HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150368 Ver 1_BR 160053 10-03-0015 Caswell 160053 NHP Archaeological no sites present or affected 8-7-2013_2015041610-03-0015
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
; o�� �� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES �����9.
�� `�� a " � PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM �� � � �
aT � , Fr °
o.��'? This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not F�;.�'�
__ s'�C�� ��t, �f5��
_ valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the �..,,, __
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No
WBS No:
F.A. No:
Bridge 53
17BP.7.R.82
n/a
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document:
Caswell
►IT[K.`J
Funding: � State ❑ Federal
� Yes ❑ No Permit Type: unspeci�ed
Project Description: The project proposes to replace Bridge No. 53 on SRI527 (River Bend Rd) in
Caswell County, North Carolina. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) is centered upon
the Bridge 53 structure and measures IOOOft in length (SOOft from each bridge end point) and IOOft in
width (SOft from each side of the SRI527 center-line).
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed
the subject project and deterrnined:
� There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's
area of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
� Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
❑ All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
� There are no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present
or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needec�
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIG/BLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
fa�ia for Minor Ti�nnsporin(ia: Projects ns Qimlified in tl�e 2007 Progrnmmatic Agreeme»t.
1 of 3
10-03-0015
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The project area is located in the north-central portion of Caswell, between the Dan River and the Virginia state
border. Consolidated to the Roanoke River Drainage Basin, Glasby Branch constitutes a second order stream
flowing north to south through the Bridge No. 53 APE. The proposed replacement location and surrounding area is
characterized by a typical "rolling" and "hilly" Piedmont topography dissected by small streams and creeks which
empty into the Dan River.
A map review and site file search conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) determined that no
previously recorded archaeological sites, NRHP eligible properties, or documented cemeteries were located within
the limits of, or directly adjacent to the APE. Further, the APE was referenced on topographic and other mapping
for the appraisal of environmental, geomorphological, hydrological, and other correlatives that may have resulted
in past occupation at this location. Finally, aerial photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) were examined and the
Google Street View map application was utilized (when amenable) for gaining a virtual, first-hand perspective of
the overall study area and for assessing disturbances, both natural and human induced, which compromise the
integrity of potential archaeological sites/deposits. Based on the topography and hydrology, the APE and
surrounding area has a high potential of containing prehistoric sites. An archaeological reconnaissance and
subsurface survey is therefore recommended prior to construction activities.
An archaeological investigation of the Bridge No. 53 APE was performed on Tuesday, August 6, 2013 by NCDOT
staff archaeologists Scott Halvorsen and Damon Jones. Initially, a reconnaissance of the entire APE was conducted
to identify potential locations of above-ground archaeological or historical remains and to determine the
placement and extent of subsurface shovel testing necessary for project compliance. The eastern quadrants were
characterized by fallow grass hay fields, the northwestern quadrant APE by a large, inundated bog-like area, and
the southwestern quadrant by a slightly sloped field planted in rowed, young pine trees. A transect was
established approximately 40ft from the SR1475 center-line on the northern and southern sides of the subject
roadway. Shovel test pits (stp) were spaced at 100ft intervals along the transects, and numbered and excavated
sequentially east to west. In total, six stp's were completed along the northern transect (5 northeastern quad; 1
northwestern quad [bog]) and ten stp's were dug along the southern transect (5 southeastern quad; 5
northeastern quad). A typical stp soil profile from a northeastern quadrant test pit consisted of a first soil stratum
containing 10YR5/1 gray sandy loam extending to 5cmbs — 7cmbs atop a second stratum characterized by 10YR5/3
brown coarse sand loam to 35cmbs — 45cmbs. Stratum III consisted of a compacted and mottled 10YR6/8 brownish
yellow and 10YR5/6 yellowish brown dry clay/clay loam subsoil. Due to the swampy inundation of most of the
northwestern quadrant APE, only one shovel test pit was excavated along the northern transect at this location.
Placed approximately 75ft. west of the creek, the stp contained 10YR4/2 dark gray brown loam to 15cmbs atop a
second soil layer typified by 10YR3/3 dark brown wet loam. No archaeological deposits or artifacts were
documented during testing of the northern quadrants.
A generalized stp profile from southeastern quadrant tests included a first soil layer typified by 10YR4/1 dark gray
loam to 10cmbs -15cmbs over a second soil stratum consisting of 10YR5/2 or 5/4 to 35cmbs —40cmbs. Stratum III
tended to resemble a mottled 10YR5/6 yellowish brown, 10YR6/8 brownish yellow, and 10YR6/1 gray clay/clay
loam. The southwestern quadrant, largely impacted from activities associated with pine tree plantings, was
characterized by a subsurface soil profile containing a 10YR3/3 dark brown sandy loam first soil stratum to around
20cmbs over a second stratum 7.5YR4/6 strong brown sandy loam to 30cmbs — 40cmbs. A sterile 7.5YR5/6 — 5/8
sandy clay subsoil underlies the second soil layer. No evidence of past cultural occupation was uncovered during
excavation of shovel test pits along the southern project transect.
No cultural artifacts or features were observed or documented during the archaeological reconnaissance and
subsurface survey of the project APE. In general, the Bridge No. 53 project study area is marked by erosion and
agricultural impact. While those ground surfaces adjacent to the APE may contain artifacts or other evidence of
past cultural activity, the survey documented no such indications within the construction impact zone. As such, no
additional archaeological investigation or input is recommended or required for the proposed project. A finding of
"no historic properties affected" is considered appropriate for the bridge replacement project.
"NO NATIONAL REG/STER ELIG�BLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL S/TES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
forn� for Minor Ti�nnsporfntim� Projects ns Qualified in (he 2007 Progrnmmntic Agreenient.
2 of 3
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: [�Map(s) [�Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
Signed:
_ <����� �
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
g/7/,�0�
Date
"NO NATlONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LlSTED ARCHAEOLOG/CAL S/TES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
foru� for Minor Trnnsportn(ion Pi�ojects ns QunliJied in d�e 2007 Progrnnmmtic Agreement.
3 of 3
� "� `����\,/\J �. � � �� �l
\ S �
/�� J'; . J � ` �..� ' �� .\ � _
�! (� �
� � .'•� \\ •` \� i / �::_/ \� .
1� ,\ �'.
��t/ /� O �`S� ��� ! ' .� J�:�� � .,
,. l ,
\ �, ,1 �'` , � T � � � \ l; , �/
i ' /,_.
��;.4� ((To� +' �t� /
� ~ J• '
A n n � , �l _...
�1 � � �' �� � =`_` � � �
�t w,
�i, iWi \��' �
� � � �Q � � �
,'
, f �+ i
\���` �--- ' �'� � ,% a .
-•`"'_" `� ` >i�/�+�i' ' � � ;p / < �.
� . - � ` � �-
-*�r::, a. L_ . ,� . � �� � 1 , 1
� . `.-_.a{ �I ��tf�N _ � -�io ��•�... / : � ��j �Y�y C
- t /l .�.� �;,`� . .� j, U
-�,��� , „ � �, 5 � , ��
y��/� ��'� � at,� f � cLi
i
� j' � ; � �� ..
__� _/ � r� a
L�� Sr `' . `)��.r � �
t:.:—,,,.� r n�� � � _.��t'i� � ' w �\� t�
�� l l �. �- . _ �
�� . .� �
�/ ;� ..V..-F;i-�t� , � �
i � ��- �
�� :�� f� l. \�� s %� m
r `, `
�-�. V T
� , - % o
r' �,�_ � �� ; �t,f �
, ,
_ -��-Y � � � - . ,r �� � ,� � -
, ,
�� �- ,� � �;- , ,i r_--._ _,, I � -- -
'<�:� �r " .�
s�> //�� \ ;r �\ �. � "_
� \ � �vjr �-.r
1 (`� 1 • - i' � / (�5`\ �
� ! J`J l ii . /`—ti� +.� ��'` _
�� <�- _ �ii` - �
`I / r � j�� A�
�. �. \ \ .1�a�.� �r' i� . �..
� — `\ �� '3 � t�✓-�-� ti..; VpL � (J ' \..
` � � .il ��--�' . � �:�,i,
� /J'�0 � ,� .� . •\� ..
J;� b fl M " h �
l�,�bb ,��,� - _: ��.i� � . '��° �t'� `�vr . .
/ \�_.
1 � I�'^/' lt
i� / . .' 1� . ( � . •7r1� \ � / � � \\i �� i��l _. ..
i( �� \� 1 } i � � \ '" " � "' /�\ �
---� — ��o��� � � ; , ��
�-- — � �`� _' � ' � � � .�
.s � � (� �' S°° ;e,
_ 1 �� %� � — � �i � ��� )
� V l�� '� `� 4o C,a It`\ ' / ��/`/ ` ),i
1.� _e � � �
/ � 400 �\. /,� 400 �� �o � �.
��� i�i1 1����� I j`ol�',rf` �r� —��.. �'1 ��—
�� ``� /11 ' 1'''.'\:���,,; �` ,�� .
� � � � 7 � � \� �V ; • ; �� `'� o�� �
�� � i �/
� (' � � � � �ll
�` �����\, »��.�/
� � '�� � ) ri i� ��,_; ��� � (� �
�1 l �� ,, I,.° o 0 1 i
� . � � / �� �� o �-, , �
1 - � 1! � � � h •.-'�
%� /� � �% � � % � � � ��� o�� /
� � �/ �r� I \� , � ���i���-'.� l � \ .//1 � / .�� �, . ��.. � i �i
, ,� � - u� � � - ��
ii °o � v� ✓
ii �
�` � � �— u �
VA� ��543 �
��,1 ,/ Cem• •I11 ��
�/�, • �� �
l �I o
� �' � �J . �
\��, J,,
� �; `� i \ �:::�• 5u �
\ � \ �-�./ \� �\ I/ � � �
� — — l ��D
:�,� �,
�� � � � ��
� �
!` ss� ��
�� I
/� �o�
i � � \ � �\�\
„ , ;
,, o .::.� � �
�
�,�� � � o d�
�' �.,,�o—�� /,�
��� �: � '`
� � �� . 1
��
11
11 �
0�1 �
00 �h
� � �.�
o< <�
� �� `'
� I �
�
/ �� c
�" -��
� ; : �
� ���
�� �
` ���jy� �'�� ��
n , � 1,
)� . ,
� �� �
l//� I ��\
z � �� �
` �� ��\
���� `
.
II° �
,�)S/ �10 1�
,
,,� �, ,
`,/�f'? �( �\
�(� /�.� � ;, %�';�;
0
��� �������1 ! l v
�
o�
y ��
� ; i
� -,�
//� ��'
�. o/'
��/%(/���?;��
� /' `_ / ) / ��4Z
,�� ,, ,�' _
�� —'
%�i
� =�%
,` �l� \\ _
%=�
�
��
l___��
i
�1t% l
',�Ir�
;� �l � � `�� �-�
� .;
�� � '�` � �
��, � _ :
l 1
�� � I 1 {
� � ✓
3 �: ^ (���� �v �
�/ ;
I �. � M
� -� � U
^� / ��� � W I��~'�' 2
r� : � � „_—� � o
,J, �a, ,�
/ � J
l �� . 500 �������
J °"/• �
/ /(_ _.`��. ��
��� �
(C-, � �5� oo�-���" 2 �
��- , �% -��� ��
� �� 1f
o ,, �
_—�--�� � �/� ao41
���'����
�:
�
�,� n ao46
� ; ��%°�- �
; ,, -
� 1 % D �;
I�' � s
�, ; � � ,
0
�,�'E��, l N A �� 5�� 32'30„
W E�L—� 0'
f o 153" � o�
0
✓ / ° 40
i ::: ���� � I 45
` .. q/
// e � „� ,
, w D �� / �''�. ° � „� 3
( ��°�0 6
� � \ � Ga � . �-...
�> � d , �
?�� � ,- � o a -'�o�U
Zuo� �, �J J//�" �
I\%i .� 4�/ �J /
/ U
ER��
- _-----__\\\ Qo44
, \��_
�
�
�� � ��_
% ��'� % ��
I � -
4
' �� � ��� 1010000 FEET
�
�� �o ��� `:;1 I � � �� - �� w � ��- � � �i � � � 153f (N. C.)
��/ � �' i k
� � �� ��, ��� , � i � iio��;�'�'�f , ` ��
� � , (��'� � � /`�l� � � n o� �
,�\ l `� (� �� � ` . � \� ,� e ir � —
� �� , ��
J� \ �� `1 , �o � •� �,i.� � ��� �i� � 4043
� ���` �, �� / �l r"' l j �� i° /
`� � , � � u i° '�� �/o �°�o
� ����-�� � �� . J ��,,� u�� j� �1 � � �
�`-�, �� � o ' ,� - - ' � � � (
� , . -� � -'" � �� ,%
��� � � l �, C�� � „ �
��� . ,�-- � � � J lI
,����_.� ;c� ,��� „� �
o -�- >
��t��� ��en'', �� � � � � ��\����� �� � �
\h�°� r-� i � ��//.1.i -� .. . 1 (�� o__ .�� �