980027_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230220

f4LJ s O—Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: C_omHance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ('Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I A - -t® - z Arrival Time: Departure Time: S/�� County: Id ► �s0 fJ Region: R D
Farm Name: AIA.$14 I ►F j9:,0JT.4I5 — /ill Gr KOII OwnerEmail:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 73 7Z Rof-l< S//IIS
Facility Contact: ie. G . /'/u A; I Title: Phone: 2 -'�'Z " 2-
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish g U
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Non-L
Pullets
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and StreamImpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ZNA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
[/] NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes N
L'J
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes L'J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 5/1212020 Continued

Facili Number: - 2 Date of Inspection. 2- _ XP— 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [7�`N0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: lA trporJ
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): I g
Observed Freeboard (in): :-(P
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �NoE] ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environments reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No [] NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. (s there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): jfA . a A J 19V FP -SC"
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes Lj
1N
❑ NA
[3 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes �
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes N
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes [ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes VNo
El NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: IS - 2 Date of Inspection: 2 ► 24 - 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA 0 NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? []Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes FfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [:]Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Yes
PX0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
LJ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[—]Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
SoI� -f; 4.E r2O23
,Vu D s-C SoC RAC 1 p ' ;.3
J Zp iZ S,• 3
L'Ali6it,�'i /O,j 3 ,®�,� c— (7 zZ) q-� -Z7, j4 r�
wRs;t ,i-, 1 :3.97
'AFP_ 20
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: I/9'7 '? ( - �Za
Date: '- - %�40Z 3
511212020