HomeMy WebLinkAbout990034_Inspection_20220804Type of Visit: tr3.Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: '6 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 'Arrival Time:I '/(�1 Departure Time:
Farm Name: I \Ql..j LAV?SibCX-) -cJ
Owner Name: '—It') 6 \(��
Mailing Address: Q C &i)( a-16, HANN \.A ) l02'0
t.taielk,. . 14isu. aoutn tebk L) Hanketnvv ue NC 2'10170
Physical Address:V(j In S\•i • • Etl4 br CiYZ:I -(4- Ck • WAONCA- Drn\A N F {•SC a-1 a'}tD I Q �/
Facility Contact: 2a� I Q,Cj Title: Phone(7tf1 ` (} I ` I
Onsite Representative: I Integrator:
County: yId �.1in Region:
Owner Email:
Certified Operator: NIIA
Back-up Operator: \i/
Location of Farm:
Phone:
�}a1-�tke US i-(a1 rl > flstavrt( on = t2t.
vs\cu)ab`1 7
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
6rrchUn,led.—% Vrare 6�%
v.irc),N)r tad IjSlt-t6Grck-er i? • Fxrc on6)
Layer
Non -La er
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Da' Calf
Dairy Heife
Dry Cow
Non Dairy
Beef Stocke
Beef Feede
Beef Brood Co
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
2/4/2015 Continued
'Facility Number: Gig -
Date of Inspection:
4 /Xry
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No 17tl NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? �c
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement.
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence _- of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop TYpe(s): ��C't{1Y'1 C'cl(Yl SI C�J I V\GG`
13. Soil Type(s):
IXI Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
���❑Yes ❑No NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
❑ Yes $tt��,,l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IXINo ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes t7❑,, No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t • - • ... riate box below. Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
0 Waste Application ❑-Weeldy-Freeboard [1 Waste An.lysi. 0 So AniY s 41Weather Code
Rainfall IAStocking EACrop Yield Q 120 , ' - . - -i - : - • : 0-Monthly-and-1 Rainfall- Inspections 0 5kt4ge-Surue}_.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No cgiNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
!Facility Number: l/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app_
Date of Inspection: /
.tion equipment as required by the permit?
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? kfm.f I l
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes El No NA ❑NE
❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes yq No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
iy gi
SIG
QL19i* ho-S bam Made fbr Def oiryw ovact- --b fin/
&fi 'n 0 - i4 h (? to fzeic L c1JaY o w osd-c.
ab» CO L I kxYat (FV\ Con,,te 1�C-cd
Noe -Ok ar
sot I) due tkis \Ieo ((Qf-). l
-• r " Q{ 1 jr J57 IQo Csv ;n ?erg
S IwArr) S "
Qom 0.-Rc.1)?-Cii2 vuk- 0161 Weems ,1 Qc+co ,
M'S2' W as4-e c k c,, is G� a (0 -
Camp ctil N i s b2) 9-ItUactich, T-f n, LIca) f.
�, K Iu Sale, v c era
� . s {C,ri n reccas G�c� (u-�-n �r's� `Mays �l, �� �„�} Cum ( S
r �-C e.9i an eo awe e u+c-r c t ( f+ t1 t Qb n+-
Vt b -061-CACY5 i (I, ecxc\ UJasa-e- ascsup
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signa
Page 3 of 3
2e. Kra I it l e