20140770 Ver 1_Emails_20141211

Strickland, Bev
From: Devane, Boyd
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 11:26 AM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: FW: Beaverdam Road Project 14 -0770 Haywood County
Please file this email in the Beaverdam Rd project 14 -0770
From: Wanda Austin [mai Ito: wa ndajoycea usti n(d)a ma il.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:17 PM
To: Devane, Boyd
Subject: Fwd: Beaverdam Road Project 14 -0770 Haywood County
Good evening. Mr. King has forwarded to me the below email from Tim Fox. Before responding to him I
wanted to clarify earlier conversations you have had with Mr. King. It is Mr. King's understanding that the
project (phase I) would be considered Low Impact and would not require much if any storm water. As phase 2
is constructed then storm water measures should be appropriately designed. Please let me know if this is an
accurate interpretation of your conversation with Mr. King. If so, I will revise the plan to indicate utilizing
existing erosion control basins as storm water measures if acceptable. These areas along with others can be
designated storm water locations on the plan.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Wanda
---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - --
From: Adam King <bradleycycle gyahoo.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: Beaverdam Road Project 14 -0770 Haywood County
To: Wanda Austin <wandajoyceaustinggmail.com>
On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 3 :05 PM, "Fox, Tim" <tim.fox(a)-ncdenr.gov> wrote:
Mr. King
I work in the Asheville Regional Office with the Division of Water Resources and our regional office
reviewed your 401 WQC application. As you are aware the stormwater component of your project is
being reviewed by Boyd Devane with our central office. I understand that you have communicated
with Mr. Devane regarding different options regarding your stormwater plan and your project is on
hold.
I wanted to communicate with you as well and see if you have any additional questions. In order to
prevent an eventual closing out and returning the application, the Division will need to know how you
choose to proceed with your project. It appears that you have three options, continue with the high -
density original application and provide the necessary additional information, modify your existing

@DDliC@tOO to @ low-density project and D[OVde the required nlOdifiC@tOOS for review and @DD[OV@l. or
withdraw your application.
We would @DDn8Cj@te any COnlnlUOiC@tiOO that you could provide OO your intent for the existing
@DDliC@tiOO. Could you respond bV December 15.2014 with what option you choose tOpursue?
If we can help with any further guidance, please let us know.
Best regards,
Tim
Fax-
Notice- Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the NC Public Records Law
2nd may be disclosed to third parties.