760060_Inspection_20211115

Facility Number
OkDivision of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: sp Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: T
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Arrival Time:
0-..1 0v
worm y\ci
,mod Kmpvno n
Loyd ) atAl-csvi Nc 'eg6'c-
41cs wle-‘ade.11 'FarvY\ , WW1 NG 2'12qN
vf Yon
Departure Time:
Owner Email:
County:
alb 1' 1 Region:\ O
Title:
Phone:
c, 0-el--04--6a---X
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:VS l {j Longitude:
usk4oy ua1Cj ---7 utoe-i(+y VA.
wrnrcjvt;a,,\ v .
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr Poultr Ca acit Po
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
`\
Dairy Cow (5nba
Dairy Calf
✓M
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes IgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes iXf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 1 -
Date of Inspection: V (, ,0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
VANW t,o -
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes IX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes cgl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. N Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
roz;,n \ar Off n 61a3e_ &Ma. exo0 r")'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?(S 3 1)r 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receivingcropand/or land application site need improvement? �lC_ C.���� Yes No NA NE
Pp P ❑ � ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 114 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
21. Does record keeping need improvement.
Waste Application ��J Weekly Freeboard
Rainfall
n Yes No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Design El Maps El Lease Agreements ['Other:
ap ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
Soil Analysis E.-Waste-Tans ers 71 Weather Code
onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections E-S-Ittelge-SurAtey
Waste Analysis
[StockingCrop Yield ns]
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NE
EX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number16 - 6 0
Date of Inspection: 11(j6(a--1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? MCA i 1 w Y
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes %No ❑NA ❑NE
n Yes A No I NA ❑ NE
fl Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NkNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
n Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
pi Yes figNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes xiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
1(zu..n .A 5oAs • \jvt cATA;, 207-3. W '
co.A.i 19YCJ 'i 0" d viz_ e xr-.V OO ) . a221, due_
C5h o / uc -? 5 4a \ v,v. d of A -1 4
�7 iSGUSs �tv� ; „trek cFDA 6 i Icy Se rCk h)Y . C
j�X�.rnc, „t voalr ee. ex\60,.c_rtn QpY seyee.
Sarn cttouf- c\8.1 uvb9.- e- CcxcnALA
a. i,i cc i o or ccL+ n 4 In ;5 ec[c .
doth bubL C - ( Yl l O CCo A r. 3 ) cm. 0 mc'n,ncnt
itie-eC skryanti,
JA, e(i{1 cA
y\ \/ . \:
%(q11\
5e),
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Si
Page 3 of 3
L )'
0.11 k 'Ig•'70()\71;10 3
'1A.01r S;(Yl6 - oIN rS1 0
cca CiAa0er
Phone:
Date:
Vza=� ovxS
eviak-l-t ohs
T1i -ai -
5/12/2020