030021_Inspection_20221202

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
Voc_i
Departure Time:
nal 5r111
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:q3CLI Region
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Re n
6iS
Title:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
COCA GO NUYS 1.
0502-N 7 ttt t vJ 7 tt1 S 7 US g g w 7 N C ft Nci 2-1 N) I9 e(a)50,2 era k Qom.
-?Forty oy-v (z 4,8\I\-©c far—
�" V@)
i40fi9�' da{CBpp#
`®urreu$ar•aa
4#***a +iu $a.iag
*SP.r ....e , . 6 t'i.,6 Ra
.aau#k. iuk..C.4 -te.3Ptt #§}yi '�. t.s
3
+
a�.$ }}$�
$8 4t $#$t`F#a 4
eext �a'fl si's
dam naeye. r sa j§ �t $$
!i tY Onl}y�p.3±24P4 Yt5' {ay ( ,�' # �#t# V` i"K$ ag$ ffi§'$1t f!x ' i B
�F'th�sn hrt+.+;:Y %�� >§� kSz �'
$
a .
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow •
Wean to Feeder
*
Non Layer
x
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
#'sacs#xaat+w�:
max��r�gaxamrca#rva�
1�taa�.
4
aros#,io-�$z`s'.
aaa
na s a x :'sa= s)
aaas+i� �#�� #
f�ir�yi,�'+`ou13�� ;,"(� ��f�tiyti
Da' Heifer
Farrow to Wean
rz
u
3 rp • a#
m1
Dry Cow
n
Farrow to Feeder
� ��
�
Non -Dairy
■■
Farrow to Finish
Layers
1,...
Beef Stocker
i
Gilts
,f
' a
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boar}}sgg
Pullets
;:
Beef Brood Cow
fa"
pp $§
Na#io +.dttfIsias#Y §tdte,p#S
5p
TurkeurlceyYs
§4 vC ptr'3aF£+i �i'y&+SBt 9§
$
TPoints
ae2 Pr.
Other
aldantxh§#nt'x bta ntki a¢.syS3 a:,ir"„..'9T.T mt
w.
sa O,a4 r: en ,,,rir to g r*o-`°.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
▪ Yes YCI No NA NE
El Yes D No NA D NE
▪ Yes No NA NE
El Yes No NA D NE
▪ Yes ®' No NA NE
▪ Yes '4T No NA NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: OS
Date of Inspection:
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes 17j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7No ❑NA ❑NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) y�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes p,� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 7�
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes tA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): -F.esCue
13. Soil Type(s): �[
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other: rcyf
21. Does record keeping need improvement? . ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis �� Soil Analysis 0-Waste Traa1, fsrs ® Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections [3€1..ds- --
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes 71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ( NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7[� No ❑ NA ❑ NE

Facility Number: C
1
Date of Inspection: ''�'
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No 0NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
If No
No
rANo
14. No
0 No
EyiNo
No
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
aon- Coa t orcd-t cy‘ c0,0 9_ e ck ? `' `', c1 j D2,- hoilk lc
2-1 . Mari GG 2 -fates) 1 f -6
i
Wier-- e, uoi n 4,,ys? «Hct u',
\pcv MS -0) Iw My iM(3Y ActA)A
\C*P"'
GeThi
a
eto h
VLh ��tr A �Yp1/���
1yI' �nJv
ev
viou r�-
Rciscej
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur` e r
itla
Page 3 of 3 a"
ca
av\c1 c
Phone:
Date:
kcrios
5/12/2020