760051_Inspection_20221212

Type of Visit: 'E Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 fra-
?aArrival Time: 10 irk-71
Owner Name: 1DCWA d\ V V (`� �/1 I/ I ^ f
Mailing Address:14Q \k ��`Yn� 1 _ v\{m /•.))�-Fran` A rwi Of 1 v 0 -1 �
Physical Address: - &(rX \T\AV\-' �1 'rj��t.')-i.L3)(6 NC) a -pro
Farm Name:
Departure Time: I I I Lj() j County: (0) Region:
Owner Email: 1
Phone:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ' v
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
V C y 1 Title:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phon
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
fi�
dd@@#waj
te#w
r Y°�Tl € 1Q.n l
.iptkk"r $ WPi1'IX
pr$th d ' �'S�}ytf�gN�a ,at,8 ittr
O a5x#+#!.8 µ.psi
esi
{ems i 11t111 yGk€
5}#Y
es
�
{
Wean to Finish
Layer
/\Dairy
Cow
5
Wean to Feeder
Non Layer
% 'Dairy
Calf
Feedeo Finsh
r ti
TMx # .�, �.. +a3e rf`-
#�$a :.s
Dairy Heifer
.�.
Farrow to Wean
ar$s
Dry Cow
�t i
Farrow to Feeder
{saga#�'°r��`se
yr. FC)t +$
Non -Dairy
i x
Farrow to Finish
V
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
}
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Turke s
el
Turkey Poults
Other
w:.e•raga-»>+,:s:^'e•.wsnR".:a€aR'u a#a�a':#"
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 1 Yes No ❑ NA El NE
of the State other than from a discharge? /�y�
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 1 O
Date of Inspection: p-
a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)/YC`
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X] No E NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No E NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
nQ a \ is _l - i s'
(3i-(nod - 2\VPA
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
El Yes No El NA ❑NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes •'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? I
Waste Application
Rainfall Stocking
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes No x NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No 70 NA ❑ NE
❑Yes El No MINA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑ Waste -Transfers [Al Weather Code
Crop Yield ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑bludgu Survey —
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: .6 - 5\
Date of Inspection: 0-
12'
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
IXINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
EENo NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
lid bit
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
❑ No
No
xi No
No
1,4 No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
nNA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
P ew ?-02'12Gok "kt 1 zz
PLT resarne(e? dccV\ C1/4v 1n.;
C) Sig) \v‘d.\noq Ek6*u67. rOVVG3 C(Mt rol ic14-0y4t3 Wolff-o i 0-Amitic
ark cyLe a cArtc-A-c- f c2e t ri bar 0 431+0 57 5\ C coAce rn r CovtAfi1.UT_ e1Cork5
Sca l l b rah (Fln 9 ( Awe
41€{Yr
o Ct .
3111
gel
316
(,t avldv.e_r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
J.rca
Phone —1-1 e / W
5/12/2020
Date: