20150414 Ver 1_Sandy Bridge_96920_MY06_2022_20230125

ID#* 20150414
Select Reviewer:
Ryan Hamilton
Initial Review Completed Date 02/01/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 1/25/2023
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Harry Tsomides
Project Information
ID#:* 20150414
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Sandy Bridge Farm
County: Rutherford
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Sandy Bridge_96920_MY06_2022.pdf 9.48MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Harry Tsomides
Signature: *
/y ta"m;�

Monitoring ReportMY06
Sandy Bridge Restoration Site
DMSContract 6400
DMSProject Number96920
DWR #:15-0414
USACE Action ID:201500827
RutherfordCounty, North Carolina
Prepared for:
NCDMS, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Monitoring Data Collected:2022
Date Submitted:December2022

Monitoring and Design Firm
Prepared by:

KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: [e-mail]

Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 969202022-MY06

KCI Response: This change has been made.
KCI Response: This change has been made.
KCI Response: This sentence has been deleted. During the periods when the site is free of
beaver dams, it has done a good job of processing the accumulated sediment, as
demonstrated by the comparison of the cross-sections across monitoring years that is
presented in the report.
KCI Response: The November 17, 2022 visual assessment of the site found no change in
the areas of aggradation and low stem density from those reported in the MY05 report.
KCI will reevaluate these areas again during the 2023 visual assessment of the site and
adjust accordingly.

KCI Response: Additional details about the supplemental planting have been added to
the report. KCI was not able to get a good gauge on the survivability after the 2022
growing season but will make a point of investigating this during the spring 2023 site
visits.
KCI Response: This will be done as necessary.
KCI Response: The wetland shapefiles have been updated.
KCI Response: These have been included in the digital deliverables.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY................................................................................................................................1
MONITORING RESULTS..........................................................................................................................2
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................................4
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map..............................................................................................................5
Figure 2. Site Asset Map...............................................................................................................................6

Appendix A–Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits...................................................................................8
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History..........................................................................................9
Table 3. Project Contacts............................................................................................................................10
Table 4. Project Information.......................................................................................................................11
Appendix B–Visual Assessment Data
CCPV..........................................................................................................................................................14
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment........................................................................15
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment................................................................................................16
Photo Reference Points...............................................................................................................................17
Appendix C –Vegetation Data
Vegetation Transect Data Sheets................................................................................................................21
Appendix D–Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 8.Baseline Stream Data Summary...................................................................................................24
Appendix E–Hydrologic Data
30-70Percentile Graph...............................................................................................................................27
Table 10.Verification of Bankfull Events..................................................................................................28
Precipitation and Water Level Plots............................................................................................................31
Table 11.Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment.....................................................................................44
Soil Profile Descriptions.............................................................................................................................45
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 969202022-MY06

PROJECTSUMMARY
The Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site (SBFRS) was completed in March 2017and restored a
total of 6.85 acres of riparian wetland(1.29 acres of wetland rehabilitation and 5.56 acres of
wetland reestablishment)and 1,626 linear feet of stream. The SBFRSis a riparian system located
in the Broad River Basin (03050105 8-digit cataloging unit) in RutherfordCounty, North
Carolina that hadbeen substantially modified to maximize the use of the areafor grazing. The
completed project will restore impacted agricultural lands to a functioning stream and wetland
ecosystem with enhanced water quality, restored hydrology, and improved fish and wildlife
habitat.
The SBFRSis protected by a 9.5acre permanent conservation easement, held by the State of
North Carolina. The site is located off of Rock Road, approximately 3 miles north of
Rutherfordton, North Carolina.The project site is bounded by interspersed pastureland and
forested land to theeast, agricultural land and Rock Road to the north-northwest, and Catheys
Creek to the southwest.
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program’s (NCEEP) publication in 2009 identified
HUC 03050105070020 (Catheys Creek) as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW). The goals and
priorities for SBRFS are based on the information presented in the Broad River Basin Restoration
Priorities: to restore wetland and stream functions,to maintain and enhance water quality, to
restore hydrology, and to improve fish and wildlife habitat (NCEEP 2009). The project goals,
which reflect those from the approved Mitigation Plan,are in line with the following basin
priorities:
-Reduce sources of sediment and nutrients by restoring riparian buffer vegetation,
excluding livestock, and restoring natural geomorphology.
-Prioritize project implementation in the Catheys Creek local watershed planning area.
The goals for the project are to:
-Restore a channelized stream to a meandering C-type channel with a floodplain.
-Buffer and reduce sediment impacts to the project stream.
-Restore a Piedmont Alluvial Forest Community.
-Restore a wetland hydroperiod to drained and livestock-impacted land.
The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
-Relocate a channelized stream to its historic landscape position.
-Install an appropriately-sized channel cross-section.
-Install bedform diversity with pools, riffles, and habitat structures.
-Demarcate the project easement boundaries and fence out livestock.
-Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and anherbaceous seed mix that supports the
development of a Piedmont Alluvial Forest.
-Fill field ditches and redevelop wetland microtopography to slow the flow of surface and
subsurface drainage.
To restore the site, select ditches across the site were modified or filled and incoming surface
inputs and seeps wereintegrated to create a stream/wetland complex. Additionally,Tributary 1 to
Catheys Creek wasimproved with Priority 1 stream restoration to re-meander the stream and
elevate the groundwater table. The entire site was planted as a Piedmont Alluvial Forest
community (Schafale 2012).The site was constructed as designed with no modification from the
design plan.
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692012022-MY06

The majority of monitoring components were installed in March 2017. Nine groundwater
monitoring wells were installed to evaluate the attainment of jurisdictional wetland hydrology. A
streamgauge wasinstalled on Tributary 1 to Catheys Creek to record the occurrence of bankfull
events. To determine the success of the planted mitigation areas, eight10 m x 10 mpermanent
vegetation monitoring plots were established. The location of the planted stems relative to the
origin within these plots, as well as the species, was recorded and planted stems were grouped
into size categories (0-10 cm, 10-50 cm, 50-100cm, >137 cm). Any volunteers found within the
plots were also grouped into size categories by species, but separate from the planted stems. Six
permanent photo reference points were established and will be taken annually. Four permanent
cross-sections (two sets of coupled riffles and pools) were also established and a detailed
longitudinal profile of the stream was taken. Wolman pebble counts were performed at both of
the riffle cross-sections. The cross-section measurements will be repeated in future monitoring
years,but the longitudinal profile will only be repeated if there are concerns about bed elevation
adjustments. Reports will be submitted to DMS by the end of eachmonitoring year.During a site
visit with the IRT on December 6, 2017, it was requested that KCI install three additional
groundwater monitoring wells and two additional vegetation plots. On March 30,2018the three
additional groundwater monitoring wellswere installedalong the area of the filled, pre-
construction stream channel.On September 10, 2018, the two additional vegetation plots were
installed near the southern end of the site.
Vegetative success criteria for the site is320 woody stems/acre after three years, 260 woody
stems/acre after five years, and 210 woody stems/acre after seven years. The baseline monitoring
counted an average of 647woody stems/acre. To meet the hydrologic success criteria, the upper
12 inches of the soil profile must have continuously saturated or inundated conditions for at least
10% of the growing season during normal weather conditions. The soil survey for Rutherford
County estimates the growing season begins April 4 and ends November 6 (217 days), meaning
the water table must be within 12 inches of the surface for at least 22 consecutive days during the
growing season. A minimum of two bankfull events must also be recorded during themonitoring
period. Bank height ratios should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios should be 2.2 or
greater. Visual assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.
MONITORINGRESULTS
The site was planted in March 2017 with tree tube protection installed around many of the planted
stems. Over the years, beaver have been present at the site and have impacted site vegetation.
Although there is still a good quantity of woody stems, beaver activity has taken out some stems
that had grown larger. Even with the beaver impacts, in general, the site is well vegetated, with
widespread herbaceous coverage and many healthy planted stems. A supplemental planting of the
site occurred in March 2020.524 one-gallon size trees were planted in the wetland rehabilitation
area and 1,875 bare root trees were planted in the central portion of the site and around the
stream. The planting in the wetland rehabilitation area was done as a means of addressinga small
area of low growth and vigor caused by dense herbaceous vegetation. The planting in the central
portion of the site was done to mitigate damage done by the beavers. An additionalsupplemental
planting of approximately 300 live stakes was completed in April2022. This planting consisted
of live stakes cut from black willow, elderberry, silky dogwood, sycamore, and cottonwood trees
on sitein approximately equal quantities of each.This planting focused on the areas most heavily
impacted by the beaversand covered an area of approximately 2.5 acres (120 stems/acre).
Monitoring of the vegetation plots did not take place during the sixth monitoring year, as
stipulated in the mitigation plan,but four vegetation transects were sampled during Monitoring
Year 6. These transects were each 100 feet long and were sampled using the point intercept
method. Sampling points were located every 5 feet and only woody stems were recorded. Two of
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692022022-MY06

the transects (Transects 1 and 2) were located in the beaver affected areas, while the other two
transects were located outside of the beaver affected areas. Transects 1 and 2 had percent covers
of 20% and 45%, respectively, while Transects 3 and 4 had percent covers of 90% and 85%.
Across all four transects, 47 stems and 15 species were recorded,withan average height of 24
feet. Please see Appendix C –Vegetation Data for additional information about the sampled
transects.
Daily rainfall data were obtained from theNC State Climate Office for a local weather station in
Rutherfordton, NC. In 2022the monthof Septemberexperienced above average rainfall, while
the monthsof January, March, April, May, July, and Novemberexperienced average rainfall. The
monthsof February, June, August, and Octoberexperienced below average rainfall for the site.
Overall, the area experienced slightlybelowaverage rainfall during the 2022growing season.
During the site’s sixthgrowing season, 11 of the12groundwater monitoring wells had
continuous saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for 10% (22 days) or more of the
217 day growing season (April 4 to November 6).The gauge that did not meet (Gauge 10) has
only met in 1 of the 4 years that it has recorded data. Due to this low level of success, KCI has
begun investigating the area around the gauge to flesh out the extent of the low performing area.
The next two closest gauges to Gauge 10 have each met the success criteria in every year except
one (Gauge 2 has met 5/6 years and Gauge 11 has met 3/4 years). Soils around these three gauges
were investigated and described,and an initial analysis shows that the low performing area is less
than 0.5 acres in size. During MY07, a more thorough investigation of this area will be performed
to determine the exact size. Please see Appendix E –Hydrologic Data for complete descriptions
of the soils in this area.
The stream gauge has recorded multiple bankfull events in each year since construction, including
3bankfull events in 2022.In June 2018, several large beaver dams were discovered towards the
lower half of the stream. These dams were removed in early August 2018.KCI has been
continuouslymonitoring for further signs of beaver activity, trapping beavers on-site and
removing dams when they are found.In August 2020 KCI contracted with USDA APHIS-WS to
provide ongoing beaver management.Additional dams were removedinNovember 2018, June
2019, August 2019, and October 2019,June 2020, September 2020, December 2020, and
November2021.New dams were not built on the site until August 2022. These dams will be
removed once the beavers on-site have been trapped and removed from the site.See Appendix B
and Appendix D for more information.
Due to the history of beaver dams on-site, there has been more aggradation in the stream channel
than has been anticipated. KCI has been removing the beavers and dams routinely, but when the
dams are built sediment has deposited in the channel. The fifth-year cross-section survey showed
bed aggradation in all four cross-sectionsas well as aggradation on the banks of Cross-sections1
and 2.When the beaver dams are removed for an extended period of time, there is evidence of the
accumulated sediment washing out of the stream. An example of this can be seen when
comparing the MY02 and MY03 surveys of XS2. During MY02, a mid-channel bar had formed
within this cross-section but after the removal of the beaver dams and a period of several months
without them being rebuilt, this bar was completely absentfrom the MY03 survey. Comparing
the MY04 and MY05 surveys of XS4 also shows this pattern. Starting in MY03, a large beaver
dam was located at the head of the riffle just downstream of XS4. This dam was removed
multiple times during 2019 and 2020. After being removed in September 2020, this dam was not
rebuilt,but a new damwas constructed upstream of XS4. Comparing the MY04 survey to the
MY05 survey shows that fine sediment has washed out of the system and the thalweg elevation in
this cross-sectionhas dropped approximately half a foot. KCI believes that if given enough time
without backwater conditions, this trend will hold true for the entire site. It is also important to
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692032022-MY06

note that even with the rebuilding of the dams, the stream flow has stayed within the restored
channel and no evidence of other channels forming in this system has been noted.
The monitored cross-section data have been calculated by adjusting the bankfull elevation to
maintain the baseline bankfull area for each cross-section. A total cross-sectional metric has been
added to the cross-section data to indicate the cross-sectional area below the baseline bankfull
elevation. In instances where there has been some lateral aggradation and narrowing,the data
show the cross-section having a significantly higher bankfull width and higher width/depth ratio
as compared to previous years. The comparison of cross-section plots between monitoring events
illustrates that these adjustments donot indicate a problematic change in cross-section condition
but are part of the processing of sediment through the site as described above. KCI will continue
to monitor and treat the beavers to ensure that sediment continues to move through the site.
The right bank of the stream flowingadjacent to the project’ssouthern boundary had been
experiencing significant erosion due to several areas of obstruction in the center of this channel
that werediverting water into the banks. Although this stream is not part of the project, and is
located outside of the easement bounds, the erosion on the right bank hadencroached into the
easement. In November 2019, KCI repaired and stabilizedthis area. This work involved
removing the mid-channel obstructions and sloping back the eroding bank. 150 live stakes were
plantedalong this bank in March 2020. During this work, several farm gates that had become
buried in theprojectstream bank were removed and a small swale was dug to direct water into
the site from fields adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site. This swalewas designed to drain
ponded conditions in these fields and dissipate the water throughout the wetlands on-site. See
Appendix B for more information.
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692042022-MY06

REFERENCES
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. BroadRiver Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009.Raleigh, NC. Last accessed 1/2016at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=705d1b58-cb91-451e-
aa58-4ef128b1e5ab&groupId=60329
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. NCDENR, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Guidelines. Last accessed1/2016 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=60409&folderId=18
877169&name=DLFE-86604.pdf
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring
Guidelines. Lastaccessed 6/2015 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=60409&folderId=18
877169&name=DLFE-86606.pdf
NC Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2010. NC Wetland Assessment Method (NC
WAM)
User Manual, version 4.1. Last accessed 11/2012 at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-
ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupId=38364
Schafale, M.P. and A.S.Weakley. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities ofNorth
Carolina:
Fourth Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment andNatural Resources. Raleigh,
NC.
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692052022-MY06

Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692062022-MY06

Conservation Easement
Wetland Rehabilitation-filled ditches (0.70 ac / 0.70 credits)
Wetland Re-establishment (5.56 ac / 5.56 credits)
Wetland Rehabilitation (0.59 ac / 0.39 credits)
T1 - Priority 1 Restoration (1626 lf / 1,626 credits)
Other Streams
NCCGIA
SITE ASSET MAP
0100200
Source: NC Statewide
SANDY BRIDGE FARM RESTORATION SITE
Orthoimagery, 2015.
Feet
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, NC
±

APPENDIX A
Background Tables
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692082022-MY06

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site, DMS Project #96920
Mitigation Credits
NitrogenPhosphorous
RiparianNon-riparian
StreamBufferNutrientNutrient
WetlandWetland
OffsetOffset
TypeRRERRERRE
1,6266.653
Credits
Project Components
Project
ExistingApproachRestoration -or-Restoration
ComponentStationing/Mitigation
Footage/(PI, PII Restoration Footage/Credits
-or-LocationRatio
Acreageetc.)EquivalentAcreage
Reach ID
10+00 to
Tributary 11,470 lfPIRestoration1,626 lf1:11,626
26+26
Wetland
Restoration5.560ac1:15.560
Reestablishment
Wetland
0.79 acRestoration0.697ac1:10.697
Rehabilitation*
Wetland
0.59 acRestoration0.594ac1.5:10.396
Rehabilitation
Component Summation
Stream
Riparian Wetlands Non-Riparian Buffer
Restoration Level(linear Upland (Acres)
(Acres)Wetlands (Acres)(square feet)
feet)
Non-
Riverine
Riverine
Restoration1,626 lf
Reestablishment5.560ac
Rehabilitation1.291ac
Enhancement
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
R= Restoration RE= Restoration Equivalent of Creation or Enhancement
*=wetland rehabilitation associated with filled ditches
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 9692092022-MY06

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Sites, DMS Project #96920
Actual Completion or
Activity or ReportData Collection Complete
Delivery
Mitigation PlanJune 2016
Final Design - Construction PlansJune 2016
Construction Grading CompletedAug 29, 2016
Planting CompletedMarch 11, 2017
Baseline Monitoring/ReportMarch 2017April 2017
Vegetation MonitoringMarch 21, 2017
Stream SurveyMarch 20, 2017
Year 1 Monitoring November 2017December 2017
Vegetation MonitoringOctober 26, 2017
Stream SurveyNovember 6, 2017
Additional Groundwater Gauges InstalledMarch 30, 2018
Beaver Dam RemovalAugust 20, 2018
Additional Vegetation Plots InstalledSeptember 10, 2018
Beaver Dam RemovalNovember 6, 2018
Year 2 MonitoringNovember 2018December 2018
Vegetation MonitoringSeptember 10, 2018
XS1 and 2: June 28, 2018
Stream Survey
XS3 and 4: September 11, 2018
Beaver Dam RemovalJune 14, 2019
Beaver Dam RemovalAugust 8, 2019
Beaver Dam RemovalOctober 17, 2019
Non-project Reach RepairNovember 21, 2019
Year 3 MonitoringNovember 2019December 2019
Vegetation MonitoringJuly 11, 2019
Stream SurveyJune 19, 2019
Supplemental PlantingMarch 27, 2020
Beaver Dam RemovalJune 12, 2020
Beaver Dam RemovalSeptember 15, 2020
Beaver Dam RemovalDecember 18, 2020
Year 4 MonitoringNovember 2020December 2020
Stream SurveyNovember 4, 2020
Beaver Dam RemovalNovember 17, 2021
Year 5 MonitoringNovember 2021December 2021
Vegetation MonitoringJuly 6, 2021
July 6, 2022
Stream Survey
Supplemental Live Stake PlantingApril 12, 2022
Year 6 MonitoringNovember 2022December 2022
Vegetation TransectsOctober 17, 2022
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920102022-MY06

Table 3. Project Contacts
Sandy Bridge FarmRestoration Sites, DMS Project #96920
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
Design Firm
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction ContractorKCI Environmental Technologies and Construction
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Planting ContractorConservation Services Inc.
1620 N. Delphine Ave.
Waynesboro, VA22980
Contact: Mr. David Coleman
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring PerformersKCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920112022-MY06

Table 4. Project Information
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site, DMS Project #96920
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
Project Name
Rutherford County
County
Project Area (acres) 9.45 acres
35.407997° N, -81.937000° W
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Piedmont
Physiographic Province
Broad
River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03050105USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit03050105070020
9-41-13-(0.5)
DWQ Sub-basin
837 acres
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Project Drainage Area Percentage
8%
of Impervious Area
Mixed Hardwoods/Conifers 42% (350.0 ac), Managed Herbaceous Cover 39%
CGIA Land Use Classification(329.3 ac), Mountain Conifers 12% (99.5 ac), Mixed Shrubland 5% (43.5 ac), Low
Intensity Developed 1% (11.0 ac)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters T1
Length of reach (linear feet)1,470 lf
Valley classificationValley Type VIII
Drainage area (acres)837 acres
NCDWQ Water Quality ClassificationWS-V (Water Supply –upstream)
Morphological Description (stream type)Ditched channel
Evolutionary trendChannelized
Mapped SoilSeriesWehadkee-Chewacla Association
Drainage classPoorly drained; Somewhat poorly drained
Soil Hydric statusDrained hydric
Slope0-1%
FEMA classificationZone AE
Existing vegetation communityN/A (Pasture)
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation5%
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.59 acres (Wetland Rehabilitation Area)
Wetland TypeHeadwater Seep
Mapped Soil Series Wehadkee-Chewacla Association
Drainage class Poorly drained; Somewhat poorly drained
Soil Hydric Status Drained Hydric
Source of Hydrology Seepage/ Precipitation
Hydrologic Impairment Ditching and Grazing
Existing vegetation community Emergent Wetland
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation 5%
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920122022-MY06

Regulatory Considerations
Supporting
Regulation Applicable?Resolved?
Documentation
Waters of the United States –Section DWR#15-0414Jurisdictional
Yes
404USACE Action ID# 201500827Determination
Waters of the United States –Section DWR#15-0414Jurisdictional
Yes
401USACE Action ID# 201500827Determination
Endangered Species ActNoN/AN/A
Historic Preservation ActNoN/AN/A
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management NoN/AN/A
Act (CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain ComplianceNoN/AN/A
Essential Fisheries HabitatNoN/AN/A
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920132022-MY06

APPENDIX B
Visual Assessment Data
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920142022-MY06

MY06
-
2022
KCI Associates of NC, PA
16
96920
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteDMS Project #

MY06
-
2022
KCI Associates of NC, PA
17
96920
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteDMS Project #

Photo Reference Photos
PP1 –MY-00 –3/21/17PP1 –MY-06–11/18/22
PP2 –MY-00 –3/21/17PP2 –MY-06–11/18/22
PP3 –MY-00 –3/21/17PP3 –MY-06–11/18/22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920182022-MY06

PP4 –MY-00 –3/21/17PP4 –MY-06–11/18/22
PP5–MY-00–3/21/17PP5–MY-06–11/18/22
PP6–MY-00–3/21/17PP6–MY-06–11/18/22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920192022-MY06

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Data
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920202022-MY06

APPENDIX D
Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920232022-MY06

n2222222222222
20202019

60505639
0.91.54.11.03.3
160
>70
18.913.827.010.7
Max
0.014102.2
MY06
-
2022
built
-
C4
1.2
1.31
1,626
0.0027
As4022
0.81.54.01.0
>68
17.213.522.178.3
0.006
Mean
KCI Associates of NC, PA
0.062/0.5/17.5/25.5/40/90
66%/2%/22%/10%/1%/0%
35302311
0.71.53.81.02.08.9
134
>60
Min
15.413.217.325.9
0.000
60503.31600.0085590
10.7
-------
-
C4
0.91.31.01.2
>38
15.012.717.71.31
>2.5
1,626
35301755
0.0038
Design2.0
1348.9
Proposed
0.002
n2222222211111222
8733
1.72.41.55.9
191105
>55
18.625.113.8
Max>2.5
0.035
Med
C4
1.3
1.49
0.0050
1.52.21.4
>47
25.111.3
16.7
>2.5
Mean
24
Reference Reach(es) Data
6016661450
1.31.98.81.20.94.1
>40
Min
14.825.0
>2.5
0.013
n444444442
2.53.72.71.7
34.092.084.016.0
Max
0.010
G4
-
*****
1.0
1.31
1,470
E4
0.0043
2.23.42.21.3
330
69.371.214.9
Med
Existing Condition
-
Pre
0.076/1.2/3.3/5.2/9.4/18
2.23.42.21.4
32.972.973.214.8
18%/39%/43%/1%/0%/0%
Mean
, DMS Project #96920
**
2.13.11.91.1
Min
31.560.966.613.5
0.000
)
2
Summary
Be%
Data
Sinuosity
Slope (ft/ft)
Stream Restoration Site
96920
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle
Bank Height Ratio
Channel length (ft)
Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Width (ft)Sectional Area (ft
Entrenchment Ratio
-
Drainage Area (SM)
Meander Width Ratio
Rosgen Classification
Floodprone Width (ft)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Riffle
Project #
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
. Baseline Stream
*No data shown due to channelization/lack of bed diversity Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteDMS
8
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
Bankfull Cross
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /
Table Sandy Bridge FarmParameterDimension PatternSubstrate and Transport Parameters

MY06
-
2022
KCI Associates of NC, PA
Sectional Area represents
-
and the resulting bankfull elevation. Total Cross
25
established during the baseline survey,
are based on a fixed bankfull area
96920
sectional area measured from the baseline bankfull elevation.
-
Project #
Calculationsthe cross Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteDMS

APPENDIX D
Hydrologic Data

Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920262022-MY06

Table 10.Verification of Bankfull Events
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site, DMS Project #96920
Photo
Date of OccurrenceMethod
Number
April 6, 2017Onsite stream gauge
April 24, 2017Onsite stream gauge
May 29, 2017Onsite stream gauge
August 3, 2017Onsite stream gauge
August 14, 2017Onsite stream gauge
August 15, 2017Onsite stream gauge
September 5, 2017Onsite stream gauge
October 23, 2017Onsite stream gauge, photos taken on site1
February 7, 2018Onsite stream gauge, photos taken on site2
February 11, 2018Onsite stream gauge
April 15, 2018Onsite stream gauge
April 24, 2018Onsite stream gauge
May 19, 2018Onsite stream gauge
May 30, 2018Onsite stream gauge
September 16, 2018Onsite stream gauge
October 11, 2018Onsite stream gauge3
January 4, 2019Onsite stream gauge
January 20, 2019Onsite stream gauge
January 24, 2019Onsite stream gauge
February 18, 2019Onsite stream gauge
February 21, 2019Onsite stream gauge
February 22, 2019Onsite stream gauge
April 8, 2019Onsite stream gauge
May 11, 2019Onsite stream gauge
June 18, 2019Onsite stream gauge
October31, 2019Onsite stream gauge
January 12, 2020Onsite stream gauge
January 24, 2020Onsite stream gauge
February 6, 2020Onsite stream gauge
February 13, 2020Onsite stream gauge
March 25, 2020Onsite stream gauge
April 13, 2020Onsite stream gauge
January 1, 2021Onsite stream gauge
February 15, 2021Onsite stream gauge
March 18, 2021Onsite stream gauge
March 26, 2021Onsite stream gauge
March 31, 2021Onsite stream gauge
April 10, 2021Onsite stream gauge
August 17, 2021Onsitestream gauge4
March 23, 2022Onsite stream gauge
April 18, 2022Onsite stream gauge
May 27, 2022Onsite stream gauge
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920282022-MY06

Wrack lines
Photo 1. Sediment on plants and wracklines above bankfull, 10/26/2017
Photo2. Bankfull event on site, 2/7/2018
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920292022-MY06

Wrack lines
Photo 3.Wracklines above bankfull, 11/7/2018
Wrack lines
Photo 4.Wracklines above bankfull, 9/13/2021

Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920302022-MY06

Rainfall (in)
4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
Bankful Elevation
16-Oct-22
7-Oct-22
28-Sep-22
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
Stream Bed Elevation
27-Jul-22
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Date
Hydrograph
Stream Gauge
21-Jun-22
12-Jun-22
Surface Water
3-Jun-22
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
19-Apr-22
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
Sensor Elevation
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
Rainfall
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
868867866865864863862
Stream Stage Elevation (ft)

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
12-Nov-22
Sensor Depth
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
27-Jul-22
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
217 Days
30-Jun-22
21-Jun-22
Hydrograph
Date
Wetland Gauge 1
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
25-May-22
Ground Surface
16-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Groundwater Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Relative Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
Sensor Depth
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
7-Oct-22
75 Days
Growing Season
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
27-Jul-22
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Hydrograph
Date
Wetland Gauge 2
21-Jun-22
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
Ground Surface
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4 10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Groundwater Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Relative Groundwater Elevation (ft)

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
Sensor Depth
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
38 Days
November 6
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
24 Days
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
27-Jul-22
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Hydrograph
Date
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 3
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
Ground Surface
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
39 Days
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Groundwater Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
37 Days
November 6
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
27-Jul-22
Ground Surface
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Hydrograph
Date
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 4
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
Groundwater Depth
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
38 Days
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Sensor Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
Sensor Depth
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
83 Days
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
27-Jul-22
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Hydrograph
Date
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 5
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
Ground Surface
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Groundwater Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
7-Oct-22
103 Days
Growing Season
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
27-Jul-22
Ground Surface
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Date
Hydrograph
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 6
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
Groundwater Depth
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
26 Days
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Sensor Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
Sensor Depth
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
7-Oct-22
121 Days
Growing Season
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
27-Jul-22
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Hydrograph
Date
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 7
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
Ground Surface
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
7-May-22
91 Days
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Groundwater Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
7-Oct-22
121 Days
Growing Season
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
27-Jul-22
Ground Surface
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Date
Hydrograph
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 8
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
38 Days
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
Groundwater Depth
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
28 Days
10-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Sensor Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
Sensor Depth
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
113 Days
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
27-Jul-22
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Hydrograph Date
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 9
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
Ground Surface
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
10-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Groundwater Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
November 6
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
11 Days
5-Aug-22
27-Jul-22
Ground Surface
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Date
Hydrograph
21-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 10
12-Jun-22
3-Jun-22
25-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
16-May-22
Groundwater Depth
7-May-22
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Sensor Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
Sensor Depth
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
38 Days
November 6
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
27-Jul-22
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Date
21-Jun-22
12-Jun-22
Hydrograph
3-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 11
Ground Surface
25-May-22
16-May-22
7-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
24 Days
10-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Groundwater Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Rainfall (in)
2.52.01.51.00.50.0
27-Dec-22
18-Dec-22
9-Dec-22
30-Nov-22
21-Nov-22
12-Nov-22
3-Nov-22
25-Oct-22
16-Oct-22
38 Days
November 6
7-Oct-22
Growing Season
12 Inches Below Ground Surface
28-Sep-22
End
19-Sep-22
10-Sep-22
1-Sep-22
23-Aug-22
14-Aug-22
5-Aug-22
27-Jul-22
Ground Surface
18-Jul-22
9-Jul-22
30-Jun-22
Date
21-Jun-22
Hydrograph
12-Jun-22
Wetland Gauge 12
3-Jun-22
25-May-22
16-May-22
Groundwater Depth
7-May-22
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site
28-Apr-22
Growing Season
19-Apr-22
BeginApril 4
10-Apr-22
1-Apr-22
23-Mar-22
14-Mar-22
Sensor Depth
5-Mar-22
24-Feb-22
15-Feb-22
6-Feb-22
28-Jan-22
Rainfall
19-Jan-22
10-Jan-22
1-Jan-22
43210
-1-2-3-4
Groundwater Elevation (ft)Relative

Table11. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration Site, DMS Project #96920
Greater than 10% Continuous Saturation/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
MY-01MY-02MY-03MY-04MY-05MY-06MY-07
Gauge #
2017201820192020202120222023
Yes/30Yes/40Yes/46Yes/215Yes/217Yes/217
Gauge 1
(13.8%)(18.4%)(21.2%)(99.1%)(100.0%)(100.0%)
No/11Yes/35Yes/32Yes/126Yes/60Yes/75
Gauge 2
(5.1%)(16.1%)(14.7%)(58.1%)(27.6%)(34.6%)
Yes/110Yes/78Yes/162Yes/158Yes/55Yes/39
Gauge 3
(50.7%)(35.9%)(74.7%)(72.8%)(25.3%)(18.0%)
Yes/47Yes/105Yes/156Yes/158Yes/82Yes/38
Gauge 4
(21.7%)(48.4%)(71.9%)(72.8%)(37.8%)(17.5%)
No/11Gauge Yes/44 Yes/158Yes/84Yes/83
Gauge 5
(5.1%)malfunction(20.3%)(72.8%)(38.7%)(38.2%)
Yes/30Yes/63Yes/49Yes/209Yes/96Yes/103
Gauge 6
(13.8%)(29.0%)(22.6%)(96.3%)(44.2%)(47.5%)
Yes/22Yes/105Yes/162Yes/214Yes/217Yes/121
Gauge 7
(10.1%)(48.4%)(74.7%)(98.6%)(100.0%)(55.8%)
Yes/29Yes/43Yes/39Yes/209Yes/96Yes/121
Gauge 8
(13.4%)(19.8%)(18.0%)(96.3%)(44.2%)(55.8%)
No/15Yes/87Yes/40Yes/197Yes/95Yes/113
Gauge 9
(6.9%)(40.1%)(18.4%)(90.8%)(43.8%)(52.1%)
No/8Yes/22Gauge No/14No/11
Gauge 10*
(3.7%)(10.1%)malfunction(6.5%)(5.1%)
No/8Yes/25Gauge Yes/52Yes/38
Gauge 11*
(3.7%)(11.5%)malfunction(24.0%)(17.5%)
Yes/38Yes/24Yes/217Yes/34Yes/38
Gauge12*
(17.5%)(11.1%)(100%)(15.7%)(17.5%)
*=Gauge installed March 30, 2018
Sandy Bridge Farm Restoration SiteKCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project # 96920442022-MY06