located along existing I-85 from north of NC 73
(Davidson Highway/Exit 55) to north of SR 2180 (Lane Street/Exit 63), in Cabarrus and Rowan
Counties, County,North Carolina.
Project Area: Approximately 7.6 miles
Nearest Town: Kannapolis
River Basin: Yadkin Pee-Dee (03040105)
Latitude and Longitude: Northern starting point-80.567435W 35.513744N
Southwestern ending point-80.644467W 35.438618N
Nearest Waterways: Irish Buffalo Creek, Threemile Branch, Cold Water Creek and Lake Fisher
(impoundment of Cold Water Creek)
Existing Site Conditions
The project area occurs along an existing highway corridor. The project area lies within the
Piedmont physiographic province of North Carolina. Jurisdictional features within the project
footprint are located in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Drainage Basin(United States Geological
Survey [USGS] Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 030401 05) in Cabarrus and Rowan Counties.
Jurisdictional streams that will be impacted by this project include Irish Buffalo Creek and 6
unnamed tributaries (UTs) of Irish Buffalo Creek, and 5 UTs of Threemile Branch, Cold Water
Creek and 11 UTs of Cold Water Creek and 9 UTs of Lake Fisher(impoundment of Cold Water
Creek). There are no designated High Quality Waters, Outstanding Resource Waters, Water
Supply I, Water Supply 11, or Trout Waters occurring within 1.0 mile of the project area. No
Anadromous Fish Spawning Areas or potential habitat areas are located near or within the
project study area. Within 1.0 mile of the construction footprint, Irish Buffalo Creek is listed as a
303(d)water in the 2014 Final North Carolina 303(d) List of Impaired Waters of North Carolina.
Irish Buffalo Creek is listed as impaired due to copper.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The applicant's stated purpose is as follows:
The primary purpose of the proposed project is to improve level of service (LOS) on 1-85 and its
interchanges in the project area. The project is part of a multi-faceted solution to address
congestion and capacity problems along the I-85 corridor in and near the Charlotte metropolitan
area. Traffic analysis shows that traffic demand along I-85 for most of the study area either
approaches or exceeds the roadway capacity limits. If no improvements are made the entire
length of 1-85 in the study area is expected to approach or exceed roadway capacity limits by
2035. The project increases the number of travel lanes on I-85 to eight lanes in Cabarrus County
and Rowan County, respectively.
- 2 -

Reconstructing the interchange at the US29/60 1 Connector will allow it to meet current design
standards and replace a structurally deficient bridge. Proposed modifications also would improve
overall traffic operations at the interchange. The improvements would increase the distance
between the interchange and local driveways and intersections, thereby reducing the number of
conflict points and providing additional capacity for drivers in the interchange vicinity.
Project Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT)proposes to add four additional
travel lanes (two in each direction) to Interstate 85 (I-85) along a 7.6 mile corridor from north of
NC 73 (Davidson Highway/Exit 55) to north of SR 2180 (Lane Street/Exit 63). The project
involves widening the existing four-lane freeway to eight lanes, which will match the existing
lane configuration at the northern terminus at NC 73 (the start of NCDOT TIP Project No I-
3803). Additionally, the project proposes to improve existing interchanges. The proposed
interchange improvements are as follows:
• Removal of the existing loops, ramps, and collector/distributor lanes along I-85 at the
US 29/601 Connector(South Cannon Boulevard/N01th Concord Parkway) and replacing
them with a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI).
• Removal and replacement of the dual, three-lane bridges over I-85
• The construction of an improved Diamond with Directional Ramp at the SR 2126 (Dale
Earnhardt Boulevard) intersection, which will provide a relocated, elongated loop, along
with removal and modification of existing ramps and inclusion of a new directional on-
ramp for I-85 southbound traffic.
• Shift to the existing horizontal alignment of Lane Street and inclusion of a Diamond
Interchange with roundabouts incorporated into the ramp termini.
The project additionally includes bridge work: a new bridge carrying SR 1790 (Winecoff School
Road) over the Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks, closure of the existing at-grade crossing,
removal of the SR 2001 (South Ridge Avenue)bridge over I-85 and the proposed replacement of
the SR 2000 (Brantley Road)bridge over I-85 and a shift in the horizontal alignment. And lastly
the project proposes the widening of shoulder sections throughout the project on both the L-line
and Y-lines in compliance with current design standards.
Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize
impacts to the aquatic environment:
The Categorical Exclusion (CE) document estimated a total of 9,230 linear feet of stream
impacts and 1.7 acres of wetland impacts. After final design, stream impacts have been
reduced to 4,273 linear feet of permanent stream impacts and 631 linear feet of temporary
stream impacts, for a total of 4,904 linear feet of jurisdictional stream impact. Overall wetland
impacts for the construction footprint of the project have also been reduced to 0.3 acres of
permanent fill, 0.04 acres of excavation, and 0.07 acres of hand clearing.
- 3 -

The applicant further listed multiple other avoidance and minimization efforts which are
summarized below:
• The enforcement of NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Protection of
Surface Waters.
• The employment of Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds;
• The utilization of NCDOT's BMPs for Construction and Maintenance Activities
• Project design incorporating widening within the median and/or existing right-of-way to
the extent practicable to minimize the amount of impacts to areas which are currently
undisturbed;
• Using steeper fill slopes (2: I) to minimize stream and wetland impacts which resulted in
the minimization of impacts to Irish Buffalo Creek (BC) and minimization of impacts to a
substantial section of Cold Water Creek (SE) that runs parallel to I-85;
• The utilization of a Stormwater Management Plan which includes multiple other methods
that attempt to minimize impacts to the natural environment.
Compensatory Mitigation
NCDOT is proposing mitigation to off-set impacts to 3,130 if of stream channel via payment to
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) sufficient to provide for mitigation at
a 2:1 ratio (mitigation to impacts) for 1,823 if of stream channel and 1:1 ratio for 1,307 if of
stream channel. NCDOT further proposes to off-set impacts to 0.34 acres of riparian wetlands
via payment to NCDMS sufficient to provide for mitigation at a 2:1 ratio.
Additional information provided by NCDOT regarding mitigation is summarized below:
The project will permanently impact 4,273 if of warm water streams. Of the 4,273 if of proposed
impact, 956 if would result from stream bank stabilization and mitigation is not proposed for the
stabilization impacts. Additionally, no mitigation is proposed for a proposed impact to 187 if of
Stream SEF (Site 19)which is currently a concrete lined channel.
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public
Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat(EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project would not effect EFH or associated fisheries managed
by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33
CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the
District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:
- 4 -

❑ Should historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, be
present within the Corps' permit area; the proposed activity requiring the DA permit(the
undertaking) is a type of activity that will have no potential to cause an effect to an
historic properties.
❑ No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties
affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Properties ineligible for inclusion in the National Register are present within the Corps'
permit area; there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed work. The Corps
subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
® Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; however, the undertaking will have no adverse
effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the
SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; moreover, the undertaking may have an adverse
effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently initiates consultation with the
SHPO (or THPO).
❑ The proposed work takes place in an area known to have the potential for the presence of
prehistoric and historic cultural resources; however, the area has not been formally
surveyed for the presence of cultural resources. No sites eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places are known to be present in the vicinity of the
proposed work. Additional work may be necessary to identify and assess any historic or
prehistoric resources that may be present.
The District Engineer's final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon coordination
with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to
the proposed undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the
Corps-indentified permit area.
Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined
all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural
Heritage Database. Based on available information:
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
- 5 -

® The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat, specifically the Northern
Long-Eared bat (Myolis septenlrionalis;NLEB). The Corps initiates consultation under
Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a permit decision until the consultation process is
complete.
❑ The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or
their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA)within the project area. The Corps will make a final determination on the effects of
the proposed project upon additional review of the project and completion of any
necessary biological assessment and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State
agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a
final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act(PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and
this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office
in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be
deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of
receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be
reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, Transportation Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury
Street, Raleigh,North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding
the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by June 1, 2015 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Amy Chapman, Transportation Permitting Unit
(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Or,
(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
❑ The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies with and
would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal
Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2(b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a
Department of Army(DA)permit for the proposed work until the applicant submits such a
- 6 -

certification to the Corps and the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs
with the applicant's consistency certification. As the application did not include the consistency
certification, the Corps will request, upon receipt„ concurrence or objection from the NCDCM.
® Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application for a
Department of Army(DA)permit does not involve an activity which would affect the coastal
zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management(CZM)Act(16 U.S.C. § 1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts
including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water
quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment(EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the
overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
- 7 -

The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the
proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, June 1, 2015. Comments should be submitted to
Crystal Amschler, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208,
Asheville,North Carolina 28801-5006, at(828) 271-7980 ext 231.
- 8 -