NC0024210_Permit Issuance_20131206 (2)

Ok
r
4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder
Governor Director
December 6, 2013
Mr. Terry L. Houk
City of High Point
P.O. Box 230
High Point, NC 27261
Resources
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Subject: NPDES Final Permit NCO024210
High Point Eastside WWTP
Facility Class IV
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Houk:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum
of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated
October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
The Division received your comment letter on the draft permit and provides the following
responses:
• The expiration date on your permit was changed to December 31, 2018.
• Footnote 4 on the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements table was modified
to include a statement explaining compliance for total residual chlorine based on reported
laboratory values.
• The statement in the draft letter indicating that quarterly monitoring for lead will be
required should have read that quarterly monitoring for nickel will be required. Lead
monitoring is not required in the permit.
• The required method for mercury was added in Section A.(7.) Effluent Pollutant Scan.
• The Division can't modify the total phosphorus limits at this time since these are based
on the Randleman Lake Rules, 15A NCAC 02B.0249 along with the results of modeling
done at the time the rule was established.
• Monitoring frequency for BOD, TSS, ammonia and fecal coliform was reduced to twice
per week.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] l FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org
Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
NorthCarohna
Nahma!!rf

0
Mr. Houk
December 6, 2013
Page 2 of 4
• Instream monitoring requirements will remain unchanged. The frequencies specified in
the permit for instream monitoring follow monitoring frequencies established in 15A
NCAC 2B .0508. By participating in the Upper Cape Fear Basin Association the
permittee is exempted from the instream monitoring requirements in the permits. Data
collected through the monitoring program is valuable to the Division as it is used to
evaluate water quality in streams. Monitoring data for the Deep River obtained through .
ambient sampling will be used by the Division for future modeling efforts for the Cape
Fear River.
In addition please note that your final permit includes the following changes from the
previous permit:
• The latitude and longitude for the Ricl-land Creek discharge (Outfall 001) in the fact
sheet and map were verified and updated. The location represented by those coordinates
was in the Deep River.
• The numerical address of the facility on Riverdale Road is denoted on the supplement to
permit cover sheet.
• The Deep River outfall 002 is listed first on the supplement to permit cover sheet and the
phrase about construction of Randleman Reservoir has been removed.
• Twice per month monitoring for total cadmium, total lead, phenols, and cyanide has been
removed from the permit based on results of the reasonable potential analysis.
• The footnotes regarding chlorinated phenolic compounds and cyanide were removed
from A. (L) and A. (2.) based on these parameters no longer being monitored in the
permit.
• Footnote 5 in A. (L) and A. (2.) now states that toxicity monitoring shall coincide with
copper and zinc monitoring.
i
• The weekly average limit for total mercury was removed based on the results of the
mercury evaluation analysis. Based on the NC approved mercury TMDL and an
evaluation of data from 2008 through 2012, it was determined that no limit was required
for the protection of the NC water quality standard or the. technology based effluent limit.
It was determined that the facility would have to conduct a mercury minimization plan
(MMP) based on the number of detectable values above 1 ng/l. A special condition was
added requiring the completion of the MMP (See A. (8)).
• The weekly average and daily maximum limit for total nickel was removed based on the
results of the reasonable potential analysis which indicated no potential to exceed the
water quality standard in the Deep River or Richland Creek. However based on current
DWQ procedure, quarterly monitoring for nickel will be required based on the predicted
concentration being greater than 50% of the allowable concentration.
14

M
Mr. Houk
December 6, 2013
Page 3 of 4
o _ Minor language changes to the chronic toxicity conditions A. (5.) and A. (6.) have been
made to reflect updates.
O Please note the following in the Special Condition A.(7.) Effluent Pollutant Scan:
1. Language has been updated to note three scans must be completed during the permit
cycle.
2. Mercury must be sampled using EPA i ethod 1631E.
3. DWQ Water Quality Section has been corrected to the Surface Water Protection
Section.
A special condition was added to your permit [See Special Condition A. (9.)] including
requirements for electronic reporting. Proposed federal regulations require electronic
submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not
establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs
electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates
that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation. For information
on eDMR, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the
following web page: http://portal.nedenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr. For
information on EPA's proposed NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the
following web site:
http://www2. epa.gov/compliance/proposed-npdes-electronic-reporting-rule.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit
are 'unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed
with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The
Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does
not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division
of Water Resources or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area
Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permits that may be required.

r
Mr. Houk
December 6, 2013
Page 4 of 4
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Teresa Rodriguez at
telephone number [phone] or at email [e-mail].
Sincerely,
U 4� &, �
M
homas A. Reeder
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office/Pubic Water Supply (ecopy)
EPA Region IV. (ecopy)
ESS/Aquatic Toxicology Unit/Susan Meadows (ecopy)
ESS/Ecosystems Unit/Carrie Ruhlman (ecopy)
Steve Reid (ecopy)
NPDES File
Central Files

Permit NCO024210
�w
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Water Quality Commission, and the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of High Point
is hereby authorized to discharge municipal wastewater from a facility located at the
High Point Eastside WWTP
5898 Riverdale Road
Jamestown
Guilford County
to receiving waters designated as Richland Creek or the Deep River in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts
I, II, III, and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective January 1, 2014.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on December 31, 2018.
Signed this day December 6, 2013
Aommas. Reeder, Director
Division of Water Resources
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1 of 13

Permit NCO024210
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to ties facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is .no longer effective. Therefore, the
exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements,
terms, and provisions included herein.
The City of High Point is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a 26.0 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of
mechanical bar screens, grit removal, primary sedimentation, flow equalization,
anaerobic/anoxic/aeration basins, secondary sedimentation, residuals thickening
devices, filtration, effluent UV disinfection, and effluent pump station. This facility
is located at the High Point Eastside Wastewater Treatment Plant, 5898 Riverdale
Road, Jamestown, in Guilford County.
2. Discharge wastewater from said treatment works at the location specified on the
attached map into
1) The Deep River through outfall 002 [refer to Part I, A. (2)], or
2) Richland Creek through outfall 001 [refer to Part I, A. (1.)],
Both Richland Creek and The Deep River are classified as WS-IV CA waters in
the Cape Fear River Basin.
Page 2 of 13

Permit NC0024210
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (26.0 MGD)
(Discharge to Richland Creek)
Beginning on the effective day of this permit and during emergency conditions as defined in A. (3.), the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored$ by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS_ - -_
MONITQRING.REQUIREMENTS
'EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
. Morltl ly
Weekly
Daily
Measuremerit
Sann' ple `
Sample. Locat onl
Average,
Average
;.Maximum
. _Frequency_ .
_.- Type._-
Flow
26.0 MGD
Continuous
'Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5 day (20°C) 2
[April 1 -October 31]
5.0 mg/L
.7.5 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Influent & Effluent
BOD, 5 day (20°C) 2
[November 1-March 31]
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Influent & Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Influent & Effluent
NH3 as N [April 1- October 31]
1.0 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N [November 1 - March 31]
2.0 mg/L
6.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
See footnote 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Fecal Coliform geometric mean
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
See footnote 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Total Residual Chlorine4
18 Ng/L
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
6.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Upstream &
[April 1- October 31]
1301 pounds/day
Downstream
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Upstream &
[November 1-March 31]]
Downstream
0.5 mg/L
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
108 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Upstream &
Downstream
Temperature (°C)
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
-See footnote 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Conductivity
See footnote 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Nickel
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
pH6
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan?
Monitor and Report
Footnote 7
Footnote 7
Effluent
(Footnotes on next page)
Page 3 of 13

Permit NCO024219
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (26.0 MGD)
(Discharge to Richland Creek)
(Continued)
Footnotes:
1. Upstream (2 locations): (1) Richland Creek at least 100 feet above outfall, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1113.
Downstream (2 locations): (1) Deep River at NCSR 1129, (2) Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall
be grab samples collected 3/Week during June — September and 1/Week during the remaining months of the
year. As a participant in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association, the instream monitoring requirements as
stated above are waived. Should your membership in the agreement be terminated, you shall notify the Division
immediately and the instream monitoring requirements specified in your permit shall be reinstated.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
4. The total residual chlorine limit and monitoring are required only if chlorine is used as back-up disinfection
method. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/l to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/l.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia dubia) P/F at 90%: January, April, July, and October [see Part I, A. (5)]. Toxicity
monitoring shall coincide with copper and zinc monitoring.
6. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units not greater than 9.0 standard units.
7. The permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit [See A. (7)].
8. No later than 90 days from the effective date of this permit, begin submitting discharge monitoring reports
electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A (9).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Page 4 of 13

Permit NCO024210
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (26.0 MGD)
(Discharge to Deep River)
During the period beginning upon the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored$ by the Peunittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT LIMITS
_ `. MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS,
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly -
' Weekly
Daily
Monthly
`Weekly
ions
Sample Locat.
-_ Average,. _
Average
Maxi _mum
, ,. Average , _
Avera e
- g.
-
Flow
26.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5 day 2
5.0 mg/L
7.5 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Influent & Effluent
[April 1—Octobertober 31]
BOD, 5 day (201C)2
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Influent & Effluent
[November 1— March 31]
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Influent & Effluent
NH3 as N [April 1 — October 31]
1.0 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N [November 1— March 31]
2.0 mg/L
6.0 mg/L
2/Week
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
See note 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Fecal Coliform geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
See footnote 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Total Residual Chlorine4
18 pg/L
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
6.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Upstream &
[April 1 —October 31]
1301 pounds/day
Downstream
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
Weekly
Composite.
Effluent
Upstream &
[November 1— March 31]
Downstream
0.5 mg/L
Effluent
Total.. Phosphorus
108 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Upstream &
Downstream
Temperature °C)
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
See note 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Conductivity
See note 1
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Nickel
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
pH6
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Scan?
Monitor and Report
Footnote 7
Footnote 7
Effluent
(Footnotes on next page)
Page 5 of 13

Permit NCO024210
r.
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (26.0 MGD)
(Discharge to Deep River)
(Continued)
Footnotes:
1. Upstream = Deep River at NCSR 1129. Downstream = Deep River at NCSR 1921. Stream samples shall be
grab samples collected 3/Week during June — September and 1/Week during the remaining months of the year.
As a participant in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association, the.instream monitoring requirements as stated
above are waived. Should your membership in the agreement be terminated, you shall notify the Division
immediately and die instream monitoring requirements specified in your permit shall be reinstated.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
4. The total residual chlorine limit and monitoring are requited only if chlorine is used as back-up disinfection
method. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC'values reported below 50 µg/l to be in compliance with the
permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina
certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/l.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia dubia) P/F at 85%: January, April, July, and October [see Part I, A. (6.)]. Toxicity
monitoring shall coincide with copper and zinc monitoring.
6. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units not greater than 9.0 standard units.
7. The permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit [See A. (7)].
8. No later than 90 days from the effective date of this permit, begin submitting discharge monitoring reports
electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Special Condition A .(9).
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (3.) EMERGENCY DISCHARGE TO RICHLAND CREEK
Upon relocation of the discharge to the Deep River, the perinittee is authorized to discharge to Richland
Creek through Outfall 001, during emergency conditions such as non -routine maintenance or pump failures
of the effluent pump station. The Winston- Salem Regional Office shall be notified when such conditions
occur and the facility needs to discharge to Richland Creek.
A. (4.) NUTRIENT MONITORING
The Division may, upon written notification to the Permittee, require additional effluent monitoring that it
deems necessary to support its water quality protection and restoration efforts in the receiving stream.
Page 6 of 13

Permit NC0024210
A. (5.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly)
f
RICHLAND CREEK discharge (Outfall 001)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
to Ceriodaplmia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, monitoring using test- procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Cenodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or
subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised- December 2010) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July, and October. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity
testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge
below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in
each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent
Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -December 2010) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B
for the pass/fail results and THP313 for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWR Form AT-3 (original) is to
be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be'measured and reported if chlorine
is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
requited, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with' the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required. monitoring
will be required during the following month. Assessment of toxicity compliance is based on the toxicity
testing quarter, which is the three month time interval that begins on the first day of the month in which
toxicity testing is required by this permit and continues until the final day of the third month.
Page 7 of 13

Permit NC0024210
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Perrnittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than requited by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT
Form submitted.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last
day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Page 8 of 13

Permit NCO024210
� Y
t
A. (6.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly)
DEEP RIVER discharge (Outfall 002)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 85 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, qLaderl monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceri0 phnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or
subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised- December 2010) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July, and October. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity
testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge
below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in
each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent
Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -December 2010) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B
for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWR Form AT-3 (original) is to
be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine
is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring
will be required during the following month. Assessment of toxicity compliance is based on the toxicity
testing quarter, which is the three month time interval that begins on the first day of the month in which
toxicity testing is required by this permit and continues until the final day of the third month.
Page 9 of 13

Permit NC0024210
. 0,
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Petimittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring "shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT
Form submitted.
NOTE:- Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and willrequite immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last
day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Page 10 of 13

Permit NCO024210
A. (7.) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The Permittee shall perform a total of three (3) Effluent Pollutant Scans for all parameters listed below. One scan
must be performed in each of the following years: 2014, 2015, and 2016. Analytical methods shall be in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 136 and shall be sufficiently sensitive to determine whether parameters are present
in concentrations greater than applicable standards and criteria. Samples should be collected with one quarterly
toxicity test each year, and must represent seasonal variation [i.e. do not sample in the same quarter every year].
Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N)
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Oil and grease
Total Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury(EPA Method 1631E)
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloro dibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
1,1-dichloro ethylene
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichl6ropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-trichlo.ro ethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid -extractable compounds:
P-chloro-m-cresol
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-dinitsophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4, 6-trichloroph enol
Base -Neutral Compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dib enz o (a,h) anthracen e
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-dichlorob enzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate .
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dirnitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitro s o dimethylamin e
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
Reporting. Test results shall be reported on DWR Form- A MR-PPA1 (or in a form approved by the
Director) by December 31st of each designated sampling year. The report shall be submitted to the
Page 11 of 13

Permit NC0024210
following address: NCDENR/DWR/Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-1617.
A. (8.) MERCURY MINIMIZATION PLAN (MMP)
The permmittee shall develop and implement a mercury minimization plan during this permit tern. The MMP
shall be developed within 180 days of the NPDES Permit Effective Date, and shall be available for
inspection on -site. A sample MMP was developed through a. stakeholder review process and has been
placed on the Division website for guidance (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/npdes, under
Model Mercury Minimization Plan). The MMP should place emphasis on identification of mercury
contributors and goals for reduction. Results shall be summarized and submitted with the next permit
renewal.
A. (9.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and
specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must subunit
DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these
regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation in late 2013.
NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this
permit (Standard ConditionsforNPDES Permits):
• Section B. (11.) Signatory Requirements
• Section D. (2.) Reporting
• Section D. (6.) Records Retention
• Section E. (5.) Monitoring Reports
1. Reporting [Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (aA
Beginning no later than 90 days from the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall begin
reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge
Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application.
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and
submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter monitoring
data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's eDMR
application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR),
permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state electronically using
eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing, signing, and submitting one
signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the following address:
NC DENR / DWR / Information Processing Unit
ATTENTION: Central Files / eDMR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility
being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband access,
then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted and
Page 12 of 13

Permit NCO024210
discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1.1, 2, 3) or alternative forms
approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing address above.
Requests for temporary waivers from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements must be submitted
in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the elate the facility would
be required under this permit to begin using eDMR. Temporary waivers shall be valid for twelve (12)
months and shall thereupon expire. At such time, DMRs shall be submitted electronically to the
Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary waiver by the Division.
Information on eDMR and application for a temporary waiver froin the NPDES electronic reporting
requirements is found on the following web page:
http: / /Vortal.ncdenr.org/web /wg /adinin/bog/ipu/edmr
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the
issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the
commencement of discharge.
2. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)]
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II, Section
B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR reporting
purposes.
For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North Carolina's
eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following
web page:
http: / /12ortal.ncdenr.org/web /wg /adinin /bog/ipu/edmr
Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make the
following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL
BE ACCEPTED:
"I cert�, underpenalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that gaaalified personnel properlygather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the ystem, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware
that there are significantpenalties for saabmitting false i1 formation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations "
3. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)]
The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions.
These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report.
This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41].
Page 13 of 13

Note to file
NPDES Permit No. NCO024210
The coordinates for the discharge to Richland Creek were verified and corrected in the map.
The coordinates should be as follows:
Richland Creek
Latitude/Longitude
35° 56' 26.7" / 79° 54' 24.8"
Teresa Rodriguez
11/26/2013

•Rodriguez, Teresa
From: Edwards, Lisa
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 9:01 AM
To: Rodriguez, Teresa
Subject: RE: Draft,permit NC24210
Teresa,
Not a problem to finalize this permit.
Lisa Edwards, PE
Regional Engineer
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, Public Water Supply Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is
exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Rodriguez, Teresa
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 1:20 PM
To: Edwards, Lisa
Subject: Draft permit NC24210
Lisa, this permit was sent to public notice in June but we forgot to copy PWS. Jackie Nowell was the permit writer but she
has been out on medical leave for a while and I'll be finalizing this permit. Let me know if there are any issues or if the
timing for review is not OK.
Thanks,
Teresa

Name
North Carolina, Guilford County
News & Record
Published by
News & Record, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina
AFFIDAVIT OF
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by law to
administer oaths, personally appeared the Publisher's Representative who being first duly sworn, deposed and says:
1. That he/she is the Publisher's Representative of the Greensboro News & Record, Inc. a corporation, engaged in the
publication of newspapers known as "News & Record", published, issued and entered as second class mail in the City of
Greensboro in said County and State.
2. That he/she is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal advertisement,
a copy of which is attached hereto, was published in the News & Record on the dates listed below.
3. That the said newspaper (or newspapers) in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement was published
was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of
Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carol' and was a qualified ► spaper within the meaning of Section 1-59;
of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
Publisher's Representative �`0\\11NE 1/ j/"ii���i/
to�07 Y
Sworn to and subscribed before , this day of 20 _
Notary Public
Ad # Date Edition
lLa�� L
Class PO Ad Copy
My Comm. Exp
6/1512014 U`
PUBL CI �\
rrrni�iti
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES 34964875 06/07/13 News & Record 400 Eastside wwt Public NoticeNorth Carolina Environmenta

Ad ID 34964875 Date , 06/05/2013 Time 10:25 AM
Public Notice
North Carolina Enkonrnental
Management ConrrissbrV
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notice of intent to Issue a NPDE5
Wastevs®ter Pemit
The North Carolina Environrnental
ManagermaCamn-ission proposes
to 'slue a N PDES wastewater
discharge permittothe person(s)
listed below. Written comments
regarding the proposed permit will
be accepted until 30 days afterthe
publish date of this notice The
Director of the NC Division of Water
Qualky(DWQ) may hold a public
hearing should there be a significant
degree of public interest Pease mail
corhn,ents ancl(or information
requeststo DWQ atthe above
address Interested persons mayvisit
the DWQ at 512 N. Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC to revewinforrration on
file. Additional infonn3tion on NPDES
Permits and this notice Tray be found
on ourwebsite•
http//portal.ncdenrorg'webMxl&wp/p
s/npciesicalendar, or by calling (919)
807-89a City of High Point
requested renewal of permit
NCO024210 for Eastsice WWiP in
Guilford County, this permitted
discharge is treated municipal
wastewaterto Deep Ri er, Cape Fear
River Basin.
Ad shown is not actual print size

Terry L. Houk
PUBLIC SERVICES
PO Box 230
HIGH POINT, NC 27261
June 27, 2013
Ms. Jacquelyn M. Nowell
Complex Permitting Unit
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit
Permit No. NCO024210
High Point Eastside WWTP
Facility - Class IV
Guilford County
Dear Ms. Nowell:
NORTH CAROLINKS INTERNATIONAL CITY`
The City of High Point has received and reviewed your letter dated June 5, 2013 and the accompanying
draft permit for the Eastside Wastewater Treatment Plant. There are items in your letter and the draft
permit that the City would like to bring to your attention and offer comments.
w! i I 1 �� The cover sheet to the draft permit states that the discharge permit will expire on August 31, 2016. The
Cdyt% permit cycle normally runs for five years; therefore the City respectfully requests that the permit
expiration date be changed to August 1, 2018.
Since DWQ has changed the Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) limit to 50 ug/I, the Daily Maximum Limit
listed on the effluent limitations page for the Deep River and Richland Creek Outfalls should be changed
from 18 ug/1 to 50 ug/l. In your letter you state that a footnote regarding the TRC change was added to
the draft permit on the effluent limitations page; however, the addition of the footnote must have been
an oversight because we could not find a footnote on this page. Also, at the top of the column for the
Deep River Outfall, the word "Daily Maximum" apparently was inadvertently left off.
14 1�� Page 2 of your letter states that quarterly monitoring for lead will be required based on the predicted
Ski concentration being greater than 50% of the allowable concentration; however, lead was not added to
the effluent limitations pages in the draft permit. Also for clarification it would be helpful to add the
�t .0i required method for mercury analysis in a footnote on the effluent limitations page of the permit.
The current NPDES permit that we are operating under became effective on February 1, 2007 and since
that time we have had only four monthly phosphorus concentration limit violations and no mass limit
violations for phosphorus. The pounds of phosphorus discharged to the receiving stream are a better
measure of the impact on the receiving stream; therefore, the City is requesting that our discharge ---i
permit have a mass based permit limit only. 'VKA-l�d
City of High Point, 211 South Hamilton Street, High Point, NC 27261 U:
Ph:336.883.3166 [e-mail] Fax:[phone]
T cCl\il`_��.

Terry L. Houk
PUBLIC SERVICES
PO Box 230
HIGH POINT, NC 27261
NORTH CAROLINNS INTERNATIONAL CITY"
In addition, based on our past history of compliance we do not see the need for a monthly average limit
and request that our phosphorus limit be changed to a,quarterly, average mass based limit.
As the attached graphs illustrate the Eastside WWTP Effluent BOD, TSS, NH3 and Fecal Coliform results
-wr have been consistently well below the NPDES effluent limits. Based on this past exceptional
Moat performance the City is requesting that the monitoring frequency of all four parameters be reduced to
two times per week in this permit cycle.
This same reasoning also applies to the frequency of the Upstream and Downstream sampling
I requirements in the draft permit. The past performance of the treatment plant has demonstrated no
significant impact on the receiving stream. Therefore, based on this past performance the stream
sampling frequency should be reduced to once per week in the summer and no sampling in the winter
or eliminated altogether.
The City appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft permit and if you have any questions
regarding our comments, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Terry Houk
Assistant Director of Public Services
Enclosure: ES BOD TSS Ammonia Fecal Summaries
cc: W. Chris Thompson P.E., Public Services Director
John Hodges, Wastewater Plants Manager
Bill Frazier, Laboratory Manager
Tim Fitzgerald, Wastewater Superintendent
Randy smith, Eastside WWTP ORC
Dawn Molnar, Laboratory Supervisor
Carrie Boyd, IPP Supervisor
File
City of High Point, 211 South Hamilton Street, High Point, NC 27261 USA
Ph:336.883.3166 [e-mail] Fax:[phone]

Reduction in Frequency Evalaution
Facility:
Permit No.
Review period (3 yrs)
High Point East Side WWTP
N C0024210
September 2010 to September 2013
Fecal
Compliance Review:
BOD
TSS
Ammonia
Coliform
No more than one civil penalty
assessment for each parameter
OK
OK
OK
OK
Not currently under SOS
OK
OK
OK
OK
Not on EPA Quarterly noncompliance
report
OK
OK
OK
OK
Criminal Review
Facility or employees convicted of
CWA violations No

Data Review
Weekly
average
limit
Monthly
average
limit
50% MA
3-yr mean
(geo mean
for FQ
< 50%?
200% MA
# daily
samples
>200%
<15?
# daily
samples
200% WA >200% < 20?
# of non -
monthly
limit
violations
< 2?
CBOD (summer)
7.5
5
2.5
2.3
OK
10
1
OK
0
0
OK
OK
CBOD (winter)
15
10
5.01
2.4
OK
20
0
OK
TSS
45
30
15
2.7
OK
60
0
OK
0
0-OK
0
OK
OK
Ammonia (summer)
3
1
0.5
0.071
OK
2
1
OK
Ammonia (winter)
6
2
1
0.4
OK
4
9
OK
Fecal Coliform
400/100
200/100
100
1.9
OK
800
2 OK
1 0
OK

1
Nowell, Jackie
From:
Ruhlman, Carrie
Sent:
Wednesday, June 05, 2013 3:14 PM
To:
Nowell, Jackie
Cc:
Kroeger, Steve
Subject:
RE: High Point Eastside WWTP draft permit
Hi Jackie,
Here are my comments on the draft High Point Eastside permit. -
Fact Sheet
• The lat/long for the Richland Creek discharge is on the Deep river.
Permit
No map attached as indicated on pg. 2 #2
• The monitoring requirement tables for both outfalls indicate that Total Nitrogen (April - October) and Total
Phosphorus have effluent, upstream and downstream limits. Is that correct? No-," " ori-ms- j(e.
• A. (1.) and A.(2.) footnote 1 indicates 3x/week in stream monitoring June -September. This is not reflected in
the tables. Why June - September?
• Please change "Cape Fear River Basin Association" to "Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association"
Carrie Ruhlman -
—NC Division of Water Qualitya-
Phone: [phone]
carrie. ruhlman@ncdenr. gov
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/eco/coalition
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
A Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: Nowell, Jackie
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 10:06 AM
To: Basinger, Corey; Morrison, Sarah; Meadows, Susan; Ruhlman, Carrie; Reid, Steve
Cc: Ghosh.BenO)epamail.epa.aov
Subject: High Point Eastside WWTP draft permit
Good morning, the subject permit is going to public notice this week. Please submit any comments to me by July 12,
2013. Thank you.
Jackie Nowell
TA 0
^�0.� ��G.c-/ �� ¢ � • / ,��, �Gy1 � p /,.fir � /� �/,�uR�- r-v,..�--r�- —
1

r
DENR / DWQ / NPDES Unit
.FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit No. NCO024210
Applrcarit/Facrhty Name
City of High Point / High Point Eastside WWTP
Applrcanpddres •, .x ,,,
P.O. Box230, High Point, NC 27261
Facility Address
5898 Riverdale Rd., Jamestown, NC 27282
FPermitfed Flaw . .a...
26 MGD
Type of Waste,
Domestic / Industrial
FachtylPernrt Staxus
Class IV / Renewal
County K ;'.
Guilford County
RegrOnal`Office. -' ..1.:>
Winston-Salem
RecetYtng`""Stream ' ._
Richland Creek (SI 17-7-(4))
Deep River (SI 17-(4))
Stream ClassificafEon
WS 1V
WS IV
303(d) Lrsted/TMDL
Yes, Fecal Coliform TMDL
No
Sut'basrn �. • •
03-06-08
03-06-08
Qrainage,Area (mr2)
16
96.3
Summer 7Q10 (cfsj
1.0
6.9
Wrnter 7Q1 Cl �> ' ..
2.6
2.6
30Gl2 ., 2_, _ .
Average Flow (cfsj ;•
15.0
96.3
96
85
Latitude/ "onaitutle
350 56' 16" / 790 53' 26"
350 56' 11" / 790 53' 22"
Stafe �rrd X USGS Quad D19NW / High Point East D19NW / High Point East
Summary
The City of High Point requested renewal of the permit for the High Point Eastside WWTP. The
renewal application was received on February 24, 2011. The High Point Eastside permit expired on
August 30, 2011 and has been administratively extended. The Eastside facility serves the City of
High -Point, the Town of Archdale, and Jamestown/Sedgefield for a total population of 86,639
persons.
The treatment system consists of three mechanical bar screens, vortex grit removal system, five
primary clarifiers, equalization basin, two aerated equalization basins, two equalization/sludge
storage tanks, four anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic aeration tanks, four secondary clarifiers, six effluent
filters (two deep bed, four dual media), UV disinfection, three Parshall flumes, effluent pump station,
post aeration channel
Per the 2011 application, before May 2008, the Eastside WWTP discharged into Richland Creek,
Outfall 001. After completion and testing of the effluent pump station, the plant began to discharge
into the channel of the Deep River in the Randleman Reservoir through Outfall 002. Outfall 001
remains as a permitted outfall, but is used only on rare occasions that the effluent pump station is
taken out of service for maintenance.
There are currently 8 Significant Industrial Users and 12 Categorical Industrial Users discharging to
the Eastside WWTP with a total permitted flow of 1.11 MGD. They have a full pre-treatment program.
The last pretreatment compliance evaluation in September 2012 rated the program as compliant and
Fact: Sheet
Renewal -- N:11I:7FS I'erniit NC,0 l24'210
Pagre .1

� 1•
extremely reliable. This permit recommends that High Point.continue to operate its approved pre-
treatment program.
Waste Load Allocation (this info submitted in the 2006 factsheet)
A Waste Load allocation was developed in 1999 for the expansion to 26 MGD. BOD5, NH3N, DO,,
total nitrogen and total phosphorus are water quality limited. Limits for total phosphorus and total
nitrogen were established in 1998 under the Randleman Lake Watershed Nutrient Reduction Strategy
and approved by the Environmental Management Commission. Based on a nutrient response model
for -the proposed lake a total phosphorus limit of 0.5 mg/L as a monthly average and total nitrogen of
6 mg/L during the summer was determined appropriate to protect water quality. As indicated in the
Hearing Officer's Summary. from September 1998, the phosphorus limit was implemented as a
monthly average not as a quarterly average because due to the, size and hydrology of the reservoir
and the availability of the phosphorus for algal growth, having quarterly limits would enable
excursions of phosphorus levels, especially during the growing seasons, which could result in algal
bloom conditions at unaccepted levels. The rule originally proposed a total phosphorus limit of 0.1
mg/L; the limit was increased to 0.5 mg/L when the proposed discharge location was moved to the
Deep River at Freeman Mill. The Hearing Officer's Summary also proposed that the rule do not
include numeric limitations and that the Environmental Management Commission be involved in any
future decision which may increase phosphorus above the mass loading at 26 MGD and 0.5 mg/L.
Rule 15 A NCAC 026.0249 requires mass and concentration limits for phosphorus and nitrogen.
TMDL only applies to discharge into Richland Creek since it is listed on the NC 2012 303d list for
impaired streams. Note that the discharge into Richland Creek from Outfall 001 is periodic and only
during emergency situations. From the 2006 factsheet - A TMDL was approved in 2004. Data
collected indicates that urban source contributions, such as leaking sewer -pipes and septic systems,
are a significant source of much of the fecal coliform impairment. Additional fecal coliform loading
from nonpoint sources such- as stormwater runoff also appear to contribute to instream
concentrations. The TMDL reductions for fecal coliform should be sought through identification and
repair of aging sewer and septic systems and removal of SSOs. Implementation should also target
storm -driven sources such as runoff from residential areas and agricultural land. The City of High
Point has completed several sewer rehabilitation projects.
Notices of Violation (NOVs) Since February 2007, the overall compliance has been good,
however there have been some NOVs and one enforcement case. There was a.NOV for ammonia in
April 2008. There have been several NOVs issued for exceedances of the monthly total phosphorus
limit. These occurred in September and October 2011, June 2012, and March 2013. The most
recent facility inspection was in November 2012 and the facility was rated compliant for compliance
evaluation and rated as satisfactory in the facility evaluation.
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Test
Existing limits: Outfall 001 @ Richland Creek Chronic limit at 90% (Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail);
Outfall 002 @ Deep River Chronic limit at 85% (Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail);
Quarterly testing conducted in January, April, July, and October.
Prior to the 2008 relocation, the Eastside facility discharged into Richland Creek with a chronic
toxicity limit of 90%. From the permit effective date of February 2007 to May 2008, there were five
chronic toxicity tests. There were failures in July and October 2007. The facility passed in January
and April 2008 before the relocation to Deep River was completed.
The relocation to Outfall 002 was completed in May 2008, therefore the chronic test with a limit of
85% became effective. Since May 2008, there have been twenty.(20) toxicity tests and the facility
has passed all twenty (20).
Recommendation: Continuation of Chronic toxicity limit at 85% (Deep River discharge),
quarterly testing in January, April, July and October.
Fact Sheet
Renewal --'` IT S N('0024210
Pant 2

Instream Data Review
Current Parameters: Dissolved Oxygen, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Conductivity, Total Nitrogen
and Total Phosphorus
Recommended Parameters: Dissolved Oxygen, Temperature, Fecal Coliform, Conductivity, Total
Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus
-Deep River discharge
Upstream: Deep River at NCSR 1129
Downstream: Deep River at NCSR 1921
-Richland Creek discharge
Upstream1: Richland Creek at least 100 feet above outfall
Upstream2: Deep River at NCSR 1113
Downstream1: Deep River at NCSR 1129
Downstream2: Deep River at NCSR 1921
City of High Point is a member of the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association (UCFRBA) and
therefore individual instream monitoring requirements are waived as long as the City is a member.
The memorandum of agreement between the UCFRBA and DWQ was renewed May 1, 2010 and is
effective until April 30, 2015. The UCFRBA conducts instream monitoring for its membership and
compiles data for review and evaluation.
A review of data sampled from January 2006 to December 2010 for Association stations for Richland
Creek and Deep River that corresponded to the sites in the permit. Station B435000- Deep River at
SR1113 showed some violations of the dissolved oxygen standard. All other field parameters, metals
and nutrients were below water quality standards. Station B4614500 — Randleman Lake at SR 1921
B1350000- the only water quality standard exceedences were for turbidity, all other parameters were
below the water quality standards.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
A RPA was completed using the data from January 2007 through December 2011.
Chronic
Acute
Maximum predicted
Parameter
standard
standard
(Ng/L) for 001 & 002
Comments/Modifications to permit
(Ng/L)
(Ng/L)
Cadmium
2
15
1.3
No RP shown, no monitoring required,
Monitor in LTMP only
Copper
7
7
395
RP, No limit b/c NC action level standards
not limited. Quarterly monitoring in
con unction with toxicity test.
Cyanide
5
22
5.0
All values below detection, o monitoring
required. Monitor in LTMP only.
Lead
26
33.8
7.4
No RP shown, no monitoring required,
Monitor in LTMP only
Mercury
* Evaluated per TMDL procedure, see
below.
Nickel
25.6
261
22.3
No RP, max. pred. value <50% of
allowable. Limit removed, quarterly
monitoring recommended.
Total
300
47.6
No RP shown, no monitoring required,
Phenolic
Monitor in LTMP only
Compounds
190.7
RP, No limit b/c NC action level standards
Zinc
51
67
not limited. Quarterly monitoring in
con unction with toxicity test.
Pact Shea
R.enewaI -- NPID S NCO024210
Pkae 3

I
Mercury data evaluation
A mercury TMDL was approved by US EPA in October 2012 and has been implemented for this draft
permit. The table below summarizes the available mercury data to determine whether limit or
monitoring is required.
High Point Eastside
nAcrr, iry nntn gtatiQtir-c f tmthnri 1631 E)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
# of Samples
52
50
52
47
52
Annual Average-, n /L
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.2
1.0
Maximum Value, n /L
9.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
TBEL, n /L
47
WQBEL, n /L
12.3
Per the mercury TMDL guidance, if there are no exceedances of the technology based effluent limit
(TBEL) or water quality based effluent limit (WQBEL) as in this case, then mercury monitoring (using
Method 1631 E) conducted in the three (3) required effluent pollutant scans is sufficient.
In addition, because there are multiple mercury measurements above 1 ng/L, and this is a major
municipal facility with a permitted flow greater than 2.0 MGD, a special condition requiring that the
facility develop a mercury minimization plan (MMP) has been added in the draft permit.
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
• The numerical address of the facility on Riverdale Road is denoted on the supplement to
permit cover sheet.
• The Deep River outfall 002 is listed first on the supplement to permit cover sheet and the
phrase about construction of Randleman Reservoir has been removed.
• Twice per month monitoring for total cadmium, total lead, phenols, and cyanide has been
removed from the permit based on results of the reasonable potential analysis that
indicated that monitoring is no longer required. The data showed no potential to exceed the
water quality standards in Deep River or Richland Creek.
• The footnotes regarding chlorinated phenolic compounds and cyanide were removed from .
A.(1.) and A.(2.) based on these parameters no longer being monitored in the permit.
• Footnote 5 in A.(1.) and A.(2.) now states that toxicity monitoring shall coincide with copper
and zinc monitoring.
• The weekly average limit for total mercury was removed based on the results of the mercury
evaluation analysis. Based on the NC approved mercury TMDL and an evaluation of data
from 2008 through 2012, it was determined that no limit was required for the protection of
the NC water quality standard or the technology based effluent limit. It was determined that
the facility would have to conduct a mercury minimization plan (MMP) based on the number
of detectable values above 1 ng/I. A special condition was added requiring the completion
of the MMP (See A.(8.)).
The weekly average and daily maximum limit for total nickel was removed based on the
results of the reasonable potential analysis which indicated no potential to exceed the water
quality standard in the Deep River or Richland Creek. However based on current DWQ
procedure, quarterly monitoring for lead will be required based on the predicted
concentration being greater than 50% of the allowable concentration. (per DWQ
memorandum 7/15/2010 re: Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances).
• Minor language changes to the chronic toxicity conditions A.(5.) and A.(6.) have been made
to reflect updates.
Fact. Sheet
Renewal -- N11DI S NC0024210
Pane 4

r
In Special Condition A.(7.). Effluent Pollutant Scan, the language has been updated to note
three scans must be completed during -the-permit cycle, mercury must be sampled using
EPA Method 1631 E and DWQ Water Quality Section has been corrected to the Surface
Water Protection Section.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: June 3, 2013
Permit Scheduled to Issue: September 1, 2013 ,
NPDES UNIT CONTACT
If you hav questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact J c ie Nowell at [phone].
NAME: A, DATE:
I Office Comments:
NAME: DATE:
RO SUPERVISOR
1=act Sheet
Renewal -- NJ D1.S NCO024210
Page 5
DATE:
r,

High Point Eastside
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
nc0024210
Qw (MGD) = 26.00
WWTP/WTP Class: IV
IQIOS(cfs)= 0.84
IWC @1Q10S = 97.96%
7QIOS (cfs) = 1.00
IWC @ 7Q10S = 97.58%
7QIOW (cfs) = 2.60
IWC @ 7QIOW = 93.94%
30Q2 (cfs) = 2.90
IWC @ 30Q2 = 93.29%
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 15.00
IWC @ QA = 72.88%
Receiving Stream: Richland
Creek Stream Class: WS IV CA
Outfali 001
Qw = 26 MGD
CHRONIC TEST CONCENTRATION = DEFAULT
= 90 %
PARAMETER
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
N
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
a
a
f-
(1)
NC WQS / Applied V2 FAV /
n # Det. Max Pred Allowable Cw
Chronic Standard -Acute
Cw
Acute: 15.3
Cadmium
NC
2 FW(7QIOs) 15
ug/L
159 1
1.3
_ _ _ ___ _
Chronic: 2 0
—Chronic:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP , Predicted Max z 50% of Allowable Cw
No value > Allowable Cw
defer to LTMP
Acute: NO WQS
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300 A(30Q2)
ug/L
71 3
47.6
_ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 321.6
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP, Predicted: Max < 50% of Allowable Cw-'No
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute: 7.5
Copper (AL)
NC
7 FW(7QIOs) 7
ug/L.
160 104
395
Chronic: 7.2
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
58 value(s) > Allowable Cw
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Acute: 22.5
All values below detection, no limit or monitoring
Cyanide
NC
5 FW(7QIOs) 22
10
ug/L
71 0
5.0
required.
Chronic:----- 5-1 --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 34.5
Lead
NC
25 FW(7Q1Os) 33.8
ug/L
159 5
7.4
_ -----------------------------------------
Chronic: 25.6
No RP, 'Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute: NO WQS
Mercury
NC
12 FW(7QIOs)
0.5
ng/L
149 115
7.8
Chronic: 12.3
_ _
No. RP, Predicted Max t 50% of Allowable Cw
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: 266.4
Nickel
NC
25 W S (7 Q 10 s) 261
ug/L
161 23
22.2
Chronic: 25.6
No RP, Predicted Max z 50% of Allowable Cw
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: 68.4
Zinc (AL)
NC
50 FW(7Q10s) 67
ug/L
160 160
190.7
Chronic: 51.2
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
69 values > Allowable Cw
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Acute:
'
0 0
N/A
Chronic:----------
---------------------------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
24210rpa2012richlandck, rpa
Page 1 of 2 6/4/2013

High Point Eastside REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Outfah 002
nc0024210 Qw = 26 MGD
Qw (MGD) = 26.00
IQIOS(cfs)= 5.74
7QIOS(cfs)= 6.90
7Q 10 W (cfs) = 2.60
30Q2 (cfs) = 0.00
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 96.30
Receiving Stream: Deep River
WWTP/WTP Class: IV
IWC @ 1Q10S = 87.53%
IWC @ 7Q10S = 85.38%
IWC @ 7Q1 OW = 93.94%
IWC @ 30Q2 = 100.00%
IWC @ QA = 29.50%
Stream Class: WS IV CA
CHRONIC TEST CONCENTRATION = 85.4%
PARAMETER
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
J
F
(1)
NC WQS / Applied Vz FAV /
a
z
Max Pred
n # Det. Allowable Cw
Chronic Standard Acute
Cw
Acute: 17.1
Cadmium
NC
2 FW(7QIOs) 15
ug/L
159 1
1.3
Chronic: 2.3
No RP , Predicted Mai > 50% of Allowable Cw-
No value > Allowable Cw
defer to LIMP
Acute: NO WQS
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300 A(30Q2)
ug/L
71 3
47.6
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 300.0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP; Predicted'Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute: 8.3
Copper (AL)
NC
7 FW(7QIOs) 7
ug/L
160 104
395
Chronic: 8.2
RP for AL(Cu,Zn;Ag',Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly
52 values > Allowable Cw
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Acute: 25.1
All values below detection, no limit .or monitoring
Cyanide
NC
5 FW(7QIOs) 22
10
ug/L
71 0
5.0
required.
----- --
Chronic: 5.9
---------------------------
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 38.6
Lead
NC
25 FW(7Q l Os) 33.8
ug/L
159 5
7.4
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 29.3
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring required
Acute: NO WQS
Mercury
NC
12 FW(7QIOs)
0.5
ng/L
149 115
7.8
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 14.1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No RP , Predicted: Max a 50% of Allowable Cw
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: 298.2
Nickel
NC
25 WS(7Q10s) 261
ug/L
161 23
22.2__
Chronic: 29.3
No RP , Predicted; Max >_ 50% of Allowable Cw
No value > Allowable Cw
apply Quarterly Monitoring
Acute: 76.5
Zinc (AL)
NC
50 FW(7QIOs) 67
ug/L
160 160
190.7
Chronic: 58,6
RP for AL(Cu,Zn;A§,Fe;CI) - apply Quarterly
50 value(s) > Allowable Cw
Monitoring in conjunction with TOX Test
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_
Chronic:----------
— - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - —
Acute:
0 0
N/A
24210rpa2012deepr,rpa
Page 1 of 2 5/31/2013

5/15/13 WQS = 12 ;
Facility Name: ,High Point Eastside
Total Mercury 1631E PQL= 0.5 ng/L
Date Modifier Data Entry
ng/L
Value
MERCURY WQBEL/TBEL EVALUATION V:2013-5
No Limit Required
MMP Required
7Q10s = 1.000 "cfs WQBEL= 12.30 ng/L
Permitted Flow = j 26.000 j 47 ng/L
1/7/2008
1
1
1/15/2008
2 1
2
1/22/2008
2
i 2
1/28/2008 <
1
0.5
2/4/2008
1
1
2/11/2008
1
j 1
2/18/2008
2
2
2/25/2008
2
, 2
3/3/2008
2
i 2
3/10/2008
2
2
3/17/2008
1
1
3/24/2008
2
2
3/31/2008
2
2
4/8/2008
1
I 1
4/14/2008
2
2
4/21/2008
1
1
4/29/2008
3
I 3
5/5/2008
2
i 2
5/12/2008
4
, 4
5/19/2008
2
f 2
5/27/2008
2
I 2
6/2/2008 <
1
0.5
6/9/2008
2
I 2
6/16/2008
2
i 2
6/23/2008
1
1
6/30/2008
2
! 2
7/7/2008
2
2
7/15/2008
2
2
7/21/2008
2
2
7/28/2008
1
I 1
8/4/2008
2
2
8/11/2008
2
2
8/18/2008
3
I 3
8/25/2008
9
9
9/2/2008
2
i 2
9/8/2008
2
2
9/15/2008
2
2
9/22/2008
1
1
9/29/2008
2
2
10/7/2008
2
2
10/13/2008
1
i 1
10/20/2008
1
1
10/27/2008
1
1
11/3/2008
1
1
11/10/2008
4
4
11/17/2008
1
! 1
11/24/2008
1
1
12/1/2008
1
1
12/8/2008
1
1
12/15/2008
1
I 1
12/22/2008
3
I 3
12/29/2008
1
1
1.8 ng/L- Annual Average for 2008
1/5/2009
1
1
1/12/2009
1
1
— 1/20/2009 _ __
2 —�
2

1/26/2009 -
- < - --
1 -
0.5
2/2/2009
<
1
0.5
2/9/2009
2
2
2/16/2009
2
2
2/23/2009
2 j
2
3/2/2009
2
2
3/9/2009
2
2
3/16/2009
2
2
3/23/2009
2
2
3/30/2009
2
2
4/6/2009
1
1
4/14/2009
2
2
4/20/2009
1
1
4/27/2009
1
1
5/4/2009
2
2
5/11/2009
1
1
5/18/2009
2
2
5/27/2009
6
6
6/1/2009
1
1
6/8/2009
2
2
6/16/2009
1
1
5/22/2009
2
2
7/6/2009
2
2
7/14/2009
1
1
7/20/2009
2
2
7/27/2009
2
2
8/3/2009
1
1
8/10/2009
2
2
8/17/2009
2
2
8/24/2009
4
4
9/1/2009
3
3
9/8/2009
1
1
9/12/2009
3
3
9/22/2009
2
2
10/8/2009
1
1
10/16/2009
2
2
10/19/2009
1
1
10/26/2009
2
2
11/2/2009
4
4
11/9/2009
2
2
11/16/2009
<
1 j
0.5
11/24/2009
2
2
11/30/2009
1
1
12/7/2009
1
1
12/14/2009
1
1
12/21/2009
2
2
12/28/2009
2
2
1/4/2010
<
1
0.5
1/11/2010
2 i
2
1/19/2010
2
2
1/25/2010
2
2
2/3/2010
4
4
2/8/2010
2
2
2/15/2010
<
1
0.5
2/22/2010
<
1
0.5
3/1/2010
1
1
3/8/2010
1
1
3/15/2010
1
1
3/22/2010
2
2
3/30/2010
1
1
4/5/2010
1
1
4/12/2010
<
1
0.5
1.8 ng/L - Annual Average for 2009

4/19/2010
- -
---1
4/26/2010
1
5/3/2010
1
5/10/2010
2
5/17/2010
3
5/24/2010
2
6/1/2010
2
6/7/2010
2
6/15/2010
3
6/21/2010
1
6/29/2010
2
7/6/2010
<
1 I
7/12/2010
3
7/19/2010
2
7/26/2010
<
1 i
8/2/2010
1
8/9/2010
2
8/16/2010
2
8/23/2010
1
8/30/2010
3
9/7/2010
2
9/13/2010
2
9/20/2010
4
9/28/2010
1
10/4/2010
2
10/12/2010
2
10/18/2010
2 i
10/28/2010
2
11/1/2010
<
1 j
11/8/2010
3
11/15/2010
5
11/22/2010
3
11/29/2010
5
12/6/2010
2
12/14/2010
<
1
12/20/2010
<
1
12/28/2010
1
1/4/2011
<
1
1/10/2011
1
1/18/2011
2 {�
1/24/2011
<
1 I
1/31/2011
<
1
2/7/2011
<
1
2/14/2011
<
1
2/21/2011
<
1
3/1/2011
2
3/7/2011
2
3/14/2011
1
3/22/2011
1
3/29/2011
1
4/4/2011
1
4/13/2011
2
4/19/2011
4
4/27/2011
2
5/3/2011
2
5/10/2011
2
5/16/2011
2
5/23/2011
2 j
5/31/2011
2
6/7/2011
2
6/15/2011
2
6/20/2011
<
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
1
2
0.5
3
2
0.5
1
2
2
1
3
2
2
4
1
2
2
2
2
0.5
3
5
3
5
2
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
1
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.5
1.8 ng/L- Annual Average for 2010

6/28/2011
-- - -
- 2 -
7/5/2011
1
7/11/2011
4
7/18/2011
3
7/26/2011
<
1
8/3/2011
<
1
8/9/2011
<
1
8/16/2011
1
8/23/2011
1
8/30/2011
<
1
9/7/2011
<
1
9/14/2011
1
9/20/2011
<
1
9/28/2011
<
1
10/5/2011
<
1
10/13/2011
<
1
10/20/2011
<
1
10/26/2011
<
1
11/2/2011
<
1
11/8/2011
<
1
11/15/2011
<
1
11/22/2011
<
1
1/5/2012
<
1
1/12/2012
1
1/18/2012
<
1
1/24/2012
<
1
2/1/2012
<
1
2/8/2012
<
1
2/15/2012
<
1
2/23/2012
<
1
2/29/2012
<
1
3/6/2012
2
3/15/2012
1
3/20/2012
1
3/27/2012
<
1
4/3/2012
2
4/11/2012
1
4/17/2012
2
4/26/2012
4
5/1/2012
1
5/9/2012
2
5/15/2012
2
5/22/2012
1
5/30/2012
1
6/7/2012
.2
6/13/2012
1
6/19/2012
1
6/27/2012
1
7/3/2012
<
1
7/11/2012
1
7/18/2012
1 !
7/25/2012
<
1
8/1/2012
1
8/8/2012
<
1
8/15/2012
<
2
8/22/2012
1
8/29/2012
1
9/5/2012
1
9/12/2012
1
9/19/2012
1
9/26/2012
<
1
10/3/2012
1
2
1
4
3
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
1
1
0.5
2
1
2
4
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
0.5
1
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
1
1.2 ng/L - Annual Average for 2011

— 10/10/2012 — ,-- -
- 2
-- 2
10/17/2012
1
1
10/24/2012 <
1
0.5
10/31/2012 <
1
l+
; 0.5
11/7/2012 <
1
I 0.5
11/14/2012
1
I 1
11/20/2012 <
1
I 0.5
11/28/2012
1
i 1
12/4/2012 <
1
0.5
12/11/2012
1
j 1
12/20/2012 <
1
I 0.5
12/27/2012
1
1
1.0 ng/L- Annual Average for 2012

NPDES/A uifer Protection Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
PERMIT WRITER COMPLETES THIS PART:
Check all that
PERMIT WRITERS - AFTER you pet this form back
apply
from Notify PERCS if LTMP/STMP data we said should be
on DMRs is not really there, so we can get it for you
(or NOV POTW).
- Notify PERCS if you want us to keep a specific POC
in LTMP/STMP so you will have data for next permit
renewal.
Email PERCS draft permit, fact sheet, RPA.
Send PERCS paper copy of permit (w/o NPDES
boilerplate), cover letter, final fact sheet. Email RPA if
changes.
Date of Request
5/7/2012
municipal renewal
x
Requestor
Nowell
new industries
Facility Name
High Point Eastside
WWTP expansion
Permit Number
NCO024210
Speculative limits
Region
WSRO
stream reclass.
Basin
CPF
outfall relocation
7Q10 change
other
other
check applicable PERCS staff:
Other Comments to PERCS:
X
BIRD, CPF, CTB, FRB, TAR - Sarah Morrison 807-6310
CHO, HIW, LUM, LTN, NES, NEW, ROA, YAD - Monti
Hassan 807-6314
PERCS PRETREATMENT STAFF COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status of Pretreatment Program (check all that apply)
1) facility has no SIU's, does have Division approved Pretreatment Program that is INACTIVE
facility has no SIU's, does not have Division approved Pretreatment Program
3) facility has SIUs and DWQ approved Pretreatment Program (list "DEV" if program still underdevelopment)
3a) Full Program with LTMP
3b) Modified Program with STMP
4) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below
Flow, MGD
Permitted
Actual
Time period for Actual
JSTMP
time frame:
Industrial
Most recent:
Uncontrollable
n/a
Next Cycle:
a
c
L w
2
Parameter of
Concern (POC)
Check List
POC due to
NPDES/ Non-
Disch Permit
Limit
Required by
EPA*
Required
by 603
Sludge—
POC due
to SIU***
POTW POC
(Explain
below)****
STMP
Effluent
Freq
LTMP
Effluent
Freq
Q = Quarterly
—
BOD
4
Q M
TSS
4
Q M
NH3
4
Q M
Arsenic
4
Q M
q
Cadmium
4
Q M
4
Chromium
4
Q M
l
opper
4
Q M
Cyanide
4
Q M
Is all data on DMRs?
'Lead
✓
4
Q M
YES
Mercury
✓
4
Q M
NO (attach data)
Molybdenum
4
Q M
q
j4ickel
4
Q M
Silver
4
Q M
Selenium
4
Q M
inc
IV
4
Q M
Is data in spreadsheet?
Total Nitrogen
4
Q M
YES email to writer
Phosphorus
V
4
Q M
NO
4 Q M
4 Q M
4 1 Q M
4 Q M
*Always in the LTMP/STMP '* Only in LTMP/STMP if sludge land app or composte (dif POCs for incinerators)
*** Only in LTMP/STMP while SIU still discharges to POTW **** Only in LTMP/STMP when pollutant is still of concern to POTW
Comments to Permit Writer (ex explanation of any POCs: info you have on IU related investigations into NPDES problems):
/
hghptea stpid2012.xl sx
Revised. July 24, 2007

LA s
Ambient Monitoring System Station
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment
Location: RANDLEMAN LAKE AT SR 1921 NR RANDLEMAN
Station #: B4614500 Hydrologic Unit Code: 03030003
Latitude: 35.90618 Longitude:-79.85648 Stream class: WS-IV CA
Agency: UCFRBA NC stream index: 17-(4)
Time period: 06/12/2008 to 04/01/2010
# # Results not meeting EL Percentiles
results ND EL # % %Conf Min loth 25th 50th 75th 90th Max
Field
D.O.(mg/L)
32
0
<4
0
0
32
0
<5
1
3.1
PH (SU)
32
0
<6
0
0
32
0
>9
0
0
Spec. conductance
32
0
N/A
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
32
0
>32
0
0
Other
TSS (mg/L)
23
0
N/A
Turbidity (NTU)
23
0
>25
4
17.4 92.7
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
23
11
N/A
NO2+NO3asN
23
8
>10
0
0
TKN as N
23
5
N/A
Total Phosphorus
15
1
N/A
Fecal Coliform Screening(#/100mL)
#results: Geomean
#>400:
%>400:%Conf:
23 15
1
4.3
4.6
5.4
6.8
8.8
9.6
11.4
12.3
4.6
5.4
6.8
8.8
9.6
11.4
12.3
6.1
6.2
6.8
7.3
8.4
8.7
8.7
6.1
6.2
6.8
7.3
8.4
8.7
8.7
77
123
157
180
211
229
311
4.3
6.9
12
24
28.2
29.9
31
3
3.4
4
8
11
27.6
34
3.3
4.1
5.3
6.8
18.1
53.6
74.9
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.07
0.12
0.14
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.08
0.28
0.4
0.43
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.69
0.9
1.2
1.67
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.12
0.14
Key:
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence

Location:
Station #:
Latitude:
Agency:
Time period
Field
Ambient Monitoring System Station
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment
DEEP RIV AT SR 1113 KIVETT DR NR HAYWORTH SPRING
B4350000 Hydrologic Unit Code: 03030003
35.95942 Longitude:-79.90605 Stream class: WS-IV CA*
UCFRBA NC stream index: 17-(4)
01/10/2006 to 12/02/2010
# # Results not meeting EL Percentiles
results ND EL # % %Conf Min loth 25th 50th 75th 90th Max
D.O.(mg/L)
85
0
<4
10
11.8 77.2
85
0
<5
14
16.5 > 99.9
pH (SU)
85
0
<6
0
0
85
0
>9
0
0
Spec. conductance
85
0
N/A
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
85
0
1>32
0
0
Other
TSS (mg/L.)
60
0
N/A
Turbidity (NTU)
60
0
>50
0
0
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
60
26
N/A
NO2+NO3 as N
60
6
>10
0
0
TKN as N
60
7
N/A
Total Phosphorus
52
6
N/A
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum, total (AI)
6
0
N/A
Arsenic, total (As)
6
6
>10
0
0
Cadmium, total (Cd)
6
6
>2
0
0
Chromium, total (Cr)
6
6
>50
0
0
Copper, total (Cu)
6
4
>7
0.
0
Iron, total (Fe)
6
0
>1000
2
33.3
Lead, total (Pb)
6
6
>25
0
0
Manganese, total (Mn)
6
0
>200
0
0
Nickel, total (Ni)
6
6
>25
0
0
Zinc, total (Zn)
6
5
>50
0
0
Fecal Coliform Screening(#/100mL)
#results: Geomean
#>400: %>400:%Conf:
60 82.4
9
15
1
3.7
5.5
7.7
9.8
11
12.6
1
3.7
5.5
7.7
9.8
11
12.6
6.3
6.6
6.8
7
7.2
7.5
8.5
6.3
6.6
6.8
7
7.2
7.5
8.5
84
99
112
134
193
245
327
2.6
6.5
11.4
20.9
25.1
27.6
28.9
1
3
4
8
12
20.9
37
3.1
4.6
6.2
9.2
22
36.3
49.9
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.12
0.24
0.02
0.02
0.09
0.17
0.3
0.45
0.93
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.47
0.64
0.85
1.16
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.07
0.15
82
82
144
329
1031
1230
1230
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
402
402
465
546
1160
1190
1190
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
68
84
115
142
142
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
Key:
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence

Ambient Monitoring System Station
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment
Location: RICHLAND CRK AT SR 1145 NR HIGH POINT
Station #: B4410000 Hydrologic Unit Code: 03030003
Latitude: 35.94100 Longitude:-79.90200 Stream class: WS-IV CA*
Agency: UCFRBA NC stream index: 17-7-(4)
Time period: 01/10/2006 to 05/27/2008
# # Results not meeting EL Percentiles
results ND EL # % %Conf Min loth 25th 50th 75th 90th Max
Field
D.O.(mg/L)
40
0
<4
2
5
40
0
<5
4
10 62.9
pH (SU)
40
0
<6
0
0
40
0
>9
0
0
Spec. conductance
40
0
N/A
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
40
0
>32
0
0
Other
TSS (mg/L)
29
1
N/A
Turbidity (NTU)
29
0
>50
2
6.9
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
29
17
N/A
NO2 + NO3 as N
29
0
> 10
0
0
TKN as N
29
0
N/A
Total Phosphorus
29
0
N/A
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum, total (Al}
6
0
N/A
Arsenic, total (As)
6
6
>10
0
0
Cadmium, total (Cd)
6
6
>2
0
0
Chromium, total (Cr)
6
6
>50
0
0
Copper, total (Cu)
6
0
>7
0
0
Iron, total (Fe)
6
0
>1000
2
33.3
Lead, total (Pb)
6
6
>25
0
0
Manganese, total (Mn)
6
0
>200
2
33.3
Nickel, total (Ni)
6
6
>25
0
0
Zinc, total (Zn)
6
1
>50
1
16.7
Fecal Coliform Screening(#/100mL)
# results: Geomean
#> 400: %> 400: %Conf-
29 41.5
5
17.2
3.1
4.7
7.4
8.1
9.2
10.1
10.8
3.1
4.7
7.4
8.1
9.2
10.1
10.8
6.5
6.7
6.8
7
7.1
7.2
7.6
6.5
6.7
6.8
7
7.1
7.2
7.6
79
127
218
360
423
477
495
7.1 10.5 14.4 21.1 24.7 26.6 / 27.9
1
2
2
4
11.5
21
38
1.7
2.2
2.8
6.8
12.2
32.6
89.8
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.17
2.12
0.02
0.09
0.16
1.43
2.18
2.79
3.86
0.34
0.4
0.5
0.69
1.02
1.14
2.46 J
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.11
1.28
2.41
156
156
188
332
415
623
623
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
3
4
5
5
259
259
300
584
1240
1390
1390
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
62
62
82
105
278
372
372
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
36
50
51
51
Kev:
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Cofrform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence

Ambient Monitoring System Station
NCDENR, Division; of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment
Location: RICHLAND CRK AT SR 1154 KERSEY VALLEY RD NR HIGH POINT
Station #: B4380000 Hydrologic Unit Code: 03030003
Latitude: 35.94100 Longitude:-79.932210 Stream class: WS-IV CA*
Agency: UCFRBA NC stream index: 17-7-(4)
Time period: 01/10/2006 to 12/02/2010
# # Results not meeting EL Percentiles
results ND EL # % %Conf Min loth 25th 50th 75th 90th Max
Field
D.O.(mg/L)
85
0
<4
0
0
85
0
<5
0
0
pH (SU)
85
0 '
<6
0
0
85
0
>9
0
0
Spec. conductance
85
0
N/A
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
85
0
>32
0
0
Other
TSS (mg/L)
60
10
N/A
Turbidity (NTU)
60
0
>50
4
6.7
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
60
0
N/A
NO2+NO3asN
60
1
>10
0
0
TKN as N
60
10
N/A
Total Phosphorus
52
32
N/A
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum, total (Al)
6
1
N/A
Arsenic, total (As)
6
6
>10
0
0
Cadmium, total (Cd)
6
6
>2
0
0
Chromium, total (Cr)
6
6
>50
0
0
Copper, total (Cu)
6
5
>7
1
16.7
Iron, total (Fe)
6
0
>1000
0
0
Lead, total (Pb)
6
6
>25
0
0
Manganese, total (Mn)
6
0
>200
0
0
Nickel, total (Ni)
6
6
>25
0
0
Zinc, total (Zn)
6
5
>50
0
0
Fecal Coliform Screening(#/100mL)
#results: Geomean
#>400: %>400:%Conf:
60 243.3
17
28.3
95.7
5.3
6.7
7.1
8.6
10.1
11.9
13.9
5.3
6.7
7.1
8.6
10.1
11.9
13.9
6.2
6.6
6.8
7.1
7.3
7.4
7.8
6.2
6.6
6.8
7.1
7.3
7.4
7.8
54
101
134
176
191
202
252
1.9
6.9
11.5
20.7
24.1
25.6
28.5
1
1
2
3
6.8
18
209
1
1.8
2.7
4.7
17.2
43.8
207
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.12
0.17
0.24
1.82
0.02
0.21
0.28
0.38
0.54
0.65
0.84
0.16
0.2
0.22
0.3
0.48
0.7
3.53
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.1
0.24
50
50
77
274
674
772
772
10'
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
4
8
8
264
264
281
450
926
1000
1000
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
37
37
68
87
94
100
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
16
33
33
Key:
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence

PubFic Services
Terry Houk, Assistant Director
PO Box 230
HIGH POINT, NC 27261
February 16, 2011
Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR/DWQ/NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: City of High Point Eastside WWTP
Permit Renewal Application
NPDES #NC0024210, Guilford County
Dear Mrs. Sprinkle:
NORTH CAROLINNS INTERNATIONAL CITY`'
The NPDES permit for the City of High Point Eastside WWTP expires on August 31, 2011. In accordance
with State and Federal regulations, the City is requesting NPDES renewal for the subject facility. This
permit renewal application includes: Form 2A, Application Overview; Part D, Expanded Effluent Testing
Data; Part E, Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data; Part F, Industrial User Discharges and RCLA/CERCLA
Wastes; and other supplemental information as required and/or needed.
The Eastside WWTP has two permitted discharges; Outfall 001, Richland Creek, and Outfall 002, Deep
River. Prior to May 2008 the Eastside WWTP discharged into Richland Creek, Outfall 001. After
completion of the Effluent Pump Station and testing of the new pumping station the plant began to
discharge into the channel of the Deep River in the Randleman Reservoir, Outfall 002. Outfall 001
remains as a permitted outfall, but is used only on the rare occasion that the Effluent Pump Station has
to be taken out of service for maintenance.
We look forward to working with you on the renewal of Eastside's NPDES permit. Please contact me at
336-883-3166 or John Hodges, Wastewater Plants manager, at 336-822-4730 if you need any
additional information.
Sincerely,
Terry L. Houk
Assistant Director of Public Services
Cc: John Hodges, Wastewater Plants Manager
Tim Fitzgerald, Wastewater Plant Superintendent
Randy Smith, Eastside WWTP Chief Operator
File
City of High Point, P.O. 230, 211 South Hamilton Street, High Point, NC 27261 USA
Phone [phone] Fax: [phone] TDD 336.883.8517

j
CITY OF HIGH POINT;�a
=.1 EASTSIDE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
-z -- — -— e
lei
Ql-
_ '�, wt : _.-�� '" .._-° (� •'( — —ter 1_�=
L I - r •t tTs
l (�. ' ✓ _ ✓ I
Legend
g
: d BUiLDINcs
C1' ^ STREETS
L-J 5
10 FEET CONTOUR
lr r Z, STREAMS
I
PARCELS

CITY OF HIGH POINT
EASTSIDE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Ry
cRFF�
N
o
�O
i W E
11 ERDALE RD
EASTSIDE O
WWTF
o
Do Q t o p
° 0
O 8
i
ut
r
Legend
STREETS
PARCELS
BUILDINGS
10 FT CONTOURS
TREATED WASTEWATER EFFLUENT
WASTEWATER LINES
WASTEWATER STRUCTURES
EFFLUENT PUMPING STATION
o
o
MAP CREATED BY:
o TOM BECKETT01/26/11
NG 6 revised 02/23/11
.o

SDO-001
EFFL
P$
$IUDCE
AEO /2 HOLDING fit: P� ^
,./ FILTERS
SLUDGE
AED HOLDING TO
FILTERS �
I NPW
TANK __PIJEt ` -
NqNTRrl
BLDG CH
_ WMi WWFt FUTURE RANDLEMAN LAKE
EST I /1 1 /2 STORA NORMAL POOL EL. 6B2
c /1 )
AI BLDG.
I PC �-�� 7ELEC.
/$ j BUILDIN -
o I / PC PC EST
ODOR /2 FINAL FINAL FIN 4_ I SD -002
FINAL
& BLDG / CLARIFIER CLARIFIER CLARIFIER CLARIFlER
I /1 /2 M- I� I
PTF
I
MZ FERM RA$ 01 RA" /
ANAEROBIC/ANOXIC/AERATION TANKS ASH LAGOON
/2
O $EPTAGE ASH
DRYING
NRCY PS k pAD ASH LAGOON —
MAINTENANCE /1
EWALIZATION OFTI BLOWER h
1 I BASIN �DG J BUtLDING�--�
STORAGE l
CL
—�
1 TANKS SDO-003
I 1
ENGINEERING
dm,,,.i,p LAND PLANNING
�SURVEYING
� 100 0 100 200
www dmn-inc com
LEGEND
DRAINAGE BOUNDARY
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
- PROPERTY LINE
DITCH
OPEN PROCESS UNIT
BUILDING
PAVEMENT
SIDEWALK
OUTLET
DRAINAGE
AREA (ac.)
IMPERVIOUS
AREA (ac.)
PERCENT
IMPERVIOUS
SDO-001
30.65
7.04
22.97%
SDO-002
1.39
0.31
22.30%
SDO-003
4.41
1 0.13
2.95%
TOTAL 1
36.45
7.48
20.52%
1 PROJECT 090056 SCALE 1"=160 FT REV FEB 24, 2009

!b' a�u, u I I I l¢ I Ili \♦ 1 l r--- I r.-�-- �
33,3% raa
el I I r aw,n, fa,wa ,xu mw rxn
Jill
1 1 , 1111 I 1 r I - 1 I' I M.— I --/ --I---/
11 IL # I 11 1
s o ¢ I i " , _Ji—_
rIW ga�aNCl
a1a11
-r�--- a
fIswMn I I
a1
I
I ,
I
I YR Vrlf
I
n
HaEN AND SAWYER
Environmental Engineors 3 Scisntlsts
6
0
n
N X X lxl x I, x+x� x+
x�x�x�xl X ILxlx i xTxix�J x
xrx X ,X! X l x+xllxllx l x� X
I r----- D ----� R
aofo ufea � D
� npy - p1R® I®Kta Nf Ml�l
1
\� I
pymw m m �
-------------------- ---------------------------------
—o---L"------ _ r--------- 4 ------------j
r-------- - me I I
rwac
oruom mu art nn I
____ _- �
sue____
�y I I I I 1 'p' eaaaaa,w ` rwa I ld ��
J'
, ; I II ♦ , I I
ro ,W nnuima+n
N a41 ---4----------I I .I muarnn muarnm
L�D - mnf,�
j an m
I-------------�
----------- i \♦♦ I M11N j r LxJ lI mu nm ona' rnm ¢ i i �--4 - ®wr
I ♦ oaiwme I i �/ I I vw I I I I
----- --------
�--- --D-----1 ♦\♦ I
II \ I
I I I I I I oaana ♦11 M°m ----o- ----1 1---------- fl-------- 1
I
I
I
I
� I
I
m�
-wo I
FIGURE 2-2
CUD:�) ffesE,,vor9.
usc_ �sIL7

City of High Point
Sludge Management Plant
Eastside WWTP
The City of High Point has a Residual Management Division to manage the solids from
the Eastside WWTP, Westside WWTP and the Ward Water Plant. The process of sludge
disposal for the Eastside WWTP is dewatering and incineration.
Solids handling facilities consist of three dissolved air flotation (DAF) thickeners, two
sludge blending tanks, one sludge storage tanks, two centrifuges, an incinerator, an ash
lagoon for ash storage, and associated pumps and process equipment.
Waste activated sludge is pumped to the DAF units for thickening. The solids content of
the WAS is approximately 1% prior to thickening and about 3.5% after thickening. The
thickened sludge is then pumped to the sludge blending tanks. Thickened primary
sludge, approximately 3.5% solids, is also pumped to the sludge blending tanks. A total
of approximately 50,000-100,000 gallons per day of WAS and primary sludge is pumped
to the sludge blending tanks.
The sludge from the sludge blending tanks will be pumped to the centrifuges for
dewatering. The dewatered sludge, approximately 25% - 27% cake, from the centrifuges
is conveyed to incinerator with the resulting ash going to two ash lagoons. The ash will
be removed from the ash lagoons and dried on the ash drying pad with the ultimate
disposal at the City of High Point's composting facility or it is taken to a brick
manufacturer.
If there is a failure of the incinerator or the two centrifuges, sludge can be stored in the
sludge blending tanks and the sludge storage tank for approximately 22 days. If just the
incinerator is out of service, the sludge could continue to be dewatered. Once dewatered,
the sludge could be trucked to a lined landfill or stored until the incinerator was fixed.
If the centrifuge at Westside WWTP is down for several days, liquid sludge may be
transported by tanker, on a temporary basis, to the Eastside WWTP and pumped into the
sludge blending tanks. It is then dewatered with the Eastside WWTP solids and
incinerated.
Te Houk
Assistant Director of Public Services

DESCRIPTION OF PLANT FACILITIES
City of High Point Eastside WWTP
NPDES Permit #NC0024210
The Eastside WWTP provides tertiary treatment of the wastewater using the activated
sludge process followed by effluent filters. The activated sludge process operates in the
biological nutrient removal (BNR) mode to provide nitrogen and phosphorous reduction
to meet stringent requirements for discharge of effluent to Randleman Lake. Following
the activated sludge stage, additional solids and organic material are removed by effluent
filters. The effluent is then disinfected by ultraviolet light prior to discharge. Waste
activated sludge is thickened by dissolved air flotation (DAF) thickening. Primary sludge
can be thickened in two fermentation tanks or sent directly to two sludge blending tanks
for blending with waste activated sludge prior to dewatering, incineration and disposal of
incinerator ash in compost material or in brick manufacturing.
Raw wastewater enters the plant through a junction box, from which the flow is fed to the
Preliminary Treatment Facilities through a 66-inch diameter line. From the Preliminary
Treatment Facilities, thy& s -legs through the entire treatment plant by gravity.
The bar screens at the Preliminary Treatment Facilities consist of three mechanically -
cleaned scre s and one manually -cleaned screen for backup. The screens remove rags,
sticks, and other large objects to prevent clogging and interference with operation of
downstream pumps and other process equipment.
From the bar screens, the wastewater flows through two channels to the grit collectors.
Two stirred vortex grit collectors operate in parallel for removal of sand and other heavy
inorganic particles. t removal is provided to reduce abrasion on downstream
equipment and to minimize reductions in process efficiency due to accumulation of
inorganic material in process units. Grit cyclones and grit classifiers are provided to
remove organic material from the settled grit. The grit is then deposited in a dumpster for
ultimate disposal in a landfill.
Five primary clarifiers are provided and are designed to remove a portion of the influent
9OD5 and suspended solids to reduce the organic loading on the biological nutrient
removal activated sludge system. Sludge collectors in each clarifier move the settled
solids to a hopper, from which it is removed and pumped to the fermentation tanks or the
sludge blending tanks. The fermentation tanks are used to break down the primary
sludge to produce a fermentation liquor with volatile fatty acids for the BNR activated
sludge process. After fermentation, the primary sludge is pumped to the sludge blending
tanks. Floating material, or scum, is also removed in the primary clarifiers. Scum pumps
are provided to pump the scum into the discharge line for the primary sludge pumps for
treatment with the primary sludge.
After primary settling, the wastewater flows to the activated sludge stage. The primary
effluent can also be directed to the flow equalization facilities, which consist of a flow
equalization basin, two aerated equalization basins, and two equalization/sludge storage
tanks. The flow equalization facilities can be used to reduce peak flows to the biological

treatment facilities during wet weather conditions and to reduce the effects of diurnal
flows.
The BNR activated sludge stage consists of the anaerobic/anoxic/aeration (AAA) tank,
the nitrified recycle (NRCY) pumps, the final clarifiers, and the return activated sludge
(RAS) pump stations. Primary effluent first enters the AAA tanks, where biological
activity takes place under anaerobic, anoxic (mixed only), and aerated conditions for
phosphorus removal; removal of BOD5i complete nitrification; and denitrification. Four
AAA tanks are normally in service at all times. The aerated portions of the four tanks are
aerated by a fine bubble diffused air aeration system. The anaerobic and anoxic zones in
the AAA tanks are mixed by vertical mixers, which provide mixing without adding
oxygen to the mixed liquor. Mixed liquor recycle is provided by nitrified recycle pumps,
which pump mixed liquor from the end of the aerobic, or nitrification, zone to the head of
the first anoxic zone.
The AAA tank effluent, or mixed liquor, is equally distributed to the al cl_ arifiers.
In the final clarifiers, the activated sludge is settled out for return to the AAA tanks. The
clear liquid above the settling sludge overflows the effluent weirs and flows to the
effluent filters. The settled sludge is removed from the clarifiers through suction -type
sludge collectors and flows to two RAS pump stations, from which the return sludge is
pumped to the AAA tanks. The two RAS pump stations operate in parallel. Each RAS
pump station contains three RAS pumps. The RAS pump stations discharge to the
anaerobic zone distribution channel and the RAS is distributed equally among the
operation AAA tanks.
Excess sludge is removed from the BNR activated sludge system by the RAS pumps.
From the RAS pump stations, the waste activated sludge is pumped to the solids handling
facilities for solids treatment and ultimate disposal.
The final clarifier effluent flows to six effluent filters for removal of fine solids not
removed in the final clarifiers. Two of the effluent filters are deep bed -tine filters,
containing approximately 48 inches of sand supported by 12 inches of filter gravel. The
other four filters are-Aual media-
�1t rs. Filter effluent flows through the underdrain
system to the ultraviolet (UV) disinfection facilities. Backwash water for the filters is
taken from the Washwater Storage Tank next to the Primary Clarifier #5 and, after
backwashing, is collected in the washwater recovery basins for return to the head of the
plant. Facilities are provided to bypass a portion of the secondary effluent when
wastewater flows exceed the capacity of the effluent filters.
Ultraviolet light is used for both filter effluent and filter bypass water disinfection. Three
ultraviolet disinfection channels are provided, with each channel containing two banks of
UV lamps. Effluent from the ultraviolet disinfection facilities flows through three
effluent Parshall Flumes for flow measurement and then flows to an Effluent Pump
Station. The effluent is pumped to Groometown Road where it flows down a Cascade
Aerator and into the channel of the Deep River in the Randleman Reservoir.

Solids handling facilities consist of three dissolved air flotation (DAF) thickeners, two
sludge blending tanks, two centrifuges, a fluidized bed incinerator, an ash lagoon for ash
storage, and associated pumps and process equipment. Primary sludge is normally
pumped to the sludge blending tanks, but can be pumped to the fermentation tanks if
additional food source is needed for BNR purposes. Waste Activated Sludge and
Primary sludge are mixed in the sludge blending tanks from which the mixed sludge is
pumped to the centrifuges for dewatering. After dewatering, the dewatered sludge is
pumped to the incinerator and the ash is pumped as a slurry to the ash lagoons and then
disposed of by adding to compost at the City landfill or it is transported to a brick
manufacturing and used to make brick.
An Odor Control System consisting of a two stage wet scrubber process was added in
2008. A 30,000 SUM fan pulls the gases from the sludge storage tanks and the
dewatering building through the two stage scrubbers where hydrogen sulfide odors are
removed.
Three 2000kW diesel -driven generators provide standby power. Two diesel -fuel storage
tanks of 10,000 gallons each provide fuel for the generators. The generators are sized to
provide full power to the plant.

PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
FA. PretreatmUYe
ram. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of CIUs.
g
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
12
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.

FA Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Alberdin kg Boley, Inc. IU Permit # 0148
Mailing Address: 6008 High Point Road
Greensboro NC 27407
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Produces water -based polyurethane and polyacrylates resins for adhesives and finishes
FA Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Polyurethane/Polyacrylate/Acrylate/Styrene Copolymers
Raw material(s): Diisocyanates, Polyesterdiols, Polyesterpolyols, Polycarbonatediols, Monomers,
Styrene
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
3,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
1,500 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40
H

FA Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Banner Pharmacaps IU Permit # 0126
Mailing Address: 4125 Premier Drive
High Point NC 27265
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Gelatin encapsulates pharmaceutical and nutritional products in dosage form
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):Soft gelatin and gelatin-enrobed pharmaceutical and nutritional capsules
Raw material(s): Gelatin glycerin, sorbitol, soybean, mineral and fish oils, acetaminophen,
ibuprofen other active pharmaceutical and nutritional compounds
F.5. Flow Rate.
c. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
15,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
62,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 439 Pharmaceuticals, Subpart D Mixing/ Compounding/ Formulation

F.3. Significant Industrial User Inforrnation. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Cintas Corporation IU Permit # 0136
Mailing Address: 4345 Federal Drive
Greensboro NC 27410
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Industrial Launderer: wash soiled garments mats shop towels and bar towels.
F.5. Principal Product(a) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Cleaned garments, mats, towels
Raw material(s): Soiled items detergents
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
75,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
2,500 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
SIU because Flow is greater than 25,000 gallons per day

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Custom Drum Services, Inc. IU Permit # 0138
Mailing Address: 2020 Jarrell Street
High Point NC 27260
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Washing and rinsing of 55-gallon steel drums
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Cleaned steel drums (recycled)
Raw material(s): Caustic acids — mostly sulfuric
F.S. Flow Rate.
g. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
3,246 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
h. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
500 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretrsahment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards El Yes ®No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
SIU because of potential to harm collection system / WWTP

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Diversified Technologies IU Permit # 0056
Mailing Address: 125 Wade Street
Jamestown NC 27282
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Copper etching electroplating board cleaning and rinsing of printed circuit boards .
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Completed, cleaned electronic printed circuit boards
Raw material(s): epoxy -fiberglass -copper laminate, photo resist, solder, Au, Cu, Ni
FA Flow Rate.
i. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
1,125 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
j. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
200
gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 413 Electroplating Subpart A

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Fairmont Metal Finishim I Permit # 0015
Mailing Address: 1301 Corporation Drive
High Point NC 27263
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Sulfuric Anodizing of aluminum (MilSpec 8625)
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Anodized Aluminum _.
Raw material(s): Aluminum Caustic Etch, Sulfuric Acid, Dyes, Sealer, Cleaner
F.G. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
1,000 gpd (-continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
100 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to ttre following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Metal Finishing Subpart A (PSNS)

FA Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Glass Unlimited IU Permit # 0142
Mailing Address: 2149 Brevard Road
High Point NC 27263
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Grind and Polish tempered glass for cabinetry, shower doors etc
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Ground and Polished tempered glass
Raw material(s): Glass polishing compounds
F.6. Flow Rate.
c. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
22,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
5,600 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
for flow greater than 25,000

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Harriss and Covington Hosiery Mills IU Permit # 0025
Mailing Address: 2525 Green Street
High Point NC 27260
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Knit socks bleaching, dyeing, boarding inspecting packaging_
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Knitted socks
Raw material(s): Cotton Nylon Orlon yarn bleach peroxide
F.G. Flow Rabe.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
26,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
8,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
flow greater than 25

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Hunter Farms Dairy IU Permit # 0107
Mailing Address: 1900 North Main Street
High Point NC 27262
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Receive whole milk process and package milk ice cream dairy specialties and juices.
FA Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): milk, ice cream, dairy specialties and bottled juices
Raw material(s): whole milk juice concentrate flavorings
FA Flow Rate.
g. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
75,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
h. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
24,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
25

Ok
%J P,ACA.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Innospec Performance Chemicals IU Permit # 0120
Mailing Address: 510 West Grimes Avenue
Hip,h Point NC 27260
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Mixing blending heating and reacting organic chemicals
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Custom and toll specialty organic chemical products
Raw material(s): organic fatty acids organic amines potassium hydroxide
F.li. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
38,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
13,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
414 OCPSR S

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: M B Platin>; IU Permit # 0050
Mailing Address: 1301 Corporation Drive
Archdale NC 27263
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Barrel electroplating of brass nickel and zinc
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): plated nuts, bolts, screws, brackets, other furniture hardware
Raw material(s): customer's unplated parts brass nickel zinc
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
200
gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A Metal FinishingL

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Royal Development IU Permit # 0055
Mailing Address: 325 Kettering Road
Point NC 27263
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Die -stamping cleaning and painting motion furniture parts
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):stamped and painted steel parts
Raw material(s): coiled cold -rolled steel , caustic, phosphatizing compounds
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
0 (non -discharging) gpd `_continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
4,100 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits E Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?

FA Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Seaboard Group II IU Permit # 0150
Mailing Address: 5899 Riverdale Road
Jamestown NC 27282
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Pumping and treating contaminated groundwater and leachate
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):Physical and chemical treatment and phytoremediation
Raw material(s): groundwater, proprietary chemical (ADX), sodium hydroxide
F.S. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent. Discharge has not yet
85,000 gpd (X continuous or _ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
Non-catei?orical

FA Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Slane Fairfield IU Permit # 0012
Mailing Address: 550 West Fairfield Road
High Point NC 27263
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Knitting,sewing, ewing dyeing & bleaching, packaging and printing of textiles
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Socks
Raw material(s): Acrylic nylon polyester, and rubber
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
20,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
2,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
25,000

F.3. Significant Industrial User Inforrnation. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Slane Hosiery IU Permit # 0043
Mailing Address: 313 South Centennial Street
High Point NC 27260
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Knit wash bleach dye dry, board inspect package and ship socks
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Finished Socks
Raw material(s): Yarn, detergents, chlorine bleach, dyes, auxiliaries
F.6. Flow Rate.
c. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
150,000 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
48,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?

FA Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Syntec Seating Solutions IU Permit # 0154
Mailing Address: 200 Swathmore Avenue
High Point NC 27263
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Shaping welding`phosphatizing and powder -coating of seat parts for transportation industry.
FA Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Finished and upholstered bus seats
Raw material(s): tubular and sheet steel, cleaning and phosphatizing compounds
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
2,100 gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
800 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433, Subpart A Metal Finishing

F.3. Significant Industrial User Inforrnation. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Thomas Built Bus IU Permit # 0047
Mailing Address: 1408 Courtesy_
High Point NC 27260
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Fabrication of completed buses
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal produet(s): buses for the transportation industry
Raw material(s): galvanized steel and components
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
12,500 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
15,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes j_] No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 Subpart A Metal Finishing

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Tyco Electronics Corp. IU Permit # 0149
Mailing Address: 8010 Piedmont Triad Parkway
Greensboro NC 27409
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Forming and electroplating of electrical connectors
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): electrical connectors for electronics, appliances, and communications
Raw material(s): copper, tin, nickel, lead, gold
F.S. Flow Rate.
C. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
30,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
6,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433. S

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Ultra Coatings Inc IU Permit 4 0140
Mailing Address: 3509 Jamac Road
High Point NC 27260
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Cleaning, priming and powder coating of metal components as job shop (does not own goods)
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Powder coated lawn and garden equipment chassis and other consumer goods
Raw material(s): soap solution, iron phosphate, thermosetting plastic powder
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
7,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
500
gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433, Subpart A Metal Finishing

F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Viking Polymers LLC IU Permit # 0145
Mailing Address: 109 Ragsdale Road
Jamestown NC 27282
FA Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Mixing blending forming and cooling plastic feed stock
FA Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Pelletized plastic products used in injection molding and extrusion
Raw material(s): PVC pellets, colorings, fillers, and plasticizers
FA Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater
discharge into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
9,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater
flow discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is
continuous or intermittent.
500 gpd (_continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 463 Subpart A contact cooling and heating water
Ir Prey."
®G PJ� ��