The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About300003_Inspection_20210913Facility Number 03 gDivision of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Reason for Visit: Date of Visit: Farm Name: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Arrival Time: toa5a Departure Time: County: DAVI 6 Region: ofSg-Ci Owner Email: Phone: \LW 1251c . AAOCA-Svc `\ ? G a'11(% rui a-1 ke ►- av-fv, vvaiF Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: cAt v\ica_w- Title: Integrator: Phone: Certification Number: Certification Number: Latitude:55°6lb' 2-t7tt Longitude: 'gU +�11 L-ko v•! 7 104' bpi V\f 2 (9 000110y Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dr v Poultry Cauacity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder 920 () \ , Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field n Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes]] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes IX No ❑NA ENE Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number: 51) - () ) Date of Inspection: - 4(13/ai Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed waste management or closure plan? Structure 4 structures observed? and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ Yes Structure 5 �No ID NA El NE No ❑NA ❑NE Structure 6 ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ Yes EANo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n Yes No ❑ NA 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ElNA (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes `-g No ❑ NA maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA tgNo ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): kscoe, FsYe 13. Soil Type(s): ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below Waste Application 4 Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Rainfall A Stocking d 120 Minute Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to inst and maintain a rain gauge? is Monthly and 1" Ra 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2 of 3 ❑ Yes rA No ❑ NA ❑ NE n Yes Xj1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE n Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE E Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes (j No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Vq,` No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Other: ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE [rste—' `f rc IP Weather Code infall Inspections ❑ "4► ' - ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 5/12/2020 Continued 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Date of Inspection: 1 I (all ❑ Yes EX No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Kj No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. T� ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ElYes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1,1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? eontkt 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Ycs No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes lic No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [X] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE n Yes ANo ❑ NA E NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). (5) Soi 15 ciut this yeaY (.0) mo Ca l t bra i-co com (o--ecp ct_ n , a' J i n 5p eC tMS cairn 1.32,_%f -ccA ? Y1(\*- --5 MX U -r 1-M VUCASk7 GmU11/40 c_ t ti RI) ifizs ve, co ft eiuus,8,1 Q\<nr\\Ni e t6(011-A cd61) b .T\ 0 G1 0'36 `fstkrtitc6 Cee_A-1. czcA4( IESIAA V.Vts t _. Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signat Page 3 of 3 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service NC-ENG-40 Rev. 7/91 PLAN OF EXC ` PATDD WASTE ST NAME: (--1 E N R. / f county: (c)Av t E Address: RAGE PIT Date: y6 LENGTH ge 11 \ w \ 4 G. 8 oa .,, \ -,----- AVE. TOP ELEV. ei h4 N / ` ��r��__!#ID SECTION yo F—fit'-- -I-V`// \\ 0 /4, 0 SIDE SLOPE 1.,TO 1 LAVE. BOTTOM ELEV. / / LENGTH Use of facility: Capacity: 2a61� q�(• =-l� Gallons Soil Type: Bench Mark Description s, (See back for volume calculations) Ft3 SUMMARY Bottom Elev. 88,g Normal Liquid Level Elev. ---- Storage for normal Precip. (+) Ft. Maximum Liquid Level Elev. 9•8 25 yr. Storm Storage (+) _______ k- Ft. Crest ESW Elev. q.3__ _ Max. Flow Depth (+) 0.6 Ft. Freeboard (+) /.0 Ft. Top of Dam Elev. / 0 t .O a, 5 Is F-o r Dct $ -r iZ u C i Ll'r- �--- c AS LEi;fr; iNei �f� VOLUME OF A TRAPEZOIDAL PIT One equation for calculating the volume of a trapezoidal pit is: 1E3 r3LP+ !1Sd2G' Volume = depth [(area of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 * area 6 of midsection) ] _ .2 31 `1-? 3 Ft3 Another equation for determining the volume of a trapezoidal excavated pit with constant side slopes is: V = wdL + Zd2 (4/3 Zd - w - L) where: V = total volume of the pit in ft3. w = width of the pit at top in feet. d = depth of the pit at top in feet. L = length of the pit at top in feet. Z = side slope for 2 to I use Z = 2 for 21/2 to 1 use Z = 21/2 NOTE: Dimensions used must be constructable. Always check for narrow, deep pits. For correct results the following must be true. w must be greater than 2Zd L must be greater than 2Zd WITS" rroRAGr PoNC r MAX. OPEkAT►MG LeVet- EcsV, 96•8 8c777"CM, :To P w to -al '0r 6/5e 6f5+ t'l/rd-Fh depends oh q��P►Ker1-1cc5e4 1`.'PICAt~ r 54;t iaier,a( r Cu7" o FT TiCOsEif �01,0 `c• TOP of PArtit ELEt/• �;11 Yca rcage r1 yd: 0;7 s; -k- EMBrwe titEN'T CRoSS S 1c7 wrJ ): \[erS r o►1 C- xcava4cd Yardage_ y I c LIS yc53 1 A) (Mv fact! OP61-ATt Nc L.6VEL El E\. Ai G�e� g,0' 6a77"oM L.- EV Me -711PrcA�, Pool, GRO55 5 r2T?On1 GEIJetzAL... Nf'ogo-iArro••! Fob Ur.ipE72.6.eoutib um,177E5 QEroKe- 1Nnc'N6 GoN677Ct(CT')Onj `tests r- [-anr 15 VAL 1 C ZF GoNs7rzucTrod ►5 W of e, i T h4r-rt me7 ANc Apt.' e_oViOF f3� NECESSItlei( rog. DNE-YeiFe Noy sTit r_;&-D RE'EVArnry 17e wtt�- V-AS bvi:145i m PeCt it " -I& Top q(, 8 0�� `vv� Q% co qP 6 2Z 4G1-) dn Ertl (9anE.A4e i,L PO NJ p LEr\1G"rt1 : ,04er t r)714 : fro Cat M2s, Of, Levet 4-46Ntie L, WACKEr— rARt►� 12A✓t Cour.ry NC TYPE aF oPEP Allcnt: eee-( Ferdlo-r- ANiMAt_. muNtR,ER,• 30o C 5 1 ame° (5Y : VA 1T e-1--- A PPRove FW C ATE- 4t/q