860029_Inspection_20221114

Type of Visit: IFACompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: elk Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
1050
Farm Name: NV t(,/\t. e FR-K r t,
Owner Name: jdd 1 Q C' kR-V dEhn'ovl
Mailing Address:
Departure Time: ' i )' J U I County: � )rr/
Owner Email: r
Phone:
Region:l[\ Sgo
5u2- v\11(M - VLd . elke-in N& 2-U2'\
Physical Address: feed 0 Lam,
Facility Contact:
eddie, SON SOM
Onsite Representative: ' Integrator: <�rvtl�2:� (-1,Certified Operator
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: Phone: tab 366-1 ? V 1
dy v�InSov\
Certification Number:
Latitude_ t1
0 '� 4ll
Longitude: $e y
k
;9 i� # 8t
3ki{ti�ss. E}}$��
7� �# au amb Naid�&� a# b{.
#ffi5�ResJntwqutai
*� � �wr p$� .�}��!'e�i#u.. y .jai ##.e Sd l�I�5#}k:L {N,}.,-�6'k
��h2•$$�`¢x54.,W Rfrnd3 $+S S 5u..43
�• 3�#&6 ���
i4`}F##SOH d¢
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
X
Wean to Feeder
1{s� 0
b4
.r
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
1 `
Feeder to Finish
aan !`a
Dairy Heifer
Q a
Farrow to Wean
Ygamr,"'t$.¢ _
,x
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Pt �# ua w as $ u4 a
lgg)iltt 2p a dal < '
?
gg
Non -Dairy
#
Farrow to Finish
Layers
F r
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
t
Beef Feeder
Boars
f
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
m
Turkeyse#e�`,�>,"'t
us
ra��rors tn,g4ror4r�kS,aakxr
i`2.try"+prs$eg
aiI$a#
TurkeyPOultSln��#pat��
gg
Other
a Y a°qq WWs a33�¢9 gyyg#yrggqq ti¢
��'4P`j.M.
Sob! ##i4RbfiYax.AtY""F#lT et.DtA#'Yk4;5
of#' aik .at§y� +��'�$xn§p§.+.np4.�'.mY#P MS pSPPd43.4J LE'a4 s.' ii 9»ti Blk �$S +#8M m4 't #�" �. i
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ ,
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes WNo ❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: ` -C
Date of Inspection: (I ilc-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Ipentifie?:
Spillway?:
❑ Yes Kj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes !❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): !�
5. Are there any immediate threats the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e, large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 14
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) /
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes I )U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 7'
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Jj(j Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, n, etc.)
PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
(ov r , boxIe4' , Sty cinin / Cot/Cy e rep
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents TTCC
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes CA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. 7�
DWUP ❑Cheeldists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement.
Waste Application rgl Weekly Freeboard "X Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑ Waotc Taus&.a Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking cziCrop Yield I111120 Minute Inspections N Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain arain gauge? ❑ Yes X' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes b No X NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number:
-
Date of Inspection: I l I TT
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes r� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes c g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. 7�
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes j`/' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes I X 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues y��C
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 17� 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? yam(
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I X I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. YYY+++
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes cz No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e, discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 1%1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes 94 No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes tgtNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
en€e"o glees on#
• U$fttbfl'tt$ •
. Cak brcxhov\ ir) 202'3.
Soi15 01 • wreck ,n Foi _ U', 'n.lw '°C°16r.
inc1X
c(2u3 ot- ct" A \ '- VAC iu i
51vd Z S�UIus h�vz c�u�zM� W�
Y/6,6W c.h —W vv\uuutv k 4LLic _ stue_ -5'Nrf>\
CKi�IG ftcocas On ;1-e.9. Swsvutllkl( a\J(Altabtc U 0 Cvm .tny YecUYcb
05h 9. ,Ves d USA. b.C7fer
�J nkto5,
5i 1 c3Vt k e v avy,ccL-\-,' o ov^ Ccx can rim
\O! ?AIC YCc— 5 c•JrQ, cry reCurkS:
'fr t rcto < t s-9 OD -\-e. Q\Chf c,J, Y- covck , ,
, uk,t co- tI3 k Lt(
i IT L01to( tol
DW'L Chs.e,
Covc'_rC
e 4 '2 vt lYarn auk
Reviewer/Inspector Name
IQ CCn Gnav\ ty
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Date: k1
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020