860010_Inspection_20221121

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Arrival Time:
V00001 t c\rYYl3
K-C3o rarer J L L
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Departure Time:
2'"#5D
Conn
Region: OFR_ t J
Owner Email:
Phone:
\'► i q YR nn\I NV) & 2-
WA (COD Y Title:
Certified Operator:
Onsite Representative:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
1
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude: ' 3 43 1511
t hiji 07 L- 4 t\l ec1- L 7 Nrn U icy f[r t Kdgt) rf l oyv
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Non -Layer
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Date of Inspection: \
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: U0SPP arker—
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes TIo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 6 . n c+\�V i . 5(UP \ y xi o A corn
13. Soil Type(s): v
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists
21
Waste Application
Rainfall
2.Did the f
❑ Design
❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes ,in No
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes 1X'Nlo
❑ Yes * No
❑ Yes JJJNo
❑ Yes ' No
❑ Yes"````ffffffCCCCCCNo
❑Other:
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Does record keeping need improvement-14❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA
i_����
Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ,/ .— psis •-� �rf�r� A Weather Code
77ftrn` fKl Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sk _ hey
Stocking J Crop Yield
fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irriga
Page 2 of 3
on equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NE
[X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No ANA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 74., - 6
Date of Inspection: 1 c2-11
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
I�1No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ No Xf NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 harciarr document ❑ Yes
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? Lim
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
111
r
atH
r i �iratl ne*cu
a
0,0) LAN m Y UQd`�a-1-es CUfv&.n.r\ir� U She�1�covO cerd \DOl copAlnc Corv��l�-eA
O
C 1. '(Y\V ere) a' \v bk i n "II �aCX L-e G� / Ncoe I i rN�. c i P�
1. SU,15 Ave,20�� 1 .2✓Ln tf ^'Zaroar our Q �'c4
W� crec)5\nNn woe cep
v.ey-0c- rn6a AnGl\ Vie iceiS Once_ J
D'-._.Cuss-e cocticar enva, cf w o r rAx\s --
ww A� \n6V eor r2 U� G.S \ of �e C ,re- .
\U113kroz 0 3 `rb
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phoney 7n lc
Date:
+ry1\`3`y
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020