660021_Closure_20230301

N RCS
tfnited States Department of Agriculture
Natural Retoulc a Conservation Sery ce
Prepared for:
By:
Farm: K
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources_
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
E'.'?iD
_ Tract(s): 'K Date:.3 / 23 / 23
e APFA;c-4 A 47 %aAls
fertilizer and manure application methods.
When precision ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site photographs)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan, Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommendations must be made using NCDA-
similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient application,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 1 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYES) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specked
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
• Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
http://www.ncaqr.gov/SWC/tech/­guidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic Group (SHG)-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
documented in conservation plan):
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
http.-Anutrients. soil. ncsu. edufindex. htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
http://www.ncaar.aov/SWC/tech/1217committee ht
ml
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned areal
In NC, a field -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical If P
application made per soil test results)
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-based manure application planning
and planning for no additional manure P.
Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
enhanced P application planning are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be specified in nutrient management
plan.
Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy
Information:
Implementation of a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the only currently proven method of
substantial P 'drawdown' Is to not apply manure -
based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
in NC website:
hftp://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/vields/index-phi)
Conservation Practices and Management
Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Conservation practices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus movement from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
determined PLAT risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the conservation plan developed in
conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
Phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be prescribed below:
✓ / d DD �i Cc/ 4-0
t',c�e1 S W I f� i�i9�j v-✓
�� ✓ �. TO Page
A 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CLAMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure
/generated by the facilit
Sa d T 4110A.3 . GlY_
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm f]Mr.'arty ap i/cati�"
c�f l i :,,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include. -
soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
• weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K,
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
• Where 'chlorophyll reader technology is
utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
as possible.
page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 1 page 5

0
N
O
N
as
N
a
O
U
O
m
d
U
a
OD
O
N
c
c
3
O
O
J
N
O
m
E
N
m
CD
y
d
:t
c
d
9
O
O
2 c
N N •Q
C y
O C>
O
U d
d
L
- E 'L
in y E
Z W U
0
N
U O
v a
LQ
a to
uLL
�a
0) O
E�
v
d y U
Q Zoc z
z
sm�
p C C
� AM U
W O
y y
w t c
> > o
o T C
CL c
m
5 `o w
Env
JEc
y
V O
� c n
O(y
atm K
c m y
O E
m 10
v
€m o.
Q d E
u
5a�iaDi
n y t
r c u
ysx
u
�o�
e � e
m
u ro
0
100
iU
r U
� a c
y O
0. C_
I d
c Ol
y V
E `�
c
y O
� O
u o'
c T
a�
u a
w
2�
rn m
€ �o
w �
LL t
O`o
CO c
D O
(D
H c
N d
7 07
y V
U
C �
3 a
D y
O1 �
� O
N O.
y N
10
y
Y W
y N
� y
aL
n
U C
07
n ayi
o d
o S
°O
7 •D
7 y
7 N
7 �
c

USDA United States
Agrricultureter Northampton County, North Carolina
Tract 2078
2023 Program Year
Page Cropland Total: 174.61 acres
Map Created February 27, 2023
Base Image Layer flown in 2022
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
OTract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
4) Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
1. t it i i I:!n t 4 A P m i I i ry it!Pf11a IIr
i "ll, 1It
11 1 11
s 111 ilsln to t rSlt iat:t 11tI a '! tst Tit IISOA Fira Sllott AS i atl isit• t3 Al It1P:as P �1� 1fI 1:Iii ; t1.1!1a'. i 11• aP! tt illtl ii a Rit I I f al l !1 t FI'! i1t! 1t �a s I I1111s nt F S A Pr:I q'I!
fl tlfi tl ltt t s l l a l 1, t p, i s t, l 1. s t t sh a:t :'s['-!': 1 t•! r 9 t a l: 11 f n e i r t i R I I, r 11,:! r 1')'11'.1!r�a111. CP A.17 i i t 1 i'll:l'.l r i p s ttitl t)tllt ti atl lt!!'n iaila! 111 : 1llirli RCS
e s 19, 0 z gat✓

USDA United States
rulturetof gricNorthampton County, North Carolina
Tract 1785
2023 Program Year
CLU Acres I HEL Crop
1 P2.9m
2
3 4 oncro land
Page Cropland Total 17 78 acres
Map Created October 20 2022
Base Image Layer flown in 2020
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
:i Restricted Use
7 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compl ance Provisions
icer andmr the NAIP imagery The seprodu-
-•-r•� • _ �a•a a� u a��•+ wnn ns use i ne JsUA farm service Agency assumes no resp*nsbilil, for actual or conquential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs
Weuand identifiers da not represent ire size shape or specdic determination of the area Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS
a. zr'' 3u

USDA United States
BM—epartmnt of Northampton County, North Carolina
Tract 2073
2023 Program Year
CLU Acres I HEL Crop
1 2.54 NHEL
2 12.56 NHEL
3 34.14 1 UHEL I Noncrooland
Page Cropland Total: 15 1 acres
Map Created October 20 2022
Base Image Layer flown in 2020
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
oTract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
D Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
jeer and/or the NAIP imagery The producer
...,..w., �= ua�a a� a� u an ns use. ine usuA rarm service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a resuh of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs
Wetlantl identifiers do not represent the size. shape or specific determination of the area Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS
3(A, <✓

USDA United States
- grricultum Northampton County, North Carolina
Tract 2074
2023 Program Year
CLU Acres I HEL Crop
1 325 1 NHEL
2 921 NH
3 11.1 UHELEL Noncro land
4 11.42 1 UHEL I Noncro land
Page Cropland Total 12 46 acres
Map Created October 20 2022
Base Image Layer flown in 2020
Common Land Unit
Cropiand
Non -Cropland
Efract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Y Restricted Use
p Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Comp',ance Provisions
icer and/or the NAIP imagery The producer
----.•- •••- --•- -- •- -••- o ....nt the size, shape, or specific detemm�ation of the area Refer to your original determination (CPA-o26 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS

USDA United States
DepartmAgriculture Northampton County, North Carolina
Tract 2509
2023 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL ICrop
1 112.72 INHEL
2 119.22 IUHEL lNoncropland
Page Cropland Total, 12 72 acres
Map Created October 20. 2022
Base Image Layer flown In 2020
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
• Restricted Use
p Limited Restrictions
O Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
ucer and/or the NAIP magery. The producer
u�.�cp,e Inc ua�a as o an° assumes an ns Rs assouatea wnn ns use the USUA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsiblhty for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs
Weiland
identRers do not represent the size, shape, or specific tlele rtnination of the area Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) forexact boundaries and detenninalions or contactNRCS

USDA United States
DepartAgriculture of
Northampton County, North Carolina
Tract 1527
2023 Program Year
Page Cropland Total: 74.9 acres
Map Created October 20. 2022
Base Image Layer flown in 2020
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
t Restricted Use
p Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
lucer and/or the NAIP imagery The producer
accepis me Cara as is and assumes as nsxs assocreted won os use Ire ..DA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs
Wetland identileis do not represent the size shape or specific determination of the area Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS

�&O#V&w
LAGOON CLOSURE PIPE SPILLWAY DESIGN
PRODUCER: Jimmy Barrow - West Lagoon COUNTY: Northampton
Designed By: Joy Sherrod Checked By: Chris Smith Date: 2/27/2023
The waste effluent in the lagoon, including sludge, is to be agitated and removed. The waste slurry is to be land applied on crop fields at
agronomic rates. The waste discharge pipes from the swine buildings to the lagoon will be removed or filled with concrete, and the lagoon
used as a freshwater pond.
Since the depth of the water impounded against the embankment at the auxiliary will be 3 feet or more above the lowest original ground
elevation, the "new" pond will require an auxiliary spillway (either a pipe or open channel) and must meet NRCS CPS 378, Pond practice
standard. The spillway must be sized for the larger design storm event shown in Table 2 and Table 5.
Water surface (acres): 0.6 Drainage area including top of embankment (acres): 0.8
Effective embankment height (ft.): <10' Depth from lagoon bottom to top embankment (ft.): 12.2
Detention storage (ac ft): 7.3 Depth from lagoon bottom to spillway (ft.): 9.6
Based on CPS 378 Table 2, the principle spillway will be designed for a storm event equal to: I year
Based on CPS 378 Table 5, the auxiliary spillway will be designed for a storm event equal to: 10 year
Type of spillway to be installed] pipe spillway
Table 2. Minimum Principal Spillway Capacity
Effective Height (ft)'
Principal Spillway Design Storm Frequency (yry-3
c 20
1
20 - 24.9
2
25 - 29.5
5
10
30 - 35
NOTE: Effective height is the difference in elevation, between the open channel spillway crest and lowest point at ground
level. Where no open channel spillway is planned, use the lowest point on top of the embankment. Detention storage
(acres -feet) is the capacity in the pond below the crest of the open channel auxiliary spillway or the top of embankment
where no auxiliary channel spillway is planned.
Table S. Minimum auxiliary spillway capacity
Minimum design storm'
Drainage area
(acre)
Effective height of
dam' puuy
Detention storage
(acre -teat)
Frequency (years)
Minimum duration
(hours)
20 or less
20 or less
c than 50
10
24
20 or less
> than 20
c than 50
25
24
> than 20
All of e-M
-
c than 50
25
24
-
50
24
NOTE: Design a minimum of 1.0' of freeboard between the design high -water -flow elevation in the auxiliary spillway or top
of pipe spillway and the lowest elevation on top of the embankment.
SPILLWAY DESIGN:
1) Using TR55 Hydrologic Program, a IOyr 24hr storm event results in a peak discharge of- 5.10 cfs
2) Using NRCS Hydraulic Formula Program, the pipe size Is: diameter = 121nches length = 30 feet
OR 3) Using NRCS EFH Chapter 11, the open channel spillway size is:
depth: width: exit slope (%): 4.0
SUMMARY:
Pipe minimum diameter. 12Inches
Pipe length :
30 feet
Pipe material:
Schedule 40 PVC
Lowest embankment elev.:
88.7
Pipe upstream Invert elev.:
86.1
Pipe downstream Invert elev.:
85.7
Open Channel Depth:
0 feet
Channel Bottom Width:
0 feet
Inside Slopes (min. 3:1):
3:1
Exit Slope (%):
0.0
Exit Slope Length:
0.0
Channel spillway crest elev:
0.0

USDA United States
—sue Department of
Agriculture
Natural Resources
`onservatlon Service
Project Name: Jimmy Barrow - West Lagoon
Project Description: pipe spillway design
Designed by: JS
Checked by: CS
Approved by: JS
Report Generated 02/27/2023
EFT Version 4.0.8.0
Pressure Flow
Location: Northampton County
Practice: Lagoon conversion to pond
Date:
Date:
Date: 2/27/2023
el. 88.7'
el 87.7' +Mf
N�wM)
max. el 86 1' "'"p'loi el. 85.7'
1 L-4th ttl I
28rr
Q - A i+Ko+Kb+Kpc
5007 n2
Kp — d./a
Inputs
Water surface elevation: 87.70 ft design surcharge head
Invert outlet elevation : 85.70 ft
RiWWKA: 12.OQ In
Lenoth of oioa j0 Od R
Manning's Coefficient (n) : 0.011 Sch. 40 PVC
Entrance Coefficient (Ke) : 0.50
Bend Coefficient (Kb) : 0.00
Outputs
Flow Q : 5.24 cfs (Q 10 year = 5 tocfs)
Velocity: 6.67 ft/sec
Friction Coefficient (Kp) : 0.022
Max allowable fall in pipe
when
outlet is not subme ed : 0.46 It
Sheet 1 of 1

WinTR-55 Current Data Description
--- Identification Data ---
User: J Sherrod Date: 2/27/2023
Project: Jimmy Barrow West Lagoon Units: English
SubTitle: Lagoon Conversion to pond - pipe designAreal Units: Acres
State: North Carolina
County: Northampton NOAA
Filename: <new file>
--- Sub -Area Data ---
Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lagoon Outlet 0.8 93 0.1
Total area: .80 (ac)
--- Storm Data --
Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period
2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1-Yr
(in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.41 4.41 5.25 6.52 7.62 8.84 2.82
Storm Data Source: Northampton NOAA County, NC (NRCS)
Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II
Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard>
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 2/27/2023 3:45:20 PM

J Sherrod Jimmy Barrow West Lagoon
Lagoon Conversion to pond - pipe design
Northampton NOAA County, North Carolina
Storm Data
Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period
2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1-Yr
(in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.41 4.41 5.25 6.52 7.62 8.84 2.82
Storm Data Source: Northampton NOAA County, NC (NRCS)
Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II
Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard>
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 2/27/2023 3:45:20 PM

J Sherrod Jimmy Barrow West Lagoon
Lagoon Conversion to pond - pipe design
Northampton NOAA County, North Carolina
Watershed Peak Table
Sub -Area ak Flow by Rainfall Return Period
or Reach 10-Yr
Identifier c s
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBAREAS
Lagoon 5.10
REACHES
OUTLET 5.10
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 2/27/2023 3:45:20 PM

J Sherrod Jimmy Barrow West Lagoon
Lagoon Conversion to pond - pipe design
Northampton NOAA County, North Carolina
Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table
Sub -Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period
or Reach 10-Yr
Identifier (cfs)
(hr)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBAREAS
Lagoon 5.10
11.93
REACHES
OUTLET 5.10
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 2/27/2023 3:45:20 PM

J Sherrod Jimmy Barrow West Lagoon
Lagoon Conversion to pond - pipe design
Northampton NOAA County, North Carolina
Sub -Area Summary Table
Sub -Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub -Area
Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description
(ac) (hr)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lagoon .80 0.100 93 Outlet
Total Area: .80 (ac)
WinTR-55, version 1.00.10 Page 2 2/27/2023 3:45:20 PM

J Sherrod Jimmy Harrow West Lagoon
Lagoon Conversion to pond - pipe design
Northampton NOAA County, North Carolina
Sub -Area Time of Concentration Details
Sub -Area
Flow
Mannings's
End Wetted
Travel
Identifier/
Length
Slope
n
Area Perimeter Velocity
Time
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ft)
(ft/ft)
(sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec)
(hr)
Lagoon
SHEET
10
0.0200
0.240
0.037
SHALLOW
329
0.050
Time of Concentration
0.1
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 2/27/2023 3:45:20 PM

J Sherrod Jimmy Barrow West Lagoon
Lagoon Conversion to pond - pipe
design
Northampton NOAA County, North Carolina
Sub -Area Land Use and Curve Number
Details
Sub -Area
Hydrologic
Sub -Area
Curve
Identifier Land Use
Soil
Area
Number
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group
(ac)
Lagoon Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways
D
.6
98
Meadow -cont. grass (non grazed)
D
.2
78
Total Area / Weighted Curve Number
,8
93
WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 2/27/2023 3:45:20 PM

mSEl
�k
of
E\
§K
IA!,
�\
a
a
f
.2va .0
k ■
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
|
a�
�¢
N
!a
$
k §
§
a
�
k
§
.
■
§
I
a
■
7
®
$
00
®
e
�
Ij
$
0
K
7
)}
�
z
z o§
_ _ _ _ _ __ _
|
!
| �

Hydrologic Soil Group —Northampton County, North Carolina
Hydrologic Soil Group
Jimmy Barrow _ West Lagoon
Map unit symbol I Map unit name I Rating ( Acres In! 01 I Percent of AOI
CrB Craven fine sandy loam, D 0.81 100.0%
1 to 4 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 0.8 100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter Is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/27/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

9
ho
m
Q
E
s,
B
_m
12
T
L
V = N
c) P Ini@ m s c
tl ■ O 0 * .
m
a
m
A
0
g W
„
g
�
o
C G
g 8 @
C J a
�a
g
Z
O
m a m Z �Q o
m
o
m
� a
W ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 2
Z
2 2
■ o■
❑ 0
�o
N

1 —TillLIL P-45 UMDJG
TV lyr M."s r pau64ml
NVId 311S 38nSO10 NOOOVI
NOODVI 1S3M — m688ve Aymir jo luawv.d a
Salels Pallun V(
0'
(0
N
a'Coo
>% -
t :; 12
CD 04
N M
o cn
r
CL fA t c
8
8W.5 &-a
Or 5.3 E
CD 4) a > C8
V
E
z N N
I 12 Al:
. . . . . . .. . . .
__j (0
_j V)
b 6
Ld Ui
.11

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWR
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
S WCD
NRCS
77 GZ�3-G7ff9
2.r� -sue - /,31 1=-toy-6Bi1
ZS.2 - 354.V ?�3 3
ZSi-Say-.5MI_J
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DW R (Division of Water Resources) regional office;
Phone 1f11,&Z3-6"7Xfer hours, Emergency Management number: 800-858-0368 or
919-733-3300. Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number,
the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the
location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The
corrective measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number 24
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - .Sete Aj o-"
December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimise off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: cT+A X�C4doV- Tiu C, /✓fig/fj�.//
b. Contractors Address: 70V Gy-, fie o /FAsy,Q 10W. o/,'ve NC ZS3 GS
c. Contractors Phone: Q/ 9 — 73 Zr — o 9 7a
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:_ evil/;qi,,, J` :oo.VC
b. Phone: ZSa
7: Implement procedures as advised by DW R and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
December 18, 1996

APPENDIX 3.1
Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: J %n t.+�� �• c�aV �'OGJ �A c.�QoJ G.ie�s'7� Facility No:
Owner(s) Name
Mailing Address: 7,__ . 12 4L-041S Phone No: 9a0-t9'078- Wo
4CkscA) /V O • ;279YS 9.6-44 County: !e" 1144 ft,0 sa/
Operation Description (remaining animals only):
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type ofSivine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Pouloy No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:
Y: pe ofDahy No. of Animals
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals:
Yes o No o
Yes o No o
(Name) of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's JRA/etf Regional Office (see snap on back) was contacted on (date)
for notification of the of rnd g closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the
start of closure, which began on (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature:
Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency):
Signature:
Phone No.:
Date:
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 March 18, 2002

SENDING SMCMCATIONS FOR CONSMIZATION WORK
Natural Resources conservation Service 1-4�FoaA) CJoj&L,--
9495 NC Highway 305 STE 107 i9le.4
Jackson, NC 27845
[phone]
Diversions
Dams
E Filter Strips br_mWWaterways
Critical tin Cal
Sediment jsasij�s Field Borders
Please observe Planting dates for all cost share work
_----
Plan
Lime
10-10-10 Fertilizer— or Chicken Littere used tons fertilizer or 3-5 tons; oftchicken litter
EW 4
2&se Ze e-d 1,ov ) , C
f COO40--4J-*-J CIS W-4-J-NCGASk
orqprjng..& ]Paft Seeding ........................... . ........ ..... ....... ............ .... ........ . . I
&
edling,U
S L.VeburuarYt-
arch
`!`77 . ..... . ................. . . .... . .... . . ....... 4e e: Sept
I. TallIF N6*# a„ Ter. -0
ABA mall GWn''(wheat,
.:,.,''Iye, etc.)All t.,s
. ....... .. 11 1-� -
40
Z __.M1jW With MY of tjj4,f6lloklji ...
iiall gFraiii.7 .1Sk
41 lo&
AT
eat ...... E
7,.Uhel pier Acr�..
............ I ...... Nov_I ........................ .......... ............ 2 bus'hel per acre.... pea
......... .......... I ep. 15 Nov. --I' j. A Biirley . ..... . ............. ...... S
• Oats
..... .... 2 bushel )ct 15:
• per acre ..................... SeO..1
Korean Lespedeza..
........... 20lbs' -acre ......... Sere 1,6sped per
iq eza ..... L...- ...... may
................. ....... 20 lbs per, acre
W
Wh
Unscarified..;,..
.. ................. ........... ........
Scarfed. ... .. .0
. ............ ..................
CtOber = February
3. Small ry
small O�rch '..-MI
.........................
(Check ...... ......... acre
(Chec' 2 tons e _k'wlth NRCS Office for •alto mulches ;��-,-7 1— . -
rnative u h
et
4. =Nettlin
n finnial
0 Ch r e#Vd
For Sumnior Seedin
I Tom SM]WG.DATFS.
..POr*8rY Cover Plantin s (low
9 .. OrOW166 knee hi
Brown Top mnet.­
......... I ....... .............. 01 bs
♦ Japanese Millet. ... ... ..... May S —July 5
Tom Japanese
........... ....... ...... lbs.
r
nl'Othf�rs'imilarPwqr variety- tMillet va Imee
high h
2. Tjmdpyovggrowing.— shoulder or head fiighj
Hyb—ffd Pearl Mifldt
7
♦
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ............. 25 lbi Acre 1 M4y, jul -7.
Per 'y 5
Sudan S9 Giais ............. j.
...... ...... .... 50 lbs'pe JWy5-
per. acre. ay 5
Permanent Stim'
merPlantings
♦ Pensicola Bahia._
........... ............
♦Pdnsicola Bahia mixed with . - . ................... ­25 ibs W., acre--).. j_'NWchl5tJW16_l5
any of the fbllowin
Annual Lespedeza.....
............................. .,­..• Kolb.......2
Le pedeza;........................ .0 lbs per acre Y
...... s .............. 2Q lbs per acre
• common Lespedeza ........... .. . ; March May
..... o ........................... 20 lbs per acre Uait • Korean LesjQeia ............ I .............. ;. b-May
...................... 20 lbs per acre
♦ Bermuda Grass March - May
• Hulled Bermuda (up
to June) ....................... April
• Unhulled Bermuda ........ 6-10 lbs per acre _'July
.............................................. 15-18 lbs per acre 1' January - March
NOTE: All ingredients average set up for acreage of practice applied on ground. To figure acreage to be seeded
multiply the length times the width of the area to be seeded and divide by 43560 to get an average figure.
EXAMPLE: Grass Waterway -- 30 ft wide / 600 ft long
30 X 600 = 18000; 18000/43560 =.41 acres (rounded off to 0.4 acres)
All temporary Plantings should be followed by permanent Plantings at the next appropriate season

r j
H
T
M
�
c
zo
�
z °
zz
O G aCC z 67
U
C
>- z
01 a u
u
b V
`O
ea �
I a b
(y1
N C
O C C A
O •y N
z u
H
y o
'D .0 A (-- .� E-• v O p y
z
o G
um c�w
a
U
3
o
UU
ria�aru
`9%
Or-o °043
a?
T r'1 N A C C T O ,y N � 7 ei •° O 14
en
V C A .�uC 7 H w .G w 6°p '^ N C A leaf
C t/ C C Y W `Cry y, • C C O '�O T O C . CG G• i"' CO p�Gjy1
AW T yNN x U A •�^� w p ° 7 OD O .r7 C o N 0 pF u iy C
E Fa to
U. u o° g° c A e o v u s
Eai a m n 3" 0 x e 'v b'CO
o. 5 ro a c u u o A �' o c
®° o°^ o w o° ° c tl o. 0 Si 0 c C v °CD
® A uFu m K m tip o° cui 3 0 °: ° o
5° 5"
0 rr u o
N C 3 C U C H .D
C FE•'' '