760013_Inspection_20221107

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
urn 001 Departure Time:
C o I\ -block �a vrrvis
Owner Name: OP(\P5 I fxW ^(tee vtO _'
Mailing Address: H l q I acre nip.
Physical Address:
10001
Owner Email:
County: Region:tS 21)
Phon4CDQ- —166Y
' v, led.) Seacrove. f\I
Facility Contact: f \J1� I.yI \f1�ie {1 C-e/ Title:
Onsite Representative: t Integrator: ccrnl
Certified Operator: l)J\l.O-(vv ("YUmr TI) (o»av nCZ
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
� ' I
Latitude:SSa �3 `-I (0" Longitude:
19b ' 4�
W as ? NC y —105 e, Tafm on U
p7 6.. m3'xg�. k�a d��SSY'�fi�A RN4. �e� � rtp•.�f #E '#
8k9dk =.44 D giDgg § t #a@r#tuhY� 3t xeFg nt
• ¢¢@ g. �gsxr aQux m ggAr ¢p a j, I rpc
Po3ei}+Fits43+6'A...e.§zOE}##`�t..Pu. i'yu"YGd�alz�u It zc�isl.Leks
f I# 4gp� �fi Poi #gq�a# Po�4
y {p#p j/
Wean to Finish -- x
Layer
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non Layer
Dairy Calf
§i xxtmtt t I"'a�€`xa't x
Feederarroto xa �a ,ta «e" :
DairyHeifer
WFean =�j=. �
i x Farrow to Wean a arg � 1 1 :, ,el; * ntt
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder a xIlryxl'Ud(tax
�,
&aa4# 5 a ,
Non -Dairy
1Q� Farrow to Finish --
Layers
Beef Stocker
� Gilts -- ar
Non -Layers
%
Beef Feeder Laoen9
--{
Boars
Pullets
Pullets
'#
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
'
otr
Poaaav�mf'xa xxtl
� # t e1tN?i .aeim}�a a t xpp xoz
p x �•ax5a �'� �....��*&4#s an
Turkey Points
)'
at )t #e o
r
Other
a 2a=r _. vTxrp.axis s+,tw asS ..iiE--,el' tt eAda'tw .'i:;. -.rvi�.w �xs a. sa =X;.:-*'j^xs.•pt ax a.xt ....
d $S #A#aa,s �. °* & # xmXa& ,. I $# W
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑Yes JNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: `l\ 1 1/trar
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
J Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: YY�kl Wper L6\P'er
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes A� I No ❑{, NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 70 No ICI NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) f�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window r,❑lEv1idence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outsidetof Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Corn o t n FYS � P�I vl�ei c ��-Pain CC'ro v,J 12) yoh
13. Soil Type(s):
v
❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA
❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
��{{
IZC
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yesy,4 No X NA ❑ NE
acres determination? jj��
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
i] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
E Weekly.LIeelord Waste Analysis 1Z Soil Analysis E-W-aste-larstrs-fees-
EA Crop Yield ❑T26-hgi ute-Inspectiens RMonthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
gation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 71 NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
W aste Appli
1 Rainfall
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on
Stockin
Page 2 of 3

Facility Number: 14 - IJ
Date of Inspection: 11 (--1 hag-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA
❑ Yes A No ❑ NA
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
El Yes
❑ Yes
[� No
YNo
No
❑ No
12� No
No
No
os
❑ NA
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
1 y( NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
�.+,..a>,w m+raa .... ../. -nE ,,. ,r rn x«:Q.,.r.� .l....,.*......, ..;..o,.a.w 9.<Y. •.. >._... r.,,,.,,.,_.., >.........,r ... _.-.___.
21 WePIU S�oct�ir� �,h�\ nrkcorgU2 ty weesty
e In\-l�( irAbet, Sr ,Abet,-'.n s, -eU
gfl2'1 Cct(,bru+i cS\\ row,ytefe tot? -rb cal.Ltj rc4-e asc 9
21. soils dot ylel(k- iear(ao''3). 20240 _ a,,-R
bgryn,Qler (orb' to-r 403
eOLP r-1YLAsh \/5. C,tI S 3t t3 cam•
1 �1 suANga/ In S'"""•..,
6 Cb S •14 bee4- L.'n- beef'
Reviewer/Inspector Name: VL2.1zoca G1n(cuAd (er
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu
Page 3 of 3
Ook - dt tr Pfla1k an
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
racarctS
5lua 3'ald coy&k a
Phone:: l cno
5/12/2020
Date: