20100952 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2014_20150414

FINAL
YEAR 1 (2014) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT
Cherokee County, North Carolina
EEP Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717)
USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009 - 00209 /DWR Project No. 10 -0952
SCO No. 08- 07251 -01
Data Collection — March - October 2014
Hiwassee River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06020002170010
SUBMITTED TO /PREPARED FOR:
E Va Me ent
PROGRAM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
December 2014

FINAL
YEAR 1 (2014) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT
Cherokee County, North Carolina
EEP Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717)
USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009 - 00209 /DWR Project No. 10 -0952
SCO No. 08- 07251 -01
Data Collection — March - October 2014
Hiwassee River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06020002170010
SUBMITTED TO /PREPARED FOR:
r~
EFVIBe
la emem ent
PROGRAM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
SUBMITTED BY:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
December 2014

Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ....................................................................... ............................... 1
2.0 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................. ............................... 4
2.1 Streams .......................................................................................... ..............................4
2.2 Vegetation ..................................................................................... ..............................5
2.3 Wetland Hydrology ...................................................................... ............................... 5
3.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... ............................... 6
Appendices
APPENDIX A. PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Fixed - Station Photographs
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D. STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross- section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Table 10a -10f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11 a -11 If Monitoring Data
APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12. Verification of Bankf ill Events
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Figure E1. Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Martin's Creek 11 (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Table of Contents

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has established the Martin's Creek II
Mitigation Project (Site) located in Cherokee County, just south of the town of Murphy. The Site
includes a 93.87 -acre easement encompassed within 14 -digit Cataloging Unit 06020002170010 of the
Hiwassee River Basin (Figure 1, Appendix B and Table 4, Appendix A). Land use at the Site, prior to
mitigation activities, was composed of livestock pasture, open land, a residence, and forested areas.
Martin's Creek and its tributaries were impaired by historical and current land management practices,
which included timber harvesting, pasture, channelization, and livestock grazing. Completed project
activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and project attributes are summarized in
Tables 1 -4 (Appendix A).
The Site is located along Martin's Creek and several unnamed tributaries, which have been assigned
Stream Index Number 1 -49 and Best Usage Classification of C. Site streams are listed on the NCDWQ
draft 2014 and final 2012 Section 303(d) list of impaired streams due to a fair bioclassification for
reduced ecological/biological integrity and fish communities, and elevated levels of fecal coliform
bacteria. The Site is located within a Targeted Local Watershed that has been identified for stream and
buffer restoration opportunities (NCEEP 2008).
The Site lies within the focus area of the Peachtree - Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) and
roughly corresponds to Restoration site #1 & Preservation site #1 of the LWP project atlas (NCEEP
2007). Goals of the LWP include implementation of wetland and stream restoration projects that reduce
sources of sediment and nutrients by restoring riparian buffers, stabilizing stream banks, and restoring
natural channel geomorphology, particularly in headwater streams.
The project goals will directly address stressors identified in the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP, namely
lack of riparian vegetation, channel modification, excess sediment inputs, excess nutrient inputs, and
bacterial contamination as follows.
• Restore geomorphically stable stream channels within the Site;
• Restore or enhance wetlands;
• Exclude livestock from accessing project streams, wetlands, and riparian zones;
• Improve and restore hydrologic connections and achieve uplift of ecosystem functions;
• Improve water quality within the Site by reducing bank erosion, improving nutrient and
sediment removal, and stabilizing stream banks;
• Restore and preserve headwater tributaries to the Peachtree - Martins Creek Watershed and
the Hiwassee River; and
• Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat by improving substrate and in- stream cover,
adding woody debris, reducing water temperatures, and restoring riparian habitat.
The Site mitigation plan was completed in March 2010 with the final design and construction plans
completed in November 2010 (Table 2, Appendix A). Project construction was completed between
October 2012 and July 2013. The implemented mitigation is as follows (Figure 2, Appendix B and Table
1, Appendix A).
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 1

• 8817 Stream Mitigation Units
• Restoring approximately 3486 linear feet of stream channel through construction of
stable channel at the historic floodplain elevation.
• Enhancing (level I) approximately 832 linear feet of stream channel through cessation of
current land use practices, installing grade control structures, repairing bank erosion,
restoring proper channel dimension, and planting with native forest vegetation.
• Enhancing (level 11) approximately 1903 linear feet of stream channel through cessation
of current land use practices, removing invasive species, and planting with native forest
vegetation.
• Preserving 21,327 linear feet of stream channel.
• 5.97 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units
• Restoring approximately 5.20 acres of riparian wetland by removing spoil castings,
restoring stream inverts to historic elevations rehydrating stream -side wetlands, removing
drain tile, eliminating land use practices, and planting with native forest vegetation.
• Enhancing approximately 1.61 acres of riparian wetland by fencing livestock and
supplemental planting.
• Planting a native woody riparian buffer (at least 30 feet in width) adjacent to restored/enhanced
streams and wetlands within the Site.
• Protecting the Site in perpetuity with a conservation easement.
Stream Success Criteria
Stream restoration success criteria for the Site are based on the Stream Mitigation Guidelines issued in
April 2003 by the USACE and NCDWQ. Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1)
documentation of two bankfull events, 2) little change in the channel cross - section from as -built
conditions, 3) stable longitudinal profile, 4) substrate consistency, and 5) photographic evidence of
stability.
Bankfull Events
Two bankfull flow events in separate years must be documented within the 5 -year monitoring period.
Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until two bankfull events have been documented in
separate years.
Crnae_cactinnc
Riffle cross - sections on restoration and enhancement reaches should be stable and should show little
change in bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. Riffle cross - sections should
generally fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type. If any
changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs
of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks.
Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease
in the width -to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth.
Longitudinal Profile
Longitudinal profile data for the stream reach should show that bedform features are remaining stable.
The riffles should be steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools should be deep with flat water
surface slopes. The relative percentage of riffles and pools should not change significantly from the
design parameters.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 2

Bed Material Anal
Substrate materials in restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards or the maintenance of
coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features.
Photo Reference Sites
Photographs will be used to evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of
riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures subjectively. Lateral photos should not
indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks. A series of photos over time should
indicate successive maturation of riparian vegetation.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community
elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria for this project includes an average density of
320 planted stems per acre must be surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290
planted stems per acre must be surviving in year 4, and 260 planted stems per acre in year 5.
Wetland Success Criteria
Hydrologic success will be based on conditions of on -site reference wetlands. Success will be determined
by the following criteria.
Years One Through Three
Hydrologic success criteria will be met if the Site demonstrates groundwater table levels within 12 inches
of the soil surface for a minimum of 13% of the growing season (this criterion reflects a deviation of 50%
from the duration of saturation expected for this type of wetland system (-25 %). Success for monitoring
years one through three will be determined based on this 50% tolerance of deviation from the duration of
wetland hydrology at the reference sites.
Years Four and Five
Success for monitoring years four and five will be determined based on a 20% tolerance of deviation from
the duration of wetland hydrology at the reference sites. Therefore, it is expected that in years four and
five the site will achieve a minimum of 20% saturation. Based on reference conditions and the criterion
stated above, it is expected that reference soil saturation for years one through five will continue to exceed
the regulatory 12.5% minimum requirement of the growing season for Cherokee County. In order to
attain conditions suitable for the formation of wetland vegetation and hydric soils, the Site should be
saturated within 12 inches of the surface or inundated for consecutive period equal to 24 days. However,
to meet hydrologic success criteria and mimic the reference wetland hydrology, the site should
demonstrate wetland hydrology for a minimum of 25 days in years one through three. In years four and
five, this will increase to a minimum of 38 days. Overbank flooding from the adjacent channel will also
be noted during monitoring.
Reference areas will be monitored for a minimum of five years.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and
figures within this report's appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found
in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 3

Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available
from WEEP upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Monitoring of the Site's restoration efforts will be performed until agreed upon success criteria are
fulfilled. Monitoring is proposed for the stream channel, riparian vegetation, and hydrology for a period
of five years (Figures 2 & 2A -2C, Appendix A). Monitoring reports of collected data will be submitted
no later than December of each monitoring year.
2.1 Streams
Post - restoration monitoring will be conducted for five years following the completion of construction to
evaluate the effectiveness of the restoration practices. Measurements were taken using a Topcon GTS
303 total station and Recon data collector. The raw total station file was processed using Carlson Survey
Software into a Computer Aided Design (CAD) file. Coordinates were exported as a text /ASCII file to
Microsoft Excel for processing and presentation of data, and are not georeferenced. Pebble counts were
completed using the modified Wolman method (Rosgen 1993). Monitored stream parameters include
stream dimension (cross- sections), pattern (longitudinal survey), profile (profile survey), and
photographic documentation. Stream data can be found in Appendix D.
Bankfull Events
The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period will be documented by the use of a crest
gauge and photographs. One crest gauge was installed to record the highest watermark between site
visits; the gauge will be checked each Site visit to determine if a bankfull event has occurred (Figure 2A,
Appendix B). Photographs will be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment
deposition on the floodplain during monitoring site visits.
Five bankfull events were documented during monitoring year 1 (2014). To meet bankfull success
criteria, one additional bankfull event will need to be documented to occur during monitoring years 2 -5.
Cross - sections
A total of 19 permanent cross - sections, 12 riffle and 7 pool, were established and will be used to evaluate
stream dimension; locations are depicted on Figures 2, 2A, and 2B (Appendix B) Because riffle cross -
sections are critical in determining bankfull design parameters, the number of riffle cross - sections
established will generally outnumber pool cross - sections. Each cross - section will be marked on both
banks with permanent pins to establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark will be used for
cross - sections and consistently used to facilitate easy comparison of year -to -year data. The annual cross -
section survey will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner
berm, edge of water, and thalweg, if the features are present. Riffle cross sections will be classified using
the Rosgen Stream Classification System.
No areas of concern or indicators of instability were observed during year 1 (2014) monitoring; therefore,
stream dimension measurements are currently meeting success criteria.
Longitudinal Profile
After Site construction, approximately 4493 linear feet of longitudinal profile was completed to document
baseline conditions. Longitudinal profile will be resurveyed annually for the duration of the five -year
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 4

monitoring period. Measurements include thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of
these measurements will be taken at the head of each channel unit (e.g., riffle, pool) and at the maximum
pool depth. The survey will be tied to a permanent benchmark.
No areas of concern or indicators of bedform instability were observed during year 1 (2014) monitoring;
therefore, stream longitudinal profile measurements are currently meeting success criteria.
Bed Material Anal
Pebble counts will be conducted annually on one permanent riffle cross - section (100- counts) at the time
cross - section and longitudinal surveys are performed during the five year monitoring period. These
samples will reveal changes in sediment gradation over time as the stream adjusts to upstream sediment
loads.
Year 1 (2014) pebble counts indicate the maintenance of coarser materials in the measured riffle feature;
therefore, bed material is currently meeting success criteria.
Photo Reference Sites
A total of 26 photographs will be used to visually document restoration success for at least five years
following construction. Photographs will be taken from a height of approximately five to six feet. Photo
locations will be recorded using sub -meter GPS to ensure that the same locations (and view directions) on
the Site are monitored in each monitoring period.
Year 1 (2014) photo reference sites show no channel aggradation or degradation, or bank erosion. In
addition, riparian vegetation is meeting success criteria based on stem counts across the Site; however, it
is too early in the monitoring period to show successive maturation of riparian vegetation.
2.2 Vegetation
After planting was completed, an initial evaluation was performed to verify planting methods were
successful and to determine initial species composition and density. Fifteen sample vegetation plots (10-
meter by 10- meter) were installed and measured within the Site as per guidelines established in CV5 -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Vegetation plots are permanently
monumented with 6 -foot metal t -posts at each corner. In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be
monitored include species composition and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of
shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph. Year 1 vegetation plot information
can be found in Appendix C.
Year 1 stem count measurements indicate an average of 335 planted stems per acre (excluding livestakes)
across the Site; therefore, the Site is currently meeting vegetation success criteria. In addition, ten of the
fifteen individual vegetation plots met success criteria based on planted stems alone.
2.3 Wetland Hydrology
Thirteen RDS Ecotone WM groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within Site wetland
restoration areas to monitor groundwater hydrology (Figure 2A, Appendix A). Hydrological sampling
will continue for five years with gauges recording daily and downloaded at a minimum of quarterly
throughout the growing season (April 14- October 21). In addition, an on -site rain gauge will document
rainfall data for comparison of groundwater conditions with extended drought conditions. Finally,
groundwater gauges located within riverine wetlands adjacent to restored stream reaches will supplement
crest gauge measurements to confirm overbank flooding events.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 5

Six of the thirteen groundwater gauges met or exceeded wetland success criteria for the Year 1 (2014)
monitoring year. It is too early in the monitoring period to determine the extent of wetland that is
currently meeting wetland hydrology success criteria.
3.0 REFERENCES
ACIS -NOAA Regional Climate Centers. WETS Table Murphy, NC6001. Available online at:
http: / /agacis.rcc- acis.org /37039 /wets /results [December 3, 2014].
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Levels 1 -2 Plot Sampling Only, Version 4.2. Available online at
http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2012. Final North Carolina Water Quality
Assessment and Impaired Waters List (NC 2012 Integrated Report Category 5, 303(d) List)
(online). Available: http: // portal. ncdenr .org /c /document librgy /Ret file ?uuid= 9d45b3b4 -d066-
4619- 82e6- ea8eaOe01930 &groupld =38364 [February 17, 2014]. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2014. Draft 2014 NC 303(d) List - Category 5
Assessments Requiring TMDLs (online). Available:
http: / /portal.ncdenr.org /c /document library/Ret_ file ?uuid= 096fb2ff- 296b- 4bd8 -8b88-
e83bb5984be6 &groupId =38364 [February 17, 2014]. North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) and Equinox Environmental Consultation
and Design. 2007. Peachtree- Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (Phase3), Hiwassee River
Basin, Cherokee and Clay Counties, North Carolina. October 2007 Watershed Management Plan.
[Online WWW]. Available URL:
http: / /www.nceep.net /services /lMs /pull down/by basin /Hiwassee_RB.html.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2010. Martin's Creek II Mitigation Plan.
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at
http: / /its.enr. state .nc.us /WebLink8 /0 /doc /140433/Pa eg 2.aspx
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout
Reporting Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance, dated February 2014. NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at
htip://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document librgy/Ret _ file ?p_1_id = 60409 &folderld = 18877169 &name=
DLFE- 86604.pdf
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2008. Hiwassee River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2008 (online). Available:
http: / /www.nceep .net /services /lUs /pull _ down /by basin/Hiwassee RB.html. North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen. 1993. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology, Training Manual. River Short Course, Wildland
Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 6

United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (USACE et al.).
2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of North Carolina.
Weakley, Alan S. 2012. Flora of the Southern and Mid - Atlantic States. Available online at:
http: / /www. herbarium .unc.edu /WeakleysFIora.pdf [September 28, 2012]. University of North
Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 7

APPENDIX A
PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

- b�,Pur
Fir
—N4 ,Rt+ Ef7 a�[ir v E. r. .
r _
ri a_ T (..rape seeker y
,.fl "a- -''.:.••..: �r Y':..'.•'r,: d,.. i''? fades
e Al
r- � mss
rmditree
�r
-
rnaru
1 ' �
1 ..
D C', r
J �
r
-
''$
Project Location
• � 35.0534640N, 84.024879 0 W
OR .erg I .QF`f f
T[fJiV Atounree 4 i A @.1
Co !' f y A L rv. { f7 T 1 CD 2+f F1 i Fl '. E -
iCC AY
V V y IiNfC3 — _ __ rr)EFNl r, Via. q;
W V I IV his V V V V I
kW V V V V V V V V V V V V
r
W V V I \AI u V V V V V V V V I {�
kW V 1\5IpV V V V V V V I n 0 p s
V y V y
E mntAxiom Environmental, Inc. as koms's e
PROGRAM
V
V V
IV I
y
V V Vcpur r
\pnos
O
y
V jV V
opinnslou

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Site
Mitigation Credit Summations
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Nonriparian Wetland
8817
5.97
---
Pro'ects Components
Station Range
Existing Linear
Footage /Acreage
Priority
Approach
Restoration/
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration Linear
Footage /Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Credits
Comment
Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs
17,234
- --
Preservation
17,234 -203 = 17,031
5:1
3406.2
Three short reaches in upstream portion of RP UTl do not
have adequate buffer to claim credit and therefore have been
removed from the total linear footage and calculated
mitigation credits.
Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs
971
- --
Enhance II
971
2.5:1
388.4
Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and
localized erosion stabilization.
Martin's Creek UTs
4296
- --
Preservation
4296
5:1
859.2
Martin's Creek*
857
- --
Enhance II
857
5:1 *
171.4
Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and
localized erosion stabilization.
UT -2 to Martin's Creek
75
- --
Enhance II
75
2.5:1
30.0
UT 1 (Reach 3) to Martin's Creek
Station 00 +00 to 03 +37
337
Enhance I
337
1.5:1
224.7
Level I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair
bank erosion, and restore proper dimension.
UT 1 -3 (Reach 1) to Martin's Creek
Station 00+00 to 04 +95
495
Enhance I
495
1.5:1
330.0
Level I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair
bank erosion, and restore proper dimension.
UT 1 (Reach 2) to Martin's Creek Station
00 +00 to 10 +52
1052
I
Restoration
1052
1:1
1052
Construction of a new channel on the existing floodplain.
UT 1 (Reach 4) to
Martin's Creek
05 +46 to 05 +91
332
II
Restoration
51
1:1
51.0
Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley.
05 +91 to 06 +35 **
37
2:1 **
18.5
06 +35 to 15 +75
941
1:1
941.0
15 +75 to 16 +75 **
100
2:1 **
50.0
U T 1 -3 (Reach 2)
U Martin's Creek
to
05 +54 to 05 +90
1068
II
Restoration
35
1:1
35.0
Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley.
05 +90 to 06 +10 * **
20
2:1***
10.0
06 +10 to 18 +59
1250
1:1
1250.0
Wetland Restoration
- --
- --
Restoration
5.14
1:1
5.14
Restoration of riparian wetlands through stream restoration
activities, filling abandoned channels and drain tiles,
removing spoil castings, and planting.
0.06
2:1^
0.03
Wetland Enhancement
1.61
- --
Enhancement
1.604
2:1
0.802
Enhancement of existing riparian wetlands by fencing
livestock and planting.
0.006
4:1'
0.002
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream pinear footage)
Riparian Wetland (acreage)
Nonriparian Wetland (acreage)
Restoration
3486
5.20
—
Enhancement (Level I)
832
--
—
Enhancement (Level II)
1903
1.61
--
Preservation
21,327
--
Totals
27,548
6.81
Mitigation Units
8817 SMUs
5.97 Riparian WMUs
0.00 Nonriparian WMUs
* Martin's Creek proper is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 5:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
** UTl (Reach 4) stations 05 +91 to 06 +35 and 15 +75 to 16 +75 are located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
* ** UTl -3 (Reach 2) station 05 +90 to 06 +10 is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
^0.06 acres of wetland restoration is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
'0.006 acres of wetland enhancement is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 4:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
Martin's Creek II (final)
EEP Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
December 2014
Appendices

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Mitigation Plan
January 2010 -July
2010
September 2010
Final Design — Construction Plans
September 2010-
March 2011
March 2011
Construction
--
October 2012 -July 2013
Temporary S &E Mix applied to Entire Project Site
--
October 2012 -July 2013
Permanent Seed Mix applied to the Entire Project Site
--
October 2012 -July 2013
Bare Root; Containerized; and B &B Plantings for the
Entire Project Site
--
March 2014
Mitigation Plan/ As -Built (Year 0 Monitoring
Baseline)
April 2014
April 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
October 2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
Edenton, NC 27932
Year 3 Monitoring
(252) 482 -8491
As -built Surveyor
Year 4 Monitoring
3201 Glenridge Drive
Year 5 Monitoring
Raleigh, NC 27604
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site
Designer
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
Micky Clemmons 828 - 350 -1408
Construction Plans and Sediment and
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Erosion Control Plans
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
Micky Clemmons 828 - 350 -1408
Construction Contractor
River Works, Inc.
6105 Chapel Hill Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 -582 -3574
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics, Inc.
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
(252) 482 -8491
As -built Surveyor
Turner Land Surveying. PLLC
3201 Glenridge Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
919 - 875 -1378
Baseline Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 - 215 -1693
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site
Project County
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Physiographic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion
Broad Basins
Project River Basin
Hiwassee
USGS HUC for Project (14
digit)
06020002170010
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
04 -05 -02
Planning Area
Yes — Peachtree - Martins Creek LWP
WRC Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Cold
% of project easement fenced or
demarcated
100
Beaver activity observed during
design phase?
No
Right Prong Martin's
Creek
Martin's Creek
RP UT1
Mainnsstem
MC UT1
MC UT1 -3
MC UT2
Man tern
LII Enh
PI
Rest
LI
Enh
PI
Rest
Drainage Area
.17
0.6
0.02-0.18
0.07-0.08
0.39
6.81
Stream Order (USGS topo)
1 st
3rd
2nd
1 st
1 st
3rd
Restored Length (feet)
Perennial or Intermittent
I/P
I/P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Watershed Type
Rural
Watershed impervious cover
<10%
NCDWQ AU /Index number
1 -49 (Martin's Creek), 1 -49 -3 (Right Prong Martins Creek)
NCDWQ Classification
C
C
C
C
C
303d listed?
No
Upstream of a 303d listed
No
Reasons for 303d listed segment
NA
Total acreage of easement
93.87
Total existing vegetated acreage
of easement
Total planted restoration acreage
17 acres
Rosgen Classification of
preexisting
B
B
Eb /FbB
/G
Cb /G
Eb /B
OF
B
C
Rosgen Classification of As -built
B
B
B/C
B/C
B
C
B
C
Valley type
11
11
VIII
VIII
VIII
Valley slope
N/A
0.015-0.05
0.007-0.04
N/A
N/A
Cowardin classification of
proposed
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Trout waters designation
No
Species of concern, endangered
etc.
No
Dominant Soil Series
Cullowhee fine sandy
loam
Thurmont-
Dillard Complex
Arkaqua loam
Dillard loam
Arkaqua
loam
Arkaqua
loam
Arkaqua
loam
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV)
Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Station Photographs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

111wzS-. l
N. rt A
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Feet
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
(919) 215 -1693
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
MARTINS CREEK II
EEP PROJECT # 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Legend
C3Easement Boundary
Streams
P
� t .
-J
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
November 2014
2
Project:
12- 004.16
r .
`q
a
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
November 2014
2
Project:
12- 004.16

N r 1W �y
UT1R3
GW -10 ) ��
- 10 9 ",
13
` UT1 R4 12 GW -9
S.AG-
17ir.
f kS. °o .
G W -6 6
i'
$ 7 N n K
4N :MN .w
- XS -4P
� 4 .,
r
5. GW-
�Jo
G W -4
5 ,
` Legend
r s.
, ; x NP C3 Easement Boundary
Instream Structures
V�•' i /�/ Constructed Riffles
Stream Stationing
` eye ►7
Streams
'2x00 M Monitoring Reach
Cross Sections
• ` >., , , 11 Crest Gauge
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Enhancement
,.
F X 1 1 • Groundwater Gauges
CA
}�.
x , Rain G auge
��
3 j CVS Plots Meeting Success Criteria
r
CVS Plots Not Meeting Success Criteria
Photo Points
0 125 250 500
Feet Powerline Right of Way
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
(919) 215 -1693
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
MARTINS CREEK II
EEP PROJECT # 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
November 2014
2A
Project:
12- 004.16

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
(919) 215 -1693
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
MARTINS CREEK II (MARTINS CREEK TRIBUTARIES)
EEP PROJECT # 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
November 2014
2B
Project:
12- 004.16

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
(919) 215 -1693
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
MARTINS CREEK II (RIGHT PRONG TRIBUTARIES)
EEP PROJECT # 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
2C
Date:
November 2014
Project:
12- 004.16

Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT1 Reach 4
Assessed Length 1129
Adjusted %
Number
Numberwith
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
a2!2 2
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etation
Ve etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
23
23
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
25
25
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
25
25
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
25
25
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
25
25
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
$
$
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
$
$
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
$
$
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
$
$
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow.
$
$
100%

Table 513 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT1 Reach 3
Assessed Length 337
Adjusted %
Number
Numberwith
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
a2!2 2
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etation
Ve etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
10
10
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
10
10
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
10
10
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
10
10
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
4
4
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
4
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%.
15 %. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow.
4
4
100%

Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT1 -3 Reach 2
Assessed Length 1305
Adjusted %
Number
Numberwith
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
a2!2 2
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etation
Ve etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
32
32
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
32
32
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
32
32
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
32
32
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
32
32
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
10
10
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
10
10
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow.
10
10
100%

Table 5D Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT1 -3 Reach 1
Assessed Length 495
Adjusted %
Number
Numberwith
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
a2!2 2
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etation
Ve etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
16
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
22
22
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
22
22
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
22
22
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
22
22
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
21
21
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
21
21
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
21
21
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
21
21
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow.
21
21
100%

Table 5E Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UT1 Reach 2
Assessed Length 1051
Adjusted %
Number
Numberwith
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
a2!2 2
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etation
Ve etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
55
55
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
55
55
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
55
55
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
55
55
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
55
55
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and /or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
57
57
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
57
57
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
57
57
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
57
57
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow.
57
57
100%

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Martins Creek II Mitigation Project
Planted Acreage' 17
Ve etation Cateaory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
None
0.25 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
0
1 0.00
1 0.0%
Easement Acreage 93.87
Ve etation Cateaory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern"
None
1000 SF
none
0
0.00
0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
None
none
none
0
0.00
0.0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those
with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are
slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2 decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped,
if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors
by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control,
but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive
amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme
risk /threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below
was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or
polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Fixed Station Photographs
Taken August 2014
Photo Point 1
ON
Photo P
4-
k
b Y .
Photo Point 6
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Fixed Station Photographs (continued)
Taken August 2014
Photo Point 7 Photo Point 8
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Fixed Station Photographs (continued)
Taken August 2014
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Fixed Station Photographs (continued)
Taken August 2014
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Fixed Station Photographs (continued)
Taken August 2014
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 25, 2014
Plot 2
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 25, 2014
(continued)
Pll n-t()-]
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Martin's Creek II
Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August 25, 2014
(continued)
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Based on Planted Stems
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (EEP Project Number 92633)
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
No
66%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
Yes
8
Yes
9
No*
10
Yes
11
No*
12
No
13
No
14
Yes
15
Yes
*When including natural recruits such as Hazel Alder (Alnus serrulata) and American Beech (Fagus grandifolia), these plots
exceed 320 stems /acre.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Martin's Creek II MitiEation Site (EEP Proiect Number 92633)
Report Prepared By
Corri Faquin
Date Prepared
9/3/2014 11:21
database name
Axiom -EEP- 2014- A- v2.3. l.mdb
database location
\\ AE- SBS\ RedirectedFolders \K.lernigan\Desktop
computer name
KEENAN -PC
file size
72589312
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Pro', total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
92633
project Name
Martin's Creek II
Description
Stream and Wetland Restoration
River Basin
Hiwassee
length(ft)
stream-to-edge width (ft)
area (s m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
15
Martin's Creek 11 (final)
EEP Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
December 2014
Appendices

Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
EEP Project Code 92633. Project Name: Martin's Creek II
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY1 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
92633 -01 -0001
92633 -01 -0002
92633 -01 -0003
92633 -01 -0004
92633 -01 -0005
92633 -01 -0006
92633 -01 -0007
92633 -01 -0008
92633 -01 -0009
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
3
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
3
3
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
11
2
2
2
1
1
1
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
Carya glabra
pignut hickory
Tree
21
2
2
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
11
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
4
4
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
Quercus coccinea
scarlet oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
ITree
3
3
3
5
5
5
1
1
1
11
11
1
3
3
3
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
7
7
7
11
ill
11
9
9
9
8
8
9
8
8
8
151
151
18
8
81
8
9
91
12
7
7
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
5
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
6
6
3
3
4
4
4
5
283.3
283.3
283.3
445.2
445.2
445.2
364.2
364.2
364.2
323.7
323.7
364.2
323.7
323.7
323.7
607
607
728.4
323.7
323.7
323.7
364.2
364.2
485.6
283.3
283.3
404.686
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
EEP Project Code 92633. Project Name: Martin's Creek II
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY1 2014)
Annual
Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
92633 -01 -0010
92633 -01 -0011
92633 -01 -0012
92633 -01 -0013
92633 -01 -0014
92633 -01 -0015
MY1 (2014)
MYO (2014)
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
7
10
2
25
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
9
9
9
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Carya glabra
pignut hickory
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
51
5
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
11
20
20
20
24
24
24
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
4
4
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
27
27
27
27
27
27
Quercus
oak
Tree
8
8
8
40
40
40
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
Quercus coccinea
scarlet oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
11
3
3
3
7
7
7
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
11
1
1
11
4
4
4
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
14
14
14
17
17
17
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
25
25
25
2
2
2
Unknown
I
I Shrub or Tree
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
21
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
10
10
17
7
7
16
4
4
4
5
5
5
8
8
18
8
81
10
1241
124
162
1341
134
142
1
1
1
1
1
1
15
15
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.37
0.37
41
41
5
31
31
81
21
21
21
21
21
21
31
31
41
4
41
51
131
131
19
121
121
15
404.71
404.71
688
283.31
283.31
647.51161.91
161.91
161.91
202.31
202.31
202.31
323.71
323.71
728.4
323.7
323.71404.71
334.51
334.51
437.11
361.51
361.51
383.1
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross - section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Tables IOa -f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 11 a -f. Monitoring Data
Martin's Creek 11 (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 1, Riffle
Reach
UT 1-4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
95.42
2.04
95.45
3.52
94.78
4.18
94.53
5.03
94.23
5.82
94.13
6.74
94.16
7.86
94.10
8.82
94.20
10.20
94.26
10.95
94.16
11.78
94.33
12.31
94.79
13.68
95.26
15.66
95.29
17.2
95.21
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
95.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
9.4
Bankfull Width:
11.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
96.5
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
13.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
97
96
-
E
5
0 95
ti
W
94
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -4
XS -1, Station 15 +32, Riffle
93 +
0
10
Station (feet)
- - Bankfull
- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
20
�^
i M
k
r X
i1
n ^iS
Upstream
a ��
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -4
XS -1, Station 15 +32, Riffle
93 +
0
10
Station (feet)
- - Bankfull
- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
20

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
96.07
Project Number:
92633
4.52
XS ID
Date:
XS - 2, Riffle
Field Crew:
Reach
6.38
UT 1-4
7.33
94.61
8.11
94.59
9.69
94.46
11.03
94.71
12.00
94.58
12.72
94.72
13.61
94.96
15.61
95.72
17.29
95.73
XS 2 Looking Upstream
Stream Typ E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -4
XS - 2, Station 14 +72, Riffle
98
97
d
5
0 96
ti
• Bankfull
W
Flood Prone Area
95
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
94
0
10 20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.00
96.07
3.23
96.01
4.52
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
96.07
3.23
96.01
4.52
95.33
5.01
95.05
6.00
94.96
6.38
94.48
7.33
94.61
8.11
94.59
9.69
94.46
11.03
94.71
12.00
94.58
12.72
94.72
13.61
94.96
15.61
95.72
17.29
95.73
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
95.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
10.2
Bankfull Width:
11.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
97.0
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
13.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Bankfull Elevation:
Martins Creek II
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.8
Project Number:
92633
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
97.1
XS ID
100.0
XS - 3, Riffle
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
Reach
W / D Ratio:
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Entrenchment Ratio:
14.7
Date:
1.0
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jern
Station
Elevation
0.00
96.82
-
1.52
96.85
3.10
96.36
- p
3.80
96.15
°
4.54
95.86
5.18
95.86
6.16
95.93
'y
7.21
96.00
8.45
96.18
10.40
96.77
XS 3 Looking Upstream
11.20
96.76
Stream Typ
E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS - 3, Station 16 +54, Riffle
98
---------------------------------------------------
w 97
m
5
----- - - -__-
-- ----------------- - - - - --
_-__-_
Bankfull
�l 96
_ _ _ - Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/l/14
t My -01 9/10/14
95
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
96.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.8
Bankfull Width:
6.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
97.1
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
igan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
96.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.8
Bankfull Width:
6.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
97.1
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
16.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
14.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
XS ID
Field Crew:
XS - 4, Pool
3
Reach
UT
- - -r=
• aTgf 1:
i
..>
i•
XS 4 Looking
ws-
A.
Stream Type E
11.2
96.9
12.0
97.1
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS - 4 Station 16 +03 Pool
98
97
0 96
•�
_ _ _ _ Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
W
95
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
94
0
10
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
2.6 9
1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
2.6 9
96.7
Bankfull Elevation: 96.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 7.3
Bankfu Width: 7.7
3.0 95.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA
Flood Prone Width: NA
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9
6.1 95.5
W / D Ratio: NA
6.9 96.0
Entrenchment Ratio: NA
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

Site
Bankfull Elevation:
Martins Creek II
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
6.3
Bankfull Width:
Project Number:
92633
98.7
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
XS ID
1.2
XS - 5, Riffle
0.7
W / D Ratio:
13.7
Reach
10:8
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
1.0
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jern
Station
Elevation
0.00
97.33
1.67
97.46
2.99
97.09
3.73
96.84
4.04
96.30
4.89
96.30
5.59
96.38
6.78
96.36
7.67
96.52
1
8.32
96.57
XS 5 Looking Upstream
t t
9.57
97.28
10.98
97.47
Stream Type E
12.16
97.49
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS - 5, Station 14 +24, Riffle
99
--------------------------------------------------------
w 98
5
ti
--- - Bankfull
�l 97
-
- - -- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
96
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
6.3
Bankfull Width:
9.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
98.7
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
igan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
6.3
Bankfull Width:
9.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
98.7
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
13.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
10:8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
Project
XS - 6, Pool
t
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
5.11
94.66
6.58
94.33
7.34
95.26
8.65
95.70
9.69
96.41
11.29
96.90
13.49
97.11
15.46
97.19
16.47
97.28
tl� r
�C A'
XS 6 Looking Upstream
f'}ffi.r zddF
Stream Typ' E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS - 6, Station 13 +85, Pool
99
98
w
5 97 ---- - - - - -- ----------------------
---- - - - - --
0
96
• Bankfull
W
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
95
� MY -0l 9/ 10/14
94
0
10 20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 6, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
97.71
2.73
97.87
3.27
97.34
3.73
95.77
4.44
95.19
5.11
94.66
6.58
94.33
7.34
95.26
8.65
95.70
9.69
96.41
11.29
96.90
13.49
97.11
15.46
97.19
16.47
97.28
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
96:9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
11.1
Bankfull Width:
8.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Station E
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 7, Pool
Site
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Martins Creek II
9/10/2014
i
r+
Project
Station E
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 7, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS - 7, Station 10 +75, Pool
100
99
E -- - - - - -- ------------------------
0
97 • Bankfull
W Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/l/14
96 MY -01 9/10/1
95
0 10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
0.00 98.71
Bankfull Elevation: 98.2
1.36 97.26
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 6.8
2.18 98.61
Bankfull Width: 8.1
3.50 98.89
Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA
4.75 96.07
Flood Prone Width: NA
5.42 96.60
Max Depth at Bankfull: 2.1
6.12 96.68
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8
7.29 96.75
W / D Ratio: NA
8.35 97.55
Entrenchment Ratio: NA
9.68 97.95
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
100.01
1.17 1
Project Number:
92633
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
XS ID
Field Crew:
XS - 8, Riffle
4.89 9
99.32
5.49 9
99.28
6.18 9
99.36
6.69 9
99.70
7.39 9
99.89
XS 8 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS - 8, Station 09 +59, Riffle
101
w 100
d
5
0
- - Bankfull
W 99
- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
My -019/10/14
98
0
10
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
0.20 1
100.01
1.17 1
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
0.20 1
100.01
1.17 1
100.03
2.26 9
99.66
3.11 9
99.52
4.11 9
99.42
4.89 9
99.32
5.49 9
99.28
6.18 9
99.36
6.69 9
99.70
7.39 9
99.89
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 100.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 2.8
Bankfull Width: 6.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 100.7
Flood Prone Width: 100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4
W / D Ratio: 16.0
Entrenchment Ratio: 14.9
Bank Height Rao: 1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
Project
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
SUMMARY DATA
0.00
101.64
Bankfull Elevation:
101.1
1.51
101.62
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
8.0
2.66
101.66
Bankfull Width:
10.6
3.64
101.45
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
4.29
100.23
Flood Prone Width:
NA
5.69
99.30
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.8
7.01
99.92
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
8.34
99.87
W / D Ratio:
NA
9.22
100.45
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
10.44
100.72
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
XS 9 Looking Upstream
11.57
100.78
12.94
101.10
Stream Typ', E
14.58
101.13
Martins
Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS - 9, Station 08 +79, Pool
102
101 ---------- - - - - --
----------------------------------------
w
5
0 100
-- - - Bankfull
W
- Flood Prone Area
99
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
98
0
10
Station (feet)
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 9, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
Project
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
4.66
,� -4� l..f. -- -•� ,.
5.18
104.59
5.77
104.38
6.37
103.89
6.98
104.50
7.93
104.75
8.83
105.25
9.97
105.34
10.99
105.63
12.19
105.63
13.00
105.68
XS 10 Looking Upstream
.._,
Stream Type E
Martins
Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 2
XS -10, Station 06 +59, Pool
106
---------- - - - - --
w 105
- -----------
- - - - -- --------- - - - - --
5
0
Bankfull
W 104
- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
103
0
10
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 10, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.30
105.75
1.46
105.78
1.93
105.78
3.08
105.46
3.91
105.27
4.66
105.31
5.18
104.59
5.77
104.38
6.37
103.89
6.98
104.50
7.93
104.75
8.83
105.25
9.97
105.34
10.99
105.63
12.19
105.63
13.00
105.68
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
105.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.7
Bankfull Width:
4.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Bankfull Elevation:
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS -11, Riffle
Project
UT 1- 3, Reach 1
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
14.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
V}
Station
Elevation.
0.00
113.81
2.28
113.89
3.74
113.81
4.56
113.47
4.95
113.19
5.63
113.41
Depth
6.15
113.08
7.20
113.22
7.85
113.25
8.68
113.61
XS 11 Looking Upstream
10.48
113.95
12.30
114.29
Stream Typ E
13.86
114.49
Martins
Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 1
XS -11, Station 03 +86, Riffle
115
------------------------------------
d
--- -----------------
- - - - --
5
0 114
W
_ _ Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
113
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS -11, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 1
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
113.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.5
Bankfull Width:
6.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
114.5
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max at Bankfull:
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
14.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
92633
i
XS -12, Riffle
Project
UT 1- 3, Reach 1
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
0.00
125.07
Bankfull Elevation:
124:9
1.34
125.06
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
1.7
2.38
124.84
3.15
124.89
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
125.5
4.33
124.62
Flood Prone Width:
14.0
4.90
124.32
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
5.57
124.33
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
6.34
124.26
W / D Ratio:
17.2
9.09
125.14
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.6
10.23
125.55
XS 12 Looking Upstream
11.33
125.66
12.23
125.70
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 -3 Reach 1
XS -12, Station 00 +81, Riffle
126
--------------------------------------
d
- - - - -- -- - - - - --
5
0 125
- -- - - - - --
---------------
- - - - -- ------------ - - - - -•
--- •Bankfull
ti
W
-- - • Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
t MY -019/10/14
124
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS -12, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 1
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Width:
5.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS -13, Riffle
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Project
5.70
98.62
6.26
4,T:
7.03
98.15
7.76
98.32
r
98.53
9.35
98.99
10.80
99.49
12.23
•
13.50
99.62
XS 13 Looking Upstream
Stream Typ -, E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -13, Station 12 +38, Riffle
101
w 100
5
0
------ -��� �����������������������������
�����������
• Bankfull
W99
••••Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
98
0
10
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS -13, Riffle
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
99.75
1.35
99.70
2.99
99.13
3.77
98.80
4.67
98.74
5.70
98.62
6.26
98.17
7.03
98.15
7.76
98.32
8.48
98.53
9.35
98.99
10.80
99.49
12.23
99.58
13.50
99.62
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
99.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
3.3
Bankfull Width:
6.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.0
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
13.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS -14, Riffle
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
101.13
1.66
101.09
2.80
100.59
3.94
100.21
4.80
99.88
5.41
99.66
6.48
99.78
7.63
99.95
8.83
99.99
9.55
100.41
10.39
100.71
12.08
100.66
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
100.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
2.9
Bankfull Width:
6.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
101.2
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
13.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
102
w 101
m
5
0
ti
W 100
99 L
0
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -14, Station 11 +37, Riffle
Station (feet)
10
- - Bankfull
- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 15, Pool
Project
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
5.70
99.19
6.35
99.04
r
99.55
8.15
100.17
i
_
100.48
13.66
100.67
15.91
101.03
16.60
101.09
ea
XS 15 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -15, Station 10 +21, Pool
102
101 - - - - -- ------------------------------------------
d
5
0 100
-- Bankfull
W
- Flood Prone Area
99
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -0l 9/ 10/14
98
0
10
20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 15, Pool
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
101.13
1.67
101.20
2.94
101.09
4.10
100.59
4.67
100.07
5.70
99.19
6.35
99.04
7.16
99.55
8.15
100.17
9.45
100.39
11.31
100.48
13.66
100.67
15.91
101.03
16.60
101.09
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
101.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
10.2
Bankfull Width:
13.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS -16, Riffle
Project
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
4.77 1
100.96
5.74 1
101.01
i
100.77
7.26 1
100.89
7.83 1
X17
�,.
XS 16 Looking Upstream
Stream Typ E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -16, Station 09 +53, Riffle
104
103 --------------------------------------------------------
d
5
102 - -- -----------------------------
- - - - -- -- - - - - --
-- - - Bankfull
W
- Flood Prone Area
101
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14
100
0
10
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS -16, Riffle
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
0.00 1
102.04
1.67 1
101.93
2.81 1
101.52
3.37 1
101.22
3.80 1
100.82
4.77 1
100.96
5.74 1
101.01
6.38 1
100.77
7.26 1
100.89
7.83 1
100.95
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 101:9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 6.1
Bankfull Width: 8.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 103.1
Flood Prone Width: 25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7
W / D Ratio: 12.1
Entrenchment Ratio: 2.9
Bank Height Rao: 1.0

Site
Bankfull Elevation:
Martins Creek II
92633
s: ,,
Project
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
3•
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
2.7
•a -
.i
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
,-
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
-0.30
106.04
u
1.81
105.93
2.90
105.56x
< =
4.00
105.64
4.69
104.97.;
a.
5.84
104.64
,
6.84
103.97
8.13
103.74
9.42
103.46
--
9.79
103.68
XS 17 Looking Upstream
10.62
103.82
-
11.48
103.03
Stream Type- E
12.32
106.42
13.99
106.57
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
15.42
106.45
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -17, Station 07 +41, Pool
107
106
- - - - - -- -------------
---- ------------ ------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - --
w
d
5 105
0
ti 104
--- •Bankfull
W
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
103
� MY -01 9/10/14
102
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 17, Pool
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
105.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
13.9
Bankfull Width:
9.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS -18, Riffle
Reach
MC UT 1, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
75.58
2.30
75.50
3.21
75.36
4.07
74.86
5.07
74.73
6.07
74.57
6.93
74.29
8.04
74.33
8.73
74.27
9.97
74.80
11.12
75.35
12.47
75.55
13.58
75.52
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
75.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
5.5
Bankfull Width:
7.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
76.5
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
11.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
77
w 76
d
5
0
ti
W 75
74
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2
XS -18, Station 08 +74, Riffle
Station (feet)
10
- - Bankfull
- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -O 19/10/14

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS -19, Riffle
Reach
MC UT 1, Reach 2
Date:
9/10/2014
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
102.53
1.44
102.53
2.85
102.56
3.82
102.10
5.21
101.61
6.61
101.77
7.79
101.87
8.81
101.52
9.51
101.89
10.11
102.04
11.05
102.62
12.05
103.28
13.76
103.23
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
102.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
5.0
Bankfull Width:
8.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
103.5
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
104
w 103
d
5
0
ti
W 102
101
Stream Typ E
Martins Creek II - NCEEP Project Number 92633
Stream Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2
XS -19, Station 04 +37, Riffle
Station (feet)
10
- - Bankfull
- Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
t MY -019/10/14

Project Name
Reach
Project Number
Date
Crew
Martins Creek II
UT 1 - 3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00 +00 - 10 +00
92633
9/10/14
Perkinson, Jernigan
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0161
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Avg. Riffle Slope
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
996.5
98.7 99.1
1016.0
98.2
98.3
990.2
97.9 99.1
996.9
98.6
99.0
983.6
97.5 99.1
991.3
97.7
99.0
977.2
98.1 99.1
980.6
97.9
99.0
972.7
99.1 99.4
973.8
99.1
99.4
958.7
99.2 99.7
952.9
99.6
100.0
952.1
99.6 100.0
949.0
99.0
100.0
948.5
98.7 100.0
942.2
98.7
100.0
944.4
98.6 100.0
941.0
99.5
100.0
941.0
98.6 100.0
922.8
99.8
100.4
937.6
99.7 100.0
919.3
98.7
100.3
921.8
100.2 100.4
917.1
98.9
100.3
919.2
99.3 100.4
913.2
100.0
100.3
914.8
99.2 100.3
890.4
100.7
101.1
911.0
100.1 100.5
884.2
99.8
101.1
889.7
100.7 101.1
877.4
99.4
101.2
882.6
99.7 101.2
867.7
100.2
101.1
876.7
99.3 101.2
863.0
101.0
101.2
867.3
100.1 101.2
846.9
101.5
101.9
861.5
100.7 101.3
839.9
100.8
101.9
846.0
101.4 101.8
830.6
99.7
102.0
839.0
100.2 101.8
825.8
101.4
102.0
829.8
100.4 101.8
797.2
102.3
102.8
824.9
101.5 101.9
791.6
101.8
102.9
814.6
102.0 102.4
776.1
101.5
102.9
796.9
102.4 102.9
771.2
102.7
103.0
792.1
101.8 102.9
743.5
102.8
103.5
781.6
101.6 102.9
737.7
1022
103.4
130
125
120
m
6 115
a
v
c
0
110
v
w
105
100
95
0
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 1 (2014) Profile - UT 1 -3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00 +00 to 10 +00
100
200
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
300
400
-a-Year 1(2014) Bed
500
Distance (feet)
600
Year 1(2014 Water Surface
700
- x-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
800
900
1000
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0161
0.0162
Riffle Length
20
20
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0185
0.0209
Pool Length
14
16
Pool to Pool Spacing
34
34
100
200
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
300
400
-a-Year 1(2014) Bed
500
Distance (feet)
600
Year 1(2014 Water Surface
700
- x-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
800
900
1000

Name Martins Creek II
UT 1 - 3 Reach 2, Station 10 +00 - 20 +00
Number 92633
9/10114
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1855.8
95.4
95.9
1852.5
94.6
95.8
1848.3
94.5
95.9
1844.3
95.3
95.9
1841.9
94.9
95.9
1834.0
94.4
95.8
1830.6
95.1
95.9
1814.5
95.4
96.0
1799.6
95.4
95.9
1794.8
95.2
96.0
1784.4
94.9
96.0
1777.9
95.1
96.0
1770.2
95.6
96.0
1746.1
95.6
96.0
1741.1
93.9
96.0
1732.1
94.5
96.1
1726.8
95.5
96.0
1690.1
95.8
96.2
1684.6
95.4
96.2
1673.3
95.1
96.2
1669.0
95.7
96.2
1656.8
95.9
96.2
1643.3
95.9
96.3
1641.8
94.6
96.3
1634.6
94.5
96.3
1630.6
95.8
96.3
1606.4
96.0
96.4
103
102
101
100
`m
°
m 99
v
w 98
c
0
i 97
v
W
96
95
94
93
2014
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1856.9
94.6
95.7
1853.2
94.5
95.7
1850.5
95.3
95.8
1828.7
95.1
95.7
1806.0
95.5
95.8
1797.1
95.0
95.8
1784.6
95.0
95.8
1775.5
95.6
95.8
1752.2
95.6
95.9
1746.3
94.1
95.9
1738.4
94.2
95.9
1731.8
95.6
95.9
1694.6
95.8
96.1
1688.2
95.3
96.1
1681.4
95.0
96.2
1673.0
95.6
96.1
1646.9
95.9
96.1
1644.5
94.0
96.2
1641.4
94.7
96.1
1635.7
95.8
96.1
1610.2
96.0
96.3
1608.3
94.6
96.4
1599.6
95.1
96.3
1596.1
96.0
96.3
1570.6
96.0
96.5
1563.3
95.0
96.5
1556.6
94.7
96.5
2015
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
2016 I 2017
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 1 (2014) Profile - UT 1 -3 Reach 2, Station 10 +00 to 20 +00
ti
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0161
0.0162
O
rl
Riffle Length
20
20
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0185
0.0209
Pool Length
14
16
Pool to Pool Spacing
34
34
ti
(0
C
o
N
p
U
N
IT
O
N
p
_ C
M
O
M
C
at
N
_
A
N
N
V
O
rl
Reach 2
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400 1500
Distance (feet)
-Year 0 (2014) Bed (Year 1(2014) Bed
1600
- +-Year 192014) Water Surface
1700 1800
_m-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
1900
2000

Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00 +00 - 06+00
Project Number 92633
Date 9/10/14
Crew Perkinson, Jernigan
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
2014
NA*
2014
2015
2016
2017
16
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Avg. Riffle Slope
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
603.4
90.7 91.5
603.8
91.2
60 1.2
92.0 92.2
600.7
90.5
583.1
92.7 92.9
597.8
92.0
575.4
92.8 93.0
582.4
92.2
573.4
92.1 93.0
572.9
92.7
570.9
92.3 93.0
570.7
91.9
569.9
93.7 93.8
568.5
91.9
556.2
94.0 94.3
566.6
93.5
544.5
94.8 95.0
540.0
94.7
539.5
94.1 95.0
536.8
93.9
"3'3
95.2 95.3
534.7
95.2
525.6
95.9 96.2
523.2
95.8
517.2
96.1 96.3
514.2
96.0
514.1
95.6 96.3
511.5
95.7
96.1
510.6
95.6 96.3
508.4
95.5
96.1
507.6
96.7 97.1
505.3
96.8
495.4
97.8 98.0
493.9
97.6
97.7
478.4
98.7 99.0
477.0
98.7
476.3
97.8 99.0
473.3
97.6
98.8
473.4
97.7 99.0
470.9
97.5
98.8
472.2
99.6 99.7
469.7
99.4
462.6
99.9 100.1
459.3
99.6
460.0
99.4 100.1
456.5
99.1
99.6
457.1
99.2 100.1
454.5
99.0
99.6
455.9
100.3 100.4
453.8
100.2
445.4
100.6 100.9
443.5
100.6
443.4
100.1 100.9
441.4
100.0
100.7
440.2
101.2 101.3
439.2
101.2
130
125
120
m
115
�a
v
w 110
0
0
v 105
w
100
95
90 +
0
100
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
200
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 1 (2014) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00 +00 to 06 +00
-a-Year 1(2014) Bed
300
Distance (feet)
-*--Yer 1(2014) Water Surface
400
X
'i
NA* No water in channel during field surveys
- r-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
500
600
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0577
NA*
Riffle Length
19
16
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0457
NA*
Pool Length
6
6
Pool to Pool Spacing
25
22
NA* No water in channel during field surveys
- r-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
500
600

Name Martins Creek II
MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06 +00 - 12+00
Number 92633
9/10/14
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1170.7
58.4
58.5
1137.5
59.4
59.6
1134.1
58.7
59.5
1132.5
60.4
60.5
1119.6
60.3
60.6
1116.2
61.8
61.8
1099.7
61.8
62.1
1081.3
623
62.4
1077.3
62.2
62.5
1074.5
62.7
62.9
1064.6
63.4
63.3
1049.9
64.3
64.5
1047.7
63.9
64.5
1041.2
63.9
64.5
1040.6
64.8
64.9
1031.8
65.0
65.4
1030.0
65.0
65.4
1026.5
65.0
65.4
1025.8
65.8
65.8
1017.7
65.8
66.0
1013.8
66.0
66.2
1012.6
65.7
66.2
1011.0
66.5
66.7
984.7
67.6
67.9
980.6
67.2
67.9
978.9
68.5
68.7
967.1
69.2
69.4
9554
696
69.9
95
90
85
m
3 80
m
75
c
0
n
v 70
w
65
60
55
600
2014
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1169.9
58.4
58.4
1153.8
58.8
58.9
1138.0
59.2
59.3
1135.4
58.8
59.3
1133.5
58.7
59.3
1132.4
60.4
NA*
1124.3
60.2
1122.3
60.0
6
1118.7
60.3
1115.6
61.7
22
1091.2
62.0
1079.4
62.3
1077.1
62.0
1075.5
61.9
1074.1
62.6
1068.2
62.8
1066.6
62.6
1064.6
62.6
1063.6
63.2
1053.6
63.9
1048.0
64.2
1044.7
63.7
1039.2
63.8
1038.1
64.9
1027.3
65.1
1024.5
64.7
1023.8
10120
65.7
661
700
2015
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
800
2016 2017
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation I Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 1 (2014) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06 +00 to 12 +00
-Year 0 (2014) Bed (Year 1(2014) Bed
00
900
Distance (feet)
- &-Year 1(2014) Water Surface
1000
NA* No water in channel during field surveys
x Year1TOB /Bankfull
1100
1200
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0577
NA*
Riffle Length
19
16
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0457
NA*
Pool Length
6
6
Pool to Pool Spacing
25.0
22
NA* No water in channel during field surveys
x Year1TOB /Bankfull
1100
1200

Name Martins Creek II
UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 - 03 +50
Number 92633
9/10/14
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
336.4
91.4
91.5
323.6
91.8
92.1
320.5
90.9
92.1
317.3
91.2
92.0
311.2
92.2
92.6
299.7
92.5
92.8
295.8
92.5
92.9
292.0
923
92.8
288.2
92.3
92.8
284.7
92.8
93.1
265.6
93.6
93.8
255.6
93.3
93.8
245.2
93.3
93.8
239.5
93.1
93.8
235.9
94.2
94.9
229.6
94.8
95.3
227.0
94.6
95.3
222.6
94.6
95.3
216.1
95.0
95.3
205.3
95.4
95.8
202.6
95.3
95.8
199.9
95.3
95.8
195.5
95.7
96.0
182.7
95.9
96.3
168.2
96.5
96.8
153.0
96.8
97.0
151.3
1444
96.4
965
97.0
970
104
102
100
m
6 93
v
c
0
96
n
v
w
94
92
2014
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
339.1
91.4
91.5
326.0
91.7
92.0
322.7
91.0
92.0
320.3
91.7
92.0
299.9
92.5
92.8
296.9
92.4
92.8
292.0
92.3
92.8
286.9
92.7
93.0
268.6
93.6
93.8
262.1
93.4
93.8
254.3
93.3
93.8
245.8
93.3
93.8
241.3
92.8
93.8
236.7
94.4
94.7
229.6
94.8
95.0
225.4
94.5
95.1
222.1
94.9
95.1
203.3
95.5
95.7
191.6
96.0
96.2
188.0
95.7
96.3
179.6
95.7
96.3
173.6
96.2
96.4
152.1
96.8
97.1
147.3
96.7
97.1
144.2
96.9
97.1
135.3
97.5
97.8
132.9
97.0
97.8
2015 2016 2017
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation I Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
90
c 50 100
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 1 (2014) Profile - UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00 +00 to 03 +50
150
Distance (feet)
Year 1(2014) Bed
200
250
Year 1 (2014) Water Surface
300
350
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0305
0.0304
Riffle Length
17
21
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0388
0.0395
Pool Length
13
13
Pool to Pool Spacing
31
34
250
Year 1 (2014) Water Surface
300
350

Name Martins Creek II
UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05 +50 - 17 +00
Number 92633
9/10/14
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1651.4
95.9
96.3
1644.5
95.0
96.3
1638.0
94.2
96.4
1634.4
96.3
96.4
1630.0
96.0
96.4
1624.0
94.5
96.4
1614.7
94.6
96.4
1611.1
96.7
96.8
1591.5
96.7
97.0
1571.8
97.0
97.2
1567.2
95.9
97.3
1563.9
95.7
97.3
1555.3
95.9
97.3
1551.1
97.0
97.2
1515.5
97.3
97.8
1512.7
96.4
97.8
1505.9
95.4
97.8
1500.0
96.8
97.7
1497.4
96.3
97.7
1495.0
96.3
97.8
1491.6
97.1
97.7
1450.2
98.1
98.3
1446.5
97.1
98.4
1440.5
96.4
98.3
1435.8
96.2
98.4
1429.6
97.9
98.3
1336.8
98.3
98.8
110
108
106
m 104
�a
102
a
v
c
100
v
W
98
96
94
92
550
2014
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1672.7
94.9
95.6
1652.2
96.0
96.1
1643.3
94.7
96.2
1638.9
94.1
96.2
1636.1
95.0
96.2
1634.1
96.2
96.3
1623.8
94.8
96.3
1617.9
94.3
96.3
1611.2
94.8
96.3
1609.1
96.4
96.6
1570.4
96.9
97.1
1564.9
95.9
97.1
1557.1
95.9
97.1
1551.1
97.0
97.2
1515.2
97.5
97.6
1511.4
96.2
97.6
1502.7
95.6
97.6
1498.0
96.7
97.6
1493.6
96.1
97.6
1488.2
97.3
97.6
1448.8
98.0
98.2
1444.2
96.8
98.3
1435.5
96.2
98.2
1432.4
96.8
98.3
1424.8
98.0
98.2
1402.7
98.5
98.6
1398.5
97.8
98.7
oe a
2015 2016 2017
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation I Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 1 (2014) Profile - UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05 +50 to 17 +00
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-0-Year 1(2014) Bed
Distance (feet)
1150
tYear 1(2014) Water Surface
1350
-"-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
1550
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0135
0.0123
Riffle Length
21
23
2
y
r
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0166
0.0161
O
Pool Length
22
19
N
N
O
N
tf!
O
Pool to Pool Spacing
42
40
U
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-0-Year 1(2014) Bed
Distance (feet)
1150
tYear 1(2014) Water Surface
1350
-"-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
1550
N
r
O
C
M
r
O
d
to
N
o
d
N
O
2
y
r
N
O
O
N
N
O
N
tf!
O
U
r
O
41
IS
r
d
N
N
N
O
V
�
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-0-Year 1(2014) Bed
Distance (feet)
1150
tYear 1(2014) Water Surface
1350
-"-Year 1 TOB /Bankfull
1550

Martins Creek II
H iawassee
Note:
Cross Section 2
Pebble Count, Martins Creek II
100%
I I I I IIII I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIII I I I I IIII
90% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1!! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIII
80%
IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
70%
I I IIIII
IIIII
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
! I I IIIII
IIIII
! I
I IIIII
IIIII
! I I
IIIII
IIIII
! I I
IIII I
IIIII
60%
50%
IIIII
I I I III
II
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
I I I IIIII
I
IIIII
I IIIII
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
2
F-
40%
IIIII
I I I IIIII
1 1 1
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
I I I IIIII
I
I
IIIII
I IIIII
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
IL 30%
I I 1 11111
! I I III II
I I I
IIII
IIIII
I 1 1 1 1
11
!
I
IIIII
I I I I II
! I I
IIIII
I IIII
!
IIIII
111111
�
20%
I I IIIII
I I I IIIII
! I I
I I I
IIIII
III
I I IIIII
I I I IIIII
!
I
I
I
I IIIII
I IIIII
! I I
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
! I I
I I I
IIII I
IIIII
v
L
Q) 10%
IIIII
IIIII
Hill
II 1
Hill II
1
Hill II 1
IIII
0%
!!!I
I I I '''
I I
IIII
IIIII
1 III
♦ I I
I, �
♦I
I
IIII
I I II
I I I
I I I I
I Hill
IIIII
! I
I I I
IIIII
IIIII
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) --o--Cumulative Percent • Percent Item — Riffle —e—Pool —*—Run +Glide
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
0.500
7.44
16.9
42
73
16%
12%
1 64%
8%
0%
0%

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek)
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition (UT -1)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design (UT -1)
Monitoring Baseline (UT -1 Reach 4)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
E .
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B %BE%
5.9
8.5
7.6
14.0
3.0
11.7
21.7
7.7
8.5
6.4
7.1
6.6
8.4
1.1
Flood prone Width (ft)
9.0
17.0
16.2
30.8
8.2
20
15.9 -28
66.8 -
410
16
100
25
25
25
25
0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.2
BF Max Depth ft
0.6
0.9
1.0
1.1
0.2
0.9
2.5
0.7
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.2
0.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
3.6
4.7
4.3
6.2
1.2
10.2
13.1
4.1
6.0
3.2
4.5
3.8
6.4
1.7
Width/Depth Ratio
7.6
18.8
12.6
55.0
18.0
10.7
17.0
12.0
14.3
10.5
11.4
11.0
12.8
1.2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
2.0
2.0
2.9
0.6
1.7
32.0
2.0
11.8
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
0.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
2.0
1.8
4.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
Profile
Riffle length ft)
5
21
20
40
8
Riffle slope ft/ft
0.025
0.170
0.2000
1.9000
0.0100
0.1600
0.0009
0.0166
0.0148
0.0337
0.0111
Pool length ft
8.0
22.0
22.0
37.0
9.5
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.2
2.5
1.6
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
0.2
Pool spacing (ft)
30.0
85.0
48.0
231.0
12.0
45.0
27.0
42.0
40.0
61.0
11.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 16 55 40 40
Radius of Curvature (ft) 28 47 30 40 30 40
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2 3 3.8 4.7 3.8 4.7
Meander Wavelength (ft) 70 260 15 30 15 30
Meander Width ratio 1.1 4.1 4.7 4.7
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs /ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport ca acit W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eb /Fb /B /G /Cb
Aa /Bc
B/C
B/C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.2 -4.4
3.9 -4.3
Bankfull Discharge cfs)
16-25
Valley Length (ft)
1565
- - --
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1747
- - --
- - --
781
Sinuosity
1.06- 1.18
1.19
1.05 -1.4
1.05 -1.4
Water Surface Slope (LfIJ
0.015-0.05
0.0333
.01 -.057
0.0135
BF slope ft /ft
- - --
- - --
- - --
- - --
Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
- - --
- - --
- - --
- - --
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
- - --
- - --
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
- - --
----
Biological or Other
- - --
i - - --
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Ri % /RU %P %G % /S%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B %BE%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
.6 -.8
2 -4.4
3.6 -8.7
15.9 -28
66.8 -
Entrainment Class <l.5/1.5- 1.99/2.0- 4.9/5.0-
Incision Class <1.2/1.2- 1.49/1.5- 1.99/ >2.0

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek)
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition (UT -1)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design (UT -1)
Monitoring Baseline (UT -1 Reach 2)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
E .
Min
Mean
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B %BE%
5.9
8.5
7.6
11.7
21.7
7.7
8.5
8.0
8.7
Flood prone Width (ft)
9.0
17.0
16.2
.6 -.8
2 -4.4
20
15.9 -28
66.8 -
410
16
100
25
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.7
0.7
BF Max Depth ft
0.6
0.9
1.0
]5L�5L8
0.9
2.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
3.6
4.7
4.3
10.2
13.1
4.1
6.0
5.2
5.9
Width/De th Ratio
7.6
18.8
12.6
0
10.7
17.0
12.0
14.3
12.3
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
2.0
2.0
1.7
32.0
2.0
11.8
2.9
3.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
2.0
1.8
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Profile
Riffle length ft)
5
21
20
40
8
Riffle slope ft/ft
0.025
0.170
0.2000
1.9000
0.0100
0.1600
0.0009
0.0166
0.0148
0.0337
0.0111
Pool length ft
8.0
22.0
22.0
37.0
9.5
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.2
2.5
1.6
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
0.2
Pool spacing (ft)
30.0
85.0
48.0
231.0
12.0
45.0
27.0
42.0
40.0
61.0
11.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 16 55 40 40
Radius of Curvature (ft) 28 47 30 40 30 40
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2 3 3.8 4.7 3.8 4.7
Meander Wavelength (ft) 70 260 15 30 15 30
Meander Width ratio 1.1 4.1 4.7 4.7
Trans ort arameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs /ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport ca acit W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eb /Fb /B /G /Cb
Aa /Bc
B/C
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.2 -4.4
3.9 -4.3
Bankfull Discharge cfs)
16-25
Valley Length (ft)
1565
- - --
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1747
----
- - --
1176
Sinuosity
1.06- 1.18
1.19
1.05 -1.4
1.05 -1.4
Water Surface Slope (LfIJ
0.015-0.05
0.0333
.01 -.057
0.0577
BF slope ft /ft
- - --
- - --
- - --
- - --
Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
- - --
- - --
- - --
- - --
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
- - --
- - --
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
- - --
- --
Biological or Other
- - --
- - --
Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Ri % /RU %P %G % /S%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B %BE%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
.6 -.8
2 -4.4
3.6 -8.7
15.9 -28
66.8 -
Entrainment Class <l.5/1.5- 1.99/2.0- 4.9/5.0-
Incision Class <1.2/1.2- 1.49/1.5- 1.99/ >2.0

Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT 1 -3 to Martin's Creek)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design _T
Monitoring Baseline (UT 1 -3)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
E .
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B %BE%
5.0
7.5
6.9
11.4
2.7
11.7
21.7
6.0
6.5
5.1
8.0
6.8
11.4
2.5
Flood prone Width ft
10.3
15.4
12.6
26.2
7.3
20
12.1
15.7
410
11
100
14
77
100
100
39
BF Mean Depth ft
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.1
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.2
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.1
0.9
2.5
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.9
1.2
0.3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
2.9
3.0
3.0
3.3
0.2
10.2
13.1
2.9
3.2
1.7
5.1
3.0
9.9
3.5
Width/Depth Ratio
8.6
19.9
15.6
39.7
13.6
10.7
17.0
12.5
11.9
15.5
14.3
22.7
3.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
2.1
2.0
2.7
0.6
1.7
32.0
3.8
15.4
2.7
9.4
9.4
15.4
5.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.7
1.4
3.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
7
19
18
51
10
Riffle slope ft /ft)
0.013
0.100
0.2000
1.9000
0.0100
0.1800
0.0215
0.0457
0.0445
0.0667
0.0125
Pool length ft
3.0
6.0
6.0
10.0
2.0
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.2
2.5
1.6
Pool spacing (ft)
20.0
100.0
48.0
231.0
10.0
60.0
15.0
25.0
23.0
58.0
10.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft 22 46 16 55 26 50 40
Radius of Curvature (ft) 14 28 28 47 15 40 30 40
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 1.2 5.6 2 3 2.5 6.7 3.8 4.7
Meander Wavelength ft 56 81 70 260 65 110 15 30
Meander Width ratio 1.9 9.2 1.1 4.1 4.3 8.3 4.7
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs /ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eb /B /C/F
AaBc
B/C
E
Bankfull Velocity s
6 -Feb
3.8-4.9
Bankfull Discharge cfs
11.0 - 14.0
Valley Length (ft)
1320
- - --
Channel Thalweg Length ft
1584
- - --
- - --
2092
Sinuosity
1.2
1.19
1.26 -1.42
1.2
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.007 -0.04
0.0333
0.005 -0.054
0.0161
BF slope ft/ft
- - --
- - --
- - --
- - --
Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
- - --
- - --
- - --
- - --
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
- - --
- - --
Channel Stability or Habitat Metrici
I
- - --
- - --
Biological or Other
- - --
- - --
Table 10f. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Ri % /RU %P %G % /S%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B %BE%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
0.3
1.1
3.5
12.1
15.7
Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5- 1.99/2.0- 4.9/5.0-
Incision Class <1.2/1.2- 1.49/1.5- 1.99/ >2.0

Table tla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Marlin's Creek D Mitinatinn Prnieet - F V P Prniert Numb- 92633
Table l lb. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Marlin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Cross Section 6 (UT 1-3)
BFWidth
BF Ma,c Depth (ft)
BF Cross Sectional Area (fi)
mum
'• OEM=
'
®
®
-
-
-
--
111
11 1
-----
®
®-----
®
®-----
��-----
�
®
-
-
-
--
Table l lb. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Marlin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
BFWidth
BF Ma,c Depth (ft)
BF Cross Sectional Area (fi)
mum
'• OEM=

Table 1le. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Proiect - EEP Proiect Number 92633
Table l Id. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4) M71 UT 1 Reach 4) MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -3 UT 1 Reach 4) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 4)
Cross Section 13 T 1 Reach 4
Cross Section 14 T 1 Reach 4
Cross Section 15 T 1 Reach 4
Cross Section 16 UT 1 Reach 4
Cross Section 17 T 1 Reach 4
Parameter
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
BF Width ft
6.6
6.6
6.4
6.3
Floodprone Width (11)
25
25
25
25
13.4
13.6
25
25
25
0
8.4
8.6
9.7
9.9
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
25.0
25.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.6
25.0
25.0
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
NA
NA
25.0
25.0
NA
NA
BF Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.5
0.9
1.2
0.2
0.8
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.4
1.4
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
3.2
4.5
3.8
6.4
BF Max Depth ft
0.9
0.9
3.3
6.1
1.7
0.8
0.8
2.1
2.1
1.2
1.2
Width Depth Ratio
10.5
11.4
2.4
2.7
1.2
12.3
12.7
12.6
13.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
3.8
3.3
3.2
2.9
10.9
10.2
Entrenchment Ratio
6.4
6.1
1.5
1.6
0.1
2.9
3.6
13.2
13.9
0.6
Width/DepthRatio
11.5
1 13.2
1
1
12.8
1 13.7
1
NA
N
1.0
1
1.0
1.0
0.0
11.0
1 12.1
1.0
1.0
0.0
NA
NA
Entrenchment Ratio
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
Profile - Upstream
Riffle length (ft)
5
21
NA
NA
8
3
23
22
43
3.0
2.9
NA
NA
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
Riffle sloe (ft /ft)
1.0
1.0
0.0148
0.0337
0.0111
0.0000
0.0161
1.0
1.0
0.0131
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
Pool length (ft)
8
22
22
37
10
6
19
18
34
8
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.1
2.3
Table l Id. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4) M71 UT 1 Reach 4) MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -3 UT 1 Reach 4) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 4)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
6.4
7.1
6.6
8.4
1.1
6.3
7.2
6.6
8.6
1.3
Floodprone Width (11)
25
25
25
25
0
25
25
25
25
0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.1
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.2
0.2
0.8
1.0
0.9
L2
0.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
3.2
4.5
3.8
6.4
1.7
2.9
4.1
3.3
6.1
1.7
Width Depth Ratio
10.5
11.4
11.0
12.8
1.2
12.3
12.7
12.6
13.2
0.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
0.1
2.9
3.6
3.6
4.0
0.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
Profile - Upstream
Riffle length (ft)
5
21
20
40
8
3
23
22
43
9
Riffle sloe (ft /ft)
0.0009
0.0166
0.0148
0.0337
0.0111
0.0000
0.0161
0.0192
0.0426
0.0131
Pool length (ft)
8
22
22
37
10
6
19
18
34
8
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
0.2
2.1
2.4
2.4
2.7
0.4
Pool spacing (ft)
27
42
40
61
11
15
40
42
57
12
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 40
Radius of Curvature (ft) 30 40
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 3.8 4.7
Meander Wavelength (ft) 15 30
Meander Width ratio 4.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B/C - Type
Cb -Type
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
781
786
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0135
0.0123
BF slope ft/ft
- - --
----
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S %
SC %/SA% /G% /C % /B %BE%
dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Table lle. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Martin's Creek TT Mitigation Proiect - F.F,P Project Number 92633
Parameter
Cross Section 18 UT 1 Reach 2
Cross Section 19 UT 1 Reach 2
Riffle
Riffle
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY5+
BF Width ft
8.0
7.9
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
8.7
8.0
8.7
7.9
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
BF Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
25
BF Max Depth ft
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
5.2
5.5
5.9
5.0
BF Mean Depth ft
0.7
Width/Depth Ratio
12.3
11.3
0.7
12.8
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.1
3.2
2.9
3.1
BF Max Depth ft
1.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
- - --
- - --
BF Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
5.2
Table HE Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek Il Mitigation Project - EEP Project Number 92633
Parameter I Baseline UT 1 Reach 2 MY -1 UT 1 Reach 2 MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 2 ) MY -3 UT 1 Reach 2 MY -4 UT 1 Reach 2) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 2)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
fled
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width ft
8.0
8.7
7.9
8
Flood prone Width ft
25
25
BF Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.7
BF Max Depth ft
1.1
1.0
1.1
BF Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
5.2
5.9
5.0
5.5
Width/Depth Ratio
12.3
12.8
11.4
1
1
12.5
Entrenchment Ratio
2.9
3.1
3.1
3.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
Profile
Riffle length ft
7
19
18
51
10
4
16
12
37
9
Riffle slope ft/ft
0.0215
0.0457
0.0445
0.0667
0.0125
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
Pool length ft
3
6
6
10
2
3
6
5
12
2
Pool Max depth ft
Pool spacing (ft)
15
25
23
58
10
9
22
19
45
9
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft 40
Radius of Curvature ft 30 40
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 3.8 4.7
Meander Wavelength (ft 15 30
Meander Width ratio 4.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
C- Type
C- Type
Channel Thalweg Length (ft
1176
1167
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.0577
NA*
BF slope ft/ft
- - - --
- - - --
Ri %/RU %P %G % /S%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B %BE%
dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
NA* No water in channel during field surveys.

APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Figure E1. Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Martin's Creek 11 (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (EEP Protect Number 92633)
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available)
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
August 25, 2014
April 7, 2014
approximately 2.4 inches of rain documented in one day at
- --
an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
August 25, 2014
July 1, 2014
approximately 2.02 inches of rain was documented over two
- --
days at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
August 25, 2014
August 24, 2014
approximately 1.39 inches of rain documented over two days
- --
at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
October 27, 2014
September 3, 2014
approximately 1.67 inches of rain documented in one day at
- --
an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data and laid back vegetation indicate a bankful I
October 27, 2014
October 14, 2014
event after approximately 2.5 inches of rain documented in
1
one day at an onsite rain gauge.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Martin's Creek II MitiEation Site (EEP Proiect Number 92633)
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 (2014) Year 2 (2015)
Year 3 (2016)
Year 4 (2017)
Year 5 (2018)
1
Yes /75 Days
(39 %)
2
No /21 Days
(11 %)
3
Yes /52 Days
(27 %)
4
No /21 Days
(11 %)
5
No /15 Days
(7.8 %)
6
Yes /58 Days
(30 %)
7
Yes /85 Days
(44 %)
8
Yes /65Days
(34 %)
9
No /22 Days
(11.5 %)
10
No /24 Days
(12.5 %)
11
No /18 Days
(9 %)
12
No /20 Days
(10 %)
13
Yes /116 Days
(61%)
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 1 of 5 (2014)
EEP Project Number 92633 December 2014
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

II
6
U
5
0
4
d
3
2
1
Figure EI: Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Data from WETS Station: MURPHY, NC 6001
2014
—30th Percentile
—70th Percentile

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 1
Year 1 (2014 Data)
12
10
April
14
October
21
I
Growing
Season
Growing
Season
6
End
4
Start
—
2
0
c -2
-4
6
J -8
I
0 10
3
c 14
22
Days
28
Day
75
Days
16
18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-
-�
-40
i
-PI
-PI
-PI
Um
Um
U1
U1
U1
rn
m
m
m
V
00
00
00
00
1.0
i0
io
1.0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
00
N
N
N
In
N
N
N
W
F\-�
F\-�
N
W
V
F\-�
N
N
F\+
F\+
N
\
\
\
\
O
V
\
\
VI
N
l0
\
N
l0
a>
\
O
V
N
\
N
00
\
N
00
In
N
l0
F�
N
3.0
2.5
c
2.0 Y
3
O
E
Q
1.5
.S
1.0
0.5
m

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 2
Year 1 (2014 Data)
3.0
2.5
2.0
3
0
a
1.5
oc
1.0
0.5
All
April
,
October
21
Growing
•
Start
•
.
.
.
.
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
3.0
2.5
2.0
3
0
a
1.5
oc
1.0
0.5
All

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 3
Year 1 (2014 Data)
3.0
2.5
2.0
3
O
a
1.5
m
oc
1.0
0.5
April
14
October
M—M
Growing
Season
Growing
Season
End
■■
'
�1\
�►
r���►1
1\
�I��i
«�1�I17�11���1�
■►�ilr���il►1:�■
1FATK\I1011100
I1EREW
AURM1101
imam1'1111Y11z
M 1101!2
lnl'�NRWUE11V'1-■
Wr�M0ammlw�a
wwm�
mr■m�r�
1
3.0
2.5
2.0
3
O
a
1.5
m
oc
1.0
0.5

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 4
Year 1 (2014 Data)
3.0
2.5
2.0
0
a
1.5 =
oc
1.0
0.5
.,
SON
iff
October
21
W
:n
April
14
Growing
Season
Growing
Season
End
Start
..
11S
II&A
te►
u
►
.
�ll
\1.1,00012►
=�301�II01
.IMRLIVER
i�l
WMIE.M.��R.m
I.IV1111�I�II�V�1■�v=
-
�1�
...��Vwii.1
■..���'1ERV.v�V►..l
■�V
ILEN■
"
■ERItINI
�NEENN,
INV'■
2_10
"m
i
SON
MEN
I
000011
MEN
001
100011001
NINE
m
ENNEENFUNI
m
RENESNON
SO
NINE
MME
SEE!
NERNEEN
011000
01100100001101
011111
n
NINE
�■
Mr��SO
m
m1m
■mm
-
Kim■
imm
WWm
MEN
1
,,
,
Kjmm
3.0
2.5
2.0
0
a
1.5 =
oc
1.0
0.5
.,

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 5
Year 1 (2014 Data)
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
0
a
1.5 c
m
1.0
0.5
April
14
October
21
■�
Growing
• n
Growing
Season
Start
End
'
NEW,
AS
Hw
n
1m1
AWAY,
m■
•
����������
ANs�WAVMVAVI
WAN
�w
NOMINEE
■
NINE
ONE
i■ENOMI■
■
r■
■m■
■
■
■■
!
■
■�
■�■
■171■■
fr�■
Elm
■1n�
Ill
1rr■■1■
■r■■�n■�■■�
�1'■
RE
!7'11�L■�1
■7M
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.. ..
..
..
. .
.
.
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
0
a
1.5 c
m
1.0
0.5

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 6
Year 1 (2014 Data)
12
10
April
14
October
21
8
I
6
Growing
Season
Growing
Season
4
Start
End
2
_ 0
�
-2
-4
>
v -6
J
v -8
a.+
3 10
i<
12
3
45
Days
25
Da
27
58
Days
-14
Vs
Days
c
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
flu
-36
-38
40
-i
—
_
A
A
A
In
In
In
In
In
-I
v
00
00
00
00
t0
t0
t0
t0
i--+
i--+
i--+
�-+
N
00
00
N
U1
N
W
N
W
N
N
A
N
\
\
\
\
O
\
--4
\
A
\
\
N
l0
Ol
O
-I
A
A
00
\
00
In
N
lD
N
N
h+
4-
A
A
h+
h+
A
N
N
N
A
N
N
N
N
A
A
N
N
N
\
\
A
4+
A
4+
A
4+
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
4�
A
4�
A
4+
A
4+
4+
A
A
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
c
3
CO
C
1.5
z
1.0
RXI
m

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 7
Year 1 (2014 Data)
12
-
-
10
April
14
October
21
8
Growing
Season
6
Growing
Season
4
Start
End
2f
0
2
4
>
v -6
J
v -8
3 10
-F
-12
85 Days
74
Da
3 14
Vs
0
Q 16
18
-20
-22
-24
E
-26
-28
-30
—
-32
I
-34
-36
-38
-40
=
-
A
A
A
In
In
In
In
In
Ol
Ol
Ol
m
v
v
v
v
v
00
00
00
00
t0
tD
tD
t0
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
O
O
O
O
O
-I
�
Lnn
N
l0
N
l0
Ol
O
-1
A
F-�
H'
A
\
F-�
\
00
\
H'
F-a
\
00
\
Lnn
\
N
\
l00
\
N
m
N
W
N
N
N
A
A
N
N
N
A
N
N
N
A
N
N
N
N
A
N
N
N
A
N
N
N
N
N
\
\
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
4�
A
4�
A
A
A
A
A
A
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
3
O
E
1.5 c
m
W
1.0
0.5
M

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 8
Year 1 (2014 Data)
■ 1_ _INI- IN WWON NIMNI1 "�■
,; M ■ r!w W71 w W 11F 7 EI'!EF1 4 1 NIEW■
000
\ Ol W
A A A
91111
2.5
c
2.0
0
a
1.5
m
ac
1.0
0.5
Rv— A
April 1
14
GrowingSeason
N
'1►T.M\IN L
Liam l
lwnr I
IWIlI►I\VINEW■ J
JININi�,11
111 =
=111W\IN N
Ni' =
= =
=am1R►Imi\ s
swami E
EININEREWIVIVIEE�\iw\lI
EWNSI
1 _
INNIN
_
_
_ _
_
I f
f■ ■
■ _
_M- I
IN _
_�
000
\ Ol W
A A A
91111
2.5
c
2.0
0
a
1.5
m
ac
1.0
0.5

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 9
Year 1(2014 Data)
3.0
2.5
2.0
0
a
1.5
m
z
1.0
0.5
••
•
April
,
Growing
•
October
21
GrowingSeason
-�
'
'1�►����I�i�1������J�11��11�Y
VI�1�1�1
ii
a
Iii►
i�i���i�ii�i�i�ii�iiii��i�iiiiii�i�i�
22
Days
.Irk
1�
mIm�
m
W=
M177
■t
"mum
Mir
mi
W-1111111
■�
3.0
2.5
2.0
0
a
1.5
m
z
1.0
0.5
••

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 10
Year 1 (2014 Data)
91,1
W
N
2.0
C�
C
a
W
1.5
1.0
0.5
,.
•
April
..-
21
EMER
u
-
�R
u
•
MONI■
PHTIW-
1100
0111110MIMMAME
KIM
III-1�.-■_-■■_I_■■�,_�■-
1.11-
-■��,
M
•
I�
\moo
O-
0.
�.
,JJU 11
MORE
\��IRVts
\E
NMINIM'
•
�MMRV
1a
1
2 1=1Vr\MEMN��
■S'
ONE
u
MEN
ONE
MMEMMME!
ME
I
=1
SEE
MMMMOMI
INS
=1
SEE
MMEN
MMI
_
EMEMEME
SEE
ON
Ms
!_-
MENNIMEN
ONME
-
M'
I
-EN1M
I01111
.
•
WNONE!
■
Im
ONsiMEME
ME
wW
=sNE
mmmm
7
Esmm
MINE
m 1
fit,■
1 ■
7'
f
BE
91,1
W
N
2.0
C�
C
a
W
1.5
1.0
0.5
,.

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 11
Year 1 (2014 Data)
41111
2.5
c
2.0 0
3
O
E
a
1.5
m
z
1.0
0.5
m
October
21
Growing
Season
n
■■
M
End
`7
'
m►
��►�,
■irilil
,,
■��
■I�l�■
NMI
YI
ONE
\��
■�1
■�
\t�
=
M
m
ONE
n�■■r■■r■�■
■■
■`■om�WWO
n■■
•■Z■
N'�■
■ I■
■l■�
■
■mml"■■�■
L
41111
2.5
c
2.0 0
3
O
E
a
1.5
m
z
1.0
0.5
m

12
10
I
April
14
8
6
Growing
Season
4
Start
2
_ 0
2
v -4
I
v -6
J
v -8
a+
-10
3
-12
c -14
-16
-18
I
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
A
A
A
--
O
\
V
\
A
\
N
N
UU1
\
N lN0
\ \
A
A
A
A
A
A
A A
Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 12
Year 1 (2014 Data)
m Ol Ol ch V V V V V 00 00 00 00 l0 l0 l0 W
Ln N N N W N N N W -II N N N A N N N \ \ \ \
\ N l0 Ol \ O V A N \ A I-+ 00 \ f-+ 00 In
N \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ 4-N
4-N 4-N A
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
c
3
C�
C
a
1.5 c
1.0
0.5
[oil]

12
10
8
6
4
2
_ 0
2
a -4
-6
J
ar -8
i+
3 -10
-12
a -14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
u, u, um um um rn rn rn rn V -A -A 00 00 00 00 �O 1.0 1.0 1.0 N N N r
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 0 0
00 Un N N Ui N 1.0 N W F-� F-� N W V F-� N 00 A F-� 00 N \ \ \ \
O V \ \ U'1 N l0 \ N l0 a> \ O V ? H' \ ? H' 00 \ N 00 V1 N 1.0 F' N
N N N A A 4� N N N N I\+ \ \
Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 13
Year 1(2014 Data)
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
3
C)
C
1.5 =
oc
1.0
0.5
is