20150100 Ver 1_More Info Received_20150414

'1 15- D la-b
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
April 10, 2015
Mr Josh Mitchell
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn Mr Chad Turlington
NC DWQ, WBSCP Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS, LINE 1 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT PROJECT
DWR# 15 -0100, SAW- 2015 -00195
ROBESON, SCOTLAND AND ANSON COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
REVISED PCN
Dear Mr Mitchell and Mr Turlington
On the behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas, Energy Land & Infrastructure (ELI) previously submitted Pre -
Construction Notifications (PCNs) for the Line 1 Class Location Replacement Project in Robeson,
Scotland, and Anson Counties The proposed project would replace seven sections of the existing gas
line across the three counties Two PCNs were submitted for Site 2, where a Section 10 Permit was
anticipated, and Site 7, where a stream relocation was anticipated The remaining five sites had minor or
no stream impacts that would be below 0 10 acre in size as covered by U S Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12 and NC DENR Water Quality Certification No 3884
Since the original PCNs were submitted, the USACE has requested that all seven sites be re- submitted In
one PCN and the delineations be provided Based on this request, a revised PCN was submitted with
plans and delineations for each site
DENR sent a Request for Additional Information date March 5, 2015 The response to that letter was
discussed at the field visit on April 1, 2015 At the field review, it was determined that at Site 7, the
pipeline will be replaced, the stream will not be relocated and the culvert replacement will remain at the
same location as the original culvert Since then, the plans have been revised and are enclosed with the
revised PCN Three copies of the revised PCN package are being submitted to NC DWQ and one revised
package is being submitted to the USACE
Thank you for allowing us to submit this revised information If you have questions or need additional
information please contact me at (615) 383 -6300 or by email at Suzanne herron @eli -Ilc com
Sincerely,
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, PLLC
Suzanne erron, P E , CPESC
cc Mr Jim Kalish, PNG (via email)
Enclosures
D9C�C0W[2
D
ii APR 1 4 2015
L._
DENR - WATER RESOURCES
401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
1420 Donelson Piles, Suits A -12, Nashville, Tennessee 37217 www.eii- llc.com 615.383.6300
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL

o/�o�wA�r�gp�
M
oo
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
ENR - WATER RESOURCGS
401 8 BUFFER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1
Processing
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12 or General Permit (GP) number 3884
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
2015 Line 1 Class Location Replacement Project
2b
County
Robeson, Scotland, and Anson
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Maxton, Laurinburg, Lilesville, and Burnsville
2d
Subdivision name
NA
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
NA
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Piedmont Natural Gas easement - Individual owners listed on Supplemental Info
3b
Deed Book and Page No
- --
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Jim Kalish, Piedmont Natural Gas
3d
Street address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28210
3f
Telephone no
(704) 731 -4598
3g
Fax no
(704) 731 -4098 10
1
I
3h
Email address
llm kalish @piedmontng com I I AFH 1 4 2015
ENR - WATER RESOURCGS
401 8 BUFFER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Party responsible for construction
4b
Name
Jim Kalish
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d
Street address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e
City, state, zip
Charlotte, NC 28210
0
Telephone no
(704) 731 -4598
4g
Fax no
(704) 731 -4098
4h
Email address
dim kalish @ pied montng com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Suzanne Herron
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC
5c
Street address
1420 Donelson Pike, Suite A -12
5d
City, state, zip
Nashville, TN 37217
5e
Telephone no
(615) 383 -6300
5f
Fax no
(615) 360 -8476
5g
Email address
suzanne herron @eli -Ilc com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
See Supplemental Information
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude Longitude
1c
Property size
acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
See Supplemental Information
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
See Supplemental Information
2c
River basin
See Supplemental Information
3.
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
See the supplemental information
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
3d
The
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
proposed project will place a new natural gas line The new gas line is being installed to replace an existing line
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
See the Supplemental Information page for the overall protect description
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments Wetland assessment, various dates, attached
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known)
Agency /Consultant Company Dial Cordy and Associates
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Corps visited sites on April 1, 2015
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
E] Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
001
W2 T
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
002
W3 P
Land Clearing
Floodplain Pool
Yes
Corps
128
W4 T
Land Clearing
Floodplain Pool
Yes
Corps
014
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts:
146
2h Comments
Wetland impacts W1 and W2 are at Site 1
Wetland impacts W3 and W4 are at Site 2
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 T
Underground pipeline
Lumber River
PER
Corps
100
30
S2 T
Culvert
Site 7, stream 3
INT
Corps
3
5
S3 T
Underground pipeline
Site 7, stream 2
INT
Corps
5
0
S4
Choose one
-
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
35
31 Comments
Stream impact S1 is at Site 2
Stream impact S2 is at Site 7 The culvert will replace an exising culvert that is undersized
Stream impact S3 is at Site 7
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indiv ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 T
Trib of Leith Creek
Other
Other
0 008
O2 T
Trib of Leith Creek
Bridge
Other
0 002
03 T
Trib of Little Creek
Other
Other
0
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
001
4g Comments an area Site
03 is at Site 5
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total
0
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below if yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require miticiation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts:
0
0
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Several of the crossing in the proposed protect are being HDD or conventially bored to avoid impacts to wetlands and streams
1 b
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ "Yes ❑X No
2b
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b
Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes X No
buffer mitigation
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
The proposed project is to construct an underground pipeline There will be no permanent above ground attributes to this project
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c
If you answered `yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
No wastewater will be generated
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS coordination - letter attached
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Protect located in Piedmont Region of NC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO coordination Response letters dated January 27, 2015 The letter is attached
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
Being an underground pipeline, the protect will not change the topography of the land
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
3(wiapy.t ran
4 1 o l i6
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
tsgpfnature ant/Agent's Signature
(A is valid only if an authorization
m the applicant is provided
Date
Page 10 of 10

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Application for Department of the Army Permit
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form Supplemental Information
Piedmont Natural Gas 2015 Line 1 Class Location Replacement Project
The information listed here is in addition to that provided on the permit application
The proposed project will replace seven portions of natural gas pipeline along Piedmont Natural
Gas's (PNG's) Line 1 The sections to be replaced are in Robeson, Scotland, Richmond, and
Anson Counties Many of the crossings do not have impacts to waters of the U S The U S
Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District has requested that the PCN be re- submitted to
combine all seven sites into one permit application
The Agent Authorization form signed by Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) is attached PNG is in
the process of obtaining easements from the homeowners along the route
A field review was held with the USACE and DENR on April 1, 2015 Updates from that meeting
will be listed as UPDATE
Site 1 — Red Hills Road
Robeson County, North Carolina
Site 1 is located in a rural /agricultural landscape Just over 1400 feet of natural gas line will be
replaced with a new gas line approximately 20 feet north of the existing gas pipeline The
existing natural gas pipeline will be taken out of service A proposed permanent easement 23-
foot wide will be added to the existing 50 -foot wide gas easement During construction, 10 foot
of temporary workspace will be used adjacent to the new easement The new permanent
easement will convert approximately 500 square feet (0 015 acres) of forested wetland to non -
forested wetland A temporary workspace easement will temporarily convert forested wetlands
to non - forested wetlands The area of the temporary workspace is approximately 1,000 square
feet (0 023 acres) The temporary and permanent easements will be cleared of vegetation prior
to construction Roots will not be disturbed to keep soil disturbance at a minimum
A pond is located on the south side of the existing easement The pond will not be impacted by
construction activities
The wetland study letter dated February 5, 2015 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached This letter presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment for
the site Wetlands were found to be on the site The Wetland Determination Data Forms are
attached The USGS topographic quad does not depict blue -line stream features within the
boundaries of Site 1
UPDATE Due to the nature of the project and the temporary impact to the wetland area, nc
USACE or DENR permit is required for this site Best management practices will be used to
protect water quality
Property Identification Nathan R Bryant & Goldie R Locklear, PIN 930655945800, DB 452, Pg
251
11 Page

Latitude 34 7536
Longitude -79 3135
Property size 3 0 acres
Nearest body of water Lumber River
Water Quality Classification Blue -line
River basin Lumber River
Site 2 — Lumber River Crossing
Robeson County, North Carolina
The proposed project will cross the Lumber River and associated wetlands with a new natural
gas pipeline and easement PNG has an existing natural gas pipeline and permanent easement
at this crossing that is 50 -feet wide A proposed permanent easement adjacent to the existing
easement ranges from 23 -feet wide to 30 -feet wide The area of the new permanent easement
within the wetland boundaries is approximately 1 28 acres This new easement will convert
forested wetlands to non - forested wetlands A temporary workspace easement will temporarily
convert forested wetlands to non - forest wetlands The area of the temporary workspace is 0 14
acres The temporary and permanent easements will be cleared of vegetation prior to
construction Roots will not be disturbed to keep soil disturbance at a minimum Once the
vegetation is removed, the easements will be temporarily matted for tree removal and
construction
The new gas line will be installed by horizontal directional drill (HDD) Due to the location of the
wetlands adjacent to the Lumber River, the drill rig will be placed on mats on the eastern edge
of the wetland in the proposed temporary easement The exit side of the bore will exit the
ground outside of the wetland at the temporary easement on the west side
The wetland study letter dated December 16, 2014 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached This letter presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment for
the site Wetlands were found to be on the site The Wetland Determination Data Forms are
attached
A coordination letter was sent to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
A response letter dated January 27, 2015 was received from the SHPO It states that they have
"conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project " They had no further comment
UPDATE Due to the nature of the project and the temporary impact to the wetland area, no
USACE or DENR permit is required for this site Best management practices will be used to
protect water quality
Property Identification Emma Lee Locklear, PIN 930636957200, DB 943, Pg 374 Marshall P
James, Jr, Jane D James, and Mary Lois Hilliard, et al, PIN 930638842100, DB 868, Pg 650
John Leach Heirs c/o David Ingram, PIN 930616934600, DB 511, Pg 272
Latitude 34 7571
Longitude -79 3255
Property size 4 1 acres
Nearest body of water Lumber River
Water Quality Classification Blue -line
River basin Lumber River
21 Page

Site 3 — Skyway Church Road
Scotland County, North Carolina
Site 3 is located in an industrial area Just south of the Lauri nburg-Maxton Airport The site is
bordered on the south by the Mentor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC facility, on the southeast by
Skyway Church Road, and the west by Airport Road Approximately 2400 feet of natural gas
line will be replaced at this location The new gas line will be to the north of the existing gas line
The wetland study letter dated February 5, 2015 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached No potential wetlands and waters Jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA)
were identified at this site
UPDATE There are no Jurisdictional waters at this site, therefore, no USACE or DENR permit is
required Best management practices will be used to protect water quality
Site 4 — McGirts Bridge Road
Scotland County, North Carolina
Site 4 is located in an area dominated by agricultural production Approximately 2400 feet of
natural gas line will be replaced at this location The new gas line will be to the south of the
existing gas line The existing and proposed gas lines cross a large agricultural field currently in
cotton production A drainage ditch intersects the corridor approximately midway along its
length The ditch will be open cut for the construction of the new gas line A temporary stream
crossing will also be needed at this site
The wetland study letter dated February 12, 2015 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached The letter states that potential Jurisdictional wetlands were not observed on the site
Although no wetlands are present, "a field ditch that is likely Jurisdictional falls within the site's
boundaries The channel did not have standing water at the time of inspection and appeared to
be non - relatively permanent waters Non - relatively permanent waters are Jurisdictional only
when there is a significant nexus with traditional navigable waters Approximately 2,000 feet to
the south, the drainage ditch discharges to a first order tributary of Leith Creek Such a
connection most likely meets the criteria for a significant nexus with traditional navigable waters,
and therefore, the ditch on the property may be Jurisdictional under the CWA " The Wetland
Determination Data Form is attached
UPDATE Waters at this site are regulated under USACE Nationwide Permit 12 Best
management practices will be used to protect water quality
Property Identification Walker Farms, Inc, PIN 01025901001, DB 14E, Pg 154
Latitude 34 7910
Longitude -79 4201
Property size 6 4 acres
Nearest body of water tributary of Leith Creek
Water Quality Classification Potentially Jurisdictional ditch
River basin Little Pee Dee River
31 Page

Site 5 — Wagram Road
Scotland County, North Carolina
Site 5 is located in a predominantly rural /agricultural area Approximately 1300 feet of natural
gas line will be replaced at this location The new gas line will be to the south of the existing gas
line The gas line corridor crosses industrial property on the southern end and continues
northwest across US Highway 401 to cross man - dominated and actively farmed agricultural
lands Drainage ditches parallel the highway and intersect the corridor The ditches will be
crossed by conventional bore for the construction of the new gas line
The wetland study letter dated February 12, 2015 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached The letter states that "no wetlands were observed on Site 5 Although no wetlands
were observed, several drainage features were identified that would likely be jurisdictional Just
south of the US Highway 15- 401/501 Bypass, a small ditch was identified The channel is
oriented perpendicular to the road and drains northward into a roadside drainage ditch that
parallels the south side of the highway Neither of these channels held water at the time of
inspection, but both displayed a high water mark and would likely be classified as non - relatively
permanent waters The roadside ditch drains southwesterly, converging with Little Creek dust
west of the site Such a connection would most likely meet the criteria for a significant nexus
with traditional navigable waters, and therefore, these ditches may be jurisdictional under CWA
Adjacent to the north side of the highway, a small drainage channel was identified, also
paralleling the roadway The ditch, which drains southwesterly and converges with Little Creek
dust west of the site, had water in the channel and would likely be classified as relatively
permanent waters Relatively permanent waters are jurisdictional under CWA " The Wetland
Determination Data Form is attached
UPDATE Waters at this site are regulated under USACE Nationwide Permit 12 Best
management practices will be used to protect water quality
Property Identification NCDOT Right -of -way
Latitude 34 8006
Longitude -79 4441
Property size 1 97 acres
Nearest body of water tributary of Little Creek
Water Quality Classification Potentially jurisdictional ditch
River basin Little Pee Dee River
Site 6 — State Road 1744
Anson County, North Carolina
Site 6 is located in a forested landscape with moderately steep topography Approximately 700
feet of natural gas line will be replaced at this location The new gas line will be to the north of
the existing gas line The proposed gas line will tie into an existing PNG Interconnect site The
surrounding area is forested An existing 100 foot wide electric easement is to the south of the
existing gas easement
The wetland study letter dated February 12, 2015 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached The letter states that potentially jurisdictional features are located on the site A first
order perennial stream with contiguous floodplain wetlands crosses the existing PNG gas
easement Since the wetland study letter was field reviewed, the project has been reduced from
41 Page

its original scope The proposed project does not extend far enough to the east to impact the
potentially jurisdictional features
UPDATE There are no jurisdictional waters at this site, therefore, no USACE or DENR permit is
required Best management practices will be used to protect water quality
Site 7 — Intermittent Stream Culvert and Relocation
Anson County, North Carolina
The main objective of the proposed project is to replace a 223 -foot length of 16" gas pipeline
This portion of the pipeline replacement project is near Burnsville in Anson County The area is
forested and the changes in elevation are relatively steep The existing PNG easement in this
area is 50 -feet wide and contains two gas lines The two gas lines are the 16" natural gas line
that is to be replaced and to the south is a parallel 30" natural gas line The two existing gas
lines are 20 feet apart within the easement The existing 30" gas line and the steep elevation to
the north significantly restrict the workspace available for the replacement of the 16" gas line
Two intermittent stream channels intersect near the center of the site Stream 3 (S3) flows
under the gravel drive that is used to access the gas line easement This stream flows through
an existing 24" culvert under the access drive Stream 2 (S2) flows along the same route as the
16" underground gas pipeline
The new gas line will be installed using the open cut method The existing pipeline will be
removed from its current location and replaced in the same ditch that will be made deeper The
existing 24" steel pipe under the gravel access drive is undersized for the acreage that flows to
it As part of the proposed project, the 24" pipe will be removed and replaced with a 53" x 43"
HERC pipe The pipe inlet and outlet will be stabilized with rip -rap
The wetland study letter dated December 24, 2014 from Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc is
attached This letter presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment for
the site Wetlands were not found to be on the site
The estimated disturbed area for the project is 0 75 acres Only temporary easement will be
acquired for the project No new permanent easement will be acquired
A coordination letter was sent to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
A response letter dated January 27, 2015 was received from the SHPO It states that they have
"conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project " They had no further comment
UPDATE Waters at this site are regulated under USACE Nationwide Permit 12 Best
management practices will be used to protect water quality
Property Identification Robert E Sikes, PIN 644900241038, DB 933, Pg 100 Raeford Dean
Lingerfelt and Laura C Lingerfelt, PIN 644900214874, DB 959, Pg 211
Latitude 35 0979
Longitude -80 1953
Property size 0 75 acres
Nearest body of water Unnamed tributary of Lanes Creek
Water Quality Classification Intermittent stream
River basin Rocky River
51 Page

O
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: December 3, 2014
Proiect Information
Project Name: 2015 Line 1 Class Location Replacement Project
Type of Project: Installation of new natural gas line
Location: Robeson, Scotland, and Richmond Counties, NC
Property Owner /Representative Information
Business Name: Piedmont Natural Gas
Mailing Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
City, State, Zip Code. Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone No.: (704) 731 -4598
Contact Name: Jim Kalish, Senior Project Manager
Agent Information
Business Name: Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC
Street Address: 1420 Donelson Pike, Suite Al2
City, State, Zip Code: Nashville, TN 37217
Telephone No.: (615) 383 -6300
Contact Name: Suzanne Herron
Authorization
L-r,c N1�2"(' GC<
I, ifff of Piedmont Natural Gas hereby authorize Energy
Land & Infrastructure, PLLC to act as agent with the U S Army Corps of Engineers and the N C
Division of Water Quality pursuant to obtaining the necessary Section 10/404 /401 /Buffer
permits, as applicable, related to the above - referenced project(s)
Signature:
�-_ '�_VL
Date: / Z I I ( I
I'20 DoaEls 3n Pi c S 1 ,ia r; -.2 Nas -vS:IE TE inESSE_ 372i, . VWW Ell- IC COrt ­615 36363
CG
ENGINEERS o SURVEYORS a INFRASTRUCTURE a ENVIRONMENTAL

DIAL CORDY
AND ASSOCIATES INC
E'nuironawntol c-onsldtants
5 February 2015
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 1 near Maxton, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment
for the Line 1, Site 1 natural gas Line corridor near Maxton, North Carolina. As
described in the following sections, the property contains potential wetlands and waters
that may be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Please note that the
attached maps show approximate boundaries of potential jurisdictional features. In
order to determine the precise limits of jurisdiction, wetlands and waters should be
delineated and reviewed with the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE)
regulatory field office.
General Site Description
The site is located in Robeson County, NC in a rural /agricultural landscape. The
wetland assessment area encompasses an approximately 100 -feet wide corridor along
approximately 1,400 linear feet of the PNG gas line corridor situated north of Old Red
Springs Road, northeast of Maxton, NC. The site exists as a mosaic of residential,
agricultural, and forested lands.
Methods
Prior to entering the field, Site 1 of the PNG Line 1 project was evaluated for evidence of
hydric soils, wetlands, and streams, using soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and
United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps. An on -site field
investigation was conducted on 5 November 2014. Potential jurisdictional wetlands and
waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation
Manual, the Regional Supplement to the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic
and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), and the USACE/EPA memorandum: Clean
Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos v.
United States and Carabell v. United States (dated 12/02/08). In accordance with the
USACE manuals, potential wetlands were evaluated for indicators of hydrophytic
vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Ditches were evaluated for the
presence of an ordinary high water mark and other indicators of sustained flow.
THE MURCHISON BUILDING • SUITE 307 • 201 NORTH FRONT STREET • WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
910 -251 -9790 • PAx 910 -251 -9409 • E-MAIL infriPdialW*.00m
JACKSONVILLE BFACH, FLORIDA • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA • TAMPA, FI ORIDA

Results
Pre -Field Investigation
According to the Soil Survey of Robeson County, soil types occurring on the property
include Norfolk loamy sand (0 to 2 percent slopes), Wakulla sand (0 to 6 percent slopes)
and Portsmouth loam (see attached soil map). Norfolk loamy sand (0 to 2 percent
slopes) and Portsmouth loam are listed as hydric soils by the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), thus providing an indication that wetlands may occur on
the property. Wakulla sand is not listed by the NRCS as a hydric soil. The USGS
topographic quadrangle (Wakulla, NC) does not depict blue -line stream features within
the boundaries of Site 1.
Field Investigation
Potential jurisdictional wetlands or waters were observed at the western end of the site
(see attached Potential Wetlands and Waters Map). Two wetland lines were flagged.
The first line parallels the southern corridor boundary and delineates the northern bank
of a pond. At the time of inspection the pond had standing water and biota indicating
permanent inundation. It would likely be classified as relatively permanent waters, which
are jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act. The second flagged line parallels the
northern corridor boundary and delineates the southern edge of a bottomland hardwood
wetland. Dominant vegetation species associated with the wetlands included red maple
(Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidarrmbar styraciflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron fulipifera)
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), swamp red bay (Persea palustris), French mulberry
(Callicarpa americana), fetter -bush (Lyonia lucida), inkbery (Ilex glabra), water oak
(Quercus nigra), sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), royal fern (Osmunda spectabilis),
and netted chain -fern (Woodwardia areolata). In uplands adjacent to the floodplain,
dominant plants included tulip poplar, sweetgum, loblolly pine, red maple, water oak,
post oak (Q. stellata), and privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that wetlands and waters are present within
the assessment area. Therefore, it is recommended that a formal wetland Jurisdictional
Determination be obtained from the Wilmington District USACE. The process of
obtaining a wetland determination from the USACE is a multi -step process requiring the
support of environmental consultants and land surveyors. A qualified consultant will fully
evaluate the property, flag all jurisdictional wetlands and waters, and complete routine
wetland determination and Rapanos data forms. Once the flags are surveyed by a
registered land surveyor, the resulting wetland survey plat and wetland data forms are
submitted to the appropriate Wilmington District regulatory field office along with a
request for a wetland jurisdictional determination. The consultant will conduct an on -site
meeting with the USACE representative to review the wetland lines. Once the final
wetland survey plat is approved and signed by the USACE, the plat can be used to
quantify wetland impacts and determine the level of permitting required for the project.
2

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the
results of this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy
and Associates Inc. would be pleased to provide additional wetland delineation and
permitting services.
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Robeson County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs
Sincerely,
J ffy J•
O
y T. Coward
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc.
3

•
I
J r
Lo
!1 r--4
1
' I
tp I a
{ c
_ 1 F
• • ��• C N a
r • • M ! ,� s� x v 'x
�M`. • _ i c
• Tf d m
•, ` c
• r i q = o
• 1 C IL J

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
Mc McColl loam
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Pt Portsmouth loam
WkB Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
3.9
4.7%
13.0
15.5%
22.1
26.5%
44.6
53.3%
$3.6
100.0%

Site 1. View to west, looking at corridor from Red Hills Road.
i4
IO
V�
Site 1. View to east, looking at corridor from Red Hills Road,

-4 *k
fit's
.41
Irk

Site 1. View to west, looking at corridor from just west of Wrangle Road..
Site 1. View to east, looking at corridor from just west of Wrangle Road.

Wrl,

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: PNG Line 1, Site 1 Clly/CourMy Maxton, Robeson County Sampling Date. 11/5/14
ApplicwWowner: " Piedmont Sampling ont Natural Gas State: NC S Point: 1-5-2 wetland
Investigaws): Jeff Coward Section, Township. Range:
Landform (hiMslow terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Lang: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are ctkratic / hydrologic condift s on the site typical tar this tine of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
No Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'NomW Circumstances' present? Yea No
Are Vegetation , Soll or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any arrwers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetaton Present? Yes ✓ Na Is On sernplod Area
Hydric Sol Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes 41, No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland data form was taken in wetland near flag 1-5 -2.
HYDROLOGY
WedwW Hydrology Indlestom:
Secondary Indicators Irninomn of two reauinmD
Prknary Indicators frninkriurn of am Is reauired:
dbar all that aw)vl
_ Surface Sol Cracks MO)
_ Surface Wafer (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Wafer Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Paft ms (610)
✓ Sahration (A3) _
Hydrogen SuMde Odor (C1)
` Moss Trim Liras (B18)
_ Weller Marks (61) _
Oxkbed Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sedinent Deposits (62) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Won Reduction In Tiled Solt (C8)
^ Saturation Visible on Aerial k mWwy (C9)
_ Algal MM or Cruet (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (BB) ✓
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aqultard (D3)
krrrmdaHon Vlslble on Aerial hragwy (B7)
V FAC- Neutral Test (135)
✓ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Obaarvadora:
Surface Wafer Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yea No
: Dspfh (inches): '18
Saturation Present? Yes If No
Depth (Inches): 9
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary hinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring won. aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
NRCS Indicator Al. Histosol
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1.5-2 wetland
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
) %
Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 13 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
Yes
FACU
pis Across AN Strata: 15 (B)
4. Plnus tseda
Yes
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 87% (AB)
6.
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover Of, by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBI- species x 1 =
S8DHM Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x2-
1
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU species x4-
3.
UPI- species x5-
4.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.4
0
= Total Cover
Hydrophydc Vegetation bndlcaWm-.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
Q 2 - Dowd nsnce Test Is >50%
1. Parsee palustris
Yes
FACW
3. Prevalence Index is S3.0'
2 Callicarpa americans
Yes
FACU
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3. Liquidamber styraciflue
Yes
FAC
4. Lyonia lucida
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric Boll and wetland hydrology must
5. Ilex glabra
Yes
FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6. Quercus ngra
Yes
FAC
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0
= Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 In.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter st breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
1. Clethra siri(olla
Yes
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. Woodwardia aredate
Yes
OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
3. Quercus ngra
Yes
FAC
then 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4. Osmunda regalia
Yes
OBL
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 Lyonia lucide
Yes
FACW
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants. including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, mil woody
7
plants, except woody vines, less then approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
g'
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
-
5.
Hydrophytic
0
■ Total Cover
Vegetation ^�✓'
Present? Yes . No
50% of total cover: _
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (lf observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

.�
7
Sampling Point: 1-5-2 wetiand
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) _ % lvoe_ Texture Remarks
0->18 10YR 2/1 Sandy muck
'Type: CoConcentradon, D =Depletion, RMsReduced Matrix, MS=Masked Send Grains.
Location: PL =Pore Lining, MsMatrix.
Hydric SoN Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for ProbNmatk Hydro WW:
Histosol (A1)
_ Polyvaiue Below Surface (S8) (LRR E. T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipsdon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S. T, U)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10),(LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loony Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ StratMed Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AB) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FO)
(MLRA 1338)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Red Parent Material (TF2) .
_ Muck Presence (A$) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark.Surfece {TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
! Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A18) (MLRA 130A)
_ Umbrie Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Octxic (F17) (MLRA 131)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Metrbk (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 130A,1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Souls (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S8)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soak (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U)
Restrielive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric SON Present? Yes 77 No n
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: PNG Line 1, Site 1 City /County: MWon, Robeson County Sampling Date: 1115114
Applicani/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Pant: 1-5 -2 upland
Investigator(s): Jeff Coward Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Lore: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Of No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Sal or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytk; Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Data form taken in upland near flag 1-5 -2.
HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is raouired:
check all that aDDly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Mart Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patters (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (B18)
_ Water Marks (Bt) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (CO)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water- Stalned Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observadons:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): >18
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '18
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling point; L5-2 upland
50% of total cover:
(Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
8.
50% of total cover.
Shrub SbVm (Plot size: )
1. Quercus stellate
2. Ugustrum sinense
3. Quarcus nigre
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Strallum (Plot size:
0 - Total Cover rrVV -wry -�a W%M5MFw-16
20% of total cover: Total % Cover of Multiply by:
OBL specks x 1 a
FACW specks x 2 a
FAC species x3-
FACU species x 4 -
UPL species x 5 -
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
0 - Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: _
Yes UPL
Yes FAC
Yes FAC
0 - Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1 Quercus nigra Yes FAC
2. Ligustnxn sinense Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
S.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Wbodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Viids sp Yea
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevalence Index - B/A -
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for HydroplW Vegetation
Q 2 - Dominance Test is -50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydrlo soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegebtion Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more In height and 3 In.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more In height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 R (1 to 6 m) in height.
Hart -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, AN woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 R (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ��'--J--���
Present? Yes r • No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet: -
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
) % Cover ? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus taeda
Yes FAC
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
yes FACU
3. Liquidambar styradflua
yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across AN Strati: (B)
4. Acer rubrum
Yes FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78% (ArB)
6.
50% of total cover:
(Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
8.
50% of total cover.
Shrub SbVm (Plot size: )
1. Quercus stellate
2. Ugustrum sinense
3. Quarcus nigre
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Strallum (Plot size:
0 - Total Cover rrVV -wry -�a W%M5MFw-16
20% of total cover: Total % Cover of Multiply by:
OBL specks x 1 a
FACW specks x 2 a
FAC species x3-
FACU species x 4 -
UPL species x 5 -
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
0 - Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: _
Yes UPL
Yes FAC
Yes FAC
0 - Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1 Quercus nigra Yes FAC
2. Ligustnxn sinense Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
S.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Wbodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Viids sp Yea
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevalence Index - B/A -
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for HydroplW Vegetation
Q 2 - Dominance Test is -50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydrlo soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegebtion Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more In height and 3 In.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more In height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 R (1 to 6 m) in height.
Hart -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, AN woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 R (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ��'--J--���
Present? Yes r • No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1-5'2 upland
Profile Desagtion: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist) % Color (molstl G ,^ Loci Texture Remarks
0- >18 10YR 2/1 50% stripped
'Type: C =Concentration, D=De tion. RM =Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
`Location: PL-Pore Lining. MaMatrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
_ Hlstosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S. T, U)
_ 1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR O)
_ Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Hlstic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sills (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stradfled Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A8) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FB)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depresskxrs (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Odxric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ iron- Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrooW vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A18) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Verdc (F18) (MLRA 150A. ISM)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrbc (S8)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sots (1720) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U)
Restrictive Layer (H observed):
Type:
n
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _a
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

DIAL CORDY
AND ASSOCIA"I -1--:S INC
Enuironmentol Consultonts
16 December 2014
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 2 near Maxton, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment
for the Line 1, Site 2 natural gas Line corridor near Maxton, North Carolina. As
described in the following sections, the property contains potential wetlands and waters
that may be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Please note that the
attached maps show approximate boundaries of potential jurisdictional features. In
order to determine the precise limits of jurisdiction, wetlands and waters should be
delineated and reviewed with the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
regulatory field office.
General Site Description
The site is located in Robeson County, NC in a rural /agricultural landscape. The
wetland assessment area encompasses an approximately 100 -feet wide corridor along
approximately 4,500 linear feet of the Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) gas line corridor
situated west of Corey Road, northeast of Maxton, NC. The site is primarily dominated
by wooded floodplains situated adjacent to the Lumber River. Approximately one -third
of the site, on the western end, consists of agricultural fields.
Methods
Prior to entering the field, soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and USGS topographic
maps were evaluated for evidence of hydric soils, wetlands, and streams at Site 2 of the
PNG Line 1 project. An on -site field investigation was conducted on 29 October 2014.
Potential jurisdictional wetlands and waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the Corps
of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
(Version 2.0), and the Corps of Engineers /EPA memorandum: Clean Water Act
Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States
and Carabell v. United States (dated 12/02/08). In accordance with the Corps Manuals,
potential wetlands were evaluated for indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
THE MURCHISON BUILDING - SUITE 307 • 201 NORTH FRONT STREET - WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
910 - 251 -9790 • FAx [phone] • F -MAn. info@di cD*-mm
JAcicsomqus BEACH, FLORIDA • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA • TAMPA, FLORIDA

and wetland hydrology. Ditches were evaluated for the presence of an ordinary high
water mark and other indicators of sustained flow.
Results
Pre -Field Investigation
According to the Soil Survey of Robeson County, soil types occurring on the property
include Bibb soils, Plummer and Osier soils, Lakeland sand (0-6 per cent slopes),
Lumbee Sandy Loam, and Kalmia Loamy Sand (see attached soil map). Bibb soils,
Plummer and Osier soils, Lakeland sand(0 -6 per cent slopes), and Lumbee sandy loam
are listed as hydric soils by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), thus
providing an indication that wetlands may occur on the property. Kalmia loamy sand is
not listed as a hydric soil. The USGS topographic quadrangle (Wakulla, NC) depicts the
Lumber River as a blue -line stream feature within the boundaries of Site 2.
Field Investigation
Potential jurisdictional wetlands or waters were observed within the wooded portion of
the site (see attached Potential Wetlands and Waters Map). The Lumber River
traverses the site, north to south, near the midpoint of the corridor. Wetlands on the site
are part of the riparian floodplain associated and contiguous with the Lumber River. The
area northwest of the floodplain wetlands is all upland and consists primarily of
agricultural fields. A very small piece of upland also exists at the southeast end of the
corridor. Dominant vegetation species associated with the floodplain wetlands included
pond cypress (Taxodium ascendens), swamp tupelo (Nyssa biflora), laurel oak (Quercus
laurifolia), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), swamp red bay (Persea
palustris), red maple (Acer rubrum), royal fern (Osmunda spectabilis), and netted chain-
fern (Woodwardia areolata). In uplands adjacent to the floodplain, dominant plants
included white oak (Quercus alba), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), loblolly pine,
horse sugar (Symplocos tinctoria), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), red maple, and
greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia).
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that extensive wetlands are present within the
assessment area. Therefore, it is recommended that a formal wetland Jurisdictional
Determination be obtained from the Wilmington District Corps. The process of obtaining
a wetland determination from the Corps is a multi -step process requiring the support of
environmental consultants and land surveyors. A qualified consultant will fully evaluate
the property, flag all jurisdictional wetlands and waters, and complete routine wetland
determination and Rapanos data forms. Once the flags are surveyed by a registered
land surveyor, the resulting wetland survey plat and wetland data forms are submitted to
the appropriate Wilmington District regulatory field office along with a request for a
wetland jurisdictional determination. The consultant will conduct an on -site meeting with
the Corps representative to review the wetland lines. Once the final wetland survey plat
is approved and signed by the Corps, the plat can be used to quantify wetland impacts
and determine the level of permitting required for the project.
N

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the
results of this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy
and Associates Inc. would be pleased to provide additional wetland delineation and
permitting services.
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Robeson County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs
SRyT.J ward
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc.
3

Line 1 replacement, Site 2. NRGS Soil Map
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name
BB
Bibb soils
Jo
Johns sandy loam
KaA
Kalmla loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
LaB
Lakeland sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Lu
Lumbee sandy loam
Pm
Plummer and Osler soils
W
Water
WkB
Wakulla sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
38.6
40.4%
3.4
3.6%
24.3
25.4%
10.3
10.7%
6.7
7.0%
8.4
8.8%
4.0
4.2%
0.1
0.1%
95.7
100.0%

Awl
As
Ir isl
jr
lb
IF-
��• •' 7 ' ' r ' r
r � '�' TIr �• • � •
L'lne S41 ' a
a a
Line 55
JP 02
CD r
N
• m c 'E
� N O
t U
N . r U v N
N
E E
o ° o
{
� D
� `^
1
Ia
• 1 ' • p1 i p
r im
e
f e LT 0 J d J
Ire
law 0 �

-wits,
yy t r
I
If
Jot
r ,

ter -
lip-
ol
tr
' r

Site 2. View looking northwest along existing gas line corridor from just east of the Lumber River.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region
Project Site: PNG Line 1, Site 2 City/County: Maxton, Robeson County Samplkrg Date: 10/29/14
Appliw,vo r,w: - Piedmont i
ont Natural Gas State: NC samng per: 1-3-2 upland
Investigator(s): Jeff Coward Section, Township, Range:
Landfonn (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Long: Datum:
Sol Map Unit Name: NW1 classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes —2L No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology aignificently disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (H needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytlo Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the smpled Area
Hydric Sol Present? Yes No ✓ wNhin s WstMnd? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
Data form was collected in upland area near flag 1-3 -2
HYDROLOGY
Wsttand Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (miNmum of two M%ftdl
Primm rndicatm (.nr *mim of one Is required:
check all that aonlvl
Surface Sol Cracks (138)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1318)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizoapheres along Living Roots (0)
^ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sots (CS)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits MS) _
Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Shallow Aqulard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '18
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (Inches): '18
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: L3-2 upland
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
Cover Species? Status-
Number of Dominant Species
1 Quercus albs
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2. Liquidarnbar styraci lua
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Pinus taeda
yes FAC
Species Across AN Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88% (AIS)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover.
Total % Cover of: Muldoly by:
OBL species x 1 =
SaoWrw Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
FAC species x3-
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Cohan+ Totab: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalorae Index = BJA . 3.125
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicalors:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot sae:
)
Q 2 - Dominance Test is 150%
S tlncloriia
1 . ymplocos
Yes FAC
3 _ prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. Quercus sp
Yes
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3 Dkupyros virginians
Yes FAC
4 Acer rubrum
yes FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
DeAnitions of Fhn Vegetation Strata:
0 = Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover.
20% of total ever:
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and 3 In.
Herb (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. Sympiocos Unctoria
Yes FAC
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
2 Quercus sp
Yes
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 2011(1 to 6 m) in height.
5
— — _
6.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants. including
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, Md woody
plants, except woody vines, less then approximately
8.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1 Smilax rotundifoNs
Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
— — --
5.
Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yee No
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1.3-2 upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) TV Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 312
4->18 10YR 412
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR*, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histoed (A1)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR 8, T, U) _
1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
^_
Thin Dark Surtaoe (S9) (LRR 8, T, U) _
2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 1SOA,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratlfied Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (All) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 ken Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron- Manganese Messes (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytk vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Ale) (MLRA 150A)
!_
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T. U)
wetland hydrology must be present.
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 158A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S8)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth ( ):
Hydric Soil Proem? Yes _, No -Z
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: PNG Line 1, Site 2 City/County: Maxton, Robeson County Sampling Date: 10/29/14
Appilcanvom sr: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Points: 1-3 -2 wetland
Investigator(s): Jeff Coward Section, TomuNp, Range:
Landform (hiilslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave. convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Long: Datum:
Sall Map Unit Name: MM dassillcallon:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the sits typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sol , or Hydrology signMcw* disturbed? Are 'Normal Circunatances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Sol , or Hydrology nalurally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Presets? Yes No Is the siTPNd Ares
Hydric Soil Presents? Yes No within a WeWrM? Yes Vt No
Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland data form collected just inside wetland flag 1-3-2.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Pftm Ind acs fmnnmmum of one is required:
dnek all flat aook)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (Be)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR u)
_ or~ Paltems (810)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxldized RMzospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish 13crows (CB)
Drift Deposits (83) _
Recent Iron Reduction In Titled Solis (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _
Thin Mudc Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Won Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on peal Ina y (87)
FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, lh
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): "18
Water Table Pnresent? Yea No
Depth (indnes): '1e
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (indws): 11
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available:
Renaft:
NRCS Indicator Al. Histosol
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1-3 -2 wetland
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
% Cover - Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Nysse biflora
Yes OBL
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2. Acer rubrum
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Pinus taeda
Yes FAC
Species Across Al Strata: 8 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIS)
6.
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of. Multioly by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
013L species x 1 =
Saplina m (Plot size:
)
FACW specles x 2 =
1.
FAC species x3-
2
FACU specles x 4 a
3
UPL species x5-
4.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index - B!A = 225
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
E] 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
© 2 - Dominance Test is 1-50%
1 Acer rubrum
Yes FAC
[] 3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
2. Parses palustris
Yes FACW
E] Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3. Ilex 010808
Yes FAC
4.
' Indicators of hydric sol and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless dishxbed or problematic.
6.
Definkions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0 • Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more In height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
1. Osmunda spectabilis
Yes OSL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 Parses palustris
Yes FACW
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and loss
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3.
4.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 R (1 to 6 m) in height.
5
- - -
6.
Herb - Al herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, AW woody
7
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 R 0 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1. Smilax sp
Yes
2.
3.
4.
- -- -
5.
Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover
Present? Vegetation Yee r . r No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1.3-2 wetland
P. Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Foci Texture Remarks
0->18 10YR 211 Sandy muck
'T : C=Concentration, , RM=Reduoed Matrix MS-Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL =Pore Uni ' M=Msttix.
Hydrk: Soil Indicators: (Applicable to oil LRRs, unless othe win noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric $0116 :
Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T. U)
_ 1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Ep Won (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
` Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
J Reduced Verdc (F18) (outside MI RA I50A,13)
_ Hydrogen Skitlde (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P. S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomabut Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F8)
(MLRA 1:1313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (Fn
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surhkx (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mart (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Odrric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Iron- Mangeneae Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F 13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology rnust be prosent,
Sandy Mucky Minerel (Si) (LRR O, S)
_Delta OdMc (F17) (MLRA 151)
uNsss disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (Fitt) (MLRA 150A,1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S8)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20) (MLRA 149A, 163C,ISM)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrie Soil Present? Yes ,F-71 Ho
US Anny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: PNG Line 1, Site 2 City/County: Maxton, Robeson County Sampling Date: 10/29/14
Applicant/owner: Piedmont Natural Gas state: NC Sampling Point: S5-12 wetland
Investigator(s): Jeff Coward Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.): flood plain Local relief (concave, convex. none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Long: Datum:
Sod Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0( No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No is dw Sampled Area
Hydrk Sal Present? Yes ✓ No wkMn a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland data form taken in wetland near flag S5-12. Wetland is part of large floodplain contiguous
with the Lumber River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology lndicaWra:
Secondary Indicators fminimurn of two reouiredl
Primer. Indicators (minimum of one is fermi d:
chock all that appiv)
- Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Be)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
` Moss Trim Lines (B16)
✓ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
r Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (1213) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CO)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (G9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muds Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (BS) ✓
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC- Neutral Test (DS)
V Water-Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR Tr U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ­!L
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 16
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth ( inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos. previous inspections). if evadable:
Remarks:
NRCS Indicator Al. Histosol
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Taxodium asoendens
2.
Nysss billm
3.
Quercus Iauriiolia
4.
Pinus teeds
5.
8.
6.
Cohxnn Totals: 0
% Cove Specks? Status
Yes
OiiL
Yes
OBL
Yes
FACW
Yes
FAC
0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
SaoNnn SftW (Plot size: )
1.
Multiply by:
2.
x 1 -
3.
x2-
4.
x3-
5.
x 4 =
8.
X5=
Cohxnn Totals: 0
0
50% of total cover.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Cyrilla racemillora
2. Ouerars laurddia
3.
4.
5.
6.
- Total Cover
20% of total cover. _
Yes FACW
Yes FACW
Sempilrg Point: 55-12 wetland
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across AN Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Spades
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB)
Total % Cover of,
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 -
FACW species
x2-
FAC species
x3-
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
X5=
Cohxnn Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A - 1.825
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
© 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Ir&mtors of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Veoetation Strata:
0 - Tote Cover
Tree - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover. 20% of total cove:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(7.6 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. Osmunds spectabilis Yes 0BL
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. Woodwardla areolate Yes 061.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and less
than 3 in. (7.8 am) DBH.
3
4.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
5.
6.
Herb - AN herbaceous (non - woody) plants. including
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, MW woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
S.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10
11
0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cove:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4. - - -
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: _
hological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic
Vegetation n
Present? Yes r• � No Li
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
to
or confirm the
Sampling Point: 55-12 waftnd
Depth Matrix
Redox FeaWres
Remarks
(inches) Color (molsU _ %_ Color
(moist) %
0-18 10YR 211
Sandy muck
'Type: C- Concentration O- Depletion RM =Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains.
21.ocaWn: PL -Pore Lining, M- Matrix.
Hydric $all Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless odwrwbs nobd.)
Indicators for ProblemaAc Hydric Soils':
Histosd (At)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S. T. U)
_ 1 an Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR 8, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR 8)
Black Histic (A3)
` Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_. Reduced Vertic (1718) (ouWde MLRA 1S0A,B)
_ Hydrogen Wilde (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_, Piednwnt Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depiefed Mafmc (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Losmy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodes (A8) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F8)
(MLRA 1530)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 an Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P. T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P. T, U)
wetland hydrology must be preseK
_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Maft (S4)
_ Reduced Vertk (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
J Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stopped Matrix (S8)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P. S, T. U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Pressnf? Yes Z No J2
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

DIAL CORDY
AND ASSOCIATES INC
Enuironrnental Consultants
5 February 2015
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217.
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 3 near Maxton, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment
for the Line 1, Site 3 natural gas line corridor near Maxton, North Carolina. As described
in the following sections, no potential wetlands and waters jurisdictional under the Clean
Water Act (CWA) were identified within the site.
General Site Description
The site is located in Scotland County, NC in an industrial area just south of the
Laurinburg - Maxton Airport. The wetland assessment area encompasses an
approximately 100 -feet wide corridor along approximately 2,000 linear feet of the PNG
gas line corridor situated northwest of Skyway Church Road, northwest of Maxton, NC.
The site is bordered on the south by the Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC facility, on
the southeast by Skyway Church Road, and on the west by Airport Rd.
Methods
Prior to entering the field, Site 3 of the PNG Line 1 project was evaluated for evidence of
hydric soils, wetlands, and streams, using soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and
United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps. An on -site field
investigation was conducted on 30 October 2014. Potential jurisdictional wetlands and
waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987 United States Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), and the
USACE/EPA memorandum: Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme
Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States (dated
12/02/08). In accordance with the USACE manuals, potential wetlands were evaluated
for indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Ditches
were evaluated for the presence of an ordinary high water mark and other indicators of
sustained flow.
THE MURCHISON BUILDING - SUICh 307. 201 NORTH FRONT STREET • WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
710-251 -9790 • FAx [phone] • E -MAIL info@diakardycom
JACKSONVBI.E BEACH, FLORIDA - HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA - TAMPA, FLORIDA

Results
Pre -Field Investioation
According to the Soil Survey of Scotland County, soil types occurring on the property
consist entirely of Blanton sand (8 to 15 percent slopes), (see attached soil map).
Blanton sand is not listed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service as a hydric
soil. This suggests that wetlands and waters are not likely to be present on the site.
The USGS topographic quadrangle (Wakulla, NC) does not depict blue -line stream
features within the boundaries of Site 3.
Field Investioation
Potential jurisdictional wetlands or waters were not observed on Site 3 (see attached
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map). The site consists of man dominated uplands in an
industrial setting, most of which appears to be mowed at least once annually. Dominant
plants in the uplands included sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), thoroughwort
(Eupatorium capillifolium), broom -straw (Andropogon virginicus), greenbrier (Smilax
rotundifolia), sedge (Cyperus sp.), and lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata).
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that wetlands and waters are not present
within the assessment area. Although no wetlands or waters were identified within the
site boundary, it is recommended the USACE be notified prior to moving forward with the
project to ensure no further action is required.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the
results of this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy
and Associates Inc. would be pleased to provide assistance with any permitting needs
that may arise.
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Scotland County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs
Sincerely,
Jeffrey T. Coward
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc.
2
,r

s rr
L
M
W
m E
c O
m�
E E
1 X X
O O
a OL
Q Q
c c g
E E
'C c c
C J J
ao

Acres in Percent of
AOI AOI
0.4
Map Unit Name
Map Unit
84.5%
Symbol
1.2%
AuB
Autryville sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
BIC
Blanton sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
CoA
Coxville loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
GoA
Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
McA
McColl loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, ponded
RaA
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Rutlege loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely
RuA
flooded
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in Percent of
AOI AOI
0.4
0.3%
107.6
84.5%
1.5
1.2%
4.9
3.8%
9.6
7.6%
1.3
1.0%
2.0 1.5%
127.3 100.0%

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: PNG Line 1, Site 3 Clty/County: Scotland County Sampling Date: 10/30/14
AppikatntlOwner Piedmont Natural gas State: INC Sampling Point: Site 3 - upland
Investigator(s): Jeff Coward Section, Township. Range:
Landform (Nllslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: Long: Datum:
Sol Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this tgne of year? Yes ✓ No (if no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Sol or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes 11 No
Are Vegetation . Sal , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (N needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Importtant features, etc.
HydrophytIc Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ NO Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sol Present? Yea NO ✓ within a Wedend? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No —!L—
Remarks:
u ..
fA
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indigators 6Wfimum of two reouiredl
Prim my Indicators (minim urn of one Is renuired•
MpA all that aooly)
! Surface Sal Cracks (88)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Panama (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhdmspheres a" LMV Roots (C3)
_ fry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction In Tiled Sal$ (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aeriai Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muds Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aqu itard (D3)
Inunde llm Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAG - Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T. U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): >18
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (Inches). >18
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
ndudes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monlorinp well, atrial photos, previous Inspections). It available:
Remarks:
Upland data form taken near approximate center of corridor, just west of the bend in the existing
easement.
US Army Corps of Englhtm"
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling poft She 3 - upland
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sae: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophylic
0 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: Present? Yes F0 No
Remarks: (If observed, Not morphological adaptations, below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
% Cover 2 Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across AN Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spades
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: e7% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of: MUNIDIV bV:
a (Plot sine:
)
OBL spades x 1 =
FACW species x 2 a
1
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU species x4-
3.
UPL specks X5=-
4
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
b.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.33
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytk Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover.
1 - Rapid Test for Hovphytic Vagetaton
Shrub Sl{atIam (Plot size:
)
D 2. Dominance rest is >W%
1. Liquidambar styracillua
Yee FAC
❑ 3 - pwisience Index WOW
2.
-
❑ Problematic HydroPIMic Vegetation' (amain)
3.
4.
'Indicators of hydric soll and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
DMn klons of tries Vegetation Strata:
0 = Total Cover
Tree - Wbody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
approximately 201t (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Pl l size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH).
I . Eupabrium capillifdium
Yes FACU
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. Cyperus sp.
No
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and less
3. Andropogon virginlcus
Yes FAC
then 3 in. (7.6 Cm) DSH.
4. SnAox rot ndlfolla
Yes FAC
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
b. Lespedeza cuneata
Yes FACU
approximately 3 to 2011(1 to 6 m) in height.
6. Liquklambar styrecMua
Yes FAC
Herb - AN herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
7.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Rd woody
vines, less than approximately
8.
3pIR (1 m ��j�g�y
9.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sae: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophylic
0 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: Present? Yes F0 No
Remarks: (If observed, Not morphological adaptations, below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

4 -
SOIL Sampling Point: she 3 - upland
Profile ascription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist)_ Color
(moist) %_
Texture Remarks -
0-14 10YR 312
Loamy sand
14 >18 10YR 312 7.5YR 4/4 Loamy sand Mottles WC/D
'T : CoConcentration D RM=Reduced Matrix, MS =Masked Send Grains.
2Location: PL-Pore Llnft. MuMatrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soile :
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U)
_. 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T. U)
_ 2 an Muds (A10) (LRR 8)
_ 8leck Histk (A3)
_
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
.—, Reduced Vertic (F1S) (outside MLRA 150A.0)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplein Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ S"Wad Layers (A5)
_ Depleled Manx (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sots (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FS)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mkreral (A7) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Depicted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (72)
_ Muck Pres tnoe (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 an Muck (A9) (LRR P. T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Odxic (F11) (MLRA 151)
_
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— icon- Manganese Masses (F12) XRR O. P, T)
3Wicatora of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A18) (MUtA 158A)
— Umrbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T. U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mudry Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochrk (F17) (MI RA 151)
unless diisturbsd or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Metric (S4)
_ Reduced Vertlo (F1S) (MLRA 150A. 159S)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Shipped Matrix (SS)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sella (F20) (MLRA 149A. 153C. 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
DOW (Inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -a No n
US Amy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Site 3. View to the west, looking at the west end of the corridor from just west of the railroad tracks.
Site 3. View looking east at the corridor from just west of the railroad tracks.

--bl -
*V.w
I
4w
Amw.
- 44
'k - I

Site 3. View looking northwest from southeast end of the corridor.
Site 3. View looking east along existing gas line corridor, from western end of the site.

DIAL CORDY
AND ASSOCIATL:S INC
MUM Enuironmental Consultants
12 February 2015
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 4 near Laurinburg, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment
for the Line 1, Site 4 natural gas line corridor near Laurinburg, in Scotland County, North
Carolina. As described in the following sections, the property contains potential
wetlands and waters that may be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA)..
Please note that the attached maps show approximate boundaries of potential
jurisdictional features. In order to determine the precise limits of jurisdiction, wetlands
and waters should be delineated and reviewed with the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) regulatory field office.
General Site Description
The site is located in Scotland County, NC in a landscape dominated by agricultural
production. The wetland assessment area encompasses an approximately 100 -feet
wide corridor centered along approximately 1,500 linear feet of the existing Piedmont
Natural Gas (PNG) gas line easement. The corridor is situated south of McGirt's Bridge
Road and east of McArn Road, near Laurinburg, NC. The gas line easement traverses.a
large agricultural field currently in cotton production. A drainage ditch intersects the
corridor approximately midway along its length. A small section of woodlands protrudes
from the south into the cotton field near the drainage ditch.
Methods
Prior to entering the field, soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and USGS topographic
maps were evaluated for evidence of hydric soils, wetlands, and streams at Site 4 of the
PNG Line 1 project. An on -site field investigation was conducted on 4 November 2014.
Potential jurisdictional wetlands and waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987
USACE Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the UASACE Weiland
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0), and the
USACE /EPA memorandum: Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme
Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States (dated
12/02/08). In accordance with the USACE Manuals, potential wetlands were evaluated
for indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Ditches
THE MURCHISON BUILDING • SunE 307 • 241 NORTH FRONT STREET • WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
910 - 251 -9790 • FAx [phone] • F. MALI. infi)@dWcordy.com
]ACKSONVILIE BEACH, FLORIDA • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA • TAMPA, FLORIDA

i
were evaluated for the presence of an ordinary high water mark and other indicators of
sustained flow.
Results
Pre -Field Investigation
According to the Soil Survey of Scotland County, soil types occurring on the property
include Autryville sand (0 to 6 percent slopes), Coxville loam (0 to 2 percent slopes), and
Noboco loamy sand (2 to 6 percent slopes) (see attached soil map). Coxville loam is
listed as a hydric soil by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), thus
providing an indication that wetlands may occur on the property. Autryville sand and
Noboco loamy sand are not listed by the NRCS as hydric soils. The USGS topographic
quadrangle (Laurinburg, NC) depicts the drainage ditch traversing the site as a blue -line
stream feature within the boundaries of Site 4.
Field Investigation
Cotton fields dominate the landscape of Site 4, and potential jurisdictional wetlands were
not observed on the site. Dominant plants within the uncultivated portions of the corridor
included dog- fennel (Eupatodum capillifolium), Lespedeza ( Lespedeza cuneata), broom -
straw (Andropogon virginicus), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and blackberry
(Rubus argutus). Although there were no wetlands present, a field ditch that is likely
jurisdictional falls within the site's boundaries (see attached Potential Wetlands and
Waters Map). The channel did not have standing water at the time of inspection and
appears to be non - relatively permanent waters. Non - relatively permanent waters are
jurisdictional only when there is a significant nexus with traditional navigable waters.
Approximately 2,000 feet to the south, the drainage ditch discharges to a first order
tributary of Leith Creek. Such a connection most likely meets the criteria for a significant
nexus with traditional navigable waters; and therefore, the ditch on the property may be
jurisdictional under the CWA.
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that waters are present within the
assessment area. Therefore, it is recommended that a formal Jurisdictional
Determination be obtained from the Wilmington District USACE. The process of
obtaining a wetland determination from the USACE is a multi-step process requiring the
support of environmental consultants and land surveyors. A qualified consultant will fully
evaluate the property, flag all jurisdictional wetlands and waters, and complete routine
wetland determination and Rapanos data forms. Once the flags are surveyed by a
registered land surveyor, the resulting wetland survey plat and wetland data forms are
submitted to the appropriate Wilmington District regulatory field office along with a
request for a wetland jurisdictional determination. The consultant will conduct an on -site
meeting with the USACE representative to review the wetland lines. Once the final
wetland survey plat is approved and signed by the USACE, the plat can be used to
quantify wetland impacts and determine the level of permitting required for the project.
2

I
ti
Please feel free to contact
results of this assessment.
and Associates Inc. would
permitting services.
me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the
If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy
be pleased to provide additional wetland delineation and
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Scotland County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs
Sincer y,
/rey JT. Coward
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc.
3

Map Unit Name
Map Unit Symbol
AuB
Autryville sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
BIC
Blanton sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
CoA
Coxville loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
DbA
Dunbar fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
LyA
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NcA
Noboco loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NcB
Noboco loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
RaA
Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
ThB
Thursa loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
17.9
13.3%
8.5
6.3%
62.6
46.3%
6.6
4.9%
5.8
4.3%
1.2
0.9%
9.0
6.6%
0.9
0.6%
1.9
1.4%
13.5
10.0%
4.2
3.1%
3.0
2.2%
135.2
100.0%
A

}
w �
�r
f r.
� s
J _ 10
I
R:
1� A 5
•
s
/ r #
1 /
` r
'r
=: m
g�
M
N V
C N Q
U
O
U Ln N
d .m N
E E
ac c
c
d

.. F .
% / l `ITT JF i ✓' ' / -��
6i
Site 4. View to south, looking from the center of the corridor at downstream end of the field ditch.
Site 4. View to north, looking from the center of the corridor at upstream end of the field ditch.

Site 4. View looking southeast from just west of the field ditch.
Site 4. View looking northwest from just west of the field ditch.

Lioo� qkpkl."- -
Site 4.
_�- �Z? � ..-�- -w . yam- • .. � .
View looking southeast from northwest end of the corridor.
Site 4. View looking northwest from southeast end of the corridor.

ft
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro)ect/Ske: PNG Line1, Site 4 City /County: Scotland County Sampling Date: 10/30/14
Applicamowner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: Sampling Pant: Site 4 upland
Im estigstor(s): Jeff Coward Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are dimetie / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology sW*ksntly disturbed? Are - Normal Ciro anstances- present? Yes V NO
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophydc Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Ana
Hydrle Soil Present? Yes V No withM a Wetland? Yes No IL
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Upland data form taken in approximate center of the project site, just west of the north -south field
ditch.
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reauireM
Prrmsry Indicatra (rrdrymum of one is reauked7
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauns (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) `
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhtzospheres along Living Roots (0)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muds Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquftard (D3)
IrNndation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water - Stained leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T. U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yea No
✓ Depth (Inches): '18
Sahraton Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (kx*m): '18
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V/
(Includes capillary
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
8.
Sampling Point: Site 4 upland
% Cover Rees? Status I Number of Dominant Species
That Are 081, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Al Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: 60% (AJB)
3.
4.
5.
6.
0 Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratus (Plat size: )
1. Eupatorium cepiitioNum
2. Juncus sp.
3. Lespedeza cuneate
4. Andropogon virginicus
5. Liquidambsr styradllua
g. Rubus argutus
7. Dichanthelium sp.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover. .
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
FACU
FACU
FAC
FAC
FAC
0 - Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: -
'Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Trss - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (8 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 an) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBM).
Soling - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
approximately, 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and less
than 3 In. (7.8 an) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, exckx ft woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 Io 6 m) in height.
Herb - AN herbaceous (non - woody) plants, inducting
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, mQ woody
plants, except woody vkas. less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - AN woody vines. regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation n
Present? Yes r . � No ja
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
0 = Total Cover
rrsv... ff wA wwn .�u
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Total % Cover of Muth& by:
08L species x 1 a
Sapling Strow (Plot size:
)
FACW spades x 2 a
1
FAC species x3-
2
FACU species x 4 i
3
UPL species x 5 m
4.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6.
prevalence Index = B/A • 3.4
0 - Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover 20% of total oover:
D 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
2 - Domk w►ce Test is 1-50%
1.
3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5.
6.
0 Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratus (Plat size: )
1. Eupatorium cepiitioNum
2. Juncus sp.
3. Lespedeza cuneate
4. Andropogon virginicus
5. Liquidambsr styradllua
g. Rubus argutus
7. Dichanthelium sp.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover. .
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
FACU
FACU
FAC
FAC
FAC
0 - Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: -
'Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Trss - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (8 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 an) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBM).
Soling - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
approximately, 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and less
than 3 In. (7.8 an) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, exckx ft woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 Io 6 m) in height.
Herb - AN herbaceous (non - woody) plants, inducting
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, mQ woody
plants, except woody vkas. less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine - AN woody vines. regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation n
Present? Yes r . � No ja
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Pant: Site a wand
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix — Redox Features
(Inc hasl Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Lae Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/1 Loam
4- >18 10 YR 5/2 7.5 YR 5/8 Sandy day Mottles M/C/D
2.5 YR 5/8 Mottles M/C/D
'T : C- Concentration D- don, RM =Reduced Matrix, MS*Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL =Pore Unlry, M- Matrix.
Hydrk Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrk Soils :
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muds (Al 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Murky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
" Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,S)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F79) (LRR P. S. T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FB)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ocric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A18) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delia Oc ric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertu: (1`18) (MLRA 150A.1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
^ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (SS)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sills (F20) (MLRA 149A. 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrk: Soil Presort? Yes Z No n
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

DIAL CORDY
AND ASSOCIATES INC
Enuironmental Consultants
12 February 2015
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 5 near Laurinburg, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment
for the Line 1, Site 5 natural gas line corridor near Laurinburg, in Scotland County, North
Carolina. As described in the following sections, the property contains potential waters
that may be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Please note that the
attached maps show approximate boundaries of potential jurisdictional features. In
order to determine the precise limits of jurisdiction, wetlands and waters should be
delineated and reviewed with the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
regulatory field office.
General Site Description
The site is located in Scotland County, NC in a predominantly rural /agricultural
landscape. The wetland assessment area encompasses an approximately 100 -feet
wide corridor centered along approximately 2,000 linear feet of the existing Piedmont
Natural Gas (PNG) gas line easement. The corridor is situated south of US Highway 15-
401/501 Bypass and north of Wagram Road, near Laurinburg, NC. The corridor
examined crosses industrial property on the southern end and continues northwest
across US Highway 15- 401/501 Bypass, traversing man - dominated and actively farmed
agricultural lands.
Methods
Prior to entering the field, soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and USGS topographic
maps were evaluated for evidence of hydric soils, wetlands, and streams at Site 5 of the
PNG Line 1 project. An on -site field investigation was conducted on 4 November 2014.
Potential jurisdictional wetlands and waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987
USACE Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), and the
USACE /EPA memorandum: Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme
Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States (dated
12/02/08). In accordance with the USACE Manuals, potential wetlands were evaluated
THE MURCHISON BUILDING • SUITE 307 201 NORTH FRONT STREET • WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
910- 251 -9790 • FAx [phone] - E -MAIL. infoftalmrdymm
]ACKSOWILLE BEACH, FLORIDA - HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA - TAMPA, FLORIDA

for indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Ditches
were evaluated for the presence of an ordinary high water mark and other indicators of
sustained flow.
Results
Pre -Field Investigation
According to the Soil Survey of Scotland County, soil types occurring on the property
include Johnston soils (0 to 2 percent slopes), Norfolk loamy sand (2 to 6 percent
slopes), and Wagram loamy sand (0 to 6 percent slopes) (see attached soil map).
Johnston soils (0 to 2 percent slopes), Norfolk loamy sand (2 to 6 percent slopes), and
Wagram loamy sand (0 to 6 percent slopes) are listed as hydric soils by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), thus providing an indication that wetlands
may occur on the property. The USGS topographic quadrangle (Laurinburg, NC) depicts
a blue -line stream feature traversing Site 5, along the northern edge of US Highway 15-
401/501 Bypass.
Field Investigation
During the site visit on 4 November 2014, no wetlands were observed on Site 5.
Dominant vegetation on the site included privet (Ligustrum sinense), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
blackberry (Rubes argutus), and dog- fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium). Although no
wetlands were observed, several drainage features were identified that would likely be
jurisdictional (see attached Potential Wetlands and Waters Map). Just south of the US
Highway 15- 401/501 Bypass, a small drainage ditch was identified. The channel is
oriented perpendicular to the road and drains northward into a roadside drainage ditch
that parallels the south side of the highway. Neither of these channels held water at the
time of inspection, but both displayed a high water mark and would likely be classified as
non - relatively permanent waters. The roadside ditch drains southwesterly, converging
with Little Creek just west of the site. Such a connection would most likely meet the
criteria for a significant nexus with traditional navigable waters; and therefore, these
ditches may be jurisdictional under the CWA. Adjacent to the north side of the highway,
a small drainage channel was identified, also paralleling the roadway. The ditch, which
drains southwesterly and converges with Little Creek just west of the site, had water in
the channel and would likely be classified as relatively permanent waters. Relatively
permanent waters are jurisdictional under the CWA.
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that extensive waters are present within the
assessment area. Therefore, it is recommended that a formal wetland Jurisdictional
Determination be obtained from the Wilmington District USACE. The process of
obtaining a wetland determination from the USACE is a multi -step process requiring the
support of environmental consultants and land surveyors. A qualified consultant will fully
evaluate the property, flag all jurisdictional wetlands and waters, and complete routine
wetland determination and Rapanos data forms. Once the flags are surveyed by a
registered land surveyor, the resulting wetland survey plat and wetland data forms are
K

submitted to the appropriate Wilmington District regulatory field office along with a
request for a wetland jurisdictional determination. The consultant will conduct an on -site
meeting with the USACE representative to review the wetland lines. Once the final
wetland survey plat is approved and signed by the USACE, the plat can be used to
quantify wetland impacts and determine the level of permitting required for the project.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concems regarding the
results of this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy
and Associates Inc. would be pleased to provide additional wetland delineation and
permitting services.
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Scotland County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs
Sincerely,
Me ard
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc.
3

Map Unit
Map Unit Name
Symbol
0.1%
AuB
Autryville sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
0.8
Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
BaA
flooded
CoA
Coxville loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
DbA
Dunbar fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
DpA
Duplin sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Johnston soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
JmA
flooded
LyA
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Mantachie soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely
MaA
flooded
McA
McColl loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, ponded
NcA
Noboco loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NcB
Noboco loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in Percent of
AOI AOI
3.8 1.5%
1.2 0.5%
3.9
1.5%
0.3
0.1%
0.3
0.1%
26.5 10.2%
7.0 2.7%
2.2 0.9%
29.9
11.5%
51.2
19.7%
95.8
37.0%
0.8
0.3%
8.3
3.2%
28.0
10.8%
259.2
100.0%

4P
00.,e
1
QL
♦ �' 0
♦ � C N
U
�md
2 o
! f c m
g
t f cn m in
�.
•Q
C
C
J
a
C
W
p C
a J

Site S. View to southwest looking at western end of roadside ditch along southern edge of Highway 401.
Site S. View to southwest looking at roadside ditch along southern edge of Highway 401.

Site 5. View looking southeast from northwest end of corridor.
Site 5. View northwest along corridor, looking from northern edge of US Highway 401.

top
71
-
r'G

Site 5. View southwest, looking at roadside ditch adjacent to southern edge of US Highway 401, from
center of corridor.
Site 5. View southwest, looking at roadside ditch adjacent to southern edge of US Highway 401, from
southwest edge of corridor.

Site S. View to northwest from northern end of ditch situated perpendicular to US Highway 401, south
of the highway
Site 5. View to southeast from northern end of ditch situated perpendicular to US Highway 401, south
of the Highway.

Site 5. View to northwest from midpoint of ditch situated perpendicular to US Highway 4a1, soutn of
the highway
Site 5. View to southeast from midpoint of ditch situated perpendicular to US Highway 401, south of the
Highway.

Site 5. View to northwest from southern end of ditch situated perpendicular to US Highway 401, south
of the highway.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: PNG Line1, Site 5 City /County: Laurinburg/Scotiand Co. Rampliny Date: 11/4/14
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: Site 5 upland
knrestigator(s): Jeff Coward Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope. terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (yb). a5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes —2L No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Sal or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes NO Is the sampled Area
Hydrtc Soil Present? Yes No ✓ wRhin a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Upland data form was taken just inside the woodline, approximately 100 yards north of US Highway
401.
HYMOLOGY
Wedand Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primary w.wican lminIm rn of me is reguire :
check as that apy4y)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sullide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Linea (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospherea a" Living Roots (0)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction In Tiled Soils (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muds Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) !
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_
_ Weir Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Obswvatk ms:
surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (Indies):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): '18
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches): '18
se
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca *ft e)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stradm (Plot sae: )
1. Ligustrum shmnse
2. Lihoderdron kApftm
3.
4.
S.
8.
50% of total carer:
Species? % Cover Stabs
Yes FAC
Yes FACU
0 = Total Cover
20% of total oovar.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
8.
0 • Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Ugustrum sinsnse Yes FAC
2. Acer rubrum Yes FAC
3. L4Wdambar sVwMua Yes FAC
4.
5.
A
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. Ligustrum sinense
Yes
2. SOIW90 OP-
Yes
3. Polygon" SP-
Yes
4. Aosr rutxum
Yes
5. VMS op.
Yes
5. Rubus argutus
Yes
7 Eupelorium capillifoaurn
Yes
8.
9.
10.
11.
FAC
FAC
Sampling Point: SRO 5 upland
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Specks Across All Strafe: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 78% (A/B)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
x 1 =
OBL species
FACW species
x 2
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x4-
UPL spades
x6-
COMM Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B!A = 3-22
t- Rapid Tag for Hydrophygc Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index Is S3.0'
Problematic HydrophytlC Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 ft (8 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.e cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
Ow 3 in. (7.8 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines.
approxkrm*dy 3 to 20 it (1 to B m) in height.
FAC Herb - AN herbaceous (non-woody) plants. Including
FACU herbaceous vines, regardless of size, ME& woody
pkrMS, except woody vanes. less than approamalely
3 ft (1 m) in height.
u = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4. - - -
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Woody vine - AN woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytk
Vegetation
Present? Yes No LL
US Amry Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Site 5 upland
Profile ascription: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) may° Color
Redox Features
(moist) % Tvne Texture
Remarks
_
0->18 2.5Y 4n
Fine gn0y b"n
'Type: CoConcentradon. DeDepletion, RM =Reduced Matrix. MS- Masked Sand Grains. =Location:
PL-Pore Lining, M- Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless ollm wise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR 8. T, U) _
1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histle Epipedon (A2)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR 8, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (AM (LRR 8)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mudky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) J
Reduced Vertic (F18) (out" MLRA 150A,8)
_ Hydrogen SuMde (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P. 8, T)
_ SM~ tyre (AS)
r Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sobs (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
_
_ 5 cm Mudry Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parana Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (FS) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P. T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain M Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O. P. T)
'Indicators d hydrophytk Vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
walland hydrology must be present,
_
Sandy Murry Mineral (S1) (LRR O.8) ,_
Delta Ochric (F17) (ItLRA 151)
urdess disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Verdc (F18) (MLRA 150A. 1106)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodptain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C. 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 8, T. U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _a NO Z
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guif Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

DIAL. CORDY
AND ASSOCIATES INC
Enuironmental Consultants
12 February 2015
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 6 near Lilesville, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment
for the Line 1, Site 6 natural gas line corridor northeast of Lilesville, in Anson County,
North Carolina. As described in the following- sections; the - property contains potential
wetlands and waters that may be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Please note that the attached maps show approximate boundaries of potential
jurisdictional features. In order to determine the precise limits of jurisdiction, wetlands
and waters should be delineated and reviewed with the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) regulatory field office.
General Site Description
The site is located in Anson County, NC in a forested landscape with moderately steep
topography. The wetland assessment area encompasses an approximately 100 -feet
wide corridor centered along approximately 1,400 linear feet of the existing Piedmont
Natural Gas (PNG) gas line easement. The corridor is roughly bisected by Clark
Mountain Road, and is situated approximately halfway between Lilesville, NC and Big
Island on the Pee Dee River.
Methods
Prior to entering the field, soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and USGS topographic
maps were evaluated for evidence of hyddc soils, wetlands, and streams at Site 6 of the
PNG Line 1 project. An on -site field investigation was conducted on 28 October 2014.
Potential jurisdictional wetlands and waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987
USACE Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the USACE Wetland
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0), and the
USACE /EPA memorandum: Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme
Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States (dated
12/02/08). In accordance with the USACE Manuals, potential wetlands were evaluated
for indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Ditches
THE MURCHISON BUILDING - SUITE 307 - 201 NORTH FRONT STREET - WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
910.251 -9790 - r•Ax 910- 251 -9409 - f: MAII. inf)@dialmrdycom
JACKSONVILLE BEACH, FLORIDA - HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA - TAMPA, FLORIDA

were evaluated for the presence of an ordinary high water mark and other indicators of
sustained flow.
Results
Pre -Field Investigation
According to the Soil Survey of Anson County, soil types occurring on the property
include Ailey loamy sand (2 to 8 percent slopes), Lillington gravelly sandy loam (2 to 8
percent slopes), Lillington gravelly sandy loam (8 to 15 percent slopes), and Pacolet
gravelly sandy loam (15 to 25 percent slopes) (see attached soil map). Ailey loamy sand
(2 to 8 percent slopes) is listed as a hydric soil by the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS), thus providing an indication that wetlands may occur on the property.
The USGS topographic quadrangle (Lilesville, NC) does not depict any blue -line stream
features within the boundaries of Site 6.
Field Investigation
Upland hardwood forest dominates the hilly landscape of Site 6. Near the southeast end
of the site, a first order perennial stream with contiguous floodplain wetlands was
identified (see attached Potential Wetlands and Waters Map). Dominant vegetation
associated with the floodplain wetland included cane (Arundinaria gigantea), netted
chain -fem (Woodwardia areolata), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and sweet
pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia). Dominant vegetation in the adjacent uplands included
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), blackberry (Rubus argutus), winged sumac
(Rhus coppalinum), sweetgum, and lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata). The stream, which
runs south and converges with McKoy Creek off -site, would likely be classified as
relatively permanent waters (RPW). RPW's are jurisdictional under the CWA.
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that wetlands and waters are present within
the assessment area. Therefore, it is recommended that a formal wetland Jurisdictional
Determination be obtained from the Wilmington District USACE. The process of
obtaining a wetland determination from the USACE is a multi -step process requiring the
support of environmental consultants and land surveyors. A qualified consultant will fully
evaluate the property, flag all jurisdictional wetlands and waters, and complete routine
wetland determination and Rapanos data forms. Once the flags are surveyed by a
registered land surveyor, the resulting wetland survey plat and wetland data forms are
submitted to the appropriate Wilmington District regulatory field office along with a
request for a wetland jurisdictional determination. The consultant will conduct an on -site
meeting with the USACE representative to review the wetland lines. Once the final
wetland survey plat is approved and signed by the USACE, the plat can be used to
quantify wetland impacts and determine the level of permitting required for the project.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the
results of this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy
2

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the
results of this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy
and Associates Inc. would be pleased to provide additional wetland delineation and
permitting services.
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Anson County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs
Sincerely,
i
J e r y T. Coward
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc.
3

Map Unit
Symbol
Map Unit Name
AeB
Ailey loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
EmB
Emporia loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
LgB
Lillington gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
LgC
Lillington gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
PgC
Pacolet gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
Pgp
Pacolet gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent
slopes
PgE
Pacolet gravelly sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent
slopes
UdC
Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 15 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in Percent of
AOI AOI
14.8
14.1%
9.0
8.6%
15.0
14.4%
33.6 32.1%
4.3 4.1%
14.9 14.3%
2.5 2.3%
10.4 10.0%
104.5 100.0%

_ I p •
r Mr rr f
AN ,
1
�..f ja 19
�(p
rl-
�. nr ti
I
�'06 1
le
IOL
f •
1 r �r 1 •� �ti D o E
N O
ref .
LM V
co
�- r - l I
.r -J�" P. � i J 00

Site 6. View from southeastern end of site, looking southeast at existing gas line corridor.
Site 6. View from the southeastern end of the site, looking northwest at the existing gas line easement.

Site 6. View to the northwest of the existing gas line corridor, from just west of SR 1744.
Site 6. View from southeast of the PNG regulator station, looking northwest at the gas line easement .

Site 6. View of the gas line easement, looking southeast from just southeast of PNG regulator station.
Site6. View from northern edge of existing gas line easement, looking south at the wetland /stream .

war
IW
4w
�` � Sf•`f � r,�� rte"' ,'� �.r � �(•/ h�y • 'C
F O� ` �, f. r •.f
AL

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSIte: PNG Line 1, Site 6 CitYpCounlY Anson County Sampling Date: 1028114
Appk„UO, „a: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC SemWng pol,t. 1-2 -5 Wetland
Investigator(*): Jeff Coward Seaton, Township. Range:
tandform (hilislope, tot, , etc.): hillslope Local relief (Concave, convex, none): Slope (96):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)• Let: Long: Datum'
Sol Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are dim k / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (11 no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Sol , or Hydrology aigniflcantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vagetaton . Sol , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transectts, Important features, etc.
Hydrophyt1c Vagetellon Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Fydric Sol Present? Yes No ,Nilide a WWand? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yea 4' No
Remarks:
Upland data form collected in wetland near flag 12 -5.
HYDROLOGY
wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of am Is reaiired%
Greek all that andv)
_ Surface Sol Cracks (B8)
_ Surface Waiter (A1) _
Aquatic; Fauna (B13)
,_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surfaos (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patients (810)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Subtle Odor (CI)
` Moss Trim Lines (818)
_ WaMr Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospfsras along LMrrg Roots (C3)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sedment Deposits (62) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Craylsh Burrows (C8)
DAR Deposits (83) _
Recent Won Reduction in Tilled Soil (Ce)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Irnagery (Cg)
Algal Met or Crust (84) _
Thin Muds Surfsoe (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
V FAC- Neutral Test (D6)
Water- Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (DO) (LRR T. U)
Field Observations:
Surince Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes V No
Depth (tnctss): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Vol No
ndudes capillary
Describe Recorded Data (stream gouge, monlorirg well. aerial photos. previous Inspections). If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: L2-5 wetland
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
% Cover Suedes? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across AN Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AB)
8.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total ever:
Total % Cover of Mul iw by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapliog Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x2-
1
FAC species x3-
2
FACU species x4-
3
UPL species x5-
4.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
6•
-
Prevalence Index = B/A =
0 = Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
Q 2 - Dominance Test is -50%
1 •
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
'Indicators of hydric sot and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Definitions of Five Vacation Sbats:
0 = Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. Panicum sp.
Yes
Sapling excluding wood vines,
� -Woody plants, ng Y
2. Jun cus sp.
Yes
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more In height and less
3. Arundinaria gigantes
Yes FACW
than 3 In. (7.6 cm) DOH.
4. Woodwardis arsolata
Yes 0131.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5. Liquidambar styraciflua
Yes - FAC
approximately 3 to 2011(1 to 6 m) in height.
6. Carex sp.
Yes
Herb -AN herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
7. Clethre alnifolia
Yes FACW
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, And woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
3 R (1 m) in height.
9.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Wbodv vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1 Lonicera japonica
Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
-- -
6.
Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover
veystadon
Z
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1-2 -5 wetland
to the depth needed to document the Indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
ruches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) %_ Tvoer Locr Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 4/4 Loamy clay pea sized gravel present
3->18 315GY (Gley 1) swwy -y-m pea sized gravel present
'T : C= Concentration. D- Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Mstked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL-Pore Lining, M- Matrix.
Hydric soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR s, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muds (Ag) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surboe (S9) (LRR s, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR s)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduoed Verk (F1S) (outside MLRA 150/1,13)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
! Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (Fig) (LRR P. s, T)
_ StraMfed Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodes (A6) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1336).
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2) #
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (Fill
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (77=12)
_ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Oduic (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T)
'Indicators of hydrophylc vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A1S) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, s)
_ Della Oc ric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F1S) (MLRA 150A,1308)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplein Soils (Fig) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solt (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (bidues):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 2L No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projed/8ite: PNG Line 1, Site 6 City/County: Anson County Sampling Date: 10/28/14
Appiicanyowner Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: 1-2 -5 upland
Investigator(s): Jeff Coward Section, Township, Range:
Landtorrn (hiNsbpe, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are dirnatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes JL No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sal Presets? Yes No ✓ within a Wadend? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Presets? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
Upland data form Collected upslope of wetland flag 1-2 -5.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (mWmurn of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is recuired:
check all that awM
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Satuation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
` Dry-Season Water Table (02)
Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (06)
Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (06)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
r' Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
oncludes capillary hinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1-2-5 upland
Tree Stratum (Plot sae:
) %
Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All &rate: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, Or FAC: 33% (AJB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover;
Total %Cover of Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL specks x 1 =
1
FACW species x2-
2
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x 4 =
4
UPL specks x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
0.
Prevalence Index a B/A =
0
a Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover
20% of total cover.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot sae:
)
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is -50%
1.
3 -Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
'Indicators of hydric sot and weland hydrology must
5.
be present unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
Deflnitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0
a Total Cover
Toss -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
(7.6 cm) or larger In diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. Lonicem japonica
Yes FACU
S"Un0 - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2. Rubus argutus
Yes FAC
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
3. unld. grass
Yes
then 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4. Rhus coppalinum
Yes UPL
Shrub - Woody planle, excluding woody vines,
5. Liquidamber styraclllus
Yes FAC
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
6. Lespedeze curate
Yes FACU
Herb - AN herbaceous (non - woody) plants. inducting
7.
herbaceous Vines, regardless of size, AW Woody
plants . except woody vines, less than approximately
8.
( ) I height.
9.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10.
11.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1. Lonicera japonica
Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
0
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes ,� No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations bek>vr).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1-2 -5 upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confkm Ow absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % _ Tjr r --L cr Texture Remarks
0-11 10YR 4/6 _ day loam pea sized gravel present
11 - >18 25Y 5/4 day loam pea sized gravel present
'T : C=Concentretion. D-DePletIon, RM- Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
=Location: PL-Pore Lining. M =Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls :
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Poyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S. T. U)
_ 1 cm Muds (A9) (LRR O)
Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S. T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
_Histic
Black Histic (A3) —
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
— Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sufte (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FB)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (An (LRR P. T. U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Belau Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) `
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1 $OB)
Sandy Redox (S5) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C. 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S. T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yea _a No . ,
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

AL
DIAL CORDY
AND ASSOCIATES INC
F_nuironmental Consultants
24 December 2014
Suzanne Herron
1420 Donelson Pike
Suite A -12
Nashville, TN 37217
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 1, Site 7 near Bumsville, NC
Dear Ms. Herron:
This letter report presents the findings of a preliminary jurisdictional wetland assessment for
the Line 1, Site 7 natural gas line corridor near Bumsville, in Anson County, North Carolina.
As described in the following sections, the property contains potential wetlands and waters
that may be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Please note that the attached
maps show approximate boundaries of potential jurisdictional features. In order to determine
the precise limits of jurisdiction, wetlands and waters should be delineated and reviewed with
the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulatory field office.
General Site Description
The site is located in Anson County, NC in a forested landscape. The wetland assessment
area encompasses an approximately 100 -feet wide corridor centered along approximately
1,000 linear feet of the existing PNG gas line corridor. The corridor is situated east of Cedar
Grove Church Road, near Bumsville, NC. The portions of the site not maintained as gas line
easement consist entirely of wooded uplands, with the exception of two Intermittent stream
channels that intersect near the center of the site.
Methods
Prior to entering the field, soil survey maps, aerial photographs, and USGS topographic
maps were evaluated for evidence of hydric soils, wetlands, and streams at Site7 of the PNG
Line 1 project. An on -site field investigation was conducted on 29 October 2014. Potential
jurisdictional wetlands and waters were evaluated in accordance with the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region" Version 2.0), and
the Corps of Engineers /EPA memorandum: Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S.
Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United States (dated
12/02/08). In accordance with the Corps Manuals, potential wetlands were evaluated for
indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Ditches were
evaluated for the presence of an ordinary high water mark and other indicators of sustained
flow.
Results
Pre -Field InvesUgaation
According to the Soil Cedar Survey of Anson County, soil types occurring on the property
include Goldston channery silt loam (2 to 8 percent slopes) and Goldston channery silt loam
THE MURCHISON BUILDING • Suin 307 • 201 NORTH FRONT STREET • WILMINCTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28401
910- 251 -9790 • FAX [phone] • f MAIL infc)@dWcordycom
JACKSONVILLE BEACH, FLORIDA • HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA • TAMPA, FLORIDA

(25 to 45 percent slopes) (see attached soil map). Goldston channery soils are not listed as
hydric soils by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), thus providing an
indication that wetlands are not likely to occur on the property. The USGS topographic
quadrangle (Polkton, NC) depicts the western channel as a blue -line stream feature within
the boundaries of Site 7.
Field Investigation
Upland hardwood forest dominates the hilly landscape of Site 7, and potential jurisdictional
wetlands were not observed on the site. Although there were no wetlands present, two
streams that are likely jurisdictional do fall within the site's boundaries (see attached
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map). Two first -order intermittent streams enter and
intersect near the middle of the site. One channel enters from the west and the other comes
from the north. Downstream of the confluence of the two first -order channels, the stream is
second -order and continues southeast adjacent to the existing gas line corridor and off the
site to its confluence with Lanes Creek. Lanes Creek flows northward to its confluence with
the Rocky River. There was no water or saturated soils in stream channels on the site at the
time of inspection.
Recommendations
The preliminary wetland analysis indicates that extensive waters are present within the
assessment area. Therefore, it is recommended that a formal wetland Jurisdictional
Determination be obtained from the Wilmington District Corps. The process of obtaining a
wetland determination from the Corps Is a multi-step process requiring the support of
environmental consultants and land surveyors. A qualified consultant will fully evaluate the
property, flag all jurisdictional wetlands and waters, and complete routine wetland
determination and Rapanos data forms. Once the flags are surveyed by a registered land
surveyor, the resulting wetland survey plat and wetland data forms are submitted to the
appropriate Wilmington District regulatory field office along with a request for a wetland
jurisdictional determination. The consultant will conduct an on -site meeting with the Corps
representative to review the wetland lines. Once the final wetland survey plat is approved
and signed by the Corps, the plat can be used to quantify wetland impacts and determine the
level of permitting required for the project.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the results of
this assessment. If you decide to move forward with the project, Dial Cordy and Associates
Inc. would be pleased to provide additional wetlarid delineation and permitting services.
Sincerely,
J T. Coward
Dial Cordy and Associates Inc.
Attachments
Potential Wetlands and Waters Map
Anson County Soil Survey Map
Site Photographs
+ t

I-
Map Unit
Map Unit Name
Symbol
BaB
Badin channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
BaC
Badin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
GoB
Goldston channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
Goldston channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent
GoD
slopes
Goldston channery silt loam, 25 to 45 percent
GoE
slopes
W
Water
Totals for Area of Interest
Acres in Percent of
AOI AOI
4.3 10.0%
0.1 0.2%
3.3 7.6%
4.6 10.6%
30.8 70.5%
0.5 1.1%
43.6 100.0%

1
1
~l
i 1 -
J ,, Am
8
Lol
c N O
��. W%6 = C N
O S S
U � N
E E
• o
i E' E
I
� m d�
a
J 1
00

r
�14

- A . -- .
�M
r
' :• ��_—
1ti
dF At
+. .�>

� � �.t ��•.. •: fib, `�, �%!.� !'1' -'•�
• ` L �' x'1,(2 - "��,. i.1 �..� \P - - .
70 -Nqm
'PLr,��')y,X •�•'i _ - • ,
Ar
Ap
w.
. - �# • _ a'� . F 4 * • � '� -� � • I sit �� w- � � ` •• +�►�.

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
April 6, 2015
Mr. Rahlff Ingle
Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc.
201 N. Front Street, Suite 307
Wilmington, North Carolina 28401
Subject: Listed Species Assessment, Proposed PNG Natural Gas Line Replacement Project (Site
7), located southeast of Cedar Grove Road, near Burnsville, Anson County, North
Carolina
Dear Mr. Ingle:
On March 6, 2015, we received a letter from you (via e-mail) requesting our comments about the
subject project. We have reviewed the information you presented and are providing the
following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661- 667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 -1543) (Act).
According to the information that you presented, PNG is proposing to replace about 223 linear
feet (If) of natural gas pipeline, replace an undersized culvert, and relocate about 1801f of eroded
intermittent stream channel. The culvert replacement and stream channel relocation is necessary
to mitigate ongoing erosion within the existing right -of -way easement. A temporary workspace
easement, about 3601f long by 20 feet wide, will be cleared for the construction. The temporary
work easement will not be grubbed and vegetation will be allowed to regenerate following
completion of the project.
Endangered Species. According to our records and a review of the information you provided,
no federally listed endangered or threatened species or their habitats occur in the project area.
Therefore, we believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However,
obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals
impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not
previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not
considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may
be affected by the identified action.

Wetland /Stream Protection and Erosion Control - We are concerned with the
stream- crossings /impacts that are being proposed for this project. We assume a Section 404
permit is being requested for the aquatic impacts associated with the project. From our past
experiences with similar projects, we believe open - cut/trenching technique for stream crossings
increases the likelihood of future lateral movement of the stream (which could undercut or erode
around the gas pipeline), and the correction of these problems could result in additional future
maintenance and impacts to the stream. Just this year, we have reviewed several projects where
PNG is conducting (and financing) stream -bank stabilization activities because of past pipeline
projects where open - cut/trenching was used for stream crossings. Therefore, we recommend the
use of directional boring under the stream to prevent stream impacts, and we recommend that
vegetated riparian buffers (a minimum of 100 feet wide on perennial streams and 50 feet wide on
intermittent streams) be restored and preserved. Directional boring under streams significantly
minimizes impacts to aquatic resources, and forested riparian buffers serve as filters for
contaminants, lessen storm -water velocities, provide thermal cover, and protect stream -bank
stability. If this method cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable option,
we recommend the development of a stream -bank monitoring and maintenance program that
would allow for the prompt stabilization of stream banks near the pipeline crossing (should any
stream -bank erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
We strongly recommend that stringent measures to control erosion be implemented prior to any
ground disturbance and that these measures be maintained throughout project construction. Any
disturbed areas should be reseeded with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife.
Fescue -based mixtures should be avoided. Native annual small grains appropriate for the season
are preferred and recommended. Biodegradable erosion - control matting should be used in
conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in steep slope and riparian areas.
Matting should be secured in place with staples, stakes, or live stakes of native trees (whenever
possible). The vegetation should be monitored, and subsequent plantings should be installed
when needed. Fertilizers and pesticides should not be used near streams.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at
828/258 -3939, Ext. 240. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4 -2 -15 -200.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

"N kc Z
50101 Governor's Drive
Suite 250
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
919.530.8446 P14-.7NE
919.530.8525 Fax
www.TRCsolutiotis.com
December 31, 2014
Ms. Renee Gledhill - Earley
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -4617
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 1, Proposed Horizontal Directional Drill at Lumber River, Maxton
vicinity, Robeson County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill- Earley:
On behalf of Energy Land and Infrastructure, PLLC, and Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., enclosed
for your review please find information on proposed construction activities at the existing Piedmont
Natural Gas Line 1 crossing of the Lumber River north of Maxton in Robeson County (Figure 1). The
work at this location is subject to Corps of Engineers regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act.
The proposed construction will consist of replacement of the existing 16 -inch gas pipeline across the
Lumber River with a new 16 -inch pipeline to be installed beneath the river via a horizontal directional
drill (HDD). As shown on the attached plan (Figure 2), the new line will be installed an average of 30 feet
or more beneath the ground surface, and will be approximately 25 feet beneath the river bed. The existing
pipeline will be abandoned in place, and the only anticipated surficial or near- surficial ground disturbance
will be limited to the existing 50 -foot -wide pipeline easement and an associated temporary workspace,
which will measure approximately 2900 feet in length and up to 50 feet in width.
Via this letter, we are requesting any comments that your office might wish to provide concerning the
potential impact of this proposed construction project on historic properties.
We look forward to the results of your review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 530 -8446
x222; or via email at pwebb(&tresolutions.com, should you have any questions or concerns regarding the
proposed construction.
Sincerely,
C& LA
Paul Webb
Principal Archaeologist, Chapel Hill
cc: Suzanne Herron, Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC

IL
L_
• Z1.111 0
'A
FiROJECT
1-00CATION
1%3o
'Max?on. North
Carolina
(1978)
A
N
Oak Gw•-e
Cerr
30
0
D-th Mi Copyriot :@,2(P3-National Geog ap
hic Society, i-cubed mile C'
'
V:— N
Figure 1. Location of proposed construction activity at PNG Line I Lumber River crossing, Robeson County,
North Carolina.

-=
^
"
PROFILE
VAPLACUMT
Cowry. Nooff"
Ndurd Gn

P. ',
SSA c -1
50101 Governor's Drive
Suite 250
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
919.530.8446 PHONE
919.530.8525 FAI
www.TRCsolutions.com
December 31, 2014
Ms. Renee Gledhill - Earley
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -4617
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 1, Proposed Construction North of Polkton, Anson County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill - Earley:
On behalf of Energy Land and Infrastructure, PLLC, and Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., enclosed
for your review please find information on proposed construction activities along an unnamed tributary to
Lanes Creek north of Polkton in Anson County (Figure 1). The work at this location is subject to Corps of
Engineers regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
The proposed construction will consist of replacement of a section of pipeline at a location that is
currently subject to erosion from a tributary to Lane Creek. All activity will be confined to the existing
pipeline right -of -way and an adjacent ca. 35- foot -wide temporary workspace, which will extend along a
ca. 300 -foot segment of the pipeline at the stream crossing (Figure 2).
Via this letter, we are requesting any comments that your office might wish to provide concerning the
potential impact of this proposed construction project on historic properties.
We look forward to the results of your review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 530 -8446
x222; or via email at pweb _,tresolutions.com, should you have any questions or concerns regarding the
proposed construction.
Sincerely,
C:�'a Cl --
Paul Webb
Principal Archaeologist, Chapel Hill
cc: Suzanne Herron, Energy Land & Infrastructure, PLLC

Figure 1. Location of proposed construction activity west of Lanes Creek, PNG Line 1, Anson County, North Carolina.

_
"
~
--------------- ------- !-Z.,Z� ---------
SM 7 CONVENTIONAL NOW
Natural Gas
A 74)0-30

0.
•
0
CONSTRUCTION PLANS
FOR -pb'
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT APR142015
VARIOUS COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA DENq Wg1ER Rfcnio.
�•
JN� ° RICHMOND
N i ANSONSITE 6 � \
L.._.. _.._.._.._a._.._..------ �.._.._ SCOTLAND,— —
• �- SITE
SITE41 STE2
•\ SITE 3—� /•-
/ � -SITE1 ,\
••` •• BJ :EN
' ROBESON
N
} '•� __j� \
rY •• ` - COLUMBUS
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
r6,11 Piedmont Natural Gas
OWNER: PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
PH:(704)731 -4375 or(615)872 -2350
ISSUE DATE: XXXX
SHEETINDEX
SHEET NO
SHEET TITLE
GENERAL
3007- 00.000
COVER SHEET
3007 - 00-001
NOTES 8 LEGEND
•
DETAILS
`
��
�
,,1
CABARRUB �'•
`
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007.01.005
i
3007 -0 1 -006
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 2 - LUMBER
RIVER
3007 -02 -007
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007�02�006
/• STANLY
3007- 02 -OD9
MONTGOMERY
,
��•
3007 -03010
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -03011
STA 5409.90 TO STA 5423.70
3007- 03-012
MOORE
3007 - 03-013
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 4 - McGIRTS BRIDGE ROAD
3007 -04 -014
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -04-015
STA 5225 -35 TO STA 5238.86
3007 -04016
STA 5238,86 TO STA 5247.17
3007- 01-017
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
3007 -05018
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007.05.019
STA 5153.15 TO STA 5166.04
3007-05020
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 6 - STATE ROAD 1744
3007-01021
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -WO22
STA 3514.96 TO STA 3552.24
3007 -WO23
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 7 - CEDAR GROVE ROAD
3007 -07 -024
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -07 -025
PLAN 8 PROFILE
3007 -07 -026
GRADING PLAN
3007 -07 -027
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
CJMBER.ANC
�•
JN� ° RICHMOND
N i ANSONSITE 6 � \
L.._.. _.._.._.._a._.._..------ �.._.._ SCOTLAND,— —
• �- SITE
SITE41 STE2
•\ SITE 3—� /•-
/ � -SITE1 ,\
••` •• BJ :EN
' ROBESON
N
} '•� __j� \
rY •• ` - COLUMBUS
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
r6,11 Piedmont Natural Gas
OWNER: PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
PH:(704)731 -4375 or(615)872 -2350
ISSUE DATE: XXXX
SHEETINDEX
SHEET NO
SHEET TITLE
GENERAL
3007- 00.000
COVER SHEET
3007 - 00-001
NOTES 8 LEGEND
3007-01002
DETAILS
3007 -01003
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
SITE 1 - RED HILLS
ROAD
3007 -01 -004
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007.01.005
STA 5595.57 TO STA 5609.89
3007 -0 1 -006
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 2 - LUMBER
RIVER
3007 -02 -007
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007�02�006
HDD BORE PLAN B PROFILE
3007- 02 -OD9
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 3 - SKYWAY
CHURCH ROAD
3007 -03010
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -03011
STA 5409.90 TO STA 5423.70
3007- 03-012
STA 5423 -70 TO STA 5431.23
3007 - 03-013
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 4 - McGIRTS BRIDGE ROAD
3007 -04 -014
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -04-015
STA 5225 -35 TO STA 5238.86
3007 -04016
STA 5238,86 TO STA 5247.17
3007- 01-017
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
3007 -05018
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007.05.019
STA 5153.15 TO STA 5166.04
3007-05020
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 6 - STATE ROAD 1744
3007-01021
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -WO22
STA 3514.96 TO STA 3552.24
3007 -WO23
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SITE 7 - CEDAR GROVE ROAD
3007 -07 -024
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
3007 -07 -025
PLAN 8 PROFILE
3007 -07 -026
GRADING PLAN
3007 -07 -027
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
DESIGN CONSULTANTS:
CIVIL ENGINEER: THOMAS L SAUNDERS, P.E.
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE, SUITE Al2
NASHVILLE. TN 37217
PHONE. 615 - 383 -6300
FAX [phone]
SURVEYOR MICHAEL J MOORE, R L.S.
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE, SUITE Al2
NASHVILLE. TN 37217
PHONE 615 - 383-6300
FAX [phone]
ELI PROJECT# 14 -21 -3007
PNG IRO 2239872 (SITES 1 - 5)
2239873 (SITES 6 & 7)
ENERGY LAND b INFRASTRUCTURE
TI PLLC
0 N
142 DOELSON PIKE. SUITE AI2 •NASHVILLE. 37217
OFFICE 615- 383 - TN 6300 - WWW.ELI- LLC.COM
ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL

u
GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF PIEDMONT
NATURAL GAS
-
2 ALL WORK MOLL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA TITLE 29 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND ALL OTHER FEDERAL, STATE AND
LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
3. THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON ALL PLANS ARE BASED ON UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS, AND
WHERE POSSIBLE, FIELD MEASUREMENTS. T/IE CONTRACTOR SMALL NOT RELY UPON THIS INFORMATION AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE
DETAILED VERIFICATION OF EXISTENCE, SIZE, LOCATION AND DEPTH SHOULD BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY DECISION
RELATIVE THERETO IS MADE DIAL 811 FOR ONE CALL
4. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SMALL ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCATING ANY UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES(PUBUC AND/OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST IN THE AREA OR CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY OWNERS SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ONE CALL TIME REQUIREMENTS IN ADVANCE OF ANY EXCAVATION IN THE PROXIMITY OF UTILITIES THE CONTRACTOR,
AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR OF EXISTING UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION THE
CONTRACTOR SHILLI. CONTACT THE ONE CALL CENTER BY CALLING 311 IN ADVANCE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.
5 CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEARLY LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND AVOID DAMAGING THESE DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
6 CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES ANDOR PENALTIES RESULTING FROM ALL NON- COMPLANCE WITH FEDERAL
STATE, AND LOCAL PERMITS AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENTS.
7. ALL PAVEMENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR
ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WINING JURISDICTION.
B THE GAS MAIN SMALL BE INSTALLED 50 AS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWENTY FOUR (24) INCHES OF CLEARANCE TO ALL OTHER
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES VWIERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, APPROPRIATE PROTECTION/ SMALL BE INSTALLED
9. ALL DRAINAGE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AND ERODED MATERIALS RESULTING FROM CONSTRICTION
THESE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SMALL BE MAINTAINED CLEW DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION.
10. ALL DISTURBED SLOPES SMALL BE RESTORED TO EXISTING GRADES AND STAN UZED WITH SEED AND STRAW AND10R TACK IF
APPROPRIATE.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DESCRIBED ON THE PROJECT PLANS AND DETAILS DURING
CONSTRUCTION AND SURFACE RESTORATION UNTIL SUCH MEASURES ARE NOT NECESSARY WHERE ADDITIONAL MEASURES ARE
NECESSARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MOUNTAIN THE APPROPRIATE MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF
THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
12. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND MULCH AS REQUIRED.
13. NOTHING IN THE GENERAL NOTES OR SPECIAL PROVISIONS SHALL RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM HIS RESPONSIBILITIES TOWARD THE
SAFETY AND CONVENIENCE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS ALONG THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AREA
14, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, (LIE. INVERTS, UTILITY ROUTINGS, UTILITY CROSSINGS, AND DIMENSIONS) IN
THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF UTILITY WORK. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.
15 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXISTENCE OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. TALK= CARE TO PROTECT UTILITIES
THAT ARE TO REMAIN. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE ACCORDING TO LOCH. STANDARDS AND AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE COORDINATE ALL
CONSTRUCTION WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY
16 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND OBTAIN APPROVAL AS NECESSARY BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION
17 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN EXISTING PAVEMENT AND NEW PAVEMENT SLIGHT FIELD
ADJUSTMENT OF FINAL GRADES MAY BE NECESSARY.
18. ALL DEBRIS FROM CHIPPING MACHINES DURING CLEARING OPERATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT SITE AND DISPOSED OF
BY CONTRACTOR.
19. ALL UTILITIES AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE LOCATED HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES COMMENCING AND ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED GAS UNE,
BORES, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR ANY REDESIGN REQUIRED.
20. LAND FARMING OF DRIVING MUD ON THE PIPELINE EASEMENTS WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE
INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS IN ADVANCE OF SUCH ACTIVITY.
SITE NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING FEATURES (PAVEMENT, CURBS, WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, YARDS, LANDSCAPING, ETC.)
TO A LIKE NEW CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
2. ALL TRENCHES CUT IN EXISTING ROADS OR DRIVES SHALL UTILIZE A CLEAR SAW CUT AND SHALL BE BACKFILLED (10D%) TO FINAL
SUBGRADE ACCORDING TO THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HAVING JURISDICTION, REQUIREMENTS.
3. CONCRETE FOR CURBS AND SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 3500 PSI CONCRETE.
4. ANY WORK UNACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, TO LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE, OR TO UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE
REPAIRED OR REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE OWNER.
5. ALL PAVEMENT MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STANDARD DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
8, ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE.
GRADING NOTES
1. PROPER TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT MEASURES SMALL BE USED TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS ALL EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES AND MEASURES SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED, INSTALLED, MAINTAINED, AND REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL STATE,
AND LOCAL LANE, REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, AND POLICIES.
2 MULCH AND SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WTHIN THE TIMEFRAW DESIGNATED ON THE GROUND STABILIZATION CHART AFTER FINAL
GRADING IS COMPLETED, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. CONTRACTOR S/YLLL TAKE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH
PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION.
3. PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS(ES) AT THE POINTS) WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION AREA
MAINTAIN PUBLIC ROADWAYS FREE OF TRACKED MUD AND DRT
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL EXISTING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK AND REPORT MAY
DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER.
5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WTH ALL PERTINENT PROVISIONS OF THE MANUAL OF ACCIDENT PREVENTION AND CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED BY AGC OF AMERICA INC. AND THE SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION ISSUED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR.
6, NO VEGETATION OR TREES OUTSIDE OF THE PERMANENT EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY WORKSPACES SHALL BE DISTURBED OR REMOVED.
7 STRIP TOPSOIL FROM ALL CUT AND FILL AREAS AND STOCKPIE UPON COMPLETION OF GENERAL GRADI NG DISTRIBUTE TOP SOIL OVER
ALL DISTURBED AREAS, TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF W. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ADDITIONAL TOP SOIL IF INSUFFICIENT QUANTITIES
EXIST ON SITE
8 POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS THE FIRST ORDER OF WORK AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER
CONSTRUCTION. SOIL SOFTENED BY PERCHED WATER IN FOUNDATION AND PAVEMENT AREAS MUST BE UNDERCUT AND REPLACED WTH
SUITABLE FILL MATERIALS APPROVED BY A GEOTECHNICJLL ENGINEER. GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION INTO EXCAVATIONS SHOULD BE
EXPECTED. AND THE WATER SHALL BE REMOVED USING GRAVITY DRAINAGE OR PUMPING.
9 THE LOCATION OF ALL DIVERSION SHALES AND DITCHES SHALL BE FIELD ADJUSTED TO AVOID TREES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THE
CONTRACTOR SMALL WALT( THE ALIGNMENT OF THESE SHALES AND DITCHES IN THE FIELD TO VERIFY AVOIDANCE OF TREES.
10 STOCKPILED TOPSOIL OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE CONTAINED SO SEDIMENT RUN-OFF WILL NOT CONTAMINATE SURROUNDING AREAS OR
ENTER NEARBY STREAMS.
11. ANY SITE USED FOR DISPOSAL ANDADR STOCKPILE OF ANY MATERIAL SHALL BE PROPERLY PERMITTED FOR SUCH ACTIVITY IT IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO SEE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS ARE SECURED FOR EACH PROPERTY UTILIZED. A COPY OF
THE APPROVED PERMIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ON ANY PROPERTY. FAILURE TO DO
90 MAY RESULT IN THE CONTRACTOR REMOVING ANY ILLEGALLY PLACED MATERIAL AT HIS OWN EXPENSE.
12. AFTER STRIPPING TOPSOIL AT STATION SITES, PROOF ROLL EXPOSED SUBGRADE WITH A LOADED TRUCK TO IDENTIFY UNSTABLE SOILS.
STABILIZE UNSTABLE AREAS BY UNDERCUTTING AND REFACING UNSTABLE MATERIALS WTH COMPACTED SELECT MATERIAL
13. ALL FILL SHALL BE FREE OF ALL ORGANC MATTER, TRASH AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS, CONTAINING NO ROCK FRAGMENTS
GREATER THAN 61NCHES IN ANY ONE DIRECTION
14. STRUCTURAL SOIL FILL SMALL HAVE A STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY OF 90 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT (PCF) OR GREATER
AND A PLASTICITY INDEX IN) OF 30 PERCENT OR LESS. ALL MATERIAL BEING USED AS SOIL FILL SHOULD BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY
THE GEOTECHMCAL ENGINEER BEFORE BEING PLACED.
15 PLACE AND COMPACT FILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS.
16 PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FINISH GRADE PROPER ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE MADE BY CONTRACTOR
FOR SUBGRADE
17. EXISTING ELEVATIONS, CONTOURS, AND BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON PLANS ARE BASED ON NADM.
18. SHAPE ALL DITCHES ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION OR SPECIAL DITCH DETAIL
19. ONLY MATERIAL MEETING CONTRACTORS GEOTECH ICAL ENGINEER'S REQUIREMENTS FOR EMBANKMENT MAY BE USED
20. ALL EXCAVATION IS UNCLASSIFIED WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE AND DRAW MS OWN
CONCLUSIONS TO CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED LINE AND GRADES SHOWN SHALL BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
21. ASPHALT PAVEMENT, MINERAL AGGREGATE BASE AND CONCRETE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF THE
REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
22 PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVAL
23 ANY AREA THAT IS DISTURBED OUTSIDE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION DURING THE LIFE OF THIS PROJECT SMALL BE REPAIRED BY
CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE
24 THE CONTRACTOR SMLLL NOT DISPOSE OF ANY MATERIAL EITHER ON OR OFF PROJECT SITE IN A REGULATORY FLOOD WAY AS DEFINED
BY T14E FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT T AGENCY WITHOUT APPROVAL BY SAME ALL MATERIAL SMALL BE DISPOSED OF IN UPLAND
(NON - WETLAND) AREAS AND ABOVE ORDINARY MGM WATER OF ANY ADJACENT WATERCOURSE. THIS DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NEED TO
OBTAIN ANY OTHER LICENSES OR PERMITS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BY ANY OTHER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT
VARIATIONS RI PLANT OR PROFILE
1 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL MAINTAIN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT (PLAN VIENO AS INDICATED ON THE PROJECT PLANS WITH A t2 FOOT
VARIANCE
2. CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE THE MINIMUM COVER AND SHALL NOT BE REDUCED. THE CONTRACTOR MAY DRILL
DEEPER WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.
3, THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST CHANCES TO THE PROPOSED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF THE INSTALLATION AND THE
LOCATION OF THE ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS FOR HOD BORES PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OOVER AND RECEIVE
APPROVAL OF THE OWNER PRIOR TO STARTING THE EFFECTED ACTIVITY
BORE PILOT HOLE REQUIREMENTS
1 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL AT ALL TIMES PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN INSTRUMENTATION WHICH WILL ACCURATELY LOCATE THE PILOT HOLE,
MEASURE DRILL STRING AXIAL AND TORSION LOADS, AND MEASURE DRILLING FLUID DISCHARGE RATE AND PRESSURE.
2 THE OWNER WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE INSTRUMENTS AND THEIR READINGS AT ALL TIMES
3, THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, W LL PROVIDE INSPECTION MOLES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO VISUALLY VERIFY
THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF THE DRILLED PIPELINE
4. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL PLOT THE ACTUAL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALGNMENT OF THE PILOT HOLES AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING
20 FEET, AND CORRESPONDING WITH THE PROJECT STATIONING AND DATUM
5. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL MAINTAIN AND UPDATE AN'AS-8UILT PLAN AND PROFILE AS THE PILOT BORE IS ADVANCED.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRANT THE OWNER ACCESS TO ALL DATA READOUT PERTAINING TO THE POSITION AND INCLINATION OF THE
BORE HEAD . WHEN REQUESTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHAU PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS OF MS POSITION MONITORING AND STEERING
EQUIPMENT
7 THE ACTUAL PILOT HOLE EXIT PENT SMALL BE LOCATED W THIN TWO (2) FEET LATERALLY OF THE EXIT PENT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
LONGITUDINALLY, THE ACTUAL EXIT PENT SMALL BE NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET SHORT OR FIVE (5) FEET PAST THE EXIT POINT SHOWN
ON THE DRAWINGS.
8. THE PILOT HOLE SHALL BE DRILLED ALONG THE PATH SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING MAINTAINING THE SPECIFIED
TOLERANCES.
9, THE OWNER SHALL APPROVE THE ALIGNMENT OF PILOT BORE BEFORE THE REAMING PHASE OR PIPE PULING MAY COMMENCE.
10. IF THE PILOT BORE FAILS TO CONFORM TO THE ABOVE TOLERANCES, OWNER MAY, AT HIS OPTION REQUIRE A NEW PILOT BORE TO BE
MADE.
11 IN ALL CASES, RIGHT OF WAY RESTRICTIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES.
12. NO PILOT HOLE W LL BE ACCEPTED IF IT W LL RESULT IN ANY OF THE PIPELINE 8ENG INSTALLED IN VIOLATION OF RIGHT OF WAY
RESTRICTIONS
13 CONCERN FOR ADJACENT UTILITIES AD/OR STRUCTURES SMALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES. LISTING OF
TOLERANCES DOES NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFE OPERATION OR DAMAGE TO ADJACENT UTILITIES AND
STRUCTURES.
14. ALL BEND RADII SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOSE LISTED IN THE PROJECT PLANS.
BORE INSTALLATION
1. ALL HDD DRILLS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE WIRE LINE PROCESS
2. THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS, WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT METHOD AND TECHNIQUES FOR
COMPLETING THE HOD CROSSINGS. EXCAVATED MUD PITS CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTRY AND EXIT AREAS WILL BE UNITED TO THE PIPE
BORE HOLE AREA ONLY
3 AFTER COMPU.ETION OF THE DIRECTICHAL DRILUNG WORK THE ENTRY AND EXIT PIT LOCATIONS SMALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS.
4. THE GEOTECHMCAL REPORT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE CONTRACTORS USE THE BORING LOGS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE
CONTRACTORS CONVENIENCE AND ARE A REPRODUCTION FROM THE GEOTECHNNICAL REPORT. THIS SUBSURFACE INFORMATION IS
PRESENTED IN GOOD FAITH AND IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR PERSONAL INVESTIGATION, INDEPENDENT INTERPRETATIONS
OR JUDGEMENT OF THE CONTRACTOR.
BORE PRE - REAMING REQUIREMENTS
1. AFTER THE PI LOT HOLE IS ACCEPTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A REAMING AND PRODUCT PIPE PULL
2. THE MAXIMUM PRE - REAMING SHALL DETERMINED BY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISORS APPROVAL UNLESS
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
3. BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS SMALL BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR. ANY BUOYANCY MODIFICATION PROCEDURE
PROPOSED FOR USE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO THE
PULL SECTION RESULTING FROM BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS
BORE PULLBACK REQUIREMENTS
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PULL EXTRA LENGTH OF PROJECT PIPE SO ONE JOINT CAN BE EXAMINED.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT THE PRODUCT PIPE PULL SECTION AS IT PROCEEDS DURING PULLBACK 80 THAT IT MOVES FREELY AND IS
NOT OVER STRESSED.
BORE DRILLING FLUp
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE COMPOSITION OF ALL DRILLING FLUIDS TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY DRILUNG FLUID THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WTH PERMIT REOUREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATIONS.
3, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTANING, TRANSPORTING, AND STORING ANY WATER REQUIRED FOR DRILLING FLUIDS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAXIMIZE RECIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID SURFACE RETURNS.
5. CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE SOLIDS CONTROL AND FLUID CLEARING EQUIPMENT OF A CONFIGURATION AND CAPACITY THAT CAN
PROCESS SURFACE RETURNS AND PRODUCE DRILLING FLUID SUITABLE FOR REUSE.
8. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS DRILLING FLUID IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN COMPUANCE WITH ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. RIGHT-OF -WAY AND WORKSPACE AGREEMENTS. AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
7, CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT DRILLING FLUID DISPOSAL PROCEDURES TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY BEST EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN FULL ANNULAR CIRCULATION OF ORILLNG FLUID
9 DRILLING FLUID RETURNS AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THE ENTRY AND EXIT PITS SMALL BE MINIMIZED
10 IN THE EVENT THAT ANNULAR CIRCULATION IS LOST, CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ACTION TO RESTORE CIRCULATION.
11. IF INADVERTENT SURFACE RETURNS OF DRILLING FLUIDS OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CLEAN AND COLLECT
BORE CROSSING WITHOUT CASINGS
1 THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL CROSSINGS DESIGNED BY THE COMPANY, INCLUDING ALL DETAILS INCIDENT TO THE INSTALLATION OF SUCH
CROSSINGS. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SMALL COMPLY WITH SUCH SPECIFICATIONS AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY
THE OTHER AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SUCH SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN AS MAY BE APPLICABLE.
2 THE CARRIER PIPE SHALL BE COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. NECESSARY DUMMY PIPE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE
LEADING AND OF THE BORING OPERATION THE FACE END OF THIS DUMMY PIPE CAN BE BUILT UP TO BE APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF INCH
TO THREE - FOURTHS INCH SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE DUMMY PIPE.
3. THE BORED CROSSING WITHOUT CASING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE DITCHING AND BENDING OPERATIONS ARRIVE AT THE
CROSSING. WHEN BORING, THE CUTTING HEAD SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE LEADING END OF THE CARRIER PIPE MORE THAN SIX
INCHES
1. WHERE REQUIRED. BORED AND CASED CROSSING SMALL BE PRESSURED GROUTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETELY FILL THE
AN MJLAR SPACE BETWEEN THE CARRIER OR CASING PIPE AND THE EARTH THE GROUT SHALL CONSIST OF A SAND-CEMENT SLURRY OF
AT LEAST TWO SACKS OF CEMENT/YD3, OR AS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY
2. ITS PNG POLICY NOT TO LEAVE S TOPPLES IN LINE UNATTENDED CONTRACTOR SHOULD PLAN AND SCHEDULE TIE4NS AT EACH 917E FOR 1
DAY DURATION.
THE PERSON TO CONTACT SHOULD ANY EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL t9BUE3 ARISE DURING LAIO4)MTURBING ACTIVITY:
MIKE GOLOMBOWBM
PH: rm) 618-IM
EMAIL• IRICREN.yoMRIUwwMMpMEww•Yg.mw
IRE AREA DINGRIPINN
"I
STA6DATIONTMEFRNE
EXCSPLION
PERIMETER OEGS. SAALE6
OTCWS. AND SLOPES
7OAY5
HOPE
140110UNIIY IWIFNI010117
xOHEll
7mn
NONE
MARCH 13, 2015
CAJ
I
F SLOPES ARE 10 OR LESS N
SLOPESSIEEPEAIIW I31
70AYS
LENOIN AND ARE NOT
STEEPER1 21, IADAYS
mCSl7®
PM ALLOWED
SWH
mm®
HOPES SI OR FLATTEIR
NO\YS
OREAWA TIiN1 WFEETW
LESOM
ALL OTER MEREIAAM
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
NOTE EXCEPT FOR
SLOEEFIATTERTMWN4:1
14DAYS
FBYETFRB AIDNOW
A `�\
ZOHE61
SINE
WEDLY WSPECTICN fEONIIEJENTS
SAME MW GAUGE 4SlPECTIbE AFTER Ot RAN EVENT
fEPEC11ON6 AFE OILY REQL4RED6 IADIBMLOUSWNN HIO W
EAFECTKM REPORTS MUST SE AVAAAME ONSTTE OXPIPO BUSINESS HOURS UPI LESS A
SM-SPEOFIC EXEW1101I N APPROVED
RECORMhIST BE KEPT FOR 3 YEARS AND MAILARE VON REQUEST.
ELECTRONCALLYIAVARASLE RECORDS MAY BE SUB611MED UWE R CURTAIN COPOTION.
15 PLACE AND COMPACT FILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS.
16 PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FINISH GRADE PROPER ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE MADE BY CONTRACTOR
FOR SUBGRADE
17. EXISTING ELEVATIONS, CONTOURS, AND BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON PLANS ARE BASED ON NADM.
18. SHAPE ALL DITCHES ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION OR SPECIAL DITCH DETAIL
19. ONLY MATERIAL MEETING CONTRACTORS GEOTECH ICAL ENGINEER'S REQUIREMENTS FOR EMBANKMENT MAY BE USED
20. ALL EXCAVATION IS UNCLASSIFIED WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE AND DRAW MS OWN
CONCLUSIONS TO CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED LINE AND GRADES SHOWN SHALL BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
21. ASPHALT PAVEMENT, MINERAL AGGREGATE BASE AND CONCRETE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF THE
REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
22 PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVAL
23 ANY AREA THAT IS DISTURBED OUTSIDE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION DURING THE LIFE OF THIS PROJECT SMALL BE REPAIRED BY
CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE
24 THE CONTRACTOR SMLLL NOT DISPOSE OF ANY MATERIAL EITHER ON OR OFF PROJECT SITE IN A REGULATORY FLOOD WAY AS DEFINED
BY T14E FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT T AGENCY WITHOUT APPROVAL BY SAME ALL MATERIAL SMALL BE DISPOSED OF IN UPLAND
(NON - WETLAND) AREAS AND ABOVE ORDINARY MGM WATER OF ANY ADJACENT WATERCOURSE. THIS DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NEED TO
OBTAIN ANY OTHER LICENSES OR PERMITS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BY ANY OTHER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT
VARIATIONS RI PLANT OR PROFILE
1 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL MAINTAIN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT (PLAN VIENO AS INDICATED ON THE PROJECT PLANS WITH A t2 FOOT
VARIANCE
2. CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE THE MINIMUM COVER AND SHALL NOT BE REDUCED. THE CONTRACTOR MAY DRILL
DEEPER WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.
3, THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST CHANCES TO THE PROPOSED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF THE INSTALLATION AND THE
LOCATION OF THE ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS FOR HOD BORES PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OOVER AND RECEIVE
APPROVAL OF THE OWNER PRIOR TO STARTING THE EFFECTED ACTIVITY
BORE PILOT HOLE REQUIREMENTS
1 THE CONTRACTOR SMALL AT ALL TIMES PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN INSTRUMENTATION WHICH WILL ACCURATELY LOCATE THE PILOT HOLE,
MEASURE DRILL STRING AXIAL AND TORSION LOADS, AND MEASURE DRILLING FLUID DISCHARGE RATE AND PRESSURE.
2 THE OWNER WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE INSTRUMENTS AND THEIR READINGS AT ALL TIMES
3, THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, W LL PROVIDE INSPECTION MOLES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO VISUALLY VERIFY
THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF THE DRILLED PIPELINE
4. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL PLOT THE ACTUAL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALGNMENT OF THE PILOT HOLES AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING
20 FEET, AND CORRESPONDING WITH THE PROJECT STATIONING AND DATUM
5. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL MAINTAIN AND UPDATE AN'AS-8UILT PLAN AND PROFILE AS THE PILOT BORE IS ADVANCED.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRANT THE OWNER ACCESS TO ALL DATA READOUT PERTAINING TO THE POSITION AND INCLINATION OF THE
BORE HEAD . WHEN REQUESTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHAU PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS OF MS POSITION MONITORING AND STEERING
EQUIPMENT
7 THE ACTUAL PILOT HOLE EXIT PENT SMALL BE LOCATED W THIN TWO (2) FEET LATERALLY OF THE EXIT PENT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
LONGITUDINALLY, THE ACTUAL EXIT PENT SMALL BE NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET SHORT OR FIVE (5) FEET PAST THE EXIT POINT SHOWN
ON THE DRAWINGS.
8. THE PILOT HOLE SHALL BE DRILLED ALONG THE PATH SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING MAINTAINING THE SPECIFIED
TOLERANCES.
9, THE OWNER SHALL APPROVE THE ALIGNMENT OF PILOT BORE BEFORE THE REAMING PHASE OR PIPE PULING MAY COMMENCE.
10. IF THE PILOT BORE FAILS TO CONFORM TO THE ABOVE TOLERANCES, OWNER MAY, AT HIS OPTION REQUIRE A NEW PILOT BORE TO BE
MADE.
11 IN ALL CASES, RIGHT OF WAY RESTRICTIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES.
12. NO PILOT HOLE W LL BE ACCEPTED IF IT W LL RESULT IN ANY OF THE PIPELINE 8ENG INSTALLED IN VIOLATION OF RIGHT OF WAY
RESTRICTIONS
13 CONCERN FOR ADJACENT UTILITIES AD/OR STRUCTURES SMALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES. LISTING OF
TOLERANCES DOES NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFE OPERATION OR DAMAGE TO ADJACENT UTILITIES AND
STRUCTURES.
14. ALL BEND RADII SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOSE LISTED IN THE PROJECT PLANS.
BORE INSTALLATION
1. ALL HDD DRILLS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE WIRE LINE PROCESS
2. THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS, WILL DETERMINE THE EXACT METHOD AND TECHNIQUES FOR
COMPLETING THE HOD CROSSINGS. EXCAVATED MUD PITS CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTRY AND EXIT AREAS WILL BE UNITED TO THE PIPE
BORE HOLE AREA ONLY
3 AFTER COMPU.ETION OF THE DIRECTICHAL DRILUNG WORK THE ENTRY AND EXIT PIT LOCATIONS SMALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL
CONDITIONS.
4. THE GEOTECHMCAL REPORT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE CONTRACTORS USE THE BORING LOGS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE
CONTRACTORS CONVENIENCE AND ARE A REPRODUCTION FROM THE GEOTECHNNICAL REPORT. THIS SUBSURFACE INFORMATION IS
PRESENTED IN GOOD FAITH AND IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR PERSONAL INVESTIGATION, INDEPENDENT INTERPRETATIONS
OR JUDGEMENT OF THE CONTRACTOR.
BORE PRE - REAMING REQUIREMENTS
1. AFTER THE PI LOT HOLE IS ACCEPTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A REAMING AND PRODUCT PIPE PULL
2. THE MAXIMUM PRE - REAMING SHALL DETERMINED BY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISORS APPROVAL UNLESS
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
3. BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS SMALL BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR. ANY BUOYANCY MODIFICATION PROCEDURE
PROPOSED FOR USE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO THE
PULL SECTION RESULTING FROM BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS
BORE PULLBACK REQUIREMENTS
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PULL EXTRA LENGTH OF PROJECT PIPE SO ONE JOINT CAN BE EXAMINED.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT THE PRODUCT PIPE PULL SECTION AS IT PROCEEDS DURING PULLBACK 80 THAT IT MOVES FREELY AND IS
NOT OVER STRESSED.
BORE DRILLING FLUp
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE COMPOSITION OF ALL DRILLING FLUIDS TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY DRILUNG FLUID THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WTH PERMIT REOUREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATIONS.
3, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTANING, TRANSPORTING, AND STORING ANY WATER REQUIRED FOR DRILLING FLUIDS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAXIMIZE RECIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID SURFACE RETURNS.
5. CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE SOLIDS CONTROL AND FLUID CLEARING EQUIPMENT OF A CONFIGURATION AND CAPACITY THAT CAN
PROCESS SURFACE RETURNS AND PRODUCE DRILLING FLUID SUITABLE FOR REUSE.
8. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS DRILLING FLUID IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN COMPUANCE WITH ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. RIGHT-OF -WAY AND WORKSPACE AGREEMENTS. AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
7, CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT DRILLING FLUID DISPOSAL PROCEDURES TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY BEST EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN FULL ANNULAR CIRCULATION OF ORILLNG FLUID
9 DRILLING FLUID RETURNS AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THE ENTRY AND EXIT PITS SMALL BE MINIMIZED
10 IN THE EVENT THAT ANNULAR CIRCULATION IS LOST, CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ACTION TO RESTORE CIRCULATION.
11. IF INADVERTENT SURFACE RETURNS OF DRILLING FLUIDS OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CLEAN AND COLLECT
BORE CROSSING WITHOUT CASINGS
1 THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL CROSSINGS DESIGNED BY THE COMPANY, INCLUDING ALL DETAILS INCIDENT TO THE INSTALLATION OF SUCH
CROSSINGS. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SMALL COMPLY WITH SUCH SPECIFICATIONS AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY
THE OTHER AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SUCH SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN AS MAY BE APPLICABLE.
2 THE CARRIER PIPE SHALL BE COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. NECESSARY DUMMY PIPE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE
LEADING AND OF THE BORING OPERATION THE FACE END OF THIS DUMMY PIPE CAN BE BUILT UP TO BE APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF INCH
TO THREE - FOURTHS INCH SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE DUMMY PIPE.
3. THE BORED CROSSING WITHOUT CASING SHOULD BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE DITCHING AND BENDING OPERATIONS ARRIVE AT THE
CROSSING. WHEN BORING, THE CUTTING HEAD SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE LEADING END OF THE CARRIER PIPE MORE THAN SIX
INCHES
1. WHERE REQUIRED. BORED AND CASED CROSSING SMALL BE PRESSURED GROUTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETELY FILL THE
AN MJLAR SPACE BETWEEN THE CARRIER OR CASING PIPE AND THE EARTH THE GROUT SHALL CONSIST OF A SAND-CEMENT SLURRY OF
AT LEAST TWO SACKS OF CEMENT/YD3, OR AS REQUIRED BY JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY
2. ITS PNG POLICY NOT TO LEAVE S TOPPLES IN LINE UNATTENDED CONTRACTOR SHOULD PLAN AND SCHEDULE TIE4NS AT EACH 917E FOR 1
DAY DURATION.
THE PERSON TO CONTACT SHOULD ANY EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL t9BUE3 ARISE DURING LAIO4)MTURBING ACTIVITY:
MIKE GOLOMBOWBM
PH: rm) 618-IM
EMAIL• IRICREN.yoMRIUwwMMpMEww•Yg.mw
IRE AREA DINGRIPINN
"I
STA6DATIONTMEFRNE
EXCSPLION
PERIMETER OEGS. SAALE6
OTCWS. AND SLOPES
7OAY5
HOPE
140110UNIIY IWIFNI010117
xOHEll
7mn
NONE
MARCH 13, 2015
CAJ
I
F SLOPES ARE 10 OR LESS N
SLOPESSIEEPEAIIW I31
70AYS
LENOIN AND ARE NOT
STEEPER1 21, IADAYS
_
PM ALLOWED
SWH
7 OAYS FOR SLOPES
HOPES SI OR FLATTEIR
NO\YS
OREAWA TIiN1 WFEETW
LESOM
ALL OTER MEREIAAM
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
NOTE EXCEPT FOR
SLOEEFIATTERTMWN4:1
14DAYS
FBYETFRB AIDNOW
A `�\
ZOHE61
SINE
WEDLY WSPECTICN fEONIIEJENTS
SAME MW GAUGE 4SlPECTIbE AFTER Ot RAN EVENT
fEPEC11ON6 AFE OILY REQL4RED6 IADIBMLOUSWNN HIO W
EAFECTKM REPORTS MUST SE AVAAAME ONSTTE OXPIPO BUSINESS HOURS UPI LESS A
SM-SPEOFIC EXEW1101I N APPROVED
RECORMhIST BE KEPT FOR 3 YEARS AND MAILARE VON REQUEST.
ELECTRONCALLYIAVARASLE RECORDS MAY BE SUB611MED UWE R CURTAIN COPOTION.
EXISTING GAS - ..- ..--- .• -.. -�-
PROPOSED GAS
OVER HEAD UTILITIES - EXISTING EASEMENT ------------------
PROPOSED PERMANENT EASEMENT -- -- - - - - - -- - --- - --
PROPOSED TEMPORARY WORK SPACE EASEMENT
ABANDONED GAS LINE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-
PROPERTY LINE
UNDER GROUND TELEPHONE
WATER LINE
SANITARY SEWER UNE
FORCE MAIN SEWER LINE
TREE LINE
FENCE LINE
EXISTING DITCH LINE
``111
•
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE
�a� dmoM 105 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27SI3
,'�y�.
■ �rW I 919.234-1974 • WWW.ELI-LLC.COM • LICENSE I P4289
CA/M��
�y� ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
'minOpuf NA S NVILL*. TENNESSEE • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA
Y�111
1 T'
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
I DESIGNED EI.
SVVH
ISSUE DATE:
O - n:
MARCH 13, 2015
CAJ
I
_
ELI PROJECT NO
CNECXED 81 '.
_
14-21 -3007
SWH
MEW
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
MEW PROJECT NO
A `�\
2239872
REYL6IDN:
CIVIL ENGINEER
THOMAS L. SAUNDERS, P.E.
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC
1420 DONELSON PIKE, SUITE Al2
NASHVILLE, TN 37217
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
PNG 4014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
VARIOUS COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL
NOTES L LEGEND
ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
-- I DRAW . 3007 -00 -001

WIDTH OF PAY LIMITS FOR
PAVEMENT REMOVAL AND REPAIR
7
IN 7 MIN
CONCRETE MATCH mP.) (Typ.I
EXISTING SECTION TACKEDGES BEE NOTE M.
8
r
E TYPICAL UTILITY CUT REPLACEMENT DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
-TEE O
NEW IF PIPE
IUCER 9O
ALL VALVE 11
�e TYPICAL FARM TAP/ LATERAL CONNECTION
(NOT TO SCALE)
(TYPICAL OF SITES 1, 3, & 6)
NEW
II` SURFACE COURSE
1 DESGIIP1XIN
_ 1.S SF 9.5 SSECONDARY)
1' VALVE
II BATERMEWTE COURSE
17 75'
• IP 119.0 (B- SECONDARY)
as,
FLOWABLE FILL ICONCRETE) OR AS OR (GPRIMARY)
I
W
APPROVED BY NCOOT. (TRAFFIC BEARING 31• MIN9MIlR BASE COURSE
Z DIM TDW STOPPLE
ROAD PLATE OR W20 LOAD RATED STEEL - PrULL DEPTH VARIER)• � R.S 8 25.0 (BSECONDARY)
WIERK
PLATE CAN BE USED FOR 24 HOURS OR (C- PRIMARY)
�
DURING CURING OF CONCRETE) Fl
I
II .
I
OE9CPoR1011
M(MD
EMBEDMENT
GTt
(SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
EMBEDMENT
t
TYPE, COMPACTION. AND _ DEPTH VARIES
t1
Too
15G
BLOCKI NG IF NEEDED) � F. - (SEE SPECIFICATIONS)
1
II- I — I_
- IIII —i I I I I I -171 —I �
15�e
NOTES
2
1 NEW PAVEMENT SMALL HAVE SECTION THICKNESS DESIGNED TO
1eT71
NCDOT SUPERPAVE STANDARDS AS PROVIDED BY ENGINEER OR
9
MATCH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. WHICH EVER IS GREATER OR AS
IeAee
SPECIFIED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMIENTS.
3
2 REFER TO EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS FOR EMBEDMENT AND FILL
REQUIREMENTS
M
3 THIS DETAIL SHOWS ASPHALT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT. THE WIDTH
12M
F PAY LIMITS SMALL APPLY TO STONE AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS
1
WELL
1618
4. PAVEMENT TO BE SAW CUT PERPENDICULAR TO SURFACE. FACE TO BE
NEAT. CLEAN 8 STRAIGHT. TACK PRIOR TO PATCH.
8
r
E TYPICAL UTILITY CUT REPLACEMENT DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
-TEE O
NEW IF PIPE
IUCER 9O
ALL VALVE 11
�e TYPICAL FARM TAP/ LATERAL CONNECTION
(NOT TO SCALE)
(TYPICAL OF SITES 1, 3, & 6)
NEW
GATE
1 DESGIIP1XIN
r-o4e n
1' VALVE
e'
17 75'
e
as,
27
W
108'
Z DIM TDW STOPPLE
IT
WIERK
LW DIM.
OAK NO
OTY
I
OE9CPoR1011
M(MD
OlY
GTt
DMGISNLL
t
0
Too
15G
e'mWf %416CFB ORL PPE
1
0
15�e
16- vMAWA1MA1 ®DENT eALL VALVE
2
D
1eT71
e'37s W7 Xe6cFBPC ORL NPE
9
0
IeAee
TXr WEIR RED. COUPU SID -Y -W
3
o
WSWT.219WTXJ TRANS. PIPE
M
9
12M
2•.151 W7 X52 CPB DILL PPE
1
D
1618
IC9R'WELD ELL F6 NR
t1
0
151w
]' VMIWANS,WKEYCGTEDBALLVALVE
1
1!45' WELD EU. M M Y52
s
o
teeeo
IeTC1! %1T WELO BARREO TEE YA
TPR 62
T-0R91
SECTION A
DIMENSION TABLE
T -0-A 91
Z DIMENSION
r-o4e n
1' VALVE
e'
17 75'
e
as,
27
W
108'
Z DIM TDW STOPPLE
IT
13.!
LW DIM.
TPR 62
T-0R91
SECTION A
DIMENSION TABLE
PIPE DIAM
Z DIMENSION
LW DIMENSION (MIN)
!
e'
17 75'
e
as,
27
W
108'
26.75'
IT
13.!
33.5
12,
1593'
36.5
IF
21'
48.75'
20'
26'
58^
21'
33.5
SIT
30'
3e•
79'
! , S PIPE USE 1' THREAD-0.RING PLUG AND }' DA DRILL
! 30' PIPE USE Z THREAD -0atING PLUG AND 1• -1 43T' DMA. DRILL
e THREAD-0-RING LOCATION DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
20' 40
NEW IS STOPPLE
FOR T.O-R LOCATION SEE F.
DETAIL 2. THIS SHEET / NEW 18' STOPPLE
EXISTING IS GAS UNE / EXISTING 16' GAS LINE
I I NEW IF GAS LINE I )
I I I I
Id l Id
FIELD DETERMINEr_I�-
II I I
I I 16 TEMPORARY
I-1~ BY -PASS
- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -5
e TYPICAL STOPPLE PLACEMENT DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
Imo- GRANULAR PA
WEAR SURFACE - MIN 2INCHES
(SEE INSET NSET B)
-I I II I I- III III
TACK GOAT
PRIME COAT
- -_I II I
II I II 111 1111 - III -11
SIDE VIEW
MATERIALS TO BE WASHED AND CLEAN
AND FREE OF FINES AND MATERIALS TO
PROVIDE A MINIMUM 40N VOID SPACE
SANDBAGS
STREAM SED
PIPELINE
FLUME SHOULD BE SIZ ED TO
HANDLE FLOW AND SUFFICIENT
IN LENGTH TO ACCOMMODATE
WIDENING TRENCH TO PREVENT
FAILURE
SECTION A -A
PIPELINE
TRENCH
SILT FENCE
SAND BAGS _ND BA
-, B
NOTES BAG
1 PUMP SHOULD HAVE MICE THE PUMPING CAPACITY OF
ANTICIPATED FLOW.
2 ALL INTAKE HOSES WALL BE SCREENED
3 DISMANTLE DOWNSTREAM DAM, THEN UPSTREAM DAM
KEEP PUMP RUNNING TO MAINTAIN STREAM FLOW
STREAM CROSSING (PIPE/PUMP DIVERSION)
WIDTH OF PAY LIMITS FOR
PAVEMENT REMOVAL AND REPAIR
Z MIN 7 MIN
(TYP) -1 r_ (TYP )
CRUSHED STONE 967
COMPACTED IN S LAYERS
CMIN.
_ I
17 ROCK DUST
MIN
ROCK DUST
NOTES
1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS ASPHALT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT THE WIDTH
OF PAY LIMITS SHALL APPLY TO STONE AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS
WELL
2 PAVEMENT TO RE SAW CUT PERPENDICULAR TO SURFACE FACE TO BE
NEAT, CLEAN S STRAIGHT TACK PRIOR TO PATCH
e TYPICAL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
1 5' ASPHALT SURFACE LAYER
GRADING'E'
7 BITUMNDDS BINDER
GRADING •B'
T MINERAL AGGREGATE BASE
TYPE •A', GRACING IT
I 1 ' SCALE OERGNED SY PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
AS SHOMM SMM
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE BSUE DATE DRnM n VARIOUS COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
P�jQ/♦ry} 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 = = MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ GENERAL
A
Piedmont Ba ELI PRGIECT NO GIECIGDBY
■WA`' �raI 919 -234 -1974 WWW.ELI- LLC.COM LICENSE +M P-12B9 14-21 -3007 SVMi DETAILS
Klpw IMhiPi IOW
CLEW
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
Cal�7^ft ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CLENTPROACTNID —
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE CARP . NORTH CAROLINA n
2239672 REVISION DRAWING NO 3QO7- 01] -OOL
WEAR SURFACE - MIN 2INCHES
/ NO 57 STONE OR EQUAL
�_
• -• �. •
•%
IT GRANULAR SUBBASE
.�(I- 12- 2.12STONE)
III — III — III - III — I
' GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
- III —III- I 1
INSET B
SUSGRADE
GRAVEL PAVEMENT DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE)
SANDBAGS
STREAM SED
PIPELINE
FLUME SHOULD BE SIZ ED TO
HANDLE FLOW AND SUFFICIENT
IN LENGTH TO ACCOMMODATE
WIDENING TRENCH TO PREVENT
FAILURE
SECTION A -A
PIPELINE
TRENCH
SILT FENCE
SAND BAGS _ND BA
-, B
NOTES BAG
1 PUMP SHOULD HAVE MICE THE PUMPING CAPACITY OF
ANTICIPATED FLOW.
2 ALL INTAKE HOSES WALL BE SCREENED
3 DISMANTLE DOWNSTREAM DAM, THEN UPSTREAM DAM
KEEP PUMP RUNNING TO MAINTAIN STREAM FLOW
STREAM CROSSING (PIPE/PUMP DIVERSION)
WIDTH OF PAY LIMITS FOR
PAVEMENT REMOVAL AND REPAIR
Z MIN 7 MIN
(TYP) -1 r_ (TYP )
CRUSHED STONE 967
COMPACTED IN S LAYERS
CMIN.
_ I
17 ROCK DUST
MIN
ROCK DUST
NOTES
1 THIS DETAIL SHOWS ASPHALT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT THE WIDTH
OF PAY LIMITS SHALL APPLY TO STONE AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS
WELL
2 PAVEMENT TO RE SAW CUT PERPENDICULAR TO SURFACE FACE TO BE
NEAT, CLEAN S STRAIGHT TACK PRIOR TO PATCH
e TYPICAL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
1 5' ASPHALT SURFACE LAYER
GRADING'E'
7 BITUMNDDS BINDER
GRADING •B'
T MINERAL AGGREGATE BASE
TYPE •A', GRACING IT
I 1 ' SCALE OERGNED SY PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
AS SHOMM SMM
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE BSUE DATE DRnM n VARIOUS COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
P�jQ/♦ry} 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 = = MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ GENERAL
A
Piedmont Ba ELI PRGIECT NO GIECIGDBY
■WA`' �raI 919 -234 -1974 WWW.ELI- LLC.COM LICENSE +M P-12B9 14-21 -3007 SVMi DETAILS
Klpw IMhiPi IOW
CLEW
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
Cal�7^ft ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CLENTPROACTNID —
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE CARP . NORTH CAROLINA n
2239672 REVISION DRAWING NO 3QO7- 01] -OOL

SWALE OR OTHER SEDIMENT
CONTROL DEVICE
NOTE
CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT BARRIER
AND CHANNELIZE RUNOFF TO
a20 R MIN LL SEDIMENT MENT TRAPPING DEVICE
17MIN
n {ALTS iX WIDTH
PIPE/CULVERT IF
NECESSARY
SUPPLY WATER TO WASH
^ I NMEELS IF NECESSARY
SD MI N
PLAN VIEW
r Z -3' WASHED STONE
6" MIN 21 OR FLITTER
ORIGINAL GRADE
FILTER FABRIC
NPE/CULVERT IF
NECESSARY
SECTION A
f
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:
1 STONE SIZE - USE 7 -3' WASHED STONE OR LARGER AS SPECIFIED IN N C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES
2 WOTH -17 MIN
3 WASHING- WHEN NECESSARY. WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE
ONTO PUBLIC R.0 W WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WTH
CRUSHED STONE WITH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN ALL SEDIMENT
SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ANY STORM DRAIN, DITCH. OR MATERCOURSE THROUGH USE OF
SAND SAGS , GRAVEL, BOARDS, OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS
4. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION MICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR
FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC R.O.W. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL
STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR ANOIOR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP
SEDIMENT ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED. WASHED. OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC R 0 W MUST BE
REMOVED IMMEDIATELY
TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEIEXIT
(NGT TO SCALE
SEWN -IN CONNECTION SLEEVE FOR
PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE (OPTIONAL)
A
7-0' IN OPTIONAL LIFTING
SILT FENCE D$MIN STRAPS
WITH WRE BACKING /
GEOTEX ILE FABRIC (TYPE III) /
UNDER AND COVERING ENTIRE
WOOD CHIP PAD
VARIES WTH GROUND
SILT -SAVER SEDIMENT LINE SLOPE
FILTER BAG
ZTMIN
WOODCHIPS
VARIES WITH
GROUNIF
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYPE SLOPE
III) OR EXISTING J 10' i IN J
VEGETATION )ll jy1
50 MIN I STANCE
FROM STREAM
r iOP OF BANK
III /STREAM
PLAN VIEW
L
a
P
F
v
B MA% STANDARD FABRIC
WITH WRE FENCE
B MA% EXTRA STRENGHT
WITHOU T WIRE FENCE
MA% ON PONDING AREAS
r7 kill
N
1 NO MORE THAN 24'
OF FABRIC
ALLOWED ABOVE
GROUND LEVEL
r EXISTING
/ GROUND
POST (TYP.) II --
24 YIN
CHOR
FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WTH WIRE TIES THE POSITION POST/FABRIC PLATES
WRE FASTENERS SHOULD BE EVENLY SPACED WTH AT ASSEMBLY AT VERTICAL TO A MAX S' FROM I
LEAST SIX PER POST.
5. FABRIC SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WRE
FENCE BACKING WITH THE TIES SPACED EVERY 24 INCHES
ALONG TOP AND MIDSECTION.
S SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SILT
FENCE WTH WRE BACKING WHEN IT HAS ACCUMULATED TO
ONE -HALF THE ORIGINAL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE AND
PAID FOR UNDER ITEM NUMBER 2WM SEDIMENT REMOVAL
THE VERTICAL (ANGLED TOWARD FLOW)
I
SILT FENCE WITH WRE BACKING FABRIC 7MIN
AND WOVEN WRE FENCE BACKING I TIEBACK BETWEEN FENCE
28' FABRIC POST AND ANCHOR STAKE
EXISTING GROUND ABOVE GROUND TO BE NO B (0.25-) HOLLOW SECURE TO POST
P`LO II BRAIDED POLYPROPYLENE BY WRAPPING
RDPE WTH MINIMUM
TENSILE STRENGTH OF 1,200
BACKFILL WITH COMPACTED SOIL POUNDS
PER CUBIC YARD
PLASTIC OR WIRE TIES
NOTES:
PUMP
13' X 15'
I. SILT FENCE WITH WRE BACKING IS USED TO INTERCEPT
WOVEN WIRE FENCE BACKING
13- X 25'
SMALL AMOUNTS OF SEDIMENTAND REDUCE VELOCITY
TOTAL WOTH 32 MIN
SILT FENCE WITH
FROM SHEET FLOW ONLY. USE SILT FENCE WITH WRE
ANCHOR SILT FENCE WTH WRE
1 MIN 2,T POST
�-I BELOW GROUND
BACKING UP4RADIENT TO, AND ALONG THE PERIMETER OF
WRE BACKING
OPERATION NOTES:
STREAMS. WETLANDS. PONDS, SPRINGS. OR OTHER
NATURAL WATER RESOURCES LOCATED WITHIN OR
SILT FENCE WITH WARE BACKING
B COORDINATE SILT FENCE PLACEMENT IN WATER QUALITY
RUN -0UT LENGTH COMPACT BACKFILL
ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT RIGHT OF WAY
FABRIC TOTAL `MOTH 3B'
EXCAVATEOAREA
2 ONCE WATER LEVEL NEARS THE CREST OF STONE WEIR,
SHUT OFF PUMP WHILE THE STRUCTURE DRAINS DOWN
2 THE MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA SIZE FOR CONTINUOUS
SECTION AA f3 A11N. YET
ILII
ANCHOR STAKE MIN. 1B"
SILT FENCE WITH BACKING SHALL BE 1 ACRE PER 150 LINEAR
9 REINFORCE TOE OF THE FENCE WTH 12 INCHES OF NC
SECTIONAL VIEW
LONG TO BE PLACED 17
INTO GROUND
FEEL OF FENCE LENGTH MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH BEHIND
BOTTOM OF WOVEN WIRE FENCE
S' FACE
PUMP EFFLUENT ACROSS A WELL VEGETATED AREA OR
FENCE ON UPSLOPE SIDE SHALL BE 2M FEET (AS
BACKING SHALL BE POSITIONED AT
THROUGH SILT FENCE PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.
21 (NN)
MEASURED ALONG GROUND SURFACE)
THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH
f� —
3 MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED,
_
/, �
CAPTURED SOIL MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN
SECTION B-B
'BULGES' DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE AND /OR WHEN
B. MIN
BOTTOM OF
EVIDENCE OF FILTER CLOGGING IS OBSERVED
TRENCH
4 STEEL POSTS $OVEN HAVE A PROJECTION FOR FASTENING
STEEL POST (STD OR -U- SECTION) -T'
WRE TO THEM MAVEN WIRE FENCE BACKING TO BE
B MA% STANDARD FABRIC
WITH WRE FENCE
B MA% EXTRA STRENGHT
WITHOU T WIRE FENCE
MA% ON PONDING AREAS
r7 kill
N
1 NO MORE THAN 24'
OF FABRIC
ALLOWED ABOVE
GROUND LEVEL
r EXISTING
/ GROUND
POST (TYP.) II --
24 YIN
CHOR
FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WTH WIRE TIES THE POSITION POST/FABRIC PLATES
WRE FASTENERS SHOULD BE EVENLY SPACED WTH AT ASSEMBLY AT VERTICAL TO A MAX S' FROM I
LEAST SIX PER POST.
5. FABRIC SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WRE
FENCE BACKING WITH THE TIES SPACED EVERY 24 INCHES
ALONG TOP AND MIDSECTION.
S SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SILT
FENCE WTH WRE BACKING WHEN IT HAS ACCUMULATED TO
ONE -HALF THE ORIGINAL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE AND
PAID FOR UNDER ITEM NUMBER 2WM SEDIMENT REMOVAL
THE VERTICAL (ANGLED TOWARD FLOW)
I
SILT FENCE WITH WRE BACKING FABRIC 7MIN
AND WOVEN WRE FENCE BACKING I TIEBACK BETWEEN FENCE
28' FABRIC POST AND ANCHOR STAKE
EXISTING GROUND ABOVE GROUND TO BE NO B (0.25-) HOLLOW SECURE TO POST
P`LO II BRAIDED POLYPROPYLENE BY WRAPPING
RDPE WTH MINIMUM
TENSILE STRENGTH OF 1,200
BACKFILL WITH COMPACTED SOIL POUNDS
PER CUBIC YARD
S' I I-
PUMP
13' X 15'
Q <-
PUMP
13- X 25'
1 08
I PUMP
SILT FENCE WITH
7 STOP SILT FENCE AT PAVED CROSSINGS, USE
ALTERNATIVE MEASURE If NECESSARY
ANCHOR SILT FENCE WTH WRE
1 MIN 2,T POST
�-I BELOW GROUND
FLpW.
��
WRE BACKING
OPERATION NOTES:
BACKING FABRIC IT DEEP WTH P
1 THE EXCAVATED AREA SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET
B COORDINATE SILT FENCE PLACEMENT IN WATER QUALITY
RUN -0UT LENGTH COMPACT BACKFILL
II II
A SIZE (MIN)
EXCAVATEOAREA
2 ONCE WATER LEVEL NEARS THE CREST OF STONE WEIR,
SHUT OFF PUMP WHILE THE STRUCTURE DRAINS DOWN
BUFFERS TO MINIMIZE IMPACT
SECTION AA f3 A11N. YET
ILII
ANCHOR STAKE MIN. 1B"
EXISTING GROUND
9 REINFORCE TOE OF THE FENCE WTH 12 INCHES OF NC
SECTIONAL VIEW
LONG TO BE PLACED 17
INTO GROUND
A MINIMUM OF B HOURS OF SEDIMENT SETTLING TIME
DOT FS OR 457 WASHED STONE WHEN FLOW WLL RUN
S' FACE
PUMP EFFLUENT ACROSS A WELL VEGETATED AREA OR
SILT FENCE TIEBACK
PARALLEL TO THE TOE OF THE FENCE
THROUGH SILT FENCE PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.
21 (NN)
NOTES:
1 SEDIMENT FILER SAGS SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WITHIN A JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND OR WITHIN 50
FEET OF A STABILIZED OUTLET, STREAM, OR OTHER NATURAL WATERS RESOURCE
2 CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION NOT TO BURST OR DAMAGE THE SEDIMENT FILTER BAG
MEN PUMPING
3 SEDIMENT FILTER SAGS SHALL BE REPLACED WHEN SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO X: OF THE
SAGS CAPACITY OR IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS.
SILT -SAVER DEWATER FILTER BAG
6 X 15-
7 S
PUMP
13' X 15'
Q <-
PUMP
13- X 25'
1 08
I PUMP
SEDIMENT FILTER BAG —
Z1 MIN CB MIN VARIES
SILT FENCE
WTH WRE BACKING
GEOTE %TILE FABRIC (TYPE III) S-MIN
OR EXISTING VEGETATION
TYPICAL SEDIMENT FILTER BAG
(NOT TO SCALE)
KIiiiI0111C8■bdm f.
USE WOOD CNIPS
PAD TO LEVEL BAG FROM
NATURAL GROUNMINE
O SILT FENCE DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
_ 10{1• 50 MINIMUM
G
MINIMUM EXISTING VEGETATIVE Lr�
TILE
BUFFER
FABBRIC RIC ITYPE SIN
SILT FENCE
WTH WRE
BACKING 2 MIN TOP OF BANK
EXISTINGIA'TIXNE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TYPE 111) s *RFAw
OR EXISTING VEGETATION
SECTION A
SILT FENCE FILTER CLOTH
ALONG ENTIRE INSIDE
FACE OF STRAW SALES
STRAW SALES — fM�N) `DISCHARGE FROM
WITH STAKES DEWATERING PUMP
RIP -RAP OF SUFFICIENT
SIZE AND DEPTH TO
RESIST MOVEMENT FROM
PUMP DISCHARGE
( DEWATERING STRUCTURE DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
SHED
S" I EDGE OF PAVEMENT
r SEE INSET
EXCELSIOR
WATTLE $
MATTING BACN
$LOPE
ISOMETRIC VIEW
7 UPSLOPE
((7(MAXI y STA NATURAL GROUND
k
I
MATTING DOWHSLOPE
n STAKE
CROSS SECTION
VEE DITCH
7 UPSLOPE
7 STAK NATURAL GROUND
MATTING 7 DOWVSIOPE
CROSS SECTION STAKE
TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH
e WATTLE DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
NOTES
1 USE MINIMUM 17 DIAMETER EXCELSIOR WATTLE
2 USE 7 VOODEN STAKES WTH A TX 7 NOMINAL CROSS SECTION
3 ONLY INSTALL WATTLE(S) TO A HEIGHT IN DITCH SO FLOW WLL NOT
WASH AROUND WATTLE AND SCOUR DITCH SLOPES AND AS DIRECTED
4 INSTALL AMINIMUM OF 2 UPSLOPE STAKES AND 4 DOWISLOPE STAKES
AT AN ANGLE TO WEDGE WATTLE TO BOTTOM OF DITCH
5. PROVIDE STAPLES FADE OF 0.125' GAME TER STEEL WRE FORMED
INTO A'U' SHAPE NOT LESS THAN 171N LENGTH
B INSTALL STAPLES APPROXIMATELY EVERY 1 LINEAR FOOT ON BOTH
SIDES OF WATTLE AND AT EACH END TO SECURE IT TO THE SGIL
7 INSTALL MATTING IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS
BTNT3 STAPLES
MSET A INSET B
/UPMOPE / /
BTAI� / /
\\ ^y ZWL W\_� . \
TOP VIEW
SCALE DESIDNEDBY PING 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
AS SHOWN SWIM
- J ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUE DATE. DRAM r VARIOUS COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
Mdmad 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 = MARCH 13, 2015 Ca
Sv�aSBBVBR• ELI PROTECT ND GNEORED SY GENERAL
MY ' 919- 234 -1974 • WWW ELI -LLC COM • LICENSE . P -1289 = 14.21 -3007 SNM EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Gas CLIENT
ENGINEEPS SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS 186UE FOR CON6TRUCTION
` CLIENT PROJECT NO
N A S H V I L L E T E N N E S S E E C A R Y NORTH CAROLINA 2239872 REVISION - -- DRAWING NO
L _ _ _ III 3007 -00 -003
RIP RAP TO RETAIN
CLASS 1 AGGREGATE
'REQUIRED VOLUME (cf) = PUMP DISCHARGE (SPm) X 16
S SPILLWAY STRAW SALE
l DEPTH
• -
OPERATION NOTES:
1 THE EXCAVATED AREA SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET
R IP RAP, CLASS
BELOW THE SASE OF THE STRAW BALESANO SILT FENCE
A SIZE (MIN)
EXCAVATEOAREA
2 ONCE WATER LEVEL NEARS THE CREST OF STONE WEIR,
SHUT OFF PUMP WHILE THE STRUCTURE DRAINS DOWN
SECTION AA f3 A11N. YET
TO THE TOP OF THE WET STORAGE PIT
STORAGE OEM"
3 THE WET STORAGE PIT MAY BE DEWATERED ONLY AFTER
A MINIMUM OF B HOURS OF SEDIMENT SETTLING TIME
S' FACE
PUMP EFFLUENT ACROSS A WELL VEGETATED AREA OR
CLASS I AGGREGATE BASE
THROUGH SILT FENCE PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.
21 (NN)
4 ONCE WET STORAGE AREA BECOMES FILLED TO ONE
HALF THE EXCAVATED DEPTH, THE SEDIMENT SHALL BE
f� —
PROPERLY REMOVED AND DISPOSED
RIP -RAP, CLASS
/, �
CLASS A SIZE (MIN)
SECTION B-B
EXCAVATED AREA
( DEWATERING STRUCTURE DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
SHED
S" I EDGE OF PAVEMENT
r SEE INSET
EXCELSIOR
WATTLE $
MATTING BACN
$LOPE
ISOMETRIC VIEW
7 UPSLOPE
((7(MAXI y STA NATURAL GROUND
k
I
MATTING DOWHSLOPE
n STAKE
CROSS SECTION
VEE DITCH
7 UPSLOPE
7 STAK NATURAL GROUND
MATTING 7 DOWVSIOPE
CROSS SECTION STAKE
TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH
e WATTLE DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
NOTES
1 USE MINIMUM 17 DIAMETER EXCELSIOR WATTLE
2 USE 7 VOODEN STAKES WTH A TX 7 NOMINAL CROSS SECTION
3 ONLY INSTALL WATTLE(S) TO A HEIGHT IN DITCH SO FLOW WLL NOT
WASH AROUND WATTLE AND SCOUR DITCH SLOPES AND AS DIRECTED
4 INSTALL AMINIMUM OF 2 UPSLOPE STAKES AND 4 DOWISLOPE STAKES
AT AN ANGLE TO WEDGE WATTLE TO BOTTOM OF DITCH
5. PROVIDE STAPLES FADE OF 0.125' GAME TER STEEL WRE FORMED
INTO A'U' SHAPE NOT LESS THAN 171N LENGTH
B INSTALL STAPLES APPROXIMATELY EVERY 1 LINEAR FOOT ON BOTH
SIDES OF WATTLE AND AT EACH END TO SECURE IT TO THE SGIL
7 INSTALL MATTING IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS
BTNT3 STAPLES
MSET A INSET B
/UPMOPE / /
BTAI� / /
\\ ^y ZWL W\_� . \
TOP VIEW
SCALE DESIDNEDBY PING 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
AS SHOWN SWIM
- J ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUE DATE. DRAM r VARIOUS COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA
Mdmad 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 = MARCH 13, 2015 Ca
Sv�aSBBVBR• ELI PROTECT ND GNEORED SY GENERAL
MY ' 919- 234 -1974 • WWW ELI -LLC COM • LICENSE . P -1289 = 14.21 -3007 SNM EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Gas CLIENT
ENGINEEPS SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS 186UE FOR CON6TRUCTION
` CLIENT PROJECT NO
N A S H V I L L E T E N N E S S E E C A R Y NORTH CAROLINA 2239872 REVISION - -- DRAWING NO
L _ _ _ III 3007 -00 -003

I
&
ER L�
e3 PC 251
41. 111 GAS LINE
Pow 8>]caFi9L58W
(TO REMAIN)
---- ------
— ---------
STA 5595-57 1 NG
EX Sn 50_j
GASEASEMENT
P" mom
PROPOSED 2'
ER- MM_ _
P 7 - -i
l 0 A
PROPOSED 710'
• TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PROPOSED W'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
TRACT
NT
MCNURGr
RELOCA TE EXISTING
GRAVEL
DRIVEWAY MATCH
EXISTING (SEE DETAIL 4
•`= SHEET 3007-00-0011
A
%
%
461,
1 0,
'�P - - ------
f
I
LOCKLEM
D
A,
A
INSTALL CONSTRUCTION
WI F
TRACTS
w
ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL 1,
7�k
SHEET 3007-(XL002
9UU"RD
DB 5mm wo
" 031INdo, I"
RELOCA TE EXISTING
GRAVEL
DRIVEWAY MATCH
EXISTING (SEE DETAIL 4
•`= SHEET 3007-00-0011
A
%
%
461,
1 0,
'�P - - ------
f
I
LOCKLEM
D
A,
A
'Ab
w
7�k
0
1,1
SALEM MSSKXIARY
PROPOSED 23'
PERMANENT EASEMENT
Do M.- .1
PROPOSED 10" OF
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
—RARD
p
-Ly
12'.
% TEMPORARY ACCESS DRIVE
(DEDICATED FOR LAND OWNERS USE ONLY)
4-
% STA 14-43-
STA
EXISTING 16"GAS �NE
LOLNiEM (TO BE ABANDONED)
K M3 PG
♦
----- 31Y
EXIST' 'n
------------ - - ACCESS
EXISTING 501
GAS EASEMENT
VLSI'
U
Davis
PROPOSED 12'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
EXISTING Nr GAS LINE
(TO REMAIN)
INSTALL CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL 1,
SHEET 3007.00-003
4ff
__.;r.j.AVtI%LL WTE LAYO&
A
*.A.A
SCALL C'Esomay
AS SmOvm $ INH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND& INFRASTRUCTURE ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
OIS PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 275I3 SITE I -RED HILLS ROAD
WHO avy 0 01100111111IMON INKNOI art JORTS[ OE9=PfION GY:
9 1 19-234-1974 - WWW :LI-LLC.COM - LICENSE * P4289 13,2D15 z"r
Piedmont
14-21143M SWIH OVERALL WE LAYOUT
Natural Gas CUM:
ML NEERS - SURVEYORS - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL NATURAL OAS mwm I= COMMUCTM - —
Cagbdmpoft NASHVILLE S I V I L L E . TENNESSEE NESSEE - CARY, NORTH CAROLINA ��To�w'
F r i 1� 2239872 3007-01-004

GOIDIE R. I Z LOCI
� D B E2. FG 05
w is. ortf wr z�z 3 O, O
ow
17
/ PROPOSED `
/ TEMPORARY WORKSPACE \
/ \
PROPOSED
PERMANENT EASEMENT STA 2.50
NN INSTALL NEW,5ARM TAP_ Qy�'
STA 500 = _ � •
STA 5595.57 � � . —
EXISTM PO 14
8 _ -
� E%IBTS4018i' 0A9 L9E
EXISTING 16' GAS LINE
N (PORT ON TO BE ABANDONED,
PLAN
ALIGNMENT PLAN
SCALE 1" = 50'
GRAPNC SCALE ON FEET)
1--wR
220
PROFILE
VERTICAL SCALE 1' = 5'
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1­50
50
210
O 200 3 ^
2 b<
O+
E 190 4- c <
x,16
180
$ 8
0.00
4' MIN�C�R
t` 5• �
C
.MW
DB 1211, PG.4M
101
H LOCJ4EAR BI.LURD LVM�E EARL
DB t68]. S. PG ]� ❑.B mt. PG 7>6 D.8 576. PG S,0 DB 1340. M. 378 08 671, PG 218
'/� \/ EXIS NG 50' �• •
EASEMENT_
Co;
LO O
GEO -CORE B-1
STA 8+02
�•�•�.�•�•
OFFSET •.74
4 17x20'
+m PIT ♦ ♦ ; •�
7R r
_______�\ � 745 � ♦ ♦ ♦; ' \.
_ z ^\
iA ,
oom
B
EXISTING 16- GAS UNE
ITO REMAIN)
�.• EXISTING W
• ♦•` •� GASEASEMENT
OkTE
OESCMPTON
EXISTIN IWGASUNE
A
- l\
t`\
(PORTION TO BE ABANDONED)
EXISTING 30 \
ACCESS EASEMENT' �. -'•
b
w
—NO
OTY
we
I LEBCOPRW
I GTI
CESCRIPOON
1
Z
1N,
41'
16'771
147
f]75VVf %15 CFi5PC 013 RPE
r]Mwr X45 CFHO CH,
S
4
\
/ \
tf RIXwMa WOOEM4NI WLYE WtvEIn
7NELDRE091IMPIRE NTYS
3
PROPOSED
,• ♦. TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
I
♦.
PROPOSED
2
0
♦ ♦•
PERMANENT EASEMENT
STA. bOt.]
♦
., STA 13.83
80' WELD ELL YSi
j►♦
�..` •- ,,, INSTALL NEW fJ67M TAP
/
ELEV -1083
• ,. -
6 GAS
LINE
NONE
1l14]
,6�0
w{• (� -%( STA 14.43 =
STA. 5595 +57 TO STA. 5510+09
GG
8 O �
_ • ♦ -•�,••
STA 581508
B
EXISTING 16- GAS UNE
ITO REMAIN)
�.• EXISTING W
• ♦•` •� GASEASEMENT
OkTE
OESCMPTON
EXISTIN IWGASUNE
A
- l\
t`\
(PORTION TO BE ABANDONED)
EXISTING 30 \
ACCESS EASEMENT' �. -'•
B
EXISTING 16- GAS UNE
ITO REMAIN)
�.• EXISTING W
• ♦•` •� GASEASEMENT
mg 8g RR RR RR
1.00 2 +00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6+00
REV
OkTE
OESCMPTON
A
b
w
—NO
OTY
we
I LEBCOPRW
I GTI
CESCRIPOON
1
Z
1N,
41'
16'771
147
f]75VVf %15 CFi5PC 013 RPE
r]Mwr X45 CFHO CH,
S
4
0
Td0
tf RIXwMa WOOEM4NI WLYE WtvEIn
7NELDRE091IMPIRE NTYS
3
0
I
6•`__ 310NRx4RTRANB.PPE
11
2
0
10763
7.,54 VR % @CiB ORL PPE
STA. bOt.]
0
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
80' WELD ELL YSi
S�
Z
w
S nu
ELEV -1083
.
0
0
NONE
1l14]
,6�0
,C 4S WELD ELL F6 �, Y@
IC n M
1Sx,aalf HELD B,RREC 7EE V -7fl
STA. 5595 +57 TO STA. 5510+09
GG
8 O �
TERM l
OFFSET 7 783
I'
3007 -01 -005
B
M'N
c�
--------------- -- -
d
------------------ - - - - --- -
4 MIN COVER
SLF -GONEM
______ __________
4
GO
4 MIN COVER
3:
O
o�
END BORE
STA =8.10
16'
J
INV EL = 19643
mg 8g RR RR RR
1.00 2 +00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6+00
REV
OkTE
OESCMPTON
w
—NO
OTY
we
I LEBCOPRW
I GTI
CESCRIPOON
1
Z
1N,
41'
16'771
147
f]75VVf %15 CFi5PC 013 RPE
r]Mwr X45 CFHO CH,
S
4
0
Td0
tf RIXwMa WOOEM4NI WLYE WtvEIn
7NELDRE091IMPIRE NTYS
3
0
I
6•`__ 310NRx4RTRANB.PPE
11
2
0
10763
7.,54 VR % @CiB ORL PPE
4
0
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
80' WELD ELL YSi
11
Z
,5150
TVGW M4x ®IO-I'CMTEOMLLVALVE
5
8
0
0
NONE
1l14]
,6�0
,C 4S WELD ELL F6 �, Y@
IC n M
1Sx,aalf HELD B,RREC 7EE V -7fl
STA. 5595 +57 TO STA. 5510+09
NATURAL GAS
WSW FOR CONSTRUCTION
2238572
zig
7.Op
Piedmont
Kim ..•• 41 Natural Gas
W�Ei f1�
Cal before you ft
MD
210
200
190
180
6+00 9.00 10.00
11+00 17 -00
13-M
14.00
.canon
I
SCALE
AS SHOWN
OEdgNED BY
SWH
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE
ISSUE DATE
ORA9NI SY
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 -
-
MARCH 13, 2015
CAJ
SITE 1 - RED HILLS ROAD
919 - 234 -1974 WWW.E LI- LLC.COM LICENSE # P4289 =
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
N A S N V I L L E T E N N E S S E E C A R Y N O R T H CAROLINA
-
�
ELI PROJECT NO
1421 -3007
CLEMT:
PIEDMONT
CLIENT PROJECT NO
CNECUD BY,
SWH
STA. 5595 +57 TO STA. 5510+09
NATURAL GAS
WSW FOR CONSTRUCTION
2238572
3007 -01 -005

2
A � ,d
e n• '
FLOW ARROW (TYP.I
T
zw-
_LA.AA� _
_______ rte•} -+_.T \
_fir A_� _� •- _ r � //(
SILT FENCE (TYP )
)SEE EPSC DETAILS SHEET) F I y
EXISTING
CONTOURS (TYP.1,' .
� L
1 �
m
I A-le,
;r
�Y
j. 1 mil+
i�
i \
��N•�� OWE
00- i NI;
1 19
1
s , i
` A
SAFETY FENCE (TYPJ
1
1
m
O
x
O
O
t ,
DETAIL 1.
THE SOU SI THE PRIM= AMA NICIJIOE:
NINA - NORFOLK LOAMY SAID, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES
• PI- PORTSMOUTH LOAM
V" - WAKUUA SAND. 0 TOO PERCENT SLOPES
3RILBPP= 1
t
\ . ;•. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
4
{ `�{ TEMPORARY
•v Z• RESIDENTIAL
ACCESS
, wrl
•\ INSTALL CONSTRUCTION lk,
•1 ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL 1,
SHEET 3007 49
i
/
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL REPLACE 7 PORTIONS OF NATURAL GAS
PIPELINE ALONG PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS' LINE 1. THE DISTURBED AREA IS
APPROXIMATELY 2LIS ACRES.
Emma SIZE CONDITIONS
THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL. EXISTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS, AND EXISTING ROAD R.O.W.
SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPEUNE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN APRIL 2015 AND BE
COMPLETE BY DECEMBER 2015,
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT
INVOLVE THE STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING
• SILT FENCE
• TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCFJEXIT
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
GRADING. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED AND ALL DISTURBED AREA HAVE
BEEN STABIUZED. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL
DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED. DUST CONTROL ON SITE SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS BY SPRINKLING VWITH WATER OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE
METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE. IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
CONSTRUC,pM SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS.
2. HOLD PRE-CONSTRUCTON CONFERENCE.
3 FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. BEGIN CLEARING.
6. REPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
7. BEGIN INSTALLING PIPE
S. COMPLETED AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PRE HAS
BEEN INSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL ALL
DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
CEASED.
9. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED NTH SEED AND STRAW,
HYDROSEEDING OR SOD.
10. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
11 PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
1. ALL STREAM AND/OR WETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE APPROXIMATE.
2, SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MNNNUIMI OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS
3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOYW4 GRAIMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
4. ANY FAILURE OF ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
5. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL. BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS, R IS THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES WRING
CONSTRUCTION.
S. BUFFER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PUNS SHALL BE SEEDED AT A
RATE OF 20 GALLONS PER 100 LF. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
FOLLWINO MIX KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55%). ENGLISH RYE (20%). KOREAN
LESPEDEZA (15 %). GERMAN MILLET (10%).
7. HYDROSEEDING OR CLRLEX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES.
MAINTENANCE
1. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A HALF INCHI(DURING A 24 HOUR
PERIOD). DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2. CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
OENERALNOT_O
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES RAVE BEEN
COMPLETED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED.
4. FILL. COVER. AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE ENO OF EACH DAY IS
RECOMMENDED WHERE PRACTICAL. IT IS IMPORTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHES ON STEEP SLOPES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE.
6. STREAM AND WETLANDS, IF PRESENT. SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION_
7. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
B. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
AND/OR WETLANDS IF PRESENT_
9, THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
10. IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING,
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED, AND ALL LOST LUBRICANTIMUD MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM. THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED
AND THE SITE WILL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATION OF BORING.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 24'
BETWEEN THE PIPEUNE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES.
STANDARDS
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
MTE -
MMTBML MA\MIY
Im a» b an IXi6CRIPII9N
yam...
~�
�����
N��' �� ��
IPWiXx It
a SVMIIIM ea
�� �
ENERGY LAND 6 I N F R A5 T R U C T U R E
1015 PASSPORT WAY • URY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513
919- 234 -1974 • WWW.ELI- LLC.COM • LICENSE IP P -1289
ENSINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
I NANMV MLLE. TENNESSEE CA RY. NORTN CAROLINA
-
-
SCALE 9E ME0 N.
AS SHOWN SWAP
-WDATIL
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE 1 -RED HILLS ROAD
EROgpN CONTROL PLAN
REV
R
MARCH 13, 2015
oRAIRISY:
CIU
MLNO
�T�T
°�
1
r
EET
euoR:
PIEDMONT NATURAL OAS
NNIUEFORCONtTRUC•fpN
REYRCM. � ISIAYMIOIOc NNN7 -01-0
_
71N
_
GlENT PROJECT w.
2235572

w
EXISTING 100' / � �, `� \'•� \ � \ \ p
RAILROAD EASEMENT
/ �•� ` `V \� \„T \ STA 0+00=
STA SW +51
EXI' 110'
-'
/•• GAS =r NT �.� �\ xy� °• \
J\• /]rte •r `
/ PROPOSED35' J �•�• ` �`` ��
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE �•�
YABIEK FE ESTATE)
Da n,. PO. n2
PIw9]d1BitMOD
N11
GRAPHC SOME PN PEET)
PLAN
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
SCALE. , -. ADO
r
EXISTING 13` GAS LINE � / , C - -
,70 REMAIN)
•X_t
1
11
•, 1
EXISTING IS- GAS LINE
(TO __ •• EXISTING 7P t
(TO BE ABANDONED)
_ GAS EASEMENT I •`
D. B 1375, PG. 147
PROPOSED
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE h
' PROPOSED 23. ' 8• _ �1
PERMANENT EASEMENT - ♦ , . - _ _ _ - - - - - -,- -
m• •���L y� Q �I^ - __ •1___-- __- ____11__ ____
\k. aoawgru w
Da $11. PO n 772
y4p
EXISTING GAS LINE
ABANDONED I IN PLACE
1 - �
8�, /••
4
CA BRONNF
\`• ,O ,`�� ��.y�$�I EXISTING I6 GPS LINE / WN p2jEBM W
_ — _ _ -- _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ •gr, 'kL;(. .. ` ( BE ABANDONED /{/
YW9MlLP SF.L1AfE � ♦`• Y I ' I
NMD B BBB. PG, ON 6 ♦
(TO EX1n
5NG 16 GAS UNE I, I
.•fit' ,'� 0 "7
REMAIN)
PROPOSED 23
' De 511 Pc 272 PERMANENT EASEMENT
•\ Rw91081782B000 •`•�•.Ki A.
PROPOSED �.
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE /�'J•jJ^7/� - � �
/
STA 5539.37
.K INSTA)2 L.TRUCTON
E9 itANCE. 9EE DEfNL 1.
/ SWEET 3007-00 -002
Os. �' i
w w 74 /
— _ _ __ _ _ — / Aw i106]BY57t00 -
REV DATE _- �SCIlIq/6 MGLL' ED By
- - — AS SHONM SWH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LANDS INFRASTRUCTURE ■EIROATL eRNNNBy: ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLJNA
-- wtERIALturN1Y • Piedmont IOIS PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 MARCH 13, 4015 C"' SITE 2 - LUMBER RIVER
OW C T0` oewer7gN NX NG: OT'I art oEEarnON Piedmont o Oa I 919- 234 -1974 • WWW.EII- IIC.COM • LICENSE M Pa2B9 � ' Ea-P M �m8� WEgALL SITE LAYOUT
roe ��� � GLlNf
SN SINEER. • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL PIEDMONT NATURAL W _— Is" FM
� OONSTgUCTpN
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE - CARY. NORTH CA ROLI NA DL. tR. MG' 3007-02-007
�� 2239572 REWBgN. ORAIMNI MD:

R
6s
R
d
3
r
RROJEOT DESCRIPTION /, ``�/ _ _ -- _ _ \ \ — — — — — — /••
TMS DESIGN IS f0{i A HORIZONTAL pRECTIONALLr ORIllEO
BORE FOR � 18' NATLAUL GAS RPEDNE
EHIE DESIXIbTN1GSRECOIOITIONd \ •\ - - -- \— -- — ,\ `,\
GN CROSSES THE uM6M RIVER. EXIST W WETLAlA —
ALL CONSTROCTKIN ACTVITE95HALL 0E IN ACCOIONxZ
LOCAL AND STATE ENNRC—NTAL PFGLLATIOW -
-
INSTALLATION NETH00 IgPoZONfAL d cTl— —L,
—
BORELENG 1,=—T -
RPE SPEdFIGTION 1C O.D..O37S W T X26
100 CAicUTATE�APPROX RAL6ACK LOAD 86.619 LW
-CONTNACTCRTOFEWVETHFYALL EXISTMO 11LITIn EXISTING GAB LINE /\ " -- - -- \ \ /• /' 1
wFDRE CCNATRIICTON LIE— (TO REMAIN) • - - - - - - - - - EXISTING 7 NT 11`
/ EXISTING 16' GAS UNE
- - - - - - - (TO REMAIN) EXSTING 16• GAS LINE \ - - - - - D B 1875, P G 147
(PORTION TO BE ABANDONED) - \ O 1
EXISTING 50' - STA28-84
GAS EASEMENT HOD Part B•
EXISTING ITGAS LINE \ RIG SIDE
V� w` «� - �- - ~O��•' I w-,Ey. �- f � _ O �t1j I Y • �� ^ (PORTION TO BE ABANDONED) N790314e 21
°A�••— W —a•.. -wow - -- -- � -- w �_ I,� Q
• r.H w- mar
NwK
PROPOSED35' ] Ie •Q $ - �$---- .-- .. - - -wO. --- Ig- -- -.g.w-
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE A Y ; - p -
8 ---- — g $ $
' - - -- ---- ,---- I- - - -. -- -- Lam• —
\ PROPOSED 16 ' R F iy — - — $ •Q• �— —
1 A -48 CP #4 CP03 GAS LINE ♦ry',\ — .— . —..�. J g'
1 HOD Pant 8• STA 990 STA 12-15 7sR
PIPE SIDE N 38686964 N 368773.11
N 368934.98 E 1901745.67 E 1901948.86 - - Op r \ TEMPORARY �NORKSPACE I /
E 1901819.18 PT . STA 23.16 STA 25+41 ' STA 29.61
N 366302.83 N 386207. 95 / OFFSET. -19.0
\ E 1902944.38 E 1903148.55 \ PROPOSED 35' I
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PLAN
ALIGNMENT PLAN
SCALE. I'-1w
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET) •\ \ / "' / ' /' I
PROFILE
VERTICAL SCALE. 1- = 10
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 100
STA • 8+H
HOD POINT 8'
90
C
_ - --
L = 14
60
25'
JIA =l6 +W
HOD POINT W
RIG SIDE
GEO -CORE
STATION = 29-61A
SURF ELEV = 17111.4
TERM ELEV = 11i.1
OFFSET= -IL
7.00 8.00 9-00 10.00 11+00 12 -DO 13.00 14.00 15 +00 16+00 17+00 16+00 19 +00 20+00 21+00 22-00 29+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27.00 28+00 29 +00 30+00
210
200
190
160
170
100
150
140
130
120
118
REW6ILN 1 1 1 I / / $CAE DESIGNED er - .. _
tlfEr �� • A A / / AS SHOWN SWH PING 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND S INFRASTRUCTURE reeVE DATE pRAnN BY ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
w1EPAL6LIEE4VRr piedmont 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ
SITE 2 . LUMBER RIVER
Euw en G1TE LESGPPTgFI MI IA eTr uTr OE6CIIiRW 919 -234 -1974 WWW.EIi- IIC.COM LICENSE ✓Y P-1289 - EU Z�- 007 CNECIffDSWH HDD BORE PLAN 8 PROFILE
1 zs9 ,m T315MRx26%ZLPIPE / D 191 ,FMtwA- FppoEM6AUVAUEW,OEX, Natural Gas �� -
z 1 1m1 FJlSYVT x- e6CS9x DTE.PrE • O tIR9 PIQ Y1Ely RED G01F1,IW 6129 Wrr.n -
3 2 Ck7.]151Vr 219 VWT x26 TRAN/. FIFE
t0 8 tti9 r.Yil lYfx,@CiD ORL PINE CLIENT.
4 0 — 1F tD' w1:LDEU FS ]I Y2R n 6 tste0 rWecwAN81Hm IEVCa1ED9AU VALVE Knor��belm PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
5 D 16]63 1r WINELDELLF671 Y ENGINEERS SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL A�
0 11A6] 16'1ftCX6�3T5x.]AO NR WELD 9R r -A Cal balm �� N A S N V I L L E T E N N E S S E E CARY . NORTH CAROLINA CLEAT PROJECT NO 2239872 REVt6g11. �� pR,1„I,,,p,p JOO7- 02 -008
F4
STA = 25N1
50
STA =9.90
DEPTH = 19.10
DEPTH = 17 81
PC
PT
TANGENT LENGTH - 1097 24'
40
IU U
= 1
RADIUS OF CURVATURE= 1800'
CURVE LENGTH =2234'
CURVE LENGTH = 2234'
CP s3
Q
30
STA = 12.15
STA =23.18
DEPTH = 34 73
DEPTH = 33.81
PT
20
-
16
JIA =l6 +W
HOD POINT W
RIG SIDE
GEO -CORE
STATION = 29-61A
SURF ELEV = 17111.4
TERM ELEV = 11i.1
OFFSET= -IL
7.00 8.00 9-00 10.00 11+00 12 -DO 13.00 14.00 15 +00 16+00 17+00 16+00 19 +00 20+00 21+00 22-00 29+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27.00 28+00 29 +00 30+00
210
200
190
160
170
100
150
140
130
120
118
REW6ILN 1 1 1 I / / $CAE DESIGNED er - .. _
tlfEr �� • A A / / AS SHOWN SWH PING 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND S INFRASTRUCTURE reeVE DATE pRAnN BY ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
w1EPAL6LIEE4VRr piedmont 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ
SITE 2 . LUMBER RIVER
Euw en G1TE LESGPPTgFI MI IA eTr uTr OE6CIIiRW 919 -234 -1974 WWW.EIi- IIC.COM LICENSE ✓Y P-1289 - EU Z�- 007 CNECIffDSWH HDD BORE PLAN 8 PROFILE
1 zs9 ,m T315MRx26%ZLPIPE / D 191 ,FMtwA- FppoEM6AUVAUEW,OEX, Natural Gas �� -
z 1 1m1 FJlSYVT x- e6CS9x DTE.PrE • O tIR9 PIQ Y1Ely RED G01F1,IW 6129 Wrr.n -
3 2 Ck7.]151Vr 219 VWT x26 TRAN/. FIFE
t0 8 tti9 r.Yil lYfx,@CiD ORL PINE CLIENT.
4 0 — 1F tD' w1:LDEU FS ]I Y2R n 6 tste0 rWecwAN81Hm IEVCa1ED9AU VALVE Knor��belm PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
5 D 16]63 1r WINELDELLF671 Y ENGINEERS SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL A�
0 11A6] 16'1ftCX6�3T5x.]AO NR WELD 9R r -A Cal balm �� N A S N V I L L E T E N N E S S E E CARY . NORTH CAROLINA CLEAT PROJECT NO 2239872 REVt6g11. �� pR,1„I,,,p,p JOO7- 02 -008

0
w
v,
INSTALL CONSTRUCTION' 1, OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS
2. HOLD PRE-CONSTRUCTION COWERENCE
ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL 1.
3 FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
SHEET 3007.0().= 4 INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
II \ 5 BEGIN CLEARING
SILT FENCE (TYP-) -- — - ----- 6 REPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL
(SEE EPSC DETAIL SHEET) B. COMPLETE NG PIPE
7 BEGIN INSTALLI
BEEN I _D AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
DISTURBED NSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL ALL
AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
CEASED
S. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW,
Jr, HYDROSFED4NG OR SOD.
10. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
11. PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
LUMBER
(TYP) RIVER EROSION CONTROL
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
iii D"M MOTES
1 ALL STREAM AND/OR WMETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE APPROXIMATE.
2 SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
3 SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN-GRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
" 41 4 ANY FAIL E OF ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY FAILURE
5 ADDITIONAL REASON SMALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
N.
EROSI ON CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. IT IS THE
CONTRACTORS ZESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
A,— ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING
6 SUPP CONSTRUCTION.
RATE OF`0 GALLONS PER 100 LF. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
ER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT
FOLLOWING z; F MIX KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55%) ENGLISH RYE (20%) KOREAN
LESPEDEZA (15x1. GERMAN MILLET (10%).
`zt T HYDROSEEDING OR CURLEX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
NS�
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES
MAINTENANC
I ALL SEDIMEE NT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN HALF INCH(DURINGGA24 HOUR
PERIOD) DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2 CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.
GENERAL NOTES
1. THECONTRACTORI S RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
EXISTING CONTOURS (TV MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND ED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING SCHOONUSLTDRLSIECTLICOCNA
1 NG
3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
b
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED. THESE AREASSR" BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED
4 FILL. COVER AND TEMPORARY STABIUZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
R COMMENDED WHERE RCTICAL. IT IS IMPOTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHEP S AON STEEP SLOPES R AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
5 CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
HEAVY EQUIPMENT
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE. b MATTING STREAM AND WETLANDS, NT
IF PRESENT, SMALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
A / 6 LA
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF
7 SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR OCEONINSTIZLETIDOALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
NO PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
WETLAND LIMIT 8 ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
EPSC SILT FENCE (TYP.) ITYP.) ANWOR WETLANDS IF PRESENT
(SEE SCDETAILSHEET) B. THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
.V AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
10 IF A FRACTURE 5 OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED AND ALL LOST LUBRICANTIMUD MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM, THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED
LATE
AND THE SITE WILL BEFORE C OF
CONTRACTOR WILL EVALUATED ORE ONTINUATION BORING
MAINTAIN A DIANIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 24-
1
fth-100t. BETWEEN THE PIPELINE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES
MIS
PLAN 8TANDA
EROSION CONTROL PLAN INSTALL—CONSTRUC ON ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL RE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SCALE 1­ 100' NOTES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL I THE NORTH CAROUNA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
SHEET 3007 DESIGN MANUAL
Wl— SCALE 0E.nNEQ1Y___
[MTE AS SHOWN SWIM PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IOISPASSPORTWAY _ARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 =i713.:2015 CAI
HID CITY CAY10 MKWFM "A"'SkMKI401 CITY 1 CATS Piedmorit r SO NECKED MY: SITE 2 -LUMBER RIVER
919-234-1974-WWW LI-LLC.CDM- LICENSE#P-1289 14-21-=7 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Natural Gas J�7
CLIENT:
I HILT FECE PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS INIM FOR CONSTMJCTM
2 , 0 SAFE FENCE KfwwwMftbobw ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL
Callbd=pUdig. N A S H V I L L e . TENNESSEE f . C A R Y , N O R T H C A R O L I N A CLIENT PROJECT 10M. 3007-02-009
J =3072 1�.�
THE SOILS IN THE PROJECT AREA INCLUDE-.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
• BB - BIBB SOILS
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL REPLACE 7 PORTIONS OF NATURAL GAS
KaA: KALMIA LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES
PIPELINE ALONG PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE I DISTURBED STURBED AREA IS
• USE LAKELAND SAND. 0 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES
APPROXIMATELY 0.11 ACRES
LUMBEE SANDY LOAM
P. . PLUMMER AND OSIER SOILS
EASING IME COMMONS
• W-WATER
THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL EXISTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS AND EXISTING ROAD R 0 W,
SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN APRIL 2015 AND BE
COMPLETE BY DECEMBER 2015.
7
ERgPqk AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT
INVOLVE THE STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING
SILT FENCE
TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEIEXIT
MOST OF T14ESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
GRADING ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED AND ALL DIST
UR BEDAREAHAVE
SEEN STABILIZED ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TEMPORARY NTR L
DEVICES SMALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED DUST CONTROL ON SITE SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN
ACCEPTABLE UNITS BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE
METHODS THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE. IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
_7\
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
ADDITIONAL STEPS AD NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
WETLAND LIMIT JTYP.�
SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
INSTALL CONSTRUCTION' 1, OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS
2. HOLD PRE-CONSTRUCTION COWERENCE
ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL 1.
3 FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
SHEET 3007.0().= 4 INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
II \ 5 BEGIN CLEARING
SILT FENCE (TYP-) -- — - ----- 6 REPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL
(SEE EPSC DETAIL SHEET) B. COMPLETE NG PIPE
7 BEGIN INSTALLI
BEEN I _D AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
DISTURBED NSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL ALL
AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
CEASED
S. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW,
Jr, HYDROSFED4NG OR SOD.
10. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
11. PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
LUMBER
(TYP) RIVER EROSION CONTROL
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
iii D"M MOTES
1 ALL STREAM AND/OR WMETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE APPROXIMATE.
2 SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
3 SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN-GRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
" 41 4 ANY FAIL E OF ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY FAILURE
5 ADDITIONAL REASON SMALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
N.
EROSI ON CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. IT IS THE
CONTRACTORS ZESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
A,— ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING
6 SUPP CONSTRUCTION.
RATE OF`0 GALLONS PER 100 LF. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
ER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT
FOLLOWING z; F MIX KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55%) ENGLISH RYE (20%) KOREAN
LESPEDEZA (15x1. GERMAN MILLET (10%).
`zt T HYDROSEEDING OR CURLEX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
NS�
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES
MAINTENANC
I ALL SEDIMEE NT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN HALF INCH(DURINGGA24 HOUR
PERIOD) DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2 CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.
GENERAL NOTES
1. THECONTRACTORI S RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
EXISTING CONTOURS (TV MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND ED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING SCHOONUSLTDRLSIECTLICOCNA
1 NG
3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
b
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED. THESE AREASSR" BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED
4 FILL. COVER AND TEMPORARY STABIUZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
R COMMENDED WHERE RCTICAL. IT IS IMPOTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHEP S AON STEEP SLOPES R AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
5 CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
HEAVY EQUIPMENT
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE. b MATTING STREAM AND WETLANDS, NT
IF PRESENT, SMALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
A / 6 LA
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF
7 SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR OCEONINSTIZLETIDOALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
NO PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
WETLAND LIMIT 8 ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
EPSC SILT FENCE (TYP.) ITYP.) ANWOR WETLANDS IF PRESENT
(SEE SCDETAILSHEET) B. THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
.V AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
10 IF A FRACTURE 5 OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED AND ALL LOST LUBRICANTIMUD MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM, THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED
LATE
AND THE SITE WILL BEFORE C OF
CONTRACTOR WILL EVALUATED ORE ONTINUATION BORING
MAINTAIN A DIANIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 24-
1
fth-100t. BETWEEN THE PIPELINE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES
MIS
PLAN 8TANDA
EROSION CONTROL PLAN INSTALL—CONSTRUC ON ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL RE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SCALE 1­ 100' NOTES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL I THE NORTH CAROUNA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
SHEET 3007 DESIGN MANUAL
Wl— SCALE 0E.nNEQ1Y___
[MTE AS SHOWN SWIM PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IOISPASSPORTWAY _ARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 =i713.:2015 CAI
HID CITY CAY10 MKWFM "A"'SkMKI401 CITY 1 CATS Piedmorit r SO NECKED MY: SITE 2 -LUMBER RIVER
919-234-1974-WWW LI-LLC.CDM- LICENSE#P-1289 14-21-=7 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Natural Gas J�7
CLIENT:
I HILT FECE PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS INIM FOR CONSTMJCTM
2 , 0 SAFE FENCE KfwwwMftbobw ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL
Callbd=pUdig. N A S H V I L L e . TENNESSEE f . C A R Y , N O R T H C A R O L I N A CLIENT PROJECT 10M. 3007-02-009
J =3072 1�.�

STA 5-17
PROPOSED 10 GEXISTING 70- INSTALL LATERAL CONNECTIqN
- - - - - - - - - - - PERMANENT EASEMENT 'AS EASEME SEE DETAJ L 5. SHEET 3007-M�2 EXISTING 70, 6
1 334 PG GAS EASEMENT
- - - - - - - - - D. B. 1348. PG 13
L - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - -- -- - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -7
+ - - - - - - - - - - - a
-------- --- - --------- 01
-0
/0
J. PROPOS 20'
PERMANENT EMENT L
- _- _t---- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.... . ...
A
%
7,
STA R 0+00-
S TING
EX 871NG SY
%
ACCESS EASEMENT GAS EASEMENT NEWT LATERAL
TA 5" D.a
1385, PG go EXISTING 16'GAS LINE D 415
(TO BE ABANDONED)
%
%
\ % %
VDo 10.po EHICLE SsTEMB %
N
%
♦♦
PROPOSED 10
PERMANENT EASEMENT
It %
♦ OUSTING 70 ACV
%
GAS EASE MENT
♦ AB 1348, PG 13
le % TA 1-59
I SEE ALELTAIL -00�W2 ♦ NST LATE5, SH EET RAL CONNECTION 3007
%
%
FX S TIN 16'G G LINE NEW I GAS LATERAL TO
I'
I'
\, (O BE ABAN ED) EXISTING POST REGULATOR %
PROPOSED 20'
RMANENT EASEMENT
EXISTING 501
EASEMENT A
PG
0,00
t
Z
01111
Ile
%
N ep
V\
0oxx %
00
"
D.9. 2E. po 70
10 I Wh-
PLAN STAL 24-03
%1-7 STAL"JA
OVERALL SITE LAY
SCALE: 1'=80' 1*
REVISION
SGLLE DES4G#im0Y
ASSHOWN SWH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUE DAYS SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1015 PASSPORT WAY - CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 MARCH 13,2015 m
Sn
ftdmom 17 - SITE 3 • SKYWAY CHURCH ROAD
0 calopmln= Itmoicy my I CATO 919-234-1974 • WWW.ELI-LLC.COM • LICENSE # P4289 ELI PaImmy No: CHEM=W.
14-21-1007 SWH OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
Natural Gas Ir -
mmy"aft bekm PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS 111" FOR 001119TRUCTON
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS -INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE - CARY, NORTH CA c"wr PROMT NO 22
R 0 L I N A m-n 3W7-OMIO

f
Q�
-
I
I
�
I
MEN?
v SYSTEMS
DO I.
D.e 1Dm. vc pa
DO A1L,T. aG ma
1B 021P X42
3 1 5 oo 1 o
4
O
I
PLAN
EXISTING 70'
GAS EASEMENT
D S 1334. PG 302
. I sTA 5+17
INSTALL LATERAL CONNECTION
SEE DETAIL 5, SHEET 3007 -00 -002
I
EXISTING TO _ _ 8
GAS EASEMENT _ vu. _ - _ - -g S+ /
US 1348, PG. 13
- -
- ~-
& ♦
^ ♦♦
\ \ \ ♦♦
SCALE I'50'
PROPOSED 10'
PERMANENT EASEMENT �-
-- �-- - _- __-
- i
T` -
-- - - - - -_
- - - - -- �� �%f.2 - - - -�
♦♦
\\�\ ♦♦
/
GRArtxC SCALE (IN FEET)
�--- - -_ -�_g --
___ - - ---
- g - --
�1
, ►
Q \\ _. ^'� -J
\\ ;� ♦ ♦♦ PROPOSED IO'
\� ♦♦ % PE RMANENTEASEMENT
­.w.
- - .
N
PROPOSED 20
PERMANENT EASEMENT
_ 4y _ - ^�
- ���.�+ -��� �• - - - - - -- �` •\
\ .,y/ ♦ /
\ "` T\ ♦♦
-
\ 'L�,`�� ,'� �
�
-, - --
-- - -- -
8 � -->,�- - - .;�1..'�' � ,� .`
\ \\ � ♦♦ by
•
s - _-
�
\ \
TO REj
NEW 7 IATERAL
\
f
GAS EXISTING
EASEMENT
EXISTING 16' GAS LINE
I
/ \ \ Gy \ ♦ ♦♦
d'
-� 'L+
�+- '•�
-•s_ EXISTING 16 GAS LINE
D B 3B. PG 415
J 1 (PORTION TO BE ABANDONEOI\
�` ?'
♦♦
f
Qx$ ! P,
�
(PORTION TO BE ABANDONED)
•
I I
\ ti:Q \y\ \
l \ t
EXISTING
\ '\! \ ♦
\ \
♦♦
/
NEW Li
SEGII ACCESS EASEMENT
\ \ \
\. \ \
♦♦
STA 0+G0 - D B 1365. PG 90
STA 5408+80
\ \
\ \ I \
i
S
220
no
i
gg
a
----------------------1-----
______
— ---
1
210
F
I
__ _____________
_________
--------------------------------------------------------------
__ -_ _______
4' MIN, COYER
----------
4 'MW OVER
4'MIN. COVER
1 `• O
6'
16'
O
200
200
EX tC
_
_ _-
200
190
190
�Fi
�R
�R
>g�
n�
Fri �1:,
Fein
'n
Fri ��Fi
t•1N
1'
`�
0+01)
1+00
2+00 3+00
4.00
5+00 0-00 7 +00 8 +00 8`00 10+00 11+00 12.00 13.00 14 +00 15+00
PROFILE
VERTICAL SCALE. I'. 5'
HORIZONTAL SCALE; 1• = W
REV
DATE
REYWON
­"OH
K�bw��Y�
•
`�-.
A
■= '11LJr
Vol EREEIEY
Piedmont
Natural Gas
011
__ _
•
ENERGY LAND 6 1 N F R AS T R U C T U R E
1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY NORTH CAROLINA 27513
919- 234 -1974 • WWW.EU- LLC.COM • LICENSE / P -1299
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
N A 5 X Y I L L E. T E N N E S S E E C A R Y N O R T X CAROL 1 N A
\ `1 1 I 1 , t
_
_-
_ _
SCALE DESIGNED BY
AS SHOWN SINN
- -
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
scoTLAND couNTV, NORTH CAROLINA
S8TA3510G+90 TO STA. 5423+70
1
t -1L10
ADOEDRPEIEM/EM EAEE/EI4f FCR lATEAAL PFHG.
peuE DATE
D -wo EY
WIERWl9lpIAARY
Apt ND
I
Dr
191D
Q.T.
TED
OF.aatlU►R110N
F]TSWTxl QLLPIPE
1pL NO
4
DTY
p
urp
DEtKrnrttoH
tS WtwA•HImGE/iRMLL VALE WIC EYT
EU PRD.ECCT.0
14-21 -3007
���Sy
SWH
2
0
tent
ea2srvT %l9 C:9RC Dra RPE
c
p
1
144M
6'%T WELD 19iD.DD1PUHR STDYrt Y.A7
3
t
6'%2'.279 Wf 11p Wf %ffi TRANS. NPE
10
14o
12TR
5.191 YYf %d2 CFB DRL PIIi
CLIENT.
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
5
1
t
IOM
16
It'WINELDEU.nm Y52
16.45 WELD ELL n m Y8
n
t
1e,60
>•w %WMi6' -I0Y CDATEDMLLVN_VE
S
0
16lA0
1"IVXIVkNEUD8R DTEEY -m
CLIENT MOO TNO:
2239872
REYL4IGH.. 1
DRAVANG 110 3007 -03 -011
7
tblF!
1621C%6. 275 = WT WELD69T Y m

u
LP
PD. mS
SKYWAY CHURCH
.CF
RIDIR-0F -YMY
m T ) NAIITON
N160R X. PION
7
O
O
5 O
4 t 3
/ /
PROPOSED 21Y
• \ TEMPORARY NORKSPACE
o
\\
STA 19+59
INSTALL LATERAL CONNECTION 1_k_
SEE DETAILS, SHEET 3007 - 00002 BORE PIT
\PROPOSED
\`
101 I•I _ _ -- $p `
PERMANENT EASEMENT , �'�`� • I — — _S _ — — — — — —
r ?a
4 r
— '• \•�
'- /,/ / -/
-
/ / / /
EXISTING\
GAS EASEMENT 13 III
I
— —
t
FQ
/
1
// _. -I•
1 4
BORE PIT - —
VIEW IT GAS LINE
a
\III
''
II
t_— ' -
�,
- - -_—
.STA 21.03=
STA 5431 +23
/
1
1 PROPOSED 20
,{Q
\
•\ +� 'ii / /
IQII Z
—�,j_e
PE EN T EASEMEM , /
'
,
% \\
,
/'
9T
'
\,
'% $•
•II��'`
✓�,./"
-
l'rl
PLAN
ALIGNME
E NT PLAN
SCALE. = 50
`
, ®
•� E
_ •� 'TY — _ `
_ _•� _ _ ,
g'" `
EXISTING 11< GAS UNE
(PORTION TO BE ABANDONED)
GHAPHC SCALE IN FEEn
''
\
` �
_
J . y Q`
^' ��.
cow;�•
_
�
� i �.
—
.�� y'+
PROFILE
VERTICAL SCALE. 1' = 5'
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1-547
5P
R
220
a
r£
K
R�
720
I? .
_
210
`_
>ra
210
°
_
1
200
200
g
B
190
190
16+00
17+00 18.00 19-00 20+00
21+00
22 +00
23+00 24+00
REV
DATE
REV
6°N
tt8tl11PItON
e*,.�
�AOM I Im
�Y/YY��
111
�
I ,I,N� '�
ENERGY LAND 6 1 N F R AS T R U C T U R E
IOIS PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27SI3
919- 2341974 • WWW.ELI- LLC.COM • LICENSE!P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
TENNESSEE
N A 5 N V I L l!. C A R P. NORTH R T N C A R O l 1 N A
__
` ` 1 1 K
_
/' � t K I , , t t \`
eCAIE
OESgNFA BY'.
SWH
PNG 2011 CLA68 LOCATION REPLACEMENT
�� +TY, ► ORTH CAROIRYA
3 - SKYWAY CHURCH ROAD
STA. 5423+70 TO STA 5431+23
1
t.1a1s
ADOEDmPERIMNENT EABEICNT FOR UTERa PMq
KSBUE DATE
MARCH 13. 2015
D"AN EY
CAJ
MATERIAL SUMM
RY
WN0
OTr
CAT*
DEScRrw)N
NRIO
OTY
CAT•
�eDBFlIDN
EUPROJECTND
14-21 -3007
CHECKED BY
SWH
t
NO
TED
e•]]SNTx4ECFEOILLPWE
e
o
T®
,twKwAw tmaFw B.K VN,8E.��—1,
2
s
2
x
Mllt
Q1157$WrS F 01EAFE
exssTSwr stetAnx�TRANS.IME
e
to
t
>N
fe410
n1v
exz WELD RIU.CWHING$mtNrr$
ztsltMZm eFB ORL FPE
CLEFT
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
186'4JE FOR CONSTRUCTION
1
1
I
taTe2
1e]eJ
18.90'NEID ELL FS>A Ydt
tC 4A•WELD ELL FS 0Rr8
11
1
15150
SwKWANSI e00 KtEYCMTEDBALL VALVE
S
0
teeAD
1e1te'1(1Q WEIR EARED TEE Y -A
CLEW FR DJECT NO
22317672
REVIBKDN 1
/�/� �} /�
DRAAIND ND. 3W7 -0J -V 12
t
+sass
texte•mr 319KIe0wf WE1D W Y -A

*1 Y -
\ 1W
\I
\ I
II � `I�
P
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SCALE 1 =

------------- -
15
EXISTING W VARIES)
GAS EASEMENT
AF L CONSTRUCTION
E E, SEE WE
EXISTING (T116Y U —7-MCOl O REMAIN AIMN) SHE 30
PROPOSED40
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PROPOSED 59
PERMANENT EASEMENT
WALKER %
8 14E, PG 15•
EXISTING 16' GAS LINE
♦
(TO BE ABANDONED)
EXISTING GAS LINE
(TO REMAIN)
INSTALL coNsTRuc'noN
ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL 1,
SHEET 3007-00-003
FARMS
%
%
♦
PROPOSED 20' /1--z' ♦
TEMPORARY VWORKSPACE % ♦
%
A\
% %
WALKER
FARMS, INC
RW olamlool PROPOSED 50.
PERMANENT EASEMENT
%
PROPOSED 40' .01,
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
it
oe Xf,
INSTALL CONSTRUCTION A--
ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL 1.
SHEET 3
N
G"C %ALE tM FEE,
I Ind, IL
EXISTING 16' GAS LINE
(TO BE ABANDONED) i I
EXISTING GAS LINE
(TO REMAIN)
RMANENTEASEMENT
PE PROPOSED
r I
PLAN
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
SCALE 1•=100'
SrALIL DESMEDGY
ASSHOWN SWH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
'i ENERGY LAND INFRASTRUCTURE om aft MAWIdM SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IOIS PASSPORT WAY - CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27SI3 MARCH 13.2015 CAJ
— -I SITE 4 - MCGIRTS BRIDGE ROAD
Piedmom 919-2-34-1974 • YVWW.ELI-LLC.COM • LICENSE * P4289 WINIOAXT PIC cmEom �w
14-21-IN7 8WH OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
MoMral Gas CLUNIT, —
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS IMM FOR CONSTRUCTION
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE - [ARV . NORTH CAROLINA MOWIRMWTNO7
I — =N72 otewumN. 30074"14
EXIST
GAS EME
EXISTING 1-
1N. N GAS LINE
To R1 EMA I
PLAN
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
SCALE 1•=100'
SrALIL DESMEDGY
ASSHOWN SWH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
'i ENERGY LAND INFRASTRUCTURE om aft MAWIdM SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
IOIS PASSPORT WAY - CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27SI3 MARCH 13.2015 CAJ
— -I SITE 4 - MCGIRTS BRIDGE ROAD
Piedmom 919-2-34-1974 • YVWW.ELI-LLC.COM • LICENSE * P4289 WINIOAXT PIC cmEom �w
14-21-IN7 8WH OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
MoMral Gas CLUNIT, —
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS IMM FOR CONSTRUCTION
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE - [ARV . NORTH CAROLINA MOWIRMWTNO7
I — =N72 otewumN. 30074"14

d
I I
sW
� M%It1Tb
TRI2i, ER1DOE nLGT, YARN
R R ROAD
DH� 1E PG. 1151 AVOW OF mF fAWtE, INC. RIGMOfLVAV
09. 1dE. PG. 131
w 1r. 0]1r Ylf 3 1 5 O O O O1 d 1 d 1
O
— �) / !
I
ExIsnNG 70' 1
GAS EASEMENT EXISTING 16" GAS LINE
GEO - - - r• - ..- -� -+�• y ' ` D.B. 1374, PG. 278 (TO BE ABANDONED)
BEGIN PROJECT EXJSTING 16GASLINE J � &SItltIF3.15
---- --- --- -- -- - ---
--- ___- _— ____ ___ _____ __ ___ __ __ __ ___
STA O•W =
STA. 5225.15 ITC BE ONEDI
! + $ $ $ H A T I Y
1 8 S
_r _-�- .• ._ -_.�Y.� { _•_ »•- •� VV�Y. -��•� / l / • /,/ '/ ' � - -
$�
___._— ____ _____- -__._-- - -n. _ ___- _- _ - __ - - -- _ - - - - - - -- -`
_ - - - - -_ _—__ - _ - - _-- _-__- .u_ ___ __ ____ _ __ __ __ ___ - _
-,9f
EXISTING 16 GwAS LINE - _- - -_ -__ -__ -- - - - - -- -- - - -- _ - - - - -- ___ __ __ __ 22 LF OPEN CUT
�-, --
-
-
(TO REMAIN) - -c / - �• -- a _ - - _ _. _ _ - - .�..�. -.�.�. �'T- - -- g 'N-- - --
-- - -r - -- - -tom - -- �i. —'-� ;, `_�,-' - -- -- — -- -- -- -- -- -- MrARNROAD - — -- - -- — — — — — — — — � 1 jp- i - - - -- - I-- - - - - --
,, 1_34W $
i'IS,, - - - - -- - - - - - - - -� ........... L.- 9 - - --- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- - -- --- - - - - -- - — �- _ I -- --
PROPOSED ,� o
rTEMPORARY WORKSPACE r� ---- ----- --- - - - - - -- -- --------------------------- --- --------- -- --- ---- -- -- - --G-
PERMANENT TEEPSEMENT `•�•� -f / - .- •- • -• -.- - • -• -• -• -. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- .- .- .- .�.- •- •- .- •- •- •- •- • -. -.- - - -
• / •` / • PROPOSED L. F. OPEN CUT
- -
(((�//444 • / / / /ppp TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
P LAN ' / / / L.
PROPOSED - , -
ALIGNMENT PLAN = ' / ¢ / /J PERMANENT EASEMENT ;
SCALE. 1" 50' / / m / PROPOSED .......
-•. I
GRAPI4C SCALE (IN FEET) / h //1 PERMANENT EASEMENT
y /
/ PROPOSED '
• IS>M -1o6. R / TEMPORARY VORKSPACE
PROFILE
REV OA,E
�O11dlag
11
Nn w" ory
1.371
z
9 1
1 3
5 3
S 0
1- S -
VERTICAL SCALE 1" =5
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1' = 50'
230 �-
ao
R
G
______- ____�____�_______�
4'M�OyER ._
31 LF. OPEN CUT
200 —
oF>CnN
--
ISM 2114 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
mm
v
Ei
CATt
OESO1i1gN
4
F
ow WTt
OESCMTION
A
I
0.00
11W
trop
RBOYED
oF>CnN
--
ISM 2114 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
_ w
SLMNRY
- - -
CATt
OESO1i1gN
76L IO
ow WTt
OESCMTION
PROJECT NO:
r 776NRX!
E
o TSO
1rxKw Ir61®p aPl,R CALL V4LVEWro EA.
1
r,376Mrt 7tl6CFElC
f
0
6,11•NELD IIFD. COLAlN06T0717Y81
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
S'lIT.3767F7.iU V77XM TRAWL FrE
W
rm—
0 7]761
v %,M .76%DRI FIE!
16761
1f Sr ELL" 311 Y�
1
0 161M
TMKWAW Opp IOi1'C04TFOMLLVALVE
141110
1r 4r MELDELL FS 3R Y@
1011111
1t71fIRlr1MHD NIlE_O
GEO CORE B-04
S1at-3.15
SURF EL EV = 221'
TERM ELEV = 191
4' MIN. COVER
1R• 4' MIN. COVER
- rvIV �fz r TY F Ti1F �'I�gil' ^ fY
3 4.00 5ro0 B+OD 7100 M00 OroD 10roD
n ENERGY LAND S INFRASTRUCTURE
• C01d Pwmcw 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513
NaW��� Ii GCE as 919.234.1974 • WWW.ELI- LLC.COM • LICENSE M P -1289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
MtWI II O N A S H V I L L E . T E N N E S S E E • C A R Y . N O R T EH IV O L I N A
a
F
11ro0
x
g $ — 220
22 LF. OPEN CUT
C O ♦ �
FF FF
72100 13100 14.00
4224.20VM
— ro
7D0
,I5
SCALE
AS SHOWN
SWH
ISM 2114 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MUE DATE:
DRAM W.
MARCH 13, 2815
BITE 4 - MCGIRTS BRIDGE ROAD
PROJECT NO:
CNECKtp N:
1c.
14.21J887
SWH
STA. 52Z6+36T08TA 5285+56
CIEMT:
..
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
ISSUE FOR CONSTPMTM
CLIENT PROJECT W
2231172
RIlYtl70N 1
IRU1rwlDllD 3007-04015

a
d 7
zW iW iW iW
FAARe, 6e`
D.fi 1( FG. 161
w
O 3
1R.011PYF11tA2
$
Q
EXISTING I W OAS UNE
E%BTING70
(TOBEASRNDONEO) ^ ^-- _ - - GAS EASEMENT
STA 23.18• - -_ -_�-
STA 5247.37_
_
8 ^ --
.B 1334, PG. 276
' _�._ - --- O ( BE ABANDONED)
z
ti3 J- `
g MNM+NNN141� ^ ^- ^_.,"3 $ _ -- -
11k
00STINO,V GAS LINE
(TO REMAIN)_ -
4
_
Ro
PROPOSED
♦� `
'\ -^` TEMPORARY WORKSPACE .- .-
i `
I
.- .,�,�.
PROPOSED
\ • \ ` ` PERMANENT EASEMENT 4
` ^
PLAN
` `
ALIGNMENT PLAN
`•�' J !
^ — ' \
•
SCALE: 1' MY
cPAP16C 6CAIE (IN FEEL)
PROFILE
VERTICAL SCALE, V-5'
230
230
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" • W
220
- -
220
w
210
4' MN. COVER 4• MIN. COVER 4' MIN. COVER -
210
18 18
g
"
2DO
2DD
190
190
FFi NF
16.00 17-0 Ill ,9•DD 2+000 21+00 22+00 23+00
FEV
l
MATERML
CATi
rm �ISrrr><a6aeDiaPOW
Nm1 31 wrx46 DRLRPE
,376 wT ]+6ER A•E1RAIR.PIPE
ISM l6.4s YIELD ELL F6 IA Y.M
1 if8'MELD ELL f6f1Y8
16® 164NTX/6'YYELO EANVD TEE r•A
16617 ti'A/67�11O.D 6TDYYIrB
i
L61NO OW CAT( OFIQOPfION
s o >s>.+svocwul6ieopaEN + awvuve
6 0 NMI( 690•VJ D RED COIIUMi diDYifr@
10 O It 7.154WX42CFBDRLPPE
1+ 0 1616p rvawRlN ®NErcMTEOBNL VALVE
is
Nv�+NRNVRMi
rain.... [�����s
ENERGY WND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE
106 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513
9�- 234- 1974•WWW.ELIdIC.COM• LICENSESP -1289
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
MASH V ILLS. TENNESSEE CA RY. NO RTN CAROM NA
I + + f""'
�
-
���� + I j 1Y�
-
SCALE:
AS
DFJIOMED By
SVVH
PNG 2914 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
SCOTLAND COUNTY. NORTH CAROLWA
SITE4- MCGIRTSBRIDGERCAD
STA. 5235+86TOSTA5247 +37
DATE
NWEOATE:
MARCH 13, 2015
-
DRAWN a:
CAJ
NAND
Or
EuFWol NO:
- 14.21 -3W7
CNECKECEY.
SNM
+
we
2
D
O
+
CLEAT:
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
ISSUE FOR CONBTRUCTION
4
0
6
6
O
6
CL4DA i11pJECT MO:
223�M
REVISION
q/y� /�� 7Y
ORAYMIq MD JW7YT'V16
T
o

\ _` \\ \ \ \ \M �•` [ ,F •I� / %� t • TIl Oaks IN THE PROJECT AREA MCLUDE:�OPES PROJECT DESCRIPTION WILL REPLACE7PORTIONS O NATURAL GAS
IY / CQA COXVILLE LOMI OO Z PERCENT THE PROPOSED PROJECT
LyA • LYNC/9URG SANDY LOAM, 0 O 2 PERCENT SLOPES
PIPELINE ALONG PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS' UNE 1. THE DISTURBED AREA IS
I \ \ H ' H n / NU • NOBOCO LOAMY SAND. 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES APPROXIMATELY 6.4 ACRES.
�,
� NOBOCO SA 2 TOG PERCENT SLOPES 2706 PERCENT SLOPES kkkyyyggq ERSTINOORECONOMONS
``\ \* - _ THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL. EXISTING UTILITY
���
\ � \\ `_ `` C\ i T_. ��I.: y:' - t EASEMENTS. AND EXISTING ROAD R.O.W.
\ ♦ `�` ((I SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN APRIL 2015 AND BE
- w _ \ \ \ 1 \ �� • - • D' COMPLETE BY DECEMBER 2015.
ENDINCIN D SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
^ \\ \
THE t INVOL�NSTRAT SEDIMENT PLLAACEMENT OF MEASURES RIETY OFRDEVICES INCLUDING
\ 1 - • SILT FENCE
FENCE (TTEP - \ _ \\ TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCFJE70T
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
II i / !C� �1� \ \ \ \\ EXISTING CONTOURS(TYP.)
GRADING. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
IL \\ \ PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES O CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
\ \\ \ \ \ CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED AND ALL DISTURBED AREA HAVE \ .-"•� ` \ \ \ \ \� \ \\ \ \ \ \ BEEN STABIUZED, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTIO ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL
DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION UCTION S COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED, DUST CONTROL ON SITE SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE
\000 \ \ \\ • \ \ / / - METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
'' ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
INSTALL CONSTRUCTION \` \ \� \ \ \ �\ j / `..75 THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL 1. \_ , \ \\ \� / / / ,.� ''-77 SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
SHEET 3007-00.003 \ \� \\ \\ \ / / / ��y•
\ \\ 1. OSTAII PIS APPROVAL AND PERMITS.
•\ \ \ + v / / '� 2. HOLD PRE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
•� \ �. \� ` \ \ / \ / / / �M 3. FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
\; + % A. / / 4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
��. \\ ~ \�� \X /^ ♦J 11 6, REPLACE O INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
\ 7. BEGIN INSTALLING PIPE
FLOW ARROW (TIP.) \` \a h \\ 8. COMPLETED AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
\\ • \ \ BEEN INSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING O AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. ALL
DISTURBED AREA SHALL DE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
\\ ♦\ \ \"- r:Ii:a .p CEASED.
B. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED YOUTH SEED AND STRAW,
\ \• % ♦� \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ '•.4, "1 HYDROSEEDING. OR SOD.
,•Y- \ \ ♦ `\ \ \ \\ 10. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
l` •N\ \ \�` +d\ \ \\ ! AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
•\ \\ • ♦ C\\ \ \ / \
REPRESENTATIVE.
LIMITS
�•\ LINTS OF DISTURBANCE 11 PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
N\
(TYP) I t EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
1. ALL STREAM IMATE. WETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
"3 `\ ? \ -� � � _ •: J ARE APPROXIMATE.
t •` + \ y - - 2. SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM O 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
\ \ •\ \ \ \+ �, \ "w. 3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN - GRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
��\ AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
`^ \ \' \ . \\ 1 k 4. AVIV FAILURE OF AVIV EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL _ `�� �\ \\ \\ \ \7 \ \ \\ ` \\ >� .. 1 •_. �` 5. AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION O SOME O THE
\\ • \\ 1 \ W EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN ON THE PLANS
s \ \ \ \lk �\• \ \,, DIFFERENT FROM CONSTRUCTION TI
M THE FINALP POSED DRAINAGE PTTERNS.I
\ S THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPUSH EROSION CONTROL FOR
\ \ - ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
'•, - 6. BUFFER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT A
RATE O 20 GALLONS PER 100 LF. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
FOLLOWWNG MIX. KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55%). ENGLISH RYE (20%1. KOREAN
\ ,� 7. HYDROSEEDII R
NG OR CCURLEX OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
` ` �` \• \} \ STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES.
`\
MAINTENANCE
1. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
\ - • -\ - SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
\ \ \ \ AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A HALF INC40URING A 24 HOUR
`` PERIOD). DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
INSTALL CONSTRUCTION \. + \ �' I ty t 2 CELEPAANN SID BMR BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
ENTRANCE. SEE DETAIL 1. ' J
SHEET 3007. 00.003 BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
\ E
GENERAL MOTS
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
+ + \+ E 3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
FOR POTIONS O THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN
�, ¢! COMPLETED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED,
4. FILL COVER, AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
\ RECOMMENDED WHERE PRACTICAL IT IS IMPORTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHES ON STEEP SLOPES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
TEMPORARY STREAM ` SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE.
CROSSING. SEE DETAILS, \ `� O �� 6. STREAM AND WETLANDS, IF PRESENT. SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
SHEET 3007-00003 \ % GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
7. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
1 •��, `' PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
8. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
i \�, X ` �'•� "'� AND/OR WETLANDS IF PRESENT.
3, Fw `'•� B. THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
\ AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES,
€ t •�+ \ `� A~' 10.IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING.
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED. AND ALL LOST LUBRICANT/MUD MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM. THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED
�•yy \ AND THE SITE WILL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATION OF BORING.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 24"
BETWEEN THE PIPEUNE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTIUTIES.
STANDARDS
1
PLAN v
EROSION CONTROL
SCALE 7 80 ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
` NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
t . = ` I `! THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
- - RETIOOU _
REY Je. -e - • AS SHOWN ...ESWH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
- - - - ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE WaEU4E ' DRAWN r: SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLRA
MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ
wlE1SM4lAOMRr IOIS PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 4- MCGCONTRIDGER
( MLNO OTY CAT$ aE1LYlliTlorR MLND ON "T4 ®o�1dl � 9I9 -234 -1974 • WWW.ELI- LLC.COM • LICENSE N P -1289 _ � 1421.9007 gyyH SITE EROSION CONTROL
-fi - Natural Gas
l 1 4,yRp GILT CLEW.
i 1 - 13r BI_.FEM1E Y� - PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS MYUE FOR COIIMTRUCUDN
ENGINEERS •
SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL _
N
r
AS X V I L L E . T T E N N E S S E E C A R Y N O R T H CAROLINA Cl lMT PROACTI16 223M72 REVMM7N: I bRAIARM M1: 3007 -04 -017

•
Ir -
11R9 D
. Z
TRUCKN
0. 10.1 - 125
A%.
ITGAS LINE
STA 5153-01
PROPOSED
PTEMPORARY7KSPACE
• EXI
STING 16'GA
�
(PORTION' ro 8E4
EXISTING W*
ING 50
GAS EASEMENT
PROPOSED
K ORARYV40RKSPACE' "A A
IP
PROPOSED
PERMANENT EASEM fff
TEM-7-
7K.PACE
!EXISTING 701
GAS EASEMENT
PROPOSED
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PA
4f
1- '19
4
Im
2e
TRACT 1
DO, 14K M 213
B 14K, PG 2W
_ozososOIN5
16 GAS LINE
lU9 AN E ED,
D)
STA 13•
W.
STA 51W
ft
EASEMENT
T
ED
G
DEEIONED By
AS SHOWN SWH PING 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND INFRASTRUCTURE WU90AlM-.,3,20,. DN�fff: SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
• 1015 PASSPORT WAY CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 MARCH CAJ
MIND aiv wo NKNOI wrY I cxT • c PiedmoM SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
919-234-1974 • WWW ;LI-LLC . COM • LICENISE# P4289 EUPADAWTNO CHECKEZI my
14-21-300 sm OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
NhWral Gas MLIF—iff
KifliIIIIIIIII r bakm C�� PIEDMONT NATURAL IIIIIIIIIIIIIMFOIlt -
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
CAbdmpuft NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE - CARY . NORTH CAROLINA 22gB7 3007-05-018
ACCESS DRIVE
PROPOSED
TEMPORARY MRKSPACE
29p
T.
DEVEUORMENT �T�
LAURENBU�
DB 1319.M, IN
EXISTING 16 GAS UNEI
D
(TO REMAJNI
Yp
t1
ITGAS LINE
STA 5153-01
PROPOSED
PTEMPORARY7KSPACE
• EXI
STING 16'GA
�
(PORTION' ro 8E4
EXISTING W*
ING 50
GAS EASEMENT
PROPOSED
K ORARYV40RKSPACE' "A A
IP
PROPOSED
PERMANENT EASEM fff
TEM-7-
7K.PACE
!EXISTING 701
GAS EASEMENT
PROPOSED
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PA
4f
1- '19
4
Im
2e
TRACT 1
DO, 14K M 213
B 14K, PG 2W
_ozososOIN5
16 GAS LINE
lU9 AN E ED,
D)
STA 13•
W.
STA 51W
ft
EASEMENT
T
ED
G
DEEIONED By
AS SHOWN SWH PING 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND INFRASTRUCTURE WU90AlM-.,3,20,. DN�fff: SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
• 1015 PASSPORT WAY CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 MARCH CAJ
MIND aiv wo NKNOI wrY I cxT • c PiedmoM SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
919-234-1974 • WWW ;LI-LLC . COM • LICENISE# P4289 EUPADAWTNO CHECKEZI my
14-21-300 sm OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
NhWral Gas MLIF—iff
KifliIIIIIIIII r bakm C�� PIEDMONT NATURAL IIIIIIIIIIIIIMFOIlt -
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
CAbdmpuft NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE - CARY . NORTH CAROLINA 22gB7 3007-05-018

I
1
z
E
r �
c
Jaq1 RR
a�8
WCTE DTRACT4 SwbTIAND TRACT]ECONOMC MM'eDl TMCT2 TRACTI
TRUCxING LAURENBURG DEVELOPAENTOMPORATION I+DM-0F'WAY TRUCIfING - TRUCXING
O DB tpl. PG 125 DB. 1401. PG. 145 Do 1]1 +.P01n D.B.IMCPG iaJ pB. UCXIN G
w 16.021Tki 3 O O O 3
GEO CORE 22
SURF \ e1 \
/ l �• / SURF ELEV 227 r� \
TERM ELEV 797
Slaill
% OReet =50.7 L\
GEO CORE' / p ____________ I 11 ( \ 1 �\\
SURF ELEVf'/ / 1/ $.__ f__i-- 8_____ I \ \�\ 1
TERM ELEV 91' - - - -- 1
/ ,n BORE PIT EXISTING PNG STATION
_ \
✓ 1ll+oon 2.29' / I 1 � - .
SEE 7-05018 F
\ \ 1 0 _ SWEET 300 OR
EXISTING 16 GAS LINE \ 06tie� -14� • \ - , ^ . g • ^' ^� / ,� '^ ty _ 1 \\ E USTNG 50 CONNECTION DETAIL
GIN Ni 1 / (PORTION TO BE ABANDONED) Y `• ^ / 1 _i p `\
•` -%% �•` GA9 EASEMENT
STA 0.00 = \,. 12' x 60' 1� _ ---
- _ _ �4ta��
EXISTING 16" GAS LINE STA 5157.01 / - -- BORE PIT 28 - --'�- - _ _ _ r � -- -- - -_`_ "^`MyK ( b _ _'__ 1' \
is I
�,../ `�__vt. �- Q -- - «+ \ �1 STA 13.05=
n TORE MAINI \ \i$ -•' _ __ xx y 8 ±- f•_w • - -� •w •�5�b STA 5161
till - - - _
•tL�_- r
-- - - --
a I r`
Wla4a< • +•- r r ►
$sr v� n - �7� I I II ♦----- rrr - --
Qy --"1 - . - - - - - - - �' I iI - -- [--------------- - - - -
Ntl
._.f- . ° "'_"_� --� �y= - -.'/7J /// L� /+ y�•� /� I I . —• —,JILL � �' �- _�r'�� 1 •r -�\
L---- - - - - -J _ - 1 1. 1. ^•'�' -• 11
/ PROPOSED \
PLAN PROPOSED ` \ ; / / / I I TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
((( \1.
ALIGNMENT PLAN TEMPORARY WORKSPACE I It� PERMANENT PROPOSED EASEMENT
SCALE 1" = 50 PROPOSED
PERMANENT EPSEMENT
GRAPHC SCALE (IN FEETI
PROFILE
VERTICAL SCALE.
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1" = 50'
O
REV
MtE
_
DESpoptgN
230
o.
NAIERNL 1R+411MY
'
`
a "a
un
DEaCR1v11oN
ucw
ON
ur+
IBSCAIP110N
-
FF
M
T®
mwrx.45CAt71LL PIPE
e
M
w
_
�
R +
�g g
3
a
GEO CORE e465
of
R.]7a YPt X416 CF64C D1l PIPE
230
B
0
o
ta45a
vx2
f1P ylE{p 1ED.00IRINGSrotNTYB
z.ta4wrx.scsBlaP+e
4
o
'M
trtD'WEID EU Fa ]R Yat
n
aapp
$
tarn
SUeort =7EV
a
b�
t+iC
16'45'WEID ELL Fa ]R Ydt
GEO CORE B-08
0
1an0
1ax1BxiSWELDB1RR -----
ELEV-22V
- - -
3 o W S
43
SURF
W
b
TERM ELEII� tiB
& 1W
W
SURF ELEV =221'
EL
_
J- e•, - x
---------------
_____
TERM El '91,
-� ,
: to
�$
' -
-
_ _
, e
220
a.
-
_
220
-
COVER
"'
i r
- --
4' MIN. COVER
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4'MIN.COVER
ITERI
16'
n0 LF210
210
200
200
Q
nn
n
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00 6+00 7.00
we
8.00 9.00 70.00 11.00 _ - 12+00 13.00
REV
MtE
_
DESpoptgN
NAIERNL 1R+411MY
Mc NO
orr
un
DEaCR1v11oN
ucw
ON
ur+
IBSCAIP110N
I
M
T®
mwrx.45CAt71LL PIPE
e
0
Too
le'vmv4Nrbo°uRaNa vNVEw,P Exi
3
a
3w
z
of
R.]7a YPt X416 CF64C D1l PIPE
+
to
0
o
ta45a
vx2
f1P ylE{p 1ED.00IRINGSrotNTYB
z.ta4wrx.scsBlaP+e
4
o
'M
trtD'WEID EU Fa ]R Yat
n
o
tarn
rr+IwNJR ®NErcwtm BUL VALVE
a
0
t+iC
16'45'WEID ELL Fa ]R Ydt
+
0
1an0
1ax1BxiSWELDB1RR -----
- - -
F Y L t 1 1 1 I J x
SCALE AS SHOWN DE6IONEDSB PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE Sol DATE, Olk"i Iw SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
O� piedmont 1015 PASSPORT WAY •CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 _ - MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ
C w,�. ` ELI PROJECT NO CXECRED n SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
Natural Gas 919- 234 -1974 WWW.EII- IIC.COM LICENSE «P -1289 14.21 -3007 SWH STA. 5153 +15 TO STA. 5166+04
Knorr �7 CLIENT
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL —
■Y��-� CIEM PROJECT NO
N A S X V I L I E TENNESSEE CARY . NORTH CAROLINA 2239872 REvowall- ONAV +NO NO 3007-05-01-9
11 IL

•
4.
I
r
I
\
\
GRAPMG SCALE ON FEET)
, NNA•mn.
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
SCALE T' =,0'
\ /
PROPOSED 20'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
APPROX TIE -IN FOR
NEW 1S' GAS FIN
EXISTIN
LINE
EXISTING MINN
LINE VALVE
1 TEMPORARY 8" BYPASS
EXISTING STATION OUTLET
TEMPORARY S` BYPASS
I INSTALL NEW 9' BLIND FLANGE
I
I INSTALL NEW < °STOPPLE
I
DETAIL
ENLARGED STATION DETAIL -
SCALE ," = 5'
ISOMETRIC
TEMPORARY 6' BYPASS TIE-IN
A
NOT TO SCE
I1x
�naaN I \ I I , S E DESIGNED SY PN(j 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
REV 6�TE DEWnP/10N
. AS SHOWN SWH
f ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUE DATE: onAMM SY. SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ftdmont MARCH 13.2015 CAJ SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
wreRUL ELERMRY 1015 PASSPORT WAY • GRY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 i _ ENLARGED PLAN RTIER DETAIL
WHO aw CATS DlSCINPIION NO OTY un OEEONPIM7N 919.234-1974 • WWW.EU- LLC.COM • LICENSE # P42M - ELIPROJEONO DNECNEDSY
�raI � 14-21 -3007 SWH
Kw {�Q� CLIENT
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERS
ASH ERf • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL C GHENT PROJECT NO
cabdam NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE CART. NORTH CAROLINA 2239872 REVSON - DRAN1NGNO 3007- 05 -019A
I
I
I
�¢
P$
ON
en0
�J
♦
♦
f
ca
\
\
GRAPMG SCALE ON FEET)
, NNA•mn.
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
SCALE T' =,0'
\ /
PROPOSED 20'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
APPROX TIE -IN FOR
NEW 1S' GAS FIN
EXISTIN
LINE
EXISTING MINN
LINE VALVE
1 TEMPORARY 8" BYPASS
EXISTING STATION OUTLET
TEMPORARY S` BYPASS
I INSTALL NEW 9' BLIND FLANGE
I
I INSTALL NEW < °STOPPLE
I
DETAIL
ENLARGED STATION DETAIL -
SCALE ," = 5'
ISOMETRIC
TEMPORARY 6' BYPASS TIE-IN
A
NOT TO SCE
I1x
�naaN I \ I I , S E DESIGNED SY PN(j 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
REV 6�TE DEWnP/10N
. AS SHOWN SWH
f ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUE DATE: onAMM SY. SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ftdmont MARCH 13.2015 CAJ SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
wreRUL ELERMRY 1015 PASSPORT WAY • GRY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513 i _ ENLARGED PLAN RTIER DETAIL
WHO aw CATS DlSCINPIION NO OTY un OEEONPIM7N 919.234-1974 • WWW.EU- LLC.COM • LICENSE # P42M - ELIPROJEONO DNECNEDSY
�raI � 14-21 -3007 SWH
Kw {�Q� CLIENT
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERS
ASH ERf • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL C GHENT PROJECT NO
cabdam NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE CART. NORTH CAROLINA 2239872 REVSON - DRAN1NGNO 3007- 05 -019A

•
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE SOILS IN THE . AREA INCLUDE: THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL INSTALL A NEW GAS LINE CROSSING MILTON RD
- K- \ /r / •1\ J"`A, JOHNSTON 90", 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES.
FREQUENTLY FLOODED
FOR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS THE DISTURBED AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 197
N.A - NOROCC LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES ACRES.
EIGSTING STE CONDITIONS
THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL EXISTINGUTIU1
EASEMENT S AND EXISTING ROAD R.O.W.
SCHEDULE
- Ap, CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AUGUST 2014 AND
EXIST. EASEMENT BE COMPLETE BY NOVEMBER 2014.
FLOWARROW(TYP) (TYP)
EROSION AN13 SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT
INVOLVE THE STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING
--------------------------- -- -- ---
----------------- - SILT FENCE
--------------- ------------ - ----- TI TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCON ENTRANCEOEXIT
---
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
GRADING.
PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
----------------- -------
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED ANDALL DISTURBED AREA HAVE
T .1vt -opoo� BEEN TR
-- -------- MAY STABOUZED, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
-------- BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE r ------ DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
(TYP) SITE IS STABIUZED DUST CONTROL IN $HALL BE KEPT WITHIN
0 SITE
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER OTHER ACCEPTABLE
METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE. IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
ol CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
FENCE t OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS
SILT 2. HOLD PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
•w (SEE EPSC Mai 3. FLAG CONSTR UC TION LIMITS.
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5 BEGIN CLEARING.
_4 6 R
EPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
7. BEGIN INSTALLING PIPE
S. COMPLETED AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITlHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
BEEN INSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL ALL
TEMPORARY I DISTURBED AREA SHAU BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK FNS
WORKSPACE (TARYi
CEASED
S. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW,
HYDROSEEDING. OR SOD.
REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
401 AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
JI, PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
1. ALL STREAM ANDIOR WETLANO CROSSING LOCATICNS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE APPROXIMATE.
2 SEDIMENT TRAPS SKILL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS WETLANDS.
3 SILT FENCAENSDKkl BE INSTALLED DOWN4RADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOON THE PLAINS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS,
4. ANY FAILURE OF ANY EROSI CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
`Ep— FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
5, ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SKALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
ON CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
EROSI GROUND DIS
.o ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE
v DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. IT IS THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS OCURJEATED AT VARIOUS. STAGES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
6 BUFFER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT A
RATE
FOLLOWING MIX KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55%) ENGLISH RYE (20%) KOREAN
RA OF 20 GALLONS PER IDD LF. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
EXISTING
LESPEDEZA (15%). GERMAN MILLET (10%).
CONTOURS (TYP.) 7. HYDROSEEDINGO CURLEX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES.
eo
MAINTENANCE
1. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
• Y^ i I�`7 •\ \ ,- / �. /' A AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A HALF INCH(DURING A 24 HOUR
PERIOD) DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2 CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR To COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
3 DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE V*eRE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN
I COMPLE SKALL BE STABILIZED No
AFTER TED THESE AREAS LATER THAN 14 DAYS
_R OVER TRUcnON HAS CEASED.
4. FILL. COVER TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
RECOMMENDED WHERE PRACTICAL. IT IS IMPORTANT To CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHES ON STEEP SLOPES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
w 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE
6 M P
STREAM AND WETLANDS IF PRESENT, SHALL BE RETURNED To ORIGINAL
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
7. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA 15 STABILIZED.
ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
AND/OR WETLANDS IF PRESENT
THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
V", 10.IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING
WORK MUST BE IMMEEXATELY HALTED AND ALL LOST LUBRICANTAAUD MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM, THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED
AND THE SITE WILL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATION OF BORING
11-CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 24'
BETWEEN THE PIPELINE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES ♦ CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC TO •
p �'Zl O U
USE EXISTING DRIVEWAY STANDARDS
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SRALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
EROSI NTN& PLAN NPD STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
SCALE, 1- 80 ES
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUALO
INNISION SCAM: INSIONE
REV DATE R{OlION • D EY
ASSMOWN SVVH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ENERGY LAND 6 INFRASTRUCTURE SCOTLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
*WE DATE, BY-
ME MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ SITE 5 - WAGRAM ROAD
—C MIX m a" Pwm 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27S13
---dff AT* 0011CRIPIM om 919-234-1974 • WWW.ELI.LLC.COM • LICENSE # P-1289 ED PROJECT' c"Rom Iff EROMON CONTROL PLAN
Natural Gas 14-21-MG7 SVm
MIA
FENCE Kmwvboft below MOM I= COINNITRUCTM
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL Plt��NTNAlILFAL"S
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE - CARY. NORTH CAROLINA
22S11 bd= FU Ift t —
72 3007-05-020

•
EXISTING SO'
GAS EASEMENT
BEGIN NEW 16• GPS LINE
STA- 0+00
STA. 3514-96
EASTING 100
ELECTRIC EASEMENT
1E 1A GPAVEL
SAND Co.
CAL M. P.G. =
POW TQMHrA1107
EXISTING 16" GAS LINE
(PORTION TO BE ABANDONED)
.e' y
\N\\
z
N
GRA!M SCALE X4 IZIM
PLAN
OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
SCALE I" - 30'
A SAM Co.
PIN )K150p3o�0
z
PROPOSED 20'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
,
ROPOSEDIT
PERMANENT EASEMENT A
♦ %
4b
% A I,
HE. �L
0 •IIANOW.
B.,10. P.G.
EXISTING PNr W Q,KX)17M7
INTERCONNECT SITE
D.B. 566 >,
P& 27
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC % %
TO USE EXISTING
ACCESS DRIVE
•
W**
PROPOSED 13'
PERMANENT EASEMENT
PROPOSED 20'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
EXISTING 16 GAS LINE —/
(PORTI ON TO BE ABANDONED)
STA. 7-28
STA 3522.22
`\ MICO11Nq
6CALE 0111IMED W
AS SHOWN SwH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
ANSON COLOM, NORTH CAROUkA
ENERGY LAND Fy INFRASTRUCTURE I �DATE D— 6��
Piedmorvt 1015 PASSPORT WAY - CARY ' NORTH CAROLINA 27513 MARCH 13,2015 SITE 6 - STATE ROAD 17"
HO. QTv NK No wf�--ATo 919-234-1974 • WWW eLI-LI.C.00M • LICENSE # P-1289 ELI �
14.21Z7 CHECKED BY
SWH OVERALL SITE LAYOUT
MIA Natural Gas ir CLIENT: I - —
Kmw PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS ISSUE FOR CONITRUMM
QUEHTMO—JECTM
ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS •INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
N A H I R
WNIGIMPUdIS s v LLE TENNESSEE CA Y. NORTH CAROLINA 1001 3007-0"21

R
Y
0
THE MOSS w THE neaecT AIa:AM INCLUDE,
LrgB- LJ1k4w P-NY tenEY loam. 210 B peroenl dopes
LSC-LEnUbn prmeIY un* loam 6 to t5 percent elopes
I I \
� N
FLOW
ARROW
\\ \SILT FENCE (TIP.)
! �w1 (SEE EPSC DETAILS SHEET) / \
!��'+,\ ` ` `. _ � ogz\ � (I• FEET)
GRAEHIC
• :17' , 31' _ r [ I,_ [� \ \ \ air \'1W\'}'�', - i � x -r� \
\ \
1 , :
I /
r
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC -J
TO USE EXISTING
ACCESS DRIVE
• r
� e
A
Hal
(cb
LIMITS OF DISTRUBANCE
�+\ \ \ TOTAL AREA = 0.71 ACRES
kb
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
[� \ (SEE EPSC DETAILS SHEET)
\ [4 \ \ \
<., (obA
Iq
too
•r. t [ -_. R,v;.. I,y[�r{NLy'A� +, ' {� ,u0 .!T.ad[' 1' y !Sj, i'�`•'i iELi'° h*r•, r
.,fix P' '1A ",'•`4. t'..r.'p. 4. �{L. i^.. 7 "1y'. �Y1[. 4�. •.:_ `.� ♦,�'
t .I -'+,111 ik t .f; � ,dK . Z ',.3+ •� 71! 1. -G4.. ''� �' !` ' A. <E
A S,.
-- _ ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
- - - - -- - - = ' IOIS PASSPORT WAY • CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27SI3 -- TATS Piedmont 919 -234 -1974 WWW.EU- LLC.COM LICENSE N P -1289
Natural
o ----_ " ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL
NASHVILLE. TENNESSEE • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I �
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL REPLACE 7 PORTIONS OF NATURAL GAS
PIPELINE ALONG PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS' LINE 1. THE DISTURBED AREA IS
APPROXIMATELY 0.71 ACRES.
E15571110511Ecopo DNS
THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL EXISTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS. AND EXISTING ROAD R.O.W.
SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN APRIL 2015 AND BE
COMPLETE BY DECEMBER 2015.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT
INVOLVE THE STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING
• SILT FENCE
• TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCFJE)UT
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
GRADING. ALL EROS ION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SWILL BE
PROPERLY MAINTAINED WRING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED AND ALL DISTURBED AREA HAVE
BEEN STABILIZED. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TEMPORARY' CONTROL
DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED. DUST CONTROL ON SITE SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS BY SPRINKUNG WITH WATER OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE
METHODS, THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE. IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE.
THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
Co"MINUC,IOR �EauENCE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS
2. /TOLD PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
3. FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
5, BEGIN CLEARING.
6. REPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
7. BEGIN INSTALLING PIPE.
6. COMPLETED AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
BEEN INSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL ALL
DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE SEEDED YMT14N 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
CEASED.
9. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW,
HYDROSEEDING. OR SOD.
to. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMNATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
11. PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
1. ALL STREAM AND/OR WETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE APPROXIMATE
2. SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOVO4GRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
4, ANY FAILURE OF AN[ EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
5. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTIRBAN -E OCCURS. TFE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANE IF DRAINAGE MAY DURING CONSTRUCTIpN ARE
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. IT IS THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
6 BUFFER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT A
RATE OF 20 GALLONS PER 100 LF. OF BUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
FOLLOWING MIX KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE 155%) ENGLISH RYE (20%) KOREAN
LESPEDEZA (15%). GERMAN MILLET (10%)
7. HYDROSEEDINO OR CURLEX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES
M UMMMANCE
I. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A HALF INCH(DURING A 24 HOUR
PERIOD). DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2. CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.
GENERAL NOTES
1. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2 ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABIUZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN
COMPLETED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED.
4. FILL COVER. AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
RECOMMENDED WHERE PRACTICAL, IT 15 IMPORTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHES ON STEEP SLOPES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE.
6. STREAM AND WETLANDS, IF PRESENT. SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION
7. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING
PIPEUNE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
6. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
AND /OR WETLANDS IF PRESENT.
9. THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
10. IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING.
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED. AND ALL LOST LUBRICANTAIUD MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM. THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED
AND THE SITE WALL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATON OF BORING.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MOUNTAIN A FAMMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 24"
BETWEEN THE PIPELINE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES,
STANDARDS
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
SCALE
g� I SWH
PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
OWE DATE:
IRMIN W. -
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MARCH 13, 2016
CAJ
euPAa4cr NO:
cllcu®ar:
SITE 6 - STATE ROAD 1744
14.21.1007
SWH
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PIEDMONT NATURAL OAS
2238673 III onam..
NN= FOR CONSTRICTION
reAAM.[G Hq. 3007 -06 -023

.0
r
LC.UNOEWELT
0
BOOK M. PAGE 211
WK 6
EOOK =,P AGE 'W
r• - - -•— ..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------
r
----------------- -------------------------
------ -----------------------------
-------------- -- — ------- — ------------
— -- — -- — --- — ----- — — -- --m — --------------- ------ -----------
-
PROPOSED 201
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
EMSTING 16"GAS UNE
I TO REMAIN)
--------------- .......
*0`
8
"I.E
_.-
BEGN ITNU��ajjN
0.00� INSTALL NEW DRAINAGE PIPING. SEE
_$________
-_ - -
STA- 2OW181, GRADING PLAN SHEET 300�07�=
PLAN
GAA
ALIGNMENT PLAN
STA- 2-23 - - - - - - - - - - -
zZ STA 2BOB-41
SCALE 1, = So
Emsn N13 24" RCP
TO BE REMOVED)
or" IV I TITI
I-ox
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - --
-----------------------------
------ --•--- ------- /------
PROFILE
--- - -- - - - -- -•--
---- ----- ----------
r--- ----------
VERTICAL SCALE 1- 10'
HORIZONTAL SCALE 1' • 10
320
320
310 - - -'-- ------------------------
3io
EXISTING GRADE -
------------
...
4' - -------------------------
300 t
--------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
- — 300
200
— 29
— 285
0-00
1.w
2-00
REV
TE
n bakm
Piedmom
ra NaWral Gas
ENERGY LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE
� 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27513
919-234-1974 • VVWW.eLl-LLC.COM • LICENSE * P4289
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
II...V.LL.. T . Al . . . . . C CAR I. —. CA..I.—
SCALE milum Iry
AS SHOWN SWH PNG 2014 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
Ilma PATE: 81f.. ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RCH 0, 2015 CAJ
E..pl- TWO. SITE 7 -CEDAR GROVE ROAD
I I PLAN & PROFILE
4.214W sv*f
I Willig- ADACTWOWASNICAPIDLENNINOFKaAr.
OW CAT#
i DERCIWqm CAT@
= 1
w_vswr TED
a-
_2 a lll�
4
WXSWrX4IGCFWCISLFft I "N"'
i!
=
" a I
---- prrMY42
SRI=
c=
PWJ)MONT NATURAL GAS
INKIIEFOR •(•QN{TRIKr•TDN
4 a Ism
Y-
Lj�
14-.
CLIENTPWAV NO:
3007-07-025
it
klr��l
71

0
` ♦ A
r
\ S \ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SAFETY FENCE ITYP.) W \ / TOTAL AREA =0.30 ACRES ,
FUM
\ 8
ARROW \ ! \ \\
PROPOSED CONTOUR
(TYP.)•`\/ 0A \C\ •;W LINES(TYP.)
PROPOSED STREAM
•\ ` \ /� `• I� \\ \ CENTERUNE
RIP -RAP OVER
FILTER FABRIC \ ` A \ 1
/ STANDARD - \
WITH I �. - SILT FENCE (NP.)
HEADWALL
\ HEADWALL \\ (SEE EPSC DETAILS SHEET)
GRATE
V - % 1, \� \� \ EXISTING STREAM
31' OF 53" X 43" - \ \(y 7 -- ` CENTERLINE
HERCP \
„Q \\ \
I\\ \ \ \# A
1
I1
1
I
I
N
ORAP W SGLE IN FEET,
1 NeR • lw R
PLAN /
OVERALLSITELAYOUT
SCALE. 1 =1yW'
\ \� v1 \ Il
.%
THE SORB N TIE PROJECTAWA RLCLUDE:
• Oddlbn dlwimy e R bon. 251045 Pwwnl ElcP•E
EXISTING
CONTOUR
LINES
ITYP.I
N
QWW WALE ON FEET) w
•t R
i 1
.L E
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WALL REPLACE 7 PORTIONS OF NATURAL GAS
PIPELINE ALONG PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS' LINE 1. THE DISTURBED AREA IS
APPROXIMATELY 0.30 ACRES.
EIOSTND SITE CONDITIONS
THE SITE IS COMPRISED OF GRASSED RESIDENTIAL EXISTINGUTILITY
EASEMENTS. AND EXISTING ROAD R.O.W.
SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN APRIL 2015 AND BE
COMPLETE BY DECEMBER 2015,
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT
INVOLVE THE STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING.
• SILTFENCE
• TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EJL1T
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
GRADING. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SMALL SE
PROPERLY MAINTAINED DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE CEASED AND ALL DISTURBED AREA HAVE
BEEN STABILIZED, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES
MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TEMPORARY CONTROL
DEVICES SHALL Be REMOVED ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE
SITE IS STABILIZED. DUST CONTROL ON SITE SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN
ACCEPTABLE LIMITS BY SPRINKLING WITH WATER OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE
METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF
SEDIMENT ON SITE. IF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES PROVE INSUFFICIENT, THE CONTRACTOR MUST TAKE THOSE
ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO STOP SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE
THE PIEDMONT SITE REPRESENTATIVE MAY ADJUST EPSC PLANS BASED ON
SITE CONDITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
COIiTRUCIIDN SEOIEIICE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS.
2. HOLD PRE•CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
3. FLAG CONSTRUCTION WETS.
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
5. BEGIN CLEARING.
6. REPLACE OR INSTALL REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
7. BEGIN INSTAWNG PIPE,
6. COMPLETED AREA SHOULD BE SEEDED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER PIPE HAS
BEEN INSTALLED AND FINAL GRADING OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. ALL
DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER WORK HAS
CEASED.
9. ALL DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW.
HYDROSEEDING. OR SOO.
10. REMOVE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION
AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE.
11. PROVIDE PERMANENT VEGETATION.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
1. ALL STREAM ANWOR WETLAND CROSSING LOCATIONS NOTED ON THE PLANS
ARE E
APPROXIMAT
2- SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET OUTSIDE
STREAMS AND WETLANDS.
3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED D01M+YGRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
4. ANY FAILURE OF ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED
FOR ANY REASON SHWl BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
5. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE
DIFFERENT FROM THE FINAL PROPOSED ORAIWIOE PATTERNS. IT IS THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR
ALL DRAINAGE PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
6. BUFFER DISTURBANCES AS NOTED ON THE FLANS SHALL BE SEEDED AT A
RATE OF 20 GALLONS PER 100 LF. OF BLUFFER DISTURBANCE USING THE
FOLLOWING MIX KENTUCKY 31 FESCUE (55%). ENGLISH RYE (20X) . KOREAN
LESPEDEIA (15%1 GERMAN MILLET 110%1.
7, HYDROSEEDING OR CURLEX NOR APPROVED EQUAL) IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL
STABILIZATION ON STEEP SLOPES.
MANTENANCE
1, All SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS
AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN A RALF INCH (DURING A 24 HOUR
PERIOD). DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR
REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE END OF THE DAY.
2- CLEAN SILT BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
OETEML NOTH
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
2. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE
FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
3. DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE
FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WAVE BEEN
COMPLETED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE STA&LIZED NO LATER THLAN 14 DAYS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS CEASED.
4. FILL COVER. AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY IS
WHERE HERE PRACTICAL. IT IS IMPORTANT TO CLOSE AND
STABILIZE OPEN TRENCHES ON STEEP SLOPES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
S. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY SWEEP SITE TO AVOID TRANSPORTING
SILT OR SEDIMENT FROM SITE.
6. STREAM AND WETLANDS, IF PRESENT, SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL
GRADE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
T SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN OR BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWMNG
PIPELINE INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
S. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM
ANWOR WETLANDS IF PRESENT.
9. THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY
AND DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
10 IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING,
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED. AND ALL LOST LUBRICANT/MUD MUST
BE REMOVED FROM THE STREAM. THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED
AND THE SITE WILL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATION OF BORING.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 24"
BETWEEN THE PIPELINE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES.
STANDARDS
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
- REVISION _ AwIgH SO "LE �'
REV OAT[ PNG 2044 CLASS LOCATION REPLACEMENT
O EBC S SHOWN SWH
e nwue IIEIG
AIDLL36TIOFJ ENERGY LAND &INFRASTRUCTURE I65uE DATE
oRASSI sW
m1s" AmLOLAIESrA1oxR ALUS _ , ' - ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
• S��� � MARCH 13, 2015 CAJ SITE 7 • CEDAR GROVE ROAD
wTR1LU aIALMeY - y�7STB/'NS�} 1015 PASSPORT WAY • CARY. NORTH CAROLINA 27513
ND OTY Gi• �7lIHON rKia OTV UTS - Liftll/bN MIS s�.rY�s �s SnL./nR Asa ELI GROIBT RO: CNCXm wY:
919 -234 -1974 VVWW.ELI- IIC.COM LICENSE I P -1289 EROSION CQNTROL PLAN
Natural Gas 1'-21'J0°T -_L_ '
® SAT ' CUENT: PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CoNiTrAxv N
KN whaft bel ISSUE FOR
♦ — -- w l� ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL i�CL�PROJWT ND.
■Y�YJR• Ia NA5N V ILlE TENNESSEE CA RY NO CAROLINA 2239873 1.*EYi1DN 2 ORAWNO NO 3007-07-027