NC0086819_Issuance of Permit_20110809

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
August 9, 2011
Mr. Bruce Biehl
Director of Engineering and Regulatory Affairs
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
2000 East Pettigrew Street
Durham, NC 27703
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit
Permit NCO086827
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. Groundwater Remediation System
Facility Class I
Durham County
Dear Mr. Biehl:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
Summary of Changes in Renewal Permit from ExistingPermit
1) Total manganese monthly average and daily limits were added.
2) Acetone and cis -1,2 dichloroethylene quarterly monitoring were added.
3) Total zinc and pH quarterly monitoring were added.
4) Narrative condition was added to bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate to require minimum detection limit of
1.0 µg/1.
5) Total nitrogen monitoring was removed.
6) Total iron monitoring was reduced to quarterly.
7) Chronic toxicity special condition narrative was updated to current narrative.
8) Narrative condition restricting an oily sheen in the discharge was added.
9) Supplemental page treatment system list was updated.
10) Stream classification was changed from C, NSW to WS -IV, NSW; to reflect 2009 stream
reclassification.
Page 1 of 2
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Caroli, a 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623.6748 North Carolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal opportunely 1, Affinnabve Action Employer Nat to /d g ` ytj�!/ y

a Yti
In the final permit, acetone and cis -1,2 dichloroethlyene monitoring frequencies were amended to
quarterly with no conditional petition to better document the treatment system removal efficiency. Also, the
final permit was not issued until the cation filters system was installed providing the manganese removal needed
to obtain compliance.
Please note that your discharge is into a receiving stream that is listed as an impaired waterbody on the
North Carolina 303(d) Impaired Waters List. Addressing impaired waters is a high priority with the Division,
and instream data will continue to be evaluated. If there is noncompliance with permitted effluent limits and
stream impairment can be attributed to your facility, then mitigative measures may be required.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final
and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits
required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local
governmental permits that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Ron Berry at telephone number (919)
807-6396 or at email [e-mail].
Sincerely,
2oleen H. Sullins
Attachments
Cc: Raleigh Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section
Environmental Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Unit/Susan Meadows (email)
David Schwartz (email:[e-mail])
Central Files
NPDES Unit
Page 2 of 2

Permit NCO086827
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. Groundwater Remediation System
2000 East Pettigrew Street
Durham County
to receiving waters designated as Unnamed Tributary to Third Fork Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III
and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2011.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on April 30, 2016.
Signed this day August 9, 2011.
een H. Sullins, Director
/Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0086827
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the
exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements,
terms, and provisions included herein.
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
is hereby authorized to:
Continue to operate a groundwater remediation treatment system consisting of:
o Influent meter
o Bag filter
o Air stripper unit with collection sump and blower
o Transfer pump
o Two (2) GAC disposable filters
a Two (2) cation disposable filters
o Effluent flow meter with totalizer
This facility is located at Brenntag Southeast, Inc., 2000 East Pettigrew Street in Durham County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map through outfall 001,
into an unnamed tributary to Third Fork Creek, classified WS -V, NSW waters in the Cape Fear River
Basin.
0

'
«W��'�" "�.: .''''�- , -.&.. cif � r -�ti �• y . �' �+ t ��
`' fr t . �
ej�
Q.
�I , I •� K l TMJ
� � � i
GVa Facihtj s z
_ 'Ji
it ' ��..- '`. �I .+ S f �. � 1':o•it
jJ�i IT �- - r��
I
�4 � • -- / u � - r may. �Rl r
�' ► ' �; '� �`' � `-
_fig- � � t. �1 , k z. - err; �,•
r c
e w-
ti ' DIS charge''
p!;
j1
a - �+{f ' `. �' AT. �' �: 1
`,
is �, y _ / •� �
,.•
'F � j �_ �,+ �• �'�~ t tr- �.( fi tie ��+I�ICr - t �_ I r• + ��"�
?.
_
pI�
\\IIIL1f s a r , .} 47.
�•
'-,
�'�,- ,`1
Kimp1. '
_ �� 1 ;� -M
Y 5, Irl 1 - '� I �� 4 � i i ', �'r ,
ir
Al
ji
i r.+ ti ,. .. • 3 j
F
..
USGS Quad: D23NW Southwest Durham, NC
Outfall Facility
Latitude: 35° 58'45.3" N 350 58'43.9" N
A
Longitude: 78° 52'58.3" W 780 52'54.2" W
Stream Class: WS -V, NSW
Facility Location
North
Subbasin: 03-06-05 HUC: 03030002
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. GWR NCO086827
Receiving Stream: UT to Third Fork Creek
Durham County

Permit NCO086827
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge treated groundwater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the
Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
PARAMETER CODES
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location
Flow
0.0144 MGD
Instantaneous
Recorder
Effluent
50050
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
30.0 mg/1
30.0 mg/1
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
00530
Total Manganese
200 µg/1
200 µg/1
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
01055
Oil and Grease', mg/1
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
00556
Acetone, µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
81552
cis 1,2 dichloroethylene, µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
81686
pH, S.U.
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
00400
Benzene, µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
34030
bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate , µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
39100
1,1 dichloroethylene, µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
34501
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
78389
Toluene, µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
34010
Total Iron, mg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
01045
Total Zinc, µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
01092
Trichloroethylene (TCE), µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
39180
Vinyl chloride, µg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
39175
Total xylenes, 1,Lg/1
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
81551
Chronic Toxicity
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
TGP3B
EPA Method 624/625 (Full Suite)
Annually
See
Effluent
76029176028
Method

Permit NCO086827
(Continued A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS)
Footnotes:
1. Sample should be skimmed from liquid surface in a quiescent zone, such as from liquid surface in
a holding tank, if possible.
2. A minimum detection limit of 1.0 jig/] is required.
3. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia), P/F at 90 %, January, April, July, and October, See Special
Condition A.(2). Toxicity sample to be collected at same time as monitored pollutants samples.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
There shall be no oily sheen in the discharge or in the receiving stream traceable to the discharge.
A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or
subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the
permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two
following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -1) for the months in which tests were performed. If reporting pass/fail
results using the parameter code TGP3B, DWQ Form AT -1 (original) is sent to the below address. If
reporting Chronic Value results using the parameter code THP3B, DWQ Form AT -3 (original) is to be
sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621

Permit NCO086827
(Continued A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY))
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if
chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring
will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently then required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR and all
AT Forms submitted.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls,
shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than
the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit NC0086827
Revised. 814111
History
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. has applied for renewal of its NPDES permit to discharge treated
remediated groundwater into a storm drain located in Durham County from its
industrial/commercial operation. The only viable option, other than discharge to surface water,
is to discharge to the City of Durham. However, the City of Durham is unwilling to accept the
remediated groundwater continuing to make this permitted discharge the most economical viable
option.
Groundwater data from 1996 to 2000 was used to establish the original owners, Southchem, Inc.,
2000 GWR permits requirements, and included 32 effluent characteristics (see Table A). In
addition to solvent contaminated groundwater, samples indicate contaminates from petroleum
sources. Therefore, the conditions of the general permit for groundwater remediation systems
were incorporated into the original permit. The discharge is to a zero flow stream.
In 2001, the ownership changed to Brenntag Southeast, Inc. A major permit modification was
issued in 2004 that reduced the monitored effluent characteristics to 18 parameters (see Table A).
After reviewing the DMR data and petition request, the 2005 permit renewal reduced the effluent
characteristics requirements to 16 (see Table A). As these permit amendments were implemented
the permit limits and monitoring frequency were also amended.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0086827
Page 1 of 5
Facility
Information
Applicant/Facility
Name:
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
Applicant Address:
2000 East Pettigrew
Street; Durham, NC 27702
Facility Address:
2000 East Pettigrew
Street; Durham, NC 27702
Permitted Flow
0.0144 MGD
Type of Waste:
GWR treated waste
Facility/Permit Status:
Class I /Active; Renewal with stream re -class
County:
Durham Count
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
UT to Third Fork
Creek
Stream Classification:
WS -V, NSW
(re -classed 2009)
Subbasin:
03-06-05
Index No.
16-41-1-12-(1)
Drainage Area (mi):
<0.1
HUC:
03030002
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
0
303(d) Listed?
Yes, Low DO,
Zinc, Fecal,
Biological Integrity
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0
Regional Office:
Raleigh
30Q2 (cfs)
0
State Grid / USGS
Quad:
D23NW
SW Durham, NC
Average Flow (cfs):
<0.1
Permit Writer:
Ron Berry
IWC (%):
100
Date: Revised
1814111
History
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. has applied for renewal of its NPDES permit to discharge treated
remediated groundwater into a storm drain located in Durham County from its
industrial/commercial operation. The only viable option, other than discharge to surface water,
is to discharge to the City of Durham. However, the City of Durham is unwilling to accept the
remediated groundwater continuing to make this permitted discharge the most economical viable
option.
Groundwater data from 1996 to 2000 was used to establish the original owners, Southchem, Inc.,
2000 GWR permits requirements, and included 32 effluent characteristics (see Table A). In
addition to solvent contaminated groundwater, samples indicate contaminates from petroleum
sources. Therefore, the conditions of the general permit for groundwater remediation systems
were incorporated into the original permit. The discharge is to a zero flow stream.
In 2001, the ownership changed to Brenntag Southeast, Inc. A major permit modification was
issued in 2004 that reduced the monitored effluent characteristics to 18 parameters (see Table A).
After reviewing the DMR data and petition request, the 2005 permit renewal reduced the effluent
characteristics requirements to 16 (see Table A). As these permit amendments were implemented
the permit limits and monitoring frequency were also amended.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0086827
Page 1 of 5

The discharge is to an unnamed tributary to Third Fork Creek. Prior to 2009 this section of
Third Fork Creek was classified as C, NSW. But in 2009 this stream was reclassified as a WS -V
stream, as it is tributary to Jordan Lake. Though the unnamed tributary is not directly listed as
impaired it is considered part of Third Fork Creek which is impaired. The approved 2010 303(d)
list Third Fork Creek impaired for low dissolved oxygen, zinc, fecal, and biological integrity.
The cause of impairment is uncertain but urbanization is suspected.
Process
The GWR system consist of 10 capture wells, estimated to extract 10 gpm each, that connect to
a common manifold which then passes the combined flow through an influent meter and then a
bag filter which removes particulate and other solids. The bag filter is routinely replaced. The
filtered flow continues to the stripper air column and collects in the stripper sump. The sump is
pumped intermittently through two in series GAC filters and then through the effluent meter
before discharging to the outfall. The GAC filters are routinely replaced and disposed of by a
contractor service. The system may be shutdown in severe weather, there are on site personnel
that routinely check and maintain the system. A new cation replaceable filter was added to
reduce the manganese and met the new effluent manganese wqs limits.
The owner is required to collect data from various monitoring wells and the capture wells on an
annual bases, and submit this data with a report to Aquifer Protection. A copy of the most recent
report, 2009, was requested and has been received
Table A: Effluent Characteristics Monitoring History
Parameters
Isopropyl ether 1
Benzene
Carbon disulfide 2
Chloroethane
Chloroform 1
1, 1 -Dichloroethane '
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane(total) 1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene '
tert-butylbenzene 1
1,2,4-Trimethlybenzene 1
sec-butylbenzene
ethylbenzene 1
Methlyene chloride 1
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichlorethane 1
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes(total)
Bis(2ethylhexyl) phthalate
Naphthalene 1
Phenol 2
Methyl isobutyl ketone 1
2000
Permit
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2004 2005
Permit Permit
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
:4
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO086827
Page 2 of 5

Footnote:
1. Based on the fact that these constituents were not found at detectable levels in the
effluent for at least 12 months, a Major Modification for the permit was granted and
issued in 2004, and these parameters monitoring requirements were removed.
2. With no detection for 12 previous months, the Permittee petitioned for the removal of
these parameters. The removal was granted and include in the 2005 permit.
Permitting Strategy
To verify an acceptable cross-section of effluent -based pollutants are monitored to validate the
treatment process, the 2009 well data was evaluated. It was noted the wells contained several
pollutants in concentrations in excess of the WS water quality standard (see Table B).
Table B: Pollutants in Wells in Excess of Water Quality Standards
Not currently monitored in effluent except for annual EPA Method 624/625
Acetone
Aquatic Life Standard = 2.0 mg/1
wells data maximum = 44.0 mg/1
Chloroethane 1
Water Supply Standard = 12 µg/1
well data maximum = 9100 µg/1
Chloroform 1
Water Supply Standard = 5.6 µg/1
well data maximum = (est) 70 µg/1
cis 1,2 dichloroethylene 1
Water Supply Standard = 0.33 mg/1
well data maximum = 59.0 mg/1
1,1 dichloroethane 1
Water Supply Standard = 6.7 mg/l
well data maximum = 8.9 mg/1
Ethylbenzene 1
Aquatic Life Standard = 97 µg/1
well data maximum = 1600 µg/1
Methylene chloride 1
Water Supply Standard = 4.6 µg/1
well data maximum = 33000 µg/1
1,1,1 trichloroethane 1
Aquatic Life Standard = 2.5 mg/1
well data maximum = 24.0 mg/1
1 Monitored in 2000, removed from permit 2004
Currently monitored in effluent
Benzene
Water Supply Standard = 1.19 µg/1
1,1 dichloroethylene
Water Supply Standard = 0.33 mg/1
Tetrachloroethylene
Water Supply Standard = 0.7 µg/1
Toluene
Aquatic Life Standard = 11 µg/1
Trichloroethylene
Water Supply Standard = 2.5 µg/1
Vinyl chloride
Water Supply Standard = 0.025 µg/1
Total xylenes
Aquatic Life Standard = 0.67 mg/l
well data maximum = 120 µg/1
well data maximum = 5.4 mg/l
well data maximum = 2300 µg/1
well data maximum = 32000 µg/1
well data maximum = 5700 µg/1
well data maximum = 6100 µg/1
well data maximum = 9.0 mg/1
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO086827
Page 3 of 5

The 2008- 2010 DMR data including the annual EPA Method 624/625 (Full suite) was reviewed.
Pollutants of interest, solvents and chlorinated compounds, were reported as no detects
indicating the treatment system was performing satisfactory. No changes to the 624/625 annual
monitoring requirement is recommended.
The Permittee has requested removal of bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate monitoring. The reported
values are less than values but are not consistent repeated values. The newly required Water
Supply water quality standard, 1.2 14g/1, and previous Human Health water quality standard, 2.2
µg/1, could not be reconciled against the reported data. In discussions with the Permittee, it was
determined that the lab inconsistency was the primary cause. The lab has agreed to provide
future values following a minimum detection limit of 1.0 µg/1. Monitoring will remain
unchanged in this permit with a minimum detection requirement of 1.0 µg/1.
An RPA was performed for iron and manganese, and all organic parameters, using 2008 - 2010
DMR data and applying the applicable water supply standards. Since iron is an action level
parameter, and all the toxicity tests were passed, monitoring was reduced to quarterly. The less
than detects for the monitored organics by default yielded no justification to add limits.
However, 8 of the reported manganese values were above its newly defined Water Supply water
quality standard so a chronic limit will be added. To be consistent with EPA policy, both a
monthly and daily limit of 200 µg/1 will be applied. Since this is a new limit as a result of the
stream reclassification to WS -V in 2009, the Permittee consultant was contacted about the new
manganese limits. The consultant responded that a new filter canister (disposable cation media)
installation would be required to meet the new limits with a June 2011 completion date. Based
on comments from CG&L, no A to C required, and the anticipated effective date on the renewed
permit the Division foresee on compliance concerns.
A review of the latest well data, influent to the treatment works, continue to show the existing
monitored organic parameters as the pollutants of concern. No changes are recommended for the
existing organic parameters monitoring. Two additional organic parameters, not previously
monitored in the effluent, and in significant excess above water quality standards in the well data
were noted, acetone and cis-1,2dichloroethlyene. However, acetone and cis -1,2 dichloroethylene
should be easily reduced to below WQS by the current treatment process so quarterly
monitoring will be added to the permit as validation.
To be consistent with EPA policy, TSS will receive both a monthly and daily limit of 30 mg/l.
Based on the current NSW Jordan Rules this facility is not required to monitor nutrients so Total
Nitrogen monitoring will be removed. Oil and Grease monitoring will continue and a new
narrative statement about oily sheen in the discharge will be added.
Quarterly pH monitoring will be added to validate no issues. The receiving stream is impaired
for zinc so quarterly zinc monitoring will be added.
Toxiary TESTING:
Since 2005 the Permittee has conducted 19 chronic toxicity tests and had no failures. No changes
are recommended. The narrative will be updated to the current version.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0086827
Page 4 of 5

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
In keeping with Division policies the following will be incorporated into the permit:
• Monthly and daily limits for manganese will be added.
• Quarterly acetone and cis-1,2dichloroethylene monitoring will be added.
• Total nitrogen monitoring will be removed.
• Total iron monitoring will be reduced to quarterly.
• Quarterly pH and zinc monitoring will be added
• Monthly TSS limit will be added.
• A footnote narrative defining the minimum report limit of 1.0 µg/1 for bis (2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate will be added.
• The chronic toxicity special condition narrative will be updated.
• A narrative condition not allowing an oily sheen to be visible or traceable to the
discharge will be added.
• Supplement page treatment system list will be updated.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: April 27, 2011
Permit Scheduled to Issue: August 2011
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Ron Berry at [phone] or email ron.berryp@� ncdde�nr.go/v.
NAME: DATE:al
o `
REGIONAL OFFICE C0MN[ENTS
NAME: DATE:
SUPERVISOR: DA
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO086827
Page 5 of 5

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 29, 2011
MEMORANDUM
To: Michael Douglas
NCDENR / DEH / Regional Engineer
Raleigh Regional Office
From: Ron Berry
NCDENR / DWQ / NPDES – Complex Group
Central Raleigh Office
Subject: Review of draft NPDES Permit NCO086827
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. GWR
Durham County
Please complete this form to indicate your agency's position or viewpoint on this draft permit and return to me
by May 18, 2011. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at telephone number (919)
807-6396 or via e-mail at [e-mail].
RESPONSE: (Check one)
Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the
FYI stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated
water quality standards.
❑ Concurs with issuance of this permit, provided the following conditions are met:
1-1
Opposes the issuance of this permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
Signed MDate:
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 North (Carolina
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org ��atitra!!�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Pudic Notice
Nath Cardin Environmental
Management
Co mmis®aNJPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
• Raleigh. NC 27699.1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a
NPDES Wastewater Permit
The Nath Carolina Environ,
mental Maregsmert Commis
e era un Blow
Written comments regarding
I �I� the ted until permit will be as
l}Gv�l ac-
cepted until 30 days after the
publish date of this not! The
Director of the NC Division of
Water Quality (E)WO) may
hold a public hearing should
there be a significant degree of
pubic interest. Please mall
Affidavit of Publication comments andlor information
requests to DWQ at the above
address Interested perms
may visit the DWQ at 512 N.
Salisbury Street. Raleigh. NC
State of North Carolina, to review information at file
Additional information on
Durham Count NPDES permits and this notice
Y may be found on our website:
hftp://portW.node v. orghrabAwq
/swpips/npdeshalendar. or by
telling (919) W7-6UX.
To Whom It May Concern: Brenntag Southeast Inc. has
requested renewal of permit
This is to certif the NC 27 for the Branntag
Y facility in Durham County; this
Advertisement attached ground aterr ttogan 'unr6eedd
tributary to Third Fork Creak in
Hereto has been published the Cape Feer River Basin
in -
The Herald Sun
on the following dates:
S�-
Sworn o on this day
of —72011
0-0 -a &4:�"
Herald Sun Representa4ve
Sworn to and Subscribed
Before me this ;1 day
of C In ►� f- , 2011
Nbtak!� Public
�,0 whuvu i� p,�Ptw, 7Ia0l I

Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
NCO086827
H
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Qw (MGD) =
0.01
WWTP/WTP Class:
I
1Q10S (cfs) =
0.00
IWC 1Q10S =
100.00%
7Q10S (cfs) =
0.00
IWC 7Q10S =
100.00%
7Q10W (cfs) =
0.00
IWC 7Q IOW =
100.00%
3OQ2 (Cfs) =
0.00
IWC ® 30Q2 =
100.00•/6
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) =
0.00
IWC @ QA =
100.00%
Receiving Stream:
UT to Third Fork Creek Stream Class:
WS -V, NSW
Outfall 001
Qw=0.0144 MGD
PARAMETER
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
H
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
-J
F
NC WQS / Applied `/2 FAV /
I1 #Det Max Pred Allowable Cw
(1)
�
Chronic Standard Acute
Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Iron (AL)
NC
1 FW(7QIOs)
mg/I
23 17
1.1
Chronic: - ^ 1.00
RPA for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
No value > Allo"able Cw
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Acute: NO WQS
Manganese
NC
0.2 FW(7QIOs)
mg/i
23 22
4.8
_ _ ronic _ _
Ch0.20
RPA for non -AL - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
8 \alue(s) > Allowable Cw
may add compliance table
Acute: NO WQS
Benzene
C
1.19 WS(Qavg)
pg/l
10 0
0.5
_
_ _ _ _
Chronic 1.14
No RPA, Influent exceeds Allowable Cw - apply
No value > Allowable Cw
Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
B19(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
C
1.2 WS(Qavg)
pg/1
10 0
7.4
_ _ _nic _
Chro1.20
RPA for non -AL - but vailues Athan WQS and
10 val uc(s) > Al lowahle C%�
variable detect- apply special condition
Acute: NO WQS
1,1-dlchloroethylene
NC
330 WS(7QIOs)
pg/l
10 0
0.5
_ _
Chronic 330.00
No RPA , influent exceeds Allowable Cw - apply
No value > Allowable C'w
Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Tetrachloroethylene
C
0.7 WS(Qavg)
pgA
10 0
0.5
_ _ hronic _ _
C 0.70
No RPA, Influent exceeds Allowable Cw - apply
10 value(S)> Allowable C%%
Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Toluene
NC
11 FW(7QIOs)
pgA
10 0
0.5
_ _ _ _ _
--------
_ -W
Chronic 11.00
_ _ _
No RPA , Intluent exceeds Allowable Cw -apply
No value > AlkMable Cw
Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Trichloroethylene
C
2.5 WS(Qavg)
pg/l
10 0
0.5
_ _hronic _ _
C 2.50
No RPA, Influent exceeds Allowable Cw - apply
No value > Allowable C'w
Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Vinyl chloride
C
0.025 WS(Qavg)
µg/l
10 0
0.5
_
Chronic 0.03
_ _ _
RPA but all values < than detect & applicable PQL -
10 caluc(S) > Allo
apply Quarterly Monitoring influnet high
Acute: NO WQS
lNo
Total xylenes
NC
670 FW(7QIOs)
pgA
10 0
1.0
_nic
_ _ _
Chro670.00
RPA , Influent exceeds Allowable Cw - apply
No value > Allowable Cw
Quarterly Monftoring;
2011 RPA, rpe
Page 1 of 1 2!22/2011

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
. 1
02531
1.2155
23
3.8500
1.3 mg/
4.8 m9ll
+ : 2011 RP& data
2222011
Iron (AL)
l
Manganese
Date
Dalt
BDL=1/2DL
Results
• -
Date
Data
6DL=I2DL
Results
1
10282008
0.0989
0.0989
Std Dev
0.1188
1
10282008
00233
0.0233
Std Dev_
2
12/32008
0.42
0.42
Mean
0.1535
2
12/32008
0.265
0.265
Mean
3
1272009
0.38
1 0.38
C. V.
0.7738
3
1272009
0.0798
0.0798
CV
4
2272009
0.347
0.347
n
23
4
2272009
0.286
0.286
n
5
3262009
0.05
0.025
5
3262009
0.135
0.135
6
4282009
0.268
0.268
Muft Factor =
2.6300
6
428/1009
0.219
0.219
Mutt Factor =
7
5282009
0.107
0.107
Max Value
04 m9A
7
5282"
1.25
1.25
Max. Value
8
6/182009
0.0578
0.0578
Max Pred Cw
1.1 mgA
8
6/18/2009.
0.0345
0.0345
Max. Pred Cw
9
7282009
0.116
0.116
9
7282009
0.0241
0.0241
10
8242009
0.05
0.025
�� ;
10
8242009
0.015
0.0075
11
9292009
0.1
0.1
11
9292009
0.0241
00241
12
10/202009
0.0914
0.0914
12
10202009
0.0535
0-0535
13
12/12009
13
12/12009
14
12/212009
14
1222009
15
12/32009
15
12/32009
16
12/42009
'
16
12/42009
17
12/52009
17
12)52009
18
1262009
18
12162009
19
12!72009
19
12/72009
20
12/82009
20
12/8/2009
21
12192009
t41
21
12/92009
22
23
12/102009
12/112009
, , • °
22
12/102009
23
12/112009
24
12/122009
24
12/12/2009
25
12/13/2009
25
12/132009
26
12/142009
0.05
0.025
26
12/142009
0.0878
0.0878
27
12/192009
27
12/192009
28
12202009
28
12202009
29
12212009
1
29
1221/2009
30
12222009
30
12222009
31
12232009
31
1223/2009
32
12242009
32
12242009
33
12252009
,
33
12252009
34
12262009
1
34
12262009
35
12272009
35
12272009
,.. y ..
36
12282009
12/28/2009
37
12292009
37
12292009
r
38
121302009
38
12/302009
39
12x312009
39
12/'312009
40
1112010
40
1/12010
41
122010
41
122010
42
1132010
42
1 /3/2010
43
1/4/2010
43
1/4/2010
44
1/5/2010
44
1 /512010
45
1/612010
45
116/2010
46
1t712010
46
1172010
47
1/8/2010
47
1 /32010
48
1/92010
48
1/9/2010
49
1 /102010
49
1/10/2010
50
1n 12010
50
1/112010
51
1/12/2010
51
1/122010
52
V13/2010
52
1/132010
53
11152010
53
1/152010
54
1 M 62010
54
1/1612010
55
1/17/2010
55
1/17/2010
56
1 n 82010
56
1118/2010
57
1/192010
57
1/19/2010
58
1262010
0.1
0.05
58
1262010
0.13
0.13
59
2/1/2010
59
2112010
60
22/2010
60
2/7/2010
61
2162010
61
2/62010
62
2!72010
62
2!72010
63
2/82010
63
2/6/2010
64
2192010
-
- - _ -
-
64
Z9/2010-
192010-65
65
2/102010
t
i
65
2/10/2010
66
67
2/112010
2/122010
l��
i
{Q„�t�1 ' �+
66
67
2/112010 ,
2/122010
SS,
68
2/132010
PP 1111T
", I
68
2/132010
{
't
69
21142010
69
2/14/2010
02531
1.2155
23
3.8500
1.3 mg/
4.8 m9ll
+ : 2011 RP& data
2222011

SUMMER
HILLSBOROUGH
WWTP 3.0
MGD
SUMMER 7Q10
= 0.4 CFS
----------
MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger
: HILLSBOROUGH WWTP
Receiving Stream : ENO RIVER
-------
The End
------
D.O.
----------
-----------_--------
i s 7.84 mg/ 1. -
� � --- -----------------------------
--�- - -- - --- -� --
-- •
The End
CBOD
is 1..41 mg/1.
The End
--------------------
NBOD
is 0. 6 mg/1.
--------------
----------------------------------
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1) M lepoi
Reach #
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
(mgd)
Segment
1
------ -- -----
5.13 0
-------
1
----
----
--
----------
Reach
1
7.50
9.00
5.00
3.00000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
$ tom-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
5
r 2 �
3
0.00.
0.00
0.00
0.00000
rT.T-..
r~t'
WI A
v. j
,..�.
-L-�JDji, ..
;v,.-AOD . .
(mq
r
U.Ui;
JC

I
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
70
2!152010
70
2/152010
71
2/162010
71
2/162010
72
2/172010
:,�, i
72
2/172010
err i ;
r
73
2242010
0.11
0.11
73
224!2010
0.19
0.19
74
3/52010
74
3152010
75
3/672010
�
75
3/6/2010
76
3/72010
76
3/72010
77
3182010
77
3!82010
11..1 (.�•hi
'�i : •!
78
3/92010
78
3/92010
79
3!102010
79
3/102010
s
80
3/112010
80
3/112010
,.
81
3/122010
2011 RPA, data r
81
3/122010
82
3/132010
82
3/132010
83
3/142010
83
3/142010
84
3/152010
84
3/152010
85
3/1612010
85
3/162010
86
3/172010
86
3/17/2010
87
3/182010
87
3/182010
88
3/192010
88
3/192010
69
3202010
89
3202010
90
3212010
90
3212010
91
3222010
91
322/2010
92
3242010
0.1
0.05
92
3242010
0.18
0.18
93
4/132010
93
4/132010
94
4/142010
94
4/142010
95
47152010
95
4/152010
96
4/16201096
.
4/162010
_
�.
97
4/172010
97
4/172010
f
98
47182010
98
4/182010
99
4/192010
99
4/192010
100
4202010
100
4/202010
101
4212010
F
101
4/212010
102
4222010
r .; �o , _ t.
102
41222010.
:y
103
4272010
0.23
0.23
103
4272010
0.17
0.17
104
5272010 z''
0.11
0.11 ;
104
5272010
0.092
0.092
105
6242010 ''
0.1
0.05
105
6242010
0.069
0 069
106
7272010
0.27
0.27
106
7272010
044
0-44
107
8232010 ';I?
0.22
0.22
107
8232010
0.6
0.6
108
9272010 "
0.23
0.23
108
9272010
0.79
0.79
109
10/192010
0.15
0.15
,
109
10/192010
0.67
0.67
1 2
110
110
:,�, i
• ��,
��. r
err i ;
r
� �'.,
1�
ra tF i { ,��
�ry: �.
,
�
iii
Yt
::,
t{ :I.
11..1 (.�•hi
'�i : •!
k .,a `'1 ' I!
T(rl . R, T ',
��F 1j1 ar�. lt.' �f�.y .
��'`' _'may.(• {
1
s
i
t
,.
t
2011 RPA, data r
-2-
2/22/2001

A14!ice fxj;;i
x,786`'8 0.5; '�<S 46
1 5 13.7 ►„�`
$ .46
84�
Seg # Reach • # . Seg 'Mi 1;1.a). . +' , �, Q iJ D
•i

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
2011 RPA� data
-2- ' 2222041
Benzene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Date
Data
BDL=112DL
Results•
-
Date
Dale
BDL--Ir2DL
Results
• '
1
7/22/2008
4
1
05
Std Dev.
0.0000
1
7/2212008
c
11.1
5.55
Std Dev_
0.4490
2
101282006
4
1
0.5
Mean
0.5000
2
102820w
11.1
5.55
Mean
5.2365
3
1272009
�;
1
0.5
C.V.
0.0000
3
1272009
oi;
9.43
4.715
C. V
0.0857
4
4282009
-6
1
0.5
n
10
4
4282009
a":;
10.5
5.25
n
10
5
7282009
:.
1
0.5
5
7282009
::
10.4
5.2
6
10202009
1
0.5
Mult Factor =
1.0000
6
10/202009
9.7
4.85
Mutt Factor =
1.1900
7
1262010
1
0.5
Max. Value
0.5 NgA
7
1262010
10
5
Max Value
6.3 NgA
8
4272010
1
0.5
Max. Pred Cw
0.5 NgA
8
4/772010
10
5
Max Pred Cw
7.4 N9A
9
7272010
1
0.5
9
7272010
10
5
10
10/192010
1
0.5
10
10/192010
12.5
6.25
11
11
2011 RPA� data
-2- ' 2222041

Seg #
Reach #
Seg Mi
D.O.
1
1
0.00
5.18
1
1
0.28
5.14
1
1
0.57
5.13
1
1
0.85
5.15
1
1
1.13
5.19
1
1
1.42
5.25
1
1
1.70
5.32
1
1
1.98
5.39
1
1
2.27
5.48
1
1
2.55
5.56
1
1
2.84
5.65
1
1
3.12
5.74
1
1
3.40
5.83
1
1
3.69
5.92
1
1
3.97
6.00
1
1
4.25
6.09
1
1
4.54
6.17
1
1
4.82
6.25
1
1
5.10
6.33
1
1
5.39
6.40
1
1
5.6
6.47
1
2
5.67
6.47
1
2
5.93
7.13
1
2
6.19
7.45
1
2
6.45
.62
1
2
6.71
71
1
2
6.97
7.76
1
2
7.23
7. 9
1
2
7.49
7.8
1
3
7.49
7.8
1
3
7:74
7:
1
3
8:00
7. 7
1
3
8:25
7.48
1
3
8.51
.41
1
3
8.76
7.36
1
3
9.01
7.33
1
3
9.27
7.31
1
3
9.52
7.29
1
3
9.7
7.28
1
3
10: 3
7:28
1
3
10.28
7.29
1
3
.54
7.30
1
3
0.79
7.31
1
3
11:05
7.32
1
3
11.30
7:34
1
4
11.30
7.34
1
4
11.53
7.63
1
4
11.76
7:78
1
4
11,99
7:87
1
4
12:22
7.92
1
4
12.45
7..95
1
4
12.68
7.96
1
5
12.68
7:96
1
5
12.89
7.93
1
5
13.10
7.90
-1 a
i 5
13.31
7.88
SUMMER
HILLSBOROUGH WWTP 3.0 MGD
SUMMER
7Q10 = 0.4 CFS
CBOD
NBOD
Flow
7.06
8.37
5.05
6.83
7.92
5.06
6.61
7.49
5.07
6.39
7.09
5.08
6.18
6.71
5.08
5.98
6.35
5.09
5.78
6.01
5.10
5.59
5.69
5.11
5.41
5.38
5.12
5.23
5.09
5.13
5.06
4.82
5.14
4.89
4.56
5.14
4.73
4.32
5.15
4.58
4.0
5.16
4.43
3 7
5.17
4.28
.66
5.18
4.14
3.46
5.19
4.01
3.28
5.19
3.88
3.10
5.20
3.75
2.94.
_ 5.21
3.6
2.:78:,
1--15.22
3.
2.78'',
5.22
-3' 3
2.62
5:23
.44
2.47
5.24
.35
2.32
5.24
3.27
2:19
5.25
3.18
2.06
5.26
3.10
1.94
5.27
3.02
1:83
5.27
3.02
�:83
5.27
2.93
1:73
5:28
2:83
1.64
5:29
2.74
1.56
5.30
2.66
1.47
5.31
2:57
1:40
5.31
.49
1.32
5.32
2 41
1.25
5.33
2. 4
1.19
5.34
2: 6
�.12
5.34
2.'1
1.06
5:35
2:1
1.01
5:36
2.06
0.96
5.37
1.99
0.91
5.37
1.93
0:86
5.38
1.87
0.81
5.39
1.87
0.81
5.39
1:83
0.'77
5.40
1:79
Q:73
5.40
1:74
0.'69
5:41
1:70
0.65
5:42
1.67
0.62
5.42
1.63
0.59
5.43
1.63
0.59
5.43
1.59
0:56
5.44
1.55
0.54
5.44
1:51
0.'52
5.45

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
2011 RPA, data
- 3 - 22220x11
1,1 -dichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Date Data
BDL=IrML
Results
• .
Date
Data
6DL=I/2DL
Results
Values" MT,'
• -
1 7222008 a
1
0.5
Std Dev
0.0
1
7222008
c 1
05
Std Dev
0.0000
2 1028200B ,,*',
1
0.5
Mean
0.5
2
10282008
ci 1
0.5
Mean
05000
3 1272009
1
0.5
C.V.
0.0
3
1272009
1
0,5
C V
0.0000
4 4282009 ;,
1
0.5
n
10.0
4
4282009
1
0.5
n
10
5 7282009 _
1
0.5
5
7282009
1
0.5
6 10202009 `.
1
0.5
Muff Factor =
1.0
6
10202009
1
0.5
Mutt Factor =
1.0000
7 1262010 ;'
1
0.5
Max Value
0.5 NgA
7
1262010
1
0.5
Max_ Value
0.5 NgA
8 4272010
1
0.5
Max. Pred Cw
0.5 NgA
8
4272010
1
0.5
Max. Pred Cw
0.5 NgA
9 7272010
1
0.5
9
7272010
1
05
10 101192010 ,'
1
0.5
10
10/19/2010
1
0.5
11
11
2011 RPA, data
- 3 - 22220x11

C
0000010
00'0
00'0
0010
c) �S
9
140eaH
00000'0
00'0
00'0
00'0
S
goleaH
00000'0
00'0
00'0
00'0
uoleaH
00000'0
00'0
00'0
00'
E
uDleaH
00000'0
00'0
00'0
00 0
z
uoleaH
00000'1
00'S
08'0
'z
T
uolegH
T%9'T
LT'S
T
:tuaw6as
-- (Pf5m) ---
WSW)
(1/Sul)
(1/Sul) # Kalea
quTodalTw
(1/6ui)
Moja a:lsleM
OQ
MEN
aOSO
UTw OQ
------------
---------------------------------------------------------
*115W
So'o ST
aOE[N
PUS aus
' 1/ btu
0 E' 0 S T
aOSO
Pus aT4i
'1/6w
E6•L ST
'O'a
Pus aw,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------ -- —
--- --- -- - -
- -
2iSAI2i- OI�iS
IUVQagS 6UTAT909H
dIMM
HJAOHOSS'IZIH
:
za6zleuasTa
----------
Ssznssu zsaow----------
oToz
Os 600z
sacmaAv
uwa
SOTOL SaD
VO
'
,daw Ills
'

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Toluene. ; , , Trichloroethylene
Date
Data
BDL=I2DL
Results
,U
Date Data
BDL=I2DL
Results SOMMOji
"
1 7/2212008
<
1
05
Std Dev
00000
1
722/2008
1
05
Std Dev
0.0000
2 10/28/2008
+
1
0.5
Mean
0.5000
2
102811008
1
0.5
Mean
0.5000
3 1272009
t:
1
0.5
C.V.
0 0000
3
1/772009
1
0.5
C V.
0.0000
4 4282009
C,
1
0.5
n
10
4
4282009
1
0.5
n
10
5 7282009
:!4
1
0.5
5
7282009
1
0.5
6 10202009
<
1
0-5
Mult Factor =
10000
6
10202009
1
0.5
Mutt Factor =
1.0000
7 1262010
1
0-5
Max. Value
0.5 Ng/l
7
1262010
1
0.5
Max. Value
0.5 Ngll
8 4272010
1
0.5
Max. Pred Cw
0 5 Ng/I
8
4272010
1
0.5
Max- Prod Cw
0.5 Ngn
9 7272010;
1
0.5
9
7272010
1
0.5
10 10/192010
1
0.5
10
10/192010
1
0.5
11
11
,
2011 RPA, data
- 4 - 2/22 Ql 1

?
15
1
00000'0
00'0
00'0
00'0
9
-gova-d
00000,0
00*0
00*0
00.0
-G� f��
S
T.jDLag
00000'0
00'0
00'0
00'0
00000' 0
0010
00' 0
00'
£
110'e;DH
00000.0
00.0
00' 0
00'
z,
uoleaH
00000'£
00'S
00'6
0 'L
T
uoieaU
T
Ti9 ' T
S S' T
T
quain6as
(P6tu)
WSW)
(T/Sul)
(T/btu) #
rga2aH
:IuiodaTTW
(T/bw)
Moja a:ISeM
OQ
QOEIN
QOHO
Urw OQ
V IM
v'IM
vum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
' T /6ul
9 S' 0 el
QOHN
puS 9'q L
'T/6u'
TV'T ST
QOHO
PUH au,L
---
- - - --- --
-. _..
_ ' T/bw
VL G Si
'O'Q
PUS auy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2iSAI2i ONS s Me;9.z'4S 6utAT909H
dIMM HJAOHOHS'I'IIH :
za6zEu�SiQ
----------
sirmsS?i
'ISaow
----------
TT/6Z/£ S.LIWI'I ZINHHd `NIISIXS
SOTOL SaD
rv' 0
damns

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Total xylenes
Vinyl chloride
Results
2 1
Std Dev
2 1
Mean
Date Data
C.V.
BDL=l2M
Results
• -
Date Data
1
71222008 e
1
05
Std Dev_
0.0000
1
72212008 <.
2
10/282008 ±
1
0.5
Mean
0 5000
2
10282008
3
1272009 •,
1
0.5
C V.
0.0000
3
11272009
4
4282009
1
0.5
n
10
4
4282009
5
7282009
1
0.5
5
7282009
6
101202009
1
0.5
Mull Factor =
1.00
6
10202009 'cwi
7
1262010
1
0.5
Max. Value
0.5 Fg/I
7
1262010
8
4272010
1
0.5
Max. Pred Cw
0.5 pg/1
8
4272010
9
7272010
1
0.5
9
7272010 #'
10
10/192010
1
0.5
10
10/192010
11
11
Total xylenes
BDL=120L
Results
2 1
Std Dev
2 1
Mean
2 1
C.V.
2 1
n
2 1
2 1
Mutt Factor =
2 1
Max- Value
2 1
Max. Pred Cw
2 1
2 1
1.00
0.00
10
1.0000
1.0 Ngo
1.0 Ngrl
2011 RPA, data
- 5 - 2/2212011
.

Mot3
aosN
a0w)
'O'Q
Tw bag
bas
vZ' S
LS' 0
E5, 1
ZL' L
TS' E
9
T
ilZ' S
LS' 0
ED, T
ZL' L
Lri' £T
9
T
tz, S
8S'0
:V:'T
ZL'L
EV ET
9
T
tiZ' S
8S' 0
SVT
ZL' L
6E' £T
9
T
EZ'S
85'0
SVI
ZL'L
SUET
9
T
EZ'S
6S'0
9V T
ZL'L
TE'ET
9
T
EZ'S
6S'0
LV T
TL'L
LZ'ET
9
T
EZ'S
0910
LV T
TL'L
EZ'ET
9
T
EZ'S
09'0
8TIIT
TL'L
6T'
9
T
EZ'S
19'0
6VI
TL'L
SUET
9
T
EZ'S
1910
6V T
TL'L
'ET
9
T
EZ'S
Z9'
OS'T
TL'L
LVET
9
T
ZZ'S
Z9'0
TS'T
OL'L
EO'ET
9
1
ZZ'S
E9'0
ZS'T
OL'
667ZT
9
T
ZZ'S
E9'0
ZS'T
0 'L
S6'ZT
9
T
ZZ'S
t,9'0
ES'T
'L
16'ZT
9
T
ZZ'S
t,9'0
S'T
OCL
L8'ZT
9
T
ZZ'S
S9'0
'T
OCL
E8'ZT
9
T
ZZ'S
S9'0
S 'T
69'L
6L'ZT
9
T
ZZ'S
99'0
95'
69'L
SL'ZT
9
T
ZZ'S
99'0
LS'
69'L
TL'ZT
9
T
TZ'S
L9'0
'T
69'L
L9'ZT
9
T
TZ'S
L9'0
8S'T
69'L
E9'ZT
9
T
TZ'S
89'0
6S'T
69'L
6S'ZT
9
T
TZ'S
89'0
09'T
89'L
SS'ZT
9
1
TZ'S
69'
09'T
9'L
TS'ZT
9
T
TZ'S
6 0
19'1
8 'L
LVZT
9
T
TZ'S
L'0
Z91T
8 'L
EV ZT
9
T
TZ'S
OL'0
E9'T
89 L
6E'ZT
9
T
OZ'S
TL'0
E9'1
89'L
S£'ZT
9
T
OZ'S
ZL'0
fii9'T
L9'L
TE'ZT
9
T
OZ'
ZL'O
S9'1
L9'L
LZ'ZT
9
T
0 S
EL'0
99'1
L9'L
EZ'Z1
9
T
'S
EL'0
L9'T
L9'L
61'ZT
9
T
OZ'S
tL'O
L9'T
L9'L
S1'ZT
9
T
OZ'S
tL'0
89'T
L9'L
TT'ZT
9
T
OZ'S
SL'0
69'1
L9'L
LO'ZT
9
T
6T'S
9L'0
OCT
L9'L
EO'ZT
9
T
6T'S
9L'0
TL'T
99'L
66'11
9
T
6T'S
LL'O
TL'T
99'L
S6'TT
9
T
6T'S
LL'0
ZL'T
99'L
T6'TT
9
T
6T'S
8L'0
EL'T
99'L
L8'TT
9
T
6T'S
6L'0
TL'T
99'L
E8'TT
9
T
6T'S
6L'0
SL'T
99'L
6L'TT
9
T
6T'S -
08'0
- SL'T --
-99'-L -
SUIT
9
T
6T'S
T8'0
9L'T
99'L
TL'TT
9
1
8T'S
T8'0
LCT
99'L
L9'TT
9
T
8T'S
Z8'0
8L'T
99'L
E9'11
9
1
81'S
Z8'0
6L'T
99'L
6S'TT
9
T
8T'S
E8'0
08'T
S9'L
SS'TT
9
T
8T S.
t8'Ci
TO T' .�,
9.9`L
TS'TT
9
'� f

Verbal description of GWR treatment operation Brenntag Durham from phone call 1/19/11 with James O
Shilliday.
9 active collection wells (pneumatic driven) tie to common manifold which passes the combined flow
through a bag filter to remove particulate and other solids. The bag filter is routinely replaced. The
filtered flow continues to the stripper column and collects in the stripper sump. The sump is pumped
intermittently through two in series GAC filters and then through the effluent meter before discharging
to the outfall. The GAC filters are routinely replaced and disposed of by a contractor service. The system
may be shutdown in severe weather, there are on site personnel that check and maintain the system.
Note: Requested a copy of the last groundwater well analysis report.
Mr. Shilliday asked bout the removal of the Bis compound monitoring from the permit.
x
J

v
J
TABLE 3 OF 503.13.
POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
Pollutant
Monthly average
concentration (milligr
per kilogram)'
Arsenic................................................
Cadmium.............................................
Copper................................................
Lead...................................................
Mercury..............................................
Nickel............................ .................
Selenium.............................. .........
Zinc........................................... ...
41
39
1500
300
17
420
100
2800
Dry weight basis.
TABLE 4 OF 503.13.
ANN L POLLUTANT LOADING RATES
Annual pollutant loading rate
/pollutant
(kilograms per hectare per
365 day period)
Arsenic.... .........................................
2.0
Cadmium... ..........................................
1.9
Copper................................................
75
Lead...................................................
15
Mercury...............................................
0.85
— ._.._— Y---- --- - - 21 -
Nickel...._ ...:. ............. ..,.-
Selenium..............................................
5.0
Zinc....................................................
140
Sludge sold or given away in a bag or container cannot exceed the ceiling concentrations
illustrated in Table 1. Sludge land applied must either not exceed the cumulative loadings in
Table 2 or must be less than the limits in Table 3 (high quality sludge). Sludge applied to a lawn
or home garden must comply with the limits in Table 3. If sludge is sold or given away in a bag
\\G-PC1\D805\FTL\2007\CL.201P06.TXT 37

NC 2010 Integrated Report Categories 4 and 5 Impaired Waters
All 13,123 Waters in NC are in Category S -303(d) List for Mercury due to statewide fish consumption advice for several fish species
AU Number AU_Name AU_Description LengthArea AU_Units Classification
Category Parameter Reason for Rating Use Category Collection Year 303(d)year
Cape Fear River Basin B Everett Jordan Lake -New Hope River Watershed 0303000206
Q 16-41-(0.5) New Hope River Arm From source at confluence of Morgan Creek 1,199.8 FW Acres WS -
of B. Everett Jordan and New Hope Creek Arm of B. Everett IV,B;NSW,CA
Lake (below normal Jordan Lake (a east -west line across the
pool elevation) southern tip of the formed penisula) to
Chatham Co
4t Chlorophyll a Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008 0`
0
5 Turbidity Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008 `V
Q 16-41-1-17-(0.7)a Northeast Creek From US Hwy 55 to Durham Triangle WWTP 3.3 FW Miles WS-IV;NSW
5 Copper Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
4t Fecal Coliform (recreation) Standard Violation Recreation 2008 1998
�n
5 Low Dissolved Oxygen Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
5 Turbidity Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Q 16-41-1-17- Northeast Creek From Durham Triangle WWTP to Kit Creek 3.3 FW Miles WS-IV;NSW 3
(0.7)bl
5 Zinc Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008 v
Q 16-41-1-17- Northeast Creek From Kit Creek to a point 0.5 mile 3.2 FW Miles WS-IV;NSW
(0.7)b2 downstream of Panther Creek
5 Copper Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
4t Fecal Coliform (recreation) Standard Violation Recreation 2008 1998
✓j
5 Turbidity Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008 A
5 Zine Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008 v
Q 16-41-1-12-(1) Third Fork Creek From source to a point 2.0 miles upstream 5.2 FW Miles C;NSW
of NC Hwy. 54
4s EcologicaUbiologial Integrity Benthos Poor Bioclassification Aquatic Life 1993 2008
N
4t Fecal Coliform (recreation) Standard Violation Recreation 2008 1998
S Low Dissolved Oxygen Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
5 Zinc Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Q 16-41-1-12-(2) Third Fork Creek From a point 2.0 miles upstream of NC 3.9 FW Miles WS-IV;NSW
HWY. 54 to New Hope Creek
5 Copper Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
4s Eeologial/blologial Integrity Benthos Poor Bioclassification Aquatic Life 1993 2008
4t Fecal Coliform (recreation) Standard Violation Recreation 2008 1998
S Low Dissolved Oxygen Standard Violation Aquatic Life 2008 2008
Cape Fear River Basin Roberson Creek -Haw River Watershed 0303000207
NC 2010 Integrated Report Category 4 and 5 303(d) List EPA Approved Aug 31, 201 9/20/2010 Page 8 of 145

RE Questions.about new limits in Brenntag southeast Inc. GWR NPDES Permit - NC00868272nd reply
From: Berry, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:40 PM
To: 'shilliday, Jim'
Subject: RE: Questions about new limits in Brenntag Southeast Inc. GWR NPDES
Permit - NC0086827
Jim,
Thanks for the information. For the manganese, prior to issuing the final permit I
will send you a draft
of the special condition text with a compliance date we will add to the permit. One
thing to remember
is to include time to obtain an Authorization to construct from the DWQ construction
Grants and
Loans section. I assume there is no additional waste streams being generated as the
CG -8 resin will be
replaced once spent.
The bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate issue is ultimately going to be addressed by the
lab ability to 1)
provide viable data demonstrating no effluent exceedance of the limit or to 2)
provide viable data
demonstrating problems with measuring this parameter or to 3) provide viable data
demonstrating
effluent exceedance of the limit. In any case, we can not wait until the manganese
treatment system
is in place. Is there some concern about interaction from the treatment system? If
there is an analytical
problem then we need the lab to advise you on the cause and possible solution which
in turn we will
require formal documentation.
If you have any questions let me know.
Ron
Ron Berry [e-mail]
Engineer I
DWQ/Point Source/NPDES Complex Permitting unit
NCDENR
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
office: Archdale Building Room 925N
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: shilliday, Jim[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:49 AM
To: Berryy, Ron
Cc: [e-mail]; Twamley, David
Subject: RE: Questions about new limits in Brenntag southeast Inc. GWR NPDES Permit
- NC0086827
Mr. Berry,
we have done some research regarding the two issues raised in your e-mail and the
below text
should address both issues.
1) Treatment of extracted groundwater to reduce manganese concentrations
Based on the information that you have provided below and information from the DwQ
Page 1

James & James Environmental Management, Inc.
+ 3801 Asheville Hwy., Hendersonville, N. C. 28791
OFFICE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
April 9, 2010
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qua.lity/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1617 \
Regarding All Waste Water Facilitie�\Operated by James & J
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is to request the renewal for the
Home Park, NPDES number NC0062634.
Sincerely
Juanita 2es
James and James Environmental Mgt., Inc.
facility of Wedgefield Acres Mobile
4AIA l/i/�f

RE Questions about new limits in Brenntag Southeast Inc. GWR NPDES Permit - NC00868272nd reply
website,
we understand that Third Fork creek was reclassified to a water supply (ws) stream
(actual
classification being ws-Iv) on August 11, 2009. The classification of ws-Iv applies
to Third
Fork creek from its source to a point 2.0 miles upstream of N.C. Highway 54.
Because of this
reclassification a surface water Quality Standard of 200 micrograms per liter (µg/L)
now applies
for manganese for surface water in Third Fork creek and its tributaries. The
treated
groundwater for the groundwater remediation system at the Brenntag Durham facility
currently
discharges to an unnamed tributary to Third Fork creek; therefore, it appears that
our new
NPDES Permit will stipulate a discharge limit of 200 Ng/L for manganese. since
activation of
our groundwater remediation system in 2002, we have detected concentrations of
manganese in
our discharge at concentrations ranging from a high of around 3,000 Ng/L to a low of
<50 Ng/L.
The typical manganese concentration range that we have seen over the past 2 years
has been
<50 pg/L to 380 pg/L. Because the potential exists for our discharge to exceed the
200 pg/L
limit for manganese that will be imposed in the new NPDES Permit, we will need to
modify our
current water treatment system to address manganese. we have engaged in discussions
with
one of our subcontractors regarding the type of equipment that would be best suited
for removal
of manganese from our effluent discharge. we supplied the subcontractor with a data
summary
table that lists the concentrations of manganese that have been detected in the
effluent samples
for the past several years. Based on our conversation with the subcontractor, they
recommend
using a strong acid cation resin called CG -8. Reportedly this type of resin is
specifically
designed to treat metals. To incorporate this technology we would add another vessel
for the
CG -8 resin after the two granular activated carbon (GAC) vessels. we are working
with our
subcontractor right now to determine how much resin we would need and how often it
would
need to be replaced. I anticipate having this data in the next week or so. we
would like to have
approximately a 3 month timeframe to purchase the new equipment, have it installed,
and test it.
So I think a realistic timeframe for having this additional equipment up and running
is June 30.
2) Reporting limit and NPDES discharge limit for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
As discussed above, it is understood that Third Fork creek and its headwater
tributaries were
reclassified to a water supply stream (ws-iv) in 2009. Because of this
reclassification a surface
water Quality standard of 1.2 Ng/L now applies for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
It is our
understanding that our new NPDES Permit will stipulate a discharge limit of 1.2 Ng/L
for bis (2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate. The standard Method 625 analysis which we have been using
Page 2

Permit NCO � 11 '
A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY MONITORING (QUARTERLY) -D T
The permittee shall conduct uarterl chronic toxicity tests using test proZb
outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised 1998, or subsequent
versions.
The effluent concentration defined as treatment two in the procedure d ument is 90 %. The testing
shall be performed as a Ceriodaphnia dubia 7day pass/fail test. The to s will be performed during the
months of February, May, August, and November. Effluent sampling or this testing shall be performed
at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment cesses.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit coon/on on will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -1) for the month in which it w performed, using the parameter code
TGP3B. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-] (orig*) is to be sent the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / Q / En ironmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Servi Ce er
Raleigh, N.C. 276 621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed :!c Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for w ch the port is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and inclu all support" chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as 11 as all dose/res nse data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured d reported if chlorine " employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow: the acility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the info ation located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit n r, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the co ent area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Section at the ad dr ss cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor d "ng a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin imm ately. Upon submission of a valid test, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in a months specified above.
Should any test data from this monito ng requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality indicate potential " pacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monit "ng requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pol tant more frequently then required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in a calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR and AT
Forms.
NOTE: Failure to achieve to t conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimu control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls,
shall constitute an invalid st and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later
than the last day of the mo; following the month of the initial monitoring.

RE Questions about new limits in Brenntag southeast Inc. GWR NPDES Permit - NC00868272nd reply
to analyze
for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate since we first started effluent sampling in 2002
provides a
reporting limit (RL) of 10 Ng/L; therefore, we will need to utilize a different
analytical procedure
for testing for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate that will provide a RL of 1.0 Ng/L.
The analytical
laboratory that we utilize on this project (Test America) has indicated that they
can provide a
consistent RL of 1.0 Ng/L for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate using Method 8270 Low
Level (LL).
Test America will use the full liter of water collected for the analysis,
concentrate it to 0.5
milliliters and analyze that extract. This will provide a RL of 1 Ng/L. The new
NPDES Permit will
need to stipulate use of EPA Method 8270 Low Level for analysis of bis
(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
Please note that because of the ubiquitous nature of bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in
all things
made of plastic, there is a concern that detections of bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
could be
associated with plastic piping associated with the groundwater extraction and
treatment system.
we would like to wait to implement this change in analytical procedures following
completion of
our installation and testing of the strong acid cation resin unit for treatment of
manganese. so
this new analytical procedure would be implemented after June 30.
Please let us know if you would like to discuss these items in more detail.
Thanks
Jim
From: Berry, Ron [mailto:ron.berrygncdenr.gov]
sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 3:52 PM
To: Shilliday, Jim
subject: Questions about new limits in Brenntag Southeast Inc. GWR NPDES Permit -
NC0086827
Mr. shilliday:
This is a follow up to the a voice message I previously left. I would like to
resolve some issues and
pending items prior to issuing the draft permit for Brenntag southeast Inc. GWR.
We have completed evaluation of all pertinent data for renewing the NPDES permit for
Brenntag
southeast Inc. GWR. Two significant items you need to be aware of, and we request
your input for
are:
1) The receiving stream classification was reclassified in 2009 to water supply
(WS). As a result,
several reported effluent manganese levels already exceed the WS water quality
standard,
200 pg/1. our evaluation indicate this discharge will continue to violate the 200
pg/l water
quality standard, and as such a limit will be applied in the new permit. we prefer
to work with
the Permittee to establish a compliance time line that is acceptable by the
Page 3

000t•zx »yDs y1JON
• •
�laas� �anea8 Iwea»S SUTAI3aay
90£06 :Utseggnc
d.LM • d xmiS
QUI d Ino]y-3 :sszl:) wea»S
3N01a :# Penb
Z 9 Z Z 8 0 0 J N ..e£so28 :aPw!$uo'i
..60,SS.S£ :aPrL)!Wj
J / ` tr• � , �i � , � � ^moi. •� j�-����+ ' . �
., r ••ate �.! = / ` S•�"H:..� �
• / � \\ �
;u_' Lila u w 1 ' � ♦ •\
( - \�
'U43 lep
Ad a
q ' _ „ ,�• � j' 1/ !^���a'►• � � '•� t IP4l.�Sf. •� � . � __ � I -tel ,
i• r ! w�r. lace.:)4"a13 / •I .. ••v }'1 .� - / _'I •s •ter.
A Ulu)
966
Oc 811w,
11H mQ
j au
IN
Nk
RM 0,19kf
.,,L tri � 1, ,1• .J•.� .��� �, -)� I� .
- -S•'-• o+t''s� �—. " (:�✓� � ��.- ��^Ff''�1 I SII 1 f �'� i`•; �' a••,` 1 ,! . • i
"' I _�ri � ; I \ l�W '�. - II II• �` o I; —f.• j1.��+x
i • 1 •).r ��.{�',I
..., �.' ,� t. �,•r'r i;l� ` ..99J�' •'� /�1; ' I,i 'Iau-
At_ . \_ *" . _.1 \r1 '^ S Iti 1 I _�_- �'_•. �-, •I�•' (`��y`4' rl I '�•.
9
-

RE Questions about new limits in Brenntag southeast Inc. GWR NPDES Permit - NC00868272nd reply
Division to allow for
design and installation of the necessary treatment equipment. we need to determine a
tentative schedule and narrative for this permit.
2) The bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate pollutant is going to receive a limit, 1.2
pg/1, in the new permit.
we recognize this is an on going issue and may be a lab issue. However, the data
provided is
not of sufficient detection to eliminate this concern. In the new permit a limit
will be imposed.
Recommend you discuss with the labyou use and see if they can succeed in providing
consistent good data, detection to less than 1 Ng/1, and make changes in the
sampling process
to eliminate the cross contamination. we can discuss options based on what
information your
lab can provide.
I am very interested in any information you can provide in regards to the above.
Ron Berry [e-mail]
Engineer I
DWQ/Point Source/NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
NCDENR
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
office: Archdale Building Room 925N
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of ARCADIS
U.S., Inc. and its
affiliates. All rights, including without limitation copyright, are reserved. The
proprietary information
contained in this e-mail message, and any files transmitted with it, is intended for
the use of the
recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified
that you have received this e-mail in error and that any review, distribution or
copying of this e-mail or
any files transmitted with it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete the original message and any files transmitted. The
unauthorized use of
this e-mail or any files transmitted with it is prohibited and disclaimed by ARCADIS
U.S., Inc. and its
affiliates. Nothing herein is intended to constitute the offering or performance of
services where
otherwise restricted by law.
Page 4

S0/0 dIM-J
• q0 �ajsd, .
)•asuabo 11upLuis 9.10J
gloq io 'saeaA S uegl ajow lou luawuosudwt so 000'SZ$ uegl a.iow lou Jo au!; is Xq luawgstund s sapinosd 100
uotlaaS 'O'S'n 8I) 'gloq Xq [o 'sgluow xis paaaxa of lou luawuosudw► Aq so 100019Z$ paaaxa of lou aug a Sq
algegstund Joueawapsiw a;o ,411pn8 aq Ilegs 'apnjy Imp Suiluawaldwt uoissiwwoo luawa8eue Ieluawuonnu3
agl ;o suopeln8ai io I Z aptuy iapun paupnutew to palaiado aq of pamnbas poglaw jo atnap Suuoltuow
.ao 8utp.1030a clue alemoogui slapuas SISutmomi io 'glinm s.iadwel 'saytsle,I ogM io 'apply egl Su. uawaldwt
uotssiwwo3 luawaBeuelp lMuawuollnu3 agl Jo suotlelt Sal so 1z appiv sapun pautelu w aq of paunbal
io salg luawnoop aaglo jo 'usld 'uodw 'p.ioaa.i 'uotleatldde Cue ut uotleat;T to 'uon uasaidai luawalels
aspsj Cue sa)lew Al2utmoull ogM uosiad SUV :1eg1 sapinoid )Z))q) 9'SIZ-Ctl alnlelS I$ uaq eutloseo glaoH
a113a ueatlddy 3o aln;euS S
ailt,L sut uosi 3o auisu ud
•a;ssnaas pas 'o;al#po:g
'asl aol;s�opq Rang Jo q pun aapolAoug La[ jo ;soq
ag; o; ;sg; pus aol;salldds a;aoa sopsauo,;al otp Id rslllsas3 gas I 3sg4 Anizaa I
uolT$aUT4303 ;usallddV 'LT
s Salsn po;snla&o aq nsgs s;usld spotaso
ON ❑ s*A ❑ d
iauzo;sna MRS(ION aqT g4IM io;salP=ooa
•slsalusaga;o
ul s;ulod IIs ;s sazanloA ezoB apnlozq A;I
ON
•lopoza AIIlsnb solum
pus asa axe uoI tao:3 sallisgan(I Q
aepatua;lr 8alsaaalBu3
:a;s& oasnos 3o so*AI=V Q
u20 aalwag aoaao;sno ag; ssm
•:a;aa� aalesog
;as;aoo ;snuz s;asalldds AwN z
-I all o; uou:ppn uz papaau uournu 0ful
s;usallddV MZN '9T
asld 2UHPUvH aPIIo9 Q
;o ;alod pas �ssoaoid ;nota;sari oq;
glno:g3 ALOII 3 apsa:agos s aPIAOJd Q
:aol;staiq;al TTUOPIPPV '91
❑ $*A
xaaya) d6r;anoa uslpal ao po;saoi AIiilas3 vm:J sI 'tiT
•paliisgaslp aq o; Isl;ua;od aq; aAsq imp 's;aatgsar;
uopaopgslP so spopnega Xalusolo I Mpnlaul 'soAplpps ;uouquar; sols& nu 39ll maid '£T
shield luawleail lalem gltm palmaosse sa8mg3sip ioq
dsJA - 3 WHod zxoHs - M011vaizddd siNHzd szadx

Subject:
Annual Report on Groundwater Remediation System O&M and Monitor Well
Sampling — January through December 2009, Brenntag Southeast Facility (Former
Southchem Facility), Durham, North Carolina.
Data:
0 ARCADIS
ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
801 Corporate Center Drive
ARCADIS is submitting the above -referenced report to your attention as per your
Suite 300
verbal request made on January 19, 2011. As we discussed, you plan to review the
Raleigh
information in this report as part of your review process for the NPDES Permit
North Carolina 27607
Renewal Application associated with the groundwater remediation system at the
Tel [phone]
Durham facility. The NPDES Permit Renewal Application (NPDES Permit
Fax [phone]
Mr. Ron Berry
www.arcadis-us.com
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
us.com
Division of Water Quality (9`h Floor)
Our ret:
512 North Salisbury Street
NC000368.0020
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
ENVIRONMENT
Subject:
Annual Report on Groundwater Remediation System O&M and Monitor Well
Sampling — January through December 2009, Brenntag Southeast Facility (Former
Southchem Facility), Durham, North Carolina.
Data:
January 20, 2011
Dear Mr. Berry:
contaet:
ARCADIS is submitting the above -referenced report to your attention as per your
Jim Shilliday
verbal request made on January 19, 2011. As we discussed, you plan to review the
information in this report as part of your review process for the NPDES Permit
919
919 854-1282
Renewal Application associated with the groundwater remediation system at the
Durham facility. The NPDES Permit Renewal Application (NPDES Permit
E-mail:
NC0086827) was submitted to the Division of Water Quality on April 30, 2010.
jshilliday@arcadis-
If you have any questions regarding the information presented in the report, please
us.com
contact me at [phone].
Our ret:
NC000368.0020
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M, Inc.
ames E. Shilliday, III, L.G. ;
Principal Scientist / Project
Copies:
Mr. Bruce Biehl — Brenntag Southeast
G'.0020%DWQ-Ron Bary rover iatter.ao«
page:
1/1

e
v—*—z—x�
LEGEND
LJ
BUILDING
Mw -1
----
PROPERTY LINE
STORAGE
—x—x—
FENCE
TANK
RAILROAD
I
MONITOR WELL
O
(D
RECOVERY WELL
®
ABANDONED WEL
SCALE IN FEET
0 00
1
1
T STT z x
I
I
CAUSTIC
r �I TANKS
1
1 1
I1 MWW-3
' I 0 0
00
-----�
00
I00
I I 33
00
-100 O
__�� MW -2•
xx�x_MWW�4/
Ot ARCADIS
ARCADIS C&M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel: [phone] Fox: 919-854-5448
--orcodis—us.com
IG
-n-
UNDERGROUND
DIESEL
OIL/WATER
STORAGE
SEPERATOR
TANK
1
I
LUBRICANT
O
PACKAGING
I
PLATFORM
OO
I
t-- MWW-51D
O
I
O
00
I
_x0
� x
� x
x
x
+
LUBRICANT
TANK
ANK TRUCK
FARM
UNLOADING
AREA
TAN K
FARM
MWW-571
.L AND RECOVERY WELL
)CATION MAP
FlGURE:
2-1

Date:2/22/11
WELL DATA FROM 2009 REPORT
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
NCO086827
Stream re -classed as WS -V in 2009
methylene chloride
Fri/1
NC/WS■4.6
4 methy 2 pentanone
KA
NC/WS■2800
tetracholoroethene
N8J1
C/WS■0.7
tduene
M4
NC/FW =11
trans 1,2 dichloroethene
y&A
NC/WS■140
1,1,1 tricholorethane
WA
N -2500
tricholorethene
Wn
CJWS=2.5
Wrild chloride
WA
C/WS=0.025
total xylenes
Wn
NOW ■670
34
940
13
210
18
1100
810
650
110
25
24
12W
410
37
15000
110
34000
47
19
2.4
98
120
8.7
1000
13
12
100
2200
590
89
21
590
16
60
11
<20
<10
<20
<50
8200
33000
18000
850
980
x
<12
<20 _
<12
<100
1300
25W
1300 _
96
96
150
1200
91
23
<10
48
2300
300
550
1200
x
8 _
<2
170
12000
12000
32000
17000
3500
2200
x
x
8.7
<2
6.7
14
<30
<60
<150
16
16 _
-
910
<2
250
28
1500
24000
16000
1500
85
x
_
220
370
160
19
<10
<40
5700
1100
380
2000
x
x
260
4.6
510
810
4800
4000
6100
1900
4000
x
x
<17
<4
120
1100
6000
9000
3000
1400
320
x
x

Date: 2/22/11
WELL DATA FROM 2009 REPORT
-
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
chloroethane
p4A
NC/WS =12
NC0086827
cls 1,2 dichloroethene
N8/1
N - 330
1,1 dkhloroethane _
paill
li s 6700
1,1 dicholorethene
N8/1
NC/WS= 330
Stream re -classed as WS -V in 2009
MWW-4D
970
Pollutant:
LI*M:
WQS:
acetone
1:n
NC/FW - 2000
benzene
14A
CAWS =1.19
2 buhnone
V8A
N - 20000
chloroethane
p4A
NC/WS =12
chloroform
V8A1
NCAWS - 5.6
cls 1,2 dichloroethene
N8/1
N - 330
1,1 dkhloroethane _
paill
li s 6700
1,1 dicholorethene
N8/1
NC/WS= 330
ethylben=ene
PSA
NC/FW ■ 97
MWW-4D
970
29
7.5
2000
210
110
180
MW W -IS D
_
21
2600
260
300
MWW-33
150
310
1100
MW W-34
IA
MW W-37
2.1
87
17
43
MW W-38
1
MWW-40
3700
310
530
MW W-43
MWW45
-
—
230
82
MW W-461
MWW-471
-
--
MWW48
7.4
5.3
6.1
MWW49 D
l W -SO D
MW W-51 D
MW W-52
--
MWW-53
-
8.7
75
14
75
MWW-571
—
-
li
<100
<6.4
<12
22
24
3700
140
220
<2
RW -2
<50
<2
<20
<2
2.5
170
14
22
<6
RW4
2900
<6.4
<12
23
6.3
2000
79
80
26
RW -5
<250
<10
_ <100
210
<10
740
130
28
170
RW -6
12000
52
1800
3000
<29
9500
4000
2400
1000
RW -7
44000
120
8800
2300
<58
29000
8900
4000
1600
RW -8
26000
<160
4300
9100
<140
59000
8700
5400
360
Iii
<250
25
<30
1100
<14
8400
5700
1400
320
RW -10
730
<16
<30
550
<14
6500
1300
350
74
In permit
x
x
_
Ors parmlt
x
x
x
x
x
x
Indicates well concentration exceeds WQS
-

1
. go / o ReapwQ' 4 p", /,'- r -
CO3 ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR/DWQ/Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject:
NPDES Permit Renewal Application (NPDES Permit NC0086827), Groundwater
Remediation System, Brenntag Southeast, Inc., Durham, North Carolina.
Dear Mrs. Sprinkle:
On behalf of Brenntag Southeast, Inc. (Brenntag Southeast), ARCADIS G&M of
North Carolina, Inc. (ARCADIS) has enclosed one original and two copies of the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit renewal application
for the continued discharge of effluent from a groundwater remediation system at the
Brenntag Southeast facility (formerly Southchem) in Durham, North Carolina
(NPDES Permit NC0086827). Treated groundwater from the remediation system is
discharged to an on-site storm sewer that, in turn, discharges to a drainage ditch
located along the southern boundary of the site. This drainage ditch conveys surface
water to an unnamed tributary of Third Fork Creek. No changes have been
implemented to the groundwater remediation system since the previous NPDES
Permit Renewal Application was submitted in April 2005.
Other items enclosed with this letter in support of the NPDES permit renewal
application include the following:
• Figure 1 - USGS topographic map of the project area that depicts the location of
the system outfall;
• Figure 2 - site map that depicts the route of the treated water to the discharge
point; and
• Attachment 1 - a copy of the March 2010 Discharge Monitoring Report which
summarizes the most recent analytical data for the system effluent.
Imagine the result
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina,
Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-ua.com
ENVIRONMENT
Date:
April 30, 2010
Contact:
Jim Shilliday
Phone:
919.854.1282
Email:
[e-mail]
Our ref:
NC000368.0020.00006

ARCADIS
Sludge is neither generated nor discharged by the groundwater remediation system;
therefore, a sludge management plan has not been included with this application.
Any solids (e.g. silt, iron and manganese precipitate) generated during the
groundwater extraction and/or treatment processes are filtered from the treatment
stream using bag filters and granular activated carbon units. The treated effluent is
sampled on a monthly basis for total suspended solids in compliance with the
monitoring requirements for the site (see Attachment 1).
If you have any questions regarding the information presented in the NPDES permit
application or any of the supporting material, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
20)--2t &
Robert White, E.I.T
Environmental Engineer II
James E. Shilliday, III,
Principal Scientist, Pr(
des:
Mr. Bruce Biehl (Brenntag Southeast, Inc.)
NCDENR/DWQ/Point Source Branch
File
0 Copy)
(2 Copies)
0 Copy)
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
April 30, 2010
Page:
2/2

A.,:5 lbwz
1f:
m

W
DISCHARGE TO
DRAJNAGE DITCH
DIESEL
-STORAGE
TANK
LUBRICANT
- PACKAGING
PLATFORM
Q BUILDING
— ^ • — FENCE
— — — — PROPERTY LINE
RAILROAD
® RECOVERY WELL
SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200
VP ARCADIS FIGURE.
ARCADIS G$M of North Carolina, Inc. S17
601 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300 MAP
Raleigh, NC 27607
Tel:[phone] Fax: [phone]
—.arcadis-us.com