20211334 Ver 2_Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shephard School Road ePCN Cover Letter and Appendices_032323_20230323

March 23, 2023
George Lyle Phillips
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for
the Proposed Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road, Wake County
Dear Mr. Phillips:
On behalf of the Town of Zebulon, WSP USA has completed a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) application
for the proposed Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road project and requests
reverification from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(DWR) to use a Nationwide Permit 14 and the associated 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) for impacts to
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. that will result from the project. A Nationwide Permit 14 was approved by the
USACE on January 13, 2022 and a 401 WQC was approved by NCDWR on December 9, 2021 but the project was
not started prior to permit expiration and construction has not commenced.
The Town of Zebulon is seeking to improve vehicular and pedestrian safety at the SR 2320 (Old Bunn
Road/Proctor Street) and Shepard School Road intersection by adding turn lanes, sidewalks, and pedestrian and
traffic signals.
The project design is the same as the previously permitted design with the exception of Impact Site S1. Changes at
S 1 include installation of a Dominion Energy subsurface gas line relocation and additional stream bank
stabilization. The gas line will cross the jurisdictional stream perpendicularly immediately upstream of the inlet of
the proposed 48" culvert extension, and within the footprint of the previously approved channel stabilization
impacts. The gas line crossing of the stream will be installed by open cutting the channel and back filling the
trench. Stream impacts associated within this gas line installation will be contained wholly within the previously
approved channel impact area, therefore, the gas line will not result in additional permanent loss of waters of the
U.S. The gas line relocation will be conducted just prior to the culvert extension. The construction corridor for the
gas line relocation will be limited to a width of 30 feet. In addition to the gas line, at Impact Site S1, 36 LF of
temporary stream impacts included in the prior permit approval has been changed to permanent stream bank
stabilization upstream of the proposed 48" culvert extension. This change was necessitated by the proximity of the
roadway fill slopes to this channel. Any temporary impacts to the stream channel resulting from the gas line
installation and stream bank stabilization will be restored to preconstruction contours.
The design and impacts at Site S2 and Site S3 are unchanged from the previously permitted design.
In total, the project will result in 83 linear feet (<0.01 acre) of permanent loss of stream (including 38 linear feet of
jurisdictional ditch), 91 linear feet (<0.01 acre) of stream bank stabilization, 23 linear feet of temporary stream
impacts (<0.01 acre), and 0.02 acre of temporary wetland impacts.
WSP USA
Suite 610
1001 Morehead Square Drive
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
WSP.Com

NN
%% ) Mr. Phillips
March 23, 2023
Mitigation for losses of Waters of the U.S. is not proposed for this project because permanent stream loss will not
exceed 0.2 acre and there will be no permanent wetland impacts.
The Town previously acquired mitigate credits for stream buffer impacts from the Kittrell Hill Mitigation Bank,
including 1,594 square feet of Zone 1 impacts at a 3:1 ratio and 700 square feet of Zone 2 impacts at a 1.5:1 ratio.
No cha4ges to buffer impacts are proposed.
Please see the enclosed documents as part of the PCN application:
• Appendix A: Applicant Information
1. Agent Authorization Form
• Appendix B: Project Information
1. Table 1. Property Owner Information
2. Figure 1. Site Location Map
3. Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
4. Figure 3. Delineated Potential Waters of the U.S.
5. Figure 4. Proposed Intersection Improvements
6. Wetland and Stream Impacts Permit Drawings Sheets 1-4, including the Impact Summary Table
• Appendix C: Supplementary Information
1. USACE Wetland Determination Forms
2. NC DWQ Stream Identification Forms
3. US Fish and Wildlife Service Information and Planning Consultation Official Species List
4. NC Natural Heritage Program Report
5. NC State Historic Preservation Office Response Letter
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at caleb.sullivankwsp.com or (980)
701-3161. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Kind regards,
Caleb Sullivan, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
cc. Rob Ridings, NCDWR
Chris Ray, Town of Zebulon
CPS
Page 2

Appendix A: Applicant Information
1. Agent Authorization Form

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT N0. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID NO. Multiple Properties
PROJECT NAME: Town of Zgbulon — Intersection improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
STREET ADDRESS: Shepgrd Schogl Road Proctor Stree Old Bunn Road
PROPERTY SIZE: _8.4 Acres
PROPERTY PROJE OWNER: Town of Zebulon
Property/Project Owner's Address (if different than property above):
450 East Horton Street, Zebulon. NC. 27597
Attention: Chris Ray
Telephone: [phone]
The undersigned, registered property/project owners or owner representatives of the above noted
property/project, do hereby authorize Amanda Johnson of WSP USA to act on our behalf and take all
actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this Jurisdictional Determination and/or
Section 404/Section 10 permit.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge.
lope,:rty roil wrier Representative:
.d
Authorized SignaturV
Print Name
-5/16171
Date

Appendix 6: Project Information
1. Table 1. Property Owner Information
2. Figure 1. Site Location Map
3. Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
4. Figure 3. Delineated Potential Waters of the U.S.
5. Figure 4. Proposed Intersection Improvements
6. Wetland and Stream Impacts Permit Drawings
Sheets 1-4, including the Impact Summary Table
7. Stormwater Management Plan

Property Owner Information for the Town of Zebulon Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
PARCEL NUMBER
PROPERTY ADDRESS
OWNER NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
MAILING CITY AND ZIP CODE
2706303537
1320 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD
BOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC
701 N RALEIGH BLVD
RALEIGH, NC 27610-1692
2706300773
111 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD
TWIN AGRI SERVICES INC
10501 DEBNAM RD
ZEBULON, NC 27597-8520
2706206369
1309 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD
LUTHER M AND MARI KITAHATA
2623B FRANKLIN AVE E
SEATTLE, WA 98102-3218
2706219033
1401 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD
DARRYL ROBERT HIGH
1721 LONGMONT DR
WAKE FOREST, NC 27587-5912
2706209765
1315 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD
TWIN AGRI SERVICES INC
10501 DEBNAM RD
ZEBULON, NC 27597-8520
2706217463
901 PROCTOR ST
TWIN AGRI SERVICES INC
PO BOX 10
ZEBULON, NC 27597-0010
2706313724
SHEPARD SCHOOL RD
STARLIGHT HOMES NORTH CAROLINA LLC
5711 SIX FORKS RD STE 300
RALEIGH, NC 27609-3888
2763044997
JOLD BUNN RD
IGRANITE PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT LLC
I PO BOX 400
ROLESVILLE, NC 27571-0400

Q f W �Kcr,F4
D
3
_o L'
p �
' n
' 3
1 5t roll
m
N
gas sr C
h 00 ° �
C
9" 4' Atper¢ A 0
"�4
R��R
g
rsi p?ap
1
9
c
ti
G
01,
q61 �
Gyti
`Sr
SR 2320
Ci
4 4
� L
07n
A t�thec
p ary
W 3WOn St
6
Fn .r
rr+ :{ _ ,de ar.:
br
1
NN`
0 &0GA�1 g 3udd St
\\ a
�O,1ver St
q
a
C
�
1 St '"
a,
�
�� -F.5k
ritn
��tat+ > N
Source: NC OneMap, Esri
World Street Map
ran
orvir
�5t
WAKE
Legend
9
4'; hitfey
Project Study Area
Flarti
o����t
(8.4 ac.)
k 1
_
u
Figure 1. Site Location
N
ZEBULQN
Intersection Improvements
at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
„
Town of Zebulon
Wake County
0
MENNEW:=
500 1,000
Feet
November 2021

71
1 �
rr df I
r
li
1 ,I
I. 1
SR 2320
��
1 -
I
I
I -
Legend - --
Project Study Area
� (8.4 ac.) .�� -
t �15 Source: USGS Zebulon, NC Quadrangle 7.5-Minute Series (2019)
�x.
Figure 2. U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Map N
ZEBULQN
Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
„ Town of Zebulon 0 200 400
Wake County MENNEN:=
November 2021 Feet

�*k
q*4
Legend
QProject Area (8.4 ac.)
WB
DWA +fie
I
r �
4
SB 3 �,:•�
SB (2)
DA
- � old eUhh Rd �SR
i 2320) ,
SA
E - WC
` ARM
- 4 r
_ Potential Waters of the U.S. r'`
Potential Wetland Waters of the ' r
U.S.
• Stream Data Form •�
Wetland Data Form ■
Upland Data Form Notes: Potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and excluded waters were delineatined by WSP on 4/7/21. This map is intended for
Culvert planning purposes only and is not intended for design, construction, or legal purposes.
Source: Esri Aerial Imagery dated 12/16/18
Figure 3. Delineated Potential Waters of the U.S. N
ZEBULON A
Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
■ Town of Zebulon 0 75 150
Wake County Feet
November 2021

See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets
•
V
Ii�Ppei3aa
2374 Re
2375 m
2343 � PROJECT
2376 LOCATION
ioo
2455
2320
264 2406
64 O/p BUnq RQ
2387 64
z3aa 26T4\
2330 2456
96
2430 9A
VICINITY MAP
TOWN OF Z1E1BU1LaN
WAKE COUNTY
LOCATION: OLD BUNN ROAD/PROCTOR STREET AND
SHEPARD SCHOOL ROAD
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, SIGNALS, SIGNING
AND TRAFFIC CONTROL
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS PERMIT 3-15-2023
S1
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 188673.08
-L- Sta. 12+75.00
o
TO US 264/64 \
-L-
•-------------
SHEPARD SCHOOL RD.
ss END CONSTRUCTION
-Y- POT Sta. 25+50.00
n97
0
N
NAD 83j2011
PERMIT DRAWING
I SHEET 1 OF 4
TO PIPPIN RD. /
DEBNAM RD.
SHEPARD ,-- OOL RD. SR 2337
® *,�' ----- --
.,
END TIP PROJECT 188673.08
-L- Sta. 21+70.00
I 22
�s O
OBI
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y- POT Sta. 14+02.17
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/ W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF
S", EAYE'1'l E\'ILLE SLRPSl
alrrr Isnn
HYDRA ENGINEER
ADT 2022 = 6825
TEL 1(:H.N( 2]6U1
TELi ].919.836.40M1
U.; 1.19-6.4019
fi fi
50 25 0 50 100
ADT 2040 = 9800
K = %
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 188763.08 = 0.170 MI
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 188763.08 = 0.000 MI
CECSE BULO65
FOR THE TOIVN OF ZEBULON
11111-
PLANS
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
D = %
P.E.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
HOLLY CHRISTENBURY, PE
SIGNATURE:
50 25 0 50 100
T = % *
V = 50 MPH
* TTST = DUAL
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 188763.08 = 0.170 MI
JUNE 22, 2021
PROJECT ENGINEER
ERIC MISAK
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
LETTING DATE:
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
F U N C CLASS =
J U N E 21. 2022
10 5 0 10 20
MAJOR COLLECTOR
PE.
SIGNATURE,
TOWN CONTACT. CHRIS RAY
7.EBULON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

°
DETAIL 1 DETAIL 4 / Q� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH CURVE DATA f-Y-J !/�'j. .F'y '� 188673.08 4
INot �o scale) (Nat fo Sfvle / p
•� �'/ NOW OR i0R1ERLx ,p .
NANEPEED DAPT5T CMACx °+..0 RW SHEET NO.
Pl Sto /6+93.93 Pl Sto 22+81.90 O +� � N 66' 24' 35.8' W � �
p = 9" 43' 52.3° (RT) p = 5. 37' 260 (RT) �L b^ pry ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Nofurol p\°'°c FIII Nafurul �.\°i`+ Fill WN R A & LIJx / A PN 7Tp5Z132%5
`: N ENGINEER ENGINEER
Gropn 7.� p Slope Graun 37slope
D D D = 3• /6' 26.6" D = i O3' 39.7" MAMgIAwIA , COTTER •
L = 29722' L = 530.05' MX AN&TA
T = 148.97' T = 26524' os 0510'�2011 2s / / N ga
Min, D= I Ft. R = 1,750.W R = 5,400.00' .
'V'
SPECIAL LATERAL DITCH / *Dan
14-66 TO STA. 15+50 LT FROM STA.. 18+25 TO STA. 21+00 RT /
FROM -L- STA. -L- DS = 40UPH DS = 40MPH SEE DETAIL 1 L
FROM -Y- STA. 14+75 TO STA. 17+25 RT FROM -L- STA. 24-AD TO STA. 25+50 RT •` END CONST CTION N �•4$•O3•E
FROM -Y- STA. 21 50 TO STA 22+75 LT FROM -L- STA. 12+75 TO STA. 14+56 LT = 37 e = NC / / POT Sta. + �•B5•
5-50 LTSTA. 2.k' -Y-
FROM -Y- STA. 21+75 TO STA.23+25 RT �! G Q �a�� �f\ N"9oy
PERMANENT SURFACE
•r
A ?
DETAIL 2 WATER IMPACTS WA /
APPROSEDL8"AGAS LINE qD
SPECIAL CUT DITCH / •/ /• 2 N 8,3/2
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
TEMPORARY SURFAC �' sX�
of
°+ PIPE INLET UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Pe EEL�&
WATER IMPACTS STABILIZATION PLANS PREPARED ev:
D
1 CLASS RIP RIP "
Min. D= I Ft. S 1 �� \� DETAIL 5 jf SPECIAL LATE ITCH I WSP USA
- SEE DE i 434 FAYE'1"fE47LLE 8'fI1EE'f
/ O Mess SL➢TE. IT,
FROM -L- STA. 18+75 TO STA. 20 119 LT / C2/ C .T.IGIT, Vf. 2i601
1'p I a I.YlY.836.4040
1' IX: 1.919. 436.4099
DETAIL 3 PERMANENT SURFACE 9 LICENSE NO.J-0165
PER A NT SURFACE
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH pow WATER IMPACTS �- 6
(NOT TO SCALE 4 RC;P-II \ W ER I PACTS
NATURAL RIP RAP EMBANKMENT PIPE OUTLET DETAIL 5
�caouND EST. 23 TOO NS CLASS I RIP RAP _ CHANNEL TN ♦ t PIPE INLET,OHTLET CHANNEL
42 SYGF STABILIZATION
3 SEE DETAIL 8 S1 CLASS I RIP RAP �� f N°t t„ S.lel
p. TEMPORARY 5
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH e2� SEE DETAIL 5y�,
IMPACTS
../ATE. 2
P / SEE DETAIL 1
FROM -L- STA. 16+97 TO STA. 18 1 25 RT 7 S LATERAL 'V' DITCH N S 'a WR IMPA TS • c�
FROM -Y- STA. 17 25 TO STA. 19-75 RT I DETAIL 1 g Y +10 VE f WqT ARp ACTS ACE Q
a5 RY S F / denglToe o "°` 'e'E�
TEMPORARY SURFACE SCALE 1"=E`X'MSTWELL
s atF,
�� TO BE RELOCATED
m3
I N !0• •B RITiW IMPA EM T Est-4 }0 8 Tons of Class 1 Rip-Rop
WATER IMPACTS
s . EST. B -Y- sTA.23+29
PERMANENT SURFACE - y-- - NDN M rM,ER x 5 T. z Y 7 , SYGF
/EDDE 0i PAVEMEM
^ T04 AORISERVNES NC �/ ) 1. D SEE DETAIL 8 SCALE 1"= 50'
WATER IMPACTS OB OONSSS PG OOESB S 'B' RIPRAP 'v Q � MASS >B
PN 2105MIO EST. DNS m �E;' ` / e2 Bz REFER TO SIGNING PLAN
EST. 7 S
NOW M i
"c s'L x 2.5'-7. D wE M TREE 5N SHEET SIGN-X FOR SPEED tD
SCALE 1"=9 ' � � c A x 1.25'D Q y // y c`cv""n DI
it a2 WARNING SIGN LOCATIONS
PIN2206300TT3 \
t1
y
Z
�
XIS SIGN "� �7 PN zT P
T BE FM VED r' ,- O 'RIP
POT Sta. 12+75.00 N
'V'
-L- SPECIAL LATERAL DITCH EST, 2,
CP I EST 2 5
e
SEE DETAIL 1 �� ST. 7 S p
'
H
_
BEGIN PROJECT 188673.08 a�
yTyEMTPEORRIARY SURFACE •. $ .c C b x2.5-' L +41 -L- POT Stu.21+70.00
A MPACTS ay N p, r7 �, 1. 'D L 34 80, N
p So' END PROJECT 188673.08
-z5 m 'V
PE OUTLET ti DIT$ EX.RW h
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH 80' G LA 'B' RI RAP; 05 SPECIA
F'X SEE DETAIL 4 40' +33 C N"A PERM ENT , XF 2 / 51 2• E DET \ EX.RW
STA RATION 3' F., 1 l
BO' WAT IMP
4 (h 40. CLAS RIP RAP S EST. 7 SYG / F 58. L +el RCP -III
siY SEE DE L 6
x 1.25'D _ ? l
E
\,B`
?
HOODS _TF 191. Ems.` / E
- LLAR _ 2 /, Y APPROX. O Bx. m-
IRS t0[ITIM -
- -A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----
C�L- - - OE
= EOGF Or PA NT-� MOVE -
RETAIN O RE E 1 { 1--
„ _
SR 2A76 SREPNARD R0.E0'PUBLM RM , y - - O p / Ly,( /# rrAFm St R0.60' PM 1 L Lu = N PAVEMENT
_EDu
IB'RCP l8'RCPO O RETAIN / � --L- -- - �--- ----- � _
T9
-
�FLr
'
'LIE e,,, / ' Iv +50 �PUE�P E � L 401• 1
PUE `\
'LIE"`^ 1 0 +55.
RUE ADP SPECIAL LATERAL 'V DITCH \HOODS 1
O C --
40
2-2-
_ _ '2
It / PUE SEE DETAIL 4 1 \
- -- - - - -
� 10'PUBLIC OR INAGE EA NI � PUE - - -
- - L 15 2
M 50' �X/6 GLASS 'B' RIPRAPS N L +
\
47 89
RE OCATE EXISTING HANDHOLE 24 ' A '61 EST.2 TONS
RCP -III PECIAL LATERAL VARIABLE WIDT ASE DITCH
EST. 7 SYGF
BE IND SIDEWALK 5'L x 2.5'-7.5'W T. 10 TONS CLASS B RIP RAP
ON ER: AT&T EXIST SIDEWALK $' 5 DETAIL 7
-
L+15 TO BE REMOVED pry OJ G x 1,25'D
40' REMOVE9}r"LiF 4 -L- POT Sto.16+65.85 = -L- Sta.19-05.00
I 2A'RCP^ RE // -Y- PC Sto.20+14JO END GRADE/ PERMIT DRAWING
N" Y+53.5 1 D PER NENT SURFACE
60' BEGIN OVERLAYNIIDENING Bl
SHEET 2 OF 4
ISBIL EXIST SIDEWALK „L -Y- PT Sto.18+42✓8 SPECIAL BACK OF CURB DITCH A ER IMPACTS
BOYS AND GIRLS TO BE REMOVED
S4
DDED253CY
CLUB OF ZEBULON •• r
3//1
®
MAss a / DETAIL 8
BOYS [L16 OF WANE CWNIr DETAIL 6
/ RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
�:•
DID 0922 PG DOSS? PIPE OLiTLET CHANNEL
/ (Not �o Scale)
PlN 2`006i0fi569 /' .O 4, /
RETAIN ,E O• / IN°t fe sole] _
tam�n
L � A
-Fipd E G�lae Lo'min. 15..
ADJ. C
GEOTEXTILE
Length- 10 Ft. CHIV-blE
o a7 d= 1.25 Ft. Type of user= Class 1 aip-R.p
Est.= 5 Tons of Class B Ri R FROM -Y- STA 22+68 TO STA. 23+10 LT
NDII M rMMERLx P 0p A/
/
ED06 TROY. SxANO BRONIJ NAM M r -EN -L- STA. 14+57 LT FROM -Y- STA. 23+15 TO STA. 23 29 RT
\ DB 4 270 PG ONTO wLSTEA0. A1M2N -EN $NW. RETAIN
MN 2T08309.H NETTxM d J DETAIL 7
N PO "A"
DB pTST 00999
n SPECIAL LATERAL WARIABLE WIDTH BASE DITCH INSET
a'N<\��
60.Sg�E Not fe Scalel N
�
I
EE•��
siY� k\
u+
y+
w
A // /4 S. IMUM DEPTH
k �/ Net�rnl A ` Fill NCRETE CAT e.n
EE••��,, // SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH r°u� .7 R A
\sit of \ E / O SEE DETAIL 3 'y p F\e� siove o SIN a F �1 %C`
A yi DDE- 69.75CY n, NIaSNiAO,Y Lo" JD�P. E7
d Geofc,xle B i ro oNyr Dr99 /$ G Xke
++
Fr. ME l03S69 '
TAIN NAN M rpUA<RLr 29•E 'q XI
+,
H+
(�'l, r F m Mox. d= 1 F 3•A9'
+iY R AI / - y o MANTE PROPERTES S B= Vries ( I RET S Z 32
M�j \, y EXIST SIDEWALK WNEGFM[NT LL[ Type of Liner- Class 8 Rip -Rap
•1`^
/ INAGE PROPOSED Q /
Y ADJOINING EC TO BE REMOVED DD ON9lPG A06.6 FROM STA. 21+00 TO STA 21+50 RT G /
z
H �• / T m PlN 2TOS3pE99T ♦ , # :D BY AD S��YJ T
6 bi acun�ac. ATmA tERrw J J.
F /
le.LEGEND 30•ZB•Z;•
-7
` 'V' 2
g�
J SPECIAL LATERAL DITCH
SEE 1
/
_ FILL IN E WETLANDy2�\ /
•C ISF Mrowmil
}I TE PROMOTE
IN BEGIN C T W�gCMDPG
��l
� �
s ((�� SURFDENOTES ACE WATERTS
ONO
S/]FFr ® DENOTES TEMPORARY OT 4 2.17 O M }NiD{9W!'p
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
�w�

n
- -- 26 - , a mm a t 3 S - i -� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
E3ETAC'i � _ ---_ DES &� -_' ,�
,'SPECIAL LATERAL GGV'�TCH------- - SPE AL LA ERAL'�' BITCH CURVE DATA 7�Y-I ` �. t�� - , I� ��� 1 P'�'� a �_ p�`� -� �6ze, tl� 188673.08 4
, �1y' INot� 53�e1 __ - --- L � I ^ 1lON OR FOR1EJ�x y
�e
- ,--�- -aZq __� .L q 0 _ _ l RW SHEET NO.
a
- -----'-' _ - PI,�Sio/6+���jj393 Pl S10 2248/90 ---- r N' 6'2435$INN�Nw
ui�o'ore.ne.,- .. _
9'43,'52_T,,(RTJ �� = 5*37'262"IRTJ �� % a '(}��_/ a - ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
t Ndk� RIr ENGINEER ENGINEER
\'�0��. y
A'a s` 31 '- �B'ff/,�aj
`^-�
slope - oo� s1aPe' _� £
� = iO3' 39.T rAnre ���JJJaaa
L o 29722'/`T=� l', --- L = 530.05' �,� �yo W;,%'
Tm= /4897;' T = 26524' T6Bzus�s SOzff_ `/-•
P{N� 9i
�n�a- -- _
-3Zj - .�94
- R = �i.%�J�l,QO' ,' 5P 5.400.00'a9PECIAL �kTERAL 'VI'DITCH _ 9'�
�--'`-�--' `
FRcSM-LT+STA.14f66 TO STA,i5+50 LT FROM+L-STA.. 18+25 Ta'STA:3}r0Q RT z'Q�--S �O PH �1,�,- 401�PH 1�,SEE DETAIL 's L / 3';2-,��a�
FROM-Y�,STA. 14475 TO -SSA. 17+25 RTz+o - FROM-L-�5�,�24-40 TO STA.25+501iiZ� ,.__,---�__ _ `� a, `'_\ / END, C�NST `` �`�
F@OM STA. 2Y1 50 TO 'STA. 22+1f FROM STA.72+75 TO, STA M+56 LT - 3� W'.a��+ @ NC a ' �/
-Y= 11 -L. R£ J
__ - -Y- T Sfd �- FROM -Y,- STA. 24+75 TO, STA. 25-50 LT �`-�--320FROM -Y- STA. 1+75 TQ STA. 23+ 5 RT --`3a ' a _ ' i r, ' ` O - -_ ------
PERMANENT ��
-- SURFACE�
'&TAI 2 ,NEB
sPrclA� DITCH r' WATER IMPACTS
�,�oo a�''¢As" �T�,,
<<j NorIel __ APPDX,, LOGQ,Tf�J! ' a--� - _, �D'Ba/LU _ �' [� _ '�� �� '3z DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
- _- - �_ --- -' -- = - �,--, X e —' ;� z,
ti F���; TEMPORAQ �
�6URFAC
of G: � � __=_-'F INLE$'--' ^--. UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
==CF_ANNEL-�= �� & h
'rr
Qt .I �` 7� � sloce �l o _--.,____ r-`)'. _ - PLANS PREPARED BY'
- ydATER '
,Iki1Pk&s
�
1 �AiP.D=t)Ft. ) i e _ I 'a� �� _ ____, ET S i jj ��� SPECM!_L,ATE TLC I `�>. USA
771, SEE DE a _ - zo " SUITE 500 E47LLE 8'fI1F.E'f
S3
WASS RAT.EIGTT, NC 27601
`FRBNI X=a STAa18+'75 TO'a STA.2Q 119 LT '4 `a -' \ ��� _ '-- UI;I:I.YlY.636.4U4U
'�.
�`�
, . 1'.AM 1.919.836.4099
DETA P - , WATER TENT SU AQE r ,�'l li'I 1� PER A NT SURFACE IICENSTE NO.T-0165
32YJ S ECIA'b BACK E3F, C�F�RR'CUT DITCH `' a _ '`40ND WATERaIMPACI i r - \
a, ,-_' i INossRgt SCALe{`, ,�� a'� 'ta .. c--` , V; 4 ER I PACTS s-
w 4 i _ i Q RIP PAT EMBANKMENT gy -
NATUrt �Y RA KMENT - N � / - PfR OUTLET
ouNo<'_` EST. 23 TONS CLASS I RIP R � Z NNEL Tr WE INLET,0T7LET CHAN44
SEE DE AIL 8 �i STABILIZATIONa.
�] '' Sj CLASS I RIP RAP'` �� ` is I, Not tU`a�lel - -
b.\ 3 TEMPORARY S
e2 SEE DETAIL 5 SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH WATER IMPACTS
' — P - SEE DETAIL 1 2
OM ST16+97 TO 18aJ RLT, S RAI Yy DITCH_-
SURFACE �­"
-L- aST,' --_ _-TS,
Oy1S7DEfATIy,I , -_-. ___�__ *�.., VE f TEM O ARY 5 ACE``
WATER PACTSLehgth=
__ELF 45'
16 F eHryo,ry
TEMPORARY-j'SURFAC �� --_ _ SCAk oBE;t� c o„ - - - �s i& — 4. - �<:�� RY S FA % �� eset,�10B.
Tod areias3,1w Ro���'`
WATER IMPACTSsTi" �� s' RIB IMPA P �_
PERMANENT SURFACE - _ L zr NDN ON rDgL(NLr 4, 5' 2. 7.5' / 9` 17 SVGF
WATER IMPACTS EocE of vAYENErn a _ _ T1MN AGMSERYKES NG - ' -�'- -
'L ��, '�/ �`� �@ tlSYEa DETAIL`e T�CALE ���=CJUa,
_ a'OB Oa333 RG A S 'B' RIPRAP �k, Q pp4gg
a PN zT R§% ' E5 oN5 (?T 8 ,r _ P 4 dz _ `+ REFER TOO SIGN G� PLv�t4
36 m
cam{ e� NONE ` x w' ��4 ' E1.7 s `° wLroN NEE 32 HEET`SIGN= FOR'SPEED.,
� 5 f0 _ 0. �� _
WINSE E NC Ivry a i �*' 51 x 2.5'-7. ' R (� `�
1.25'D ELEY•) 22
J I.ALC a �,i=l� l i
�
s y s z // y oR a WARNING, SIG�7�,LOCAiJON��
ygyyb ' `rp�gv
N
iTO6�If0TT3 _ p�
�� ✓ __ y,wl�
--,L- POT'5i� . 12+ .VU SPECIAL LATERM 'V' T BE
DETAIL 1 <
a •' ,.� CP I 5Y:7o5 -_ `�
`
m ,SEE r
EGI,jsl KpJECT�188673% $w R g'� tie- Qo� �s Y z : L +41 -L- POT S4a, 2j`�76.00
i TyyEMTPEOR RIA Y S118F .. r ' `� o -ao£
�LSPECIA
r �. NP s� 1. D, ,- L 13a�
`^
v DI �� 80 �` EX.RWJ END PRQJEC'T. 18>�t�73.b8
_�, / S ECIAL LAT Q'V'DI CH W25 _ PE OUTLETA ACT N my ,Y RA / )' �'
W �iA� 8 T G LA '8' Ri Rty / 05 �� EX. RW -
SPE+33 C NNEL PERM ENT F ` DET
'Tr � j 2 a
1 _ ,� STA IZATIONT AT IMP
C1�5 RIP RAP / 'E s --_-
"'�SEE DE L 6 - 58. RC@ -III
E
�F 48.93' R �
a��Y1
1_9
s`-CE�
I�D'__ --
SH_____ ATglpi
N` EDGE MOVE ___-
SR U RIM,
2+fl6'%IEPNARD AAiSDPi O 1- —�— 1_\_ _ _ -- - -- —= —
CP RETAIN Iy _ _ -_- O _ ___ .• __
-
s—y F n
`
_1. �A=°_� �—a t-- c � - ---- .�•o ���, �-�-��;,�
�I`I,
L '
124---- -'+50 PUE .� __e 1�
/ PUE �% '� O C PUE P a SPECIAL LATERAL 'V DITCHwools42.2'-
o
40' '$EE DETAIL 4 sow_ ��- /
-F - PUE 2
1� - JB' PUBLIC fYt INAGE EA NI 'K
SO / �M..
E150 ,
0 CLASS 'B'RIPRAP
r
RELOCATE'EXISTING HANDHOLF�' , RCP -III �� EST,2 TON$LATERAL YARI Bl,E 4A�fbT �p ASE DITCH
eD BE IND SIDEWALK a EST.J SY 7 -C`i15$�RVI�'RAP _ g
OI ER AT&T ,'EXIST SIDEWALK R r'
I' -C /k
O _ O5'-7.5'W
Lfi T(�BERE'PAOVED R., -
---- -_•
' _ 40' _ _ REMOVE 9}r,LF RET N POT S/p.16-+65.85 Sid. 9 - 0o
__ 2a" RCP, -Y=1 PC St 20+/4Jn D G DEi ` P '^)
____________'_ -�-__ C-F �` Y '`^ 1:yV
"�, 9Uf�F�4CE
Y+53.5 ( 1 PEP, T 999
< -^ GIN `OVERL Y/H11D N�NG BZ o 03 _
p C
A
ISBk. ee _ _EXIST SIDEWALK' `Y oJii;,�� 60'Y- PT SILO. 18'�42✓(Q SPECCIAL BACK OF CURB D�TCHAR I�A�cs �SR��� ��
-�
eIRI<S " ---� %-
t BOYS AND -- _-' ��fYBE REMOVED
'o __ -_ c--- r DDE-253CYa
CLUB OF ZEBULON. -� te. r
/ as .,.,,� T r
t
a f �N-•
r� 8s0�9�5 nNc LR16TOODLi i0YMfilN6E9 �c WNTxL ETAIL S
GRASS RIP RAP
�w DETAIL
�f 09zrG oa59PIP�ouTLET CHANNEL, IATt,EMBANoKMENaT
` ----
RETAIN
Y � � ��' a � °.^. min; maw tam�n. •• •_
r d -D`�< _
-Fn,1t,Y k� - u a '- _ _ oiyot�ma I.0'min. 15'
-' A;1J. C Qc5 �r a _ e
�u
`
! `
I a� oTEXTIL
`[HANNH 3Eo ' t w ,
R9 a Ivonam�.�
� � Q� � to ih-r 1 Ft. � _ �,,. � �vice k$�e,= (&IFlj"; P
d= 1.25 Ftt5, �a a - Tt s u ` - _ a` _ 1 - r � gj 1 Ri R.P
-- o�!•� `.
' _' _-_ Est.a 5 Tons` {Classe Ri Ra 1 _ vo - _
NDII OR EORNFNL Z£ '' :' e P _ _ � P �'za `-5 a _ - - OpA` �6gW .22+68 TO SA. 23+10,L'T
�§ !`-W-S�A.'2 +�5 TO ,STA. 23 2 RT
EDNN TROY. SHANN BRMENE,, NOW OR FORhj I£, ,' _ti STA. 1�+57 LTA ' w _ -;. �- " moo '� '>� a a M �, w �'
` VZE UB 0650O PG OWTNU-' HALSTEAD. NYt[ uIEN�Suw. RETAIN' � � u, � . � `�� s � ��-
a;_nN R106lD i�Z aE,,. N -` ETAS 7 �''N _ ` '` rr rr
., DID MIST PG *MliS + ,,, -
ylFTy • -__ TA
- �I'�� SPECIAL LATERAL WARIABLE WJDTH SE 4JTCH. T - INSET A
^'<z'- -- �2e'��' - < v • INot to scale)
8+
�'
imu4( @EPTH
- ___• �' r3' `. \x • F.1�
--� E ' SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH_ ``pµ �, _ I�J
_ ~/� •_ of SEE DETAIL 3 '� D P° �' ,.3 siove • - _ s�gte a o SIN 'QR T
DOE- 69.75CY Cy
moo
+�
i
THIN' F m N0,1!' 0R dWEN�Y.e ; - '< t: -a 1 Fi. a A 7I
R AI , �,'y n wAIiIE WpPI ULC 'z` B= ( I -a M ., "' 5 Y 32.. t f , J ..,
E��1L,, � , S EXIST SIDEWALK m NAGFNENI LL[ Tyjne of Liner= Class B Ri�R.R ' 'j°ries
�A3.
w
z
,,gym
�W'D IIE PROP v �, u _ -- INAGE PROPOSED
""�TCLA Y ADJOINING P�4iJEC - -� { J`O BE REMOVED. BN.�AT�P 9916 FizOM STA.�I+OO TO SETA. 21+50 RT -- BY AD YCW)
P �\ ��, try" P,
ww
.P�
't "' _ ., l
C I r
££
'2�U'
7TONBDKSio i'q- '?
S�F r `LEGEND
w�
?1
- 30 7 1
jNS gl. - �- / q
SPECIAL LATERA�'I'rDITCH err
^,320'
�yaQ
7 SEE DETAIL 1
AC l
�� / / DENOTES TEMPORARY
_FILL IN WETLAND -' �Iit1. `�ti DN rMNfAY
ie, YNNIMES t
III TGTMMORWAT
DENOTES IMPACTS IN BE INa �.' w
LEO
i s -' SURFACE WATER
A.
C''rvN _ -� 0 4 017 G \' a ONIlPO MDN.e
`E�' '�- ® -- - TM }TO57DANNT
MDENOTES
PAOCT55INE SURFACE WATER

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACT6 SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
S1
-Y- 23+30 LT
Channel Stabilization
< 0.01
< 0.01
16
(0)
S1
-Y- 22+70 LT
Rip Rap at Embankment
< 0.01
< 0.01
49
9
S1
-Y- 23+30 LT
Stream loss in 48" Pipe
< 0.01
7
S2
-Y- 23+30 RT
Stream loss in 48" Pipe
< 0.01
22
S2
-Y- 23+30 RT
48" Pipe Oulet Stabilization
< 0.01
< 0.01
16
7
S3
-L- 14+42 LT
Stream loss in 30" Pipe
< 0.01
< 0.01
16
S3
-L- 14+42 LT
Pipe Outlet Stabilization
10
7
S4
-L- 21+24 RT
Fill Slope Over Ex. Ditch
< 0.01
38
W1
-L- 14+42 RT
Construction Easement
0.02
TOTALS*:
0.02
< 0.01
< 0.01
138
59
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Permanent Surface Water Impacts: 356 SF
Temporary Surface Water Impacts: 50 SF
Revised 2018 Feb

Highway ice"
Stor►lIitfeT Highway Stormwater Program
MW STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 188673.08 TIP No.: N/A Count ies : Wake Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element:
188673.08 ITIP Number: N/A Project Type: Intersection Improvement Date: 6/21/2021
Town Contact:
Chris Ray
Contractor / Designer:
WSP USA/ John F. Watson, PE
Address:
450 East Horton St
Zebulon, NC 27597
Address:
434 Fayetteville St.
Suite 1500
Raleigh, NC 27601
Phone:
919-269-5285
Phone:
919-836-4040
Email:
cray((D town ofze bu lon. org
Email:
lohn.f.watson(aDwsp.com
City/Town:
Zebulon
County(ies):
I Wake
River Basin(s):
Neuse T
ICAMA County?
I No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Yes
Project Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
0.17 miles Surrounding Land Use: lResidential
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area (ac.)
2.4 ac.
1.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
-L- will have 2-12' paved lanes with a 4' paved open shoulder/ditch section on the left; a 12' ctr. It.
turn lane a 12' rt. turn lane along with a 5' concrete sidewalk and C&G. -Y- will feature 2-12' paved
lanes w/a 12' ctr It. turn lane with C&G on both sides w/a 5' concrete sidewalk. North of the
intersection, -Y- transitions from the C&G section to an open shoulder/ditch section
-L- features 2-14' paved lanes with C&G along the right side w/a 4' concrete sidewalk from Sta.
12+75 to 16+66. From 16+66 to 21+70 L has 2-11' paved lanes w/open shoulder/ditch
sections. -Y- features 2- 10' lanes w/4' concrete sidewalk on both sides and open
shoulder/ditch sections from start to 20+14; and 2-12' paved lanes from Sta. 20+14 to end.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 9800 2040
Existing: 6825 Year: 2022
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
Along Shepard School Rd (-L-) the roadway has been widened to include a variable turn and median lane and curb and gutter will be installed on both sides. Catch basins will
be installed along the curb and gutter and tie into the existing 30" RCP -III near Sta. 14+40. This crosspipe will be collared and extended to proposed roadway fill. By not
replacing 30" RCP -III, impacts to Wetland (W1) are minimized to mechanized clearing for roadway construction. Impacts to JS are from pipe extension and channel stabilization
at this site. Along Old Bunn Rd (-Y-), a proposed 48" RCP -III crosspipe will replace the existing 30" RCP. Permanent surface water mpacts to the JS, include rip rap at
embankment where a lateral 'v' ditch outlets and channel stablization at the inlet of the proposed 48" RCP -III. At the outlet of the proposed 48" RCP -III, there is rip rap at the
embankment at the outlet of the ditch along with pipe outlet channel stabilization. The last site of impacts is at the end of the project on -L- RT where a proposed ditch outlets at
the wetland boundary and due to construction a segment of the wetland (W2) will require mechanized clearing.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body 1 : Unnamed Tributaryof Beaver Dam Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
27-86-2-3
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
ISA, SB 1-4
Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A
Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? I N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
N/A
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

Hlhwa North Carolina Department of Transportation
Stormwater
�..Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 188673.08 TIP No.: N/A County(ies): Wake Page 2 of 2
Swales
Sheet
No.
Station & Coordinates
(Road and Non Road
Projects)
Surface
Water
Body
Base
Width
(ft)
Front
Slope
(H:1)
Back
Slope
(H:1)
Drainage
Area
(ac)
Recommended
Treatm't Length
(ft)
Actual
Length
(ft)
Longitudinal
Slope
(%)
Q2
(cfs)
V2
(fps)
Q10
(cfs)
V10
(fps)
Rock
Checks
Used
BMP
Associated w/
Buffer Rules?
4
-Y- 17+25 RT
(1)Unnanned
Tributary of
0.0
4.0
2.0
1.3
128
250
1.22%
2.7
2.0
2.3
2.1
No
No
-Y- 19+75 RT
4
-L- 19+00 LT
(1)Unnanned
Tributary of
0.0
4.0
3.0
0.1
8
119
1.55%
0.5
4.1
1.2
1.9
No
No
-L- 20+19 LT
4
-L- 19+00 RT
(1)Unnanned
Tributary of
0.0
4.0
3.0
2.8
280
250
2.73%
4.4
7.1
9.6
3.9
Yes
No
-L- 20+50 RT
4
-Y- 21+50 LT
(1)Unnanned
Tributary of
0.0
4.0
2.0
0.1
14
125
0.38%
0.4
1.0
1.2
1.1
No
No
-Y- 22+75 LT
4
-L- 16+97 RT
(1)Unnanned
Tributary of
0.0
4.0
3.0
2.9
292
203
2.88%
4.4
4.7
5.6
3.4
Yes
No
-L- 19+00 RT
4
-L- 13+50 LT
(1)Unnanned
Tributary of
0.0
4.0
3.0
0.5
48
106
1.25%
1.2
2.7
1.5
0.4
Yes
No
-L- 14+56 LT
4
-L- 15+75 LT
(1)Unnanned
Tributary of
0.0
4.0
2.0
0.1
13
109
0.30%
0.3
1.3
0.9
1.0
Yes
No
-L- 14+66 LT
Additional Comments

Appendix C: Supplementary Information
1. USACE Wetland Determination Forms
2. NC DWQ Stream Identification Forms
3. US Fish and Wildlife Service Information and
Planning Consultation Official Species List
4. NC Natural Heritage Program Report
5. NC State Historic Preservation Office Response
Letter

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #. 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): A. Johnson & C. Baker, WSP USA Section, Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.839743 Long:-78.315130 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB - Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: R4SBC
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
X Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0.25
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1. Juncus effusus
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 35
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC
_=Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
_
FAC species
x 3 =
_
FACU species
x 4 =
_
UPL species
x 5 =
_
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
_ =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
70 Yes FACW
70 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 14
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Plot size adjsuted to fit the size of the wetland
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil was extremely saturated and muddy
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #. 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: UPA
Investigator(s): A. Johnson & C. Baker, WSP USA Section, Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.839761 Long:-78.315095 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB - Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: R4SBC
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland data form represents the adjacent roadside area that is periodically mowed
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UPA
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1. Anthoxanthum odoratum
2.
Lamium purpureum
3.
Poa annua
4.
Taraxacum officinale
5.
Valerianella radiata
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 60
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
_=Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0
x 1
= 0
FACW species 0
x 2
= 0
_
FAC species 5
x 3
= 15
_
FACU species 80
x 4
= 320
_
UPL species 35
x 5
= 175
_
Column Totals: 120
(A)
510 (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A
= 4.25
_ =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
50 Yes
FACU
35 Yes
UPL
20 No
FACU
10 No
FACU
5 No
FAC
120 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 24
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Plot size adjsuted to fit the roadside upland area
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 3/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
4-10
10YR 4/4
60
10YR 3/4 40 Loamy/Clayey
10-16
10YR 5/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #. 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: WB
Investigator(s): A. Johnson & C. Baker, WSP USA Section, Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.839761 Long:-78.315095 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RgC - Rawlings -Rion complex, 6-10 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB
Absolute
Dominant
Indicatc
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Yes
FAC
2. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
45
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 23
20% of total cover:
9
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Acer rubrum
5
No
FAC
3.
Morella cerifera
5
No
FAC
4.
Liriodendron tulipifera
2
No
FACU
5.
Pinus taeda
2
No
FAC
6.
7.
8.
9.
34
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17
20% of total cover:
7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
2.
Juncus effusus
5
Yes
FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
25
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13
20% of total cover:
5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC
4 (A)
5 (B)
80.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100
Loamy/Clayey
4-9 2.5Y 7/3 70
10YR 7/8 20 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10YR 4/1 10
9-17 10YR 4/2 95
10YR 5/8 5 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
17-20 10YR 4/1 95
10YR 4/6 5 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Gravel and sand was intermixed within the soil profile from 4 to 13 inches
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #. 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: UPB
Investigator(s): A. Johnson & C. Baker, WSP USA Section, Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 5-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.840441 Long:-78.314920 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RgC - Rawlings -Rion complex, 6-10 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UPB
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Juniperus virginiana 10 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover:
2
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8
20% of total cover:
3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Rosa multiflora
90 Yes
FACU
2. Lonicera japonica
10 No
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
100 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC
1 (A)
3 (B)
33.3% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1
= 0
FACW species 0
x 2
= 0
FAC species 15
x 3
= 45
FACU species 110
x 4
= 440
UPL species 0
x 5
= 0
Column Totals: 125
(A)
485 (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A
= 3.88
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPB
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5
10YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
5-12
10YR 6/3
100
Loamy/Clayey
12-18
10YR 5/3
100
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #. 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: WC
Investigator(s): A. Johnson & C. Baker, WSP USA Section, Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.837889 Long:-78.314483 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB - Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: PUBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Vegetation was mowed within 7 days of the delineation which left behind dead material and made it difficult to characterize vegetation. Equipment
tracks in soft soil with standing water were observed within the wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
FAC-Neutral Test hydrology indicator was omitted due to inability to identify vegetation that typically grows within the area idenified as wetland WC
because of recent mowing.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: _
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Juncus effusus
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicatc
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC
1 (A)
1 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
_=Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
_
FAC species
x 3 =
_
FACU species
x 4 =
_
UPL species
x 5 =
_
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
_ =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
10 Yes FACW
10 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Much of the area was covered in dead plant material. Some dead material that suggested plants such as Solidago sp. and Dichanthelium sp. (less
wet species) may be growing in the area identified as wetland WC
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-9
10YR 4/1
95
10YR 5/8 5 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-15
10YR 5/1
80
10YR 5/8 20 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
15-24
10YR 6/1
75
10YR 5/6 25 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SA
Date: 4/7/21
Project/Site: Shepard School Rd
Intersection
Latitude: 35.837993
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.314776
Total Points: 27.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Zebulon Quadrangle
Other � 5-Minute Series
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral ntermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3Q
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
10
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1Q
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1Q
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
10
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
QO
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(2)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
20
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
30
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
20
3
22. Fish
OD
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
OQ
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other=(
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: A crayfish, aquatic beetle, and many
small clams were observed
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SB(1)
Date: 4/7/21
Project/Site: Shepard School Rd
Intersection
Latitude: 35.838636
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.315597
Total Points: 33.0
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Zebulon Quadrangle
Series
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent erenni
e.g. Quad Namete
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3Q
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2Q
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1Q
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
10
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
QO
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1Q
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
(D
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3Q
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1Q
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
OQ
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other=(
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: A crayfish and several dragonfly nymphs
and mosquito fish were observed
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SB(2)
Date: 4/7/21
Project/Site: Shepard School Rd
Intersection
Latitude: 35.839072
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.315696
Total Points: 28.0
Stream Determination (circle one)
Zebulon Quadrangle
Other � 5-Minute Series
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 11.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3Q
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
02
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2Q
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
10
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
20
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
QO
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
Q
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3Q
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
OQ
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other=(
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Data form also represents segment SB 3 ; a crayfish was observed
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SB(4)
Date: 4/7/21
Project/Site: Shepard School Rd
Intersection
Latitude: 35.840031
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.314831
Total Points: 31.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Zebulon Quadrangle
Series
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Namete
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
20
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
02
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
10
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
10
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
10
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
10
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
QO
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
10
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3Q
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
Q
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other=(
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: A few crayfish and several dragonfly
nymphs, aquatic snails, tadpoles,
and mosquito
fish were observed
Sketch:

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: January 19, 2023
Project Code: 2023-0035621
Project Name: Intersection Improvements at SR 2230 and Shepard School Road
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

01/19/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

01/19/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

01/19/2023
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

01/19/2023
KA
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0035621
Project Name: Intersection Improvements at SR 2230 and Shepard School Road
Project Type: Road/Hwy - Maintenance/Modification
Project Description: The Town of Zebulon is seeking to improve vehicular and pedestrian
safety by adding turn lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian and traffic signals.
Drainage improvements to accommodate the sidewalks and additional
lanes are also being proposed. There are three culvert extensions with
riprap stabilization at the inlet/outlet and two small sections of bank
stabilization along a stream bank that is located adjacent to the proposed
roadway fill slope.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.838930399999995,-78.31593139283666,14z
A r. ka
Counties: Wake County, North Carolina

01/19/2023 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 8 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NA MF STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

01/19/2023 4
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masom Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■0■� INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■�■m NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
January 24, 2023
Adam Karagosian
WSP USA
1001 Morehead Square Drive
Charlotte, NC 28203
RE. Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
Dear Adam Karagosian:
d_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-20629
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
January 24, 2023
NCNHDE-20629
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last � Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
i Date = Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner ier Type
Town of Zebulon Open Space Town of Zebulon Local Government
Town of Zebulon Open Space - Gill Street Park Town of Zebulon Local Government
Town of Zebulon Open Space - Whitley Park Town of Zebulon Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on January 24, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q3, October 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-20629: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
ngham Rd
�P64 4,""erdaln CreeG
'o
a
h
m e��
4 q\Pp
Riley HA"1 Rd
�a
Greer
P ace
Srrdt \
a
January 24, 2023
Managed Area (MAREA)
® Buffered Project Boundary
Q Project Boundary
u,
r°tor St m
96
342 ft
264
NMI pr
9W , Jaa c�C
Debnam R</
O/d Bunn Rd
97
E Gan�O� Ave
a
L
Zebulon '�4r/eO eek
2
0.28 0.55 1.1 Miles
64 I I I I I I I I
So uross. Fsh, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NCFAS.
NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland, FFMA,
It-mapand the GIS user community
Sources. Esri, HERE. Garm in. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User in,
Page 3 of 3

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
October 12, 2021
Amanda Johnson
WSP USA
434 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1500
Raleigh, NC 27601
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
Amanda. Johnson(2wsp.com
Re: Intersection improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road, Zebulon, Wake County,
ER 21-2226
Dear Ms. Johnson:
Thank you for your letter of September 7, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a�ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� o
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898