HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050676 Ver 2_Year 4 Monitoring 2014_20150414Little River
Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project
SCO No. 070715501
DENR Contract No. D08049S
EEP Project No. 226
Moore County, North Carolina
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report
Data Collection: January through December 2014
Submission Date: December 15, 2014
Prepared for:
i tfn
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, 3rd Floor, Suite 3000A; Raleigh, NC 27603
(This page intentionally left blank)
Little River
Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project
SCO No. 070715501
DENR Contract No. D08049S
EEP Project No. 226
Moore County, North Carolina
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report Data Collection:
January through December 2014
Submission Date: December 15, 2014
Prepared by:
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROC�F INC.
Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
(910) 452 -0001
(This page intentionally left blank)
Table of Contents
1.0 TITLE PAGE ..................................................................................................... ..............................i
2.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................... ............................... ii
3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /PROJECT ABSTRACT ................................... ..............................1
4.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... ..............................3
5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................. ..............................3
6.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING DATA APPENDICES .... ..............................4
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix D. Hydrologic Data
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project — EEP No. 226 ii
December 15, 2014 — Monitoring Year 4 of 5
3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Site is located on a 125 -acre
conservation easement along Little River near Vass, NC (Moore County) within the Cape
Fear River Basin #03030004 Cataloging Unit (Figure 1). It is located within a larger tract
owned by J.J. Barnes and his family. The larger tract is actively managed for wildlife
habitat to facilitate hunting on the overall tract. Prior to mitigation activities, the project
site was a jurisdictional wetland with planted loblolly pine. The pine plantation was
planted in the early 2000s as part of the CREP program. The stream and wetland
enhancement project is funded by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP).
The overall goal for the Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Site is to preserve
and enhance a natural bottomland hardwood forest which exhibits desired functions
appropriate to the existing geomorphic setting of the site.
Specific goals include:
1) Preservation of wildlife habitat; and
2) Natural community enhancement.
The project objectives include:
1) Partial removal of undesired vegetation via burning to promote desired
species growth; and
2) Planting of the project site with specific native species to enhance natural
habitat.
To accomplish these goals, the site was burned in December of 2010 and planted in
January of 2011. The baseline field monitoring was performed by Stantec in February of
2011. Land Management Group, Inc. (LMG) performed Year One vegetation monitoring
in October of 2011, Year Two vegetation monitoring in September of 2012, Year Three
vegetation monitoring in September of 2013, and Year Four vegetation monitoring in
September of 2014 (Table 2).
Stream enhancement II and preservation are both components of this project (Table 1).
Three stream channels traverse the project site. Small portions of the channels have been
altered in the past but currently appear stable. The project includes 3,593 linear feet of
stream enhancement II on two tributaries to the Little River (Reach 1 & Reach 2) and 210
linear feet of stream preservation of one associated tributary (Reach 3).
Wetlands within the conservation easement boundary were enhanced or preserved.
Approximately 39 acres of wetlands in the bottomland hardwood forest adjacent to the
Little River channel and approximately nine acres of successional wetlands located in the
northwest portion of the project site have been preserved. The wetlands within the
approximately 48 -acre loblolly pine plantation area and 7 -acre grassy field area have
been enhanced through the planting of native hardwood trees (See Table 1 for Project
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project— EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 — Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Components and Figure 2 for Component Location).
Vegetation monitoring is conducted on an annual basis using sixteen (16) permanent
vegetation plots (Figure 2). The vegetation success criterion for the pine plantation area is
the survival of 150 planted woody stems per acre at the end of the five -year monitoring
period. The success criterion for the grassy field area is the survival of 260 planted
woody stems per acre at the end of the five -year monitoring period. Monitoring Year 4
(MY4 2014) observed a mean stem density of 255 planted stems per acre in the plots.
The plots located in the grassy field area (Plots 1 -3) had an average of 310 planted stems
per acre. The plots located within the pine plantation area (Plots 4 -16) had an average of
243 planted stems per acre. When volunteer stems and mature pines were included, the
site had an overall mean stem density of 2,527 stems per acre. The stem density
decreased to 2,243 stems per acre when mature pine trees were not counted. The plots
located in the grassy field area had an average of 1,632 planted and volunteer stems per
acre (1,430 stems per acre without mature pines). The plots located within the pine
plantation area had an average of 2,733 planted and volunteer stems per acre (2,431 stems
per acre without mature pines). Plots #2, #3, and #12 did not meet the vegetation success
criterion in MY4 2014. Plot #9 meets the success criterion, but by less than 20 %. In
addition to shading effects from volunteers, other impacts to planted stems included
disease, insects, and deer browse.
The project consisted of the enhancement and preservation of existing wetlands and
streams within the site. Prior to mitigation, wetlands were determined and confirmed by a
jurisdictional determination. Therefore, there is no hydrological success criterion.
However, five continuous groundwater monitoring gauges were installed on the site in
order to monitor and confirm hydrology. Four of the gauges are located in wetlands of the
pine plantation and a fifth is a reference gauge located in a preserved wetland area on the
west side of the project. During the growing season of MY4 (2014), the groundwater
monitoring gauges located within the enhancement site demonstrated a water level within
12" of the soil surface for between 6% and 22% of the growing season. Rainfall totals
during the growing season were below average or average (Appendix D).
• Gauge #1: 18% (42 days)
• Gauge #2: 6% (13 days)
• Gauge #3: 22% (50 days)
• Gauge #4: 22% (50 days)
• Reference Gauge: 21% (49 days)
Streams are visually assessed each year to monitor for stability. One crest gauge was
installed on -site and is located adjacent to Vegetation Plot 7. Streams were stable during
the MY4 monitoring assessment. The crest gauge was evaluated several times throughout
2014. During these visits, water was noted within the channel. Water staining was
observed on the crest gauge on several occasions, indicating overbank flooding.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project— EEP No. 226 2
December 15, 2014 — Monitoring Year 4 of 5
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring
elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative
background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in
the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request.
4.0 METHODOLOGY
Vegetation
Sixteen (16) permanent vegetation plots are used for annual vegetation monitoring
(Figure 2). All vegetation monitoring was completed in September 2014 utilizing the
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) — EEP protocol Level 2 (version 4.2).
Hydrology
A crest gauge was installed within a stream to monitor flow and is assessed through
visual evaluation. Five groundwater monitoring gauges were installed on site (4 within
the enhancement area and 1 within the reference area). All groundwater monitoring
gauges were downloaded quarterly utilizing Remote Data System, Inc. data loggers and
software. Data from the groundwater monitoring gauges are not used toward success
criteria of the wetland.
Photo documentation was performed at prescribed locations across the site. A digital
camera was used to take photos at each predetermined photo point location (Figure 2).
5.0 References
NCEEP. 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout Reporting Format, Data Requirements,
and Content Guidance. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC. February, 2014.
NCEEP. 2014. Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Year 3 of 5 Monitoring
Report. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC. January, 2014.
NCEEP. 2013. Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Year 2 of 5 Monitoring
Report. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC. March, 2013.
NCEEP. 2012. Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Year 1 of 5 Monitoring
Report. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC. March, 2012.
NCEEP. 2011. Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement As -Built & Baseline
Monitoring Report. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project— EEP No. 226 3
December 15, 2014 — Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC. December, 2011.
NCEEP. 2008. CVS -EEP Vegetation Sampling Protocol. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, NC.
Version 4.2, 2008.
NCEEP. 2007. Little River Wetland Enhancement Restoration Plan. North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Raleigh, NC. September 28, 2007.
US Army Corps Of Engineers. 1987. U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers. Tech Report Y -87-
1, 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, Washington, DC. AD /A176.
US Army Corps Of Engineers. 2005. U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers. Information
Regarding Stream Restoration in the Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina, Wilmington
Regulatory Field Office.
6.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Data Appendices
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project— EEP No. 226 4
December 15, 2014 — Monitoring Year 4 of 5
(This page intentionally left blank)
Appendix A.
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
(This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing)
hF si f I I
4`;I
V
_ f
!�
ASS
;i i �-
i' �
h v`I
690 t`k
if
�- j° � I , , �-� '� ° • f i" x ! t Pt � �� Y,.r.� -,� '`rt �5 I y,. 1 j Il,.
14 -
- � � t � f �,�I I�� � _1wf� � r �`.��-� rte,+ _ ...- �� �� 5�� , �� ��I� �Y I } � � ' -�.'- '� � �'� •�,
Project Area {
r�
•r'.i�` ri ��" � �l �_y4 '�^^z; �t''!f � -� \c ��'�.r-�'! •�.�� f� �. r.�� t •.
�-W.g
�LsJ`
} g ., P
{
_.5frr
�vxr:. -f,f !L l "tll til /Ir S'I 'rte -ep
rti L'r r�� 1 `°i �I s I I r 'r�la x °,l c 1`. :a S �i�}.5 r ✓r�.Y� a
f _ I �.. �Li }{ I(44, ��. _�, fir- T -• ".� � y k 's L.,.s,JJ� "L -� f
S ` 4I IV_•`•54`71�+ F�- f` I{ i`t- '115541L_ -Q Al
AID §rte
Directions to Site: From Raleigh take US -1 S /US -64
toward Sanford /Asheboro. Continue to follow US -1 S�
for 50.9 miles. Take the Carolina 690 Exit toward Vass.
Turn left onto N Carolina 690 E /Lobelia Rd. Continue _F =:' = �'
to follow 690 E /Lobelia Rd for 2.5 miles. Turn right onto ,;` ` "`
a dirt driveway, follow the dirt driveway and make a left
at the fork. Continue down the dirt road to the NW Figure 1 . Vicinity Map
corner of the site. L' i ttl R' St d W 4.1 h
l d E t
W aver ream an a an n ancemen
EEP Project #226
Moore County, NC
75 USGS Topoquad Lobelia
Project boundary
J -Bar Ranch parcel boundary
Municipal boundary —'
�!y I:;cosys�
Stantec
(This page intentionally left blank)
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project/EEP Project No. 226
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorus
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
1437
21
27.5
Project Components
Project
Component or
Reach ID
Stationing /Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Approach
Restoration or
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
Comment
Reach 1
Flows NW to SE across the
middle of site
1,726
E
R
1,726
2.5:1
Enhancement - planting occurred in the riparian
area of both banks
Reach 2
Flows NW to SE across the
middle of site
1,867
E
R
1,867
2.5:1
Enhancement - planting occurred in the riparian
area of both banks
Reach 3
Enters the site on middle N
boundary, tributary of Reach 2
210
P
RE
210
10:1
Preservation - area is protected by a
conservation easement with signage around the
boundary
Wetland 1
Pine Plantation
47.8
E
RE
47.8
2.5:1
Enhancement - weedy vegetation was
suppressed with fire and area was planted
Wetland 2
Grassy Field
7.0
E
RE
7.0
2:1
Enhancement - El as a result of no trees
present in this area. Area was burned and
planted
Wetland 3
S boundary of site
39.4
P
RE
39.4
5:1
Preservation - area is protected by a
conservation easement with signage around the
boundary
Wetland 4
Successional Wetlands- NW
portion of the site
9.3
P
RE
9.3
10:1
Preservation - area is protected by a
conservation easement with signage around the
boundary
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (If)
Riparian Wetland (ac)
Non - Riparian Wetland (ac)
Buffer (sq ft)
Upland (ac)
Riverine
Non - Riverine
Restoration
Enhancement
54.8
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
3,593
Creation
Preservation
210
48.7
HQ Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose /Function
Notes
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 Appendix A.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Little River Stream and Wetland
Enhancement Project -EEP Project No. 226
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: n/a
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 48 months
Number of Reporting Years': 4
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Sep -07
Oct -07
Final Design — Construction Plans
n/a
n/a
Construction
n/a
n/a
Seeding
n/a
n/a
Prescribed Burn
n/a
Dec -10
Planting
n/a
Jan -11
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring - baseline)
Feb -11
Dec -11
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec -11
Feb -12
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec -12
Jan -13
Year 3 Monitoring
Dec -13
Jan -14
Year 4 Monitoring
Dec -14
Dec -14
Year 5 Monitoring
n/a
n/a
1 = number of reports or data points produced excludinq the baseline
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 Appendix A.
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project -EEP Project No. 226
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Designer
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300; Raleigh, NC 27606
Primary project design POC
Amber Coleman (919) 865 -7399
Construction Contractor
None
Carolina Silvics, Inc.
1908
Planting Contractor
Indian Trail Road; Edenton, NC 27932
Planting Contractor POC
Mary- Margaret McKinney (252) 482 -8491
Seeding Contractor
None
Seed Mix Sources
None
ArborGen and Superior Trees
Arborgen - 180 Westvaco road; Summerville, SC 29483
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Superior Trees - 12493 E US Highway; Lee, FL 32059
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Monitoring Performers (MYO)
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300; Raleigh, NC 27606
Stream Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman (919) 865 -7399
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman (919) 865 -7399
Wetland Monitoring POC
Amber Coleman (919) 865 -7399
Land Management Group, Inc.
Monitoring Performers (MY1 - MY4)
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15; Wilmington, NC 28403
Stream Monitoring POC
Kim Williams (910) 452 -0001
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Kim Williams (910) 452 -0001
Wetland Monitoring POC
Kim Williams (910) 452 -0001
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 Appendix A.
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project -EEP Project No. 226
Project Information
Project Name
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project
Project County
Moore
Project Area (ac)
125.8
Project Coordinates (Lat and Long)
35.223562, - 79.240977
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Region
Sandhills
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03030004070050
NCDWQ Subbasin
03 -03 -14
Project Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.52
Project Drainage impervious cover estimate ( %)
< 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Active Forest Management and Harvesting; Unused
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Length of Reach (linear feet)
1,726
1,867
210
Valley Classification
VIII
Drainage Area (ac)
335
NCDWQ Stream Identification Score
30 28 28
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
Perennial
Morphological Description (stream type)
C5
E5
E5
Evolutionary Trend
C5
C5
C5
Underlying Mapped Soils
Bibb
Drainage Class
Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Yes
Slope
0-1%
FEMA Classification
Zone X
Native Vegetation Community
Riverine bottomland hardwood
Percent Composition Exotic Invasive Vegetation
0% 0% 0%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameter
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Wetland 3
Size (ac)
47.8
7
48.7
Wetland Type
Riparian Riverine
Mapped Soils Series
Bibb
Drainage Class
Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Overbank flooding and groundwater
Hydrologic Impairment
None
Native Vegetation Community
Riverine bottomland hardwood
Percent of Exotic/Invasive Vegetation
0% 0% 0%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404 Yes Yes USACE 404 Permit
Waters of the United States - Section 401 Yes Yes NCDWQ 401 Permit
Endangered Species Act
No
n/a
n/a
Historic Preservation Act
No
n/a
n/a
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
n/a
n/a
FEMA Flood lain Compliance
No
n/a
n/a
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
n/a
n/a
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 Appendix A.
Appendix B.
Visual Assessment Data
(This page intentionally left blank)
(This page intentionally left blank for two -sided printing)
Vegetation Plot Photos (all photos recorded on December 4, 2014)
Photo Station V1 - Veg Plot 1 looking along X -axis (December 4, 2014)
Photo Station V2 - Veg Plot 1 looking across (Dec. 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V3 - Veg Plot 2 looking along X -axis (Dec. 4, 2014)
f�
�r
Photo Station V3 - Veg Plot 2 looking along X -axis (Dec. 4, 2014)
Photo Station V4 - Veg Plot 2 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
�r
M
_ F
'Y rw
Net
Photo Station V4 - Veg Plot 2 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V5 - Veg Plot 3 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V6 - Veg Plot 3 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Photo Station V7 - Veg Plot 4 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V8 - Veg Plot 4 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V9 - Veg Plot 5 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V10 - Veg Plot 5 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V11 - Veg Plot 6 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V12 - Veg Plot 6 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Photo Station V13 - Veg Plot 7 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V14 - Veg Plot 7 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V15 - Veg Plot 8 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V16 - Veg Plot 8 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V17 - Veg Plot 9 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V18 - Veg Plot 9 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
,r
t�
M
r
1
Photo Station V18 - Veg Plot 9 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
,r
t�
M
Photo Station V18 - Veg Plot 9 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
,r
Photo Station V18 - Veg Plot 9 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V19 - Veg Plot 10 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
�-
AA
1 �
1 � -_ i6 ��.y:.��„ � -. {n��I '��1E6• •' r' /,�M Rte' , y
� F1,
w
v�
Photo Station V20 - Veg Plot 10 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V21 - Veg Plot 11 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V22 - Veg Plot 11 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
I
i
Photo Station V23 - Veg Plot 12 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V24 - Veg Plot 12 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
4 N
1
a,S�N �" ":
.
► r
� rill •s
,�
�
t
ti -�l
6
r ^47
s
tee' -F � r #
•Y !_
r
Photo Station V24 - Veg Plot 12 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
i\
p �Y
I{
� \ � 74�
Photo Station V25 - Veg Plot 13 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
� { + • ' jam, . ; v; p.
`A Y
L �
•'.�'(((�� y�, . , ``�.. �_> m � $.: r •�,�Yrr i"� .sew
4',k
f
E
Photo Station V26 - Veg Plot 13 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
P`.
w
ti
1� j
- • Vi. _
.t�A
•
� '~� !• Y
� � � pie .:
� SS4
i
r c
Al
Photo Station V25 - Veg Plot 13 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
� { + • ' jam, . ; v; p.
`A Y
L �
•'.�'(((�� y�, . , ``�.. �_> m � $.: r •�,�Yrr i"� .sew
4',k
f
E
Photo Station V26 - Veg Plot 13 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V27 - Veg Plot 14 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V28 - Veg Plot 14 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Photo Station V29 - Veg Plot 15 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V30 - Veg Plot 15 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Photo Station V31 - Veg Plot 16 looking along X -axis (Dec 4, 2014)
Photo Station V32 - Veg Plot 16 looking across (Dec 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Stream Photo Station 1: looking upstream (northwest) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Stream Photo Station 1: looking downstream (southeast) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Stream Photo Station 2: looking upstream (northwest) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Stream Photo Station 2: looking northeast (Dec. 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Stream Photo Station 2: looking downstream (southeast) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Stream Photo Station 3: looking upstream along Reach 2 (west) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Stream Photo Station 3: looking upstream at Reach 3 (north) (Dec. 4, 2014)
eve
r �r.
ft
(Y� t 1 '-t ytEU �' � z �y'� ,ii•� a
Stream Photo Station 3: looking downstream along Reach 2 (east) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Stream Photo Station 4: looking upstream along Reach 1 (northwest) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Stream Photo Station 4: looking downstream along Reach 1 (southeast) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 pp
Stream Photo Station 5: looking upstream along Reach 1 (northwest) (Dec. 4 2014)
Stream Photo Station 5: looking downstream along Reach 1 (southeast) (Dec. 4, 2014)
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226 Appendix B
December 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
CCPV Depiction
Number of Polygons
Combined Acreage
% of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both
1. Bare Areas
woody and herbaceous
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
material
As in MY2 (2012) and MY3
(2013), areas near Plots 2, 3,
12 and 13 had stem densities
Woody stem densities clearly
lower than the five -year
2. Low Stem Density Areas
below target levels based on
monitoring success criterion.
Red Outline on Figure 2
2
1.5 ac
2.7%
MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria
However, Plot 2 did not meet
criterion at baseline and this
area was probably under -
planted.
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates
Areas with woody stems of a
or Vigor
size class that are obviously
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
small given the monitoring year
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 Appendix B.
(This page intentionally left blank)
Appendix C.
Vegetation Plot Data
(This page intentionally left blank)
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project EEP
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
VP1
Y
81%
VP2
N
VP3
N
VP4
Y
VP5
Y
VP6
Y
VP7
Y
VP8
Y
VP9
Y
VP10
Y
VP11
Y
VP12
N
VP13
Y
VP14
Y
VP15
Y
VP16
Y
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 Appendix B.
Table 7. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project EEP No. 226
Report Prepared By
Kim Williams
Date Prepared
12/15/2014 13:30
Database Name
LittleRiver 226 MY4 2014.mdb
Database Location
L: \Wetlands \2008 \LittleRiver\Annnal Monitoring Report\Year 4
Computer Name
KWILLIAMS
Description Worksheets in This Document IMW_ l
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project and
project data.
Proj Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems.
Proj Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc)
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot;
dead and missing stems are excluded.
Project Summary
Project Code 226
Project Name
Little River
Description
Stream and Wetland Enhancement
River Basin
Cape Fear
Length (ft)
Stream -to -Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
16
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 Appendix C.
Table 8. Planted and total stem counts (species by plot with annual means)
Grassy Field Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 260 stems /ac
Pine Plantation Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 150 stems /ac
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by more than 20%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 20%
Fails to meet requirements
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 Appendix C.
Current Plot Data (MY4 2014)
Species
E226 -LMG -0001
E226 -LMG -0002
E226 -LMG -0003
E226 -LMG -0004
E226 -LMG -0005
E226 -LMG -0006
E226 -LMG -0007
E226 -LMG -0008
E226 -LMG -0009
E226 -LMG -0010
E226 -LMG -0011
Scientific Name
Common Name
Type
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
9
7
12
12
17
5
1
Aronia spp,
shrub
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
Chamaecyparis thyoides
Atlantic white cedar
Tree
Clethra alnifolia
sweet pepperbush
Shrub
1
32
Cyrilla racemiflora
swamp titi
Shrub
7
7
11
7
4
10
10
8
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
Fraxinus pennsy/vanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
7
7
7
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
Ilex glabra
inkberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
2
2
177
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
1
1
1
5
2
2
Itea virginica
Virginia sweetspire
Shrub
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
Leucothoe
doghobble
shrub
5
Ligustrum japonicum
Japanese privet
Exotic
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
1
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
Shrub
Liquidambarstyrociflua
sweetgum
Tree
28
3
21
3
1
1
4
8
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
Lyonia lucida
fetterbush lyonia
Shrub
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
1
3
1
3
Morello cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
8
8
11
2
2
5
3
3
6
3
3
5
4
4
6
1
1
1
Ostrya virginiana
hophornbeam
Tree
Persea borbonia
redbay
tree
Persea palustris
swamp bay
tree
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
8
5
2
4
9
1
10
2
7
11
6
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus spp.
oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
2
1
2
2
5
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
8
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
6
4
Symp/ocos tinctoria
common sweetleaf
Shrub
1
Vaccinium spp.
blueberry
Shrub
4
4
3
3
4
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
12
12
60
5
5
29
6
6
32
7
7
44
5
5
40
5
5
E56
6
40
11
11
46
mmmm
4
4
229
7
7
77
5
5
28
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
4
4
9
3
3
9
4
4
6
2
2
8
3
3
9
2
21
1
9
3
3
9
2
2
10
2
2
11
3
3
12
485.6
485.6
2428
202.3
202.3
1174
242.8
242.8
1295
283.3
283.3
1781
202.3
202.3
1619
202.3
202.3
242.81
1619
445.21
445.2
1862
161.91
161.91
9267
283.31
283.31
3116
202.31
202.31
1133
Grassy Field Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 260 stems /ac
Pine Plantation Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 150 stems /ac
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by more than 20%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 20%
Fails to meet requirements
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 Appendix C.
Table 8 contd. Planted and total stem counts (species by plot with annual means)
Grassy Field Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 260 stems /ac
Pine Plantation Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 150 stems /ac
Color for Density
cceeds requirements by more than 20%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 20%
Fails to meet requirements
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Current Plot Data (MY4 2014)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
E226 -LMG -0012
E226 -LMG -0013
E226 -LMG -0014
E226 -LMG -0015
E226 -LMG -0016
MY4 (2014)
MY3 (2013)
MY2 (2012)
MY1 (2011)
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
16
10
9
11
109
232
123
55
Aronia spp.
shrub
1
40
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Chamaecyparis thyoides
Atlantic white cedar
Tree
2
Clethra alnifolia
sweet pepperbush
Shrub
21
1
41
1 95
1
133
Cyril/a racemiflora
swamp titi
Shrub
8
1
1
10
16
3
1
1
101
1
1
236
2
2
105
2
2
85
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
3
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
33
33
38
32
32
38
31
31
32
32
32
37
Ilex glabra
inkberry
Shrub
1
1
6
13
21
25
5
5
249
7
7
169
8
8
45
10
10
45
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
2
1
2
2
19
27
7
6
Itea virginica
Virginia sweetspire
Shrub
5
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
2
2
Leucothoe
doghobble
shrub
5
25
Ligustrum japonicum
Japanese privet
Exotic
2
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
1
8
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidamborstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
4
5
6
6
95
114
68
54
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
4
3
5
4
Lyonia lucido
fetterbush lyonia
Shrub
10
3
3
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
3
2
13
14
9
9
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
1
4
Nysso sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
23
23
36
30
30
55
35
35
85
41
41
91
Ostrya virginiana
hophornbeam
Tree
12
Persea borbonia
redbay
tree
5
Persea palustris
swamp bay
tree
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
7
5
7
11
17
112
117
108
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
Quercus spp.
oak
Tree
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercus lourifolia
laurel oak
Tree
5
3
3
3
8
8
23
8
8
43
9
9
15
10
10
14
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
25
25
25
24
24
26
18
18
34
19
19
19
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
9
6
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
5
15
66
12
3
Symplocos tinctoria
common sweetleaf
Shrub
15
16
11
Vaccinium spp.
blueberry
Shrub
2
1
23
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
2
2
54
6
6
42
7
7
70
5
5
70
8
8
113
101
101
999
110
110
1412
111
111
667
122
122
437
1
1
1
1
1
16
16
16
16
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
2
2
11
2
2
8
2
2
9
3
3
9
3
3
10
8
8
25
9
9
30
9
9
21
9
9
19
80.937
80.937
2185.3
242.81
242.81
1699.7
283.28
283.28
2832.8
202.34
202.34
2832.8
323.75
323.75
4572.9
255.46
255.46
2526.8
278.22
278.22
3571.4
280.8
280.8
1687
308.6
308.6
1105
Grassy Field Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 260 stems /ac
Pine Plantation Area 5 -yr Success Criterion: 150 stems /ac
Color for Density
cceeds requirements by more than 20%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 20%
Fails to meet requirements
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 9. CVS - Damage by Plot
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement - EEP #226
E 226 -L M G- 0007 -yea r:4
E226 -LMG- 0008 -yea r:4
E 226 -L M G- 0009 -yea r:4
E 226 -L M G- 0010 -yea r:4
E226 -L M G- 0011- year:4
E 226 -L M G- 0012 -yea r:4
E226 -LM G- 0013- year:4
E226 -L M G- 0014 -ye a r:4
E226 -L M G- 0015 -ye a r:4
E226 -L M G- 0016 -ye a r:4
16
a
oO�F
Jc� aaF 2�
CO? O�
0 13
0 6
2 7 2
0 7
2 31 1
0 8
4 2 3
5 9
0 4
5 3
2 4 1
1 1
0 6
2 5 2
3 51 2
5 3 4
31 86 15
�C 0
ya• s yd
a or
�m
,`Cyr
1
1
4
1
2 1
2
1
1
1
1
1 9 2
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5 Appendix C.
Fails to meet requirements
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
O b
D
0
o°
a
Appendix C.
Table 10. CVS - Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement - EEP #226
,b ,b b P P
,b P
b
Cb
b >
o° 531
°c
a`� o "o ttrryry ttrryry �uryry <v�ry ttrryry <uryry
<v�'ry <v�'ry
<uryry �`�ry <uryry ttrryry ttr�ry
�tr^ry
4D'ry
�U
Aronia arbutifolia
Shrub
Red Chokeberry
4
1
4
4
Cyrille racemiflora
Shrub
swamp titi
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Tree
green ash
33
12
2.75
1
1
2
1
1
6
7
3
2
5
3
1
Ilex glabra
Shrub
inkberry
5
4
1.25
1
1
2
1
Nyssa sylvatica
Tree
blackgum
23
8
2.88
8
2
3
3
4
1
1
1
Quercus
Tree
oak
21
Quercus laurifolia
Tree
laurel oak
1 8
4
2
2
1
1
1
1 2
1
1
3
Quercus lyrata
Tree
I overcup oak
1 25
10
2.5
1
5
1
1
1 2
2
4
2
5
2
1
TOT:
0
8
8
8
1 101
8
12
5
6
7
5
5
6
11
4
71
5
2
6
7
5
8
Fails to meet requirements
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Project - EEP No. 226
December 15, 2014 - Monitoring Year 4 of 5
O b
D
0
o°
a
Appendix C.
Appendix D.
Hydrologic Data
(This page intentionally left blank)
10
2
d -10
m
J
d
is
-20
-30
-40
Reference Gauge (AB37307)
Chid V-v V- v d O` v-d-r/-v-rhrhrt IV, IV, ChO`Chd d d O`ChCh Ch��lz�,a V- 1 d V-o 11-P 'IV- d fir/ �d- v-
�
tl ,Q Lt L1 Q ) Q � Q �Q N � Q 2� z� 2, � 2� a
WANN 6NoN -6 'v M N c,) co M� ^�M�NNN ACV) C\j N V- ,
U
V'-N M
Date
Reference Gauge (AB37307) 12" Below Surface On -site Raingauge
E:3
7
0
5
C
F
0
4
'a
a
C-1
0
49 days above -
U VNU
M
N
L
o
'
m
U)
0
C�
0
m
C/)
Chid V-v V- v d O` v-d-r/-v-rhrhrt IV, IV, ChO`Chd d d O`ChCh Ch��lz�,a V- 1 d V-o 11-P 'IV- d fir/ �d- v-
�
tl ,Q Lt L1 Q ) Q � Q �Q N � Q 2� z� 2, � 2� a
WANN 6NoN -6 'v M N c,) co M� ^�M�NNN ACV) C\j N V- ,
U
V'-N M
Date
Reference Gauge (AB37307) 12" Below Surface On -site Raingauge
E:3
7
0
5
C
F
0
4
'a
a
C-1
0
10
-5
S-10
d
X15
d
R:-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
Gauge 1 (A282F9D)
v v Itv rrV- er<rrrv. IV. errrv-V. v v - v- rry v rrv-rrrrv- NO d v �lz r, V- erv�V.IV. V. rrd rrrrrry erV,rrrr
A n n n n A n n A n n n n V A n n n n n A i n n n A n V_
C C Q -Q
�i �14 �e Qi Qe Qi Q14 Qi 1 1 QQQ �4 � Q -L -L A -L 1 -L
3 O U U U U U 0 Z0 j Z0 > 0 O 0u Q) C/) G*)(OOOOO
1-4C66 6N rnoN(:6,_z d 4c6 MCOniQ6Kr 6 K (� `4 -6 6cN40k6c4c6 M
N cV CV M NN �N_ N — NN
U
�N
Date
Gauge #1 (A282F9D) 12" Below Surface On -site Raingauge
[y
5
4
C
3
.Q
d
2
❑C
42 days above -12"
E
>
'
z°
CL
O
W
o
0)
c
o
o
c
W
v v Itv rrV- er<rrrv. IV. errrv-V. v v - v- rry v rrv-rrrrv- NO d v �lz r, V- erv�V.IV. V. rrd rrrrrry erV,rrrr
A n n n n A n n A n n n n V A n n n n n A i n n n A n V_
C C Q -Q
�i �14 �e Qi Qe Qi Q14 Qi 1 1 QQQ �4 � Q -L -L A -L 1 -L
3 O U U U U U 0 Z0 j Z0 > 0 O 0u Q) C/) G*)(OOOOO
1-4C66 6N rnoN(:6,_z d 4c6 MCOniQ6Kr 6 K (� `4 -6 6cN40k6c4c6 M
N cV CV M NN �N_ N — NN
U
�N
Date
Gauge #1 (A282F9D) 12" Below Surface On -site Raingauge
[y
5
4
C
3
.Q
d
2
❑C
10
5
0
-5
-10
d
d -15
J
d
is
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
Gauge #2 (A27AA3E)
m
N
t
13 days above -12"
`m
E
0
c
0
Z
0
�
c
0
CIO
m
(n
.3
0
o
�
o
ARI _
w
III
Ch O` d a V- V. d V- d V- V- a- IV- � a V. V. V. O` IV, Ch O` V- d IV- V- �h V- Ch V. V. V a 1;t Ch r/- V. V. O` Ch ;�, d d- rh v- a V- d-
A A n A . n A r . n A A n A n
� »Nn M , N c��hNaS , W^VV � NrnCoNo^ ^NN � N
CIC'NN A N ^�) � NCV) N MO ^ NN C.\/ A
Date
Gauge #2 (A27AA3E) 12" Below Surface On -site Raingauge
N
5
4
2
0
3
.Q
d
CL`
2
U
WE
-5
-10
d
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
Gauge 3 (EBD3D95)
V V V d d N1. r/ V- V V- d- r* NI_ N7- V, V- IV, VI 14, Ch O', 11-P V- N/ tl. V 11-h 1;41 N1. V. rl- O` V- N;t V. lv r lzh lz�, III* V, d, r/- d-
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
» »>14 Ul1lIJ_Q QQQQ » »NojcpMO , ,
AM -NN tr)NojN �No)N Nrn CIVro ^NN V �N ANM O�NN MAO ^cv AMI-cVcV � cy M
Date
Gauge #3 (EBD3D95) 12" Below Surface On -site Raingauge
C
0
3 j
.Q
d
CL`
10
-5
-10
d
-15
J
d
3 -20
-25
-30
-35
-40
Gauge 4 (EBD13A4)
M
N
A 11
50 days above -12"
(6
C
0
U)
U-
.3
c�
0
U)
1
C C C C C Q Q Q Q �II �II aJ �II Q Q Q Q Q N RO N N, JY 'Zr J� J� .i J J J J �� Zr J� � �Q �Q �Q �Q V U V V 0 0 0 O 0 a,
» »> 00000
>��c��c����Q���Q���� »» Q- Q- Q- Q- v,v�c�v� 22220
W^ NV 46 Dry h^ 0 � N 0) CO�MMO/� � � N rj ^ CO N � C^O�MM CO 0 OO /� M O^ � � C6 46 ryNN h^ � CO M
ry N N N c N
Date
f Gauge #4 (EBD13A4) 12" Below Surface On -site Raingauge
[y
5
4
2
_
3
.Q
d
a`
2
❑c
7
5
c
_
0
4
.Q
VD
L
M 3
I
1
I
Little River Site
Rainfall 2014
January February March April May June July August September October November December
Month
30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from
Precipitation data obtained from: Moore County WETS Station: Carthage 8
On -site rain gauge D Monthly Rainfall (on -site) 30th Percentile 70th Percentile sE, N 51 1971 -2000
(wcc.nres.usda.gov)