20120773 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2014_20150414

Jacob's Landing
Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 95024
EEP Contract # 003984
Monitoring Year 01
Submitted to:
0
la e
PROGRAM
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: January 2014
Data Collection: 2014
Submitted: January 2015

Design and Monitoring Firm
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.spiller @kci.com
Project No: 20110675
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 2014 — MY01

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /PROJECT ABSTRACT .................. ..............................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................... ..............................2
3.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................ ..............................2
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure1. Vicinity Map ..................................................................................... ..............................4
Figure2. Site Asset Map .................................................................................. ..............................5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits ..................................... ..............................6
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ............................................ ..............................7
Table 3. Project Contacts Table ...................................................................... ..............................7
Table 4. Project Attribute Table ...................................................................... ..............................8
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Current Condition Plan View ....................................................................................... .............................10
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment ............................. .............................12
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment ..................................................... .............................14
StreamStation Photos .................................................................................................. .............................15
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .............................................................................. .............................23
ProblemArea Photos ................................................................................................. ............................... 21
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment .................................................. .............................27
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata .......................................................... .............................28
Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species .................. .............................29
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section Plots ........................................................... ...............................
Longitudinal Profile Plots ................................................. ...............................
PebbleCount Plots ............................................................ ...............................
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table ... ...............................
Table 11 a. Cross - Section Morphology Data Table .. ...............................
Table 1 lb. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table ... ...............................
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events ...................... ...............................
Jacob's Landing Site
EEP Project # 95024
32
43
45
53
57
58
64
KCIAssociates of North Carolina
2014— MY01

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site is a full - delivery project that was developed for the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). Construction was completed in November 2013. The site restored 4,484
linear feet and implemented 109 linear feet of enhancement on four tributaries to Irish Buffalo Creek in the
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. The project is located west of China Grove and north of Kannapolis off of Saw
Road in Rowan County (Figure 1, Appendix A). This project will expand aquatic and terrestrial habitat in the
Rocky River Watershed (03040105). The project is within the 03040105020040 Irish Buffalo Creek Local
Watershed Unit (14 -digit HUC) (NCDENR, EEP 2009). In the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program's (EEP) most recent publication of excluded and Targeted Local Watersheds /Hydrologic Units, the
03040105020040 14 -digit HUC has been identified as a Targeted Local Watershed. The project is located in the
Piedmont Physiographic Province and the project streams initiate as headwater systems out of moderately - sloped,
forested hills before reaching the floodplain of Irish Buffalo Creek. The site's 0.72- square mile watershed is
mostly pasture and mixed hardwoods with small pockets of rural residential development. Prior to construction
the site was actively used for timber and cattle production for over five generations.
The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
• Restore a diverse riparian corridor that connects forested stream systems upstream and downstream of the
project.
• Reduce the sediment supply entering Irish Buffalo Creek.
Project Objectives
• Restore stable channel planforms to streams that have been straightened and modified.
• Reshape and stabilize eroding stream banks.
• Plant the site with native trees to help reestablish a diverse riparian corridor.
• Install exclusion fencing and alternative watering options to keep livestock out of the project streams.
Vegetation success is based on the criteria established in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003). This
document states that vegetation monitoring results should have the following planted stem density minimums in
the corresponding monitoring years: 320 stems /acre through Year Three, 288 stems /acre in Year Four, and 260
stems /acre in Year Five. The first -year vegetation monitoring was based on the Level 2 CVS -EEP vegetation
monitoring protocol. The site's average density for this monitoring period is 464 planted stems /acre, with none of
the plots having live stakes planted in them. Eleven of the thirteen plots had greater than 320 planted stems /acre.
There are two monitoring plots that have calculated planted stem densities less than 320 stems /acre; (Plots 3 and
7). This is not seen as problematic given the high potential for desirable volunteers to become established in the
plots and across the site. Like natural vegetative communities, some areas will have slightly higher densities than
others, but the data from the vegetation monitoring plots reveal that the site has an adequate average stem density.
To ensure continued vegetative success, some parts of the site will receive supplemental planting in early 2015.
Including volunteers, the monitoring plots averaged 1,382 total stems /acre. The overall vegetation assessment
found the site to be on track to meeting the vegetative success criterion.
First -year monitoring found the Jacob's Landing Site to be stable, with only minor changes from the as -built
conditions. No areas show signs of serious bank erosion or bed degradation potential. The monitoring components
were installed in February/March 2014. Two automatic recording gauges have been installed along T1 and T2.
The stream gauges have not recorded any bankfull events since the project was constructed early this year. The
monitoring plan for each tributary is as follows: T1 has a 1500 foot longitudinal profile, 3 riffle cross - sections,
Jacob's Landing Site KC[ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 1 2014 — MY01

and 1 pool cross - section; T2 has a 1500 foot longitudinal profile, 5 riffle cross0sections and 2 pool cross - sections;
T1A and T2A are being monitored visually since they are short reaches and small channels. Pebble counts were
conducted at all eleven cross - sections. Ten permanent photo reference points have been established with a total of
twenty -two photos to be taken annually. The first year of monitoring found the site to be functioning as designed
and all of these features show little change from the baseline conditions.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related
to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the
Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan documents available on the EEPs website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The survey data were collected with a total station instrument between October 29 and November 4, 2014.
Some of the cross - sections have shown minor settling in the floodplain. The bankfull elevations at these cross
sections have not been changed to reflect this. For calculating cross- sectional morphologic data the cross - section
width has been limited to a width that appropriately reflects the top of bank location so as not to inaccurately
skew data.
The CVS -EEP protocol, Level 2 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data from
the site. The vegetation monitoring was completed on September 30, 2014
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm)
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Priorities 2009. Raleigh, NC.
http: / /www.nceep .net /services /restplans /Yadkin Pee Dee _RBRP_2009_Final.pdf
USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR -DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 2 2014— MY01

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 3 2014 — MY01

0
152 3
HINA G
r,
d;#
vi � J4
Cr
To reach the site from Raleigh. proceed west on I -40 Q
for approximately 62 miles. Then travel on 1-05 south NDIS
toward High Point(Chartotte for approximately 50
miles. Take Exit 66 toward China Grove on US-29
south. Turn right on NC-152 on East Church Street for
approximately 5 mules and then turn left onto Saw
Road. The site will be approximately 0.5 -m6e ahead
can the right.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration
site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded
conservation easement, but is bordered by land under
private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary
and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted Access by authorized personnel of state
and federal agencies or their designeeslcontractors
involved in tha dovelopment, avarsighl and
stewardship of the restoration site Is permitted within
Ow terms and timeframes of their defined roles Any
intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
aclivalog prior c6ordinatidn with EEP.
DAVIE
KANNAPOLIS
CREilELL DAVIDSON
29
138
ROWAN
i
CARARRUS STANLY {
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP
JACOB'S LANDING STREAM RESTORATION SITE
EEP PROJECT # 95024, ROWAN COUNTY, NC
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates ofNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 4 2014 — MY01

i
M1
Stream Restoration 4,484 ff t 4, 484 ShA Us I-
Stream Enhancement II 109 If f44 3MUs
Other Streams l
Conservation EasernenC lids l l ''
rannae!u
FIGURE 2, SITE ASSET MAP
n 175 350 JACOB'S LANDING STREAM RESTORATION SITE Smime,NC2010
.Fee` EEP PROJECT # 95024, ROWAN COUNTY, NC Saatew-de Drtho rrragery.
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 5 2014— MY01

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Miti ation Credits
Riparian
Non-
Nitrogen
Stream
Wetland
riparian
Buffer
Nutrient
Wetland
Offset
Type
R
EII
Length
4,484
109
Credits
4,484
44
TOTAL
4,528
CREDITS
Project
Components
Project
Design
Existing
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Component
Stationing/
Footage
Approach
Restoration
Footage
Mitigation
-or-
Location
(pI PH etc.)
Equivalent
Ratio
Reach ID
T1
10 +00 — 13 +03
326
P2
Restoration
303
1:1
TI
13 +52 — 14 +61
158
-
Enhancement II
109*
1:2.5
T1
14 +61 — 23 +54
846
P2
Restoration
893
1:1
T1A
40 +00 —41+78
294
P2
Restoration
178
1:1
T2
50 +00 —77+45
2,935
P2
Restoration
2,645*
1:1
T2A
100 +00 —104+65
465
P2
Restoration
465
1:1
Component Summation
Restoration
Stream
Mitigation Units (SMU)
Level
(linear feet)
Total Restoration
4,484
4,484
Total
Enhancement II
109
44
TOTAL SMU
4,528
*Mitigation units have been calculated to exclude the easement exceptions and water utility easements.
Though not formal BMPs, several small water quality detention structures were installed throughout the project to improve
water quality from the surrounding drainage area.
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 6 2014— MY01

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
Sept 12
Final Design - Construction Plans
r
Dec 12
Construction
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Nov 13
Planting
Jan 14
Baseline Monitoring /Report
Feb /March 14
April 14
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 14
Nov 14
Table 3. Project Contacts
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Design Firm
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC
160 Walker Road
Lawndale, NC 28090
Contact: Mr. Stephen James
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor
Forestree Management Co.
1280 Maudis Road
Bailey, NC 27807
Contact: Mr. Tony Cortez
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -00 - MY -01
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
Landmark Center Il, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 7 2014— MY01

Table 4. Project Information
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Project Name
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
County
Rowan County
Project Area acres
13.9 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.)
35.552956 N, 80.653116 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sio ra hic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03040105
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03040105020040
DWQ Sub -basin
13 -17 -09
Project Drainage Area
459 acres /0.72 square miles
Project Drainage Area Percentage
o
2.3 /o / 6 acres
of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification
4.8% Cultivated, 60.1 % Managed Herbaceous Cover, and 35.1 % Mixed Upland Hardwoods.
Reach Summary Information (Post- Restoration)
Parameters
T1
T1A
T2
T2A
Length of reach (linear feet)
1,305
178
2,645
465
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
258.6 acres
136.9 acres
200.6 acres
35.7 acres
NCDWQ Water Quality
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Classification
Morphological Description (stream
C4
134c /C4
C4
134c /C4
type)
Evolutionary trend
Stage II
Stage II
Stage 11
Stage 11
Constructed
(Constructed)
Constructed
Constructed
Mapped Soil Series
Chewacla loam
Chewacla loam
Pacolet sandy loam
Pacolet sandy loam
and Chewacla loam
Drainage class
Poorly drained
Well drained
Poor to Well drained
Well drained
Soil Hydric status
Non hydric
Non hydric
Non hydric
Non hydric
Slope
0 -2%
0 -2%
0 -2%
0 -2%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Piedmont Alluvial
Piedmont Alluvial
Piedmont Alluvial
Mesic Mixed
Forest
Forest
Forest
Hardwood Forest
Percent composition of exotic
0%
0%
0%
0%
invasive vegetation
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 404 permit.
N/A
404
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 401 permit.
N/A
401
Endangered Species Act*
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act*
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act *
N/A
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management
No
N/A
Act (CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Floodplain development permit obtained
N/A
through Rowan County
Essential Fisheries Habitat*
No
N/A
N/A
Jacob's Landing Site KC[ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 8 2014— MY01

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 9 2014 — MY01

LEGEND
___3b J`i
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CROSS - SECTION (XS)
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING DENSITY CRITERION
Fol
VEG PLOT BELOW DENSITY CRITERION
1382/464
VEG PLOT TOTAL / PLANTED STEM DENSITY
E0
PHOTO POINT (PP)
O
GAUGE LOCATION
IMAGE SOURCE: NC 2010 STATEWIDE ORTHOIMAGERY
■II
k
jp J
N
uj
uj
NNW[
___3b J`i
fbY'
wow
0
z
a
w a
z
a �
x�
a via
oz
�z
z
Z
_ J
F— 0
w 0
O
Z 0— Q z
oz
w
S. z0>- ~
Q H (D =) U
Q O Q
i r m H 0 Z
H CC O
f` @' ire � 0
i/ F- C7
Q
jw
NOV 2014
GRAPHIC
yi
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
SHEET 1 01 2

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
J acob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
AssessedLength 2,389
Major
Channel
Channel
0
Category
Sub-Category
Metric
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
point bars)
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting
100%
14
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
substrate
14
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
11
11
Condition
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
100%
providing habitat.
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
3. Mass Wasting
downstrem riffle)
43halweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
(Run)
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
Totals
Reach - TI
Number
Stable, Total Number of Amount of %Stable,
Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing
2. Bank
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
21
21
100%
14
16
88%
14
16
88%
11
11
100%
10
10
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eaoding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
0
0
o
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
o
100 /o
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
boulders or logs.
6
6
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
6
6
o
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
sills or arms.
0
0
N/A
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
6
6
100%
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
0
0
N/A
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
Jacob's Landing Site KC[ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 12 2014 — MY01

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Assessed LenEth 2,084 Reach - 12
Major Channel
1. Bed
2. Bank
3. Engineered
Structures
Channel Sub-
Sub-
Total Number
in As -built
Cat=
L!Lt=y
Metric
'7 Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1. Aggmdation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
1. Vertical Stability (Riffle
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point
and Run units)
bars)
2. Degradation - Evidenceofdowncutting
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate -Riffle maintains coarser substrate
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
Condition
Depth > 1.6
2. Length appropriate ( >30 %ofcenterline distance
26
26
between tail ofupstreamriffle and head of downstrem
riffle
4.Thalweg Position'
1. Thalweg centering at upstream ofineander bend (Run)
2. Thalweg centering at downstream ofineander(Glide)
N/A
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoor
0
growth and /or scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that
are modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
lBank slumping, calving, or collapse
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or
logs.
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or
amts.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does
3. Bank Protection
not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for this table in EEP
monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — MaxPoolDepth :
4. habitat
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing
some cover at base -flow.
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
'7 Stable,
Performing as
Intended
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
15
23
65%
26
26
100%
26
26
100%
N/A
N/A
0
0
100%
0 1 100%
0 0 100%
Totals 0 0 100%
15 15 100%
15 15 100%
1 1 100%
6 1 6 1 1 100%
0 0 N/A
'Due to this reach's small size and the scale of the pattern, the exact position ofthe thalweg in relation to the meanders and morphological features is inconsistent and not practical to
evaluate .
Jacob's Landing Site KC[ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 13 2014 — MY01

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Jacob's Ladder Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95023
Planted Acreage 12.83 Easement Acreage 13.9
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Cate o
Definitions
Ma in Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
'V. of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
Pattern and
1. Bare Areas
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.0`%
and herbaceous material.
Color
Woody stem densities clearly below
2. Low Stem Density
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.01/1,
Areas
Color
stem count criteria.
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
Pattern and
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Growth Rates or Vigor
Color
the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
1,000 SF
0
0.00
0.0%
Concern
render as polygons at ma scale).
Color
5. Easement
I Areas or points (if too smallto
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale).
none
Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 14 2014 — MY01

Stream Station Photos
Photo Point In: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point lu: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Photo Point Id: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point Id: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Photo Point 1 Tributary: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 1 Tributary: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Jacoh's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 15 2014 — MY01

Photo Point 2u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 2u: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Photo Point 2d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 2d: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Photo Point 3u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 3u: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 16 2014 — MY01

Photo Point 3d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 3d: MY -01 10/29/14
Photo Point 4u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 4u: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Photo Point 4d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 4d: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 17 2014 — MY01

Photo Point 5u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 5u: MY- 01- 10/29/14
Photo Point 5d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 5d: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Photo Point 6u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 6u: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 18 2014 — MY01

Photo Point 6d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 6d: MY -01— 10/29/14
Photo Point 7u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 7u: MY -01— 10/29/14
Photo Point 7d: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point 7d: MY -01 10/29/14
Jacoh's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 19 2014 — MY01

Photo Point 8u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 8u: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Photo Point 8d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 8d: MY -01— 10/29/14
Photo Point 9u: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point 9u: MY -01 10/29/14
Jacoh's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 20 2014 —MY01

Photo Point 9d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 9d: MY- 01- 10/29/14
Photo Point 9 Tributary: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 9 Tributary: MY- 01- 10/29/14
Photo Point 10u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 10u: MY -01 — 10/29/14
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 21 2014 — MY01

Photo Point 10d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 10d: MY -01— 10/29/14
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 22 2014 — MY01

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 3 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 5 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 2 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 4 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 6 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Jacoh's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 23 2014 —MY01

Plot 7 Photo: 10/1/14 — WO
Plot 9 Photo: 10/1/14 — WO
Plot 11 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 8 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 10 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Plot 12 Photo: 10/1/14 — MY01
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 24 2014 — MY01

Plot 13 Photo: 10/ 1 / 14 — MY01
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 25 2014 — MY01

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates ofNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 26 2014— MY01

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold
Met?
Monitoring Year 01
Planted Stem Density
(stems /acre)
Monitoring Year 01
Total Stem Density
(stems /acre)
1
Yes
567
931
2
Yes
647
647
3
No
202
283
4
Yes
647
1,781
5
Yes
405
526
6
Yes
364
567
7
Yes
567
6,596
8
No
283
283
9
Yes
567
1,659
10
Yes
486
688
11
Yes
405
2,388
12
Yes
445
971
13
Yes
445
647
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 27 2014 — MY01

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Report Prepared By
Aril Eason
Date Prepared
10/9/2014 9:30
database name
KCI- 2014 -1-mdb
database location
M: \2011 \20110675 - Jacobs Landin \Monitorin \Ve etaton CVS Database
computer name
12- J1V5CX1
file size
62001152
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THLS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution ofvigor classes for stems for allplots.
Vigor by Spp
tribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each lot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95024
project Name
Jacob's Landing
Description
Stream Restoration Site
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
length(ft)
4593
area (s m)
0.72
Re iredPlots (calculated)
13
,SampledPlots
13
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 28 2014 — MY01

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Current Plot Data (MYl 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95024 -01 -0001
95024 -01 -0002
95024 -01 -0003
95024
-01 -0004
95024 -01 -0005
95024 -01 -0006
95024 -01 -0007
95024 -01 -0008
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder
Tree
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
4
4
4
13
13
13
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
Callicarpa americana
American Beautyberry
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
8
2
28
3
4
147
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
6
6
6
1
1
1
2
2
4
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
8
8
8
3
3
3
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus
Oak
Tree
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
Pin Oak
Tree
5
5
5
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
4
4
4
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
14777423
161
161
16
57
51
7
16
161
44
107
10
13
9
9
14
14
14
163
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
31
31
5
31
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
41
6
31
3
3
3
5671
56719311
6471
647
6471
202
2021
2831
647
647
17811
405
405
5261
364
3641
5671
5671
283
283
283
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 29 2014 — MY01

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Current Plot Data (MY1 2014) Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95024
-01 -0009
95024 -01 -0010
95024 -01 -0011
95024 -01 -0012
95024 -01 -0013
MY1 (2014)
MYO (2014)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder
Tree
1
1
1
3
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
44
44
44
44
44
44
Callicarpa americana
American Beautyberry
Shrub
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
5
11
11
12
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
1
l
1
1
1
1
Liguidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
Tree
22
5
39
10
4
272
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
1
3
11
111
17
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
4
51
2
21
21
32
3
3
3
Quercus
Oak
Tree
11
11
11
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
3
3
4
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
Pin Oak
Tree
5
5
5
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
9
9
9
41
41
41
54
54
54
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
133
133
133
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
14
14
41
12
12
17
10
10
59
11
11
24
11
11
16
149
149
444
246
246
246
1
1
1
1
1
13
13
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.32
0.32
41
41
7
3
31
4
41
4
8
21
21
51
21
21
4
1 1�-
111
141
61
61
6
5671
5671
1659
4861
4861
6881
4051
405
23881
4451
4451
9711
4451
4451
647
464
4641
13821
7661
7661
766
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 30 2014 — MY01

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 31 2014— MY01

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -1, Riffle (T1
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.37
Date:
10/27/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station
Elevation
0.0
800.54
2.0
800.36
5.0
799.84
6.5
799.30
9.6
797.97
13.2
796.55
14.9
795.91
19.4
795.62
22.2
795.93
24.1
795.31
25.6
795.15
25.8
795.03
26.3
794.81
26.9
794.50
28.1
794.39
28.9
794.45
29.4
794.66
30.3
794.77
30.8
795.00
31.7
795.19
33.2
795.62
34.3
795.83
36.9
795.66
42.6
795.78
46.0
795.90
49.0
796.09
52.2
797.08
56.2
798.76
59.0
799.43
60.9
799.77
63.7
799.76
65.0
799.88
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
795.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
8.9
Bankfull Width:
11.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
797.3
Flood Prone Width:
41.2
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
15.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -1, Riffle (TI)
aVL
800
z<77
798
---- - - - - ------- ------------------------------------- ------ ------
0
796
--------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --------------------
W
--- - Bankfull
- Flood Prone Area
794
As -Built, 2/25/14
t MY- 01,10/27/14
792
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation
Yadkin -Pee Dee
794.46
3.1
Watershed:
6.6
Jacob's Landin
10.9
792.47
XS ID
and M. Underwood
XS -2, Riffle (T1
792.28
21.8
Drainage Area s mi :
0.38
792.35
31.3
Date:
35.9
10/27/2014
38.5
792.14
Field Crew:
792.10
T. Se linger
791.33
41.1
791.16
42.4
790.99
43.6
790.95
44.7
790.99
45.5
790.97
.. j.
791.28
46.6
791.66
48.2
f
49.7
792.49
54.1
792.50
a
792.63
61.9
792.74
65.9
792.82
70.8
792.96
74.8
793.58
77.8
794.38
77.9
794.93
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -2, Riffle (TI)
796
794
-------------------------------
v
0
-- - - - - -- ��
- - - - - -
- -- - -- ---------------------
-
fj 792
----Bankfull
As- Built, 2/25/14
- - - - Flood Prone Area
t MY-01, 10/27/14
790
0 10
20 30 40
50 60 70 80
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
794.46
3.1
794.24
6.6
793.49
10.9
792.47
15.1
and M. Underwood
Station
Elevation
0.0
794.46
3.1
794.24
6.6
793.49
10.9
792.47
15.1
792.26
18.0
792.28
21.8
792.31
25.3
792.35
31.3
792.17
35.9
792.23
38.5
792.14
38.8
792.10
40.7
791.33
41.1
791.16
42.4
790.99
43.6
790.95
44.7
790.99
45.5
790.97
46.1
791.28
46.6
791.66
48.2
791.99
49.7
792.49
54.1
792.50
57.8
792.63
61.9
792.74
65.9
792.82
70.8
792.96
74.8
793.58
77.8
794.38
77.9
794.93
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
792.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
10.3
Bankfull Width:
10.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
793.8
Flood Prone Width:
70.7
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
11.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Bankfull Elevation:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
17.2
Bankfull Width:
Area s mi :
Watershed:
Date:
Jacob's Landing
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
2.9
Mean at Bankfull:
XS ID
W / D Ratio:
XS -3, Pool T1
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Ratio:
-
Drainage
�.
I"� ,j
Station
Elevation
0.0
794.12
0.8
794.02
3.6
793.16
5.8
792.52
�,:•,,
z . ��
7.9
791.64
y•;
10.2
791.14
Depth
`4
14.5
791.24
Depth
7 v -
18.0
791.18
'
t
22.4
791.36
27.4
791.30
Height
y. r,
30.1
791.31
33.0
791.11
36.3
790.82
37.3
790.32
38.4
790.08
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -3, Pool (TI)
39.3
789.23
40.4
788.81
41.1
788.43
794
42.0
788.51
42.6
788.38
42.7
788.54
43.4
789.11
43.6
789.59
792
44.3
790.05
0
--- - - - - -- -
----------------
----------------
45.1
790.68
45.8
791.08
46.9
791.38
W 790
48.6
791.66
Bankfull
52.5
791.79
54.1
791.89
As-Built, 2/25/14
56.8
793.06
t MY- 01,10/27/14
58.4
793.31
788
0 10
20
30 40
50
60
60.2
793.94
62.5
793.87
Station (feet)
62.4
794.36
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
791.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
17.2
Bankfull Width:
Area s mi :
0.4
Date:
10/27/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
791.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
17.2
Bankfull Width:
15.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max at Bankfull:
2.9
Mean at Bankfull:
1.1
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -4, Riffle (T1)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.40
Date:
10/27/2014
Field Crew:
789.95
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station
Elevation
0.0
792.17
1.2
792.12
3.8
791.09
7.3
790.15
10.8
789.95
16.0
790.02
21.3
789.79
25.5
789.84
26.8
789.65
28.4
789.20
28.9
789.01
29.7
788.91
30.6
788.59
31.6
788.58
32.9
788.59
33.4
788.74
33.7
788.95
34.5
789.13
35.0
789.34
36.3
789.79
37.4
790.15
40.1
789.95
44.7
790.16
48.7
790.30
54.5
790.22
58.6
790.13
60.9
790.49
63.9
791.43
66.2
792.34
67.8
792.93
67.6
793.51
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
789.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
8.7
Bankfull Width:
11.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
791.2
Flood Prone Width:
59.8
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
14.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
795
793
0
791
W
789
787 +
0
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -4, Riffle (TI)
10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
As- Built, 2/25/14
t MY -01, 10/27/14
50 60 70

River Basin:
Elevation
Yadkin -Pee Dee
818.52
0.1 8
Watershed:
Area s mi :
Jacob's Landin
Date:
10/28/2014
XS ID
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
XS -5, Riffle (T2
813.38
11.3 8
Drainage
13.3 8
813.36
14.8 8
813.19
15.5 8
812.82
f
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -5, Riffle (T2)
821
818
w
° 815
-- - - - - -- - --------------------------------------------
----- - - - - --
W
---------- - - - -
-- ----------- - - - - -- - - - - - - --
813
- - - - Bankfull
- - - -Flood Prone Area
As- Built, 2/24/14
t MY -01, 10/28/14
810
0
10 20 30
40
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
0.0 8
818.52
0.1 8
817.82
Area s mi :
0.23
Date:
10/28/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station E
Elevation
0.0 8
818.52
0.1 8
817.82
0.5 8
817.66
2.8 8
816.40
8.5 8
813.70
9.8 8
813.38
11.3 8
813.40
13.3 8
813.36
14.8 8
813.19
15.5 8
812.82
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 813.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 10.5
Bankfull Width: 11.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 814.9
Flood Prone Width: 27.4
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9
W / D Ratio: 13.3
Entrenchment Ratio: 2.3
ank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Elevation S
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Area s mi :
Jacob's Landing
Date:
10/28/2014
XS ID
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
XS -6, Riffle (T2
Drainage
;-
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -6, Riffle (T2)
815
813
811
s
0
c� 809
W
- - - - Bankfull
807
- - - - Flood Prone Area
As- Built, 2/24/14
t MY -01, 10/28/14
0
10 20 30
40
Station E
Elevation S
Area s mi :
0.23
Date:
10/28/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station E
Elevation S
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.4
18.9 809.64 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8
20.0 809.49 W / D Ratio: 14.8
21.0 809.13 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.8
22.2 808.71 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
Yadkin -Pee Dee
810.64
0.2
809.88
Area s mi :
Watershed:
Date:
Jacob's Landing
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
5.7
807.40
XS ID
806.84
XS -7, Pool T2
806.80
11.6
Kit
11.7
Drainage
12.9
805.92
13.8
805.60
14.0
805.29
15.2
805.02
16.6
804.40
17.2
804.41
18.1
804.51
18.9
804.56
19.8
804.57
20.7
804.82
21.3
804.86
22.0
805.17
22.9
805.45
23.0
805.60
23.6
805.82
= 1i14�
806.03
25.4
806.24
27.6
806.26
31.1
u'3e
34.8
vt`
36.7
806.74
39.0
807.59
41.4
808.60
42.2
809.07
,R.
ss °
It� Y
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -7, Pool (T2)
812
810
808
0
ti 806
W
804
- - - Bankfull
As- Built, 2/24/14
t MY -01, 10/28/14
802
0
10
20
30
40
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
810.64
0.2
809.88
Area s mi :
0.23
Date:
10/27/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station
Elevation
0.0
810.64
0.2
809.88
1.6
809.70
2.6
809.31
4.2
808.07
5.7
807.40
7.5
806.84
9.5
806.80
11.6
806.51
11.7
806.46
12.9
805.92
13.8
805.60
14.0
805.29
15.2
805.02
16.6
804.40
17.2
804.41
18.1
804.51
18.9
804.56
19.8
804.57
20.7
804.82
21.3
804.86
22.0
805.17
22.9
805.45
23.0
805.60
23.6
805.82
24.8
806.03
25.4
806.24
27.6
806.26
31.1
806.46
34.8
806.50
36.7
806.74
39.0
807.59
41.4
808.60
42.2
809.07
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
806.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
16.9
Bankfull Width:
13.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max De th at Bankfull:
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation
Yadkin -Pee Dee
805.35
0.1 8
Watershed:
Area s mi :
Jacob's Landin
Date:
MV
i-
XS ID
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
XS -8, Riffle (T2
802.50
10.6 8
Drainage
13.5 8
801.63
15.2 8
801.55
16.0 8
801.55
a
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -8, Riffle (T2)
808
806
0 804
0
802
ti-----------------
- - - - -- - -
- - - -
------- - - - - -- - --
w
- - -- Bankfull
800
- - - - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/24/14
t MY -01, 10/28/14
798
0
10
20 30 40
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
0.0 8
805.35
0.1 8
804.85
Area s mi :
0.23
Date:
10/28/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station E
Elevation
0.0 8
805.35
0.1 8
804.85
3.5 8
804.27
4.5 8
803.83
7.0 8
803.13
8.6 8
802.50
10.6 8
801.85
13.5 8
801.63
15.2 8
801.55
16.0 8
801.55
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 801.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 11.8
Bankfull Width: 11.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 803.1
Flood Prone Width: 30.1
Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0
W / D Ratio: 11.4
Entrenchment Ratio: 2.6
ank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -9, Riffle (T2
Drainage Area (sq mi :
0.31
Date:
10/29/2014
Field Crew:
1T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station
Elevation
0.0
801.48
1.5
801.10
2.3
800.89
4.3
800.20
6.6
798.97
8.2
798.38
10.5
798.07
13.2
797.95
15.0
797.83
16.2
797.78
16.8
797.76
17.7
797.43
18.5
797.23
18.7
797.16
19.2
796.98
19.8
797.05
20.3
796.84
20.5
796.67
21.4
796.51
22.0
796.67
23.2
796.47
24.2
797.02
26.2
797.13
27.3
797.62
28.7
798.11
30.2
798.09
32.6
798.18
36.3
797.93
39.6
798.04
41.7
798.21
46.0
798.18
48.4
798.66
50.6
799.40
52.6
799.74
52.6
800.24
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
797.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
8.0
Bankfull Width:
10.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
799.1
Flood Prone Width:
43.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
14.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
805
803
t 801
0
799
ti
W
797
795 L
0
a
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -9, Riffle (T2)
IN. ,
------- - - - - -- ----------------------
Bankful I
As- Built, 2/24/14
Flood Prone Area
MY- 01,10/29/14
10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation S
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Area s mi :
0.31
Date:
10/29/2014
Watershed:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -10, Pool T2
Drainage
:.
�rt .
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -10, Pool (T2)
800
798
5
0
W 796
- - - Bankfull
As- Built, 2/24/14
t MY -01, 10/29/14
794
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
Station E
Elevation S
Area s mi :
0.31
Date:
10/29/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station E
Elevation S
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.0
18.9 796.12 W / D Ratio: -
20.8 795.72 Entrenchment Ratio:
22.0 795.70 Bank Height Ratio:
Station (feet) -
-

River Basin:
Elevation
Yadkin -Pee Dee
794.13
-
i
Watershed:
0.31
Jacob's Landin
10/29/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
XS ID
793.37
XS -11, Riffle T2
792.54
19.0
792.41
Drainage
792.15
20.4
792.31
21.2
792.00
21.8
792.00
22.3
792.14
22.8
792.22
23.4
792.39
24.1
792.50
25.3
792.93
26.9
793.41
28.6
793.58
31.0
793.26
35.0
793.33
38.6
793.20
42.6
793.41
46.7
793.57
50.6
794.48
53.0
795.15
54.7
795.60
55.9
795.94
55.8
796.40
-
-
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -11, Riffle (T2)
798
796
--------------------------------------------------------
- - -
- -- - - --
794
° ----------- - - - -
-- --- - - - - --
-----
- - - - --
W
-- - - Bankfull
792
-Flood Prone Area
As- Built, 2/24/14
t MY -01, 10/29/14
790
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.0
794.13
3.6
793.89
Area s mi :
0.31
Date:
10/29/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and M. Underwood
Station
Elevation
0.0
794.13
3.6
793.89
7.4
793.84
11.1
793.76
14.7
793.60
16.7
793.37
18.1
792.54
19.0
792.41
19.7
792.15
20.4
792.31
21.2
792.00
21.8
792.00
22.3
792.14
22.8
792.22
23.4
792.39
24.1
792.50
25.3
792.93
26.9
793.41
28.6
793.58
31.0
793.26
35.0
793.33
38.6
793.20
42.6
793.41
46.7
793.57
50.6
794.48
53.0
795.15
54.7
795.60
55.9
795.94
55.8
796.40
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
793.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
9.6
Bankfull Width:
11.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
795.0
Flood Prone Width:
52
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
14.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

800
798
796
794
792
c
.� 790
W
788
786
784
782
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
TI MY-01
SBA _ - 0.0068x + 804.48
S,, = - 0.0068x + 803.26
IV—��
780
1050
1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750 1850 1950 2050 2150
Station (ft)
As- Built, 2/20/14 —MY-01, 10/27/14 O Cross Sections Bankfull — — - Water Surface
2250 2350 2450

Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
T2 MY-0 I
812
810 ■
808
806 - - -
804 _ —
Sµ,s = - 0.0106x + 865.78
y 802
0
SBU _ - 0.0109x + 868.65
800
a� ■
W
798 \ \ ■
■
- 1 ■
796
794 N. — _
■
792 ■
790
5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100 7200 7300
Station (ft)
As- Built, 2/19/14 — MY -01, 10/29/14 0 Cross Sections ® Structures ■ Bankfull — — - Water Surface

Cross
- Section 1 Riffle
- MY -01
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 1 Riffleng
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
8
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
4
Fine
.125-.25
A
7
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
14
100%
4
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
39
Very Fine
2 - 4
6
80%
8
60%
_/
Fine
4-5.7
G
2
Fine
5.7-8
R
T As Built
Medium
8- 11.3
A
t MY -01 (2014)
Medium
11.3- 16
V
1
Coarse
16-22.6
E
a 40%
w
e
Coarse
22.6-32
L
4
Very Coarse
32-45
S
4
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
4
Small
90-128
O
5
Large
128-180
B
2
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.19
1
1.4
1.8
29
100
Size Distribution
mean 2.3
dispersion 14.0
skewness 0.15
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
8%
64%
17%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 2 Riffle
- MY -01
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 2 Rigfleng
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
6
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
7
Coarse
.50-1
D
11
l00%
4
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
5
Very Fine
2 - 4
8
80%
8
�?
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
3
0 As Built
Fine
5.7-8
R
5
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
3
H
t MY-01 (2014)
Medium
11.3 -16
V
10
Coarse
16-22.6
E
6
n 40%
w
e
Coarse
22.6-32
L
6
Very Coarse
32-45
S
8
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse
45-64
4
Small
64-90
C
7
Small
90-128
O
9
Large
128- 180
B
1
Large
180-256
L
1
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.6
3.4
12
23
71
110
Size Distribution
mean 6.5
dispersion 13.0
skewness -0.18
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood /det
artificial
6%
23%
53%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross-
Section 3 Pool
- MY -01
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 3 Pool Landing
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
100
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
80%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
a
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
�
H
p
40%
MY -01 (2014)
Medium
11.3 -16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
w
a
Coarse
22.6-32
L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
20%
oI /°
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
L
Small
90-128
O
Large
128-180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16 0.062
D35 0.062
D50 0.062
D65 0.062
D84 0.062
D95 0.062
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness - --
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 4 Riffle
- MY -01
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 4 Riffleng
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
80%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
1
a
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
2
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
4
E~
p
40%
T As Built
AMY -01 �zol4>
Medium
11.3 -16
V
2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
6
w
a
Coarse
22.6-32
L
12
Coarse
32-45
S
27
20 °i°
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
24
Small
64-90
C
7
Small
90-128
O
12
Large
128-180
B
5
Large
180-256
L
1
Small
256-362
B
Size mm
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
25
37
44
55
95
140
Size Distribution
mean 48.7
dispersion 2.0
skewness 0.06
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
0%
75%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 5 Riffle
- MY -01
100
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 5 Rifileng
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
4
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
I
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
1
P
%°
80%
Very Coarse
1-2
S
1
Very Fine
2-4
1
E
U
60%
Fine
4-5.7
Fine
5.7-8
T As Built
Medium
8 - 11.3
gA
H
� MY -01 (2014)
Medium
11.3 - 16
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
w
0
40%
20%
Coarse
22.6-32
L
5
Very Coarse
32-45
S
21
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse
45-64
19
Small
64-90
C
15
Small
90-128
O
25
Large
128-180
B
9
Large
180-256
L
3
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 34
D35 47
D50 63
D65 90
D84 120
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 63.9
dispersion 1.9
skewness 0.01
T
e
Small
362-512
L
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
4%
3%
44%
49%
%%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BD RK
106
Note:

Cross-
Section 6 Riffle
-MY -01
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 6 Riffleng
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
7
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
I
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
;
80%
Coarse
1 - 2
S
1
—Very
Very Fine
2 - 4
a
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8-11.3
A
1
4
E~
p
40%
- As Built
s MY_01 (2014)
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
w
0
Coarse
22.6-32
L
6
Coarse
32-45
S
17
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
13
Small
64-90
C
20
Small
90-128
O
15
Large
128-180
B
11
Large
180-256
L
2
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 21
D35 41
D50 60
D65 79
D84 120
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 50.2
dispersion 2.4
skewness -0.09
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
7%
5%
41%
48%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock >2048
Note:
BDRK
101

Cross-
Section 7 Pool
-MY -01
l00%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 7 Pooling
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
100
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
80%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
a
v
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
t -0 1(2014)
Medium
11.3 -16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
w
a
40%
Coarse
22.6-32
L
Coarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90-128
O
Large
128-180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.062
D35 0.062
D50 0.062
D65 0.062
D84 0.062
D95 0.062
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 1.0
skewness - --
lirt
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
I wood/det
artificial
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 8 Riffle
-MY -01
l00%
Particle Size Distribution
daXS 8 Riffleng
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
80%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
a
v
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
— As Built
tivlY -ol (zola)
Medium
11.3 -16
V
1
Coarse
16-22.6
E
7
w
a
40%
Coarse
22.6-32
L
26
Coarse
32-45
S
25
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
13
Small
64-90
C
5
Small
90-128
O
14
Large
128-180
B
8
Large
180-256
L
1
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 25
D35 32
D50 40
D65 53
D84 110
D95 150
Size Distribution
mean 52.4
dispersion 2.2
skewness 0.15
Small
362-512
L
silt /cl
sa
grav
cobb
bould
bedro
hardp
wood/d
artifici
]0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 9 Riffle
- MY -01
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs XS 9 Riffleng
Particle
Millimeter
t
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
12
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
3
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50-1
D
;
80%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
5
Very Fine
2 - 4
1
a
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
As Built
tiviY -ol (2014)
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
6
p
w
a
40%
Coarse
22.6-32
L
14
Coarse
32-45
S
14
20%
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
10
Small
64-90
C
7
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
90-128
O
11
Large
128-180
B
11
Large
180-256
L
3
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.63
D35 25
D50 37
D65 58
D84 120
D95 170
Size Distribution
mean 8.7
dispersion 31.0
skewness -0.42
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
12%
11%
45%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
100
Note:

Cross
- Section 10
Pool - MY -01
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs Landing
XS 10 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
2
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
2
Medium
.25-.50
N
1
Coarse
.50-1
D
19
80%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
20
Very Fine
2 - 4
a
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
1
Fine
5.7-8
R
1
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
�
H
p
40%
MY-01 (2014)
Medium
11.3- 16
V
2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
w
a
Coarse
22.6-32
L
8
Coarse
32-45
S
13
20%
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
7
Small
64-90
C
3
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Small
90-128
O
12
Large
128-180
B
6
Large
180-256
L
I
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.76
D35 1.5
D50 20
D65 38
D84 97
D95 140
Size Distribution
mean 8.6
dispersion 15.6
skewness -0.25
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
2%
41%
35%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
00
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
)2048
BDRK
Total
102
Note:

Cross-
Section 11 Riffle
- MY -01
100%
Particle Size Distribution
JaXS 11LRi fle g
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt /Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
4
Coarse
.50-1
D
7
P
80%
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
25
Very Fine
2-4
22
a
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
9
Fine
5.7-8
R
7
Medium
8-11.3
A
7
4
p
40%
- As Built
t MY_01 12014
Medium
11.3- 16
V
3
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
w
0
Coarse
22.6-32
L
1
Very Coarse
32-45
S
2
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
4
Small
90-128
O
3
Large
128-180
B
4
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 1.1
D35 1.9
D50 3.1
D65 5.5
D84 16
D95 110
Size Distribution
mean 4.2
dispersion 4.0
skewness 0.12
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt /clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
36%
53%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512-1024
D
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Table 10a. TI Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre - Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.5
9.1
4
6.9
1
11.5
12.2
10.1
11.0
12.1
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
1
26
4
23
1
25
70
40
56
71
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1.8
4
1.1
1
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
2.8
4
1.6
1
1 1
1.5
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.4
3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
8.6
12.1
4
7.4
1
11.2
12.6
7.9
8.8
10.0
3
Width/Depth Ratio
3.7
9.6
4
6.4
1
12.0
12.0
12.9
13.8
14.6
1 3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
3.3
4
3.4
1
2.2
4.9
3.7
5.1
5.9
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.6
2.2
4
1.0
1
1
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
13
26
2
14
26
38
2
25
50
25
38
50
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6
30
2
12
19
25
2
20
45
20
33
45
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.7
4.6
2
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
2.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
75
110
2
43
73
102
2
65
125
65
95
125
Meander Width Ratio
1.4
4.0
2
2
1 3.8
1 5.5
1 2
1.9
1 3.5
1.9
1 3.0
3.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
22
32
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.043
2
0.011
0.025
2
0.007
0.012
0.001
0.013
0.026
21
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
12
30
6
18
38
23
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
20
75
30
56
79
23
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% G% C% 13% / Be%
0%/24%/ 76%/0% /0%/0%
0% / 25% / 52% / 23% / 0% / 0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm)
1/5/7/10/17/25
5/15/22/38/94/143
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
1,330
1,305
1,305
Drainage Area (SM)
0.40
0.16
0.40
0.40
Rosgen Classification
G4
E4
C4
C4
Sinuosity
1.07 -1.15
1.18
1.09 -1.12
1.09 -1.12
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.009 -0.014
0.0070
0.007 -0.010
0.007
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 56 2014 - MY01

Table 10b. T1A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Pro'ect # 95024
Parameter Pre- Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.7
1
6.9
1
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
15
1
23
1
19
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
1
1.1
1
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1
1.6
1
1.2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
6.4
1
7.4
1
6.2
Width /Depth Ratio
9.3
1
6.4
1
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
1
3.4
1
2.2
Bank Height Ratio
2.2
1
1.0
I
1
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
20
75
1
14
26
38
2
19
24
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8
24
1
12
19
25
2
10
25
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1
3.1
1
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
1.2
2.9
Meander Wavelength (ft)
25
50
1
43
73
102
2
50
55
Meander Width Ratio
2.6
1
9.7
1
2
1 3.8
5.5
2
2.2
2.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.013
0.019
1
0.011
0.025
2
0.010
0.012
Pool Length (ft)
16
J
23
7
14
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
22
34
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
294
178
178
Drainage Area (SM)
0.21
0.40
0.21
0.21
Rosgen Classification
E4
B4c
B4c /C4
B4c /C4
Sinuosity
2.10
1.20
1.11
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.023
1 0.013
1 0.017
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 57 2014 - MY01

Table 10c. T2 Baseline Stream Summary
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre - Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Mcd
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.8
12.3
4
6.9
1
10.4
11.6
10.4
10.9
12.0
5
Floodprone Width (ft)
17
20
4
23
1
23
50
27
32
42
5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
4
1.1
1
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.9
5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1
1 1.8
4
1.6
1
1 1
1.4
1 1.5
1.2
1.3
1 1.4
5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
9.2
11.7
4
7.4
1
9.1
11.1
8.8
9.2
9.7
5
Width /Depth Ratio
8.4
12.9
4
6.4
1
12.0
12.0
11.8
12.9
15.2
1 5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
2.3
4
3.4
1
2.2
4.3
2.6
3.2
4.2
5
Bank Height Ratio
1.5
1
4.7
4
1.0
1
l
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
10
60
2
14
26
38
2
25
50
25
38
50
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8
35
2
12
19
25
2
20
45
20
33
45
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.9
3.9
2
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
2.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
65
130
2
43
73
102
2
60
130
60
95
130
Meander Width Ratio
1.1
6.8
2
2
3.8
5.5
2
2.2
4.8
2.2
4.0
4.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
14
22
36
33
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.003
0.011
2
0.011
0.025
2
0.006
0.017
0.004
0.016
0.041
33
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
2
8
35
7
18
35
31
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
2
30
95
42
59
107
31
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
6 %/25 %/68 % /1 % /0 % /0%
0 %/6 %/58 %/32 %/3 % /0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm)
1/2/3/6/12/24
16/30/44/65/109 /144
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
2,935
2,641
2,641
Drainage Area (SM)
0.31
0.16
0.31
0.31
Rosgen Classification
E4, F4
E4
C4
C4
Sinuosity
1.09 -1.45
1.18
1.16 -1.31
1.16 -1.31
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.007 -0.010
0.0007
0.009 - 0.0100
0.009
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 58 2014 -MY01

Table 10d. T2A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre - Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Mcd
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
1
6.9
1
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
11
1
23
1
14
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
1
1.1
1
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1
1.6
1
0.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
3.4
1
7.4
1
3.5
Width /Depth Ratio
12.8
1
6.4
1
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.7
1
3.4
1
2.2
Bank Height Ratio
6.3
l
1.0
l
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
8
15
1
14
26
38
2
8
15
Radius of Curvature (ft)
10
12
1
12
19
25
2
10
25
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.5
1.8
1
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
1.5
3.8
Meander Wavelength (ft)
50
63
1
43
73
102
2
50
63
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
2.3
1
2
3.8
5.5
2
1.2
2.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.010
0.017
l
0.011
0.025
2
0.010
0.012
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
2
4
15
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
2
22
42
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
465
465
465
Drainage Area (SM)
0.06
0.40
0.06
0.06
Rosgen Classification
G4
B4c
B4c /C4
B4c /C4
Sinuosity
1.16
1.20
1.13
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.019
0.013
1 0.014
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 59 2014 - MY01

Table 11. Cross - Section Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Dimension and Substrate
Cross - Section 1 (T1- Riffle)
Station 12 +29
Cross - Section 2 (T1- Riffle)
Station 17 +79
Cross - Section 3 (T1 -Pool)
Station 19 +25
Cross - Section 4 ( T1- Riffle)
Station 21 +36
Cross - Section 5 (T2- Riffle)
Station 52 +53
Based on flxed baseline elevation `
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.8
11.8
12.1
10.9
15.5
15.5
10.1
11.2
10.4
11.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
40.0
41.2
71.0
70.7
-
-
58.0
59.8
27.0
27.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.2
1.1
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1
1.4
1.4
2.8
2.9
1.2
1.3
1.3
6.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
10.0
10.3
18.1
17.2
7.9
8.7
9.0
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.6
11.5
-
-
12.9
14.4
12.0
13.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
K21
5.9
6.5
5.7
5.3
2.6
2.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
28
12
35
44
47
63
Cross - Section 6 (T2- Riffle)
Station 56 +18
Cross - Section 7 (T2 -Pool)
Station 60 +09
Cross - Section 8 (T2- Riffle)
Station 63 +84
Cross - Section 9 (T2- Riffle)
Station 66 +63
Cross - Section 10 (T2 -Pool)
Station 68 +61
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
11.4
13.3
13.5
10.7
11.6
10.8
10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
29.0
32.0
-
-
30.0
30.1
42.0
43.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.7
1.2
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1.9
2.0
1.3
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.8
2.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
8.8
8.8
13.8
16.5
9.7
11.8
9.2
8.0
14.5
17.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
14.8
-
-
11.8
11.4
12.7
14.9
-
-
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.7
2.8
-
2.8
2.6
3.9
4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
49
60
66
40
41
37
Cross- Section 11 (T2- Riffle)
Station 72 +48
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Bankfall Width (ft)
12.0
11.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
9.5
9.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
14.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.2
4.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
16
3
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 60 2014 - MY01

Table llb. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Reach: Tl (2,389 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016)
MY04 (2017)
MY05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.9
12.4
11.5
15.5
1.85
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
41.2
57.2
59.8
71.0
12.2
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.75
0.90
0.86
1.1
0.143
4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.8
1.4
2.9
0.637
4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
8.7
11.3
9.6
17.2
3.48
4
Width/Depth Ratio
11.5
13.9
14.4
15.6
1.72
3
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
5.1
5.3
6.5
1.23
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25.0
38.0
50.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
33.0
45.0
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
2.0
3.0
4.0
M eander Wavelength (ft)
65.0
95.0
125.0
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
3.0
3.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 3.0
34.0
32.0
85.0
16.1
21.0
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.005
0.015
0.013
0.052
0.010
20
Pool Length (ft)
4.0
13.0
10.0
27.0
7.4
14.0
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
0
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
41.0
83.0
62.0
233.0
60.4
13.0
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,305
Sinuosity
1.09 -1.12
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0068
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0068
Rosgen Classification
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be %o
29 %/22 %/36% /14%/0%/0%
dl6/d35/d50 / d84 / d95
7/10/14/49/88
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 61 2014 -MY01

Table Ile. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95024
Reach: T2 (2,084 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016)
MY04 (2017)
MY05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.9
13.2
11.8
18.0
2.64
7
Floodprone Width (ft)
27.4
37.0
32
52.3
9.34
5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.73
0.88
0.89
1.04
0.110
7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.7
1.6
2.1
0.280
7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
8.0
11.8
10.5
17.1
3.47
7
Width/Depth Ratio
11.4
13.8
13.8
14.9
1.34
5
Entrenchment Ratio
2.3
3.2
3.2
4.4
0.811
5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
5
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25.0
38.0
50.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
33.0
45.0
Rad. of Curv.: Bankf ill Width (ft /ft)
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
60.0
95.0
130.0
Meander Width Ratio
2.2
4.0
4.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
5.0
14.0
17.0
24.0
5.9
15.0
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.007
0.021
0.016
0.047
0.012
14
Pool Length (ft)
4.1
15.8
14.7
26.9
6.5
29.0
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
0
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
31.8
61.8
54.4
160.9
29.0
28.0
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,641
Sinuosity
1.16 -1.31
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0106
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0109
Rosgen Classification
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
29 %/22 %/36 %/14 % /0 % /0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
12/21/32/46/83/127
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 62 2014 -MY01

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 63 2014 —MY01

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site EEP Project # 95024
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo Number
Collection
Occurrence
None recorded
None recorded
I N/A
N/A
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 95024 64 2014 —MY01