The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0024210_Permit Issuance_20000525State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director May 25, 2000 Mr. Thomas P. Gore, Plants Division Manager City of High Point Public Services Department P.O. Box 230 High Point, North Carolina 27261 Dear Mr. Gore 1�• 621 mow NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NCF)ENR ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Final Permit High Point Eastside WWTP NPDES Permit NCO024210 Guilford County In accordance with the application for discharge permit, the Division is forwarding herewith the modified NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983. The following comments address High Point's concerns regarding the draft permit: • The Supplement to the Permit Cover Sheet has been modified to reflect, as best as possible, the current and future treatment train. • The footnote for pH given in Part I, A.(1.) has been corrected to 9. • Limits for toxicant parameters are given in ug/1 units (this has been specified in the attached finai permit) . • As is always the case, effluent monitoring must be conducted via an EPA approved method. Specifically, per Part II, D.4. of the NPDES permit, "all test procedures must produce minimum detection and reporting levels that are below the permit discharge requirements and all data generated must be reported down to the minimum detection or lower reporting level of the procedure." To the best of the Division's knowledge, High Point has not regularly tested for chlorinated phenolic compounds in the effluent, so interference may not be an issue. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 919 733-5083, extension 510 (fax) 919 733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Susan_Wilson@ncmail.net Mr. Thomas P. Gore City of High Point 1 Page 2 of 3 Effluent monitoring prior to the upgrade should allow High Point an opportunity to determine the appropriateness of the GC/FID method. Method 604 or 6420 are recommended for testing wastewater for phenolic compounds. Should you have further questions regarding appropriate methods for testing phenols, please contact Connie Brower, Chemist/ Laboratory Section, at (919) 733 - 3908. • The phenols limit listed for Richland Creek is correct for discharge into a Class WS - IV waterbody. Both Richland Creek and the Deep River have already been reclassified to WS - IV, regardless of whether or not the dam is built. The City may request that the Division review the monitoring data collected prior to the upgrade to determine if a limit is still appropriate for phenolic compounds. • The quarterly monitoring requirement for mercury will remain in the final permit for 16 MGD permitted flow. After 2 years of data have been collected, High Point may request that the Division review the data to determine if a monitoring requirement or limit (with upgrade) is still appropriate. • As stated previously, both Richland Creek and the Deep River have been reclassified to Class WS- IV. This classification stands regardless of the existence of the Lake. The Division is required to implement limits to protect the designated use/ classification of a waterbody. Therefore, the Nickel limit, based on the water quality standard of 25 ug/l for water supply (WS) waters, will remain in the permit. • The toxicant limits were derived based on the water quality standard for the parameter of concern and the 7Q l Os of the receiving stream (either Richland Creek or the Deep River). The exception to this occurs with the phenols limit. The concern with chlorinated phenols is based on an aesthetic standard (taste and odor), The 30Q2 streamflow is used to derive allowable levels for aesthetic standards. Please contact Susan Wilson should you require more detailed information on the derivation of toxicant limits. [Ref. 15A NCAC 2B .0206 Flow Design Criteria for Effluent Limitations]. If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Mail Service Center 6714, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding. Please take notice that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water Quality. Part II, E.4. addresses the requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit. Mr. Thomas P.-Gore Giiy of High Point Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Susan Wilson at telephone number (919) 733-5083, ext. 510. Sincerely, Original Signed By David k Goodrich Kerr T. Stevens Enclosures: NPDES Permit No. NCO024210 cc: Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Point Source Compliance/ Enforcement Unit Central Files NPDES Files 1 Permit No. NCO024210 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Water Quality Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, City of High Point is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at High Point/ Eastside Wastewater Treatment Plant Off NCSR 2569 Denton Guilford County to receiving waters designated as Richland Creek in the Cape Fear Basin in accordance with the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective July 1, 2000. This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2001. Signed this day May 25, 2000. Original Signed By David A. Goodrich Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission / s t FJ Permit No. NC0024210 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET City of High Point Eastside WWTP is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate a 16 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of screening, grit removal, primary sedimentation, flow equalization, trickling filters [to be decommissioned with upgrade], aeration basins, secondary sedimentation, residuals thickening devices, filtration, incinerator and lime stabilization for residuals, and effluent UV disinfection located at the High Point/ Eastside Wastewater Treatment Plant, 5898 Riverdale Road, Guilford County, and 2. Discharge wastewater from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Richland Creek which is classified WS IV & CA waters in the Cape Fear River Basin [refer to Part I, A. (1.)]. 3. After receiving an Authorization to Construct permit, construct treatment facilities not to exceed 26 MGD design flow, 4. Discharge wastewater from the approved treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into 1) - Richland Creek [refer to Part I, A. (2.)], or 2) The Deep River [if the Randleman Reservoir is constructed, refer to Part I, A. (3.)], which is classified WS IV & CA waters in the Cape Fear River Basin. City of High Point High Point/ Eastside WX.VTP NPDI:S NC0024210 !,:a I N :A V� ?CV Ilz 0 a ' A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expansion above 16.0 MGD, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfa11001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum. Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Locationl, Flow 16.0 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD, 5 day (209C)2 [April 1- October 31] 8.0 mg/l 12.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent BOD, 5 day (202C)2 [November 1- March 31 ] 16.0 mg/I 24.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent Total Suspended Residue2 30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent NHs as N Aril 1- October 31 3.0 m Daily Composite Effluent NHs as N November 1- March 311 6.0 mg/I Daily Composite Effluent Dissolved Oxygen3 Daily Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen 3Meek Grab Upstream & Downstream Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200/100 ml 400/100 ml Daily Grab Effluent Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 3Meek Grab Upstream & Downstream Total Residual Chlorine4 3Meek Grab Effluent Total Nitrogen NO2+NO3+TKN Monthly Composite Effluent Total Phosphorus Monthly Composite Effluent Temperature 2C Daily Grab Effluent Temperature ('C) 3Meek Grab Upstream & Downstream Conductivity Daily Grab Effluent Conductivity 3Meek Grab Upstream & Downstream Chronic Toxicfty5 Quarterly Composite Effluent Cadmium 2.1 pgA 15 pgA Weekly Composite Effluent Lead �V 25 pgA 33.8 pgA Weekly Composite Effluent Nickel �-`-25 pgA 261 pgA Weekly Composite Effluent Copper ��_ 2/Month Composite Effluent C anide6 g z,z Monthly Grab Effluent Mercury7 �� Quarterly Composite Effluent Phenols8 Quarterly Grab Effluent Silver -, ` Quarterly Composite Effluent Zinc ' - 2/Month Composite Effluent PHg 6-9 Daily Grab Effluent (Footnotes on next page) City- of High Point High Point/ Eastside WN-VI'P NPDES NCO024210 A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Continued) Footnotes: 1. Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream (2 locations) : (1) Richland Creek at least 100 feet above outfall, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1113, D - Downstream (2 locations): (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/Week during June - September and 1 /Week during the remaining months of the year. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal). 3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 5.0 mg/l. 4. Monitoring for total residual chlorine is required only if chlorine is used as a back-up disinfection method. 5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia dubia) P/F at 90%: January, April, July, and October [see Part I, A(4.)]. Toxicity monitoring shall coincide with metals and cyanide monitoring. 6. The quantitation limit for cyanide shall be 10 ug/1 (10 ppb). Levels reported at less than 10 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 7. The quantitation limit for mercury shall be 0.2 ug/1 (0.2 ppb). Levels reported at less than 0.2 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 8. Phenols are defined as chlorinated phenolic compounds. 9. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. City- of High Point High Point/ E astsidc NVIiITP NPDES NCO024210 A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and discharge to Richland Creek) During the period beginning upon expansion above 16.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS. LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Locationl Flow 26.0 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD, 5 day (20'C)2 [April 1- October 31 ] 5.0 mg/I 7.5 mg1I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent BOD, 5 day (209C)2 [November 1- March 31 ] 10.0 mg/I 15.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent Total Suspended Residue2 30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent NH3 as N Aril 1- October 311 1.0 m /l Daily Composite Effluent NH3 as N November 1- March 311 2.0 m Daily Composite Effluent Dissolved Oxygen3 Daily Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200/100 ml 400/100 ml Daily Grab Effluent Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Total Residual Chlorine4 18 µg/I 3/Week Grab Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) [April 1- October 31 ] 6.0 mg/I 1301 lbs/day Weekly Composite Effluent Upstream & Downstream Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) [November 1- March 31]] Weekly Composite Effluent Upstream & Downstream Total Phosphorus 0.5 mg/I 108 lbs/day Weekly Composite Effluent Upstream & Downstream Temperature 'C Daily Grab Effluent Temperature ('C) 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Conductivity ' Daily Grab Effluent Conductivity 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Chronic Toxicity5 Quarterly Composite Effluent Cadmium 2.0 pgA 15 pgA Weekly Composite Effluent Lead 25 /I 33.8 vqA Weekly Composite Effluent Mercury6 0.012 pg/I Weekly Composite Effluent Nickel 25 pgA 261 pgA Weekly Composite Effluent Phenols? 1.1 pgll Weekly Grab Effluent Copper 2/Month Composite Effluent C anide8 Monthly Grab Effluent Silver Quarterly Composite Effluent Zinc 2/Month Composite Effluent H9 6-9 Daily Grab Effluent City of High Point High Point/ Eastside V1 VTP N PDES NC0024210 . A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and discharge to Richland Creek) (Continued) Footnotes: 1. Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream (2 locations): (1) Richland Creek at least 100 feet above outfall, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1113, D - Downstream (2 locations): (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/Week during June - September and 1 /Week during the remaining months of the year. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal) . 3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l. 4. The chlorine limit and monitoring are required only if chlorine is used as a back-up disinfection method. 5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaph.nia dubia) P/F at 90% January, April, July, and October [see Part I, A (4)]. Toxicity monitoring shall coincide with metals and cyanide monitoring. 6. The quantitation limit for mercury shall be 0.2 ug/1 (0.2 ppb). Levels reported at less than 0.2 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 7. Phenols are defined as chlorinated phenolic compounds.. Specifically, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4-dimethylphenol, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 2-methylphenol, 4,6- dimethylphenol, 2-nitrophenol, 4-nitrophenol, pentachlorophenol, phenol, and 2,4,5- trichlorophenol should be monitored. 8. The quantitation limit for cyanide shall be 10 ug/1 (10 ppb). Levels reported at less than 10 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 9. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. City of High Point High Point/ Eastside WX.XITP NPDF_S NCO024210 A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and relocation of discharge to Deep River) During the period beginning upon expansion above 16.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS LIMITS:_.. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Location' Flow 26.0 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD, 5 day (209C)2 [April 1- October 31 J 5.0 mg/I 7.5 mgA Daily Composite Influent & Effluent BOD, 5 day (202C)2 [November 1- March 31 ] 10.0 mg/I 15.0 mg/l Daily Composite Influent & Effluent Total Suspended Residue2 30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/l Daily Composite Influent & Effluent NH3 as N Aril 1- October 311 1.0 mg/I Daily Composite Effluent NH3 as N November 1- March 311 2.0 mg/I Daily composite Effluent Dissolved Oxygen3 Daily Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200/100 ml 400/100 ml Daily Grab Effluent Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Total Residual Chlorine4 20 µg/I 3/Week Grab Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) [April 1- October 31] 6.0 mg/I 1301 lbs/day Weekly Composite Effluent Upstream & Downstream Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) [November 1- March 31 J] Weekly Composite Effluent Upstream & Downstream Total Phosphorus 0.5 mg/I 108 lbs/day Weekly Composite Effluent Upstream & Downstream Temperature °C Daily Grab Effluent Temperature (2C) 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Conductivity Daily Grab Effluent Conductivity 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Chronic Toxicity5 Quarterly Composite Effluent Cadmium 2.3 pgA 15 pgA Weekly_Composite Effluent Lead 29 pgA 33.8 pgA Weekly Composite Effluent Mercu 6 0.014 pg/l Weekly Composite Effluent Nickel 29 /I 261 pgfi Weekly Composite Effluent Phenols? 1.4 pg/I Weekly Grab Effluent Copper 2/Month Composite Effluent C anide8 Monthly Grab Effluent Silver Quarterly Composite Effluent Zinc 2/Month Composite Effluent H9 6-9 Daily Grab Effluent City of High Point High Point/ Eastside WXVTP NPDES NC0024210 A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and relocation of discharge to Deep River) (Continued) Footnotes: 1. Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, D - Downstream (1) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/Week during June - September and 1 /Week during the remaining months of the year. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal). 3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l. 4. The chlorine limit and monitoring are required only if chlorine is used as a back-up disinfection method. 5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia dubia) P/F at 85%: January, April, July, and October [see Part I, A (5)]. Toxicity monitoring shall coincide with metals and cyanide monitoring. 6. The quantitation limit for mercury shall be 0.2 ug/1 (0.2 ppb). Levels reported at less than 0.2 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 7. Phenols are defined as chlorinated phenolic compounds. Specifically, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 2- chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4-dimethylphenol, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 2-methylphenol, 4,6- dimethylphenol, 2-nitrophenol, 4-nitrophenol, pentachlorophenol, phenol, and 2,4,5- trichlorophenol should be monitored. 8. The quantitation limit for cyanide shall be 10 ug/1(10 ppb). Levels reported at less than 10 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 9. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. CitV Of Hig1l Point High Point/ East.side X-VX- jTP NPDES NCO024210 S o _ A (4). CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90 %. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised - February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re- opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. Cite of High Point High Point/ East:side VV'A1TP NPDES NCO024210 A (5). CHROMC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LINUT (QRTRLY') The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 85 %. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, guarterl monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised - February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re- opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. City of High Point High Point/ l.astsicle WXXITP NPDF.S NC0024210 Division of Water Quality December 14, 1998 TO: Reginald Sutton THROUGH: Coleen Sullinn Greg Thorpe . FROM: Boyd DeVane 11v SUBJECT: Comments on High Point Eastside EA We have reviewed the modifications to the EA for the High Point Eastside Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and upgrade and believe that, due to the modifications to the document and the recent action by the Environmental Management Commission to protect the Randleman Lake watershed, most of our earlier concerns have been addressed. We are, however, still concerned about the power source reliability at the site. Although we believe the proposed dual transmission line will provide some additional protection from future outages, from our review of the failure analysis for the 1996 to 1998 period, we do not have adequate assurances that future failures will be reduced to an acceptable level. Unless additional information is provided that convincingly demonstrates that the reliability will be sufficiently improved, we intend to include the requirement for standby power in the upcoming NPDES permit. cc: Bobby Blowe Coleen Sullins E """ p JUL - 1 IM DENR - WATER QUALITY POINT SOURCE BRANCH NOTES TO FILE 5/15/00 High Point Eastside I' NC0024210' Guilford County High Point's comments on draft: (corresponding to nos. on their letter dated 4/ 18/00) 1. OK, corrected Effluent limits and monitoring requirements 1. Corrected 2. a) Clarified with ug/1 units on toxicants. b) E-mailed Connie Brower (lab cert.) re. phenols testing; she questioned how they could know of interferences when no testing has been conducted. Also wrote that several methods were available. She also said M604 and 6420 are approved for wastewater and could reach detection/reporting limit (I'll state in final letter to clarify). Well not advise another method without empirical data. I'll also list specific chlorinated phenols to be tested. c) statement is incorrect - Phenols based on WS classification of Richland Creek. 3. Monitoring will remain - we can review again at a later date. 4. Ni - based on WS classification - it's correct. 5. Explained this in letter. Phenols based on 30Q2. Others based on 7QIOs. W-SRLaM CDLeON, 5+1WN04 cd,6&z /bkE7:TiNq i"C>A-y `b DlScgS5 / ?05yt61µr4 oG µoy.Aiokiva b�6 la COM('Ll4-fJcE PtcCD" (s.£,/dk 1/j paa&5) CITY OF HIGH POINT NORTH CAROLINA April 18, 2000 FEDERAL EXPRESS OVERNIGHT TRACKING NUMBER: # 809-750-795-918 Ms. Susan Wilson State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 (919) 733-5083 ext. 510 Comments to: March 15, 2000 NPDES Draft Permit High point Eastside WWTP Permit No. NCO024210 Guilford County APR 2 5 27 I �- — _- 4u� � —� DeraP - w-, I , , Please find the following comments in response to our concerns over the subject draft permit. Supplement to cover Sheet: 1. Features of the Treatment Facility — At present, the treatment train does not include anaerobic digesters or pH adjustment. Considering the presentation of the "boiler plates" format for the A. (L), (2.) and (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS, the D trickling filter will be removed during the upgrade and would not be applicable in boiler plates (2.) and (3.) A. (1.), (2.) and (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIMMENTS 1. There is a reference in broiler plate (1.) for pH directing the reader to the footnote #8. We believe it should be footnote #9. `/c-,, 2. Phenols: (a) We are not sure of what units apply to the limits given in boiler plate (2.) and (3.). However we are assuming they will be ug/L (ppb) relative to comments made in the text concerning other items in this section of the boiler plate. (b) We would like to be specific about methods acceptable for analytical monitoring for phenols.. Colorimetric methods do not provide acceptable resolution relative to comments in Standard Methods concerning interferences. This is a similar issue to cyanide's analytical problems. Gas Chromatograph/Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID) does not yield acceptable resolution and/or selectivity to meet the monitoring requirement with or without a numerical limit. We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss using Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometric such as Method USEPA 624.0 and defining the phenol parameters. �f,CS,lu�� 60q 7 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT, P.O. Box 230, 211 S. HAMILTON STREET, HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA 27261 TELEPHONE (336) 883-3410 FAX 336-883-3109 7DD 336-883-8517 (c) In the Richland Creek boiler plate #2 for phenol, to remain consistent with the explanaiton in the cover letter, the listing for phenol should be for monitoring only not a numerical limit. This boiler plate does not include formation of Randleman Reservoir. 3. Mercury — We do not necessarily agree with the lack of data to support a Reasonable Potential to Exceed exemption for mercury. The quarterly Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) requirement that has been in Eastside's permit for at least 2 cycles and the city's Industrial Pretreatment Program's Long-term Monitoring Program (LTMP) both have evaluated mercury. We have not seen any sources or other evidence of its presence and are unaware of contamination in the waste or receiving stream or biota. We would appreciate the opportunity to revisit this issue at your convenience in order to maintain this as a monitoring limit only. r s `y 4. Nickel — It seems that this should remain at the 15A NCAC Stream Quality Standard of 88 ug/L for non -drinking water standards on boiler plate #1 and #2 to remain consistent with the assumption of not constructing Randleman Lake. CNo - 2 Fes, cc r; : 70 ws] 5. 7Q 10 vs Toxics Limits — The difference between the given limit for boilerplate #2 and #3 for cadmium is 15%. Phenol is 27% difference. All other "toxics" are equal. There does not seem to be consistent treatment of the limits with the implicit changes of receiving waters. It would help to understand the method used to acquire these numbers before making a decision on the applicability of the limit. Please feel free to contact us if further information or clarification is needed. Respectfully, Thomas P. Gore Plants Division Manager CC: ACA Winston-Salem Regional Office Division of Environmental Health PUBLIC NOTICE STATE OF NORTN CAROLINA ENVIflONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSIOry/NPOES UNIT 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGN NC 27699-1617 NOTIFICbTION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A NPOES WASTEWATER PERMIT C3 co 42832 News & Record Published by News & Record, Inc. Greensboro, North Carolina North Carolina, Guilford County AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared Lolita Cousin who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That she is the Publishers Representative of the Greensboro News & Record, Inc. a corporation, engaged in the publication of newspapers known as "News & Record", published, issued and entered as second class mail in the City of Greensboro in said County and State; 2. That she is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in the News & Record on the following dates: March 17, 2000 for Notification of Intent to Issue A NPDES Wastewater Permit and placed through NCDENR; Div of Water Quality 3. That the said newspaper (or newspapers) in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina. This 17 day of March, 2000 Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 17 :;--I. D n expi MAR 2 8 2000 DFNR -WATER QUALITY POINT SOURCE kpril 10, 2001 Publishers Representative Notary Public T. PARRISH NOTARY PUBLIC ALAMANCE COUNTY, Na. .Commission Expires 4-10.2005 State of North Carolina ---- -- Department of Environment and Natural Resources N C Division of Water Quality MAR z 1 2090 James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Winston -Sale: Kerr T. Stevens, Director Regional Office March 15, 2000 To: Lee Spencer NC DENR / DEH / Regional Engineer Winston-Salem Regional Office From: Christie R. Jackson NPDES Unit Subject: Review of Draft NPDES Permit NCO024210 High Point East Side WWTP Guilford County NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES RECEIVE[ N.C. Dept. of EHNR MAR 2 1 2000 Winston-Salem Regional Office �1- ! MAY - 1 2000 1 Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this -form by i April 14. 2000. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at the telephone number or e-mail address listed at the bottom of this page. RESPONSE: (Check one) ❑Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated water quality standards. Concurs with issuance of the above permit, provided the following conditions are met: -I'L1L U ._ 4_._..__- U47-E1-! f'Ro/�ost,0 K.a,IDLLM.t.J 4,4kti iS USL.D As A-5da4et of Q*rxve ❑ Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached: ? 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, extension 538 (lax) 919 733-0719 Vlsrr us ON THE INTERNET@htlp://h2o.enr.state.nc.ustNPDES Chdslie.Jackson@ ncmail.nel Division of Water Quality March 2, 2000 u108101)11XV11% TO: Susan Wilson THROUGH: Matt Matthews 0` it FROM: Kristie Robeson SUBJECT: Draft Permit Correction High Point Eastside NPDES Permit No. NCO024210 Guilford County MAR - 8 2000 L DENR - WATER QUALITY POINT SOURCE BRANCH Our office has received the fact sheet for NPDES permit development for the subject facility. Upon review of this fact sheet, we noted that the organism type on all the effluent limitations pages needs to be changed from Pimephales promelas to Ceriodaphnia dubia. In addition, Special Condition A(4) and A(5) contains the wrong months for toxicity testing. These months should be changed to January, April, July, and October to prevent any confusion for the facility. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comment prior to this draft going to Public Notice. If you have any questions, please contact me at 733-2136. cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office/Water Quality Section ESB Facility Files Central Files — Cno- z DENR/DWQ FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT (NO RELOCATION OF DISCHARGE POINT; NO RANDLEMAN LAKE DAN) NPDES No. NC0024210, High Point - Eastside WWTP Facih!y Information Applicant/Facility Name: High Point Eastside WWTP Applicant Address: P.O. Box 230, High Point, NC 27261 Facility Address: 5898 Riverdale Road, Jamestown, NC 27281 Permitted Flow 16 MGD, Expansion to 26 MGD & relocation to Deep River/ Randleman Lake Type of Waste: 97% Domestic/ 3% Industrial (est. from application) Facility/Permit Status: Modificatioty Coun "' oc' Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: Richland Creek n ris nf/ i J j Stream Classification: WS-IV CA SI: 17-7-(4) 303(d) Listed?: YES Subbasin: 03-06-08 Drainage Area (mt2): 16 Summer 7Q10 (cfs) 1 Winter 7g10 (cfs): 2.6 Average Flow (cfs): 15 IWC (%): 96% at 16 MGD -98% at 26 MGD Primary SIC Code: NA SUMMARY FOR HIGH POINT WITH NO CONSTRUCTION OF RANDLEMAN LAKE DAM High Point Eastside intends to expand their discharge to 26 MGD. [This wasteload allocation is presented assuming the dam will not be constructed]. Instream waste concentration and 7Q10s flows were based on existing streamflow information (from previous WLAs, which was cross-checked with updated USGS low flow stream characteristics publication). A proposal for expansion has been ongoing for many years and problematic due to the proposed Randleman dam to create a water supply for the Triad area (Greensboro). The EMC approved nutrient management rules for the proposed Randleman Reservoir watershed on November 11, 1998. The current location on Richland Creek (NS) is listed as impaired for fecal coliform, turbidity, and habitat degradation. Depressed Dos have been documented on the Deep River below the discharge. High point will be required to achieve tertiary treatment with the expansion at the current locaiton. ASSIGNED TO 3 /''t PUEDIATE Z-/v- 60 RECEIVED N.C. Dept. of EHNR FEB 2 5 2000 I h-h Point EasUidc WA4 I P ,VPDES Pcrnm Nlodifiuii,,i P'hc I Winston-Salem Regional Office. TOXICANT PARAMETERS A reasonable potential analysis (RPA) was conducted for all toxicants currently monitored [Cd, Cr, CN, Pb, Ni, Cu, Fe, Hg, Ag, Zn). The analysis was performed for the current location at flows of 16 MGD (IWC-96%) and 26 MGD (IWC = 98%). Reasonable Potential? Limit? Current Location Limit? YES NO MON (mon) YES YES MON. DROP YES MON (Qtrl ) MON. YES Expansion/ No Relocation Acute Chronic Acute Chronic Standard Cadmium YES 15 2.1 15 2.0 Chromium NO Cyanide MON (monthly) Lead YES 33.8 25 33.8 25 Nickel YES 261 25 261 25 Copper MON. Iron DROP Merc MON: 0.012 Silver MON (Qtrly) Zinc MON. Phenols MON (Qtrl) 1.1 Chromium and nickel had been removed during the permit modification 1/11/99. However, based on the instream data and the RPA a nickel limit will be reinstated. Because cyanide values have consistently been less than 10 ug/l since the inception of UV disinfection (— May 1999) the cyanide limit will be reduced to monthly monitoring. Silver values have consistently been less than detection level and the silver limit will be reduced to quarterly monitoring. High Point has not had a toxicity failure in 2 years (to date). Since iron is an action level and may occur naturally in elevated levels, iron will be dropped as a monitoring requirement. Due to EPAs continued concerns regarding copper and zinc, monitoring for these parameters will continue to be required. Phenolic compounds have been included as a monitoring requirement for 16 MGD, then as a limit at 26 MGD due to potential water supply taste/odor concerns. The limits at the WQ standard for lead and nickel at the existing location are due to detected instream levels on Richland Creek (Highpoint's data). The allowable level of 1.1 ug/l at 26 MGD is based on a 30Q2 of 2.9 cfs. The monitoring requirement will ' allow High Point the opportunity to determine if phenols are parameters of concern. This same logic has been used for implementation of a monitoring requirement for mercury at 16 MGD and limit at 26 MGD. TOXICITY TESTING: Recommended Requirement: 90% at the current location on Richland Creek (capped at 90%) The last toxicity failure was reported January 1998. COMPLIANCE SUMMARY: The facility continues to have UI problems (WSRO has expressed continued concerns regarding adequacy of treatment during peak flows). The facility has had assessments during the past year for monthly average violations of BOD5. The facility is within — 80% of the currently permitted flow of 16 MGD. INSTREAM MONITORING: Instream monitoring data indicate depressed D.O.s during summer months (up and downstream on t e Deep River). This is possibly due to NPS as well as PS contributions. High Point has been required to monitor lead and nickel instream. Lead values were above detection in many cases, but were not approaching the water quality standard of 25 ug/l. Nickel values were variable, with some values near the consumption water quality standard of 25 ug/l. Nickel will be a limited parameter with this permit cycle. PROPOSED CHANGES Limits for the expansion are based on tertiary treatment. I liLyh Point I: aststck WW` P NPD'.s Pennit 'N't«clilicatio n Page 1 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE: Draft Permit to Public Notice: March 8, 2000 (est.) Permit Scheduled to Issue: April 24, 2000 STATE CONTACT: If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Susan Wilson at (919) 733-5038 ext. 510. SWILSON 7�pN�s REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT: \ \ �ot2R�CT NoTic= -110-,HwLD Suvs+ ac�uahc 4 X 'ivPu+ r-i ar-d I A 06 C�:au' C- ? Cer,.o. n r160 I i M i+64�of15 (Jaac- C1jirLT �y'C"VY i is�re Pa r,et n m o n �GiS for +es 1=� n a disc(-4c-n et ', rl e 6f tee e. `3l�1 00 �F C3Z- Full ro-r\i if .2-2 9—v 0 use oP f 15ts Ceriod apAn i(;� a156 Acre 15 1P��orMP� . J I T ali Brim I�:UM 11 & �kU I P 'T1)I'S Ncrmil Modincau'.0 Paec , DENR/DWQ • • FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT EXPANSION TO 26 MGD AND RELOCATION TO THE DEEP RIVER NPDES No. NCO024210, High Point - Eastside WWTP Facility Information Applicant/FacilityName: High Point Eastside WWTP Applicant Address: P.O. Box 230, High Point, NC 27261 Facility Address: 5898 Riverdale Road, Jamestown, NC 27281 Permitted Flow 16 MGD, Expansion to 26 MGD & relocation to Deep River/ Randleman Lake Type of Waste: 97% Domestic/ 3% Industrial (est. from application) Facility/Permit Status: Modification County: 06 Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: Richland Creek Deep River (relocation) Regional Office: WSRO Stream Classification: WS-IV CA SI: 17-7-(4) WS-IV CA SI: 17-(4) USGS Topo Quad: D19NW 303(d) Listed?: YES YES Permit Writer: S. Wilson Subbasin: 03-06-08 03-06-08 Date: February 2, 2000 Drainage Area (mi2): 16 96.3 Summer 7Q10 (cfs) 1 6.9 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 2.6 Average Flow (cfs): 15 96.3 fWC (%): 96% 85% Primary SIC Code: NA NA SUMMARY High Point Eastside intends to expand their discharge to 26 MGD. The Department agreed to this as long as the discharge would be relocated downstream to a site near Freeman's Mill on the Deep River. This wasteload allocation is presented assuming the dam will be constructed and Randleman Lake will be formed. An additional fact sheet is attached which addresses the expansion if the dam for Randleman Lake is not built. Instream waste concentration and 7Q10s flow were based on freshwater inflow to the Deep River at the proposed point of discharge (NCSR 1129 at Freeman's Mill, USGS # 209948955). The proposed limits were presented to the City as part of speculative limits through letters dated September 18, 1995 and February 24, 1999. A proposal for expansion has been ongoing for many years and problematic due to the proposed Randleman dam to create a water supply for the Triad area (Greensboro). The EMC approved nutrient management rules for the proposed Randleman Reservoir watershed on November 11, 1998. Both the current location on Richland Creek and the proposed location on Deep River at Freeman's Mill are listed on NCs 303d list (1998 & 2000). Richland Creek (NS) was impaired for fecal coliform, turbidity, and habitat degradation. Deep River (PS) was deemed impaired for fecal coliform, habitat degradation, and biological impairment. Predictive modeling indicated that the dam for Randleman Lake and the High Point Eastside discharge may cause nutrient problems within the lake, therefore both nitrogen and phosphorus limits have been placed on the discharge upon expansion. Iheh Point Fatia.ide WWTP `ll'UI;S Permit modification Paec I • TOXICANT PARAMETERS A reasonable potential analysis (RPA) was conducted for all toxicants currently monitored [Cd, Cr, CN, Pb, Ni, Cu, Fe, Hg, Ag, Zn]. The dilution at the proposed relocation point will be slightly higher than the current location (IWC=85%, therefore, a greater allowable level, or limit, will be applied). Reasonable Potential? Limit? Current Location Limit? YES NO MON (mon) YES YES MON. DROP YES MON (Qtrl ) MON. YES Relocation Acute Chronic Acute Chronic Standard Cadmium YES 15 2.1 15 2.3 Chromium NO Cyanide MON (monthly) Lead YES 33.8 25 33.8 29 Nickel YES 261 25 261 29 Copper MON. Iron DROP Mercury MON. 0.014 Silver MON (Qtrly) Zinc MON. Phenols MON (Qtrl) 1.4 Chromium and nickel had been removed during the permit modification 1/11/99. However, based on the instream data and the RPA a nickel limit will be reinstated. Because cyanide values have consistently been less than 10 ug/l since the inception of UV disinfection (-- May 1999) the cyanide limit will be reduced to monthly monitoring. Silver values have consistently been less than detection level and the silver limit will be reduced to quarterly monitoring. High Point has not had a toxicity failure in 2 years (to date). Since iron is an action level and may occur naturally in elevated levels, iron will be dropped as a monitoring requirement. Due to EPAs continued concerns regarding copper and zinc, monitoring for these parameters will continue to be required. Phenolic compounds have been included as a monitoring requirement for 16 MGD, then as a limit at 26 MGD due to potential water supply taste/odor concerns. The limits at the WQ standard for lead and nickel at the existing location are due to detected instream levels on Richland Creek (Highpoint's data). The allowable level of 1.4 ug/l at 26 MGD is based on a 30Q2 of 17 cfs. The monitoring requirement will allow High Point the opportunity to determine if phenols are parameters of concern. This same logic has been used for implementation of a monitoring requirement for mercury at 16 MGD and limit at 26 MGD. TOXICITY TESTING: Recommended Requirement: Chronic P/F @ 85% (with the relocation); 90% at the current location on Richland Creek. The last toxicity failure was reported January 1998. COMPLIANCE SUMMARY: The facility continues to have I/I problems (WSRO has expressed continued concerns regarding adequacy of treatment during peak flows). The facility has had assessments during the past year for monthly average violations of BOD5. The facility is within — 80% of the currently permitted flow of 16 MGD. INSTREAM MONITORING: Instream monitoring data indicate depressed D.O.s during summer months (up and downstream on the Deep River). This is possibly due to NPS as well as PS contributions. High Point has been required to monitore)(lead and nickel instream. Lead values were above detection in many cases, but were not approaching the water quality standard of 25 ug/l. Nickel values were variable, with some values near the consumption water quality standard of 25 ug/l. Nickel will be a limited parameter with this permit cycle. PROPOSED CHANGES Limits for the expansion are based on Randleman Lake rule (2B .0249) and tertiary treatment for the expansion phase. The nitrogen limit is based on a predictive nutrient model for the proposed lake. Toxicant limits are based on estimated freshwater inflow via Deep River at the proposed discharge point. l lis,h I'm tit Eastside WWTP N1101"S Porinit W)diti4atiotl Paue 2 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE: Draft Permit to Public Notice: March 8, 2000 (est.) Permit Scheduled to Issue: April 24, 2000 STATE CONTACT: If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Susan Wilson at (919) 733-5038 ext. 510. SUSAN A. WILSON REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT: -.2 r-ao I li.,1, I.:. _.idr W W"TP `111; M uilication A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Continued) Footnotes: 1. Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream (2 locations): (1) Richland Creek at least 100 feet above outfall, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1113, D - Downstream (2 locations): (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/Week during June - September and 1 /Week during the remaining months of the year. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total 150/b of the respective influent value (85% rem 3. The daily average en effluent VFnwoW Residue concentrations shall not exceed shall not be less than 5.0 mg/l. 4. Chronic Toxici (Pimephales promelas) P F 00/w Januaa. April, J ly, and October [see Part I, A(4.)]. Toxicity m shah th metals an cyanide monitoring. 5. The quantitation limit for cyanide shall be 10 ug/1 (10 ppb). Levels reported at less than 10 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 6. The quantitation limit for mercury shall be 0.2 ug/1 (0.2 ppb). Levels reported at less than 0.2 ug/I shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 7. Phenols are defined as chlorinated phenolic compounds. 8. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and discharge to Richland Creek) During the period beginning upon expansion above 16.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Locationi Flow 26.0MGD 'l � Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD, 5 day (20eC)2 [April 1- October 311 5.0 mg/I 1 m Daily Composite Influent & Effluent BOD, 5 day (20eC)2 [November 1 - March 31 ] 10.0 mg/I 15.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent Total Suspended Residue2 30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent NH3 as N Aril 1-October 31 1.0 mg/I Daily Composite Effluent NH3 as N November 1- March 31 2.0 mg/I Daily Composite Effluent Dissolved Oxygen3 Daily Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200/100 ml 400/100 ml Daily Grab Effluent Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) TWeek Grab Upstream & Downstream Total Residual Chlorine r 9 3/Week Grab Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) [April I - October 31 6.0 mg/I 4101 'r' Weekly Composite Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) November 1 - March 31 MA55 Mr75 Atso Weekly Composite Effluent Total Phosphorus 0.5 m /Ij Weekly Composite Effluent Temperature T Io8# Daily Grab Effluent Temperature (2C) 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Conductivity Daily Grab Effluent Conductivity 3NMeek Grab Upstream & Downstream Chronic Toxicity4 Quarterly Composite Effluent Cadmium 2.0 15 Weekly Composite Effluent Lead 25 33.8 Weekly Composite Effluent Mercury5 0.012 Weekly Composite Effluent Nickel 25 261 Weekly Composite Effluent Phenols6 1.1 Weekly Effluent Copper 2/Month Composite Effluent C anide7 Monthly Grab Effluent Silver Quarterly Composite Effluent Zinc 2/Month Composite Effluent R8 6-9 Daily Grab Effluent (Footnotes on next page) cc Pat, A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and discharge to Richland Creek) (Continued) Footnotes: 1. Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream (2 locations): (1) Richland Creek at least 100 feet above outfall, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1113, D - Downstream (2 locations): (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/Week during June - September and 1 /Week during the remaining months of the year. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal). & /0 3. The daily avera ved oxygen effluent co ce ation shall not be less tha 5.0 /1. �ct�\ate \K%" 4. Chronic Toxic ty (Pirnephaies promelas) P/F 90% January, April, July, and October [see Part I, A (4)). Toxicity itoring shall coincide metals and cyanide monitoring. 5. The quantitation limit for mercury shall be 0.2 ug/1 (0.2 ppb). Levels reported at less than 0.2 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 6. Phenols are defined as chlorinated phenolic compounds. 7. The quantitation limit for cyanide shall be 10 ug/l (10 ppb). Levels reported at less than 10 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 8. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and relocation of discharge to Deep River) During the period beginning upon expansion above 16.0 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Locationl Flow 26.0MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD, 5 day (20°C)2 [April 1 - October 31] 5.0 mg/I 0.0 mg Daily Composite Influent & Effluent BOD, 5 day (20°C)2 [November 1-March 31] 10.0 mg/I IT.Tmgti Daily Composite Influent & Effluent Total Suspended Residue2 30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I Daily Composite Influent & Effluent NH3 as N Aril 1-October 311 1.0 mg/I Daily Composite Effluent NH3 as N November 1- March 311 2.0 mg/I Daily Composite Effluent Dissolved Oxyged Daily Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen 3Meek Grab Upstream & Downstream Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200/100 ml 400/100 ml Daily Grab Effluent Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Total Residual Chlorine 3/Week Grab Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) [April I -October 3l 6.0 mgll ej Weekly Composite Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN) November 1 - March 31 MA%h A MI'1`5 Weekly Composite Effluent Total Phosphorus 0.5 mg/I I Weekly Composite Effluent Temperature °C Daily Grab Effluent Temperature CC) 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Conductivity Daily Grab Effluent Conductivity 3/Week Grab Upstream & Downstream Chronic Toxicity, Quarterly Composite Effluent Cadmium 2.3 15 Weekly Composite Effluent Lead 29 33.8 Weekly Composite Effluent Mercury5 0.014 Weekly Composite Effluent Nickel 29 261 Weekly Composite Effluent Phenols6 1.4 Weekly Gomoostle Effluent Copper 2/Month Composite Effluent C anide7 Monthly Grab Effluent Silver Composite Effluent Zinc —Quarterly 2/Month Composite Effluent PH8 6-9 Daily Grab Effluent (Footnotes on next page) A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL (Expansion and relocation of discharge to Deep River) (Continued) Footnotes: 1. Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, D - Downstream (1) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/Week during June - September and 1/Week during the remaining months of the year. 2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal). 3. The daily average dissoly en effluent concentration shall not be less tha(�0 g/l. 4. Chronic Toxic' phales promelas) /F a%: January, April, July, and October [see Part I, A (5)]. Toxici om ring shall coincid with tals and cyanide monitoring. ` 0�►1 5. The quantitation lirm �¢ shall be 0.2 ug/1 (0.2 ppb). Levels reported at less than 0.2 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 6. Phenols are defined as chlorinated phenolic compounds. 7. The quantitation limit for cyanide shall be 10 ug/1 (10 ppb). Levels reported at less than 10 ug/1 shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. 8. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. A (4). CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERNUT LIMIT (QRTRL The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90 %. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests— wi a unng the months of March - June September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final e' uent ischarge below 1 treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised - February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP313 for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re- opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. A (5). CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERNUT LDOT (QRTRL The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 85 %. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum,guarterlcl monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodophnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June §&Zember. and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NAD permitted final effluent discharge be ow all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase 11 C hmnie Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised - February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re- opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. A (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (page 1 of 2 effluent pages) FINAL, Permit No. NC0024210 During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS �( Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Location' ' Flow 16.0 MGD Continuous Recording I or E BOD, 5 day, 20°C (April 1 - October 31 1 S, mg/1 12.0 mg/I Daily Composite 1, E BOD, 5 day, 20°C November 1 - March 31 1 1 0. > ,L� mg/1 24.0 mg/I Daily Composite 1, E Total Suspended Solidsi 30.0 mg/1 45.0 mg/I Daily Composite 1, E NH3 as N (April 1 - October 31) 1. p mg/1 Daily Composite E NH3 as N (November 1 - March.31) mg/l Daily Composite E Daily Grab E 'sso ed Oxygen3 Daily Grab E, U, D t F ca Coliform(geometric mean 200 100 ml 400 100 ml Daily Grab E, U, D Total Residual Chlorine Daily Grab E Temperature °C Daily Grab E, U, D Conductivity Daily Grab El U, D Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN) Monthly Composite E Total Phosphorus 0.7 Monthly Composite E Chronic Toxicity4 I S I-i' -L Quarterly Composite E Cadmium 2.0 I Weekly Composite E C anide5 dGF __Wzek4y- )WXTiiLy Grab E Lead j 25 l 33 Weekly Composite E U Dt Cb er 2 Month Com osite E Ipea- li�l' 2 Month Com osite E Mercury (A,>,) wNi- ai " PA4S>o/d uarterl Com osite E Silver ^ Composite E Zinc 2/Month Composite E AbD 74;a .5 Notes: Sample locations: E - Effluent, 1 - Influent, U - Upstream (2 locations): (1) Richland Creek at least 100 feet above outfall, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1113, D- Downstream (2 locations): (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be collected 3/Week during June -September and 1/,Week during the remaining months of the year. i Upstream and downstream monitoring for lead and nickel shall be conducted monthly by grab sample at the first upstream site U(1) and the first downstream site D(1). t The monthly average effluent BODS and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal). .ti N a N 0 A (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (page 2 of 2 effluent pages). 2 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units, 3 The daily average dissolved oxyg filu,cAt,concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l. 4 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnial P F 900 January, Aril, July, and October; see Part 11I, Condition G. Toxicity monitoring shall coincide with metals and cyanide monitoring. bpes nt+ s The quantitation limit for cyanide shall be 10 µg/1 (10 ppb). Levels reported as 10 µg/1" shall be considered zero for compliance purposes. Pere' hall be no discharge o oating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. 9 f.� ? t 1' t' Permit No. NCO024 , L 41�pr 7rLU7-loN To LkKv� ,>SC A(&T6 S�tr /`l9 — Pvs I rJ LAJ „ten 011- P/e�0 ZerP R a� FnC stn� f) Pt E t?uAD �_D� _ice q,�y= 15d3 x 0 209`tg4 000 35 56 Z-7 ' 9t,56 T)A=9o,3 u:v D yJri biro �j¢-7J 3Z(�2 �RS` --- ------ ✓ -� VL - 6W7 W&jri U—SIC,$ -rLa FLOQ� /HEAP-GST S-A-T�oN1 fR>5rrPa Mll ,- r a oc r e.d C (f% PWix. AAI t,AKZ) -_-- CioySc 5(A-.7oa 'PA = I25; A �r 175 Ri4'r,i .: C2 N �t2t N, n�c �%' jT..S J? i `'.i.1 c AI- I2,5 y 57 Z G{'S _ U5e et+ I PrsaD On1 For S �Rre 79(os , 0-1 • %. 3 = -- Qpoa 96, 3s l.7 Ar or,sr- It2,y 2.15- MGn our np I & = z.(0 T DF )ZU6F. S s �' E41,_O�P'D, 7h0E Tel hew Ri5sra.4,Mr PJ 7R4/3. fb7 rrrk�---__-- NLelwranti lMPAcT /N /fir S4M &NE . ® - u ,>;Co jwG, 24. 3.z70 'L�1c- o.3� S Gh 2 w/• I C Lp- ike -r, 4 City of High Point 8/17/99 From Coleen: 4n the relocation and the permit, they can not get a permit for an expansion at their existing location, unless the dam is not constructed. I think since the EMC signed off on the Randleman rules that we have to make the assumption that the dam is going to be constructed in proceed in that direction. The 26 MGD is supposed to be at their new location and yes, they need a map showing where it is going. From Bobby B.: Jay will work with Susan on the EA requirements for the 16 to 26 mgd permit application. I think the design of the outfall line will wait on a. decision as to whether or not it looks like the Randleman Lake will be able to be constructed --If so, design will likely start around March of 2000 and be ready to go to construction around Jan 2001. If not, I assume that High Point will be able to get a_26_mgd permit at their existing location and that the outfall wont be needed. Meanwhile, High Point can proceed with the construction of a 26 rngd plant (upon receipt of an A to Q although they will only have a 16 mgd permit. WILL 8G Coaclrz i " T c o,tilSTfzu cT tb� �pG,/aT10+3 CNo 26 M40 UaVcss �l Asµ- 1'a � ��v lrtC,D A G� 26 /t&4 0 AT 12E(,c-,AT I0/J - CUr<R6 -r (oA1Z;lT1o1J5 Toxicant Analvais/ hliah Point LIM IT - ow IS tIM r 1)PrTA O/L Moti, AKO- M on►r,� S/rgi (uV) MP, Ivaj 91&7 #10d /Vtorl POP Facility Name -- NPDES # 7Q10s (cls) /WC (%) Hi h Point WWTP Parameter= Standard = - n 1 2 ------------------- _3 Cd �- - RESULTS P �- - --- - I 0.424911878 J NCO024210 2 pg/I ctual Data BDL=1/2DL 0.5 1 96.12 <1 <1 Std Dev. Mean -------- C.V. c'ving Stream Deep River 0.5 0.580928571 Stream Class WS-IV CA ----------- 1.49 1.49 ----- 0.731435668 FINAL RESULTS_______ J _ 4.0914 5 0.5 <1 Cd u _ u J 6 0.5 <1 _ Mult Facto 1.8 Max. Pred Cw 7 - 8 9 0.5 <1 Max. ValuE 2.273 pgl Ng/ Allowable Cw 2.1 0.5 <1 Max. Pred 4.0914 Max. Value 2.273 0.5 <1 Allowable 2.08pg/ Ni _ ---10 0.5 <1 Max. Pred Cw 107.205 u 11 0.5 <1 Allowable Cw ---_-- - _-_ -- 26.0 u_ _ _ 12 13 14 0.5 <1 --- - -- Max. Value 51.05 0.5 <1 ___ Pb (lead) ---- � 2.029 <1 --- --------- Max. Pred Cw -- _ _ 325.5 26.0 93 144.4 _ 5.2 - - -�- 76 - -- - ----- ug/� ug/. ug/I u - �- -- - - _ -15 16 17 19 20 -- �--- 21 0.5 2.029 --- Allowable Cw 0.5 <1 --- ----- Max. Value 0.5 <1 ax. Pred Cw 0.5 <1 Allowable Cw Max. Value 1.108 <1 1.033 1.108 --- --- -- ---- - - -- ---- -- Cr ug ----- 22 -- -- 23 2.273 1.033 Max. Pred Cw 19.975 2.099 2.273 Cw _ 52.0 -- --- - 11.75 ug/ -- 24 0.5 2.099 _ - _Allowable Max. Value - �-- 25 0.5 <1 - - - -- - --- - -- __-_-_f_ _-_-�-- _ Max. Pred Cw - --_-__-_-_-__ 0.100 0.012 ----____ --__ - 0.100 u _ _27 u 28 _-- - - ---- 2_9 --t - - - - 30 u 31 u 32 33 - - - - - 34 u 35 u 36 -- ' I 37 ug/l 38 - - _39 ug/l 40 __-, 41 i 38 ugA 39 ug 40 41 --f - 38 u --39 -0 - 40� 411 i 501 i 511 52 541 551 56. 571 0.5 <1 -- v--- Allowable Cw 0.5 <1 Max. Value 0.5 <1 Max. Pred Cwj - - 0.5 <1 --- -- 73.095 0.5 <1 Allowable Cw 7.3 48.7a 0.25 <1 Max. Value 0.25 <.5 Max. Pred Cw 283-.5- 52.0 0.25 <.5 -_-T -- - - 0.25 <,5 Allowable Cw 0.25 c5 -- - -- l Max. Value -- ---- 189 - 0.25 c5 _ -- AaxAPred Cw ---- -- ------ 3.000 - - - - - - - - -- - 0.062 0.25 <.5 ----- ---1 -- ---- � _ 0.25 <.5 Allowable Cw 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 <.5 <.5 <.5 <1 -- - - _ - --- _ _A --- - __ -- Max. Value Fe(AL) 2.500 4488 1040 2137 - - ----- Mai-Pred Cwj Allowable Cw Max. Value I 0.5 <1 = 0.5 <1 -- - AI(AL) Max. Pred Cw_ Allowable Cw Max. Valuei 0.5 0.5 <1 2955 -----_ - 0 1407 - - - <1 0.5 -- - 0.5 <1 -- - ------ - 0.5 - 0.5 <1 <1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point -- - - -------- - ----- --- ----------- - 581 - - - - - - - - - -- 591 - ---- ---60 61 - 62 63 --------- 64 ---- 65 66 67 68 - - 69 70 71 72 73 74 - - -- - - 75 --- -�- - - - - -� -- --- 77 --- - _ - - -- I-- - -- - 78 -- 79 80 81 -____ _ 82 83 -- - --_ _ -- - -- 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 1 -'-- 93 --- - -- -- - - -- - 94 95 -- -- - - - -- - --- 96 -- - � 97 98 99 - - --,- 100 101 2n 8/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point meter _ ] tandard _ n 1 2 3 Ni � 25 DL=1/2D 16.22 - - -- � �g� i.: Actual Data 16.22 j RESULTS I Std Dev. 110.0906 - P� ameter = ----- d Pb lea - ----- --- -- ' --- - ]RESULTS Std Dev_. 13.753 Mean 5.8599 - /.rglf :::::: pglt:::: pg/I:::::: to ndard _ n 1 2 25 �I 4117 Actual Data DL=1/2D 7.127 7.127 12.98 5 5 10.31 12.98 Mean 1 C.V. i j ---- _ - j Mult Factor 10.5139 0.95974 9.613 9.613 <10 <10 _--^-_-_-_- 10.31 <10 3 23.95 23.95 C.V. 2.347 4 _ 4 2.5 <5 --_ 5 _ 5 2.5 -- <5 6 _ 5 2.1 6 2.5 <5 Mult Factor 3.5 7 16.01 16.01 Max. Value 51.05 __ pug/!.... 7 2.5 <5 Max. Value _ 93 8 5 <10 Max. Pred G 107.205 8 5.602 -5.602 _ Max. Pred C 325.5 9 5 <10 Allowable d 26.01 p_gA: _ 9 10.77 10.77 Allowable C 26.01 10 5 <10 j 10 7.217 7.217 - 11 51 51 11 8.31 8.31 12 _ -12.12 12.12 12 14.96 14.96 13 15.32 - 15.32 i _ _ _ _ 13 Av 14 - 8.364 8.364 -- - 14 13.62 13.62 11.04 11.04 - �_�_- - ----- - --- - _- ---- 15 51.05 5 10.06 51.05 --- _ - _ + - _ 15 ---^---16 1 <2 16 <10 10.06 1 <2 <2 17 17 1 18 12.16 12.16 _ �_ _ 18 j 19 2.5 <5-- - 19 5 <10 1 1 <2 <2 - 20 15.66 15.66 20 21 --17.63 10.59 17.63 -��--- -- 10.59 _ --`------- ----- _--- 21 1 <2 �-_-_------ 22 - 22 1 <2 <2 - - - - -- - 23 20.26 20.26 -- - 23 24 1 24 10.41 10.41 1 <2 25 5I <10 --_- -_25 1 <2 -_-_ 26 _ 10.14 17.25 51 12.54 10.14 - - 26 2.7 2.7 <2 25 <2 <2 _ 27 - 17.25 <10 12.54 _ 1 _ 27 1 28 28 25 29 29 1 30 16.55 16.55 - _ j _ 30 31 1 31 _ 5 5 2.5 <10 _ - _� 2.3 2.3 _ - <21 <2 <21 39 <2 5.2- <2 2.5 93 <2 <2 -------- 2.1 <2 <2 _ 31 2.9~ <2 - <2' <21 <2 <21' <21 i t <2 32 <10 <5 - 32 1 33 33 34 1 34 6 6 1 35 9.5 4 9.5 <8 ---- _ ::: - 35 36 •:.•• .__ 38 39 36 1 38 8.3 5 5 12 5 ---- 8.3 <10 <10 <10 �---- 5.2 39 i 39 1 40 40 41 42 43 --- 44 :::: 45 2.5 93 41 42 1 43 51 <10 5; <10 5 <10 51 <10 5; <10 51 <10 5; <10 - 51 <10 - 51 -- <10' 41.151 41.151 5 <10 14.45 � 14.45 5 i <10 - - --------- 5 <10 1 44 2.1 45 1 46 �--- 46 j ^ 47 � 48 49 50 51 :::`: 52 - 53 - 1 : 54 55 i ::.: - 561 i 57( 1 - _ 47 3 48 2.9 49 1 50 1 51 1 52 _ _ �-------i-- 1 ! i 53 1 54 1 55 561. 1 57 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 58 59 61 62 -} _ i :' 58 59 61 f - - - - 1 - ---_ { --- - --- -- -- - - ---- — i - - - -- f-- - - r - ' 62 - 65 66 67 65 66 67 69 69 72 72 — - - --- - - -- __ _ ;- --- -- 73 74 —73 74 76 77 76 77 :;:.78:.: 79 79 81 81 82 — 82`-- 83 83 84 84 r- - - ---! --- - ---1- a -- - - -� -- � - -- 88 88 ss ss - 90 - 91 92 90 ----- i 91---- 92 -- --- - 93 - 93- 94 95 96 94 i 95 96 97 97 98 98 99 100 ----- 99 100 101 101 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ Pugh Point rameter = CN- i _ - - - fandard = :51 Ng/l 1/2D �DL= n iActual Data' 1 5 <10 2 5 <10 3 5 <10 4 5 <10 I Parameter = ;- t - . ----- - i Standard = RESULTS _ _ _ n3D__L-1/2DIActual Std Dev. 7.73152i 1 1 Mean 6.059411 j 2 C.V. 1.27595 31 j - 4 Cr - jug/l Data <5 -- -r j P - - 50 2.5 2.5 RESULTS Std Dev. 1.74351 <5 Mean 2.95907 2.5 <5 <5 C.V. 0.58921 Mult Facto_ <10 1.9 6 2.5 <5 Mult Facto 1.7 7 5 <10 Max. Value76 _ lug/l 7 2.5 <5 Max. Value.11.75 _ /igll 8 5 _ <10 Max. Pred 144.4 pg/l 8 2.5 <5 Max. Pred 19.975 Ngll 9 5 <10 Allowable pg/l 9 2.5 <5 Allowable 52.02 pg/I 10 5 _ <10 __5.20 10 2.5 <51 11 5 <10 ---- -- _ 1 - _ 11 2.5 <5 12 5 - <10 - 12 2.5 <5 13 V5 <10 - 13 14 2.5 11.75 <5 11.75 _ i 14 5 _ <10 - _ _ 15 16 5 <10 ! 1 15 16 17 2.5 <5 5 <10 2.5 <5 <10 2.5 <5 18 �5 ---v <10 - -- ---- -------- - - - - - 18 7.861 7.861 _ - - ----_ 19 5 <10 - I i - - 19 20 ^- 21 22 _ 2.5 2.5 <5 <5-�_ --- _ _ - 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5 5 _ 5 5 5 5 -^ <10 <10 <10 _ <10 <10 ----- <10 - -- --- 2.5 2.5 <5 <5 - - - �I 23 2.5 <5 -_-- -� _ - 24 25 2.5 2.5 <5 <5 - --- 5 <10 - 26 2.5 <5 ----- 27 5 <10 -- -_-- 27 2.5 <5 ---- 28 5 <10 -� i - - j -_ - ; �--- -- T - '_- - -- - _ . -- 28 9.297 9.297- 29 5 <10 29 2.5 <5 _ ---fi - - - -- - - - -- -Y - - -; - --- - 30 5 <10 �- -r I - iY 30 2.5 <5 31 5 - <10 - -- - -- ' --- -- - 31 -- 2.5 - - <5 -Y-_--. - 32 33 5 5 <10 <10 - 32 ------ 33 2.51 2.51 <5 <5 _ ---��- 34 5 <10 i 34 <5 36 5 <10 - _ I ' 35 36 _2.5 2.5 <5 - 5 _ <10 _ 2.5 2.5 <5 <5-- I _-- 37 11 11 37 38 5 <10 _----- 34 u _ ..-' I 38 39 6.8 6.8 - . ---- _ r--- -- -f--- 39 34 2.5 <5 - - 40 5 <10 - ' I -- - - - i __-_ ; - : - i - , 40 2.5 <5 -- i - i - i i _ ` ! _ 1- 41 42 43 44 -- -- _ _ 45 46 47 48 491 50 51 52 53 541 55 ---- 56 571 5 <10 41 2.5 7.8 5 <10 i � --- 42 43 -- 44 - 2.5 - <5 <5 5 <10 2.5 2.5 5 <10 <5 5 <10 45 - 2.5 <5 5 <10 46 2.5 <5 47 2.5 <5 48 2.5 <5 49 2.5 <5 _ 501 2.5, <5 51 i 2.51. <5 52� 2.51 <5 53 2.51 <5 Y_-__ 541 2.5j <5 - - -- - - - - 551 2.54 <5 -- --- -56; , ----- 57 5 <10 _ I 5 <10 5 <10 5 5 <10 <10 <10 I 5 5 5 _ <10 <10 --- I - -- v 5 5� -- 51 - <10 - - -10 <10; _ 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 581 59! 60; 61 621 63 5 11, 5' ` 5 5 5 5 <10 11 <10 - _ ' !! - � -- - - 58 --- 1 '-- - - - - - -- -- 59 60 61 <10 <10 - 62 63 64 <10 64 -- - 67 <10 _ - - - 65 - - 5 <10 --- 67 - - - - 69 5 <10 � - - -- - 69 -- - -- 70 5 <10 70 - 71 _ 76 76 - 71 -- 73 - 5 <10 - - - 72 - -- -- - 5 <10 -- - 73 741 5 <10 -- - - --- 74 -- ----- I� _ 1 r 1 76 -- - - - 77 78 5 -- - 5 <10 - - - -- 76 <10 - - - 77 - - - 5 <10 78 -- 79 5 - <10 -� - - - - --- 79 - -- - - - - -� - - 81 83 ---- ---5 12 <10 -- -- 80 81 -- I- - -- -- ------ --- - - - -- <10 -- 12 83 84 5 <10 - 84 - -- - 85 _--_---86 5 --- 5 <10 -- - 85 <10 -- 86 - ------- - 1 87 5 <10 87 --- 88 891 --- 90 91; 5 2.5 <10 - _ _ 88 - -- - -- - _ i 1--- - ' -- j - r - ' <5 -_ 89 - 90 --- 6 6 - I 2.5 <5 1 91 92 93 - 92 2.5 <5 6 -- - --- ! 93 94 95 -_---- 96 97 98 6 5 <10 - j --- 94 - 95 96 -- - - - 5 - -- 5 2.5 2.5 <10 <10 <5 97 98- <5 - - i -- -�-- 1 -1 --- 99 100 101 2.5 2.5 2.5 <5 -- 99 <5 100-- <5 - 101 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point rameter - - tandard - -- - n 1 H9 ^ - - -- � - pgll- - -- -- , i Actual Dataj ! RESULTS' <.2' Std Dev. ; 1.7E-09 --- -- c.2( Mean -- -0.1 -_ <.21 C.V. 1.7E-08 c2 - i-- c2 -- Parameter= - - Standard = t n 1 1 Cu AL 7 -- ._ - Ng/I - Actual Data 15.41 21.86 10.06 10.97 5.242 --__ --_-- - _ - t - RESULTS{ Std Dev. 7.37033 P � -�--- - - -- - - 0.012 0L=1/21D DL=1/2D 15.41 21.86 10.06 10.97 _ 5.242 0.1 _ 2 0.1 - _- -- -2 3 - 4 - 5 Mean C.V. -_�---- - 14.8726 0.49556 --- ---- - --_� - 3 0.1 4 - 0.1 5 0.1 _ - 6 0.1 <.2 tiWuh Facto 1 6 5.418 5.418 Mult Facto 1.5 7 Max. value 0.1 7 4.424 4.424 Max. Valu 48.73 _ pg/l 8 Max. Pred 0.1 8 14.17 14.17 Max. Pred 73.095 _ Ng/l _ 9 Allowable --- --- ------ - ---- I -- - - --' _ - 0.01 pg/l 9 14.58 14.58 Allowable _ 7.28 /ig/I 10 10 11.97 11.97 11 11 8.58 8.58 ------+- -_ 12 I 12 24.54 24.54 13 13 9.069 9.069 14 - ! - - - -: { 1 _ -- - _ - i 14 16.48 16.48 15 15 15.06 15.06 16 12.44 12.44 --16 17 _ 17 14.79 14.79 18 - - _ 18 48.73 48.73 - - --------- --- --_- -- - i- -- -- I 19 19 8.236 8.236 20 20 13.47 13.47 21 21 8.856 8.856 22 22 10.85 10.85 23 - - - 23 11.18 11.18 24 _ _ - -- -_ _ - - I '1_ I ; _ - 1 -_I (� i l - - - --- ;- - - j ( - - - -1- --- I - - - - --- � - ; - } i - - - - _' - -' ; - ----- - - - r I 24 14.17 14.17 f - _ ' i - - - - - - -- -- -- - -- - ------ - - -- - I- - - ------- - - I - i - - ! ----------, - -�i -- - l - - -= - - - - -- ----- . -- - - - 25 13.99 13.99 26 -25 26 16.24 16.24 27 27 13.8 13.8 28 28 16.94 16.94 29 29 14.95 14.95 30 30 15.86 15.86 31 31 _ 16.23 16.23 32 32 15.17 15.17 33 33 19 19- 34 34 12 12 35 36 _ 35 12 12 36 17 17 37 37 11 11 38 40 41 38 36.1 36.1---39 39 10 - 10 __- 40 10 10 41 ------ 42 36 ---- 7.6 36-- 42 7.6 43 44 45 46 43 12.46 12.46 44 17.95 14.38 17.95 14.38 45 46 15.11 15.11 10.38 3847 10. 48 49 50 51 52 - _ 53 54 --55 56 57 48 12.58 12158 49 50 51 - -- 52 53 541 ----- 551 561 57, 11.97 17.36 11.39 _15.76 16.99 18.63 19 14.47 1947 .7 17.36 11.39 --- - 15.76 -- - 16.99 (_ 18.63 19 14.47� 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 581 59 60 - 61 62; 63 _ 64 -- 65 6fi 671 - -- -- --- �_ I� - - - - 1 � --- i i ! - 58 --- - - -- --- - - - I 1 - - -- - I- - -- - - - -- -_59 60 fit+ 62 63 - --- �_ 64 65 66 - I 67 - 71 72 71 72 76 77 78 79 - 801- 81 82 83 �- -- -.. - _ - - - - - - _ - - 76 j i - - --- 77 -- 78 79 80- - -- -- 81 82 83 84 84 I 86 86 87 88 89 i - ---1 f----- j , j -------: � 87 88 -- r - ---�. 89 - 1 - - - 91 92 93 - - - - - 91 92 -- -- -- - 93 - -- - - - ---- 95 - - 961 -- - - - - 97 98 99 100 - -- ---� - - - 95 , 96 ' - 97- ----- ---. _1..--- 98 --- - - -. 99 - - .-- ; ___ 100 101 101 - --- 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ high Point rameter = Zn - -. ' ---- -- AL 50/l n DL=1/2D 1 156 2 189 3 162 -- -- 4 ---- - . -78 -_ -- --- Actual Data 156 =- ---- -- - - - - i Parameter ' RESULTS; i n Std Dev. l 29.14091 1 Mean ;_ 62.1607! 2 C.V. -_I 0.4688� I 3 - 4 _-- -_ --_-__ _ 5 Mult Factoi 1.5 6 Max. ValuE 189 Ngll -r 7 A AL P - f -- - -- 0.0 ------- - - NT/tandard ----------} - -- - --- Actual Data IRESULTS - -- - ----- - 0L=1/213 10.38266 2.5 <5 Std Dev. 189 <5 Mean 2.41071 162 _2.5 2.5 _ <5 C.V. 0.15873 - 7811 2.5 <5 _ 5 6 7 ---62 51 44 62 51 44 2.5� 2.5 2.5 <5 <5 <5 _ Mult Factoj Max.Valu 1.2 2.5 _ lrg/I 8 71 71 Max. Pred 283.5 Ngll 8 2.5 <5 Max. Pred 3 pg/l 9 90 90 Allowable 52.02 NgA 9 2.5 <5 Allowable 0.06 /ug/l 10 41 41 10 2.5 <5 11 45 45 _ _ 11 2.5 <5 12 44 44 -- -- - -'- �- -- _ - __ I I - 12 2.5 <5 - -_ _ _ 13 14 59 59 13 2.5 <5 35 35 - - - -_� - 14 2.5 <5 _ 15 16 66 34 66 -- - 15 161 I-- - -- 17 2.5 <5 - - - -- - -- 34 2.5 <5 - -17 -- 39 39 _ � 2.5 <5 --- 19 75 75 - 18 _ 19 20 2.5 <5; 46 46 2.5 <5 i 20 61 _ 61 - 2.5 _ <5 1 21 63 63 _ - - I_v=1 - - -- - _ - - - - - 21 22 23 24 - 25 i 26 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 <5 <5 _ <5 _ <5 <5 <5 - - - -- _ 22 23 -- - 24 73 73 61 63 -�---- - 80 - 63 61 63 80 63 - -25 _� 26 _ _ - 27 --- 28 29 30 44 441 -- - -_ 27 2.5 <5 - 67 67 28 2.5 <5 76 76! 29 2.5 - <5 --- - - - __ 78 78 30 2.5 <5 -- - 311 --- - 64 32 63 33 - 51 34 50 __ .--- 35 -_� 56 36 51 37 - _ 58 38 77 39 56 -- - 40 , _ - 59 41 82 42 46 43 42 44 571 45 E 54 46 36 47 48 --_ -- 48 53 49 I 461 50! 41 51 - 31 5254 53! 461 54 481 491 561 471 -- - - - 57+ 64 63 51 50 56 - - -- ---- - -- I --- ! - - !_ ! _.--- - -� --j- 1 I - - i I _ I I - --- 1 1---� i t #- _ 1_ I :� --- 31 2.5 <5 ' - f } - I I - ; ! 32 2.5 <5 - 33 2 <4 34 2 <4 - 35 2.5 - -- -<5 _ 51 58 36 0.5 <1 ---- 37 0.5 <1 771 38 2.5 <5 56 39 2.5 <5 59 - � 40 2.5 - - - <5 82 I 41 42 43 44 45 46 -- 47 2.5 2.5 2.51 2.5 2.5 2.5 <5 <5 <5 _ <_5 <5 <5 _ <5 • - <5 <5 _ - -- -`5i - - - <51 <5'' - <511 - - - <51 i <51 - 1 - 1 46 42 57 54 36 48 ----- 53 48 2.5 46 49 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 41 _ 50 - 51 52 53 54 31 - 54 46 1 48 - - 49 2.5 _ - 55 _ 56 57 -- 2.5 2.5, 47 1- 2118/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 581 - 61. -- - -- - - - --- 62 ! 63I 65t 66 67 5859. -- - 611 62 j 63 1 64 65 66 67 . . ---- '- - -- ---- I -- - ! -- -- �- - - 73 75 - 77 78 i 73 75 77 ---t ' 78 79 - --80-- -._ 81 _ ... - - - 82 83 84 - --- 85 -{ -- - - 86 ... - 88 ' --� - 891 91 92 95 96 = -- 98 99 100 loll --- j - - -- - - - - -- - -- -- 79 80 81 - - -I-- - 82 ... - 83 _ 85 - - 86 - - - -_ -- 1---- ----- ----{- -- ---- -! -- - I - - 87- - 88 --- - I -- - - 89 92 95 96 98 99 - 100 101 - - - - - { - -- - -- - - - - - - --- - - t i ---- ---_ - - 2/18/00 10 Toxicant Analvoi5/ High Point _ rameter - tandard - -- _ n 1 2 3 Fe I i l Ng/l Actual Data RESULTS --- ---- - - - <500 Std_Dev. ! 363.5_14 — <500 Mean -_- 334.196 - - <500 j C.V. 1.08773 <500 <500--- - - - - <500 Mult Facto 2.1 I Parameter ' All No WO f Standard = n3DL=1/2D 1 250 -- - - - 2 250 Stndrd Ng/l RESULTS Std Dev. 2_83.517 Mean - - 307.268 C.V. -- 0.9227 - Mutt Facto 2.1 1000 DL=1/2D - 250 Actual Data <500 <500 250 -- 250 - —_ -- - 3 4 -- 5 _250 250 250 <500 <500 <500 <500 4 5 250 250--,- — 6 250 250 7 250 - <500 Max. Value 2137 Ng/I _6 7 250 <500 Max. Value 1407 lug/l _ 8 250 <500 Max. Pred_ 4487.7 Ng/I 8 — 250 <500 Max. Pred 2954.7 /ug/I 9 250 <500 Allowable 1040.32.ug/I 9 250 <500 Allowable 0.00 pg/l 10 250 <500 — 10 250 <500 11 250 - <5001 - -- 11 250 <500 12 1135 1135 - — 12 1135 <500 _ --- 13 250 <500 -J - —� -_ 13 250 <500 -- _ 14 1407 Y 1407 14 1407 <500 _- 15 250 <5001 <500 - - -- 15 250 <500 _ — 16 250 16 250 <500 17 250 <500 17 250 <500 18 2137 2137 j -- -- - - - - - -- -- - ----f_ --- -- - - - - - --- j ! -- ----i- , - - i - _ � 1 j - - _A __ {- -- _ t j _ _ 1 � • - � ' - j - - - 11 -- 18 1290 1290 --- - - - - - 19 250 <500' ---- <500 19 250 <500 20 250 - 20 250 <500 21 250 <5001 21 _ 250 <500 -�— --- -- - 22 250 <500 22 250 <500 - --- -- 23 250 <500 <500 23 250 <500 ^� 24 250 24 250 <500 �- 25 250 _<500 <500T 25 250 <500 26 250 26 250- 27 250 <500 27 250 <500 ------------- 28 250 <500 28 250 <500 29 250 <500l 29 250 <500 - 30 250 _ - <500j <500 30 250 <500 ------ -- - 31 250 31 250 <500 32 250 <500 32 250 <500 33 130 130, 33 70 70 34 35 100 100, 1_20 34 60 60 120 35 95 95 36 120 120, _ 36 120 120 T _ 37 130 130 37 85 85 38 39 40 41 42 1300 13001 38 1100 1100 _ T _ '- ' -- - -- � -- - - T -• i - - E _ 1 - 89 - 39 61 87 --89 87. 40 59 _61 59 1100 1100 41 910 910 110 110 42 65 65 - - - 43 - - - 44 45 250 — <500; <5001 - -- - - <500!' _ 43 _ 250 250 _ <500 <500 ----_ 250 _ �_ 44 250 45 - - 250 -_ - <500 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ---- _ 55 - 56 250 <500 46 250 <500 , 250 <500 47 250 <500 250 <500 — 48 -_ 250 250 250 <500 250 <5001, <500, 49 50 <500 250 <500 250 <500 250 - 250 <500 _ 250 <500 - _51 - -- 521 <500 250 <500j1 <500' 5& 54 250 1- -_ 250 250, 25- <500 250 <500 -- 250 250 <500 - - <500 - - 55 _ 56! <500 - ---- --- - - 500 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysio/ High Point 58 -- - 59 601 - 61- - --63 64 - --- 65 66 r - + - ! -- --- --- ---- --- I --- -- - -_ -- - --- ` f. 581 - -- - ' --591. 60 -. j - . fit I -- - -- ! !- - - -- 63 64 65 - 66 ; - - - - -- - - - --- - - ! 4 � - j - ----- 1 - - - - - -- -- _` 69 69 70 -- --- - 70 _ 71 - 71 - - 74 - 74 - - 75 - 75 78 78 79 79 80 -- - -- - 1 - -- - 80 81 - - - - t -- - 81 - - 82 82 83 83 84 84 } 85 - _ - 85 86 - 86- 87 - 87 - 88 -- 88 - -- 89!! -- 89 - - -- - - ------- - - - - - ' - _ - - -- ---- - , 91 -` -- 91 ---- 92 -- - -- --- _ _ �- 92 _ 93 - 93 94 95 -- 94 - - ` 95 - 96 -- _ - a-- - -- -- ' - , 1 --- 96 97 99, 100 101 - --- - 97 98 --- 99 - ---- -- 100 101 2118/00 12 `oCAT1oN Toxicant Analvoi5/ Hiah Point (.IM IT WM IT uM I'F D,A7A Ok- "tit aF,' Uq Kokr4t y 5 /11 nr� �1�lvN �1�to N VO&I JkoN qI14y DPW Nof (�Y D- Facility Name NPDES # -Ow (MGD) 7QIOs (c1s) IWC (%) High Point WWTP Parameter= Standard = � - --- n 1 Cd I --- - ctual Data ! - --1- ----- RESULTS Std Dev. 0-.424911878 Mean___ 0.580928571 C.V. 0.731435668 ----- - P NCO024210 2 26 BD_L=1/2DL 0.5 0.5 1 97.58 <1 c'ving Stream Richland Creek 2 <1 1.49 <1 Stream Class WS-IV CA i- -r 31 1.49 4 --- - 0.5 FINAL RESULTS 5 0.5 <1 Cd _ 4.0914 u 6 V 7 0.5 <1 <1 Mult Facto Max. value 1.8 2.273 kgl Max. Pred Cw 0.5 Allowable Cw `2.0 ug/ 8 0.5 <1 Max. Pred 4.0914 u / Max. Value 2.273 _ 9 0.5 <1 Allowable 2.05 ,u / Ni � - 10 - -- 0.5 <1 Max. Pred Cw 107.205 ug/ 11 0.5 <1 Allowable Cw 25.6 ug/ 12 _ 0.5 <1 Max. Value 51.05 13 0.5 <1 Pb (lead - - _ 14 15 _ 2.029 <1 _ Max. Pred Cw _ 325.5 ug/ 0.5 0.5 2.029 Allowable Cw 25.6 ug/ 16 <1 Max. Value 93 17 0.5 <1 _ CN- 18 _ - 0.5 <1 �- --- - -- Max. _Pred _Cw Allowable Cw _ 144.4 _ u -- 19 -- 0.5 1.108 <1 5.1 u _ -20 <1 Max. Value 76 21 _ i 1.033 1.108 Cr _ 22 2.273 1.033 A _ Max. Pred Cw 19.975 _ _ u 23 24 - 2.099 0.5 2.273 Allowable Cw 51.2 u 2.099 <1 _ Max. Value 11.75 25 -- 0.5 -- --- ._.0.5 - 0.5 ^- 0.5 Hg -.. 26 <1 <1 ----_-_-_-_--_ Max. Pred Cw 0.100 u _ _ 27 Allowable Cw 0.012 ug/l 28 <1 Max. Value 0.100 , 29! 0.5 0.5 0.25 <1 Max. Pred Cw 73.095 u 31 <1 <1 Allowable Cw 7.2 ug 32 Max. Value 48.73 _ _ _ 3_3 0.25 - 34 0.25 35 0.25 ---- - 36 f - -- - _ 0.25 1 371 -0.251 ------------ ----- _ -38i - 0.251__- 39 _ 0.25 4_0_ 0.25 41 0.25 - _38 - -- -0.5 39. 0.5 - - 40i 0.5 - -- 41 + -- - - 0.5 38 - -- -- 39' 0.5 0.5 40 0.5 411 0.5 ; - - 50! 0.5 51 i 0.5 52 i 0.5 � 53 0.5 54! 0.51 55 i 0.5 .561 0.5 57 <.5 - Zn(AL) <.5 _ ___ Max. Pred Cw 283.5 uCJ4 <.5 Allowable Cw -- -- 51.2 u <.5 Max. Valuel 189 <.5 Ag(AL) - - Max. Pred Cw <.5 <.5 --- 3.000 - - u Allowable Cw 0.061 ug/ <.5- Max. Value Fe(AL� 2.500 <.5 - <.5 ---+ Max. Pred Cwi Allowable Cw Max. Value 4488 Mg/ u ^- <1 1025 �-<1 ------ - � -- � - - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - I 2137 -- <1 AI(AL) - - Max. Pred Cw 2955 Allowable Cw 0 Max. Value - 1407 i - -- <1 u g/� <1 u�/ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - { <1 <1 <1 - <1 NOV Iq 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysisl High Point 591 60; 61, 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 691 701 711 72� 731 741 75 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 871 881 891 901 91 92 93 ----94 95 96 97 98 99 101 2/18/00 Toxicant Analvoisl Hiah Point meter tandard = n _ 1 25 DL=1/2D _ 16.22 12.98 -- �ug/l Actual Data I RESULTS 1 1 e paramter= _ ::Standard = n 1 _ _ 2 - 3 --T_ 4 Pb lead pgll:: pgh ii* p 25 - - pgAn Actual Data _ - I RESULTS 0L=1_/2D 16.22 Std Dev. _ - 1_0.0906 7.127 9.613 7.127 Std Dev. 13.753 2 12.98 Mean 10.5139 10.95974 - 9.613 Mean 5.8599 _ 3 5 _<10 C.V. 23.95 23.95 _ C.V. 2.347 4 5 _6 5 <10 2.5 2.5 <5 ------Y <5 _ 10.31 10.31 -- -_- -_ - _ 5 6 _ 5 <10 Mult Factor 2.1 2.5 2.5 5.602 10.77 7.217 <5 <5 5.602 10.77 7.217 _ Mult Factor Max. Value Max. Pred C Allowable OA 3.5 93 325.5 25.62 _ 7 16.01 16.01 Max. Value 51.05 pg/1_ 7 8 5 <10 Max. Pred 107.205 p I 8 9 5 <10 Allowable 25.62 _- pg/I� 9 10 - 5 <10 _ 10 11 51 51 - -- 11 -- -- 12 8.31 8.31 12 12.12 12.12 14.96 _ 8.364 11.04 14.96 8.364 11.04 _ 13 14 15.32 15.32 13 13.62 13.62 _ 14 -____---15 _ 51.05 51.05 15 16 _ 17 18 1_ 9�_ --^--_ 1 <2 <2 - 16 17 5 <10 1 10.06 10.06 1 <2 18 12.16 12.16 _ 2_.5 1 <5 19 20 5 <10 <2 <2 15.66 15.66 _ - _ 20 21 _ 1 21 17.63 17.63 1 <2 22 - 10.59 10.59 - --_- - ---- 1 <2 <2 -- 23 20.26 20.26 _ _22 23 1 24 25 10.41 10.41 _ 1 _ <2 _ 5 <10 -- - - - _24 25 - -- - -_26 - 27 - -- - 28 -- ------- - - - -- _ _2_9 30 31 -- - 32 - - ------ - 331 1 _ <2 _ T 26 10.14 10.14 i 2.7 2.7 - - 27 _ 17.25 17.25 1 <2 28 5 <10 25 - --- _1 1 25 29 12.54 - 12.54 - - <2 _ 30 31 16.55 16.55 _ <2 5 <10 - _ 2.3 2.3 - -- 32 - 5_ <10 1 - -- 1 <2 33 2.5 <5 <2 35 35 36 -- -9.5 9.5 39 1 39 _ 36 37 - 38 4 <2 4 _<8 <8 -- - - --- -- ---- 37 -- - --- 1 -�- <2 5.2 -- - 8.3 8.3 - - - 38-�---- 5.2 -t- _ -__ _-391 _--__--1 _ 40 _ 2.5 - 41 93 42 1 - -- 43 - - 1 --- 44 - - - 2.1 ;: - _ - 45 _ 1 461 1 -- - - 47 - --- - 3 48? 2.9 - 49, 1 50 1 511 1 - --52i- - -- 1 53! 1 � 54 1 i 11 561 1 57 39 5 <10 -- <2 _ 40 5 <10 2.5 41 42 12 12 93 _ 5 <10 <2 43 ---- --- 44 - -- 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 5 ------ 5<10 <10 - <2 - -- -_- 2.1 5 -- _- <10 _<10 <10 <10 _ ___ -- <10 <10 _<10 41.151 <10j_..- 14.45 <101 <2 5 5 5 --- _5 5 5 51 14.45 5 - - - -- --- <2 ---- 3 2.9 - - -- � - -- t <2 �-__----�-------- <2 <2 - 52--41-.15-------- 53 54 <2 <2 f <2 56 <2 <2 57 2/18/00 Toxicant Analy5i5/ Hiuh Point 58!j 59i- ---60 - --- 61 - 62 - -- 63 - - -- -r- 65 - - 1 i --- - - - - - 58► fi0t - - 61 - -- ------:::. 62 63 --- - : 65 - 66 - - - —------' - - -�- --- -- - - - --- - ------ - - fib - -- ----- --- T�-- 67 - - - 67 -- - - - -1- 70 70 71 71 72 ----- 72 -- ----- 73 73 -- - 74 ---_- 74� :. . j 76 78 — ---- 76 1 78 :.:. 79 80 80 82 82 83 ----83 - - 84 -- 85 --- ---- -- - - —_84- 85 i 87 87 --- - - -- 1 - - 89 89 80 91 :.:.:92- 90 91 94 ..... 93 94 - - -- - - --- — 95 --- - 95- — 96 97 96 97 ! - 98 100 ----98 100 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point irameter= CN- 3tandard 5 n0l_=11/213 1 5 2 3 4 /ig/l Actual Data <10 <10 RESULTS Std Dev. 7.73152 6.05941 1.27595 j -Parameter Cr Standard50 n WL=1 /2DI Actual Data --I 5 1 2.5 < 3 <5 P. RESULTS Std Dev. 1.74351 Mean 2.95907 <10 C.V. C.V. 0.58921 <10 4 2.5 <5 <10 <10 5 2.5 <5 <5 Mult Facto, 1.9 6 2.5 Mult Facto, 1.7 7. 5 <10 Max. Value 76 /ig/l 7 2.5 <51 Max. Value 11.75 pg/l <10 <10 Max. Pred Allowable 144.4 5.12 yg/l /ig/l 8 9 2.5 2.5 <5 I- <5, Max. Pred Allowable 19.975 51.24 11 1 jui 10 <10 10 2.5 <5i 11 -5 5 <10 11 2.5 2.5 <5 <5 -5 <10 12 13 5 <10 13 2.5 <5 14-- 5 <10 1411.75 11.75 151 16 17 _5 5 5 <10 15 2.51 2-51 2.5 7.8611 2.51 2.5 <5 <5 <5 7.861 <51- <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 16 17 18 18 5 5 5 191 20 19 20 <10 21 2.5 __<5 <5 22 5 <10 22 2.5 <5 23 5 <10 23 2.5 2.5, <5 <5 24; <10 <10 24 25 5 26 5 271 5 281 5 291 5 -370 5[ 31, 5 32i 5 33; 51 34! 51 351 5, 36j 51 37 -1,11 381 5! 39; 34 401 5 41 5 42 - 51-<10 431: 5 -5 45�1 5 _46� 5 t 47. 5 48. 5,,-,-- 49 5 50 5 51 5 52! 5 53 5 54 51 55� 5 56, 5 571 5; 25 2.51 2.51 <5 <5 <10 26 <10 27 <10 28 9.2971 -2.5! 2.51 2.51 2.51 9.297 <5 <5 <5 <5 <10 <10 <10 29 30 31 <10 32 <10 33 2.5;<5 2.5i <5 2,51 <5 2.51 <5 -- 2.51 <5 6.8! 6.8 2-Z <5 2.5;: <5 7.8 2.51 <5 2.6 <5' 2.51 <5 2.51 <5 2.-5!1 <51 -2.5' <5 2.5: <5 2.5, <51 2.5<5 2.5: <5 2.& <5 2.5: <51 2.5<5 2.& <5 2.5, <10 <10 34 35 <10 36 37 <10 38 34 39 <10 40 <10 41 421 - <10 <10 431 44 <10 45 <10 <10 46 47 <10- <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 48 49 so 51 52 53 54 <10 <10 <10 55 56 57 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 581 51 <10 59 11 11 -- 60 61 5' <10 — 5 { ---- — <10 -- — — — —62— 51- -- -- —<10« --- — <10 65 11 11 66 5 <10 j— -- f -- -- --- — — — — — — -- ---- ---- -- t —— — 58 — 59: �— 60 t — i — 61 — — -- --- --- — — a — — — -- 62 — - — 65 66 67 — - t -- —!_ — 67 5 <10 71 5 <10 <10 _ 69 70 — -- _ — --76 --- 76 --_ — 71_- 72, - 73 74 75 76 77 8011 5, _ 5 5 5 5 5 <10 <10 <10 j <10 <10_ 72 74 75 76 771 j — t — —� --- — -- -- -- --' --.. -- --- --- '-- _.— --- — ----- --- I -- -- -- - 51 — — 5�—� 5 — - -- 12 — — 5 — — `5. 5 5 — _ . 5 <10 <10- — <10 80 — 81, 82 --- - 83 — --- — 85 — — — _ _ — -- -- 82 -- ----_ ---- 83 84 12 <10 _ —--<10 <10 _ <10 86 87 88 —85— 86 881 891 91 92 94[ — — 951 96 97 98 -------- 991 - -- — 1001 101 2.51 —6 2.5!<5 2.5'1 — — --61 51 5 5 2.51 2.5 . 2.5 2.5 � 2.51 <5 891 91 <5 6 <10 92 93 94 i1 — — — —I — — ---- —� — �' -----<10 <10 <5 , <5 — --<5 — <5 <5 95 96 97 I — — --- — 98— -- — — 99 -- — —100 101 t — — -- — — — — — - 2118/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point irameter_.7H 3tandard n�DL=1/21) 11 0.1 2- 0.1 3 0.1 4 0.1 5 0.1 /ig/l Actual Data <.2 RESULTS' Std Dev. 1 7E-09 Mean 0.1 C.V. I 1.7E-08 Parameter 71/igA RESULTS 7.37033 Standard = n 1 0L=1/2Dj 15.41 21.86 10.97 Actual Data 15.41 21.86 10.06 10.97 IStd Dev. <.2 Mean 14.8726 <.2 31-----1-0.06 41 C.V. 0.495561 <.2 <2 5 5.242 5.242, 6 0.1 <2 Mult Facto 1 6 5.418 5.418 Mult Facto. 1.5 7 Max. Value 0.1 pq�/ 7 4.424 4.424 Max. Value 48.73 /ig/l 8 Max. Pred 0.1 kW! _- 8 14.17 -8 14.17 Max. Pred 73.095 lig/l 9 Allowable 0.01 /1 9r-14. 14.58 Allowable 7.17 ji 10 10 11.97 11.97 11 12 13 14 15 161 17 12 13 14 15 16, 8.58 24.54 9.069 16.48 -15.064 12.441 14.79; - 4-8-.7-3-1 8.2361 -----13.47 8.856 10.85 8.58 24.54 9.069 16.48 15.06 12.44 1-7j 14.79 191 20 18'-- 19 48.73 , .... .. 8.2361 20 13.471 21-1 22j___ 21 8.8561 22 10.851 231 241 251 27 23 11.18 14.17 13.99 16.24 13 .8-1 11.18 14.17 24 -251 13.99 16.24 ----13.81 261 27! _281 291 301 31 28 29 - .16.94i16.941 14.95 . , 14.95 15.86 15.86 16.23 16.23 -1-5.1-7-1 15.17 191 121 -12 1 12 17' 17 11� 11 36.1' 36.1 10, 10 101 101 30 31 321 331 -341 351 -36, 37!' ----31 39i 401 -32-- 33 34 35 - 361 371 38 39 40 411 421 431 441 45!� 4& 4T 48 49 50 51! 521i 53' 54! 551 56': 571 41 42 43 44 _361 36 7.6i 7.6 12.46 12.46 17.95� 17.95 .14.38 14.38 15.111 15.11 10.38; 10.38 12.58; 12.58 11.97' 11.97 17.361 17.36 11.39i 11.39 15.76, 15.761 16.99! 16.991r 18.63, 18.631 1! - 1917 9 14.47' 14.47 45 46 47 1 1 48 49 50 51 52 53 541 55 56, r--- 571 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 5 - 59 ' 60 61' j - - -- - - 641 I-- - - - 65! - 661 - --- - 671 68 _ .. - -_60--- i 59 61163 63 - - - 64 65 - - - - - - 1 ! - - - i -- - -- -- _ - - - --- -_ -- 66 1 --- - -- -- 67 68 69 69 -- --- 71 72 - - ---- - 72 73 - 73 - -- -- -_ _ _ 75 75, 761 781 79 80 81 8283 76 78 79 80 81 82l --- --- - -- - - -- 84 - ----85 84 86 87 .891 go! 91 92 93 94 95 --- 96i 97 j 99 100 101 86 87 - — -- - - - 1 ------- - ------ - ` -88 891 -- - - 901 91 92 93 94 95 -- 96 97 99 100 ---- - - 101 -- -- -----' — f -------- -- - - 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point mameter = Aandard = n Zn (AL) pg/I Actual Data 156 189 1 62 78 i RESULTS Std Dev. 29.1409 Mean 1 62.1607 C.V. 0.4688 1 Parameter= Ag (AL) Actual Data ,�IRESULTSI' <51 Std Dev. <51 Mean <5� C.V. <5 P 50 01-=1 /2DI 156 189 78 Standard = 0.061/jg/l n 1 IDL=1/2D 2.5 1 2 0.38266� 2 2.51 2.41071 3 3 0.15873 4 4 2.5--- 5 62 62 5 2.5 <5 6 51 51 Mult Facto j 1.5 6 2.51 <5 Facto 1.2 7 44 44 Max. Valud 189 pgA ligA 7 8 2.5 2.5 <5 <5 ..Mult Max. ValuE 2.5 pg/I 8 71 71 Max. Pred 283.5 Max. Pred 3 /ig/l 9 90 90 Allowable 51.24 ligA 9 2.5 <5 <5 Allowable 0.06 jig/I 10 41 41 10 2.5 1145 45 11 2.5 <5- 12 44 44 12 2.5 13 59 59 13 2.5 -<5 -<-5 <51 -<5.�j <51 --<5 <5 -<5 -.<51; 14 35 66------66 35 34 39 14 2.5 15----- J 15 2.51 16---- .34 39 16 2.5 17 17 2.5 18.--.--- 19 75 46 75 46 18 19 2.5 2.51, 20 61 63 61 63 20 21 21 2.51 22 61 73 61 22 23 23 2.5 <:5-1 24 63 80 63 24 2.5 25 80 25 2.5 <5- <5i <5!1 <5i: 11' <51 <5i <5 -<4 <4,, <5-'! <V; I 26 441 67! 761 63 26 2.5 27 44 27 2.51 28 29 67 28 2.5 76 29 2.5 30 31 781 64 63 51 5011 561 51: 58 78 30 2.5 641 63 51 50 56 51 58 31 2.5 32 32 2.51 33 33 21 34 21 _34 35 35 36 36 _?.5 0.5 37 37 0.5 -38, 391 77-------- 77 56 56 591 59 _82! 82 46i 46 421 42 57i 57 54 54 361 36 481 ---48 53! 53 46 46 411 41 311 31 54i 54 ;: 4646 48 48 491 49 41 47 38 2.5 -<1 <5 <511 <5 <5 <5 <5�' <5 <51; <5:! <5. <5i <51 <5, <5 <& <5:!' <5 <5,, <5 39 2.5 40 40 2.5 41 41 2.5 42 42 2.51 43 i 1 I 43 2.51 44 45 44 2.51 45 2.5 46 46 2.5 47 48 49-- 47 2.5 48 49 50 51 52 53 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2*5 50 51 52 531 54! 54 55 56 57 2.51 551 2.51 56 2.51 571 1 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysiel High Point 581 59! -- 60i 611 fit 63 64 -- F f - - - -- 58 _ 59 60 61 -- -I- ;- - --- 62 j 63 64 65 65 66 66 67 68 68 70 70 71 71 ; ll, -. ------� 74 75 74 - - ----- ---- L- --- --------- 75 ------- ------_ ..---- _ 76 ---77 -78 79 76 - R ---- --- -; ---- --- - ------F- 77 78-- 79-- - - -' - - -- -- - - - I -- �- - - - -- ; - i E - --- , - - - - :: --- - - -- -- - - -- -- --� 80 80 I !- 81 - - ---82 83 - 81 -- --- -- 82 - -- - -- ----- - -- j ' - ---� i - - —t- - - -� - 83 -1--- i_ -- - 84 84 85 --I' 85 86 87 - - - - - - -- 86 87 88 891- 88 89 i - -90 91 92 90- i - 91- 92 93 94 95 93 - _ -_ 94 - -- - - --- - - 95 - - - 96- 98 - 96 --- 98 99 - -- --99 1 oo 101 100 -- - -- -� 2/18/00 10 Toxicant Analysir,/ Hielh Point _�tul Data RESULTS 39 2150J �600 51 Toxicant Analysiel High Point - -9- - - - -�� - 5 - 60 - ' _--- 61; I ? 62 - _ - - - 64; - - - - i - - -- -- 65 i - - 66 - - -- - 68 -- -- - -- -1-- 69 -- 5 - 83- 59l -- - 60 61 - - -- 62 63 - - 64 65 66 -- - - - - -- - -_ -- -- - - - - -� --- - - - - - - -- -- - _ - - -- 1 4 --- - ( -- - - -- - - - 67 68 69 70 - - - -- - - ---� -- - - - - - --- 70 r-- - - -- 71 72 71 - - -- - 72 i i - -- - - - -- --- - -- -- j - - ---- - -- - - 74 75 76 781 79-- --- 80--- -_�---- 74 75 76 - 77 - 78 79 80 81 - 82 83 �- -- 82 83 - - --- 84 85�- - --- 87 - 84 85 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : - - - -- --- - - ----- - --- - - _ 86 - 87 -- - - -- - 881 89 -- - 91,- ---- - - 92; - - - 4 95 ------961 971 -- 9$ 99 - 10 88- -- ------ 89 92 i - - - - - l - 93 94 --- 95 - - ; -- - 96; -- ,- 97 ' - 98 ---_ -1001 1011 2/18/00 12 • i-KMn15Ionl /> RC6-MR,\I /yllL.,t- Loom IvN D66P RjVEk3 Toxicant Analvoi5/ Hiah Point &"EauAh t-t L t M rr I.IMIf l F- ItTR M4r117-04 Uq OK MorJr4t y <lo DW µ04. QTPJ-1 t,kDo. Mort. txoo. QT"I 1� rIDT nLRI� Facility Name NPDES ## _Qw (MGD) IWC (0 c'ving Stream High Point WWTP Parameter= Standard = - - 1 2 3 -- _ 5 6 ug/j 7 Cd I /ig/11 ctual Data _ -v 4 P NCO024210 2 _ 0.424911878 26 BDL=1/2DL _ 0.5 RESULTS 85.38 _ <1 _<1 1.49 Std Dev. Dee River Mean 0.580928571 Stream Class WS-IV CA _0.5 1.49 0.731435668 fC.V. FINAL RESULTS _ 4.0914 - 0.5 <1 Cd _ Max. Pred Cw - 0.5 <1 Mult Facto 1.8 <1 Max. Valuf 2.273 Ng/ Allowable Cw _ 2.3 ugr'�, _ v 8 _0.5 0.5 _ <1 <1 Max. Pred Allowable 4.0914 2.34 Ngl pg/ Max. Value 2.273 107.205 29.3 ug/ ug/ 9 __10 -11 12 0.5 Ni 0.5 <1 _ Max. Pred Cw - 0.5 <1 Allowable Cw 0.5 <1 <1 <1 Max. Value 51.05 13 0.5 Pb (lead) 325.5 29.3 - v_� 14 ucA 151 u 16 - --- - --17 - - - 18 ug/ _ 191 ug/ 201 21 221 u - - - -- -- 2 u_ 241 ' - 25 ------ -- 26 - - ug/l 27 ug/( 28 2.029 Max. Pred Cw Allowable Cw Max. Value 0.5 2.029 _-- _ - 0.5 --- -0.5 <1 - - -- <1 -�- - 93 - 144.4 5.9 76 19.975 58.6 --_-_ 11.75 - 0.100 0.014 CN- 0.5 <1 _ _ Max. Pred Cw _ 0.5 <1 Allowable Cw 1.108 <1 Max. Value 1.033 1.108 Cr 2.273L 1.033 Max. Pred Cw 13 2.099 2.273 -- -- Allowable Cw 2.099 Max. Value _0.5 0.5 <1 Hg 0.5 <1 - Max. Pred Cw 0.5 <1 - -- - Allowable Cw_ Max. Value - 0.5 <1 <1 _ 0.100 _ ! 291 0.5 _ _ r - 30 0.5 73.095 ug4 31 0.5 8.2 ug 32 T- 0.25 48.73 _ 331 0.25 _ _ - 34� 0.25 283.5 ug35 i _ _ 0.25 _ 58.6 ug/I 361 0.25 189 1 37 0.25 381 0.25 3.000 ug/I 39i 0.25 0.070 u 40' 0.25 2.500 -4 - 0.25 - i 38j 0.5 4488 ug/l. 39, 0.5 ---i - -'---- --- --- 1171 ug/l -40- 0.5 2137 41; 0.5_ �00 V,�� 381-- 0.5 _ FIB 2955 ug/ 391 0.5 04TUA h 0 u 40; 0.5 1407 ! 41, 0.5 1- --- -1 50' 0.5 51 + - - -1- - -- 52. 0.51 !- -- 53 0.51- 54, 0.5 55 i -- 0.5 56 i 0.5 57 Cu(AL) - <1 --- _ Max. Pred Cw <1 Allowable Cw Max. Value <1 <.5 Zn(AL) <.5 _ _ Max. Pred Cw <.5 Allowable Cw <.5 Max. Value c5- A9(A�� Max. Pred Cw Allowable Cw <.5 <.5 _ <.5 Max. Value c5-- Max. _Pred Cw Allowable Cw <.5 <1 - - ---- _ <1 - Max. Value AI(AL) _. <1 <1 ------ �--- ---- ---- Max. Pred Cw_ Allowable CvA Max. Value - -- - <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 -1 - - - ----- - --- <1 - --- -I---- <1 - <1 2/18/00 1 Toxicant Analysis/ Hiah Point - -- - -- 1- ----- I 581 i C - -- -- -- - --- -- 59 60 6163 62 - 64 65 - - -- - - - --- - -- - - -- - J 66 67 68 - 69 70 71 -� 72 73 74 75 - ---- - 76 - --77 - - 78 ----- - - -- 79 80 -- 81 - - ---- - --- — - 82 — - --� - 83 - - 84 -- -. ------ - 85 __ -- - 87 -� - - 88 -- - _ 89 -- - - 90 91 92 -- — - - - ------ --- - - ----i_ --! 93 94 95- 96 97 98 99- 100 -- -± -- --- ' — --- -- 101 _ 2/18/00 T....... ..r A.,. 1-a;G/ 1 ;.6 Point Ni -ug/l. 1 - f - - Actual Data RESULTS! _ _16.22 Std Dev. 10.0906 12.98 Mean - - 10.5139 -1------ - - <10 C.V. 0.95974 --<10 - 10.31 - _ -- <10 Mult Facto 2.1 P-iiameter = .andard = .. -- _ n 1 --- --- 2 ---- 3 _ 4 5 Pb lead 25 _ _ _ --------- - - --- I - Actual Data --------- -- - - - RESULTS Std Dever - _ } 13.753 5.8599 2.347 ------ -- -- 3.5 _ 93 fl l 325.5 NqA 29.28 ippi _ meter = tan dard = 25 _ - n D_L=1/2D DL=1/2D 7.127 9.613 - 7.127 ----_9.613 1 - 16.22 Mean C.V. - 2 12.98 3 5 23.95 . 23.95 4 5 2.5 <5 5 10.31 _2.5 <5 6 5 6 2.5 <5 Mult Factor 7 16.01 16.01 Max. Value 51.05 _ pg/I :: 7 2.5 <5 Max. Value 8 5 <10 Max. Pred 107.205 Ng/1::- _ 8 5.602 5.602 Max. Pred C 9 5 <10 Allowable 29.28 pgA-.::: 9 10.77 10.77 Allowable C 10 5 <10 -- 10 7.217 7.217 11 51 51 --- - ---- -- 11 12 8.31 8.31 - 12 12.12 12.12 14.96 14.96 13 15.32 15.32 i_ - I _ _ i - - l _ _ 13 8.364 8.364 _ 14 13.62 13.62 --- - _ 14 11.04 11.04 - 15 51.05 51.05 15 17 1 <2 16 5 <10 17 10.06 10.06 1 <2 18 12.16 12.16 - -- j------_ - 18 19 2.5 <5 __- --- - 19 5 <10 1 _- <2 20 15.66 15.66 - -- - -- -- - - 20 21 1 <2 21 17.63 17.63 1 <2 22 10.59 10.59 - 22 _-_ 1 <2 23 20.26 20.26 --- '-- i - I ----�- 23 1 <2 24 10.41 10.41 24 25 1 <2 25 5 <10 1 <2 26 10.14 10.14 26 27 ~,.. 28 2.7 2.7 27 17.25 17.25 1 <2 - I_ t -- - _ i ^- - _- - 1 - ----- - k - r - - --I--:•:•:.:. - -- - -- - --�- -- I i 28 5 <10 25 25 29 12.54 12.54 _ 29 1 <2 30 16.55 16.551 _ _� f 30 31 1 <2 31 _ 5 <10 2.31 2.3 32 5 <10 32 1 <2 33 2.5 _ <5 _ _ I _ - --33 � 1 <2 34 6 6 -�- _ - ---1 - -- -- i i i 34 35 ;.;.; --��-- 37 38 39 40 1 <2 35 9.5 9.5 39 39 37 4 <8 1 <2 38 8.3 8.3 5.2 5.2 39 5 <10 1 <2 40 5 <10 2.5 2.5 41 12 12 41 k 42 - -� --- -- 43 44 -..--- - - I 45 46 j 47 - -- - :. :.:. 48 49 - - - 50 l 52 i 53 -1 54 55 56 57 93 93 42 5 <10 1 1 <2 <2 43 5 <10 44 5 <10 2.1 2.1 45 5 5 ---- - <10 <10 <10 1 <2 46 1 <2 47 51 3 3 48 5 <10 2.9 2.9 49 -- 5 <10 -- ---- <10 <10 41.15 <10 14.45 � <10 <10 1 -- <2 50 5 5 41.15 5� 14.451 _ 1 - - 1 1 <2 51 _ <2 52 53 <2 54 -- 1 1 1 <2 55 5 51 <2 <2 56 57 2/18/00 3 Toxicant Analysie/ High Point 58 59! 60! 62 -- - - -- - - 58� = ` --59 60 62 63 :: 64 -- - 65 66 68 - - - -- --- - - - - i - - -- - - -- - -- � ' - -- -= - - - - - ;.:.:.: -.•. l i 63 64 -�_—� -- 65 66 68 ------ --- --- - - 71 - - - 72 73 74 75 l - 76 :::;: 77 --- 78 - - 79 80 81 --- - 82 - - - - ` --- 83 II 84 - - - i - - --85 87 89 90 '' 9192 92 94 95 97 ,. 98 99 100 101 71 --- - ----- --- 72 73 74 ------- - - ---- 75 76J - -- -- - - - - 781 - -- — - 791 80 81 82 -- -- - - 83 - - -- -- -- �- 85 - - 87 89 90 91 94 5 97 98 99 100 101 ---- --- - ,- - 2/18/00 Toxicant Analvric,/ Hiah Point Uv rameter = - tandard = n 1 2 --- 3 4 CN- Parameter = 5 pg/l ~--- -- � --- Standard = IDL=1 /21) Actual Data RESULTS 1 ODL=1 5 - _ _ .<I0 Std Dev. 7.73152; i - - 1 5 <10 Mean 6.05941 2 5 _ -- <10 C.V. _ + 1.27595 - t _ 3 5 <10 ' 4 5 _ <10 -+ i _ 5 51 < 10 { 1 Mult Facto 1.9 _ 6 Cr 50 pgll Actual Data <5 <5 ! RESULTS Std Dev. Mean { I P. -- - f /2D 2.55 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 { 1.74351 2.95907 --- <5 -------- C.V. 0.58921 <5 _ <5 <5 - Mult Facto 1.7 _ 5 6 _ 7 5 <10 Max. Value_ 76 pg/l 7 2.5 <5 Max. Valuq 11.75 Ng_ll _ 8 5 Max. Pred 144.4 pg/I pg/l -- - - _ 8 -- --- - 9 _ 2.5 <5 Max. Pred 19.975 p _ 9 5 _<10 ^T_<10 Allowable --- 5.86 2.5 <5 Allowable 58.56 pgll _ _ 10 5 --_ - <10 - - - - _ --- - -- - 10 2.5 <5 _ 11 5 <10 - 11 2.5 <5 -- 12 5 <10 -- 12 2.5 <5 -- 13 5 <10 13 2.5 <5 _ 14 5 <10 - - - -{ _' -- _ - - 1 14 --- -15 16 17_ -- -- �18 11.75 11.75 15 16 5 <10 - -- 2.5 2.5 2.5 7.861 <5 5 - - - <10� <10 <5 <5 17 5 18 19 5 <10 -- _ - --- -'_- - 7.861 -- 51 <10 --- <10 19 2.5 2.5 - _<5 <5 _ 20 5 _ -- - 20 21 5 -<10 - 21 22 -- - 23 � 2.5 2.5 2.5 v <5 ---- 22 - -- 23 5 <10 --- A----- -- -i <5 5 <10 - <5 - - -- 24 5 <10 _ -_ - - - - -24 2.5 <5- 25 5 <10 _ - - -- 25 - 26 ---- 27 28 2.5 _2.5 2.5 9.297 <5 _ <5 <5 9.297 - --- 26 5 _ <10, _ - 27 5 <10 28 --- 29 5 <10 5 < 10 -- - �- { - --. 29 2.5-- 30 31 5 5 --� <10 <10 - A -` I - - 30 --- 31 32 _2.5 - 2.5 2.5 <5 } - <5 ` - -- 32 - 33 5 <10 { <5 <5 -- I-- - 5 <10 �--- - -- i -__ 33 __- 2.5 - 34 5 -- <10 {�- I -� - - 34 2.5 -- - f-- -- --- -- 35 2.5 36 2.5 { - --- - 37 2.5 i 38 6.8 39 2.5 i40 - j 41 2.5 421 2.5 �- -� - 43 ---2.5 - - _ 1 44 2.5 45 2.5 i _ 46 2.5 i _ - 471 - 2.5 i ' - 481 - - 2.5 -- -t--- - --49' 2.5 50 . 25 I 51 2.5 I- _ 521 2.5 i 53, 2.5 t 2.5 55 ,I ' 56' 2.5 57 <5 ---- '- 35 36 5 5 -- -- - <10 -- -- { -- - - <5 ;-- - -- <10 11 <5 37 38 39 ----- 40 41 11 <5 - - 5--- <10 6.8 34 34 <10 { ! <5` -- _ - 5 -- 7.8 5 - - <10, - - 43 441 - - - - -- - <5 -- - -- - - - ---- - 5 <10 <5 --- - - 5 -- - <10 - --- -- - - <5 45 46 47 48 - ---- 50 51 52 53 55 56 5 <10 <5 5 <101 <10 !- - - -- --- -------- - <5 -- --- I 5 <5 - 5 -- - - - <10!; ----- _--- - -'----- --- <10f I <10' <10� <101' -- <101. <10 1 -- <5 <5 i 5 <5 <5 5 5 <5 5 <5 <5 5 <5 5 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 58; 5 <10' 59 11 11 60, 5<10 61! 5 <10 621 5 <10 - -- -- 63 5 - - <10 64 5 <10 65 111 - 11 - ------ -- - 67 -- - 5 - ---<10 68 5 - <10 69 5 <10 L I 581 , 59 } 60, ! -- 611 !- 621- -- - - 63 j - 64 - i i 65 ! — 1 -- - -- -- - --- -- -- - - - -- -- �- --- �- - - - - ---- -66 - 67 -- - - 68 - - - - 69 70 - 70 -- -- - 5 <10 - ---- - -' 71 76 ---- 76 71 72 5 - -- <10 � - 72 - - -- -- - ----- - - 73 - -� 74 --- - -- - - 74 5 -- - --- 75, 5 76! 5! - -- 78 - 5 79i 5 <10 - I - <10- <10 <10 -f-- - ! ! 761 --- - - --78 79 80 -81 i 82 - -1 - i - — — i 83 t 84 - - --r--- - - ----- ! -� 85 -- - I - -- 86 ! 87 - - --88 ` 89 90 91 - t - ! --?-- - 92 - -' 94 95 - - 96 j 97 99 I �-� 100 I-- � 101 ! -- <10 <10 <10 --- --- - - - - - - - - --- - - -- l-- - - --�-- - - 80 ! 5 - i I---5 --- - -- — - ---81 82 ! - - - 5 j 12 -- 5 - <10 I - ---- - 83 84 f---- 12I - --- <10 85 - - -- - - - -- <10 -- - 86 _5 5 -- <10 - ---- — --- - - --- -- 87 88 5 <10 -- - 5 2.5 6 2.5 <10 89 <5 - 90 6 91 ----- - 92 <5 -- 2.5 5 <5 <10 r--�-` -- 94 i 95 ! 5 96[ 5 991 2.5 100! 2.5 101---- - 2.51 <10 <10 <5 --- - I ------ - - - - --- - <5( <5 i ----- <5 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point rameter _ (H tandard = -- n 1 2 3 0.012 DL-1/2D - -! Ng/l Actual Data ! ... . _ _ ( RESULTS Std Dev. 1 1.7E-09( Mean 0.1(- C.V. 1.7E-08 . -- Parameter ^ Cu AL Standard - 7 n DL=1/2D i 1 15.41 -1 _ - 2 21.86 3 10.06 i - 4 10.97 5 _ 5.242 6 5.418 lig/l i - --- 7 4.424 Ngll 8 14.17 i-- - - - Ng/l- Actual Datal 15.41 21.86 10.06 - - RESULTS _ P _ 0.1 <.2 Std Dev. Mean 7.37033 --- 0.1 - ----- <.2 14.8726 0.1 <.2 --_-_-_-- _<.2 C.V. 0.49556 - _ 4 0.1 10.97 5.242 5 0.1 <.2 <.2 61 0.1 Mutt Facto 1 5.418 Mult Facto 1.5 7 Max. Value 0.1 4.424 Max. Value 48.73 Nig/I 8 Max. Pred Allowable 0.1 0.011.. 14.17 14.58 Max. Pred Allowable 73.095 8.20 pg/l Ng/l 9 Ngll 9 14.58 10 - -- -- ---------- ------- -- 10 11.97 ---- 11.97 -- 11 - - - I-`-�-- -- ----- - - - - - -� -- 11 1- ---12 13 8.58 8.58 - -- _ - 12 -24.54 24.54 - --- - 13 --_-- - 9.069 9.069 -- 14 ---� i - , 14 16.48 16.48 15 16 -- -- - _ j - - - -' i 15 -_-- 16 i 17 18 -- -- - - - 19 --- ---- � - -- ---- - 20� I 21 15.06 15.06 12.44 --- - ---- - - -- 12.44 -14.79 17 14.79 _-- 19 -`--- 48.73 48.73 ---_ 8.236 --13 8.236 - -- - 20 --- 47 -----13.47 - -- 21 8.856 8.856 --- 22 -- (� �-� 22 10.85 10.85 23 -- ---- - -- 23 i j 24 25 - - - -- -26 --- - - 27 � -^ -- -- 28 29 _ 30 ' _ - � _ 31 32 11.18 11.18 24 --------- ---- -- -- __ ^� -- - - -- � I - _ - � _ }-- ---- I -- -- - ---- ---- - - - T I ; j - !- - - j 1 j - - - ---- { ( - { - - ---- ! - - - - i-i 14.17 14.17 _ ! 25 13.99 _ 16.24 13.8 16.94 13.99 16.24 13.8 16.94 -- ( --I- j ;--- ---- _ - - - -- ----- 26 27 -- 28 _- 29 14.95 14.95 30 - 31 --- - - 15.86 15.86 - --I - 16.23 16.23 32 -- 33 15.17 19 12 15.17 -� -; T . -i---- - t - - , - - � -, --' - _. _---_ - -- -- 19 12 34 ------- --- 35 38 - -- 39 -33 34 - 35 36 37 38 ---- 12 ---- ----- 1236 17 11 - - 17 11 ----- 36.11 101-- 10 36 36.1 10 -1 39 1 --- -- - 40 T--- 41 42 43 ( -- 44 45 46 47 - - 48 491 50( 51 - -- I 52 --- -.53 54 55 _ b7j 40 10- 36 _ 41 42 43 - - 44 45 46 47 481 -49_ 501 51 I - - ---,- - - --- ---- -- _ --- - ----- 54 ; 55i 56. I - - -• _ 57! 7.6 12.46 7.6 12.46 17.95 --_17.95 14.38 14.38 15.11,- 15.1 10.381 10.38 12.581 12.58 11.97� 11.97 - 17.36-- 17.36 -11.39 11.39 15.761 15.76 i - --- 9__-1 -- - -16.99 18.63 � - - - _ 18.63 19. 19 - -- - 14 47� 14.47� ---- -- i- j 1 i - � - -- _--------_ --- � -- 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 58; -- 591 - f� 60 i � i 11i ----fi21 - I --- 61 ---- - - --- 671 - -- --- - 68 l { { � # } � - - f - - - �- - - ---- - - -- 58 60 -- --- 61 ---- fit - I - -- �_ _ ---- - - -! - -- --- - - - - 1 - --1 67- 68 -- - --- 70.- --- --- --- - - _ _ , ; ' I - { - - ! - - -1 l { ` 70 - ---�- -- - - --- -- 1--- -- 1' j - 1 - - -- - -- --- I 1 71 ----- -1- - --- - - j � 71 -- 72 72- 73 74 - 73 74 --- � 78 77'77 78 79 � --- - 791 80 81 82 80 81 82 83 83-- 84 84 85 86- 1 _ 87 88 { 85 - -- - - --- - - i 86, - 87� 88 89 91 921 - ----- 89 - - - 91 92 941 93 94 95-- -- 961 9698 _ --------- 99 -1- 100I 1011 100 101 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ Hiqh Point rameter = tandard = n 1 - _- -- _2 3 4i 5 6 7 8 Zn AL i 50 i ,ugll - - - _ _ � • � Actual Datat RESULTS 156 Std _Dev. 29.1409 -_ - -189 Mean - --62.1607 162 C.V. 0.4688 Parameter = � A AL StandI ard - 0.06 N9l k i n 3DL=1 /2D Actual Data 11 2.5 <5 - -- - - -- 21 2.5 <51 3i 2.5 <5 42.5 <5 5 2.5 <5 _2.5 <_5 �ugll 7 2.5 _ <5 Ngll 8 2.5 <5 ji 91 2.5 <5 101 2.51 - _ <5 - i RESULTS 0.38266 _ I P _ 3DL=1 /2D i 156 189 162 78j 62 _ 51 _ 44 - 71 Std Dev. Mean___ - 2.41071 _ C.V. 0.15873 78 62 _ 51 -44 71 Mult Facto Max. Valu Max. Pred 1.5 189 283.5 Facto 1.2 _Mult Max. Valu Max. Pred 2.5 3 ugA ,ug/l 9 10 90 41 90 Allowable 58.56 Allowable 0.07,ug/l 41 -- --�- 11 _ 45 45 44 _ 11 12 _ 2.5 2.5 _2.5 2.5 . - 2.5 2.5, 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 <5 12 44 -- 59 -i35 - <5 <5 13 ------14 59 13 35 ---- - 14 <5 - 15 ---16! _ 17 18 -- --- -- 66 34 39 75 j 46 61 63 --- _66 34 - - --- - ----- - 15 16 - <5 - - - - - .. ----- - <5 <5 - <5 <5 <5 39 I 17 18 75 19 46 191 20 - 20 21 61 63 21 --- 2.5 ._�.2.5 - - 2.5 2.51 _ <5 _.. -- -- <5 22 -- 23 -- 73 ------ 61 63 73 ----.. - -- 61 __ __- __ 22 23 24 _ <5 <5 ----- - 24 63 - -- -- 25 ---- ----- 26 - - --- 80 -- -- - 63 80 - - 25 � 2.51 - ---2-5 --- •_.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 1 2 <5 ------- <5 - _ <5 -- <5 <5 --- --- - -- - 63 - - -- -- --- - 26 -i- � 27 44 � - - --- 67 - 28,----- -- --- 291 76 30 j 78 31; 64 -- 32; - ------ 63 331 51 44 271 67 ----- -- 76 -- ------ ---- - 281---`- 291 30 78 <5 j 64 311 ----32i------2.5 33 <5 -- - -<5 <4 - 63 51 - - - - -_ 34' 501 501 35� - _ 56 56 36 51 51 37 58 58 --- --- 38 � - -- 77 -- 77 39 56 56 40;-• - - - 59� -- - - 59 --- - - - 41 : 82 , 82 42i 461 46 431 421 - - -- 42 441 571-_- 57 45 '� 541 54 46 i 36 i 36 47' 48; 48 ---- 48 53 � 53 49' 46' 46 '� 41 504i i - - 51 31 t - -- 52 31 53 541 54 461 46 --- _ 1 54; 4848 55 � 49 i 49 - - - - i 47" -- 56.47 34 2 2.5 j <5 j -- -- ------ - 0.5 <1 0.5 <1 2.5�-- <5 - - - --- I _2.51 <5 2.5' - ---- -- <51 -- - -- -- - -- f- 2.5 <5 2.5 ---- <5 2.5 <5--- _ _ 2.5_ - <5 2.5 <5 , 2.5 <5 _ 2.5 _ <5 i _ 2.5 - <51!- 2.51 - <51 2_.5, -- --<5 ! i _2.5. <5i' - • - - 2.5, <5 E 2.5 ` <5 j - - -- - _ --- 2.5 � -- - c5! - - - ---- <5; 2.5,' ----, 35 36 37 ------- ---- --- 38 39 ---- -- - ----�- - 40� -- -- 41 42 - _ _ 1 - - _ r -- - :.. 1 - -- 1 43 44 45 46 47 i- _ 48 49 50 _ 51 - - -- 52 - 53 -- 55 561- -- - -- - -- ; - _--_�---- 1- - ----- - - 2/18/00 1 9 Toxicant Analy5W High Point 611- --- 63163 651 - ' 66 - -- -- 67 -- -' 68------- - 62 - --- -_-�-- 65 ---- ' - -__ - - -67 _ -- - - --- 68 + - -- - - - I - - - -- - - - - --- - --- - - i ---- -- -- - - - 69 - - 69 - - 70 70 ---72 --- - - - --- - ------ - j ------- - ---- 72 -- -73 75 i 76 77 78 - _ - - -- -- - - - i L- - - ---- - i - -73 74-- ---- - - -- -- E - -- f ---- --- --- ----- - --_ _ -' - ' --- - -- 75 - - ( 76 77 78 --- - 80 81 82 ----- ( - 79 80 81 � -- - -----------i 831 - ---- 84-- 85 - -- - -- - - -- 86 87 88--- - 891 90, 911 931 -- 94, - - 95 i - - 971 98 - 99, 100i - - 101! —- --- - _ 83 84 -- - -- - - -- - --- -- - - -- 85 86 � --- j 87 -- 88 89 1 - - 90 1. -- 1 -- 91 93 94 - - - - -- - - - - - - --� j ! I - - - -- - - 95 -- 96 97 ---- ---- 9$ 99 100 101 ----- --- --- i - - - --- ------ , - r- , --- -- - -- _ - - - -- -1- 2/18/00 10 Toxicant AnalycW High Point rameter_ _ ; Fe , tandarid - 1000 - _ n3DL=1/2D Actual Data 1 250 <500 2 250 <500 3 250 - <500 4 _ 25_0 <500 {� - Parameter = 1 Standard = RESULTS; n Std Dev. ' 363.514 1 Mean 334.1961 ' 2 C.V. ^ - - - 1.08773 - - 3 - - - 4 5 Mult Facto 2.1 _ _ 6 Max. Value _ 21371Ng/I i 7 Max. Pred _4487_71Ng/I _ 8 Allowable 1171.22 /ug/l 9 - - - - �- - `T 10 All No WO Stndrd) DL=1/2D Q/I Actual Data <500 <500 <500 RESULTSAL _ Std Dev. Mean - 250 283.517 250 307.268 _ - 250 - -250 C.V. 0.9227 <500 5 250 <500 250 <500- _ _-_ 6 _ 250 _ _<500 250 <500 Mult Facto 2.1 7 250 <500 250 <500 Max. Value/l 1407�Ng 8 250 <500 250 <500 Max. Pred 2954.7 Ngll 9 250 <500 250 <_500 Allowable 0.00 pr ll _ 10 _ 250 <500 250 <500 -- _ 11 250 <500 - - 11 T - - 12 -- - - 13 i 14 '. 15 - � � -- ---16 - 17 -- ! - - 18 { } 19 - 20 21 I 22 - 23 --- -- -� 24 - - -- 25 26 - 27 -- - 28 ; 29 - j _3_0 31 - 32 - - -- 33 --- -- - -, ', - 34 f 35 - j-_ _ 36 37 1 --�- - 38 l 39 40 --- - - � - - , - 41 -r 42 43 44 45 46 �_ 47 48 49 50 51 52 - 53 54 55 -} - 56 57 250 <500 12 -- 1135 1135 1135 <500 - 13 2501 <500 250 ---- 14 14071 1407 1407 _<500 <500 15 16 _250 -- - 250 <500 250 <500 _ <500 Y 250---- 17 250 _ <_50_0 - 250 <500 18 2137 _ 2137 1290 1290 19 - <500 -- -- <500 250 250 <500- <500 _- -- 20 21 _250 250 250 -- <500 250 <500 -- 22 250 <500 250 250 <500 — <5 23 250 <500 250 - <500 - 250 <500 _24 -- 25 _ 250 _ <500 250 <500 _ 26 250 <500 250 <500 _ 27 _ 250 <500 250 28 250 250 250 <500 <500 250 _<500 <500 29 30 250 <500 <500 250 <500 31 250 <500 250 <500 32 250 _ <500 250 <500}-- 33 130 -100 130 70 70 1 � -__ 100 60 60 � ----�- 35 120 120 -- 130 120 - - -120 - 130 95 95 - --- 36 120 — 120 - - - 37 85 85 _ _ 38 1300 1300 89 - 871 -- 1100 -- 1100 1100 61 - 39 89 _ 87 _ - --1100 _ 61 _ 40 - 41 59 59 910 910 42} 110 250 250 250 250 250 - 2501 250, 25& - 250 250; 250! 256 - 2501 - 2501 - 110 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 <500 - <500 <500 -<500 { <500 1 65 65 <50011 <500 f - 43; 250 - 44J 250 45 250 <500 46 47 250 <500 250 _<500 <500 <5001, <5001 -<5W <500; - <500' <506 -- <5001; _ .. <500!- - -- : - ---- -- -- - 48 250 491 250 250 501 51; 250 521 250 53 250 54 250 55 --- 56 - 250 250 --- 571 - 2/18/00 Toxicant Analysis/ High Point 58! 59, :- 60 611, - - - -- - 63 --- ' 64 1 65 67 - - 68 - — - - -- -- i 58i 59;- 60 61 l 62 1 -- _ 63 64 I _I 65 - - --- -- ---- _ - � - - ! 67j - 68 69 - - - - -- -- - - -- 70 -- -- 71= 71 - ----- - - -- -- r- -- 731 741 - -- ---- - - - - 73 74 - - - - 76 77' 78 - 751 - ---76- 77- 7s -- - 791- - 80 81 �---�- '; - � 82 j 83 84 85 _ 86 88 - 89, -- — 90 -- - - 91;-- 92 93 94 95 961 97i 981 99' --1004 - 101' -- ----- ---� �- - -- ----- ---- --- 79 801 81 -82 83 84 85 86 87 881 89 -- -90 91 92I 93 94 95 961 98! - - 99T- 100 101 ----------- -- - ---- - -- - - — - - - ---� - -- — - ----- - — I ___ - i - - --- T, ! - - j -- - - i i l - ---- I - i ! �_ - -- -- j! - ; -- - - - 2/ 18/00 12 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 00 Ienderson Co. SelsooB Pennclulhn: 139.(Gnh) - - - - ION Pa. - -- Pas. .-- -- Pan - -- L.I. NCOD66681A01 Beet AW111995 Fnq..ev;QP/F . Ian AMJuI(7cl NanComp.Single lees Lau Pau -- Pas. ... -- NR Le.. Pass Is... Pau County: Hcndsrx Region: ARO S.Musio s FRB02 1997 Is... _. ... P.L. - --- Pa.. - ... Pea. PF: 0OD99 Spas INS Pa.a -- -- Pesa ... Pea -- Pau 7QI00.1 IWC(%):13 19.99 P.1. -- - Pess --- .- Pess -- -_ Henderson Nutbush Cr WWTP Penn 0.lion 909 1995 81.9 340 >90 >90 son .90 17) aW) .w 1 NCW20559/001 Bcgin:101111997 Frequcncy:QP/F + Mur Jun Scp Dcc + NonComp:Single 19% 61 35 M at St 025 at 55 55 N St 21 35,35 37 County: Vance Regi.o RRO Suhbmin, ROA06 107 Late 62162 >90,12.5 37.55 61 >98 55.78 78 a90 Lau a90 779 N Lelo.190 PF: 4.14 Sprain SOC:I INg-9130N9 P 2 clu ounni nwadty(90.61.5,45,30.15) 1998 55A >90 ass ... -. 779 Soil >90 212 7QIO: 0.20 IWC(%)97 INS son 551 >90 367 36.7 .15 .0 21.2 719 HendersonvBle WilliPcmmWlinc 229;ifrckc Cka Crdulim l2%;pf 4.&lv limn Y lees - Pen -� ... Is ... --- ... Pan ._ ... Pass ... NC00255341O01 Brput3Jl/1"'? FouquenaY:QP/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonCmnpAingle loge -- Pan _. ... Pa.. -- - Paa. Pau _ Pas. Pass - County: Henderson Region: ARO Subbssin: MB02 1997- Paa. _ ... Paa. -- --- Pau --. Pas. ... PF: 3.2 spsw INS-. Pan -- -.. Pea. Fast --- ... 7Q10: Il IWf(%)22 99 t9 - Pa" --- --. Pau -- -�- Iliekory-Henry Fork WWTP Pemn elu lint 349 V INS a3 113 <13 Is .5 >52 >62 16 17.7 32 <13 15 NC0040797A11 Begin:&1/1995 Frequency: Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov N.aCuric5ingle I99fi .13 -- >52 .52 Ann 62 >I00 s52 -_ ._ >52 Lat - .6 County:Catawha Region: MRO SuM1hnin: CTB35 1907 -- BI >IN 48 -- -. as Peu - PF: 9.0 Slays] tees --� 48 _. ... Pea. -- .. Pa.. ... -- 7Q10:27 IWC(%):34 ION -- Pan --. ... Paa. .- ... IOakory-N.E. WWTP Penncln hunt 13% V INS Pau --- Paa. --- Pass -- -_ Pa.. ... - NC0020MIA01 Begirs:8/I/1995 Frequency: Q POP + Jun Ale Jul0Lt NuCon.PALO lc tees Pau --- -- Paaa P... "- - P°.. Is.a - -- CounIt: Countries Region: MRO SuRsain: CTB32 Into Pass -- - Pau - -. Pau Pan -- - -- Paa. -- -' PF: 6O SPrad INS Late Pa.. _. Fall Pau - -- NR 7Q10. 60.0 IWC(%):13 INS Paa - - Paa .-- .- Pau - - High Point Care Center Pcnnclulun: 21% 1995 --- ... Pau -- - rail Pau - Pess ... - Pau Pak• NC01346035A01 B.SWS/1/1999 Frequency: Q P/F + MaJun Scp Dcc + NcnConp:Singlc 1906 - -. Paaa -- -- Pa.. - --- Peu Fell ..- Is .. _ Pa- County: Forsyth Region: WSRO Subbssin: YAD07 1997 - --- Pass -- Fall Pe.. -- Pao ._ .. Pass PF:0.01 Staid Inns --. ... Is... Pa.. ... ... ... ... Pas. Pa.. ... ... _. ... Pa.. .. 7Q10: OM IWC(%):205 loss ... ... IliBh Point Eatable WWTP Penn chr lint: 90% V ION Pas. ... Pass ... _. Pao --- ... Pass -- -. NCW2421"1 Bcgin:41111996 Frequency: Q P/F . Jwt Apr Jul Orl NaiCump:Sg,,Ic ION Fail Pea. - Pass ... ... Pau _. ... Paaa Pa.. ..- - C..atry: GotfnN Region: WSRO SubMsim CPHS 1997 Pau _. ._ Pasa ... ... NFYPass Late -- Paae - Pen -- PE 16.0 Staid 1998 Fun NWPe.. -- Pan .-- - Paa. 7Q10: 1.0 IWC(%p96 lane Pan - - Paaa .-- - Pau - --- High Palo, Weauside WWTP Pcnnchr lbn: 90% V1.5 Pae. -- -- Pa.. ... -- NIYPa.. -- -- Pasa ... . NC0024228A01 Begin:7/1/1999 Frequem,Q PIP + Jon Apr Jul Oct + NonComp:Single lam Falfa4 NFVFe9 Fail Fell Paa. -- Pau --- - Pae. Pus _-- _ Cuunty: Davidson Region: WSRO Subbssin: YAD07 1997 Pa.. .-- _. FaRPes. -- -- N". Pa.. - --- F.H,Pa.. PF: 6.2 Staid 1No Pau _. --- Pau ... -- Peu ... -- Pau 7Q10: 0.67 IWC(%)93.47 law Pas. --- ... Pas. -. -- Highlands Camp h Cod Center Permchr IS.: 90%(Gmh) INS -- Pau -- --. P... --- -- Fat Fall Fen Fain Fall Fain Pau NCO061123/001 Begin:10/1/1997 Fragguny:QP/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Singlc 1998 Fail Pau -- --- Fell Fail Fall Nf4IFe9 NWFeH an Fail Pea. County: Macon Region: ARO Suhlvsin: SAVOI 1997 -- Pesa --- ... Fell Fail NP/Fe. Pa.. Fall --. Pass ... Is .. ... PF: 0006 SPeod 190 -- P... -. _. Peas Pao - --- -- - Fail Fail Fail 7Q1000 IWC(%):IOD ION - Pau -- -- mllshamugh WWTP Penn ehr lint: 90% lees -- Fell Fall Paa. Pam -- -- Pa.. _. ... Fan Pu. NC0026433A01 Begim611/1995 Frequency: Q PF + Feb May Aug Nov + Nancontp. Single 1996 -- Pau ... -- Po. -- - Pesa Pas..Pass ... Pau -- Pass Pas° gc R County: Cronegion: ROD Subbssin: NEU01 IN?- Pau -- _. Pau -- Pas.Paaa -- PF: JO 51a1d lees �- Felt Pa.. -- Fail Pae. 7Q10: 0.18 IWC(%)96 ION -- Pen Paaa - P... -_ -_ Paaa - - IINA Ilaldings, Inc. Perm ,lur Ion: 5.89E INS Paea -- - Pass ... --. Pa.. .- -- Pas. Pan NC0004952A01 BegW5/1/1999 Frequency: Q We + Mac Jun Sep Dee + NonCslnp:Single 19% -_ ... Paae -- -- Pasa - -- Pau Pss. -- - .. Pa.. Co..": Cleveland Region MRO Suhhson: BR005 107 -- -- Let. Pau - Peaa Pe.. Pa.. PF: 0.8 Sp d loge -�- -�- Pam Pua --- -- - Is .s Pau -- -- -- -_ Pua --. 7QI0200 IWC(%)3.8 loge -- -_ ... LEGEND: PERM=Pemdt Requircmcm LET= Adminisauiveleton-Target Frequency= Monitoring frequency:Q-Quasserly;M- Mondt; y; RM. Bitllonthly; SA- A.AnnW ually;OD Only wlien disalurging; D. Discontinued ncnnao,g reyuinne Begin=Finsmonds required 7Q10=1kecivinSsueanlow Roweitcrion(cfs) += quasi uniounrinp increases to monthly upon failure or NR Months hbal testing mml occur. ex. Jars. Apr, Jul. Oct NonColnp= Current Cnntpliane Reyuitenlenl PF=Pcnvdttdfluw(MGD) JWC%=lnrocanwastamtuenwlion P/F=Paa/Feil test AC=Acura CHR=Clwnk D=a Norathf - Fa1tr:W Mi' nt.; a - C.rodapMfa ap.; my - MyiJ shrimp: PIN - CMmie venue; P - Mortality of Prrcanaga e bigleu aotio"Onsion; a .e - Fau fanned by DWQ Aquatic Toe Unir, bs - Bad our Berytn, Nuristan: -- = Dau no ae,isal; NR - Na nForud FxilitY Acliviry Stmus: 1- htalive, N - NewIY Iswcd(To colrmaq; IL Active h111 nun Jischaping: f-Marc t;ua uvailaM1le for nennh in yurstian; = ORC signaurc neeskd 02/03/00 Facility Case Number Number Violator W 98- 003 City Of High Point LV 98- 062 Nc0024228 High Point, City-westside Wwtp LV 99- 258 Nc0024210 High Point - East Side Wwtp LV 99- 553 Nc0024210 High Point - East Side Wwtp LV 99- 584 Nc0024210 High Point - East Side Wwtp Total Cases: 5 Date Penalty County assessed assessed Guilford 10/6/98 $8,000.00 Davidson 8-25-98 $250.00 Guilford 7-16-99 $500.00 Guilford 11-24-99 $1,250.00 Guilford 12-23-99 $1,250.00 • ,. Date Remission Investigative requested considered Case hear( costs remission by Director by EMC $1,545.00 $46.00 $47.00 $48.00 $74.00 Total Assessed: $11,250.00 $1,760.00 $13,010.00 ** Some facilities may be submitting payments according to an agreed upon payment plan AL = Nonsubmittal of application for permit, CD = Discharge after Designation, CF = Willful or Intentional Discharge, CL = Certification Late, CV = Construction Violation: DV = Discharge without a permit, , OP = Operate Treatment Works w/o Permit, , RL = Registration Late, WP = Violation of Waste Management Plan, WQ = Water Quali designate an operator in charge /� oo NG\��3 --7 7 >, a it (o�95 a If Zr'I - F- Fa6ZI,- './j s AO U, i a/a0`5 �5 rJa nl*, CAmpurk (2 . 4- J>(- G 160, —Cale- N 7 D L, l�Li ra V2g - P6 r Pc, ftI3t;&, S—,AT-totils No A*'A 9 , STAitonJs 4a, PT ` ra Ck *r� wip6 &Y�e r, s- ( ill �S U4bA,-,) N125 � Go�L,_�Hivl%R.Q�7�aN 14r'ciFMA l ; ! L/11J, i CflLiFa/L,rn r Hydrograph and statiop descript on for 02099500 http://nc.water.usgs.gov/rt-cgi/gen_stn_pg?station=0209950 PROVISIONAL DATA SUBJECT TO REVISION 02099500-- Deep River near Randleman, NC This station is operated in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Current Conditions Flow (ft3/s) Stage (ft) Date Time 70 2.77 O1/20', 12:30 Stage -- updated Thu Jan 20 12:30 2000 -- download presentation -quality ¢rap 3-1 3.0 2.9 CE a 2.8 0 2.7 t— LO 2.6 H 2.5 s 2.4 in 2.3 2.2 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 January 2000 Streamflow -- updated Thu Jan 20 12:30 2000 -- download presentation -quality raph I of 3 1/20100 3:09 PM Hydrograph and station description for 02099500 http://nc.water.usgs.gov/rt-cgi/gen—stn—pg?station=0209950 200 O 180 r•n i - 2 140 ' o. 120 H w 100 — _— - ---1_ ---- --- -- - m 80 - ---- .- -- w 7060 t M H = 50 O U. 40—�_ OG- H : v, 30 L -- 14 15 16 STRERHFLON Data used in graph Historical daily mean or peakflow data for this station ® Complete station data for previous water year o Return to Current Streamflow Conditions table Station Description CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN 17 18 19 20 21 January 2000 • HEDIRH DRILY STRERHFLON, based on 68 years of record 02099500 DEEP RIVER NEAR RANDLEMAN, NC LOCATION.--Lat 35 54'06", long 79 51'05", Randolph County, Hydrologic Unit 03030003, on left bank 500 ft downstream of bridge on Secondary Road 1929, 0.2 mi downstream of Coltrane's Mill, 0.5 mi south of Guilford County line, 4.8 mi upstream from Muddy Creek, and 7 mi north of Randleman. DRAINAGE AREA.--125 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD. --October 1928 to current year. REVISED RECORDS.--WSP 782: 1929-30. WSP 1383: 1934-35, 1941. WSP 1723: 1929(M). WDR NC-81-1: Drainage area. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 638.11 ft above sea level (levels by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). REMARKS. --Records fair except those for estimated daily discharges, which are poor. Diurnal fluctuation at times during periods of low flow caused by Coltrane's Mill. Some regulation by Oak Hollow Reservoir (station 02098495) and High Point Lake (station 02099096). City of High Point diverted an average of 21.3 ft3/s for municipal water supply, 18.6 ft3/s was discharged as treated effluent into Richland Creek upstream from station and 5.3 ft3/s into Rich Fork Creek in Pee Dee River basin. Maximum discharge for period of record from rating curve extended above 7,100 ft3/s on basis of contracted -opening measurement of peak flow at bridge 1.5 mi upstream; maximum gage height for period of record from floodmarks. 2 of 3 l /20/00 3:09 PM Hydrograph and station description for 02099500 http://nc.water.usgs.gov/rt-cgi/gen_stn_pg?station=0209950 • • 'Daily Mean Flow Statistics for 01/20 based on 68 years of record, in ft3/s Latest flow ' 80 percent 50 percent' 20 percent 01/2012:30` Minimum; Meanl Maximum` exceedance] exceedance; exceedance --"770 19 278 2,310 52 _; 89 317 Percent exceedance means that 80, 50, or 20 percent of all daily mean flows for 01/20 have been greater than the the value shown. Return to Water Resources of North Carolina Home page Please direct questions or comments to -- Alex Cardinell, Information Officer U.S. Geological Survey 3916 Sunset Ridge Road Raleigh, NC 27607 (919) 571-4021 rt_www -- (rev 2.10) -- Acknowledgements 0.71 3 of 3 1/20/00 3:09 PM [Fwd:-Re: [Fwd: [Fwds High Point East]]] • Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: High Point East]]] Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 16:18:48 -0500 From: Bobby Blowe <Bobby.Blowe@ncmai].net> Organization: DENR/DWQ/Construction Grants and Loans Section To: Susan A Wilson <Susan.A.Wilson @ncmail.net> Sorry for the delay. I think I responded to your previous message, but it probably went to another Susan Wilson. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: High Point East]] Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 15:54:00 -0600 From: "Cecil G. Madden" <Cecil.Madden@ncmail.net> Organization: DENR/DWQ/Construction Grants and Loans To: Bobby Blowe <Bobby.Blowe@ncmail.net> References: <389889C2.21EE9943@ncmail.net> You are correct. The P&S for the WWTP are just about approvable. We haven't received anything on the outfall. We intend to issue an A to C for the WWTP ahead of the NPDES Permit and limit their capacity to their existing capacity. Ed Powel was in the office yesterday. He indicated that he didn't think High Point would proceed with construction until they got the NPDES permit worked out. He indicated that there have been negotiations between High Point and the PTA regarding who would be responsible for operation of the Outfall. This point still remains unresolved. Later, Cecil Bobby Blowe wrote: > Cecil -what is the status? As far as I know the P&S are under review for > the wwtp. As for the outfall, we are waiting for an EA on the new route. > Can you add anything? >-------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Fwd: High Point East] > Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 14:15:30 -0500 > From: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> > To: Bobby Blowe <Bobby.Blowe@ncmail.net> > Bobby, > Not sure you got this when I sent it before the big snow. Have any > info. on these guys? > Thanks. > -------------------------------------------------------- > Subject: High Point East > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:40:02 -0500 > From: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> > To: Bobby Blowe <Bobby.Blowe@ncmail.net> 1 of 2 2/2/00 4:28 PM [Fwd: Re: '[Fwd: [Fwd:, High Pof nt East > Bobby, > > What is the latest, greatest status on High Point Eastside? I'm > proceeding forward with their expansion request at the relocation point > that Jay sent over. They were really pushing for the permit when > submitted in May, and I'm very surprised I haven't heard anything from > them since - do you know why? > The only thing I've heard out of High Point is with regard to their > adjudication of the West side permit. > Thanks for any info. > > Susan 2 of 2 2/2/00 4:28 PM Rr,: deep r. /cape fear • Subject: Re: deep r. /cape fear Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 1 b:10:51 -0500 From: Cam McNutt <cam.mcnutt@ncmail.net> To: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> This is all WS-IV CA now. The lindane problem was evidently related to a flea doggie dipping session that got out of control and now is no longer a problem. Richland Creek is proposed to be 3dlisted for Fecals and habitat degradation (stormwater issues). I think the copper issue has gone away also. There is a metals testing reliability problem that may be in affect here. good day Susan Wilson wrote: > mr. . cape fear, > i assume deep river is listed/impaired where high pts. new location will > be at sr 19291 freeman's mill? i 'm having a tough time with the > descriptions (and i actually have the topo out). and this is C until > the dam for randleman is built? > why is richland creek impaired for lindane?? and i assume the copper > impairment is due to highpoint? anything more specific on that? > thanks! Cam McNutt <cam mcnutt@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> Basinwide Planner DWQ-Planning Branch 1 of 1 2/2/00 4:57 PM ,Re: randleman/deep river/high pl • . Subject: Re: randleman/deep river/high pt Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 16:02:57 -0500 From: Cam McNutt <cam.mcnutt@ncmail.net> To: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> The TP limits are in the Randleman Rule and I suppose that TN will also be addressed. This is a proactive pounding to reduce the possibility of nutrient problems in the reservoir. I can give you more info if needed ,see .0249 later CAm Susan Wilson wrote: > hey, if i were high point I'd be wondering why we're pounding on them > about nutrients when, although the 198 303d lists both richland crk and > the deep river, they POC is not chlor a. can someone help me out with > this? bearing in mind that i have not been involved in the randleman > issue at all before. Cam McNutt <cam mcnutt @ h2o.enr. state. nc. us> Basinwide Planner DWQ-Planning Branch 1 of 1 2/2/00 4:57 PM Re: high.pt/ randleman,rules ' • . Subject: Re: high pt/ randleman rules Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:15:22 -0500 From: Boyd Devane <Boyd.Devane@ncmail.net> To: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> the EMC passed the rules in November 11, 1998, they did not go into effect until April 1, 1999 The local governments had 270 days after the effective date to submit ordinances and one year after effective date to submit stormwater management plans. Susan Wilson wrote: > Boyd, > when did the EMC pass the Randleman rules? i 'm writing up a synopsis > for high point's expansion (we have their permit expansion request > in-house) and if you don't mind, since you've had so many years with > this issue, I'd like for you to check out what i've written. i'll also > probably forward the text to Ruth when i get it completed. don't want > to put anything in a public document that may be off the mark! Thanks. 1 of 1 2/2/00 6:00 PM ,,Re: randleman/deep river/high p! • . Subject: Re: randleman/deep river/high pt Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:16:54 -0500 From: Ruth Swanek <ruth.swanek@ ncmail.net> To: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson @ncmail.net> Chl-a is not a problem as long as the Deep River is not dammed in that area. It is predicted to be a problem based on the BATHTUB model once the dam is built. Susan Wilson wrote: > hey, if i were high point i ' d be wondering why we're pounding on them > about nutrients when, although the 198 303d lists both richland crk and > the deep river, they POC is not chlor a. can someone help me out with > this? bearing in mind that i have not been involved in the randleman > issue at all before. MAILTO:Ruth.Swanek@ncmail.net RUTH SWANEK DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PLANNING NC DENR 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1617 (919)733-5083, ext. 503 1 of 1 2/2/00 6:02 PM I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 • s.r ;� Hayworth',, A _. _SpIring,1 1 • ., Oa ore E I n 7O9 I c -a ?7$ r I .r / ii Miles CrOssroal BM� 779 jai- li " EgSTSIM r re,E High Point Sewage 10 AE TME�NT ��LAT �y�±iF ..a; —, � Freeman � Mill n i N i� / I°s ci 'PineGrove $00 ,. � 801 • (I I+�.. �0 _ a EXHIBIT 1 SITE LOCATION MAP PREPARED BY e82 FairfieldCh EASTSIDE WASTEWATER 4� p DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL & ASSOC., INC. f, TREATMENT PLANT ENGINEERING —LAND PLANNING —SURVEYING / SCALE: 1„=2000' j HIGH POINT, NORTH CAROLINA i % O EXISTING PLANT 48" EFFLUENT PIPE INVERT ELEV. 686.2! Cl ED 0 0 Eb 1:P C �o 00 00 D m � ❑o 0 1 ° Oe CID EE=l Fl EXHIBIT 2 NORMAL POOL AND 100-YEAR FLOOD LEVELS FOR RANDLEMAN LAKE AT THE EASTSIDE WWTP LAST EXISTING STEP IN CASCADE 4ERATION SYSTEM ELEV.682.92 ` LEGEND - - - PTRWA PROTECTED BOUNDARY (Land PurahasaC from City of High Point by PTRWF) - 682' MSL NORMAL POOL - 689' - 690' MSL PROPOSED 100 YEAR FLOOI , 694' MSL 100 YEAR FLOOD I -OR CORPS LAKI- CONVERT PLANT 1 AERATION TANKS AND FINAL CLARIFIERS TO SOLIDS STORAGE/ FLOW EQUALIZ!/ATION TANKS PROVIDE NEW SOLIDS GRINDERS AND REPLACE PRIMARY SOLIDS PUMPS \ PROPOSEI PRIMARY CLARIFIEF NEW PRELIMINARY TREATMENT INCLUDING NEW BAR SCREEN, GRIT TANKS. PREAERATION, ANDINFLUENT AND RECYCLE FLOW MEASUREMENT/ SAMPLING REPLACE VALVE OPERATORS FOR EXISTING FILTERS 0 0 O 0 0 TANKS ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION EFFLUENT FACILITIES FILTERS NEW EFFLUENT FLOW MEASUREMENT/ SAMPLING n REPLACE/RELOCATE I _i- LOW PRESSURE U iu I1�r NPW PUMPS I'\ NEW DAF LACE/ THICKENEi RELOCATE cb HIGH PRSUR a" 9 �PW PUMPS lug C o c O R',�E\JPLW2E FINAL POLYMER CLARIFIER SYSTEM �, 0 REHAB. EXISTING �, Y DAF THICKENERS � BLOWER/ ADMINISTRATION BUILDING E.Xi ITBiT PROPOSED FACILITIES FOR EXPANSION TO 26 MGD AND FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL EASTSIDE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATE EXISTING CKWASH RECOVERY TANK 0 c REHABILITATE EXISTING CLARIFIER AND CONVERT TO BACKWASH RECOVERY TANK PROVIDE WEIR COVERS ON NEW FINAL CLARIFIERS FINAL FINAL 1 CLARIFIER CLARIFIER RECYCLE PUMP STATION EAST ID W � W 4 \ I i•' 1 O °j- 1918 41+ • • a • 1 ri+ AKDALE f4R4 I g E \ / RIVERDALE(RORO \ I/919 r r � � I , GLENOLA TA r.OR EW AGE ❑ '� SPO SAL 'A _ N BRA NCH r G p0 {N • G\ 'J o r I 1140 VICKERY o CHAPEL ROAD = I , W 522 I MUDDY CREEK IIROOAkT O c '- �040 OW1Y R04 1-as i r ` 1929 ! 1 2 o 4 m �- -, N MILES a, ---- ! /a ROSSROA05: !!! I � 1927 �g 1 � G \\AO c � 19?9 - 63 = .FQ o —` y / �4,0 1120 i cc 16 v �� 13 1 • < ( h Ago - 1J1�* a 1 E A r✓4 i _ W ! 'RO-0SH tee. a CEDAR- 3 QUARE 1 1945 ¢- \� 1929 1l I3 HICKORY 2 z 193Z" 9 �1 CR£EK = m SOPH I A NEW ly** i • 1 , MARKET kC,p `. \ ORAKE SPEHSER \ S0'-_ SOUTHERN _ \ROAD 1 O GUI LFO RO i-- �040 rS. 1933 J + HIGH SCHOOL i ` 194; v C1 e�aN9r TV, LEVIS'DA Vlg yr `f'Y' . OON WALL RD. so a4f + 14❑ s \ �' C y I ❑ oc \ rr o4 VIS \ . R Do 15 COL 1936 _ �Op"'S\._Z JZ �1• i' t i O O - oq I O U \ D 4fy a ; e I " Irk 1926 °f , I i 2 a2 r al=' 0 1937 Z. r _ BYP s �, 4 1934 I - 11 :I EXHIBIT NO. y 1939 RANDLEMAN LEVEL PIEDMONT TRIAD REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY t961 � V .� CROSS It RANDLEMAN LAKE 53 LEGEND '� r-�.� ss RANDOLPH 81 GUILFORD COUNTIES PROJECT BOUNDARY (200 FOOT BUFFER) NORTH CAROLINA 1 U.S- 220 6U5 _ >L-• NORMAL POOL (682 CONTOUR) l: f — 7 9y�ji�� =•` ' - - - +� - PwL. ri •-.y.. �.�. f1J •,• ` _�.l ' — -i l."'-� 1`-M l� 1� - / ry ", i A V-is 8 _ `V'[1..�L _ „i7 r ! •1 'Yyr �� , �J_ �•f' H i�i .6 �--. ..�c Iir w f0 m an =c, �, - �•--�• [ - ..- - C a �Y~ �1�ta 111 �'} �� .��', 1j1� .��r'+ t "-`'' �l% �`:i" titi� - _ �-.—�.-v>'� -1 �•} _ InW N N S� t1 !,. l `�� m .�n �� E r �•^' �a I � y � f_:• 'y F o ` � - .. �j,�y"" Q M a t _ �� ;�.. � / r�.} r �, i . y � r3 I � '-' J m ti F �.�*r c." y r, _ ffi +r' t 9�� ,, .: ..Y •x ' Mr.: _ - ••�� ♦o 2 y o m �3°- 7 v' Z <m -�: _ •+ _ _S .i _ "`� _ _ '2 c j'� � � 1 � ._.4 - r� _ .�.� � ! f- , '� �y- -�- �� + i I �L jt �yl / s �• �.'�G 3 c• 'F r', �- _ - a x. ' .� t y�n. f 1. a �� c•+� s 0 i w = - : r t b j i L r� tl I { q `' 1 r 1 C_ J J w Z co W ach, A L� ��` .n�"z - r q r ao� p _ _ 1 �� O ccmaF ICL Z ►wr 2 Z lop.., 1 T 1 P 1 _ .r_ _ J m, _ .. l ~ �$- ;, _ •4 (") Lu _ ll f -Cc a C° _� -_--- r --' -;' :'� - r EXPAND EXIST.' - x ;fi ° �'- �_ F?-_ - t PUMP STATION f _ cn I , r � �i' > .�',�^�ti•� % I f t l El R •c.'' a '�. � �� t _ ', °'r � _--� +b rv�``�' � '�� •,..C1 t: •'r - -_ r f _ _l LEGEND �_ p .�� F EXIST. SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY '� " G. s� -� ='4 ' Q Z W } �. ..n "'i> ` �, Ftt7. R.1 i .ti Z w co i U -i > A BOUNDARY FUTURE SERVICE AREo 0 0 EXIST. SEWER OUTFACE FUTURE SEWER OUTFALL • �.;- � �_.� # i I� � � � _ . � Cif - ,:�` � + r'"SF L''�-L EXIST. FORCEMAIN --- - - - - - - - - - - r,: .� EXIST. FUTURE FORCEMAIN +' i� �' -� -"' w w a _ r .. _. - - PUMP EASTS I DE �`�+ STATION '' V Tl �� y r b-,,r• . r�.' �i - I_j- p'+ F�'�- W.W.T. P. -� - �_ LLJ Si d • 1 ----_ l� , , :�.�Y� , = 3 _ _,L---ram •`L°j-� K w a �_ 1 ( ^ s � � rd•� ='4 .; - � a � f r � � �v/ts ' - � � i � .>I.r�'11af � �,� � ` �r •i+� - . �, � - �' �_ -- � V l PROPOSED I RANDLEMAN�� LAKE r •_ _, -� ..u. u FUTURE O 3 Q PUMP STATIONui Rk x < cr - Z 0 co 17 x�n;� � � ��. - . `t a a .A' n.m° � 4 r� A � � •• , : � °. syw ' - b � �'' -_�. ' 1 � x.'.4 �` a 7 `—`SL.. H w w a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b u m un Ln v ut I rnlm n unn Cape Fear River Basin #1 1� //1110.11 11 ItY814' 11 I,- ,1,1, iM1OY- 11.t . 1111110, Supporting QSupporting - threatened Partially Supporting - Not Supporting Cape Fear River Basin #1 EXHIBIT 6 N.C. Department of Environment Health, and Natural Resources DlviSion of Environmental Management Water Quality Section .. .. Sao cmb, m�nlm a Sxxooa or N nna Vs.mv