310036_Compliance Report_20230124 (2)

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency ?0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: f��f Ik)_j Arrival Time: ` ,(} j� Departure Time: (o�(Y� County: m - 1dy-Region:
Farm Name: ��4��1�,r --��►,> � �� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator,
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: ?1.2
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. is storage capacity(structural phis storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Stn�ure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): —I � -- ----- \Q.
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA M NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? (D Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA i] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA [ENE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ® NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA E0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA F5 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA 4�] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ' \ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: �{
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ] NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge`' ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA q NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes kt No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? [:] Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [o Yes [:) No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
�+r'-)VxADf) Wl&&
AAP
JA- q(13o C' &L's
PPLA,,,p
-Adz
Yam(
� °i-'4" vim;+ s v�.. � � �` (err W r`xt X�.
LAIUt_ oc�> wee` 1ae, �j(\,\pedirWi
LarOl.,^..AA-cam
V� Ar'lti r►R i owe P '►�
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name: nn I �ti ((J U//1 Phone: —1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �— Date: I I aH to
Page 3 of 3 511212020