20050172 Ver 3_401 Application_20071011

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
oS-,oi7a v3

To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Andrew Williams
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27614
From: Nicole Thomson
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Tree Farm Subdivision -Phase III
Orange County, NC
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 2~0 ., ,, ~ m
Raleigh, NC 27604 ^i `` Y,R;-~~ .,_.
~t~ ~ ..,,. _ ,
~:. '
~,c l
M~ .: ~ _ ~. "1~P~~1~.~
On behalf of the owner, Land Ventures I, LLC. ,please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 29 as well as General
Water Quality Certifications 3705. Flease contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional
information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Tree Farm Subdivision -Phase III
Project T e Residential Develo ment
Owner / A licant Land Ventures I, LLC.
Coun Oran e
Nearest Town Hillsborou h
Waterbod Name Crabtree Creek
Basin /Sub-basin Neuse River Basin; 03-04-01
Index Number 27-2-6-1
Class WS-II; HW ;NSW
USGS Catalo in Unit 03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.034
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.034
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 145
*of the 145 LF of impact, 122 LF is to intermittenUunimportant channel and 23 LF is to perenniaUimportant channel
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization
USGS Topographic Vicinity Map
Soil Survey Vicinity Map
Previous 401 & 404 Approvals (DWQ No. OS-0172; USAGE Action ID #200520529)
Stream & Wetland Data Fonns
Overall Site Plan and Detail Impact Maps (11x 17 and large sheet)
Level Spreader Design Calculations
Email correspondence from EEP
Check for 401 Processing Fee (DWQ only)
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 11, 2007
-~ ~ 3 ~ ~ S&EC Project # 9243.W2

o~-oti~a; U3
Nikki and Debbie:
The EMC approved our ILF Program fee revisions in
September. Those were set to go to the Rules Review
Commission later this month with the intent of becoming
effective November 1, 2007. This fee revision has been a
long time coming and is necessary for EEP to continue to
provide successful mitigation throughout the state. The
current fees are not in tune with our costs, especially in
many areas of the state where land and construction costs
are very high or mitigation opportunities are scarce. The
fee schedule approved by the EMC was a two tiered approach
they developed to account for the disparity of costs
throughout the state. Mitigation fees for applicants
choosing to use the EEP would be higher in some hydrologic
units, lower in others, but commensurate with our costs.
The Rules Review Commission received ten (identical and
clearly coordinated) letters of protest to our fee revision
which triggers a legislative review. Since this will not
happen until Summer Session 2008, we need to develop a
strategy we can use to make decisions about whether we can
continue to accept mitigation requirements in certain areas
and if so, under what conditions. We anticipate it will
take EEP 2-3 weeks to develop that strategy. At that point
we will respond to applicants to the ILF program who have
outstanding requests. As of today I do not anticipate
denying requests, rather I expect it taking a little longer
to receive an acceptance letter from us. The reason for
the delay is our strategy needs to be consistently applied
and will take into account our existing "assets"
(mitigation sites) and costs of construction compared to
fee schedule. I don't anticipate it will take this long to
get a decision from us once the strategy is developed- we
are shooting for November 1.
Kelly
Kelly Williams
NCEEP

~C ~ 3 1 .~-
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 05 - o i ~ a y 3
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), ~l~eel~ k~e~e'~~`^ ~'~a
_..
~~ ~ ,~~
II. Applicant Information '~ ~ ~ ; (ail l
11', ~ ,
~,,;.
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~ ;
o,
Name:_ _ Land Ventures I, LLC ;~~,,, ,- _ - `~.3tt~ti~dG~
Mailing Address: Attn: Mark Oneal
PO Box 52118
Durham NC 27717
Telephone Number: (9191493-0395 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Nicole J. Thomson
Company Affiliation:__ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ride Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number:~919) 846-5900 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: NThomson(a~sandec.com
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
2
5
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Tree Farm Subdivision Phase III
T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN)
4. Location
9853-20-3133
County: Orange Nearest Town: Hillsborough
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Tree Farm
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh, take US 70
West to I-85 South; continue on I-85 South to Exit 164 (Chapel Hill road ;turn ri h~~
ramp onto Chapel Hill Road; follow Chapel Hill Road for approximately '/z mile to OranPe
Grove Road; turn left onto Orange Grove Road and follow for approximately 4 miles to Tree
Farm Road; turn right on Tree Farm Road and follow for approximately 1 mile to entrance of
subdivision.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line,
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.0304 °N 79
6. Property size (acres):_ X126 (Phase III of ~ 461 acres of total project)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Crabtree Creek (03-04-01; 27-2-6-1; WS-II;
HQW; NSW)
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin (USGS Catalo~in~ Unit 03020201)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
attach a sheet that
1603 °W
Page 2 of 9

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The subject property site is primarily forested. The general
land use in the vicinity is mostly residential with large tracts of undeveloped forests.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will be a single family residential community with typical roads and
utilities. The project will include 10 large acre lots for residential homes: minimum lost size
is 10 acres. Heav~quipment typically necessary for road and home construction will be
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
construct Tree Farm subdivision-Phase III to provide additional housing for the area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. On May 5, 2005, the NC Division of Water Quality issued an ap royal
for 237 linear feet of permanent, perennial stream impact associated with Tree Farm Phase II
~WQ project# OS-0172~~ril 16, 2006, Mr. Todd Tu~well of the USAGE also issued an
approval for 237 linear feet of permanent, perennial stream impact associated with Tree Farm
Phase II (Action ID# 200520529. In May 2007, Mr. Andrew Williams of the USAGE and Mr.
Kevin Martin of S&EC reviewed the subject property for verification of the streams, wetlands
and freshwater springs. Please see the attached wetland and stream forms. No other permits
have been requested or issued for this project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are known to be required at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Page 3 of 9

Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impact #1: 122 linear feet of
permanent intermittent stream impact and 9,027 square feet ,5,765 square feet Zone 1 and
3,262 square feet Zone 22of Neuse River Riparian Buffer "allowable" impacts for proposed
roadway crossing;
Impct #2: 23 linear feet of permanent perennial stream and 1,846 square feet (1,110 square
feet Zone 1 and 736 square feet Zone 21 of Neuse River Riparian Buffer "allowable" impact
for proposed driveway crossing; *note* there is an existing farm crossing at this location that
is being utilized for the driveway crossing; the additional impact is necessary in order to
make the existing crossing safer and to allow for adequate driveway access to the proposed
lot per Orange County Subdivision Ordinances.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list imnacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Unknown
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
Impact # 1-NWP UT to Crabtree Road crossing Intermittent +/- 10' 122' 0.030
29 Creek
Impact # 2- NWP UT to Crabtree Driveway crossing Perennial +/- 8' 23' 0.004
29 Creek
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 145 0.034
Page 4 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)
0 0 0 0 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.034
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.034
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 145
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
No isolated waters are known to exist on the subject property.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant requested a
detailed delineation of streams and wetlands prior to site plan development in order to
Page 5 of 9

determine the extent and location of streams and buffers in the vicinit o~proposed road
crossing. The site plan has limited permanent impacts to one road crossing and one driveway
crossinp~. Streams are not crossed multiple times byroads. The proposed road crossing is
necessary in order to access a useable portion of the uplands for development. It should also be
noted that an existing farm road crossing is being utilized for the proposed driveway crossing
(i.e. further minimization of impacts ; it is being widened in order to make the existing crossing
safer and to allow for adequate driveway access to the proposed lot per Orange County
Subdivision Ordinances. Also, there were several freshwater springs located on the subject
property that were completely avoided with the proposed roadway infrastructure design, thereby
demonstrating further avoidance. And finally, there are no proposed wetland impacts with the
subject project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmuide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The project proposes permanent impacts to 145 linear feet of stream (122 LF of
intermittent/unimportant channel and 23 LF of perennial/important channel). Since this
Page 6 of 9

portion of Crabtree Creek is classified WSII, HQW and NSW, mitigation is required by
DWQ even for impacts to intermittent streams. Therefore, if required by the USACE, the
client proposes payment to the NC-EEP at a ratio of 1:1 to meet the stream mitigation
requirement for 23 linear feet of permanent impact to a perennial/important channel for the
purposes of the driveway crossing. Based on an October 8th phone conversation with the
USACE agent, the USACE concurs with the proposed mitigation ratio. Additionally, if
required by the NC DWQ, the client proposes payment to the NC -EEP at a ratio of l:l to
meet the stream mitigation requirement for 122 linear feet of permanent impact to an
intermittent/unimportant stream channel per General Certification 3705. We are waitingfor
a response from the NC-EEP; please see the attached email.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):145 LF (122 LF of
intermittent/unimportant stream channel; 23 LF ofperennial/important stream channel)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
Page 7 of 9

and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact #1-Road Crossing - "Allowable"
Zone* Impact
(s ware feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,765 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 3,262 1.5 N/A
Total 9,027 N/A
Impact #2 - Driveway Crossing - "Allowable"
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 1,110 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 736 1.5 N/A
Total 1,846 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. The proposed Buffer Impacts are allowable
per the table of uses for the Meuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. therefore. no buffer
mitigation is proposed.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. The minimum lot size is 10 acres; therefore, proposed impervious surface is well
1_ess than 30% and therefore a Stormwater Management Plan is not required.
Page 8 of 9

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
On-site count~pproved subsurface septic systems.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: We
have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water OualitX
Certification and Isolated Wetland Pro~,rams" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
ualit~pril 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. This residential project does not meet any of the three
criteria of np ~vate projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. This development is
relatively small in nature, has no commercial component associated with it, is within a primarily
residentially developed landscape and therefore, the utility infrastructure (i.e. water and
electricity) are alreadyplace to service the third phase of the proposed development. We
anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
D /f
~- Applica~it/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

oliza/2005 is:oz PnX X002
•
Soi.X & Ex~vironxnerital Coxxsultants, PA.
]]OS0 Raven FtidF.c Ao~+tl Ru)eifh, No,cu~ Carot;no 77614 i'hone: [phone] - Fax: (919) Bad-9461
www,SanaEC-c4m
AGENT AUTHO~tTZATION FORM
All Bl'at/il~:s To Be pilled Yn, By The Curre~tt Lan owner
Address: /- • 0, ~~~ /` s Z / ~ S ,d42 ~ ~n-• ~// L z ~ 7 / 7
phone: !_~7~ ~~ ~ d.3 ~J ... ! ~ ~,~5 O .3~ 3/ -
X'rcrje.~ct Name/bescraption: -`~ fie- '~ce C ''~'. S~~Q ~ ~ ~ (S L~ ~ ~~s 2
Date: __ Z ~ ~~
T'he Department of. tJ:ic Arzxty
L7.S. Axmy Corps of Eng~ctePxs, ~N'ilmington D~stxict
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: f/ U ~~ ~(~.~ ~ t~L ~ ~ ~~.~
~iPld OEficc; _~,~ ~ ~-~--
.Re: W elands Related. Consultu.~g and Pez:mittir-g
To Whom ~lt May Canccr'n:
9,9_ yy3-~s 23 ~~~
`'yI'g2~'8- ~
/~~i ~ S~~LD~.SE
CO/r"S
1, the current ~r,~~cr~, owner, k~~reby desx~atc and authozize Soil dt Enviroanuzeztital Consultants, PA to
cct i,n my bpllalf as zzty agent uc] the processing of pernut applications, to furnish upon xequcst, f~
supplPmcntal informattaz~ iun sznpport of applications, etc. frozzt thzs day forward. Tk~e 7 7 -_ d,ay of
This notxfic~tion supersedes an~v previous correspondence conccrtvllg the aunt for this project.
1~107('YC'E: Tlur+ authorization, nor liability and profeseio~n~.l courtesy reasons, is valid onlyfok
government officials to enter t#~e propezty wvhen azcv~onpansed b~ S&>GC staf~f_ Xou should call S&EC
to arrange a safe ~a-PCbing prier to vxsitx~ag the! site. ,~-_~,__ -,
...--
~ ~ ~~~~ ez
J'rint Property Owner's Name ~~ v~;{~~ca~~ i'rv y Uw~ner s Si~atuxe
)~G ~--
cc: Mr. Joku~ Dorney cc: Mr. Kevin C. Min
NCDENR - b'iN'Q Soil d= Envisonmca~t,11 Consultant;, i'A
721 Crabtxee 8oulcvard
Raleigkl, NC 27609
c.R:c~o.~ Qfficc: ~i,~ rv o ~ ..:
~Y)yC1QQ~0,f£~c.G~: 622 Coffin Maur~ta.o i.mc
2361,cPh~]u~ Cuun, Su~cc C 3817•E (.aWgpblo DrIVC
Concord. t~'C 28025 Creensooro, T]C 27455 Tayfoc~+nlic, NC 28681
phone: (336) 540-BZ3a Pl~on~ <826) 635-5824
Phone: [phone]x5 f„x: (336) Sao-62?5 Fax: (8zx) 535.5820
rax: (70d> 7za44o6
Z ' d EZS i -E6~b-6 i 6 asno,~dS Z.~ago~ d9 i ~ SO SO LZ uet

i
' ~ J 1~ ~' \) h - ~~ i'"~ ~///~~ V 1 1 1 ~ ` (` ~`\ c- .i:' j} ~~ V .f //~~4 ~a'`~r/ \ ~ ' J/ Ir ° J ( r '`\
~ ~~ F ~! ~ \„y ~~J ~~ ~`~„ J~~ \\ ~~ ` l < <~~ /~y ~ 1. ~ ~ ~~ ~ / ~\r^i (~•`.r1~' .~y~
, ~ `~, / j~ /: - 1 ~ ~ r~"°~ ~i~ `~ ~ ~ i~ 1~~~. ~ ( ,[/ ~~ 1y ~fil 1 1 '~"' ~~ (~ l'1rr'-~I ~c ~ ~ i.~'~ ~ , , - ~~
l~~' f+ 1~-' ~~, ~~„\\~~`~~ ~ y, -l~_til~~ -~~/l% ~I ,i'~ r, j •j~~l ~ ~j~~%/%..s/~~~,-- 111 -
.. \~ ~' ~J ~ ?/` ~~' ~t t.~Jt , ~ ~~~ ~ ~r~ ~/;~ .~ L/,`=~ ~) :~') a r ` r_~ , `.~ ` ~~ {`,/ r~j ~ 1, tF~ ~~ 'l ~
~~/ 74 t1~ /~~~ ! ( ~\~`5~ i ~~ f\`ti ~~' yU ~ r ~ `, .C v-- i 1. ~` r~~J i % /~ --.~/ ~~ ~s-> i ~ ' I/~ _ -n1~' ~_) ll ( ~ (~~
~~ - `~1 C'/ ~/,f(~/~l ~~1~`.~.'~ \~`f/(~~ '~~`_ti~- - ~ }~-o: ~; (I~~~.(((~a~ .^ L._/~/!~': ~E., "i ~`J rl '~`~~
~p7~ r' ~,l~J ~r L~,~~r'1%~!~ .~p0 `~~ ,`J~ 7`~~ •;_- ~^1,~~ `..-'~ /~ ~~~ 1 ~ ~~,~'~' ~ f ( ..~'~~. 7~ \ ~\ 1 4 ~ ~~
I .~~ r=~-' ~ EXISTING ;~/~^~(r - ;,- tI i I ~~ ~,~~1 ~ ~(~ ```~~~ 1 ~~1
C-'~; `•; :~"~~--.~_ PHASE 1 & 2 `~ \ `'~~Yrn ! ~ }1) 1 ~ ~_"" ~~~ ~.,, ~:. _~ -
~~
`~ ` ~) `~ ~ ~ '~_ i Jet I[,~ ~r' fv /i ~,~~~ ~) ~ ~ \ i\ 65o PROPOSED ...: L.~` +
`' I`~~;,`-;~I J /'I ~1 r, ,_ \ I ( ~) ~ ~ i ' PHASE 3 ~\.
~` ,~ 1 ~\ ~,\\\`\ `\_-~ _~ . h. ~ j ~ ` ~ ~ J~ t ~ ~ ~ f1 I ~ ~ J~ ,~~,.!` / /G:~~j~~I/ r ~; J 1 .i 1 ~+('/ I v •^\`~
i ~ X- , l r J ti.~'~' ~! ` \~ , - 760 ~~,
l>. _•''/~ . ~ ,y~//~~~~`~'•1~ _-.~`,~,,~ ~r ~' / =' l._~;'t ~ ~ i ~ ~~: ~-_;; ,}fit ~'~ ~~~-.~i
.~~ , ~ C `~ ~-~i=, .~ J r t ~ ti. ass=' { ~ ~------~-- ,~/~h ,
J/~~-r-'r r \ '!; ~rf r ~~ ~ // ~`.JI ' ~~ I 1 r ~ ~~'v'~..r-~ ~1 ~(~ ~ C,
' r
r...r~~ ~\~ ~ l~ ~ /il~~" ~ 1 ~_~ ~ `~~ it fr'~, l G~ ~\~ ~~~~, i f~" f~^~ ~ ~~. ~\~ ~~ ~/ r'~~1~
~~ ~ ~%600 ~ .~, ~.~ ~^1~. ~~:1~~ "{~~ ~~I ~~ :` r ~ ° ~~~~_~-~ ~ ~ [ ~r'~r ~tJ/~~/~~~_~-
\\ \\ i J V / l_--
i \~~~ ':~7 ~:`l 1 ,1 ((, J (\ fJ~''~~ r/ ;y' ~4~ . y7'I ~ ~ ~' /J //~ -~J / f^ ~-~, -
1 ~ ~~ ~ ~~~`_"~~~ ~ ,~f ~~~ 1 / ~ / I \~ 1 ` 650 ~
Prot1ect No. Scale:
4-1707.W3 1°=zooo~ FIG. 1 -USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SOURCE: ~
EFLAND USGS 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.
Project Mgr. DfaWfl sy: TREE FARM -PHASE 3 ~ Raleigh, NC 27614
NT MM QUADRANGLE 9195900
ORANGE COUNTY, NC DATED:1999
Date: 10/11/07

neo
Lg Ch _
HrB Lg U Lm GeC
EnB r i
HrB TaD.. GeC
GeB _
EnB
' HrC
OrHrB TaE�
Or /�CGec
HrB ,
TaD TaD GeB
EnB Ch
EnC HrC HrC En
2 Ch teC:,
rC /. Er
Or GeB C \
Ot �a0 ec GeB xr. aE TaD
HeC'l
Cry HrC
at v HrC HrC
TaE ((
h v HrB 1
/HrC `Ch nr r Or-
y
TaD {� . GeB 1 Hr'B `mow I
\ 1U
T r �-_..: - � � m Ch i
d0 r
Ch _ HrB v TaE GeC GeB EnB HrC TaD' W Er
�.: TaD HrB Or HrB /
HrB HrC HrC TaD FTrB • Hr8 'Hr8
HrB GeC HrG HrC Lg HrC 'ao
GeB r TaE GeB � HrB Hy.0 HrB h'rc
C
IHr(: GeB' � - �a •�
F En6 - B WB
Ge
�o EXISTING HrC — Hr� _ Ch
PHASE 1 & 2 -GeC-. rc Lg`^ r
GeB CSO Ge8 � u,�n6 B: HrC HrB r EnB HrBHrC H
(j r _
GeCL9 "rB PROPOSED Lg EnB
\ GeC TaD GeC Ch Lg /
GeB C Lg PHASE 3
Se8 n -
EnBL r Gi .En` Ert6-.. _S r ;"BHr8 .. r
Lg
EnC ,HrB
C�. HrB
L
GeC G�\rCTaD GeB Lg g r
C Lg /
\ Lg
Lp Ne6 GeB /Hr8 Eng HrB
GeB GeB �. m
Lg GID Lg
Ch 1 TaD HrB Lg a
V- v HrB HrB'
Lg Lg -- - - TaD Lg g o� I rR MPw, ' GI HrC HrB TSD
'HrB GC t`
GeB E� _a _- GeC � � Ch Hr
Ch HrB Ir6
Ch t4 Fr
U GeC GeC Ch Lg tir ,n,,
Lg GeC GeB \ C t1-
GeB J - L. HrB_., �g + HrC
re Ge8 :F
L GeB v G js1rB GI`i r f F
�.z
GeB TaD HrC fir► �a0
GeB ( HrB k .
r r veB a" - TaE
GeC r G 0
GeC r , ' r .
N GeB HrB r / .' .
0 HrB
TaEW
HrC
GeB r L •.. Ta.
E ;.
. r r r L GeC
Lg CP i GeB CSO
En6
�IHrC GeB,' TaD'..
GeB _
,. EnB
S TaD'_ Lg HrB+ Mac GeC i "TaD
$ / h. LgCh
r
I i GeC
ProjectNo. Scale:
4-1707.W3 1"=1667' FIG. 2 - SOIL SURVEY MAP •
SOURCE: 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.
Project Mgr. Drawn sy: TREE FARM - PHASE 3 Raleigh, NC 27614
NT MM ORANGE COUNTY 919.846-5900
Date: 10/11107
ORANGE COUNTY, NC SOIL SURVEY
EnF
C�EaC
EnC
HwB%
GeC
GeB
ri
OeB
C
GeB
�C7�
TaD
,
EnB
GeB��
N,-
C7
°
�a0
GeC
E11G
1
TaD.
GeB/
i
GeC
NrB
TaD
-
HrB
Ge ' i
GeC GeB
z
b
TaD
HrC
c
Enm .,
o O
EnB
TaD
/
TaD
C
HrC
Tab
3%
HrB
Ch
/
{aro
GeB
��
HrB
1
T
r
/HrC `Ch nr r Or-
y
TaD {� . GeB 1 Hr'B `mow I
\ 1U
T r �-_..: - � � m Ch i
d0 r
Ch _ HrB v TaE GeC GeB EnB HrC TaD' W Er
�.: TaD HrB Or HrB /
HrB HrC HrC TaD FTrB • Hr8 'Hr8
HrB GeC HrG HrC Lg HrC 'ao
GeB r TaE GeB � HrB Hy.0 HrB h'rc
C
IHr(: GeB' � - �a •�
F En6 - B WB
Ge
�o EXISTING HrC — Hr� _ Ch
PHASE 1 & 2 -GeC-. rc Lg`^ r
GeB CSO Ge8 � u,�n6 B: HrC HrB r EnB HrBHrC H
(j r _
GeCL9 "rB PROPOSED Lg EnB
\ GeC TaD GeC Ch Lg /
GeB C Lg PHASE 3
Se8 n -
EnBL r Gi .En` Ert6-.. _S r ;"BHr8 .. r
Lg
EnC ,HrB
C�. HrB
L
GeC G�\rCTaD GeB Lg g r
C Lg /
\ Lg
Lp Ne6 GeB /Hr8 Eng HrB
GeB GeB �. m
Lg GID Lg
Ch 1 TaD HrB Lg a
V- v HrB HrB'
Lg Lg -- - - TaD Lg g o� I rR MPw, ' GI HrC HrB TSD
'HrB GC t`
GeB E� _a _- GeC � � Ch Hr
Ch HrB Ir6
Ch t4 Fr
U GeC GeC Ch Lg tir ,n,,
Lg GeC GeB \ C t1-
GeB J - L. HrB_., �g + HrC
re Ge8 :F
L GeB v G js1rB GI`i r f F
�.z
GeB TaD HrC fir► �a0
GeB ( HrB k .
r r veB a" - TaE
GeC r G 0
GeC r , ' r .
N GeB HrB r / .' .
0 HrB
TaEW
HrC
GeB r L •.. Ta.
E ;.
. r r r L GeC
Lg CP i GeB CSO
En6
�IHrC GeB,' TaD'..
GeB _
,. EnB
S TaD'_ Lg HrB+ Mac GeC i "TaD
$ / h. LgCh
r
I i GeC
ProjectNo. Scale:
4-1707.W3 1"=1667' FIG. 2 - SOIL SURVEY MAP •
SOURCE: 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.
Project Mgr. Drawn sy: TREE FARM - PHASE 3 Raleigh, NC 27614
NT MM ORANGE COUNTY 919.846-5900
Date: 10/11107
ORANGE COUNTY, NC SOIL SURVEY

~OF WATFh,Q
~ ~
j r7~..
]_ ~
0 ~
Mr. Mark O'Neal
Land Ventures I, LLC
P.O. Box 52118
Durham; NC, 27717
Subject Property:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 5, 2005
Tree Farm Subdivision Phase II
Cane Creek, 03-06-04, Class WS-II HQW
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dear Mr. O'Neal:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 237 feet of perennial streams, including upstream and downstream
stabilization measures, for the purpose of constructing road crossings at the subject property, as described
within your application dated January 28, 2005 and in additional correspondence received by the N.C.
Division of Water Quality fDWQ) on Apri128, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided
that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion
and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 1501inear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Stream 237 (feet) ~ PCN form ---J one
No Carolina
~tura!!y
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] Internet http~l/h2o enr state nc.uslncwetlands
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Tree Farm Phase II Subdivision
Page 2 of 3
May 5, 2005
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in `wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, anal
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
6. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or

Tree Farm Phase II Subdivision
Page 3 of 3
May 5, 2005
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlan,ds. The text of the sample deed notification maybe modified
as appropriate to suit to this project.
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administirative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality-under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-9646.
AWKlcbk
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
cc:
Sincerely,
/~
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Kevin Martin, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC, 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office '
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050172TreeFarmII(Orange)401

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 200520529 County: Orange USGS Quad: Efland
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Land Ventures, LLC
Attn: Mark Oneal
Address: Post Office Box 52118
Durham, NC 27717
Telephone No.: [phone]
Authorized Agent: Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Attn: Kevin Martin
Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone No.: [phone]
Size and location of property (waterbody, road name/number, town, etc.): The property is Located evest of Orange
Grove Road and north of Tree Farm Road, in Orange County, North Carolina.
Site Coordinates: 36.0269 °N 79.1686 °W Waterway: UT to Cane Creek River Basin: Cape Fear
Description of project area and activity: The project includes mechanized landclearing, excavation, and placement of
culverts and fill material, including riprap, associated with the construction of three road crossings required for
the development of Tree Farm Subdivision, Phase II.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
^ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide or Regional General Permit Number(s): 14
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appro~iriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If, prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid
until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and conditions. The District
Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization'-
under any NWP.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Todd Tugwell at telephone [phone], ext. 26.
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: April 17, 2006
Expiration Date of Nationwide Permit Verification: March ] 8. 2007
Copy Furnished:
Page 1 of 2
V
D
APR 2 0 2006
By: Soil & Enrivnmental Consultants. PA

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ^ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal
Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ^ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ^ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please
reference the jurisdictional determination issued on (Action ID: ).
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The site contains an unnamed tributary to Cane Creek, a stream channel with ordinary
high water marks, defined bed and bank, and adjacent wetlands. The stream channel is a tributary to the Cape Fear River.
Appeals Information: (This information does not apply to preliminary determinations as indicated by paragraph A. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above-described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the South Atlantic Division, Division Office at the Following address:
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-ET-CO-R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 16, 2006.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: Apri117, 2006
Expiration Date of Jurisdictional Determination: April 17, 2011
Summary of Authorized Impacts and Required Mitigation
Action ID NWP / GP en Water ac) Wetland ac) Unim ortant Steam (1 Im ortant Stream (lf)
# # Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
200520529 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250

Impact Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac) 0 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (lf) 250
Required Wetland Mitigation (ac) 0 Required Stream Mitigation (lf) 250 In-Lieu/EEP
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions:
SEE PAGE 3 OF 3
Page 2 of 2

Special Permit Condition
1. In order to compensate for impacts to 250 linear feet of stream the permittee shall make payment to the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the amount determined by the NCEEP, sufficient to
perform the restoration of 250 linear feet of warm water stream in the Cape Fear River Basin, Cataloging Unit
03030002. Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made
full payment to the NCEEP and provided a copy of the payment documentation to the Corps, and the NCEEP has
provided written confirmation to the Corps that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation work required,
in compliance with the MOU between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and
the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November 4, 1998.
Page 3 of 2

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Form; Version 3,1
Date: ~ { ~ ~ ~ Project: ~ ~~ -'~=.r ~"~^ f ~ +~ Latitude: _
Evaluator: G, ~_ ~, ,i.~ Site: `q 1 • . y ~ ~, r «. F,p ` ~_ Longitude:
Tatal Points: ' Other ~ ~~- ~.S
Stream is at least intenniftenf ~.+ ' County: ~' ~; ~- d -. ..~ e,q, Quad Na e: ,~ ~
if 219 Or nial if 2 80 l~

A. Geomorphology (subtotal =~-~ ' ~ 1 Absent Weak Moderate
----- .__ Strong
__ -

i a. Continuaus bed and bank
0
1
r 1 3
_.,
.
--
2. Sinuosity 0 _._.
1
... _ _ --~`'._ 3
__ -
3. fn-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0
-- 1
_ -_ ' 2
- 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 (~.~' 3 r
5. Activelrelic floodplain 0 ~
-- 1 2 3
_.. _._
6. Depositional bars or benches
t 0_
_ - --. - 1
._---- 2 '
_..._ 3
--
_
7. Braided channel ° 0
, 1 _ 2 3
$. Recent alluvial deposits __
_
D
_ - 1 _
--- ~~,

_- 3

_ _
__-
9 ° Natural levees 0 (1,i 2 3
10. Headcuts

11. Grade controls ~ 0
<_ _
-0 1

0.5 2

~'Ir}~~ ? 3

1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 ~:3
13, Second or greater order channel on existin
USGS ar NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No
= 0
Yes -
~3~, g y
Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
~~AA}
8. H df'ology ~Subtofal = C' )
_-__ _
14. Groundwater flowJdischarge D 1 2 ! 3
-- -- - -
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1 2 ~3
Water in channel -dry or growing season - ~ _ `
16 Leaflitter ~1 5 1 0.5 0
- -
17. Sediment on ptanis or debris 0 0 5 ? 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack tines} _ D ~ 0 5 ~'1 - 1.5
_ _ --- --
19. tiydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? No - 0 Yes 1 5
C. Bialo y _~Sub#ota1= ~ ~"~ ~___.__._ ~ ~`
__
20 . Fibrous mats to channel ~..3~.==' 2 ~ 1 ~ 0
21 . Rooted plants m channel 3' 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 _ 0.5 1 1.5
- - ---
C 23 Bivalves _ ' 0 1 2 3 _
24 Fish 0 0 5 t.5
25 Amphibians - 0 _ _ 0.5 __ 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversify and abundance) 0 0.5 l1 ' 1.5
- --- - - - -
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton Q __ 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteriaffungus. " 0 ~ 0 5 1 1.5
_ ._ --
29b~Wetland plants in streambed FAC 0 5; FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
° Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 fo~s o the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
F ~ ~~~ ' t ~' ~ ~ ~~'~-
Notes: (use back side of tt~~ far additional notes.} I .~ Sketch: _ `
r-- ~'-°
` c~ ~ .~c~
Vim. ; ~ ~. <,~ .~ ~ ~ , ~~ .~,... ~ ,~
_ __
~~
__ ~ .
`~' .~ ~"~
`~ ~ ~ ~ _ _

~.
' ~_
Nortfi Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Farm; Version 3.1
Date: ~ J + (~~ t ~ -~ Project "`~ ~ ~. t.- -~ ~~.. ~ ~ ~ Latitude:
-_-__ .- _
Evaluator: ~ : ti ~ Site: ;1,'t ~ ~~ ~.. ~~, : ~- t.~ (~ ~ ~ ~ .i ~~ `~ Longitude: _- _
Total Points: Other
Stream is at teas! rntermltrent C~ ~ County: ~ ~~ ~ ~, ,
r1 ? 19 ar erennral rf>_ 30 t ` ~ ~ ~ i e g Quad Name:
'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
~ _) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
13. Continuous ba_d and bank 0 1 ~~ 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 •Q~ 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 ~' 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 L2 ~ 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 ~1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches Q v.' 1 2 3
7. Braided channel t_0- ~ 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 L ' 2 3
93 Natural levees 0 ~ 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11 Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12 Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 ~' 1 5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing ~ `,
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No 0 } Yea = 3
evidence.
a Man-made ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
~
8, Hydrology (Subtotal =
'
14. Groundwater flowldischarge 0 `r(1,~ 2 3
15 Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or f'~~~"

Water in channel -- dry or growing season
l„U ,_ 1 2 3
16 Leaflitter ` 1',. 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris ~~ ' 0.5 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0 5 ~~ 1 5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features} present? NQ-~ 0' ; Yes = 1 5
~-
C. Biology (Subtotal =
20° Fibrous roots in channe( 3 2 ,' ---~ 1 p
21~ Rooted plants in channel ~ 1 p
22. Crayfish
23 E3ivalves ~4„~
r~ 0.5 1 1.5

~G
2d. Fish 0. 1
0.5 2
1 3
1.5
~ 25. Amphibians Q.5 1 1 5
~~ ,,,~ 26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance}
27 Q-
~ p.5 1 1 5
. Filamentous algae; periphyton - 1 Z 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. ~0 0.5 1 1.5
19~. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Ottrer = 0
t Items 20 and 27 focus on the presence of u{eland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aqua lir. or wetland plants.
Notes: (usa back side of This form for a.4ditional notes j Sketch;
~i ~ i~'~,~ it
l~ _ E: c ~ ~ : <"
,: ~~ , ~~~
~ E.S
~~ ~~ , ~.-
,`,,
""{~
~ ~~ y~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.
~ ~ -~ ~ ~ f ~
,~ ,
~- ~ ~.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Tree Farm Phase 3 / S&EC Project# 9243.W3 Date: 5/16/07
Applicant/Owner: Tree Farm LLC County: Orange
Investigator: Kevin Martin State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? X Yes No Community ID: Old Beaver Swamp
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes X No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes X No Plot ID: Wetland at proposed rd
(If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Alnus serrulata Shrub FACW+
Carex frianqularis
Eulalia viminea
Juncus effuses
Acer rubrum
Smilax rotundifolia
Herb FACW
Herb FAC+
Herb FACW+
Tree FAC
Vine FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(excluding FAC-):
Hydrophytic vegetation dominant.
HYDROLOGY
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
100%
Indicator
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
X No Recorded Data Available X Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) X Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
De th to Saturated Soil: 8 in.
Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Present.

Wetland Delineation Performed By: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
[phone]
ProjeCUSlte: PIOt ID: Wetland at proposed rd flags A
Tree Farm Phase 3 / S&EC Proiect# 9243.W3 through H
SOILS
Map Unit Name Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
(Series and Phase): Chewacla loam Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes X No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-10 Al 10YR 3/4 Loam
10+ A2 10YR 6/2 7.5YR 5/6 Few prominent Cla loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions X Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present. More like Wehadkee (Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts) poorly drained.
WETLANDS DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Is this sampling point within a wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No X Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No
Remarks: Sampling point is within a wetland. All three criteria met photos 2 and 3.

oS-o-~a, U3
I 19 3.5 = ~' ~ \ 2\~'/ 71M0 Y W CRABTR ET ALS ~ I / , t II ; S W A N S O N
~- t I DWIGHT ALLEN ffRRE
0. Acr~ i t cres ~''~ ' 3832 49 ,~ ~ I I D8 261/1356 ~ and A S S O C I A T E S P.A.
% I NANCY T. PARRISH
y0 TIM YW. CRABTREEE LS LANDSCAPE ARCHITHCTURH
I ~ ~ e ,~~ 3832 ~ DB J632/518 I POSSIBLE GAP
, ~ t I PB 74/747 I The Couttyatd Suite 13
I RE ~ I
p ,~ 2223' I 1 431 West Ftarlklin Sleet
Control & TONE / 5 0.66' 595.82' Chapel }3iI1, North Cazolina 27516
N8634'42 E _ _ _ _ S8 73' "E •09• 8972'04
Corner ~'' C OWNS 1 36. J' ~ Ph./Faa [phone]
dswansonla®earthliuk.ua
EBAk N86'32' <E % MGHAM T HI I '~ I t
1 1 I 479'9 ~- + (I I t 50 ~ •'D ROAD BED dl~
m •1 y I. aaundory Inhrmatlon from 'Prdlminary Plot'by
~sT ~ 0 3'43"~ ' ' 1 •„w„ Pudett, Land Surveyare, aX NC 27302 Ph.Fae (919)
,Jj, 6 ~ 7HY • ~ ~• 563-3823,. Information m thla Praminary Plat b
`36 ~nF 12°I ~1 5 5g.49 / CRA E fT ALS I ~ I'\ _ ~„ net for racordalim, cmroycnce m wlea.
/~.
, I ~ 3 J8 • ,• 1 ~~"\ y •~"~'~ wdastralNdolwfhydrdogic llnfonnutlm,contwr and
'~ I !`con e ~ I '~, • Orangeh Co~yhNC Cwgrrap ky lnfarmatlon`Sem'cwm
3q.2 ~ Lat 5 I ~ ' ••~' data floe. Thle Infonnallm ehwld not tw
v h h canldered aurroy quclRy data and 6 for prel(minary
1 i p b p `a L I I / planning purposes only.
I~WI I "' , 4 sf / / ' 3, Sd wltobllily for septic lnformatlan Drohded by
m r / 6.4..2 ~ ~ ~ , Sol § Environmmlol Caneultanla, PA,Rolelgh, NC,
1o.s4 AcreB ' __ __ 10.88 - { ,b f ' ; Lot 7 , j Lot m map entitled 'Deleted 50l Ewluotim Nap', dated
o {I 1 O + Novanbar 2002, Propct No. 7211 (updated Oct
21 ~ 69 269 sf 'O6). 6ultaNe sole defned os: 'orwe contain solle
I ~ 675. - 464,197 / With 24 Nchee m mme of ueeode materiel and
% I y hero potential tar cmrontimal, modKed
1 / 10.65 a . + r, Q i 1'05 +- ~ wptronal~<malo-aaacoio'teedslsECDU Pe°o~a D`
5897 "E 0° ~, mcompmying raDOrla
i~
I My f ry0 h DR. MER C MI 6 4. Each lot la over 10.01 acres and Is not whject
' y ~ / 329.99 ~ I A > EST IE FIL 92E 14 to the Cringe Canty SubdiNeim Ordinance Zming
:7 7 ~ -- - -- ----~ I 1 0n' 'vk far r ert le RA-40. Reler to Iacatlan maD for
See / ~ OB 1 3/29 PaD Y
41P~ ~ ~ is Associate , L.P. t r •
~ ~ yry y ~ DB 1066/700 La 4 0692.8 t /
i ! ,
~ / ~~
,;" ~ ~ +_ I - 5,609, 9 S . `•,t•~~.,, Existing Log
`,~q „ / 5.7 w 1 .76 ~ 28.7 aC +- / ..q -.~,~`::;,,t yi' Road Crossing -- _--- ---
)~~ 6 ~ C eeks Towns ~~~ ~\` Lo'8 tf.~1`~" ~t•' over stream
S 9)agho Township "~~ 6es.6 ~ ~ 7,50 sf ( , 1' "'m`
i 1°I ~ Z ~~ ~ tt~ ~ H4.17a ,+-I~i I ..o.
i wt I A
'va o d I
~, Lot 3 / \ ~ a i.r. ~~ ~~ .
\\\ , a
~ . G DL
/ .m P 23 ~ 5.06 ac. +- t % ^'
/' ., i 1
N87 J8'38"E _ 36.4 eb~•res ' ` ~~ ' ~ Lot 9
~. ~
~ 3.5 1 tjl 6.4..2 ' "' 437 ~~.0
/ ~' I ,~ .1 .04 ~' ~y ~ I
Lot 2 r ~ ~
~ ' 568,065 s •
.' .,~. ~ i I 1 .04 ac. - 69.0 - 493 446 f f ~ \ , ^~° N° sN 1
tt ` t - ~ ~ ~ N' 1t' h
h ti~ ~ ~ a N.C..S. (P 52) I 1,1 Qa.+- QP ` I •~
1 ~ ~ e4~, 2.n I A r e es L I '~
71. 1 A re5 ~ ~ ~ E: 1,9 ,838 96' ~ ~ Q
0 ~ ;~ CSPC ' J Harris Associates, L.P. -- _ ~ fVQte
DB I __ __ __ __ ~_ _ __ \ __ - ~y _
NCSPC '8J in U.S. ve F et 7~ £ / " l 1
~ ~ N 8290 Y ~ 188$Z"24Y I _ e P w_er ~a e f t
.e i \ ~a ,/'PGWBT ~o•. e - ~ - - - - eD' ;W - - I I •.\
~~ O 0' coot of ' - - - -
\ Existing a 661.89' SmT55`\ -,/-- 1,6.14'( 1,9 11 ''.
a , ~ 88b9"14" 9'14 f f ~ 720.5
\ plrl m - I
ol`~ ~ ,~ ~ Development ° / ~ - 709.06' ~14' '~ - B0 t SQ' R
`~ I I ; ~ 0 34.E , , 1'~~ ~ - Existing /( ,-- t ~ •~~\
7 '4 6
` N 85.5 ' ' ~ -/-~ -~~ ~` Development / ~ t m I •`••~
/ 1 ~ J WI ®A4 t~ ~ •\
~ ~ ~' l 10 n
-78.4= - , ' 31 / ~' ~ t~ < D~ Harris Tract
NBI.a , ; / \ ,y / o ~ 27 "21 p l t~ 2 hn .••}fLrtw I(~1
' S I~ IZ 6 m %, ~ I~ & Po Trio H. I I 1
t ~ Const ^"o °'o of q~ N ~ 0 55 59 I ` Tree Farm
- • 1 ~ ° 12.89 % = -~/ I tS, \ r
t Easem 2 o u ~j ~. 4 AC S N~ y~ c
_ ,J i~ , I ~ ~___ Chestnut Church Road
A ~ ol0 15. H S to IN 6.4..19 'a+o I
~~ y, ~, ~ ~ (\/\\~\J I i ~ ~-m \ t IIy/ ~~, Orange County, NC
o
~ ~l I 7x2.7 ~ __ 2 0 ~ I ~\ `a"°bm NOV. D1, 2006
~ `
1 ` \ ~ ' I, ~~1~ 3 Io 7 B ^ ~ to / i JUNE O6, 2007
;.~ ~~r ~' ~ __ ~ _ I~ ~ ~ o Preliminary
.\ I _
^1N ^ ~ 1. 4 A res ~ ~ ~ \ `\ ~ II rear -, ~ L4 !? ~. ~ /' m L23 ~Z' ~ ® A~/` tJ o 7s' Ise, 300, ~ JUNE 12, 2006
\ 1 I ~ I a2 ~~ e ~ Sheet Name
1 1 , I G Concept Site Plan
9 I I `'D \ ~' North
I Scale :1" =150'-0"
t ~ R _ _ - ° I ` - - _ ~~ ~ ' I 1 I Y'g ~ ~ Nap nfmwnm ~ uanv. caawy Law v«ara. ma Sheet NnmbeE
r L 7 - 1 IWI A 1 ~. 06 res _ 3 Ook 7~ ry N b Prdimhary Plmnfnq Inlormalbn Only. L.1
p - ~/may E.t.. - _ I 7 ` ,, 707.9
~', l~ / \ i.~ '- - n .~-~\~ III Y \ hI~ is

'l~
~S
`;
0
,,
i
t
t
.
S
1
i
f
I
i
f
}
i
t
E
t
i
i
i
I
r
3
t
I
I
i
1
s
I
S
I
t
i
I
E
l
t
s
~j
i
.`
i
i
`t
.t
i`
I
t
i
I
}
~l`
STREl~m
'~~ BUFFERS
}
1
1
1
y~~
I
I
I
Q1
0)
Cti
i
f
3
I
f
i
I~
I
r
i
I
t
I
I
k
I
i
V
I
I
t
I
t
t
I~~
I
1
.~\ •\
~•,
.\
1
i
I
1
1
f
1
I
F
f
l
~~.
~~~
\,
.*
1
\`\
~R
~\
ti\
\\ ~
~y STREAM ,`., ~ `;
~ BUFFERS '•• ~
1 ~~
\~~`',1 !ti ,\` ~'~
`~ ~ ti ~
\,
}•
4'~
S
t.
1j i
}
l'.
I~
i
i
it{t
1
1
.t
j`,
S
4
• {
I
\ I
.\
~~.
`1~`\,
1jl ~S
~\
1
I
a
I
r
I
~`
i
r
I
i
I
,I
I
I
i
i
i
~ !
I
1 I
i
t
1
~ ~
~ ~
F ~, ., ~~
\~
,~.
\\
\\
~ ~,
\` ~'
~ ~I
H
~~
OO
U
~-I
.-fan ~` . \ ~\
V ~~ 1
~ •~
~~ ~ `~.
~~ .~,
,;, ~...._,_.~ ~ ~ , ti ,,
ti~ ~ ~~
~~ , ~ ,, ` \
I ti } I, •~ ~, ,~
I; ~ ~ ~ ~ i
t ft i ~\ C 2\ ~\\ ~\ `1\ ` .~
.Iti~ ` O'~, 1 ~`
~ 0
~~ ~R
,~
~~~~~ r ~~
~O=~
\ ~/0~
..~. 'C
N
~o~~
oR~a P ~~FF
S~R~`
.,
l~ ~ ~/
6~?
~~P~~P~
~~
SURVEYED
to TOP OF
~~ STREAM
y~ BANK
T
~o~
~`
\~ s
~o
\`1
GRAP~IIC SCALE
30 0 '15 30 60
E~~T)~r
1 inch = 90 ~
1
1
1

I~ ~ }

m ~
U
3
ii~
'v
a,
N N~
o z~

z
Q U V Q
"~ N M ~ Z
~~ ~ ~
~Q °

~~
~ ~
~
.~~
~
$ w o
,
~a ~
© ~
~
M q
a

a~.~o~~~~ 4 ~ ~ ~9a~~~
2 xa ~ o tB P
F ~~
~. tgtg~~
~ ~ Q./~µ.~o1F+la P
0 y
~,
~~f~rJ n <~ID
s
¢@ ~~aaps~yn a~ x
~p ~ ti9~~i~~; -a' ~ h`~
~'~"8334:?a~~°~a:
DATE:
JULY 17, 2007
HORIZ. SCALE:

O ~ ~ W UERTICAt SCALE:
~ ~ Q ~ NIA
z ~ a

0
0 PftOJ. MANAGER;

~~~
a
xA ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ O DRAWN BY:
E„ ~ ~ y, RJf

~ ~ ~ W PROJECT N0:
i
W a G Z E aott
W ~ ~ ~ DRAWING NAME:
W z, ~ H ~an».owG
H °a w ~ SHEET N0
.
~1
P:~14di7•dwg~14017.dwg, Stream Impachganged, 9J27I200711:46:05 AM

i

~4
t

0

4
,
1
t
,
t

1

~.
1
`1
i
(,,
i4
t
i
t
sl
ti'
,~
`~t
;1
'~.
~~~ STRE/~m
'~` BUFFERS
L~VEL~.
SPREADER l~4
44 L.F.

~~ ..~ ~~
~r r
t,'~ '
.~+ t
i ~ ,
` ~ 5,831 "'
I
1-00 ~ ~ ~~ ~
' 1
i i ~
t
r' i '~
~ ~ ~. y
E -~_..-rte i
~ T s ~~ ~
i
i i
i I t
i ~
r
f
1
~ i
i ~
LE~EL --~
{ SPREADER ~3
,i
60 LIF.
I ~
4
1 ~
i
~ t
t `y
{
;S ,~1
t
'~ 1
r ~
4 1
f ,l
1 ~
}
i
I
.\
"6
~S~
1`
~~
~~
9~
<°~i
- 48" RCP
,66 LF C~ 1.00
~T~ FES AT EACH END
1221~F. {12$3 S.F.) OF
STREAI~~~ MPACT
A
STREAM \~~ ;
BUFFER51 `~ ,

' . t
~'
~
:,; ~.,,.
' ,~~ ` ••-
~ ,~
~1
INV IN I
6,8.26
2,83$ 1
$Q.FT , -%

;,
z,s2~
r~;~~.so.~r ~--
i
i
i
~ ~ ~~~'
~ ~.
~~~. ti~~w
s ~ ~°~~ ,
`~ ~ 6~ C4~ FER
GE ~F
S
I
i
i
t
1
i
a
t
E
k
,~
2~
/~~5 15-~Oa --
/ ~--^f`~
_--~' " ~
40~,/
~- . ~ -
~ ` i
~ h~
~ 6
~ 0
~ ~
\`~ ~f ~/
\~ ~ //
~ _.-
,. 6~ Go J ~~~1 LEVEL
`. ~` SPREADER #2
i~, ~P~G~~ 0 ~~ 90 L.F.
O~~Q~C/ \,
``
' SURVEYED ~~
~` ~~ ToP OF ~' ,
~~ STREAM ~ ~~
q~ BANK 0
~°~ GRAR~IIC SCALE
30 0 `, 15 30 64
t~~~
i inch = 3Q `fit'
R
1
.G
~0,
.~
,~
ti
,~
~~
LEVEL ~'
SPREADER ~1 ~~~.
20 L.F.
i
-,
~.
~~
:5,139
s~-cn c'r 1

~ ~ ~
~ ~
~

~ a ~
~
ti
~W U o
N
~
CC'S
U g
~ U Y
z U N
"+v v
~ ~._
a~
Z
~ Q
~
~
H ~
`° a °z
Np
i
'~
U

O
Z
O ~°~ ~ ~

U
~~
~ 5
~
a ~~
~''
U a
~~ ~ ~
a^
~~ ~
~ ~
\
I

~'

6~~~~•94 sld~i r9~~90
y~ /~ O~
a €:" `~ 0 a
" =~ g
~~ $
1~9~7 m
`'°a~~~~~~~ ~. ~o~o3~D'1
9 PP// 8A8i6 ~ ~~
DATE:
JULY 17, 2007
z ~A
~oz
A° ~~
~~ ~
~~z ao
'may U ~ ~{* P'
~p Vw
~Wav ZH
W ~ U1 }:+
F
W
HORIZ. SCALE:
X" = XX'
VERTtCAI SCALE:
N!A
PROJ~ MA- NAGER:
Trnw
DRAWN 8Y:
RJF
PROJECT N0:
14017
DRAWING NAME:
14017.DWG
SHE_.r~_
1 ~
P:`14017Ldwg~14017.dwg, Stream Imps-ganged, l0(3/Z0071;Z0:04 PM

..
~~ ~~,.
\ ~ ~~
~ `~ ~.
~ ~
~~ may.
~. ~ ~'
~ '`~ !
~^ J
~ \
~ ~ \ /~u ~
~" ~' ~ /'
` ~~
-~ r `"~
\ .~ •,~ ti\
~ \ off
05
J
,. E
\ ~ .ter ~\
~ ~d ~d
~ .-,
. -_. „~
`` `S'~~~ p •\ '•\ l
holy •\• ~''~ ~ ~ \ \.,\ ' `~' ~,.~ --
~ o
'\ \ ~r \
`~~, \ ~y~0 ••\ \
~` ~~ ~O •\ •.\ ~ \
• ti •~ ~ , „ •\ •\ •\
\ ~ ~' '~ .~
,~~ ~ ' r ~'' '~~ Cam.
~ ••~
.i \ ~
tit f ~ ~ •\ ••\ ,t~ ~
~~ \
!r
i4 i f! a~2po ,.-`~~r ~ _~ 1~t `OIL \ ltt
! \
S r
1 / ~ l ~~~ ~ S Sl
{ ' ~S~ .ice. ' t
1 ~ ~-.,- -- ~ 1
t ~ ITl (1) G7 G7 ! 'ti
_ _ _ !
1 / ~ ~ ~ j ;f
~ ~ n C) t y
r ~ ... ~ ~ ! tit
~ ~ ~ ~
S
r 'N ; I f {- f1 tS ~
~ ~ ~ x s 1 i ~1
11 ~ cn C~2 i , ~~ t
5 ~
O 1 1 sr ~t
.. C/.~ 1 ~
w n ~ 1 i! ~`
S~ o ~ li ~ ~
s ° ~~
~ ` i
i , i
t ~
1 ~
~ ~ ~~
t
s ~ \~~
~ ~ ~ L
1 ~
1 , ~
~ ~~
` S ` i
1` tS \ ~
\~ 1 ~ ~~
TREE FARM SUBDIVISION _
PROJECfi LOCATION ,~,^~ns•~,;a, CIVIL CONSULTANTS mc.
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA c~~'c~~ N'~` - "~'`ay~~~ CivitEngincers
EXISITING -PROPOSED 9•tu~~y^a~S~~ytPi~~~^Q5p2*~+l°,~11t~~~~,, c,~an~~elop~~~cco~~c~ts
DRIVEWAY FOR LOT # 10 4' •~~` ~~~~ °~~?~a,~ ~~ 3708 Lyckan Parkway suite Z01 nurhaam, NC 27707
' ,.",„y ~'<w ,, P,~ ~, , ~"` ~ PE#: [phone] Fax: [phone] www.civil•consultanta.com
fi'~
A D A '0 ~) O ~ 'O 2 < X ~ C O ya1,, aP""`~ ~.>,.~ $r~3 ~.*.n t 3 "' 3' d,~
(n ° ~ ~ O -ti ~ ~ p, ~ u ~ ~'-Di AM, S o ~*E`~ 4°1a ~"
I ~ y ~ ' REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
~ > ~ ;~,~ ,~'' • ~ „ 1 9 25 07 REVISED NOTATIONS WCM
O m ~ ~ ~_

,
`ti ,i ,'~
"` ,yr \
`~,-.
\ f.
\ ~ r~
\ ~ ~°
"~. ~
'+` +~ '.~
i
1 /
~~~. Tj
~ r
~ \ \ \ ' ~'r""~~
~ ~ '`.
~ f
\ /
-~ / ~ ~g9
\ \ \ \ .. ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ... ...._ .......~
\ JrnV '
D1 .., r'i
1
~~ ~ `~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~- .'ter `~
~ \ ~'
~ ~~ ~~ \ ~ ~ \y~
(~ ~ `'' ~,
t ~ y\, Q1' \ \ ~ ~ g~.
1 ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ \ ~ ~
} s1 C `C7~ ~ \ O N ` ©~ ~
1 • \
~ .. . ~ rn
~ !y \ ~y • ~ -I Oo \ ~ '~,
O -r~ k
'~ ~ ~~ i v{yD~;
C'r r ,r \
~~
~ ~ ,~ ~.;~
~~ ~ ~„y ~ tiv. ~3 ~~' ~ ~ r v 'v ~v
a '') ~ sa t v, O ~' \
` ~ l
\ V 'f~ ~
\ ~' ,' ~!
N
r
~~, ~t
~\ ~~ ~ ~`.w W \~ ~V \
~ r- m r~ r t ., ,. \ ~ ~ l ~
s ~ r r ~\ --IW~~ ~ t
i I r op,.--' ~ ~' p' ~ ~
~/ a ~~ i ~'~ C ~ ~ i
r' ~ p ,,.~ W ~ ~
~ ( ~~ / ~rnrr- Drnwn i is
/ ?1 D
~ p ~~~~ jrr i
i-~
4 l ~ X ~ ,~~
1n i ~ Q~ N t ~~
t , ~ ~
ov ; ~ ~r ~
r ~
('~ 1 ~ ~
WO ai i ~ r~ \~
`1 i J i
} , 1.
i ` y
i ~
i ' ~
I ~
1 ~
C i ,, \~~
l ~ ~~
1~ \ ~
1
ti\ 1` ~ \
~ 1 \ \~
TREE FARM SUBDIVISION
PROJECT' LOCATION ~~349(<b~a a~,
~~°'~' ~ ` `~~ ...CIVIL CONSULTANTS n~C.
: ,~
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ~`~ "`~'bt 7 ~ ;, rT Civil En ' eene___
EXISITING - PROPOSED m s G~r ° ~ ~,~, : r LandDevelapmemtCoasultants
z Q~i
DRIVEWAY FOR LOT # 10 ;; ~ "~~"~ ,, ~ "~ x ~ " > 3~ras Lyekan PsClcway s~i:e zol Dwham, rrc z~7o~
a a +> PFI: [phone] Fax: [phone] www.civil-consultaats.com
~o- r'".~ . ' r ~~ .,
7J p Qb~-j-i ~7 ~ 7J ~ M p ~ IC" 9' ~~ d~^9' v"~ w~ f~`°~~q~.'
Z v~ v a ix ~ D~ N d m ~'r~~~.~r~°~eraaa~~'~`~~>~`'~~~~ REV. DATE DE.SCRIF~TEON BY
~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~, ~ °~~v~~ ~:;~~" 1 9 25 07 REVISED NOTAT10N5 WCM
~~~ z ~ z y a g ~~Pm'~4~'
0 m o ~ ,~q m V
~ ~