The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150288 Ver 1_Application_20150323STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA GOVERNOR SECRETARY March 23, 2015 Mr. John Thomas US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Dr. Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27615 SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit # 1 4 Bridge No. 281 on SR 2538 (Peeler Road) over Town Creek (Class C) WBS project no.: 17BP.9.R.60 (DWQ permit fee $570) Rowan County, NC Dear Mr. Thomas, We are requesting a Nationwide 14 permit for replacement of Bridge No. 281 with a triple barrel box culvert on SR 2538 (Peeler Road) over Town Creek (Class C; 303d fecal coliform and impaired biological integrity) in Rowan County. I have attached a pre -construction notification application, a topography map with the project area circled, a stormwater management plan, No Survey Required forms from NCDOT Cultural Resources for Historic Architecture and Archeology, and a mitigation acceptance letter from EEP. Also attached are the permit drawings. The project will permanently impact 195 linear feet (150' of fill and 45' of bank stabilization) and temporarily impact 20 Iinear feet of Town Creek. Stream flow will be isolated into one barrel, with 4' sills and floodplain benches constructed at the inlet and outlet of the overflow barrels in order to prevent stream over widening and facilitate aquatic passage. The low flow barrel will be buried 1' below the stream bed to ensure aquatic passage and a 1' sill will be installed in the low flow barrel. The overflow barrels will be backfilled with class 1 rip rap or native bed material of appropriate size to the sill elevation.. The culvert site will be dewatered during construction in accordance with NCDOT's Best Management Practices. By copy of this letter, we also request 401 review and approval from the NC Division of Water Resources with one copy of the application package provided to Dave Wanucha, DOT Project Coordinator and Kristie Lynn Carpenter, Transportation Permitting Unit Administrative Assistant. Please charge the application fee of $570 to WBS project no. 17BP.9.R.60. By copy of this letter, we also request Marla Chambers, NC Wildlife Resources Commission, to comment directly to the Corps concerning the permit request. Division of Highways • Division Nine • 375 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston-Salem, NC 27127 Telephone (336) 747-7800 • Fax (336) 703-6693 • Courier Box 13-12-04 If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material please contact me at (336) 747-7802. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Ain Euliss Division Environmental Officer, NCDOT Division 9 Attachments: Application Package and plans CC: Dave Wanucha, NCDENR-DWR, Environmental Specialist- e-copy Kristie Lynn Carpenter, NCDENR-DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit Administrative Assistant- e-copy Matt Jones, P.E., Division Bridge Program Engineer- e-copy Phil Suggs, Division 9 Roadside Environmental Engineer- e-copy Marla Chambers, WRC- e-copy Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Il Section 404 Permit • Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? • Yes 0 No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization © 401 Water Quality Certification • 401 Water Quality Certification 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: ■ Yes © No ■ Yes © No 1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance or in -lieu fee program. program proposed for letter from mitigation bank 0 Yes • No 1 g. is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer Ih below. •Yes ©No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? • Yes © No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 281 on Peeler Rd (SR 2538) over Town Creek with a box culvert. 2b. County: Rowan 2c. Nearest municipality I town: Salisbury 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: BD-5109Z, WBS no. 17BP.9.R.60 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Division 9 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): NCDOT Division 9 3d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway 3e. City, state, zip: Winston Salem NC 27127 3f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7800 3g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693 3h. Email address: pivey@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: 0 Agent © Other, specify: NCDOT Division Environmental Officer (DEO) 4b. Name: Amy Euliss, DEO 4c. Business name (if applicable): NCDOT Division 9 4d. Street address: 375 Silas Creek Parkway 4e. City, state, zip: Winston Salem NC 27127 4f. Telephone no.: 336-747-7802 4g. Fax no.: 336-703-6693 4h. Email address: aeuliss@ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.615685 Longitude: 80.523238 1 c. Property size: 2.4 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Town Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C 2c. River basin: Yadkin- Pee Dee 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The existing land use is urban and industrial. There is a forested riparian zone along Town Creek up and downstream of the project area. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.04 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 215 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge with a sufficiency rating of 19 out of 100 with a box culvert. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Replace a bridge with a 3 barrel) concrete box culvert using standard road building equipment. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? • Yes © No • Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what typeII of determination was made? preliminary ■Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ■Yes ©No ■Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? • Yes © No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form -- Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la. Which sections ❑X Wetlands were completed below for your project (check all that apply): 0 Open Waters l3 Streams — tributaries ■ Buffers • Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) WI P Fill Floodplain Pool Yes Corps 0.02 W2 P Mechanized Clearing Floodplain Pool Yes Corps 0.01 W3 T Hand Clearing Floodplain Pool Yes Corps 0.01 W4 - Choose one Choose one YeslNo - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No - 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.04 2h. Comments: The wetland will be impacted by fill from the road slope, mechanized Bearing to install erosion control, and hand cleared to relocate an aerial utility line. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 39. Impact length (linear feet) 51 P Culvert Town Creek PER Corps 14 150 52 P Bank stablization Town Creek PER Corps 14 45 53 T Dewatering Town Creek PER Corps 14 20 54 - Choose one - - 55 - Choose one - - 56 - Choose one - - 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 215 3i. Comments: The stream will be impacted for 150' by the culvert, 45' for bank stabilization, and 20' for dewatering. Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 - Choose one Choose 02 - Choose one Choose 03 - Choose one Choose 04 - Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes © No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? • Neuse • Tar -Pamlico • Catawba • Randleman • Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number— Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 - Yes/No B2 - Yes/No B3 - Yes/No B4 - Yes/No B5 - Yes/No B6 - Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The stream will be isolated to one barrel during low flow through installation of floodplain benches and sills. This will facilitate aquatic passage and prevent the stream channel from overwidening. The overflow pipes will be back filled with class I or native bed material of a suitable size. The culvert slope is 0.3%. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. The stream will be dewatered during construction. NCDOT will design the erosion control using best management practices. Stream and wetland impact limits within the construction limits with highly visible fencing or flagging per NCDOT specifications. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? p Yes • No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): © DWQ © Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? fee program Mitigation • Mitigation bank p Payment to in -lieu • Permittee Responsible 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. © Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 345 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: 150 linear feet at a 2:1 ratio was requested for culvert installation. 45 additional feet at a 1:1 ratio for banks stabilization for DWR. 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? • Yes © No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? • Yes p No 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ■ Yes ■ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 26.6 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? © Yes • No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached Stormwater Management Plan. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? i DWR TPU 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? W 3b. hich of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): • Phase II : NSW • USMP • Water Supply Watershed • Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? • Yes ■ No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): • Coastal counties • HQW • ORW • Session Law 2006-246 • Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? • Yes • No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? p Yes • No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? © Yes • No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? p Yes • No 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 0Yes • No 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, aftach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) The project requires a minimum criteria document which is not required to be Comments: submitted to the State Clearing House. • Yes 13 No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 28 .0200)7 El Yes 13 No 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ['Yes © No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? [Yes 13 No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project involves replacement of a bridge with a culvert, which will not have an impact on additional development. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from NA the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species orLi habitat? Yes ©No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? 0 Yes X[} No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - 5d. VVhat data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Natural Heritage program database. The project will have no effect on Schweinitz's sunflower, because none were found. The Northern Long-eared bat is proposed to be listed on April lst. NCDOT will continue to communicate with the USFWS regarding the impacts of the project on the NLEB. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes 10 No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation• status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? El No Yes 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Submitted the project to NCDOT Human Environment and no effect was determined. See attached documentation. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes • No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: project met MOA Type ll B established between NCDOT and NC Floodplain mapping. 8c. VVhat source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC OneMap Amy Euliss, DEO Applicant/Agent's Printed Name s r' / • 3.23.2015 Date p• icant/Agenl's Signature (Ag is signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 10 of 10 Pat McCrory Governor ATA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program Ms. Amy Euliss NCDOT Division 9 Environmental Officer North Carolina Department of Transportation 375 Silas Creek Parkway Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27127 Dear Ms. Euliss: March 18, 2015 Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter: Donald R. van der Vaart Secretary Division 9 Project, TIP BD-5109Z, Replace Bridge 281 over Town Creek on SR 2538 (Peeler Road), Rowan County; WBS Number 44105.1.FD1 The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will provide the compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on March 10, 2015, the impacts are located in CU 03040103 of the Yadkin River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Yadkin 03040103 CP Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.) Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non- Riparian Coastal Marsh Zone 1 Zone 2 Impacts (feet/acres) 0 0 195.0 0 0 0 0 0 ome of the stream impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details. This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on March 13, 2015. This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2015 impact data. EEP will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F.3.c.iii of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP. 8420. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707- Sincerely, Jame B. Stanfill EEP Asset Management Supervisor cc: Mr. John Thomas, USACE — Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Mr. Dave Wanucha, NCDWR — Winston-Salem Office Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT — PDEA File: SR 2538 - Bridge 281 — (BD-5109Z) — Division 9 Revised 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652 Phone: 919-707-89761 Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper SCALE 1:24000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 FEET Copyright (C) 2009 MyTopo, 2006-2015 TomTom 80.5416666° W 80.5416666° W 080.5333333° W 080.5333333° W 080.5250000° W 080.5250000° W 080.5166666° W 080.5166666° W 080.5083333° W 080.5083333° W 35 . 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 ° N 35 . 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 ° N 35 . 6 2 5 0 0 0 0 ° N 35 . 6 2 5 0 0 0 0 ° N 35 . 6 1 6 6 6 6 6 ° N 35 . 6 1 6 6 6 6 6 ° N 35 . 6 0 8 3 3 3 3 ° N 35 . 6 0 8 3 3 3 3 ° N 35 . 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° N 35 . 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° N (Version 1.2; Released September 2011) 17BP.9.R.60 County(ies):Rowan Page 1 of 1 Project Type:Date: Phone:Phone: Email:Email: County(ies): CAMA County? Design/Future:Existing: Surrounding Land Use: Residental, Wooded 8520 (2015) 0.58Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) Proposed Project Existing Site Project Length (lin. Miles or feet): Buffer Rules in Effect Project Description fecal coliform biological impairment No None NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water 303(d) Impairments: River Basin(s): Primary Receiving Water: Class C Other Stream Classification: City/Town: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr Address: Salisbury 919.707.6711 Rowan ac. General Project Narrative:The project consists of replacing bridge #281 on SR 2538 (Peeler Rd) over Town Creek. The approach work will consist of raising the existing roadway grade and providing grass shoulders and guardrails. Bridge #281 existing 4 span structure (71' oal) will be replaced with 3 @ 14' x 10' RCBC. The RCBC will have a low flow center barrel with sills in outside barrels. RCBC to be buried 1' below stream bed. Channel banks to be armored with Class I rip rap at inlet and outlet of RCBC. Best Management Practices: - Promotion of sheet flow and infiltration with grass shoulders. - An existing ditch and associated driveway pipe on the southeast side of the structure will be realigned and the ditch lined with PSRM. Natural drainage patterns on the northeast, northwest, and southwest sides of the structure will not be disturbed or modified. Typical Cross Section Description: References 5300 (2008) 0.64 Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): ac. North Carolina Department of Transportation Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS Galen Cail Bridge Replacement General Project Information Address: 2/23/2015 Raleigh, NC 27610 Project/TIP No.: NCDOT Contact: Project No.:17BP.9.R.60 Contractor / Designer: gcail@ncdot.gov Yadkin-Pee Dee 12-115-3 2-12' lanes with 4' paved shoulders.2-10' lanes with 5' shoulders (unpaved), bridge is 2-10' lanes with little to no shoulder. N/A NCDWQ Stream Index No.: Supplemental: None Primary: Town Creek SITE 1 SITE 2 INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS GRADING, DRAINAGE, WIDENING, CULVERT, AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS See Sheet 1-B For Conventional Symbols 50 25 50 100 50 25 50 100 10 5 10 20 LOCATION PROJECT DETOUR ROUTE 4 ROWAN COUNTY (SR 2538) OVER TOWN CREEK WITH BOX CULVERT REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE NO. 281 ON PEELER RD. J. BRETT ABERNATHY, PE, PLS W. AL BLANTON, PE, PLS XXXX XX, 20XX XXXX XX, 20XX VICINITY MAP 1516 .12 2580 2653 2540 2574 2581 2528 1526 .24 1.00 2528 2574 .87 . 0 7 . 0 8 .09 .0 7 .38 .07 .60 .4 5 .42 1002 2532 2539 2612 2613 2611 2610 2539 2544 2615 .20 .60 .2 8 1 .29 2538.542584 2643 .79 2582 1 . 2 4 1.50 .62 .20 .10 . 14 .18 2539 2545 .12 .35 .99 .6 9 .3 4 .1 3 2538 1500 1503 .12 .21.5 9 .34 . 4 7 .101577 1588 1560 1. 1 2 .15 .02 .16 . 0 7 1594 1501 .67 .4 0 2661 .30 .20 .45.19 .10.20 2662 2599 Satellite of Salisbury .13 .59 . 6 6 . 6 0 .2 8 .6 6 2667 .10 .30.50.26 [74] .17 . 0 4 . 0 9 2670 2669 .17 .18 .24 2673 FCA Julian S t. C am p R d . Long Meadow Dr. Southmark Dr. P le a s a n t P la in sR d. Peeler Rd. P ee ler Peachtree Ave. Hall Ave.E lm S t.Peac h Orchard Trexle r St. Orchard Ln. Peach Ridg e S t.RailroadSt. Rd.Rid ge Ave. C ro sby S t. Rd. Circle "M"Dr. Kelly Dr. Old Con cord Rd. Ln. Orchard Peachtree Ln. V i n e y a r d C i r . Vineyard Dr. Eastbend Ln. Rd. Julian Rd. Rit c hi e R d. E. Ritchie R d . W. P e a c h Orchard Rd. St. C e d a r S prin g s R d. St. PorterRd.H e nd e rs o n G rov e C h urch Pinewood Ave. S. S t. Ave. Eastover Dr.FurnitureR d. Dr. $85 $85 [71] [72] [74] R edh aven D r Tru ck Ave. G G U Q G St. Pauls Ch. b M b %29 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT BD-5109Z = X.XXX MILE LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT BD-5109Z = X.XXX MILE TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT BD-5109Z = 0.162 MILEDHV = 9 % D = 55 % SUBREGIONAL TIER FUNC CLASS = LOCAL 0 0 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 17BP.9.R.60 PE RW/UTILS CONST PROJECT LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY DATE: LETTING DATE: STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA Prepared in the Office of: SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES D I X X X X X PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 BD-5109ZDIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 0 00 See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 C O N T R A C T : T I P P R O J E C T : B D - 5 1 0 9 Z A R T MEN N A S O H D E P T O F TRA S PORT T I O N T A TEOFN RT C AR O LI N A V = 50 MPH * 4% TTST + 4% DUALS ADT 2037 = 15400 ADT 2015 = 8520 T = 8 % * T O IN TE R S T A TE 85 TO MAIN ST / US 29 NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 TOWN CREEK-L- PEELER RD SR 2538 BEGIN PROJECT WBS 17BP.R.9.60 -L-POT Sta. 10+00.00 END PROJECT WBS 17BP.R.9.60 -L-POC Sta. 18+50.00 S : \ M a i n t e n a n c e \ C e n t r a l \ R o w a n - 7 9 \ B r g # 2 8 1 7 9 0 2 8 1 \ P e r m i t s _ E N V IR O N M E N T A L\ 7 9 0 2 8 1 _ h y d _ p r m _ w e t _ t s h . d g n a m k e e t e r 2 /2 5 /2 0 1 5 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT SHEET _1_ OF _7_ PERMIT DRAWING S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY SCALE 1"=50' 0'50'100'150'50' WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 S : \ M a i n t e n a n c e \ C e n t r a l \ R o w a n - 7 9 \ B r g # 2 8 1 7 9 0 2 8 1 \ P e r m i t s _ E N V IR O N M E N T A L\ 7 9 0 2 8 1 _ H y d _ p r m _ w e t . d g n a m k e e t e r 3 /11 /2 0 1 5 SHEET __ OF __ PERMIT DRAWING SITE 1 SITE 2 CLEARING DENOTES MECHANIZED* * * * ** * ** * * IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO PERMIT CONDITIONS. TOP TO FILL VOIDS AND PROVIDE A FLAT SURFACE FOR ANIMAL PASSAGE. NATIVE MATERIAL USED TO LINE THE HIGH FLOW CULVERT BARRELS, NATIVE MATERIAL SHOULD BE PLACED ON TO SUPPLEMENT THE NATIVE MATERIAL IN THE HIGH FLOW CULVERT BARRELS. IF RIP RAP IS FLOODPLAIN AT THE PROJECT SITE DURING CULVERT CONSTRUCTION. RIP RAP MAY BE USED NATIVE MATERIAL CONSISTS OF MATERIAL THAT IS EXCAVATED FROM THE STREAM BED OR NOTE UNDER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION & COMPUTATIONS: HC HC CLEARING DENOTES HAND REMOVE GRADE TO DRAIN n=0.04 s=0.052FT/FT d=0.5 V2=3.1FT/S, V10=3.3FT/S Q2=3.4CFS, Q10=4.2CFS (DAp=0.5; DAg=0.8) DA=1.3ac INLET DETAIL OUTLET DETAIL EXISTING2:1 TO EXI STI N G 2: 1 TO EXI STI N G 2: 1 TO OUTER MOST BARRELS) (TYP. INLET/OUTLET & 4' SILL EXISTING GROUND EXISTING GROUND TOP OF BENCH COIR MAT TO (SEE NOTE) EXISTING TOP OF BANK BACKFILL CHANNEL TO EXCAVATION EST. 140 CU.YDS EXCAVATION EST. 260 CU.YDS 1' SILL & OVERBANK TOP OF BENCH COIR MAT TO EST. 200 SQ.YDS. COIR MAT EST. 160 SQ.YDS. GEOTEXTILE EST. 70 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP 1' SILL 2:1 DETAIL B INLET/OUTLET CHANNEL SEE DETAIL B W/ CLASS I RIP RAP OUTLET CHANNEL SEE DETAIL B W/ CLASS I RIP RAP INLET CHANNEL -X-SECTIONS VIEWS LOOKING DOWNSTREAM SEE NOTE UNDER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION & COMPUTATIONS. -BACKFILL TO TOP OF SILLS W/ NATIVE MATERIAL. NOTE: 18" (DO NOT DISTURB) RETAIN 3 @ 14' x 11' RCBC EST. 7 SQ.YDS. GEOTEXTILE EST. 2 TONS RIP RAP CL B RIP RAP V A R H T W O O D CON C. G R AV. 24" CONC. GRAV. GRAV. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TOWN CREEK EIP EIP EIP EIP LOUISE HONEYCUTT AND WIFE LESTER W. HONEYCUTT EIP EIP EIP RONNIE CARLEE RINEHART AND HUSBAND LINDA CHAPMAN RINEHART EIP EIP PLATINUM CONSTRUCTION CORP. EIP EIP EIP EIP 15 " R C P 15 " RC P D IR. ON L Y L O C A T E E ND ) (UN A B LE T O DI 36" STEEL PIPE CASING BRIDGE #281 JESSE MAE BURGESS 6 0 . 0 0 ' PEELER RD SR 2538 P EEL E R RD SR 253 8 27.0' BST 3 1 . 0' B S T T O IN TE R S T A TE 85 TO MAIN ST / US 29 30.0' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (DB 1141 PG 560) 3 0 .0 ' S A N IT A R Y S E WE R E A S E M E N T (D B 114 1 P G 5 6 0 ) 18" CMP 48" CHL 1 15+00 20 + 00KKK K K KK K K K KKKKK R E V IS I O N S HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 1 7 / 9 9 417BP.9.R.60 AASHTO PRACTICE OF AN EVEN RADIUS.BY DEGREE WAS UTILIZED INSTEAD OF THE CURRENTDESIGNER, THE ANTIQUATED PRACTICE OF DEFINING CURVESNOTE: DUE TO THE AGE AND CLOSE-MINDEDNESS OF THE PR OFESS IO N A L E NG INEER N ORTH CARO LINA SEAL N OTNALB .A MA ILLIW 025499 PR OFESS IO N A L E NG INEER N ORTH CARO LINA SEAL LIAC NELAG .W 022000 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F C F C F C F C F C F C F F F F F F F F F S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY SCALE 1"=50' 0'50'100'150'50' WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 S : \ M a i n t e n a n c e \ C e n t r a l \ R o w a n - 7 9 \ B r g # 2 8 1 7 9 0 2 8 1 \ P e r m i t s _ E N V IR O N M E N T A L\ 7 9 0 2 8 1 _ H y d _ p r m _ w e t . d g n a m k e e t e r 3 /11 /2 0 1 5 SHEET __ OF __ PERMIT DRAWING SITE 1 SITE 2 CLEARING DENOTES MECHANIZED* * * * ** * ** * * IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO PERMIT CONDITIONS. TOP TO FILL VOIDS AND PROVIDE A FLAT SURFACE FOR ANIMAL PASSAGE. NATIVE MATERIAL USED TO LINE THE HIGH FLOW CULVERT BARRELS, NATIVE MATERIAL SHOULD BE PLACED ON TO SUPPLEMENT THE NATIVE MATERIAL IN THE HIGH FLOW CULVERT BARRELS. IF RIP RAP IS FLOODPLAIN AT THE PROJECT SITE DURING CULVERT CONSTRUCTION. RIP RAP MAY BE USED NATIVE MATERIAL CONSISTS OF MATERIAL THAT IS EXCAVATED FROM THE STREAM BED OR NOTE UNDER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION & COMPUTATIONS: HC HC CLEARING DENOTES HAND 736 736 737 737 7 3 7 7 37 737 738 7 3 8 738 738 7 3 8 738 7 3 8 738 7 3 8 7 3 8 7387 3 9 7 3 9 739 7 3 9 7 3 9 7 3 9 739 739 739 739 7 4 0 740 740 740 740 740 740 7 4 0 7 4 0 740 740 74 0 7 4 0 7 4 0 7 4 0 740 7 4 0 7 40 7 4 0 7 4 0 740 74 0 7 4 0 740 74 0 74 0 7 4 0 740 740 740 740 7 4 0 7 4 1 741 741 7 4 1 7 4 1 741 741 741 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 741 74 1 741 741 741 741 7 4 1 74 1 741 7 4 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 741 74 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 741 7 4 1 7 4 1 741 7 4 1 741 7 4 1 741 741 742 7 4 2 742 742 7 4 2 7 4 2 742 7 4 2 7 42 742 7 4 2 7 4 2 74 2 742 74 2 7 4 2 742 7 4 2 742 742 7 4 2 742 7 4 2 7 4 2 742 74 2 7 4 2 7 4 2 742 742 742 7 4 2 7 4 2 7 4 2 7 4 2 742 7 42 7 4 2 742 742 74 2 74 2 742 743 7 4 3 7 4 3 743 743 7 4 3 743 743 743 7 4 3 7 4 3 743 7 4 3 743 743 743 7 4 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 743 743 74 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 743 743 7 4 3 74 3 743 743 743 743 74 4 744 7 4 4 744 744 7 4 4 7 4 4 7 4 4 74 4 744 7 4 4 744 7 4 4 744 744 744 744 744 7 4 4 7 4 4 744 744 7 4 4 744 744 744 74 4 74 4 744 7 4 4 744 744 745 7 45 7 4 5 745 7 4 5 7 4 5 745 745745 745 7 4 5 7 4 5 7 4 5 7 4 5 7 4 5 7 4 5 745 7 4 5 7 4 5 7 4 5 7 4 5 7 4 5 745 745 745 745 745 74 5 745 745 74 5 7 4 5 745 745 7457 4 6 7 4 6 7 4 6 746 746 7 4 6 74 6 746 7 4 6 7 4 6 7 4 6 746 746 74 6 746 746 747 74 7 7 4 7 74 7 7 4 7 747 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 7 4 7 747 7 4 7 747 7 4 7 747 7 48 7 4 8 748 7 4 8 748 748 7 4 8 7 4 8 7 4 8 7 4 8 7 4 8 7 4 8 748 748 748 7 4 8 748 7 4 8 748 748 749 7 4 9 7 4 9 7 4 9 7 4 9 749 7 4 9 7 4 9 7 4 9 749 749 74 9 749 749 7 4 9 7 4 9 749 749 750 7 5 0 7 5 0 750 7 5 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 750 750 750 750 7 5 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 750 750 7 5 0 750 75 0 750 750 750 750 750 750 7 5 0 7 5 0 750 7 5 0 750 7 5 1 7 5 1 75 1 7 5 1 751 751 7 5 1 7 5 1 751 751 751 751 751 751 751 7 5 1 7 51 7 5 1 752 752 752 752 752 7 5 2 75 2 752 7 5 2 752 75 2 752 752 7 5 2 752 7 5 2 753 7 5 3 753 75 3 753 753 75 3 7 5 3 7 5 3 7 5 3 7 5 3 753 753 7 5 3 75 3 753 7 5 3 754 7 5 4 754 75 4 7 5 4 754 7 5 4 754 7 54 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 5 4 7 5 4 754 75 5 755 7 5 5 755 7 5 5 755 75 5 755 755 755 7 55 7 5 5 7 5 5 755 755 755 7 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 5 755 755 7 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 5 75 5 7 5 5 755 755 755 756 756 756 7 5 6 756 75 6 756 75 6 756 7 5 6 7 5 6 7 5 6 756 7 5 6 7 5 6 756 7 5 6 757 7 5 7 7 5 7 757 757 757 757 75 7 7 5 7 7 5 7 7 5 7 75 7 7 5 7 757 7 5 7 7 5 7 758 758 7 5 8 7 5 8 7 58 7 5 8 758 7 5 8 758 75 8 7 5 8 7 5 8 758 7 5 8758 759 7 5 9 75 9 759 759 759 759 759 759 7 5 9 759 75 9 7 5 9 7 5 9 759 760 7 60 760 760 76 0 76 0 760 760 7 6 0 760 7 6 0 76 0 76 0 7 6 0 7 6 0 7 6 0 760 7 6 0 7 6 0 7 6 0 760 7 6 0 7 6 0 7 6 0 760 760 76 0 761 761 761 7 6 1 7 61 761 7 6 1 761 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 7 6 1 761 762 762 7 6 2 762 7 6 2 76 2 762 762 7 6 2 762 7 6 2 762 762 7 6 2 762 762 763 7 6 3 7 63 76 3 763 7 6 3 7 6 3 7 6 3 763 7 6 3 76 3 763 764 7 6 4 76 4 76 4 764 764 7 6 4 76 4 7 6 4 764 7 6 5 7 6 5 765 765 765 765 7 6 5 765 7 6 5 765 7 6 5 765 7 6 5 76 6 766 766 766 766 7 6 6 7 6 6 766 7 6 6 7 6 7 767 767 767 767 7 6 7 767 7 6 7 767 7 6 7 768 768 768 76 8 7 6 8 7 6 8 7 6 8 7 6 9 76 9 769 769 769 7 6 9 7 6 9 770 770 7 7 0 770 7 70 770 77 0 7 70 77 0 77 0 77 0 770 771 7 7 1 771 7 7 1 771 7 7 2 77 2 7 7 2 77 3 773 7 7 4 774 775 775 775 7 7 6 776 7 7 6 777 REMOVE GRADE TO DRAIN n=0.04 s=0.052FT/FT d=0.5 V2=3.1FT/S, V10=3.3FT/S Q2=3.4CFS, Q10=4.2CFS (DAp=0.5; DAg=0.8) DA=1.3ac INLET DETAIL OUTLET DETAIL EXISTING2:1 TO EXI STI N G 2: 1 TO EXI STI N G 2: 1 TO OUTER MOST BARRELS) (TYP. INLET/OUTLET & 4' SILL EXISTING GROUND EXISTING GROUND TOP OF BENCH COIR MAT TO (SEE NOTE) EXISTING TOP OF BANK BACKFILL CHANNEL TO EXCAVATION EST. 140 CU.YDS EXCAVATION EST. 260 CU.YDS 1' SILL & OVERBANK TOP OF BENCH COIR MAT TO EST. 200 SQ.YDS. COIR MAT EST. 160 SQ.YDS. GEOTEXTILE EST. 70 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP 1' SILL 2:1 DETAIL B INLET/OUTLET CHANNEL SEE DETAIL B W/ CLASS I RIP RAP OUTLET CHANNEL SEE DETAIL B W/ CLASS I RIP RAP INLET CHANNEL -X-SECTIONS VIEWS LOOKING DOWNSTREAM SEE NOTE UNDER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION & COMPUTATIONS. -BACKFILL TO TOP OF SILLS W/ NATIVE MATERIAL. NOTE: 18" (DO NOT DISTURB) RETAIN 3 @ 14' x 11' RCBC EST. 7 SQ.YDS. GEOTEXTILE EST. 2 TONS RIP RAP CL B RIP RAP V A R H T W O O D CON C. G R AV. 24" CONC. GRAV. GRAV. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TOWN CREEK EIP EIP EIP EIP LOUISE HONEYCUTT AND WIFE LESTER W. HONEYCUTT EIP EIP EIP RONNIE CARLEE RINEHART AND HUSBAND LINDA CHAPMAN RINEHART EIP EIP PLATINUM CONSTRUCTION CORP. EIP EIP EIP EIP 15 " R C P 15 " RC P D IR. ON L Y L O C A T E E ND ) (UN A B LE T O DI 36" STEEL PIPE CASING BRIDGE #281 JESSE MAE BURGESS 6 0 . 0 0 ' PEELER RD SR 2538 P EEL E R RD SR 253 8 27.0' BST 3 1 . 0' B S T T O IN TE R S T A TE 85 TO MAIN ST / US 29 30.0' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (DB 1141 PG 560) 3 0 .0 ' S A N IT A R Y S E WE R E A S E M E N T (D B 114 1 P G 5 6 0 ) 18" CMP 48" CHL 1 15+00 20 + 00KKK K K KK K K K KKKKK R E V IS I O N S HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 1 7 / 9 9 417BP.9.R.60 AASHTO PRACTICE OF AN EVEN RADIUS.BY DEGREE WAS UTILIZED INSTEAD OF THE CURRENTDESIGNER, THE ANTIQUATED PRACTICE OF DEFINING CURVESNOTE: DUE TO THE AGE AND CLOSE-MINDEDNESS OF THE PR OFESS IO N A L E NG INEER N ORTH CARO LINA SEAL N OTNALB .A MA ILLIW 025499 PR OFESS IO N A L E NG INEER N ORTH CARO LINA SEAL LIAC NELAG .W 022000 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F C F C F C F C F C F C F F F F F F F F F R E V IS I O N S HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 1 7 / 9 9 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 S S SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS IN TS TS IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY SCALE 1"=25' 0'25'50'75'25' S : \ M a i n t e n a n c e \ C e n t r a l \ Ro w a n - 7 9 \ B r g # 2 8 1 7 9 0 2 8 1 \ P e r m i t s _ E N V IRO N M E N TA L\ 7 9 0 2 8 1 _ H y d _ p r m _ w e t _ b l o w u p . d g n a m k e e t e r 3 /11 /2 0 1 5 WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF SHEET _4_ OF _7_ PERMIT DRAWING CLEARING DENOTES MECHANIZED* * * * ** * ** * * HC HC CLEARING DENOTES HAND T METAL GATE V A R H T W O O D G HTR S S CON C. G R AV. 24" CONC. GRAV. GRAV. DELAPIDATED TOWN CREEK EIP EIP EIP LOUISE HONEYCUTT AND WIFE LESTER W. HONEYCUTT EIP EIP RONNIE CARLEE RINEHART AND HUSBAND LINDA CHAPMAN RINEHART PLATINUM CONSTRUCTION CORP. EIP EIP EIP 15 " RC P 15 " RC P D IR . ON L Y L O C A TE E ND ) (UN A B LE T O INV = 750 . 92'IN V = 751 . 37' INV = 74 6. 6 8' DI 36" STEEL PIPE CASING BRIDGE #281 JESSE MAE BURGESS 6 0 . 0 0 ' EXISTING R/W EX IST ING R /W EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W PEELER RD SR 2538 P EEL E R RD SR 253 8 27.0' BST 31 .0' B S T T O IN T E R S T A T E 85 TO MAIN ST / US 29 30.0' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (DB 1141 PG 560) 3 0 .0 ' S A N IT A R Y S E WE R E A S E M E N T (D B 114 1 P G 5 6 0 ) 18" CMP GATE MTL 48" CHL S1SFBUS SITE 1 SITE 2 REMOVE GRADE TO DRAIN n=0.04 s=0.052FT/FT d=0.5 V2=3.1FT/S, V10=3.3FT/S Q2=3.4CFS, Q10=4.2CFS (DAp=0.5; DAg=0.8) DA=1.3ac (SEE NOTE) EXISTING TOP OF BANK BACKFILL CHANNEL TO SEE DETAIL B W/ CLASS I RIP RAP OUTLET CHANNEL SEE DETAIL B W/ CLASS I RIP RAP INLET CHANNEL 18" 401 (DO NOT DISTURB) RETAIN 3 @ 14' x 11' RCBC EST. 7 SQ.YDS. GEOTEXTILE EST. 2 TONS RIP RAP CL B RIP RAPKKK K K KK K K K KKKKK 15+00 F F F F F F F F F F F F F F C F C F C F C F C F C F F F 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 PI = 13+07.00 EL = 748.30' (-)2 .8677% (+)3.0958% VC = 580' K = 97 -L- EL. 765.11 -L- Sta. 18+50.00 END GRADE EL. 756.72 -L- Sta. 10+13.31 BEGIN GRADE DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION 5 / 1 4 / 9 9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 517BP.9.R.60 $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ S : \ M a in t e n a n c e \ C e n t r a l \ R o w a n - 7 9 \ B r g # 2 8 1 7 9 0 2 8 1 \ P e r m it s _ E N V IR O N M E N TA L\ 7 9 0 2 8 1 _ h y d _ p r m _ p f l . d g n a m k e e t e r 2 /2 5 /2 0 1 5 SHEET _5_ OF _7_ PERMIT DRAWING 12+0013+0014+0015+00 Q25=747.5' Q100=748.61' NG LT NG RT PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE 4' L NWS=739.8' w/ SILLS C 3 @ 14' x 11' RCBC LT_Slope_Fill RT_Slope_Fill 739.15 2: 1 2.48:1 0.0200.020 752.77 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION 5 / 1 4 / 9 9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 738 13+50 S : \ M a i n t e n a n c e \ C e n t r a l \ R o w a n - 7 9 \ B r g # 2 8 1 7 9 0 2 8 1 \ P e r m i t s _ E N V I R O N M E N T A L\ 7 9 0 2 8 1 _ H y d _ XS C _ L. d g n a m k e e t e r 2 /2 5 /2 0 1 5 SHEET _6_ OF _7_ PERMIT DRAWING Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.Design (ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft) 1 13+14-L-3 @ 14' X 10' RCBC 0.05 150 & ROAD FILL Bank Stabliziation <0.01 <0.01 45 20 2 13+50-L-RT FILL 0.02 0.01 0.01 TOTALS:0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 <0.01 195 20 0.0048 ATN Revised 3/31/05 3/11/2015 17BP.9.R.60 (790281) WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS SHEET 7 OF 7 ROWAN COUNTY NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Project Tracking No. (Internal Use) 11-08-0016 NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: WBS No: F.A. No: BD-5109Z 45355.1.26 -zs8>> Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP3 County: Rowan Document: PCE-Data Sheet Funding: ❑ State ® Federal Project Description: Low Impact Bridge Program. Replace Bridge No. 281 on SR 2538 (Peeler Rd) over Town Creek. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on August 19, 2011. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, or DE properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 300' from each end of the bridge and 50' each way from the centerline. A survey site, RW 1726, is located just north of the APE. Records indicate that it is a 1950 Minimal Traditional home, and was found not eligible for NR listing in 2010 in an environmental review report. Based on current Rowan County GIS/Tax information, the subdivision of brick houses located in the northwestern portion of the APE was built in the 1970s and is not historic. There is a house and several outbuildings in the southeast quadrant of the bridge, identified as 520 Peeler Road. The house was built in 1950, and two garages were built in the 1990s. The one-story house is not National Register eligible based on Google Maps "Street View." There are no historic properties within the APE, and no survey is required. Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the Rowan County survey, Rowan County GIS and tax information, and Google Maps "Street View" are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There are no historic resources present and no survey is required. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: Maps. FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RES R _� ES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED ARCHAEOLOGY NC OT Cultural Resources Specialist (CIRCLE ONE) os ,D20\ "No Survey Required" form Jor Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups 11-08-0016 Google Street View, showing 520 Peeler Road (Looking North). 1950 House is on the left. Bridge is directly to the left of the image. "No Survey Required" form for Minor Transportation Projects as ()notified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups N SCALE 1:24000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 FEET ROWAN COUNTY SR 2538 PEELER ROAD 1?)=k1 e4 281 ®ver town (reek 3 roxmmtl rnronEw a li o o o 0 01 H N AM m Pit PI zH tlrotloz m z1 ;0 00 \ t H 01 r HZH3 b1 • 'y 01 • m O b1 HM rromr> m rOH3 ,00'L' H y G n10r xz[1H k �101oz 010 0 3[1Gn —0 [1 Croyz • zr• • • • • H t7 tie t7 .P 0 o t1 m + 1 HHHHHH 000000 000000 m 01 m 0 0100 H O H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w 0 0 0 0 01 0.0 w o to 0 o 00 000000 I I H O O H H O U1 01 0 o w o o H N O H O (Jr 000 0 0 XIXX 10 a H to H 0 W NW W 0 N O m oleo 0 0 0 0 O a I I I .P m 0Xm3 0 > n n H 01 H O 0Z z 3 H H roHro '1 0 0 b1 H zz0 z t1 H H z*3 9 0 y 101 S0 .3. • r k • ro• . m [] n o on1 - 0 0NN00 n • N Ll t1 O m t1 H b1 O y y H nnk m m 01 hi n.P 0 0b1 b1 nz mo o 00 ro b1 • o tl n t1 0 [1 H r o 0 m3ty›H y. HYt1n3 01 H En ni H CJ G' zn\,ro• • • z 0 t1 0 N N O 10 H OHNCAMOH H ;hro00000k m OH 3 0• kt1 z• zz 0 • \ y r • y m 04* 1001 '1 m t1 - 0 H N m z o o 0 01 • 0 H 00> b • C • • H H 00t1 C1 00 �*z N H 0 • N 0 0 t1 3 0 t1 WHH'3 ro OtIW • H m 0 k m H 0 0 d° H • a 3 0 0 x1 00 ro * 0 0 0 ott 1 m N3 m r to. ro y H 000, P1 z 00 m H N a 3C .bH H x ZiH O H H H ?0 t1 d° H 0 z• t1• t7 Fri t1 • N rh1 \ d' 0 0 H n OH n a 10 m \m d° N HW 0 k HH 00r 000 • • n 000, 00 H .a m m H N 00 d. 00 H yOOd" 000 Dit (4 Hy 0 0 t-' • • rot? o0x z O 0 0 H 1t .P 10 H 301 r o C Uy • 0 0 • 0 0 PM Wob \\r NOb1 .P W \ \ 0 H N'1 10 O H 10 0 t1 A C1 N x N 0 0 0 Z o y 0 roC3 Ti Hyt7 '0 0Hb1 n H z m t1HHn r t1 1t 0 O H H m• zro H • 01 H 0' • tJ H y • • 0 O• • z • • n H C m otoz/co/T, b1 U1 k k Pi [1 n H roo zz to C 0 x21IISS I'tYS z n 2Ia IVOH'IIiiS 59Z m H .PH0mtJ0m 0lotorto00 1 '£00t1n0 N 0 01 1 0 y n ulmr Ht1 ro W x A11Hr 01 aH0000 .ro ro 0 0 '0 z H n C • m 0 0• 0 0> • n\\• • rr • •• rom• • 0 t[1 • 00001a0 E o 0 0 N t1 x NO .b .P • 0100- \0m Z F. Mn0 ro 0 0 0 r n 10 H O t1 N 0 O O aN H t1 t1w ro 0 \ 0 • r ktlz H `0' • b1 b1 rK1 H '0 L1 Pi T' y k \ ?d N 11 k N O }l1 0 ot7 Nnz H o 00n H PM Co H 0 m 10 k H 3 n 0 OM a H 0 .0 7a m tO H hi y0 b1 .'0 0 n y b1 H r n0 01zz 00 ro 4* >0 rxo1 HZ H HC 1 mz z A [1H nx I-3W o OH rO 10 m O z b 0 H - MO m 0 OH o kit m• HU .0 N • . . . . . O W .. .. .. m wad-zvax 00 Ha O OM H a N n'0 Nm W a m mo 0Hz o t1E01 ma H ro 1 y ro IIx r O n r 0 H O OHO m ro 3H0 b1 ro 30 0 z \xo x1 0 b111m k 0 C x1 01 4* m H m 0 z 3 N O 001 ob1 0 ro O m 01 0 Cl ' H z H SAO1 Dxa 1C 9 luno3 ueMoH I NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM I largely characterized by artificially uptrended ground surfaces containing above and below ground utility lines. Beyond the right-of-way, residential and other past land-clearing impacts are evident. Bri ef Explanation ofwhy the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that th ere are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: The diminutive and restricted nature of the APE and construction effort (in-place replacement with no new location and an off-site detour), along with frequently flooded and somewhat poorly drained soil s (ChA) within the immediate replacement area , a disturbed existing right-of-way corridor, and residentially altered ground surfaces bordering the APE, make it highly unlikely that any significant cultural resources would be contained within the construction footprint of the proposed bridge replacement project as proposed. No further archaeological work is advocated. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: l2J Map(s) l2J Previous Survey Info l2J Photos DCorrespondence D Photocopy of County Survey Notes FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REQUIRED NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist Date "No Survey Required'tform for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified In the 2007 Programmatic Agreement. NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Group s CHINA GROVE QUADRAN NORTH CAROLINA CHINA GROVE QUADRANGLE NORTH CAROLINA CHINA G RO VE Q UA DRANGLE -s:. (\1 r:» cr-.s s-SHEET N UM BER 11 OF I 4 ~QJ>800 32'30" ' 4 0 542 ,I 3 5 o r~' rry f/~::s ~ J'42 ~f.s \)--~~ ~ ~I~~In~ ~ ~~ " ~'--......c» ~D ,,,,~ 1 Bct-~~ CX\' ~ \ ~ ~~ ~V) LA ~ ~OC\\~ " '1 0 ~~ ,,,", ~'i-~ ~~ ~ {~~~ .. ~-~ ::h~ '"'-t ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~... ~~~~ tJ'~ f} ~~~ ')S -,J .~~~f~~ ~ ~~ .~