20070295 Ver 2_More Info Received_20071012

TIC JOHN R McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Ms. Lauren Cobb Date:
NCDWQ
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Re: Holding Village Job No
DWQ Response-To-Comments
I am sending you the following item(s):
October 11, 2007
** HAND DELIVER **
EW P-06040
DWQ # 07-0295 v2
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 DWQ Comment Letter Dated 09/24/07 DWQ # 07-0295v2
5 Res onse-To-Comments Letter
5 Revised PCN
These are transmitted as checked below:
® As requested
® For approval
Copy to:
Mr. Ian McMillan, NCDWQ
X1 -Via FedEx
^ For your use
D LSv~~~~ U
OCT 1 2 2007
gTTq~t~'I~ATER BRANCH
Signed: ~~ A~
Kevl Yates
Senior Environment (/Wetland Scientist
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
^ Copy Letter of Transmittal Only to File
® Copy Entire Document to File
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING SURVEYING
PO Box 14005 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 [phone] • fax [phone]
www.johnrmcadams.com

o~~~•W~T ~9pt,
~_ ~
d .~_...~~".~ 'C
r
Michael ~. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross •Ir., Secretary
North Carolina C)epartment of l;nvironment and Natural Resources
Coleen 11. Sullins, Director
Division of water Quality
September 24, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Planned Community Development
Attn: George Krichbaum
6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Subject Property: Holding Village
Buffer Impacts
® REQITEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
^ PERMITTING FEE MISSING/INCORRECT
^ RETURN OF APPLICATION PACKAGE
Dear Mr. Krichbaum:
DWQ Project # 07-0295v2
Wake County
...
._ ,
~... ;.
.._
''~ s~f
~(1r17
..,
. ~.~ ~l~ 'P- dCpo4fl
~:...
w~,c.. 1 , ~ 1 ~, (,~,
Q~~c~oe~~
O C T 1 2 2007
DENR -WATER t~UALITY
WET1AW03 M1D STORAAMAT6R BRANCFI
On September 24, 2007, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated .
September 21, 2007 for the above referenced project. The DWQ has determined that your application
was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on
the subj ect property. Therefore, unless we receive five copies of the additional information requested
below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and
will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information, Please provide
the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
® Incorrect and/or missing wetland, intermittent-perennial stream and/or buffer impacts.
DWQ is unable to review this project without noted or corrected impacts reflected. Please
submit one (Z) original and four (4) copies of completed page $ of PCN application.
® OTHER: The PCN submitted to DWQ reflects Zone 1 impacts of "9,1478". Please submit
the connected impact, and impact totals for Zones 1 and 2.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact this office in writing. If we
do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Scrvicc Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]! 1~AX 919-733-6893 /Internet: i1Sy~!!h2q.enr_stale.ne.us?ncW~c4lanyS
No°CthCarolina
~llflltq~~~
An Cqual Opporuutity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycledll0%Post Consumer Paper

This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Mr. Ian McMillan or me at 919-733-1786 if you have
any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this mattez•.
Sincer ,
~~
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
g01 Oversight/Express Review Pezmitting Unit
CBK/rnj
cc: Lauren Cobb, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc., Attn: Kevin Yates, 2905 Meridian Pkwy, Durham, NC
27713
File Copy
Central Riles
' Filename: 070295v21-YoldingVillage(Wake)_Hold_hnpacts

Since 1979
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
October 11, 2007
To: Cyndi Karoly
Division of Wat Quality
From: Kevin Yates `'
Senior Environm arlE 1/Wetland Scientist
Re: Holding Village
Buffer Impacts -Request For More Information
DWQ 07-0295 v2 / EWP-06040
Our response to additional information requested:
1. Incorrect and/or missing wetland, intermittent-perennial stream and/or
buffer impacts. DWQ is unable to review this project without noted or
corrected impacts reflected. Please submit one (1) original and four (4)
copies of completed page 8 of PNC application.
There are no direct impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with
the construction of this site. There is a pedestrian bridge (inset sheet
# 1) ,roadway (inset sheet # 2), and sewer line (inset sheet # 4), all of
which are proposed aerial crossings of the jurisdictional waters
Neuse Buffer Impacts: There is a network of roads to access the
approximately 148-acre project site; however, the development plan
proposes only one roadway stream buffer impact totaling 0.27-acre
and less than ISO linear feet of impact associated with the
installation of the entrance road, which is an allowable use (sheets
2). The proposed road will span the stream feature close to 90
degrees and will have abutments 10 feet from the stream's top-of-
bank. A pedestrian bridge is proposed instead of a road in the
northwest quadrant to encourage walking to the retail areas adjacent
Research Triangle Park, Nc areas of the site (sheet 1). A majority of the proposed sewer corridor
Post Office Box 14005 impacts are located within the Zone 2 of the Neuse River Buffers
Research Triangle Park, (sheets 3, 4, and S). There is one proposed sewer line that is to be
North Carolina 27709 directionally bored across stream feature "D" close to 90 degrees,
2905 Meridian Parkway and will have a maintenance corridor through the buffer (sheet 4).
Durham, North Carolina 27713
800-733-5646
919-361-5000
919-361-2269 Fax
Charlotte, NC
5311 Seventy-Seven Center Drive,
Suite 66
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
800-733-5646
704-527-0800
704-527-2003 Fax
Comprehensive Lantl Development Design Services
www.johnrmcadams.com We help our clients succeed.

Since 1979
THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED BUFFER IMPACTS:
IMPACT SHEET # ZONE 1 ZONE 2 USE
1 -Pedestrian bridge 0.02 ac. 0.02 ac. Allowable
2 -Roadway (981f) 0.15 ac. 0.12 ac. Allowable
2 -Sewer 25 s.f. Allowable
3 -Sewer 0.02 ac. Allowable
4- Sewer 0.04 ac. 0.11 ac Allowable
5 -Sewer 0.08 ac. Allowable
TOTAL 0.21 ac. 0.35 ac.
See Page 8 of the revised PCN enclosed.
2. OTHER: The PCN submitted to DWQ reflects Zone 1 impacts of
"9,1478". Please submit the corrected impact, and impact totals for
Zones 1 and 2.
See revised PCN enclosed.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 9,148 3 N/A
2 15,246 1.5 N/A
Total 24,394

Office Use Only' Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 441 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Neuse River Buffer
Authorization only
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), the ~~~~(~~~ D
7 !~
II. Applicant Information ~~~ 1 2 2007
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~NR , w^~ q~gt,1TY
Name: Planned Community Development yyET~,~pgT6RBRANCH
Mailing Address: Attn• George Krichbaum
6900 Slade Hill Road
Raleigh NC 27615
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (919 981-6579
E-mail Address:
2. AgentlConsultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kevin Yates
Company Affiliation: The John R. McAdams Company
Mailing Address: 2905 Meridian Pkwy
Durham North Carolina 27713
Telephone Number:~919) 361-5000
Fax Number: [phone]
Page 5 of 14

E-mail Address: yates a iohnrmcadams com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Holding Village
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/.
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1840448440
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Wake Forest
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The subject property
bounded to the north by NC 98 Bypass to the west by the Seaboard Airline Railroad, to the
south by Forestville Road and to the east by South Franklin Street.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.9615 °N 78.5181 °W
6. Property size (acres): 148 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Unnamed tributaries to Smith Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse LHUC 03020201
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http•//h2o em•.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: ,The site is undeveloped with the majority of the property
open pasture and old dairy farm
Page 6 of 14

Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
~;op~osed project entails the construction of mixed-use residential and retail sub-division in
two phases. Phase 1 is designed and proposed to be constructed within the next year. Phase
2 is currently only conceptual and will come on-line in approximatel~5 years. The current
project consist of constructing Phase will be mixed-use retail and residential, with associated
roads and infrastructure Typical construction equipment will be used such as a front end
loader bulldozer, and paving~equipment.
Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Thepurpose of the ~oposed work is to construct
a mixed-use retail and residential sub-division.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. A jurisdictional wetland/stream delineation was performed by The John
R McAdams Company on March 17 2006 and field verified by Mr. Jamie Shern (USACE
representative) on November 9,.,_2006 A Neuse River Stream Buffer deterniination was issued
b~Mr Eric Kulz on Februar~2 2007 (attached DW(~ Project No. NBRRO 06-317 letter).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Page 7 of 14

wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no direct impacts to
jurisdictional waters associated with the construction of the this site. There is a pedestrian
bridge (inset sheet # 1) roadway (inset sheet # 2) and sewer line (inset sheet # 4), all of
which are proposed aerial crossings of the jurisdictional waters
Neuse Buffer Impacts• There is a network of roads to access the approximately 148-acre
project site• however the developmentplan proposes online roadway stream buffer impact
totaling 0 27 acre and less than 150 linear feet of impact associated with the installation of
the entrance road which is an allowable use (sheets 2) The proposed road v~nll span the
stream feature close to 90 degrees and will have abutments 10-feet from the stream's top-of-
bank A pedestrian bridge is proposed instead of a road in the northwest quadrant to
encourage walking to the retail areas adjacent areas of the site (sheet 1). A malority of the
proposed sewer corridor impacts are located within the Zone 2_of the Neuse River Buffers
(sheets 3 4 and 5) There is one proposed sewer line that is to be dtrecttonally bored across
stream_feature "D" close to 90 degrees and will have a maintenance corridor through the
buffer sheet 4Z
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED BUFFER IMPACTS:
IMPACT SHEET # ZONE 1 ZONE 2 USE
1 -Pedestrian bridge 0.02 ac. 0.02 ac. Allowable
2 -Roadway (981f) 0.15 ac. 0.12 ac. Allowable
2 -Sewer 25 s.f. Allowable
3 -Sewer 0.02 ac. Allowable
4- Sewer 0.04 ac. 0.11 ac Allowable
5 -Sewer 0.08 ac. Allowable
TOTAL 0.21 ac. 0.35 ac.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
e aratel list im acts due to both structure and flooding.
s

Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) y

Type of Impact
T e of Wetland
~
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.)
Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no)
Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet)
Area of
Impact
(acres)

Page 8 of 14

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.59-acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial o Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact ~
Intermittent Stream Width Length Impact

(indicate on map . Before Im act ]near feet
( ) acres
( )

Sheet 1 Ut to Smith Crk Span -Pedestrian
Bridge Intermittent 6
Sheet 2 Ut to Smitli Crk Span -Roadway Intermittent S
Sheet 4 Ut to Smith Crk Span -Aerial
Sewer Intermittent S
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
S. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
F11 ,.~*:.,., .arnrl rrinrt fl~nrlintt rlraina aP 1',„11C f1PA~C P.t(:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) I n act
p
(acres

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List t
he cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Page 9 of 14

Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the [1SACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stoimwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The entire Rroiect was designed to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands streams, and riparian
buffer areas while utilizing the remaining areas for development of the site. There are no
jurisdictional stream or wetland impacts_pro~osed with the project There is one roadway span,
pedestrian brid e span, and several areas of buffer encroachment associated with the installation
of the sanitary sewer All proposed stream buffer impacts fall under the "allowable use"
category in the Neuse River stream buffer table of uses. There is a network of roads to access
the approximately 148-acre protect site• however the development plan proposes only one
roadway stream buffer impact totaling 0 27-acre and less than 150 linear feet of impact
associated with the installation of the entrance road which is an allowable use (sheets 2). T'he
proposed road will span the stream feature close to 90 degrees and will have abutments 10-feet
from the stream's top-of--bank A ,pedestrian brid e is proposed instead of a road in the
northwest quadrant to encourage walking to the retail areas adjacent areas of the site (sheet 1). A
majority of the proposed sewer corridor impacts are located within the Zone 2 of the Neuse River
Buffers (-sheets 3, 4 and 5) There is one proposed sewer line that is to be directionally bored
across stream feature "D" close to 90 degrees and will have a maintenance corridor through the
buffer sheet 4) All encroachments into the Neuse River Buffers associated with the installation
and maintenance of the sewer line corridor fall under the "allowable use" category m the Neuse
River stream buffer table of uses Proper sedimentation and erosion control measures will be
implemented during the construction of the project.
Page 10 of 14

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited. to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~,ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 11 of 14

Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Meuse)? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Kequtred
Miti ation
1 9,148 3 N/A
2 15,246 1.5 N/A
Total 24,394
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone I.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 12 of 14

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious surface. A series of level spreaders are to be installed
to the current BM_P manual for Phase 1 of the project Drainage calculations, outlet velocities,
pictures and location descriptions are provided with the level spreader exhibits. Executed
O eration and Maintenance exhibits are also enclosed for each of the devices. As stated
previously Phase 2 is currently only proposed and may not be built for several years. We will
provide the level-spreader documentation for Phase 2 once it come on-line. There are no 401
impacts associated with the site, so a formal stormwater plan is not require to be submitted to
DWQ however the site is to be reviewed by the Town of Wake Forest for stormwater
management.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitar Sewer
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This project is embedded within the Town of Wake Forest as is to provide residential housing
and retail shopping to the Town of Wake Forest There are no anticipated future development
that will affect downstream water Quality
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 13 of 14
__ __

work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
d~ f ~U
Applicant/Agent's nature ~ Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 14 of 14